Language Model Alignment in Multilingual Trolley Problems
Zhijing Jin Max Kleiman-Weiner Giorgio Piatti Sydney Levine Jiarui Liu Fernando Gonzalez Adauto Francesco Ortu András Strausz Mrinmaya Sachan Rada Mihalcea Yejin Choi Bernhard Schölkopf
We evaluate the moral alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences in multilingual trolley problems. Building on the Moral Machine experiment, which captures over 40 million human judgments across 200+ countries, we develop a cross-lingual corpus of moral dilemma vignettes in over 100 languages called MultiTP. This dataset enables the assessment of LLMs' decision-making processes in diverse linguistic contexts. Our analysis explores the alignment of 19 different LLMs with human judgments, capturing preferences across six moral dimensions: species, gender, fitness, status, age, and the number of lives involved. By correlating these preferences with the demographic distribution of language speakers and examining the consistency of LLM responses to various prompt paraphrasings, our findings provide insights into cross-lingual and ethical biases of LLMs and their intersection. We discover significant variance in alignment across languages, challenging the assumption of uniform moral reasoning in AI systems and highlighting the importance of incorporating diverse perspectives in AI ethics. The results underscore the need for further research on the integration of multilingual dimensions in responsible AI research to ensure fair and equitable AI interactions worldwide.
LLM alignment, moral evaluation, trolley problems, language model evaluation, AI alignment
We test the alignment of 19 LLMs with human preferences on Trolley Problems in 100+ different languages.