Issue 2 The applicant argues that the ATIP office's decision to disclose should be quashed due to a lack of issuance of reasons, as required in Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817.
Deuxième question Invoquant Baker c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration), [1999] 2 R.C.S. 817, la demanderesse plaide que l'absence de motifs justifie l'annulation de la décision de communiquer prise par le bureau de l'AIPRP.