Central Information CommissionMr.Sunil Kumar Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 24 January, 2012CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                             Club Building (Near Post Office)
                           Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                                  Tel: +91-11-26161796

                                                              Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/003352/17047
                                                                    Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/003352

Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal

Appellant                             :       Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma
                                              R/o 9561, Azad Market,
                                              Library Road, Delhi-110006
                                              Mob. No. 9278008618

Respondent                            :       Mr. V. R. Bansal
                                              Public Information Officer & SE
                                              Municipal Corporation of Delhi
                                              Sadar Pahar Ganj Zone, Idgah Road,
                                              New Delhi.

RTI application filed on              :       31/05/2011
PIO replied                           :       No reply mentioned.
First Appeal                          :       04/07/2011
First Appellate Authority order       :       16/08/2011
Second Appeal received on             :       22/11/2011

Information sought:(i) Whether the aforesaid construction in the property No. 4555-4556, Main Bazar, Paharganj, Delhi is
approved by the MCD. or not? If approved, please supply the sanctioned building plan.(ii) That in case the same is not approved what action has been taken by the M.C.D., action taken report
given in detailed along with notings, orders and photographs.(iii) Copy of the ownership documents along with all relevant documents produced by the owner of
building at the time of getting sanctioned building plan. ,. •(iv) Copy of the sanctioned building plan of the previous period (before the current construction along
with complete file).(v) How many complaints have been received by the M.C.D. of this unauthorized construction? The copy
of the each and every complaint with action taken report be supplied, rest complaints be supplied in the
shape of a list in this regard.(vi) Copy of the orders, notings given by the DC (S.P. Zone), Delhi for removing, stopping this illegal
construction.(vii) Copy of the F.I.R; of the same along with detail of complete area of the said plot.(viii) Copy of the show cause notice under Section 344(1) and Section 343 of D.M.C. Act be given.(ix) Copy of the requisition prepared by the JE at the spot under Section 344(2) of D.M.C. Act for the
police intervention on the very same day.(x) Copy of the F.I.R. under Section 466(A) ci the D.M.C. Act 1957 read withSection 34/120, of the
Indian Penal Code is supplied.(xi) Copy of the speaking order of Demolition of this unauthorized construction under Section 343 of
D.M.C. Act. Whether the 'B-Form' has been submitted? (Copy of the same is supplied).(xii) It is further more clear that besides demolition of the unauthorized construction action for
disconnection of water and electricity supply shall be taken as per instructions contained in office in officePage 1 of 2Order No. PSC/759/08 dated 26.09.2008 issued under signature of the Commissioner. What action has
been initiated against the same? Copy of the action taken, notings and other is supplied.CPIO's reply:No reply mentioned.Grounds for the First Appeal:Information has not been provided.Order of the FAA:Supply the information within 10 days.Grounds for the Second Appeal:Information has not been provided.Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present:Appellant: Absent;Respondent: Mr. S. K. Aggarwal, AE on behalf of Mr. V. R. Bansal, Public Information Officer & SE;The Respondent shows that the information was given to the Appellant firstly on 25/08/2011
where the Appellant ahs written receive satisfactory reply.Decision:The Appeal is disposed.The information appears to have been provided.
This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as perSection 7(6)of RTI Act.Shailesh Gandhi
                                                                                              Information Commissioner
                                                                                                        24 January 2012
(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (PG)Page 2 of 2