text: While the article does a decent job of reporting the details, the headline is editorialized at best. To say that Bailey is "exploiting" a "loophole" suggests that he's trying to circumvent rules imposed upon him, when in reality he's simply strictly adhering to a *self-imposed* rule. Literally interpreting a constraint you impose upon yourself can hardly be considered "exploiting a loophole."
  
  Meanwhile, Wheeler -- who hasn't handicapped himself with any such rule -- is out-earning Bailey by an order of magnitude. The WWeek might as well write a headline about Wheeler "exploiting" his right to collect contributions without limit.