The evidence persuaded the Appeal Board that there had been interruptions and, given the nature of the disability with which he had been diagnosed, it was more likely than not that those interruptions had affected his ability to demonstrate his qualifications.
La preuve a convaincu le Comité d’appel qu’il y a eu des interruptions et qu’étant donné la nature de l’incapacité diagnostiquée chez l’appelant, il était probable que ces interruptions l’empêchent de démontrer ses qualités.