<clinical_study>
  <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
  <required_header>
    <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
    <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
    <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02992366</url>
  </required_header>
  <id_info>
    <org_study_id>Cairoshi-con</org_study_id>
    <nct_id>NCT02992366</nct_id>
  </id_info>
  <brief_title>: SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE VERSUS EMPTY SOCKET TECHNIQUE</brief_title>
  <official_title>IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN THE ESTHETIC ZONE: SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE VERSUS EMPTY SOCKET TECHNIQUE FOR PRESERVATION OF LABIAL ALVEOLAR BONE INTEGRITY</official_title>
  <sponsors>
    <lead_sponsor>
      <agency>Cairo University</agency>
      <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
    </lead_sponsor>
  </sponsors>
  <source>Cairo University</source>
  <oversight_info>
    <has_dmc>No</has_dmc>
  </oversight_info>
  <brief_summary>
    <textblock>
      To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with&#xD;
      conventional immediate implant placement.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </brief_summary>
  <detailed_description>
    <textblock>
      To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with&#xD;
      conventional immediate implant placement.&#xD;
&#xD;
      PICO&#xD;
&#xD;
        -  P: patient require immediate dental implant placement for esthetic consideration&#xD;
&#xD;
        -  I: socket shield technique&#xD;
&#xD;
        -  C: conventional immediate implant placement&#xD;
&#xD;
        -  O:&#xD;
&#xD;
      Outcome name Measuring device Measuring unit Primary outcome Vertical and horizontal bone&#xD;
      level Cone beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) Millimeter Secondary outcome (a) Pocket probing&#xD;
      depth Periodontal probe Millimeter Secondary outcome (b) Labial Alveolar crestal bone height&#xD;
      compared with the lingual side Cone beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) Millimeter&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </detailed_description>
  <overall_status>Unknown status</overall_status>
  <last_known_status>Not yet recruiting</last_known_status>
  <start_date>December 2016</start_date>
  <completion_date type="Anticipated">December 2017</completion_date>
  <primary_completion_date type="Anticipated">July 2017</primary_completion_date>
  <phase>N/A</phase>
  <study_type>Interventional</study_type>
  <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
  <study_design_info>
    <allocation>Randomized</allocation>
    <intervention_model>Parallel Assignment</intervention_model>
    <primary_purpose>Treatment</primary_purpose>
    <masking>Single (Participant)</masking>
  </study_design_info>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>Vertical and horizontal bone level</measure>
    <time_frame>9 months</time_frame>
  </primary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Pocket probing depth</measure>
    <time_frame>9 months</time_frame>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Labial Alveolar crestal bone height compared with the lingual side</measure>
    <time_frame>9 months</time_frame>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <number_of_arms>2</number_of_arms>
  <enrollment type="Anticipated">20</enrollment>
  <condition>Dental Implant Placement</condition>
  <condition>Socket Shield Technique Implant Placement</condition>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>socket shield (A)</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Experimental</arm_group_type>
    <description>Following local anesthetic infiltration opposite to the root to be extracted the root is sectioned in a mesiodistal direction along its long axis as far apical as possible.&#xD;
After sectioning the root into labial and palatal halves, the palatal half is removed with preservation of the labial root section.&#xD;
The labial half is prepared to be Flushing or 1mm above the labial alveolar crest. Then thinned slightly to a concave contour in an apico-coronal and mesiodistal direction.&#xD;
The implant will be inserted in place of the palatal half with the labial surface of the implant facing the labial root shield (root-implant interface)&#xD;
primary closure will not be attempted as the patients will undergo immediate non-functioning provisionization.</description>
  </arm_group>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>conventional immediate implant (B)</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Active Comparator</arm_group_type>
