Simply increasing inventory for all SKUs would be a poor allocation of investment, further increasing the order-fill rate for those SKUs for which service levels are already high.
( Simply ( ( ( increasing inventory ) ( for ( all SKUs ) ) ) ( ( would ( ( ( be ( ( a ( poor allocation ) ) ( of investment ) ) ) , ) ( further ( increasing ( ( ( the ( order-fill rate ) ) ( for ( those SKUs ) ) ) ( ( for which ) ( ( service levels ) ( ( are already ) high ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Simply)) (NP (NP (VBG increasing) (NN inventory)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT all) (NNPS SKUs)))) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ poor) (NN allocation)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN investment)))) (, ,) (S (ADVP (RB further)) (VP (VBG increasing) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ order-fill) (NN rate)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT those) (NNPS SKUs))) (SBAR (WHPP (IN for) (WHNP (WDT which))) (S (NP (NN service) (NNS levels)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB already)) (ADJP (JJ high)))))))))) (. .)))
Upping the inventory for SKUs might be a solution, but isn't the best way of tackling the job.
( ( ( ( ( ( Upping ( ( the inventory ) ( for SKUs ) ) ) ( might ( be ( a solution ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( is n't ) ( ( the ( best way ) ) ( of ( tackling ( the job ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (S (VP (VBG Upping) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN inventory)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNP SKUs)))))) (VP (MD might) (VP (VB be) (NP (DT a) (NN solution))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (VP (VBZ is) (RB n't) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS best) (NN way)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG tackling) (NP (DT the) (NN job)))))))) (. .)))