Rajasthan High CourtMukesh Urf Babli vs State Of Rajasthan on 14 August, 2015Author:M.N. BhandariBench:M.N. BhandariIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8450/2015
Mukesh Urf Babli 
Versus 
State of Rajasthan    
DATE OF ORDER      :       14/08/2015
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI

Mr. Mohar Pal Meena, for petitionerMr. R.S. Raghav, P.P., for the State 
***	
	Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case.It is stated that in the statement underSection 164Cr.P.C., the prosecutrix has not made allegation against the petitioner for commission of offence underSection 376IPC rather it shows to be a case of consent. The petitioner may accordingly be enlarged on bail.Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.After considering rival submissions of the parties and without  expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial but looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail.Accordingly, bail application underSection 439Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Mukesh Urf Babli S/o Shri Lalluram in FIR No.123/2015,  registered with Police Station Raini, District Alwar be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before the court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.[M.N.BHANDARI], J.FRBOHRA


Certificate:All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.FATEH RAJ BOHRA, Sr. P.A.