Some studies have found a survival benefit to WBCT compared with selective CT [14], whereas others have found no mortality benefit [15]. Meta-analyses have found conflicting results with respect to improvements in mortality [16-18]. Therefore, clinical judgement remains vital for determining which patients should obtain selective CT versus WBCT. Indications that may warrant WBCT imaging as defined above include high-velocity (>35 mph) MVC, MVC resulting in rollover or passenger ejection, motorcycle trauma, bicycle injury, MVC-pedestrian collision, and a fall from a height of >15 feet. Additional considerations include patient age and functional status, hemodynamic stability, neurological status, and results of initial imaging from portable radiographs of the chest and pelvis, and/or FAST. CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis with IV contrast has greater sensitivity for detecting visceral organ and vascular injury compared with noncontrast CT, and contrast-enhanced CT of these areas should be primarily considered unless absolutely contraindicated [19,20]. Patients who have an abnormal chest radiograph in the setting of trauma have clinically significant rates of major injury on CT chest [8]. Radiography Trauma Series In the setting of blunt facial trauma, facial and cervical lateral radiographs may also be part of the initial trauma series radiographs, which also typically consists of portable radiographs of the chest and pelvis. Single cervical radiographs can rapidly evaluate for severe fracture, abnormal alignment, and prevertebral swelling, but it may miss nondisplaced fractures that are evident on CT. The portable AP chest radiograph helps screen for immediately life- threatening findings, such as tension pneumothorax and significant mediastinal injury, as well as confirms line placement [13]. A portable radiograph of the pelvis can evaluate for unstable pelvic injuries and hip dislocation [4]. Variant 4: Major blunt trauma. Hemodynamically stable. Suspected extremity trauma.
Major Blunt Trauma. Some studies have found a survival benefit to WBCT compared with selective CT [14], whereas others have found no mortality benefit [15]. Meta-analyses have found conflicting results with respect to improvements in mortality [16-18]. Therefore, clinical judgement remains vital for determining which patients should obtain selective CT versus WBCT. Indications that may warrant WBCT imaging as defined above include high-velocity (>35 mph) MVC, MVC resulting in rollover or passenger ejection, motorcycle trauma, bicycle injury, MVC-pedestrian collision, and a fall from a height of >15 feet. Additional considerations include patient age and functional status, hemodynamic stability, neurological status, and results of initial imaging from portable radiographs of the chest and pelvis, and/or FAST. CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis with IV contrast has greater sensitivity for detecting visceral organ and vascular injury compared with noncontrast CT, and contrast-enhanced CT of these areas should be primarily considered unless absolutely contraindicated [19,20]. Patients who have an abnormal chest radiograph in the setting of trauma have clinically significant rates of major injury on CT chest [8]. Radiography Trauma Series In the setting of blunt facial trauma, facial and cervical lateral radiographs may also be part of the initial trauma series radiographs, which also typically consists of portable radiographs of the chest and pelvis. Single cervical radiographs can rapidly evaluate for severe fracture, abnormal alignment, and prevertebral swelling, but it may miss nondisplaced fractures that are evident on CT. The portable AP chest radiograph helps screen for immediately life- threatening findings, such as tension pneumothorax and significant mediastinal injury, as well as confirms line placement [13]. A portable radiograph of the pelvis can evaluate for unstable pelvic injuries and hip dislocation [4]. Variant 4: Major blunt trauma. Hemodynamically stable. Suspected extremity trauma.