Rajasthan High Court - JodhpurHans Raj vs State Of Rajasthan on 14 September, 2020Author:Dinesh MehtaBench:Dinesh Mehta(1 of 14)                 [CW-5753/2020]\n\n\n     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT\n                      JODHPUR\n            S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5753/2020\nNirmla Jat D/o Raichand Jat, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Vpo\nNagdi Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagour At Present Working On The\nPost Of Teacher Grade Ii (Hindi) At Govt. Senior Secondary\nSchool Madpura Tehsil Khinvsar District Nagour (Raj.).----Petitioner\n                                   Versus1.     State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of\n       Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.2.     The Education Department (Secondary) Through Its\n       Director, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.).3.     The Joint Director, Secondary Education, Government Of\n       Rajasthan, Ajmer Zone, Ajmer (Raj.).4.     The Joint Director, Secondary Education, Government Of\n       Rajasthan, Pali Zone, Pali (Raj.).----Respondents\n\nFor Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi\n                               Mr. Kailash Jangid\n                               Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary\n                               Mr. Inderjeet Yadav\n                               Mr. Sushil Solanki\n                               Mr. Madhu Lal Deora\n                               Mr. K. R. Saharna\n                               Mr. Devi Lal Rawla\n                               Mr. Surendra Singh Choudhary\n                               Mr. Varda Ram Choudhary\n                               Mr. RJ Punia\n                               Mr. Kan Singh Oad\n                               Mr. Kailash Meghwal\n                               Mr. Tanwar Singh\n                               Mr. Rakesh Kumar Chotia\n                               Mr. Sumit Singhal\n                               Mr. Awar Dan Ujjwal\n                               Mr. Shree Kant Verma\n                               Mr. Ramniwas\n                               Mr. Vinod Choudhary\n                               All through Jitsi Meet App\nFor Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Hemant Choudhary with\n                               Mr. Vishal Jangid(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(2 of 14)                   [CW-5753/2020]\n\n\n                    JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA\n\n                                Judgment\n\n14/09/20201.   The petitioners, involved in the present group of writ\n\npetitions (enumerated in the Schedule appended with the present\n\norder, which be treated an intergral part of this order), have\n\napproached this Court being aggrieved of the State's action of\n\nreshuffling of divisions and allotment of new division vide order\n\ndated 20.07.2020.2.   For the purpose of present controversy, facts apropos are\n\nnarrated in para No. 3 to 8 infra:-3.   The petitioners herein were selected and given appointment\n\nas Senior Teacher Grade - II in various subjects, pursuant to\n\nadvertisement dated 13.07.2016.4.   It is pertinent that some candidates, selected pursuant to\n\nthe advertisement in question, were given posting according to\n\ntheir merit cum preference consequent to counselling.5.   Some of the selected candidates, did not join, for which\n\ncandidates   from   reserve       list   were        considered      and   offered\n\nappointment.6.   Some candidates filed a writ petition at Jaipur Bench of this\n\nCourt interalia raising a grievance that persons less meritorious\n\nthan them had been given postings of their choice, whereas\n\ndespite having secured higher marks, they were not allotted the\n\ndesired   divisions/postings,      as     they       stood      occupied   by   the\n\ncandidates though lower in merit.(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(3 of 14)                    [CW-5753/2020]7.   Single Bench of this Court at Jaipur in its judgment dated\n\n2.4.2019 (SB Civil Writ Petition No. 23680/2018:Sunita Kumari\n\nMeena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) and Division Bench in its\n\njudgment dated 29.08.2019 rendered in DB SAW No.815/2019\n\n(State of Rajasthan & Ors. V. Poonam Sharma) exhaustively\n\nconsidered the law on the subject and gave comprehensive\n\ndirections. The operative portion of the Division Bench Judgment\n\nreads thus :"15.............This meant that if there were some delays\n     in forwarding recommendations, the allocations of\n     concerned divisions had to be made finally. Until the\n     entire picture emerged with regard to recommendation\n     of    candidates, the State could have well made\n     provisional cadre allocations, which could have been\n     finalized,      after    all     recommendations              had    been\n     received. In such latter event, the State would have\n     been able to ensure that MRC candidates had a choice\n     to seek the division which they wanted, given their\n     relative merit ranking. In such an event, by application\n     of the rule indicated in Para 72 (iv) of the judgment in\n     Ramesh Ram(supra), MRC candidates would have\n     been provided with a choice of being treated as those\n     belonging to the general category, or being treated as\n     reserved category candidates.16. In the light of the above discussion, the Court is of\n     opinion that the findings and conclusions recorded by\n     the    Single     Judge        are   reasonable.         