text: as shown in the process set forth in fig1 of the drawings , dried and pulverized raw coal is passed through line 10 to slurry mixing tank 12 wherein it is mixed with recycle slurry containing recycle normally solid dissolved coal , recycle mineral residue and recycle hot distillate solvent boiling in the range of between about 350 ° f . ( 177 ° c .) and about 900 ° f . ( 482 ° c .) flowing in line 14 . the resulting feed slurry contains heavy distillate and light distillate in a weight ratio of heavy distillate to light distillate of about 15 : 1 . if it is desired to enhance the light distillate relative yield , then the aforesaid ratio of heavy distillate to light distillate can be increased to a ratio of , for example , 20 : 1 . fresh supplies of light and heavy distillate from an outside source ( not shown ) can be added to slurry mixing tank 12 if desired . preferably , no fresh distillate is required . in the preferred operation of the process , an extraneous catalyst ( non - feed coal derived ) is not required . the solvent - containing feed slurry mixture containing , for example , 1 to 4 , preferably , 1 . 5 to 2 . 5 parts by weight of recycle material to one part by weight of feed coal in line 16 is pumped by means of reciprocating pump 18 and admixed with recycle hydrogen entering through line 20 and with make - up hydrogen entering through line 21 prior to passage through tubular preheater furnace 22 from which it is discharged through line 24 to dissolver 26 . the ratio of hydrogen to feed coal can be about 40 , 000 scf / ton ( 1 . 24 m 3 / kg ). the temperature of the reactants at the outlet of the preheater is about 700 ° f . ( 371 ° c .) to 760 ° f . ( 404 ° c .). at this temperature the coal is partially dissolved in the recycle solvent , and the exothermic hydrogenation and hydrocracking reactions are just beginning . whereas the temperature gradually increases along the length of the preheater tube , the dissolver is at a generally uniform temperature throughout and the heat generated by the hydrocracking reactions in the dissolver raise the temperature of the reactants to the range 820 ° f . ( 438 ° c .) to 870 ° f . ( 466 ° c .). hydrogen quench passing through line 28 is injected into the dissolver at various points to control the reaction temperature and alleviate the impact of the exothermic reactions . the conditions in the dissolver include a temperature in the range of 750 ° to 900 ° f . ( 399 ° to 482 ° c . ), preferably 820 ° to 870 ° f . ( 438 ° to 466 ° c .) and a residence time of 0 . 1 to 4 . 0 hours , preferably 0 . 2 to 2 hours . the pressure is in the range of 1 , 000 to 4 , 000 psi and is preferably 1 , 500 to 3 , 000 psi ( 70 to 280 kg / cm 2 , preferably 150 to 210 kg / cm 2 ). the dissolver effluent passes through line 29 to vapor - liquid separator system 30 . the hot overhead vapor stream from these separators is cooled in a series of heat exchangers and additional vapor - liquid separation steps and removed through line 32 . the liquid distillate from the separators passes through line 34 to atmospheric fractionator 36 . the non - condensed gas in line 32 comprises unreacted hydrogen , methane and other light hydrocarbons , along with h 2 s and co 2 , and is passed to acid gas removal unit 38 for removal of h 2 s and co 2 . the hydrogen sulfide recovered is converted to elemental sulfur which is removed from the process through line 40 . a portion of the purified gas is passed through line 42 for further processing in cryogenic unit 44 for removal of much of the methane and ethane as pipeline gas which passes through line 46 and for the removal of propane and butane as lpg which passes through line 48 . the purified hydrogen in line 50 is blended with the remaining gas from the acid gas treating step in line 52 and comprises the recycle hydrogen for the process . the liquid slurry from vapor - liquid separators 30 passes through line 56 and comprises liquid solvent , normally solid dissolved coal and catalytic mineral residue . stream 56 is split into two major streams , 58 and 60 , which have the same composition as line 56 . the temperatures and pressures used in the series of vapor - liquid separators are preferably controlled in such a way as to minimize the concentration of liquid solvent in the slurry in line 56 since there is no independent method of control of the ratio of light distillate to heavy distillate stream in line 56 . thus , by increasing the temperature or lowering the pressure used in vapor - liquid separators 30 , the amount of both light and heavy distillate in line 56 can be decreased to a minimal level . if desired , the ratio of light distillate to heavy distillate in line 56 ( and thus lines 58 and 60 ) can be determined by sampling . it is preferred to utilize conditions in the vapor - liquid separators 30 which will maintain the amount of light distillate and heavy distillate at a substantially constant value in line 56 . by minimizing the quantity of liquid solvent in line 56 , the control of the light to heavy ratio in the process through controlled addition of distilled fractions is facilitated . the slurry in line 58 is recycled and joins line 73 to form stream 14 which is passed to mixing tank 12 . the non - recycled portion of this slurry passes through line 60 to atmospheric fractionator 36 for separation of the major products of the process . in fractionator 36 the slurry product is distilled at atmospheric pressure to remove an overhead naphtha stream through line 62 , a 350 ° f . ( 177 ° c .) to 600 ° f . ( 316 ° c .) light distillate stream through line 64 and a bottoms stream through line 66 . the bottoms stream in line 66 passes to vacuum distillation tower 68 . the temperature of the feed to the fractionation system is normally maintained at a sufficiently high level that no additional preheating is needed , other than for start - up operations . a heavy distillate stream comprising 600 ° f . ( 316 ° c .) to 800 ° f . ( 427 ° c .) material is withdrawn from the vacuum tower through line 70 . the combination of the light and heavy distillates in lines 64 and 70 makes up the major fuel oil product of the process . the relative yields of the light distillate and heavy distillate in lines 64 and 70 , respectively , can be controlled by controlling the concentration of light distillate and heavy distillate in the feed slurry in process line 16 . control of the concentration of light and heavy distillate in the feed slurry can be accomplished by any suitable means . preferably , such concentration is controlled by automatically and continuously controlling the amount of light and heavy distillate fractions which are passed to line 73 for recycle to the slurry mixing tank by means of line 14 . the concentration of the light distillate in line 73 is thus controlled by automatically and continuously controlling the rate of light distillate introduced into line 73 by means of three - way valve 76 and line 78 . similarly , the concentration of heavy distillate in line 73 is controlled by automatically and continuously controlling the rate of heavy distillate introduced into line 73 by means of three - way valve 80 and line 82 . the amount of light distillate passing through line 64 is automatically and continuously monitored by measuring device 84 , and the resulting signal is transmitted by means of output line 86 to the automatic control instrument 88 . likewise , the amount of heavy distillate passing through line 72 is monitored by measuring device 90 and the signal is automatically and continuously transmitted by output line 92 to automatic control instrument 88 . in response to the output signals received from flow measuring sensors 84 and 90 , the automatic control instrument regulates the amount of light distillate recycled by controlling automatic valve 76 by means of input line 94 . similarly , the amount of heavy distillate that is recycled is controlled by the automatic control instrument 88 by regulating the operation of automatic valve 80 by means of input line 96 . in this way , the concentration of light distillate and heavy distillate in the feed slurry is continuously and automatically controlled in response to the concentration of similar distillate fractions in the product of the process . automatic control instrument 88 and flow measuring sensors 84 and 90 can be of conventional design well known to the art , and can be , for example , differential pressure , thermal or sonic type flow measuring devices . by controlling the ratio of heavy distillate to light distillate in the feed slurry , for example , to between about 5 : 1 to about 15 : 1 , the ratio of heavy distillate to light distillate withdrawn as a fuel oil product by means of lines 72 and 64 , respectively , can be controlled within a range of between about 0 . 