Wrong/Misleading NatSpec Documentation
The NatSpec documentation in several parts of the code base contains inaccuracies or is misleading. This issue can lead to misunderstandings about how the code functions, especially for developers who rely on these comments for clarity and guidance.\\nIn `RocketDAOProtocolProposal`, the NatSpec comments are potentially misleading:\\n```\\n/// @notice Get the votes against count of this proposal\\n/// @param _proposalID The ID of the proposal to query\\n```\\n\\n```\\n/// @notice Returns true if this proposal was supported by this node\\n/// @param _proposalID The ID of the proposal to query\\n/// @param _nodeAddress The node operator address to query\\nfunction getReceiptDirection(uint256 _proposalID, address _nodeAddress) override public view returns (VoteDirection) {\\n    return VoteDirection(getUint(keccak256(abi.encodePacked(daoProposalNameSpace, "receipt.direction", _proposalID, _nodeAddress))));\\n}\\n```\\n\\nIn RocketDAOProtocolVerifier, the NatSpec documentation is incomplete, which might leave out critical information about the function's purpose and behavior:\\n```\\n/// @notice Used by a verifier to challenge a specific index of a proposal's voting power tree\\n/// @param _proposalID The ID of the proposal being challenged\\n/// @param _index The global index of the node being challenged\\n```\\n
The NatSpec documentation should be thoroughly reviewed and corrected where necessary. We recommend ensuring it accurately reflects the code's functionality and provides complete information.
```\\n/// @notice Get the votes against count of this proposal\\n/// @param _proposalID The ID of the proposal to query\\n```\\n