text: The objection I have is the new rule where a second degree relative hunting with me for mountain goat, dall sheep and grizzly and is successful, BOTH of us have to punch our tags.  No real reason for it since the number of animals taken by non-resident "relatives" is extremely small.  It will, of course, prevent me from taking one of those animals on the same hunt without any opportunity to hunt that species the rest of the regulatory year. From what I read, it was pushed through by APHA.  The only people this adversely effects is the resident. 
  Instead of facts supporting Mr. Turner or the proposals that passed, this rebuttal is nothing more than attacks on Mr. Richards, BHA and RHAK which does absolutely no good for anyone.