<clinical_study>
  <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
  <required_header>
    <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
    <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
    <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03011385</url>
  </required_header>
  <id_info>
    <org_study_id>2014/15/B/HS6/00923_C</org_study_id>
    <nct_id>NCT03011385</nct_id>
  </id_info>
  <brief_title>Effects of Individual, Dyadic, and Collaborative Plans on Physical Activity in Partner-Partner Dyads</brief_title>
  <official_title>Physical Activity and Health-related Quality of Life: Dyadic Research in the Context of Forming Individual, Dyadic, and Collaborative Plans. Trial 3</official_title>
  <sponsors>
    <lead_sponsor>
      <agency>University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw</agency>
      <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
    </lead_sponsor>
  </sponsors>
  <source>University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw</source>
  <oversight_info>
    <has_dmc>No</has_dmc>
  </oversight_info>
  <brief_summary>
    <textblock>
      OBJECTIVE: The project aims at investigating of the effects of three types of planning&#xD;
      (individual planning, collaborative planning, and dyadic planning) on physical activity among&#xD;
      dyads.The influence of three planning interventions are compared with an active control&#xD;
      condition, including physical activity education.&#xD;
&#xD;
      PARTICIPANTS: The effects of the interventions are evaluated among dyads of two adults&#xD;
      (partner-partner dyads). Adults forming dyads (e.g. two romantic partners, two relatives, two&#xD;
      co-workers, two friends) who are in regular contact for at least one year will be enrolled. A&#xD;
      minimum of 50 dyads enrolled into the each arm of the trial (a total of 200 dyads). The&#xD;
      interventions consist of six planning sessions.&#xD;
&#xD;
      DESIGN: The dyads are randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions. The&#xD;
      assessment of the main and secondary outcomes is conducted at the baseline, at 1 week after&#xD;
      the first intervention session, at post-intervention (after six intervention sessions are&#xD;
      completed), and at 6-, and 12-month follow-ups.&#xD;
&#xD;
      OUTCOMES: Physical activity constitutes the main outcome, whereas health-related quality of&#xD;
      life (HRQOL), body mass index, and sedentary behavior as well as the self-regulatory strategy&#xD;
      called the use of planning (individual, dyadic and collaborative) are secondary outcomes.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </brief_summary>
  <detailed_description>
    <textblock>
      Individual planning (also known as implementation intentions or action and coping planning)&#xD;
      is a regulatory strategy, which refers to making plans on when, where, and how to perform an&#xD;
      intended behavior. In dyadic planning, a target person is setting plans together with a&#xD;
      partner on when, where, and how the target person will individually engage in behavior&#xD;
      change. The concept of dyadic planning differs from the conceptualization of collaborative&#xD;
      plans, where two individuals make plans on how to enact a behavior together.&#xD;
&#xD;
      The study will evaluate the effects of a short-term planning intervention. The intervention&#xD;
      includes a total of six sessions: two face-to-face sessions with the experimenter (delivered&#xD;
      over two weeks) and three sessions delivered over phone (over the following three weeks), one&#xD;
      face-two-face session (delivered at one month after the third session delivered over the&#xD;
      phone). The delivery has an individual format (the experimenter + the dyad). The total time&#xD;
      from first to sixth session is 2 months. The setting for the interventions will include&#xD;
      physician's offices and participant's home. The same format, schedule, delivery, and setting&#xD;
      will be used for conducting active control group procedures.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </detailed_description>
  <overall_status>Completed</overall_status>
  <start_date type="Actual">December 2016</start_date>
  <completion_date type="Actual">September 30, 2021</completion_date>
  <primary_completion_date type="Actual">February 28, 2020</primary_completion_date>
  <phase>N/A</phase>
  <study_type>Interventional</study_type>
  <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
  <study_design_info>
    <allocation>Randomized</allocation>
    <intervention_model>Parallel Assignment</intervention_model>
    <primary_purpose>Prevention</primary_purpose>
    <masking>Single (Participant)</masking>
  </study_design_info>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>Physical activity</measure>
    <time_frame>Change from baseline physical activity at 8 months</time_frame>
    <description>Accelerometry: ActiGraph (the model: wGT3X-B)</description>
  </primary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Health-related quality of life (HRQOL)</measure>
    <time_frame>Change from baseline HRQOL at 8 months</time_frame>
    <description>WHOQOL--BREF Questionnaire (Skevington et al., 2004)</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>The use of planning</measure>
