<clinical_study>
  <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
  <required_header>
    <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
    <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
    <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02188407</url>
  </required_header>
  <id_info>
    <org_study_id>UKC-TOR-1</org_study_id>
    <nct_id>NCT02188407</nct_id>
  </id_info>
  <brief_title>Inflammation After One Lung Ventilation</brief_title>
  <official_title>Phase 1 Study of Antiinflammatory Effect of Sevoflurane in Open Lung Surgery With One-Lung Ventilation</official_title>
  <sponsors>
    <lead_sponsor>
      <agency>University Medical Centre Ljubljana</agency>
      <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
    </lead_sponsor>
  </sponsors>
  <source>University Medical Centre Ljubljana</source>
  <oversight_info>
    <has_dmc>Yes</has_dmc>
  </oversight_info>
  <brief_summary>
    <textblock>
      The aim of the study was to prospectively investigate the influence of one-lung ventilation&#xD;
      (OLV) on the inflammatory response and to identify possible antiinflammatory effects of the&#xD;
      volatile anaesthetic sevoflurane.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Forty patients undergoing thoracic surgery with OLV were enrolled in this prospective,&#xD;
      randomised study. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups to receive either&#xD;
      propofol (Group P) or sevoflurane (Group S) for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Inflammatory mediators (Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin8 (IL8), Interleukin 10 (IL10), (C-&#xD;
      reactive protein)CRP) were measured intra- and postoperatively.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Six hours after surgery oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) was calculated and chest X ray was&#xD;
      taken and assessed.&#xD;
&#xD;
      The clinical outcome determinated by postoperative adverse events was assessed as the&#xD;
      secondary endpoint.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </brief_summary>
  <detailed_description>
    <textblock>
      Lung injury is the main complication of open lung surgery and is associated with a very high&#xD;
      mortality rate.&#xD;
&#xD;
      In 1984, Zeldin reported on ten patients with a complication that he referred to as&#xD;
      postpneumonectomy pulmonary oedema (PLE). The complication is sometimes not easy to&#xD;
      differentiate from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), defined by Bernard et al,&#xD;
      because the patients may not fulfill all the ARDS criteria. The incidence of this so-called&#xD;
      acute lung injury (ALI) after lobectomy is 1-7%. The mortality rate in patients with ARDS and&#xD;
      ALI is 72% and 33%, respectively.&#xD;
&#xD;
      In patients undergoing lung resection, mechanical ventilation and surgery may induce alveolar&#xD;
      and systemic inflammatory responses. One-lung ventilation (OLV) has become as a standard&#xD;
      procedure for many interventions in thoracic surgery with a need for deflation of the lung to&#xD;
      facilitate the surgical procedure. It is also the main cause of acute inflammatory response&#xD;
      and is associated with ALI and ARDS. The inflammatory reaction produces injury to the lung&#xD;
      endothelium. The loss of endothelium integrity causes increased protein leak into the&#xD;
      alveolar fluid. The inflammatory reaction leads to other histological changes. These&#xD;
      reactions during OLV have been reported by many investigators.&#xD;
&#xD;
      A number of studies have shown that sevoflurane attenuates cardiac ischaemia-reperfusion&#xD;
      injury. These results have been lately transferred to lung surgery. Some studies have&#xD;
      demonstrated that volatile anaesthetics sevoflurane, isoflurane and desflurane have an impact&#xD;
      on ischaemic-reperfusion lung injury. These studies have confirmed the local alveolar, but&#xD;
      not the systemic antiinflammatory effects of sevoflurane.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Studies to date have not evaluated long-lasting effects of anaesthetics administered&#xD;
      intraoperatively.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Demonstrating the influence of volatile anaesthetics on the inflammatory response and the&#xD;
      treatment outcome in patients undergoing open lung surgery with OLV is still a great&#xD;
      challenge for thoracic anaesthesiologists.&#xD;
&#xD;
      The effects of sevoflurane on release of inflammatory markers has been addressed before, but&#xD;
