I do not like when governments have a role in child-rearing.
I agree, but the government should only get involved if there is abuse, otherwise its not their business.
Governmental results like maternal deprivation as described my John Bowlby are quite awful!
I'm not familiar with John Bowlby, what does he say about maternal deprivation?
Bowlby's work on delinquent and affectionless children is harrowing!
Oooo really? What is his exact theory on it ?
war Europe whilst he was head of the Department for Children and Parents at the Tavistock Clinic in London after World War II. The result was the monograph "Maternal Care and Mental Health" published in 1951, which sets out the maternal deprivation hypothesis.
Bowlby drew together such empirical evidence as existed at the time from across Europe and the US, including Spitz (1946) and Goldfarb (1943, 1945). His main conclusions, that "the infant and young child should experience a warm, intimate, and continuous
-five percent of childhood sexual abuse victims never seek treatment because of their false beliefs about what abuse should look like:
There was much outrage over the findings presented in this book.
When questioned about the critique that her book could be arguing that children are not hurt by sexual abuse, Clancy says, "I will never say that. I could not be more clear. This is an atrocious, disgusting crime." Many have also accused Clancy and this book of encouraging child abusers. To this she responds