da en en fi da id da da da fy en fr da en id da da ca da nb da fr da eo es da da de da en es en da de fr en ru da da da de en de sv nb en en de en nb da en sv en sv da tr da sv sv sv sv sv sv sv da en en da da af da en da da ro da pt en da da nb id en da da af en en da da ro da da en fi da da tr en da nb de es da da da da tr en da nb da da tr da de nb de en tr en de de en da sv de es de en ca de de sv de sv da tr da nb sv de sv ca sv ca sv de en da en sv da da da da it da fr en en es es en en en da en tr en da en da da da nb da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da fr da da da da de da da da da da da da da da da sv sv da da en da da da da da da da da da da da da da da sv en en en en en en en ru en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en de en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en sk en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en pl en en en en en en en en en en en en en en fr en en en en da da da da az de en pt sv es sv sv en es es en en da da sv es sv de sv de sv en de en sv fr nn hbs_lat da sv fi da fi da da da de da en da es sv oc da da de sv da fi en da da da da da da en en pl da de sv da fi en da nn sv sv nb de sv en tr da da en fi da da tr en da nb de es da da da da tr en da nb da da tr da de nb de en tr en de de en da sv de es de en ca de de sv de sv da tr da nb sv de sv ca sv ca sv de en en da es sv de da en
Velkomst!Logge ind på din konto
Velkommen! Log ind på din konto
Forgot your password? Get help
En adgangskode vil blive sendt til din email.
SOCIALISTISK BIBLIOTEK Progressive Online Library
Te Danish Labour Movement and Marxism 1885-1920
PFLP – “Mod imperialisme, zionisme og arabiske reaktionære”
Fireburn – Har vi glemt Danmarks største arbejderopstand?
H.C. Andersen – i en progressiv vinkel
Brexit between United Kingdom EU. Photo: Petr Kratochvil (CC0 1.0)
Linkbox om Brexit – EU afstemning i juni 2016 i Storbritannien – set fra venstre, med link til sites og artikler på dansk og engelsk. Opdateret med artikler om valget december 2019.
Sites and articles in English
Leksikale, sites + på dansk
Emneord: EU –  Brexit – Daxit
Brexit og venstresidens krise. Af Asbjørn Wahl (Blog, 3. september 2016). “Venstresida, med sine illusjoner, (har) satt seg i en situasjon der de verken er i stand til å organisere de misnøyde til politisk motstand, eller å gi misnøyen et politisk uttrykk.”
Hvad mener Enhedslisten egentligt? Af Leif Donbæk Thomsen (Blog, 8. juli 2016). “Enhedslistens principprogram er meget klar i spyttet … (men) onde tunger ville måske endda kalde det direkte uigennemskueligt, hvad Enhedslisten egenligt mener.”
Er der et liv efter EU? Af Rinja Ronja Kari (Blog, 7. juli 2016). “Folkebevægelsen vil indsamle gode ideer og tanker om, hvordan verden ser ud efter et dansk exit fra EU.”
Seks myter i Brexit-debatten. Af Tobias Clausen (Blog, 7. juli 2016). “(Jeg) forsøger at aflive nogle af de mest udbredte myter og misvisende historier om det britiske nej.”
EU-hønen og nationalisme-ægget. Af Louise Pedersen (Blog, 7. juli 2016). “EU er ikke den eneste størrelse i verden, der skaber fremmedhad og intolerance … (men) i Europa er EU for hovedparten den høne, der lægger nationalisme-æggene.”
Vær Solidarisk – forlad EU. Af Margit Kjeldgaard (Blog, 6. juli 2016). “Verden er større end EU, og international solidaritet er en god grund til at forlade EU.”
“Ud af EU”: handlingslammende nationalisme. Af Steen Gottlieb (Blog, 2. juli 2016). “Enhedslistens strategi … er nationalistisk, og partiet er derved afmægtigt parkeret i en blindgyde …”
Brexit handler om protest, frygt og politisk elite. Af Peter Kenworthy (1. juli 2016). “Kompleksiteten i årsagerne og situationen, der førte til Brexit er noget mindre sort og hvid.”
Alternativet til EU. Af Astrid Vang Hansen (Blog, 29. juni 2016). “Kravet om en folkeafstemning om EU-medlemskab må ikke stå alene.”
Drop illusionerne! EU kan ikke forandres indefra. Af Rina Ronja Kari (Blog, 28. juni 2016). “… udviklingen er kun gået i retning af mere EU-integration og mere politik til skade for arbejdstagere, velfærd og miljø.”
Politik! – tak! Af Pernille Frahm (Blog, 28. juni 2016). “Det er ikke lykkedes gennem det europæiske samarbejde at skaffe folk økonomiske og sociale rettigheder af betydning …”
Kan Brexit være progressivt og en sejr for venstrefløjen? Af Yannick Harrison (27. juni 2016). “Brexit var aldrig en venstreorienteret kamp mod demokratiske problemer i EU, men en kampagne på et racistisk grundlag.”
