6

## Tunable pure spin supercurrents and the demonstration of a

## superconducting spin-wave device

1

Kun-Rok Jeon, 1,2 * Xavier Montiel, 3 Sachio Komori, 1 Chiara Ciccarelli, 2 James Haigh, 4 Hidekazu Kurebayashi,  Lesley F. Cohen,  Chang-Min Lee, 5 6

Mark G. Blamire 1 and Jason W. A. Robinson 1 *

1 Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, United Kingdom

2 Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom

3 Department of Physics, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, United Kingdom

4 Hitachi Cambridge Laboratory, J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom

- 5
- London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering at University of College London, London WC1H 01H, United Kingdom

The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

*To whom correspondence should be addressed: jeonkunrok@gmail.com, jjr33@cam.ac.uk

Recent ferromagnetic resonance experiments and theory of Pt/Nb/Ni8Fe2 proximitycoupled  structures  strongly  suggest  that  spin-orbit  coupling  (SOC)  in  Pt  in conjunction with a magnetic exchange field in Ni8Fe2 are the essential ingredients to generate  a  pure  spin  supercurrent  channel  in Nb.  Here,  by  substituting  Pt  for  a perpendicularly magnetized Pt/Co/Pt spin-sink, we are able to demonstrate the role of  SOC,  and  show  that  pure  spin  supercurrent  pumping  efficiency  across  Nb  is

tunable by controlling the magnetization direction of Co. By inserting a Cu spacer with weak SOC between Nb and Pt/(Co/Pt) spin-sink, we also prove that Rashbatype SOC is key for forming and transmitting pure spin supercurrents across Nb. Finally,  by  engineering  these  properties  within  a  single  multilayer  structure,  we demonstrate a prototype superconducting spin-wave (SW) device in which lateral SW  propagation  is  gateable  via  the  opening  or  closing  of  a  vertical  pure  spin supercurrent channel in Nb.

Spin-triplet  Cooper  pairs  carry  a  net  spin  component  in  addition  to  charge  and  are therefore key to the development of superconducting spintronics 1-3 , underlying a future revolution in energy-efficient computing. It is established that spin-polarized triplet pairs are generated via spin-mixing and spin-rotation processes at magneticallyinhomogeneous superconductor/ferromagnet (SC/FM) interfaces 1-3 . Recently, theoretical 4-8 and experimental studies 9-13 have  been dedicated to an alternative mechanism for triplet pair creation involving spin-orbit coupling (SOC) in combination with a magnetic exchange field h ex . In such systems, triplet pair creation depends on the commutation relationship 4-7 between SOC and h ex .

The latter mechanism via SOC in conjunction with h ex offers a conceptually novel approach  to  tune superconducting spin currents, as we  demonstrate  here using ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) spin pumping 9,14 .  When a perpendicularly magnetized Pt/Co/Pt spin-sink is proximity-coupled to Nb (singlet SC) (Fig. 1a), the Co thickness t Codependent magnetization anisotropy 15,16 changes its effective tilt angle Ɵ Co under in-plane (IP) FMR condition of the IP magnetized Ni8Fe2 (Fig. 1b). This in turn alters the degree of orthogonality between h ex and SOC at the interface of Nb and Pt/(Co/Pt) spin-sink.

Manipulating Ɵ Co determines the efficiency with which spin-zero triplets (converted from spin  singlets  by  the  presence  of h ex )  rotate  to  form  equal-spin  triplets 4-6 .  This  enables orthogonality  tuning  of  spin-angular-momentum  transfer  from  the  precessing  Ni8Fe2 through the proximity-induced equal-spin triplets into singlet Nb layers, which we call superconducting pure spin currents . Such transmitted spin currents to Pt/Co/Pt spin-sinks 9 result in the enhanced spin pumping/transfer which is then probed by measuring the FMR linewidth broadening or Gilbert damping increase of the middle Ni8Fe2 layer 9,14 .

