Patna High Court - OrdersVikash Kumar & Ors vs The State Of Bihar on 13 April, 2018Author:Arun KumarBench:Arun KumarIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Criminal Miscellaneous No.21414 of 2018
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2017 Thana- MANIGACHI District- Darbhanga
               ======================================================
            1. Vikash Kumar son of Binod Rai resident of Village - Dharm
               Saini, P.S. + District - Saharsa, presently residing at Patel
               Nagar, Ward No. 31, P.S. + District - Saharsa.
            2. Amar Kumar son of Kanhaiya Mahto resident of village -
               Muradpur, P.S. Nauhatta, District - Saharsa.
            3. Prem Kumar son of Upendra Mahto resident of village + P.S. -
               Nauhatta, District - Saharsa.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Pramod Mishra
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sri Chandrasen Prasad Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-04-2018Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

                  learned APP for the State.Petitioners, already in custody, seek bail in connection

                  with Manigachhi P.S. Case No.250 of 2017, registered underSections 420,414,467,468and120(B)of the Indian Penal

                  Code.The police stopped a vehicle on suspicion and the

                  driver produced the papers but registration book of the vehicle

                  was found fake and suspected to be a stolen vehicle and the

                  three petitioners were also boarding the vehicle.Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                  vehicle was of Vishundeo Mahto and he was driving the vehicle,
          Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21414 of 2018(2) dt.13-04-20182/2the petitioners had taken lift and petitioner no.2 has no criminal

                  antecedent whereas petitioner nos.1 and 3 have one criminal

                  antecedent underSections 366/365of the Indian Penal Code.Having        considered        the     aforesaid   facts   and

                  circumstances and in particular that the vehicle was being

                  driven by another co-accused Vishundeo Mahto and papers were

                  also produced by him, petitioners, namely, Vikash Kumar, Amar

                  Kumar and Prem Kumar are directed to be released on bail on

                  furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with

                  two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                  learned ACJM-VI, Darbhanga in connection with Manigachhi

                  P.S. Case No.250 of 2017.(Arun Kumar, J)
S.KUMAR/-U    T