The pattern in mathematical induction proofs When given a statement to be proven by mathmatical induction
the statement tends to look like this
$1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$
so going about the proof.
1) Prove the base case
$\frac{1\times(1+1)}{2} = 1$
2) Prove the inductive case
Assume 
$1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$
Now add $n+1$ to both sides of the equation.
\begin{align}
1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + n + (n + 1) & = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} + (n + 1) \\
& =  \frac{n(n+1)}{2} + \frac{2(n+1)}{2} \\
& =  \frac{(n + 1)(n + 2)}{2} \\
& =  \frac{(n + 1)((n + 1) + 1)}{2} 
\end{align}
Thus the proof is complete.  Now my question is, can we just remove the $1 + 2 + 3 + \dots + n$ side of the equation, and put anything there? for example, if we used $f(n)$, Then the proof would look like this.
1) Prove the base case
$f(1) = \frac{1\times(1+1)}{2} = 1$
2) Prove the inductive case
Assume 
$f(n) = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$
Now add $n+1$ to both sides of the equation.
\begin{align}
f(n) + (n + 1) & = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} + (n + 1) \\
& =  \frac{n(n+1)}{2} + \frac{2(n+1)}{2} \\
& =  \frac{(n + 1)(n + 2)}{2} \\
& =  \frac{(n + 1)((n + 1) + 1)}{2} 
\end{align}
Thus we now know $f(n) = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$.  But what pattern represents $f(n)$?
it's not immediately obvious that $f(n)$ is the sum of the first $n$ positive integers.

The general theorem of mathematical induction goes like this:
Suppose that "$\Phi$" is a proposition involving the variable "n". Actually let's call the proposition $\Phi(n)$, and agree that whenever we write "$\Phi(\text{something})$" the reader is meant to substitute the "something" in for $n$. If $\Phi(0)$ holds, and if $\Phi(n+1)$ holds whenever $\Phi(n)$ holds, then we may conclude that $\Phi(n)$ holds for all $n$.
We can express this more precisely using quantifiers. With the same setup, here is what induction says:
$$
\Phi(0)\text{ and }(\forall k\in\mathbb{N}\ |\ \Phi(k)\Rightarrow \Phi(k+1))\ \ \ \ \Longrightarrow\ \ \ \ \ (\forall n\in\mathbb{N}\ |\ \Phi(n))\ .
$$
(The $k$ could just as well be an $n$, but sometimes changing variable naming inside quantifiers helps to avoid confusion).
In the example with which you began your post, the proposition $\Phi(n)$ is
$$
1+2+3+\cdots+n=n(n+1)/2\ .
$$
The proposition you do your induction on can really be any proposition! It doesn't need to be an equality.
