Perhaps I missed it but I don't recall reading anything in the article that says to the otherwise.  The the subject of the article is 1) a criticism of the deception of claiming Trump's tax reform proposal is to benefit middle class Americans, and; 2) maybe a backhand criticism of trickle down or "voodoo" economics because it is based upon dubious calculations that are, even by the administration's own officials, directly if not categorically disputed.
Though given your history of partisan lying I guess that's actually tame compared to past comments.