To  demonstrate  our  approach,  we  perform  a  series  of  FMR  measurements  on Pt/Co/Pt/Nb/Ni8Fe2/Nb/Pt/Co/Pt multilayers (Fig. 1a). The ultrathin (≤ 1.5 nm) perpendicularly magnetized  Co  layers  serve  as  an internal source  of h ex to the neighbouring (inner) Pt layers, supplying spontaneous spin splitting 17,18 with out-of-plane (OOP) polarization (Fig. 1a); the outer Pt layers boost the perpendicular anisotropy of the Co as well as the total effective spin conductance of Pt/Co/Pt trilayers 19 . By inserting a thin Cu spacer with weak SOC at the interface between Nb and Pt/(Co/Pt) layers (Fig. 1a), we are able to separate the contribution of interfacial Rashba-type SOC to the θ Codependent  superconducting  spin-pumping  efficiency  from  other  contributions  and  to compare it with the prediction from spin-triplet proximity theory 4-6,8 .

We first measure the t Co -dependence of the superconducting transition T c (Fig. 1c) for  a  series  of  multilayers  with  and  without  Cu  spacers. T c decreases  rapidly  with increasing t Co  until  it  reaches  about  1.5  nm  where  it  slightly  increases.  No  significant change  in T c ( t Co)  appears  with  the  addition  of  the  Cu  spacer,  consistent  with  its  long (thermal) coherence length of several hundred nanometers . In analogy with the original 3 consideration  on  the  non-uniform  superconducting  state 20,21 ,  such  non-monotonic T c behaviour has been discussed based on a spatial modulation of the superconducting order

parameter due to Cooper pairs acquiring a non-zero net momentum in the presence of h ex ; in  particular,  for  SC/FM  multilayers  or  SC/FM  bilayers  with  FM  thickness t FM of  the order of the coherence length  FM, which leads to a damped oscillatory behaviour of the order parameter 22 . A quantitative analysis (see Methods) of the T c data (black lines, Fig. 1c) gives an effective 𝜉𝐹𝑀 of 1.4 -1.6 nm and interface transparency 𝛾𝐵 = 0.18 -0.20 for our  samples,  which  are  in  reasonable  agreement  with  those  obtained  from  Nb/FM 23 bilayers and Nb/Cu/FM trilayers 24 with strong FMs.

The t Co-dependent  magnetization  anisotropy  of  the  Pt/Co/Pt  spin  sinks  can  be independently characterized by static magnetometry measurements on Pt/Co/Pt/Nb-only films with different t Co. Figure 1e shows the typical magnetization hysteresis m H ( ) curves obtained at 8 K by applying the external magnetic field µ H 0 parallel and perpendicular to the film plane. At low t Co (≤ 0.8 nm), the easy axis of the Co magnetization M Co is clearly OOP,  indicating  that  the  ultrathin  Co  sandwiched  between  two  Pt  layers  has  wellestablished perpendicular magnetization anisotropy (PMA), as expected for the Pt 5d-Co 3d orbital hybridization at either Pt/Co interface plus SOC 15 . As t Co approaches 1.5 nm, the  predominant  magnetization  anisotropy  changes  from  OOP  to  IP,  exhibiting  the reorientation transition 16 . Using the relationship 16 µ H 0 ani ∙ M s /2 = K eff , where µ H 0 ani is the anisotropy field and M s is the saturation magnetization, the effective PMA energy K eff is estimated  for t Co  ≤  0.8  nm  to  be  1  MJ  m -3 ,  comparable  to  typical  values  of  the perpendicularly magnetized Pt/Co/Pt trilayers 25 .

Assuming coherent rotation of M Co from OOP under the application of IP resonance fields µ H 0 res for  the  middle Ni8Fe2, the effective θ Co can be estimate using the simple Stoner-Wohlfarth model where θ Co = arccos[ M µ H ( 0 res )/ M s ]. We then achieve discrete tilt states  of  the  Pt/Co/Pt  spin  sinks  from  OOP  to  IP  (Fig.  1f),  which  are  systematically

controllable by varying t Co.

We next show the influence of the tilt states on the superconducting spin-pumping efficiency,  namely  that  the  associated  orthogonality  between h ex and  SOC  at  the Nb/Pt/(Co/Pt)  interface  strongly  modifies  the  spin-angular-momentum  transfer  in  the superconducting state. Figure 2a,b shows the microwave frequency f dependence of FMR data for the Cu-absent (Cu-present) samples, taken above and below T c of the Nb layers. From this, we extract the effective Gilbert damping α , which provides a measure 9,14,18 of the  net  spin  current  flow  out  of  the  precessing  Ni8Fe2,  and  the  effective  saturation magnetization µ M 0 s (see Methods).

