The term “validity” did not appear to be as neutral as it was claimed to be, but reflected a subjective value judgement that operated a posteriori and had to do with the existence or absence of legal consequences of the act in question and not with the process of achievement or formulation.
Le terme "validité" ne semblait pas être si neutre qu'on le prétendait mais comportait un jugement subjectif de valeur intervenant a posteriori et portant sur l'existence ou l'absence de conséquences juridiques de l'acte jugé et non sur son processus d'accomplissement ou de formulation.