Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference under Ambiguities
Zheyuan Zhang Fengyuan Hu Jayjun Lee Freda Shi Parisa Kordjamshidi Joyce Chai Ziqiao Ma
Spatial expressions in situated communication can be ambiguous, as their meanings vary depending on the frames of reference (FoR) adopted by speakers and listeners. While spatial language understanding and reasoning by vision-language models (VLMs) have gained increasing attention, potential ambiguities in these models are still under-explored. To address this issue, we present the COnsistent Multilingual Frame Of Reference Test (COMFORT), an evaluation protocol to systematically assess the spatial reasoning capabilities of VLMs. We evaluate nine state-of-the-art VLMs using COMFORT. Despite showing some alignment with English conventions in resolving ambiguities, our experiments reveal significant shortcomings of VLMs: notably, the models (1) exhibit poor robustness and consistency, (2) lack the flexibility to accommodate multiple FoRs, and (3) fail to adhere to language-specific or culture-specific conventions in cross-lingual tests, as English tends to dominate other languages. With a growing effort to align vision-language models with human cognitive intuitions, we call for more attention to the ambiguous nature and cross-cultural diversity of spatial reasoning.
vision-language models, spatial reasoning, multimodal reasoning
We present an evaluation protocol to systematically assess the spatial reasoning capabilities of vision language models, and shed light on the ambiguity and cross-cultural diversity of frame of reference in spatial reasoning.