Brexit er et wake up call for EU-eliten. Af Nikolaj Villumsen (24. juni 2016). “I går var det demokratiet, som talte i Storbritannien … Den britiske befolkning ønsker at være fri af EU.”
Tanker efter Brexit. Af Pelle Dragsted (Blog, 24. juni 2016). “Det er ikke hverken nationalistisk eller højrepopulistisk at ønske, at flere beslutninger bliver taget tæt på én selv i nationale parlamenter …”
Brexit – et jivende slag mod Europas lønmodtagerklasse. Af Steen Gottlieb (Blog, 19. juni 2016). “Brexit betyder deregulering og bliver en styrkelse de mest aggressive dele af kapitalistklassen.”
»EU er en klub for arbejdsgiverne«. Af  Tobias Clausen (17. juni 2016). Interview med Karlson Lingwood, sømand og ledelsesmedlem i fagforeningen RMT, der organiserer over 80.000 britiske transportarbejdere.
Forlader briterne EU? Af Christian Juhl (Kontradoxa, 15. juni 2016). “Danskerne skal have mulighed for at stemme, ligesom briterne.”
Når medierne dumper detektor-testen. Af Tobias Clausen (Blog, 13. juni 2016). Om ECD’s Brexit-rapport og mediernes økonomiske skræmmekampagne.
Situationen i Storbritannien er gift for venstrefløjen. Af Mads Wilmann (Blog, 23. maj 2016). “Nejsiden af venstrefløjen har (…) et antiprojekt (ud af EU-siden), og dette vil i GB sandsynligvis blive opslugt af meget stærkere højrenationale og konservative kræfter …”
EU i krise: Derfor er radikal forandring mulig. Af Torkil Lausen (4. maj 2016). “EU modstanden er ikke en modstand mod kapitalisme, men et forsvar af nationale privilegier i en ulige verden.”
I Storbritannien stemmer de progressive også nej. Af Rina Ronja Kari (Blog, 24. februar 2016). “Den bevægelse (i Storbritannien), som ønsker et nej på et progressivt og demokratisk grundlag, skal vide, at de ikke står alene.”
Storbritannien: Brexit, Lexit – “In” eller “Out” af EU? (22. juni 2016). “Om de forskellige holdninger indenfor den britiske fagbevægelse og venstrefløjen i forbindelse med  folkeafstemningen den 23. juni.”
Henrik Herløv Lund (site)
Læren af Brexit-debatten: EU selv skyld i modstand pga. manglende politisk effektivitet og demokratisk underskud (pdf) (Kritiske Analyser, 23. juni 2016, 5 s.). “… voldsomheden af Brexit-debatten (peger) på nogle store svagheder og fejl ved EU …”
EU som ondskabens imperium? Af Holger K. Nielsen (16. juli 2016). “Unionen giver ofte for lidt politisk modspil til de rå markedskræfter. Men hvis alternativet er, at der intet sker, er vi på herrens mark. Hvis vi ikke havde EU, måtte vi opfinde det.”
“Hvis ikke Europas venstrefløj tager folks EU-skepsis alvorligt, går de til nogen, der gør” (7. juli 2016). Interview med Pernille Skipper.
Enhedslisten kæmper stadig for et rødt-grønt Europa. Af Rune Lund (7. juli 2016). “… som venstreorienterede kan vi ikke lade være med at kritisere EU’s demokratiske underskud, bare fordi vores politiske modstandere på højrefløjen har meldt sig i debatten.”
Enhedslistens nationale drejning er uspiselig for socialister. Af Claus Bryld (Information.dk, 5. juli 2016). “EL’s taktiske alliance med DF minder – sat på spidsen – om det tyske kommunistpartis lejlighedsvise alliance med nazisterne før Hitlers magtovertagelse.” Se læserbrev af Finn Sørensen: Sammenligning af EL og Hitler er langt ude (20. juli) + Claus Bryld: EL savner historisk bevidsthed (1. august).
Nederlaget. Af Jan Helbak (december 2019). “Labour tabte brexitvalget december 2019 den 12. september 2015, hvor Jeremy Corbyn holdt sin tiltrædelsestale som ny formand for partiet. Her blev partiets underliggende og styrende ambivalens i forhold til EU gjort fuldstændig tydelig og dermed også partiets politisk strategiske svaghed.”
Vi har brug for en Labour-Brexit. Af Costas Lapavitsas (august 2019). “… det at konfrontere den neoliberalistiske kapitalisme i Europa indebærer et brud med EU. Venstrefløjen bør derfor begynde at udforme politiske og ideologiske instrumenter, der kan støtte sand internationalisme og solidaritet blandt de europæiske folk.”
Exitstrategiens illusion. Af Jan Helbak (august 2019). “Costas Lapivitsa … fortjener en kritisk analyse, da Lapavitsas argumenter også har en vis gang på jorden på den danske venstrefløj, selv om der også her foregår en diskret opblødning af fronterne.”
