xml: <clinical_study>
    <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
      https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
    <required_header>
      <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
      <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
      <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05997797</url>
    </required_header>
    <id_info>
      <org_study_id>IRB- UOL-FAHS/810-XXII/2021</org_study_id>
      <nct_id>NCT05997797</nct_id>
    </id_info>
    <brief_title>Translation and Reliability of FAAM-U</brief_title>
    <official_title>Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of Urdu Version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-U)</official_title>
    <sponsors>
      <lead_sponsor>
        <agency>University of Lahore</agency>
        <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
      </lead_sponsor>
    </sponsors>
    <source>University of Lahore</source>
    <oversight_info>
      <has_dmc>No</has_dmc>
      <is_fda_regulated_drug>No</is_fda_regulated_drug>
      <is_fda_regulated_device>No</is_fda_regulated_device>
    </oversight_info>
    <brief_summary>
      <textblock>
        This study is designed to translate and validate the FAAM questionnaire to the Urdu language,&#xD;
        to interpret its psychometric properties, and to determine the reliability of scores obtained&#xD;
        from the population of Pakistan. The translated version of the gold standard tool will be&#xD;
        used by the local population as well as Urdu-speaking immigrants across the globe to better&#xD;
        understand and report the severity of their symptoms. Hence, to improve quality of life&#xD;
        across cultures, there is a need of standard outcome measures in Urdu language.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </brief_summary>
    <overall_status>Completed</overall_status>
    <start_date type="Actual">July 2, 2022</start_date>
    <completion_date type="Actual">November 15, 2022</completion_date>
    <primary_completion_date type="Actual">September 7, 2022</primary_completion_date>
    <study_type>Observational</study_type>
    <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
    <study_design_info>
      <observational_model>Other</observational_model>
      <time_perspective>Prospective</time_perspective>
    </study_design_info>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>FAAM-U</measure>
      <time_frame>72 Hours</time_frame>
      <description>The FAAM is made out of two subscales including ADL and Sports subscales that have a complete score of 84 and 32, individually. Also, toward the finish of the structure, patients were approached to rate the current degree of function with a 4-point Likert scale</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <number_of_groups>1</number_of_groups>
    <enrollment type="Actual">175</enrollment>
    <condition>Foot Injuries</condition>
    <condition>Ankle Injuries</condition>
    <arm_group>
      <arm_group_label>Single Group</arm_group_label>
      <description>A total of 175 patients with a range of foot or ankle problems were included for the review. Informed consent was taken from the review members in written form. They all finished the Urdu version of FAAM in the test session. With a time, span of 3 days after the primary recording, a total of the 175 patients whose conditions were relied upon to stay stable were approached to complete the forms again in the retest meeting; no treatment was given during this time-frame. The FAAM is made out of two subscales including ADL and Sports subscales that have a complete score of 84 and 32, individually. Also, toward the finish of the structure, patients were approached to rate the current degree of function with a 4-point Likert scale. Patients evaluated everything as indicated by the trouble they go over with each undertaking on account of their foot or ankle condition. After assortment, information was saved in a safe spot to keep away from any dispositions.</description>
    </arm_group>
    <intervention>
      <intervention_type>Other</intervention_type>
      <intervention_name>FAAM</intervention_name>
      <description>The FAAM is made out of two subscales including ADL and Sports subscales that have a complete score of 84 and 32, individually</description>
      <arm_group_label>Single Group</arm_group_label>
    </intervention>
    <eligibility>
      <study_pop>
        <textblock>
          With a time, span of 3 days after the primary recording, a total of the 175 patients whose&#xD;
          conditions were relied upon to stay stable were approached to complete the forms again in&#xD;
          the retest meeting; no treatment was given during this time-frame.&#xD;
        </textblock>
      </study_pop>
      <sampling_method>Non-Probability Sample</sampling_method>
      <criteria>
        <textblock>
          Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Ankle and foot disorders, referred by a general physician or surgeon,&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Conscious&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Ambulatory&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Able to write and read Urdu language&#xD;
  &#xD;
          Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  inflammatory disease&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  vascular diseases&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  neural diseases&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  cancer&#xD;
        </textblock>
      </criteria>
      <gender>All</gender>
      <minimum_age>16 Years</minimum_age>
      <maximum_age>44 Years</maximum_age>
      <healthy_volunteers>No</healthy_volunteers>
    </eligibility>
    <location>
      <facility>
        <name>The University of Lahore</name>
        <address>
          <city>Lahore</city>
          <state>Punjab</state>
          <zip>54000</zip>
          <country>Pakistan</country>
        </address>
      </facility>
