On the other hand he must have suffered both from the existence of the death sentence and from his conditions of detention; that being so, the Court considered that the facts complained of by Mr Ilaşcu did not call for a separate examination under Article 2 of the Convention, but would be more appropriately examined under Article 3 instead.
Cependant, il a dû souffrir à la fois de sa condamnation et de ses conditions de détention ; dès lors, la Cour estime qu’il y a plutôt lieu d’étudier les faits dont se plaint le requérant sous l’angle de l’article 3.