en en id en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en es de en en en en en en fr nl en en en en en en fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en nl en en en en en nl en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fa en en en en en en en en fa en en en en en en en pt en en en fa en en en en en en en en fa en en en en en en en en fa en en en en en en en en fa en en en en en en en en fa en en en en en en en en fa en en en en en en
The climate crisis is the most complex challenge mankind has ever faced. We’re covering what edleaders and educators can do about it.
An exploration of new agreements, new practices, new tools and new opportunities.
Focusing on how making a difference has emerged as one of the most powerful learning experiences.
This campaign will serve as a road map to the new architecture for American schools. Pathways to citizenship, employment, economic mobility, and a purpose-driven life.
New learning models, tools, and strategies have made it easier to open small, nimble schooling models.
We share stories that highlight best practices, lessons learned and next-gen teaching practice.
Why True Equity in Learning Depends on Proactive, not Reactive, Design
By Julia Freeland Fisher and Ace Parsi
Innovation isn’t an outcome; it’s a process. How we approach that process will inevitably influence our outcomes.
Bearing this in mind, one of the primary challenges facing a number of efforts around education innovation—including a number of personalized learning initiatives—is that they are built upon simplified models and assumptions.
The risk of oversimplifying personalized learning on the front end is that we may fail to successfully leverage what works, for which students, in specific circumstances; especially in light of messy human relationships, political dynamics, and histories of discrimination. If innovators don’t consider the needs of traditionally disadvantaged populations at the outset, they will be left to retrofit these needs on the back end. This often makes efforts tedious, costly, and frustrating for both the disadvantaged students and those working to serve them.
Failing to address complexities upfront may be the undoing of a number of well-intentioned education innovations, including personalized learning.
One example of this retrofitting is the integration of technology in learning. As a leading disability rights advocate and Executive Director of the Robert Louis Stevenson School and the Purnell School, Bob Cunningham has said that technology is not just a tool or accommodation like a wheelchair—it can actually represent a different learning environment. “As with any education environment, your ability to promote your students’ success within it will depend, in large part, on your thorough understanding of the environment itself and of how each students’ interests, strengths and challenges will interact with that environment,” Cunningham said. “We have a tremendous opportunity when creating these new environments. We don’t have to just modify what already exists or accommodate for difference. We can actually plan for diverse students in these contexts as we are designing them.”
Put differently, designing technology-rich models with different students in mind is critical. If you are an English language learner, a student who has experienced trauma, or even have executive functioning issues and your district is implementing a model that hasn’t accounted for cultural sensitivity, holistic supports or training for educators to help students organize their learning, then opportunity gaps for you may very well increase rather than decrease.
Starting with the end in mind
What if we were to think about innovation differently, starting, rather than ending, with an equity lens? Rather than creating a reactionary taskforce once an initiative has already rolled out, we might create dedicated affinity groups of marginalized populations, be proactive in identifying the weaknesses in our models and create thinking communities and partnerships to grapple with those challenges.
An equity-based design framework is one approach to achieving this goal, ensuring program leaders and policy makers can gather information and empathize with a variety of stakeholders’ needs. Based on deep analysis of putting this approach to work in the Colorado SpaceLab, and when implemented well, a deliberate design framework can have positive impacts not only for traditionally disadvantaged groups, but their peers as well.
SpaceLab’s process to achieving this goal and efforts at the outset–hinged on empathizing with disadvantaged groups’ experiences and then using that empathy to effectively define the problem and design solutions–is a key to success.
4 questions to help ensure equity in design
Answers to a few questions can help anchor the design process in equity:
Vision. Is the vision guiding an initiative inclusive and does it incorporate all students? How could an outsider or a new team member ascertain these characteristics?
Engagement. Who are the stakeholders who have been invited into the conversations, or as Hamilton might say, the room where it happens? Do those stakeholders reflect the
diversity of the community being served?
Difficult Conversations. How have you been explicit about the mindsets of different actors in the system? Have you set up a space to talk about addressing underlying biases related to race, culture, gender, sexual orientation, and disability status?
Action-Reaction. How have you set up a system to act on what you’ve learned? What are the protocols your team and program use to modify their practice?
If innovation efforts are not anchored in equity and inclusion at the forefront of their work, personalized models will replicate the results of the traditional system. If design-thinking is really going to work to advance equity, innovators will need to wrestle with these questions on the front end. From there, by creating a system that meets the needs of students at the margins, we can more effectively meet the needs of all students.
For more on intentional design, see:
Whittle School & Studios: Transforming Education for Global Good
A Place-Based Micro-School in the Heart of D.C.
Building a Shared Vision of the Future of Learning
Ace Parsi is the Personalized Learning Partnership Manager at the National Center for Learning Disabilities (NCLD) where he works to ensure students with disabilities fully benefit from initiatives aiming to personalize learning for all students.
Julia is the director of education research at the Clayton Christensen Institute. She leads a team that educates policymakers and community leaders on the power of disruptive innovation in the K-12 and higher education spheres.
Stay in-the-know with all things EdTech and innovations in learning by signing up to receive the weekly Smart Update.
Getting Smart loves its varied and ranging staff of guest contributors. From edleaders, educators and students to business leaders, tech experts and researchers we are committed to finding diverse voices that highlight the cutting edge of learning.
Discover the latest in learning innovations
Sign up for our weekly newsletter.
Podcast: 20 Trends in 20 Minutes
Are You Putting Learners First? Here are 8 Ways to Check Yourself
Deeper Learning For All: The Equity Agenda in Louisville
Emancipating Equity for Learning Justice
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.
Sign up to receive our weekly innovations in learning email newsletter:
Stay on the Cutting Edge of Learning Innovation
Subscribe to our weekly Smart Update!
Enter your email to get our weekly What If? questions sent to directly to your inbox!
Enter the information below to get signed up for our weekly Smart Update newsletter below so you don't miss any learning innovations. The more information, the more we will be able to personalize your email!
Are you interested in getting our weekly "What If?" question sent to your inbox? *
What is PBE (Spanish)
Please submit the following information and you will be given a link to download our free guide: What is Place-Based Education and Why Does it Matter?
Please submit the following information and you will be given a link to download our free guide: Designing Microschools: Why Launching Small Learning Environments Is a Big Idea
Download Quick Start Guide to Implementing Place-Based Education
Please submit the following information and you will be given a link to download our free guide: Quick Start Guide to Implementing Place-Based Education.
Download Quick Start Guide to Place-Based Professional Learning
Please submit the following information and you will be given a link to download our free guide: Quick Start Guide to Place-Based Professional Learning.
Download What is Place-Based Education and Why Does it Matter?
Please submit the following information and you will be given a link to download our free guide: What is Place-Based Education and Why Does it Matter?
Download 20 Invention Opportunities in Learning & Development
Please submit the following information and you will be given a link to download our free 20 Invention Opportunities in Learning and Development Report.