      the added value of our study is that we tested the systemic imunomodulatory effect of&#xD;
      sevoflurane in combination with postoperative clinical outcome and adverse effects.&#xD;
&#xD;
      In the current study the following null hypothesis was tested: the administration of&#xD;
      sevoflurane or propofol does not affect the systemic proinflammatory response after open lung&#xD;
      surgery with OLV.&#xD;
&#xD;
      ANAESTHESIA REGIMEN All patients were given oral diazepam 5-10 mg (Apaurin, Krka, d.d.) one&#xD;
      hour before surgery. On arrival in the operating room, they were randomly assigned to either&#xD;
      Group P or Group S. Randomisation was done according to computer-generated order.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Antibiotic prophylaxis with intravenous (iv) cefazolin (Cefamezin, Krka, d.d.) 2g/100 ml 0.9%&#xD;
      NaCl was used in all patients.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Standardised clinical monitoring devices were attached to all patients prior to induction of&#xD;
      anaesthesia. For extended haemodynamic monitoring LiDCO plus system was used.&#xD;
&#xD;
      A thoracic epidural catheter was inserted at the T6-7 level. Anaesthesia induction in Group P&#xD;
      was performed with propofol (Propoven, Fresenius Kabi) and in Group S with sevoflurane&#xD;
      (Sevorane, Abbott Laboratories). Before intubation all patients received remifentanil&#xD;
      (Ultiva, GlaxoSmithKline) and vecuronium (Norcuron, Organon).&#xD;
&#xD;
      All patients were intubated with a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube (Malinckrodt,&#xD;
      with hook, 37-41 Charriere) and ventilated by volume-controlled ventilation, provided by a&#xD;
      closed-circuit anaesthesia ventilator (Primus, Draeger, Luebeck, Germany). The tidal volume&#xD;
      was set to 6 ml/kg. The peak inspiratory pressure was limited to 25 cm H2O. The fraction of&#xD;
      inspired oxygen was adjusted to maintain oxyhaemoglobin saturation at greater than 96%&#xD;
      (fraction of inspired oxygen 0.3 to 0.4 before OLV; fraction of inspired oxygen 0.6 to 0.7&#xD;
      during OLV, and the respiratory rate to keep the PaCO2 between 3.8-4.5 kPa. The positive end&#xD;
      expiratory pressure (PEEP) was set to 5 cm H2O. Gas concentration and airway pressures were&#xD;
      measured at the proximal end of the tube using ventilator-integrated functions. During OLV&#xD;
      the tidal volume was set to 4 ml/kg and peak inspiratory pressure limited to 25 cm H2O. Other&#xD;
      ventilation settings were maintained and PEEP was reduced to 3 cm H2O.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Anaesthesia was maintained with propofol in Group P (4-6 mg/kg/h) and with sevoflurane (V%&#xD;
      2-2.5) in Group S. The rate of remifentanil iv infusion was 0.3-0.5 mcg/kg/min in both&#xD;
      groups. The depth of anaesthesia was measured by a bispectral index (BIS) monitor; BIS values&#xD;
      were maintained at 40-60.&#xD;
&#xD;
      For haemodynamic management the following algorithm was used: continuous infusion of 0.9%&#xD;
      NaCl 6 mL /kg for the first hour, followed by 2.5 ml /kg/h, if DO2I&lt;600 ml/min/m2 and SVR&gt;&#xD;
      800 and SVV &gt; 10% 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven, Fresenius Kabi) until SVV decreased under&#xD;
      10% ; if there was no improvement after 250 ml 6% HES-a, dobutamine (Inotop Torrex Pharma)&#xD;
      1-10 mcg/kg/min iv is introduced; if SVR &lt; 800 dyn•s/cm5 then ephedrine (0.5% Efedrin, UMC&#xD;
      Ljubljana Pharmacy) 5-10 mg iv was given. If the mean arterial pressure increases by more&#xD;
      than 30% and the heart rate by more than 30% from baseline, the infusion of remifentanil is&#xD;
      increased by 0.1mcg/kg/min.&#xD;
&#xD;
      At the end of the procedure, the action of muscle relaxants was reversed with neostigmine&#xD;
      (Neostigmin-Actavis, Actavis) 2.5 mg and atropine (Atropinum sulfuricum, Nycomed) 1 mg iv.&#xD;
      All patients were extubated in the operating theatre and then transferred to the recovery&#xD;
      room.&#xD;
&#xD;
      POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT After surgery, the patients stayed in the recovery room for one hour&#xD;
      and were then transferred to the intensive care unit of the Department of Thoracic Surgery.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Standard postoperative monitoring generally used in these procedures was implemented.&#xD;
      Haemodynamic monitoring using the LiDCO plus system was continued after surgery.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Oxygen titrated to the lowest level needed to achieve the target arterial oxygen saturation&#xD;
