And that is why you don't get it, Richard Rhyner. You equate a criminal action with accidental one. That incident on Diamond, the cyclist did not cause the accident. He was part of it but it was mutual. We all have driven the road where a cyclist is moving against the traffic but that don't give us the right to slammed into him. The fact the driver was impaired made her an impaired driver. Where you and I would avoid the cyclist.....she could not. She was breaking the law and that is where you are stuck in the box. You think people who break the law are not accountable if the share of the incident is mutual. Standards are different, Richard, when a human life is at stake.