xml: <clinical_study>
    <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
      https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
    <required_header>
      <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
      <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
      <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06028750</url>
    </required_header>
    <id_info>
      <org_study_id>RCT X-GUIDE (50/2022)</org_study_id>
      <nct_id>NCT06028750</nct_id>
    </id_info>
    <brief_title>Dynamic Navigation vs. the Freehand Method</brief_title>
    <official_title>Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Dynamic Navigation or the Freehand Method: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Novice Operators</official_title>
    <sponsors>
      <lead_sponsor>
        <agency>University of Barcelona</agency>
        <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
      </lead_sponsor>
    </sponsors>
    <source>University of Barcelona</source>
    <oversight_info>
      <is_fda_regulated_drug>No</is_fda_regulated_drug>
      <is_fda_regulated_device>No</is_fda_regulated_device>
      <is_us_export>Yes</is_us_export>
    </oversight_info>
    <brief_summary>
      <textblock>
        The purpose of the study is to evaluate in novice surgeons the accuracy of the X-Guide®&#xD;
        navigation system (X-Guide®, X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA) in implant placement&#xD;
        compared to freehand implant placement.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </brief_summary>
    <detailed_description>
      <textblock>
        Randomized clinical trial with 2 parallel treatment groups. Eligible patients will be&#xD;
        randomized with a 1:1 ratio to one of 2 possible parallel treatment groups:&#xD;
  &#xD;
          -  Group 1: Nobel Replace Conical Connection® placed freehand.&#xD;
  &#xD;
          -  Group 2: Nobel Replace Conical Connection® placed using the X-Guide guided surgery&#xD;
             system (X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA).&#xD;
  &#xD;
        PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:&#xD;
  &#xD;
        - To evaluate in novice surgeons the accuracy of the X-Guide® Navigation System (X-Guide®,&#xD;
        X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA) in implant placement compared to freehand implant&#xD;
        placement.&#xD;
  &#xD;
        SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:&#xD;
  &#xD;
          -  To evaluate overall surgical time with the X-Guide® Navigation System (X-Guide®, X-Nav&#xD;
             Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA) compared to freehand implant placement in&#xD;
             inexperienced surgeons.&#xD;
  &#xD;
          -  To evaluate Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) during implant treatment with&#xD;
             navigation systems performed by novice surgeons.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </detailed_description>
    <overall_status>Recruiting</overall_status>
    <start_date type="Actual">March 1, 2023</start_date>
    <completion_date type="Anticipated">December 2023</completion_date>
    <primary_completion_date type="Anticipated">November 2023</primary_completion_date>
    <phase>N/A</phase>
    <study_type>Interventional</study_type>
    <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
    <study_design_info>
      <allocation>Randomized</allocation>
      <intervention_model>Parallel Assignment</intervention_model>
      <primary_purpose>Other</primary_purpose>
      <masking>Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)</masking>
    </study_design_info>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>To evaluate in novice surgeons the accuracy of the X-Guide® navigation system (X-Guide®, X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA) in implant placement compared to freehand implant placement.</measure>
      <time_frame>Through study completion, an average of 1 year.</time_frame>
      <description>The accuracy of placement of Nobel Replace Conical Connection® implants (Nobel Biocare) will be evaluated by superimposing the two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (pre- and post-surgical) and calculating the deviations from the pre-operative planning and the final implant position. The superimposition of both CBCTs will be performed using X-Guide Standalone Planning Software (Nobel Biocare).&#xD;
  The following variables will be analyzed for each implant: Angular deviation, Lateral platform deviation (2D), Global platform deviation (3D), Lateral apex deviation (2D), Apex depth deviation and Global apex deviation (3D).</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>To evaluate overall surgical time with the X-Guide® Navigation System (X-Guide®, X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA) compared to freehand implant placement in inexperienced surgeons.</measure>
      <time_frame>During the surgical procedure.</time_frame>
      <description>Duration of the operation from the moment of anesthesia to the last suture point. In seconds (s).</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Comparison of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) between navigated and freehand surgery, using the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire, in addition to a PROMs questionnaire designed.</measure>
