Click here for Finkelstein's explanation of why this logic is expedient.
( ( ( Click here ) ( for ( ( ( Finkelstein 's ) explanation ) ( of ( why ( ( this logic ) ( is expedient ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Click) (ADVP (RB here)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Finkelstein) (POS 's)) (NN explanation)) (PP (IN of) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB why)) (S (NP (DT this) (NN logic)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ expedient))))))))) (. .)))
Click here for Finkelstein's explanation of why this logic is expedient due to philosophical constraints.
( ( ( Click here ) ( for ( ( ( Finkelstein 's ) explanation ) ( of ( why ( ( this logic ) ( is ( ( expedient due ) ( to ( philosophical constraints ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Click) (ADVP (RB here)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Finkelstein) (POS 's)) (NN explanation)) (PP (IN of) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB why)) (S (NP (DT this) (NN logic)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (ADJP (JJ expedient) (JJ due)) (PP (TO to) (NP (JJ philosophical) (NNS constraints))))))))))) (. .)))