Navindra Persaud, Jessica Chin, and Mark Walker wrote a public letter to the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Canada and raised concerns over the risks of Diclectin and recommended reconsidering it as the "first-line pharmacological treatment" against the nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Dr. Persaud shared with news agencies that his only source of research data for this drug came from Health Canada and claimed he was only able to access the document by signing a confidentiality agreement.In January 2019, Canadian Family Physician issued a correction stating "Recommendations in 2 articles published in Canadian Family Physician, “Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Evidence-based treatment algorithm” and “Treatment of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. An updated algorithm,” have subsequently come under critical scrutiny. These articles were not subjected to standard peer review, and Canadian Family Physician acknowledges that upon closer inspection these articles did not provide satisfactory evidence that would have justified the recommendation of doxylamine-pyridoxine as a sole first-line treatment for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP). More recent Canadian NVP guidelines have been published; however, a subsequent re-analysis questions the conclusions of 1 of the studies cited in these guidelines to justify doxylamine-pyridoxine as a recommended first-line treatment for NVP. Additionally, for the articles in Canadian Family Physician there was an undisclosed conflict of interest with Duchesnay, the manufacturer of Diclectin, the combination of doxylamine-pyridoxine. Canadian Family Physician encourages readers to interpret previously published NVP recommendations with caution.
Readers are also referred to the commentary “Motherisk and Canadian Family Physician” in the January 2017 issue of Canadian Family Physician." [Ed: bolding to help summarize information, note please follow link to article to see the footnotes from this article]

Society and culture
From a legal perspective, the case through Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993) set a new standard for admitting expert testimony in federal courts in lieu of the Frye standard. See also
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Daubert standard

References
External links
FDA FederalRegister/Vol. 64, No. 152/August 9,1999/Determination That Bendectin Was Not Withdrawn From Sale for Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness
FDA approves Diclegis for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting, April 8, 2013
About Morning Sickness from MOTHERISK at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto