text: Well, you really offered no response to my analysis, so does that mean you don't challenge the truth of it? 
  
  Of course I'm concerned about the "quality of clergy," as are we all. Admitting married men to the priesthood doesn't make any change in that, unless you are prepared to argue that married men are intrinsically "better" in quality than unmarried men, which is without foundation, and rather insulting to single people. Is that what you mean to say?
  
  Now, overstretching personnel certainly affects quality, which is where my analysis bears some consideration. By my calculation, admitting married men to the priesthood would *reduce* total clergy availability, thereby overstretching them further. If I'm right, what does *that* do to quality?