 bill no 55 of  2020 the medical termination of pregnancy (amendment) bill, 2020 a billfurther to amend the medical termination of pregnancy act, 1971be it enacted by parliament in the seventy-first year of the republic of india as follows:—short title and commencement1 (1) this act may be called the medical termination of pregnancy (amendment)act,  20205(2) it shall come into force on such date as the central government may, by notificationin the official gazette, appointamendment of section 234 of 19712   in the medical termination of pregnancy act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the principal  act), in section 2,—(i) after clause (a), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:—10'(aa) "medical board" means the medical board constituted undersub-section (2c) of section 3 of the act;';(ii) after clause (d), the following clause shall be inserted, namely:—'(e) "termination of pregnancy" means a procedure to terminate a pregnancy by using medical or surgical methods'3  in section 3 of the principal act, for sub-section (2), the following sub-sections shall be substituted, namely:—amendment of section 35"(2) subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,—(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twenty weeks, if such medical practitioner is, or10(b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twenty weeks but does not exceed twenty-four weeks in case of such category of woman as may be prescribed by rules made under this act, if not less than two registered medical practitioners are, of the opinion, formed in good faith, that—15(i)  the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or mental health; or(ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer from any serious physical or mental abnormality20explanation 1—for the purposes of clause (a), where any pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any woman or her partner for the purpose of limiting the number of children or preventing pregnancy, the anguish caused by such pregnancy may be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman25explanation 2—for the purposes of clauses (a) and (b), where any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by the pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman30(2a) the norms for the registered medical practitioner whose opinion is required for termination of pregnancy at different gestational age shall be such as may be prescribed by rules made under this act(2b) the provisions of sub-section (2) relating to the length of the pregnancy shall not apply to the termination of pregnancy by the medical practitioner where such termination is necessitated by the diagnosis of any of the substantial foetal abnormalities diagnosed by a medical board35(2c) every state government or union territory, as the case may be, shall, by notification in the official gazette, constitute a board to be called a medical board for the purposes of this act to exercise such powers and functions as may be prescribed by rules made under this act(2d) the medical board shall consist of the following, namely:—40(a) a gynaecologist; (b) a paediatrician; (c) a radiologist or sonologist; and (d) such other number of members as may be notified in the official gazette by the state government or union territory, as the case may be"4 after section 5 of the principal act, the following section shall be inserted, namely:—insertion of new section 5a protection of privacy of a woman5"5a (1) no registered medical practitioner shall reveal the name and other particulars of a woman whose pregnancy has been terminated under this act except to a person authorised by any law for the time being in force(2) whoever contravenes the provisions of sub-section (1) shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both"amendment of section 65 in section 6 of the principal act, in sub-section (2), after clause (a), the following clauses shall be inserted, namely:—10"(aa) the category of woman under clause (b) of sub-section (2) ofsection 3;(ab) the norms for the registered medical practitioner whose opinion is required for termination of pregnancy at different gestational age under sub-section (2a) of section 3;15(ac) the powers and functions of the medical board undersub-section (2c) of section 3" statement of objects and reasonsthe medical termination of  pregnancy act, 1971 (34 of 1971) was enacted to provide for the termination of certain pregnancies by registered medical practitioners and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto the said act recognised the importance of safe, affordable, accessible abortion services to women who need to terminate pregnancy under certain specified conditions2 with the passage of time and advancement of medical technology for safe abortion, there is a scope for increasing upper gestational limit for terminating pregnancies especially for vulnerable women and for pregnancies with substantial foetal anomalies detected late in pregnancy further, there is also a need for increasing access of women to legal and safe abortion service in order to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity caused by unsafe abortion and its complications considering the need and demand for increased gestational limit under certain specified conditions and to ensure safety and well-being of women, it is proposed to amend the said act besides this, several writ petitions have been filed before the supreme court and various high courts seeking permission for aborting pregnancies at gestational age beyond the present permissible limit on the grounds of foetal abnormalities or pregnancies due to sexual violence faced by women3 accordingly, the medical termination of pregnancy (amendment) bill, 2020, inter alia, provides for,—(a) requirement of opinion of one registered medical practitioner for termination of pregnancy up to twenty weeks of gestation;(b) requirement of opinion of two registered medical practitioners for termination of pregnancy of twenty to twenty-four weeks of gestation;(c) enhancing the upper gestation limit from twenty to twenty-four weeks for such category of woman as may be prescribed by rules in this behalf;(d) non applicability of the provisions relating to the length of pregnancy in cases where the termination of pregnancy is necessitated by the diagnosis of any of the substantial foetal abnormalities diagnosed by a medical board;(e) protection of privacy of a woman whose pregnancy has been terminated 4 the proposed bill is a step towards safety and well-being of women and will enlarge the ambit and access of women to safe and legal abortion without compromising on safety and quality of care the proposal will also ensure dignity, autonomy, confidentiality and justice for women who need to terminate pregnancy5 the bill seeks to achieve the above objectsnew delhi;dr harsh vardhanthe 14th  february, 2020 annexure extract from the medical termination of pregnancy act, 1971 (34 of 1971)    3 (1)    (2) subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,—when pregnancies may be terminated by registered medical practitioners(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twelve weeks, if such medical practitioner is, or(b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twelve weeks but does not exceed  twenty  weeks,  if  not  less  than  two  registered  medical  practitioners  are, of opinion, formed in good faith, that—(i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or mental health; or(ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicappedexplanation i—where any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by such pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant womanexplanation ii—where any pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any married woman or her husband for the purpose of limiting the number of children, the anguish caused by such unwanted pregnancy may be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman    ———— a billfurther to amend the medical termination of pregnancy act, 1971————(dr harsh vardhan, minister of health and family welfare)mgipmrnd—5427ls(s3)—25-02-2020