text: A few other elements have been proposed as candidates for supporting biological systems and processes as fundamentally as carbon does, for example, processes such as metabolism. The most frequently suggested alternative is silicon. Silicon, atomic number of 14, more than twice the size of carbon, shares a group in the periodic table with carbon, can also form four valence bonds, and also bonds to itself readily, though generally in the form of crystal lattices rather than long chains. Despite these similarities, silicon is considerably more electropositive than carbon, and silicon compounds do not readily recombine into different permutations in a manner that would plausibly support lifelike processes. Silicon is abundant on Earth, but as it is more electropositive, it mainly forms Si–O bonds rather than Si–Si bonds. Boron does not react with acids and does not form chains naturally. Thus boron is not a candidate for life. Arsenic is toxic to life, and its possible candidacy has been rejected. In the past (1960s-1970s) other candidates for life were plausible, but with time and more research, only carbon as the complexity and stability for life, to make very large molecules, like  polymers. Thus life must be carbon based.