text: I'm confused, do you refer to the corporate Dems rush to the party's extreme right?
  
  Hillary is a conservative politician, the Clinton dynasty is based on a drug war that populated the prisons to the point of the land of the free becoming the most imprisoned nation on the planet.  The Clintons destroyed welfare for the poor while making corporate welfare an entitlement and repealed Glass Steagal setting us up for the mess in 2008.
  
  Her Wall Street goonage puts GOP flacks to shame whilst her neocon credentials have her viewing a nuclear first strike using the new superfuses as a strategy worth investigating.
  
  Hillary wouldn't have had the leeway to present her candidacy without Democratic leadership complicit in her incompetence.  Now that her failure is enshrined in history, Dem leaders only complain Russia Russia Russia, all the while talking about a better deal.  My question is better for whom?