The   following\n     directions are consequently issued:(a)    The State shall issue a circular/order within four\n     weeks, expressly stating that cadre allocations (to\n     different divisions) made are only provisional and that\n     such allocations would be made finally in a time bound\n     manner, to be clearly indicated in such an order or\n     circular;(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(4 of 14)                     [CW-5753/2020](b)   Await the receipt of all recommendations for 3\n      months      and    thereafter        take      up     the     process     of\n      determination of cadre allocations, in accordance with\n      the rules and circulars applicable and complete such\n      cadre allocations within 6 months from today;(c)   The      State      is   further       directed         that    cadre\n      allocations     made       finally     pursuant         to    the    above\n      directions, shall not be treated as transfers, but\n      instead as revised initial postings of the concerned\n      teachers.(d)   The      circular    issued       pursuant        to    the    above\n      directions shall also mention that it has been issued\n      pursuant to the present order.17. The State's appeals therefore have to fail. They\n      are   according        dismissed,        subject       to     the    above\n      directions."8.    The Petitioners, herein, have raised a number of grievances.\n\nBut the genesis of all grievance lies in the contention/allegation\n\nthat the respondents have not followed the above directions in its\n\nletter and spirit.9.    Sheet anchor of their argument was that neither guidelines\n\ndated 19.06.2020 & 26.06.2020 are, nor State's action is in sync\n\nwith the judgment of Division Bench rendered in the case ofState\n\nof Rajasthan V. Poonam Sharma(supra).10.   It was highlighted that the respondents have invited options\n\nonly from the candidates whose zones/divisions, according to\n\nthem (on the basis of their merit position), were going to be\n\nchanged.11.   The relevant part [Para No.B (1)] of the guidelines dated\n\n19.06.2020 reads thus :(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(5 of 14)                       [CW-5753/2020]\n\n\n      "B     fj'kQy lEHkkx vkoaVu ds i'pkr~ inLFkkiu dh izfdz;k :-ofj"B v/;kid (fofHkUu fo"k;) HkrhZ ijh{kk - 2016 ds fj'kQy vkoaVu i'pkr~ ftu\n      vH;fFkZ;ksa dk lEHkkx ifjorZu gks jgk gS dsoy mUgha vH;fFkZ;ksa   को   uohu vkoafVr lEHkkx\n      esa inLFkkiu gsrq Counselling Camp (ijke'kZ f'kfoj) lfEefyr fd;k tk;sxk rFkk ftu\n      vH;fFkZ;ksa dk fj'kQy vkoaVu i'pkr~ lEHkkx ifjorZu ugha gqvk gSa mudk inLFkkiu\n      LFkku ;Fkkor~ jgsxkA"12.   Learned counsel for the petitioners invited Court's attention\n\ntowards notice dated 26.06.2020, which was accompanied by a\n\nlist containing particulars of around 3000 candidates.13.    The moot question which needs to be examined, is, whether\n\nthe State has followed the Division Bench judgment and the law\n\non the subject? or as to whether the guidelines/circulars issued by\n\nthe State are in-tandem with the Division Bench judgment.14.   Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that the State\n\nwas not justified in confining the option only to the candidates\n\nwhose divisions were going to change. According to them, the\n\nDivision Bench judgment in case ofState of Rajasthan V. Poonam\n\nSharma(supra) was unequivocal and the State was required to\n\ngive option to all the candidates, irrespective of the fact whether\n\ntheir division were going to be changed or not.15.   It was argued that even if a candidate's division was not\n\nlikely to change, still he/she ought to have been given chance to\n\nopt for another District or another school at a vacant position, in\n\nlight of the State's Circular dated 04.03.2018.16.   Learned counsel for the petitioners asserted that after\n\nallotment of division, the options simplicitor were asked without\n\nnotifying category-wise total vacant posts; the candidates have(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(6 of 14)                   [CW-5753/2020]\n\n\nbeen accommodated only against the position, which were lying\n\nvacant or fell vacant pursuant to reshuffle.17.     Mr.   Choudhary,      learned        counsel         appearing     for     the\n\nrespondents, submitted that a perusal of the reply and the\n\nposition of allotment of vacant posts leaves not even an iota of\n\ndoubt. He added that, no lesser meritorious candidate has been\n\ngiven     better   posting.     Candidates          having        higher   merit    or\n\nmeritorious reserve category candidates have been considered in\n\ntheir own category.18.     Learned Government Counsel submitted that the State has\n\nrightly invited options from only those candidates whose divisions\n\nwere changed, as per their merit position. He tried to justify\n\nrespondents' action by saying that it was done with a view to\n\navoid unnecessary exercise of inviting option from all the\n\ncandidates. He emphasised that the respondents had done their\n\nhomework or in house exercise and thereafter invited options only\n\nfrom those candidates whose divisions were going to be changed.19.     Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the\n\nrespondents have complied with the judgment of Single Judge\n\nBench so also the Division Bench and as there was no direction to\n\nchange the posting (within the Division) in terms of Para-B of the\n\nCircular dated 04.03.2018, such exercise has not been done and\n\nthat is why the position/posting which were held by the teachers,\n\nwhose division remained intact, were not shown in the list of\n\navailable schools/vacant seats.20.     It was also admitted by Mr. Choudhary that the posts held by\n\nthe teachers, whose divisions have not been changed, have not\n\nbeen reflected in the list published and the exercise in question(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(7 of 14)              [CW-5753/2020]\n\n\nhas been carried out on the basis of vacant seats (ignoring the\n\npost held by the teachers whose divisions have not been\n\nchanged).21.   He however submitted that even if a further direction is\n\nissued to comply with Clasue-B of the circular dated 04.03.2018;\n\nit is not necessary that the petitioners, who are 76 in number will\n\nbe given desired or satisfactory posting, as that too would be\n\ngiven in accordance with their merit/preference. He added that if\n\nthe entire exercise is ordered to be done qua 5212 teachers, it will\n\nlead to unnecessary shifting of the teachers, who have already\n\naccepted their postings.22.    