Himachal Pradesh High CourtDev Raj & Ors vs . Mulakh Raj & Ors on 23 April, 2022Author:Tarlok Singh ChauhanBench:Tarlok Singh Chauhan.Dev Raj & ors            Vs.           Mulakh Raj & ors\n\n\n\n\n\n                                           RFA No. 324 of 2014\n\n\n\n\n\n23.4.2022   Present:   Mr. Vikas        Rajput,      Advocate,          for      the\n                       appellants.Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate vice Mr. Suneet\n                       Goel, Advocate, for the respondents.It would be noticed that the decree passed\n\n            by learned District Judge, Mandi was conditional, as is\n\n\n            evident from para­23 of the judgment, which reads as\n\n            under:"In view of the findings on the above issues, the suit\n                       of the plaintiff is decreed. A decree for possession of\n                       the house in dispute by way of specific performance\n\n\n\n\n                       of contract dated 27.7.2009 Ext. PW1/A is hereby\n                       passed against the defendant and in favour of the\n\n\n\n\n\n                       plaintiff directing the defendant to execute and\n                       register the sale deed of the house in dispute within\n\n\n\n\n\n                       three months from today on receipt of amount of Rs.\n                       309156/­ as per terms and conditions of agreement\n                       dated 27.7.2009 Ext. PW1/A on the condition that\n                       the plaintiff shall pay the entire outstanding loan\n                       amount regarding the house loan account No.\n                       30106376131 to State Bank of India, Mandi upto\n                       30.3.2013."Both the parties claim to have deposited\n\n            certain amounts in the bank/Court from time to time.In such circumstances, let affidavit be filed by both the\n\n            parties regarding the amounts, they claim to have so::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISdeposited. The needful be done within four weeks. List\n\n     on 1.6.2022..(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n\n\n\n\n\n                                           Judge\n     April 23, 2022\n     (Kalpana)\n\n\n\n\n              r        to::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISAnkush Sharma             Vs.           Rattan Lal & orsFAO(MVA) No. 53 of 2013.\n\n23.4.2022   Present:     Mr. T.S.     Chauhan,         Advocate,          for     the\n                         appellant.Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate vice Mr.\n                         Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent\n                         No. 3.Learned      vice    counsel         appearing            for\n\n\n\n\n            respondent No. 3 prays for an adjournment of four\n\n            weeks. Prayer allowed. List on 25.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                        Judge\n\n\n            April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISOriental Ins.Co. Ltd.   Vs.   Smt. Nagina & orsFAO(WCA) No. 24 of 2013.23.4.2022   Present:     Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms.\n                         Meera Devi, Advocate, for the appellant.Since the counsel for respondent No. 1 has\n\n            been elevated as Hon'ble Judge of this High Court,\n\n            therefore, let fresh notice be issued to respondent No. 1,\n\n\n\n\n            informing her this fact, returnable for 15.6.2022. His\n\n            name be accordingly deleted from the cause list.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n\n\n                                                      Judge\n            April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISThe New India Assurance Co. Vs. Neeraj and othersFAO(MVA) No. 13 of 2013.23.4.2022   Present:     Mr. M.S. Katoch, Advocate vice counsel, for\n                         the appellant.None for the respondents.Learned vice counsel appearing for the\n\n            appellant prays for an adjournment on the ground that\n\n\n\n            1.6.2022.r         to\n            his briefs have been misplaced. Prayer allowed. List on\n\n                                           (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                    Judge\n            April 23, 2022\n\n\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISOriental Insurance Co. Vs. Wasim Akram & orsFAO(MVA) No. 10 of 2013.23.4.2022   Present:     Ms. Jyoti Dogra, Advocate vice counsel for\n                         the appellant.Mr.   Vishwa    Bhushan,           Advocate,           for\n                         respondent No. 1.Learned vice counsel appearing for the\n\n\n\n\n\n            appellant prays for an adjournment on the ground that\n\n            learned senior counsel, who has to conduct the case, is\n\n            out of station. Prayer allowed. List on 1.6.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                     Judge\n\n\n\n            April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISKrishna Devi            Vs.          Ram ChanderFAO(HMA) No. 163 of 2012.23.4.2022   Present:     Ms. Tanu, Advocate vice Mr. Raju Ram Rahi,\n                         Advocate, for the appellant.Mr. Mehar Chand Sharma, Advocate, vice\n                         counsel for the respondent.Learned vice counsel appearing for the\n\n\n\n\n\n            appellant prays for an adjournment on the ground that\n\n            the original counsel, who has to conduct the case, is out\n\n            of station. Prayer allowed. List on 18.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                     Judge\n\n\n\n            April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISH.P. State Forest Corp. Ltd.   Vs. Ashok KumarRSA No. 231 of 2009.23.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate vice counsel for\n                         the appellant.Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het\n                         Ram Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.As prayed for, list on 11.5.2022.April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)\n                                to           (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                      Judge::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISSubhadra Devi & ors     Vs.          Hans RajRSA No. 213 of 2009.23.4.2022   Present:     Ms. Anu Tuli, Advocate, for the appellants.Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate, for the\n\n\n\n\n\n                         respondent.Learned counsel appearing for the appellants\n\n            prays for and is granted an adjournment in order to\n\n                      r         to\n            ascertain the status of the parties. List on 1.6.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n\n                                                      Judge\n            April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISYash Pal Singh          Vs.          Anil Kumar KhachiCOPCT No. 936 of 2020.23.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the\n                         petitioner.Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.G., for the\n                         respondents­State.Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for\n\n\n\n\n\n            and is granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit to\n\n            the supplementary affidavit filed by the respondents. List\n\n            on 25.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                      Judge\n\n\n\n            April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISH.P. Housing & Urban Devlop & anr Vs. Saroj RastogiRSA No. 51 of 2009.23.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the\n                         appellant.Mr. Naresh    Kaul,        Advocate,          for      the\n                         respondent.Learned   counsel        appearing           for       the\n\n\n\n\n\n            respondent states that he has filed an application for\n\n            withdrawal of power of attorney, however, the same is\n\n            not on record. Be traced and placed on record. List on\n\n            11.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                      Judge\n            April 23, 2022\n\n\n\n\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISUttam Chand             Vs.          Sandeep BhatnagarCOPCT No. 964 of 2020.23.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate vice counsel, for\n                         the petitioner.None for the respondent.As prayed for, list on 4.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                      Judge\n            April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISAshok Kumar             Vs.          Sandeep BhatnagarCOPCT No. 957 of 2020.23.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate vice counsel, for\n                         the petitioner.None for the respondent.As prayed for, list on 4.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                      Judge\n            April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISSanyukta Thakur         Vs.          State of H.P.& orsCWPOA No. 3031 of 2019.23.4.2022   Present:     None for the petitioner.Mr. Ajay Vaidya and Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Sr.\n\n\n\n\n\n                         Addl. AGs with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.G.\n                         and Mr.Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the\n                         respondents­State.Despite repeated calls, no one has put in\n\n\n\n\n            appearance on behalf of the petitioner. However, in the\n\n            interest of justice, the matter is adjourned. List on\n\n\n            11.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n\n\n\n                                                      Judge\n            April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISReshma Poswal             Vs.   Namrata Dwivedi & othersCR No. 37 of 2022.23.4.2022   Present:     Ms. Kavita, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv\n                         Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.Mr.   Umesh     Kanwar,             Advocate,            for\n                         respondents No. 1 to 5.Respondents No. 1 to 6 and 8 to 10 have\n\n\n\n\n\n            been served, however, appearance has only been put on\n\n            behalf of respondents No. 1 to 5 by Mr. Umesh Kanwar,\n\n            Advocate. He prays for and is granted six weeks' time to\n\n            file power of attorney.As regards respondent No. 7, he has refused\n\n\n\n            to accept the notice, therefore, he is deemed to have been\n\n            served. List on 15.6.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                       Judge\n\n\n\n\n\n             April 23, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISRajinder Kumar         Vs.          State of H.P.CWPOA No. 1670 of 2019.21.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with\n                         Mr. Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate, for the\n                         petitioner.Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.G., for the\n                         respondents­State.The letter dated 26.3.2009, as was directed\n\n\n\n\n            vide previous order, has not been produced. Needful be\n\n            done on the next date of hearing. List on 28.4.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n\n\n                                                    Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISSmt. Khimi Devi             Vs.            