Brexit – en social protest. Af Inger V. Johansen (august 2016). “… kan det være med til at skabe en helt anden dagsorden og nye muligheder for en mere social udvikling i et kriseramt EU eller Europa? Eller er det ikke på tide at venstrefløjen bereder sig på et alternativ til EU?”
“Big business is bad politics”. Af Jan Helbak (juni 2016). “Lexit (left exit) legitimerer højrepopulisternes nationalkonservative og autoritære sirenesang, og marginaliserer endnu engang venstrefløjen til fable om fantasifostret …”
Brittisk vänsterpress om Brexit (pdf) (10. december 2018). “Avgörandets stund närmar sig när det gäller att godta eller förkasta det Brexit-avtal som brittiska tories-regeringen framförhandlat. Motsättningarna stora om detta.”
Europa skal hverken være Juncker-blåt eller Le Pen-sort. Af Pelle Dragsted (6. juli 2016). “Fremtidens Europa skal være rødt, grønt og demokratisk.”
Storbritannien efter valgnederlaget. Af Alan Woods (Revolution, 24. december 2019). “Hvorfor tabte Labour? Og svaret på det spørgsmål stemmer ikke det mindste overens med de falske og løgnagtige argumenter, der gentagende gange er blevet ført frem i massemedierne.”
Brexit sender chokbølger gennem hele det europæiske etablissement. Af Alan Woods (25. juni 2016). “Sejren til Brexit betyder ikke en styrkelse af den revolutionære fløj eller bare venstrefløjen, sådan som nogle illusoriske folk forestillede sig, men tværtimod en sejr til reaktionens kræfter …”
Et katastrofalt valgresultat: Forsvar corbyismens landvindinger. Af Andy Stowe (15. december 2019) + Lindsey German: Efter det britiske valg: Hvordan kommer vi videre? (16. december 2019).
Brexit: For enhed og solidaritet i Europa, mod racisme og social dumping (3. juli 2016). “Denne udtalelse er vedtaget af Fjerde Internationales ledelse den 28. juni 2016.”
Brexit er en katastrofe, men kampen fortsætter (3. juli 2016). “Udtalelse vedtaget af Socialist Resistance, den britiske sektion af Fjerde Internationale, den 25. juni 2016, efter folkeafstemningen.”
(Også) venstrefløjen er uenige om ”stay” or ”leave”. Af Niels Overgaard Hansen (4. juni 2016). “Den yderste venstrefløj er imod EUs politik, men mange er alligevel imod udmeldelse med argumentet om, at det vil gavne højrefløjen og puste til racisme og nationalisme.”
Det britiske valg: Højrepopulismens triumf – og tid til eftertanke (24. januar 2020). “Mikkel Warming gør status på det britiske valg i december 2019, som sendte Labour til tælling. Resultatet skyldtes ifølge ham både Labours svage budskab og De Konservatives transformation.”
Valget i UK: Da nation trumfede klasse. Af Esben Bøgh Sørensen (21. december 2019). “Men hvad handlede valget egentlig om, hvad gik der galt, og hvad kan vi lære af Labours udvikling de seneste år? Tre væsentlige spørgsmål for Labours venstrefløj – og for venstrefløjen i andre lande.”
Kampen er startet om Corbyns eftermæle (20. december 2019). “Hvis Jeremy Corbyn og Labours fremgang ved det britiske parlamentsvalg i 2017 viste, at partier kan vinde på at gå til venstre – hvad viser resultatet af det seneste valg så? Kim Kristensen har undersøgt en række af de foreløbige bud.”
Hvad sker der, hvis Storbritannien melder sig ud af EU? Af Mikkel Andreas Beck (16. juni 2016). “Hvordan melder man sig egentlig ud af EU? Og hvad bliver resultatet?”
Folkeafstemningen om Storbritanniens EU-medlemsskab 2016
Sites & articles in English
Another Europe is Possible: “We don’t believe a British exit from te EU offers a path towards te social, citizen-led Europe we so urgently need.” See: Statement in response to te Leave vote: ‘It is better to light a candle than curse te darkness’  (24 June 2016).
Labour Leave: te Labour campaign to leave te European Union
Left Leave: Campaign for a UK left exit from te EU. See: #Lexit statement on te vote to leave te European Union (24 June 2016).
United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016
Te crisis of British politics (Issue 202, September-October 2019). Suzi Weissman interviews Daniel Finn. See also Daniel Finn: Crosscurrents: Corbyn, Labour and te Brexit crisis (New Left Review, Issue 118, July-August 2019, p.5-35).
Was Brexit a working-class revolt? By Kim Moody (Issue 184, September-October 2016). “If te EU is moving toward disintegration, so far at least it is doing so on te basis of a resurgence of rampant nationalism not a socialist or even social democratic future.”
Strategy beyond te referendum (June 27, 2016). “As te established order falls apart, Chris Bambery argues how te left should respond.”
