<clinical_study>
  <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
  <required_header>
    <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
    <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
    <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04488523</url>
  </required_header>
  <id_info>
    <org_study_id>1928922</org_study_id>
    <nct_id>NCT04488523</nct_id>
  </id_info>
  <brief_title>Family Telehealth Project for Foster Care Youth</brief_title>
  <official_title>Leveraging Technology to Improve Family Relationships for Adolescents in Out-of-Home Placement</official_title>
  <sponsors>
    <lead_sponsor>
      <agency>University of California, San Francisco</agency>
      <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
    </lead_sponsor>
    <collaborator>
      <agency>Visa Foundation</agency>
      <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
    </collaborator>
  </sponsors>
  <source>University of California, San Francisco</source>
  <oversight_info>
    <has_dmc>No</has_dmc>
    <is_fda_regulated_drug>No</is_fda_regulated_drug>
    <is_fda_regulated_device>No</is_fda_regulated_device>
  </oversight_info>
  <brief_summary>
    <textblock>
      The purpose of this research is to adapt and evaluate the efficacy of an existing family&#xD;
      based intervention to be delivered via telehealth to child welfare-involved (CWI) youth and&#xD;
      their caregiver of origin.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </brief_summary>
  <detailed_description>
    <textblock>
      The goal of this study is to adapt and evaluate the efficacy of an existing empirically&#xD;
      supported, family-based affect management intervention to be delivered via telehealth. There&#xD;
      are two versions of this intervention: 1) a dyadic version to be delivered to CWI youth and&#xD;
      their caregiver of origin, and 2) a caregiver-only version to be delivered to any caregiver&#xD;
      (including kinship caregivers) of a CWI youth. The study involves iteratively adapting the&#xD;
      intervention with feedback from youth and caregiver participants and stakeholder partners, as&#xD;
      well as evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the&#xD;
      intervention.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </detailed_description>
  <overall_status>Recruiting</overall_status>
  <start_date type="Actual">July 1, 2019</start_date>
  <completion_date type="Anticipated">July 2023</completion_date>
  <primary_completion_date type="Anticipated">July 2023</primary_completion_date>
  <phase>N/A</phase>
  <study_type>Interventional</study_type>
  <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
  <study_design_info>
    <allocation>N/A</allocation>
    <intervention_model>Single Group Assignment</intervention_model>
    <intervention_model_description>This study is designed to iteratively adapt a family-based intervention with feedback from youth and caregiver participants and stakeholder partners, as well as to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the intervention.</intervention_model_description>
    <primary_purpose>Treatment</primary_purpose>
    <masking>None (Open Label)</masking>
  </study_design_info>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure caregiver and youth affect management skills. Scores range from 36 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater problems with emotion regulation.</description>
  </primary_outcome>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure caregiver and youth affect management skills. Scores range from 36 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater problems with emotion regulation.</description>
  </primary_outcome>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>Parent-adolescent General Communication Scale (PPAC)</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure caregiver-youth communication. The PPAC measures both positive and negative communication. Scores for positive communication ranging from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating more positive communication. Scores for negative communication range from 13 to 65, with higher scores indicating more negative communication.</description>
  </primary_outcome>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>Parent-adolescent General Communication Scale</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure caregiver-youth communication. The PPAC measures both positive and negative communication. Scores for positive communication ranging from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating more positive communication. Scores for negative communication range from 13 to 65, with higher scores indicating more negative communication.</description>
  </primary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Telehealth Satisfaction Questionnaire</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure attitudes about the delivery of the intervention via telehealth.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Family telehealth feedback form</measure>
    <time_frame>Two weeks post-baseline.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Family telehealth feedback form</measure>
    <time_frame>Three weeks post-baseline.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Family telehealth feedback form</measure>
    <time_frame>Four weeks post-baseline.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Family telehealth feedback form</measure>
    <time_frame>Five weeks post-baseline.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Family telehealth feedback form</measure>
    <time_frame>Nine weeks post-baseline.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Family Assessment Device</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention</time_frame>
