cs en en en en en en en hu es en en en es en en en fr cs en en cs en fi en en en es en en en en en cs es en es en en en cs es en en en en en fr cs en fr sv fr en de fr de en en en en en fi sk en en en en en fr en en
České tištěné Bible 1488-1715 v kontextu domácí knižní kultury - Česká literatura (Czech Literature) - Volume 61, Issue 4 (2013) - CEJSH - Yadda
Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
BibTeX PN-ISO 690:2012 Chicago Chicago (Author-Date) Harvard ACS ACS (no art. title) IEEE
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
2013 | 61 | 4 | 477-501
České tištěné Bible 1488-1715 v kontextu domácí knižní kultury
Czech printed Bibles 1488-1715 in the context of domestic book culture
a2_4) Pro budoucí vývoj knižní kultury měla Bible benátská 1506 a dvě Severinovy bible 1529 a 1537 větší váhu než takzvané melantrišky, které jsou jen drobně inovovanými edičními kopiemi zejména druhého Severinova vydání 1537. 5) Typografická stránka bratrských edicí není původní, ale těží ze švýcarského vlivu. Životná a silně inspirační role kralických vydání spočívá v rovině exegetické, překladatelské a jazykové, nikoli však v přínosu písmařském a graficko dekoračním. Tyto roviny ve své době českou knižní kulturu neovlivnily a byly reflektovány a osvětově využity až mnohem později. 6) Na otázku, zda prvotiskové a předbělohorské edice biblí ovlivnily tuzemskou knižní kulturu, nelze odpovědět přímo negativně, ale spíše s notnou dávkou skepse. Ve srovnání s běžnou knižní produkcí však jejich povětšinou nadstandardní grafická úroveň k návyku tiché každodenní četby přispěla jistě významně.
b1_The present paper aims to linguistically assess Czech bibles published between 1488 and 1715. However, the bibles within this period are not examined so much from a theological, translational or linguistic standpoint as from that of book culture. Through research into printing type, decoration, illustrations and also to some extent publishers' and individual bindings, we shall attempt by means of comparisons with foreign bibles to answer the question whether publishing initiatives of this type contributed to the cultivation of the community of readers and the book printing craft. Apart from several popularizing works over the last few decades, nobody has yet dealt with this topic in its entirety. As our exploratory "Spravedlnost pro Severinovy bible" [Justice for the Severin Bibles] (Knihy a dějiny 2012, pp. 70-86) initially outlines, materially and comparatistically conceived research may lead to conclusions which in many respects will not fit in with previous research. This is indicated by the following conclusions: 1) THe publications frequency of "Utraquist" versions in this country reflected the limited creative capacity of biblists and the book printing sphere, whereas in the case of Brethren versions in bears withness to a great appreciation for collective intellectual and craftsmanlike work. 2) Publication strategy was responding to the official Czech dual faith (the coexistence of Utraquism and Catholicism) and the existence of the non-conformist Unity of Brethren. Synoptic research indicates that most pre-1620 publishers and printers had to flexibly respect these specific denominational conditions in such a way that the bible as a book product reached the broadest possible reading public. 3) Bible editions almost invariably had no effect on the illustration scene even taking into account the 1570 illustration series.
b2_4) The 1506 Venetian Bible and two Severin Bibles (1529 and 1537) had greated influence on the future development of book culture than the "Melantrichs", which as publication copies are only minor innovations, particularly based on the second Severin of 1537. 5) The typographical aspect of the Brethren editions is not original, but draws on Swiss influence. A strongly inspirational and vital role is played by the Kralice edition at the exegetic, translational and linguistic level, but not with regard to its typographic and graphic decorative contribution. In their time these levels did not influence Czech book culture and were only reflected and used for enlightenment purposes much later. 6) The question whether incunabula and pre-1620 bible editions influenced book culture in this country cannot be answered with a clear negative, but it can be answered with a considerable degree of scepticism. In comparison with ordinary book production, however, their geenrally superior graphic standard clearly facilitated the habit of quiet daily reading to a considerable extent.
Literatura. Literární život   čtenáři   knižní ilustrace   knižní kultura   literární komunikace   tisková písma   utrakvismus   jezuitský řád   knižní dekor   Nový zákon   Starý zákon
librarian readers   illustration of books   books and reading   communication in literature   printing types   Utraquism   Unity of Brethren   Jesuit order   book decoration   literary communication   New Testament   Old Testament   print font   Vulgate
PHILOLOGY_&_LINGUISTICS: PHILOLOGY & LINGUISTICS
Institute of Czech Literature, Czech Academy of Sciences
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
Česká literatura, redakce, Ústav pro českou literaturu AV ČR, v. v. i., Na Florenci 3/1420, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic
Copyright Notice. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this material in part or whole is permitted for non-commercial, educational and scientific uses | System oparty na platformie YADDA yadda-front.vls, ver. 4.4.27, rev. 42758 | © ICM UW 2005-2022
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.