 bill no  25 of  2007 the constitution (scheduled castes) order (amendment) bill, 2007 by prof mahadeorao shiwankar, mp a billfurther to amend the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950be it enacted by parliament in the fifty-eighth year of the republic of india as follows:—short title1  this act may be called the constitution (scheduled castes) order (amendment)act, 2007co 1952 in the schedule to the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950, in part x—maharashtra,—amendment of the schedule(i) for entry 8, the following entry shall be substituted, namely:—"8 basor, burud, bansor, bansodi, basod, vihchar, injwar, dhoba, dhobi, mang"; and(ii) for entry 11, the following entry shall be substituted, namely:—10"11 bhambi, bhambhi, asadaru, asodi, chamadia, chamar, chamari, chambhar, chamgar, haralayya, harali, khalpa, machigar, mochigar, madar, madig, mochi, telegu mochi, kamati mochi, ranigar, rohidas, nona, ramnami, rohit, samgar, samagara, satnami, surjyabanshi, surjyaramnami, charmakar, pardeshi chamar, holi"15 statement  of  objects  and  reasonsin pursuance of article 341 of the constitution, the list of scheduled castes was first notified in 1950 and this list was modified from time to time however, there are certain castes in various states which have found no place in the scheduled castes order, 1950  a  number of requests have been made by several state governments to amend the (scheduled castes) order, 1950 in order to include new and synonymous communities in the list of scheduled castes in order to extend the benefits of reservation to the persons belonging to these castes in some cases, people belonging to the same caste are known by different or synonymous names of their caste in different areas of the same state but all these names are not mentioned in the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 the persons belonging to the same caste are denied benefits of reservations and other facilities because of different nomenclature of their caste moreover, there are certain new castes which are required to be included in the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 in view of their social, educational and economic backwardness this anomaly requires to be rectified by amending the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 in relation to the state of maharashtrathe bill seeks to achieve the above objectsnew delhi;mahadeorao shiwankarnovember 13, 2006 financial  memorandumthe bill seeks to include new castes based on social, educational and economic backwardness, synonymous communities in respect of a caste and modifications in the existing entries relating to certain communities in the list of scheduled castes for the state of maharashtra the bill, if enacted, would involve additional recurring and non-recurring expenditure on account of benefits to be provided to the persons belonging to the communities to be included under continuing schemes meant for development of the scheduled castes from the consolidated fund of india  at this stage, it is not possible to give the exact amount to be incurred on this account however, it is estimated that a sum of approximately rupees one hundred crore is likely to be involved as a recurring expenditure per annuma non-recurring expenditure of about rupees fifty crore is also  likely to be involvedannexureextract from the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950co 19     (part iii—rules and orders under the constitution)     part  x—maharashtra     8 basor, burud, bansor, bansodi      11 bhambi, bhambhi, asadaru, asodi, chamadia, chamar, chamari, chambhar, chamgar, haralayya, harali, khalpa, machigar, mochigar, madar, madig, mochi, telegu mochi, kamati mochi, ranigar, rohidas, nona, ramnami, rohit, samgar, samagara, satnami, surjyabanshi, surjyaramnami      lok  sabha————— a billfurther to amend the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950—————(prof mahadeorao shiwankar, mp)mgipmrnd—264ls(s-3)—23022007