Allahabad High CourtWasim vs State Of U.P. & Another on 28 April, 2016Author:Vipin SinhaBench:Vipin SinhaHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 46
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13532 of 2016
 

 
Applicant :- Wasim
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Mishra
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A. for the State.I have perused the prosecution story as set up in the FIR and also the bail rejection order.The contention as raised at the bar by learned counsel for the applicant is that co-accused Sufian has already been enlarged on bail by this Court, copy of which has been produced and the same is taken on record. He further submits that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of the co-accused who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. Learned counsel for the applicant lastly submits that the applicant is in jail since 3.3.16.The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However, he does not dispute the fact that the similarly placed co-accused has been granted bail by this Court.Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A. G. A. and the fact that identically placed co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out. However, the said prima facie view will not in any manner adversely affect the case of the prosecution.In view of the above, let the applicant Wasim be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No. 1018 of 2015, underSections 147,148,149,452,307,506, IPC and 27Arms Act, P.S. Deoband, District Saharanpur.Order Date :- 28.4.2016
 
Anand