OHIM, in maintaining that the Board of Appeal lacks the power to review the proportionality of rules providing for the dismissal of an appeal brought in a language other than the language of the proceedings, contends that the very existence of different legal remedies enabling errors of form or the non-observance of time-limits to be overcome supports the proportionality of such rules.
En effet, cette pratique ne saurait modifier le point de départ du délai prévu par la règle 96, paragraphe 1, du règlement n° 2868/95 [voir, en ce sens, arrêt du Tribunal du 17 septembre 2003, Classen Holding/OHMI – International Paper (BECKETT EXPRESSION), T-71/02, Rec. p. II-3181, point 41].