en en en en fr en en en en it en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en sv en en en it en en en en it en en en en it en en en en it en en en en en en en en de it en en en en it en en en en it en en en de it en en en en it en en en en en en en en en en en en lv en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fi ca en es es en en zh cv en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en
Pa. Senate officials scrub details from financial records, raising alarm among open records advocates · Spotlight PA
Investigations Events Newsletters Staff Tips State College SearchSupport Us
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted and Sam Janesch of The Caucus | March 5, 2020
The information deleted from Senate documents included details on the purpose of the chamber’s expenses, including travel, meetings, and conferences.
HARRISBURG — Top officials with the Pennsylvania Senate scrubbed thousands of detailed explanations about its expenses from official records provided to two news organizations, raising alarm among open records and good-government advocates.
In turning over the documents, requested by The Caucus and Spotlight PA, Senate officials did not black out the explanations, but instead edited them out, making it appear as though they never existed. The officials also did not disclose that they had removed the information.
“You can’t just delete things from public records,” said Terry Mutchler, the first director of the state’s Office of Open Records and a prominent First Amendment lawyer. “It is absolutely flabbergasting. It’s a new level of anti-transparency. We are now in the anti-transparency Olympics.”
The records were requested as part of an ongoing effort to document exactly how the nation’s largest full-time legislature spends the roughly $360 million in taxpayer money it receives each year, including more than $100 million allocated to the Senate.
Donetta D’Innocenzo, the Senate’s chief clerk and open records officer, did not return calls or emails seeking comment about how or why the information was removed.
Michael Sarfert, the Senate’s open records lawyer, said in an email that the chamber removed the spending details because the news organizations did not specifically state that they wanted to know the “purpose” of the Senate’s expenditures. The news organizations asked for all expenses, from all Senate accounts.
Pennsylvania’s open records law requires government agencies to search for all records that are relevant to a request. The law exempts certain records from release and allows government agencies to black out, or redact, portions of documents.
The law does not, however, appear to give agencies the authority to erase information without disclosing it. A bill pending in the House would make it a third-degree felony to alter government documents after a public records request has been made.
Rep. Cris Dush (R., Jefferson), the sponsor of the legislation, said it would “absolutely” prevent the Senate and other government agencies from scrubbing information.
“If they’re producing a record, then the record in full should be subject to the law,” he said.
The information deleted from Senate documents included details on the purpose of the chamber’s expenses, including travel, meetings, conferences, and other outings by senators and their staffers, as well as other top officers in the chamber.
Initially, Senate officials blacked out some of those details, arguing they were subject to “legislative privilege” and did not have to be disclosed to the public. The news organizations appealed and eventually submitted a new request for many of the same records. This time, however, Senate officials simply erased information rather than redact it, giving the impression it was never part of the official record.
For instance, a January 2018 expense for $60 incurred by the Senate’s then-top lawyer, Drew Crompton, was originally described as: “Parking & tolls, Overnight Parking, Washington D.C. - attend meeting on [REDACTED].”
In the new set of records, it became just “Parking & tolls.”
In another instance, a staffer’s $27.27 lunch charge in August 2018 was described as “Legislative meals, Lunch, Bellefonte, to attend the [REDACTED].” In the new documents, it was described merely as “Legislative meals.”
Other seemingly trivial details that hadn’t been redacted originally were also removed. For example: The original documents showed a staffer charged $3 for “Other travel expenses, Gratuities, Maid service.”
The new documents erased the description, listing it simply as “Other travel expenses.”
Senate officials did not answer questions about whether they made the edits to the original documents, or just to copies of records turned over in response to the news organizations’ request.
The news organizations requested access to the entire database used to track the Senate’s spending. But officials refused, contending they are not required to give the public access to data or records that would “subject them to alteration or manipulation.”
Erik Arneson, who runs Pennsylvania’s Office of Open Records, said the agency has handled 25,000 appeals since the public records law went into effect. (The legislature answers to appeals officers it appoints, not to Arneson’s office.)
He could not recall any appeals involving records that have been scrubbed of information without an explanation.
“Simply leaving it out of the response is not an appropriate way to proceed,” Arneson said.
Melissa Melewsky, media law counsel for the Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association, called the move “disturbing.”
“If they are going to withhold information from a public record, they have to justify it — not just erase it,” Melewsky said.
The Caucus and Spotlight PA sent similar public records requests to the House of Representatives. The House turned over thousands of pages of documents, many containing redactions for information it claims is exempt from disclosure. The news organizations have appealed, arguing taxpayers have a right to know how and why the money was spent.
When asked for additional records, the House did not edit out details, but did continue to black out portions of the records.
Though the legislature passed a sweeping open records law in 2008, Pennsylvania still earns low marks for transparency and public accountability.
