en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en pl en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en de en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en
What’s Wrong with Cleveland By Rabbi Daniel Jeremy Silver 1985 (with intro by Roldo Bartimole) – Teaching Cleveland Digital
The late Rabbi Daniel Jeremy Silver, who was the spiritual leader of The Temple, gave a sermon in the mid 1980s that should be well remembered by Clevelanders, especially as the city examines why its population has declined so severely over the years.
It may offer some insight into how Cleveland deteriorated and why. I believe it dissected Cleveland’s downfall and the reasons why the city decayed over the years. It suggests the city suffered the inertia of its past success. I think it also gives us something to think about when we get over-excited about projects – like the East Bank Flats development now and Gateway and other costly developments of the past couple of decades.
Cleveland’s greatness, he tells us, was a “matter of historical accident.” Geography, indeed, played a major component in our growth. It was not planned, nor could have been, I’d say.
Rabbi Silver’s words were taken from a sermon he gave in the mid-1980s. It was given wider exposure in the Cleveland Edition on March 6, 1985, more than 25 years ago. To me it’s as fresh as if it were given yesterday.
His words should receive much wider exposure in this day of the internet. It traces our downfall. It details many of the reasons we have failed.
I was particularly struck by his recitation of an attempt by John D. Rockefeller to finance higher education here and the response he got from Samuel Mather, one of Cleveland’s wealthy leaders of our iron ore and steel industry. Mather told Rockefeller that his children and his friends went to Yale. Cleveland didn’t need a great university. Go elsewhere, he advised Rockefeller. Rockefeller did. He gave the first million dollars to the University of Chicago, setting that university on its way to greatness. Cleveland lost its chance.
Rabbi Silver also told us that “… the future of this city does not depend upon entertainment or excitement….” He goes on: “In real life people ask about the necessities – employment and opportunity – before they ask about lifestyle and leisure-time amenities.” How about that?
Here are his words. This is a first attempt to look at Cleveland’s population losses and its tragic downfall as a leading American city.
I suggest anyone interested in the history of the city to print out Rabbi Silver’s address and keep it to read and re-read. It may be 25 years old but it speaks to us today as we make some of the same mistakes.
I hope to be able to trace some of the city’s decline and its causes as I have seen it from the mid-1960s until the present soon.
What’s Wrong with Cleveland
By Rabbi Daniel Jeremy Silver
Cities grow for practical reasons. Cities grow where there is water and farm land. Cities thrive if they serve a special political or economic need. A city’s wealth and population increase as long as the special circumstance remains. A city becomes a lesser place, settles back into relative obscurity, when circumstances change. Some, like Rome, rise, fall and rise again. Some like Nineveh, rise, fall and are heard of no more.
In this country the larger towns of the colonial period – Boston, Newport, New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore – came into being and grew because they provided safe harbor for the ships that brought goods and colonists to the New World and carried back to Europe our furs and produce. New York continued to grow because it had a harbor and great river, the Hudson, that could carry its commerce hundreds of miles into the hinterland. Newport did not grow because all it had was a landlocked harbor.
Cleveland was founded as another small trading village on Lake Erie. We began to grow because of the decision to make the village the northern terminus of the Ohio Canal. The canal brought the produce of the hinterland to our port and these goods were then shipped on the lakes eastward to the Erie Canal and to the established cities along the eastern seaboard.
In 1840, shortly after the Ohio Canal was opened, there were 17,000 people in our town. We became a city through a second stoke of good fortune: Iron ore was discovered in the Lake Superior region. Because of the canal, this city was the logical place to marry the ore brought by ships from the Messabi Range, the coal brought by barge from the mines of southern Ohio, West Virginia and western Pennsylvania and the limestone brought by wagon and railroad from the Indiana quarries. Here investors built the great blast furnaces that supplied America the steel it needed for industrial expansion. From 1840 to 1870 our population increased tenfold. It is claimed that from 1880 to 1930 we were the fastest growing city in America. By 1930 Cleveland had become America’s sixth city. There was nothing magical about our growth, or really planned. It is a matter of historical accident: the siting of the canal, the discovery of iron ore and the ease of transportation here, the basic materials from which steel is produced.
