Jharkhand High CourtPurushottam Dubey vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. on 27 April, 2010Author:D.G.R. PatnaikBench:D.G.R. PatnaikIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI.
                             Cont. Case (C) No. 633 of 2009
                                          with
                             Cont. Case (C) No. 624 of 2009
                                          with
                             Cont. Case (C) No. 625 of 2009
                                          with
                             Cont. Case (C) No. 626 of 2009
                                          with
                             Cont. Case (C) No. 627 of 2009
                                          with
                             Cont. Case (C) No. 628 of 2009
                                          with
                             Cont. Case (C) No. 629 of 2009
                                          with
                             Cont. Case (C) No. 630 of 2009
                                          ...
              Savitri Verma & Others... ...            Petitioners[Cont. Case (C) No. 633/09]
              Ramni Bhushan Prasad ... ...         Petitioner [Cont. Case (C) No. 624/09]
              Rash Behari Ghosh ...       ...      Petitioner [Cont. Case (C) No. 625/09]
              Mantu Banerjee        ...   ...      Petitioner [Cont. Case (C) No. 626/09]
              Ashwini Kumar         ...   ...      Petitioner [Cont. Case (C) No. 627/09]
              Pratima Ghosh         ...   ...      Petitioner [Cont. Case (C) No. 628/09]
              Anand Kand Prasad Verma......        Petitioner [Cont. Case (C) No. 629/09]
              Purushottam Dubey ...       ...      Petitioner [Cont. Case (C) No. 630/09]
                                          V e r s u s-
              The State of Jharkhand & Ors.        ...       Opposite parties [In all cases]
                                          ...
CORAM: - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.G.R. PATNAIK.
                                          ...
              For the Petitioners : - Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate.
              For the Respondents : - M/s. Srijit Choudhary and A. Allam, Sr. S.C. II
                                          ...
14/27.04.2010In compliance with the directions contained in the order
              dated-19.04.2010, the Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh
              (Respondent No. 3) has appeared in Court in person today and has filed a
              supplementary show-cause, informing thereby that the total amount, which was
              due and payable to the sole remaining petitioner, namely, Purushottam Dubey,
              has been assessed at Rs.2,67,096/- and a cheque dated-22.04.2004, for the said
              amount drawn on the United Bank of India has already been forwarded to the
              petitioner's Bank account.Learned counsel for the petitioners acknowledges that the
              payment as informed above, has been made to the petitioner, Purushottam
              Dubey and upon such payment being made to him, the grievance of the
              petitioner, Purushottam Dubey has been redressed. Learned counsel adds that
              the grievances of all the petitioners including the petitioner, Purushottam
              Dubey (in Cont. Case (C) No. 630 of 2009) have also been redressed.In the light of the above facts and circumstances, there appears
              no further reason to retain these contempt applications on board. Accordingly,
              all these contempt applications (Cont. Case (C) No. 633 of 2009, Cont. Case
              (C) No. 624 of 2009, Cont. Case (C) No. 625 of 2009, Cont. Case (C) No. 626
              of 2009, Cont. Case (C) No. 627 of 2009, Cont. Case (C) No. 628 of 2009,
       Cont. Case (C) No. 629 of 2009 and Cont. Case (C) No. 630 of 2009) are
      dropped.The personal appearance of the Registrar, Vinoba Bhave
      University, Hazaribagh (Respondent No. 3) is dispensed with.(D.G.R. Patnaik, J.)

APK