<clinical_study>
  <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
  <required_header>
    <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
    <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
    <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01727856</url>
  </required_header>
  <id_info>
    <org_study_id>NMCSD.2012.0060</org_study_id>
    <secondary_id>NIH CTSA 8KL2TR000110-05</secondary_id>
    <nct_id>NCT01727856</nct_id>
  </id_info>
  <brief_title>Usability and Reliability of a New Physical Therapy Tool</brief_title>
  <official_title>An Evaluation of a Novel Motion Tracking Enabled Knee Physical Therapy Application With Healthy Patients to Assess Reliability and Usability</official_title>
  <sponsors>
    <lead_sponsor>
      <agency>Reflexion Health, Inc.</agency>
      <agency_class>Industry</agency_class>
    </lead_sponsor>
    <collaborator>
      <agency>United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego</agency>
      <agency_class>U.S. Fed</agency_class>
    </collaborator>
  </sponsors>
  <source>Reflexion Health, Inc.</source>
  <oversight_info>
    <has_dmc>No</has_dmc>
  </oversight_info>
  <brief_summary>
    <textblock>
      Rehabilitation exercise conducted at home following injury improves clinical and functional&#xD;
      outcomes. Optimum compliance with prescribed exercise regimens requires regular patient&#xD;
      instruction, performance assessment, monitoring and general encouragement from healthcare&#xD;
      staff. Exercise at home though convenient for patients is not conducive for provision of the&#xD;
      professional support needed to maximize prescribed regimen effectiveness.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Software in development by Reflexion Health Inc. along with the Naval Medical Center San&#xD;
      Diego (NMCSD) is being designed to facilitate remote staff-patient interaction during at-home&#xD;
      rehabilitative exercise sessions. Microsoft Kinect® will serve as the hardware platform for&#xD;
      the designed software package tentatively called, &quot;Reflexion.&quot; Kinect® contains a&#xD;
      marker-less/controller-less motion tracking camera. The final Reflexion software will rely on&#xD;
      a &quot;Rehabilitation Measurement Tool (RMT)&quot; to detect cardinal plane skeletal joint movement&#xD;
      and its velocity utilizing the embedded Kinect® camera while also providing patient visual&#xD;
      feedback via an avatar on a television screen.&#xD;
&#xD;
      In this observational minimal risk study, RMT/Kinect® functional reliability and usability&#xD;
      will be assessed. Twenty healthy subjects will physically set-up and turn-on the&#xD;
      hardware/software system; receive exercise directions from the RMT; then conduct a series of&#xD;
      knee exercises similar to those prescribed after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair.&#xD;
&#xD;
      An initial limited data set, obtained by Reflexion Health, provided validity and reliability&#xD;
      measures. Eighteen degrees of absolute difference was detected between manual goniometry and&#xD;
      Kinect® measurements in relevant planes of movement utilized during prescribed ACL exercise.&#xD;
      Good relative agreement between RMT and goniometry scores was obtained (ICC = 0.89). A&#xD;
      correctable systematic bias toward underestimation by the RMT will allow for future more&#xD;
      accurate estimations of joint positioning improving face validity.&#xD;
&#xD;
      RMT functional reliability and general usability will be expressed in this study utilizing&#xD;
      descriptive statistics and scaled questionnaires. Hardware component malfunction (Kinect®&#xD;
      camera, laptop, PC, or LCD television/monitor) as well as RMT internally logged software&#xD;
      errors and failure will tallied and measured to ascertain RMT reliability.&#xD;
&#xD;
      User-RMT interaction quality will be evaluated with video recordings of each set-up and&#xD;
      exercise session. Specifically, usability measures will include: need for additional&#xD;
      assistance setting-up or operating the RMT; number of attempts required by the subject to&#xD;
      interact with a specific feature: time spent on specific elements during the session.&#xD;
      Participant feedback will be elicited post-session using two scaled questionnaires: System&#xD;
      Usability Scale (SUS)and Reflexion Usability Scale (RUS). Findings from the study will guide&#xD;
      software modifications needed prior to implementation of future clinical studies within the&#xD;
      NMCSD population.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </brief_summary>
  <detailed_description>
    <textblock>
      1. General Approach:&#xD;
&#xD;
           We plan on using an observational study design to assess the reliability and usability&#xD;
           of the RMT by healthy volunteers as they participate in a simulated session of knee&#xD;
           physical therapy as presented by the RMT. Each session will be supervised by research&#xD;
           staff and recorded for later review and assessment of areas of concern for reliability&#xD;
           and usability.&#xD;
&#xD;
        2. Methods:&#xD;
&#xD;
           The study will use 20 (n=20) healthy volunteers. These subjects will be actively&#xD;
           recruited from Naval Medical Center San Diego and Orthopedic by research staff. We will&#xD;
           also use an informational flyer placed in the NMCSD Physical Therapy and Orthopedic&#xD;
           outpatient clinic waiting room. No medical records will be used to identify subjects for&#xD;
           recruitment. Subjects will be approached by research staff and will be asked about&#xD;
           participation and will undergo standard practices regarding meeting, inclusion and&#xD;
           exclusion criteria and clinical trial consent by trained research staff. Those who&#xD;
           consent to participate will be taken to an area that houses the RMT hardware and&#xD;
           software. Subjects will then undergo a brief 5 minute tutorial on the setup, power-on,&#xD;
           and navigation of the hardware and gesture controlled software.&#xD;
&#xD;
