Jharkhand High CourtBanti Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand ... Opposite ... on 7 June, 2021Author:Anil Kumar ChoudharyBench:Anil Kumar ChoudharyIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI\n                         A.B. A. No. 3389 of 2021\n\n                  1.Banti Kumar2. Shyam Sundar Kumar                       ...       Petitioners\n\n                                                     Versus\n\n                  The State of Jharkhand                      ...    Opposite Party\n\n\n\n          Coram:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY\n\n          For the Petitioners              : Mr. D. K. Chakraverty, Adv.For the State                    : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, Addl. P.P.\n\n\n\n\n02 / 07.06.2021                 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved\n              this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection\n              with Mahila P.S. Case No. 36 of 2020 registered underSections 341,323,452,504,506,354,34of the Indian Penal Code.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the\n             allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners trespassed to\n             the house of the informant and outraged the modesty of the daughter\n             of the informant. It is then submitted that the allegations against the\n             petitioners are all false and both the petitioners are minors. It is\n             further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the\n             petitioners have no criminal antecedents, as mentioned in paragraph\n             13 of the anticipatory bail application and the occurrence took place\n             because of the petty dispute. It is next submitted that the petitioners\n             are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also\n             undertakes to pay Rs. 5,000/- jointly as ad interim victim\n             compensation to the informant without prejudice to their defence\n             and they undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant or his\n             family members in any manner during pendency of the case hence,\n             the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of\n             the petitioners.Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am\n             inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.\n Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a\nperiod of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be\nreleased on bail on depositing Rs. 5,000/- jointly by way of demand\ndraft drawn in favour of           informant as ad interim victim\ncompensation and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees\nTwenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount\neach to the satisfaction of learned J.M., 1st class, Bokaro in connection\nwith Mahila P.S. Case No. 36 of 2020 subject to the condition that the\npetitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family\nmembers in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-\noperate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the\nInvestigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit\nmobile number      and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of\nsurrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change\nmobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other\nconditions laid down undersection 438 (2)Cr. P.C.\n          In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the\npetitioners, learned court below is directed to issue notice to the\ninformant and release the demand draft in his favour on proper\nidentification forthwith.(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)\nSmita/-