A positive integer is called fancy if it can be expressed in the form

$$
2^{a_{1}}+2^{a_{2}}+\cdots+2^{a_{100}}
$$

where $a_{1}, a_{2}, \ldots, a_{100}$ are non-negative integers that are not necessarily distinct.
Find the smallest positive integer $n$ such that no multiple of $n$ is a fancy number.
Answer: The answer is $n=2^{101}-1$.

Translate the above text into English, please keep the original text's line breaks and format, and output the translation result directly. 

The text provided is already in English, so no translation is needed. Here is the text as requested:

A positive integer is called fancy if it can be expressed in the form

$$
2^{a_{1}}+2^{a_{2}}+\cdots+2^{a_{100}}
$$

where $a_{1}, a_{2}, \ldots, a_{100}$ are non-negative integers that are not necessarily distinct.
Find the smallest positive integer $n$ such that no multiple of $n$ is a fancy number.
Answer: The answer is $n=2^{101}-1$.
Let $k$ be any positive integer less than $2^{101}-1$. Then $k$ can be expressed in binary notation using at most 100 ones, and therefore there exists a positive integer $r$ and non-negative integers $a_{1}, a_{2}, \ldots, a_{r}$ such that $r \leq 100$ and $k=2^{a_{1}}+\cdots+2^{a_{r}}$. Notice that for a positive integer $s$ we have:

$$
\begin{aligned}
2^{s} k & =2^{a_{1}+s}+2^{a_{2}+s}+\cdots+2^{a_{r-1}+s}+\left(1+1+2+\cdots+2^{s-1}\right) 2^{a_{r}} \\
& =2^{a_{1}+s}+2^{a_{2}+s}+\cdots+2^{a_{r-1}+s}+2^{a_{r}}+2^{a_{r}}+\cdots+2^{a_{r}+s-1} .
\end{aligned}
$$

This shows that $k$ has a multiple that is a sum of $r+s$ powers of two. In particular, we may take $s=100-r \geq 0$, which shows that $k$ has a multiple that is a fancy number.

We will now prove that no multiple of $n=2^{101}-1$ is a fancy number. In fact we will prove a stronger statement, namely, that no multiple of $n$ can be expressed as the sum of at most 100 powers of 2.

For the sake of contradiction, suppose that there exists a positive integer $c$ such that $c n$ is the sum of at most 100 powers of 2. We may assume that $c$ is the smallest such integer. By repeatedly merging equal powers of two in the representation of $c n$ we may assume that

$$
c n=2^{a_{1}}+2^{a_{2}}+\cdots+2^{a_{r}}
$$

where $r \leq 100$ and $a_{1}<a_{2}<\ldots<a_{r}$ are distinct non-negative integers. Consider the following two cases:

- If $a_{r} \geq 101$, then $2^{a_{r}}-2^{a_{r}-101}=2^{a_{r}-101} n$. It follows that $2^{a_{1}}+2^{a_{2}}+\cdots+2^{a_{r}-1}+2^{a_{r}-101}$ would be a multiple of $n$ that is smaller than $c n$. This contradicts the minimality of $c$.
- If $a_{r} \leq 100$, then $\left\{a_{1}, \ldots, a_{r}\right\}$ is a proper subset of $\{0,1, \ldots, 100\}$. Then

$$
n \leq c n<2^{0}+2^{1}+\cdots+2^{100}=n
$$

This is also a contradiction.
From these contradictions we conclude that it is impossible for $c n$ to be the sum of at most 100 powers of 2. In particular, no multiple of $n$ is a fancy number.