           After the orientation session each subject will be presented the RMT hardware and asked&#xD;
           to connect the hardware components via provided cables and subsequently power on the&#xD;
           system and application as well as position themselves correctly in front of the camera.&#xD;
           Next, they will be instructed to follow the on screen prompts to enter their subject ID&#xD;
           and pertinent login information and navigate the system using gestures. Following the&#xD;
           setup process they will then proceed to engage in four exercises sequentially presented&#xD;
           by the RMT software. Approximately 5 repetitions of each exercise will be recorded and&#xD;
           evaluated by the RMT after which the subject will be asked to follow the onscreen&#xD;
           prompts to review a summary of their activity as presented by the RMT and exit the&#xD;
           application. After their interaction with the RMT they will be asked to complete a&#xD;
           System Usability Scale questionnaire as well as a Reflexion Usability Scale&#xD;
           questionnaire.&#xD;
&#xD;
           We anticipate the total time required by each subject will be approximately 45 minutes.&#xD;
           Research staff will be available to provide any assistance as requested by the subjects&#xD;
           in their interaction with the RMT. Additionally, staff will also intervene while&#xD;
           consented subjects perform the exercises if they detect any signs of impending injury or&#xD;
           harm. Subjects will be allowed to terminate their involvement at any time and for any&#xD;
           reason.&#xD;
&#xD;
           Review of the research staff notes during the subject interaction with the RMT, SUS and&#xD;
           RUS results, and videotape of the interaction between the subject and RMT will be&#xD;
           corroborated post-hoc.&#xD;
&#xD;
             1. Sample Size&#xD;
&#xD;
                We estimate the sample size of this study to be approximately 20 subjects. Since no&#xD;
                direct comparison is being made to a control cohort, no inferential statistical&#xD;
                analysis will be performed. This means that there is no meaningful way to&#xD;
                appropriately power the study via sample size adjustments. Our choice of 20&#xD;
                subjects, therefore, was based on balancing the logistics required to test this&#xD;
                platform with collecting sufficient data to understand the usability of then&#xD;
                system.&#xD;
&#xD;
             2. Randomization&#xD;
&#xD;
                N/A&#xD;
&#xD;
             3. Blinding&#xD;
&#xD;
                N/A&#xD;
&#xD;
             4. Initial Orientation Session&#xD;
&#xD;
           Subjects will be given a brief video tutorial on how to connect the Kinect camera to the&#xD;
           television and laptop, power on the RMT and Kinect camera, and operate the RMT hardware&#xD;
           and software by research staff; any questions will be answered at that time regarding&#xD;
           RMT operation. Then, subjects will be evaluated by a licensed, currently practicing&#xD;
           physical therapist and shown the four exercises they will perform in the session. The&#xD;
           therapist will work with each of the patients until they achieve a satisfactory&#xD;
           performance in each of the exercises, as assessed by the therapist.&#xD;
&#xD;
        3. Components&#xD;
&#xD;
             -  Hardware:&#xD;
&#xD;
                  -  Kinect Camera&#xD;
&#xD;
                  -  LCD Television&#xD;
&#xD;
                  -  Laptop PC&#xD;
&#xD;
             -  Software:&#xD;
&#xD;
                  -  Windows 7 Operating System&#xD;
&#xD;
                  -  Rehabilitation Measurement Tool Software Application&#xD;
&#xD;
        4. Statistical Analysis:&#xD;
&#xD;
      The primary goal of this research is to understand the usability and reliability of the&#xD;
      system. Since the present application is relatively novel, there are no standard mthods to&#xD;
      'success' or 'failure' of the system. Therefore, we do not intend to perform any inferential&#xD;
      statistical analyses. Rather, we will generate descriptive statistics to be used in a&#xD;
      post-hoc fashion to determine system reliability, and usability for future applications to&#xD;
      sick patients undergoing physical therapy for post-ACL reconstruction surgery. Descriptive&#xD;
      statistics provide better insight into the data allowing a more informed assessment of&#xD;
      potential risks of the system. Understanding the distributional nature of the data (e.g.,&#xD;
      normal symmetric, normal skewed, bimodal, etc.) and the variability of the data scores can&#xD;
      better identify overall safety risks as well as help to specify individuals that could&#xD;
      potentially incur a greater safety risk, should one exist.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </detailed_description>
  <overall_status>Completed</overall_status>
  <start_date>October 2012</start_date>
  <primary_completion_date type="Actual">December 2012</primary_completion_date>
  <study_type>Observational</study_type>
  <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
  <study_design_info>
    <observational_model>Cohort</observational_model>
    <time_perspective>Prospective</time_perspective>
  </study_design_info>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>Reliability</measure>
    <time_frame>30 minutes, patients followed for duration of set-up, initialization, and completion of RMT exercise protocol</time_frame>
    <description>We have designed and plan to implement a measure, which quantifies the length of time for the subject to set-up and initialize the system which will be used to test inter-reliability of patients using the Reflexion Measurement Tool to complete the exercise protocol. After the patient completes the exercise protocol we will ask the patient to complete the Reflexion Usability Scale to provide their user feedback and experience.</description>
  </primary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Usability</measure>