      of 96%, was administered via a Venturi mask.&#xD;
&#xD;
      For postoperative haemodynamic management the following algorithm was implemented: continuous&#xD;
      infusion of 0.9% NaCl 1 ml/kg/h , if oxygen delivery index (DO2I) was less than 600 ml/min/m2&#xD;
      and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was higher than 800 dyn•s/cm5 infusion of 6%&#xD;
      hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven, Fresenius Kabi), if no improvement occurs after 250 ml 6% HES,&#xD;
      dobutamine (Inotop, Torrex Pharma) 1-10 mcg/kg/min was initiated, if SVR &lt; 800 than ephedrine&#xD;
      (0.5% Efedrin, Pharmacy UMC Ljubjana ) 5-10 mg iv was given.&#xD;
&#xD;
      In the recovery room, all patients received 10 ml of 0.5% levo-bupivacaine (Chirocaine,&#xD;
      Abbott Laboratories) and the level of the epidural sensory block was tested. Postoperative&#xD;
      analgesia was provided by infusion of 0.25 % levobupivacaine via an epidural catheter using a&#xD;
      patient- controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. The infusion rate was 5 ml/h and lockout time 30&#xD;
      min. Hourly pain assessments using a visual analogue scale (VAS) were performed. Patients&#xD;
      with VAS scores greater than 3 received a rescue analgetic piritramide 3 mg (Dipidolor,&#xD;
      Johnson&amp;Johnson) intravenously.&#xD;
&#xD;
      MEASUREMENTS The data recorded included demographic characteristics, time of surgery, time of&#xD;
      OLV and DO2.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Arterial blood samples for the determinations of cytokines (IL 6, IL 8, IL 10), C-reactive&#xD;
      protein (CRP) were drawn at the following time points: 1. before induction, 2. five minutes&#xD;
      after the placement of the retractor, 3. 10 minutes after the beginning of OLV, 4. at the end&#xD;
      of surgery, and 5. 6 hours after surgery. CRP was measured also 24 hours after the operation.&#xD;
      For the analysis of serum CRP, IL 6, IL 8 and IL 10, blood samples were collected without&#xD;
      additive. After centrifugation, serum samples were stored at -20 °C until analysis. Samples&#xD;
      were analysed in one batch. CRP, IL 6, IL 8 and IL 10 were measured by a chemiluminescent&#xD;
      immunometric assay (Immulite analyser; Simens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany); a&#xD;
      high-sensitivity method with a detection limit of 0.3 mg/L was used for measuring CRP.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Procalcitonin (PCT) levels were measured 6 and 24 hours after the operation. Chest X-rays&#xD;
      were taken 6 hours after the procedure to evaluate the infiltration of the nonoperated lung.&#xD;
      The following scoring was used: 0=no infiltration; 1=partly infiltrated; and 2= fully&#xD;
      infiltratied.&#xD;
&#xD;
      The oxygenation index (ratio of partial arterial oxygen pressure to inspiratory fraction of&#xD;
      oxygen =PaO2/FiO2) was calculated 6 hours after the procedure.&#xD;
&#xD;
      SECONDARY ENDPOINTS The clinical postoperative outcome was assessed as secondary endpoint&#xD;
      based on adverse events. The following parameters were determined: prolonged antibiotics,&#xD;
      diagnosed pneumonia, reintubation, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, acute&#xD;
      respiratory distress syndrome, acute renal failure, postoperative nausea and vomiting and&#xD;
      death.&#xD;
&#xD;
      STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statistical analysis were performed using the R software v 3 (R&#xD;
      Development Core Team). All p-values reported are two-sided and the significance level was&#xD;
      set at 5% (p &lt; 0.05). Continuous variables are presented as mean ±SD.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Repeated measures ANOVA was used to identify differences in plasma CRP, IL6, IL8 and IL10&#xD;
      concentrations between the two study groups.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Based on authors' previous pilot study in 6 patients, to detect the significant difference of&#xD;
      the IL 6 concentration with a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, 16 patients in&#xD;
      each group sufficed for the primary test. To compensate for withdrawals, 20 patients per&#xD;
      group were included in the study.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Where appropriate t-test, Mann-Whitney tests and Chi-square test were also used.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </detailed_description>
  <overall_status>Completed</overall_status>
  <start_date>July 2008</start_date>
