en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en ca en oc de en es en en en en ceb zh zh hi gu ko
Case Studies Vehicle Insurance Travel Insurance House & Contents Insurance Health Insurance Life Insurance Natural Disasters Financial Advisers Loans & Credit Superannuation & Investments
Media Articles Media Releases Document Library COVID-19
Join the IFSO Scheme Participant Homepage Case Study Search How to search the Case Study Database. Portal Access
Events Coffee Time Webinars Newsletters Participant obligations Industry Data and Insights
All Toolkits Complaints Response Toolkit Complaints - Interactive Process Map Build-a-Complaint-Process Toolkit Vulnerability and Threats of Harm Toolkit Webinar Library and CPD Template Library
Fair Insurance Code Breach
Insurers bound by the Fair Insurance Code must provide agreed minimum standards of service to customers.
Fair Insurance Code Breach
In February 2017, Kim* made a claim for cracking walls in her house caused by vibration from roadworks. In April 2017, the insurer accepted the claim and arranged for experts to assess the damage and undertake temporary repairs.
In February 2018, the insurer told Kim it had declined the claim, based on an exclusion for loss caused by vibration. The insurer offered to continue to investigate the claim on the basis of holding the road construction company responsible.
Members of the Insurance Council of New Zealand are bound by the Fair Insurance Code. While the IFSO Scheme found the insurer could rely on the vibration exclusion to decline the claim, it had significantly breached the Code. The IFSO Scheme had serious concerns about the delays, lack of transparency and follow-up relating to incomplete repairs.
After discussions with the IFSO Scheme, the insurer agreed it had significantly breached the Code. The insurer provided a detailed apology and offered Kim an unconditional ex-gratia payment of $50,000 in recognition of customer service issues and Code breaches, and $5,000 towards Kim’s legal fees.