eo en eo eo en en en en en en en en en en en en el en en en en en el en en en en en en en el en eo nl eo en en en en eo en en jv cs en de da en da en en cs en en en cs da en da cs en en de da en da cs en en cs cs en en en cs cs da en cs da en en cs cs en en en cs cs da en da cs en en cs da en en en de cs da en da en en en cs da en en en fr en it en en es es eo en en en en en en eo en en en eo da en da da en en cs en en cs cs da en da cs en en cs cs en da cs en cs cs cs da en cs cs en eo eo eo it it it en it it pt it it it es it eo eo de pt pl hu it eo de en et it it de de it pt eo en en en it fr it pt en lt fr it hu en en eo de en eo eo it hu it it it eo it es en en es cs pt hbs_lat fr pt hu en en de it it lt de it eo eo eo es it en tl it it en it es en eo pt en en en en pt en en eo eo eo en it eo eo it it pt eo hbs_lat en en en eo en it en en it it it it nl en es en eo fr en sv en en en it en en eo eo pt pt eo pt en en it fr it ceb it it it it eo pl en en lt it fr en eo hu eo it da pl hu io en it it de it it en is it de it it en en hu eo en en pt fr it eo id eo en en en de en ca hu en it it it ro it fr it es pt eo eo eo eo en es pt pt it fr eo it fr it en en eo es fy it it eo it en pt en en fr hu fr la eo eo eo eo es eo id hu it ceb eo es eo it en pt cs pt de cs eo nl en en la pt eo lt fr it it en en en en ro eo eo en en en en en en en it en de eo it hu hu en en it de it it it hu en en hbs_lat eo de hu it hu hu ceb ceb ru de pt en en en eo pt pt it it de fr fr fr pl en eo en de fr nl en en pt eo eo es pl eo eo it hu en es en pl es ceb es it es it pt it eo pt hu es it en es pt eo eo it eo es eo eo eo it tr it it it es nl it en it hu it hu pt pt eo it hu cs ceb sv fr pt fr en en en en en en nl nl hu hu eo hbs_lat cs cs en en eo en fr en cs cs de en en en hu pt pl en nl en de fi it en en en en fr en pt en en cs cs de en hu eo fr pt eo it pt en pl es es en de eo en lt it eo hbs_lat en eo es it hbs_lat hu it en en en it eo hu eo en en hbs_lat it eo pl pt it cs pl eo eo eo es eo en es pt eo cs it ceb pt eo it de de ca ceb hu eo it cs et pt hu en it pt eo id it pt it de de de is it es it eo cs it es en hbs_lat pl nl en eo pl eo it de eo hu la nl es en en fr it fr en pt it en cs pl eo es de en en it pt it eo ceb ceb uz eo en en en fr en it en pl pt en en en hu eo eo en it fr fr it ceb pl eo en sv en fr it es eo eo it en hu hu hu en it it eo eo it pt it it es it en fr hu en en eo eo it eo en it it tr en eo eo en eo it eo eo en it fr pt fr sv en pt en en it pt en it eo es en pt fr eo pt hbs_lat it en hu it es es en es it es de en cs nb en en de it en en eo fi en en eo hu it en fr sv cs en en en en fr en eo it eo eo eo it eo eo it hbs_lat eo it it es eo en en en it tr eo it en pl de en es pt eo en en sk hbs_lat en pt de fr it it en it eo it es en en en en it fr en en pt eo en pt de it fr eo pt ceb en es eo eo sv eo eo it it fr eo en sv hu hu pl es de it it en it eo eo pt en fr de eo eo it eo eo it it pt pt eo fr cs pt es eo it eo it it en eo pl it it it en it cs en en sv fr en it it en it it hbs_lat vi war it it pt tr pt eo it it en en fr en en it it fr hbs_lat it pt pt es it eo it en es id en hbs_lat it it en it cs it en eo pl eo eo eo es fr en en pl eo pl eo it en en en eo pt pt hu pt it it en en it ceb eo en eo cs nl de en en en en en en en en en it en en en gl en en pl de de ca pt es pl eo hu it eo eo en es en eo eo es eo eo eo nb eo eo ceb es de en eo en es en eo eo en eo it eo eo eo eo eo es eo fr it eo ro eo vo pl ro eo eo eo eo eo en eo en en lt sv eo eo eo eo eo eo tr eo eo eo en en en en en en en en
Ĝirafo: Universal Races Congress of 1911 & L. L. Zamenhof
skip to main | skip to sidebar
Esperanto-blogo, kelkfoje blago, de Ralph Dumain
Decades ago I read the conference proceedings in hard copy, but now they are online, and hopefully complete:
Papers on Inter-Racial Problems, Communicated to the First Universal Races Congress, Held at the University of London, July 26-29, 1911; edited by Gustav Spiller. London: P. S. King & Son; Boston: The World’s Peace Foundation, 1911. xlvi, 485 pp.
