Jharkhand High CourtLaxami Narayan Mishra vs The State Of Jharkhand on 12 August, 2014Author:Shree ChandrashekharBench:Shree ChandrashekharIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                          A.B. A. No. 1636 of 2014
      Laxmi Narayan Mishra                             ...  Petitioner

                                 Versus

      The State of Jharkhand       ... Opposite Party
                             ..........
   CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
                             ..........

      For the Petitioner    :  Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, Advocate
      For the State         :  Ms. Niki Sinha, A.P.P.
                               ..........

04/12.08.2014Heard   the   learned   counsel   appearing   for   the 
      parties and perused the documents on record.The  applicant   is   apprehending   his   arrest   in 
      connection   with   TELCO   P.S.   Case   No.   297   of   2012 
      corresponding   to   G.R.   No.   2729   of   2012   registered   underSections 147,148,149and504of the Indian Penal Code andSection 27of the Arms Act.The learned counsel appearing for the applicant 
      submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the 
      present case and earlier also the informant had lodged a false 
      case against him.  It is submitted that during the investigation 
      no witness has come forward to disclose the complicity of the 
      applicant in the crime.The learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for grant of 
      anticipatory   bail   and   submitted   that   the   applicant   has 
      criminal antecedent and there are two other cases against the 
      present applicant.The learned counsel appearing for the applicant 
      further submits that since the cases against the applicant have 
      been   lodged   by   the   informant   in   the   present   case   and 
      therefore, it cannot be considered.Considering   the   facts   and   circumstances   andSection   438   (ii)Cr.P.C.   I   am   not   inclined   to   entertain   the 
        present application and accordingly, it is dismissed.Let a copy of this order be sent through FAX to 
        the concerned trial court.(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/