<clinical_study>
  <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
  <required_header>
    <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
    <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
    <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03834181</url>
  </required_header>
  <id_info>
    <org_study_id>18-003</org_study_id>
    <nct_id>NCT03834181</nct_id>
  </id_info>
  <brief_title>Evaluation of a Telemedicine System for Patients Carried for Bariatric Surgery</brief_title>
  <acronym>Bartélémis</acronym>
  <official_title>Evaluation of a Telemedicine System for Patients Carried for Bariatric Surgery</official_title>
  <sponsors>
    <lead_sponsor>
      <agency>IHU Strasbourg</agency>
      <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
    </lead_sponsor>
  </sponsors>
  <source>IHU Strasbourg</source>
  <oversight_info>
    <has_dmc>No</has_dmc>
    <is_fda_regulated_drug>No</is_fda_regulated_drug>
    <is_fda_regulated_device>No</is_fda_regulated_device>
  </oversight_info>
  <brief_summary>
    <textblock>
      This study is intended to study the feasibility of a telemedicine system to monitor and&#xD;
      control certain vital parameters before and after surgery for obesity. During the&#xD;
      preoperative preparation phase, weight, exercise, blood pressure and heart rate are recorded&#xD;
      and transmitted to the patient's surgeon. In the immediate post operative period, the heart&#xD;
      rate is a sensitive and reliable indicator of the occurrence of a complication. A telemetry&#xD;
      system will allow rapid home return, continuous monitoring and early warning in the event of&#xD;
      a problem. Prolonged follow-up identical to that started preoperatively should allow&#xD;
      improvement and better control of weight loss by monitoring especially physical exercise.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </brief_summary>
  <detailed_description>
    <textblock>
      The evolution of the health system requires a rationalization of the supply of care and the&#xD;
      care of patients. It has allowed the evolution and generalization of ambulatory surgery for&#xD;
      certain pathologies. For other pathologies, a hospital stay is still desirable with a&#xD;
      tendency to decrease the length of stay. Thanks to the telemedicine platforms, specialized&#xD;
      medical monitoring can be extended pre- and post-operatively to ensure good patient&#xD;
      preparation and quality secure follow-up.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Early return to home is an essential parameter in optimizing the distribution of hospital&#xD;
      resources. Several studies have shown improved clinical outcomes, fewer complications, more&#xD;
      beds available, and lower hospital costs. The development of outpatient surgery has enabled&#xD;
      the establishment of systems allowing a return home in secure conditions. Early return home&#xD;
      is also a wish of the patient. He becomes an actor of his own health. Obesity surgery is an&#xD;
      exemplary specialty for the care of patients. The ideal course of care is perfectly codified&#xD;
      both preoperatively and postoperatively. Nevertheless, this ideal care path is not always&#xD;
      respected especially in structures too small to offer a real integrated multidisciplinary&#xD;
      follow-up. Pre- and postoperative management solutions on the Internet exist but require a&#xD;
      voluntary and active adherence of the patient. They allow a stronger involvement of the&#xD;
      patient in his approach, they are nascent and integrate no connected solution for automated&#xD;
      monitoring of the patient. Telemedicine can now allow continuous monitoring without the need&#xD;
      for face-to-face interaction. The automatic collection of the physical activity and the heart&#xD;
      rate makes it possible to guarantee the involvement of the patient in his preparation. After&#xD;
      the intervention, the monitoring of the occurrence of complications can be delegated to&#xD;
      connected objects with alert transmission according to parameters defined in advance. In&#xD;
      particular, the heart rate is a sensitive indicator and will be followed by two sensors&#xD;
      (activity bracelet and pulse oximeter). These complications occur mainly in the 15 days&#xD;
      following the intervention, they are rare in immediate postoperative. The hospital stay is no&#xD;
      longer necessary for a simple surveillance. In case of receipt of an alert, the surgeon&#xD;
      contacts the patient to check his state of health. An adapted action is then engaged.&#xD;
&#xD;
      The late postoperative follow-up throughout this document corresponds to the phase following&#xD;
      the immediate postoperative phase. This late postoperative follow-up can be improved with the&#xD;
      support of telemonitoring (activity, change in weight.) The addition of connected devices&#xD;
      allows a stronger and faster interaction between the patient and his doctors, providing close&#xD;
      monitoring and appropriate support.&#xD;
&#xD;
      The study focuses on assessing the reliability of a remote monitoring system. The&#xD;
      implementation of this remote monitoring system is subordinated to the reliability of the&#xD;
      data transmissions between the connected objects and the remote site which receives the data,&#xD;
      interprets them and generates the alerts.&#xD;
