Central Information CommissionMr.Sanjeev Kumar vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 May, 2011CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                         Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market,
                           Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067.
                                   Tel: +91-11-26161796

                                                           Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/000727/12494
                                                                   Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/000727

Appellant                                   :      Mr. Sanjeev Kumar
                                                   A -201, Rajasthan Appartment
                                                   Plot No. 36, Sector - 4 Dwarka,
                                                   Delhi

Respondent                                  :      Dr. B. M. MishraPIO & SDM(Narela)
                                                   Revenue Department, GNCTD
                                                   O/o the SDM Narela
                                                   MPCC Building, Nayabass,
                                                   Narela, Delhi

RTI application filed on                    :      03/09/2010
PIO replied                                 :      05/10/2010
First Appeal filed on                       :      03/11/2010
FAA's Order                                 :      29/11/2010
Second Appeal filed on                      :      27/02/2011
Hearing Notice Issued on                    :      25/04/2011
Date of Hearing                             :      24/05/2011

Information Sought:-The appellant wants the information about the following:-1) During consolidation proceedings of Village Pooth Khurd, please intimate me from which date and
under which section/clause of East Punjab Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1948 etc, the allotment of
residential plots started. Please give me clear point wise reply.2) During consolidation proceedings of Village Pooth Khurd, please intimate me from which date and
under which section/clause of East Punjab Consolidation Act, 1948 etc, the allotment of industrial plots
started. Please give me clear point wise reply.3) I sold my agricultural land 1/3 share of Khasra Nos. 111/5/2 (0-13), 18/2 (2-08), 23 (4-08) (Copy
enclosed) to a Private Limited Company on 24/2/1999, who is not related to the village. Please intimate
me as to whether a plot could be allotted to aforesaid company during process of consolidation of village
Pooth Khurd. If yes, please provide me the certified copy of same policy, scheme, Act or clause etc...Reply from the PIO:-The appellant was provided with the following replies:-In view to 1) - The allotment of Residential plot of village Pooth Khurd was started from 18/3/99 to
5/5/99 under section 21(1) of the East Punjab Consolidation of Holding Act, 1948.
In view to 2) - Same as above.In view to 3) - The allotment made to the applicant during the repartitionu/s 21(1)of the East Punjab
Holdings Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act 1948 by the then Consolidation Officer as
per Scheme of village Pooth Khurd. The copy of the scheme of the village can be obtained after
depositing of required fee as prescribed inRTI Act, 2005.Grounds for First Appeal:Information provided is misleading, concealment of facts and evasive which required investigations.
 FAA's Order:-On perusal of the records , it is found that the PIO/SDM(NL) has furnished the requisite information to
the appellant.Appeal is disposed off. Ordered accordingly. All concerned may be informed. If the appellant is not
satisfied with this order, he may file 2nd Appeal in CIC.Grounds for Second Appeal:The information provided by the PIO is incomplete and evasive.Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:The following were present
Appellant: Absent;Respondent: Mr. Puran Singh, Superintendent on behalf of Dr. B. M. Mishra, PIO & SDM(Narela);The respondent shows that the information has been provided as per available records. The
Appellant is alleging that there are certain irregularities in the department. For this he should take up the
matter at an appropriate forum.Decision:The appeal is disposed.The information available on the records appears to have been provided.
This decision is announced in open chamber.Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as perSection 7(6)of RTI Act.Shailesh Gandhi
                                                                                              Information Commissioner
                                                                                                           24 May 2011
(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (HA)