text: There is no rational basis at this point for anyone to disregard or marginalize reports in Washington Post or New York Times based upon unnamed officials, senior advisor, etc. and yet people keep trying.  Trump proved beyond question on numerous occasions that the story he's concocted are lies after some unnamed official leaked the truth.  Yet people still want to buy into his fantasies.  It's gotten to the point I'm tired of hearing the same "fake news" protestations and trying to not just write off anyone who objects like that as irrational but it gets harder with every article.
  I curious.  Has there been a single occasion where a leak was proven wrong in regards to Trump since his inauguration?  Perhaps that is why he feels the media is "treating him unfairly" because they can report on leaks he considers a "witch hunt" but he cannot?