    <time_frame>Change from baseline use of planning at 2 months</time_frame>
    <description>The self-reported use of planning questionnaire (individual, dyadic and collaborative), based on Luszczynska (2006)</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Body mass index (BMI)</measure>
    <time_frame>Change from baseline BMI at 8 months</time_frame>
    <description>Certified and standardized body weight scales (Beurer; European Union safety certificate; measurement error &lt; 5%) and measuring rods will be used. Body mass index will be calculated using the following formula: body weight [in kg] divided by a square of body height [in meters]. Body weight will be recorded in kilograms and body height will be recorded in meters.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Physical activity</measure>
    <time_frame>Change from the baseline physical activity at 8 months</time_frame>
    <description>The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (Craig et al., 2003); open-ended questions indicating the minutes and the number of occasions of physical activity behavior per week; higher scores represent better outcome</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Habitual physical activity</measure>
    <time_frame>Change from baseline habitual physical activity at 8 months</time_frame>
    <description>Self-reported habit index questionnaire for physical activity (based on Gardner et al., 2012)</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Habitual sedentary behavior</measure>
    <time_frame>Change from baseline habitual sedentary behavior at 8 months</time_frame>
    <description>Self-reported habit index questionnaire for sedentary behavior (based on Gardner et al., 2012)</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Sedentary behavior</measure>
    <time_frame>Change from baseline habitual sedentary behavior at 8 months</time_frame>
    <description>Accelerometry: ActiGraph (the model: wGT3X-B)</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <number_of_arms>4</number_of_arms>
  <enrollment type="Actual">640</enrollment>
  <condition>Health Behavior</condition>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Individual Planning</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Experimental</arm_group_type>
    <description>The planning materials and forms have sections: (a) information on the importance of planning, including examples of how planning works and what it affects, (b) instructions of what should be included in a good plan (the when, where, and how components), (c) formulating action and coping plans.&#xD;
Action plans (referring to when, when, and how the individual will act) as well as coping plans (referring to how to overcome potential difficulties, risky situations or temptations to not engage in physical activity) will be formed. Each participant will form their plans individually, without consulting the dyadic partner, but discussing the plans with the experimenter.</description>
  </arm_group>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Dyadic Planning</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Experimental</arm_group_type>
    <description>The planning materials and forms have sections: (a) information on the importance of planning, including examples of how planning works and what it affects, (b) instructions of what should be included in a good plan (the when, where, and how components), (c) formulating action and coping plans.&#xD;
Action plans as well as coping plans will be formed. Both partners in the dyad jointly form one plan. This jointly developed plan is discussed with the experimenter.&#xD;
The plan focuses on physical activity of only one person in the dyad. This target person will be selected jointly by the participants if both participants are healthy. If one participant has a chronic disease, e.g. diabetes or a cardiovascular disease, the plans are formed for the person with a disease.</description>
  </arm_group>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Collaborative Planning</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Experimental</arm_group_type>
    <description>The planning materials and forms have sections: (a) information on the importance of planning, including examples of how planning works and what it affects, (b) instructions of what should be included in a good plan (the when, where, and how components), (c) formulating action and coping plans.&#xD;
Action plans and coping plans will be formed. Both partners in the dyad jointly form one plan. This jointly developed plan is discussed with the experimenter.&#xD;
The plan focuses on physical activity of both persons within the dyad (both partners) and include some plans for joint physical activity.</description>
  </arm_group>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Education</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Active Comparator</arm_group_type>
    <description>The education materials address physical activity and healthy nutrition guidelines for age groups and chronic disease. Participants receive a set of educational materials about types of physical activity (PA), PA intensity, exercise calorie expenditure, strength and endurance training, stretching, and general nutrition guidelines in terms of meal composition, and nutrients, meal frequency. The materials exclude any planning statements. The education is delivered by the experimenter to a partner-partner dyad and discusses individual guidelines for both dyadic partners.</description>
