My question has to do with how it is possible that a program that the Conservatives criticized as having been inaction, using a criterion of intensity on which we now agree was not effective, is now regarded as being acceptable, and is a good idea.
Je me demande ´ ` ´ ´ ´ comment il est possible qu’un programme que les conservateurs ont ´ ` ´ ` critique en l’assimilant a de l’inaction, fonde sur des criteres ´ d’intensite que nous jugeons aujourd’hui inefficaces, est maintenant ´ ´ ´ ´ considere comme acceptable, comme etant une bonne idee.