text: What your blinkers are keeping you from seeing is that stopping/reversing GW isn't even remotely on the table(your lunatic NW plan notwithstanding). The best that can be hoped for at this point, in anything approaching a reasonable timeframe, is to delay the worst effects/increases in temp, to allow for a future technical mitigation to present itself(maybe). This has to happen BEFORE tipping points(mass methane release of Siberian Traps, for example) are reached and it really is 'game over'. But hey, unless you have an ironclad, peer-reviewed way to stop/reverse GW, why bother, just pump even more GHG into the atmosphere and watch the show unfold. The Titanic is sinking but the band plays on. Great strategy!
  
  I'm not going to continue further on this obviously pointless discussion, except to say that I have no 'faith' that something good will happen. Quite the reverse, nothing good will happen IMO. But then I likely won't be around to see the worst, so that's my own silver lining.