    </location>
    <location_countries>
      <country>Pakistan</country>
    </location_countries>
    <reference>
      <citation>Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1995 Dec 13;274(22):1800-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.22.1800. No abstract available. Erratum In: JAMA 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1232.</citation>
      <PMID>7500513</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Cervera-Garvi P, Ortega-Avila AB, Morales-Asencio JM, Cervera-Marin JA, Martin RR, Gijon-Nogueron G. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Spanish version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-Sp). J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Aug 22;10:39. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0221-6. eCollection 2017.</citation>
      <PMID>28852426</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Carcia CR, Martin RL, Drouin JM. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):179-83. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.179.</citation>
      <PMID>18345343</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.</citation>
      <PMID>17161752</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Feb;37(2):72-84. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2403.</citation>
      <PMID>17366962</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gabel CP, Bennett P. Cross cultural adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 May 17;12:75. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-75.</citation>
      <PMID>24885123</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7818. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7818. No abstract available.</citation>
      <PMID>25670183</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gabel PC. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jul 26;11:126. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-126.</citation>
      <PMID>23889883</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Forget NJ, Higgins J. Comparison of generic patient-reported outcome measures used with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: linking process using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). J Rehabil Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):327-34. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1784.</citation>
      <PMID>24531349</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>De Noronha M, Refshauge KM, Kilbreath SL, Figueiredo VG. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(26):1959-65. doi: 10.1080/09638280701809872.</citation>
      <PMID>18720109</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Martin RL, Hutt DM, Wukich DK. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Diabetes Mellitus. Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Apr;30(4):297-302. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0297.</citation>
      <PMID>19356352</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.</citation>
      <PMID>11124735</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Bago d'Uva T, Van Doorslaer E, Lindeboom M, O'Donnell O. Does reporting heterogeneity bias the measurement of health disparities? Health Econ. 2008 Mar;17(3):351-75. doi: 10.1002/hec.1269.</citation>
      <PMID>17701960</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Lin CI, Houtenbos S, Lu YH, Mayer F, Wippert PM. The epidemiology of chronic ankle instability with perceived ankle instability- a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2021 May 28;14(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13047-021-00480-w.</citation>
      <PMID>34049565</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Lopez-Lopez D, Perez-Rios M, Ruano-Ravina A, Losa-Iglesias ME, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Romero-Morales C, Calvo-Lobo C, Navarro-Flores E. Impact of quality of life related to foot problems: a case-control study. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 15;11(1):14515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93902-5.</citation>
      <PMID>34267276</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Saleh, A.M., et al., PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF TRANSLATED ARABIC VERSION OF FOOT AND ANKLE ABILITY MEASURE QUESTIONNAIRE. 32: p. 3.</citation>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Nauck T, Lohrer H. Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;45(10):785-90. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.067637. Epub 2009 Dec 2.</citation>
      <PMID>19955163</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Bravini E, Bargeri S, Moroso M, Plebani G, Ferriero G. [Foot and ankle ability measure: cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL)]. Med Lav. 2014 Jul 15;105(5):357-65. Italian.</citation>
      <PMID>25134631</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Negahban H, Sohani SM, Taghizadeh F, Feizi A, Karimi A, Parnianpour M. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Jun;18(6):755-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Mar 23.</citation>
      <PMID>20338253</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Uematsu D, Suzuki H, Sasaki S, Nagano Y, Shinozuka N, Sunagawa N, Fukubayashi T. Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure. J Athl Train. 2015 Jan;50(1):65-70. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.42. Epub 2014 Oct 13.</citation>
      <PMID>25310247</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Angthong C. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Dec;22(4):224-228. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 13.</citation>
      <PMID>27810018</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Li GZ, Ruiz Munoz M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(21):2182-2189. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219772. Epub 2016 Sep 6.</citation>