The extracted α and µ M 0 s values are plotted as a function of t Co in Fig. 2c. In the normal state ( T T / c &gt; 1), α is  almost t Co-independent for both sample sets and there is a small decrease in the magnitude by introducing Cu spacers. This means that the presence of  ultrathin  Co(≤  2  nm)  and  Cu(5  nm)  layers  hardly  changes  the  normal-state  spinpumping behaviour, as expected from their small spin conductances 19 relative to Pt and the three layers (Co, Cu, Pt) are all approximately spin-transparent 26 with each other due to their similar crystal and electronic structures.

However,  in  the  superconducting  state  ( T T / c &lt;  1),  a  significant t Co-dependent enhancement of α appears and  is strongly affected  by the addition of Cu. For the Cuabsent  multilayers,  as t Co  increases  the  superconducting-state  damping  enhancement (indicating  the  enhanced  spin  flow/transfer  mediated  most  likely  by  equal-spin  triplet pairing) 8,14,18 rapidly rises until reaching 0.8 nm and then slowly decreases for thicker Co layers, resulting in a maximum at t Co ≈ 0.8 nm. For the Cu-present samples, the overall amplitude of damping enhancement diminishes compared with the Cu-absent samples and  the  maximum  moves  to  a  lower  value  of t Co  (0.4  nm).  Since  this  non-trivial

enhancement of α t ( Co)  occurs  in  the  ultrathin  regime  ( t Co ≤  2  nm,  about  one  order  of magnitude smaller than the spin diffusion length 27 ) only for the superconducting state, it must reflect how  the  tilt states of the Pt/Co/Pt spin sinks correlate with the superconducting spin transport.

To elucidate this, we plot the damping difference across T c , defined as [ α 2 K α 8 K]/2∆2 K where 2∆ is the superconducting gap at 2 K calculated from the measured T c (Fig. 1d), with and without Cu spacers as a function of the effective θ Co (Fig. 2e). In the absence of the Cu spacers, [ α 2 K α 8 K]/2∆2 K rapidly rises with increasing θ Co from 0  to o 56 o followed a fall for a higher angle. However, this characteristic angular dependence vanishes  when  the  Cu  spacer  (with  weak  SOC)  is  present:  the  damping  difference increases monotonically/slowly up to the highest angle and it saturates to the similar value of the Cu-absent θ Co ≈ 76 o ( t Co = 0.4 nm) sample.

There are, in principle, two different sources of proximity-induced triplet pairing which  can contribute to the characteristic angular dependence  observed in our experimental  setup.  Firstly,  it  is  well-known  that  magnetization  noncollinearity  (or inhomogeneity) 1-3,28 between two FMs separated by a SC of the order of the coherence length can generate equal-spin triplets through the entire structure. The equal-spin triplet density is then ascribed to the relative magnetization angle θ between the two FMs 28 : ∝ M 1 × M 2 ∝ sin( θ ). This explains why our θ Co ≈ 76 o ( t Co = 0.4 nm) samples reveal larger enhancements than θ Co ≈ 9  ( o t Co = 2.0 nm) samples (Fig. 2e). Secondly, even for a single magnetically-homogeneous FM, the equal-spin triplet correlation can  be generated by introducing a strongly SO coupled interface (e.g. Pt) between the FM and SC 4-6,8 . In this case,  the  singlet-triplet  conversion  efficiency  is  predicted  to  scale  with  the  degree  of orthogonality between SOC and h ex ; or equivalently, the cross product of the SO vector

operator [𝐴 ̂ 𝑘 , [𝐴 ̂ 𝑘 , ℎ 𝑎 𝜎 𝑎  ]] and  the  exchange  field  operator ℎ 𝑎 𝜎 𝑎 .  Here 𝐴 ̂ 𝑘=𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 is  the vector potential describing the form of the SOC, for instance, the Rashba constant 𝛼𝑅 (Dresselhaus constant 𝛽𝐷 ) due to the interface (bulk) inversion asymmetry. 𝜎 𝑎 (ℎ 𝑎 ) with 𝑎 = x,y,z is the vector of Pauli matrices (exchange field).

