<clinical_study>
  <!-- This xml conforms to an XML Schema at:
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/html/images/info/public.xsd -->
  <required_header>
    <download_date>ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023</download_date>
    <link_text>Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.</link_text>
    <url>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01689675</url>
  </required_header>
  <id_info>
    <org_study_id>NA_00049927</org_study_id>
    <secondary_id>1R01AR054009-01A1</secondary_id>
    <nct_id>NCT01689675</nct_id>
  </id_info>
  <brief_title>Pain Management Following Musculoskeletal Injury</brief_title>
  <official_title>Pain Management Following Musculoskeletal Injury</official_title>
  <sponsors>
    <lead_sponsor>
      <agency>Johns Hopkins University</agency>
      <agency_class>Other</agency_class>
    </lead_sponsor>
    <collaborator>
      <agency>National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)</agency>
      <agency_class>NIH</agency_class>
    </collaborator>
  </sponsors>
  <source>Johns Hopkins University</source>
  <oversight_info>
    <has_dmc>No</has_dmc>
  </oversight_info>
  <brief_summary>
    <textblock>
      Musculoskeletal sprain/strain injuries and disorders (MSID) have a major impact on health,&#xD;
      quality of life and societal productivity. Early intervention for pain following acute MSIDs&#xD;
      may prevent secondary complications of chronic pain, disability, reduced quality of life or&#xD;
      lost productivity. The investigators goal is to evaluate the efficacy of a computer-based&#xD;
      self-management intervention for reducing pain and improving function in persons treated in&#xD;
      on-site physical rehabilitation centers.&#xD;
&#xD;
      The specific aims are:1) evaluate the efficacy of a computer-based self-management&#xD;
      intervention in reducing pain and self-efficacy and function in high risk MSID patients; 2)&#xD;
      determine long term impact during a six month follow-up period; and 3) determine whether&#xD;
      reductions of pain and improved function translate into reductions in lost work time days&#xD;
      away from work, restricted work days, worker's compensation costs and re-injury rates during&#xD;
      the 6 month follow-up.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Persons with sprain/strain injuries at risk for poor pain control will randomized to either:&#xD;
      1) control condition - standard care in the rehabilitation center plus computer exposure or&#xD;
      2) standard care plus computer-based self-management pain intervention. Assessment will be at&#xD;
      baseline, treatment completion, 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome measures are&#xD;
      self-efficacy, pain and physical/psychosocial functioning and secondary outcome measures are&#xD;
      days away from work, restricted work days worker's compensation costs and re-injury rates.&#xD;
      The investigation will also provide unique and valuable information regarding patients&#xD;
      acceptance and use of computer-based interventions following acute injury. By establishing&#xD;
      the utility and efficacy of computer-based pain management interventions for MSID the&#xD;
      investigators have the potential to improve the health and quality of life of persons with&#xD;
      injuries, improve productivity and develop new methods for health care delivery.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </brief_summary>
  <detailed_description>
    <textblock>
      The proposed study will use a 2 group randomized controlled clinical trial design. The two&#xD;
      groups are: 1) standard care in the rehabilitation center with control computer exposure&#xD;
      (SCCE) and 2) standard care plus computer-based self-management pain (CBSM) intervention. The&#xD;
      study will examine the short- and long-term effects of these interventions on pain and&#xD;
      physical and psychosocial functioning and productivity (DAW, RWD, WC costs and re-injury) in&#xD;
      200 completing patients with strain/sprain MSID. Outcome data will be collected at baseline,&#xD;
      after treatment, and at 3 and 6 month follow-up. All outcome assessments will be administered&#xD;
      by computer.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Pain Management Following Musculoskeletal Injury Study. The study is comprised of two phases:&#xD;
      Phase I Planning/Development and Phase II Intervention.&#xD;
&#xD;
      During Phase I Planning/Development, the study investigators 1) identified technology partner&#xD;
      to aid in computerization of intervention; 2) identified sites for study implementation; 3)&#xD;
      developed consent forms and tracking procedures; 4) developed computer based self-management&#xD;
      (CBSM) pain intervention; 5) developed computer based educational materials for the control&#xD;
      condition; 6) beta tested intervention materials; 7) developed recruitment materials; 8)&#xD;
