text: If you have no money, and they love you, then it's obvious that's better... Disaster can easily take each, your love, or your money away, the only difference is money can be garnered again, but will you ever have opportunity to love that person in this world if they die first?\n\nEverything must be valued, but only in its proper degree, since loving something like money over people is sure to leave you less well off than if you love and care for people so much, that with the friends you gain from it, they'll always be glad to help you out too.\n\nMoney can't really give back like that, since you work to acquire it, but it's other people that make the product or do the service you want to buy with it, so it's always people's value that's traded, never money in itself. \n\nThis can be done without money in just working for them, and they'll help out, so the benefits of both love and money are evident with love, but money hides the value of love from you. Even if someone loves you with your focus on money how will you observe truly what you're not focused on? So with a focus on money true love will always pass you by.\n\nMoney itself is worthless, except it's an agreeable trade between you and what you do value, which is always what others provide for that money, and since we all need that, with or without monetary existence, we love people, and never money - no matter how it may appear superfiscally. ;)