      <time_frame>The OHIP-14 will be performed just before starting the surgery and at the 7-day postoperative control. The PROMs questionnaire will be performed by the patient just after finishing the implant surgery and having explained the postoperative instructions.</time_frame>
      <description>A questionnaire has been designed to evaluate the PROMs of patients treated with dynamic guided surgery and compare it with the PROMs of patients treated freehand:&#xD;
  Prior to surgery the patient will complete the oral health impact profile questionnaire (OHIP-14sp).&#xD;
  Immediately after the surgery and after explaining the postoperative instructions, the patient will fill in the questionnaire designed to evaluate PROMs.&#xD;
  At 7 postoperative days, the patient will again complete the OHIP-14sp.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Comparison of postoperative pain between navigated and freehand surgery, using a questionnaire designed with a visual analog scale (VAS).</measure>
      <time_frame>The postoperative pain will be evaluated immediately after the surgery with a VAS questionnaire and during the 7 days following surgery.</time_frame>
      <description>A questionnaire has been designed to evaluate the postoperative pain of patients treated with dynamic guided surgery and compare it with patients treated freehand:&#xD;
  Immediately after the surgery the patient will complete the VAS questionnaire.&#xD;
  Another VAS questionnaire will be given to assess postoperative pain during the 7 days following surgery.&#xD;
  The VAS questionnaire consists of a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). In the VAS questionnaire given for the 7 postoperative days there will be a VAS for each day and the analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs consumed by the patient will be recorded.&#xD;
  The VAS is formed by the value &quot;No pain&quot; to the left of the 100 mm straight line and by the value &quot;Worst pain imaginable&quot; to the right of the 100 mm straight line.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <number_of_arms>2</number_of_arms>
    <enrollment type="Anticipated">50</enrollment>
    <condition>Dental Implants</condition>
    <arm_group>
      <arm_group_label>Freehand</arm_group_label>
      <arm_group_type>Active Comparator</arm_group_type>
      <description>Nobel Replace Conical Connection® placed freehand</description>
    </arm_group>
    <arm_group>
      <arm_group_label>X-Guide guided surgery system (X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA)</arm_group_label>
      <arm_group_type>Experimental</arm_group_type>
      <description>Nobel Replace Conical Connection® placed using the X-Guide guided surgery system (X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA)</description>
    </arm_group>
    <intervention>
      <intervention_type>Procedure</intervention_type>
      <intervention_name>Dynamic Computer Assisted Surgery</intervention_name>
      <description>Surgical navigation system (X-Guide guided surgery system) Navigation system X-Guide</description>
      <arm_group_label>X-Guide guided surgery system (X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA)</arm_group_label>
      <other_name>Dynamic Navigation</other_name>
      <other_name>Navigated surgery</other_name>
    </intervention>
    <intervention>
      <intervention_type>Procedure</intervention_type>
      <intervention_name>Freehand</intervention_name>
      <description>Freehand implant placement</description>
      <arm_group_label>Freehand</arm_group_label>
    </intervention>
    <eligibility>
      <criteria>
        <textblock>
          Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Subjects who agree to voluntarily sign the informed consent before performing any&#xD;
               action related to the study.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Men or women at least 18 years old.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Single edentulous spaces or edentulous sections located in maxilla or mandible with a&#xD;
               healing period longer than 12 weeks to rehabilitate with implant-supported fixed&#xD;
               crowns ≤3 units.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  O'Leary plaque and/or bleeding on probing index ≤25%.&#xD;
  &#xD;
          Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Systemic diseases that may interfere with dental implant placement.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Any contraindications for oral surgical procedures.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  History of head and neck radiotherapy.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patients smoking &gt;20 cigarettes/day or tobacco equivalents.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  History of substance abuse (drugs or alcohol) or any other factor (e.g., severe&#xD;
               psychiatric illness) that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with&#xD;
               the patient's ability to cooperate and comply with the study.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patients who have participated in a clinical trial within the last 30 days.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Pregnant or lactating women.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patients with poor or unmotivated oral hygiene.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Probing depth with bleeding of ≥4 mm in one of the teeth adjacent to the edentulous&#xD;
