9University of California San Diego, San Diego, California. 10University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 11Specialty Chair (Interventional Radiology), University of Chicago Hospital, Chicago, Illinois. 12Panel Chair (Vascular Imaging), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas. The American College of Radiology seeks and encourages collaboration with other organizations on the development of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria through society representation on expert panels. Participation by representatives from collaborating societies on the expert panel does not necessarily imply individual or society endorsement of the final document. Reprint requests to: publications@acr.org Chylothorax Treatment Planning are at increased risk for postoperative adhesions, infection, and poor wound healing. Reported postoperative mortality rates for patients who have failed conservative management range from 4.5% to as high as 50% [2,4,9,10]. TDE is a percutaneous alternative to thoracic duct ligation. TDE allows for direct embolization (Type I) or needle disruption of the thoracic duct (Type II). Whereas the former directly treats the focus of injury, the latter is purported to create a controlled leak and inflammatory reaction in the retroperitoneum, which collateralizes and diverts flow from the thoracic duct. Over several successive publications, Cope et al [14,15] defined the technique and reported its feasibility. The initial series of 42 patients by Cope and Kaiser [16] revealed effective percutaneous treatment in >70% of cases. In 109 patients with traumatic thoracic duct leak, Itkin et al [5] reported 90% clinical resolution postembolization and 72% clinical resolution of the chyle leak with thoracic duct disruption. A subsequent report by Nadolski and Itkin [6] reported that TDE for nontraumatic chylous effusions in 34 patients was primarily successful if there was thoracic duct occlusion and extravasation.
Chylothorax Treatment Planning. 9University of California San Diego, San Diego, California. 10University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 11Specialty Chair (Interventional Radiology), University of Chicago Hospital, Chicago, Illinois. 12Panel Chair (Vascular Imaging), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas. The American College of Radiology seeks and encourages collaboration with other organizations on the development of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria through society representation on expert panels. Participation by representatives from collaborating societies on the expert panel does not necessarily imply individual or society endorsement of the final document. Reprint requests to: publications@acr.org Chylothorax Treatment Planning are at increased risk for postoperative adhesions, infection, and poor wound healing. Reported postoperative mortality rates for patients who have failed conservative management range from 4.5% to as high as 50% [2,4,9,10]. TDE is a percutaneous alternative to thoracic duct ligation. TDE allows for direct embolization (Type I) or needle disruption of the thoracic duct (Type II). Whereas the former directly treats the focus of injury, the latter is purported to create a controlled leak and inflammatory reaction in the retroperitoneum, which collateralizes and diverts flow from the thoracic duct. Over several successive publications, Cope et al [14,15] defined the technique and reported its feasibility. The initial series of 42 patients by Cope and Kaiser [16] revealed effective percutaneous treatment in >70% of cases. In 109 patients with traumatic thoracic duct leak, Itkin et al [5] reported 90% clinical resolution postembolization and 72% clinical resolution of the chyle leak with thoracic duct disruption. A subsequent report by Nadolski and Itkin [6] reported that TDE for nontraumatic chylous effusions in 34 patients was primarily successful if there was thoracic duct occlusion and extravasation.