Furthermore, it must be held that, of the annexes in question, only Annex 23 to the application initiating proceedings had already been produced before OHIM and that Annexes 24 to 29 were produced for the first time before the Court.
II-287, points 22 et 30]. Il en résulte, en l’espèce, que l’invocation du caractère distinctif acquis par l’usage de la marque antérieure est irrecevable devant le Tribunal.