xml: <clinical_study>
    <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
      https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
    <required_header>
      <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
      <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
      <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06019585</url>
    </required_header>
    <id_info>
      <org_study_id>003may21PIInmovilizacionfxd</org_study_id>
      <nct_id>NCT06019585</nct_id>
    </id_info>
    <brief_title>Inmobilization With Compression Bandage vs Antebraquial Splint in Distal Radius Fractures</brief_title>
    <official_title>Inmobilization With Compression Bandage vs Antebraquial Splint in Distal Radius Fractures Operated by Internal Fixation With Volar Locking Plate: A Pilot Study</official_title>
    <sponsors>
      <lead_sponsor>
        <agency>Hospital Costa del Sol</agency>
        <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
      </lead_sponsor>
    </sponsors>
    <source>Hospital Costa del Sol</source>
    <oversight_info>
      <has_dmc>Yes</has_dmc>
      <is_fda_regulated_drug>No</is_fda_regulated_drug>
      <is_fda_regulated_device>No</is_fda_regulated_device>
    </oversight_info>
    <brief_summary>
      <textblock>
        The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of&#xD;
        distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilized&#xD;
        with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3 weeks.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </brief_summary>
    <detailed_description>
      <textblock>
        The aim of the study is to compare functional and radiological results as well as to evaluate&#xD;
        possible complications in distal radius fractures operated by open reduction and internal&#xD;
        fixation with volar locking plate in two groups , one treated with immobilization using a&#xD;
        forearm cast for 3 weeks and the other with immobilization using a compression bandage for 3&#xD;
        weeks, based on the hypothesis that compression bandage group could obtain better results in&#xD;
        the short term, and none of the treatments is superior to the other after 3 or 6 months of&#xD;
        evolution, as indicated by some reviewed studies.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </detailed_description>
    <overall_status>Recruiting</overall_status>
    <start_date type="Actual">June 1, 2021</start_date>
    <completion_date type="Anticipated">December 30, 2026</completion_date>
    <primary_completion_date type="Anticipated">December 30, 2026</primary_completion_date>
    <phase>N/A</phase>
    <study_type>Interventional</study_type>
    <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
    <study_design_info>
      <allocation>Randomized</allocation>
      <intervention_model>Parallel Assignment</intervention_model>
      <intervention_model_description>2 parallel groups, each one receives one treatment</intervention_model_description>
      <primary_purpose>Treatment</primary_purpose>
      <masking>Single (Outcomes Assessor)</masking>
      <masking_description>Patient receive the correspondant treatment based on the order of an aleatory numbers table</masking_description>
    </study_design_info>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>Pain in Visual Analogue Scale.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Points from 1 to 10. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>Function in Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation Scale.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Points from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>Range Of Motion in Flexion.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Grades from 0 to 70. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <primary_outcome>
      <measure>Range Of Motion in Flexion.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Grades from 0 to 80. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.</description>
    </primary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Function in Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scale.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Points from 1 to 150. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Function in Mayo Wrist Score Scale.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Points from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Range of motion in Supination.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Grades from 0 to 90. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Number of participants with posoperative complications.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Number of participants per group that suffer some complication or side effect during the follow-up period. Higher number of complications: worse value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Number of posoperative Fisiotherapy sessions performed.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Number of sessions per participant from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Time of fracture union in radiographs.</measure>
      <time_frame>12 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>Number of Weeks from 1 to 12. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Number of Instability distal radius fracture Criteria per participant.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Number of criteria from 1 to 6. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Grades of Dorsal Displacement in fracture.</measure>
      <time_frame>6 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>Grades from -10 to 30 grades. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Range of motion in Pronation.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Grades from 0 to 90. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Range of motion in Radial Deviation</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Grades from 0 to 15. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Range of motion in Ulnar deviation.</measure>
      <time_frame>1 year</time_frame>
      <description>Grades from 0 to 30. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Number of shortening millimeters in fracture.</measure>
      <time_frame>6 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>Number of millimeters from 0-10. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Number of ulnar variance millimeters in fracture.</measure>
      <time_frame>6 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>Number of millimeters from -2 to +4. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <secondary_outcome>