  <completion_date type="Actual">January 2014</completion_date>
  <primary_completion_date type="Actual">September 2013</primary_completion_date>
  <phase>Phase 1</phase>
  <study_type>Interventional</study_type>
  <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
  <study_design_info>
    <allocation>Randomized</allocation>
    <intervention_model>Parallel Assignment</intervention_model>
    <primary_purpose>Treatment</primary_purpose>
    <masking>Double (Participant, Investigator)</masking>
  </study_design_info>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>IL 6</measure>
    <time_frame>intraoperatively and 6 hours after surgery</time_frame>
    <description>IL 6 blood level (ng/L) at the 1. Insertion of the retractor, 2. Begining of OLV 3. End of surgery, 4. Six hours after surgery</description>
  </primary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>IL8</measure>
    <time_frame>intraoperatively , 6 hours after surgery</time_frame>
    <description>IL 8 (mg/L) blood level at the 1. Insertion of the retractor, 2. Begining of OLV 3. End of surgery, 4. Six hours after surgery</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>IL10</measure>
    <time_frame>intraoperatively , 6 hours after surgery</time_frame>
    <description>IL 10 blood level (ng/L) at the 1. Insertion of the retractor, 2. Begining of OLV 3. End of surgery, 4. Six hours after surgery</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>CRP</measure>
    <time_frame>24 hours after surgery</time_frame>
    <description>CRP blood level 24 hours after surgery</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Oxygenation index</measure>
    <time_frame>6h after surgery</time_frame>
    <description>pO2/FiO2</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Lung infiltration</measure>
    <time_frame>6h after surgery</time_frame>
    <description>X-ray of the lung- clear lungs, partly infiltrated lungs, totally infiltrated lungs</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Postoperative adverse events</measure>
    <time_frame>24h after surgery</time_frame>
    <description>Prolonged antibiotics Pneumonia Reintubation SIRS ARDS Sepsis Death Acute Renal Failure Pooperative nausea and vomiting</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <number_of_arms>2</number_of_arms>
  <enrollment type="Actual">40</enrollment>
  <condition>Inflammation</condition>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Sevoflurane</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Experimental</arm_group_type>
    <description>Sevoflurane group (S group)- The group anaesthesied with sevoflurane</description>
  </arm_group>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Propofol</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Active Comparator</arm_group_type>
    <description>Propofol 4-6 mg/kg/h iv</description>
  </arm_group>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Drug</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>Sevoflurane</intervention_name>
    <description>MAC 3-5 V% during surgery</description>
    <arm_group_label>Sevoflurane</arm_group_label>
    <other_name>Sevorane</other_name>
  </intervention>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Drug</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>Propofol</intervention_name>
    <description>Propofol group (P group)- The group anaesthesied with propofol</description>
    <arm_group_label>Propofol</arm_group_label>
  </intervention>
  <eligibility>
    <criteria>
      <textblock>
        Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Patients aged 20-70 years&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  elective open lobectomy with OLV&#xD;
&#xD;
        Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  history of drug hypersensitivity&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  drug addiction&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  treatment with psychotropic drugs&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  severe psychiatric and central nerve system diseases&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  persistent tobacco abuse, autoimmune system diseases&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  diabetes mellitus&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  cardiac failure (New York Heart Association class greater than 2)&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  clinically relevant obstructive and restrictive lung diseases (vital capacity or&#xD;
