eUniversity of Utah, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah. fThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; American College of Physicians. gKaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, California. hSanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina; Cardiology Expert. iUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington. jUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, California. kHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. lNaval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia. mMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. nLoyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. oUniversity of Virginia Health Center, Charlottesville, Virginia; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. pAscension Healthcare Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Nuclear Cardiology Expert. qSpecialty Chair, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. The American College of Radiology seeks and encourages collaboration with other organizations on the development of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria through representation of such organizations on expert panels. Participation on the expert panel does not necessarily imply endorsement of the final document by individual contributors or their respective organization. Reprint requests to: publications@acr.org Asymptomatic Patient at Risk for CAD Resting image modalities (ultrasound [US], scintigraphy, CT, and MRI) depict late findings of CAD, such as ventricular dilatation and wall-motion abnormalities, and can directly visualize the morphology of infarcted myocardial segments. Intravascular US, an invasive technique, can detect both calcified and noncalcified plaque.
Asymptomatic Patient at Risk for Coronary Artery Disease PCAs. eUniversity of Utah, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah. fThe University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; American College of Physicians. gKaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, California. hSanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina; Cardiology Expert. iUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington. jUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, California. kHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. lNaval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia. mMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. nLoyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. oUniversity of Virginia Health Center, Charlottesville, Virginia; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. pAscension Healthcare Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Nuclear Cardiology Expert. qSpecialty Chair, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. The American College of Radiology seeks and encourages collaboration with other organizations on the development of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria through representation of such organizations on expert panels. Participation on the expert panel does not necessarily imply endorsement of the final document by individual contributors or their respective organization. Reprint requests to: publications@acr.org Asymptomatic Patient at Risk for CAD Resting image modalities (ultrasound [US], scintigraphy, CT, and MRI) depict late findings of CAD, such as ventricular dilatation and wall-motion abnormalities, and can directly visualize the morphology of infarcted myocardial segments. Intravascular US, an invasive technique, can detect both calcified and noncalcified plaque.