[null, {"document_url": "https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/science/space/ninth-planet-solar-system-beyond-pluto.html?_r=0", "unformatted_src": "https://static01.nyt.com/images/2015/08/25/science/space/NNpromo/NNpromo-videoLarge-v3.jpg", "src": "https://static01.nyt.com/images/2015/08/25/science/space/NNpromo/NNpromo-videoLarge-v3.jpg", "formatted_filename": "NNpromo videoLarge v"}, null]
There might be a ninth planet in the solar system after all, and it is not Pluto.

Two astronomers reported on Wednesday that they had compelling signs of something bigger and farther away â something that would satisfy the current definition of a planet, where Pluto falls short.

âWe are pretty sure thereâs one out there,â said Michael E. Brown, a professor of planetary astronomy at the California Institute of Technology.

What Dr. Brown and a fellow Caltech professor, Konstantin Batygin, have not done is actually find that planet, so it would be premature to start revising mnemonics of the planets.

In a paper published in The Astronomical Journal, Dr. Brown and Dr. Batygin laid out a detailed circumstantial argument for the planetâs existence in what astronomers have observed: a half-dozen small bodies in distant elliptical orbits.

What is striking, the scientists said, is that the orbits of all six loop outward in the same quadrant of the solar system and are tilted at about the same angle. The odds of that happening by chance are about 1 in 14,000, Dr. Batygin said.

A ninth planet could be gravitationally herding them into these orbits.

For the calculations to work, the planet would be at least an equal to Earth, and most likely much bigger â perhaps a mini-Neptune, with a small but thick atmosphere surrounding a rocky core and mass about 10 times that of Earth. That would be 4,500 times the mass of Pluto.

Pluto, at its most distant, is 4.6 billion miles from the sun. The potential ninth planet, at its closest, would be about 20 billion miles away; at its farthest, it could be 100 billion miles away. One trip around the sun would take 10,000 to 20,000 years.

âWe have pretty good constraints on its orbit,â Dr. Brown said. âWhat we donât know is where it is in its orbit, which is too bad.â

Alessandro Morbidelli of the CÃ´te dâAzur Observatory in France, an expert in dynamics of the solar system, said he was convinced. âI think the chase is now on to find this planet,â he said.

This would be the second time that Dr. Brown has upended the map of the solar system. In January 2005, he discovered a Pluto-size object, now known as Eris, in the Kuiper belt, the ring of icy debris beyond Neptune.

The next year, the International Astronomical Union placed Pluto in a new category, âdwarf planet,â because in its view, a full-fledged planet must be the gravitational bully of its orbit, and Pluto was not.

The first indication of a hidden planet beyond Pluto had come a couple of years earlier. The Kuiper belt extends outward from Neptuneâs orbit, about 2.8 billion miles from the sun, to a bit less than twice Neptuneâs orbit, about five billion miles.

Astronomers expected that beyond lay mostly empty space.

Thus, they were surprised when Dr. Brown and two colleagues spotted a 600-mile-wide icy world at a distance of eight billion miles that remained well outside the Kuiper belt even at the closest point in its orbit.

No one could convincingly explain how the object, which Dr. Brown named Sedna, got there, and the hope was that the discovery of more Sedna-like worlds would provide enlightening clues.

Instead, astronomers looked and found nothing, deepening the mystery.

Finally, in 2014, Chadwick Trujillo, who had worked with Dr. Brown on the Sedna discovery, and Scott S. Sheppard, an astronomer at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, reported a smaller object in a Sedna-like orbit, always remaining beyond the Kuiper belt.

Dr. Trujillo and Dr. Sheppard noted that several Kuiper belt objects had similar orbital characteristics, and they laid out the possibility of a planet disturbing the orbits of these objects. âIt was the best explanation we could come up with,â Dr. Trujillo said.

But the particulars of their proposed planet did not explain what was in the sky, Dr. Brown said.

âThe theorists didnât really take it seriously,â he said. âThey figured it was all some observational effect. The observers didnât take it seriously, because they figured it was all some theoretical thing they couldnât understand.â

Still, the peculiarities of the orbits appeared genuine. Dr. Brown said he and Dr. Batygin âsat down and beat our heads against the wall for the last two years.â

First, they focused on the six objects in stable orbits and disregarded others that had been recently flung out by Neptune. NASAâs Next Horizon in Space

Since New Horizons beamed back photos of Pluto, the question has loomed: Whatâs next? More than 1,600 Times readers shared their ideas.

Aug. 28, 2015

That made the picture clearer.

âThey all point into the same overall direction,â Dr. Batygin said. âThis is in stark contrast with the rest of the Kuiper belt.â

Besides the long odds of this alignment being coincidental, Dr. Batygin said, this pattern would disperse over time.

That argued for the force of some unseen body guiding Sedna and the others.

Dr. Batygin, a theorist, tried placing a planet among them using computer simulations, which scattered some Kuiper belt objects, but the orbits were not sufficiently eccentric.

Then he examined what would happen if a ninth planet were looping outward in the opposite direction. That, Dr. Batygin said, gave âa beautiful match to the real data.â

The computer simulations showed that the planet swept up the Kuiper belt objects and placed them only temporarily in the elliptical orbits. Come back in half a billion years, Dr. Brown said, and Sedna will be back in the Kuiper belt, while other Kuiper belt objects will have been pushed into elliptical orbits.

Another strange result in the simulations: A few Kuiper belt objects were knocked into orbits perpendicular to those of the planets. Dr. Brown remembered that five objects had been found in perpendicular orbits.

âTheyâre exactly where we predicted them to be,â he said. âThatâs when my jaw hit my floor. I think this is actually right.â

Dr. Morbidelli said a possible ninth planet could be the core of a gas giant that started forming during the infancy of the solar system; a close pass to Jupiter could have ejected it. Back then, the sun resided in a dense cluster of stars, and the gravitational jostling could have prevented the planet from escaping to interstellar space.

âI think theyâre onto something real,â he said. âI would bet money. I would bet 10,000 bucks.â

Dr. Brown said that he had begun searching for the planet, and that he thought he would be able to find it within five years. Other astronomers will most likely also scan that swath of the night sky.

If the planet exists, it would easily meet the definition of planet, Dr. Brown said.

âThere are some truly dominant bodies in the solar system, and they are pushing around everything else,â Dr. Brown said. âThis is what we mean when we say planet.â


An earlier version of an animation accompanying this article carried an incorrect credit. It was made by Michael E. Brown, not Michael E. Clark.

A version of this article appears in print on , on Page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: There May Be a Ninth Planet (Not You, Pluto). Order Reprints | Todayâs Paper | Subscribe

Discovery of Planetoid Hints at Bigger Cousin in Shadows


NASAâs New Horizons Spacecraft Has Next Mission After Pluto


After Pluto, What Should NASA Explore Next?
