en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en pl en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en de en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en
HIGHWAYS. Roads in Cleveland and other cities have served 2 main purposes. First, roads were built for commerce, including traffic movement and economic growth. Next, roads helped create and separate neighborhoods, allowing development of specialized districts for housing and business and an increase in property values. Inevitably, proponents of roads for traffic purposes came into conflict with those favoring the community and property interests of those living alongside. Officials in Cleveland and Cuyahoga County enjoyed only modest success in accommodating these conflicting goals. After 1900 state and federal officials financed part of the construction costs, leading to an upward shift in the level of conflict but no better luck in resolving it. The net result during the period between 1796-1990 was the creation of a vast and improved road network that never appeared affordable and adequate for traffic flow and local development. In 1796 MOSES CLEAVELAND† and his survey party reached the site of the city and began marking off streets for future settlement. The grid idea with a couple of radial routes prevailed. Cleaveland’s group sketched PUBLIC SQUARE, with Ontario running north to south and Superior east to west marking the center. Four additional streets bounded the outskirts of the area. In 1797 a second group of surveyors added 3 additional streets to the town plan. Actually, none of these streets existed; the marking of roads was simply a component in the division of land into lots for expeditious sale, the primary interest of the CONNECTICUT LAND CO. The net result of the 2 plattings, however, was to create a frame for Cleveland’s development that emphasized expansion toward the east and south. From 1810-15, only Superior and Water streets were open for travel, but tree stumps and bushes remained as obstacles. Ontario was open south of the square but was equally undeveloped.
During the 1820s, growth of a warehouse and wholesale district in the FLATS along the CUYAHOGA RIVER encouraged officials to develop adjacent roads. On the far north, Bath St. ran between the river and Water St. Farther south, 4 lanes allowed traffic to descend into the Flats from Water and Superior streets. Construction in 1824 of 2 bridges across the river linked commercial and residential development around Public Square with river traffic and the smaller west side. Approval and completion of a route, it appears, rested on a petition presented by property owners, along with the perception among officials that property values and trade would be enhanced. Streets constructed after 1820 often were named for leading businessmen and politicians who fostered commerce. Case St. honored LEONARD CASE†, a prominent real-estate developer. In 1836 the council dedicated Clark St. for Jas. S. Clark, who had constructed the Columbus Bridge with a view toward development of his property in the Flats.
After 1840 leaders in urban America undertook the task of improving their streets. In 1880 Geo. Waring, an engineer active in street and sanitary improvements, conducted a survey of street conditions in the nation’s cities. Half of the streets remained unpaved; only 2.5% of the paved roads were constructed of asphalt, a smooth, dust-free surface. During the 1870s, officials in cities such as New York, Cleveland, Chicago, and Washington, DC, had installed wooden blocks, which muffled the noise of horses and carts. But wooden streets, soaked in creosote oil as a preservative, fueled the fires that occasionally destroyed portions of major cities. Other surfaces included cobblestone and granite blocks, set on beds of sand, and gravel, the cheapest type of surface. Because abutters rather than the city usually financed improvements, the emphasis was on rapid extension of streets to houses and buildings in outlying districts rather than on securing the best surface. Many hoped that street improvements would encourage a quick increase in property values, perhaps leading to the creation of exclusive residential districts, such as Chicago’s Union Park and EUCLID AVE.. in Cleveland.
The desire for miles of cheap roadway guided street designers in Cleveland. By the early 1880s, a lengthy network of streets, bridges, and viaducts had been constructed. The city had increased in size to 26.3 sq. mi., and the number of streets had jumped to 1,155, running 444 mi. in length. The CENTRAL VIADUCT was under construction to connect the city at Ohio St. with outlying areas south and west. The quality of surfaces varied; approx. 92 mi. had been graded, and another 32 mi. graded and curbed. During the 1840s, city officials had paved Superior St., and by the 1880s paving, though still costly, had been applied to 58 mi. Altogether, 41% of the city’s streets were improved. However popular these improvements, neither the costs nor the construction materials proved satisfactory. During the mid-1880s, officials installed block stone over several streets, including Broadway, Woodland, Superior, and Erie, a length of 13 mi., at a cost of $723,000. But the block stone was in fact the third type of improvement attempted; earlier pavements, including asphalt, had become “unendurable” and had generated a “long controversy.” Nor was controversy limited to this particular project. During the early 1870s, property owners had petitioned the council to open 17 streets, including Payne and Sheriff. Approval rested on the legal requirement that petitioners would repay bonds issued by the city through tax assessments amounting to more than $1 million. Once the improvements were in place, however, several of the beneficiaries secured a court order preventing the city from collecting the taxes.
