xml: <clinical_study>
    <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
      https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
    <required_header>
      <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
      <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
      <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06009913</url>
    </required_header>
    <id_info>
      <org_study_id>21/8/2023asu</org_study_id>
      <nct_id>NCT06009913</nct_id>
    </id_info>
    <brief_title>Online Versus Real Time Dental Education</brief_title>
    <official_title>What is More Effective Online Versus Real Time Dental Education</official_title>
    <sponsors>
      <lead_sponsor>
        <agency>Ain Shams University</agency>
        <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
      </lead_sponsor>
    </sponsors>
    <source>Ain Shams University</source>
    <oversight_info>
      <has_dmc>Yes</has_dmc>
      <is_fda_regulated_drug>No</is_fda_regulated_drug>
      <is_fda_regulated_device>No</is_fda_regulated_device>
    </oversight_info>
    <brief_summary>
      <textblock>
        Through covid period the concept of distant, online and hybrid learning evolved in reaction&#xD;
        to lockdown. This hindered the capability of students to receive and practice on patients as&#xD;
        they should do. The current study compared data of two classes that had different education&#xD;
        systems because of COVID-19. Class 2020 had nearly a complete online teaching of theoretical&#xD;
        part, practical and minimal patient interaction. Class 2021 had the opportunity to try both&#xD;
        systems because of partial lockdown in 2020 and complete return to work in 2021.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </brief_summary>
    <detailed_description>
      <textblock>
        Methodology&#xD;
  &#xD;
        Evaluation of the quality of teaching of oral surgery curriculum during the COVID 19 lock&#xD;
        down.&#xD;
  &#xD;
        The Objective Achieving high quality teaching in similar future situations. The Standards&#xD;
        used for evaluation. The course report published by the faculty student's affair section and&#xD;
        the students survey.&#xD;
  &#xD;
        ETHICS &amp; ENGAGEMENT This data was collected from the course report published by the faculty&#xD;
        student's affair section. All students shared in the survey consented that their data can be&#xD;
        used and presented for research and audit purposes. All adjunctive research presented in this&#xD;
        audit got ethical clearance from the Faculty Ethical Committee.&#xD;
  &#xD;
        sample Fourth year students studying oral surgery had online teaching and forty students had&#xD;
        real time teaching.&#xD;
  &#xD;
        Survey Questions A short five-question survey was used to assess the students overall and was&#xD;
        given to 40 students from each class to assess the student's satisfaction with the quality of&#xD;
        the education.&#xD;
  &#xD;
        The survey questions:&#xD;
  &#xD;
          1. Technical skills taught during the academic year were valuable or not.&#xD;
  &#xD;
          2. real patients provide higher skills compared to dummies and models&#xD;
  &#xD;
          3. Teaching in real classroom is better than teaching through online portal&#xD;
  &#xD;
          4. do you prefer introudction of dummies before real time patients&#xD;
  &#xD;
          5. Regarding the overall satisfaction by the education system The survey portal had a&#xD;
             percentage satisfactory meter. Responses over 50% or equal 50% were considered yes and&#xD;
             responses below 50% were considered no.&#xD;
  &#xD;
        Statistical assessment:&#xD;
  &#xD;
        Chi-square test was used to assess the statistical significance between the results using&#xD;
        SPSS software.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </detailed_description>
    <overall_status>Completed</overall_status>
    <start_date type="Actual">January 1, 2022</start_date>
    <completion_date type="Actual">January 1, 2023</completion_date>
    <primary_completion_date type="Actual">January 1, 2023</primary_completion_date>
    <phase>N/A</phase>
    <study_type>Interventional</study_type>
    <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
    <study_design_info>
      <allocation>Randomized</allocation>
      <intervention_model>Parallel Assignment</intervention_model>
      <intervention_model_description>two group survey 40 students had online teaching 40 students had real time teaching</intervention_model_description>
      <primary_purpose>Health Services Research</primary_purpose>
