Rajasthan High Court - JodhpurSona Ram vs Mukesh Kumar Jat on 24 February, 2014Author:Govind MathurBench:Govind Mathur(1)

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    AT JODHPUR

                              ORDER

   S.B. CIVIL MISC. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.289/2013
                           IN
         S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7851/2012

                          Sona Ram
                              Vs.
                       Mukesh Kumar Jat


                  DATE OF ORDER : 24.2.2014

                              PRESENT

          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR

Mr. Richin Surana, for the petitioner.
                                ...
BY THE COURT :By order dated 30.8.2012 an interim direction was given to

the respondents for not discontinuing the petitioner from service

to accommodate any retired person or any other person on

contract basis.This application for initiating contempt petition is preferred

with the allegation that the respondents have discontinued the

petitioner from service in disregard to the directions given on

30.8.2012. On asking, it is further submitted by learned counsel

for the petitioner that after discontinuing the petitioner from

service, the respondents have not engaged any retired person or

any other person on contract basis to discharge the service as

rendered by the petitioner.(2)In view of the statement so given, I do not find any reason

         to initiate contempt proceedings.      The contempt petition,

         therefore, is dismissed accordingly.(GOVIND MATHUR), J.Sanjay