    <description>Following local anesthetic infiltration opposite to the root to be extracted non traumatic extraction of the tooth or remaining root by periotome.&#xD;
The implant fixture will be inserted in the empty socket by conventional manner.&#xD;
primary closure will not be attempted as the patients will undergo immediate non-functioning provisionization.</description>
  </arm_group>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Procedure</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>implant placement</intervention_name>
    <description>implant placement</description>
    <arm_group_label>conventional immediate implant (B)</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_label>socket shield (A)</arm_group_label>
  </intervention>
  <eligibility>
    <criteria>
      <textblock>
        Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          1. Patients with remaining roots in the esthetic zone with intact periodontal condition&#xD;
             indicated for extraction.&#xD;
&#xD;
          2. Physically able to tolerate conventional surgical and restorative procedures&#xD;
&#xD;
          3. Signing of an informed consent form&#xD;
&#xD;
          4. Implant insertion torque &gt; 32 N cm with good primary stability&#xD;
&#xD;
        Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          1. Systemic diseases contraindicating implant placement eg uncontrolled diabetes&#xD;
&#xD;
          2. Severe bruxism&#xD;
&#xD;
          3. Active infection in the teeth to be treated&#xD;
&#xD;
          4. Vertical root fractures with displacement in the teeth of the surgical area&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </criteria>
    <gender>All</gender>
    <minimum_age>N/A</minimum_age>
    <maximum_age>N/A</maximum_age>
    <healthy_volunteers>Accepts Healthy Volunteers</healthy_volunteers>
  </eligibility>
  <overall_official>
    <last_name>Mohamed Galal G. Beheiri, professor</last_name>
    <role>Study Director</role>
    <affiliation>senior supervisor</affiliation>
  </overall_official>
  <overall_contact>
    <last_name>Ahmed G. Khater, Bsc</last_name>
    <phone>+201111717300</phone>
    <email>drahmedgamalkhater@gmail.com</email>
  </overall_contact>
  <overall_contact_backup>
    <last_name>Mostafa I. Shindy, lecturer</last_name>
  </overall_contact_backup>
  <reference>
    <citation>Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Sep;30(9):809-18. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00366.x.</citation>
    <PMID>12956657</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jun;32(6):645-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x.</citation>
    <PMID>15882225</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.</citation>
    <PMID>12956475</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.</citation>
    <PMID>15635945</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Aug;17(4):351-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01270.x.</citation>
    <PMID>16907764</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler MB. Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1111-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01575.x.</citation>
    <PMID>18983313</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>AMLER MH, JOHNSON PL, SALMAN I. Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing in undisturbed extraction wounds. J Am Dent Assoc. 1960 Jul;61:32-44. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1960.0152. No abstract available.</citation>
    <PMID>13793201</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Stappert CF, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after different socket preservation techniques. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Oct;35(10):906-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01305.x. Epub 2008 Aug 17.</citation>
    <PMID>18713258</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 1967 Jan;17(1):21-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7. No abstract available.</citation>
    <PMID>5224784</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MC. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:39-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x.</citation>
    <PMID>22211305</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Oct;31(10):820-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x.</citation>
    <PMID>15367183</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M; Osteology Consensus Group 2011. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:80-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x. Erratum In: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):641.</citation>
    <PMID>22211307</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hammerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:12-25.</citation>
