If the writer is saying that HC is Obama part II, then we need to dissect the inaccuracies of the premise. If you think Tarp & Tarp II were failures, discuss why. If you think the GOP stifling reregulation was constructive then you won't be able to complain about Tarp III 6yrs from now. HC would likely do what needs to be done, trump would apparently default on the national debt and declare bankruptcy. I'm sorry if you think it didn't matter. We can agree to disagree.