eo en eo eo en en en en en en en en pl en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en eo pl en en eo en en jv en en eo eo de da en da en en cs en en en cs da en da cs en en de da en da cs en en cs cs en en en cs cs da en cs da en en cs cs en en en cs cs da en da cs en en cs da en en en de cs da en da en en en cs da en en en cs cs da en da da en en cs en en cs cs da en da cs en en cs cs en da cs en cs cs cs da en cs cs en eo eo eo it it it en it it pt it it it es it eo eo de pt pl hu it eo de en et it it de de it pt eo en en en it fr it pt en lt fr it hu en en eo de en eo eo it hu it it it eo it es en en es cs pt hbs_lat fr pt hu en en de it it lt de it eo eo eo es it en tl it it en it es en eo pt en en en en pt en en eo eo eo en it eo eo it it pt eo hbs_lat en en en eo en it en en it it it it nl en es en eo fr en sv en en en it en en eo eo pt pt eo pt en en it fr it ceb it it it it eo pl en en lt it fr en eo hu eo it da pl hu io en it it de it it en is it de it it en en hu eo en en pt fr it eo id eo en en en de en ca hu en it it it ro it fr it es pt eo eo eo eo en es pt pt it fr eo it fr it en en eo es fy it it eo it en pt en en fr hu fr la eo eo eo eo es eo id hu it ceb eo es eo it en pt cs pt de cs eo nl en en la pt eo lt fr it it en en en en ro eo eo en en en en en en en it en de eo it hu hu en en it de it it it hu en en hbs_lat eo de hu it hu hu ceb ceb ru de pt en en en eo pt pt it it de fr fr fr pl en eo en de fr nl en en pt eo eo es pl eo eo it hu en es en pl es ceb es it es it pt it eo pt hu es it en es pt eo eo it eo es eo eo eo it tr it it it es nl it en it hu it hu pt pt eo it hu cs ceb sv fr pt fr en en en en en en nl nl hu hu eo hbs_lat cs cs en en eo en fr en cs cs de en en en hu pt pl en nl en de fi it en en en en fr en pt en en cs cs de en hu eo fr pt eo it pt en pl es es en de eo en lt it eo hbs_lat en eo es it hbs_lat hu it en en en it eo hu eo en en hbs_lat it eo pl pt it cs pl eo eo eo es eo en es pt eo cs it ceb pt eo it de de ca ceb hu eo it cs et pt hu en it pt eo id it pt it de de de is it es it eo cs it es en hbs_lat pl nl en eo pl eo it de eo hu la nl es en en fr it fr en pt it en cs pl eo es de en en it pt it eo ceb ceb uz eo en en en fr en it en pl pt en en en hu eo eo en it fr fr it ceb pl eo en sv en fr it es eo eo it en hu hu hu en it it eo eo it pt it it es it en fr hu en en eo eo it eo en it it tr en eo eo en eo it eo eo en it fr pt fr sv en pt en en it pt en it eo es en pt fr eo pt hbs_lat it en hu it es es en es it es de en cs nb en en de it en en eo fi en en eo hu it en fr sv cs en en en en fr en eo it eo eo eo it eo eo it hbs_lat eo it it es eo en en en it tr eo it en pl de en es pt eo en en sk hbs_lat en pt de fr it it en it eo it es en en en en it fr en en pt eo en pt de it fr eo pt ceb en es eo eo sv eo eo it it fr eo en sv hu hu pl es de it it en it eo eo pt en fr de eo eo it eo eo it it pt pt eo fr cs pt es eo it eo it it en eo pl it it it en it cs en en sv fr en it it en it it hbs_lat vi war it it pt tr pt eo it it en en fr en en it it fr hbs_lat it pt pt es it eo it en es id en hbs_lat it it en it cs it en eo pl eo eo eo es fr en en pl eo pl eo it en en en eo pt pt hu pt it it en en it ceb eo en eo cs nl de en en en en en en en en en it en en en gl en en pl de de ca pt es pl eo hu it eo eo en es en eo eo es eo eo eo nb eo eo ceb es de en eo en es en eo eo en eo it eo eo eo eo eo es eo fr it eo ro eo vo pl ro eo eo eo eo eo en eo en en lt sv eo eo eo eo eo eo tr eo eo eo en en en en en en en en
skip to main | skip to sidebar
Esperanto-blogo, kelkfoje blago, de Ralph Dumain
Showing posts with label Ahad Ha-am. Show all posts
Zamenhof & the new Jewish intellectual historiography (2)
The relevant documents by L. L. Zamenhof on Yiddish, Zionism, and the Jewish question are written in Yiddish, Russian, or Esperanto, and while there are Esperanto translations of most or all of the other writings, with the exception of a few letters, excerpts, or quotations everything in English is to be found in the scanty secondary literature in English. To get a picture of what Zamenhof was trying to accomplish, start here:
L.L. Zamenhof and the Shadow People: The Amazing Story of How Esperanto Came to Be by Esther Schor (2009)
Zamenhof and the Shadow People: video of presentation by Esther Schor, Zamenhof Symposium (15 December 2009)
There are revelant documents in Esperanto, Esperanto translation, and Yiddish on my web site:
For Zamenhof's conception of nationality in general, see:
“International Language” (Universal Races Congress, 1911) by L. L. Zamenhof
Now let's pick up where we left off in the previous post, and proceed to this article:
On the Idea of a Jewish Nation: Before and After Statism by David N. Myers, Perush, Volume 1, 2009
Myers find today's discourse about Jewish nationhood impoverished compared to the vigorous debates of a century ago:
I am intrigued by the once-vibrant ideological and theoretical debate of the early twentieth century that revolved around the idea of a Jewish nation. [. . . .] But our main task in the body of the paper will be to begin excavating a history of Jewish nationalism that has been somewhat forgotten, neglected, and at times, marginalized. I argue that there is in fact a common thread linking the theoretical poverty today and the partial narrative of Jewish nationalism that has been received: namely, the rise to dominance of one variant of Jewish nationalist ideology, what I call Statist Zionism.
One must of course determine at the outset what one means by nation. Myers begins with Renan, who centers the idea of nationhood around a spiritual principle. This notion was taken up by Simon Dubnow. Comparable contemporary constructivist notions of nationalism have been articulated by Ernest Gellner, Eric Hobsbawm, and Benedict Anderson. Here is how Myers summarizes the development of Jewish self-conceptions:
European Jews in the mid-nineteenth century, embedded in societies affirming their own sense of national integrity, labored to find the best way to name themselves. They described themselves as a confession of faith, a religious community, a community of fate (Schicksalsgemeinschaft), a tribe (Stamm). Later, toward the end of the century, they began to designate themselves more assertively as a nation. Throughout the early twentieth century, this language of Jewish nationhood was widespread among Jewish intellectuals, writers, and scholars, especially in Europe, though one of the characteristic features of this discursive moment was the considerable divergence over the ways in which the term was understood. Over the course of the latter half of the twentieth century, this mode of Jewish political discourse—marked by the ubiquitous use of the language of “nation,” alongside an obsessive need to name the collective—began to dissipate. Since that time, and up to the present, there has been relatively little meditation about the nature of Jewish collectivity, especially when compared to the golden age of ideological contestation that extended from 1897 to 1939.
Myers goes on to supply an explanation for the dissipation of this ideological contestation, and how it narrowed into the prevailing statism, which he now wishes to contest. But returning to the historical period that interests me:
So rather than begin in 1897 with the first Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland and then look forward to the inevitable creation (predicted by Theodor Herzl) of a Jewish state and again backward to the established “precursors of Zionism” (Alkalay, Kalischer, Hess, etc.) as they are known in Zionist historiography, I propose a somewhat less linear recounting that consists of the following chapters: first, a mid- to late-nineteenth-century phase in which Jews began to debate what to call themselves as a collective; second, a period that I’ll call the “golden age of Jewish nationalism,” commencing indeed in 1897, but highlighting less the historical inevitability of Statism and more the common commitment of Jewish nationalist movements to culture; and third, a phase in which rights of Jews as a national minority became a focus of international attention.