    <time_frame>30 minutes, patients followed for duration of set-up, initialization, and completion of RMT exercise protocol</time_frame>
    <description>The number of interactions required by the study coordinator in order for the subject to correctly set up, initialize and complete the set protocol of physical therapy exercises using the Rehabilitation Measurement Tool. The study coordinator will use the Reflexion Usability Scale to quantify and measure outcome while subject is using the system to complete the exercise protocol.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <number_of_groups>1</number_of_groups>
  <enrollment type="Actual">20</enrollment>
  <condition>Healthy Normals</condition>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Rehabilitation Measurement Tool</arm_group_label>
    <description>This single arm consists of all subjects which will interact with the tool under invstigation.</description>
  </arm_group>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Device</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>Rehabilitation Measurement Tool</intervention_name>
    <description>The Rehabilitation Measurement Tool represents a telerehabilitation tool for physical therapy.</description>
    <arm_group_label>Rehabilitation Measurement Tool</arm_group_label>
  </intervention>
  <eligibility>
    <study_pop>
      <textblock>
        Healthy males and femailes, ages 18-35&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </study_pop>
    <sampling_method>Probability Sample</sampling_method>
    <criteria>
      <textblock>
        Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Healthy Males and Females&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Age 18-35&#xD;
&#xD;
        Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Active knee symptoms&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Enrollment in knee physical therapy within 3 months of evaluation&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  External or implanted lower extremity prosthetics&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Administration of regularly scheduled pain medication for lower extremities including&#xD;
             oral, topical, or intra-articular routes of delivery&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Surgery or procedures within 3 months prior to enrollment&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Previous History of traumatic Knee Injury that required surgical intervention and/or&#xD;
             resulted in baseline knee functional disability&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Pregnant women&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Significant cognitive impairment&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Neurovestibular deficits resulting in impaired balance and proprioception&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Traumatic brain injury&#xD;
&#xD;
          -  Loss of function or immobilization of both upper extremities&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </criteria>
    <gender>All</gender>
    <minimum_age>18 Years</minimum_age>
    <maximum_age>35 Years</maximum_age>
    <healthy_volunteers>Accepts Healthy Volunteers</healthy_volunteers>
  </eligibility>
  <location>
    <facility>
      <name>Naval Medical Center San Diego</name>
      <address>
        <city>San Diego</city>
        <state>California</state>
        <zip>92134</zip>
        <country>United States</country>
      </address>
    </facility>
  </location>
  <location_countries>
    <country>United States</country>
  </location_countries>
  <reference>
    <citation>Hurley MV, Walsh NE, Mitchell H, Nicholas J, Patel A. Long-term outcomes and costs of an integrated rehabilitation program for chronic knee pain: a pragmatic, cluster randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Feb;64(2):238-47. doi: 10.1002/acr.20642.</citation>
    <PMID>21954131</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Jan MH, Hung JY, Lin JC, Wang SF, Liu TK, Tang PF. Effects of a home program on strength, walking speed, and function after total hip replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):1943-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.011.</citation>
    <PMID>15605331</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Jette DU, Jette AM. Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with knee impairments. Phys Ther. 1996 Nov;76(11):1178-87. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.11.1178.</citation>
    <PMID>8911431</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Harris GR, Susman JL. Managing musculoskeletal complaints with rehabilitation therapy: summary of the Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on musculoskeletal rehabilitation interventions. J Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;51(12):1042-6.</citation>
    <PMID>12540330</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Fischer DA, Tewes DP, Boyd JL, Smith JP, Quick DC. Home based rehabilitation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Feb;(347):194-9.</citation>
    <PMID>9520889</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Campbell R, Evans M, Tucker M, Quilty B, Dieppe P, Donovan JL. Why don't patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):132-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.132.</citation>
    <PMID>11154253</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Jette AM, Rooks D, Lachman M, Lin TH, Levenson C, Heislein D, Giorgetti MM, Harris BA. Home-based resistance training: predictors of participation and adherence. Gerontologist. 1998 Aug;38(4):412-21. doi: 10.1093/geront/38.4.412.</citation>
    <PMID>9726128</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Fitzgerald GK. Therapeutic exercise for knee osteoarthritis: considering factors that may influence outcome. Eura Medicophys. 2005 Jun;41(2):163-71.</citation>
    <PMID>16200033</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Pisters MF, Veenhof C, van Meeteren NL, Ostelo RW, de Bakker DH, Schellevis FG, Dekker J. Long-term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Oct 15;57(7):1245-53. doi: 10.1002/art.23009.</citation>