Included in these papers is the English text of Zamenhof's contribution, which was originally submitted in Esperanto and in French. Sometime in the 1970s I read the entire proceedings cover to cover, and there were few contributions that impressed me, foremost among them an essay by W.E.B. Du Bois on the racial situation in the USA. But perhaps now I would be more historically perceptive.
I decided to look this up, as earlier today I read the Esperanto version in Zamenhof's Originala Verkaro (1929, pp. 345-353). This time I paid reasonably close attention to Zamenhof's reasoning, which while flawed, is interesting, esp. in juxtaposition with his writings elsewhere on the Jewish question. Oddly, Zamenhof is well aware of existing social conditions (though teeth-grindingly ill-informed about Africa) and is unsparing in demystifying the entirely bogus basis on which racial and ethnic discrimination is based, and yet remains—so it seems—obtuse to certain aspects of the driving forces which maintain them. The climax of Zamenhof's argument—the key to its fundamental structure—can be found in this paragraph:
All that I have said justifies us in formulating this principle: The diversity of peoples and the hatred of each other which they betray will not wholly disappear from the face of the earth until humanity has but one language and one religion. Then in truth will the whole of humanity form one single people. Then there may, indeed, still be the various kinds of discord which are now found within the confines of every country and every people, such as political and economic discords, or those of conflicting parties or classes, and so on, but the most formidable of all discords, the mutual hatred of peoples, will have entirely disappeared.
This follows upon the logic of Zamenhof's argument wherein he purports to explain the governing factors behind interethnic & interracial enmity, discounting most of the usual justifications. It is a curious argument, with a number of suppressed premises. Here is one revealing passage:
Can we say, for instance, that so many millions of poor Russians hate the millions of poor Chinese on economic grounds, when they shed their blood so willingly to defend their Russian oppressors against the attacks of foreigners? Assuredly not, for the Russian soldier knows very well, when he kills a Chinese soldier, that the man would never do him as much harm as the "mailed fist" of his own compatriots. It is not economic causes that give rise to national hatreds.
I do not know how keen a sense of irony Zamenhof possessed. When you read this paragraph with care, and in context, you may find it as amazing as I do, for what Zamenhof doesn't say as for what he does. He never follows up on this scenario, never answers the question: if poor Russian cannon fodder know full well their Russian oppressors are far more harmful to them to Chinese peasants they are willing to slaughter with gusto, and if underlying motivations for this situation are not economic, then what are they? Zamenhof's argument is that only language and religion ultimately keep people apart. (Note also that Zamenhof also interjects the Jewish question, which is the key to everything he wrote, into his exposition.) This is truly an amazing line of argument, because while it doesn't hold up to scrutiny, it constitutes a backhanded slap in the face to the actual sociopolitical conditions that Zamenhof seeks to combat, combining both political awareness and political self-censorship in a single line of reasoning.
Two decades later, Zamenhof's daughter Lidia would pursue a comparable agenda in the USA, promoting both Esperanto and the Baha'i religion (rather than Zamenhof's homaranismo), with the noblest of intentions but with identical social ineffectuality. There is also, I should add, at least an iota of documentation on Lidia's connection with black Bahai's who learned Esperanto in the USA in the 1930s.
It would also be instructive to compare Zamenhof's moral idealism and world view with two other participants in the 1911 Congress: Felix Adler, conference organizer and founder of the Ethical Culture movement, akin to Zamenhof's homaranismo, and Israel Zangwill, originator of the term "melting pot" (which he applied not only to the condition of immigrants in the USA, but ultimately to the whole world), proto-Zionist, and advocate of the Jewish contribution to world civilization in books and numerous essays published in every venue imaginable, including the African-American press, with frequent mentions of Zamenhof and Esperanto.
It is useful to compare this essay to Zamenhof's writings (originally in Russian) on the Jewish question— Hilelismo etc. Zamenhof is quite soberly hard-headed and realistic; he's a debunker and demystifier of then-accepted notions of race, ethnicity, nationality, or what some scholars today call "imagined communities". His remark about powerless poor people killing one another in service to the rich and powerful is an illustration of his realism, and remains, sadly, an entirely contemporary issue. It is curious, though, that he doesn't follow through on the logic of this scenario. He argues that all other social conflicts will remain, but were people to find a common bridge language and bridge religion, at least interethnic hatreds could be eliminated. There are some big "if"s here and dubious "then"s, which reveal the essential limitations of Zamenhof's social perspective. (I would argue the same for Adler and Zangwill.) If I were to recommend explaining how Zamenhof thought while standing on one foot, this is the paragraph I would cite.
