en ar en en en nl en en en en en en id en en en en en en nb en nl nl nb en en en en en en en en en en nb en en en en en fr en en en nb en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en it es en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en ca en en en en en en es en en en en en en en en en en en en en pt sv en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fa en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en
Almost all American adults – including parents, medical patients and people who are sexually active – regularly exercise their right to privacy, even if they don’t know it.
Privacy is not specifically mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. But for half a century, the Supreme Court has recognized it as an outgrowth of protections for individual liberty. As I have studied in my research on constitutional privacy rights, this implied right to privacy is the source of many of the nation’s most cherished, contentious and commonly used rights – including the right to have an abortion.
A key component of liberty
The Supreme Court first formally identified what is called “decisional privacy” – the right to independently control the most personal aspects of our lives and our bodies – in 1965, saying it was implied from other explicit constitutional rights.
For instance, the First Amendment rights of speech and assembly allow people to privately decide what they’ll say, and with whom they’ll associate. The Fourth Amendment limits government intrusion into people’s private property, documents and belongings.
Relying on these explicit provisions, the court concluded in Griswold v. Connecticut that people have privacy rights preventing the government from forbidding married couples from using contraception.
In short order, the court clarified its understanding of the constitutional origins of privacy. In the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision protecting the right to have an abortion, the court held that the right of decisional privacy is based in the Constitution’s assurance that people cannot be “deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.” That phrase, called the due process clause, appears twice in the Constitution – in the Fifth and 14th Amendments.
Decisional privacy also provided the basis for other decisions protecting many crucial, and everyday, activities.
The right to privacy protects the ability to have consensual sex without being sent to jail. And privacy buttresses the ability to marry regardless of race or gender.
The right to privacy is also key to a person’s ability to keep their family together without undue government interference. For example, in 1977, the court relied on the right to private family life to rule that a grandmother could move her grandchildren into her home to raise them even though it violated a local zoning ordinance.
Under a combination of privacy and liberty rights, the Supreme Court has also protected a person’s freedom in medical decision-making. For example, in 1990, the court concluded “that a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment.”
The right to decisional privacy is not the only constitutionally protected form of privacy. As then-Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist noted in 1977, the “concept of ‘privacy’ can be a coat of many colors, and quite differing kinds of rights to ‘privacy’ have been recognized in the law.”
This includes what is called a right to “informational privacy” – letting a person limit government disclosure of information about them.
According to some authority, the right extends even to prominent public and political figures. In one key decision, in 1977, Chief Justice Warren Burger and Rehnquist – both conservative justices – suggested in dissenting opinions that former President Richard Nixon had a privacy interest in documents made during his presidency that touched on his personal life. Lower courts have relied on the right of informational privacy to limit the government’s ability to disclose someone’s sexual orientation or HIV status.
All told, though the word isn’t in the Constitution, privacy is the foundation of many constitutional protections for our most important, sensitive and intimate activities. If the right to privacy is eroded – such as in a future Supreme Court decision – many of the rights it’s connected with may also be in danger.
Scott Skinner-Thompson is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Colorado Boulder.
The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone. The Conversation publishes nightly at 9 p.m. on FlaglerLive.
Understanding the Heat Dome: Why America Is Baking
Endorsements Aren’t As Influential as You Think
Wiccan Celebrations and the Permanence of Change
Privacy Isn’t In the Constitution. But It’s Everywhere in Constitutional Law.
Anti-Trans Legislation and Lawsuits Are Pushing back Against Chosen Pronouns
How Mike Pence’s Unremarkable Actions on Jan. 6 Saved the Nation
Blaspheming Human Rights: The Hypocrisy at the Core of Authoritarian Muslim Nations
There Is No One ‘Religious View’ on Abortion
Inflation Is Spiking. Can the Fed Raise Interest Rates Without Spiking Unemployment, Too?
Blaming ‘Evil’ Is Not Enough
Did the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban Diminish Mass Shootings? Yes.
