text: This argument that the use of chemical weapons crosses some red line and demand a response - like ineffective  bombing of assets, leaving airstrip intact - is beyond ridiculous.  The inane, depraved, unconscionable, assumption is that it is better to kill babies with barrel bombs?  Is this REALLY an argument we are making or want to make?  At the root of it all is the KILLING OF INNOCENTS.  SMDH.