    <PMID>17907210</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Rand D, Kizony R, Weiss PT. The Sony PlayStation II EyeToy: low-cost virtual reality for use in rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008 Dec;32(4):155-63. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31818ee779.</citation>
    <PMID>19265756</PMID>
  </reference>
  <reference>
    <citation>Burke, J. W. et al. Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. Vis Comput 25, 1085-1099 (2009).</citation>
  </reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Pisters MF, Veenhof C, Schellevis FG, Twisk JW, Dekker J, De Bakker DH. Exercise adherence improving long-term patient outcome in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Aug;62(8):1087-94. doi: 10.1002/acr.20182.</citation>
    <PMID>20235201</PMID>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Zhiqiang Luo; Chee Kian Lim; Weiting Yang; Ke Yen Tee; Kang Li; Chao Gu; Kim Doang Nguen; I-Ming Chen; Song Huat Yeo; ,</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Zhou, H. Human motion tracking for rehabilitation--A survey. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control (2008).</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Papastergiou, M. Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: A literature review. Computers &amp; Education 53, 603-622 (2009).</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Broeren J, Claesson L, Goude D, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual rehabilitation in an activity centre for community-dwelling persons with stroke. The possibilities of 3-dimensional computer games. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(3):289-96. doi: 10.1159/000149576. Epub 2008 Jul 31.</citation>
    <PMID>18667809</PMID>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Yu, C. A Study on Technology Acceptance of Applying Wii to Physical Therapy. (2008).</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Lange, B., Flynn, S. &amp; Rizzo, A. Initial usability assessment of off-the-shelf video game consoles for clinical game-based motor rehabilitation. Phys. Ther. Rev. 14, 355-363 (2009).</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Clark R, Kraemer T. Clinical use of Nintendo Wii bowling simulation to decrease fall risk in an elderly resident of a nursing home: a case report. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(4):174-80. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200932040-00006.</citation>
    <PMID>20469567</PMID>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Holden, M., Dyar, T. &amp; Schwamm, L. Home-based telerehabilitation using a virtual environment system. (2003)</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Rizzo AA, Strickland D, Bouchard S. The challenge of using virtual reality in telerehabilitation. Telemed J E Health. 2004 Summer;10(2):184-95. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2004.10.184.</citation>
    <PMID>15319048</PMID>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Gövercin, M., Missala, I. M., Marschollek, M. &amp; Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. Virtual Rehabilitation and Telerehabilitation for the Upper Limb. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry 23, 79-90 (2010).</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Sigal, L. Articulated Pose Estimation and Tracking: Introduction. Visual Analysis of Humans (2011).</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Lange, B., Rizzo, S., Chang, C. &amp; Suma, E. Markerless Full Body Tracking: Depth-Sensing Technology within Virtual Environments. The Interservice/Industry , Simulation &amp; Education Conference (I/ITSEC) (2011).</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Lewis GN, Woods C, Rosie JA, McPherson KM. Virtual reality games for rehabilitation of people with stroke: perspectives from the users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(5):453-63. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.574310. Epub 2011 Apr 17.</citation>
    <PMID>21495917</PMID>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Rand, D., Kizony, R., Feintuch, U. &amp; Katz, N. Comparison of two VR platforms for rehabilitation: video capture versus HMD. … Teleoperators &amp; Virtual Presence, Vol. 14, No. 2, April 2005, 147-160 (2005). 28. Mumford, N. et al. 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation. 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation 175-180 (2008).</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Kizony, R., Katz, N. &amp; Tamar Weiss, P. L. Adapting an immersive virtual reality system for rehabilitation. J. Visual. Comput. Animat. 14, 261-268 (2003).</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Bruun, A. Evaluating the Usability of Home Healthcare Applications. Human-Centered Design of E-Health (2010).</citation>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Gruchmrnann T. The impact of usability on patient safety. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2005 Nov-Dec;39(6):462-5. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2005)39[462:TIOUOP]2.0.CO;2. No abstract available.</citation>
    <PMID>17432472</PMID>
  </results_reference>
  <results_reference>
    <citation>Fairbanks RJ, Wears RL. Hazards with medical devices: the role of design. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;52(5):519-21. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Aug 22. No abstract available.</citation>
    <PMID>18722693</PMID>
  </results_reference>
  <verification_date>November 2014</verification_date>
  <study_first_submitted>November 1, 2012</study_first_submitted>
  <study_first_submitted_qc>November 12, 2012</study_first_submitted_qc>
  <study_first_posted type="Estimate">November 16, 2012</study_first_posted>
  <last_update_submitted>November 5, 2014</last_update_submitted>
  <last_update_submitted_qc>November 5, 2014</last_update_submitted_qc>
  <last_update_posted type="Estimate">November 6, 2014</last_update_posted>
  <responsible_party>
    <responsible_party_type>Sponsor</responsible_party_type>
  </responsible_party>
  <keyword>rehabilitation</keyword>
  <keyword>physical therapy</keyword>
  <keyword>telemedicine</keyword>
  <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
</clinical_study>