This vote was about far more than immigration (June 25, 2016). “Te vote to leave te EU was fuelled by class divisions, argues Alastair Stephens.”
Te EU vote: this is what a social crisis looks like (June 15, 2016). “Tail-ending te Cameron Remain campaign is hemorrhaging working class support for Labour and te left, argues John Rees.” With comments.
Te EU referendum and te Left. By Alex Snowdon (April 24, 2016). “Te EU referendum has generated a lot of debate on te British Left, with a range of perspectives on te EU itself and on whether socialists should advocate a vote to leave …”
Debunked: 12 left-wing reasons for remaining in te European Union. By Alex Snowdon (April 19, 2016). “Te referendum is not a vote on whether we want to be ‘part of Europe’ its a vote on an institution that has done far more harm than good.” With comments.
Europe and socialist strategy (28 February 2016). “Kevin Ovenden examines te various political strategies on offer from te European left.”
5 reasons to leave te EU (February 20, 2016). “There are many reasons why Britain should leave te EU. Alastair Stephens lists just five.”
Brexit as nostalgia for Empire. By Nadine El-Enany (19 June 2016). “Te run up to te EU referendum has shown Britain for what it is. Woodwork: te washed-up bracken of te British Empire, and te ugly flotsam of its legacy of racism.” With comments.
‘Brexit’ vote dividing all sides, but Corbyn right to campaign to remain. By Derek Wall (international coordinator of te Green Party) (April 30, 2016).
In Defence of Marxism
Brexit vote sends shockwaves across European Establishment. By Alan Woods (24 June 2016). “Te victory of Brexit does not mean a strengthening of te revolutionary or left-wing tendency as some deluded people imagine, but on te contrary, a victory for te forces of reaction …”
Te EU referendum and xenophobia: How to fight te Right. By Adam Booth (21 June 2016). “On te Leave side, te months leading up to this referendum have seen a ratcheting up of xenophobic and racist rhetoric …”
Te delusions of Brexit (27 April 2016). “Daniel Morley looks at te nationalist delusions of te Brexit camp in te Tories and UKIP, and highlights te limitations of te arguments of left-wing Leave campaigners.”
Te crisis in Europe: What is te EU and where is it going? Part 1-3. By Josh Holroyd (15 February – 3 March 2016). “… Marxists stand for neither European nor British capitalism, but for a Socialist Britain as part of a Socialist Europe!”
Te wages of Brexit. By Alex Callinicos (International Socialism, Issue 165, Winter 2020). “So why did Corbyn lose? International Socialism went to press four days after te general election, so this assessment is written amid te heat generated by a crushing result for te left as a whole, not just te Labour Party.”
Brexit blues. By Alex Callinicos (International Socialism, Issue 161, Winter 2019, p.3-19). “Te radical and revolutionary left too should avoid getting trapped on one side or other of te debate within te ruling class and instead stand ready to promote and help shape ‘fundamental revolts’.” See also Feedback by Wayne Asher: In a hole and still digging: te left and Brexit (ibid., p.149-162) + Sabby Sagall: Remain and replace—a socialist case (Issue 162, Spring 2019, p.165-169) + Sean Leahy: Why we voted Leave (Issue 162, Spring 2019, p.171-175) + Wayne Asher: Socialists and te Leave vote—a (brief) reply to Sean Leahy (Issue 163, Summer 2019, p.173-176).
Widening fractures. By Alex Callinicos (Issue 152, Autumn 2016, p.3-19). “Te real problem lies in te disruption Brexit might cause to te global positioning of British capitalism and thereby to te dominant capitalist networks.”
Why did Britain vote Leave? By Charlie Kimber (Issue 152, Autumn 2016, p.21-42). “Te British vote on 23 June 2016 to leave te European Union was a bitter blow for te establishment, big business, te international financial institutions, te rich and te politicians.”
David Cameron’s cunning plan goes awry. By Alex Callinicos (Issue 151, Summer 2016). “… an attempt to make sense of te situation in ignorance of whether or not te British people have rejected te EU.” See updated, revised, and extended version: Brexit: a world-historic turn (27 June 2016).
Te EU referendum: Te case for a socialist Yes vote. By John Palmer (Issue 148, Autumn 2015). “Te ‘Balkanisation’ of Europe would represent a historic defeat for human progress …”
Te internationalist case against te European Union. By Alex Callinicos (Issue 148, Autumn 2015). “How to vote in that referendum is a difficult choice for anyone on te left … [but] there is a powerful internationalist case against te EU.”
After Brexit: Will te European Union crack up? By Neil Davidson (Issue 102, Fall 2016, online only). “I have to give a talk of two halves: one, a talk about te EU … and two, a talk about what has happened in Britain.”
