text: It truly is sad that Scalia didn't have the opportunity to show how he had come to the conclusion that the Respondent(s) in Dollar General Corporation v. T
  HE
  M
  ISSISSIPPI
  B
  AND OF
  C
  HOCTAW
  I
  NDIANS
  ;
  T
  HE
  T
  RIBAL
  C
  OURT OF THE
  M
  ISSISSIPPI
  B
  AND OF
  C
  HOCTAW
  I
  NDIANS
  ;
  C
  HRISTOPHER
  A.
  C
  OLLINS
  ,
  IN HIS OFFICIAL
  CAPACITY
  ;
  J
  OHN
  D
  OE
  ,
  A MINOR
  ,
  BY AND THROUGH HIS
  PARENTS AND NEXT FRIENDS
  J
  OHN
  D
  OE
  S
  R
  .
  AND
  J
  ANE
  D
  OE, should prevail. His unlikely, but factual support and empathy for said respondents, would have cast a more reflective light of his understanding about the Constitution, Judiciary, and Advise and Consent. Something sorely lacking in the current public discourse.