text: That's quite simplistic of you to assume that anyone who is not for this ill-conceived agreement must be in favor of destroying the environment. It's not an all or nothing proposition and a healthy and clean environment is not dependent on the Paris Climate Accord. How about a better agreement that holds other countries accountable instead of putting all the burden on the U.S.? Better yet, how about acknowledging that it's a farce to suggest that such an agreement is capable of delivering any measurable benefit to the climate? It sounds to me like the President did a cost-benefit analysis and decided this was a bad deal.