    <description>To measure general family functioning, affective responsiveness, and affective involvement. Scores range from 1 to 4 for each of the scales, with higher scores reflecting unhealthy family functioning.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Family Assessment Device</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure general family functioning, affective responsiveness, and affective involvement. Scores range from 1 to 4 for each of the scales, with higher scores reflecting unhealthy family functioning.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure caregiver-youth relationship quality and caregiver parenting stress. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale, with raw scores then categorized as within normal limits, borderline, clinically significant, or clinically severe.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure caregiver-youth relationship quality and caregiver parenting stress. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale, with raw scores then categorized as within normal limits, borderline, clinically significant, or clinically severe.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Pediatric Symptom Checklist</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure youth psychiatric symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 70, with scores of 30 or higher indicating psychological impairment.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Pediatric Symptom Checklist</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure youth psychiatric symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 70, with scores of 30 or higher indicating psychological impairment.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Homelessness Asset and Risk Screening Tool</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure risk for homelessness and residential stability.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Homelessness Asset and Risk Screening Tool</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure risk for homelessness and residential stability.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Adolescent Risk Behavior Assessment</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure youth substance use and youth sexual risk behavior.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Adolescent Risk Behavior Assessment</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure youth substance use and youth sexual risk behavior.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>National Stressful Events Survey PTSD Short Scale</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To assess the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder in youth. The item are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater severity of acute stress disorder.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>National Stressful Events Survey PTSD Short Scale</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To assess the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder in youth. The item are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater severity of acute stress disorder.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Texas Christian University Drug Screen 5 - Opioid Supplement</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure youth substance use.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Texas Christian University Drug Screen 5 - Opioid Supplement</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To measure youth substance use.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Asian American Family Conflict Scale</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To assess caregiver perceptions of intergenerational acculturation conflict. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater family conflict.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Asian American Family Conflict Scale</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To assess caregiver perceptions of intergenerational acculturation conflict. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater family conflict.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>DSM-5 Cross Cutting Symptom Inventory</measure>
    <time_frame>Immediately after the intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To assess caregiver mental health domains that are important across psychiatric diagnoses. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). The score on each item within a domain should be reviewed. A rating of mild (i.e., 2) or greater on any item within a domain (except for substance use, suicidal ideation, and psychosis) and a rating of slight (i.e., 1) or greater on any item within a substance use, suicidal ideation, or psychosis domain may serve as a guide for additional inquiry and follow up to determine if a more detailed assessment for that domain is necessary.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>DSM-5 Cross Cutting Symptom Inventory</measure>
    <time_frame>Three months post-intervention.</time_frame>
    <description>To assess caregiver mental health domains that are important across psychiatric diagnoses. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). The score on each item within a domain should be reviewed. A rating of mild (i.e., 2) or greater on any item within a domain (except for substance use, suicidal ideation, and psychosis) and a rating of slight (i.e., 1) or greater on any item within a substance use, suicidal ideation, or psychosis domain may serve as a guide for additional inquiry and follow up to determine if a more detailed assessment for that domain is necessary.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <number_of_arms>1</number_of_arms>
  <enrollment type="Anticipated">300</enrollment>
  <condition>Parent-Child Relations</condition>
  <condition>Communication</condition>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Family-based Telehealth Treatment</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Experimental</arm_group_type>
    <description>A family-based telehealth intervention.</description>
  </arm_group>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Behavioral</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>Family-based Telehealth Intervention</intervention_name>
    <description>The Family Telehealth intervention focuses on improving parent-child relationships and communication.&#xD;
For the dyadic version, the intervention involves eleven hours of intervention material; it includes motivational interviews, individual and joint sessions co-led by two separate clinicians. The sessions will be delivered on a weekly basis.&#xD;
For the caregiver-only version, the intervention involves six hours of intervention material; it includes a motivational interview and individual sessions led by a single clinician. The sessions will be delivered on a weekly basis.</description>
    <arm_group_label>Family-based Telehealth Treatment</arm_group_label>
  </intervention>
  <eligibility>
    <criteria>
      <textblock>
        Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
        Eligible youth:&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Will be between the ages of 12 and 18 years&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Will have ongoing child welfare involvement&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Will be proficient in English&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Will have no cognitive impairment which would preclude provision of informed assent&#xD;
&#xD;
        Eligible caregivers for dyadic version:&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Will be the caregiver of origin for the enrolled youth&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Will be proficient in English or Spanish&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Will be cognitively capable of providing informed consent for themselves and their&#xD;