Jacobin: Reason in Revolt
Te obsessive Remainers have scored a massive own goal. By Daniel Finn (19 December 2019). “For te last three years, second-referendum campaigners heaped blame on Jeremy Corbyn for his alleged role in “facilitating” Brexit. Yet their determined efforts to torpedo his leadership destroyed any chance of a compromise solution — and made te hardest of hard Brexits inevitable.”
Europe’s Left after Brexit (5 September 2016). “Former Greek finance minster Yanis Varoufakis responds to his critics and lays out DiEM25’s plan for resisting within te European Union.”
An open letter to te British Left. By Stathis Kouvelakis (5 July 2016). “A Greek leftist on why British socialists shouldn’t shy away from rejecting te European Union.”
Te Left after Leave. By Ed Rooksby (1 July 2016). “Brexit offered te Left bad choices, and its aftermath has emboldened a racist right. What do we do now?”
There is no Left Exit. By Ed Rooksby (22 June 2016). “We shouldn’t have illusions about transforming te EU from below. But a Leave vote would only strengthen te Right.”
Te Socialist case for Remain. By David Renton (22 June 2016). “It’s not clear that a Leave vote would make our tasks on te Left any easier.”
Te Socialist case for Leave. By Neil Davidson (22 June 2016). “Te European Union provides internationalism for te bosses, not for workers. We should join te vote to leave it tomorrow.”
Brexit and te Left. By Richard Seymour (22 June 2016). “Te European Union is brutal and undemocratic — ignoring that just gives te Right more power.”
Brexit and te British Left – a debate between Joseph Choonara and Pete Green (March 2016). “Great Britain is preparing to vote on leaving te EU (Brexit). This has provoked a significant discussion inside te British Left. We talked to 2 leading figures about what how British socialists should respond to te referendum.”
Links: International Journal of Socialist Renewal
Scottish Socialist Party, Sinn Féin, Momentum and Left Unity on Brexit referendum result (June 26, 2016). “Links has republished a variety of statements reflecting te views of key left forces in England, Skotland and Ireland.”
Should te left support a “Brexit” in te upcoming British referendum? (February 12, 2016). “We are republishing two opposing views on whether te left should support a British exit, or ‘Brexit’, by Luke Cooper and Chris Bambery.”
Michael Roberts Blog: blogging from a Marxist economist
Te Brexit deal (December 29, 2020). “Te UK finally leaves te European Union on 31 December, after 48 years of membership. Te initial decision to leave, made in te special referendum back in June 2016, has taken over four tortuous years to implement. So what does te deal mean for British capital and labour?”
Brexit: 100 days and after (December 18, 2018). “On balance, leaving te EU is a negative for British capital but it is also not good news for British labour …”
Te impact of Brexit (June 24, 2016). “Brexit in te long run may not make a huge difference to te health of British capitalism, but right now it could help accelerate a new global recession.”
Brexit, China, te Fed and te global recession  (June 15, 2016). “Te vote on Brexit has assumed a greater global significance than I originally thought.”
Brexit: stay or leave? (March 24, 2016). “Leaving te EU would probably be marginally bad for British capital and there would be little or no gain for British Labour.”
Exchange: Brexit, te EU and te Left (Vol.71, No.5, October 2019). Costas Lapavitsas’s Te Left Case Against te EU (Polity, 2019) is recognized as te leading work advocating Lexit, te left-wing case for Brexit, and for nations leaving te European Union more generally … we are publishing two assessments of Lapavitsas’s book [Neil Davidson and Andy Storey] followed by his extensive response.”
Brexit and te EU implosion: National sovereignty – for what purpose? By Samir Amin (8 August 2016). “Te defense of national sovereignty, like its critique, leads to serious misunderstandings once one detaches it from te social class content of te strategy in which it is embedded.
Communists applaud blow to imperialism (25 June 2016). “Communist parties across Europe and beyond congratulated te British people yesterday for their victory in te EU membership referendum.”
Why Morning Star supports a Leave vote (22 June 2016). ” A vote to Leave today will … be a step towards restoring democratic control of our economy, and would remove an obstacle to progress.”
Left wants Out for te right reasons (13 April 2016). “Te launch of a left-wing campaign for Britain to leave te European Union this June is welcome — indeed overdue.”
Election analysis: a victory for te far Right: a crisis for te Left (Mutiny, 13 December 2019). “Neil Faulkner and Phil Hearse analyse te general election defeat and draw lessons for te battles ahead.”
Crosscurrents: Corbyn, Labour and te Brexit crisis. By Daniel Finn (Issue 118, July-August 2019, p.5-35). “This article will examine te extent of Labour’s internal transformation under Corbyn, as te necessary precondition for any wider success.” See alo interview with Daniel Finn: Te crisis of British politics (Against te Current, Issue 202, September-October 2019).
Casting off? By Susan Watkins (Issue 100, July-August 2016, p.5-31). “How to assess te latest set-back for te European Union: te vote to leave by its second-largest state? Complex determinants of te Brexit protest … met by single-minded condemnation of it by te global elite.”
