text: Incorrect.  
  I said: "Traffic does follow the path of least resistance. That is why traffic calming is needed in neighborhoods."
  You said: "You’ll only see more cross-cutting through neighborhoods because more traffic lanes are being “reassigned” to transit"
  I said: "Continuing our practice, we’ll only see more and wider roads, less quality of life, "
  You said: Social engineering would be great, if it worked. How would people buy their food without fossil fuel for cultivation, and transporting? Maybe we could turn Eugene into a third world “village”, and we could live like stone-age animals who “hunt-and-gather”.
  That last part you talked about social engineering, fossil fuel for cultivation (you did mention transportation), third world village, stone age animals, hunter-and gatherer..
  I know you are extremely adept at following a sequence of thought that is more connected. But social engineering  & "hunter-gatherer" is not about roads. Then you started blaming. Just more diversion.