en en en de en en en de la en en la en en ro en en en pt en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en de en en en en en en en en fr pt en it en ca it en de it fr it en de en fr it it it en en en it en de pt la ceb ceb it it en sv en en ca nl sv sv en fr it en en it it it en de en en en en en fr it pt en fr en de pt en it en en la ceb it en ru en en en en cs en en en cs cs da en da cs en en cs da en en en cs cs da en da cs en en cs cs en en en fr cs da en da en en en en en de en en cs da en en en cs cs da en da cs en en cs cs en en en cs cs da en da cs en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en
The Latin reading blog: Einhard, Vita Karoli Magni, 28: Emperor!
On Christmas day in the year 800, Charlemagne was crowned emperor by Pope Leo iii. The first emperor since Romulus Augustus had been abdicated in 476. Why and under which circumstances he had been crowned is still a matter of debate. In the following section of Einhard’s Vita Karoli Magni, it is suggested that it came as a complete surprise for Charlemagne, but this is rather questionable, not to say very unlikely. It is more likely that, as the Byzantine Empire was at that time ruled by Empress Irene of Athens, Charlemagne saw a legal opportunity to seize the crown of emperor. Legally the Byzantine Empire was the heir of the Roman Empire, but according to some interpretations a woman could not be sole ruler. Einhard claims that Charlemagne was completely unaware of the coronation under preparation and that he refused repeatedly to be crowned. As it happens he entered the church at Christmas and was taken by surprise and suddenly found himself emperor. I have watched enough detectives to suspect that this so-called surprise was fabricated, as he did not want to upset the Byzantine court too much…
In the summer of 800 Charlemagne went to Rome to protect Pope Leo iii, who was highly unpopular amongst the aristocracy and was charged with adultery and treason. They even went so far – according to Einhard – to blind him and cut his tongue off. Fortunately other legendary sources tell us that the poor man was healed by a miracle.
To overcome the grudge of Empress Irene, Charlemagne made her a marriage proposal. His fourth (or fifth)  and last wife Liutgard had died in 800 and he had not married again but lived with his concubine Regina. Irene had sought closer contacts with the Frankish empire before she became empress and even proposed a marriage between her son and a daughter of Charlemagne, so the idea of a marriage was not that absurd. At first she accepted, but due to all kinds of intrigues at the Byzantine court, she was compelled to withdraw. Byzantine history: never a dull moment!
Einhard, Vita Karoli Magni, chapter 28:
Ultimi adventus sui non solum hae fuere causae, verum etiam quod Romani Leonem pontificem multis affectum iniuriis, erutis scilicet oculis linguaque amputata, fidem regis implorare conpulerunt. Idcirco Romam veniens propter reparandum, qui nimis conturbatus erat, ecclesiae statum ibi totum hiemis tempus extraxit. Quo tempore imperatoris et augusti nomen accepit. Quod primo in tantum aversatus est, ut adfirmaret se eo die, quamvis praecipua festivitas esset, ecclesiam non intraturum, si pontificis consilium praescire potuisset. Invidiam tamen suscepti nominis, Romanis imperatoribus super hoc indignantibus, magna tulit patientia. Vicitque eorum contumaciam magnanimitate, qua eis procul dubio longe praestantior erat, mittendo ad eos crebras legationes et in epistolis fratres eos appellando.
hae causae: in the previous chapter it is told that Charlemagne had made a vow to pray at Rome venerated and venerate the churches there. This was his fourth and final visit to Rome.
Romani Leonem…fidem regis implorare conpulerunt: the Romans forced (compello)Leo to ask for the protection of the king
tempus extraxit: he spent the time
aversor aversatus sum: to refuse repeatedly (frequentative of averto)
Invidiam tamen suscepti nominis…tulit: he bore the hate the accepted title
Romanis imperatoribus super hoc indignantibus: as the byzantine emperors were indigent about that
qua eis procul dubio longe praestantior erat: in which he was undoubtedly (procul dubio  = sine dubio) for more superior than they
crebras legationes:  frequent embassies
Translation by A.J. Grant (1922)
HOW CHARLES BECAME EMPEROR
28. But such were not the only objects of his last
visit ; for the Romans had grievously outraged Pope
Leo, had torn out his eyes and cut off his tongue, and
thus forced him to throw himself upon the protection
of the King. He, therefore came to Rome to restore
the condition of the church, which was terribly dis-
turbed, and spent the whole of the winter there. It
was then that he received the title of Emperor and
Augustus, which he so disliked at first that he
affirmed that he would not have entered the church
on that day — though it was the chief festival of the
church — if he could have foreseen the design of the
Pope. But when he had taken the title he bore very
quietly the hostility that it caused and the indignation
of the Roman emperors. He conquered their ill-
feeling by his magnanimity, in which, doubtless, he
far excelled them, and sent frequent embassies to them,
and called them his brothers.
Posted by Leo Tepper at 07:13
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
There was an error in this gadget
caesarius of heisterbach (1)
early christian latin (1)
gregory of tours (6)
johannis de capua (2)
paulinus of nola (1)
pliny the younger (4)
Walter of Ch√Ętillon (1)
Ausonius, epigram 14: last time making love?
Propertius 2.26: a dream.
A strong warning against garden thieves!
Ovid, Fasti 2, 571-82: a ritual to ward off curses...
Einhard, Vita Karoli Magni, 28: Emperor!
These blogs are meant for anyone interested in Latin and are the result of my own curiosity. Have f
View my complete profile
Lucretius I.80-101: tantum religio potuit suadere malorum or on the crimes of religion.
The Roman poet Lucretius (99-55 BC) was a follower of the Greek philosopher Epicurus   (341-270 BC). Epicurus did not believe in gods a...
An early Cristmas post.
I know it is still a bit early for Christmas posts, but a befriended cellist and leader of a baroque ensemble asked me to translate the...
Martial, Liber Speculatorum VII. A gruesome scene at the arena.
I n this poem Martial describes the performance of a mimus in the amphitheatre.  A mimus is a kind of play with often comic situations es...
Carmina Burana 211: My belly is my god!
Whenever the Carmina Burana is mentioned, the music by Carl Orff will come to mind. It is less known that Orff only orchestrated 24 of t...
Paulus Diaconus, Historia Longobardorum 1.4: the miracle of the seven sleepers
During the great migrations of the 4 th -6 th century, the Roman empire, or rather what was left of it, was invaded by Germanic tribes...
Propertius 2.12: war with Amor.
This week I returned from a short holiday to Normandy and Brittany.   A lovely countryside with many remains from the Middle Ages and m...
Some Roman Epitaphs. Memento mori!
Whenever I see an old church, I walk around the graveyard, reading the inscriptions on the graves, provided they have not faded away thro...
Propertius 3,12: Don't join the army!
In 22 BC a certain Postumus was about to enter the army for an expedition to Armenia. Augustus wanted to confront the Persians there ...
Song of songs: Nigra sum, sed formosa!
Some time ago I saw a documentary on Dutch television about a new trend amongst dark skinned women, namely to use cream to whiten their...
Petronius, Cena Trimalchionis c. 61 and 62. A were-wolf story....
This extract is from the Cena Trimalchionis  `Trimalchio’s Dinner’, which is a part of the Satyricon written by Petronius Arbiter (27-66)...
There was an error in this gadget
Watermark theme. Powered by Blogger.