For instance, mandatory account proposals are more likely to increase private saving because such a program would require households that do not currently save-such as many low-income individuals or families-to place some amount in an individual account.
( ( For instance ) ( , ( ( mandatory ( account proposals ) ) ( ( are ( more ( likely ( to ( ( increase ( private saving ) ) ( because ( ( such ( a program ) ) ( would ( require ( households ( that ( ( ( do not ) currently ) ( ( save-such ( as ( ( ( many ( low-income individuals ) ) or ) ( families-to place ) ) ) ) ( ( some amount ) ( in ( an ( individual account ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN For) (NP (NN instance))) (, ,) (NP (JJ mandatory) (NN account) (NNS proposals)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ likely) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB increase) (NP (JJ private) (NN saving)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PDT such) (DT a) (NN program)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB require) (NP (NP (NNS households)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP do) (RB not) (ADVP (RB currently)) (VP (VB save-such) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (JJ many) (JJ low-income) (NNS individuals)) (CC or) (NP (JJ families-to) (NN place)))) (NP (NP (DT some) (NN amount)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT an) (JJ individual) (NN account)))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
Mandatory account proposals would outlaw savings in individual accounts.
( ( Mandatory ( account proposals ) ) ( ( would ( ( outlaw savings ) ( in ( individual accounts ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Mandatory) (NN account) (NNS proposals)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB outlaw) (NP (NNS savings)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ individual) (NNS accounts))))) (. .)))