      <masking>Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)</masking>
      <masking_description>triple blinded</masking_description>
    </study_design_info>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>effectiveness of online teaching</measure>
      <time_frame>3 months</time_frame>
      <description>through a survey 40 students will volunteer for online teaching education survey assessment</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <number_of_arms>2</number_of_arms>
    <enrollment type="Actual">80</enrollment>
    <condition>Educational Problems</condition>
    <arm_group>
      <arm_group_label>online teaching</arm_group_label>
      <arm_group_type>Experimental</arm_group_type>
      <description>Teaching was done completely online</description>
    </arm_group>
    <arm_group>
      <arm_group_label>Conventional class room</arm_group_label>
      <arm_group_type>Active Comparator</arm_group_type>
      <description>Teaching was done completely offline in classroom</description>
    </arm_group>
    <intervention>
      <intervention_type>Other</intervention_type>
      <intervention_name>online teaching</intervention_name>
      <description>teaching of subject was done using online system only</description>
      <arm_group_label>online teaching</arm_group_label>
    </intervention>
    <intervention>
      <intervention_type>Other</intervention_type>
      <intervention_name>In class teaching</intervention_name>
      <description>subjects were explained in normal class room</description>
      <arm_group_label>Conventional class room</arm_group_label>
    </intervention>
    <eligibility>
      <criteria>
        <textblock>
          Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  fourth year students attending normally in ain shams university&#xD;
  &#xD;
          Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  any student who is repeating or had this course before&#xD;
        </textblock>
      </criteria>
      <gender>All</gender>
      <minimum_age>20 Years</minimum_age>
      <maximum_age>21 Years</maximum_age>
      <healthy_volunteers>Accepts Healthy Volunteers</healthy_volunteers>
    </eligibility>
    <overall_official>
      <last_name>Mohamed diaa</last_name>
      <role>Study Chair</role>
      <affiliation>Ain shams</affiliation>
    </overall_official>
    <location>
      <facility>
        <name>Faculty of Dentistry Ain Shams University</name>
        <address>
          <city>Cairo</city>
          <zip>11361</zip>
          <country>Egypt</country>
        </address>
      </facility>
    </location>
    <location>
      <facility>
        <name>Ain shams University</name>
        <address>
          <city>Cairo</city>
          <zip>11757</zip>
          <country>Egypt</country>
        </address>
      </facility>
    </location>
    <location_countries>
      <country>Egypt</country>
    </location_countries>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Haridy R, Abdalla MA, Kaisarly D, Gezawi ME. A cross-sectional multicenter survey on the future of dental education in the era of COVID-19: Alternatives and implications. J Dent Educ. 2021 Apr;85(4):483-493. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12498. Epub 2020 Dec 1.</citation>
      <PMID>33263205</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <verification_date>August 2023</verification_date>
    <study_first_submitted>August 21, 2023</study_first_submitted>
    <study_first_submitted_qc>August 21, 2023</study_first_submitted_qc>
    <study_first_posted type="Actual">August 24, 2023</study_first_posted>
    <last_update_submitted>August 21, 2023</last_update_submitted>
    <last_update_submitted_qc>August 21, 2023</last_update_submitted_qc>
    <last_update_posted type="Actual">August 24, 2023</last_update_posted>
    <responsible_party>
      <responsible_party_type>Principal Investigator</responsible_party_type>
      <investigator_affiliation>Ain Shams University</investigator_affiliation>
      <investigator_full_name>Yasser Mohamed Nabil Ahmed Khirat El Hadidi</investigator_full_name>
      <investigator_title>Doctor</investigator_title>
    </responsible_party>
    <patient_data>
      <sharing_ipd>No</sharing_ipd>
      <ipd_description>Introduction: Through covid period the concept of distant, online and hybrid learning evolved in reaction to lockdown. This hindered the capability of students to receive and practice on patients as they should do.&#xD;
  Methodology: The current study compared data of two classes that had different education systems because of COVID-19.</ipd_description>
    </patient_data>
    <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
  </clinical_study>
  
