en en en en es es it id en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en ca es es ne en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en es nl en en ru en az en en en en en en en en pt en en en en en en en en en en en en en fa en en
Ontology is most accurately described as a “taxonomy of being,” meaning that it seeks to figure out what kinds of things there are, whether those things are “real” – (a much trickier concept than we commonly take it to be), and to map the relations between the categories of things it uncovers.
Ontology seeks to understand what “counts” as a thing in the sense indicated by its second appearance in this quote.
“Taxonomy” is perhaps an appropriate term because philosophers often rely on the Nietzschean idea of a “genealogy” of ideas through history. It also helps capture that the project of ontology isn’t merely word games (although there is a lot of that, to be sure) – but also a practical endeavor to discover real relationships between the categories of being that might shed light on how the world works at its most fundamental level.
If you take one thing away from ontology as a concept, it’s the ability to question the nature of your reality, as Dolores says in Westworld. Many of the things we take for granted in life, according to strict ontological scrutiny, aren’t real things. That doesn’t mean that they don’t matter, but it does mean that their existence depends on their relationships to other things.
The existence of government and law, for example, depend by their very nature on the people who create and enact them. Color, mathematical concepts like pi or infinity, even scientific concepts like the atom – these are all things that have real and observable consequences, but their existence as such, or to use some fancy philosophical jargon, their existence qua existence, is dependent on human observation.
Realizing this, we can take a more critical look at the areas where we get complacent about what is and isn’t “real” or “true” without our active participation in creating its reality. This has real consequences, in the case of government and law, as I mentioned, but also for things like money, corporations, psychological disorders, morality, justice, gender, social class, and many more “things” that we often fail to question the “thingness” of, to put it crudely.
I want to underline here, though, that to say that something “doesn’t exist” in a strict ontological sense isn’t necessarily to say it’s unimportant, it’s just to say that it’s less fundamental to the structure of reality than other things. Often this simply comes down to its human construction as a concept, but this doesn’t mean that the reality underneath ceases to exist without humans. The wavelengths that we perceive as color can still exist without a person to see them, but the way we divide them is reflective of our perception, rather than the wavelengths themselves.
The atom remains a reality that is scientifically describable, regardless of the way we as humans currently agree that it should be described. Gender is still meaningful insofar as it describes biological sex characteristics, but the meanings we attach to those characteristics depends on social and contingent (i.e. subject to change) factors.
These are important things to take into account when we’re talking about things that have real consequences despite not necessarily being real things. We have to get straight about what we mean when we say these words in order to understand the conversations we have about them.
Here’s an interesting website that goes a little more in depth…
Become a Cool Kid
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 1,144 other followers
What happened to me?
An *edited letter to incels
Mental health & sassafras
“Soft to be Strong”
This is my safe space.
"What is Philosophy?" Video Extras (Part 1)
"The Society of the Spectacle"
Learning how to aim.
"There is no object so foul that intense light will not make beautiful..."
Is this the best of all possible worlds?
I guess I have a blog, now.
Sometimes it’s smart to be dumb
Mental health & sassafras
This is my safe space.
aesthetics Blog epistemology ethics logic metaphysics philosophy politics rambling sex Uncategorized youtube
No Instagram images were found.
Sexy Archives… Select Month September 2021  (1) August 2021  (1) July 2021  (1) March 2021  (1) February 2021  (1) January 2021  (2) December 2020  (2) October 2020  (1) August 2020  (1) March 2020  (3) February 2020  (2) December 2019  (1) November 2019  (1) October 2019  (2) September 2019  (1) August 2019  (1) July 2019  (2) June 2019  (1) May 2019  (1) April 2019  (2) March 2019  (3) February 2019  (1) January 2019  (1) December 2018  (5) November 2018  (5) October 2018  (3)
anaiis mitchell authenticity brene brown capitalism consent david foster wallace gratitude guy debord hadestown hope jake paul kierkegaard Leibniz media metaphysics Music mythology personal philosophy of sex plans problem of evil ralph waldo emerson random sartre self-awareness serious silly social media spectacle suffering transcendentalism video extras Voltaire vulnerability youtube