text: the present invention is directed to a block protection scheme in a disk array or controller that monitors for write activity to a protected area of storage within the disk array . such protected storage includes destination extents generated by a third party copy . as illustrated in fig7 a disk array 700 includes the functionality of a data mover represented as data mover 710 . alternatively , the data mover 710 could be disposed externally from the disk array 700 so long as the operation of the data mover 710 is tightly coupled to a disk array controller 720 . with continued reference to fig7 a data source such as tape device 730 is coupled to disk array 700 , either directly or through a san ( not shown ). the disk array 700 is in turn coupled to an application server 750 . host write data flow 760 shows the flow of data written to a disk drive 740 from the application server 750 . third party copy data flow 770 shows the flow of data written to the disk drive 740 from the tape device 730 . in one aspect of the invention , the data mover 710 intercommunicates with the controller 720 such that the controller 720 is aware of the extents that the data mover 710 is moving between the tape device 730 and the disk drive 740 . if the controller 720 detects a block write request from the application server 750 that corresponds with the block number in the list of extents being moved along path 770 , the controller 720 holds the write request and notifies the data mover 710 to terminate the move operation , when the move operation terminates , the controller 720 completes the write of data from the application server 750 to the disk drive 740 . in another aspect of the invention , and as illustrated in fig8 and fig9 an algorithm is provided for ensuring the integrity of data moved or written to the disk drive 740 ( fig7 ). a third party copy operation begins 800 and an extent list is derived 810 that describes an object being moved . the extent list is derived at the application server 750 ( fig7 ). if data is being written to a new file or data space , a decision is made 815 and storage is pre - allocated 820 on the disk drive 740 to store the object . the pre - allocation also takes place at the application server 750 ( fig7 ). once the extent list is derived , the extent list is sent 825 to the disk array 700 ( fig7 ). the extent list describes the extents to be written by the third party copy operation and , within the disk array 700 , is sent to both the mover 710 and the controller 720 to both establish the extents to be moved by the mover 710 as well as the extents to be protected by the controller 720 . the extent list may alternatively be sent directly to the mover 710 and controller 720 in order or , in the alternative , to the controller 720 and the mover 710 in order . in either case a first recipient device forwards the extent list to a subsequent recipient device . when the extent list has been received by the controller 720 , it immediately begins to monitor for any write operations to the protected storage area . once both the mover 710 and the controller 720 verify receipt of the extent list , the extent list is checked 830 by the application server 750 ( fig7 ) to verify that the extent list is still correct . the extent list can be verified by either re - mapping the object being copied and comparing the two maps or by checking a configuration id of the object to see if it indicates that a change has occurred . the configuration id is maintained by the file system , volume manager , or database and can be used by an external program to identify if changes have been made to a specified object . if it is determined 835 that the extent list is not valid , then the extent list is released 840 at the disk array 700 by the application server ( fig7 ) and the process returns to block 810 . if on the other hand the extent list is valid , the third party copy operation is initiated 845 . if the controller 720 ( fig7 ) receives 850 a write request to the protected blocks from the application server 750 ( fig7 ) then the write request is stalled 900 and a request to terminate the third party copy is sent 910 to the data mover 710 ( fig7 ) as illustrated in fig9 . if the termination request is acknowledged 920 by the data mover 710 ( fig7 ), then the stalled write request is completed 930 and the copy application notified of the overwrites occurrence . the application server 750 ( fig7 ) then releases the extent list 840 ( fig8 ) at the disk array 700 ( fig7 ). if on the other hand the termination request is not acknowledged 920 ( fig9 ) a determination is made 940 whether the write request has timed out . if it has not timed out , then processing returns to 920 to check for the data mover acknowledgment . otherwise , the write request is cancelled 950 and the server 750 notified 960 of a failed write . the copy operation is also notified 960 of a failure and the process ends 970 . with reference to fig8 if there is no intervening write operation 850 , then a determination 855 is made whether the third party copy has completed . if it has not , processing returns to 850 to check for a write request to the protected blocks . if it is determined 855 that the third party copy operation has completed , then the application server 750 ( fig7 ) is notified of the completion of the operation and the extent list is released 870 at the disk array 700 ( fig7 ). the extent list is again checked for correctness 860 either by re - mapping the copied object or checking the configuration id of the object . if there has been no change to the extent list 865 then the process ends 875 . if on the other hand the extent list has changed , processing returns to the creation 810 of an updated extent list and the copy operation is repeated to the newly mapped space . accordingly , the algorithm ensures the correctness of the data moved when using a third party copy operation to move data into a live storage environment . the first sector slipping error state ( volume reorganization ) is avoided by checking the extent list for correctness 860 after the completion of the third party copy operation 855 . if the extent list is incorrect due to a reallocation of disk space , the copy operation is repeated using the new extent list . the second sector slipping error state ( volume reorganization with overwrite ) is avoided by stalling the host write request 900 until either the copy manager acknowledges the termination request or the host write request times out 940 and the write request is cancelled 950 . in accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes , the principle and mode of operation of the invention have been explained and illustrated in its preferred embodiment . however , it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope . for example , while the preferred embodiment has been illustrated and described in the context of a san , it will be appreciated that the invention can be practiced with other network topologies .