R & A: Using a handsaw to cut a tree branch in a wooded area does not imply making way for a new hiking path.
it is not possible to tell
Q: Can we conclude from "Man in jeans and a sweatshirt using a handsaw to cut a tree branch in a wooded area." that "A man cuts branches to make way for a new hiking path."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

R & A: Men cannot be in board room and on sidewalk at the same time.
no
Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two men stop on the sidewalk to chat as a third passes by."
Hypothesis: "Two men talk in the board room."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

R & A: A boy in camouflage shorts and an orange shirt is someone is wearing striking clothing.
yes
Q: If "A boy in camouflage shorts and an orange shirt has his hat on backwards." does that mean that "A boy in striking clothing with backwards hat."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

R & A: Not every man looking in windows is going to rob them.
it is not possible to tell
Q:
Can we conclude from "A man is looking in a row of windows outside by a trash dumpster." that "The man is looking for a place to rob."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
R & A: Using a handsaw to cut a tree branch in a wooded area does not imply making way for a new hiking path.
it is not possible to tell
Q: Can we conclude from "Man in jeans and a sweatshirt using a handsaw to cut a tree branch in a wooded area." that "A man cuts branches to make way for a new hiking path."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

R & A: Men cannot be in board room and on sidewalk at the same time.
no
Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two men stop on the sidewalk to chat as a third passes by."
Hypothesis: "Two men talk in the board room."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

R & A: A boy in camouflage shorts and an orange shirt is someone is wearing striking clothing.
yes
Q: If "A boy in camouflage shorts and an orange shirt has his hat on backwards." does that mean that "A boy in striking clothing with backwards hat."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

R & A: Not every man looking in windows is going to rob them.
it is not possible to tell
Q:
user
Can we conclude from "A man is looking in a row of windows outside by a trash dumpster." that "The man is looking for a place to rob."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
assistant
R & A: Using a handsaw to cut a tree branch in a wooded area does not imply making way for a new hiking path.
it is not possible to tell
Q: Can we conclude from "Man in jeans and a sweatshirt using a handsaw to cut a tree branch in a wooded area." that "A man cuts branches to make way for a new hiking path."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

R & A: Men cannot be in board room and on sidewalk at the same time.
no
Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two men stop on the sidewalk to chat as a third passes by."
Hypothesis: "Two men talk in the board room."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

R & A: A boy in camouflage shorts and an orange shirt is someone is wearing striking clothing.
yes
Q: If "A boy in camouflage shorts and an orange shirt has his hat on backwards." does that mean that "A boy in striking clothing with backwards hat."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

R & A: Not every man looking in windows is going to rob them.
it is not possible to tell
Q:
Can we conclude from "A man is looking in a row of windows outside by a trash dumpster." that "The man is looking for a place to rob."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell