Tripura High CourtParty Name : Md. Jaffur Uddin @ Abdul ... vs The State Of Tripura on 5 April, 2017Author:S.TalapatraBench:S.TalapatraCase No :IA. 0000359/2017


Party Name : MD. JAFFUR UDDIN @ ABDUL KADIR Vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA


THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.TALAPATRAHeard Mr. S.C. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
This is a petition for suspending the sentence dated 21.02.2017 as passed by the Special
Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar, in connection with Special (POCSO) No.33 of 2015.
Mr. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-applicant has submitted that
the evidence based on which the conviction has been returned cannot sustain the scrutiny
of law inasmuch as the testimonies of the victim and other two witnesses who came to know
about commission of the offence immediately after the occurrence are in congruity.
While appreciating the evidence, the trial court omitted to take into consideration those
aspects. Apart that, Mr. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-applicant
has stressed that no criminal antecedent has been reported against the appellant-applicant.
Moreover, he is of tender age. He may not be allowed to languish in jail, else it may destroy
his mental frame.Having gone through impugned judgment of conviction, this court is unable to accept the
contention at this stage and hence, this petition stands dismissed.
Mr. S. Sarkar, learned P.P. appears for the State.Download Date: 8-05-2017 15:05               1/1