    <PMID>15635942</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Fickl S, Schneider D, Zuhr O, Hinze M, Ender A, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May;36(5):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01381.x.</citation>
    <PMID>19419446</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Vermylen K, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL, De Bruyn H. Patient satisfaction and quality of single-tooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1):119-24. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x.</citation>
    <PMID>12562374</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Schneider D, Schupbach P, Hurzeler M. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment - a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):71-82. doi: 10.1111/cid.12076. Epub 2013 Apr 30.</citation>
    <PMID>23631704</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Cherel F, Etienne D. Papilla preservation between two implants: a modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy? A case report. Quintessence Int. 2014 Jan;45(1):23-30. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a30765.</citation>
    <PMID>24392492</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Proximal socket shield for interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):e24-31. doi: 10.11607/prd.1346.</citation>
    <PMID>23342355</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Scheuber S, Bosshardt D, Bragger U, von Arx T. [Implant therapy following trauma of the anterior teeth - a new method for alveolar ridge preservation after post-traumatic ankylosis and external root resorption]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2013;123(5):417-39. French, German.</citation>
    <PMID>23720038</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Parlar A, Bosshardt DD, Unsal B, Cetiner D, Haytac C, Lang NP. New formation of periodontal tissues around titanium implants in a novel dentin chamber model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Jun;16(3):259-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01123.x.</citation>
    <PMID>15877745</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Davarpanah M, Szmukler-Moncler S. Unconventional implant treatment: I. Implant placement in contact with ankylosed root fragments. A series of five case reports. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Aug;20(8):851-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01653.x.</citation>
    <PMID>19604282</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):173-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01269.x.</citation>
    <PMID>18724850</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Salama M, Ishikawa T, Salama H, Funato A, Garber D. Advantages of the root submergence technique for pontic site development in esthetic implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Dec;27(6):521-7.</citation>
    <PMID>18092446</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, Mellonig J, Corio R, Emerson J, Stevens M, Romberg E. Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans. Part III. J Periodontol. 1989 Dec;60(12):683-93. doi: 10.1902/jop.1989.60.12.683.</citation>
    <PMID>2614633</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Hurzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Sep;37(9):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x.</citation>
    <PMID>20712701</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3.</citation>
    <PMID>24660198</PMID>
  </reference>
  <verification_date>December 2016</verification_date>
  <study_first_submitted>December 10, 2016</study_first_submitted>
  <study_first_submitted_qc>December 10, 2016</study_first_submitted_qc>
  <study_first_posted type="Estimate">December 14, 2016</study_first_posted>
  <last_update_submitted>December 10, 2016</last_update_submitted>
  <last_update_submitted_qc>December 10, 2016</last_update_submitted_qc>
  <last_update_posted type="Estimate">December 14, 2016</last_update_posted>
  <responsible_party>
    <responsible_party_type>Principal Investigator</responsible_party_type>
    <investigator_affiliation>Cairo University</investigator_affiliation>
    <investigator_full_name>Ahmed Gamal Khater Ali</investigator_full_name>
    <investigator_title>Oral and Maxillofacial surgery resident in ministry of health</investigator_title>
  </responsible_party>
  <keyword>socket shield</keyword>
  <keyword>volumetric tissue alteration</keyword>
  <keyword>immediate implant</keyword>
  <patient_data>
    <sharing_ipd>Undecided</sharing_ipd>
  </patient_data>
  <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
</clinical_study>