The Center for Public Integrity in 2015 gave the state an F in its 50-state assessment of laws and other systems in place to deter corruption. Researchers cited, in part, a lack of legislative and executive accountability. Meanwhile, lawmakers in recent years have repeatedly declined to take up bills that advocates say could improve transparency.
Spotlight PA receives funding from nonprofit institutions and readers like you who are committed to investigative journalism that gets results. Give a gift today at spotlightpa.org/donate.
THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING...
We believe everyone in Pennsylvania should have access to trusted public-service and investigative journalism. That’s why we don’t have a paywall on our site, charge a subscription fee, or clutter our articles with ads that have nothing to do with our state.
Instead, we use the honor system.
Each of our stories costs hundreds if not thousands of dollars to produce. If you learned something today, do your part and join our effort to rebuild reliable, high-quality local journalism in Pennsylvania by making a tax-deductible contribution of any amount. We can’t do this work without you.
Support Spotlight PA »
I am a robot
Never Miss a Story
Sign up for PA Post and get a free daily email with top news from across PA, plus some fun, too.
You’re invited! Pennsylvania’s top election official answers your voting questions live
by Spotlight PA Staff
Photo Courtesy Chris Harter
Talk of a tax increase is driving a wedge between leaders of a growing Pa. township and its fire company
by Min Xian of Spotlight PA State College
Tom Gralish / Philadelphia Inquirer
A complete guide and amendment tracker for proposed changes to Pennsylvania’s Constitution
by Danielle Ohl of Spotlight PA
Leise Hook / For Spotlight PA
Pa. law protects workers who are approved for medical marijuana — but once they use it, it’s a different story.
by Ed Mahon of Spotlight PA
THE LATEST ON COVID-19
Dan Nott / For Spotlight PA
Pa. COVID updates: Your guide to finding resources on cases, vaccines, and tests
by Spotlight PA Staff
THOMAS HENGGE & STEVEN M. FALK / Philadelphia Inquirer
Pa. election 2022: Your complete guide to the candidates for governor
by Stephen Caruso of Spotlight PA, Ethan Edward Coston of Spotlight PA and Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA
More Stories from Spotlight PA
MATT ROURKE / AP
Top Pa. GOP lawmaker fast-tracking a lucrative gambling expansion that would benefit a major campaign donor
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted and Sam Janesch of The Caucus
Kalim A. Bhatti / Philadelphia Inquirer
Pa. House drops ‘legislative privilege,’ will release lawmaker spending details
by Brad Bumsted and Sam Janesch of The Caucus and Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA
Kalim A. Bhatti / Philadelphia Inquirer
Pa. lawmakers black out details of why they spent tax dollars, claiming ‘legislative privilege’
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted and Sam Janesch of The Caucus
JOSE F. MORENO / Philadelphia Inquirer
Top Pa. GOP lawmaker taps politically connected lobbyist to be chief of staff
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted of The Caucus
CHRISTINE BAKER / The Patriot-News
Dark money mystery: Top Pa. lawmaker helped raise cash for nonprofit whose agenda is largely a secret
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted and Sam Janesch of The Caucus
KALIM BHATTI / The Philadelphia Inquirer
Prospects dimming for behind-the-scenes push to expand video gaming in Pa.
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted of The Caucus
JOSE F. MORENO / Philadelphia Inquirer
For the first time, Pa. Senate gives public online access to spending records
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Mike Wereschagin, Brad Bumsted, and Sam Janesch of The Caucus
ALEJANDRO A. ALVAREZ / Philadelphia Inquirer
Theft charges brought down a state lawmaker. But Pa.’s taxpayer-funded system for perks was already ripe for abuse.
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Sam Janesch, Mike Wereschagin, and Brad Bumsted of The Caucus
Tom Cherry / Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs
How one Pennsylvania lawmaker billed taxpayers $1.8 million in expenses
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted, Sam Janesch, and Mike Wereschagin of The Caucus
Leise Hook / For Spotlight PA
Bill would force Pa. to post online how lawmakers spend millions in tax dollars each year
by Angela Couloumbis of Spotlight PA and Brad Bumsted, Sam Janesch, and Mike Wereschagin of The Caucus
Spotlight PA relies on funding from foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results.
If you value this reporting, please give a gift today at spotlightpa.org/donate.
Special Projects & Investigations
This site is powered by Netlify
228 Walnut St., #11728
Could not load results. ${error.message}
Sign Up For Our Free Newsletters
Get every Spotlight PA story and
the best investigative journalism from across Pa.
PA Post (Daily): Top news every weekday morning, plus a daily puzzle.
The Investigator (Weekly): Best accountability journalism every Thursday, plus a weekly riddle.
PA Local (Weekly): A fresh look at the incredible people, places, and food of Pa. every Friday, plus events, guides, best-of, and more.