Broadly speaking, the CEF Moderate scenario can be thought of as a 50% increase in funding for programs that promote a variety of both demand-side and supply-side technologies.
( ( Broadly speaking ) ( , ( ( the ( CEF ( Moderate scenario ) ) ) ( ( can ( be ( ( thought ( of ( as ( ( a ( ( 50 % ) increase ) ) ( in funding ) ) ) ) ) ( for ( programs ( that ( promote ( ( a variety ) ( of ( both ( demand-side ( and ( supply-side technologies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (ADVP (RB Broadly)) (VP (VBG speaking))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP CEF) (NNP Moderate) (NN scenario)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN thought) (PP (IN of) (IN as) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (CD 50) (NN %)) (NN increase)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN funding))))) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NNS programs)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP promote) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN variety)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT both) (JJ demand-side) (CC and) (JJ supply-side) (NNS technologies)))))))))))) (. .)))
The CEF Moderate scenario can be thought of as a 10% decrease in funding for programs.
( ( The ( CEF ( Moderate scenario ) ) ) ( ( can ( be ( thought ( of ( as ( ( a ( ( 10 % ) decrease ) ) ( in ( funding ( for programs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP CEF) (NNP Moderate) (NN scenario)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN thought) (PP (IN of) (IN as) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (CD 10) (NN %)) (NN decrease)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN funding)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS programs)))))))))) (. .)))