RRM:  Robust Reward Model Training Mitigates Reward Hacking
Tianqi Liu Wei Xiong Jie Ren Lichang Chen Junru Wu Rishabh Joshi Yang Gao Jiaming Shen Zhen Qin Tianhe Yu Daniel Sohn Anastasia Makarova Jeremiah Zhe Liu Yuan Liu Bilal Piot Abe Ittycheriah Aviral Kumar Mohammad Saleh
Reward models (RMs) play a pivotal role in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, traditional RM training, which relies on response pairs tied to specific prompts, struggles to disentangle prompt-driven preferences from prompt-independent artifacts, such as response length and format. In this work, we expose a fundamental limitation of current RM training methods, where RMs fail to effectively distinguish between contextual signals and irrelevant artifacts when determining preferences. To address this, we introduce a causal framework that learns preferences independent of these artifacts and propose a novel data augmentation technique designed to eliminate them.  Extensive experiments show that our approach successfully filters out undesirable artifacts, yielding a more robust reward model (RRM). Our RRM improves the performance of a pairwise reward model trained on Gemma-2-9b-it, on Reward-Bench, increasing accuracy from 80.61% to 84.15%. Additionally, we train two DPO policies using both the RM and RRM, demonstrating that the RRM significantly enhances DPO-aligned policies, improving MT-Bench scores from 7.27 to 8.31 and length-controlled win-rates in AlpacaEval-2 from 33.46% to 52.49%.
Reward model, RLHF, Alignment
The first paper to point out the reason for reward hacking from a causal perspective.