de da de id en en en en en en en en en en en en en de de sv fa it en en en la de la en la en en en la de ru et de it en ru
Argentina’s Debt Appeal Dies at U.S. Supreme Court – Lesung mit Robert Claus | 3. April 2019 | 18:00 Uhr | Wirkbau Chemnitz
You don’t have to be an Argentina fan to worry about the precedent set on June 16, when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the nation’s appeal in a case brought by hedge funds that hold Argentine government debt. The high court let stand a lower court ruling that blew a hole in the country’s attempt to shrink its debt burden following a 2001 default on $95 billion in bonds. Although the U.S. courts’ actions apply only to this case, they send a message about the empowerment of creditors that could make it harder for other countries to stretch out or cut debt payments in hard times.
Argentina, as a defiant, serial defaulter that offered creditors the worst terms since World War II, isn’t the ideal poster child for debt relief. But France, Brazil, and Mexico submitted friend of the court briefs on its behalf because of the principle involved—that U.S. courts should not be able to force sovereign nations to do the bidding of bondholders. The International Monetary Fund planned to submit a brief but didn’t last year because of opposition from the U.S.
“I’m reeling a little bit,” says Eric LeCompte, executive director of Jubilee USA Network. “It’s clearly the worst possible outcome.” The coalition of religious and other organizations says it has helped coordinate efforts to win $130 billion in debt relief for governments of the world’s poorest countries.
“It is a pretty remarkable precedent for the U.S. to allow a lower court judge to push around a sovereign nation,” says Karen Hooper, director of analysis for Latin America at Stratfor, a geopolitical intelligence company. Some countries could choose to issue debt in countries that are more favorable to debtors, she says. In 2012, Greece, whose bonds were issued under Greek and English rather than New York law, reduced its debt by about €100 billion ($136 billion) in a restructuring.
Holders of about 92 percent of the Argentine bonds accepted restructuring deals in 2005 and 2010 for about 30¢ on the dollar. The Supreme Court’s inaction is a win for investors, led by billionaire Paul Singer, who refused. Federal courts have ruled that Argentina can’t make payments on the restructured bonds unless it pays holdouts in full. A federal district court in Manhattan issued an injunction that could put banks in contempt of court if they pass along Argentina’s payments on the restructured bonds without a deal in place to pay holdouts. Many new bonds avoid the holdout problem by including clauses requiring all investors to accept the same terms.
Share on Facebook Share
Share on Pinterest Share
Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on Digg Share
Schreibe einen Kommentar Antworten abbrechen
Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert
Maecenas id eros vel tortor efficitur auctor ut vitae metus. Aliquam a lacus ac nulla egestas pulvinar vel in ex. Aenean sollicitudin tortor...
Sed consectetur erat lectus, id lacinia arcu dignissim ut. Sed luctus nulla a quam pulvinar, sed interdum nisl cursus. In consequat neque eg...
Duis ac nisl quis risus facilisis rutrum. Proin euismod metus justo, at suscipit nisl sodales sit amet. Morbi ultricies ligula id arcu conse...
Nunc ornare dolor eu lorem accumsan porttitor. Integer ac erat non magna finibus tincidunt sit amet nec quam. Quisque eleifend justo nunc. Pellentesque tempor tincidunt risus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus pulvinar orci sit amet arcu commodo commodo. Sed pulvinar vulputate nunc quis malesuada.
Copyright © 2022 Dr. André Körner