&#xD;
      The motivation of the patient is appreciated by the acceptance of connected objects.&#xD;
&#xD;
      During this study, the remote monitoring system is offered in addition to the usual care. The&#xD;
      usual care does not change and is not impaired. This study concerns only one group of&#xD;
      patients, there is no control group since the investigators seek to validate the reliability&#xD;
      of remote surveillance.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </detailed_description>
  <overall_status>Completed</overall_status>
  <start_date type="Actual">April 15, 2019</start_date>
  <completion_date type="Actual">August 31, 2020</completion_date>
  <primary_completion_date type="Actual">August 31, 2020</primary_completion_date>
  <phase>N/A</phase>
  <study_type>Interventional</study_type>
  <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
  <study_design_info>
    <allocation>N/A</allocation>
    <intervention_model>Single Group Assignment</intervention_model>
    <primary_purpose>Supportive Care</primary_purpose>
    <masking>None (Open Label)</masking>
  </study_design_info>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>Reliability of a remote monitoring system during treatment for bariatric surgery evaluated in days between two failures</measure>
    <time_frame>From the inclusion to 6 months after the surgery</time_frame>
    <description>The reliability of the system, corresponding to the average time between two failures, over the 9 months of study for each of the 30 patients. A failure is a momentary and abrupt loss of the ability of the system to transmit data.</description>
  </primary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Patient acceptance of adding a telemonitoring device to their care evaluated in percentage of patients who signed a consent</measure>
    <time_frame>Inclusion period of 4 months</time_frame>
    <description>Acceptance is the ratio of the number of patients who signed the consent to the number of total patients to whom the study was presented as a percentage.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Relevance of the data received from each connected object (activity bracelet, scales, blood pressure monitor, thermometer and pulse oximeter) evaluated in percentage of data sent and verified</measure>
    <time_frame>Study duration of 18 months</time_frame>
    <description>The relevance of the data corresponds to the number of data sent and verified, using the alert system, of each of the connected objects (activity bracelet, scales, blood pressure monitor, thermometer and pulse oximeter) the number of data sent by the system over the entire duration of the study (activity bracelet, scale, tensiometer) or the entire immediate postoperative period (thermometer, pulse oximeter), in percentage.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Durability of the data over a defined period evaluated in number of connections.</measure>
    <time_frame>From the inclusion to 6 months after the surgery</time_frame>
    <description>The durability of the data corresponds to the number of connections interrupted or lost in a duration of more than 90 minutes per patient</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Ratio of the number of patients who performed all the prescribed autonomic measures requested on the total number of patients included in the study</measure>
    <time_frame>Study duration of 18 months</time_frame>
    <description>Ratio of the number of patients who performed all the prescribed autonomic measures requested on the total number of patients included in the study, as a percentage. It will be evaluated by age categories (18-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 54-65 years), sex (male and female) and obesity classes (35.00 ≤ BMI). ≤ 39.99 kg / m² and BMI ≥ 40.00 kg / m²)</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <number_of_arms>1</number_of_arms>
  <enrollment type="Actual">24</enrollment>
  <condition>Bariatric Surgery Candidate</condition>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Monitoring evaluation</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Experimental</arm_group_type>
    <description>Monitoring evaluation by connected devices: Wristband activity tracker &quot;Garmin Vivosmart® 3&quot;, &quot;Fora® Scale 550&quot;, &quot;Terraillon® Tensioscreen&quot;, Pulse oximeter &quot;Nonin® 3230&quot;, thermometer &quot;Fora® IR20b&quot;</description>
  </arm_group>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Device</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>Monitoring evaluation by connected devices: Wristband activity tracker &quot;Garmin Vivosmart® 3&quot;, &quot;Fora® Scale 550&quot;, &quot;Terraillon® Tensioscreen&quot;, Pulse oximeter &quot;Nonin® 3230&quot;, thermometer &quot;Fora® IR20b&quot;</intervention_name>
    <description>All patients will be monitored before and after the bariatric surgery:&#xD;
During the preoperative preparation phase: weight, exercise, blood pressure and heart rate&#xD;
In the immediate post operative period: continuous monitoring of the heart rate with a telemetry system&#xD;
Prolonged follow-up: weight, exercise, blood pressure and heart rate</description>
    <arm_group_label>Monitoring evaluation</arm_group_label>
  </intervention>
  <eligibility>
    <criteria>
      <textblock>
        Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          1. Patient (s) applying for bariatric surgery&#xD;
