da en en fi da id da da da fy en fr da en id da da ca da nb da fr da eo es da da de da en es en da de fr en ru da da da de en de sv nb en en de en nb da en sv en sv da tr da sv sv sv sv sv sv sv da en en da da af da en da da ro da fr en da da nb id en da da af en en da da ro da da en fi da da tr en da nb de es da da da da tr en da nb da da tr da de nb de en tr en de de en da sv de es de en ca de de sv de sv da tr da nb sv de sv ca sv ca sv de en da en da da da it da fr en en es es en en da da da nl da sv en en da da en en nl da nb da da da da en da sv da nb sv da da en en en fr en en nb da nb en en en en en en en en en fr en en en en en en en en en en en sk en en fa en en en en sv fr da fa fr en en es en nb nb nb en de da sv da nb sv da da da da da da sv en da fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en en en en en en fa en en en en da da sv da nb nl en en en en en fr en en en en en en en en en da en da fa en fr da da da en de da da da da da da sv da da da da fr en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en en en da en da fa en en en en da da sv da da de en en fr en en en en en en en en en en en en en da en da da da en fa da fr en da da sv da da da da da az fr en da en en en en da da nn en de en fr en fr fr en es es en en da da da da fi da tr da sv en sv en sv en nn hbs_lat da sv fi da fi da da da en da de da de da es sv da de sv da fi en da da da da da da en en pl da de sv da fi en da nn sv sv nb de sv en tr da da en fi da da tr en da nb de es da da da da tr en da nb da da tr da de nb de en tr en de de en da sv de es de en ca de de sv de sv da tr da nb sv de sv ca sv ca sv de en en da da fi da da en
Religionskritiske bøger < Socialistisk Bibliotek
Velkomst!Logge ind på din konto
Velkommen! Log ind på din konto
Forgot your password? Get help
En adgangskode vil blive sendt til din email.
SOCIALISTISK BIBLIOTEK Progressive Online Library
Te Danish Labour Movement and Marxism 1885-1920
PFLP – “Mod imperialisme, zionisme og arabiske reaktionære”
Fireburn – Har vi glemt Danmarks største arbejderopstand?
H.C. Andersen – i en progressiv vinkel
Tvangskristening af hedninge: Te Taking of Arkona in 1169, King Valdemar and Bishop Absalon indtager Arkona i 1169 og vælter stuen af Guden Svantevit. Malet af den danske maler og skulptør Laurits Tuxen (1853–1927) sidst i 1900 tallet (før 1890). Olie på lærred.Note: Original studie til vægmaleriet på Frederiksborg slot. Fotograf: hopegallery.com. Public Domain Kilde: Wikimedia Commons.
Daniel C. Dennett: Breaking te Spell
Bertrand Russell: Hvorfor jeg ikke er kristen
I forbindelse med religionens øgede politiske betydning, er der gennem de sidste par år udgivet en række bøger med hård og polemisk religionskritik fra filosoffer og evolutionsbiologer. Bøgerne har medført omfattende debat, og vi har her samlet lidt af diskussionen – både fra venstrefløjen og bredere.
Bjarne A. Frandsen, juni 2007.
Se også på Socialistisk Bibliotek:
Emnelisten: Socialister om Religion, om socialistiske religionskritikere
Christiane Jordheim Larsen: Nyateistisk vekkelse (11. januar 2007)
“Er du ‘bright’? Den nyateistiske bevegelsen ser til homobevegelsen for inspirasjon. De vil ha deg ut av skapet.”
Jens Lenler: Ateisterne angriber (24. december 2007)
“Internationale bestsellere og prominente ateister kræver fornuften tilbage og angriber de troende. Også Danmark har fået to ateistiske talerør.”
“Why has my local bookshop suddenly sprouted a section labeled ‘Atheism’? Why, just as we were apparently moving into a post-metaphysical, post-ideological, even post-historical era, is theology breaking out all over te place? Can we put it all down to fanatical Islamists and falling towers?”
Chris Hedges: Te dangerous Atheism of Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris (March 22, 2008)
“From demonizing Muslims to believing we can use science for our own moral advancement, te New Atheists preach a dangerous faith.”
