text: Hi, Ottawa.  Hope you're correct.  You may not be.  
  RCMP couldn't even get it's own story straight--headline, one day: RCMP won't investigate "unfounded." Next day: RCMP WILL investigate.  Doesn't auger well. 
  
  No lack of G&M "commitment" but good journalism?  Debatable.  I'd love to see a feature story that includes, say, even half a dozen police spokespersons commenting on why their  "unfounded" is as high as it is.  I'd also like to read their explanations of what "unfounded" means--and "no crime committed" is too vague for my ears. Did G&M ask these questions?I have yet to read answers... 
  
  Govt? Public Safety ministers: "national strategy".  Sounds big and bold. This is a vague feel good response (unchallenged by G&M) and there's no timeline. So I have doubts. A good start?  International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)--See "Trauma Informed Sexual Assault Investigation Training". It's on-line. Why re-invent the wheel?  Nothing in the G&M about this...  
  
  And on and on.