download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01727856
org study id: NMCSD.2012.0060
secondary id: NIH CTSA 8KL2TR000110-05
nct id: NCT01727856
lead sponsor: 
collaborator: 
has dmc: No
Rehabilitation exercise conducted at home following injury improves clinical and functional
      outcomes. Optimum compliance with prescribed exercise regimens requires regular patient
      instruction, performance assessment, monitoring and general encouragement from healthcare
      staff. Exercise at home though convenient for patients is not conducive for provision of the
      professional support needed to maximize prescribed regimen effectiveness.

      Software in development by Reflexion Health Inc. along with the Naval Medical Center San
      Diego (NMCSD) is being designed to facilitate remote staff-patient interaction during at-home
      rehabilitative exercise sessions. Microsoft Kinect® will serve as the hardware platform for
      the designed software package tentatively called, "Reflexion." Kinect® contains a
      marker-less/controller-less motion tracking camera. The final Reflexion software will rely on
      a "Rehabilitation Measurement Tool (RMT)" to detect cardinal plane skeletal joint movement
      and its velocity utilizing the embedded Kinect® camera while also providing patient visual
      feedback via an avatar on a television screen.

      In this observational minimal risk study, RMT/Kinect® functional reliability and usability
      will be assessed. Twenty healthy subjects will physically set-up and turn-on the
      hardware/software system; receive exercise directions from the RMT; then conduct a series of
      knee exercises similar to those prescribed after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair.

