Switching interventions after randomization Suppose in a randomized control study, we assigned each individual to one of two interventions (A or B) with equal probability. And suppose for the sake of argument, there is complete balance in characteristics in the two groups after randomization, so individuals are indeed exchangeable for all intents and purposes.
Suppose after randomization, and for no reason, we switch the labels of the individuals - those receiving A instead receive B, and vice-versa. Are there any concerns after switching?
Now let's say after randomization, perhaps the one factor that isn't balanced is location of the individuals - those randomized to B all live closer to the factory producing A, and those randomized to A live closer to the factory containing B. We therefore switch the randomization to save on transport costs. Would this switch be allowed if we believe (or, let's say we can prove) that location is not associated with our outcome of interest? Certainly, if location is related, I can see that it should not be allowed.

Manual intervention of switching the randomization labels would typically be frowned upon, but should have no statistical effect. A statistically valid randomization between two groups is no less valid by switching the group labels. A "good" randomization depends on how it was done and the characteristics of the selected groups - neither of those change in the slightest by re-naming the groups. It doesn't matter if you arbitrarily call the first group "Group A" or "Group B". Whether or not the randomization is good depends on whether Group A and Group B are comparable, but it doesn't matter which one is called Group A.
Switching group labels dependent on some external factor should also have no effect if there is indeed zero relationship between the study outcome and the factor. Geographic location can have a subtle influence on many, many things, though, so you may inadvertently reverse an effect by switching groups based on location. That said, this change would require that you didn't adequately randomize for location in the first place - the swapped labels are no less valid than the original ones, but the original ones might not have been very good if you didn't randomize a potentially important factor.