&#xD;
          2. Patient aged 18 to 65&#xD;
&#xD;
          3. Compliance with the High Authority of Health (HAS) criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
               -  BMI&gt; 40 without comorbidities&#xD;
&#xD;
               -  BMI&gt; 35 with cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory or rheumatic comorbidity,&#xD;
&#xD;
               -  Psychological follow-up well followed for 4 to 6 months&#xD;
&#xD;
          4. Patient with an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score less than or equal&#xD;
             to 2&#xD;
&#xD;
          5. Patient able to receive and understand information about the study&#xD;
&#xD;
          6. Patient able to manipulate connected objects&#xD;
&#xD;
          7. Patient (e) affiliated to the French social security system&#xD;
&#xD;
          8. Patient who does not live in the white area of wireless telephone coverage.&#xD;
&#xD;
        Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          1. Patient unable to give informed consent&#xD;
&#xD;
          2. Patient unable to use the connected tools (Internet)&#xD;
&#xD;
          3. Patient whose general condition is not favorable to participation in the study&#xD;
&#xD;
          4. Patient presenting, in the opinion of the investigator, a condition that may prevent&#xD;
             participation in the procedures provided for in the study&#xD;
&#xD;
          5. Patient in exclusion period (determined by previous or current study)&#xD;
&#xD;
          6. Patient under the protection of justice&#xD;
&#xD;
          7. Patient under guardianship or trusteeship&#xD;
&#xD;
          8. Patient with epilepsy&#xD;
&#xD;
          9. Patient who is sensitive to light flashes&#xD;
&#xD;
         10. Patient with deformity of the ear&#xD;
&#xD;
         11. Patient with bleeding ear&#xD;
&#xD;
        Exclusion Criteria :&#xD;
&#xD;
          1. Patient whose home is in a white GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) zone or&#xD;
             white zone in reception and 3G (third generation) transmission&#xD;
&#xD;
          2. Patient (e) not knowing how to use connected objects.&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </criteria>
    <gender>All</gender>
    <minimum_age>18 Years</minimum_age>
    <maximum_age>65 Years</maximum_age>
    <healthy_volunteers>No</healthy_volunteers>
  </eligibility>
  <overall_official>
    <last_name>Michel Vix, MD</last_name>
    <role>Principal Investigator</role>
    <affiliation>Service Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Nouvel Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg</affiliation>
  </overall_official>
  <location>
    <facility>
      <name>Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, NHC</name>
      <address>
        <city>Strasbourg</city>
        <zip>67 091</zip>
        <country>France</country>
      </address>
    </facility>
  </location>
  <location_countries>
    <country>France</country>
  </location_countries>
  <reference>
    <citation>Loots E, Sartorius B, Paruk IM, Clarke DL. The Successful Implementation of a Modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Bariatric Surgery in a South African Teaching Hospital. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Feb;28(1):26-29. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000488.</citation>
    <PMID>29064879</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, Burr M, Birch C, Babor R, MacCormick AD, Arroll B, Hill AG. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):482-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9026. Epub 2013 Jan 21.</citation>
    <PMID>23339040</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Jonsson A, Lin E, Patel L, Patel AD, Stetler JL, Prayor-Patterson H, Singh A, Srinivasan JK, Sweeney JF, Davis SS Jr. Barriers to Enhanced Recovery after Surgery after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):605-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Jan 5.</citation>
    <PMID>29309941</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Aman MW, Stem M, Schweitzer MA, Magnuson TH, Lidor AO. Early hospital readmission after bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2231-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4483-4. Epub 2015 Oct 19.</citation>
    <PMID>26482158</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Kampmeijer R, Pavlova M, Tambor M, Golinowska S, Groot W. The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 5;16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):290. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1522-3.</citation>
    <PMID>27608677</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Wang Y, Xue H, Huang Y, Huang L, Zhang D. A Systematic Review of Application and Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Obesity and Diabetes Treatment and Self-Management. Adv Nutr. 2017 May 15;8(3):449-462. doi: 10.3945/an.116.014100. Print 2017 May.</citation>
    <PMID>28507010</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Chen SY, Stem M, Schweitzer MA, Magnuson TH, Lidor AO. Assessment of postdischarge complications after bariatric surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):777-86. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.04.028. Epub 2015 Jun 19.</citation>