There is an old Yiddish saying that when a man is wealthy his opinions are always significant and his singing voice is of operatic quality. During the years of rapid growth no one complained about the weather. For most of this period our symphony orchestra was a provincial organization and our art museum was either non-existent or a fledgling operation; yet, no one complained about the lack of cultural amenities. Our ball club wasn’t much better than it is today, but no one was quoted as saying that the town’s future depended on winning a pennant. There was then no domed stadium and no youth culture. Yet, young people of ambition and talent came. They came because there was opportunity here.
Those who believe that the solution to our current faltering status lies in a public relations program to reshape our tarnished image or in the reviving of downtown are barking up the wrong tree. We all welcome the city’s cultural resurgence – that Playhouse Square is being developed and that there is a new Play House – but, ultimately, the future of this city does not depend on entertainment or excitement, but upon economics. In real life people ask about the necessities – employment and opportunity – before they ask about lifestyle or leisure-time amenities.
We grew because we served the nation’s economy. We fell on hard times when the country no longer needed our services or products. Fifty years ago the nation and the world needed the goods we provided. Today the world no longer needs these goods in such quantity, and we can no longer produce our projects at competitive prices.
Once upon a time the steel we forged could be shipped across the country and outsell all competition. Today steel can be brought to west coast ports from Asia and to east coast ports from Europe and sold more cheaply than steel made here. The Steel Age is over and so is the age of the assembly-line factories that used our machine tools. This is the age of electronics and robotics, and these are not the goods in which we specialize.
Cleveland grew steadily until the Depression when, like the rest of the country, it suffered. Unlike many other areas we did not recover our élan after the Depression and World War II. It is not hard to know why. We were a city for the Steel Age. America was entering the High Tech Age. We lacked the plant, the scientific know-how and, sadly, the will to develop new products and new markets. The new age was beginning and the leaders in Cleveland preferred to believe that little had changed. We played the ostrich with predictably disastrous results. The numbers are sobering. The human cost they represented far more so. There were some 300,000 blue-collar jobs in the area by 1970. By 1971 this number had been reduced to 275,000 and by 1983 to 210,000. One in four factory jobs available 15 years ago no longer exists.
Cleveland lacks the two special circumstances that have made for the prosperity of certain American cities in the post-war era: government and advanced technologic research. This has been a time of expanding government bureaucracies and of the transformation of our information and control systems. Silicon Valley is the symbol of the new economy. We are a city of blast furnaces and steel sheds, not sophisticated laboratories.
The years between 1980 and 1982 were a time of national economic stringency, but the number of jobs available in the United States still grew by slightly under 1 percent. In the same period Cleveland lost 50,000 jobs between 1982 and 1984; when there was resurgence in employment levels, Cleveland lost another 30,000 jobs. The census for metropolitan Cleveland indicates that between 1970 and 1980, 168,000 people left the area and that the exodus continues at about the rate of 10,000 a year.
These facts should give pause to anyone who still believes that Cleveland will again become what Cleveland was a half-century ago. The numbers are sometimes rationalized as the result of the elderly leaving for warmer climates and a falling birth rate. These are factors, but the heart of the exodus has been our children. Our young, excited by new ideas, believe that another market will offer more opportunity or that their professional careers will be enhanced if they settle elsewhere.
Why has this happened to Cleveland?
Labor blames management. Management did not reinvest in new plant and equipment or research. When local corporations expanded into electronics, they generally built plants elsewhere. Management blames high labor costs and low labor productivity. Both groups are right, but in the final analysis, whatever the mistakes our political, business and labor leaders make, these alone do not account for Cleveland’s slide. Had there been fewer mistakes this town would still be suffering a serious economic downturn. We no longer are in the right place with the right stuff. (My emphasis.)
Our inability to adjust to a new set of circumstances is the inevitable result of a prevailing state of mind that can only be called provincial. Over the years Cleveland has been comfortable, conservative and self-satisfied. Clevelanders believed, because they wanted to believe, that what was would always be. Those who raised question were politely heard but not listened to. The city fathers set little value on new ideas, or indeed, on the mind. Business did not encourage research. Our universities were kept on meager rations. I know of no other major American city which has such a meager academic base.
