I think you are the one that needs to check your facts with ADF&G.  Much of the ADF&G Budget as a whole comes from the legislature but the vast majority of this goes to fisheries.  Wildlife division has had $2-7 Million in GF money for the last decade or so which is a small percentage of It's budget.  Prior to that it was self funded through license and PR money.  The new license increase was intended so all GF money could be cut and it would be once again self funded.  The last conversation I had with leadership, they where expecting to loose all GF money withing the next couple years.  The new license and tag fee increase, along with a bounty of Pittman-Robertson Federal money (generated from a tax on sporting goods) will more than make up for loosing all GF money.  There may be a few small things that are not eligible for License or PR money but I stand by my statement that Wildlife Division is largely user funded.