    <PMID>26096563</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Montravers P, Augustin P, Zappella N, Dufour G, Arapis K, Chosidow D, Fournier P, Ribeiro-Parienti L, Marmuse JP, Desmard M. Diagnosis and management of the postoperative surgical and medical complications of bariatric surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015 Feb;34(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2014.06.002. Epub 2015 Mar 5.</citation>
    <PMID>25829315</PMID>
  </reference>
  <verification_date>February 2021</verification_date>
  <study_first_submitted>February 5, 2019</study_first_submitted>
  <study_first_submitted_qc>February 6, 2019</study_first_submitted_qc>
  <study_first_posted type="Actual">February 7, 2019</study_first_posted>
  <last_update_submitted>February 9, 2021</last_update_submitted>
  <last_update_submitted_qc>February 9, 2021</last_update_submitted_qc>
  <last_update_posted type="Actual">February 10, 2021</last_update_posted>
  <responsible_party>
    <responsible_party_type>Sponsor</responsible_party_type>
  </responsible_party>
  <keyword>Connected devices</keyword>
  <keyword>Telemetry</keyword>
  <keyword>Obesity surgery</keyword>
  <patient_data>
    <sharing_ipd>No</sharing_ipd>
  </patient_data>
  <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
</clinical_study>


download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03834181
org study id: 18-003
nct id: NCT03834181
lead sponsor: 
has dmc: No
is fda regulated drug: No
is fda regulated device: No
This study is intended to study the feasibility of a telemedicine system to monitor and
      control certain vital parameters before and after surgery for obesity. During the
      preoperative preparation phase, weight, exercise, blood pressure and heart rate are recorded
      and transmitted to the patient's surgeon. In the immediate post operative period, the heart
      rate is a sensitive and reliable indicator of the occurrence of a complication. A telemetry
      system will allow rapid home return, continuous monitoring and early warning in the event of
      a problem. Prolonged follow-up identical to that started preoperatively should allow
      improvement and better control of weight loss by monitoring especially physical exercise.
The evolution of the health system requires a rationalization of the supply of care and the
      care of patients. It has allowed the evolution and generalization of ambulatory surgery for
      certain pathologies. For other pathologies, a hospital stay is still desirable with a
      tendency to decrease the length of stay. Thanks to the telemedicine platforms, specialized
      medical monitoring can be extended pre- and post-operatively to ensure good patient
      preparation and quality secure follow-up.

      Early return to home is an essential parameter in optimizing the distribution of hospital
      resources. Several studies have shown improved clinical outcomes, fewer complications, more
      beds available, and lower hospital costs. The development of outpatient surgery has enabled
      the establishment of systems allowing a return home in secure conditions. Early return home
      is also a wish of the patient. He becomes an actor of his own health. Obesity surgery is an
      exemplary specialty for the care of patients. The ideal course of care is perfectly codified
      both preoperatively and postoperatively. Nevertheless, this ideal care path is not always
      respected especially in structures too small to offer a real integrated multidisciplinary
      follow-up. Pre- and postoperative management solutions on the Internet exist but require a
      voluntary and active adherence of the patient. They allow a stronger involvement of the
      patient in his approach, they are nascent and integrate no connected solution for automated
      monitoring of the patient. Telemedicine can now allow continuous monitoring without the need
      for face-to-face interaction. The automatic collection of the physical activity and the heart
      rate makes it possible to guarantee the involvement of the patient in his preparation. After
      the intervention, the monitoring of the occurrence of complications can be delegated to
      connected objects with alert transmission according to parameters defined in advance. In
      particular, the heart rate is a sensitive indicator and will be followed by two sensors
      (activity bracelet and pulse oximeter). These complications occur mainly in the 15 days
      following the intervention, they are rare in immediate postoperative. The hospital stay is no
      longer necessary for a simple surveillance. In case of receipt of an alert, the surgeon
      contacts the patient to check his state of health. An adapted action is then engaged.

      The late postoperative follow-up throughout this document corresponds to the phase following
      the immediate postoperative phase. This late postoperative follow-up can be improved with the
      support of telemonitoring (activity, change in weight.) The addition of connected devices
      allows a stronger and faster interaction between the patient and his doctors, providing close
      monitoring and appropriate support.

      The study focuses on assessing the reliability of a remote monitoring system. The
      implementation of this remote monitoring system is subordinated to the reliability of the
      data transmissions between the connected objects and the remote site which receives the data,
      interprets them and generates the alerts.

      The motivation of the patient is appreciated by the acceptance of connected objects.

