Madhya Pradesh High CourtSahara States Bhopal vs Assistant Commissioner on 9 December, 2010W.P.No.17141/2010

 Sahara States - Bhopal                  Assistant Commissioner, Income
                                         Tax, Bhopal and another




9.12.2010
      Shri Amit Singh, counsel for petitioner.
      Shri Sanjay Lal, counsel for respondents.Shri Amit Singh, learned counsel for petitioner at the outset
submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with
liberty to raise objection before the respondent in respect of notice
undersection 148-Aof Income Tax Act, 1961.On raising such contention, Shri Lal, learned counsel for
respondents submitted that against the show cause notice objections
were raised and decided long back by respondent no.1, so there is no
question of filing of fresh objection by the petitioner before
respondent no.1.On raising aforesaid contention by Shri Lal, Shri Amit Singh
submitted that he has not received any communication from the
respondent no.1 in respect of deciding the aforesaid objection. It is
further submitted by Shri Singh that in case such objection has been
decided against the petitioner, petitioner be granted liberty to
challenge the aforesaid order before the appropriate forum.Considering the peculiar facts of the case, petitioner is
permitted to withdraw this petition, with liberty as prayed.This petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.
No order as to costs.C.C., as per rules.(Krishn Kumar Lahoti)                      (Smt.Sushma Shrivastava)
      JUDGE                                       JUDGE
M.