      developed outcome assessment procedures measures.&#xD;
&#xD;
      During Phase II Intervention, the study investigators will 1)complete IRB review at each of&#xD;
      the study sites; 2) train study personnel, and upon approval from each of the IRBs; 3)&#xD;
      initiation of study subject recruitment and intervention. Phase II will begin June 2011 and&#xD;
      be completed by June 2013.&#xD;
&#xD;
      During Phase II a total of 200 patients will be enrolled in the study.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Control Group Individuals with acute MSID, in the employers with on-site rehabilitation&#xD;
      centers, are initially seen by the plant medical office and, if appropriate, referred for&#xD;
      rehabilitation services. Patients are given an initial evaluation by the treating physical or&#xD;
      occupational therapist and a treatment plan is implemented. The typical patient is seen for&#xD;
      an average of approximately 9 visits over a four-week period. However, patients can be seen&#xD;
      as long as indicated. SCCE is seen as the appropriate control condition for several reasons.&#xD;
      First, denying patients care is not ethically appropriate. Second, this is type of&#xD;
      rehabilitation and injury education is the care typically received by acute MSID patients and&#xD;
      is the current standard of practice. Currently the education is provided in written brochures&#xD;
      and handouts. The addition of computer interaction for presenting this education controls for&#xD;
      threats related to differential time spent in treatment and the novelty of computer&#xD;
      supplement to care. The computer exposure will be administered over 8 sessions during the&#xD;
      average 4-week period patients are receiving their standard on-site rehabilitation care.&#xD;
      Patients will come to the center to receive their standard care and then interact with the&#xD;
      computer for the 25-30 minute control condition. The primary goal of this condition is to&#xD;
      provide a control for computer exposure. Briefly, the first session will concentrate on&#xD;
      establishing the patient's ability to interact with the computer. The materials will provide&#xD;
      general education regarding the injury and methods for preventing re-injury. This condition&#xD;
      will not provide teaching and practice of specific pain management and coping management&#xD;
      skills. This control computer education activity will equalize the computer exposure of the&#xD;
      two groups and the duration of time devoted to injury care.&#xD;
&#xD;
      Intervention Group: Will receive the same medical care and physical therapy treatment as the&#xD;
      control group. In addition the computer-based self-management program (CBSM) intervention&#xD;
      will be administered over 8 sessions during the average 4 week period patients are receiving&#xD;
      their standard on-site rehabilitation care. Patients will come to the center to receive their&#xD;
      standard care and then interact with the computer for the 25-30 minute CBSM intervention. The&#xD;
      primary goals of treatment include developing skills for managing acute injury and related&#xD;
      pain including: reducing fear avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing, improving mood,&#xD;
      increasing perceptions of control and self-efficacy, maintaining activity and reducing pain.&#xD;
      The intervention materials are based on the investigators work in the a self-management&#xD;
      program for persons with limb loss and those shown effective in other secondary prevention&#xD;
      studies in MSID, specifically the Pain Disability Prevention Program (PDPP) develop by&#xD;
      Sullivan. While the PDPP has been evaluated on persons who have been out of work for six&#xD;
      weeks or more and this study targets individuals who are more recently injured, the content&#xD;
      of the intervention is appropriate for the study population. Each session focuses on specific&#xD;
      topics and sets of skills. Skills are presented and modeled by computer-based video during&#xD;
      sessions, audio will be used to explain models and teach skills such as relaxation training.&#xD;
      This will supplement any written materials and minimize the need for reading. Patients are&#xD;
      instructed to practice and apply skills between sessions. Patients will also be given&#xD;
      specific feedback about their progress in working through the CBSM modules. As all CBSM takes&#xD;
      place within the on-site rehabilitation center, staff are available to provide assistance if&#xD;
      necessary. The sessions initially focus on pain, which is a primary motivator to the patient,&#xD;
      expand the focus to cognitive and emotional factors related to pain and disability and&#xD;
      finally move to increasing activity. A home activity will be assigned at completion of the&#xD;
