However, the differences between them are not sufficient of themselves to exclude the possibility of a likelihood of confusion, in particular where the mark applied for is identical to an earlier mark which is particularly distinctive (see paragraph 48 above).
Sur les plans visuel et phonétique, il convient de relever que, dans les deux formes de la marque ant érieure visées au point 60 ci-dessus, l’élément verbal « linderhof » détient une place prépondérante.