  </arm_group>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Behavioral</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>Individual Planning</intervention_name>
    <description>Participants are filling in the planning forms, referring to their individual physical activity. Both members of the dyad form their own, interdependent plans.&#xD;
The following behavior change techniques (BCT) are included in the planning intervention protocol: action planning, barrier identification, prompting self-talk, relapse prevention/coping planning. Applications of all BCT included references to planning.</description>
    <arm_group_label>Individual Planning</arm_group_label>
  </intervention>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Behavioral</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>Dyadic Planning</intervention_name>
    <description>Participants are filling in the planning forms jointly. Planning refers to physical activity of only one person in the dyad. The other person in the dyad is actively participating in forming plans by the target person.&#xD;
The following BCT are included in the planning intervention protocol: action planning, barrier identification, prompting self-talk, relapse prevention/ coping planning. Applications of all BCT included references to planning.</description>
    <arm_group_label>Dyadic Planning</arm_group_label>
  </intervention>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Behavioral</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>Collaborative Planning</intervention_name>
    <description>Participants are filling in the planning forms jointly. Planning refers to physical activity of both persons in the dyad. Physical activity may be performed jointly by both persons in the dyad. The following BCT are included in the planning intervention protocol: action planning, barrier identification, prompting self-talk, relapse prevention/ coping planning. Applications of all BCT included references to planning.</description>
    <arm_group_label>Collaborative Planning</arm_group_label>
  </intervention>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Behavioral</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>Education</intervention_name>
    <description>The education group participants receive extended physical activity and healthy nutrition education program. The education includes: (1) the guidelines for physical activity and healthy nutrition, tailored to age and health status of the participants, (2) the examples of exercises and their metabolic equivalent; (3) information about healthy body mass and body composition.</description>
    <arm_group_label>Collaborative Planning</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_label>Dyadic Planning</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_label>Education</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_label>Individual Planning</arm_group_label>
  </intervention>
  <eligibility>
    <criteria>
      <textblock>
        Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Both partners in the dyad are adults&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  At least one partner in the dyad does not meet the World Health Organization&#xD;
             guidelines for physical activity for their respective age group and health status&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Participants are healthy or with a diagnosed chronic illness (without&#xD;
             contraindications for moderate intensity physical activity&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  The partners may be a romantic relationship or in another relationship: next of kin,&#xD;
             family members, friends who are willing to join the study together&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  The dyadic partners are in the stable relationship for at least one year or meet and&#xD;
             spend time together regularly for at least one year&#xD;
&#xD;
        Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Any existing diseases with contraindications for moderate intensity physical activity,&#xD;
             confirmed by patient's primary care physician or a specialist in cardiovascular&#xD;
             diseases/endocrinology/rehabilitation medicine providing care for the patient during&#xD;
             the recruitment and follow-ups&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Both participants in the dyad meet the World Health Organization guidelines for&#xD;
             physical activity for their respective age group and health status in terms of minutes&#xD;
             per week, the intensity of physical activity, and the types of exercises&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </criteria>
    <gender>All</gender>
    <minimum_age>18 Years</minimum_age>
    <maximum_age>N/A</maximum_age>
    <healthy_volunteers>Accepts Healthy Volunteers</healthy_volunteers>
  </eligibility>
  <overall_official>
    <last_name>Aleksandra Luszczynska, PhD</last_name>
    <role>Principal Investigator</role>
    <affiliation>SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities</affiliation>
  </overall_official>
  <location>
    <facility>
      <name>University of Social Sciences and Humanities</name>
