Caught
a method of dismissal in which one of the fielders, including the bowler, catches the ball before it touches the ground after the batsman hits it (with either the bat or a glove that is in contact with the bat). This is the most common method of getting a batsman out in professional cricket. Caught and bowled
Dismissed by a catch taken by the bowler. The term originates from the way such dismissals are recorded on a scorecard (c & b); the alternative "bowled and caught", referring to the sequence of events in the strict chronological order, is almost never used. Caught behind
Dismissed by a catch taken by the wicket-keeper. Usually from an edge or glove, but sometimes from a skier. Centurion
A player who has scored a century. Century
1. A score of at least 100 runs by a single batsman; considered a substantial personal achievement. 2. (rare) An ironic term for a bowler who has conceded over 100 runs in an innings. Chance
An opportunity to dismiss a batsman that isnt taken by the fielding side. Common examples include a shot that carries to a fielder who then drops the catch; a possible run out in which the fielders throw misses the stumps; or a fumble by a wicketkeeper during an attempted stumping. If a batsman doesnt provide any chances to the opponent, it is referred to as a "chanceless innings" or "chanceless knock". Some commentators refer to a very difficult opportunity as a "half chance".
These three compounds are formed by means of similar chemical processes, and oil that contains one of the three substances is likely to contain the other two. Oil samples that are suspected to have been ingested by people who later developed TOS often contain all three of these contaminants (among other substances), but are most likely to contain OOPAP. However, when these three substances were given to laboratory animals, OOPAP was not acutely toxic, PAP was toxic only after injection, but not after oral administration, and OPAP was toxic only after injection of high doses. Therefore, none of these three substances is thought to cause TOS. Similar results were obtained after administration of fatty acid anilides.Data discrepancies combined with both a high level of secrecy surrounding the huge investigation and the fact that the first cases of the syndrome were located in Madrid (near the U.S. military base in Torrejón de Ardoz) spread the idea of a conspiracy. Several of those affected by TOS claim they never consumed any of the tainted oil products. Furthermore, the tainted oil was primarily sold in low-cost street markets; yet, a considerable percentage of the patients were wealthy. Another theory suggests the toxic reaction was triggered by organophosphate poisoning (e. g., from pesticide residues in tomatoes) and covered up by the Spanish government and the WHO. See also
Eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome
Ginger Jake
Health crisis
The Jungle
List of food contamination incidents

References
External links
WHO Report: Toxic Oil Syndrome - Ten years of progress