             youth&#xD;
&#xD;
        Eligible caregivers for caregiver-only version:&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Will be the caregiver of a youth, between the ages of 12 and 18 years, with ongoing&#xD;
             child welfare involvement&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Will be proficient in English or Spanish&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Will have no cognitive impairment which would preclude provision of informed consent&#xD;
&#xD;
        Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Caregivers whose rights were terminated due to substantiated abuse or neglect.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </criteria>
    <gender>All</gender>
    <minimum_age>12 Years</minimum_age>
    <maximum_age>N/A</maximum_age>
    <healthy_volunteers>No</healthy_volunteers>
  </eligibility>
  <overall_official>
    <last_name>Marina Tolou-Shams, PhD</last_name>
    <role>Principal Investigator</role>
    <affiliation>University of California, San Francisco</affiliation>
  </overall_official>
  <overall_contact>
    <last_name>Marina Tolou-Shams, PhD</last_name>
    <phone>628-206-2212</phone>
    <email>marina.tolou-shams@ucsf.edu</email>
  </overall_contact>
  <overall_contact_backup>
    <last_name>Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan</last_name>
    <phone>415-509-5999</phone>
    <email>Lakshmi.Gopalakrishnan@ucsf.edu</email>
  </overall_contact_backup>
  <location>
    <facility>
      <name>UCSF Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital</name>
      <address>
        <city>San Francisco</city>
        <state>California</state>
        <zip>94131</zip>
        <country>United States</country>
      </address>
    </facility>
    <status>Recruiting</status>
    <contact>
      <last_name>Marina Tolou-Shams, PhD</last_name>
      <phone>628-206-2212</phone>
      <email>marina.tolou-shams@ucsf.edu</email>
    </contact>
  </location>
  <location_countries>
    <country>United States</country>
  </location_countries>
  <verification_date>November 2022</verification_date>
  <study_first_submitted>July 2, 2020</study_first_submitted>
  <study_first_submitted_qc>July 24, 2020</study_first_submitted_qc>
  <study_first_posted type="Actual">July 28, 2020</study_first_posted>
  <last_update_submitted>November 30, 2022</last_update_submitted>
  <last_update_submitted_qc>November 30, 2022</last_update_submitted_qc>
  <last_update_posted type="Actual">December 2, 2022</last_update_posted>
  <responsible_party>
    <responsible_party_type>Sponsor</responsible_party_type>
  </responsible_party>
  <keyword>telehealth</keyword>
  <keyword>parent-child relationships</keyword>
  <keyword>adolescent</keyword>
  <keyword>Quality communication</keyword>
  <keyword>Housing stability</keyword>
  <keyword>Child welfare</keyword>
  <keyword>Emotional regulation</keyword>
  <patient_data>
    <sharing_ipd>No</sharing_ipd>
  </patient_data>
  <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
</clinical_study>


download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04488523
org study id: 1928922
nct id: NCT04488523
lead sponsor: 
collaborator: 
has dmc: No
is fda regulated drug: No
is fda regulated device: No
The purpose of this research is to adapt and evaluate the efficacy of an existing family
      based intervention to be delivered via telehealth to child welfare-involved (CWI) youth and
      their caregiver of origin.
The goal of this study is to adapt and evaluate the efficacy of an existing empirically
      supported, family-based affect management intervention to be delivered via telehealth. There
      are two versions of this intervention: 1) a dyadic version to be delivered to CWI youth and
      their caregiver of origin, and 2) a caregiver-only version to be delivered to any caregiver
      (including kinship caregivers) of a CWI youth. The study involves iteratively adapting the
      intervention with feedback from youth and caregiver participants and stakeholder partners, as
      well as evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the
      intervention.
allocation: N/A
intervention model: Single Group Assignment
intervention model description: This study is designed to iteratively adapt a family-based intervention with feedback from youth and caregiver participants and stakeholder partners, as well as to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the intervention.
primary purpose: Treatment
masking: None (Open Label)
measure: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To measure caregiver and youth affect management skills. Scores range from 36 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater problems with emotion regulation.
measure: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To measure caregiver and youth affect management skills. Scores range from 36 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater problems with emotion regulation.
measure: Parent-adolescent General Communication Scale (PPAC)
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To measure caregiver-youth communication. The PPAC measures both positive and negative communication. Scores for positive communication ranging from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating more positive communication. Scores for negative communication range from 13 to 65, with higher scores indicating more negative communication.
measure: Parent-adolescent General Communication Scale
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To measure caregiver-youth communication. The PPAC measures both positive and negative communication. Scores for positive communication ranging from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating more positive communication. Scores for negative communication range from 13 to 65, with higher scores indicating more negative communication.
measure: Telehealth Satisfaction Questionnaire
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To measure attitudes about the delivery of the intervention via telehealth.
measure: Family telehealth feedback form
time frame: Two weeks post-baseline.
description: To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.
measure: Family telehealth feedback form
time frame: Three weeks post-baseline.
description: To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.
measure: Family telehealth feedback form
time frame: Four weeks post-baseline.
description: To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.
measure: Family telehealth feedback form
time frame: Five weeks post-baseline.
description: To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.
measure: Family telehealth feedback form
time frame: Nine weeks post-baseline.