2 : 1 to about 1 : 1 . the bottoms from vacuum tower 68 , consisting of all the normally solid dissolved coal , undissolved organic matter and mineral matter of the process , but essentially without any distillate liquid or hydrocarbon gases is discharged by means of line 74 , and may be processed as desired . for example , such stream may be passed to a partial oxidation gasifier to produce hydrogen for the process in the manner described in u . s . pat . no . 4 , 159 , 236 to schmid , the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference . the process as depicted in fig1 does not employ any hydrogenation reaction zone involving either catalytic or non - catalytic hydrogenation downstream from dissolver 26 prior to separation of the liquid into light and heavy distillate fractions in fractionator 36 and vacuum tower 68 . thus , the recycle light distillate and heavy distillate are unhydrogenated . the following examples are not intended to limit the invention , but rather are presented for purposes of illustration . all percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated . six tests were conducted to demonstrate the effect of varying the concentration of light distillate and heavy distillate in the feed to a coal liquefaction process upon the composition of the product fuel oil . pittsburgh seam coals were used in the tests . in tests 1 - 3 the pittsburgh seam coal used had the following analysis : ______________________________________pittsburgh seam coal ( percent by weight - dry basis ) ______________________________________ carbon 73 . 41 hydrogen 5 . 10 sulfur 3 . 37 nitrogen 1 . 29 oxygen 11 . 62 ash 9 . 5 moisture -- ______________________________________ tests 4 - 6 were conducted using a pittsburgh seam coal from a different location having a slightly higher ash content of 11 . 7 weight percent on a weight basis . a feed slurry is prepared for each test by mixing pulverized coal with liquid solvent and a recycle slurry containing liquid solvent , normally solid dissolved coal and catalytic mineral residue . the feed slurry was formulated such that the ratio of the light oil fraction ( approximate boiling range 193 °- 282 ° c ., 380 °- 540 ° f .) to heavy oil fraction ( approximate boiling range 282 °- 482 ° c ., 540 °- 900 ° f .) in the liquid solvent was varied , while the total amount of the two oil fractions remained relatively constant , varying only from 34 . 2 to 36 . 8 weight percent of the total feed slurry composition . the coal concentration in the feed slurry was 30 weight percent and the pressure was 1800 psig ( 126 kg / cm 2 ) using an average dissolver temperature of 455 °- 457 ° c . ( 851 °- 855 ° f .). the hydrogen feed rate was 49 - 72 mscf / ton of coal ( 1 . 52 - 2 . 23 m 3 / kg ). the coal feed rate was 21 . 0 - 21 . 5 lb / hr / ft 3 , which corresponds to a nominal slurry residence time of 1 . 0 - 1 . 02 hour . the feed slurry composition for the various tests is set forth in table i below : table i______________________________________feed slurry composition , test no . wt . % based on slurry 1 2 3 4 5 6______________________________________coal 30 . 0 30 . 0 30 . 0 30 . 0 30 . 0 30 . 0light distillate 7 . 2 8 . 1 3 . 0 7 . 4 4 . 1 11 . 5heavy distillate 28 . 3 28 . 5 33 . 8 28 . 3 30 . 6 22 . 7total of light andheavy distillates 35 . 5 36 . 6 36 . 8 35 . 7 34 . 7 34 . 2ratio of heavy distillateto light distillate 3 . 9 3 . 5 11 . 3 3 . 8 7 . 5 2 . 0normally soliddissolved coal 22 . 4 22 . 1 21 . 3 20 . 7 21 . 3 19 . 8ash * 8 . 2 7 . 4 8 . 0 9 . 3 9 . 7 10 . 2insoluble organic matter * 3 . 9 3 . 9 3 . 9 4 . 3 4 . 3 5 . 8total solids 42 . 1 41 . 3 41 . 9 43 . 6 44 . 0 46 . 0______________________________________ * ash and insoluble organic matter together constitute the mineral residue the composition of the feed slurry was adjusted in part by varying the temperature of the high pressure separator ( 350 °- 390 ° c .) and the distillation column , but more importantly , by the slurry formulation procedure . light distillate and heavy distillate were collected separately . the light distillate has an approximate boiling range of 193 ° c ., 380 ° f ., to 282 ° c ., 540 ° f . ( atmospheric boiling point corrected from actual cut point of 108 ° c . at 2 mmhg ). the heavy distillate has an approximate boiling range of 282 ° c ., 548 ° f ., to 482 ° c ., 900 ° f . ( atmospheric boiling point corrected from actual cut point of 270 ° c . at 2 mmhg ). the ratio of light distillate and heavy distillate used in slurry formulation was adjusted to provide the desired feed slurry composition as shown in table i above . the results of the various tests are set forth in table ii below : table ii______________________________________yields , wt . % based on test no . maf coal 1 2 3 4 5 6______________________________________c . sub . 