A deep learning algorithm for categorizing high-resolution CT images reported high accuracy  and a research project led by Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine and Riken used a combination of Deep learning and Machine learning algorithm to accurately diagnose the disease. Differential diagnosis
Recognizing IPF in clinical practice can be challenging as symptoms often appear similar to those of more common diseases, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and congestive heart failure (www.diagnoseipf.com). The key issue facing clinicians is whether the presenting history, symptoms (or signs), radiology, and pulmonary function testing are collectively in keeping with the diagnosis of IPF or whether the findings are due to another process. It has long been recognized that patients with ILD related to asbestos exposure, drugs (such as chemotherapeutic agents or nitrofurantoin), rheumatoid arthritis and scleroderma/systemic sclerosis may be difficult to distinguish from IPF. Other differential diagnostic considerations include interstitial lung disease related to mixed connective tissue disease, advanced sarcoidosis, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis and radiation-induced lung injury. Classification
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) belongs to a large group of more than 200 lung diseases known as interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), which are characterized by the involvement of the lung interstitium, the tissue between the air sacs of the lung. IPF is one specific presentation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), which is in turn a type of ILD, also known as diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD).The 2002 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) classification of IIPs was updated in 2013.
Consistency in the form of communication, as well as the development and use of oral communication are extremely important in aiding a childs speech learning process.Many therapy approaches are not supported by thorough evidence; however, the aspects of treatment that do seem to be agreed upon are the following:

Treatment needs to be intense and highly individualized, with about 3–5 therapy sessions each week
A maximum of 30 minutes per session is best for young children
Principles of motor learning theory and intense speech-motor practice seem to be the most effective
Non-speech oral motor therapy is not necessary or sufficient
A multi-sensory approach to therapy may be beneficial: using sign language, pictures, tactile cues, visual prompts, and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) can be helpful.Although these aspects of treatment are supported by much clinical documentation, they lack evidence from systematic research studies. In ASHAs position statement on DVD/CAS, ASHA states there is a critical need for collaborative, interdisciplinary, and programmatic research on the neural substrates, behavioral correlates, and treatment options for DVD/CAS. Integral stimulation
One technique that is frequently used to treat DVD/CAS is integral stimulation. Integral stimulation is based on cognitive motor learning, focusing on the cognitive motor planning needed for the complex motor task of speech. It is often referred to as the "watch me, listen, do as I do" approach and is founded on a multi-step hierarchy of strategies for treatment. This hierarchy of strategies allows the clinician to alter treatment depending upon the needs of the child.