---
license: cc-by-sa-4.0
language:
- en
---
# Dataset Card for Explain Artworks: ExpArt
This dataset card aims to be a base template for new datasets. It has been generated using [this raw template](https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/blob/main/src/huggingface_hub/templates/datasetcard_template.md?plain=1).
# Dataset Card for "Wiki-ImageReview1.0"
## Table of Contents
- [Table of Contents](#table-of-contents)
- [Dataset Description](#dataset-description)
- [Dataset Summary](#dataset-summary)
- [Supported Tasks and Leaderboards](#supported-tasks-and-leaderboards)
- [Languages](#languages)
- [Dataset Structure](#dataset-structure)
- [Data Instances](#data-instances)
- [Data Fields](#data-fields)
- [Data Splits](#data-splits)
- [Dataset Creation](#dataset-creation)
- [Curation Rationale](#curation-rationale)
- [Source Data](#source-data)
- [Annotations](#annotations)
- [Personal and Sensitive Information](#personal-and-sensitive-information)
- [Considerations for Using the Data](#considerations-for-using-the-data)
- [Social Impact of Dataset](#social-impact-of-dataset)
- [Discussion of Biases](#discussion-of-biases)
- [Other Known Limitations](#other-known-limitations)
- [Additional Information](#additional-information)
- [Dataset Curators](#dataset-curators)
- [Licensing Information](#licensing-information)
- [Citation Information](#citation-information)
- [Contributions](#contributions)
## Dataset Description
- **Homepage:**
- **Repository:https://github.com/naist-nlp/Hackathon-2023-Summer**
- **Paper:**
- **Leaderboard:**
- **Point of Contact:**
## Dataset Summary
>Explain Artworks: ExpArt is designed to enhance the capabilities of large-scale vision-language models (LVLMs) in analyzing and describing artworks.
>Drawing from a comprehensive array of English Wikipedia art articles, the dataset encourages LVLMs to create in-depth descriptions based on images with or without accompanying titles.
>This endeavor aims to improve LVLMs' proficiency in discerning and articulating the historical and thematic nuances of art. Explain Artworks: ExpArt not only aims to elevate AI's understanding and critique of art but also seeks to forge a stronger connection between artificial intelligence and art history.
>With approximately 10,000 articles, the dataset introduces specialized metrics for assessing the effectiveness of LVLMs in art explanation, focusing on their interpretation of visual and textual cues.
### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
[More Information Needed]
### Languages
This dataset is available in English.
## Dataset Structure
The structure of the raw dataset is as follows:
```JSON
{
"id": "0001_T",
"title": "Mona Lisa",
"conversations": [
{
"from": "user",
"value": "/images/Mona Lisa.jpg\nFocus on Mona Lisa and explore the history."
},
{
"from": "assistant",
"value": "Of Leonardo da Vinci’s works, the Mona Lisa is the only portrait whose authenticity...."
}
]
}
```
```JSON
{
"id": "0001_NT",
"conversations": [
{
"from": "user",
"value": "/images/Mona Lisa.jpg\nFocus on this artwork and explore the history."
},
{
"from": "assistant",
"value": "Of Leonardo da Vinci’s works, the Mona Lisa is the only portrait whose authenticity...."
}
]
}
```
### Data Instances
To load datasets, you must specify a language.
### English Example
```Python
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("naist-nlp/Wiki-ImageReview1.0", 'en')
print(dataset)
# DatasetDict({
# train: Dataset({
# features: ['id', 'image', 'image_url', 'genre', 'sentence_1', 'sentence_2', 'sentence_3', 'sentence_4', 'sentence_5', 'annotator_1', 'annotator_2', 'annotator_3', 'best_pair', 'best_pair_rho'],
# num_rows: 207
# })
# })
```
### Japanese Example
```Python
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("naist-nlp/Wiki-ImageReview1.0", 'ja')
```
An example of the English dataset is as follows:
```JSON
{
"id": "001",
"image": ,
"image_url": "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ec/Ardea_picata.jpg/242px-Ardea_picata.jpg",
"genre": "Animals",
"sentence_1": "This photograph captures the...",
"sentence_2": "The photographer has done...",
"sentence_3": "While the clarity of the image is...",
"sentence_4": "I believe the image fails to...",
"sentence_5": "The photograph stunningly showcases...",
"annotator_1": [1, 3, 4, 5, 2],
"annotator_2": [3, 1, 4, 5, 2],
"annotator_3": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
"best_pair": ["annotator_1", "annotator_3"],
"best_pair_rho": 0.4000000059604645
}
```
### Data Fields
- id: Unique ID for each pair of an image and its review.
- image: The image itself.
- image_url: URL from which the image was retrieved.
- genre: The genre to which the image belongs.
- sentence_[1-5]: Review sentences generated by GPT-4V, rated from 1 (best) to 5 (worst) as a review.
- annotator_[1-3]: Rankings of the review sentences in Good Order by annotators 1 to 3.
- "best_pair": [Information Needed]
- "best_pair_rho": [Information Needed]
### Data Splits
| Language | Language code | Size |
| --: | :---------- | :---------- |
| English | en | 207 |
| Japanese | ja | 207 |
## Dataset Creation
> Our dataset construction process consists of the following four steps;
> (1)Collecting images, (2)Generating five review texts, (3)Ranking review texts manually and (4)Filtering low-quality data.
### Curation Rationale
### Source Data
- #### Source of Image
>The images are collected from the "Featured pictures" section of English Wikipedia.
>This section is composed of images, such as photographs, illustrations, and diagrams selected by user votes.
>The image data contained in this section is of very high quality and covers a diverse range of genres including artwork, natural landscapes, historical events, and science.
