In the event, why not just say   lithe   under lento and the reverse under lithe ?  (This latter piece of information is unaccountably lacking.)
( In ( ( ( the event ) , ) ( ( ( why not ) just ) ( ( ( say ( lithe ( under ( ( lento and ) ( the reverse ) ) ) ) ) ( under ( lithe ? ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( ( ( ( This ( latter piece ) ) ( of information ) ) ( ( is unaccountably ) lacking ) ) . ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN event)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB why) (RB not) (RB just)) (S (VP (VBP say) (ADJP (JJ lithe) (PP (IN under) (NP (NP (NN lento)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (NN reverse))))) (PP (IN under) (FRAG (ADJP (JJ lithe)) (. ?))) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (S (NP (NP (DT This) (JJ latter) (NN piece)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN information)))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB unaccountably)) (VP (VBG lacking)))) (. .) (-RRB- -RRB-))))))))
In the event, why not just say that you do not understand?
( ( In ( the event ) ) ( , ( why ( ( not ( just ( say ( that ( you ( ( do not ) understand ) ) ) ) ) ) ? ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (PP (IN In) (NP (DT the) (NN event))) (, ,) (WHADVP (WRB why)) (SQ (RB not) (VP (ADVP (RB just)) (VB say) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP do) (RB not) (VP (VB understand))))))) (. ?)))