text: The first issue is irrelevant. This is a civil suit for a tort, not a criminal proceeding.
  
  On the first observation, the firm representing the plaintiff is in another practice area than SNAP and the attorneys for the abused, so your conclusion is erroneous.
  
  On the second observation, two wrongs do not make a right, but in any case the article is about an alleged tort of SNAP's officers, not why SNAP existed in the first place.