The loudest lament in the radtradisphere has been that 1) Amoris lacks clarity, ergo, 2) Answer the Dubia. They cite apparently conflicting implementations of its guidelines to support the claim that it's confusing. And they want the Pope to not only answer the Dubia but to explain the inconsistencies.

For starters, I doubt Pope Francis would want to back track and thus undo Amoris' work of overcoming the infantilization of the laity or subsidiarity approach to church polity. 

This is to highlight how wrong the Dubia are in so many ways. To respond to them would 1) be a reversal of his trajectory of subsidiarity over against their hierarchicalism 2) uncharitably expose their category errors 3) dignify the premises of their interpretation, which ignored the Ignatian rule 4) dilute his leit motif of pastoral accompaniment, which repudiates hierarchicalism, legalism, rigorism.

As for "inconsistencies" in canonical applications & implementations of pastoral guidelines ... contd