Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear a Washington case challenging the widespread practice of pooling client money held by lawyers and using the interest to pay for legal services for the poor.
( ( Supreme Court ) ( ( ( agreed Monday ) ( to ( hear ( ( a ( Washington case ) ) ( challenging ( ( the ( widespread practice ) ) ( of ( ( ( pooling ( ( client money ) ( held ( by lawyers ) ) ) ) and ) ( using ( the ( interest ( to ( pay ( for ( ( legal services ) ( for ( the poor ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Supreme) (NNP Court)) (VP (VBD agreed) (NP (NNP Monday)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB hear) (S (NP (DT a) (NNP Washington) (NN case)) (VP (VBG challenging) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ widespread) (NN practice)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VP (VBG pooling) (NP (NP (NN client) (NN money)) (VP (VBN held) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNS lawyers)))))) (CC and) (VP (VBG using) (NP (DT the) (NN interest) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB pay) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ legal) (NNS services)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJ poor)))))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
The Supreme Court refused to hear a case about pooling client money.
( ( The ( Supreme Court ) ) ( ( refused ( to ( ( hear ( a case ) ) ( about ( pooling ( client money ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Supreme) (NNP Court)) (VP (VBD refused) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB hear) (NP (DT a) (NN case)) (PP (IN about) (S (VP (VBG pooling) (NP (NN client) (NN money))))))))) (. .)))