      <address>
        <city>Wroclaw</city>
        <zip>53-238</zip>
        <country>Poland</country>
      </address>
    </facility>
  </location>
  <location_countries>
    <country>Poland</country>
  </location_countries>
  <reference>
    <citation>Burkert S, Knoll N, Luszczynska A, Gralla O. The interplay of dyadic and individual planning of pelvic-floor exercise in prostate-cancer patients following radical prostatectomy. J Behav Med. 2012 Jun;35(3):305-17. doi: 10.1007/s10865-012-9416-2. Epub 2012 Mar 28.</citation>
    <PMID>22454228</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Prestwich A, Conner MT, Lawton RJ, Ward JK, Ayres K, McEachan RR. Randomized controlled trial of collaborative implementation intentions targeting working adults' physical activity. Health Psychol. 2012 Jul;31(4):486-95. doi: 10.1037/a0027672. Epub 2012 Apr 2.</citation>
    <PMID>22468716</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Luszczynska A. An implementation intentions intervention, the use of a planning strategy, and physical activity after myocardial infarction. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(4):900-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.043. Epub 2005 Aug 10.</citation>
    <PMID>16095786</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.</citation>
    <PMID>15085902</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.</citation>
    <PMID>12900694</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Hagger MS, Luszczynska A. Implementation intention and action planning interventions in health contexts: state of the research and proposals for the way forward. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2014 Mar;6(1):1-47. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12017. Epub 2013 Oct 8.</citation>
    <PMID>24591064</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Action plans and coping plans for physical exercise: A longitudinal intervention study in cardiac rehabilitation. Br J Health Psychol. 2006 Feb;11(Pt 1):23-37. doi: 10.1348/135910705X43804.</citation>
    <PMID>16480553</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Burkert S, Scholz U, Gralla O, Roigas J, Knoll N. Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: a randomized-controlled planning intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Sep;73(5):783-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jul 12.</citation>
    <PMID>21807446</PMID>
  </reference>
  <verification_date>May 2023</verification_date>
  <study_first_submitted>January 3, 2017</study_first_submitted>
  <study_first_submitted_qc>January 3, 2017</study_first_submitted_qc>
  <study_first_posted type="Estimate">January 5, 2017</study_first_posted>
  <last_update_submitted>May 8, 2023</last_update_submitted>
  <last_update_submitted_qc>May 8, 2023</last_update_submitted_qc>
  <last_update_posted type="Actual">May 9, 2023</last_update_posted>
  <responsible_party>
    <responsible_party_type>Sponsor</responsible_party_type>
  </responsible_party>
  <patient_data>
    <sharing_ipd>Yes</sharing_ipd>
    <ipd_description>As agreed with the funding institution (the National Science Centre, Poland) the dataset will be publicly available (for research use) not later than in 2023 at the website of the SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland</ipd_description>
  </patient_data>
  <study_docs>
    <study_doc>
      <doc_type>Study Protocol</doc_type>
      <doc_url>https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xGrVkCeXwUZbih7NuOujjlNJcWvQ4j6H/view?usp=sharing</doc_url>
      <doc_comment>The file includes the protocol for data collection and intervention sessions</doc_comment>
    </study_doc>
  </study_docs>
  <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
</clinical_study>


download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03011385
org study id: 2014/15/B/HS6/00923_C
nct id: NCT03011385
lead sponsor: 
has dmc: No
OBJECTIVE: The project aims at investigating of the effects of three types of planning
      (individual planning, collaborative planning, and dyadic planning) on physical activity among
      dyads.The influence of three planning interventions are compared with an active control
      condition, including physical activity education.

      PARTICIPANTS: The effects of the interventions are evaluated among dyads of two adults
      (partner-partner dyads). Adults forming dyads (e.g. two romantic partners, two relatives, two
      co-workers, two friends) who are in regular contact for at least one year will be enrolled. A
      minimum of 50 dyads enrolled into the each arm of the trial (a total of 200 dyads). The
      interventions consist of six planning sessions.

      DESIGN: The dyads are randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions. The
      assessment of the main and secondary outcomes is conducted at the baseline, at 1 week after
      the first intervention session, at post-intervention (after six intervention sessions are
      completed), and at 6-, and 12-month follow-ups.

      OUTCOMES: Physical activity constitutes the main outcome, whereas health-related quality of
      life (HRQOL), body mass index, and sedentary behavior as well as the self-regulatory strategy
      called the use of planning (individual, dyadic and collaborative) are secondary outcomes.
