Broadly speaking, the CEF Moderate scenario can be thought of as a 50% increase in funding for programs that promote a variety of both demand-side and supply-side technologies.
( ( Broadly speaking ) ( , ( ( the ( CEF ( Moderate scenario ) ) ) ( ( can ( be ( ( thought ( of ( as ( ( a ( ( 50 % ) increase ) ) ( in funding ) ) ) ) ) ( for ( programs ( that ( promote ( ( a variety ) ( of ( both ( demand-side ( and ( supply-side technologies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (ADVP (RB Broadly)) (VP (VBG speaking))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP CEF) (NNP Moderate) (NN scenario)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN thought) (PP (IN of) (IN as) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (CD 50) (NN %)) (NN increase)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN funding))))) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NNS programs)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP promote) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN variety)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT both) (JJ demand-side) (CC and) (JJ supply-side) (NNS technologies)))))))))))) (. .)))
A 60% increase in funding for programs is better than a 50% increase.
( ( ( A ( ( 60 % ) increase ) ) ( in ( funding ( for programs ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( better ( than ( a ( ( 50 % ) increase ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT A) (ADJP (CD 60) (NN %)) (NN increase)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN funding)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS programs)))))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (ADJP (JJR better)) (PP (IN than) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (CD 50) (NN %)) (NN increase))))) (. .)))