The analysis concluded that, because the rule relaxed the hog cholera-related restrictions imposed on the importation of live swine and prepared pork products from Sonora, Mexico, the proposed rule could have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities in the United States.
( ( The analysis ) ( ( concluded ( ( that ( , ( ( because ( ( the rule ) ( relaxed ( ( the hog ) ( ( cholera-related restrictions ) ( ( ( imposed ( on ( ( the importation ) ( of ( live swine ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( prepared ( pork products ) ) ( from ( Sonora ( , Mexico ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ) ) ( ( the ( proposed rule ) ) ( could ( have ( ( a ( significant ( economic impact ) ) ) ( on ( ( a ( substantial number ) ) ( of ( ( small entities ) ( in ( the ( United States ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN analysis)) (VP (VBD concluded) (SBAR (IN that) (PRN (, ,) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (DT the) (NN rule)) (VP (VBD relaxed) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN hog)) (SBAR (S (NP (JJ cholera-related) (NNS restrictions)) (VP (VP (VBN imposed) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN importation)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ live) (NNS swine)))))) (CC and) (VP (JJ prepared) (NP (NN pork) (NNS products)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNP Sonora) (, ,) (NNP Mexico))))))))))) (, ,)) (S (NP (DT the) (VBN proposed) (NN rule)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ significant) (JJ economic) (NN impact)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ substantial) (NN number)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ small) (NNS entities)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP United) (NNPS States))))))))))))) (. .)))
The analysis thought the rule would have no impact on US entities at all.
( ( The analysis ) ( ( thought ( ( the rule ) ( would ( ( have ( ( no impact ) ( on ( US entities ) ) ) ) ( at all ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN analysis)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NN rule)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN impact)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP US) (NNS entities)))) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all))))))) (. .)))