      An initial limited data set, obtained by Reflexion Health, provided validity and reliability
      measures. Eighteen degrees of absolute difference was detected between manual goniometry and
      Kinect® measurements in relevant planes of movement utilized during prescribed ACL exercise.
      Good relative agreement between RMT and goniometry scores was obtained (ICC = 0.89). A
      correctable systematic bias toward underestimation by the RMT will allow for future more
      accurate estimations of joint positioning improving face validity.

      RMT functional reliability and general usability will be expressed in this study utilizing
      descriptive statistics and scaled questionnaires. Hardware component malfunction (Kinect®
      camera, laptop, PC, or LCD television/monitor) as well as RMT internally logged software
      errors and failure will tallied and measured to ascertain RMT reliability.

      User-RMT interaction quality will be evaluated with video recordings of each set-up and
      exercise session. Specifically, usability measures will include: need for additional
      assistance setting-up or operating the RMT; number of attempts required by the subject to
      interact with a specific feature: time spent on specific elements during the session.
      Participant feedback will be elicited post-session using two scaled questionnaires: System
      Usability Scale (SUS)and Reflexion Usability Scale (RUS). Findings from the study will guide
      software modifications needed prior to implementation of future clinical studies within the
      NMCSD population.
1. General Approach:

           We plan on using an observational study design to assess the reliability and usability
           of the RMT by healthy volunteers as they participate in a simulated session of knee
           physical therapy as presented by the RMT. Each session will be supervised by research
           staff and recorded for later review and assessment of areas of concern for reliability
           and usability.

        2. Methods:

           The study will use 20 (n=20) healthy volunteers. These subjects will be actively
           recruited from Naval Medical Center San Diego and Orthopedic by research staff. We will
           also use an informational flyer placed in the NMCSD Physical Therapy and Orthopedic
           outpatient clinic waiting room. No medical records will be used to identify subjects for
           recruitment. Subjects will be approached by research staff and will be asked about
           participation and will undergo standard practices regarding meeting, inclusion and
           exclusion criteria and clinical trial consent by trained research staff. Those who
           consent to participate will be taken to an area that houses the RMT hardware and
           software. Subjects will then undergo a brief 5 minute tutorial on the setup, power-on,
           and navigation of the hardware and gesture controlled software.

           After the orientation session each subject will be presented the RMT hardware and asked
           to connect the hardware components via provided cables and subsequently power on the
           system and application as well as position themselves correctly in front of the camera.
           Next, they will be instructed to follow the on screen prompts to enter their subject ID
           and pertinent login information and navigate the system using gestures. Following the
           setup process they will then proceed to engage in four exercises sequentially presented
           by the RMT software. Approximately 5 repetitions of each exercise will be recorded and
           evaluated by the RMT after which the subject will be asked to follow the onscreen
           prompts to review a summary of their activity as presented by the RMT and exit the
           application. After their interaction with the RMT they will be asked to complete a
           System Usability Scale questionnaire as well as a Reflexion Usability Scale
           questionnaire.

           We anticipate the total time required by each subject will be approximately 45 minutes.
           Research staff will be available to provide any assistance as requested by the subjects
           in their interaction with the RMT. Additionally, staff will also intervene while
           consented subjects perform the exercises if they detect any signs of impending injury or
           harm. Subjects will be allowed to terminate their involvement at any time and for any
           reason.

           Review of the research staff notes during the subject interaction with the RMT, SUS and
           RUS results, and videotape of the interaction between the subject and RMT will be
           corroborated post-hoc.

             1. Sample Size

                We estimate the sample size of this study to be approximately 20 subjects. Since no
                direct comparison is being made to a control cohort, no inferential statistical
                analysis will be performed. This means that there is no meaningful way to
                appropriately power the study via sample size adjustments. Our choice of 20
                subjects, therefore, was based on balancing the logistics required to test this
                platform with collecting sufficient data to understand the usability of then
                system.

             2. Randomization

                N/A

             3. Blinding

                N/A

             4. Initial Orientation Session

           Subjects will be given a brief video tutorial on how to connect the Kinect camera to the
           television and laptop, power on the RMT and Kinect camera, and operate the RMT hardware
           and software by research staff; any questions will be answered at that time regarding
           RMT operation. Then, subjects will be evaluated by a licensed, currently practicing
           physical therapist and shown the four exercises they will perform in the session. The
           therapist will work with each of the patients until they achieve a satisfactory
           performance in each of the exercises, as assessed by the therapist.

        3. Components

             -  Hardware:

                  -  Kinect Camera

                  -  LCD Television

                  -  Laptop PC

             -  Software:

                  -  Windows 7 Operating System

                  -  Rehabilitation Measurement Tool Software Application

        4. Statistical Analysis:

      The primary goal of this research is to understand the usability and reliability of the
      system. Since the present application is relatively novel, there are no standard mthods to
      'success' or 'failure' of the system. Therefore, we do not intend to perform any inferential
      statistical analyses. Rather, we will generate descriptive statistics to be used in a
      post-hoc fashion to determine system reliability, and usability for future applications to
      sick patients undergoing physical therapy for post-ACL reconstruction surgery. Descriptive
      statistics provide better insight into the data allowing a more informed assessment of
      potential risks of the system. Understanding the distributional nature of the data (e.g.,
      normal symmetric, normal skewed, bimodal, etc.) and the variability of the data scores can
      better identify overall safety risks as well as help to specify individuals that could
      potentially incur a greater safety risk, should one exist.
observational model: Cohort
time perspective: Prospective
measure: Reliability
time frame: 30 minutes, patients followed for duration of set-up, initialization, and completion of RMT exercise protocol
description: We have designed and plan to implement a measure, which quantifies the length of time for the subject to set-up and initialize the system which will be used to test inter-reliability of patients using the Reflexion Measurement Tool to complete the exercise protocol. After the patient completes the exercise protocol we will ask the patient to complete the Reflexion Usability Scale to provide their user feedback and experience.
measure: Usability
time frame: 30 minutes, patients followed for duration of set-up, initialization, and completion of RMT exercise protocol
description: The number of interactions required by the study coordinator in order for the subject to correctly set up, initialize and complete the set protocol of physical therapy exercises using the Rehabilitation Measurement Tool. The study coordinator will use the Reflexion Usability Scale to quantify and measure outcome while subject is using the system to complete the exercise protocol.
arm group label: Rehabilitation Measurement Tool
description: This single arm consists of all subjects which will interact with the tool under invstigation.
intervention type: Device
intervention name: Rehabilitation Measurement Tool
description: The Rehabilitation Measurement Tool represents a telerehabilitation tool for physical therapy.
arm group label: Rehabilitation Measurement Tool
study pop: 
sampling method: Probability Sample
criteria: 
gender: All
minimum age: 18 Years
maximum age: 35 Years
healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
facility: 
country: United States
citation: Hurley MV, Walsh NE, Mitchell H, Nicholas J, Patel A. Long-term outcomes and costs of an integrated rehabilitation program for chronic knee pain: a pragmatic, cluster randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Feb;64(2):238-47. doi: 10.1002/acr.20642.
PMID: 21954131
citation: Jan MH, Hung JY, Lin JC, Wang SF, Liu TK, Tang PF. Effects of a home program on strength, walking speed, and function after total hip replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):1943-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.011.
PMID: 15605331
citation: Jette DU, Jette AM. Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with knee impairments. Phys Ther. 1996 Nov;76(11):1178-87. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.11.1178.
PMID: 8911431
citation: Harris GR, Susman JL. Managing musculoskeletal complaints with rehabilitation therapy: summary of the Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on musculoskeletal rehabilitation interventions. J Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;51(12):1042-6.
PMID: 12540330
citation: Fischer DA, Tewes DP, Boyd JL, Smith JP, Quick DC. Home based rehabilitation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Feb;(347):194-9.
PMID: 9520889