Heard.23.   It is true that the Division Bench has expressly and\n\nunequivocally directed the State to invite options from all the\n\ncandidates. No leeway was given to the State to invite options\n\nonly from the candidates whose divisions were likely to be\n\nchanged.24.   Stand of the State is not in conformity with the Division\n\nBench judgment dated 29.08.2019 rendered in the case ofState\n\nof Rajasthan Vs. Poonam Sharma(supra).25.   It is to be noted that not only the Division Bench judgment\n\neven the guidelines dated 19.06.2020 envisages that after\n\nallotment of division, the preference would be given as under : -**6-    fj'kQy lEHkkx vkoaVu ds i'pkr~ ofj"B v/;kid ds inLFkkiu gsrq\n      ofj;rk dze dk fu/kkZj.k fuEu dze esa fd;k tkosa :-(a) 40 izfr'kr ls vf/kd fnO;kax vH;FkhZ (jktLFkku yksd lsok vk;ksx dh\n      esfjV ds dze esa)(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(8 of 14)                 [CW-5753/2020](b) fo/kok ,oa ifjR;drk efgyk (jktLFkku yksd lsok vk;ksx dh esfjV ds dze\n      esa)(c) efgyk vH;FkhZ (jktLFkku yksd lsok vk;ksx dh esfjV ds dze esa )(d) 'ks"k vU; vH;FkhZ (jktLFkku yksd lsok vk;ksx dh esfjV ds dze esa) "26.   An additional affidavit has been filed by the respondent -\n\nState on 03.09.2020 interalia setting out in detail the process of\n\nallotment of division adopted by them.27.   Having gone through the additional affidavit and process\n\nchalked out therein, this Court is satisfied that the respondents\n\nhave adhered to the directions of the Division Bench given on\n\n29.08.2019 and so also the guideline dated 04.03.2018 so far as\n\nallotment of Division/Range is concerned - All the candidates have\n\nbeen allotted division/range strictly in accordance with their\n\nmerit/preference.28.   The issue which still concerns the Court or remains to be\n\nadjudicated upon is, whether the process so adopted by the\n\nrespondents pursuant to the Division Bench's directions could be\n\nbeyond the guidelines dated 04.03.2018.29.     A careful reading of the Judgments of the Single Bench inSuman Meena(supra) and Division Bench inState of Rajasthan\n\nVs. Poonam Sharma(supra) reveals that the issue which was\n\ncanvassed,        considered          and       decided         was    confined       to\n\nallotment/allocation of          Division/Range only. The Division Bench\n\nhas noticed the Circular dated 04.03.2018 and para 6 of Part B of\n\nthe Circular and has given general direction to comply with the\n\nsame.30.   This    Court     finds     substance         in    the    submission     of   the\n\npetitioners that the respondents were required not only to comply(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(9 of 14)              [CW-5753/2020]\n\n\nwith the Para-A of the guidelines dated 04.03.2018, they were\n\nequally obliged to give posting in accordance with Part 'B' of the\n\ncircular aforesaid, once divisions are allotted.31.   As a matter of fact, after allocation of divisions, the\n\nrespondents ought to have published category-wise position of all\n\nthe respective schools in the concerned division, which has\n\nadmittedly not been done by the respondents. Consequently,\n\nlimited vacant seats were made available to the petitioners for\n\ngiving their choices.32.   This Court finds that the respondents have not adhered to\n\nthe guidelines dated 04.03.2018. Subsequent guidelines dated\n\n19.06.2020, particularly para No. B (1) thereof (reproduced in\n\npara No. 11 above), issued by the respondent - State, are\n\ncontrary to its parimateria stipulations in the Circular dated\n\n04.03.2018.33.   Strictly speaking impugned exercise done by the respondents\n\nis incomplete and cannot stand the scrutiny on the anvil of\n\nfairness and reasonableness, but given the fact that all the\n\nteachers have now been allotted appropriate divisions/ranges on\n\nthe basis of their merit cum preference and almost all of them\n\n(except 76 petitioners herein) are satisfied, direction to undertake\n\nthe de novo exercise in the era of spread of pandemic COVID-19\n\nmay lead to undesired disturbance, which in the opinion of this\n\nCourt, should be avoided.34.   There is yet another reason, for which this Court does not\n\ndeem it appropriate to direct the respondents to undertake the\n\nexercise afresh. Seniority of the teachers is reckoned division\n\nwise. Now all the teachers have been allotted the division(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(10 of 14)             [CW-5753/2020]\n\n\naccording to their merit cum preference. When it comes to\n\nposting, it has to be noted that they are subject to intra division\n\ntransfers, hence, posting at a particular place cannot be claimed\n\nas a matter of right. Posting is only a matter of convenience,\n\nwhich can be addressed/redressed at a later point of time.35.     Hence, considering the submission of the State, as noticed in\n\npara No. 21 above and in view of the common consensus and\n\nalternative oral submission of all the learned counsel for the\n\nrespective petitioners, this Court deems it appropriate and in the\n\ninterest of all the concerned, particularly the candidates (who are\n\nnot before this Court) to dispose of all the writ petitions with\n\nfollowing directions:-(i) The State shall publish latest subject-wise and category-wise vacant position of each division on its website, within a\n\nperiod of 15 days from today.(ii) All the petitioners herein may submit representations to\n\nthe Director, giving choice(s) qua the vacant positions [out of their\n\ndivision(s)], so published by the State. Representation(s) be\n\nfurnished within a period of four weeks from publication of such\n\nlist.(iii) The petitioners shall also be permitted to request for\n\nmutual transfer within their division.(iv)   The Director/Joint Director shall decide petitioners'\n\nrepresentations within a period of four weeks thereafter, while\n\ntrying to accommodate the petitioners in accordance with the\n\npreference given by them, of course, if the relevant law/guidelines\n\nso permit.