Erik Tunstad: Ateistene slår tilbake (1. november 2006)
“Hvorfor er vi religiøse? Representerer religiøs tro noen biologisk fordel for de troende, eller er troen mer å regne som et tilfeldig og kanskje til og med skadelig biprodukt av noe annet, og langt mer nyttig?”
In Defence of Marxism
Religion and secularism. By John Pickard (27 April 2011)
“As te twenty-first century progresses, there has been an increasing interest and not a small amount of debate on te role of religion in society and particularly on advances in secularisation.”
John Molyneux: More than opium: Marxism and religion (Issue 119, Summer 2008, p.51-73)
“Two vehemently anti-religious books have found their way into te bestsellers list – one by te ‘selfish gene’ biologist Richard Dawkins, te other by Christopher Hitchens, te one-time socialist who is now a fervent supporter of imperialist war. In a major article, John Molyneux shows how distant their attitude to religion is from that of te Marxist tradition.”
Luke Savage: New Atheism, old empire (February 12, 2014)
“Te ‘New Atheists’ have gained traction because they give intellectual cover to Western imperialism.”
Ronald Aronson: Te new Atheists (June 25, 2007)
“Te great success of te New Atheists is to have reached them, both speaking to and for them. These writers are devoted, with sledgehammer force and angry urgency, to ‘breaking te spell’ cast by te religious ascendancy … This does not make for restraint. Harris displays brash self-confidence, Hitchens and Dawkins angry intellectual bite and Dennett an inexhaustible theoretical energy and range of inquiry.”
Te New York Review of Books
H. Allen Orr: A mission to convert (Vol.54, No.1, January 11, 2007)
“During te last year, a number of popular books on religion by scientists or philosophers of science have appeared. Daniel Dennett kicked things off with his Breaking te Spell (2006), an investigation into te possibility of a science of religion. Reviewing evolutionary, psychological, and economic theories of te origin and spread of belief, Dennett covered much ground but reached few conclusions. In te last few months, three prominent scientists – all biologists – have published their own books on belief. Richard Dawkins, has given us Te God Delusion, an extended polemic against faith, which will be considered at length below.”
Te threat to reason. Book review by Neil Davidson (Issue 316, July/August 2007)
“Te Enlightenment tradition is under attack – at least if a series of recent books are to be believed … Dan Hind convincingly shows … that under te cover of attacks on religion in general te greatest bile is invariably reserved for Islam.”
Gary Wolf: Te church of te non-believers (Issue 14.11, Nov. 2006)
“A band of intellectual brothers is mounting a crusade against belief in God. Are they winning converts, or merely preaching to te choir?”
A.J. Chien: Te new Atheism (September 10, 2007)
“… a string of books critical of religion have become modest bestsellers in recent years … How could this happen in a country where upward of 80% majorities assert belief in God, Christ, and miracles?”
Wikipedia, te free encyclopedia
Category: Books critical of religion
Richard Dawkins on stage in Stockholm. 12. December 2015. Photo: Anders Hesselbom. Public Domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons.
Richard Dawkins: Te God Delusion / Illusionen om Gud
By Richard Dawkins (London, Bantam, 2006, 372 s.). Dansk udgave: Illusionen om Gud (Thaning & Appel, 2007, 432 s.). See te English edition online (pdf) (Metataphysicspirit.com).
Wikipedia, te free encyclopedia
Richard Dawkins Foundation on Reason & Science
Te Official Richard Dawkins Website.
Erik Tunstad: Forfriskende religionskritikk (3. november 2006)
“Evolusjonsbiologen Richard Dawkins bruker tung redskap når han dundrer løs på religionen i sin siste bok Te God Delusion. Forfriskende for ateister, men han omvender neppe de troende.”
Johann Hari: Ateismens ayatollah (25. januar 2006)
“Dawkins er ikke perfekt. Selvfølgelig er religion ikke roden til alt ondt. Den tanke kan imødegås med to ord: Stalin og Mao. At udrydde religiøs overtro gør det ikke af med hver en farlig forblændelse. Men han er en af de få, som i dag har mod til at udfordre troens anmassende mørkemænd …”
Christiane Jordheim Larsen: Vil rette på det vrange (22. desember, 2006)
“Et univers med en personlig gud skiller seg fra et uten, sier Richard Dawkins, som argumenterer for at det nesten helt sikkert ikke finnes noen gud.”