Myers begins with the French revolution and the subsequent re-definition of Jewish identity with respect to Jewish emancipation and loyal citizenship in the countries in which Jews lived. In 1869, Adolf Jellinek introduced a notion we might call ethnicity but which he called Stamm, or tribe, more suited to the conditions of the Austro-Hungarian empire. Then there was the Jewish rebellion against the thrust of a new configuration of anti-Semitism in the 1870s-80s, when the term "anti-Semitism" itself was launched. Into the Berlin Antisemitismusstreit of 1879-1881 comes the 1879 lecture by the German-Jewish philosopher and psychologist Moritz Lazarus, “Was heißt National?” In 1897, Ahad Ha-am, whose focus was cultural renewal, represented a dissenting view from the vision of Theodor Herzl that won the day. The Austro-Marxist (not identified by Myers as such) Social Democrats Otto Bauer and Karl Renner endeavored to disaggregate the notions of nation and state. Note Renner's notion of national cultural autonomy. And note the connection to Bundism:
On this view, it was not the state or territory or even race (in its biological sense) that made a nation, but, in the first instance, culture. Of course, we cannot forget the powerful class dimension in the Bund’s agenda, which added a deterministic quality to its view of Jewish nationalism. But it is the nexus between nation and culture that linked the Bund, in its 1905 platform, to the Folkspartay founded by Simon Dubnow in St. Petersburg a year later. Although the two parties disagreed over the question of socialism, they both agitated for the right of Jews to preside over their own cultural affairs, in their own language, Yiddish. In fact, it was that latter point that prompted the convening of an assembly of intellectuals and writers in Czernowitz a few years later in 1908—one hundred years ago (and now being marked with several centennial conferences). Amidst a typically discordant group of Jews, the conference demanded equal rights for Yiddish, but could not agree on declaring Yiddish “the national language of the Jewish people.” Instead, it opted for the formulation “a national language,” in recognition of the potent claims that Hebrew too deserved recognition as such.
One should compare this to Zamenhof's notion that a people is defined by language and religion.
Myers continues discussing Bundism (a phenomenon that merits sustained study), and summarizes:
. . .  there was a consequential debate among a growing and influential group of European Jews regarding the essence, preferred form, and desired venue of the Jewish nation in the first two decades of the twentieth century. It was not only Zionists, Autonomists, and Bundists, but also Territorialists of Israel Zangwill’s ilk and even the Agude, the Orthodox Agudat Yisrael, which arose formally in 1912 as a pan-national traditionalist alternative to secular nationalism.
This is the debate that was cast down the memory hole by victorious statism. But continuing on, World War I and the subsequent reterritorialization spurred a new round of debate. Not mentioned by Myers: Zamenhof circulated his proposal to the world's diplomats on the post-war political order in 1915 and died in 1917, so he wasn't a party to the debates of 1919 and the 1919 peace conference where national minority rights were on the table.
There is some debate on the ideological terrain in the interwar period, including the question of the definitive triumph of statism.  But if not earlier, the Extraordinary Zionist Conference at the Biltmore Hotel in 1942 sealed the deal. (Note that Hitler's Final Solution, formulated in 1941, was in macabre full throttle by 1942.)
Thus Myers seeks to resuscitate this complex ideological history drowned in the historical narrative instituted by victorious statism. And it is this history, apart from Myers and co.'s presentist political concerns, that is vital to understand, in general and in relationship to Zamenhof's lifelong struggle with the Jewish question. While Zamenhof is discussed in the context of Jewish intellectual historiography, I have not yet ascertained whether this recent turn in the historiography of Jewish nationalism has visibly incorporated Zamenhof into its narrative, and, lacking the recent scholarly books written on Zamenhof in Esperanto, German, and possibly other languages that slip my mind (but not English), I do not know how thoroughly this vein of scholarship has penetrated Zamenhofology. The interpenetration of these two foci of scholarship has got to be made to happen, above all in the English-speaking world.
