A specific Diophantine equation restricted to prime values of variables. Consider the following Diophantine equation $$x^2+x+1=(a^2+a+1)(b^2+b+1)(c^2+c+1).$$ Assume also that $x,a,b,c,a^2+a+1,b^2+b+1, c^2+c+1$ are all primes. We'll call such a quadruplet $(x,a,b,c)$ a triple threat. 
I'd like to be able to show that there are no triple threats. I've been able to prove the following weaker result that if $(x,a,b,c)$ is a triple-threat and $x \equiv 1$ (mod 5), then none of $a,b$ or $c$ can be $1$ (mod 5). For my purposes, this is useful, but I can get a stronger result with a simpler proof if I can get that there are no triple threats.  
Let me briefly sketch the idea of the proof: Most of what I have been able to do has been from looking at the more general equation
$$x^2+x+1=(a^2+a+1)(b^2+b+1)p$$ where $x,a,b,p,a^2+a+1$ and $b^2+b+1$ are all prime. Note that this equation does solutions (and probably has infinitely many). Call this an almost-triple threat. 
The key approach is showing the following sort of result: If  $a \leq b$, and we have some specific modulo restriction on $x,a,b,p$ then one must have $a^2+a+1<p$.  If one then applies to the original triple threat equation one can in some circumstances get a contradiction by forcing that $a^2+1<c^2+c+1<b^2+b+1<a^2+a+1$. 
Let me briefly sketch how in most contexts I've obtained that $a^2+a+1<p$.
My primary method of attack on this equation has been to rewrite it as
$$(x-a)(x+a+1)=((b^2+b+1)p-1)(a^2+a+1) $$ and 
$$(x-b)(x+b+1)=((a^2+a+1)p-1)(b^2+b+1). $$
Since $a^2+a+1$ and $b^2+b+1$ are assumed to be prime, one has that either the pair of relations $a^2+a+1|x-a$ and $x+a+1|(b^2+b+1)p-1$, or the pair of relations $a^2+a+1|x+a+1$ and $x-a|(b^2+b+1)p-1$. One gets similar pairings using the second version above with $b^2+b+1$. One has then four cases: 
I) $a^2+a+1|x-a$ and  $b^2+b+1|x-b$ 
II)  $a^2+a+1|x-a$ and  $b^2+b+1|x+b+1$ 
III) $a^2+a+1|x+a+1$ and $b^2+b+1|x-b $.
IV) $a^2+a+1|x+a+1$ and $b^2+b+1|x+b+1$.
It is not too hard to show in Cases II and III that one always has $a^2+a+1<p$. The difficulty is primarily in Cases I and IV. In Case I one gets with a little algebra that $x+a+1|p(a+b+1) + \frac{x-b}{b^2+b+1}$. One then has $k(x+a+1)= p(a+b+1) + \frac{x-b}{b^2+b+1}$. For many choices of $x,a,b$ mod 5 one can force $k$ to be large. Say $k \geq 3$. Then one has $$a+x+1 \leq \frac{ p(a+b+1) + \frac{x-b}{b^2+b+1}}{3},$$ and one can get that $a^2+a+1<p$ from this inequality and a little work. (I can expand on this part if necessary.) 
The main difficulty right now is dealing with Case IV. I can handle Case IV under some small modulus assumptions, but I cannot prove that $a^2+a+1<p$ in Case IV unconditionally. 
In Case IV one has with a little work that 
$x-a|p(a+b+1)-\frac{x+b+1}{b^2+b+1}$ and $x-b|p(a+b+1)-\frac{x+a+1}{a^2+a+1}$ but it seems tough to use these to get a tight enough bound to conclude what is wanted without having some extra modulus restriction on the variables.  Any thoughts on either clearing out Case IV, or any other method of showing that triple threats don't exist via some other method would be appreciated.  

Pace Nielsen and Cody Hansen just put this preprint on the Arxiv which shows that no triple threats exist.