  
text: download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
  link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
  url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06009913
  org study id: 21/8/2023asu
  nct id: NCT06009913
  lead sponsor: 
  has dmc: Yes
  is fda regulated drug: No
  is fda regulated device: No
  Through covid period the concept of distant, online and hybrid learning evolved in reaction
        to lockdown. This hindered the capability of students to receive and practice on patients as
        they should do. The current study compared data of two classes that had different education
        systems because of COVID-19. Class 2020 had nearly a complete online teaching of theoretical
        part, practical and minimal patient interaction. Class 2021 had the opportunity to try both
        systems because of partial lockdown in 2020 and complete return to work in 2021.
  Methodology
  
        Evaluation of the quality of teaching of oral surgery curriculum during the COVID 19 lock
        down.
  
        The Objective Achieving high quality teaching in similar future situations. The Standards
        used for evaluation. The course report published by the faculty student's affair section and
        the students survey.
  
        ETHICS & ENGAGEMENT This data was collected from the course report published by the faculty
        student's affair section. All students shared in the survey consented that their data can be
        used and presented for research and audit purposes. All adjunctive research presented in this
        audit got ethical clearance from the Faculty Ethical Committee.
  
        sample Fourth year students studying oral surgery had online teaching and forty students had
        real time teaching.
  
        Survey Questions A short five-question survey was used to assess the students overall and was
        given to 40 students from each class to assess the student's satisfaction with the quality of
        the education.
  
        The survey questions:
  
          1. Technical skills taught during the academic year were valuable or not.
  
          2. real patients provide higher skills compared to dummies and models
  
          3. Teaching in real classroom is better than teaching through online portal
  
          4. do you prefer introudction of dummies before real time patients
  
          5. Regarding the overall satisfaction by the education system The survey portal had a
             percentage satisfactory meter. Responses over 50% or equal 50% were considered yes and
             responses below 50% were considered no.
  
        Statistical assessment:
  
        Chi-square test was used to assess the statistical significance between the results using
        SPSS software.
  allocation: Randomized
  intervention model: Parallel Assignment
  intervention model description: two group survey 40 students had online teaching 40 students had real time teaching
  primary purpose: Health Services Research
  masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
  masking description: triple blinded
  measure: effectiveness of online teaching
  time frame: 3 months
  description: through a survey 40 students will volunteer for online teaching education survey assessment
  arm group label: online teaching
  arm group type: Experimental
  description: Teaching was done completely online
  arm group label: Conventional class room
  arm group type: Active Comparator
  description: Teaching was done completely offline in classroom
  intervention type: Other
  intervention name: online teaching
  description: teaching of subject was done using online system only
  arm group label: online teaching
  intervention type: Other
  intervention name: In class teaching
  description: subjects were explained in normal class room
  arm group label: Conventional class room
  criteria: 
  gender: All
  minimum age: 20 Years
  maximum age: 21 Years
  healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
  last name: Mohamed diaa
  role: Study Chair
  affiliation: Ain shams
  facility: 
  facility: 
  country: Egypt
  citation: Haridy R, Abdalla MA, Kaisarly D, Gezawi ME. A cross-sectional multicenter survey on the future of dental education in the era of COVID-19: Alternatives and implications. J Dent Educ. 2021 Apr;85(4):483-493. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12498. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
  PMID: 33263205
  responsible party type: Principal Investigator
  investigator affiliation: Ain Shams University
  investigator full name: Yasser Mohamed Nabil Ahmed Khirat El Hadidi
  investigator title: Doctor
  sharing ipd: No
  ipd description: Introduction: Through covid period the concept of distant, online and hybrid learning evolved in reaction to lockdown. This hindered the capability of students to receive and practice on patients as they should do.
  Methodology: The current study compared data of two classes that had different education systems because of COVID-19.