en en en id ca en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fr en de en en en en en en en en en en en en en en ceb en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en jbo en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fa en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en
Comparison of utility cost in three commercially available precision medicine approaches in Oncology | Caris Life Sciences
Kenneth Russell, Jaak Janssens, Andrew Dean, William Gallagher, Alejandro Hernandez, Andreas Voss, Gordon Stamp
The introduction of molecular profiling as standard of care in cancer has led to the launch of a number of commercial precision medicine services, which differ largely in their approaches. It can be difficult for payers, physicians, and patients to distinguish between these services and determine which testing is most appropriate for an individual case. An understanding of the clinical utility and the utility cost (cost of finding one patient with clinical benefit) of the different approaches can help to set expectations for all stakeholders involved.
The aim of this study is to define the utility cost of three leading commercially available oncology precision medicine approaches, Caris Molecular Intelligence® (CMI), FoundationOne® and PCDx™.
A systematic review of all published clinical evidence for the three services was performed, to determine the number of patients treated in line with the profiling results and the clinical benefit resulting from these treatment choices. Utility cost was defined as the list price divided by the fraction of patients treated based upon the profiling results and the clinical benefit in treated patients.
Based on the number of profiled patients treated and the corresponding number of patients with clinical benefit, 34% of CMI-profiled patients had clinical benefit (184 of 534 profiled patients), compared to 6% of those profiled with FoundationOne® (166 of 2,675 profiled patients) and 11% profiled using PCDx™ (19 of 168 profiled patients). Utility cost was calculated as $19,118 for CMI, $43,636 for
PCDx™ and $96,667 for FoundationOne®.
The results of this study shows that the multiplatform approach of CMI brings the highest clinical utility, based on the use of conventional chemotherapies in the majority of patients profiled. A low clinical utility means that almost 20 cases of FoundationOne® must be purchased to find one patient who benefits.
Caris Molecular Tumor Board
Laboratory Accreditations & Licenses
Privacy & Website Policies
Annual Notice to Physicians
© 2022 Caris Life Sciences. All rights reserved.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept,” you consent to the use of all cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.