      session. The home activity will be printed out for the patient to take home and will be&#xD;
      available to the participant through the study website from remote locations. The study&#xD;
      intervention and home activities will be refined using focus group and pilot testing methods.&#xD;
    </textblock>
  </detailed_description>
  <overall_status>Completed</overall_status>
  <start_date>January 2012</start_date>
  <completion_date type="Actual">December 2013</completion_date>
  <primary_completion_date type="Actual">May 2013</primary_completion_date>
  <phase>N/A</phase>
  <study_type>Interventional</study_type>
  <has_expanded_access>No</has_expanded_access>
  <study_design_info>
    <allocation>Randomized</allocation>
    <intervention_model>Single Group Assignment</intervention_model>
    <primary_purpose>Prevention</primary_purpose>
    <masking>Single (Participant)</masking>
  </study_design_info>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>Pain</measure>
    <time_frame>3 month followup</time_frame>
    <description>Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory, which includes 4 pain items assessing current, worst, least, and average pain (0-no pain to 10-as bad as you can imagine) during the past week. This scale has excellent reliability and validity in a wide variety of acute and chronically painful conditions. In addition to measuring pain severity, 10 items measure pain-related interference in daily activities (0-does not interfere to 10-completely interferes) which also shows excellent reliability and validity in a wide variety of acute and chronically painful conditions.</description>
  </primary_outcome>
  <primary_outcome>
    <measure>Physical and Psychosocial Function</measure>
    <time_frame>3 month followup</time_frame>
    <description>The SF-12 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys. The SF-12 includes items that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. A total score and two subscales scores are calculated -physical function and psychosocial function. The survey was constructed for self-administration by persons 14 years of age and older, and for administration by a trained interviewer, self-report, or by telephone.</description>
  </primary_outcome>
  <secondary_outcome>
    <measure>Work Productivity</measure>
    <time_frame>3 month followup</time_frame>
    <description>Work productivity will be measured by the number of days away from work, restricted work days, and Worker's compensation costs related to this incident of care. Due to the lost productivity and worker compensation cost associated with MSID, it is critical to include these measures in the outcome analyses 10. In addition, the number of re-injuries that occur following treatment will also be included as an outcome measure. These data are available through contacting Worker's Compensation intermediary. We have experience accessing, manipulating and analyzing these data for previous program evaluation cost benefit analyses.</description>
  </secondary_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Catastrophizing</measure>
    <time_frame>3 month followup</time_frame>
    <description>The Pain Catastrophizing Scale will be used to measure catastrophic thinking related to pain. Respondents rate the frequency with which they experience 13 different thoughts and feelings related to pain. The scale has been shown to be reliable (alpha =.87) and has been associated with pain levels, self-reported disability and employment status.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Self-Efficacy</measure>
    <time_frame>3 month followup</time_frame>
    <description>There is evidence that enhancement of perceived self- efficacy may mediate pain control and improved psychosocial functioning in persons who participate in self-management intervention. Self-efficacy for pain management will be measured using the Pain Self-Efficacy scale which includes subscales that measure self-efficacy for pain management, self-efficacy for coping with symptoms, and self-efficacy for physical function.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Fear-avoidance beliefs</measure>
    <time_frame>3 month followup</time_frame>
    <description>This variable will be measured with 2 questionnaires: 1) The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), which has been shown to be a relevant measure of fear of movement/activity; 2) A modified form of the Fear-Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire that contains four items from the physical activity scales. These measures have both been associated with long term pain and work disability in acutely injured individuals.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <other_outcome>
    <measure>Utility and Use of Intervention Materials</measure>
    <time_frame>4 weeks after starting treatment</time_frame>
