The Court therefore concluded that “it can hardly be considered contrary to the moral integrity of the minor to order the performance of another previous decision seeking the reunification of a daughter with her biological mother; so that, in our own terms, `the best interest of the child has at all times been taken into account, weighing it with the interest of her biological mother, which, although of lesser rank is not negligible (and this is the meaning of the case law of European Court of Human Rights in art )' “.
Nonobstant, l'utilisation du principe de l'intérêt supérieur de l'enfant dans l'argumentation juridique du tribunal constitutionnel peut être constatée dans d'autres décisions, rendues durant la période considérée, telles que la décision 75/2005, du 4 avril, la décision 17/2006, du 30 janvier, ou la décision 118/2006, du 24 avril.