Consequently, the Committee considers that the author has not substantiated, for the purpose of admissibility, his claim that the limited review of his conviction and sentence allowed under his application for Special Leave to Appeal, in the circumstances of his case, amounted to a violation of his right under article 14, paragraph 5.
Il estime que l'auteur a suffisamment démontré aux fins de la recevabilité que l'examen partiel de la déclaration de culpabilité et de la condamnation en vertu de la procédure de demande d'autorisation spéciale de recours pouvait soulever des questions au titre du paragraphe 5 de l'article 14.