Patna High Court - OrdersSadhu Saran Prasad vs The State Of Bihar on 3 August, 2021Author:Sudhir SinghBench:Sudhir SinghIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17840 of 2021\n                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-493 Year-2020 Thana- GARDANIBAG District- Patna\n                 ======================================================\n                 Sadhu Saran Prasad, Male, aged about 44 years, Son Of Sri Sidheshwar\n                 Prasad @ Kameshwar Prasad, R/O Village- and P.O.- Dasturur, P.S.-\n                 Tharthari, District- Nalanda.\n\n                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner\n                                                      Versus\n                 The State Of Bihar\n\n                                                          ... ... Opposite Party\n                 ======================================================\n                 Appearance :\n                 For the Petitioner     :        Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Advocate.\n                 For the Opposite Party :        Mr. A.G.\n                 ======================================================\n                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH\n                                       ORAL ORDER\n\n2   03-08-2021Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to\n\n                   remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period\n\n                   of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned\n\n                   counsel for the State through virtual mode.The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection\n\n                   with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 493 of 2020 for the offence\n\n                   registered underSection 30(a)/34of the Bihar Prohibition and\n\n                   Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 26.400\n\n                   liters wine is recovered from the Innova Crysta Car in question.It has been submitted by learned counsel for the\n\n                   petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.\n Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17840 of 2021(2) dt.03-08-20212/3There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged\n\n          against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated\n\n          in the present case. It is alleged that total 26.400 liters wine is\n\n          recovered from the Innova Crysta Car in question. The\n\n          petitioner is alleged to be the owner of the Car in question. The\n\n          said Car is run as Public Transport. Except for this, there is no\n\n          other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the\n\n          petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered\n\n          from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner\n\n          had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no\n\n          compliance ofSection 100Cr. P.C.\n\n                        On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the\n\n          petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case.Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of\n\n          the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or\n\n          surrender before the learned court below within a period of\n\n          twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his\n\n          personal bond to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge,\n\n          Excise, Patna, in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No.\n\n          493 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down underSection 438(2)of the Code of Criminal Procedure.Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall\n            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17840 of 2021(2) dt.03-08-20213/3furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with\n\n                     two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight\n\n                     weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection\n\n                     with the aforesaid case.(Sudhir Singh, J)\nU.K./-U      T