Regarding Measure 91, you wrote the following on state marijuana taxes:

"I have no illusions that this will become a major revenue stream to offset the impact to services created by users. I am making a statement about the fact that the impact will be on local government and if there is any revenue generated it should go where the impact is borne. We are going to have to deal with the increases in DUII arrests in our patrol, jail and prosecution service. We are going to deal with the increase in children dealing with marijuana poisoning in our public health services. Colorado has shown that it this is the result of legalization and that local government has to deal with the impact. Colorado has also shown that revenue is coming in far below estimates. I hope that the legislature will recognize where the impact is felt in distributing resources if 91 passes.

It passed Jay and all of your phony predictions failed badly. Why?