text: CONTINUED from ABOVE:
  
  I refer of course to the American Eugenics Movement, which inspired Hitler and which argued that certain "lineages" should be forcibly sterilized or otherwise eliminated, to "improve" humans by culling "inferiors".  Who decides what's inferior?  That has literally proved to be a life or death question.
  
  Regarding your last question as to my "deciding" to be heterosexual, that isn't the RIGHT question if you would understand the logical fallacy of claiming certain behaviors "inborn" without evidence.  It is as inaccurate a comparison as trying to equate "gay" and "interracial" marriages in this context.
  
  I'll use myself as an example why the comparison can't be used to claim choice-of-mate is "inborn", i.e. controlled by genetics.  I'm mixed European and Arab.  I've had three wives.  Two are black.  One is half-Thai and half Texan.  So am I "genetically wired" to marry black women?  Or Thai women?  Or (God forbid) Texas women?  What's your answer?  I'll wait.