Explore the Abstract art of this artwork.
From 1909 to 1913 several experimental works in the search for purely non-representational art had been created by a number of artists. In addition to Picabia's Caoutchouc, early abstractions included, Wassily Kandinsky's Untitled (First Abstract Watercolor), 1913, Improvisation 21A, the Impression series, and Picture with a Circle (1911); František Kupka's Orphist works, Discs of Newton (Study for Fugue in Two Colors), 1912 and Amorpha, Fugue en deux couleurs (Fugue in Two Colors), 1912; Robert Delaunay's series entitled Simultaneous Windows and Formes Circulaires, Soleil n°2 (1912–13); Léopold Survage's Colored Rhythm (Study for the film), 1913; Piet Mondrian's Tableau No. 1 and Composition No. 11, 1913; and Kasimir Malevich completed his first entirely abstract work, the Suprematist composition entitled Black Square, in 1915.
The title "Caoutchouc" was derived from a book by Raymond Roussel, Impressions d'Afrique (1909). It was chosen by Picabia several years after the painting was executed. During the months of May or June 1912, Picabia—along with Marcel Duchamp and Guillaume Apollinaire—went to see the stage version of Roussel's Impressions d'Afrique in Paris at the Théâtre Antoine. In both the novel and the play, an ancestral African emperor had planted a rubber tree and a palm for his twin sons. The first tree to bloom would determine which of his sons would become the heir to his throne. The palm bloomed first and one of the sons became king, setting off a feud that resulted in the death of the newly crowned king, whose decaying body was displayed resting against the aged rubber tree (caoutchouc caduc); the rubber tree itself became the symbol for the end of a branch of family lineage.It has been argued by Belton that Caoutchouc—rather than representing the beginning of a period of abstraction in the oeuvre of Picabia—represented the end of a branch of figurative pictorial lineage, the end of a series of experimental paintings that approached total abstraction without ever attaining it. Though the artist painted several works between 1909 and 1912 that were clearly figurative, they were superseded by non-objective works at a time when Picabia gave his painting the title Caoutchouc.
Art historian and critic Bernard Dorival has vehemently argued in favor of the abstract nature of Caoutchouc, while Gabrièle Buffet-Picabia referred to it as a still life, and the artist Philip Pearlstein, who wrote his thesis on Picabia, described the subject of the painting as a bouncing rubber ball.Whether a purely abstract work or a still life, the composition itself is highly abstracted in style, not dissimilar to Picabia's proto-Cubist landscapes of 1908 through 1910. Whatever the artists intention, he did not pursue pure abstraction following Caoutchouc until 1912 (with paintings such as La Source (The Spring)).
still life Philip Pearlstein Piet Mondrian Gabrièle Buffet-Picabia Wassily Kandinsky Black Square Abstract art Robert Delaunay Untitled (First Abstract Watercolor) Bernard Dorival Marcel Duchamp Théâtre Antoine Kasimir Malevich Guillaume Apollinaire abstract Léopold Survage The Spring proto-Cubist Paris Suprematist La Source (The Spring) František Kupka