citation: Campbell R, Evans M, Tucker M, Quilty B, Dieppe P, Donovan JL. Why don't patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):132-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.132.
PMID: 11154253
citation: Jette AM, Rooks D, Lachman M, Lin TH, Levenson C, Heislein D, Giorgetti MM, Harris BA. Home-based resistance training: predictors of participation and adherence. Gerontologist. 1998 Aug;38(4):412-21. doi: 10.1093/geront/38.4.412.
PMID: 9726128
citation: Fitzgerald GK. Therapeutic exercise for knee osteoarthritis: considering factors that may influence outcome. Eura Medicophys. 2005 Jun;41(2):163-71.
PMID: 16200033
citation: Pisters MF, Veenhof C, van Meeteren NL, Ostelo RW, de Bakker DH, Schellevis FG, Dekker J. Long-term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Oct 15;57(7):1245-53. doi: 10.1002/art.23009.
PMID: 17907210
citation: Rand D, Kizony R, Weiss PT. The Sony PlayStation II EyeToy: low-cost virtual reality for use in rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008 Dec;32(4):155-63. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31818ee779.
PMID: 19265756
citation: Burke, J. W. et al. Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. Vis Comput 25, 1085-1099 (2009).
citation: Pisters MF, Veenhof C, Schellevis FG, Twisk JW, Dekker J, De Bakker DH. Exercise adherence improving long-term patient outcome in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Aug;62(8):1087-94. doi: 10.1002/acr.20182.
PMID: 20235201
citation: Zhiqiang Luo; Chee Kian Lim; Weiting Yang; Ke Yen Tee; Kang Li; Chao Gu; Kim Doang Nguen; I-Ming Chen; Song Huat Yeo; ,
citation: Zhou, H. Human motion tracking for rehabilitation--A survey. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control (2008).
citation: Papastergiou, M. Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: A literature review. Computers & Education 53, 603-622 (2009).
citation: Broeren J, Claesson L, Goude D, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual rehabilitation in an activity centre for community-dwelling persons with stroke. The possibilities of 3-dimensional computer games. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(3):289-96. doi: 10.1159/000149576. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
PMID: 18667809
citation: Yu, C. A Study on Technology Acceptance of Applying Wii to Physical Therapy. (2008).
citation: Lange, B., Flynn, S. & Rizzo, A. Initial usability assessment of off-the-shelf video game consoles for clinical game-based motor rehabilitation. Phys. Ther. Rev. 14, 355-363 (2009).
citation: Clark R, Kraemer T. Clinical use of Nintendo Wii bowling simulation to decrease fall risk in an elderly resident of a nursing home: a case report. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(4):174-80. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200932040-00006.
PMID: 20469567
citation: Holden, M., Dyar, T. & Schwamm, L. Home-based telerehabilitation using a virtual environment system. (2003)
citation: Rizzo AA, Strickland D, Bouchard S. The challenge of using virtual reality in telerehabilitation. Telemed J E Health. 2004 Summer;10(2):184-95. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2004.10.184.
PMID: 15319048
citation: Gövercin, M., Missala, I. M., Marschollek, M. & Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. Virtual Rehabilitation and Telerehabilitation for the Upper Limb. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry 23, 79-90 (2010).
citation: Sigal, L. Articulated Pose Estimation and Tracking: Introduction. Visual Analysis of Humans (2011).
citation: Lange, B., Rizzo, S., Chang, C. & Suma, E. Markerless Full Body Tracking: Depth-Sensing Technology within Virtual Environments. The Interservice/Industry , Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC) (2011).
citation: Lewis GN, Woods C, Rosie JA, McPherson KM. Virtual reality games for rehabilitation of people with stroke: perspectives from the users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(5):453-63. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.574310. Epub 2011 Apr 17.
PMID: 21495917
citation: Rand, D., Kizony, R., Feintuch, U. & Katz, N. Comparison of two VR platforms for rehabilitation: video capture versus HMD. … Teleoperators & Virtual Presence, Vol. 14, No. 2, April 2005, 147-160 (2005). 28. Mumford, N. et al. 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation. 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation 175-180 (2008).
citation: Kizony, R., Katz, N. & Tamar Weiss, P. L. Adapting an immersive virtual reality system for rehabilitation. J. Visual. Comput. Animat. 14, 261-268 (2003).
citation: Bruun, A. Evaluating the Usability of Home Healthcare Applications. Human-Centered Design of E-Health (2010).
citation: Gruchmrnann T. The impact of usability on patient safety. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2005 Nov-Dec;39(6):462-5. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2005)39[462:TIOUOP]2.0.CO;2. No abstract available.
PMID: 17432472
citation: Fairbanks RJ, Wears RL. Hazards with medical devices: the role of design. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;52(5):519-21. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Aug 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 18722693
responsible party type: Sponsor