Ophthalmology as a career choice among medical students in Eastern India – A cross-sectional study
It was a descriptive, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, carried out in a central institute and adjoining state medical colleges in the eastern part of India. The data were collected for a period of 6 months from January 2021 to August 2021. All under-graduate medical students who had completed or underwent rotatory internship posting in ophthalmology were eligible for this study. A questionnaire-based survey tool was designed for this study after consultation with experts and adapted from similar studies conducted worldwide. In this survey tool, there were 25 questions which were divided into five sections: Demographic data of participants Factors influencing the choice of ophthalmology as a career option Perception of ophthalmology as a career option and field of practice Previous experience concerning research and community service in ophthalmology Impact of rotatory internship posting on the choice of subject. The survey was subjected to a pilot trial on 20 medical students doing internships at the author’s institute after it was validated by external experts on the subject. An e-mail survey was conducted on the medical students of the author’s institute and also sent to medical students who had completed or were doing an internship in different institutes in eastern India. A reminder e-mail was sent after 3 months, and written consent was obtained from the participants. A total of 515 medical graduates who completed the survey were included in the study. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and was conducted as per the rules of the Declaration of Helsinki. Statistical analysis The data entry was performed using MS Excel (ver. Office 365). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA). Based on the questionnaire, the data collected from the medical students were categorized into four broad categories with group-wise total scores of the following: Major deciding factors for opting for ophthalmology as a career: Questions 10 and 11 [maximum possible score (MPS): 8] Influencing factors for opting for ophthalmology as a career: Questions 11–31 (MPS: 18) Perception toward ophthalmology as a career: Questions 32 and 33 (MPS: 18) Experiences in ophthalmology during UG posting/rotation: Questions 34–41 (MPS: 16). The basic demographic profile, information on under-graduate (UG) college and batch, the presence of any relative in the medical profession, and influence of parents on professional choices were factored individually. Any choice higher than or equal to the third choice in favor of ophthalmology was considered a positive inclination toward ophthalmology as a career. For individual questions, the answers were grouped as favorable toward ophthalmology as a career choice and were indexed as 1 if positive or 0 if negative. Similarly, for each category, a score was calculated. Consequently, a category index was computed as a binary variable (1 or 0 for a positive inclination or negative inclination, respectively) by considering a score of more than 50% of the maximum possible score for the category as a positive inclination. Data were expressed in terms of the median [inter-quartile range (IQR)], and non-parametric tests were used. Kendall’s tau and Spearman’s rho were used to determine the correlation between the various scores and other factors. The Chi-Square test was used to determine any significant differences in the two groups for dichotomous data, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous data. Logistic regression was performed to find the significant model to determine the choice of career along with the odds ratio. 

The data entry was performed using MS Excel (ver. Office 365). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA). Based on the questionnaire, the data collected from the medical students were categorized into four broad categories with group-wise total scores of the following: Major deciding factors for opting for ophthalmology as a career: Questions 10 and 11 [maximum possible score (MPS): 8] Influencing factors for opting for ophthalmology as a career: Questions 11–31 (MPS: 18) Perception toward ophthalmology as a career: Questions 32 and 33 (MPS: 18) Experiences in ophthalmology during UG posting/rotation: Questions 34–41 (MPS: 16). The basic demographic profile, information on under-graduate (UG) college and batch, the presence of any relative in the medical profession, and influence of parents on professional choices were factored individually. Any choice higher than or equal to the third choice in favor of ophthalmology was considered a positive inclination toward ophthalmology as a career. For individual questions, the answers were grouped as favorable toward ophthalmology as a career choice and were indexed as 1 if positive or 0 if negative. Similarly, for each category, a score was calculated. Consequently, a category index was computed as a binary variable (1 or 0 for a positive inclination or negative inclination, respectively) by considering a score of more than 50% of the maximum possible score for the category as a positive inclination. Data were expressed in terms of the median [inter-quartile range (IQR)], and non-parametric tests were used. Kendall’s tau and Spearman’s rho were used to determine the correlation between the various scores and other factors. The Chi-Square test was used to determine any significant differences in the two groups for dichotomous data, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous data. Logistic regression was performed to find the significant model to determine the choice of career along with the odds ratio. 