    <description>The use of computers for delivery of the intervention allows for ongoing monitoring of intervention activity materials. Quantitative metrics will be collected as part of the intervention including sessions attended, the amount of the program completed in each session, and utilization of Support Services (time on bulletin board and number of postings). Utilization of the website containing the intervention, Support Service and assessment materials will be evaluated for (1) the effectiveness with which users can accomplish tasks; (2) the speed with which users can find the information they are seeking and navigate through the elements of the prototype session; (3) the paths users take to complete a task; and 4) users' satisfaction level using the interactive tools. Qualitative data to be collected includes: user comments, concerns, frustrations, and suggestions.</description>
  </other_outcome>
  <number_of_arms>2</number_of_arms>
  <enrollment type="Actual">200</enrollment>
  <condition>Musculoskeletal Strain</condition>
  <condition>Musculoskeletal Sprain</condition>
  <condition>Injury of Musculoskeletal System</condition>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Computer based pain management</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Experimental</arm_group_type>
    <description>The computer-based self-management program (CBSM) intervention will be administered over 8 sessions during the average 4 week period patients are receiving their standard on-site rehabilitation care. Patients will come to the center to receive their standard care and then interact with the computer for the 25-30 minute CBSM intervention. The primary goals of treatment include developing skills for managing acute injury and related pain including: reducing fear avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing, improving mood, increasing perceptions of control and self-efficacy, maintaining activity and reducing pain. Skills are presented and modeled by computer-based video during sessions, audio will be used to explain models and teach skills such as relaxation training.</description>
  </arm_group>
  <arm_group>
    <arm_group_label>Education control</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_type>Active Comparator</arm_group_type>
    <description>The computer exposure will be administered over 8 sessions during the average 4-week period patients are receiving their standard on-site rehabilitation care. Patients will come to the center to receive their standard care and then interact with the computer for the 25-30 minute control condition. The primary goal of this condition is to provide a control for computer exposure. Briefly, the first session will concentrate on establishing the patient's ability to interact with the computer. The materials will provide general education regarding the injury and methods for preventing re-injury. This condition will not provide teaching and practice of specific pain management and coping management skills. This control computer education activity will equalize the computer exposure of the two groups and the duration of time devoted to injury care.</description>
  </arm_group>
  <intervention>
    <intervention_type>Behavioral</intervention_type>
    <intervention_name>Computer based pain management</intervention_name>
    <arm_group_label>Computer based pain management</arm_group_label>
    <arm_group_label>Education control</arm_group_label>
  </intervention>
  <eligibility>
    <criteria>
      <textblock>
        Inclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          1. age 18 years or older&#xD;
&#xD;
          2. Musculoskeletal sprain/strain injury&#xD;
&#xD;
          3. pain level greater or equal to 5&#xD;
&#xD;
          4. English speaking&#xD;
&#xD;
        Exclusion Criteria:&#xD;
&#xD;
          1. Age &lt; 18&#xD;
&#xD;
          2. non-English speaking&#xD;
      </textblock>
    </criteria>
    <gender>All</gender>
    <minimum_age>18 Years</minimum_age>
    <maximum_age>N/A</maximum_age>
    <healthy_volunteers>No</healthy_volunteers>
  </eligibility>
  <overall_official>
    <last_name>Stephen T Wegener, PhD</last_name>
    <role>Principal Investigator</role>
    <affiliation>Johns Hopkins University</affiliation>
  </overall_official>
  <location>
    <facility>
      <name>Johns Hopkins University</name>
      <address>
        <city>Baltimore</city>
        <state>Maryland</state>
        <zip>21287</zip>
        <country>United States</country>
      </address>
    </facility>
  </location>
  <location>
    <facility>
      <name>Vanderbilt University Medical Center</name>
      <address>
        <city>Nashville</city>
        <state>Tennessee</state>
        <zip>37232</zip>
        <country>United States</country>
      </address>
    </facility>
  </location>
  <location_countries>
    <country>United States</country>
  </location_countries>
  <link>
    <url>http://www.takechargeofpain.org</url>
    <description>Related Info</description>
  </link>
  <verification_date>October 2017</verification_date>
  <study_first_submitted>September 7, 2012</study_first_submitted>
  <study_first_submitted_qc>September 17, 2012</study_first_submitted_qc>