Crowded Primaries Are Good for Extremists, Bad for Voters
To Get Safe Schools, Mental Health Resources Are Critical
Antarctica’s Riskiest Glacier Is Losing Its Grip
The Legal Age to Buy Assault Weapons Doesn’t Make Sense
See the Full Conversation Archives
If you’ve made it this far down our notoriously long articles, you’re probably among our more committed and regular readers. You value serious, quality local reporting, produced locally. As a non-profit, FlaglerLive depends in large part on you, the reader, for support. Much as advertising helps, you are the buffer that enables our independence from market vagaries and the occasional threat, common against independent journalism these days. FlaglerLive will always be available to you free of charge. Your support is essential. Become a Friend of FlaglerLive today. FlaglerLive is a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization: your contribution is tax-deductible. Click now, anywhere in this box, and contribute.
All donors' identities are kept confidential and anonymous.
June 20, 2022 at 6:43 am
We have to remember… we are living under a radical red scourge. Laws and constitutional protections are fluid, at best. Conservative justices, red-state supreme courts, governors, and attorneys general are all now free to make rulings based on cultural beliefs. They have shown complete disdain for law and precedent. And they are all protected from the consequences of their actions.
America is no longer a democratic bastion. We are subject to the whims of the cancerous red tide.
June 21, 2022 at 9:03 am
It’s growing more frightening by the day too. At this point it’s open treason, talks of secession 2.0, and now “hunting down those who don’t agree.”
This isn’t a game. The politicians benefitting from the rhetoric are moving seriously ill individuals to act on their behalf. And at this point, it’s clear they aren’t slowing down, but ramping up. A lot of people are going to be hurt or worse as a result. My fear is that all of this is designed to lead us into the result they want, which is open civil conflict or total abdication of democratic norms with the enthroning of tyrants nationwide.
This is going to get very very bad. I believe 2022 will be the spark and 2024 could be the last American election. To those who still value democracy, I say that running is not the answer. Leaving the worlds most powerful military and nuclear weapons delivery systems in the hands of the insane is not saving yourself, but damning everyone and everything. Our place is here. Running isn’t an option.
Timothy Patrick Welch says
June 20, 2022 at 9:21 am
So does an abortion deprive the unborn child of their of life, liberty or property, without due process of law?
And, if the unborn child is not yet a child, then why is there a punishment for someone causing harm or killing a pregnant woman’s child?
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
Been There on Flagler Library Director Holly Albanese Is 24-County Network’s Member of the Year
Been There on Flagler District Pays $6 Million for 685 Students to Attend Private Schools, Many Out of County, or Homeschooled
Been There on Flagler District Pays $6 Million for 685 Students to Attend Private Schools, Many Out of County, or Homeschooled
Lee on Judge Clears Way for Challenge to Law Allowing State to Override Local Police Budget Decisions
Laurel on DeSantis Pledges More Migrant Flights Out of Florida at State’s Expense
Laurel on DeSantis Pledges More Migrant Flights Out of Florida at State’s Expense
Gina Weiss on 416-Unit Apartment Complex on SR100 Near Colbert Ln. Adds to Growth Cluster Totaling 1,320 Units
Laurel on Flagler District Pays $6 Million for 685 Students to Attend Private Schools, Many Out of County, or Homeschooled
The problem isn't with public schools on Flagler District Pays $6 Million for 685 Students to Attend Private Schools, Many Out of County, or Homeschooled
Sandene on Flagler District Pays $6 Million for 685 Students to Attend Private Schools, Many Out of County, or Homeschooled
Herewegoagain on Plan for a Massive Apartment Tower at Harborside Draws Opposition, Accusations and Delay
DaleL on ‘Not My King’: Protesting a Monarchy in Mourning
Tony Mack on Flagler Library Director Holly Albanese Is 24-County Network’s Member of the Year
PS on 416-Unit Apartment Complex on SR100 Near Colbert Ln. Adds to Growth Cluster Totaling 1,320 Units
Sunny Cupcakes on Flagler District Pays $6 Million for 685 Students to Attend Private Schools, Many Out of County, or Homeschooled
Ray W. on DeSantis Defends Martha’s Vineyard Migrant Flight But Details of ‘Repulsive’ and ‘Cruel Ruse’ Scant