Erik Bjerager: Illusionen om altings forklaring (12. oktober 2007)
“Richard Dawkins’ ateisme og afvisning af Gud er lige så intolerant og doktrinær som det værste af den religion, han gør udfald imod.”
Bjarne Nørum: Gud er ikke stor (4. juni 2007)
” Videnskabsmanden og forfatteren Richard Dawkins er en superstjerne på den internationale boghimmel. Kristeligt Dagblad har mødt den kontroversielle ateist til litteraturfestival i Hay on Wye i Wales.”
Sidsel Nyholm: Tro er blændværk (26. januar 2007)
” Biologen Richard Dawkins’ polemiske bestseller om ‘Vrangforestillingen om Gud’ udfordrer religiøs tro ud fra både en psykologisk, historisk og naturvidenskabelig vinkel. Religion er blændværk, og at opdrage børn til at tro på Gud er lig med mishandling, argumenterer Dawkins, der med sin bog vil fyre op under verdens ateister.”
Lars Sandbeck: Dawkins Mysteriet (5. november 2007)
“Biologen Richard Dawkins’ opgør med religionen er næsten ikke til at tage seriøst; til gengæld er det underholdende læsning.”
Alister McGrath: Te Dawkins Delusion (January 26, 2007)
“An Oxford theologian contends that te aggressive rhetoric of Richard Dawkins’ books masks a deep insecurity about te public credibility of atheism.”
Atheist Richard Dawkins on ‘Te God Delusion’. Interview with Terrence McNally (January 18, 2007)
“In te last few years, Americans have seen te harm that results when political decisions are made in te name of religion. Now, te non-believers are fighting back.”
Beyond demonic memes: why Richard Dawkins is wrong about Religion (July 4, 2007)
“David Sloan Wilson shares with us his analysis of Dawkins’ theory of religion, which he feels is wide of te mark based on te evidence.” See Richard Dawkins replies (July 11, 2007)
Norman Levitt: What a friend we have in Dawkins + Michael Shermer: Arguing for Atheism (January 31, 2007)
An ultimately crude and one-sided atheism (Vol.2, No.5, Summer 2008; online at Internet Archive)
“His moral zeitgeist is capable of mocking te evident absurdities of te religious ideas of te great unwashed masses, and te cynicism with which religious and secular elites make use of these ideas. It is unable, however, to explain te source of te great contradiction with which he tries to grapple – that te achievements of capitalist modernity conflict with te ideas of religion in all sorts of ways, but at te same time reproduce religious belief like smallpox.”
Kenan Malik: I don’t believe in Richard Dawkins (8 October 2006)
“Dawkins’s polemic against te need for religion is compelling, even if te arguments are not particularly new. Less persuasive is his attempt to explain what faith is and why people continue to believe. So great is his loathing for religion that it sometimes overwhelms his reasoned argument.”
London Review of Books
Terry Eagleton: Lunging, flailing, mispunching (Vol. 28, No. 20, 19 October 2006)
“Card-carrying rationalists like Dawkins, who is te nearest thing to a professional atheist we have had since Bertrand Russell, are in one sense te least well-equipped to understand what they castigate, since they don’t believe there is anything there to be understood, or at least anything worth understanding. This is why they invariably come up with vulgar caricatures of religious faith that would make a first-year theology student wince.”
Te New York Review of Books
H. Allen Orr: A mission to convert (Vol. 54, No. 1, January 11, 2007)
“Te most disappointing feature of Te God Delusion is Dawkins’s failure to engage religious thought in any serious way. This is, obviously, an odd thing to say about a book-length investigation into God. But te problem reflects Dawkins’s cavalier attitude about te quality of religious thinking. Dawkins tends to dismiss simple expressions of belief as base superstition.”
Niall Mulholland: Dissecting ‘te God hypothesis’ (Issue 110, June 2007)
“Te God Delusion is a powerful counterblast to reactionary religious leaders and te fog of mystical ideas and Dawkins has te right to robustly put forward rational, scientific arguments … This does not mean socialists would agree with everything Dawkins writes or would always take te same approach. His arguments sometimes feel abstract. Crucial factors like society, class, history, ‘tradition and culture’, and politics, or te reasons for te religious outlook of many poor and oppressed people, are not properly addressed or not at all.”
