text: # Degree of an odd map
  
  If $\gamma : S^1 \rightarrow S^1$, $\gamma(t) = e^{2 \pi i t}$ and $\gamma_+$ denotes $\gamma$ restricted to $[0, 0.5]$ i.e. the upper half of $S^1$ and $f:S^1 \rightarrow S^1$ is an odd map, how do I see that the angle swept by $f \circ \gamma_+$ is $\pi + 2 \pi$?
  
  Thanks for your help!
  
  -
  Do you mean the angle is $\pi$ modulo $2\pi$ ? – PseudoNeo Jul 5 '11 at 11:27
  Besides, it is quite confusing to use alternatively two different constructions of $S^1$ : $\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$ and $\{ z\in\mathbb C^* : |z|=1\}$. If you take this second construction from the very beginning, I think your question becomes clearer. – PseudoNeo Jul 5 '11 at 11:29
  I am meaning to use $S^1 = [0,1]/\{0, 1\}$! – Rudy the Reindeer Jul 5 '11 at 11:38
  My goal is to use this to show that an odd map $f:S^1 \rightarrow S^1$ has odd degree... – Rudy the Reindeer Jul 5 '11 at 11:43
  
  I consider the map $z \mapsto - z$ from $S^1$ to itself ($S^1$ is hereafter identified to the unit circle of $\mathbb C$). An odd map is a map $\gamma : S^1 \to S^1$ obeying the law $\gamma(- z) = -\gamma(z)$. The restriction $\gamma_+$ of $\gamma$ to the top half-circle is a map $C_+ \to S^1$. Its endpoints are $\gamma(1)$ and $\gamma(-1) = -\gamma(1)$. So this path goes from a point to its antipodal. As such, it makes an odd number of half-turns and it sweeps an angle of $\pi$ modulo $2\pi$.
  As any map $C_+ \to S^1$ sending $1$ and $-1$ to antipodal points can be extended to an odd map $S^1 \to S^1$, this result cannot be sharpened: for any angle $\theta$ equal to an odd number of half-turns, there's an odd map $\gamma$ whose $\gamma_+$ sweeps an angle equal to $\theta$.
  Please note that in the other canonical model of $S^1$ (the quotient $\mathbb R / \mathbb Z$) you have to replace $z \mapsto -z$ by the transformation $t \mapsto t + .5$ to define an odd map. The transformation $t \mapsto -t$ of $\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$ corresponds to $z \mapsto \overline z$, and it is not true that if $\gamma : S^1 \to S^1$ obeys $\gamma(\overline z) = \overline{\gamma(z)}$, its restriction $\gamma_+$ sweeps an odd number of half-turns (the constant map $\gamma(z) = 1$ is a counterexample).
  thank you! And why does it follow that $f \circ \gamma_+$ also sweeps an angle of $\pi + 2 \pi n$? Could it not be that it sweeps an angle $\Theta + 2 \pi n$? – Rudy the Reindeer Jul 5 '11 at 12:10
metadata: {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 1, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0, "katex": 0, "math-container": 0, "wp-katex-eq": 0, "align": 0, "equation": 0, "x-ck12": 0, "texerror": 0}