  <study_first_posted type="Estimate">September 21, 2012</study_first_posted>
  <last_update_submitted>October 4, 2017</last_update_submitted>
  <last_update_submitted_qc>October 4, 2017</last_update_submitted_qc>
  <last_update_posted type="Actual">October 6, 2017</last_update_posted>
  <responsible_party>
    <responsible_party_type>Sponsor</responsible_party_type>
  </responsible_party>
  <keyword>musculoskeletal</keyword>
  <keyword>pain</keyword>
  <keyword>pain management</keyword>
  <keyword>computer based intervention</keyword>
  <condition_browse>
    <!-- CAUTION:  The following MeSH terms are assigned with an imperfect algorithm            -->
    <mesh_term>Wounds and Injuries</mesh_term>
  </condition_browse>
  <!-- Results have not yet been posted for this study                                          -->
</clinical_study>


download date: ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on September 20, 2023
link text: Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
url: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01689675
org study id: NA_00049927
secondary id: 1R01AR054009-01A1
nct id: NCT01689675
lead sponsor: 
collaborator: 
has dmc: No
Musculoskeletal sprain/strain injuries and disorders (MSID) have a major impact on health,
      quality of life and societal productivity. Early intervention for pain following acute MSIDs
      may prevent secondary complications of chronic pain, disability, reduced quality of life or
      lost productivity. The investigators goal is to evaluate the efficacy of a computer-based
      self-management intervention for reducing pain and improving function in persons treated in
      on-site physical rehabilitation centers.

      The specific aims are:1) evaluate the efficacy of a computer-based self-management
      intervention in reducing pain and self-efficacy and function in high risk MSID patients; 2)
      determine long term impact during a six month follow-up period; and 3) determine whether
      reductions of pain and improved function translate into reductions in lost work time days
      away from work, restricted work days, worker's compensation costs and re-injury rates during
      the 6 month follow-up.

      Persons with sprain/strain injuries at risk for poor pain control will randomized to either:
      1) control condition - standard care in the rehabilitation center plus computer exposure or
      2) standard care plus computer-based self-management pain intervention. Assessment will be at
      baseline, treatment completion, 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome measures are
      self-efficacy, pain and physical/psychosocial functioning and secondary outcome measures are
      days away from work, restricted work days worker's compensation costs and re-injury rates.
      The investigation will also provide unique and valuable information regarding patients
      acceptance and use of computer-based interventions following acute injury. By establishing
      the utility and efficacy of computer-based pain management interventions for MSID the
      investigators have the potential to improve the health and quality of life of persons with
      injuries, improve productivity and develop new methods for health care delivery.
The proposed study will use a 2 group randomized controlled clinical trial design. The two
      groups are: 1) standard care in the rehabilitation center with control computer exposure
      (SCCE) and 2) standard care plus computer-based self-management pain (CBSM) intervention. The
      study will examine the short- and long-term effects of these interventions on pain and
      physical and psychosocial functioning and productivity (DAW, RWD, WC costs and re-injury) in
      200 completing patients with strain/sprain MSID. Outcome data will be collected at baseline,
      after treatment, and at 3 and 6 month follow-up. All outcome assessments will be administered
      by computer.

      Pain Management Following Musculoskeletal Injury Study. The study is comprised of two phases:
      Phase I Planning/Development and Phase II Intervention.

      During Phase I Planning/Development, the study investigators 1) identified technology partner
      to aid in computerization of intervention; 2) identified sites for study implementation; 3)
      developed consent forms and tracking procedures; 4) developed computer based self-management
      (CBSM) pain intervention; 5) developed computer based educational materials for the control
      condition; 6) beta tested intervention materials; 7) developed recruitment materials; 8)
      developed outcome assessment procedures measures.

      During Phase II Intervention, the study investigators will 1)complete IRB review at each of
      the study sites; 2) train study personnel, and upon approval from each of the IRBs; 3)
      initiation of study subject recruitment and intervention. Phase II will begin June 2011 and
      be completed by June 2013.

