xml: <clinical_study>
    <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
      https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
    <required_header>
      <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
      <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
      <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05986149</url>
    </required_header>
    <id_info>
      <org_study_id>IRB-300008546</org_study_id>
      <nct_id>NCT05986149</nct_id>
    </id_info>
    <brief_title>Making Intergenerational Connections Through Arts</brief_title>
    <official_title>Making Intergenerational Connections Through Arts</official_title>
    <sponsors>
      <lead_sponsor>
        <agency>University of Alabama at Birmingham</agency>
        <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
      </lead_sponsor>
    </sponsors>
    <source>University of Alabama at Birmingham</source>
    <oversight_info>
      <has_dmc>No</has_dmc>
      <is_fda_regulated_drug>No</is_fda_regulated_drug>
      <is_fda_regulated_device>No</is_fda_regulated_device>
    </oversight_info>
    <brief_summary>
      <textblock>
        The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact on older adults' wellbeing of&#xD;
        participating in a 10-week conversation about arts and culture with an international&#xD;
        university student whose native language is not English.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </brief_summary>
    <detailed_description>
      <textblock>
        Older adults residing in subsidized housing will participate in a series of online&#xD;
        conversations over 10 weeks about various arts and culture with an international university&#xD;
        student enrolled at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB); each weekly session will&#xD;
        last for about 30 min to one hour.&#xD;
  &#xD;
        Participants will complete survey questionnaires before and after the 10-week conversation&#xD;
        program, and an exit interview at the end of the conversation program.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </detailed_description>
    <overall_status>Not yet recruiting</overall_status>
    <start_date type="Anticipated">October 1, 2023</start_date>
    <completion_date type="Anticipated">September 1, 2025</completion_date>
    <primary_completion_date type="Anticipated">August 31, 2025</primary_completion_date>
    <study_type>Observational</study_type>
    <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
    <study_design_info>
      <observational_model>Cohort</observational_model>
      <time_perspective>Prospective</time_perspective>
    </study_design_info>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale</measure>
      <time_frame>baseline</time_frame>
      <description>(ULS-8, Hays &amp; Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale</measure>
      <time_frame>at 10 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>(ULS-8, Hays &amp; Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale</measure>
      <time_frame>at 2 months</time_frame>
      <description>(ULS-8, Hays &amp; Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale</measure>
      <time_frame>baseline</time_frame>
      <description>De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as &quot;1&quot;. Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as &quot;1&quot;. Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale</measure>
      <time_frame>at 10 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as &quot;1&quot;. Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as &quot;1&quot;. Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale</measure>
      <time_frame>at 2 months</time_frame>
      <description>De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as &quot;1&quot;. Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as &quot;1&quot;. Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)</measure>
      <time_frame>baseline</time_frame>
      <description>It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)</measure>
      <time_frame>at 10 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)</measure>
      <time_frame>at 2 months</time_frame>
      <description>It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)</measure>
      <time_frame>baseline</time_frame>
      <description>It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)</measure>
      <time_frame>at 10 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)</measure>
      <time_frame>at 2 months</time_frame>
      <description>It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)</measure>
      <time_frame>baseline</time_frame>
      <description>SWLS (Diener et al., 1985) is used to evaluate the global self-assessment of one's quality of life. The SWLS consists of five statements where participants indicated how much they agreed or disagreed with each statement about their life satisfaction using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with one's life.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)</measure>
      <time_frame>at 10 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>SWLS (Diener et al., 1985) is used to evaluate the global self-assessment of one's quality of life. The SWLS consists of five statements where participants indicated how much they agreed or disagreed with each statement about their life satisfaction using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with one's life.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)</measure>
      <time_frame>at 2 months</time_frame>
      <description>SWLS (Diener et al., 1985) is used to evaluate the global self-assessment of one's quality of life. The SWLS consists of five statements where participants indicated how much they agreed or disagreed with each statement about their life satisfaction using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with one's life.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)</measure>
      <time_frame>baseline</time_frame>
      <description>The WEMWBS is intended to measure a person's functioning aspects of mental well-being (Stranges et al., 2014). The scale consists of 14 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = none of the time to 5 = all of the time). The total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater mental well-being.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)</measure>