Around 1900, rapid increases in auto sales began to highlight older problems and create new ones for those charged with road building. Competition between trolley operators and motorists for limited space added a fresh dimension to the traditional question of whether roads should benefit traffic flow or property values. Unable to satisfy diverse constituencies, road officials accelerated the pace of improvements and extensions. Between 1900-40, officials at every level paved more than 1.2 million mi. Local authorities proved unable to finance such costly improvements, forcing the level of highway funding (and decision making) up to the state and federal levels. In fact, the “battle for the streets” in cities such as Chicago, Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, and Cleveland prompted federal officials to contemplate funding the construction of a national expressway system. During the 1920s, road engineers and political leaders in the Cleveland region undertook major programs of extending and widening streets and roads. Federal and state funds were available for a number of these projects, which helped reduce the burden on local ratepayers and permitted more construction. Four-lane highways, replacing narrower and often twisting roads built prior to heavy traffic, were a popular design around Cleveland and many cities. On the far east, Kinsman, Euclid, and Lee roads were among those upgraded; and on the west, the 4-lane projects included West Lake Rd. Widening of older streets inside Cleveland proved slower and more costly, but engineers widened and resurfaced a large number, especially where trolleys and automobiles competed for space on narrow brick pavements. Projects such as the widening and extension of Chester from E. 13th to WADE PARK had to take place in sections of 8 to 10 blocks a year. In 1928 engineers counted nearly 1,800 mi. of roadway in the region constructed with federal, state, and county funds. Even more, they planned redevelopment and construction totaling 281 mi. in Cuyahoga County and another 312 mi. in the outlying areas at a cost of $63 million, exclusive of rights-of-way and damages.
Widening and extending roads failed to solve the traffic mess. In 1934, the low point of the Great Depression, county engineers surveyed traffic volume on major streets. During a 12-hour period, they counted 43,000 vehicles crossing the Superior Bridge. The outward movement of households and businesses added traffic along newer roads. Engineers counted 13,000 vehicles on Cedar Ave. west of Fairmount; 1,500 crossed Cedar at Warrensville, roughly the edge of suburban settlement. Leaders in politics and highway engineering added to the problem by spreading funds across numerous projects, partially satisfying demand and yet constructing roads that were below the standard of heavier and faster traffic. By the 1930s engineers had begun to define the problems of constructing a highway system in political rather than technical terms. Road building always required the support of politicians, and the difference after the 1920s is one of emphasis. In brief, engineers lacked the financial resources and legal remedies required to construct a road network adequate to traffic. Demand for road improvements routinely outstripped resources. Not until additional funds were made available and direction of road building centralized, many argued, could engineers improve the road network. Even during harsh Depression days, moreover, automobile registrations jumped 16%, and travel increased 45%. Truckers and motorists contended with traffic jams; downtown businessmen faced declining sales; and all endured the waste and tragedy of accidents. “Our street systems,” reported the Regional Assn. of Cleveland in 1941, “belong to the horse-and-buggy era.”
By the early 1940s, the construction of limited-access roads, popularly known as expressways, appeared to offer a solution to traffic jams and political stalemate. In 1939 the U.S. Bureau of Public Roads offered formal articulation of a plan for constructing a national expressway system. Within a year or two, road engineers and city planners formed committees to fix local routes and secure the support prerequisite to a lobbying campaign with state and federal governments. In Nov. 1944, members of the committee in Cleveland published a plan for expressway construction consisting of an inner and outer beltway plus 7 radial routes. Expressways would eventually serve 20% of the region’s traffic, or so ran the reasoning, drawing enough traffic from local roads to eliminate “need for many extensions and widenings.” Fewer autos on local streets, in this scheme, would “ensure quiet in the neighborhood,” encouraging residents not to seek “`greener pastures’ in the suburbs.” Proponents of expressways in Cleveland, as elsewhere, also promised a reduction in the number of accidents and, of course, “quick movement of heavy traffic.” Estimates of costs ran to $228 million during the course of 10 to 20 years, with the state and federal governments paying most of the bill.