             forced expiratory volume in 1s lover than 50% of the predicted values)&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary arterial pressure grater than 25 mmHg)&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  pre-existing coagulation disorders&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  history of treatment with immunosuppressant drugs in the 4 weeks before surgery&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Patient with evidence of pulmonary or systemic infections (C-reactive protein serum&#xD;
             concentration greater than 5 mg/L, leucocytosis greater than 10.0 bioparticles/L or&#xD;
             body temperature greater than 37 stC)&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  perioperative blood derivatives, steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug&#xD;
             (NSAID)&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </criteria>
    <gender>All</gender>
    <minimum_age>20 Years</minimum_age>
    <maximum_age>70 Years</maximum_age>
    <healthy_volunteers>No</healthy_volunteers>
  </eligibility>
  <overall_official>
    <last_name>Iztok Potocnik, MD, MSC</last_name>
    <role>Principal Investigator</role>
    <affiliation>University Medical Centre Ljubljana</affiliation>
  </overall_official>
  <overall_official>
    <last_name>Vesna Novak Jankovic, MD, PROF</last_name>
    <role>Study Chair</role>
    <affiliation>University Medical Centre Ljubljana</affiliation>
  </overall_official>
  <location>
    <facility>
      <name>UMCLjubljana, CD of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy</name>
      <address>
        <city>Ljubljana</city>
        <zip>1230</zip>
        <country>Slovenia</country>
      </address>
    </facility>
  </location>
  <location_countries>
    <country>Slovenia</country>
  </location_countries>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>De Conno E, Steurer MP, Wittlinger M, Zalunardo MP, Weder W, Schneiter D, Schimmer RC, Klaghofer R, Neff TA, Schmid ER, Spahn DR, Z'graggen BR, Urner M, Beck-Schimmer B. Anesthetic-induced improvement of the inflammatory response to one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jun;110(6):1316-26. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a10731.</citation>
    <PMID>19417610</PMID>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Schilling T, Kozian A, Senturk M, Huth C, Reinhold A, Hedenstierna G, Hachenberg T. Effects of volatile and intravenous anesthesia on the alveolar and systemic inflammatory response in thoracic surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jul;115(1):65-74. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318214b9de.</citation>
    <PMID>21399490</PMID>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Schilling T, Kozian A, Kretzschmar M, Huth C, Welte T, Buhling F, Hedenstierna G, Hachenberg T. Effects of propofol and desflurane anaesthesia on the alveolar inflammatory response to one-lung ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;99(3):368-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem184. Epub 2007 Jul 9.</citation>
    <PMID>17621602</PMID>
  </results_reference>
  <verification_date>July 2014</verification_date>
  <study_first_submitted>July 3, 2014</study_first_submitted>
  <study_first_submitted_qc>July 8, 2014</study_first_submitted_qc>
  <study_first_posted type="Estimate">July 11, 2014</study_first_posted>
  <last_update_submitted>July 8, 2014</last_update_submitted>
  <last_update_submitted_qc>July 8, 2014</last_update_submitted_qc>
  <last_update_posted type="Estimate">July 11, 2014</last_update_posted>
  <responsible_party>
    <responsible_party_type>Principal Investigator</responsible_party_type>
    <investigator_affiliation>University Medical Centre Ljubljana</investigator_affiliation>
    <investigator_full_name>Iztok Potocnik</investigator_full_name>
    <investigator_title>MD, MSC</investigator_title>
  </responsible_party>
  <keyword>thoracotomy</keyword>
  <keyword>one-lung ventilation (OLV)</keyword>
  <keyword>total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA)</keyword>
  <keyword>volatile induced and maintained anaesthesia (VIMA)</keyword>
  <keyword>cytokines</keyword>
  <keyword>interleukine (IL)</keyword>
  <condition_browse>
    <!-- CAUTION:  The following MeSH terms are assigned with an imperfect algorithm            -->
    <mesh_term>Inflammation</mesh_term>
  </condition_browse>
  <intervention_browse>
    <!-- CAUTION:  The following MeSH terms are assigned with an imperfect algorithm            -->
    <mesh_term>Propofol</mesh_term>
    <mesh_term>Sevoflurane</mesh_term>
  </intervention_browse>
  <pending_results>
    <submitted>July 11, 2014</submitted>
    <returned>August 5, 2014</returned>
  </pending_results>
  <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
</clinical_study>