State of H.P. & othersCWPOA No. 168 of 2019.21.4.2022   Present:     Ms. Anaida Kuthiala, Advocate, for the\n                         petitioner.Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.G., for the\n                         respondents­State.Mr.   Surinder    Saklani,               Advocate,           for\n                         respondent No. 5.The instant petition has been filed for the\n\n            grant of following relief(s):i) That the impugned appointment of respondent No.\n                         5 Smt. Kamla Devi as Water Carrier in Govt.Primary School, Naun by the respondents No. 1 to 3\n\n\n                         be quashed and set aside.ii) That the respondents No. 1 to 3 be directed to\n                         make the appointment of the applicant as Water\n\n\n\n\n                         Carrier   in   Govt.   Primary      School,     Naun,      after\n                         adopting proper and legal procedure as envisaged in\n\n\n\n\n\n                         various guidelines issued from time to time by the\n                         respondent No. 1­State.iii) That the respondent No. 4 be directed to allow the\n                         applicant Smt. Khimi Devi to join as Water Carrier at\n                         Govt. Primary School, Shala in accordance with her\n                         appointment letter dated 13.5.2002( Annexure A­8)."2.           It is not in dispute that respondent No. 5Smt. Kamla Devi has since retired after attaining the\n\n            age of superannuation, therefore, the respondents­State\n\n            could well consider the case of the petitioner for\n\n            appointment.::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CIS3.          Let instructions in this regard be obtained\n\n     on or before the next date of hearing. List on 5.5.2022..(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                             Judge\n     April 21, 2022\n     (Kalpana)\n\n\n\n              r         to::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISHPPWD throughLAC Vs. Kewal Ram & others&\n            connected matters\n\n\n\n\n                                                              .CMP(M) No. 126 of 2019 a/w\n\n\n\n\n\n                                    CMP(M) Nos 1250 to 1261 of 2019,\n                                    1490, 1491 of 2019, 921 and 922 of202021.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl.              A.G.      for     the\n                         applicants/appellants.Mr.    Rupinder    Singh,     Advocate,     forrespondents No. 1, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 18, 22, 28to 31, 38, 43,44, 49, 50,55, 57, 59, 60, 61,\n                         63, 64, 65, 67, 68, 69, 79, 83, 85, 87 and88.CMP(M) Nos 921 and 922 of 2020\n\n                         Notices issued to proposed LRs 3(a) to 3(c )\n\n\n            are stated to be awaited. Be awaited for another two\n\n            weeks. List on 5.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                      Judge\n\n\n\n\n\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISHPSEB Ltd.         Vs.    M/s Indian Tecnomac CorpCOMS No. 21 of 2019.21.4.2022   Present:     Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the plaintiff.Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for defendant\n\n\n\n\n\n                         No. 6.On 3.3.2022, this Court passed the following\n\n            order:r          to\n                         "Even though no ground is made out for granting\n                         further time to the plaintiff­Board to take steps for\n                         the service of defendants No. 1, 2 and 4, however,\n\n                         taking into consideration the public interest and the\n                         plaintiff being the State within the meaning ofArticle\n                         12of the Constitution, I deem it proper to grant six\n                         weeks' time to the plaintiff­Board to do the needful.Ordered accordingly. List on 21.4.2022."Even today, the order dated 3.3.2022 has\n\n\n\n\n\n            not been complied with and two weeks' further time is\n\n            prayed for, for taking steps for the service of defendants\n\n\n\n\n\n            No. 1, 2 and 4. Even though, no ground is made out for\n\n            granting     further      time,     however,           taking         into\n\n            consideration the persuasive submission made by\n\n            learned counsel for the plaintiff, I deem it proper to\n\n            grant two weeks' further time to take steps for the\n\n            service of aforesaid defendants. It is made clear that in\n\n            case the steps are not taken within the aforesaid period,\n\n            the present suit shall be deemed to have been dismissed\n\n            for want of prosecution, without further reference to the\n\n            Court.::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISList on 5.5.2022..(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                              Judge\n     April 21, 2022\n\n\n\n\n\n     (Kalpana)\n\n\n\n\n              r         to::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISSh. Sant Ram & ors      Vs.   Sh.Chuni Lal @ Chuni RamRSA No. 153 of 2017.\n\n21.4.2022   Present:     Mr. P.S. Goverdhan,         Advocate,         for     the\n                         appellants.\n\n\n\n\n\n                         Mr.   Romesh      Verma,          Advocate,            for\n                         respondent No. 1.Mr.   J.L.   Bhardwaj,            Advocate,            for\n                         respondents No. 5 to 11.\n\n\n                      r          toList for consideration on 28.4.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                     Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n\n\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISSubhash Chand            Vs.            