A vignette: In the mid-1880s, John D. Rockefeller, then in the first flush of his success, went to see the town’s patriarch, Samuel Mather. He wanted to talk to Mather about Western Reserve College. Rockefeller believed that his hometown should have a great university. He knew that Mather was proud of Western Reserve and each year made up from his own pocketbook any small deficit. But Western Reserve College was small potatoes and Rockefeller proposed that the leadership of Cleveland pool its resources and turn the school into a first-line university. Mr. Mather was satisfied with Western Reserve Academy. It was just fine for Cleveland. He and those close to him sent their sons and their grandsons to Yale for a real education. He listened to Rockefeller, thanked him for his interest and suggested that he might take his dream somewhere else. John D. took his advice and in 1890 gave the first million dollars to the University of Chicago, a grant that set that university on its way to become what Western Reserve University is not – one of the first-rank universities in the country.
The same attitude of provincial self-satisfaction was to be found among our public officials. At the turn of the century we were certainly the dominate political force in the state; yet, when Ohio’s public university system began to expand, no one had the vision to propose establishing a major urban university in Cleveland whose research facilities would concern themselves with the problems of the city, its people and its industry. Again, in the 1950s, during the second period of major expansion by the state university system, Cleveland showed little interest. I am told that at first the town fathers actually opposed the establishment of Cleveland State University. They came around, of course, but ours is still one of the branches with the least research potential and fewest laboratories. Even today much of what it does is limited to the retraining of those who came out of our city schools and to the training of those who will occupy third-level jobs in the electronic and computer world. Change is in the air. Our universities are struggling to come of age, but a half century, at least, has been lost because Cleveland did not prize one of God’s most precious gifts – the mind.
Some argue that those who ran Cleveland limited their academic community because they did not want an intelligentsia to develop here. Academics and writers have a well-known propensity for promoting disturbing economic and political ideas. The comfortable and complacent do not want their attitudes questioned, but Cleveland’s lack of interest in ideas extended beyond political conservatism. Our leaders do not subsidize research and development in their corporations or in the university. Case was not heavily funded for basic research. Instead, it was encouraged to provide the training for mechanical and electrical engineers, the middle-level people needed by the corporations. It is only in the years of economic decline that our business leadership has begun to provide money for the research that ultimately creates new business opportunities and provides new employment.
Cleveland did not, however, fall behind in one area of technology: medical research. If the city fathers believed that the Steel Age would last forever, that real education took place back East and that it was wise and proper for them to look for investment opportunities elsewhere, they still lived here and the made sure that first-rate health care was available. Our hospitals have been well-financed. Medical research has been promoted. Such research was valuable and non-controversial, and the results of this continuing investment are clear. The medical field has been the one bright spot in an otherwise gloomy economic picture. Our hospitals are renowned worldwide. The research being done here is state-of-the-art. Recently the medical industry has come on straitened times, be even so, the gains are there and it is not hard to see what might have happened in other areas had our investment in ideas and idea people been significant and sustained.
Cleveland majored in conventional decency rather than in critical thinking. Our town has a well deserved reputation in the areas of social welfare and private philanthropy. Social work here has been of a high order. Until World War II the city had one of the finest public school systems in the country. We were concerned with the three Rs, but research goes beyond the three Rs. We never made the leap of intellect and investment that is required when you accept the fact that the pace of change in our world is such that yesterday is the distant past and tomorrow will be a different world.
We have fallen lengths and decades behind cities whose leaders invested money, time and human resources in preparing for the 21st Century. They broke new ground and laid foundations for change. We stayed with the familiar. As long as the economy depended upon machines and those who could tinker with machines, Cleveland did well. But when it was no longer a question of having competent mechanics retool for the next year’s production but a question of devising entirely new means of production, we could no longer compete. To a large extent, we still cannot.
In recent years Cleveland’s industrial leadership seems to have come awake to our mind and research gap, but the CEOs of the major corporations no longer have the power to singlehandedly make over the economy. In the High Tech Age, the factory that employs thousands of people is no longer the dominate force. Three out of every four jobs that have been created over the past decade have developed in businesses that are either brand new or employ fewer than 100 people. Those who lead old-time production line corporations struggle not to fall further and further behind and are an unlikely source of jobs.