      <measure>Number of step-off millimeters in fracture.</measure>
      <time_frame>6 weeks</time_frame>
      <description>Number of millimeters from 0 to 4 mm. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.</description>
    </secondary_outcome>
    <number_of_arms>2</number_of_arms>
    <enrollment type="Anticipated">120</enrollment>
    <condition>Distal Radius Fractures</condition>
    <condition>Internal Fixation; Complications, Mechanical</condition>
    <arm_group>
      <arm_group_label>Splint inmmobilization</arm_group_label>
      <arm_group_type>Active Comparator</arm_group_type>
      <description>Distal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plate and immobilized with an antebrachial splint for 3 weeks</description>
    </arm_group>
    <arm_group>
      <arm_group_label>Bandage immovilization</arm_group_label>
      <arm_group_type>Active Comparator</arm_group_type>
      <description>Distal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plate and immobilized with a compressive bandage for 3 weeks</description>
    </arm_group>
    <intervention>
      <intervention_type>Device</intervention_type>
      <intervention_name>Splint inmmobilization</intervention_name>
      <description>After internal fixation with volar locking plate, groups of distal radius fractures are inmobilized with a plaster splint of París for 3 weeks</description>
      <arm_group_label>Splint inmmobilization</arm_group_label>
    </intervention>
    <intervention>
      <intervention_type>Device</intervention_type>
      <intervention_name>Bandage immovilization</intervention_name>
      <description>After internal fixation with volar locking plate, groups of distal radius fractures are inmobilized with compressive bandage for 3 weeks</description>
      <arm_group_label>Bandage immovilization</arm_group_label>
    </intervention>
    <eligibility>
      <criteria>
        <textblock>
          Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patients with type A, B, C fractures of AO classification of distal radius fractures&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patents aged between 18 and 75 years,&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patients operated on in the first 3 weeks after the trauma, and independent for the&#xD;
               basic activities of daily living&#xD;
  &#xD;
          Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patients with open fractures&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patients with mental disorders (dementia, alcoholism, etc.),&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patient dependent for basic activities of daily living&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patients with fractures with severe articular and metaphyseal comminution and/or&#xD;
               severe soft tissue injuries (type 2R3C3 AO),&#xD;
  &#xD;
            -  Patients with previous diseases or anatomical alterations in the injured wrist&#xD;
               (previous fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.).&#xD;
        </textblock>
      </criteria>
      <gender>All</gender>
      <minimum_age>18 Years</minimum_age>
      <maximum_age>75 Years</maximum_age>
      <healthy_volunteers>No</healthy_volunteers>
    </eligibility>
    <overall_official>
      <last_name>Alberto Izquierdo Fernández, Phd</last_name>
      <role>Study Director</role>
      <affiliation>Hospital Reina Sofía ( Córdoba, Spain)</affiliation>
    </overall_official>
    <overall_contact>
      <last_name>Jose Ignacio Miró Jiménez, MD</last_name>
      <phone>+34 674501958</phone>
      <email>ppnxmj89@gmail.com</email>
    </overall_contact>
    <overall_contact_backup>
      <last_name>Alberto Izquierdo Fernández, Phd</last_name>
      <phone>+34 667789977</phone>
      <email>alberto.izquierdo.fer@hotmail.com</email>
    </overall_contact_backup>
    <location>
      <facility>
        <name>Hospital Reina Sofía</name>
        <address>
          <city>Córdoba</city>
          <zip>14004</zip>
          <country>Spain</country>
        </address>
      </facility>
      <status>Recruiting</status>
    </location>
    <location>
      <facility>
        <name>Hospital Costa del Sol</name>
        <address>
          <city>Málaga</city>
          <zip>29603</zip>
          <country>Spain</country>
        </address>
      </facility>
      <status>Recruiting</status>
      <investigator>
        <last_name>Francisco Rivas, Phd</last_name>
        <role>Sub-Investigator</role>
      </investigator>
    </location>
    <location_countries>
      <country>Spain</country>
    </location_countries>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Delft EAKV, Gelder TGV, Vries R, Vermeulen J, Bloemers FW. Duration of Cast Immobilization in Distal Radial Fractures: A Systematic Review. J Wrist Surg. 2019 Oct;8(5):430-438. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683433. Epub 2019 Mar 18.</citation>
      <PMID>31579555</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Quadlbauer S, Pezzei C, Jurkowitsch J, Kolmayr B, Keuchel T, Simon D, Hausner T, Leixnering M. Early Rehabilitation of Distal Radius Fractures Stabilized by Volar Locking Plate: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study. J Wrist Surg. 2017 May;6(2):102-112. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587317. Epub 2016 Aug 5.</citation>
      <PMID>28428911</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Toemen A, Collocott S, Heiss-Dunlop W. Short Term Outcomes Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation Surgery for a Distal Radius Fracture: 2 Week Versus 4 Week Immobilization. A Retrospective Analysis. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Mar 25;12:21514593211004528. doi: 10.1177/21514593211004528. eCollection 2021.</citation>
      <PMID>35186419</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Klein SM, Prantl L, Koller M, Vykoukal J, Dolderer JH, Graf S, Nerlich M, Loibl M, Geis S. Evidence based postoperative treatment of distal radius fractures following internal locking plate fixation. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(1):33-40.</citation>
      <PMID>25748659</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Lichtman DM, Bindra RR, Boyer MI, Putnam MD, Ring D, Slutsky DJ, Taras JS, Watters WC 3rd, Goldberg MJ, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Haralson RH 3rd, Boyer KM, Hitchcock K, Raymond L; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the treatment of distal radius fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 20;93(8):775-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.938ebo. No abstract available.</citation>