description: To measure attitudes about the content and delivery of the intervention.
measure: Family Assessment Device
time frame: Immediately after the intervention
description: To measure general family functioning, affective responsiveness, and affective involvement. Scores range from 1 to 4 for each of the scales, with higher scores reflecting unhealthy family functioning.
measure: Family Assessment Device
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To measure general family functioning, affective responsiveness, and affective involvement. Scores range from 1 to 4 for each of the scales, with higher scores reflecting unhealthy family functioning.
measure: Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To measure caregiver-youth relationship quality and caregiver parenting stress. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale, with raw scores then categorized as within normal limits, borderline, clinically significant, or clinically severe.
measure: Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To measure caregiver-youth relationship quality and caregiver parenting stress. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale, with raw scores then categorized as within normal limits, borderline, clinically significant, or clinically severe.
measure: Pediatric Symptom Checklist
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To measure youth psychiatric symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 70, with scores of 30 or higher indicating psychological impairment.
measure: Pediatric Symptom Checklist
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To measure youth psychiatric symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 70, with scores of 30 or higher indicating psychological impairment.
measure: Homelessness Asset and Risk Screening Tool
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To measure risk for homelessness and residential stability.
measure: Homelessness Asset and Risk Screening Tool
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To measure risk for homelessness and residential stability.
measure: Adolescent Risk Behavior Assessment
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To measure youth substance use and youth sexual risk behavior.
measure: Adolescent Risk Behavior Assessment
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To measure youth substance use and youth sexual risk behavior.
measure: National Stressful Events Survey PTSD Short Scale
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To assess the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder in youth. The item are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater severity of acute stress disorder.
measure: National Stressful Events Survey PTSD Short Scale
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To assess the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder in youth. The item are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater severity of acute stress disorder.
measure: Texas Christian University Drug Screen 5 - Opioid Supplement
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To measure youth substance use.
measure: Texas Christian University Drug Screen 5 - Opioid Supplement
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To measure youth substance use.
measure: Asian American Family Conflict Scale
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To assess caregiver perceptions of intergenerational acculturation conflict. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater family conflict.
measure: Asian American Family Conflict Scale
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To assess caregiver perceptions of intergenerational acculturation conflict. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale. Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater family conflict.
measure: DSM-5 Cross Cutting Symptom Inventory
time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
description: To assess caregiver mental health domains that are important across psychiatric diagnoses. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). The score on each item within a domain should be reviewed. A rating of mild (i.e., 2) or greater on any item within a domain (except for substance use, suicidal ideation, and psychosis) and a rating of slight (i.e., 1) or greater on any item within a substance use, suicidal ideation, or psychosis domain may serve as a guide for additional inquiry and follow up to determine if a more detailed assessment for that domain is necessary.
measure: DSM-5 Cross Cutting Symptom Inventory
time frame: Three months post-intervention.
description: To assess caregiver mental health domains that are important across psychiatric diagnoses. The items are scored on a 5-point rating scale (from 0 to 4). The score on each item within a domain should be reviewed. A rating of mild (i.e., 2) or greater on any item within a domain (except for substance use, suicidal ideation, and psychosis) and a rating of slight (i.e., 1) or greater on any item within a substance use, suicidal ideation, or psychosis domain may serve as a guide for additional inquiry and follow up to determine if a more detailed assessment for that domain is necessary.
arm group label: Family-based Telehealth Treatment
arm group type: Experimental
description: A family-based telehealth intervention.
intervention type: Behavioral
intervention name: Family-based Telehealth Intervention
description: The Family Telehealth intervention focuses on improving parent-child relationships and communication.
For the dyadic version, the intervention involves eleven hours of intervention material; it includes motivational interviews, individual and joint sessions co-led by two separate clinicians. The sessions will be delivered on a weekly basis.
For the caregiver-only version, the intervention involves six hours of intervention material; it includes a motivational interview and individual sessions led by a single clinician. The sessions will be delivered on a weekly basis.
arm group label: Family-based Telehealth Treatment
criteria: 
gender: All
minimum age: 12 Years
maximum age: N/A
healthy volunteers: No
last name: Marina Tolou-Shams, PhD
role: Principal Investigator
affiliation: University of California, San Francisco
last name: Marina Tolou-Shams, PhD
phone: 628-206-2212
email: marina.tolou-shams@ucsf.edu
last name: Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan
phone: 415-509-5999
email: Lakshmi.Gopalakrishnan@ucsf.edu
facility: 
status: Recruiting
contact: 
country: United States
responsible party type: Sponsor
sharing ipd: No