text: "I don't count the Congressman that was injured as innocent, as he is definitely part of the problem in Washington, but I obviously don't support him being shot. The acrimonious separation of Americans is doing nobody any good" ... Holy moly. So if he's not innocent then he's guilty, but you don't support him being shot? Perhaps some other penalty then. And then you don't like the "acrimonious separation" of Americans but congressman being shot up while participating in an event which is part of the few genuine attempts to bring both sides together he is still not innocent and therefore in some way deserving of being shot. A lot of contradictions there.
  
  Oh and you wonder why he missed with a rifle? Really? Perhaps because as a leftist he had no prior gun experience and thinks it's as simple as picking one up and blasting away like he sees them do in the movies.