text: Supernatural is defined by wikipedia as:\nThe supernatural (Latin:super- "exceeding"+nature) comprises forces and phenomena that cannot be perceived by natural or empirical senses, and whose understanding may be said to lie with religious, magical, or otherwise mysterious explanation —yet remains firmly outside of the realm of science. ...\nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernatural\n\nBy it's very nature the supernatural cannot now or ever be proven. Every story you hear has just enough loop holes that it could be true, or it might not. There is a reason no photographic evidence of ghosts, nessie, bigfoot, etc. exist, because they don't. I am a trained scientist. I have been tought to question everything that cannot be analytically proven, and for good reason.\n \nBy the same token, there are hundreds of cases in which creatures that were thought to be only myths have been proven to be living, breathing creatures. It was only this year that the first  image of a live giant squid was captured. There are numerous other cases, but one of the best is that of the ceolocanth, afish thought extinct to the western world, but known well to indigenous peoples of the pacific rim and southeast coast of africa. Other cases, like the Loch Ness monster are pure, unadultarated bulls***. The idea of a sea creature holing up in a large lake for 365 million years is just ludicrous, and ecologically impossible. Were that the case, something, head, flipper, whole body would have washed up by now, and in this day of genetic testing, we would be able to verify its novel species status in a matter of minutes. But, nothing has, and nothing ever will. If you want to discover something new, look to the sea or an isolated island chain, not your local woods. It is entirely possible you could discover something new, and then you can name it after yourself or someone you care about, which is always fun. \n\nThe bottom line is, it you can give proof of something that the scientific community will not hold true, they will accept it. You prove no one wrong, only add to humanity's ever increasing store of knowledge.