John McAnulty: Vulgar materialism meets te spirit world (14 October 2007)
“Dawkins trashes religion, but he does so from a crude and dogmatic positivism and reductionism that is thoroughly reactionary … Te book is at its strongest when it enters battle against te creationists, disguised as advocates of te argument for intelligent design as te source of biological diversity.”
Michael Rosen: Richard Dawkins: damning te religious (Issue 1984, 21 January 2006)
“Michael Rosen argues that Richard Dawkins’ new TV series, Te Root Of All Evil, misunderstands te historical role of religion and those who practise it.”
Michael Fitzpatrick: Te Dawkins delusion (18 December 2006)
“‘Catholic atheist’ Michael Fitzpatrick finds himself repelled by Richard Dawkins’ crass and prejudiced polemic against religion.”
Paul Greenaway: Domination theology (Issue 607, January 12, 2006)
“How is it, asks a puzzled and sometimes furious Dawkins, that in what ‘should be an age of reason’, instead there is an ‘elephant in te garden’ called religion – a superstitious thought system which in his damning view invites te ‘positive suspension of critical faculties’ and thus promotes intolerance, fanaticism and violence?”
Clive Bradley: Richard Dawkins, Te God Delusion (5 April 2007)
“I think it is a mark of something about te contemporary world that much of te tone of Dawkins’ critique of religion would have been commonplace thirty, or even a hundred and fifty years ago, yet now te forthrightness with which he denounces te Biblical God seems slightly shocking. Secularists have given too much ground to te God Squad.”
Janine Booth: Is religion te root of all evil? (10 January, 2006)
+ Part 2 (17 January, 2006)
“On te broad question he addressed – science versus religious superstition – Dawkins is absolutely right, and he is right to raise te alarm about te revival of religious belief and te repression and violence it can lead to … But, there are some buts.”
World Socialist Web Site
Joe Kay: Science, religion and society: Richard Dawkins’s Te God Delusion (15 March 2007)
“Te problem Dawkins and others confront in explaining religious and ideological change lies ultimately in their refusal to take up Marxist theory. Dawkins refers to Marx only once in passing, and deals with class theory only in te paragraph quoted above. For Dawkins, religion has no social or political significance. He treats it merely as an idea without any real connections to te more material conditions of life.”
Daniel Dennett at te 17. Göttinger Literaturherbst, October 19th, 2008, in Göttingen, Germany. 19. October 2008. Photo: Mathias Schindler. (CC BY-SA 3.0). Source: Wikimedia Commons.
Daniel C. Dennett: Breaking te Spell
Breaking te spell: religion as a natural phenomenon
By Daniel C. Dennett (New York, Viking, 2006, 448 s.)
Wikipedia, te free encyclopedia
Rune Lykkeberg: Kamp mod forbandelser ved højlys dag (12. maj 2007)
“Den amerikanske filosof og religionskritiker Daniel Dennett kom til Amager og forklarede, at religioner egentlig er udviklet ligesom en moderne ko.”
Christiane Jordheim Larsen: Vil dissekere religion (21. desember, 2006)
“Daniel C. Dennett står i fremste rekke blant dem som vil forklare religion som naturfenomen. Det kan hjelpe oss med å hindre religiøst begrunnet terrorisme.”
Review by Kenan Malik (8 April 2006)
“His project of putting religion under rational scrutiny is surely to be welcomed in an age in which faith seems to shape so much of people’s responses to political and social issues. Te real problem is that Dennett’s explanation of religion is less than convincing. It may be true that humans possess certain psychological dispositions that open them to religious ideas. But uncovering such traits is not te same as explaining te origins, let alone te contemporary attractions, of religion.”
H. Allen Orr: Te good project (April 2006)
“‘Breaking te Spell’ ranges widely, perhaps too widely. It surveys te state of religion in contemporary America, considers whether believers are happier or more moral than nonbelievers, discusses te rise of modern nondenominational spirituality, and briefly reviews te purported philosophical proofs for te existence of God. But all these topics have been widely discussed, and Dennett has little new to say about them; his real contribution is an accessible account of what might be called te natural history of religion.”
