text: The situation on rough surfaces is much more complicated. The main characteristic of the wetting properties of rough surfaces is the so-called apparent contact angle (APCA). It is well known that the APCA usually measured are different from those predicted by the Young equation. Two main hypotheses were proposed in order to explain this discrepancy, namely the Wenzel and Cassie wetting models. According to the traditional Cassie model, air can remain trapped below the drop, forming "air pockets". Thus, the hydrophobicity of the surface is strengthened because the drop sits partially on air. On the other hand, according to the Wenzel model the roughness increases the area of a solid surface, which also geometrically modifies the wetting properties of this surface. Transition from Cassie to Wenzel regime is also called wetting transition. Under certain external stimuli, such as pressure or vibration, the Cassie air trapping wetting state could be converted into the Wenzel state. Apart from external stimuli, intrinsic contact angle of the liquid (below or above 90 degree), liquid volatility, structure of cavities (reentrant or non-reentrant, connected or unconnected) are known to be important factors determining the rate of wetting transition. It is well accepted that the Cassie air trapping wetting regime corresponds to a higher energetic state, and the Cassie–Wenzel transition is irreversible. However, the mechanism of the transition remains unclear. It was suggested that the Cassie–Wenzel transition occurs via a nucleation mechanism starting from the drop center. On the other hand, recent experiments showed that the Cassie–Wenzel transition is more likely to be due to the displacement of a triple line under an external stimulus. The existence of so-called impregnating Cassie wetting state also has to be considered.  Understanding wetting transitions is of a primary importance for design of superhydrophobic surfaces.