               space or tract.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Need to perform guided bone regeneration procedures simultaneous to implant placement.&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Cases where the use of transepithelial abutments is not recommended (reduced&#xD;
               prosthetic space, high esthetic demand associated with thin gingival biotypes, etc.).&#xD;
        </textblock>
      </criteria>
      <gender>All</gender>
      <minimum_age>18 Years</minimum_age>
      <maximum_age>N/A</maximum_age>
      <healthy_volunteers>Accepts Healthy Volunteers</healthy_volunteers>
    </eligibility>
    <overall_official>
      <last_name>Eduard Valmaseda Castellón, PhD</last_name>
      <role>Study Chair</role>
      <affiliation>University of Barcelona</affiliation>
    </overall_official>
    <overall_contact>
      <last_name>Octavi Camps Font, PhD</last_name>
      <phone>665-980-569</phone>
      <email>occafo@gmail.com</email>
    </overall_contact>
    <overall_contact_backup>
      <last_name>Victor Ruiz Romero, MS</last_name>
      <phone>657-262-457</phone>
      <email>victorruizromero24@gmail.com</email>
    </overall_contact_backup>
    <location>
      <facility>
        <name>University of Barcelona</name>
        <address>
          <city>L´hospitalet de Llobregat</city>
          <state>Catalunya</state>
          <zip>08903</zip>
          <country>Spain</country>
        </address>
      </facility>
      <status>Recruiting</status>
      <contact>
        <last_name>Octavi Camps-Font, DDS, MS</last_name>
        <phone>+34667378126</phone>
        <email>occafo@gmail.com</email>
      </contact>
      <contact_backup>
        <last_name>Rui Figueiredo, DDS, MS, PhD</last_name>
        <phone>+34665980569</phone>
        <email>ruipfigueiredo@hotmail.com</email>
      </contact_backup>
      <investigator>
        <last_name>Rui Figueiredo, DDS, MS, PhD</last_name>
        <role>Principal Investigator</role>
      </investigator>
      <investigator>
        <last_name>Eduard Valmaseda-Castellon, DDS, MS, PhD</last_name>
        <role>Principal Investigator</role>
      </investigator>
      <investigator>
        <last_name>Octavi Camps-Font, DDS, MS</last_name>
        <role>Sub-Investigator</role>
      </investigator>
    </location>
    <location_countries>
      <country>Spain</country>
    </location_countries>
    <reference>
      <citation>D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):121-133. doi: 10.1111/prd.12175.</citation>
      <PMID>28000275</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Block MS, Emery RW. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;74(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 30.</citation>
      <PMID>26452429</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Gaggl A, Schultes G, Karcher H. Navigational precision of drilling tools preventing damage to the mandibular canal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001 Oct;29(5):271-5. doi: 10.1054/jcms.2001.0239.</citation>
      <PMID>11673921</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Wang F, Wang Q, Zhang J. Role of Dynamic Navigation Systems in Enhancing the Accuracy of Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Oct;79(10):2061-2070. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 10.</citation>
      <PMID>34245701</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Pellegrino G, Ferri A, Del Fabbro M, Prati C, Gandolfi MG, Marchetti C. Dynamic Navigation in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Sep-Oct;36(5):e121-e140. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8770.</citation>
      <PMID>34698720</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Jorba-Garcia A, Gonzalez-Barnadas A, Camps-Font O, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.</citation>
      <PMID>33635397</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Emery RW, Merritt SA, Lank K, Gibbs JD. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation. J Oral Implantol. 2016 Oct;42(5):399-405. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025. Epub 2016 Jun 6.</citation>
      <PMID>27267658</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Jorba-Garcia A, Figueiredo R, Gonzalez-Barnadas A, Camps-Font O, Valmaseda-Castellon E. Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in-vitro study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Jan 1;24(1):e76-e83. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22785.</citation>
      <PMID>30573712</PMID>
    </reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):214-27. doi: 10.1111/prd.12056.</citation>
      <PMID>25123770</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Miller RJ, Bier J. Surgical navigation in oral implantology. Implant Dent. 2006 Mar;15(1):41-7. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000202637.61180.2b.</citation>
      <PMID>16569960</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <verification_date>August 2023</verification_date>
    <study_first_submitted>May 8, 2023</study_first_submitted>
    <study_first_submitted_qc>August 31, 2023</study_first_submitted_qc>
    <study_first_posted type="Actual">September 8, 2023</study_first_posted>
    <last_update_submitted>August 31, 2023</last_update_submitted>
    <last_update_submitted_qc>August 31, 2023</last_update_submitted_qc>
    <last_update_posted type="Actual">September 8, 2023</last_update_posted>