Individual planning (also known as implementation intentions or action and coping planning)
      is a regulatory strategy, which refers to making plans on when, where, and how to perform an
      intended behavior. In dyadic planning, a target person is setting plans together with a
      partner on when, where, and how the target person will individually engage in behavior
      change. The concept of dyadic planning differs from the conceptualization of collaborative
      plans, where two individuals make plans on how to enact a behavior together.

      The study will evaluate the effects of a short-term planning intervention. The intervention
      includes a total of six sessions: two face-to-face sessions with the experimenter (delivered
      over two weeks) and three sessions delivered over phone (over the following three weeks), one
      face-two-face session (delivered at one month after the third session delivered over the
      phone). The delivery has an individual format (the experimenter + the dyad). The total time
      from first to sixth session is 2 months. The setting for the interventions will include
      physician's offices and participant's home. The same format, schedule, delivery, and setting
      will be used for conducting active control group procedures.
allocation: Randomized
intervention model: Parallel Assignment
primary purpose: Prevention
masking: Single (Participant)
measure: Physical activity
time frame: Change from baseline physical activity at 8 months
description: Accelerometry: ActiGraph (the model: wGT3X-B)
measure: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL)
time frame: Change from baseline HRQOL at 8 months
description: WHOQOL--BREF Questionnaire (Skevington et al., 2004)
measure: The use of planning
time frame: Change from baseline use of planning at 2 months
description: The self-reported use of planning questionnaire (individual, dyadic and collaborative), based on Luszczynska (2006)
measure: Body mass index (BMI)
time frame: Change from baseline BMI at 8 months
description: Certified and standardized body weight scales (Beurer; European Union safety certificate; measurement error < 5%) and measuring rods will be used. Body mass index will be calculated using the following formula: body weight [in kg] divided by a square of body height [in meters]. Body weight will be recorded in kilograms and body height will be recorded in meters.
measure: Physical activity
time frame: Change from the baseline physical activity at 8 months
description: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (Craig et al., 2003); open-ended questions indicating the minutes and the number of occasions of physical activity behavior per week; higher scores represent better outcome
measure: Habitual physical activity
time frame: Change from baseline habitual physical activity at 8 months
description: Self-reported habit index questionnaire for physical activity (based on Gardner et al., 2012)
measure: Habitual sedentary behavior
time frame: Change from baseline habitual sedentary behavior at 8 months
description: Self-reported habit index questionnaire for sedentary behavior (based on Gardner et al., 2012)
measure: Sedentary behavior
time frame: Change from baseline habitual sedentary behavior at 8 months
description: Accelerometry: ActiGraph (the model: wGT3X-B)
arm group label: Individual Planning
arm group type: Experimental
description: The planning materials and forms have sections: (a) information on the importance of planning, including examples of how planning works and what it affects, (b) instructions of what should be included in a good plan (the when, where, and how components), (c) formulating action and coping plans.
Action plans (referring to when, when, and how the individual will act) as well as coping plans (referring to how to overcome potential difficulties, risky situations or temptations to not engage in physical activity) will be formed. Each participant will form their plans individually, without consulting the dyadic partner, but discussing the plans with the experimenter.
arm group label: Dyadic Planning
arm group type: Experimental
description: The planning materials and forms have sections: (a) information on the importance of planning, including examples of how planning works and what it affects, (b) instructions of what should be included in a good plan (the when, where, and how components), (c) formulating action and coping plans.
Action plans as well as coping plans will be formed. Both partners in the dyad jointly form one plan. This jointly developed plan is discussed with the experimenter.
The plan focuses on physical activity of only one person in the dyad. This target person will be selected jointly by the participants if both participants are healthy. If one participant has a chronic disease, e.g. diabetes or a cardiovascular disease, the plans are formed for the person with a disease.
arm group label: Collaborative Planning
arm group type: Experimental
description: The planning materials and forms have sections: (a) information on the importance of planning, including examples of how planning works and what it affects, (b) instructions of what should be included in a good plan (the when, where, and how components), (c) formulating action and coping plans.
Action plans and coping plans will be formed. Both partners in the dyad jointly form one plan. This jointly developed plan is discussed with the experimenter.
