The United Kingdom also said that, according to its interpretation, the fact that a person was placed outside the protection of the law meant that, in the eyes of the State, the deprivation of liberty or the detention of the person was not covered by the rules relating to deprivation of liberty or detention, or that those rules were not in accordance with applicable international law.
Le Royaume-Uni a également déclaré que, dans son interprétation, la soustraction à la protection de la loi signifiait que, aux yeux de l'État, la privation de liberté ou la détention de la personne ne rentrait pas dans le champ d'application des normes relatives à la privation de liberté ou la détention, ou que ces normes n'étaient pas conformes au droit international applicable.