There were theoretical interventions on this question in other circles—particularly in the social democratic movement (Marxist) of central Europe, and later in Russia on the part of Stalin. Noteworthy here is the difficulty of defining the cohesive forces binding the Jewish people as compared to any other nationality of central and Eastern Europe. Politically, these issues were parceled out among assimilationists, Zionists, Bundists, Marxist social-democrats, and Bolsheviks. Ultimately, nothing turned out as anyone anticipated in Zamenhof's lifetime. Theoretically, there were individuals in the anti-Stalinist left who attempted to carry on. For example, Abram Leon, a Jewish Trotskyist, wrote a book on the subject circa 1940, and ended up perishing in Auschwitz. In recent decades, there have appeared retrospective works on these developments, pointing up the theoretical inadequacies of previous formulations.
So it is understandable how difficult it was for Zamenhof to struggle with the theoretical as well as the practical question. This applies also to the Esperanto workers' movement, whose anarchist (sennaciista) and Stalinist intellectuals were, as far as I can tell, no more sophisticated than their krokodilaj counterparts.
I can't get into this in my upcoming half-hour talk, but I have to keep it in mind when thinking of how Zamenhof encountered the USA in 1910. The USA presented a whole different scenario from Europe, and as millions of Eastern European Jews voted with their feet, ending up in the USA, there remains something else to be examined—i.e. Zamenhof's interactions with Jewish immigrants and their spawn in the USA.
The American situation of course could not be captured by the European conception of nationality. This applies also to the situation of black Americans. While the concept of "race" has certainly been the dominant organizing principle—conceptually as well as in practice—there have nonetheless been several theories attempting to explain how race works in the USA and elsewhere. A decade ago when I was researching this and assisting someone in a doctoral dissertation on this subject, I could have rattled off most of these theories. My memory is rusty at this point, though.
I'll just note that the Stalinist conception of nationality was imported into the American Communist Party in 1928, leading to some curious results, first in labeling American's apartheid system as a national question, and secondly, in formulating a policy that had no relationship to actual political practice or prospects. When James W. Ford was placed on the ballot as the Communist Vice Presidential candidate in 1932, probably the first such black candidate from any political party in the USA, the party's platform included the creation of a Negro republic in the Southern states with a predominantly black population. There was even a map indicating the relevant territory on campaign posters. It was an avant-garde position for the time and totally divorced from reality as well as from the actual practice of the Communist Party, which consistently fought for integration.
The punchline, though, is that the American configuration of race and ethnicity and the quasi-caste system in place did not mirror the nationality question in central Europe or the Russian empire.
The Jewish question in Europe did not fit comfortably into the European national paradigm either, practically or theoretically. Theory and policy  don't always run parallel, as not every political position elaborates a complementary theory, though implicitly there are differential world views at work. The socialist Bundists for example militantly opposed Zionism but lobbied for cultural (not political) autonomy in Eastern Europe, a notion that was shot down by the Bolsheviks. The Nazis took care of the rest. There is a substantial amount of scholarship on Bundism still going on: see bundism.net.
The ethnicity question viz. the new European immigrants was fought out in the USA a century ago, both by pro-immigrant and anti-immigrant factions among non-immigrants (i.e. WASPs and others of Northwestern European extraction), and by intellectuals among the new immigrant groups, e.g. Israel Zangwill's "melting pot" vs Horace Kallen's conservative ethnopluralism.
The fragments above were written on 4 December 2010. I have digitized the Esperanto version of Zamenhof's contribution:
Gentoj kaj Lingvo Internacia (1911) de L. L. Zamenhof
Verkis Ralph Dumain je 5:59 PM
Rubrikoj: Esperanto-movado, Felix Adler, homaranismo, internaciismo, Israel Zangwill, judoj, kongresoj, kulturpolitiko, Lidia Zamenhof, marksismo, naciismo, rasismo, religio, Universal Races Congress, Zamenhof
Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Pri Mi / About Me
View my complete profile
La Iamo Longe For (Auld Lang Syne in Esperanto)
Zamenhof-Simpozio at UNo, George Soros, & mi (9)
Zamenhof Symposium at UN, George Soros, & me (8)
Zamenhof & the new Jewish intellectual historiogra...
Zamenhof & the new Jewish intellectual historiogra...
Lejb Malaĥ pri Misisipi: de la jida al Esperanto
A Yiddish play you can read in Esperanto but not i...