      <PMID>27597231</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Celik D, Malkoc M, Martin R. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Rheumatol Int. 2016 Oct;36(10):1469-76. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3485-4. Epub 2016 May 2.</citation>
      <PMID>27136921</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Borloz S, Crevoisier X, Deriaz O, Ballabeni P, Martin RL, Luthi F. Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Feb 8;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-40.</citation>
      <PMID>21303520</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Nov;26(11):968-83. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601113.</citation>
      <PMID>16309613</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Brown, T.A., Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2015: Guilford publications.</citation>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12 Suppl 2):S15-20. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619.</citation>
      <PMID>11128900</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.12.</citation>
      <PMID>2002127</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Maskey, R., et al., Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research. 2018. 34(2): p. 91- 111.</citation>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Arunakul M, Arunakul P, Suesiritumrong C, Angthong C, Chernchujit B. Validity and Reliability of Thai Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Subjective Form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jun;98(6):561-7.</citation>
      <PMID>26219160</PMID>
    </reference>
    <reference>
      <citation>Kline, R.B., 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications.</citation>
    </reference>
    <verification_date>August 2023</verification_date>
    <study_first_submitted>August 1, 2023</study_first_submitted>
    <study_first_submitted_qc>August 11, 2023</study_first_submitted_qc>
    <study_first_posted type="Actual">August 18, 2023</study_first_posted>
    <last_update_submitted>August 11, 2023</last_update_submitted>
    <last_update_submitted_qc>August 11, 2023</last_update_submitted_qc>
    <last_update_posted type="Actual">August 18, 2023</last_update_posted>
    <responsible_party>
      <responsible_party_type>Sponsor</responsible_party_type>
    </responsible_party>
    <condition_browse>
      <!-- CAUTION:  The following MeSH terms are assigned with an imperfect algorithm            -->
      <mesh_term>Wounds and Injuries</mesh_term>
      <mesh_term>Ankle Injuries</mesh_term>
      <mesh_term>Foot Injuries</mesh_term>
    </condition_browse>
    <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
  </clinical_study>
  
  
text: download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
  link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
  url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05997797
  org study id: IRB- UOL-FAHS/810-XXII/2021
  nct id: NCT05997797
  lead sponsor: 
  has dmc: No
  is fda regulated drug: No
  is fda regulated device: No
  This study is designed to translate and validate the FAAM questionnaire to the Urdu language,
        to interpret its psychometric properties, and to determine the reliability of scores obtained
        from the population of Pakistan. The translated version of the gold standard tool will be
        used by the local population as well as Urdu-speaking immigrants across the globe to better
        understand and report the severity of their symptoms. Hence, to improve quality of life
        across cultures, there is a need of standard outcome measures in Urdu language.
  observational model: Other
  time perspective: Prospective
  measure: FAAM-U
  time frame: 72 Hours
  description: The FAAM is made out of two subscales including ADL and Sports subscales that have a complete score of 84 and 32, individually. Also, toward the finish of the structure, patients were approached to rate the current degree of function with a 4-point Likert scale
  arm group label: Single Group
  description: A total of 175 patients with a range of foot or ankle problems were included for the review. Informed consent was taken from the review members in written form. They all finished the Urdu version of FAAM in the test session. With a time, span of 3 days after the primary recording, a total of the 175 patients whose conditions were relied upon to stay stable were approached to complete the forms again in the retest meeting; no treatment was given during this time-frame. The FAAM is made out of two subscales including ADL and Sports subscales that have a complete score of 84 and 32, individually. Also, toward the finish of the structure, patients were approached to rate the current degree of function with a 4-point Likert scale. Patients evaluated everything as indicated by the trouble they go over with each undertaking on account of their foot or ankle condition. After assortment, information was saved in a safe spot to keep away from any dispositions.
  intervention type: Other
  intervention name: FAAM
  description: The FAAM is made out of two subscales including ADL and Sports subscales that have a complete score of 84 and 32, individually
  arm group label: Single Group
  study pop: 
  sampling method: Non-Probability Sample
  criteria: 
  gender: All
  minimum age: 16 Years
  maximum age: 44 Years
  healthy volunteers: No
  facility: 
  country: Pakistan
  citation: Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1995 Dec 13;274(22):1800-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.22.1800. No abstract available. Erratum In: JAMA 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1232.
  PMID: 7500513
  citation: Cervera-Garvi P, Ortega-Avila AB, Morales-Asencio JM, Cervera-Marin JA, Martin RR, Gijon-Nogueron G. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Spanish version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-Sp). J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Aug 22;10:39. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0221-6. eCollection 2017.
