Can anything interesting be said about this fake proof? The Facebook account called BestTheorems has posted the following. Can anything of interest be said about it that a casual reader might miss?

Note that \begin{align}
\small 2 & = \frac 2{3-2} = \cfrac 2 {3-\cfrac2 {3-2}} = \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3-2}}} = \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3-2}}}} = \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {\ddots}}}}} \\[10pt]
\text{and } \\
\small 1 & = \frac 2 {3-1} = \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3-1}} = \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3-1}}} = \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3-1}}}} = \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {3 - \cfrac 2 {\ddots}}}}} \\
\text{So } & 2=1.
\end{align}


Simple, the problem is the assumption the three dots aka the ellipsis, in the first equation equal the ellipsis in the second.  They are not. 