World Socialist Web Site
James Brookfield: Dennett’s dangerous idea (6 November 2006)
“Te strengths of Dennett’s book lie in its materialism and te fact that it makes reference to a wide body of contemporary research on these subjects … [it] does have, however, significant limitations. While te centrality of neo-Darwinism to his outlook contributes to an historical approach to te development of religion, Dennett does not add to this a theoretical framework for considering te development of human society. Dennett treats human history in a very abstract, non-concrete form.”
James Brookfield: Religion and science: a reply to a right-wing attack on philosopher Daniel Dennett (21 March 2006)
“Te 19 February 2006 issue of te New York Times Book Review carries a tendentious attack on Breaking te Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, te latest work by American philosopher Daniel Dennett.”
Daniel Dennett: Breaking te Spell – Religion as a Natural Phenomenon (YouTube.com; 58:43 min.)
Sam Harris speaking 11 February 2010. Photo: Steve Jurvetson. (CC BY 2.0). Source: flickr.com.
Sam Harris: Te End of Faith / Troens Fallit
Te End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and te Future of Reason
By Sam Harris (New York, W.W. Norton, 2005, 348 s.). Dansk udgave: Troens fallit: religion, terror og fornuftens fremtid (Akademisk Forlag, 2007, 332 s.)
Letter to a Christian nation
By Sam Harris (New York, Knopf, 2006, 96 s.). Dansk udgave: Brev til en kristen nation (Akademisk Forlag, 2007, 101 s.)
Wikipedia, te free encyclopedia
Te End of Faith
Rune Engelbreth Larsen: Troens eller troskritikkens fallit? Sam Harris’ aggressive ateisme (25.7.2007)
“Sam Harris hører sammen med Richard Dawkins til de senere års skarpeste religionskritikere, der på den ene side påpeger og udstiller flere trosretningers ildevarslende tendenser og paradoksale forklaringsproblemer, men hvis ateistiske udgangspunkt imidlertid på den anden side lider under en række ensidige fordomme og proportionsforvrængende kortslutninger …”
Sam Harris: Troens spektrum (11. april 2007)
“De moderate religiøse værner uvægerlig deres mere fanatiske trosfæller imod en effektiv konfrontation med den kritiske fornuft, skriver Sam Harris – en førende fortaler for tidens nye ‘militante ateisme’.”
Sam Harris: 10 myter og sandheder om ateisme (8. januar 2007)
“I det superreligiøse USA er ateisme moralsk og politisk diskvalificerende for det store flertal. Det nødvendiggør et opgør med de udbredte misforståelser om, hvad ateisme indebærer.”
Per Clausen: Til kamp mod den religiøse overtro (10. maj 2006)
“… han stiller de fundamentale og nødvendige spørgsmål, nemlig hvorfor vi skal tage hensyn til religiøse dogmer, der er totalt uunderbyggede, og følgelig med hvilken ret det religiøse indtager en særstilling i den offentlige diskurs.”
Lars Sandbeck: Opgør med fundamentalismen (2. juni 2007)
“Sam Harris’ nyeste bog henvender sig direkte til de kristne fundamentalister, der især i USA har penge og politisk magt i ryggen.”
Lars Sandbeck: Til kamp mod religionen (21. april 2007)
“Sam Harris forener synspunkter fra den politiske højrefløj med en aggressiv ateisme. Resultatet bliver et politisk opgør med trosfriheden.”
John Gorenfeld: Sam Harris’s faith in Eastern spirituality and Muslim torture (January 5, 2007)
“Te best-selling author of ‘Te End of Faith’ may argue against Christianity, but he is also supportive of phenomena such as reincarnation and ESP, and calls for ‘compassionately killing’ te ‘Muslim hordes’.”
Alexander Saxton: Faith in te ‘War with Islam’ (October 19, 2006)
“After having declared all religions irrational, divisive, and inciters of conflicts that threaten te destruction of civilization, Harris turns to a vitriolic and selective polemic against Islam. This permeates te entire book.”
An Atheist Manifesto (December 7, 2005)
“Sam Harris argues against irrational faith and its adherents.”