The national expressway system was a popular idea. In 1944 members of Congress and Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt approved construction of the Interstate Highway System but failed to vote funds for construction costs. Despite the widespread celebration of such limited-access roads as the Pennsylvania Turnpike (opened 1940), leaders in the highway field, including truckers, economists, and the directors of farm and automotive groups, always sought to shift the financial burden of highway construction from themselves to general revenues, to taxes on other groups of road users, and to property owners. In cities such as Cleveland, debate revolved around the potential of expressways for serving urban renewal, resuscitating the downtown and speeding up traffic. Not until 1956 could members of Congress and Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower approve dedication of the gasoline tax to rapid development of the federal highway systems, particularly the Natl. System of Interstate & Defense Highways. During the mid-1950s, engineers in Cleveland spent $14 million to construct a section of the Innerbelt running 6/10 of a mile. In the future, federal officials would pay 90% of those costs, leaving the state responsible only for 10%. Free expressways proved no panacea in Cleveland. The scale of the interstate system, with its multiple lanes and wide interchanges, heightened the differences between those favoring traffic flow and others committed to property development. Conflict in the political arena began during the process of identifying routes. A route proposal submitted by a group of consulting engineers rested “solely on the basis of traffic,” the planning director of Cleveland advised the county engineer on 1 June 1954, and “would result in so great a disruption of over-all community plan that we cannot endorse it.” Route coordinates remained imprecise for several years pending the availability of funds. By Dec. 1957, however, the report of another consulting firm had it that “the primary purpose of a freeway is to serve traffic. . . .”
Between 1958 and the mid-1970s, planning and construction of the interstate system emerged as tangible facts on the landscape. Generally, those favoring traffic service predominated. The new Innerbelt, according to a report of 7 Oct. 1961 in the Cleveland PLAIN DEALER, “Loosens Downtown Traffic.” Occasionally, proponents of local development and property values managed to secure changes in routings and the elimination of extensions. In mid-1965, officials of the State Highway Dept. agreed to major changes in the location of interstate routes through the eastern suburbs. Observers noted that residents of these communities possessed wealth, which was imagined to translate directly into political protection, but unity and savvy were far more significant in the counsels of government. Traditional programs of road building and remodeling continued during the period of constructing the interstate system. The out-migration of households and businesses and a doubling of traffic during the first decade after World War II guided highway planners. From 1946 through the late 1950s, engineering staffs emphasized removal of bricks and streetcar tracks and repaving with concrete and asphalt. Beginning in 1946, officials spent $80,000 a mile to remodel Cedar Ave. between E. 2nd St. and E. 109th. The interstate system never refocused traffic toward downtown, nor did it encourage residents to remain in the city. By the late 1960s, officials had to extend main roads far to the south, west, and east in order to serve traffic and property in numerous subdivisions around the region. During the 1970s, attention in the region and nation shifted to repair and rehabilitation. Cleveland exhausted its funds, and other levels of government had to contend with inflation, declining resources, and fierce competition for road improvements.
From the early 19th century through the late 1970s, engineers, politicians, and developers in the Cleveland region directed the funding and construction of a large and up-to-date highway system. Materials and design approximated national standards in each period. Equally, road builders in the Cleveland region served the conflicting interests of highway users and adjoining owners of property. During the period up to ca. 1900, property enjoyed the greatest attention; thereafter, the crush of traffic forced greater attention to the design and siting of roads with a view toward vehicular service. After 1900, moreover, the momentum of highway building encouraged the training of professionals in the fields of road construction and land-use planning. Professional status conferred political and social legitimacy, allowing planners and engineers to interpret traffic and urban changes for politicians and residents. Engineers in the Cleveland region and nationwide held a larger influence and exercised a greater authority, especially because they had access to the revenues created by state and federal taxes on the sale of gasoline. Nonetheless, rarely could engineers in the Cleveland region–or in the nation as a whole–fund and construct the mileage demanded. During this entire period, road builders served the conflicting needs of a commercial civilization.