A total of 515 medical students participated in this study. The median age of the study population was 23 years (ranging from 22 to 24 years). Around 306 (59.4%) of the participants were from different state medical colleges, whereas 209 (40.6%) were from the central institute. There were 341 (66.2%) of the students who did not have a doctor in the family, and only a few students (n = 179, 34.8%) were influenced by their parents to choose a specialty. Only eight (1.6%) were self-motivated to choose ophthalmology as their first career option, whereas 70 (13.6%) did not want to pursue it at all. The other demographic data are described in . The major deciding factors for choosing ophthalmology were based on the choices the students made when surveyed as to why or why not they preferred ophthalmology as a subject for post-graduation. The reason that was the most against ophthalmology was that it had a steep learning curve (n = 302, 58.6%). However, it is also a subject that will offer ample personal time (n = 268, 52.0%) while providing for a good financial scope (n = 247, 47.9%), which were the reasons for choosing it as detailed in . Only a few agreed to the question that getting into the PG Ophthalmology course was easy (n = 100, 19.4%), whereas a majority believed that there is an increased workload during the residency training (n = 352, 68.4%). The factors mostly influencing choosing ophthalmology were mostly the uniqueness of the branch offering both medical and surgical opportunities which can be gratifying (n = 480, 93.2%). There was a scope to work in the urban area (n = 480, 93.2%) and start private practice (n = 444, 86.2%) as well as hold a prestigious job in medical colleges and institutions (n = 421, 81.8%). Role models and mentors also had an impact on students’ choices (n = 449, 87.2%). The other factors studied have been summarized in . Perceptions regarding ophthalmology and the various other factors affecting it were also studied. The requirement of fine motor skills, stereoscopic depth perception, and rapidly advancing surgical techniques were certain pre-conceived notions that were the major driving factors that influenced the decision making most. Furthermore, medical graduates agreed that ophthalmology is a broad specialty with multiple sub-specialties in it (n = 360, 70.0%). They also agreed that it needs to be integrated with primary health care services routinely as shown in . The majority of participants did not have adequate experience in working and learning in ophthalmology as evidenced by almost 80.0% of participants saying that they did not have the opportunity to do research work, 69.0% did not have any chance of working in project work, and 79.0% never participated in community service activity. Even though 62.0% of participants feel that their training was more than average, only 31.0% were interested and attended ophthalmology-related seminars and grand rounds. However, only 10.5% of the students rated their experience during rotation as poor, and the rest viewed it positively. The effects of experiences based on participation in department-related activities as well as the impact are shown in [ and ]. Using Spearman’s correlation coefficient, the correlation between the various parameters and the cumulative score of the career option index was performed. Age had a negative correlation, meaning that younger students were more interested in picking up ophthalmology as a career in this study. Similarly, a positive correlation was found for all the three indices that were calculated. This has been tabulated in . As per the scores obtained in the various indices, logistic regression was performed to determine the odds of the indices with the inclination of the students toward choosing ophthalmology as a future career as well as a post-graduation residency option. Age had an odds ratio of 0.781 (0.662–0.921 CI), showing that the lower the age, the higher the chances of being positively inclined toward ophthalmology as a career choice. Similarly, the major deciding factors, perceptions of ophthalmology, and experiences in ophthalmology had odds ratios of 1.841 (1.236–1.735 CI), 1.725 (1.145–2.600 CI), and 2.057 (1.308–3.235 CI), respectively, which showed a positive inclination for the subject. The binary logistic regression of parameters with adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios has been detailed in . The end point of the analysis of the questionnaire scores was based on whether a particular participant has an overall positive or negative inclination toward the ophthalmology. When the cumulative scores of all the questions in the sub-grouping of the questionnaire, which aimed at determining “External Influences” and “Perception Toward Ophthalmology”, were analyzed, no significant difference in these scores was found between the two groups. However, experiences drawn from the under-graduate career were significantly different. When the major deciding factors as per the questionnaire were considered, they were also significantly different between groups divided according to their inclination. The various indices were also compared to see for correlation among them using Kendall’s tau. The only significant correlation was between the deciding index and perception index (-0.126, P < 0.001). The rest have been summarized in . 