Doug Lowe: A kick up te ’arris (No.31, 2007)
“A book that began as an acute dissection of te contradictions and irrationality of all main religions ended up as a cleverly re-packaged flag-waving exercise. I can’t quite decide whether Harris is confused, naïve, cynical, a bad historian or a combination of all four.”
World Socialist Web Site
Christie Schaefer: Atheism in te service of political reaction : A comment on author Sam Harris (16 April 2007)
“Harris has been hailed by some as something of a rationalist savior. While on te surface his arguments against te current violent trends in fundamentalist religions seem something with which most people would agree, it does not take much examination to reveal an extremely backward and reactionary perspective underneath.”
Christopher Hitchens v. John Lennox at Samford University in Birmingham, Alabama. 3 March 2009 “Is God Great” Debate. Photo: stepherw. (CC BY-SA 2.0). Source: flickr.com.
Christopher Hitchens: God is not Great / Gud er ikke stor
God is not great: how religion poisons everything
By Christopher Hitchens (New York, Warner Books, 2007). Dansk udgave: Gud er ikke stor : hvordan religionen forpester alt (Gyldendal, 2007, 362 s.)
Wikipedia, te free encyclopedia
God is not Great
Martin Burcharth: Sådan gør man op med religion i Guds eget land (19. maj 2007)
“Den flabede eksilbrite Christopher Hitchens har gjort kunststykket igen. I sin nye bog kalder han religion roden til al ondt. Af en eller anden grund slipper han billigt fra provokationen i sit adopterede Amerika.”
Marcus Rubin: Fri os fra det guddommelige (24. november 2007)
“Religioner er roden til alt ondt, og verden kan ikke blive fri for dem hurtigt nok. Det er budskabet i Christopher Hitchens’ brillant skrevne intellektuelle tour de force, men næppe en bog, som overbeviser ret mange troende om ateismens glæder.
Richard Seymour: Reason in revolt: two books on enlightenment (July 4, 2007)
“God Is Not Great is sometimes witty, or at least half-witty, which is better than average. And it displays some of te author’s ostentatiously wide learning with some of te old lapidary skill … It is also superficial, error-strewn, and riddled with inconsistency and disavowal.”
Daniel Lazare: Among te Disbelievers (May 28, 2007)
“Christopher Hitchens’s new book, God Is Not Great, is another example of atheism as an empty vessel, one he manages to fill with an intellectual justification for George W. Bush’s ‘war on terror’ … Yet one person is conspicuously absent from Hitchens’s list of religious evil-doers: George W. Bush. Yes, te man who said Jesus is his favorite philosopher.”
Shaun Doherty: Book review (Issue 316, July/August 2007)
“Hitchens sees religion as te root of all evil and this leads to a crudely reductive and ahistorical approach.”
Te Spiked Review of Books
Michael Fitzpatrick: Baiting te devout (Issue 2, June 2007)
“It is because secular intellectuals have lost their own belief in progress and liberation that they are turning venomously on those who retain a vision of te good society: te religious.”
God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything – Chapter Nine: Te Koran Is Borrowed From Both Jewish and Christian Myths (YouTube.com, 28:43 min.)
Russell announces te Russell-Einstein Manifesto in London, 9 July 1955. Photo: Pugwash Committee Public Domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons.
Bertrand Russell: Hvorfor jeg ikke er kristen
Hvorfor jeg ikke er kristen
Af Bertrand Russell (Bindslev, 2007, 121 s.)
Bogen er tidligere udkommet på dansk i en større udgave med titlen Derfor er jeg ikke kristen (Biilmann & Eriksen, 1966, 239 s.). Den nye udgave er nyoversat og med indledning af Flemming Chr. Nielsen, og består af de 4 mest centrale kapitler af de oprindelige 14.
Wikipedia, te free encyclopedia
Why I Am Not a Christian. Med link til hovedartiklen online.
Rune Lykkeberg: Kampskrift mod kristendommen (20. marts 2007)
“Intelligens har skabt problemer i Vesten, men er det grund til at kaste os ud i mørket og omfavne overtroen? Nej, sagde Bertrand Russell.”