download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02992366
org study id: Cairoshi-con
nct id: NCT02992366
lead sponsor: 
has dmc: No
To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with
      conventional immediate implant placement.
To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with
      conventional immediate implant placement.

      PICO

        -  P: patient require immediate dental implant placement for esthetic consideration

        -  I: socket shield technique

        -  C: conventional immediate implant placement

        -  O:

      Outcome name Measuring device Measuring unit Primary outcome Vertical and horizontal bone
      level Cone beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) Millimeter Secondary outcome (a) Pocket probing
      depth Periodontal probe Millimeter Secondary outcome (b) Labial Alveolar crestal bone height
      compared with the lingual side Cone beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) Millimeter
allocation: Randomized
intervention model: Parallel Assignment
primary purpose: Treatment
masking: Single (Participant)
measure: Vertical and horizontal bone level
time frame: 9 months
measure: Pocket probing depth
time frame: 9 months
measure: Labial Alveolar crestal bone height compared with the lingual side
time frame: 9 months
arm group label: socket shield (A)
arm group type: Experimental
description: Following local anesthetic infiltration opposite to the root to be extracted the root is sectioned in a mesiodistal direction along its long axis as far apical as possible.
After sectioning the root into labial and palatal halves, the palatal half is removed with preservation of the labial root section.
The labial half is prepared to be Flushing or 1mm above the labial alveolar crest. Then thinned slightly to a concave contour in an apico-coronal and mesiodistal direction.
The implant will be inserted in place of the palatal half with the labial surface of the implant facing the labial root shield (root-implant interface)
primary closure will not be attempted as the patients will undergo immediate non-functioning provisionization.
arm group label: conventional immediate implant (B)
arm group type: Active Comparator
description: Following local anesthetic infiltration opposite to the root to be extracted non traumatic extraction of the tooth or remaining root by periotome.
The implant fixture will be inserted in the empty socket by conventional manner.
primary closure will not be attempted as the patients will undergo immediate non-functioning provisionization.
intervention type: Procedure
intervention name: implant placement
description: implant placement
arm group label: conventional immediate implant (B)
arm group label: socket shield (A)
criteria: 
gender: All
minimum age: N/A
maximum age: N/A
healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
last name: Mohamed Galal G. Beheiri, professor
role: Study Director
affiliation: senior supervisor
last name: Ahmed G. Khater, Bsc
phone: +201111717300
email: drahmedgamalkhater@gmail.com
last name: Mostafa I. Shindy, lecturer
citation: Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Sep;30(9):809-18. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00366.x.
PMID: 12956657
citation: Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jun;32(6):645-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x.
PMID: 15882225
citation: Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.
PMID: 12956475
citation: Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.
PMID: 15635945
citation: Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Aug;17(4):351-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01270.x.
PMID: 16907764
citation: Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler MB. Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1111-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01575.x.
PMID: 18983313
citation: AMLER MH, JOHNSON PL, SALMAN I. Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing in undisturbed extraction wounds. J Am Dent Assoc. 1960 Jul;61:32-44. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1960.0152. No abstract available.
PMID: 13793201
citation: Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Stappert CF, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after different socket preservation techniques. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Oct;35(10):906-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01305.x. Epub 2008 Aug 17.
PMID: 18713258
citation: Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 1967 Jan;17(1):21-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 5224784
citation: Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MC. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:39-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x.
PMID: 22211305
citation: Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Oct;31(10):820-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x.
PMID: 15367183
citation: Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M; Osteology Consensus Group 2011. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:80-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x. Erratum In: Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):641.
PMID: 22211307
citation: Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hammerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:12-25.
PMID: 15635942
citation: Fickl S, Schneider D, Zuhr O, Hinze M, Ender A, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May;36(5):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01381.x.
PMID: 19419446
citation: Vermylen K, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL, De Bruyn H. Patient satisfaction and quality of single-tooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1):119-24. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x.
PMID: 12562374
citation: Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Schneider D, Schupbach P, Hurzeler M. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment - a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):71-82. doi: 10.1111/cid.12076. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
PMID: 23631704
citation: Cherel F, Etienne D. Papilla preservation between two implants: a modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy? A case report. Quintessence Int. 2014 Jan;45(1):23-30. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a30765.
PMID: 24392492
citation: Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Proximal socket shield for interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):e24-31. doi: 10.11607/prd.1346.
PMID: 23342355
citation: Scheuber S, Bosshardt D, Bragger U, von Arx T. [Implant therapy following trauma of the anterior teeth - a new method for alveolar ridge preservation after post-traumatic ankylosis and external root resorption]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2013;123(5):417-39. French, German.
PMID: 23720038
citation: Parlar A, Bosshardt DD, Unsal B, Cetiner D, Haytac C, Lang NP. New formation of periodontal tissues around titanium implants in a novel dentin chamber model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Jun;16(3):259-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01123.x.
PMID: 15877745
citation: Davarpanah M, Szmukler-Moncler S. Unconventional implant treatment: I. Implant placement in contact with ankylosed root fragments. A series of five case reports. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Aug;20(8):851-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01653.x.
PMID: 19604282
citation: Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):173-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01269.x.
PMID: 18724850
citation: Salama M, Ishikawa T, Salama H, Funato A, Garber D. Advantages of the root submergence technique for pontic site development in esthetic implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Dec;27(6):521-7.
PMID: 18092446
citation: Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, Mellonig J, Corio R, Emerson J, Stevens M, Romberg E. Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans. Part III. J Periodontol. 1989 Dec;60(12):683-93. doi: 10.1902/jop.1989.60.12.683.
PMID: 2614633
citation: Hurzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Sep;37(9):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x.
PMID: 20712701
citation: Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3.
PMID: 24660198
responsible party type: Principal Investigator
investigator affiliation: Cairo University
investigator full name: Ahmed Gamal Khater Ali
investigator title: Oral and Maxillofacial surgery resident in ministry of health
sharing ipd: Undecided