Teaching Cleveland Digital is a repository of writing, pictures and videos to support the teaching of Cleveland, Northeast Ohio and Ohio @ www.teachingcleveland.org. View all posts by
Author Posted on March 17, 2010Categories Transportation
Previous Previous post: Urban Transportation in Cleveland
Next Next post: “The Secret History of Chief Wahoo” by Brad Ricca from Belt Magazine 2014
History of the Cleveland-area’s Hispanic population and where most live now, Sept 27, 2022
Great Lakes Science Center marks 25 years, keeps evolving, educating, entertaining, Cleveland.com, September 27, 2022
Candidates for Cuyahoga County Executive: Chris Ronayne and Lee Weingart debate. The City Club of Cleveland 9.20.22
A bumpy road to regionalism by Jay Miller, Crain’s Cleveland Business 9/19/22
Updating the list of Cleveland’s most influential people: Brent Larkin July 17, 2022
“A Man is Passing” Poem written on the death of CLE Mayor Tom L Johnson 1912 by Edmund Vance Cooke
11 weeks after Jackie Robinson’s debut, Larry Doby arrived By Frederic J. Frommer/Washington Post July 5, 2022
Will Cleveland Ever Develop Its Lakefront? Cleveland Magazine August 2022
The Rise and Fall of the Cleveland Air Races by Vince Guerrieri June, 2022
A look back at 9 previous downtown Cleveland lakefront proposals that didn’t move ahead – Plain Dealer May 30, 2022
Myths surround ‘Untouchable’ lawman Eliot Ness. What’s the truth? Washington Post June 1, 2022
Tour the tunnels below Cleveland’s Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Monument – May 3, 2022
CLEVELAND: AN HISTORICAL OVERVIEW from Encyclopedia of Cleveland History (1987)
Cleveland’s 50 Most Important Moments of the Past 50 Years – Cleveland Magazine, April 2022
Categories Select Category Timeline of Cleveland/NE Ohio The Western Reserve 1796-1820    “Cleveland’s First Neighborhood – The Flats”    Along the Cuyahoga    Connecticut Western Reserve    Explorations Pre 1788    Lorenzo Carter    Moses Cleaveland    Oliver H. Perry/Battle of Lake Erie/War of 1812    Samuel and Hannah Huntington    Speculation, Sales and Real Estate    The Firelands    Women in the Western Reserve Pre Industrial 1820-1865    Building the Railroads    Cleveland Annexation of Ohio City    Columbus Bridge Street War    Leonard Case Sr./Leonard Case Jr.    The Abolition Movement    The Civil War and Cleveland    The Civil War and Ohio    The Erie and Ohio Canals Industrial Revolution 1865-1900    Amasa Stone    Charles F. Brush    Cleveland and the Gilded Age-student documentary    Cleveland in the Gilded Age by Dr. John Grabowski    Cleveland’s Millionaires    Flora Stone Mather    Henry Chisholm and Cleveland Rolling Mill Company    Henry Flagler in Cleveland    James A. Garfield    Jeptha Wade    John D. Rockefeller    John Hay in Cleveland    Mark Hanna    Maternity Homes    Millionaires Row    Municipal Government in Cleveland 1876-1900    Orphanages, 1851-1933    Philanthropy and Charity    Samuel Mather    School Reform in 1892    Settlement Movement    The Flats 1880 to 1920    William McKinley Progressive Era: 1900-1920    “Cleveland in 1912” The Lecture (Video)    1900-1919 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Brand Whitlock    Charles E. Ruthenberg and Socialism in Cleveland    Charles Willard “Billy” Stage    Cleveland 1912: Civitas Triumphant    Cleveland Economic History -The First 200 Years    Cleveland Foundation    Collinwood School Fire    Daniel Morgan    Edward W. Bemis    Frederic C. Howe    George Barnsdale Cox    Harris Cooley    Hazen Pingree    Henry George    Henry Thomas Hunt Mayor of Cincinnati    Herbert C. Bigelow    How Cleveland Women Got the Vote    Misc Articles on the Progressive Period in Ohio    Myron Herrick    Newton D. Baker    Ohio Constitutional Convention of 1912    Peter Witt    Photo Gallery    Ralph Hayes    Samuel “Golden Rule” Jones    The City Club    The Group Plan (The Mall)    Theodore E. Burton    Tom L. Johnson    World War 1 in Cleveland City Managers Political Bosses 1920’s    1920-1929 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Charles W. Chestnutt    City Manager Government    Cleveland Clinic Origins    Fred Kohler    Garrett A. Morgan    Jane Edna Hunter    Linda Eastman and the Cleveland Public Library    Margaret Bourke-White    Maurice Maschke    Police Actions Against Asians in 1920s Cleveland    Political Bosses    The Cleveland Orchestra    The Metroparks    Walter Burr Gongwer    Warren G. Harding in Ohio    William Hopkins 1930’s    1930-1939 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Eliot Ness    Frances Payne Bolton    Great Lakes Exposition    Harold Burton    John O. Holly    Public Housing / Ernest Bohn    Steel Industry    The Depression in Cleveland/Ohio    The New Deal in Ohio    The Van Sweringens    WPA in Cleveland African American Migration    African American History in Cleveland    Black Political Power in Ohio