In the context of this artwork, analyze the Fraudulent pious invention of the Claims of forgery.
Some  sects of Nichiren Shu and modernist factions of the Soka Gakkai reject the image as fraudulent, citing independent analysis of the calligraphy style, and asserting that Nichiren never mentions this particular mandala in any of his authenticated preserved writings. Such varying Nichiren sects claim that these types of wooden mandalas were rampant among Hokkeko believers during the latter Muromachi period.Furthermore, such sects maintain that Nichiren never meant to permanently enshrine Buddhist Mandalas in a written format, but intended to permit both written form and Buddhist statues in the Gohonzon arrangement after his own demise. Owing to the scarcity of financial sources during Nichiren's own lifetime, they dismiss the claim of a Dai-Gohonzon's purpose and exclusive privilege to the present time.
Soka Gakkai Muromachi period Nichiren Shu Nichiren Hokkeko mandala Gohonzon