Bhaue @ Dev RajRSA No. 467 of 2015.21.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Ishan Sharma,             Advocate,          for     the\n                         appellants/applicants.Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate,                            for\n                         respondent/non­applicant No. 1.CMP No. 4051 of 2022Notice.   Mr.     Prashant     Sharma,          Advocate\n\n            appears and waives service of notice on behalf of non­\n\n            applicant No. 1. He prays for and is granted a week's\n\n            time to file reply. List on 28.4.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                        Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n\n\n\n\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISPushpa Devi Mishra       Vs.    Sanjeev Jha\n\n                                            RSAs No. 17 and 59 of 2010\n\n\n\n\n                                                               .21.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Janesh        Gupta,     Advocate,          for     the\n                         appellant.Mr.   Surinder    Saklani,           Advocate,           for\n                         respondent No. 1(a).CMPs No. 3727 of 2022 and 5685 of 2016in RSA No. 17 of 2010r Both these applications have been filed for\n\n            early   hearing   of   the   instant    appeal.       Taking        into\n\n            consideration the averments made in the application,\n\n            coupled with the fact that the civil suit, out of which the\n\n\n\n            present proceedings emanate, was filed in the year 2000.In such circumstances, the applications are allowed and\n\n\n\n\n            disposed of.RSAs No. 17 and 59 of 2010\n\n\n\n\n\n                         List for final hearing on 16.6.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                       Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISKaram Singh             Vs.   Parkash Chand & othersCMPMO No. 81 of 2022.21.4.2022   Present:     Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr.\n                         Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.Mr.   Sunny     Moudgil,          Advocate,            for\n                         respondent No. 1.Mr. Prashant Sharma,               Advocate,           for\n                         respondents No. 2 and 3.The contesting parties are present in person\n\n            who are not averse to make an endeavour to settle the\n\n\n            matter amicably.At the joint request of the parties, Mr.\n\n\n            Naresh Sood, learned Senior Advocate is appointed as\n\n            Mediator. The parties are directed to appear before him\n\n\n\n\n            today at 1 p.m. in the Mediation Center.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n\n\n\n\n\n                                                      Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISH.P. Primary Teachers Federation Vs. K.K.Pant & orsCOPCT No. 928 of 2020.21.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Peeyush    Verma,       Advocate,         for     the\n                         petitioner.Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Sr.Addl. A.G. with Mr.\n                         Vinod Thakur, Addl.       A.G., for the\n                         respondents­State.Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for\n\n            and is granted four weeks' time to file better particulars.List on 26.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                     Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n\n\n\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISDhani Ram               Vs.          Manoj KumarCOPCT No. 589 of 2020 a/w CWPOA\n\n\n\n\n                                                             .No. 3880 of 202021.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Rajat Kumar Advocate vice Mr. Ramesh\n                         Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Sr.Addl. A.G. with Mr.\n                         Vinod Thakur, Addl.       A.G., for the\n                         respondents­State.Learned vice counsel for the petitioner states\n\n            that he has filed an application for impleading the\n\n            present incumbents as party respondents. However, the\n\n            same is not on record. Be traced and placed on record.List on 5.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n\n\n\n\n                                                     Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n\n\n\n\n\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISBrij Mohan        Vs.          Upendra Prasad Singh & ors\n\n                                           COPC No. 232 of 2019 with\n\n\n\n\n                                                               .COPC Nos 72, 73, 117, 118 of\n\n\n\n\n\n                                    2016,214, 320 of 2017, 97, 267 of 2019,\n                                    19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37,\n                                    38, 154 of 2020 and COPC No. 100 of\n\n\n\n\n\n                                    2021.21.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.\n                         Ajay K. Thakur, Mr. Mukul Sood, Mr. S.D.\n                         Vasudeva, Advocate, for the respective\n\n\n\n\n                         petitioner(s).Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Sr.Addl. A.G. with Mr.\n                         Vinod Thakur, Addl.       A.G., for the\n\n                         respondents­State.Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondent\n                         No. 1­UOI in COPC Nos 232/2019, 72/2016,\n                         73/2016, 214/2017, 97/2019, 320/2017,\n\n\n                         117/2016 and 118/2016.Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate vice Mr.