Te UK Election: A car crash on te left side of te road. By Kim Moody (New Politics, December 28, 2019). “Te primary motivations for many of those who voted in favour of leaving te EU in te 2016 referendum were informed by English nationalism and anti-immigrant sentiment, but in 2019 these were reinforced by te argument that a democratic decision had been made, te people had decided.”
Te endless Brexit crisis (Issue 67, Summer 2019). “Ashley Smith interviews Neil Davidson about te roots, politics, and trajectory of te battle over Brexit.”
Brexit: A victory for te populist right. By Barry Finger (June 25, 2016). “Te reaction is, to put it bluntly, a toxic mix of little England racism and anti-establishment populism that, like all populisms, ransacks te grievances of te left and twists them into grotesque distortions.”
Te Project: A Socialist Journal
Brexit or international socialism? By Nick Wrack (May 1, 2016). ” Here, I argue that te interests of te working class are best advanced by rejecting te arguments for Lexit/Brexit or abstention and voting to remain within te EU.”
Te Brexit nightmare. By Tom Walker (June 2016). “Unfortunately, Brexit did nothing but hand te initiative to te right – and make everything a hell of a lot worse.”
So you think te EU can’t be reformed? (June 2016). “A look at history will show you otherwise argues Hilary Wainwright and Mary Kaldor.”
EU debate: what are te real choices? (December 2015). “John Palmer argues te left must begin with simple answers.”
EU debate: We need to stay in Europe to change Europe (December 2015). “Te idea that a social Europe could emerge by quitting te EU is a delusion. There are no quick fixes for neoliberalism, writes Luke Cooper.”
RS21: Revolutionary Socialism in te 21st Century
After Brexit: Keeping our heads when all around are losing theirs. By Rob Owen (June 28, 2016). “… we have to accept that te referendum damaged our side—dividing workers who see themselves as ‘British’ against migrant workers—as much as it damaged our ruling class.” With comments.
Part of te Union? – What should socialists argue in te EU referendum? (June 9, 2016). “Charlie Hore puts te case for a ‘remain’ vote, Christina Delistathi to ‘leave’ and Rob Owen for a ‘radical abstention’.” With comments.
EU referendum: for an internationalist leave position (18 April 2016). “There are differences in among rs21 members as to what are te key political questions at stake around te EU referendum, however discussions were illuminating and comradely.” With comments.
EU referendum: A crisis of te right, not an opportunity for te left (April 6, 2016). “Rob Owen [is] arguing te left can abstain from te vote without abstaining from te politics.” With comments.
Whose Europe? Theirs or ours? (March 29, 2016). “… however unfavourable te current balance of forces, our task it to argue for an exit from te un-reformable EU on left terms, write Jen Wilkinson and Paul O’Connell.” With comments.
Revolutionary socialists and te EU referendum campaign: sorting out te real issues (March 25, 2016). “Te EU referendum offers no clear route for socialists; instead, John Walker argues, our focus should be on organising against te attack on migrants and workers …” With comments.
EU debate: A socialist case for leaving te EU (March 2, 2016). “Neil Davidson makes te case from a Scottish perspective about why socialists should support leaving te EU.” With comments.
Exit stage left (Issue 92, March-April 2016). “Vince Mills puts te socialist case for leaving te EU.”
Socialist case against leaving (Issue 92, March-April 2016). “Hugh Cullen says populist xenophobia, nationalism & heightened neo-liberalism will win if we leave te EU.”
Referendum revolt: Capitalist establishment shattered. By Peter Taaffe (Issue 200, July-August 2016). “Te vote to leave te EU has rocked capitalist institutions – in Britain and internationally. It is yet another reflection of te anger at mass poverty and savage austerity …”
Socialists and te EU referendum (Issue 90, July-August 2015). “Clive Heemskerk looks at how socialists should approach te in-or-out EU debate.”
Socialist Democracy statement on te European referendum (Socialistdemocracy.org, April 2016). “No to te Racism! No to imperialist Europe! Yes to Britain remaining in Europe! Yes to a United Socialist States of Europe!”
Te UKIPisation of te Tory Party –Te Brexit left in denial. By Alan Thornett (July 25, 2016). “Socialist Resistance argued for a remain vote on te basis that te referendum would be a carnival of reaction leading to a major shift to te right in British politics, and we have been right on both counts.”
Brexit vote is a disaster, but te struggle goes on (June 24, 2016). “Te Brexit vote to leave te EU is a victory for te right-wing xenophobes and a disaster for te struggle against austerity in Britain.”
Te left debates te case for EU exit (March 25, 2016). “Alan Thornett reports on te London meeting on March 23 called by Counterfire and te Communist Party of Britain (CPB) in support of an exit vote in te EU referendum.” With comments.
A bloody bitter pill. By Joseph Choonara (Issue 453, January 2020). “Te reasons for te Tory victory extend back beyond Jeremy Corbyn’s time as Labour Party leader and beyond Brexit. Joseph Choonara explains and point a way forward.”
