Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Mechanics
[Cueball and Ponytail stand facing each other, talking. Cueball has a small dog on a leash.] Cueball: But dogs can observe the world, which means that according to quantum mechanics they must have souls.
[Caption below the frame:] Protip : You can safely ignore any sentence that includes the phrase "According to quantum mechanics".
Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it.

This comic plays with the fact that quantum mechanics is a very complex subject that is frequently misapplied by laymen. Many of the phenomena studied in quantum mechanics are contrary to common sense and can only be expressed in complex mathematics. Yet, since the field is fundamental to our understanding of reality, it is commonly cited to support broad sweeping philosophical generalizations.
The phrase “according to quantum mechanics” betrays the speaker's lack of knowledge about the subject. To a physicist, it is almost as vague as “according to physics”. Somebody who understands the subject would use a more precise term, such as “according to the uncertainty principle” or “according to a paper by such-and-such.”
Cueball explains to Ponytail that dogs must have souls . This would be against the doctrine of certain religions, including some sects of Christianity, which teach that only humans have souls. The question of whether animals have souls comes up for many reasons in theological and philosophical discussions. One major one is the wish of many dog owners to meet their pets in Heaven . For this to come to pass, it would be necessary for dogs not only to have souls, but also immortal souls. This distinction comes up in Catholicism, for example, where the commonly taught doctrine, as in Aquinas, S.C.G. II, C. 82 , is that, while animals do have souls, their souls are mortal, and therefore die with their bodies. In this case, animals cannot enter Heaven, Hell , or Purgatory .
Cueball, however, uses quantum mechanics as an argument, even though quantum mechanics is only applicable on the atomic scale and not on macroscopic objects like animals. It also only applies to matter and energy, and not to souls, which are held by most doctrines to be immaterial. His argument, however, is a reference to the concept of an ' observer ' in quantum physics, as well as theories about the collapse of wave functions . It should also be noted that science does not equate the ability to observe the world and possession of a soul, and that the latter is merely a theological concept, not used in science and not proven to exist in real world.
The vast majority of people do not have a sufficient understanding of quantum mechanics to judge whether Cueball's statement is correct. Nevertheless, Randall's message is: you don't need to understand quantum mechanics to judge the statement. No matter what the sentence is, it is almost certainly incorrect, so “you can safely ignore” it.
The title text refers to “science assertions” — that is, claims about scientific knowledge — that include the words “quantum mechanics”. If “quantum mechanics” is the most complicated term in the sentence, then the speaker probably does not know what they are talking about. If a scientist is correctly applying quantum mechanics, they will use more specific (and hence more complicated) language.
[Cueball and Ponytail stand facing each other, talking. Cueball has a small dog on a leash.] Cueball: But dogs can observe the world, which means that according to quantum mechanics they must have souls.
[Caption below the frame:] Protip : You can safely ignore any sentence that includes the phrase "According to quantum mechanics".
Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it.
