No implication at all...nor did I ever mention the word "greed."  

This attorney has already made his move - he has stated he wants to have the Diocese declared "a public nuisance." 

He needed a case to focus on, because the 2003 case was done and couldn't be reopened.  He needs this Bishop with his baggage and history.  All of a sudden?  A "repressed memory" case.

That doesn't raise any flags with you?