As was stated in paragraphs 73 to 75 of this judgment, it must be recalled, first, that those arguments relate principally to the effect of garlic taken as a foodstuff and not specifically to those of the product concerned and, second, that such risks arose in very specific circumstances.
En l’occurrence, la République fédérale d’Allemagne se contente de renvoyer à ses développements sur les risques pour la sant é qui découleraient de la préparation en cause pour justifier la restriction à la libre circulation des marchandises.