text: Can you get a dictionary to adopt that meaning? If not then I guess the answer to your question is no.
  But let's suppose you were successful. Then, as LSJM notes above, we would no longer have a word that precisely means "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."
  so you would have reduced our ability to speak precisely and concisely. That makes speech more ambiguous and I don't see how that is beneficial to anyone but politicians.