But even at that, if the family court petition would have been to obtain clearance to apply for a Canadian passport, because the permission would have been granted after the fact, it would not erase the situation which is to be assessed based on elements which existed at the time the application was submitted. In this context, the childâ€™s application was silent as to key elements enabling Passport Canada to assess the rights of divorced parents as they pertain to mobility restrictions, custody over children and minor childrenâ€™s passport services.
Et mÃªme alors, si la requÃªte prÃ©sentÃ©e au tribunal de la famille avait visÃ© lâ€™obtention de la permission du tribunal de soumettre une demande de passeport canadien, puisque la permission aurait Ã©tÃ© accordÃ©e aprÃ¨s coup, cela nâ€™effacerait pas lâ€™irrÃ©gularitÃ©, car la situation doit Ãªtre Ã©valuÃ©e en fonction des Ã©lÃ©ments existant au moment de la prÃ©sentation de la demande. Dans ce contexte, la demande de passeport pour lâ€™enfant Ã©tait muette en ce qui a trait Ã des Ã©lÃ©ments essentiels permettant Ã Passeport Canada dâ€™Ã©valuer les droits de parents divorcÃ©s en ce qui concerne les restrictions touchant les dÃ©placements, la garde dâ€™enfants et les services de passeport pour des enfants mineurs.