document: Towards identifying arguments in Wikipedia pages Wikipedia is one of the most widely used repositories of human knowledge today , contributed mostly by a few hundred thousand regular editors . In this open environment , inevitably , differences of opinion arise among editors of the same article . Especially for polemical topics such as religion and politics , difference of opinions among editors may lead to intense `` edit wars '' in which editors compete to have their opinions and points of view accepted . While such disputes can compromise the reliability of the article ( or at least portions of it ) , they are recorded in the edit history of the articles . We posit that exposing such disputes to the reader , and pointing to the portions of the text where they manifest most prominently can be beneficial in helping concerned readers in understanding such topics . In this paper , we discuss our initial efforts towards the problem of automatic evaluation of extracting controversial points in Wikipedia pages .
doc_bio_tags: O O O O B O B O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B O O O O O B O O