en en en en fr en en en en it en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en sv en en en it en en en en it en en en en it en en en en it en en en en en en en en de it en en en en it en en en en it en en en de it en en en en it en en en en en en en en en en en en lv en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fi ca en es es en en zh cv en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en
Pa. lawmakers black out details of why they spent tax dollars, claiming ‘legislative privilege’ · Spotlight PA
Investigations Events Newsletters Staff Tips State College SearchSupport Us
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted and Sam Janesch of The Caucus | Feb. 27, 2020
Lawyers for the House say "legislative privilege" shields the details of lawmakers' spending.
HARRISBURG — The Pennsylvania legislature is attempting to shield records showing why it spends some of the roughly $360 million in taxpayer money it receives each year, citing an obscure protection it claims gives lawmakers immunity from total transparency.
The House and Senate have turned over thousands of pages of financial records in response to recent public records requests from The Caucus and Spotlight PA. But many contained vague descriptions of expenses or had redactions that made it impossible to see their purpose.
The redactions primarily concealed whom legislators were meeting with, and why.
In defending their decision to keep the information secret, legislative officials cited an obscure clause in the state constitution that they say protects lawmakers’ ability to speak and debate without retribution — a right they call the “legislative privilege.”
But good-government advocates countered that such an interpretation warped the intent of the speech and debate clause, which, they said, was meant to allow lawmakers to speak freely in official proceedings.
“Seems like a huge stretch,” said David Cuillier, an associate professor of journalism at the University of Arizona and president of the National Freedom of Information Coalition. “I guess there are some seriously creative lawyers there.”
The news organizations’ requests — covering all of the legislature’s expenses, except salaries and benefits, from 2017 through 2019 — are part of a collaborative effort to document the spending of the nation’s largest full-time legislature.
The nearly 3,000 pages of records the House and Senate have released so far included information about staff travel, meals, lodging, conference costs, and professional training. Often, descriptions for expenses were vague, making it difficult to identify who spent the money and for what purpose.
Of the redactions, some were to protect personal information such as bank account numbers or home addresses. In dozens of other instances, however, legislators invoked the speech and debate privilege to black out information about whom they and their staff spent money to meet with, and the purpose of those meetings.
For instance, four charges of $95.25 each for staffers who stayed overnight in Pittsburgh say only that they “Met with [REDACTED] … and legislation to create a [REDACTED]…”
A $265.49 lodging and parking charge for a onetime top Senate staffer states that he traveled in January 2018 to Washington, D.C., to “attend meetings on [REDACTED].”
A lawyer for the House has argued that releasing the redacted information would “interfere with the legislature’s independence and unbalance the constitutional equilibrium among the three branches of government.”
Legislators may “be less inclined to engage in the full range of legitimate legislative activities that carry a reimbursable cost, for fear that those activities might be questioned or scrutinized,” Jim Mann, a lawyer for House Republicans, wrote in a brief supporting the redactions, which The Caucus and Spotlight PA are appealing.
The House argues the list of protected activities for lawmakers — who earn a minimum annual salary of $90,000, with leaders earning as much as $141,000 — is lengthy: communications with constituents, internal memos, talking points for speeches, and more.
Officials in the House also say the “legislative sphere” of privileges extends to staffers or anyone who might be working on their behalf.
The constitutional clause they cite appears far less expansive.
“The members of the General Assembly,” it states, “shall in all cases, except treason, felony, violation of their oath of office, and breach or surety of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the sessions of their respective Houses and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House they shall not be questioned in any other place.”
After The Caucus and Spotlight PA challenged some of the redactions, House lawyers restored portions of some documents, providing a glimpse into the details — many trivial — they originally had determined were subject to legislative privilege.
Among the items they revealed: that freshman legislators were regularly treated to coffee and doughnuts (although it was not stated who the legislators were). In another instance, they revealed that a legislator had bought supplies and pizza for a meeting held at a local elementary school.
They also restored information about two breakfast meetings totaling $1,623 that outgoing House Speaker Mike Turzai (R., Allegheny) held last year. Initially, House lawyers had blacked out whom Turzai had hosted. When they unmasked the information, it showed the speaker had met with Eagle Scouts.
The legislature has successfully invoked the clause in the past to shield records such as correspondence that could shed light on deliberations leading up to a vote or other official action. But it has not routinely been used to shield records detailing how and why the House and Senate are spending taxpayer money. House officials said they do not track how often the clause has been used as a reason to redact information.
Though the legislature has largely exempted itself from the state public records law, which applies to most other government entities, financial records are among the few items that legislators are required to make public.