>We therefore select it as the image source.
>Genre(number of images)
>
>```
>Animals (15) / Artwork (15) / Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle (15) /
>Currency (15) / Diagrams, drawings, and maps (15) /
>Engineering and technology (15) / History (15) / Natural phenomena (15) /
>People (15) / Places (15) / Plants (15) / Sciences (15) / Space (15) /
>Vehicles (15) / Other lifeforms (15) / Other (15)
>```
>
- #### Source of review
> Five review texts are generated for each image by using GPT-4V in English and Japanese.
#### Initial Data Collection and Normalization
- #### Ganaration Prompt
>we formulate a prompt specifically designed to underscore distinctions.
>This prompt is tailored to generate five distinct review texts, each uniquely characterized by their degree of reasonableness and objectivity.
>Prompt:
>Please describe five different review texts about the good points and room for improvement of the image, following the constraints below:
>1.Each review text should have different content.
>2.The length of each review text should be almost the same.
>3.Do not include bullet points within the review texts.
>4.The review texts should be described in the following order: "Objective and reasonable," "Subjective but reasonable," "Objective but unreasonable," "Subjective and unreasonable," and "Subjective and containing an error".
>5.Each review text should describe both the good points and room for improvement of the image.
>6.If the image has no room for improvement, explicitly state that within the review text.
- #### Removing contradictory expressions
>a generated text sometimes ends with contradictory expressions that negate itself, such as "Note: the review contains an error as the stars are not blurred in the image provided.
>We check these phrases and remove them manually.
- #### Ranking review texts manually
>The five review texts of each image are manually ranked by $X$~($\geq3$) annotators.
- #### Filtering low-quality data
>we measure rank correlations among annotators and conduct filtering by setting a threshold on the rank correlation of the pair of annotators with the highest correlation.
#### Who are the source language producers?
[More Information Needed]
### Annotations
> The evaluation method consists of the following two steps;(1)Ranking review texts by LVLM and (2)Measuring rank correlation between LVLM and humans.
#### Annotation process
- #### Ranking review texts by LVLM
- perplexity-based ranking
>We employ perplexity as the evaluation metric for ranking review texts by LVLM.
>We compute perplexity by inputting both the image and its corresponding review text, along with a prompt described
>`Prompt:
>Please describe a review text about the good points and room for improvement of the image`
- response-based ranking
>In some LVLMs like GPT-4V, calculating perplexity is not straightforward.
>Therefore, we also consider a method of directly ranking with a Prompt.
>Prompt:
>Below are the images and their review texts. Please rank the review text of each image from 1 to 5, in order of appropriateness. Please note that the numbers from 1 to 5 are not scores but rankings, and the smaller the number, the more appropriate it is. There should be no ties, and each rank from 1 to 5 should always appear once.
>Please judge the appropriateness by the following aspects in the following order. That is, first, rank the texts by truthfulness. If there are equally truthful texts, rank them by consistency. Similarly, if they are equal also in consistency, rank them by informativeness; if they are equal also in it, rank them by objectivity; if they are equal also in it, rank them by fluency.
>1. Truthfulness: Is it free of false information?
>2. Consistency: Does it correspond to the image?
>3. Informativeness: Does it describe detailed information or features of the image?
>4. Objectivity: Is it an objective description?
>5. Fluency: Is it grammatically correct?
>If the text contains unfamiliar information, you may use a dictionary or search engine. However, please do not use a generative AI such as ChatGPT or image search.
>Do not include the reason for rankingAbsolutely respond in the following format.text1:2nd place, text2:3rd place, text3:1st place, text4:5th place, text5:4th place
- #### Measuring rank correlation between LVLM and humans
>The rank correlation between top-correlated annotators and an LVLM is measured using the procedure
>![代替テキスト](画像のURL "画像タイトル")
#### Who are the annotators?
>The English data were ranked by three native and near-native English speakers, whereas the Japanese data were ranked by three native Japanese speakers.
### Personal and Sensitive Information
[More Information Needed]
## Considerations for Using the Data
>While the proposed method emphasizes consistency and objectivity in assessing image review capabilities of LVLM, it does not evaluate from the perspective of domain knowledge, which remains a challenge for future work.
### Social Impact of Dataset
[More Information Needed]
### Discussion of Biases
> However, as acknowledged on its official pages[(1,](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view\#Bias_in_sources)[ 2)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources\#Biased_or_opinionated_sources),
> the present English Wikipedia allows the inclusion of information from sources that may be biased.
> Consequently, the dataset we developed might also reflect the inherent biases of the English Wikipedia.
### Other Known Limitations
>In this study, our dataset was created using images obtained from English Wikipedia. The editors of English Wikipedia remove unnecessarily aggressive content, and we also excluded images involving political issues and other sensitive topics from our dataset.
>However, as acknowledged on its official pages, the present English Wikipedia allows the inclusion of information from sources that may be biased. Consequently, the dataset we developed might also reflect the inherent biases of the English Wikipedia.
## Additional Information
### Dataset Curators
[More Information Needed]
### Licensing Information
For licensing information, please refer to the licenses of the specific data subsets you utilize.
[Wikipedia License](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights)
[OpenAI Terms of use](https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use)
### Citation Information
To cite this work, please use the following format:
```
@software{Wiki-ImageReview1.0,
author = {naist-nlp},
title = {Vision Language Model が持つ画像批評能力の評価用データセット},
year = {2024},
url = {https://github.com/naist-nlp/Hackathon-2023-Summer}
}
```
### Contributions
Thanks to [@github-username](#https://github.com/) for adding this dataset.