Telangana High CourtAyesha Bin Abdad vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others on 18 February, 2020Author:T. Vinod KumarBench:T. Vinod KumarHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR\n\n               WRIT PETITION No.2235 OF 2020\n\nORDER (ORAL) :This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the\n\ninaction of respondent No.4 - Station House Officer, Women Police\n\nStation, Charminar, Hyderabad, in conducting investigation into\n\nCrime No.250 of 2019 for the offences punishable underSections 498-A,406and506of Indian Penal Code, 1860, andSections 3and4of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dated 23.11.2019,\n\nas being illegal and arbitrary, and for a consequential direction to\n\nrespondent No.4 to complete the investigation and to file charge sheet\n\nbefore the Magistrate concerned in accordance with law.2. Heard Sri Gajanand Chakravarthi, learned counsel for the\n\npetitioner, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home\n\nappearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4, and perused the material on\n\nrecord.3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home based\n\non the written instructions dated 04.02.2020, a copy of which is\n\nplaced on record, submits that on receipt of the complaint from the\n\npetitioner, a case has been registered by respondent No.4 in\n\nCrime No.250 of 2019 on 23.11.2019 for the offences punishable\n\nunderSections 498-A,406and506of Indian Penal Code, 1860, andSections 3and4of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, against accused\n\nNos.1 to 10 and the matter is being investigated into by the2Sub Inspector of Police, Women Police Station, Charminar,\n\nHyderabad.(a) The learned Assistant Government Pleader further submits\n\nthat during the course of investigation, detailed statements of LWs.1\n\nto 3 were recorded, notices underSection 41-Aof the Code of\n\nCriminal Procedure, 1973, were issued to the accused on 06.01.2020\n\nand the same has been acknowledged by accused No.1 on 08.01.2020\n\nand the investigation is pending for further evidence. It is further\n\nsubmitted that the investigating officer visited the place of offence and\n\nother probable places and tried to collect more evidence to proceed\n\nfurther in the case, but no one came forward to speak anything and\n\nefforts are being continued to examine some more witnesses and\n\ncollect evidence to proceed further in the matter.(b) It is also submitted by the learned Assistant Government\n\nPleader that the police are discharging their legitimate duties and\n\ninvestigating into the matter by following due procedure of law and\n\nthe investigation would be completed expeditiously and final report\n\nwill be filed before the competent Court.4. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions made by the\n\nlearned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on behalf of the\n\nrespondents' authorities, this Court is of the view that, no interference\n\nis called for into investigation of the crime at this stage, as such, no\n\norders are required to be passed in the matter.35. With the above observations, the writ petition is closed.\n\nNo order as to costs.As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in\n\nthe writ petition stand closed._______________________\n                                              T. VINOD KUMAR, J\nFebruary 18, 2020.PV