en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en hu en en pl de uk en en en de en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en ca es es es en ne en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en en en en en da en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en nl en en en en en en en en en en en ar en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en it en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en de hbs_lat fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en it en en en en es en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en es en en en en en en en en hu hu ru en en en en en en de de en en en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en pt en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en
Unlike the Miramax (Rozema) production I discussed last week, this adaptation of Austen’s Mansfield Park emphasizes the societal depiction of Austen’s time. Even the opening scene is staged quite differently. In the 1999 film version, the young Fanny is portrayed as intelligence and possessing of resolve, where in this production the child Fanny is well dressed in a red cloak and hat. She is shy and only speaks when spoken to. Her home life is displays a sense of “disorder” and “distracted parenting,” rather than poverty. (See my previous posts on Mansfield Park 1983 and Mansfield Park 1999.)
When Sir Thomas announces Fanny’s second-class status to his family it is done in private. Fanny does not hear Sir Thomas’s disparagements. Sir Thomas’s apprehension that either of his sons might take a liking to Fanny is more out of not thinking Fanny worthy of his offsprings.
The interior sets draw the viewer’s attention to the period decor. Many of the scenes are shot outdoors with the characters strolling through gardens and rustic pathways. The novel gives the impression that Mansfield Park is a modern manor house. “Miss Crawford soon felt that he and his situation might do. She looked about her with due consideration, and found almost everything in his favour: a park, a real park, five miles round, a spacious modern-built house, so well placed and well screened as to deserve to be in any collection of engravings of gentlemen’s seats in the kingdom, and wanting only to be completely new furnished–pleasant sisters, a quiet mother, and an agreeable man himself–with the advantage of being tied up from much gaming at present by a promise to his father, and of being Sir Thomas hereafter.” Newby Hall, Skelton on Ure, North Yorkshire, was used for Mansfield Park in the mini-series.
Unlike the 1999 version of the story, this one keeps William Price as an important character in the story. As we all may remember, Henry Crawford’s assistance in getting William a commission for military service brings Fanny many moments of introspection after Crawford’s proposal to her. In the 1999 film, Fanny is heard in voiceover reading letters to her sister. In this mini-series, Fanny’s voiceover is directed to William. In her letters, she summarizing many of the events at Mansfield Park. William also plays an important role in the ball given by Sir Thomas in honor of William and Fanny.
It also portrays Henry Crawford in a less than kindly light than does the Miramax film. Crawford “plays” with Fanny, seducing her to fall in love with him. This is more in character to the Austen novel than the 1999 film, where Crawford appears to fall in love with Fanny. Mrs. Norris is seen as too ingratiating in her relations with Sir Thomas’s family. Like the novel, Lady Bertram is seen as disengaged from her family. She cares more for her pugs than her children.
As in the novel, Sir Thomas chastises Tom Bertram for Tom’s excessive expenditures. Tom’s inconsideration has forced Sir Thomas to sell a benefice meant for Edmund. Tom accepts the fault, but he does nothing to change his ways other than to “hope” he will have better luck at the gaming tables and the horse races.
Costumes for Regency Bad Girls in Jane Austen Movies
Mansfield Park (2007), Mary Crawford (Hayley Atwell)
In this adaptation, Fanny’s costumes are plain and “useful.” She wears white or pastel colors. Mary Crawford’s character wears pastel colors also, but her costumes are elaborately elegant. Neither Fanny, Mary, or the Bertram sisters show much décolletage.
The scenes where the group perform the play, this mini-series stays close to Austen’s novel. Fanny is reluctant to participate in the play and is more reluctant to serve as the “partner” to both Mary and Edmund when the pair are learning their lines. Fanny must witness Edmund’s “courtship” of Mary Crawford.
The ball scene shows how Fanny enjoys the dance with Edmund best. She dances first with Henry Crawford, after Sir Thomas demands that she lead off the ball. The dance with Henry is slow and stately. Next, she dances with her brother William to a lively jig. The dance with Edmund is formal, but we see them clasping hands and enjoying each other’s company. After the ball, Sir Thomas orders her to bed, as if he had extended his benevolence long enough.
Mansfield Park (2007) | Costume drama reviews
In both the novel and this mini-series, Fanny is in Portsmouth when she learns of Maria and Henry’s flight. She also learns of Tom’s illness, and Fanny wishes to be of service to those at Mansfield Park. Edmund comes to Portsmouth and escorts Fanny and Susan to Mansfield Park. Fanny learns from Edmund his change of heart toward Mary Crawford. A flashback is used where Edmund calls on Mary in London. Mary is angry at her brothers and Maria’s escape, not because of adultery, but because they caused rumors, which affect her also. Mary claims that if Fanny accepted Henry then none of this would happen. Mary develops a plan to “re-introduce” Maria and Henry to society if they marry.
Fanny’s voiceover to William in a letter advances the film’s ending. She tells the viewer that Rushworth receives his divorce, Julia and Yates elope and marry, and Mrs. Norris is to set up a home for Maria. Then we see Fanny’s wedding day as Fanny continues to tell William that she and Edmund will live in the parsonage for Dr. Grant has departed the neighborhood. The ending scene is Edmund and Fanny together with Pug on the parsonage’s grounds.
Regina Jeffers is the award-winning author of Austenesque, Regency and historical romantic suspense.
View all posts by reginajeffers →
This entry was posted in British history, film, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Regency era and tagged film adaptations of novels, Jane Austen, Mansfield Park. Bookmark the permalink.
← Winners of “His Irish Eve” Giveaway from Regina Jeffers
Do You Know These Words and Phrases? →
4 Responses to Mansfield Park 2007
May 26, 2015 at 10:58 am
I just happened to watch the Master Piece Theater version of Mansfield Park last night. I found the physical similarities in the characters to be distracting. Perhaps because I haven’t read the novel in a long time, but I was confused. Tom and William looked almost identical to me at first. And Maria, Julia, and Mary were so similar it was frustrating telling them apart. I was pleased when Maria and Julia were taken off screen. Perhaps my eyes were tired. 🙂
May 26, 2015 at 2:20 pm
An interesting perspective, Barbara… I am a fan of Hayley Atwell, but I understand what you are saying about the characters possessing similar looks. I find this most frustrating in more than one film/series.
May 27, 2015 at 12:54 pm
It’s interesting to me how the variations of the movies differ, in some ways for no reason from the original novels. In writing Sense & Sensibility’s adaptation, I find that the novel has so many characters, it is hard to include them all without confusing the reader. Barbara’s comment about being confused on screen solidifies my decision to cut out some characters.
May 27, 2015 at 1:18 pm
It is especially difficult for many of the American readers, who less familiar with the nuances of life in England during the Regency Period. It is difficult to find a balance between being true to Austen and not overwhelming the reader.
St Albans in Hertfordshire, Setting for my Latest JAFF Novel, “Elizabeth Bennet’s Gallant Suitor” + a Giveaway
Marriage A-la-Mode and the Upcoming Release of “Elizabeth Bennet’s Gallant Suitor” + a Giveaway
Annuities in the Regency as Basis for “Mr. Darcy’s Bargain”
Recording of Births in the Church of England During the Regency
Billiards in the Regency Era
Glenda M on Marriage A-la-Mode and the Upc…
darcybennett on Marriage A-la-Mode and the Upc…
reginajeffers on Marriage A-la-Mode and the Upc…
reginajeffers on Marriage A-la-Mode and the Upc…
Glenda M on Marriage A-la-Mode and the Upc…
Living in the Regency
Living in the UK
Shining Light on Our Ladies
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.