download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02188407
org study id: UKC-TOR-1
nct id: NCT02188407
lead sponsor: 
has dmc: Yes
The aim of the study was to prospectively investigate the influence of one-lung ventilation
      (OLV) on the inflammatory response and to identify possible antiinflammatory effects of the
      volatile anaesthetic sevoflurane.

      Forty patients undergoing thoracic surgery with OLV were enrolled in this prospective,
      randomised study. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups to receive either
      propofol (Group P) or sevoflurane (Group S) for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia.

      Inflammatory mediators (Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin8 (IL8), Interleukin 10 (IL10), (C-
      reactive protein)CRP) were measured intra- and postoperatively.

      Six hours after surgery oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) was calculated and chest X ray was
      taken and assessed.

      The clinical outcome determinated by postoperative adverse events was assessed as the
      secondary endpoint.
Lung injury is the main complication of open lung surgery and is associated with a very high
      mortality rate.

      In 1984, Zeldin reported on ten patients with a complication that he referred to as
      postpneumonectomy pulmonary oedema (PLE). The complication is sometimes not easy to
      differentiate from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), defined by Bernard et al,
      because the patients may not fulfill all the ARDS criteria. The incidence of this so-called
      acute lung injury (ALI) after lobectomy is 1-7%. The mortality rate in patients with ARDS and
      ALI is 72% and 33%, respectively.

      In patients undergoing lung resection, mechanical ventilation and surgery may induce alveolar
      and systemic inflammatory responses. One-lung ventilation (OLV) has become as a standard
      procedure for many interventions in thoracic surgery with a need for deflation of the lung to
      facilitate the surgical procedure. It is also the main cause of acute inflammatory response
      and is associated with ALI and ARDS. The inflammatory reaction produces injury to the lung
      endothelium. The loss of endothelium integrity causes increased protein leak into the
      alveolar fluid. The inflammatory reaction leads to other histological changes. These
      reactions during OLV have been reported by many investigators.

      A number of studies have shown that sevoflurane attenuates cardiac ischaemia-reperfusion
      injury. These results have been lately transferred to lung surgery. Some studies have
      demonstrated that volatile anaesthetics sevoflurane, isoflurane and desflurane have an impact
      on ischaemic-reperfusion lung injury. These studies have confirmed the local alveolar, but
      not the systemic antiinflammatory effects of sevoflurane.

      Studies to date have not evaluated long-lasting effects of anaesthetics administered
      intraoperatively.

      Demonstrating the influence of volatile anaesthetics on the inflammatory response and the
      treatment outcome in patients undergoing open lung surgery with OLV is still a great
      challenge for thoracic anaesthesiologists.

      The effects of sevoflurane on release of inflammatory markers has been addressed before, but
      the added value of our study is that we tested the systemic imunomodulatory effect of
      sevoflurane in combination with postoperative clinical outcome and adverse effects.

      In the current study the following null hypothesis was tested: the administration of
      sevoflurane or propofol does not affect the systemic proinflammatory response after open lung
      surgery with OLV.

      ANAESTHESIA REGIMEN All patients were given oral diazepam 5-10 mg (Apaurin, Krka, d.d.) one
      hour before surgery. On arrival in the operating room, they were randomly assigned to either
      Group P or Group S. Randomisation was done according to computer-generated order.

      Antibiotic prophylaxis with intravenous (iv) cefazolin (Cefamezin, Krka, d.d.) 2g/100 ml 0.9%
      NaCl was used in all patients.

      Standardised clinical monitoring devices were attached to all patients prior to induction of
      anaesthesia. For extended haemodynamic monitoring LiDCO plus system was used.

      A thoracic epidural catheter was inserted at the T6-7 level. Anaesthesia induction in Group P
      was performed with propofol (Propoven, Fresenius Kabi) and in Group S with sevoflurane
      (Sevorane, Abbott Laboratories). Before intubation all patients received remifentanil
      (Ultiva, GlaxoSmithKline) and vecuronium (Norcuron, Organon).

      All patients were intubated with a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube (Malinckrodt,
      with hook, 37-41 Charriere) and ventilated by volume-controlled ventilation, provided by a
      closed-circuit anaesthesia ventilator (Primus, Draeger, Luebeck, Germany). The tidal volume
      was set to 6 ml/kg. The peak inspiratory pressure was limited to 25 cm H2O. The fraction of
      inspired oxygen was adjusted to maintain oxyhaemoglobin saturation at greater than 96%
      (fraction of inspired oxygen 0.3 to 0.4 before OLV; fraction of inspired oxygen 0.6 to 0.7
      during OLV, and the respiratory rate to keep the PaCO2 between 3.8-4.5 kPa. The positive end
      expiratory pressure (PEEP) was set to 5 cm H2O. Gas concentration and airway pressures were
      measured at the proximal end of the tube using ventilator-integrated functions. During OLV
      the tidal volume was set to 4 ml/kg and peak inspiratory pressure limited to 25 cm H2O. Other
      ventilation settings were maintained and PEEP was reduced to 3 cm H2O.

      Anaesthesia was maintained with propofol in Group P (4-6 mg/kg/h) and with sevoflurane (V%
      2-2.5) in Group S. The rate of remifentanil iv infusion was 0.3-0.5 mcg/kg/min in both
      groups. The depth of anaesthesia was measured by a bispectral index (BIS) monitor; BIS values
      were maintained at 40-60.