1 - c . sub . 4 15 . 7 15 . 0 16 . 6 17 . 7 15 . 6 15 . 4naphtha ( c . sub . 5 + - 193 ° c .) 13 . 5 12 . 9 13 . 1 9 . 9 10 . 3 15 . 9light distillate 17 . 5 15 . 2 22 . 5 14 . 2 21 . 6 7 . 4heavy distillate 13 . 1 15 . 3 8 . 8 15 . 4 9 . 4 20 . 1total of light andheavy distillates 30 . 6 30 . 5 31 . 3 29 . 6 31 . 0 27 . 5ratio of heavy distillateto light distillate 0 . 7 1 . 0 0 . 4 1 . 1 0 . 4 2 . 7normally soliddissolved coal 28 . 7 30 . 9 27 . 7 30 . 8 29 . 7 26 . 0insoluble organic matter 5 . 1 5 . 4 5 . 1 6 . 4 6 . 0 7 . 7h . sub . 2 reacted 5 . 6 5 . 2 5 . 3 6 . 0 5 . 2 4 . 7______________________________________ the results set forth in table ii demonstrate that the yields of light and heavy distillate are strongly affected by the levels of such materials in the feed slurry . for example , comparing tests 3 and 6 , it is seen that increasing the light distillate concentration in the feed slurry from 3 . 0 to 11 . 5 weight percent resulted in decreasing the light distillate yield from 22 . 5 to 7 . 4 weight percent based upon maf coal . similarly , increasing the heavy distillate concentration in the feed slurry from 22 . 7 ( test 6 ) to 33 . 8 weight percent ( test 3 ) resulted in decreasing the heavy distillate yield from 20 . 1 weight percent ( test 6 ) to 8 . 8 weight percent ( test 3 ). such large decrease in light distillate yield and corresponding increase in heavy distillate yield with an increase in light distillate concentration in the feed slurry , while the total distillate concentration and yields remain relatively constant , is especially surprising since such strong dependence of yield distribution upon slurry feed composition could not have been predicted . this is demonstrated in fig2 and 3 . fig2 and 3 show the effect of recycle distillate composition upon product distillate composition . since the concentration of total distillate ( light distillate plus heavy distillate ) is approximately the same for all experiments , the concentration of light or heavy distillate is also a measure of the ratio of light distillate to heavy distillate . the actual data points shown in fig2 and 3 were taken from tables 1 and 2 . the solid line shown in fig2 was obtained by mathematical correlation based upon a large number of experiments carried out under various conditions and indicate little or no effect of recycle distillate composition upon predicted yields of light and heavy distillates . the actual data points show , unpredictably , that the yield of light distillate increases as the concentration of heavy distillate ( shown as a decrease in light distillate concentration ) in the slurry feed is increased . similarly , the solid line in fig3 obtained by mathematical correlation predicts that the concentrations of light and heavy fuel oil , respectively , in the recycle distillate have little or no effect upon the relative yields of light and heavy distillate . however , the actual data points show that increasing the concentration of light distillate in the feed slurry ( shown as a decrease in heavy distillate concentration ) actually will cause an increase in the heavy distillate concentration in the fuel oil distillate product . based upon data , including that of tables i and ii , the following algebraic expressions were developed to show the effect of the light to heavy distillate ratio in the feed slurry upon the yields of light and heavy distillates : r 2 = desired weight ratio of light / heavy distillate in feed slurry r 1 = measured weight ratio of light / heavy distillate in feed slurry when using the foregoing algebraic expressions , ( i ) and ( ii ), it is assumed that the other process conditions remain constant . it was found that the basic relationships between the ratio of light / heavy distillate in the feed slurry and light / heavy distillate yields can be expressed by equations ( i ) and ( ii ) over a wide range of liquefaction reactor conditions . such strong interdependence of fuel oil product distribution upon the composition of the light and heavy fuel oil in the slurry liquid permits the continuous control of light and heavy fuel oil yield distribution . although the invention has been described in considerable detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof , variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention as described hereinbefore , and as defined in the appended claims .