      During Phase II a total of 200 patients will be enrolled in the study.

      Control Group Individuals with acute MSID, in the employers with on-site rehabilitation
      centers, are initially seen by the plant medical office and, if appropriate, referred for
      rehabilitation services. Patients are given an initial evaluation by the treating physical or
      occupational therapist and a treatment plan is implemented. The typical patient is seen for
      an average of approximately 9 visits over a four-week period. However, patients can be seen
      as long as indicated. SCCE is seen as the appropriate control condition for several reasons.
      First, denying patients care is not ethically appropriate. Second, this is type of
      rehabilitation and injury education is the care typically received by acute MSID patients and
      is the current standard of practice. Currently the education is provided in written brochures
      and handouts. The addition of computer interaction for presenting this education controls for
      threats related to differential time spent in treatment and the novelty of computer
      supplement to care. The computer exposure will be administered over 8 sessions during the
      average 4-week period patients are receiving their standard on-site rehabilitation care.
      Patients will come to the center to receive their standard care and then interact with the
      computer for the 25-30 minute control condition. The primary goal of this condition is to
      provide a control for computer exposure. Briefly, the first session will concentrate on
      establishing the patient's ability to interact with the computer. The materials will provide
      general education regarding the injury and methods for preventing re-injury. This condition
      will not provide teaching and practice of specific pain management and coping management
      skills. This control computer education activity will equalize the computer exposure of the
      two groups and the duration of time devoted to injury care.

      Intervention Group: Will receive the same medical care and physical therapy treatment as the
      control group. In addition the computer-based self-management program (CBSM) intervention
      will be administered over 8 sessions during the average 4 week period patients are receiving
      their standard on-site rehabilitation care. Patients will come to the center to receive their
      standard care and then interact with the computer for the 25-30 minute CBSM intervention. The
      primary goals of treatment include developing skills for managing acute injury and related
      pain including: reducing fear avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing, improving mood,
      increasing perceptions of control and self-efficacy, maintaining activity and reducing pain.
      The intervention materials are based on the investigators work in the a self-management
      program for persons with limb loss and those shown effective in other secondary prevention
      studies in MSID, specifically the Pain Disability Prevention Program (PDPP) develop by
      Sullivan. While the PDPP has been evaluated on persons who have been out of work for six
      weeks or more and this study targets individuals who are more recently injured, the content
      of the intervention is appropriate for the study population. Each session focuses on specific
      topics and sets of skills. Skills are presented and modeled by computer-based video during
      sessions, audio will be used to explain models and teach skills such as relaxation training.
      This will supplement any written materials and minimize the need for reading. Patients are
      instructed to practice and apply skills between sessions. Patients will also be given
      specific feedback about their progress in working through the CBSM modules. As all CBSM takes
      place within the on-site rehabilitation center, staff are available to provide assistance if
      necessary. The sessions initially focus on pain, which is a primary motivator to the patient,
      expand the focus to cognitive and emotional factors related to pain and disability and
      finally move to increasing activity. A home activity will be assigned at completion of the
      session. The home activity will be printed out for the patient to take home and will be
      available to the participant through the study website from remote locations. The study
      intervention and home activities will be refined using focus group and pilot testing methods.
allocation: Randomized
intervention model: Single Group Assignment
primary purpose: Prevention
masking: Single (Participant)
measure: Pain
time frame: 3 month followup
description: Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory, which includes 4 pain items assessing current, worst, least, and average pain (0-no pain to 10-as bad as you can imagine) during the past week. This scale has excellent reliability and validity in a wide variety of acute and chronically painful conditions. In addition to measuring pain severity, 10 items measure pain-related interference in daily activities (0-does not interfere to 10-completely interferes) which also shows excellent reliability and validity in a wide variety of acute and chronically painful conditions.
measure: Physical and Psychosocial Function
time frame: 3 month followup
description: The SF-12 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys. The SF-12 includes items that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. A total score and two subscales scores are calculated -physical function and psychosocial function. The survey was constructed for self-administration by persons 14 years of age and older, and for administration by a trained interviewer, self-report, or by telephone.