Sørine Gotfredsen: Der er grænser for logikken (22. marts 2007)
” Bertrand Russell har interessante pointer i sin religionskritik, men han kommer også til kort. Guds eksistens kan ikke diskuteres i et rum af ren logik.”
Anders Gudmundsson: Blasfemikerens miniguide til kristendommen (5. august 2007)
“Hvorfor jeg ikke er kristen er til trods for dens åbenlyse svagheder en fin lille og letlæst introduktion til blasfemien.”
God is not Great
Gud er ikke stor
Hvorfor jeg ikke er kristen
Te End of Faith
Pelle Dragsteds “Nordisk Socialisme”
Salg: Brugte bøger for socialister
Hvis dette er et menneske
Følg os på Facebook
Nyt 12. december 2019
Salg: Brugte bøger for socialister
Nyt 15. september 2022
Mest sete den seneste uge
PFLP – “Mod imperialisme, zionisme og arabiske reaktionære”
Palæstina / Israel 24. august 2022
Tidslinje: 2000- 22. august 2022
Marxisme / Marxism 7. maj 2022
Tidslinje: 2000- 30. juni 2022
Tidslinje: 1700-1799 3. december 2020
Tidslinje: 2000- 15. september 2022
Salg: Brugte bøger for socialister
Nyt 15. september 2022
Tidslinje: 2000- 22. august 2022
PFLP – “Mod imperialisme, zionisme og arabiske reaktionære”
Palæstina / Israel 24. august 2022
Pelle Dragsteds “Nordisk Socialisme”
Bøger / Books 10. september 2022
Socialistisk Bibliotek er et politisk venstrefløjsbibliotek, der laver Emnelister, Personlister og en Tidslinje, ligesom vi også indskanner ældre politiske artikler.
Te Socialist Library in Copenhagen is left wing library making Link Collections, a Timeline, and we are scanning older political articles (so far only in Danish).
See more in Om /About.
Tidslinje: 2000- 15. september 2022
Salg: Brugte bøger for socialister
Nyt 15. september 2022
Tidslinje: 2000- 22. august 2022
AlleAnarkisme / AnarchismAntikapitalistiske bevægelse / Anti-capitalist movementArbejderbevægelse / Labour movementBorgerrettighedsbevægelseDatoer / DatesEU / European UnionFascismeHistorie / HistoryKlima & Miljø / Climate & EnvironmentKolonialismeKønspolitik / GenderKrig / WarMarxisme / MarxismNaturvidenskab / ScienceØkonomi / EconomyOprør / RebellionRacismeSolidaritetStrejkerTerrorVenstrefløj
Te Danish Labour Movement and Marxism 1885-1920
Danmarks Kommunistiske Parti, DKP
PFLP – “Mod imperialisme, zionisme og arabiske reaktionære”
AlleAfrika / AfricaAsien / AsiaDanmark / DenmarkEuropaFinlandFrankrig / FranceIrlandItalienKina / ChinaLatinamerika / Latin AmericaMellemøsten / Middle EastØstrigPalæstina / IsraelPolenRusland / RussiaSpanien / SpainStorbritannien / Great BritainTyskland / GermanyUSA / United States of AmericaVenezuela
Te Danish Labour Movement and Marxism 1885-1920
Danmarks Kommunistiske Parti, DKP
PFLP – “Mod imperialisme, zionisme og arabiske reaktionære”
Fireburn – Har vi glemt Danmarks største arbejderopstand?
AlleFilmFoto / PhotoKirkegårdeKultur / CultureMusik / MusicReligion
Martin Andersen Nexø (1869-1954)
H.C. Andersen – i en progressiv vinkel
Martin Andersen Nexø (1869-1954)
AlleTidslinje: 2000-Tidslinje: 1900-1999Tidslinje: 1800-1899Tidslinje: 1700-1799Tidslinje: 1600-1699Tidslinje: 1500-1599Tidslinje: 0-1499Tidslinje: Før vor tid / B.C.E.
© Te Theme is developed by Socialistisk Bibliotek via Newspaper WordPress Theme by TagDiv. © 2022
Salg: Brugte bøger for socialister
Nyt 15. september 2022
Pelle Dragsteds “Nordisk Socialisme”
Bøger / Books 10. september 2022