Verkis Ralph Dumain je 11:30 AM 0 komentoj
Rubrikoj: Adolf Jellinek, Ahad Ha-am, cionismo, David N. Myers, Esther Schor, etnismo, historio, Israel Zangwill, judoj, marksismo, Moritz Lazarus, naciismo, Noam Pianko, Simon Dubnow, Zamenhof
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Pri Mi / About Me
View my complete profile
Feathers / Plumoj & Esperanto (7)
Feathers / Plumoj & Esperanto (6)
Serĉu ĉi-bloge / Search This Blog
A. K. Tolstoj (1)
A. N. Tolstoj (1)
A. Z. Foreman (8)
Aldo de’ Giorgi (2)
Alfred Hermann Fried (1)
Arthur Dawson Foote (2)
Benjamin Lee Whorf (1)
Carl Van Vechten (1)
Carlos A. Castrillón (1)
Charles F. Hockett (1)
Chloe Yelena Miller (1)
D. H. Lawrence (1)
David J. Peterson (1)
David K. Jordan (1)
David N. Myers (2)
Donald E. Morse (1)
E. James Lieberman (1)
Edgar Allan Poe (2)
Eduardo Rózsa Flores (1)
Edward Page Mitchell (1)
Edwin de Kock (4)
Enrique Gaspar y Rimbau (2)
Ezra Clark Stillman (1)
Fernando de Diego (1)
Forrest J. Ackerman (3)
G. M. Tamás (1)
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing (1)
H. G. Wells (9)
H. P. Lovecraft (1)
Imre Baranyai (Emba) (6)
Independent Labour Party (2)
Insulo de la Rozoj (1)
Ivy Kellerman Reed (1)
J. D. Bernal (1)
J. R. R. Tolkien (4)
Jacques Le Puil (1)
James Branch Cabell (1)
Jan Amos Komensky (3)
Jewish Daily Forward (2)
Joel Augustus Rogers (3)
Johan Hammond Rosbach (1)
John I. Francis (11)
Jorge Luis Borges (34)
José Antonio Vergara (1)
Juan Régulo Pérez (1)
K. R. C. Sturmer (8)
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. (3)
L. N. Newell (2)
Ladislav Podmele / Jiří Karen (4)
Lester del Ray (1)
Lev S. Vygotsky (1)
Library of Congress (1)
Lodewijk Cornelius Deij (4)
Louis de Beaufront (1)
Ludovic Rodo Pissarro (2)
Luis Jorge Santos Morales (1)
Martin Luther King (2)
Melvin B. Tolson (1)
Michael G. Smith (1)
Miguel A. Caycedo (1)
Parley Parker Christensen (1)
Paul D. Brazill (1)
Paulo Silas R. Sena (2)
Percy Bysshe Shelley (1)
Philip José Antonio Vergara (1)
Philip José Farmer (1)
Rainer Maria Rilke (1)
Rejna de Jong (1)
Roberto Passos Nogueira (6)
Rodrigo Alberto Ramirez (1)
Ronald J. Glossop (1)
Samuel R. Delany (2)
Sander L. Gilman (1)
T. S. Eliot (1)
The Daily Show (1)
Theodor W. Adorno (10)
Universal Races Congress (10)
Universala Esperanto Asocio (3)
W. A. Verloren van Themaat (1)
W. E. B. Du Bois (4)
William James Sidis (1)
William Sanders Scarborough (2)
William Thomas Stead (1)
Zamenhof Symposium 2009 (1)
Zamenhof Symposium 2010 (19)
Ligoj al miaj projektoj
Esperanto Study Guide / Esperanto-Gvidilo
Esperanto & Laborista Movado / Esperanto & the Labor Movement
Heinrich Heine en Esperanto
Philosophical & Universal Languages, 1600-1800: Bibliography
William Blake en Esperanto
Ateismo / Ateista Tutmonda Esperanto-Organizo
Marxists Internet Archive: Esperanto-sekcio
La Blogo de Tonyo
Gazetoj / Revuoj / Bultenoj
Kajeroj el la Sudo (HALE)
La Ondo de Esperanto
Le Monde diplomatique en Esperanto - la "Diplo"
Ligoj al aliaj retejoj
Elektronika Bibliografio de Esperanto-Artikoloj (EBEA)
Esperanta Literaturo (indekso--Don Harlow)
Esperanta literaturo en la reto (serĉilo)
Esperanto League for North America
Katalogo de artikoloj en E-periodaĵoj
Literaturo en Esperanto (Don Harlow)
Project Gutenberg - Esperanto
Serĉilo de pluraj librokatalogoj
TROVANTO (Aŭstria Nacia Biblioteko)