      <time_frame>at 10 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>The WEMWBS is intended to measure a person's functioning aspects of mental well-being (Stranges et al., 2014). The scale consists of 14 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = none of the time to 5 = all of the time). The total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater mental well-being.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)</measure>
      <time_frame>at 2 months</time_frame>
      <description>The WEMWBS is intended to measure a person's functioning aspects of mental well-being (Stranges et al., 2014). The scale consists of 14 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = none of the time to 5 = all of the time). The total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater mental well-being.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9)</measure>
      <time_frame>baseline</time_frame>
      <description>is to measure for depression, where participants are asked to rate how often they were bothered by specific symptoms over the last two weeks. It has 9 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day) with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9)</measure>
      <time_frame>at 10 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>is to measure for depression, where participants are asked to rate how often they were bothered by specific symptoms over the last two weeks. It has 9 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day) with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9)</measure>
      <time_frame>at 2 months</time_frame>
      <description>is to measure for depression, where participants are asked to rate how often they were bothered by specific symptoms over the last two weeks. It has 9 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day) with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <enrollment type="Anticipated">30</enrollment>
    <condition>Older Adults</condition>
    <intervention>
      <intervention_type>Behavioral</intervention_type>
      <intervention_name>Conversation about arts and culture</intervention_name>
      <description>intergenerational conversation about arts and culture between older adults and international students who native language is not English.</description>
    </intervention>
    <eligibility>
      <study_pop>
        <textblock>
          residents living in low income housing&#xD;
        </textblock>
      </study_pop>
      <sampling_method>Probability Sample</sampling_method>
      <criteria>
        <textblock>
          Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
  &#xD;
            1. Live alone&#xD;
  &#xD;
            2. older than 60 years old&#xD;
  &#xD;
            3. Residence in a subsidized apartment for at least one year&#xD;
  &#xD;
            4. Able to carry on a daily conversation with or without hearing aids&#xD;
  &#xD;
            5. Intact cognition as indicated by a score of greater than 5 on the Short Portable&#xD;
               Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ)&#xD;
  &#xD;
            6. have a working smart phone that can do video-conferencing&#xD;
  &#xD;
            7. being able to provide informed consent&#xD;
  &#xD;
          Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
  &#xD;
            1. having physical, or sensory (visual or hearing) deficits or language barriers&#xD;
               (non-English communicators) that may impede study participation&#xD;
  &#xD;
            2. non-English speaker&#xD;
        </textblock>
      </criteria>
      <gender>All</gender>
      <minimum_age>60 Years</minimum_age>
      <maximum_age>N/A</maximum_age>
      <healthy_volunteers>Accepts Healthy Volunteers</healthy_volunteers>
    </eligibility>
    <overall_contact>
      <last_name>Hon K Yuen, PhD</last_name>
      <phone>2059346301</phone>
      <email>yuen@uab.edu</email>
    </overall_contact>
    <location>
      <facility>
        <name>University of Alabama at Birmingham</name>
        <address>
          <city>Birmingham</city>
          <state>Alabama</state>
          <zip>35294</zip>
          <country>United States</country>
        </address>
      </facility>
    </location>
    <location_countries>
      <country>United States</country>
    </location_countries>
    <verification_date>September 2023</verification_date>
    <study_first_submitted>August 2, 2023</study_first_submitted>
    <study_first_submitted_qc>August 2, 2023</study_first_submitted_qc>
    <study_first_posted type="Actual">August 14, 2023</study_first_posted>
    <last_update_submitted>September 7, 2023</last_update_submitted>
    <last_update_submitted_qc>September 7, 2023</last_update_submitted_qc>
    <last_update_posted type="Actual">September 8, 2023</last_update_posted>
    <responsible_party>
      <responsible_party_type>Principal Investigator</responsible_party_type>
      <investigator_affiliation>University of Alabama at Birmingham</investigator_affiliation>
      <investigator_full_name>Hon K. Yuen, PhD</investigator_full_name>
      <investigator_title>Professor</investigator_title>
    </responsible_party>
    <patient_data>
      <sharing_ipd>No</sharing_ipd>
    </patient_data>
    <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
  </clinical_study>
  
  
text: download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
  link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
  url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05986149
  org study id: IRB-300008546
  nct id: NCT05986149
  lead sponsor: 
  has dmc: No
  is fda regulated drug: No
  is fda regulated device: No
  The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact on older adults' wellbeing of
        participating in a 10-week conversation about arts and culture with an international
        university student whose native language is not English.
  Older adults residing in subsidized housing will participate in a series of online
        conversations over 10 weeks about various arts and culture with an international university
        student enrolled at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB); each weekly session will
        last for about 30 min to one hour.