For a metallic vertical structure with atomically flat interfaces, the vector potential can  be  approximated  as 4,5 : 𝐴 ̂ 𝑥 ≈ 0, 𝐴 ̂ 𝑦 ≈ -𝛽𝐷𝜎 𝑦 +𝛼𝑅𝜎 𝑧 , 𝐴 ̂ 𝑧 ≈ 𝛽𝐷𝜎 𝑧 -𝛼𝑅𝜎 𝑦 . With finite  Rashba  ( 𝛼𝑅 ≠  0)  and  zero  Dresselhaus  ( 𝛽𝐷 =  0)  contribution  to  the  SOC 6,8 ,  as relevant  to  our  experimental  setup,  a  sinusoidal  maximum  of  the  equal-spin  triplet correlation is expected when the canting angle between IP and OOP components of h ex becomes 45 0 .  In  such  a  case,  the overall triplet density  is quadratic  in 𝛼𝑅 and so very sensitive to details of the spin-orbit coupled interface. The addition of a-few-nm-thick Cu spacer  layers 26,29 at  the  spin-orbit  coupled  interface  turns  out  to  be  sufficient  to significantly quench the interfacial Rashba-type SOC, thus providing an important test experiment for the responsible mechanism, being done clearly here (inset of Fig. 2e,f).

We also note that non-vanishing of 𝐴 ̂ 𝑥 (≠ 0) , as would be expected from non-ideal interfaces  where  OOP  component  of  the  Rashba  SO  field  with  respect  to  the  local interface plane survives on a scale of the coherence length , allows the equal-spin triplet 7 to  be  generated  locally  even  with  a  purely  IP  magnetized  FM  ( ℎ 𝑥 = 0 ).  Each  triplet channel  is  then  able  to  transport  spin-angular-momentum  from  the  precessing  FM (Ni8Fe2) through a singlet SC (Nb) to a spin dissipative bath (Pt spin-sink) independently even  if  the  spatial  average  of  net  polarization  of  total  triplet  channels  over  the  entire interface  plane  becomes  zero.  This  is  a  likely  mechanism  for  our  previous  FMR experiments 9,18 and for the t Co = 0 samples (Fig. 2e). When the Pt spin-sink is substituted for the perpendicularly magnetized Pt/Co/Pt spin-sink, a global triplet channel opens in

addition  to  the  local  channels,  maximizing  the  overall  superconducting  spin-pumping efficiency at θ Co ≈ 45  (Fig. 2e). o

By taking all these effects together, we can arrive at good fits to [ α 2 K α 8 K]/2∆2 K vs. θ Co  data  for  both  sample  sets  (black  solid  and  dashed  lines  in  Fig.  2e,  see Supplementary Section 1,2), thereby reproducing the experimental results and capturing the underlying physics. To focus on the second SOC mechanism, in particular for the interfacial contribution, we take the difference between the data with and without the Cu spacer (Fig. 2f). We then find an approximately sinusoidal maximum at θ Co ≈ 45 , which o is  in  good agreement with the Rashba SOC-induced triplet pairing 6,8 described above. The data described above provides a proof-of-concept result demonstrating the orthogonality tuning of superconducting spin currents.

To help understand better the FMR absorption data of symmetric structures (Fig. 2), we also measure the t Co-dependence of spin-pumping-induced inverse spin-Hall effect (iSHE) 30,31 for the additional sets of asymmetric Pt/Co/Pt/Nb/Ni8Fe2 structures with and without Cu spacers. This provides direct evidence for spin transport in the normal state. Figure 3a (3b) displays the transverse d.c. voltage signals vs. external IP μ H 0 for the Cuabsent (Cu-present) samples at   = 5 GHz, taken above and below f T c (see Methods). Under IP  FMR of the Ni8Fe2, a clear Lorentzian peak emerges  in the dc voltage only  in the normal state for both sample sets, which can be explained 31 by the strong decay of the quasiparticle charge-imbalance relaxation length across T c .  Importantly, the polarity of the  Lorentzian  peak  is  identical  (opposite) to that of  Pt/Ni8Fe2  (Nb/Ni8Fe2)  bilayers 31 , where the Pt (Nb) spin sink is known to have a positive (negative) spin-Hall angle θ SH 19,31 . This indicates that the pumped spin currents from the precessing Ni8Fe2 pass through the Nb(30 nm) layer to a large extent to the (Cu)/Pt/Co/Pt spin sinks and the overall iSHE in

our structures is dominated by the (Cu)/Pt/Co/Pt (rather than the Nb).