Another problem has been that for decades the major banks were not eager to support bright, young outsiders who had drive and an idea but little ready cash. We all know people who went to our banks, were turned down, left town and set up successful businesses elsewhere. The officers of our lending institutions preached free enterprise and entrepreneurship, but most of their loans were to the stable, old-line corporations. For all their praise of capitalism, they were not risk takers. New business formation here has lagged behind that in most other cities. The birth of new business in Cleveland over the past three decades has been about 25 percent lower than the rate of new-business birth in other second-tier cities. Despite a new openness at the banks, we continue to trail. Catch-up takes a long time.
Cleveland’s business leadership has become aware of the need for research and development and of the need to stake bright young men and women who have ideas and are willing to risk their best efforts to make these successful; but even as we come alive to the importance of the inquiring mind and the risk takers of the academy and the research laboratory, we must recognize that Cleveland has a special albatross about its neck; Cleveland is not a city. There are over 30 self-governing districts in Cuyahoga County. There are over 100 self-governing communities in the metropolitan area. What we call Cleveland is an accumulation of competing fiefdoms.
This sad situation is also a result of our parochial outlook and our unwillingness to look ahead. It is easier to let each group draw into itself than to work out ways to adjust competing needs and interests. The result is a diminished city. There were 970,000 residents of the city in 1945; there are 520,000 today (My note: Try 396,815 as of 2010). Only one in four Clevelanders live within the metropolitan area. The economic gap and the gap of understanding between the suburbs and the city and between suburb and suburb has widened, not narrowed, over the years.
Those who live here lack of shared agenda because we have allowed each area to go its own way and seek its special advantage. Some of our fiefdoms are run simply for the benefit of their traffic courts. Others are run for the benefit of white or black power groups. Some exist to protect the genteel ways of an America that no longer exists. Each is prepared to put obstacles in the way of community planning when a proposal threatens its attitudes or interests.
Do you remember those small groups of white and blacks that used to meet on the High Level Bridge to signify that we were really one city? Their tiny numbers, the very fact that their actions were seen as symbolic, underscored how far we have moved away from each other. To be sure, Clevelanders meet together in non-political forums where we profess infinite good will and talk of shared goals, but the talk rarely leads to decisive actions. Why? We lack a political area where our needs are necessarily brought forward and brokered. We lack a political structure that would force us to adjust our interests and develop an agenda to which we could commit ourselves, and until such a structure is in place we will not be able to marshal the shared purpose.
When suburbanites look at the problem of the city, they tend to focus on the long-range economic problems: how to create jobs and prosperity. Any who live in the city have no work in the city or outside it. Their problem is not how we can, over a 5-year period, establish X number of new businesses that will provide X number of new jobs, but how to keep body and soul together; how to provide food, clothing and shelter for their families. We do not see the immediacy of their needs. They do not see the wisdom of our plans, and inevitably we frustrate each other’s hopes. The suburbs mumble about their particular concerns and the community stumbles into a future for which it cannot plan.
In 1924 the citizens of Lakewood and West Park voted on a proposal to annex their communities to the city of Cleveland. That proposal was defeated soundly. Since then every proposal to create countywide government has failed and failed badly. Yet it should be clear to all that only when we succeed in becoming citizens of a single community will we be able to do much about our economy and our future.
Because the city’s concerns stop at the borders, its ability to handle the future stops at its borders. The same is, of course, true of the suburbs. In Columbus the city grew by annexing to itself the farm land on which the commercial parks and the new suburbs were built. In Cleveland we went the other way; today you could do some large-scale farming within the city limits.
Will we confront this structural challenge and create metropolitan government? I see little reason to believe that we will. Our history has, if anything, intensified racial and class polarization. If we become a unified city, every group and municipality will lose some precious advantage. I can’t imagine the citizens of Moreland Hills wanting to throw in their lot with the citizens of Hough. Many minorities would lose their power base. The suburbs would no longer be able to provide services tailored to the middle class and would have to bear an expensive welfare load. Yet, until we unite politically we will be unable to address effectively the needs of Cleveland tomorrow. We simply cannot plan constructively so long as members of our many councils are able to thwart well-intentioned proposals.