After te leave vote: we can beat back racism and austerity. By Joseph Choonara (Issue 415, July-August 2016). “Te vote was, above all else, a rebellion by working class people who feel they have had their lives torn apart by te ruling elite.”
Down with miserabism. By Joseph Choonara (Issue 414, June 2016). “… much of te left have taken te mistaken and less understandable decision to back a Remain vote.”
EU referendum: Should we stay or should we go? (Issue 404, July-August 2015). “Joseph Choonara argues that socialists should argue for a left wing No vote, despite te right wing dominating te campaign for a ‘Brexit’.
Section: EU referendum special
We must overcome te dangerous divisions in te working class. By Alex Callinicos (Issue 2512, 12 July 2016). “It’s now very urgent for begin to overcome te divisions within both te left and te working class more broadly over te referendum.”
Brexit vote was a revolt against te rich. By Charle Kimber (Issue 2510, 28 June 2016). “Te vote to leave te European Union last week defied te establishment and revealed a deep disaffection towards a system that has failed working class people.”
After EU vote and Cameron goes: unite to shape revolt against establishment. By Charlie Kimber (Issue 2509, 24 June 2016). “Te politicians, te rich and te powerful who are so used to getting their own way have suffered a massive reverse.”
An anti-racist, anti-austerity and socialist case to vote Leave (Issue 2508, 14 June 2016). “Te EU is racist and beyond reform. A Leave vote would mean a double crisis—for te Tories and te ruling class.”
Remain or Leave — te left debates different visions of Europe. By Tomáš Tengely-Evans (Issue 2506, 3 June 2016). “Natalie Bennett, Green Party leader, debates Joseph Choonara from te SWP and Lexit—te left leave campaign.” Text + Video.
Exit stage left – why we oppose te EU (Issue 2505, 24 May 2016). “Socialists and anticapitalists come out fighting to put their own case against te bosses’ European Union at an international rally in London last week, reports Alistair Farrow.”
Socialist Workers Party (SWP)
Section: Te EU Referendum. With 12 articles 1971-2015.
Six myths about te European Union. By Tomáš Tengely-Evans (29 March 2016).
No exit from te Brexit crisis (December 20, 2018). “Neil Davidson was interviewed by Ashley Smith about te Brexit crisis and what it means for British politics and te European Union.” See also interview: Understanding te Brexit bedlam (Ibid., January 31, 2019).
Building te Left in te face of Brexit (SocialistWorker.org, January 8, 2019). “Charlie Hore responds to Neil Davidson’s discussion of te Brexit crisis and offers an alternative analysis of te Leave vote.”
Discussing te meaning of te Brexit vote (June 27, 2016). ” Here, we publish a sample of te commentary from Richard Seymour of Lenin’s Tomb, Terry Conway writing in International Viewpoint, and Tom Bramble of Australia’s Red Flag.”
Why socialists should support a British exit (June 20, 2016). “Neil Davidson explains for a U.S. audience his case for casting a left-wing vote to Leave te EU.” See also Readers’ Views: Is te EU necessarily harmful to struggle? by John Palmer (June 22, 2016).
After te referendum. By Hannah Sell (24 June 2016). “Not only in Britain but across Europe many workers have been inspired by this vote against te bosses EU.”
EU referendum. Editorial (Te Socialist, 19 June 2016). “We urge a vote for exit on 23 June, which will strike a serious blow against te Tories and te capitalist class.”
Te Brexit Crisis: A Verso Report. Edited by Verso Books (12 July 2016). An ebook available for free download: “Leading writers provide their thoughts on te EU referendum. Includes contributions from Étienne Balibar, William Davies, Akwugo Emejulu, John R. Gillingham, Peter Hallward, Laleh Khalili, Stathis Kouvelakis, Sam Kriss, Rebecca Omonira-Oyekanmi, Lara Pawson,  Wolfgang Streeck, and more.”
Fear, confusion and delusions (Issue 113, 30 June 2016). “Left responses to te referendum result vary from despondency to total exuberance. Both are misplaced, argues Paul Demarty.”
Te in-out kabuki dance (Issue 1102, 14 April 2016). “James Marshall of Labour Party Marxists says a passive boycott is not as good as an active boycott.”
Both sides are reactionary (Issue 1101, 7 April 2016). “Eddie Ford calls for an active boycott.”
A carnival of reaction (Issue 1095, 25 February 2016). “Neither side in te EU referendum campaign deserves leftwing support, argues Paul Demarty.”
Te left and te Brexit vote. By Martin Thomas (24 June 2016). “Some on te left hail te Brexit vote as a victory. This is manipulative and fantasy-ridden politics.”
Europe: te Stalinist roots of te “left exit” myth. By Paul Hampton (Issue 54, June 2016, 8 p.). “Te story of how te British revolutionary left went from an independent working class stance to accommodation with chauvinism and Stalinist “socialist-in-one-country” deserves to be better known.”
