8. (10 points) As shown in the figure, there are 9 intersections numbered from $1 \sim 9$, connected by 9 streets: 3 horizontal, 3 vertical, and 3 diagonal. Five police officers, $A$, $B$, $C$, $D$, and $E$, are stationed at 5 different intersections. If two police officers are on the same street, they can see each other. They each said the following:

A: “I can see the other 4 police officers”.
B: “I can see 3 out of the other 4 police officers”.
C: “I can see 2 out of the other 4 police officers”.
D: “I can only see $B$”.
E: “I can't see anyone”.

It is known that exactly one of them is lying, and the lying police officer is stationed at the intersection with the smallest number among the five. Therefore, the five-digit number formed by the intersection numbers of $A$, $B$, $C$, $D$, and $E$ is $\qquad$
【Analysis】Obviously, what $A$ said is contradictory to $D$ and $E$, so $A$ is wrong, and $B$, $C$, $D$, and $E$ are right. If someone stands at position 1, they can see positions $2$, $4$, $8$, $3$, and $6$, a total of 5 positions, so $E$ cannot stand at position 1, otherwise positions $2$, $4$, $8$, $3$, and $6$ cannot be occupied, and there will not be enough positions. Similarly, we can determine the numbers of the intersections where other letters are located.

【Solution】Solution: According to the analysis, what $A$ said is contradictory to $D$ and $E$, so $A$ is wrong, and $B$, $C$, $D$, and $E$ are right.

If someone stands at position 1, they can see positions $2$, $4$, $8$, $3$, and $6$, a total of 5 positions, so $E$ cannot stand at position 1,

otherwise positions $2$, $4$, $8$, $3$, and $6$ cannot be occupied, and there will not be enough positions. Similarly, position 3 can see 6 positions, position 4 can see 6 positions,
position 5 can see 5 positions, position 7 can see 6 positions, and position 8 can see 6 positions, so $E$ cannot stand at these positions, and $E$ can only stand at $2$, $6$, or $9$;

If $E$ stands at position 2, positions $1$, $4$, $5$, and $7$ cannot be occupied, and among the remaining positions $3$, $6$, $8$, and $9$, no one can see 3 other positions at the same time,

which contradicts the fact that $B$ can see 3 people;
If $E$ stands at position 9, positions $3$, $5$, $7$, and $8$ cannot be occupied, and among the remaining positions $1$, $2$, $4$, and $9$, only position 1 can see 3 other positions at the same time,

so $B$ is at position 1, and since 1 is the smallest number, the number of the intersection where $A$ is located must be greater than 1,
which contradicts the statement that "the number of the intersection where the lying police officer is located is the smallest among the five police officers";
Therefore, $E$ is at position 6, positions $1$, $3$, $7$, and $8$ cannot be occupied, and among the remaining positions $2$, $4$, $5$, and $9$, only position 5 can see 3 other positions at the same time,

so $B$ is at position 5; the lying $A$ is at the smallest number among the five police officers, so $A$ is at position 2; position 4 can see $A$ at position 2 and $B$ at position 5, according to "D can only see B", so $D$ is not at position 4, $D$ is at position 9;

The remaining $C$ is at position 4.
The answer is: 25496.