The plan focuses on physical activity of both persons within the dyad (both partners) and include some plans for joint physical activity.
arm group label: Education
arm group type: Active Comparator
description: The education materials address physical activity and healthy nutrition guidelines for age groups and chronic disease. Participants receive a set of educational materials about types of physical activity (PA), PA intensity, exercise calorie expenditure, strength and endurance training, stretching, and general nutrition guidelines in terms of meal composition, and nutrients, meal frequency. The materials exclude any planning statements. The education is delivered by the experimenter to a partner-partner dyad and discusses individual guidelines for both dyadic partners.
intervention type: Behavioral
intervention name: Individual Planning
description: Participants are filling in the planning forms, referring to their individual physical activity. Both members of the dyad form their own, interdependent plans.
The following behavior change techniques (BCT) are included in the planning intervention protocol: action planning, barrier identification, prompting self-talk, relapse prevention/coping planning. Applications of all BCT included references to planning.
arm group label: Individual Planning
intervention type: Behavioral
intervention name: Dyadic Planning
description: Participants are filling in the planning forms jointly. Planning refers to physical activity of only one person in the dyad. The other person in the dyad is actively participating in forming plans by the target person.
The following BCT are included in the planning intervention protocol: action planning, barrier identification, prompting self-talk, relapse prevention/ coping planning. Applications of all BCT included references to planning.
arm group label: Dyadic Planning
intervention type: Behavioral
intervention name: Collaborative Planning
description: Participants are filling in the planning forms jointly. Planning refers to physical activity of both persons in the dyad. Physical activity may be performed jointly by both persons in the dyad. The following BCT are included in the planning intervention protocol: action planning, barrier identification, prompting self-talk, relapse prevention/ coping planning. Applications of all BCT included references to planning.
arm group label: Collaborative Planning
intervention type: Behavioral
intervention name: Education
description: The education group participants receive extended physical activity and healthy nutrition education program. The education includes: (1) the guidelines for physical activity and healthy nutrition, tailored to age and health status of the participants, (2) the examples of exercises and their metabolic equivalent; (3) information about healthy body mass and body composition.
arm group label: Collaborative Planning
arm group label: Dyadic Planning
arm group label: Education
arm group label: Individual Planning
criteria: 
gender: All
minimum age: 18 Years
maximum age: N/A
healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
last name: Aleksandra Luszczynska, PhD
role: Principal Investigator
affiliation: SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
facility: 
country: Poland
citation: Burkert S, Knoll N, Luszczynska A, Gralla O. The interplay of dyadic and individual planning of pelvic-floor exercise in prostate-cancer patients following radical prostatectomy. J Behav Med. 2012 Jun;35(3):305-17. doi: 10.1007/s10865-012-9416-2. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
PMID: 22454228
citation: Prestwich A, Conner MT, Lawton RJ, Ward JK, Ayres K, McEachan RR. Randomized controlled trial of collaborative implementation intentions targeting working adults' physical activity. Health Psychol. 2012 Jul;31(4):486-95. doi: 10.1037/a0027672. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
PMID: 22468716
citation: Luszczynska A. An implementation intentions intervention, the use of a planning strategy, and physical activity after myocardial infarction. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(4):900-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.043. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
PMID: 16095786
citation: Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.
PMID: 15085902
citation: Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
PMID: 12900694
citation: Hagger MS, Luszczynska A. Implementation intention and action planning interventions in health contexts: state of the research and proposals for the way forward. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2014 Mar;6(1):1-47. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12017. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
PMID: 24591064
citation: Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Action plans and coping plans for physical exercise: A longitudinal intervention study in cardiac rehabilitation. Br J Health Psychol. 2006 Feb;11(Pt 1):23-37. doi: 10.1348/135910705X43804.
PMID: 16480553
citation: Burkert S, Scholz U, Gralla O, Roigas J, Knoll N. Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: a randomized-controlled planning intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Sep;73(5):783-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
PMID: 21807446
responsible party type: Sponsor
sharing ipd: Yes
ipd description: As agreed with the funding institution (the National Science Centre, Poland) the dataset will be publicly available (for research use) not later than in 2023 at the website of the SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland
study doc: 