United Europe and te Marxist tradition. By Paul Hampton (8 August 2015). “Te classical Marxist tradition debated many of te issues at stake in te referendum, from te standpoint of wanting to bring about socialism.”
What do Socialists say about te United States of Europe? (12 April 2013). “Early socialist debates about te United States of Europe help us orientate in today’s conditions.” See also: A highly serviceable political weapon (Weekly Worker, Issue 1105, 5 May 2016). “Jack Conrad discusses Lenin and te ‘United States of Europe’ slogan.”
World Socialist Web Site
UK vote to Leave te European Union triggers economic and political crisis. By Chris Marsden and Julie Hyland (25 June 2016). “Te referendum has produced a significant shift to te right in Britain and throughout Europe.”
Te pseudo-left’s nationalist Leave campaign in te UK Brexit referendum. Part 1-2. By Chris Marsden (19 March 2016). “Opposition to British membership of te European Union in te June 23 referendum is dominated by two rival nationalist and pro-big business groups, Leave EU and Vote Leave.”
For an active boycott of te Brexit referendum! (29 February 2016). Statement of te Socialist Equality Party, British section of te International Committee of te Fourth International.
Se også på Socialistisk Bibliotek:
Tidslinjen: 12. september 2015, om Jeremy Corbyn.
Linkboxen: Folkeafstemningen om retsforbehold 3. december 2015
Linkboxen: 25. maj 2014: EU-valg – parlament & patentdomstol
Følg os på Facebook
Nyt 12. december 2019
Salg: Brugte bøger for socialister
Nyt 15. september 2022
Mest sete den seneste uge
PFLP – “Mod imperialisme, zionisme og arabiske reaktionære”
Palæstina / Israel 24. august 2022
Marxisme / Marxism 7. maj 2022
Tidslinje: 2000- 22. august 2022
Tidslinje: 1700-1799 3. december 2020
Tidslinje: 1700-1799 22. februar 2022
Tidslinje: 2000- 15. september 2022
Salg: Brugte bøger for socialister
Nyt 15. september 2022
Tidslinje: 2000- 22. august 2022
PFLP – “Mod imperialisme, zionisme og arabiske reaktionære”
Palæstina / Israel 24. august 2022
Pelle Dragsteds “Nordisk Socialisme”
Bøger / Books 10. september 2022
Socialistisk Bibliotek er et politisk venstrefløjsbibliotek, der laver Emnelister, Personlister og en Tidslinje, ligesom vi også indskanner ældre politiske artikler.
Te Socialist Library in Copenhagen is left wing library making Link Collections, a Timeline, and we are scanning older political articles (so far only in Danish).
See more in Om /About.
Tidslinje: 2000- 15. september 2022
Salg: Brugte bøger for socialister
Nyt 15. september 2022
Tidslinje: 2000- 22. august 2022
AlleAnarkisme / AnarchismAntikapitalistiske bevægelse / Anti-capitalist movementArbejderbevægelse / Labour movementBorgerrettighedsbevægelseDatoer / DatesEU / European UnionFascismeHistorie / HistoryKlima & Miljø / Climate & EnvironmentKolonialismeKønspolitik / GenderKrig / WarMarxisme / MarxismNaturvidenskab / ScienceØkonomi / EconomyOprør / RebellionRacismeSolidaritetStrejkerTerrorVenstrefløj
Te Danish Labour Movement and Marxism 1885-1920
Danmarks Kommunistiske Parti, DKP
PFLP – “Mod imperialisme, zionisme og arabiske reaktionære”
AlleAfrika / AfricaAsien / AsiaDanmark / DenmarkEuropaFinlandFrankrig / FranceIrlandItalienKina / ChinaLatinamerika / Latin AmericaMellemøsten / Middle EastØstrigPalæstina / IsraelPolenRusland / RussiaSpanien / SpainStorbritannien / Great BritainTyskland / GermanyUSA / United States of AmericaVenezuela
Te Danish Labour Movement and Marxism 1885-1920
Danmarks Kommunistiske Parti, DKP
PFLP – “Mod imperialisme, zionisme og arabiske reaktionære”
Fireburn – Har vi glemt Danmarks største arbejderopstand?
AlleFilmFoto / PhotoKirkegårdeKultur / CultureMusik / MusicReligion
Martin Andersen Nexø (1869-1954)
H.C. Andersen – i en progressiv vinkel
Martin Andersen Nexø (1869-1954)
AlleTidslinje: 2000-Tidslinje: 1900-1999Tidslinje: 1800-1899Tidslinje: 1700-1799Tidslinje: 1600-1699Tidslinje: 1500-1599Tidslinje: 0-1499Tidslinje: Før vor tid / B.C.E.
© Te Theme is developed by Socialistisk Bibliotek via Newspaper WordPress Theme by TagDiv. © 2022
Tidslinje: 1700-1799 3. december 2020
Tidslinje: 1700-1799 30. november 2020