Cuillier, president of the National Freedom of Information Coalition, said legislators are notorious for “secrecy creep.”
“They need to buck up, have some backbone, and be accountable,” he said.
Spotlight PA receives funding from nonprofit institutions and readers like you who are committed to investigative journalism that gets results. Give a gift today at spotlightpa.org/donate.
THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING...
We believe everyone in Pennsylvania should have access to trusted public-service and investigative journalism. That’s why we don’t have a paywall on our site, charge a subscription fee, or clutter our articles with ads that have nothing to do with our state.
Instead, we use the honor system.
Each of our stories costs hundreds if not thousands of dollars to produce. If you learned something today, do your part and join our effort to rebuild reliable, high-quality local journalism in Pennsylvania by making a tax-deductible contribution of any amount. We can’t do this work without you.
Support Spotlight PA »
I am a robot
Never Miss a Story
Sign up for PA Post and get a free daily email with top news from across PA, plus some fun, too.
You’re invited! Pennsylvania’s top election official answers your voting questions live
by Spotlight PA Staff
Photo Courtesy Chris Harter
Talk of a tax increase is driving a wedge between leaders of a growing Pa. township and its fire company
by Min Xian of Spotlight PA State College
Tom Gralish / Philadelphia Inquirer
A complete guide and amendment tracker for proposed changes to Pennsylvania’s Constitution
by Danielle Ohl of Spotlight PA
Leise Hook / For Spotlight PA
Pa. law protects workers who are approved for medical marijuana — but once they use it, it’s a different story.
by Ed Mahon of Spotlight PA
THE LATEST ON COVID-19
Dan Nott / For Spotlight PA
Pa. COVID updates: Your guide to finding resources on cases, vaccines, and tests
by Spotlight PA Staff
THOMAS HENGGE & STEVEN M. FALK / Philadelphia Inquirer
Pa. election 2022: Your complete guide to the candidates for governor
by Stephen Caruso of Spotlight PA, Ethan Edward Coston of Spotlight PA and Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA
More Stories from Spotlight PA
MATT ROURKE / AP
Top Pa. GOP lawmaker fast-tracking a lucrative gambling expansion that would benefit a major campaign donor
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted and Sam Janesch of The Caucus
Kalim A. Bhatti / Philadelphia Inquirer
Pa. House drops ‘legislative privilege,’ will release lawmaker spending details
by Brad Bumsted and Sam Janesch of The Caucus and Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA
JOSE F. MORENO / Staff Photographer
Pa. Senate officials scrub details from financial records, raising alarm among open records advocates
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted and Sam Janesch of The Caucus
JOSE F. MORENO / Philadelphia Inquirer
Top Pa. GOP lawmaker taps politically connected lobbyist to be chief of staff
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted of The Caucus
CHRISTINE BAKER / The Patriot-News
Dark money mystery: Top Pa. lawmaker helped raise cash for nonprofit whose agenda is largely a secret
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted and Sam Janesch of The Caucus
KALIM BHATTI / The Philadelphia Inquirer
Prospects dimming for behind-the-scenes push to expand video gaming in Pa.
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted of The Caucus
JOSE F. MORENO / Philadelphia Inquirer
For the first time, Pa. Senate gives public online access to spending records
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Mike Wereschagin, Brad Bumsted, and Sam Janesch of The Caucus
ALEJANDRO A. ALVAREZ / Philadelphia Inquirer
Theft charges brought down a state lawmaker. But Pa.’s taxpayer-funded system for perks was already ripe for abuse.
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Sam Janesch, Mike Wereschagin, and Brad Bumsted of The Caucus
Tom Cherry / Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs
How one Pennsylvania lawmaker billed taxpayers $1.8 million in expenses
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted, Sam Janesch, and Mike Wereschagin of The Caucus
Leise Hook / For Spotlight PA
Bill would force Pa. to post online how lawmakers spend millions in tax dollars each year
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted, Sam Janesch, and Mike Wereschagin of The Caucus
Spotlight PA relies on funding from foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results.
If you value this reporting, please give a gift today at spotlightpa.org/donate.
Special Projects & Investigations
This site is powered by Netlify
228 Walnut St., #11728
Could not load results. ${error.message}
Sign Up For Our Free Newsletters
Get every Spotlight PA story and
the best investigative journalism from across Pa.
PA Post (Daily): Top news every weekday morning, plus a daily puzzle.
The Investigator (Weekly): Best accountability journalism every Thursday, plus a weekly riddle.
PA Local (Weekly): A fresh look at the incredible people, places, and food of Pa. every Friday, plus events, guides, best-of, and more.