text: Well, crappy language aside, would you agree:
  -  you argue that differences between males and females is a explanation as to why women can never be ordained priests?
  -  that style of argument is what is meant by the ontological argument?
  -  that argument is no longer part of the magisterium's explanation, in so far as it was conspicuously dropped from Ordinatio Sacerdotalis?
  -  to invoke an obsolete argument in a current discussion is fairly described as metaphorically hauling something out of a closet?
  - "deniers" is a fair epithet for those who deny that woman can be ordained?
  
  The leaves only my adjective "crap" to describe the ontological argument. Yeah, I could have been more circumspect in expressing my "disdainful dismissal" of this argument. Note, BTW, that it is the argument that I "dismiss" as "crap" not those who haul it out of the closet.
  
  Still, Pandora, if you have taken offence and feel you have been unfairly "labelled" and "dismissed", I apologize.