en en en en fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en
My name is mentioned in your Letters in India Today. I have asked for the text to be removed as it is quoted out of context. As a proviso for keeping the letter posted your staff agreed to put an addendum to this quote which says "...is and was never an ex- devotee...) This should read ( Is a devotee of Sai Baba and was never an ex-devotee). The harassment I have suffered as a result of this post and your obsession with Sai Baba is probably a hundred times worse than anything that you have alleged Sai Baba has done.
India has a long history of Tantric tradition in yoga which prescribes certain sexual practices under the guidance of the guru. Perhaps, in surrendering to a guru, sex is the last boundary of the ego.
Susan Olorenshaw, Bangalore (Is a devotee of Sai Baba and was never an ex-baba devotee.)
Our comment on this is:
The stupidness of your writing on a site like this, will 'probably' cause some harassment from people, who do know how to think straight, who don't need a faulty guru to follow, you should learn from them, instead of feeling harassed.
Is it a fact that Robert.C.Priddys so callled 'wife ' is actually his servant maid? If so then why does he not declare her so? Does he pay her fair wages for services rendered to him? Is it also a fact that his so called 'son' is actually his old lover who is now blackmailing him? Is it a fact that Priddy is a drug addict with AIDS?
Comment from Exbaba Admin:
No, nothing of this is a fact, but it surely is a fact, that a lo life clown from Bangalore, India, as above, is harassing himself by ridicilous statements, of which he or she knows, that none of this could have the slightest sparkle of truth in it.
Name: Sujay Rao Mandavilli
You might find my papers interesting:
BBCs defamatory documentary, The Secret Swami, made in 2004 on Sathya Sai Baba, and then subsequently withdrawn from Channel 4 due to criminal lawsuits is however all over the Internet.
Many simple minded devotees like Robert Priddy for example, believed every word that the BBC said in this piece of defamation. Yet what is the credibility and integrity of the BBC worth? Recent revelations on the BBCs cover up of the sexual abuse of underage children, both boys and girls, by two top BBC presenters, Jimmy Savile and Stuart Hall, spread over several decades horrified the world and has raised serious doubts about the BBCs impartiality and objectivity.
It seems to suffer from grave moral double standards and racial arrogance when reporting alleged misdemeanours by non-whites and whites especially by white Protestant Englishmen. A retired judge, Dame Janet Smith conducted the probe into allegations against Jimmy Savile and Stuart Hall and concluded that the BBC, for decades hushed up matters due to a culture of "reverence and fear" in the BBC towards its celebrity presenters. The probe found that Jimmy Savile had raped 72 boys and girls of which 34 were under the age of 16. What is even more shameful is that these rapes were carried out on the BBCs office premesis.
Stuart Hall, a lesser achiever, raped 13 girls and is now in jail. The BBCs Director-General, Tony Hall made a public apology on BBC World Television on 25th february 2016 to the victims of BBCs lust and admitted that the BBC had failed them. Get raped and then make do with an apology? Not likely! The victims are planning to engage the best lawyers in the world and sue the BBC and the British government for damages which will amount to billions of pounds.
They are likely to succeed, as the probe has already been done and everything proved by a judge beyond a shadow of doubt. Consider this, such an organisation which regularly condoned rape of minors on its very own office premesis for decades, now has the gumption to make slanderous charges on asian Hindu relegious leaders? Why doesn't the BBC have the gumption to make such documentaries on the sex life of Al-Bagdadi the revered leader of ISIS? Is it because the BBC journalists are terrified of having their throats slit with a kitchen knife by Britains own Muslim Jehadis?
Or why doesn't the BBC make defamatory documentaries on the hundreds of Cardinals and Bishops world wide who have pending criminal proceedings for rape of underage boys spread over several decades? Why pick only on Hindu Gurus and Godmen? This is because of the racial arrogance of the British Raj. The BBC and the British have yet to get over their racist superiority complex, when it comes to dealing with or reporting on non-white peoples or cultures.
This explains the ease with which rabidly racist Englismen like Robert Priddy. lap up any drivel that the BBC dishes out without once questioning its veracity. Priddy confesses that the BBCs defamatory documentary on Sai Baba in 2004 made him see the "light".
What a fool Priddy is! For 20 years, according to Priddys own confessions, he told lies about Baba and then he saw the BBCs" light" on a TV screen and then, for the next 15 years began maligning Baba! This doesn't speak much for Priddys maturity, even at the ripe old age of 88, nor for his devotion or faith in god! It only illustrates what a ludicruous Englishman he really is!