Ignorance over substance?    

I think good problem solving teams DO use people that can take a fresh look at an old problem.   A lack of expereince can mean a lack of bias.   That's why Trump has something to offer, or why Elizebeth Warren scares  both Republicans and Democrats.  They both challenge the foundations of the political/economic structures we've known since the end of WWII (although they have very different ideas of what to fix/change)

That doesn't mean that I believe those folks have perfect vision, they are simply a valuable piece of the process.   You don't assign leaders with no experience in the process they are evaluating.

I've got zero idea of what you want Dog?    Can you explain it without making it all about Trump or anti-Hillary.