  PMID: 28852426
  citation: Carcia CR, Martin RL, Drouin JM. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):179-83. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.179.
  PMID: 18345343
  citation: Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
  PMID: 17161752
  citation: Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Feb;37(2):72-84. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2403.
  PMID: 17366962
  citation: Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gabel CP, Bennett P. Cross cultural adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 May 17;12:75. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-75.
  PMID: 24885123
  citation: Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7818. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7818. No abstract available.
  PMID: 25670183
  citation: Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gabel PC. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jul 26;11:126. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-126.
  PMID: 23889883
  citation: Forget NJ, Higgins J. Comparison of generic patient-reported outcome measures used with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: linking process using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). J Rehabil Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):327-34. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1784.
  PMID: 24531349
  citation: De Noronha M, Refshauge KM, Kilbreath SL, Figueiredo VG. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(26):1959-65. doi: 10.1080/09638280701809872.
  PMID: 18720109
  citation: Martin RL, Hutt DM, Wukich DK. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Diabetes Mellitus. Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Apr;30(4):297-302. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0297.
  PMID: 19356352
  citation: Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.
  PMID: 11124735
  citation: Bago d'Uva T, Van Doorslaer E, Lindeboom M, O'Donnell O. Does reporting heterogeneity bias the measurement of health disparities? Health Econ. 2008 Mar;17(3):351-75. doi: 10.1002/hec.1269.
  PMID: 17701960
  citation: Lin CI, Houtenbos S, Lu YH, Mayer F, Wippert PM. The epidemiology of chronic ankle instability with perceived ankle instability- a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2021 May 28;14(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13047-021-00480-w.
  PMID: 34049565
  citation: Lopez-Lopez D, Perez-Rios M, Ruano-Ravina A, Losa-Iglesias ME, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Romero-Morales C, Calvo-Lobo C, Navarro-Flores E. Impact of quality of life related to foot problems: a case-control study. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 15;11(1):14515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93902-5.
  PMID: 34267276
  citation: Saleh, A.M., et al., PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF TRANSLATED ARABIC VERSION OF FOOT AND ANKLE ABILITY MEASURE QUESTIONNAIRE. 32: p. 3.
  citation: Nauck T, Lohrer H. Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;45(10):785-90. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.067637. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
  PMID: 19955163
  citation: Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Bravini E, Bargeri S, Moroso M, Plebani G, Ferriero G. [Foot and ankle ability measure: cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL)]. Med Lav. 2014 Jul 15;105(5):357-65. Italian.
  PMID: 25134631
  citation: Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Negahban H, Sohani SM, Taghizadeh F, Feizi A, Karimi A, Parnianpour M. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Jun;18(6):755-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
  PMID: 20338253
  citation: Uematsu D, Suzuki H, Sasaki S, Nagano Y, Shinozuka N, Sunagawa N, Fukubayashi T. Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure. J Athl Train. 2015 Jan;50(1):65-70. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.42. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
  PMID: 25310247
  citation: Angthong C. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Dec;22(4):224-228. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
  PMID: 27810018
  citation: Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Li GZ, Ruiz Munoz M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(21):2182-2189. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219772. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
  PMID: 27597231
  citation: Celik D, Malkoc M, Martin R. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Rheumatol Int. 2016 Oct;36(10):1469-76. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3485-4. Epub 2016 May 2.
  PMID: 27136921
  citation: Borloz S, Crevoisier X, Deriaz O, Ballabeni P, Martin RL, Luthi F. Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Feb 8;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-40.
  PMID: 21303520
  citation: Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Nov;26(11):968-83. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601113.
  PMID: 16309613
  citation: Brown, T.A., Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2015: Guilford publications.
  citation: Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12 Suppl 2):S15-20. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619.
  PMID: 11128900
  citation: Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.12.
  PMID: 2002127
  citation: Maskey, R., et al., Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research. 2018. 34(2): p. 91- 111.
  citation: Arunakul M, Arunakul P, Suesiritumrong C, Angthong C, Chernchujit B. Validity and Reliability of Thai Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Subjective Form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jun;98(6):561-7.
  PMID: 26219160
  citation: Kline, R.B., 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications.
  responsible party type: Sponsor
  mesh term: Wounds and Injuries
  mesh term: Ankle Injuries
  mesh term: Foot Injuries