40 In the present case, it is clear from the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division to which the contested decision refers that the Office, having undertaken a visual, aural and conceptual analysis, found that the conflicting signs were similar, although the similarity was not pronounced.
En effet, d’une part, dans les marques antérieures, et principalement dans la marque n° 104 442, l’élément „El Castillo" doit être considéré comme dominant d’un point de vue auditif et d’un point de vue conceptuel [voir, par analogie, arrêt du Tribunal du 23 octobre 2002, Oberhauser/OHMI - Petit Liberto (Fifties), T104/01, Rec. p.