For a quantitative analysis, we plot the iSHE voltage divided by sample resistance V iSHE/ R vs. t Co (Fig. 3c) and θ Co (Fig. 3d). In these plots, we can see that there is a clear decrease  in  the  iSHE  signal  by  the  addition  of  Cu  and  its  magnitude  is  strongly θ Codependent, which can be described by the rapid spin precession/dephasing of transverse spins 32 around h ex of the Co layer: cos ( 2 θ Co) (black lines in Fig. 3d). Note that the signal difference  caused  by  the  addition  of  5  nm  of  Cu  (insets  in  Fig.  3c,d)  is  nearly θ Coindependent. These results taken together support our argument that Cu spacers weaken the interfacial SOC strength and it is the Co tilt state that then plays a dominant role in the spin transport process.

Finally, we progress to show the potential to harness these effects in a proof-ofprinciple  prototype  superconducting  SW  device  (Fig.  4).  The  idea  behind  this  is  that lateral SW propagation 33,34 in our proximity-engineered structure (e.g. α 2 K α 8 K ≈ 0.005 for the t Co = 0.8 nm sample) between microwave injector and detector antennas is readily altered by opening or closing the vertical spin transport channel via the proximity creation of triplet pairing. Figure 4a,b shows the  -dependent SW transmission ΔS12 of two types f of  the  SW  devices  with  and  without  Pt/Co(0.8  nm)/Pt  spin  sinks,  obtained  above  and below T c at the fixed/external IP μ H 0 = 70 mT in the magnetostatic surface wave (MSSW) geometry 33,34 (see  Methods  and  Supplementary  Section  6  for  details).  The  observed spectra containing two major peaks in the low f (&lt; 7 GHz) regime and satisfying the SW dispersion  relationship  (Supplementary  Video  1-4  and  Supplementary  Section  6)  and their exponential decay in the intensity with  increasing the distance d between the two separate antennas (Fig. 4c,d) indicate the propagating SWs 33,34 .

The most  noteworthy  aspect  in  this  demonstration  is  that  on  entering  the

superconducting  state,  the  intensity  of  lateral  SW  transmission  signal  clearly  rises (decays) when the Pt/Co(0.8 nm)/Pt spin sinks are omitted (added) [Fig. 4c (4d), see also Supplementary  Video  1-4]  and  the  degree  of  this  change  becomes  pronounced  with increasing d .  This  is  because  SWs  experience  weaker  (stronger)  effective  attenuation during laterally propagating if spin-angular-momentum is less (more) transmitted across the adjacent/superconducting Nb to the spin loss regimes in vertical direction. Note that the SW attenuation increases proportionally to the total FMR damping of the system 33,34 .

With  the  Pt/Co(0.8  nm)/Pt  spin  sinks,  we  are  able  to  modulate  the  lateral  SW transmission intensity up to about 40% by proximity-generating the vertical triplet spintransport channel. This result is encouraging and may provide a new type of SW logic functionality 35 activated in the superconducting state.

We  have  shown  that  when  a  perpendicularly  magnetized  Pt/Co/Pt  spin  sink  is proximity-coupled  to  Nb,  superconducting  spin-pumping  efficiency  can  be  tuned  by controlling the effective θ Co - i.e. by tuning the degree of orthogonality between the SOC and h ex at the Nb/Pt/(Co/Pt) interface 4-6,8 . We have also found that by comparison with the  Cu-present  samples,  the θ Co-dependent  superconducting  spin-pumping  efficiency reflects  characteristic  features  of  Rashba  SOC-induced  triplet  pairing 4-6,8 .  Our  results provide  a  timely  step  towards  understanding  key  interfacial  properties  for  tuning superconducting  spin  transport  mediated  via  equal-spin  triplet  states  in  a  spin-singlet superconductor. Our finely proximity-engineered structures enable experimental realization of a prototype superconducting SW device. This concept can be extended to any  Rashba system 36,37 for  the  development  of  superconducting  spin-logic  devices   in 1 which SOC is gate-tunable 36 , leading to a superconducting spin-based transistor.

## Methods

Methods and any associated references are available in the online version of the paper.

