10) For the burglary at Ricchis' house, the suspects have been narrowed down to 4 people: Aldo, brown-haired and without glasses, Baldo, brown-haired and with glasses, Carlo, blonde and with glasses, and Dario, blonde and without glasses. The police have determined that the theft was committed by one person who had a single accomplice. The suspects have been narrowed down to 4 people; their statements are as follows.

Aldo: "The culprit is brown-haired and wears glasses".

Baldo: "The culprit is blonde and does not wear glasses".

Carlo: "The culprit wears glasses and his accomplice is Aldo".

Dario: "The culprit is brown-haired and his accomplice is Carlo".

It is known that the two statements of the culprit are false, while only one statement of the accomplice is false. The others told the truth. Who are the culprit and his accomplice?
(A) Aldo and Carlo
(D) Aldo and Dario
(B) Baldo and Carlo
(C) Baldo and Dario
(E) It is not possible to deduce.
10) The answer is (B). Since Aldo's two statements contradict the corresponding statements of Baldo, one of the two must be the culprit and the other must be innocent (they cannot both make a true statement and a false one). If Aldo were the culprit, both Carlo and Dario would make a false statement, which is impossible, so the culprit is Baldo. Furthermore, Carlo's statement that the accomplice is Aldo is false, so the accomplice is Carlo. It is easily verified that this conclusion is consistent with the data in the problem.