Pre World War 2    Notable Blacks of Cleveland from Cleveland Memory World War 2 – Post War 1940’s    1940-1949 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Bill Veeck and the 1948 Cleveland Indians    East Ohio Gas Explosion 1944    Frank Lausche    Karamu House    World War 2 in Cleveland 1950’s Suburbanism    1950-1959 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    An Overview of the Suburbs    Civil Defense in Cleveland    Cleveland Economic History -The First 200 Years    Cleveland Museum of Art    Cyrus Eaton    Dorothy Fuldheim    Housing    Rock and Roll    The Creation of the Highway System in NE Ohio    Urban Renewal/Erieview    Viktor Schreckengost Carl Stokes – Civil Rights 1960’s    1960-1969 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Carl Stokes    Cleveland in the 1960s incl. Mike Roberts Essay    Cleveland’s Muhammad Ali Summit, 45 Years Later    Cuyahoga River Fire    Hough Riots    Lee-Seville Public Housing Controversy    Martin Luther King Jr. in Cleveland    Robert F. Kennedy Speech At Cleveland City Club    School Desegregation Crisis of 1963-64    Stanley Tolliver    The Glenville Riots 1968 Ralph Perk – Dennis Kucinich 1970’s    1970-1979 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Cleveland in the 1970s (incl. Mike Roberts essay)    Community Organizing in Cleveland 1975-1985    Dennis Kucinich    James Rhodes    Kent State Shootings May 4, 1970    More than a bus ride: Deseg. of the Cleve Schools    Muny Light vs. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.    Ralph Perk    WMMS-FM 1980’s – 1990’s    “The Women Who Would Be Mayor” by Marian Morton    1980-1999 A Retrospective Year-by-Year Timeline    Cleveland in the 1980’s – Mike Roberts    Cleveland in the 1990’s – Mike Roberts    Cleveland in the 2000’s – Mike Roberts    George Forbes    George Voinovich Era as Mayor    Howard Metzenbaum    James Rokakis    John Frederick Seiberling    John Glenn    Louis Stokes    Michael R. White Era as Mayor    Playhouse Square    Richard Celeste    Robert Hughes    Stephanie Tubbs Jones    The Struggle For Stability by Dr. Thomas Campbell 2000s    Frank Jackson    Jane Campbell Books We Suggest    Books We Suggest Cleveland Cleveland History E-Books    Clevelands History E-Books Cleveland History Self Study: Syllabus of Essays    Cleveland History Self Study: A 5 Week Syllabus Cleveland Politician Interview Series    Cleveland Politician Interview Series Columbus Documentaries E-Books Elegant Cleveland Ethnic History of Cleveland    African Americans in Cleveland    Chinese in Cleveland    Cleveland Cultural Gardens    Eastern Orthodox in Cleveland    Ethnic Settlement in Cleveland       Hispanics in Northeast Ohio    Germans in Cleveland    Hungarians in Cleveland    Irish in Cleveland    Jews in Cleveland    Mormons in Cleveland    Polish in Cleveland    Protestants in Cleveland    Religion in Cleveland    Roman Catholics in Cleveland    Russians in Cleveland    Turks in Cleveland    Ukrainians in Cleveland History Day Live Events NE Ohio Neighborhoods and Their History    Asia Town from Fresh Water Cleveland    Beachwood    Bedford and Bedford Heights    Broadway/Slavic Village    Buckeye Neighborhood    Campus District    Central/Kinsman    Chagrin Falls    City of Cleveland/NE Ohio Neighborhoods    Cleveland Heights    Collinwood/Waterloo    Detroit Shoreway    Downtown    East Cleveland    Glenville    Gordon Square    Hough    Hudson    Lakewood    Little Italy    Lyndhurst    Mid Town    Mount Pleasant    Newburgh    North Olmsted    North Ridgeville    Ohio City    Olmsted Falls    Parma    Playhouse Square    Rocky River    Shaker Heights    South Euclid    Tremont    University Circle    Warrensville    West Park/Kamm’s Corners    Westlake Northeast Ohio Public Policy Forums Policies    2014 Cuyahoga County Executive Election    2014 Ohio Governor Election    Adult/College Education    African American Political Power in the 21st Cent    Agriculture    Cincinnati    Cuyahoga County    Energy    Environment    Foster Care in Northeast Ohio    Greater Cleveland    Healthcare Delivery    Healthcare Economic Opportunity    Housing    Immigration    Journalism       Roldo Bartimole    Lake and River Fronts    Manufacturing/Technology    Minority Participation in the New Economy    News Aggregator Archives    Ohio    Ohio Constitution    Overview    Philanthropy in NE Ohio    Planning    Primary and Secondary Education    Professional Sports    Regional Govt vs Home Rule    Regionalism    State of the County/City/State of Downtown    The Arts    Transportation    Voting Rights in Ohio    Water Teaching Cleveland    Introduction Teaching Cleveland Digital Media    About Us The Best Uncategorized    Teaching Cleveland Classes Video Candidate Election Forums Cincinnati Cleveland Photos League of Women Voters Ohio Congressional Redistricting Pittsburgh Women History in Cleveland