text: Of the 4 different sources what one in your view biased?
  
  As for the Fact Checker link - again, it doesn't seem to be very relevant to my comment. What do Kay Hagan & Mark Udall have to do with the decline in greenhouse gas emissions?
  
  As for cherry-picking, perhaps you ought to re-read my original comment. I said simply that Democrats oppose any reform of entitlements; you were the one who lept to the conclusion that I was defending or asserting Paul Ryan's plan. I am not. In fact I had in mind the proposals that emerged from the bipartisan Breaux Commission, which was constituted by Bill Clinton in mind-1990s. Alice Rivlin has championed these, among others.
  
  Your other links are to an partisan advocacy group - the National Committee to Preserve Social Security & MEdicare. Fine, but please drop the pretense that you are not presenting a biased argument when you're relying on an advocacy group. I suspect you would demand the same of someone relying on a Heritage Foundation report.