Zamenhof Symposium at UN, George Soros, & me (7)
Zamenhof Symposium at UN, George Soros, & me (6)
Zamenhof Symposium at UN, George Soros, & me (5)
Zamenhof Symposium at UN, George Soros, & me (4)
Zamenhof Symposium at UN, George Soros, & me (3)
George Soros parolas pri Esperanto en 2008
Zamenhof-Simpozio at UNo, George Soros, & mi (2)
Zamenhof Symposium at UN, George Soros, & me (1)
Universal Races Congress of 1911 & L. L. Zamenhof
Gentoj kaj Lingvo Internacia (1911) de L. L. Zamen...
Serĉu ĉi-bloge / Search This Blog
A. K. Tolstoj (1)
A. N. Tolstoj (1)
A. Z. Foreman (8)
Aldo de’ Giorgi (2)
Alfred Hermann Fried (1)
Arthur Dawson Foote (2)
Benjamin Lee Whorf (1)
Carl Van Vechten (1)
Carlos A. Castrillón (1)
Charles F. Hockett (1)
Chloe Yelena Miller (1)
D. H. Lawrence (1)
David J. Peterson (1)
David K. Jordan (1)
David N. Myers (2)
Donald E. Morse (1)
E. James Lieberman (1)
Edgar Allan Poe (2)
Eduardo Rózsa Flores (1)
Edward Page Mitchell (1)
Edwin de Kock (4)
Enrique Gaspar y Rimbau (2)
Ezra Clark Stillman (1)
Fernando de Diego (1)
Forrest J. Ackerman (3)
G. M. Tamás (1)
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing (1)
H. G. Wells (9)
H. P. Lovecraft (1)
Imre Baranyai (Emba) (6)
Independent Labour Party (2)
Insulo de la Rozoj (1)
Ivy Kellerman Reed (1)
J. D. Bernal (1)
J. R. R. Tolkien (4)
Jacques Le Puil (1)
James Branch Cabell (1)
Jan Amos Komensky (3)
Jewish Daily Forward (2)
Joel Augustus Rogers (3)
Johan Hammond Rosbach (1)
John I. Francis (11)
Jorge Luis Borges (34)
José Antonio Vergara (1)
Juan Régulo Pérez (1)
K. R. C. Sturmer (8)
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. (3)
L. N. Newell (2)
Ladislav Podmele / Jiří Karen (4)
Lester del Ray (1)
Lev S. Vygotsky (1)
Library of Congress (1)
Lodewijk Cornelius Deij (4)
Louis de Beaufront (1)
Ludovic Rodo Pissarro (2)
Luis Jorge Santos Morales (1)
Martin Luther King (2)
Melvin B. Tolson (1)
Michael G. Smith (1)
Miguel A. Caycedo (1)
Parley Parker Christensen (1)
Paul D. Brazill (1)
Paulo Silas R. Sena (2)
Percy Bysshe Shelley (1)
Philip José Antonio Vergara (1)
Philip José Farmer (1)
Rainer Maria Rilke (1)
Rejna de Jong (1)
Roberto Passos Nogueira (6)
Rodrigo Alberto Ramirez (1)
Ronald J. Glossop (1)
Samuel R. Delany (2)
Sander L. Gilman (1)
T. S. Eliot (1)
The Daily Show (1)
Theodor W. Adorno (10)
Universal Races Congress (10)
Universala Esperanto Asocio (3)
W. A. Verloren van Themaat (1)
W. E. B. Du Bois (4)
William James Sidis (1)
William Sanders Scarborough (2)
William Thomas Stead (1)
Zamenhof Symposium 2009 (1)
Zamenhof Symposium 2010 (19)
Ligoj al miaj projektoj
Esperanto Study Guide / Esperanto-Gvidilo
Esperanto & Laborista Movado / Esperanto & the Labor Movement
Heinrich Heine en Esperanto
Philosophical & Universal Languages, 1600-1800: Bibliography
William Blake en Esperanto
Ateismo / Ateista Tutmonda Esperanto-Organizo
Marxists Internet Archive: Esperanto-sekcio
La Blogo de Tonyo
Gazetoj / Revuoj / Bultenoj
Kajeroj el la Sudo (HALE)
La Ondo de Esperanto
Le Monde diplomatique en Esperanto - la "Diplo"
Ligoj al aliaj retejoj
Elektronika Bibliografio de Esperanto-Artikoloj (EBEA)
Esperanta Literaturo (indekso--Don Harlow)
Esperanta literaturo en la reto (serĉilo)
Esperanto League for North America
Katalogo de artikoloj en E-periodaĵoj
Literaturo en Esperanto (Don Harlow)
Project Gutenberg - Esperanto
Serĉilo de pluraj librokatalogoj
TROVANTO (Aŭstria Nacia Biblioteko)