    <responsible_party>
      <responsible_party_type>Principal Investigator</responsible_party_type>
      <investigator_affiliation>University of Barcelona</investigator_affiliation>
      <investigator_full_name>Octavi Camps-Font</investigator_full_name>
      <investigator_title>Associate Professor of Oral Surgery</investigator_title>
    </responsible_party>
    <keyword>Dynamic computer assisted implant surgery</keyword>
    <patient_data>
      <sharing_ipd>No</sharing_ipd>
      <ipd_description>Patients' personal data will not be published, however, the results of the scientific study will be published in a scientific dental journal.</ipd_description>
    </patient_data>
    <provided_document_section>
      <provided_document>
        <document_type>Informed Consent Form</document_type>
        <document_has_protocol>No</document_has_protocol>
        <document_has_icf>Yes</document_has_icf>
        <document_has_sap>No</document_has_sap>
        <document_date>August 30, 2023</document_date>
        <document_url>https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/50/NCT06028750/ICF_000.pdf</document_url>
      </provided_document>
    </provided_document_section>
    <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
  </clinical_study>
  
  
text: download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
  link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
  url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06028750
  org study id: RCT X-GUIDE (50/2022)
  nct id: NCT06028750
  lead sponsor: 
  is fda regulated drug: No
  is fda regulated device: No
  is us export: Yes
  The purpose of the study is to evaluate in novice surgeons the accuracy of the X-Guide®
        navigation system (X-Guide®, X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA) in implant placement
        compared to freehand implant placement.
  Randomized clinical trial with 2 parallel treatment groups. Eligible patients will be
        randomized with a 1:1 ratio to one of 2 possible parallel treatment groups:
  
          -  Group 1: Nobel Replace Conical Connection® placed freehand.
  
          -  Group 2: Nobel Replace Conical Connection® placed using the X-Guide guided surgery
             system (X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA).
  
        PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
  
        - To evaluate in novice surgeons the accuracy of the X-Guide® Navigation System (X-Guide®,
        X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA) in implant placement compared to freehand implant
        placement.
  
        SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
  
          -  To evaluate overall surgical time with the X-Guide® Navigation System (X-Guide®, X-Nav
             Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA) compared to freehand implant placement in
             inexperienced surgeons.
  
          -  To evaluate Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) during implant treatment with
             navigation systems performed by novice surgeons.
  allocation: Randomized
  intervention model: Parallel Assignment
  primary purpose: Other
  masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
  measure: To evaluate in novice surgeons the accuracy of the X-Guide® navigation system (X-Guide®, X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA) in implant placement compared to freehand implant placement.
  time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
  description: The accuracy of placement of Nobel Replace Conical Connection® implants (Nobel Biocare) will be evaluated by superimposing the two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (pre- and post-surgical) and calculating the deviations from the pre-operative planning and the final implant position. The superimposition of both CBCTs will be performed using X-Guide Standalone Planning Software (Nobel Biocare).
  The following variables will be analyzed for each implant: Angular deviation, Lateral platform deviation (2D), Global platform deviation (3D), Lateral apex deviation (2D), Apex depth deviation and Global apex deviation (3D).
  measure: To evaluate overall surgical time with the X-Guide® Navigation System (X-Guide®, X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA) compared to freehand implant placement in inexperienced surgeons.
  time frame: During the surgical procedure.
  description: Duration of the operation from the moment of anesthesia to the last suture point. In seconds (s).
  measure: Comparison of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) between navigated and freehand surgery, using the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire, in addition to a PROMs questionnaire designed.
  time frame: The OHIP-14 will be performed just before starting the surgery and at the 7-day postoperative control. The PROMs questionnaire will be performed by the patient just after finishing the implant surgery and having explained the postoperative instructions.
  description: A questionnaire has been designed to evaluate the PROMs of patients treated with dynamic guided surgery and compare it with the PROMs of patients treated freehand:
  Prior to surgery the patient will complete the oral health impact profile questionnaire (OHIP-14sp).
  Immediately after the surgery and after explaining the postoperative instructions, the patient will fill in the questionnaire designed to evaluate PROMs.
