"Lavrov added. “The investigation into this high-profile incident must be transparent and leave no doubt that someone is trying to hide something.”
Well ... that certainly sounds reasonable.
But wrong. Because he said leaves no doubt.
Half of Americans (and about 25% of Canadians?) can't agree on what an "alternative fact" is.
Then there's alternate fact Donald himself and his merry band of behavioural psychologists and marketeers.
Anyone have a plan B?