      During this study, the remote monitoring system is offered in addition to the usual care. The
      usual care does not change and is not impaired. This study concerns only one group of
      patients, there is no control group since the investigators seek to validate the reliability
      of remote surveillance.
allocation: N/A
intervention model: Single Group Assignment
primary purpose: Supportive Care
masking: None (Open Label)
measure: Reliability of a remote monitoring system during treatment for bariatric surgery evaluated in days between two failures
time frame: From the inclusion to 6 months after the surgery
description: The reliability of the system, corresponding to the average time between two failures, over the 9 months of study for each of the 30 patients. A failure is a momentary and abrupt loss of the ability of the system to transmit data.
measure: Patient acceptance of adding a telemonitoring device to their care evaluated in percentage of patients who signed a consent
time frame: Inclusion period of 4 months
description: Acceptance is the ratio of the number of patients who signed the consent to the number of total patients to whom the study was presented as a percentage.
measure: Relevance of the data received from each connected object (activity bracelet, scales, blood pressure monitor, thermometer and pulse oximeter) evaluated in percentage of data sent and verified
time frame: Study duration of 18 months
description: The relevance of the data corresponds to the number of data sent and verified, using the alert system, of each of the connected objects (activity bracelet, scales, blood pressure monitor, thermometer and pulse oximeter) the number of data sent by the system over the entire duration of the study (activity bracelet, scale, tensiometer) or the entire immediate postoperative period (thermometer, pulse oximeter), in percentage.
measure: Durability of the data over a defined period evaluated in number of connections.
time frame: From the inclusion to 6 months after the surgery
description: The durability of the data corresponds to the number of connections interrupted or lost in a duration of more than 90 minutes per patient
measure: Ratio of the number of patients who performed all the prescribed autonomic measures requested on the total number of patients included in the study
time frame: Study duration of 18 months
description: Ratio of the number of patients who performed all the prescribed autonomic measures requested on the total number of patients included in the study, as a percentage. It will be evaluated by age categories (18-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 54-65 years), sex (male and female) and obesity classes (35.00 ≤ BMI). ≤ 39.99 kg / m² and BMI ≥ 40.00 kg / m²)
arm group label: Monitoring evaluation
arm group type: Experimental
description: Monitoring evaluation by connected devices: Wristband activity tracker "Garmin Vivosmart® 3", "Fora® Scale 550", "Terraillon® Tensioscreen", Pulse oximeter "Nonin® 3230", thermometer "Fora® IR20b"
intervention type: Device
intervention name: Monitoring evaluation by connected devices: Wristband activity tracker "Garmin Vivosmart® 3", "Fora® Scale 550", "Terraillon® Tensioscreen", Pulse oximeter "Nonin® 3230", thermometer "Fora® IR20b"
description: All patients will be monitored before and after the bariatric surgery:
During the preoperative preparation phase: weight, exercise, blood pressure and heart rate
In the immediate post operative period: continuous monitoring of the heart rate with a telemetry system
Prolonged follow-up: weight, exercise, blood pressure and heart rate
arm group label: Monitoring evaluation
criteria: 
gender: All
minimum age: 18 Years
maximum age: 65 Years
healthy volunteers: No
last name: Michel Vix, MD
role: Principal Investigator
affiliation: Service Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Nouvel Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg
facility: 
country: France
citation: Loots E, Sartorius B, Paruk IM, Clarke DL. The Successful Implementation of a Modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Bariatric Surgery in a South African Teaching Hospital. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Feb;28(1):26-29. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000488.
PMID: 29064879
citation: Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, Burr M, Birch C, Babor R, MacCormick AD, Arroll B, Hill AG. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):482-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9026. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
PMID: 23339040
citation: Jonsson A, Lin E, Patel L, Patel AD, Stetler JL, Prayor-Patterson H, Singh A, Srinivasan JK, Sweeney JF, Davis SS Jr. Barriers to Enhanced Recovery after Surgery after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):605-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
PMID: 29309941
citation: Aman MW, Stem M, Schweitzer MA, Magnuson TH, Lidor AO. Early hospital readmission after bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2231-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4483-4. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
PMID: 26482158
citation: Kampmeijer R, Pavlova M, Tambor M, Golinowska S, Groot W. The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 5;16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):290. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1522-3.
PMID: 27608677
citation: Wang Y, Xue H, Huang Y, Huang L, Zhang D. A Systematic Review of Application and Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Obesity and Diabetes Treatment and Self-Management. Adv Nutr. 2017 May 15;8(3):449-462. doi: 10.3945/an.116.014100. Print 2017 May.
PMID: 28507010
citation: Chen SY, Stem M, Schweitzer MA, Magnuson TH, Lidor AO. Assessment of postdischarge complications after bariatric surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):777-86. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.04.028. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
PMID: 26096563
citation: Montravers P, Augustin P, Zappella N, Dufour G, Arapis K, Chosidow D, Fournier P, Ribeiro-Parienti L, Marmuse JP, Desmard M. Diagnosis and management of the postoperative surgical and medical complications of bariatric surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015 Feb;34(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2014.06.002. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
PMID: 25829315
responsible party type: Sponsor
sharing ipd: No