"G&M keeps the comment closed on the "unfounded" articles..." Well, on the newest one, published a day or two ago, yes. Don't know why, exactly.  

Most of the articles and columns related to "unfounded" do allow comments. The G&M (and series editor, Robyn Doolittle) keep churning out the articles, so do as I do: use the comment page on a latest one to comment on the other that DOESN'T allow comments.  Reference the earlier story, so readers understand the "out of context."

Your comments can matter. I've seen text and headlines of articles change after I've posted applicable comments.  It's not my imagination when it happens 2-3 times, on the "unfounded" file alone. That they're will to change is good.  That they have to be reminded is bad. 

Also bad: no profile stories of the falsely accused and how it affected their lives. Both genders are make  victims of each other.