Recent years have been better years for this city. There has been significant construction downtown. The highway system is in place. We have created regional transport, regional hospitals, and a regional sewage system. But big buildings downtown do not guarantee the city’s future. Big buildings can be empty buildings, as some of them are. Regional transport can mean empty buses. The future of Cleveland rests first on a revived economy. A revived economy depends upon bright people and new ideas. People do not get ideas out of the air. Ideas begin in our schools, universities and laboratories. High-quality education is costly. The future for Cleveland cannot be bought cheaply.
A meaningful future depends upon a new recognition of where a city’s strength lies. It’s nice that our suburbs are famous for their green lawns and lovely homes. It’s nice that everybody agrees that Cleveland is a wonderful place to raise children. It’s a wonderful place to raise children if you don’t want your children to live near you when they become adults. As things stand now, they will make their futures elsewhere. Our suburbs are the result of yesterday’s prosperity. Employment and political unity must be today’s goals if we are to have a satisfying future.
Unfortunately, we did not prepare in the fat years for a time when we no longer could take advantage of the circumstances that had made us prosperous. Those who study such things say that if the American economy stays healthy and the formation of new businesses in Cleveland continues at its present rate, we will be fortunate if in 1990 we have the same number of jobs we had in 1970.
Our future is to be a second-tier city. I do not find that such a discouraging prospect. A prosperous city of two million can be a satisfying place and can provide many amenities. But before we can feel sure even of a second-tier status, we must develop a new economic base and a renewed concern for community. We need to reevaluate our attitudes toward the mind. It is tragic that one in two who enter the city schools never graduate.
Of those who graduate – the best – who enroll in Cleveland State University, 51 percent need remedial work in mathematics; 62 percent need remedial work in English. Half the city’s children do not graduate from high school. More than half who graduate are not prepared for this world. Is this any way to prepare for the 21st Century?
When the rabbis were asked “who is the happy man?” they answered, “the person who is happy with his own lot.” The question that Clevelanders must ask is whether we can be happy even if we are not now, and will not become again, one of the premier cities in the country. The answer seems to me obvious. We can. But even the modest hope will escape us unless we put behind us the stand-patism that has characterized our past. We must put our minds and imaginations to work in planning for an economy and a community suited to the world of tomorrow.
Teaching Cleveland Digital is a repository of writing, pictures and videos to support the teaching of Cleveland, Northeast Ohio and Ohio @ www.teachingcleveland.org. View all posts by
Author Posted on February 1, 2016February 1, 2017Categories 1980's - 1990's, Roldo BartimoleTags Rabbi Daniel Silver
Previous Previous post: Black Lynching in the Promised Land: Mob Violence in Ohio 1876-1916 by Marilyn K. Howard
Next Next post: Shocking images of air pollution from Cleveland’s past By Tim Kovach May 1, 2014
History of the Cleveland-area’s Hispanic population and where most live now, Sept 27, 2022
Great Lakes Science Center marks 25 years, keeps evolving, educating, entertaining, Cleveland.com, September 27, 2022
Candidates for Cuyahoga County Executive: Chris Ronayne and Lee Weingart debate. The City Club of Cleveland 9.20.22
A bumpy road to regionalism by Jay Miller, Crain’s Cleveland Business 9/19/22
Updating the list of Cleveland’s most influential people: Brent Larkin July 17, 2022
“A Man is Passing” Poem written on the death of CLE Mayor Tom L Johnson 1912 by Edmund Vance Cooke
11 weeks after Jackie Robinson’s debut, Larry Doby arrived By Frederic J. Frommer/Washington Post July 5, 2022
Will Cleveland Ever Develop Its Lakefront? Cleveland Magazine August 2022
The Rise and Fall of the Cleveland Air Races by Vince Guerrieri June, 2022
