Uttarakhand High CourtHarpal Singh vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 19 February, 2016Author:Servesh Kumar GuptaBench:Servesh Kumar GuptaWPMS No.330 of 2016
Hon'ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.Mr. T.P.S. Takuli, Advocate for the
petitioner.Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Brief Holder for
the State.Having heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner, it transpires that for founding a
bakery shop in the remote hills a loan of
`95,000/- was taken by him under some
government scheme. Somehow that bakery
could not be successful due to extreme
poverty of surrounding area so there was a
default in the payment of installments of
such loan. Bakery had been closed much
before. A recovery of almost `94,000/- has
been issued by the Bank through the
revenue officers.It is hereby directed that the petitioner
shall make a representation to the Bank
Manager who, after adjusting the subsidy
granted by the Industrial Department of the
Government as well as the money which the
petitioner had already paid towards the
installments, rest of the amount shall be
exigible from the petitioner in easy
installments which shall not be less than
`1500/- per month. Subject to this order,
the recovery issued against the petitioner
shall remain stayed. In case of default in
payment of any of the installments settled by
the Bank, the entire amount can be
recovered from the petitioner at one go.With the above observation and
direction, the writ petition stands disposed
of.Urgency application no.1162 of 2016
and stay application 1090 of 2016 stands
disposed of accordingly.(Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.)
                               Vacation Judge
19.02.2016             
Rajni/Arti