bResearch Author, Allegheny Health Network Imaging Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. cPanel Chair, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. dUniversity of Utah, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. eCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Cardiology expert. fEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia. gOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. hChristianaCare Health System, Newark, Delaware; Society of General Internal Medicine. iUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. jVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California and Stanford University, Stanford, California. kInnovation Health Services, Norfolk, Virginia. lMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. mHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Heart Rhythm Society. nSanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. oIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; American College of Physicians. pDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. qOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. rSpecialty Chair, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. The American College of Radiology seeks and encourages collaboration with other organizations on the development of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria through representation of such organizations on expert panels. Participation on the expert panel does not necessarily imply endorsement of the final document by individual contributors or their respective organization. Reprint requests to: publications@acr.org All elements are essential: 1) timing, 2) reconstructions/reformats, and 3) 3-D renderings. Standard CTs with contrast also include timing issues and reconstructions/reformats. Only in CTA, however, is 3-D rendering a required element.
Preprocedural Planning for Left Atrial Procedures in Atrial Fibrillation. bResearch Author, Allegheny Health Network Imaging Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. cPanel Chair, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. dUniversity of Utah, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. eCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Cardiology expert. fEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia. gOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. hChristianaCare Health System, Newark, Delaware; Society of General Internal Medicine. iUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. jVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California and Stanford University, Stanford, California. kInnovation Health Services, Norfolk, Virginia. lMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. mHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Heart Rhythm Society. nSanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. oIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; American College of Physicians. pDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. qOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. rSpecialty Chair, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. The American College of Radiology seeks and encourages collaboration with other organizations on the development of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria through representation of such organizations on expert panels. Participation on the expert panel does not necessarily imply endorsement of the final document by individual contributors or their respective organization. Reprint requests to: publications@acr.org All elements are essential: 1) timing, 2) reconstructions/reformats, and 3) 3-D renderings. Standard CTs with contrast also include timing issues and reconstructions/reformats. Only in CTA, however, is 3-D rendering a required element.