      For haemodynamic management the following algorithm was used: continuous infusion of 0.9%
      NaCl 6 mL /kg for the first hour, followed by 2.5 ml /kg/h, if DO2I<600 ml/min/m2 and SVR>
      800 and SVV > 10% 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven, Fresenius Kabi) until SVV decreased under
      10% ; if there was no improvement after 250 ml 6% HES-a, dobutamine (Inotop Torrex Pharma)
      1-10 mcg/kg/min iv is introduced; if SVR < 800 dyn•s/cm5 then ephedrine (0.5% Efedrin, UMC
      Ljubljana Pharmacy) 5-10 mg iv was given. If the mean arterial pressure increases by more
      than 30% and the heart rate by more than 30% from baseline, the infusion of remifentanil is
      increased by 0.1mcg/kg/min.

      At the end of the procedure, the action of muscle relaxants was reversed with neostigmine
      (Neostigmin-Actavis, Actavis) 2.5 mg and atropine (Atropinum sulfuricum, Nycomed) 1 mg iv.
      All patients were extubated in the operating theatre and then transferred to the recovery
      room.

      POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT After surgery, the patients stayed in the recovery room for one hour
      and were then transferred to the intensive care unit of the Department of Thoracic Surgery.

      Standard postoperative monitoring generally used in these procedures was implemented.
      Haemodynamic monitoring using the LiDCO plus system was continued after surgery.

      Oxygen titrated to the lowest level needed to achieve the target arterial oxygen saturation
      of 96%, was administered via a Venturi mask.

      For postoperative haemodynamic management the following algorithm was implemented: continuous
      infusion of 0.9% NaCl 1 ml/kg/h , if oxygen delivery index (DO2I) was less than 600 ml/min/m2
      and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was higher than 800 dyn•s/cm5 infusion of 6%
      hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven, Fresenius Kabi), if no improvement occurs after 250 ml 6% HES,
      dobutamine (Inotop, Torrex Pharma) 1-10 mcg/kg/min was initiated, if SVR < 800 than ephedrine
      (0.5% Efedrin, Pharmacy UMC Ljubjana ) 5-10 mg iv was given.

      In the recovery room, all patients received 10 ml of 0.5% levo-bupivacaine (Chirocaine,
      Abbott Laboratories) and the level of the epidural sensory block was tested. Postoperative
      analgesia was provided by infusion of 0.25 % levobupivacaine via an epidural catheter using a
      patient- controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. The infusion rate was 5 ml/h and lockout time 30
      min. Hourly pain assessments using a visual analogue scale (VAS) were performed. Patients
      with VAS scores greater than 3 received a rescue analgetic piritramide 3 mg (Dipidolor,
      Johnson&Johnson) intravenously.

      MEASUREMENTS The data recorded included demographic characteristics, time of surgery, time of
      OLV and DO2.

      Arterial blood samples for the determinations of cytokines (IL 6, IL 8, IL 10), C-reactive
      protein (CRP) were drawn at the following time points: 1. before induction, 2. five minutes
      after the placement of the retractor, 3. 10 minutes after the beginning of OLV, 4. at the end
      of surgery, and 5. 6 hours after surgery. CRP was measured also 24 hours after the operation.
      For the analysis of serum CRP, IL 6, IL 8 and IL 10, blood samples were collected without
      additive. After centrifugation, serum samples were stored at -20 °C until analysis. Samples
      were analysed in one batch. CRP, IL 6, IL 8 and IL 10 were measured by a chemiluminescent
      immunometric assay (Immulite analyser; Simens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany); a
      high-sensitivity method with a detection limit of 0.3 mg/L was used for measuring CRP.

      Procalcitonin (PCT) levels were measured 6 and 24 hours after the operation. Chest X-rays
      were taken 6 hours after the procedure to evaluate the infiltration of the nonoperated lung.
      The following scoring was used: 0=no infiltration; 1=partly infiltrated; and 2= fully
      infiltratied.

      The oxygenation index (ratio of partial arterial oxygen pressure to inspiratory fraction of
      oxygen =PaO2/FiO2) was calculated 6 hours after the procedure.

      SECONDARY ENDPOINTS The clinical postoperative outcome was assessed as secondary endpoint
      based on adverse events. The following parameters were determined: prolonged antibiotics,
      diagnosed pneumonia, reintubation, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, acute
      respiratory distress syndrome, acute renal failure, postoperative nausea and vomiting and
      death.

      STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statistical analysis were performed using the R software v 3 (R
      Development Core Team). All p-values reported are two-sided and the significance level was
      set at 5% (p < 0.05). Continuous variables are presented as mean ±SD.

      Repeated measures ANOVA was used to identify differences in plasma CRP, IL6, IL8 and IL10
      concentrations between the two study groups.

      Based on authors' previous pilot study in 6 patients, to detect the significant difference of
      the IL 6 concentration with a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, 16 patients in
      each group sufficed for the primary test. To compensate for withdrawals, 20 patients per
      group were included in the study.

      Where appropriate t-test, Mann-Whitney tests and Chi-square test were also used.
allocation: Randomized
intervention model: Parallel Assignment
primary purpose: Treatment
masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
measure: IL 6
time frame: intraoperatively and 6 hours after surgery
description: IL 6 blood level (ng/L) at the 1. Insertion of the retractor, 2. Begining of OLV 3. End of surgery, 4. Six hours after surgery
measure: IL8
time frame: intraoperatively , 6 hours after surgery
description: IL 8 (mg/L) blood level at the 1. Insertion of the retractor, 2. Begining of OLV 3. End of surgery, 4. Six hours after surgery
measure: IL10
time frame: intraoperatively , 6 hours after surgery
description: IL 10 blood level (ng/L) at the 1. Insertion of the retractor, 2. Begining of OLV 3. End of surgery, 4. Six hours after surgery
measure: CRP
time frame: 24 hours after surgery
description: CRP blood level 24 hours after surgery
measure: Oxygenation index
time frame: 6h after surgery
description: pO2/FiO2
measure: Lung infiltration
time frame: 6h after surgery
description: X-ray of the lung- clear lungs, partly infiltrated lungs, totally infiltrated lungs
measure: Postoperative adverse events
time frame: 24h after surgery
description: Prolonged antibiotics Pneumonia Reintubation SIRS ARDS Sepsis Death Acute Renal Failure Pooperative nausea and vomiting
arm group label: Sevoflurane
arm group type: Experimental
description: Sevoflurane group (S group)- The group anaesthesied with sevoflurane
arm group label: Propofol
arm group type: Active Comparator
description: Propofol 4-6 mg/kg/h iv
intervention type: Drug
intervention name: Sevoflurane
description: MAC 3-5 V% during surgery
arm group label: Sevoflurane
other name: Sevorane
intervention type: Drug
intervention name: Propofol
description: Propofol group (P group)- The group anaesthesied with propofol
arm group label: Propofol
criteria: 
gender: All
minimum age: 20 Years
maximum age: 70 Years
healthy volunteers: No
last name: Iztok Potocnik, MD, MSC
role: Principal Investigator
affiliation: University Medical Centre Ljubljana
last name: Vesna Novak Jankovic, MD, PROF
role: Study Chair
affiliation: University Medical Centre Ljubljana
facility: 
country: Slovenia
citation: De Conno E, Steurer MP, Wittlinger M, Zalunardo MP, Weder W, Schneiter D, Schimmer RC, Klaghofer R, Neff TA, Schmid ER, Spahn DR, Z'graggen BR, Urner M, Beck-Schimmer B. Anesthetic-induced improvement of the inflammatory response to one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jun;110(6):1316-26. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a10731.
PMID: 19417610
citation: Schilling T, Kozian A, Senturk M, Huth C, Reinhold A, Hedenstierna G, Hachenberg T. Effects of volatile and intravenous anesthesia on the alveolar and systemic inflammatory response in thoracic surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jul;115(1):65-74. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318214b9de.
PMID: 21399490
citation: Schilling T, Kozian A, Kretzschmar M, Huth C, Welte T, Buhling F, Hedenstierna G, Hachenberg T. Effects of propofol and desflurane anaesthesia on the alveolar inflammatory response to one-lung ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;99(3):368-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem184. Epub 2007 Jul 9.
PMID: 17621602
responsible party type: Principal Investigator
investigator affiliation: University Medical Centre Ljubljana
investigator full name: Iztok Potocnik
investigator title: MD, MSC
mesh term: Inflammation
mesh term: Propofol
mesh term: Sevoflurane
submitted: July 11, 2014
returned: August 5, 2014