  
        Participants will complete survey questionnaires before and after the 10-week conversation
        program, and an exit interview at the end of the conversation program.
  observational model: Cohort
  time perspective: Prospective
  measure: University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale
  time frame: baseline
  description: (ULS-8, Hays & Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.
  measure: University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale
  time frame: at 10 weeks
  description: (ULS-8, Hays & Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.
  measure: University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale
  time frame: at 2 months
  description: (ULS-8, Hays & Dimatteo, 1987) measures one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. It has 8 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=never to 3=always) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of loneliness. Some items require reverse scoring.
  measure: De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
  time frame: baseline
  description: De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.
  measure: De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
  time frame: at 10 weeks
  description: De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.
  measure: De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
  time frame: at 2 months
  description: De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale - 6 items) measures one's emotional loneliness (lack of intimate relationship, 3 items) and social loneliness (lack of wider social network, 3 items). There are negatively (1-3) and positively (4-6) worded items. On the negatively worded items, the neutral and positive answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 1-3 score Yes=1, More or less=1, and No=0. On the positively worded items, the neutral and negative answers are scored as "1". Therefore, on questions 4-6, score Yes=0, More or less=1, and No=1. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, with 0=least lonely, and 6=most lonely.
  measure: Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)
  time frame: baseline
  description: It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.
  measure: Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)
  time frame: at 10 weeks
  description: It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.
  measure: Social Connectedness Scale (SCS)
  time frame: at 2 months
  description: It has 8 items rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly agree to 6=strongly disagree) with higher scores indicating a more reported sense of social connectedness and belongingness.
  measure: Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)
  time frame: baseline
  description: It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.
  measure: Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)
  time frame: at 10 weeks
  description: It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.
  measure: Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS)
  time frame: at 2 months
  description: It has 3 items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ( 'none of the time' = 1 to 'all of the time' = 5) with higher scores indicating a more positive social interaction.
  measure: Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
  time frame: baseline
  description: SWLS (Diener et al., 1985) is used to evaluate the global self-assessment of one's quality of life. The SWLS consists of five statements where participants indicated how much they agreed or disagreed with each statement about their life satisfaction using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with one's life.
  measure: Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
  time frame: at 10 weeks
  description: SWLS (Diener et al., 1985) is used to evaluate the global self-assessment of one's quality of life. The SWLS consists of five statements where participants indicated how much they agreed or disagreed with each statement about their life satisfaction using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with one's life.
  measure: Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
  time frame: at 2 months
  description: SWLS (Diener et al., 1985) is used to evaluate the global self-assessment of one's quality of life. The SWLS consists of five statements where participants indicated how much they agreed or disagreed with each statement about their life satisfaction using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with one's life.
  measure: Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)
  time frame: baseline
  description: The WEMWBS is intended to measure a person's functioning aspects of mental well-being (Stranges et al., 2014). The scale consists of 14 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = none of the time to 5 = all of the time). The total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater mental well-being.
  measure: Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)
  time frame: at 10 weeks
  description: The WEMWBS is intended to measure a person's functioning aspects of mental well-being (Stranges et al., 2014). The scale consists of 14 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = none of the time to 5 = all of the time). The total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater mental well-being.
  measure: Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)
  time frame: at 2 months
  description: The WEMWBS is intended to measure a person's functioning aspects of mental well-being (Stranges et al., 2014). The scale consists of 14 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = none of the time to 5 = all of the time). The total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater mental well-being.
  measure: Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9)
  time frame: baseline
  description: is to measure for depression, where participants are asked to rate how often they were bothered by specific symptoms over the last two weeks. It has 9 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day) with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression.
  measure: Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9)
  time frame: at 10 weeks
  description: is to measure for depression, where participants are asked to rate how often they were bothered by specific symptoms over the last two weeks. It has 9 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day) with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression.
  measure: Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 items (PHQ-9)
  time frame: at 2 months
  description: is to measure for depression, where participants are asked to rate how often they were bothered by specific symptoms over the last two weeks. It has 9 items rated on a 4-level frequency score scale (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day) with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression.
  intervention type: Behavioral
  intervention name: Conversation about arts and culture
  description: intergenerational conversation about arts and culture between older adults and international students who native language is not English.
  study pop: 
  sampling method: Probability Sample
  criteria: 
  gender: All
  minimum age: 60 Years
  maximum age: N/A
  healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
  last name: Hon K Yuen, PhD
  phone: 2059346301
  email: yuen@uab.edu
  facility: 
  country: United States
  responsible party type: Principal Investigator
  investigator affiliation: University of Alabama at Birmingham
  investigator full name: Hon K. Yuen, PhD
  investigator title: Professor
  sharing ipd: No