Jharkhand High CourtLele Sahu vs The State Of Jharkhand ... Opposite ... on 8 February, 2018Author:Ananda SenBench:Ananda SenIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                       B.A. No. 9281 of 2017
                                                 ----Lele Sahu                                   ...            Petitioner
                                              -versus-
          The State of Jharkhand                      ...          Opposite Party
                                                 ----
                         CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN
                                                 ----
                For the Petitioners :    Mr. K.S. Nanda, Advocate
                For the State        :   A.P.P.
                                                 ----
          5/ 08.02.2018      Heard learned counsel for the parties.Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
                grant of bail of the petitioner.Petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing the offence
                punishable underSections 333,353,307,414,34of the Indian Penal
                Code andSection 27of the Arms Act.The    petitioner     has surrendered   before   the   Court   on
                19.02.2016. The impugned order suggests that six prosecution witnesses
                have already been examined out of 13 chargesheet witnesses.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation
                is general and omnibus in nature and there is nothing specific against the
                petitioner. He was also not arrested from the place of occurrence.Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State submits that the
                petitioner is named in the FIR. He submits that there are at least 11 cases
                pending against the petitioner, out of which about six cases are underSection 302of the Indian Penal Code. He further submits that the Trial
                Court has sent a report that trial can be concluded within six months.Taking into consideration the report of the Trial Court and
                criminal antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant privilege of
                bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in
                connection with Bolba Police Station Case No.17 of 2012 (G.R. No.513 of
                2012) corresponding to Session Trial No.176 of 2013A, is hereby rejected.The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within six
                months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.This application stands dismissed.( Ananda Sen, J.)
Kumar/Cp-03