(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(11 of 14)             [CW-5753/2020](v) In case, petitioners' representations are rejected, the\n\nrespondents shall pass a reasoned order under intimation to the\n\nconcerned.(vi) The petitioners will be free to take up their remedies\n\nagainst such orders, in accordance with law.36.   Interim orders, if any, shall continue till 30.11.2020.37.   All the interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.(DINESH MEHTA),J\n 111to186-A.Arora/-(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(12 of 14)                    [CW-5753/2020]\n\n\n\n                                                                        SCHEDULE\n\nS.No.   Civil Writ Petition No.                Petitioner(s)            Respondents\n\n   1.   SB Civil Writ Petition No.5842/2020    Pappu Ram Kumar          State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n\n   2.   SB Civil Writ Petition No.5852/2020    Rajaram                  State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   3.   SB Civil Writ Petition No.5861/2020    Satyawati Saran          State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   4.   SB Civil Writ Petition No.5866/2020    Laxman Singh             State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   5.   SB Civil Writ Petition No.5878/2020    Suresh                   State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   6.   SB Civil Writ Petition No.5883/2020    Bheru Lal Pareek         State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   7.   SB Civil Writ Petition No.5889/2020    Bhanver Lal Yogi         State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   8.   SB Civil Writ Petition No.5918/2020    Surendra Kumar           State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   9.   SB Civil Writ Petition No.5919/2020    Poonam Bansal            State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   10. SB Civil Writ Petition No.5921/2020     Naresh Bai Meena         State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   11. SB Civil Writ Petition No.5923/2020     Ram Niwas                State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   12. SB Civil Writ Petition No.5925/2020     Lala Ram                 State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   13. SB Civil Writ Petition No.5935/2020     Saroj Kaswan             State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   14. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6050/2020     Shilochana Jakhar        State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   15. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6085/2020     Ramchandra Bishnoi       State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   16. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6086/2020     Krishan Kant Meena       State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   17. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6097/2020     Neha Sharma              State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   18. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6105/2020     Sarla Kumari             State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   19. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6107/2020     Santra Sain              State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   20. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6108/2020     Susheela Chhagan         State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   21. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6116/2020     Ephat Janhan             State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   22. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6118/2020     Laxman Swami             State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   23. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6135/2020     Om Siyag                 State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   24. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6137/2020     Sonu Anand               State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   25. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6153/2020     Nirmala Kaswan           State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   26. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6156/2020     Mukesh Kumar             State of Raj. &\n                                               Kumawat                  Ors.\n   27. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6157/2020     Rajendra Prasad          State of Raj. &\n                                               Verma                    Ors.\n   28. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6159/2020     Om Prakash Saini         State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.\n   29. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6169/2020     Bhagwati Kumari          State of Raj. &\n                                                                        Ors.(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(13 of 14)                    [CW-5753/2020]\n\n30. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6171/2020   Pooja Dhindharia        State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n31. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6173/2020   Pradeep Kumar           State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n32. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6175/2020   Smt. Sunita             State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n33. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6218/2020   Santosh Locchab         State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n34. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6221/2020   Murli Dhar Swami        State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n35. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6255/2020   Manohari                State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n36. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6278/2020   Sumer Ram               State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n37. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6343/2020   Om Prakash              State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n38. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6353/2020   Prahalad Kumawat        State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n39. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6355/2020   Mukesh                  State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n40. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6361/2020   Ajay Kumar              State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n41. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6363/2020   Geeta Rani              State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n42. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6364/2020   Ram Swaroom             State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n43. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6374/2020   Bhanwar Lal Gurjar      State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n44. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6380/2020   Bhanwar Lal             State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n45. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6395/2020   Reena Kumari            State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n46. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6400/2020   Anju Kumari             State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n47. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6405/2020   Shyam Sunder Jatav      State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n48. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6410/2020   Sandeep Kaur            State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n49. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6414/2020   Prashila                State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n50. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6415/2020   Vishnu Kumar            State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n51. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6417/2020   Kiran Singaria          State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n52. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6418/2020   Jagdish Prasad          State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n53. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6419/2020   Lal Chand               State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n54. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6420/2020   Satyaprakash            State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n55. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6424/2020   Hans Raj                State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n56. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6425/2020   Hansraj Verma           State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n57. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6427/2020   Shivraj Barth           State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n58. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6428/2020   Rajendra Kumar          State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n59. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6459/2020   Jitendra Kumar Jatav    State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n60. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6461/2020   Nisha                   State of Raj. &\n                                                                  Ors.\n61. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6463/2020   Sunil Kumar             State of Raj. &(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)(14 of 14)                    [CW-5753/2020]\n\n                                                                                                     Ors.62. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6473/2020   Antima Kumari Meena State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                 Ors.63. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6513/2020   Krishna Prajapat        State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                     Ors.64. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6537/2020   Dilip Kumar             State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                     Ors.65. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6576/2020   Rajender Kumar          State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                     Ors.66. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6604/2020   Kaushaliya              State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                     Ors.67. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6605/2020   Ashok Kumar             State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                     Ors.68. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6617/2020   Giriraj Bairwa          State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                     Ors.69. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6628/2020   Ram Phal                State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                     Ors.70. SB Civil Writ Petition No.6727/2020   Pramila Kaswan          State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                     Ors.71. SB Civil Writ Petition No.7091/2020   Dau Ram                 State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                     Ors.72. SB Civil Writ Petition No.7130/2020   Himani Dangi            State of Raj. &\n                                                                                                     Ors.(Downloaded on 15/09/2020 at 08:52:44 PM)Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)