      <PMID>21508285</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Valdes K, Naughton N, Michlovitz S. Therapist supervised clinic-based therapy versus instruction in a home program following distal radius fracture: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2014 Jul-Sep;27(3):165-73; quiz 174. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 3.</citation>
      <PMID>24508093</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Driessens S, Diserens-Chew T, Burton C, Lassig E, Hartley C, McPhail S. A retrospective cohort investigation of active range of motion within one week of open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;26(3):225-30; quiz 231. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 14.</citation>
      <PMID>23770202</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Koval K, Haidukewych GJ, Service B, Zirgibel BJ. Controversies in the management of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;22(9):566-75. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-566.</citation>
      <PMID>25157038</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Lozano-Calderon SA, Souer S, Mudgal C, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Wrist mobilization following volar plate fixation of fractures of the distal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun;90(6):1297-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01368.</citation>
      <PMID>18519324</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <results_reference>
      <citation>Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063. No abstract available.</citation>
      <PMID>29256945</PMID>
    </results_reference>
    <verification_date>August 2023</verification_date>
    <study_first_submitted>July 24, 2023</study_first_submitted>
    <study_first_submitted_qc>August 25, 2023</study_first_submitted_qc>
    <study_first_posted type="Actual">August 31, 2023</study_first_posted>
    <last_update_submitted>August 25, 2023</last_update_submitted>
    <last_update_submitted_qc>August 25, 2023</last_update_submitted_qc>
    <last_update_posted type="Actual">August 31, 2023</last_update_posted>
    <responsible_party>
      <responsible_party_type>Sponsor</responsible_party_type>
    </responsible_party>
    <keyword>distal radius fractures</keyword>
    <keyword>volar plate</keyword>
    <keyword>internal fixation</keyword>
    <keyword>Inmobilization</keyword>
    <condition_browse>
      <!-- CAUTION:  The following MeSH terms are assigned with an imperfect algorithm            -->
      <mesh_term>Fractures, Bone</mesh_term>
      <mesh_term>Radius Fractures</mesh_term>
      <mesh_term>Wrist Fractures</mesh_term>
    </condition_browse>
    <patient_data>
      <sharing_ipd>No</sharing_ipd>
    </patient_data>
    <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
  </clinical_study>
  
  
text: download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
  link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
  url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06019585
  org study id: 003may21PIInmovilizacionfxd
  nct id: NCT06019585
  lead sponsor: 
  has dmc: Yes
  is fda regulated drug: No
  is fda regulated device: No
  The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of
        distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilized
        with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3 weeks.
  The aim of the study is to compare functional and radiological results as well as to evaluate
        possible complications in distal radius fractures operated by open reduction and internal
        fixation with volar locking plate in two groups , one treated with immobilization using a
        forearm cast for 3 weeks and the other with immobilization using a compression bandage for 3
        weeks, based on the hypothesis that compression bandage group could obtain better results in
        the short term, and none of the treatments is superior to the other after 3 or 6 months of
        evolution, as indicated by some reviewed studies.
  allocation: Randomized
  intervention model: Parallel Assignment
  intervention model description: 2 parallel groups, each one receives one treatment
  primary purpose: Treatment
  masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
  masking description: Patient receive the correspondant treatment based on the order of an aleatory numbers table
  measure: Pain in Visual Analogue Scale.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Points from 1 to 10. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
  measure: Function in Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation Scale.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Points from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
  measure: Range Of Motion in Flexion.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Grades from 0 to 70. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
  measure: Range Of Motion in Flexion.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Grades from 0 to 80. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
  measure: Function in Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scale.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Points from 1 to 150. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value
  measure: Function in Mayo Wrist Score Scale.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Points from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
  measure: Range of motion in Supination.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Grades from 0 to 90. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
  measure: Number of participants with posoperative complications.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Number of participants per group that suffer some complication or side effect during the follow-up period. Higher number of complications: worse value.
  measure: Number of posoperative Fisiotherapy sessions performed.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Number of sessions per participant from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
  measure: Time of fracture union in radiographs.
  time frame: 12 weeks
  description: Number of Weeks from 1 to 12. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
  measure: Number of Instability distal radius fracture Criteria per participant.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Number of criteria from 1 to 6. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
  measure: Grades of Dorsal Displacement in fracture.
