In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Estonian you must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.

Let me give you an example: Ese oli mullikilesse mässitud.
(1)See oli õrn.(2)See oli väike.
The answer to this example can be: 1
Here is why: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object in bubble wrap if they are delicate.

OK. solve this:
Auto sai mõlgitud.
(1)Juht sõitis vastu telefoniposti.(2)Juht sõitis punase tule alt läbi.
Answer:
1
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Estonian you must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.

Let me give you an example: Ese oli mullikilesse mässitud.
(1)See oli õrn.(2)See oli väike.
The answer to this example can be: 1
Here is why: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object in bubble wrap if they are delicate.

OK. solve this:
Auto sai mõlgitud.
(1)Juht sõitis vastu telefoniposti.(2)Juht sõitis punase tule alt läbi.
Answer:
user
1
assistant
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Estonian you must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.

Let me give you an example: Ese oli mullikilesse mässitud.
(1)See oli õrn.(2)See oli väike.
The answer to this example can be: 1
Here is why: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object in bubble wrap if they are delicate.

OK. solve this:
Auto sai mõlgitud.
(1)Juht sõitis vastu telefoniposti.(2)Juht sõitis punase tule alt läbi.
Answer:
1