Our study aimed at analyzing the trend of choices among under-graduate medical students regarding their interest in opting for ophthalmology as a post-graduate specialization and career choice. Age was an important deciding factor as the year of age increased the students’ choice of ophthalmology gradually decreased (B = -0.260, OR = 0.771, P = 0.002). Various studies have reported gender differences in the selection of specialty branches. The study by Madani et al . and Hamid et al . reported that female medical students showed a preference for ophthalmology more than males, whereas Iftikar et al . did not find any gender preference in their study which is similar to our findings. This study further reported that the majority of students did not prefer ophthalmology as a primary choice but will join if selected, whereas only 1.6% opted for it as their first choice, and 13.6% of the students did not want to pursue this subject at all. This is similar to a study by Adeboye et al. , who reported that only 6.6% chose ophthalmology as a first career choice. This is in contrast to the findings by Savur et al. , who reported that ophthalmology ranked among the top three choices in 60% of medical interns. The study by Abdulghani et al . also reported that ophthalmology was one of the top preferred choices. Furthermore, the READS I study by Gogate et al . also reported ophthalmology among top three choices for specialization. In our study, a steep learning curve and the subject being difficult to understand were the two most cited reasons for not choosing ophthalmology as a career. When asked, however, if they would choose ophthalmology, what would be the reason, then an adequate personal time and monetary scope were the most chosen ones. This finding is similar to the study conducted by Newton et al. , who reported that the choice of sub-speciality was influenced by both lifestyle and money. They reported that students with an inclination to earn money over a quality lifestyle usually chose orthopedics, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery, and internal medicine the most. Furthermore, the study from Japan by Takeda et al . reported that students who wanted job security and a fulfilling life usually chose ophthalmology as a career option. In India, the cost of residency training in a government setting is minimal and usually borne by parents unlike in USA, where students take loans for studying and hence can be a major deciding factor for subject choice. The residency workload hours and the need for extra training following post-graduation such as fellowship programs are a deterrent to the choice that a student makes. However, on a positive note, a remarkably high number of students also recognize its future potential, the scope of advancements, and ample opportunities to practice privately with adequate financial rewards and social stature. Even though a higher number of participants felt that it possesses difficulties related to instruments and learning, they also agreed that it has ample academic as well as clinical possibilities, while being ambivalent about their compatibility with the subject. The studies by Kolcic et al . and Dikici et al . reported that medical students are recently opting for medical branches where they can have a ‘work control’ environment and also ‘easiness of the subject’. As a career option, in our study, most agreed that ophthalmology is a highly sub-speciality-based subject with an increased frequency of work and rapidly advancing surgical techniques requiring fine motor skills and good stereoscopic depth perception. The need for an efficient team and the cost of procurement of instruments were also deterrents. These findings of our study are similar to the data by Savur et al. , who reported that 41–56% of medical interns did not want to study ophthalmology because of dependency on diagnostic equipment, the high cost for the practice setup, and the frequent need for skill development. A general lack of awareness of patients regarding ocular issues and availability of treatment is a major factor that participants agree plagues the future practice. Most also agree that ophthalmology consultation should be a part of the primary care system and not just a measure to correct refractive errors. There are certain misconceptions among the medical students, and these need to be clarified for making this one of the top-ranking choices. Experiences gained in the department of ophthalmology during the under-graduate period including internship are the factors that affect the choice of career the most (B = 0.612, OR = 2.262, P = 0.005). Furthermore, these experiences gained during their training period also had some significant impact on the students’ mindset toward the subject improving their knowledge, developing interest, and dispersing their apprehensions about the subject. Hence, this study suggests that rotational posting during under-graduate training as well as internship will have a positive impact on the students. It amply increased scientific curiosity, academic interest, and knowledge in the majority of students. These made most of the students like the subject and also created role models within the department. These findings are similar to the study by Hsiao et al. , who reported that the quality of training is more effective than just extending the duration of exposure during the internship. The study by Mehmood et al . and Yamane et al . reported that clinical rotation posting influences the choice of specialty. The study by Linz et al . also reported that lack of exposure, an insufficient time, and a too specialized branch were the reasons for not opting for ophthalmology. The studies from the UK report that the Royal College of Ophthalmologists is pro-active in conducting various prize examinations (e.g., the Duke-Elder prize and the Trevor-Roper Travel award) to encourage the medical students to take interest in ophthalmology from an early phase. The study by Nour et al . on EPOD (ENT, Plastic surgery, Ophthalmology, and Dermatology) prize examination also reported that students gained adequate knowledge in the subjects, and it also helped them to cultivate interest in the subject. Therefore, strategies must be included in the curriculum and training programs to focus on developing interest in ophthalmology. Medical students’ choice of a particular specialty varies according to their grades and the curriculum. The study reported by Kim et al . and Cleland et al . further reported that the choice of subject preferences changed in different years of medical education. Therefore, longitudinal studies are required to be conducted to understand how curriculum modification, quality of learning environment, and personal perceptions influence the subject choice of the students to maintain an adequate supply and demand workflow for optimum patient care. The limitation of the study was the lack of data describing the perceptions toward ophthalmology from all the years (the first to the fourth year) of medical education. Second, the choice of career subject is a complex process, and factors beyond the questionnaires may need to be explored. Third, we did not evaluate the personality preferences of medical students and their influence on sub-speciality choices. Further studies are required to make it more generalized. Therefore, multi-centric studies from all over the country can be useful for formulating new recruitment strategies, curriculum modification, and uniformity in teaching patterns. 

The factors which affected the medical students from choosing ophthalmology as a career were varied. The study states that a steep learning curve, personal attitudes, and pre-conceptions may dissuade them from taking this subject, but adequate clinical exposure and experience as well as role models during the internship can create a positive impact on career choice. Therefore, periodic orientation and correct counseling at different stages of medical education will help in making ophthalmology an attractive subject despite the ranking and high level of competition. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. 

Nil. 

There are no conflicts of interest. 