A look back at 9 previous downtown Cleveland lakefront proposals that didn’t move ahead – Plain Dealer May 30, 2022
Myths surround ‘Untouchable’ lawman Eliot Ness. What’s the truth? Washington Post June 1, 2022
Tour the tunnels below Cleveland’s Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Monument – May 3, 2022
CLEVELAND: AN HISTORICAL OVERVIEW from Encyclopedia of Cleveland History (1987)
Cleveland’s 50 Most Important Moments of the Past 50 Years – Cleveland Magazine, April 2022
Categories Select Category Timeline of Cleveland/NE Ohio The Western Reserve 1796-1820    “Cleveland’s First Neighborhood – The Flats”    Along the Cuyahoga    Connecticut Western Reserve    Explorations Pre 1788    Lorenzo Carter    Moses Cleaveland    Oliver H. Perry/Battle of Lake Erie/War of 1812    Samuel and Hannah Huntington    Speculation, Sales and Real Estate    The Firelands    Women in the Western Reserve Pre Industrial 1820-1865    Building the Railroads    Cleveland Annexation of Ohio City    Columbus Bridge Street War    Leonard Case Sr./Leonard Case Jr.    The Abolition Movement    The Civil War and Cleveland    The Civil War and Ohio    The Erie and Ohio Canals Industrial Revolution 1865-1900    Amasa Stone    Charles F. Brush    Cleveland and the Gilded Age-student documentary    Cleveland in the Gilded Age by Dr. John Grabowski    Cleveland’s Millionaires    Flora Stone Mather    Henry Chisholm and Cleveland Rolling Mill Company    Henry Flagler in Cleveland    James A. Garfield    Jeptha Wade    John D. Rockefeller    John Hay in Cleveland    Mark Hanna    Maternity Homes    Millionaires Row    Municipal Government in Cleveland 1876-1900    Orphanages, 1851-1933    Philanthropy and Charity    Samuel Mather    School Reform in 1892    Settlement Movement    The Flats 1880 to 1920    William McKinley Progressive Era: 1900-1920    “Cleveland in 1912” The Lecture (Video)    1900-1919 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Brand Whitlock    Charles E. Ruthenberg and Socialism in Cleveland    Charles Willard “Billy” Stage    Cleveland 1912: Civitas Triumphant    Cleveland Economic History -The First 200 Years    Cleveland Foundation    Collinwood School Fire    Daniel Morgan    Edward W. Bemis    Frederic C. Howe    George Barnsdale Cox    Harris Cooley    Hazen Pingree    Henry George    Henry Thomas Hunt Mayor of Cincinnati    Herbert C. Bigelow    How Cleveland Women Got the Vote    Misc Articles on the Progressive Period in Ohio    Myron Herrick    Newton D. Baker    Ohio Constitutional Convention of 1912    Peter Witt    Photo Gallery    Ralph Hayes    Samuel “Golden Rule” Jones    The City Club    The Group Plan (The Mall)    Theodore E. Burton    Tom L. Johnson    World War 1 in Cleveland City Managers Political Bosses 1920’s    1920-1929 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Charles W. Chestnutt    City Manager Government    Cleveland Clinic Origins    Fred Kohler    Garrett A. Morgan    Jane Edna Hunter    Linda Eastman and the Cleveland Public Library    Margaret Bourke-White    Maurice Maschke    Police Actions Against Asians in 1920s Cleveland    Political Bosses    The Cleveland Orchestra    The Metroparks    Walter Burr Gongwer    Warren G. Harding in Ohio    William Hopkins 1930’s    1930-1939 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Eliot Ness    Frances Payne Bolton    Great Lakes Exposition    Harold Burton    John O. Holly    Public Housing / Ernest Bohn    Steel Industry    The Depression in Cleveland/Ohio    The New Deal in Ohio    The Van Sweringens    WPA in Cleveland African American Migration    African American History in Cleveland    Black Political Power in Ohio Pre World War 2    Notable Blacks of Cleveland from Cleveland Memory World War 2 – Post War 1940’s    1940-1949 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Bill Veeck and the 1948 Cleveland Indians    East Ohio Gas Explosion 1944    Frank Lausche    Karamu House    World War 2 in Cleveland 1950’s Suburbanism    1950-1959 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    An Overview of the Suburbs    Civil Defense in Cleveland    Cleveland Economic History -The First 200 Years    Cleveland Museum of Art    Cyrus Eaton    Dorothy Fuldheim    Housing    Rock and Roll    The Creation of the Highway System in NE Ohio    Urban Renewal/Erieview    Viktor Schreckengost Carl Stokes – Civil Rights 1960’s    1960-1969 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Carl Stokes    Cleveland in the 1960s incl. Mike Roberts Essay    Cleveland’s Muhammad Ali Summit, 45 Years Later    Cuyahoga River Fire    Hough Riots    Lee-Seville Public Housing Controversy    Martin Luther King Jr. in Cleveland    Robert F. Kennedy Speech At Cleveland City Club    School Desegregation Crisis of 1963-64    Stanley Tolliver    The Glenville Riots 1968 Ralph Perk – Dennis Kucinich 1970’s    1970-1979 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Cleveland in the 1970s (incl. Mike Roberts essay)    Community Organizing in Cleveland 1975-1985    Dennis Kucinich    James Rhodes    Kent State Shootings May 4, 1970    More than a bus ride: Deseg. of the Cleve Schools    Muny Light vs. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.    Ralph Perk    WMMS-FM 1980’s – 1990’s    “The Women Who Would Be Mayor” by Marian Morton    1980-1999 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Cleveland in the 1980’s – Mike Roberts    Cleveland in the 1990’s – Mike Roberts    Cleveland in the 2000’s – Mike Roberts    George Forbes    George Voinovich Era as Mayor    Howard Metzenbaum    James Rokakis    John Frederick Seiberling    John Glenn    Louis Stokes    Michael R. White Era as Mayor    Playhouse Square    Richard Celeste    Robert Hughes    Stephanie Tubbs Jones    The Struggle For Stability by Dr. Thomas Campbell 2000s    Frank Jackson    Jane Campbell Books We Suggest    Books We Suggest Cleveland Cleveland History E-Books    Clevelands History E-Books Cleveland History Self Study: Syllabus of Essays    Cleveland History Self Study: A 5 Week Syllabus Cleveland Politician Interview Series    Cleveland Politician Interview Series Columbus Documentaries E-Books Elegant Cleveland Ethnic History of Cleveland    African Americans in Cleveland    Chinese in Cleveland    Cleveland Cultural Gardens    Eastern Orthodox in Cleveland    Ethnic Settlement in Cleveland       Hispanics in Northeast Ohio    Germans in Cleveland    Hungarians in Cleveland    Irish in Cleveland    Jews in Cleveland    Mormons in Cleveland    Polish in Cleveland    Protestants in Cleveland    Religion in Cleveland    Roman Catholics in Cleveland    Russians in Cleveland    Turks in Cleveland    Ukrainians in Cleveland History Day Live Events NE Ohio Neighborhoods and Their History    Asia Town from Fresh Water Cleveland    Beachwood    Bedford and Bedford Heights    Broadway/Slavic Village    Buckeye Neighborhood    Campus District    Central/Kinsman    Chagrin Falls    City of Cleveland/NE Ohio Neighborhoods    Cleveland Heights    Collinwood/Waterloo    Detroit Shoreway    Downtown    East Cleveland    Glenville    Gordon Square    Hough    Hudson    Lakewood    Little Italy    Lyndhurst    Mid Town    Mount Pleasant    Newburgh    North Olmsted    North Ridgeville    Ohio City    Olmsted Falls    Parma    Playhouse Square    Rocky River    Shaker Heights    South Euclid    Tremont    University Circle    Warrensville    West Park/Kamm’s Corners    Westlake Northeast Ohio Public Policy Forums Policies    2014 Cuyahoga County Executive Election    2014 Ohio Governor Election    Adult/College Education    African American Political Power in the 21st Cent    Agriculture    Cincinnati    Cuyahoga County    Energy    Environment    Foster Care in Northeast Ohio    Greater Cleveland    Healthcare Delivery    Healthcare Economic Opportunity    Housing    Immigration    Journalism       Roldo Bartimole    Lake and River Fronts    Manufacturing/Technology    Minority Participation in the New Economy    News Aggregator Archives    Ohio    Ohio Constitution    Overview    Philanthropy in NE Ohio    Planning    Primary and Secondary Education    Professional Sports    Regional Govt vs Home Rule    Regionalism    State of the County/City/State of Downtown    The Arts    Transportation    Voting Rights in Ohio    Water Teaching Cleveland    Introduction Teaching Cleveland Digital Media    About Us The Best Uncategorized    Teaching Cleveland Classes Video Candidate Election Forums Cincinnati Cleveland Photos League of Women Voters Ohio Congressional Redistricting Pittsburgh Women History in Cleveland