Simply increasing inventory for all SKUs would be a poor allocation of investment, further increasing the order-fill rate for those SKUs for which service levels are already high.
( Simply ( ( ( increasing inventory ) ( for ( all SKUs ) ) ) ( ( would ( ( ( be ( ( a ( poor allocation ) ) ( of investment ) ) ) , ) ( further ( increasing ( ( ( the ( order-fill rate ) ) ( for ( those SKUs ) ) ) ( ( for which ) ( ( service levels ) ( ( are already ) high ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Simply)) (NP (NP (VBG increasing) (NN inventory)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT all) (NNPS SKUs)))) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ poor) (NN allocation)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN investment)))) (, ,) (S (ADVP (RB further)) (VP (VBG increasing) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ order-fill) (NN rate)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT those) (NNPS SKUs))) (SBAR (WHPP (IN for) (WHNP (WDT which))) (S (NP (NN service) (NNS levels)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB already)) (ADJP (JJ high)))))))))) (. .)))
The one and only way to solve the problem is to increase inventory for all SKUs.
( ( ( ( The one ) and ) ( only ( way ( to ( solve ( the problem ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( to ( ( increase inventory ) ( for ( all SKUs ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN one)) (CC and) (NP (JJ only) (NN way) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB solve) (NP (DT the) (NN problem))))))) (VP (VBZ is) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB increase) (NP (NN inventory)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT all) (NNPS SKUs))))))) (. .)))