What is the dipole moment direction in the nitrosonium ion?

In the recent question about the [molecular orbitals of $\ce{NO^{$x$}};\ x\in\{-1,0,+1\}$](https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/66633/4945) the follow-up title question arose:



> 
> Just a random side-question: What’s the dipole moment’s negative and positive sides in $\ce{NO+}$?
> 
> 
> 


At the time I was unable to answer that question sufficiently, therefore I share the addendum Q&A style. The question further deconstruct the molecular orbital components to the dipole moment.




In non-neutral species the dipole moment in calculations is dependent on the choice of the co-ordinate system. For this reason the origin is chosen to be the centre of mass. With $r=107.8~\pu{pm}$ on RMP2/def2-QZVPP previously determined by a geometry optimisation. The program used for the computations is Gaussian 09 Rev. D.01 and used input files are attached at the bottom of the post.


I am loosely following the same procedure/ conclusions as in [Gernot Frenking, Christoph Loschen, Andreas Krapp, Stefan Fau, and Steven H. Strauss, *J. Comp. Chem.*, **2007**, *28* (1), 117-126.](https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20477) (I believe it is available free of charge.) since $\ce{NO+}$ is isoelectronic with $\ce{CO}$.


According to the definition of the dipole moment
$$\huge\ominus \overset{\mathbf{p}}{\longrightarrow}\oplus$$
positive values in the following table indicate that the negative end is at the nitrogen atom.


\begin{array}{lr}\hline
\text{Orbital} & \text{Bond Moment} \\\hline
\text{MO 1 } (\sigma) & -4.8336 \\
\text{MO 2 } (\sigma) & 5.5232 \\
\text{MO 3 } (\sigma) & -0.7891 \\
\text{MO 4 } (\sigma) & -3.0061 \\
\text{MO 5 } (\pi ) & -1.1642 \\
\text{MO 6 } (\pi ) & -1.1642 \\
\text{MO 7 } (\sigma) & 4.7383 \\\hline
\text{MO 8 } (\pi, \text{virt.}) & (2.3831) \\
\text{MO 9 } (\pi, \text{virt.}) & (2.3831) \\\hline
\text{Total } \sum\_i^7 \text{MO }i & -0.6956 \\\hline
\end{array}


While we see the same polarisation of the molecular orbitals as in carbon monoxide, the magnitude differs and the HOMO of $\ce{NO+}$ cannot compensate for the polarisation of the electron density towards the oxygen.


[![molecular orbitals of NO+ projected into the molecular plane](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Ifan7.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Ifan7.jpg)




---


### Appendix


Base calculation for $\ce{NO+}$ after previous optimisation, `E(RHF)=-128.972090453` input file:



```

%chk=mp2qzvpp.chk
#p MP2/def2QZVPP
scf(verytight)
symmetry(loose)
gfinput gfoldprint iop(6/7=3)

base

+1 1
N   0.0 0.0 -0.575312
O   0.0 0.0  0.503398


```

Analysis calculation input file for MO 1



```

%oldchk=mp2qzvpp.chk
#p MP2/def2QZVPP
geom=check
guess=(read,only,alter)
symmetry(loose)
gfinput gfoldprint iop(6/7=3)

analysis

+13 1



```

(Both empty lines are necessary.)


Analysis calculation input file for MO 2, etc



```

%oldchk=mp2qzvpp.chk
#p MP2/def2QZVPP
geom=check
guess=(read,only,alter)
symmetry(loose)

analysis

+13 1

2,1


```

The last line needs to contain the complete reordering procedure. The MO to be analysed needs to be in first place. Therefore for MO 3 it needs to read `3,1,2`, for 4 `4,1,2,3`, etc.


 12