measure: Work Productivity
time frame: 3 month followup
description: Work productivity will be measured by the number of days away from work, restricted work days, and Worker's compensation costs related to this incident of care. Due to the lost productivity and worker compensation cost associated with MSID, it is critical to include these measures in the outcome analyses 10. In addition, the number of re-injuries that occur following treatment will also be included as an outcome measure. These data are available through contacting Worker's Compensation intermediary. We have experience accessing, manipulating and analyzing these data for previous program evaluation cost benefit analyses.
measure: Catastrophizing
time frame: 3 month followup
description: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale will be used to measure catastrophic thinking related to pain. Respondents rate the frequency with which they experience 13 different thoughts and feelings related to pain. The scale has been shown to be reliable (alpha =.87) and has been associated with pain levels, self-reported disability and employment status.
measure: Self-Efficacy
time frame: 3 month followup
description: There is evidence that enhancement of perceived self- efficacy may mediate pain control and improved psychosocial functioning in persons who participate in self-management intervention. Self-efficacy for pain management will be measured using the Pain Self-Efficacy scale which includes subscales that measure self-efficacy for pain management, self-efficacy for coping with symptoms, and self-efficacy for physical function.
measure: Fear-avoidance beliefs
time frame: 3 month followup
description: This variable will be measured with 2 questionnaires: 1) The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), which has been shown to be a relevant measure of fear of movement/activity; 2) A modified form of the Fear-Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire that contains four items from the physical activity scales. These measures have both been associated with long term pain and work disability in acutely injured individuals.
measure: Utility and Use of Intervention Materials
time frame: 4 weeks after starting treatment
description: The use of computers for delivery of the intervention allows for ongoing monitoring of intervention activity materials. Quantitative metrics will be collected as part of the intervention including sessions attended, the amount of the program completed in each session, and utilization of Support Services (time on bulletin board and number of postings). Utilization of the website containing the intervention, Support Service and assessment materials will be evaluated for (1) the effectiveness with which users can accomplish tasks; (2) the speed with which users can find the information they are seeking and navigate through the elements of the prototype session; (3) the paths users take to complete a task; and 4) users' satisfaction level using the interactive tools. Qualitative data to be collected includes: user comments, concerns, frustrations, and suggestions.
arm group label: Computer based pain management
arm group type: Experimental
description: The computer-based self-management program (CBSM) intervention will be administered over 8 sessions during the average 4 week period patients are receiving their standard on-site rehabilitation care. Patients will come to the center to receive their standard care and then interact with the computer for the 25-30 minute CBSM intervention. The primary goals of treatment include developing skills for managing acute injury and related pain including: reducing fear avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing, improving mood, increasing perceptions of control and self-efficacy, maintaining activity and reducing pain. Skills are presented and modeled by computer-based video during sessions, audio will be used to explain models and teach skills such as relaxation training.
arm group label: Education control
arm group type: Active Comparator
description: The computer exposure will be administered over 8 sessions during the average 4-week period patients are receiving their standard on-site rehabilitation care. Patients will come to the center to receive their standard care and then interact with the computer for the 25-30 minute control condition. The primary goal of this condition is to provide a control for computer exposure. Briefly, the first session will concentrate on establishing the patient's ability to interact with the computer. The materials will provide general education regarding the injury and methods for preventing re-injury. This condition will not provide teaching and practice of specific pain management and coping management skills. This control computer education activity will equalize the computer exposure of the two groups and the duration of time devoted to injury care.
intervention type: Behavioral
intervention name: Computer based pain management
arm group label: Computer based pain management
arm group label: Education control
criteria: 
gender: All
minimum age: 18 Years
maximum age: N/A
healthy volunteers: No
last name: Stephen T Wegener, PhD
role: Principal Investigator
affiliation: Johns Hopkins University
facility: 
facility: 
country: United States
url: http://www.takechargeofpain.org
description: Related Info
responsible party type: Sponsor
mesh term: Wounds and Injuries