Rajasthan High CourtSonu Singh vs State Of Rajasthan Through P.P on 29 March, 2012Author:Mohammad RafiqBench:Mohammad RafiqIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.3012/2012
Sonu Singh Vs. State

Date of order 			:	               29/03/2012.

		HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ

Shri Ashvin Garg for the petitioner.Shri S.K. Mehla, P.P. for the State.******
		Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me.Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that this is the first alleged offence against the petitioner. He is in jail for last six months. Petitioner was a khalasi, however, co-accused Rinku Singh who was driver, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 13.2.2012. Petitioner would undertake not to indulge in any offence in future. Trial may take long.Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail.In the result, this bail applicationu/S.439Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sonu Singh S/o Fadali Jatav shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.169/2011, P.S. Vijay Nagar, Distt. Ajmer for offenceu/s. 19/54of Rajasthan Excise Act to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial.However, in case it is found that any other criminal case is pending against petitioner and that misstatement has been made about his whereabouts or non-registration of any other criminal case or any new case in future is registered against him, the bail so granted to him by this court in this bail application would be liable to be cancelled at the instance of prosecution even by the trial court.(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J.RS/68

All corrections made in the judgement/order have been incorporated in the judgement/order being emailed.(Ravi Sharma,P.A.