Nevertheless, theoretically, patients previously dependent upon the inotropic effects of digoxin could develop heart failure and hypokalaemia could result within 1–5 hours, owing to intracellular shifts of potassium, as the effects of digoxin are reversed. Patients who require redigitalization must wait for the complexes to be eliminated from the body by the kidneys, this taking 2–3 days with normal renal function. Unfortunately, fab fragments interfere with both fluorescence excitation transfer immunoassays and radioimmunoassays for digoxin. This means that serum drug levels cannot be monitored until the drug-antibody complexes are cleared from the circulation. Intellectual property
DigiFab is used as an antidote to treat a life-threatening overdose of digoxin or digitoxin. DigiFab is manufactured and distributed by BTG international Inc. under U.S. License No. 186. DigiFab is a sterile, lyophilized preparation of digoxin-immune ovine Fab (monovalent) immunoglobulin fragments. It is prepared by isolating the immunoglobulin fraction of the ovine serum, digesting it with papain and isolating the digoxin-specific Fab fragments by affinity chromatography. These antibody fragments have a molecular weight of approximately 46,000 Da. Each vial of DigiFab, which will bind approximately 0.5 mg digoxin, contains 40 mg of digoxin immune Fab, 75 mg (approx) of mannitol USP, and 2 mg (approx) sodium acetate USP as a buffering agent. The product contains no preservatives and is intended for intravenous administration. Digibind is manufactured by GlaxoSmithkline, SpA, Parma Italy under US License No. 129. It’s distributed by GSK, Research Triangle park, NC 27709.
Regulatory information and clinical studies
Case series have reported benefits from anti‐digoxin Fab, but data regarding the response in acute or chronic poisoning are conflicting. Recent observational data support an effect in acute poisoning, but efficacy in chronic poisoning be minimally effective in alleviating cardiac toxicities in chronic digoxin poisoning. Data also support outcomes of acute digoxin poisoning without use of anti‐digoxin Fab. A case series of 147 patients showed that not all cases of acute digoxin overdose require anti‐digoxin Fab, nor should anti‐digoxin Fab dose be calculated based on ingested dose. In contrast, a higher mortality (7.6%) was noted in a case series of acute and chronic digoxin and digitoxin poisoning despite Fab being used first line. Further, a retrospective case‐controlled study of chronic digoxin poisoning did not observe a beneficial effect of anti‐digoxin Fab on mortality. An RCT (n = 66) in yellow oleander poisoning showed an early improvement in cardiac rhythm and hyperkalaemia from anti‐digoxin Fab, prompting early termination of the trial. It was not powered to detect a change in mortality and no deaths were noted. As with all foreign proteins, anaphylaxis, serum sickness or febrile reactions are a source of concern, especially with repeated administration. These reactions appear uncommon for example, in a study of 717 adults where only six patients (0.8%) exhibited any evidence of allergic response.