  At 7 postoperative days, the patient will again complete the OHIP-14sp.
  measure: Comparison of postoperative pain between navigated and freehand surgery, using a questionnaire designed with a visual analog scale (VAS).
  time frame: The postoperative pain will be evaluated immediately after the surgery with a VAS questionnaire and during the 7 days following surgery.
  description: A questionnaire has been designed to evaluate the postoperative pain of patients treated with dynamic guided surgery and compare it with patients treated freehand:
  Immediately after the surgery the patient will complete the VAS questionnaire.
  Another VAS questionnaire will be given to assess postoperative pain during the 7 days following surgery.
  The VAS questionnaire consists of a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). In the VAS questionnaire given for the 7 postoperative days there will be a VAS for each day and the analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs consumed by the patient will be recorded.
  The VAS is formed by the value "No pain" to the left of the 100 mm straight line and by the value "Worst pain imaginable" to the right of the 100 mm straight line.
  arm group label: Freehand
  arm group type: Active Comparator
  description: Nobel Replace Conical Connection® placed freehand
  arm group label: X-Guide guided surgery system (X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA)
  arm group type: Experimental
  description: Nobel Replace Conical Connection® placed using the X-Guide guided surgery system (X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA)
  intervention type: Procedure
  intervention name: Dynamic Computer Assisted Surgery
  description: Surgical navigation system (X-Guide guided surgery system) Navigation system X-Guide
  arm group label: X-Guide guided surgery system (X-Nav Technologies®, Pennsylvania, USA)
  other name: Dynamic Navigation
  other name: Navigated surgery
  intervention type: Procedure
  intervention name: Freehand
  description: Freehand implant placement
  arm group label: Freehand
  criteria: 
  gender: All
  minimum age: 18 Years
  maximum age: N/A
  healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
  last name: Eduard Valmaseda Castellón, PhD
  role: Study Chair
  affiliation: University of Barcelona
  last name: Octavi Camps Font, PhD
  phone: 665-980-569
  email: occafo@gmail.com
  last name: Victor Ruiz Romero, MS
  phone: 657-262-457
  email: victorruizromero24@gmail.com
  facility: 
  status: Recruiting
  contact: 
  contact backup: 
  investigator: 
  investigator: 
  investigator: 
  country: Spain
  citation: D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):121-133. doi: 10.1111/prd.12175.
  PMID: 28000275
  citation: Block MS, Emery RW. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;74(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
  PMID: 26452429
  citation: Gaggl A, Schultes G, Karcher H. Navigational precision of drilling tools preventing damage to the mandibular canal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001 Oct;29(5):271-5. doi: 10.1054/jcms.2001.0239.
  PMID: 11673921
  citation: Wang F, Wang Q, Zhang J. Role of Dynamic Navigation Systems in Enhancing the Accuracy of Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Oct;79(10):2061-2070. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
  PMID: 34245701
  citation: Pellegrino G, Ferri A, Del Fabbro M, Prati C, Gandolfi MG, Marchetti C. Dynamic Navigation in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Sep-Oct;36(5):e121-e140. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8770.
  PMID: 34698720
  citation: Jorba-Garcia A, Gonzalez-Barnadas A, Camps-Font O, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
  PMID: 33635397
  citation: Emery RW, Merritt SA, Lank K, Gibbs JD. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation. J Oral Implantol. 2016 Oct;42(5):399-405. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
  PMID: 27267658
  citation: Jorba-Garcia A, Figueiredo R, Gonzalez-Barnadas A, Camps-Font O, Valmaseda-Castellon E. Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in-vitro study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Jan 1;24(1):e76-e83. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22785.
  PMID: 30573712
  citation: Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):214-27. doi: 10.1111/prd.12056.
  PMID: 25123770
  citation: Miller RJ, Bier J. Surgical navigation in oral implantology. Implant Dent. 2006 Mar;15(1):41-7. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000202637.61180.2b.
  PMID: 16569960
  responsible party type: Principal Investigator
  investigator affiliation: University of Barcelona
  investigator full name: Octavi Camps-Font
  investigator title: Associate Professor of Oral Surgery
  sharing ipd: No
  ipd description: Patients' personal data will not be published, however, the results of the scientific study will be published in a scientific dental journal.
  provided document: 