text: I would like to examine the liberal/conservative views of whoever complained to the State Bar about Arnold's offer of free representation in the Bundy case.  
  
  I don't believe they would reflect an adherence to the US Constitutional principles  regarding "Free Speech" or "Representation by Counsel" but just the opposite.  
  
  Personally, I believe the "Content Neutrality" requirement in this case will trump (so to speak) the volume issue.