\n                         Yashwardhan     Chauhan,   Advocate, for\n\n\n\n\n                         respondent No. 3­Government of Rajasthan.Learned    vice     counsel         appearing            for\n\n            respondent No. 3 prays for an adjournment on the\n\n\n\n\n\n            ground that the original counsel is to undergo an eye\n\n            operation. Prayer allowed. List on 19.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                       Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISKamlesh & another             Vs.    Hem Chand & orsCR No. 24 of 2018.21.4.2022   Present:     Mr. Arun Raj, Advocate, for the petitioners.Mr.   Vivek     Sharma,           Advocate,            for\n\n\n\n\n\n                         respondents No. 1 and 2.As prayed for, list on 19.5.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                      Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISKiran Sharma            Vs.              Brinda Jewellers & anrCr. Revision No. 191 of 2022.21.4.2022   Present:      Ms. Leena       Guleria,     Advocate,         for     the\n                          petitioner.Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr.\n                          Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.G. for respondent No.2.Cr. Revision No. 191 of 2022 & Cr. M.P.No. 984 of 2022Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional\n\n            Advocate General appears and waives service of notice\n\n            on   behalf   of   respondent    No.      2.   Issue      notice       to\n\n            respondent No. 1 through process­serving agency,\n\n\n\n            returnable for 28.4.2022.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n\n\n\n\n\n                                                        Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISOriental Insurance Co.              Vs.    Smt. Asha & orsFAO No. 70 of 2022.21.4.2022   Present:          Ms. Rajvinder Sandhu, Advocate, for the\n                              appellant.Issue notice to the respondents through\n\n            process serving agency, returnable for 16.6.2022. In the\n\n\n\n\n\n            meanwhile, the records be requisitioned.r       CMP No. 4328 of 2022Since the entire amount stands deposited\n\n            before learned trial Court, therefore, the operation and\n\n            execution of the impugned award dated 14.1.2022,\n\n\n\n            passed by the Commissioner, Employees' Compensation\n\n            Act, Chamba, in petition No. 11 of 2016, is ordered to be\n\n\n\n\n            stayed. The application stands disposed of, reserving\n\n\n\n\n\n            liberty      to   the   claimants   to    move       an     appropriate\n\n\n\n\n\n            application for release of amount, which application,\n\n            needless to say as and when filed, shall be considered\n\n            on its ow merits.The amount lying deposited before learned\n\n            Commissioner's Court be requisitioned and thereafter\n\n            invested as per procedure.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                           Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISNational Insurance Co.       Vs.    Smt. Usha Devi & orsFAO No. 69 of 2022.21.4.2022   Present:     Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for the\n                         appellant.Issue notice to the respondents through\n\n            process serving agency, returnable for 16.6.2022. In the\n\n\n\n\n\n            meanwhile, the records be requisitioned.r  CMP No. 4327 of 2022Since the entire amount stands deposited\n\n            before learned trial Court, therefore, the operation and\n\n            execution of the impugned award dated 19.10.2021,\n\n\n\n            passed       by     the   Commissioner,               Employees'\n\n            Compensation , Kullu in W.C. Act No. 8/19/2013, is\n\n\n\n\n            ordered to be stayed. The application stands disposed of,\n\n\n\n\n\n            reserving liberty to the claimants to move an appropriate\n\n\n\n\n\n            application for release of amount, which application,\n\n            needless to say as and when filed, shall be considered\n\n            on its ow merits.The amount lying deposited before learned\n\n            Commissioner's Court be requisitioned and thereafter\n\n            invested as per procedure.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                    Judge\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISSh. Kamal Kant & anr         Vs. Jyoti PrakashRSA No. 59 of 2022.21.4.2022   Present:     Mr. R.L. Chaudhary,        Advocate,         for     the\n                         appellants.RSA No. 59 of 2022 & CMP No. 2620 of2022Learned counsel for the appellants prays for\n\n\n\n\n\n            and is granted an adjournment. List on 28.4.2022.r                     (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                     Judge\n\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CISC.K. Baljee             Vs.   Susheela Joshi & anrCR No. 60 of 2022.\n\n21.4.2022   Present:      Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rohit, Advocate, for the petitioner.Notice be issued to the respondents, through\n\n            process serving agency, returnable for 2.6.2022.The caveat petition, which has been filed by\n\n            the petitioner himself, has wrongly been placed in the\n\n            instant file. The same is required to be placed in the\n\n\n            petition, if any, filed by the respondents herein.Therefore, the Registry is directed to detach the caveat\n\n\n            petition.(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)\n                                                      Judge\n\n\n\n\n\n            April 21, 2022\n             (Kalpana)::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CIS.::: Downloaded on - 23/04/2022 20:16:52 :::CIS