Karnataka High CourtSri. Kumar vs Sri. Siddappa @ Siddanna on 10 May, 2016Author:Ravi MalimathBench:Ravi Malimath1




    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU

            ON THE 10TH DAY OF MAY 2016

                      BEFORE

       THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

       WRIT PETITION NO.27875 OF 2016(GM-CPC)
                        AND
       WRIT PETITION NO.27881 OF 2016(GM-CPC)


BETWEEN:

SRI KUMAR
S/O CHANDRAKANT DESAI,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST,
JAINAPUR TALUK,
VIJAYAPURA DISTRICT - 586 101.       ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI VARUN JAYAKUMAR PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI SIDDAPPA @ SIDDANNA
S/O MALLAPPA DESAI,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST,
NEW VITHAL MANDIR ROAD,
VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.               ...RESPONDENT

                       ****

     THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDERARTICLE
227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 30.4.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-J
                                2




PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
VIJAYAPURA IN MA.NO.8/2016 AND M.A.NO.9/2016.

     THESE   WRIT  PETITIONS    COMING   ON   FOR
PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:


                           ORDERThe petitioner is challenging the order passed by the

first appellate Court wherein the matter was remanded by

the trial Court for fresh enquiry. A detailed order has been

passed by the appellate Court assigning reasons as to why

the matter requires re-consideration by the trial court.2.   Under these circumstances, I find no good

ground to entertain the writ petition especially since the

matter arises out of an order remanding the matter to the

trial Court. In that view of the matter, the petitions being

devoid of merit, are dismissed.SD/-JUDGE


Rsk/-