  time frame: 6 weeks
  description: Grades from -10 to 30 grades. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
  measure: Range of motion in Pronation.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Grades from 0 to 90. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
  measure: Range of motion in Radial Deviation
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Grades from 0 to 15. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
  measure: Range of motion in Ulnar deviation.
  time frame: 1 year
  description: Grades from 0 to 30. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
  measure: Number of shortening millimeters in fracture.
  time frame: 6 weeks
  description: Number of millimeters from 0-10. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
  measure: Number of ulnar variance millimeters in fracture.
  time frame: 6 weeks
  description: Number of millimeters from -2 to +4. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
  measure: Number of step-off millimeters in fracture.
  time frame: 6 weeks
  description: Number of millimeters from 0 to 4 mm. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
  arm group label: Splint inmmobilization
  arm group type: Active Comparator
  description: Distal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plate and immobilized with an antebrachial splint for 3 weeks
  arm group label: Bandage immovilization
  arm group type: Active Comparator
  description: Distal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plate and immobilized with a compressive bandage for 3 weeks
  intervention type: Device
  intervention name: Splint inmmobilization
  description: After internal fixation with volar locking plate, groups of distal radius fractures are inmobilized with a plaster splint of París for 3 weeks
  arm group label: Splint inmmobilization
  intervention type: Device
  intervention name: Bandage immovilization
  description: After internal fixation with volar locking plate, groups of distal radius fractures are inmobilized with compressive bandage for 3 weeks
  arm group label: Bandage immovilization
  criteria: 
  gender: All
  minimum age: 18 Years
  maximum age: 75 Years
  healthy volunteers: No
  last name: Alberto Izquierdo Fernández, Phd
  role: Study Director
  affiliation: Hospital Reina Sofía ( Córdoba, Spain)
  last name: Jose Ignacio Miró Jiménez, MD
  phone: +34 674501958
  email: ppnxmj89@gmail.com
  last name: Alberto Izquierdo Fernández, Phd
  phone: +34 667789977
  email: alberto.izquierdo.fer@hotmail.com
  facility: 
  status: Recruiting
  facility: 
  status: Recruiting
  investigator: 
  country: Spain
  citation: Delft EAKV, Gelder TGV, Vries R, Vermeulen J, Bloemers FW. Duration of Cast Immobilization in Distal Radial Fractures: A Systematic Review. J Wrist Surg. 2019 Oct;8(5):430-438. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683433. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
  PMID: 31579555
  citation: Quadlbauer S, Pezzei C, Jurkowitsch J, Kolmayr B, Keuchel T, Simon D, Hausner T, Leixnering M. Early Rehabilitation of Distal Radius Fractures Stabilized by Volar Locking Plate: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study. J Wrist Surg. 2017 May;6(2):102-112. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587317. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
  PMID: 28428911
  citation: Toemen A, Collocott S, Heiss-Dunlop W. Short Term Outcomes Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation Surgery for a Distal Radius Fracture: 2 Week Versus 4 Week Immobilization. A Retrospective Analysis. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Mar 25;12:21514593211004528. doi: 10.1177/21514593211004528. eCollection 2021.
  PMID: 35186419
  citation: Klein SM, Prantl L, Koller M, Vykoukal J, Dolderer JH, Graf S, Nerlich M, Loibl M, Geis S. Evidence based postoperative treatment of distal radius fractures following internal locking plate fixation. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(1):33-40.
  PMID: 25748659
  citation: Lichtman DM, Bindra RR, Boyer MI, Putnam MD, Ring D, Slutsky DJ, Taras JS, Watters WC 3rd, Goldberg MJ, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Haralson RH 3rd, Boyer KM, Hitchcock K, Raymond L; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the treatment of distal radius fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 20;93(8):775-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.938ebo. No abstract available.
  PMID: 21508285
  citation: Valdes K, Naughton N, Michlovitz S. Therapist supervised clinic-based therapy versus instruction in a home program following distal radius fracture: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2014 Jul-Sep;27(3):165-73; quiz 174. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
  PMID: 24508093
  citation: Driessens S, Diserens-Chew T, Burton C, Lassig E, Hartley C, McPhail S. A retrospective cohort investigation of active range of motion within one week of open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;26(3):225-30; quiz 231. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
  PMID: 23770202
  citation: Koval K, Haidukewych GJ, Service B, Zirgibel BJ. Controversies in the management of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;22(9):566-75. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-566.
  PMID: 25157038
  citation: Lozano-Calderon SA, Souer S, Mudgal C, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Wrist mobilization following volar plate fixation of fractures of the distal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun;90(6):1297-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01368.
  PMID: 18519324
  citation: Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063. No abstract available.
  PMID: 29256945
  responsible party type: Sponsor
  mesh term: Fractures, Bone
  mesh term: Radius Fractures
  mesh term: Wrist Fractures
  sharing ipd: No