Question about latent space for GANs I am currently reading about GANs and I had a question about latent space.
A site mentions:

Latent space refers to an abstract multi-dimensional space containing
feature values that we cannot interpret directly, but which encodes a
meaningful internal representation of externally observed events.

Furthermore, this answer mentions

The latent space itself has no meaning. Typically it is a
100-dimensional hypersphere with each variable drawn from a Gaussian
distribution

From my understanding, certain points from the latent space are inputted through the generator model during training.
If the latent space is just a Gaussian distribution, how does it encode "meaningful internal representation of externally observed events"?

We say the latent state is a "meaningful internal representation" because manipulations and transformations to a latent vector $z$ results in meaningful changes in the observed output $x = f(z)$.
"Meaningful changes" is a pretty vague term, but it's commonly used to say something like: for $z_1, z_2$ which map to $x_1, x_2$ if we define $x_3 = f(0.5 z_1 + 0.5 z_2)$, it looks like a mixture of $x_1$ and $x_2$. For semantic attributes $a$ such as "hair color" or "brightness" or "face orientation", $a(x_3)$ is somewhere between $a(x_1)$ and $a(x_2)$.
None of this so far makes any assumption about the construction of $f$, or that there is any distribution on the latent space.
Now suppose you choose some distribution over the latent space $p(z)$, which induces  a corresponding $p(x)$. The goal of training a GAN (or any latent variable generative model) is to make $p(x)$ match up with the empirical data as best as possible.
So to answer your question:

*

*The "meaningfulness" of a latent space is a property of the mapping $f$, not the distribution over $z$. $^1$

*Separately, the gaussian distribution $p(z)$ is chosen mostly for empirical reasons, but this is kind of independent of the latent space -- I could define a uniform distribution $p'(z)$, and sample from the resulting $p'(x)$, and even train a GAN using $p'$.

*So how does it happen that the latent space / mapping is meaningful? This is kind of just an empirical fact about the world, that if you train a GAN, you will get such nice properties.

$^1$ This isn't entirely true, I think in practice you expect the nice meaningful properties of a latent space only to hold up within a certain region near the origin, for most common values of $f$.