## References

- 1. Linder, J. &amp; Robinson, J. W. A. Superconducting spintronics. Nat. Phys. 11 , 307-315 (2015).
- 2. Eschrig, M. Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics: a review of current progress. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78 , 104501 (2015).
- 3.  Birge,  N.  O.  Spin-triplet  supercurrents  in  Josephson  junctions  containing  strong ferromagnetic materials. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376 , 20150150 (2018).
- 4. Bergeret, F. S. &amp; Tokatly, I. V. Spin-orbit coupling as a source of long-range triplet proximity  effect  in  superconductor-ferromagnet  hybrid  structures. Phys.  Rev.  B 89 , 134517 (2014).
- 5. Jacobsen, Sol H., Ouassou, Jabir A. &amp; Linder, J. Critical temperature and tunneling spectroscopy of superconductor-ferromagnet hybrids with intrinsic Rashba-Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 92 , 024510 (2015).
- 6. Jacobsen, Sol H., Kulagina, I. &amp; Linder, J. Controlling superconducting spin flow with spin-flip immunity using a single homogeneous ferromagnet. Sci. Rep. 6 , 23926 (2016).
- 7. Montiel, X. &amp; Eschrig, M. Generation of pure superconducting spin current in magnetic heterostructures via nonlocally induced magnetism due to Landau Fermi liquid effects. Phys. Rev. B 98 , 104513 (2018).
- 8.  Amundsen,  M.  &amp;  Linder,  J.  Quasiclassical  theory  for  interfaces  with  spin-orbit cupling. Phys. Rev. B 100 , 064502 (2019).
- 9. Jeon, K.-R. et al. Enhanced spin pumping into superconductors provides evidence for superconducting pure spin currents. Nat. Mater. 17 , 499-503 (2018).

- 10. Banerjee, N., Ouassou, J. A., Zhu, Y., Stelmashenko, N. A., Linder, J. &amp; Blamire, M.
- G. Controlling the superconducting transition by spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 97 , 184521 (2018).
- 11. Satchell, N. &amp; Birge, N. O. Supercurrent in ferromagnetic Josephson junctions with heavy metal interlayers. Phys. Rev. B 97 , 214509 (2018).
- 12.  Satchell,  N.,  Loloee,  R.  &amp;  Birge,  N.  O.  Supercurrent  in  ferromagnetic  Josephson junctions with heavy metal interlayers II: canted magnetization. Phys. Rev. B 99 , 174519 (2019)
- 13. Martínez, I. et al. Interfacial Spin-Orbit Coupling: New Platform for Superconducting Spintronics, arXiv :1812.08090 (2018).
- 14.  Tserkovnyak,  Y.,  Brataas,  A.,  Bauer,  G.  E.  W.  &amp;  Halperin,  B.  I.  Nonlocal magnetization dynamics in ferromagnetic heterostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 ,  13751421 (2005).
- 15.  Nakajima,  N.  et  al.  Perpendicular  Magnetic  Anisotropy  Caused  by  Interfacial Hybridization via Enhanced Orbital Moment in Co/Pt Multilayers: Magnetic Circular XRay Dichroism Study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 , 5229-5232 (1998).
- 16. Johnson, M. T., Bloemen, P. J. H., a Den Broeder, F. J. and De Vries, J. J.  Magnetic anisotropy in metallic multilayers. Reports Prog. Phys . 59 , 1409-1458 (1999).
- 17. Klewe, C. et al. Static magnetic proximity effect in Pt/Ni1-xFex bilayers investigated by x-ray resonant magnetic reflectivity. Phys. Rev. B 93 , 214440 (2016).
- 18.  Jeon,  K.-R.  et  al.  Exchange-field  enhancement  of  superconducting  spin  pumping. Phys. Rev. B 99 , 024507 (2019).
- 19. Tanaka, T., Kontani, H., Naito, M., Naito, T., Hirashima, D. S., Yamada, K. &amp; Inoue,
- J. Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4d and 5d transition metals. Phys.

Rev. B 77 , 165117 (2008).

- 20. Larkin, A. I. &amp; Ovchinnikov, Y. N. Nonuniform state of superconductors. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47 , 1136-1146 (1964); Sov. Phys. JETP 20 , 762-769 (1965).
- 21. Fulde, P. &amp; Ferrell, R. A. Phys. Rev. 135 . A550 (1964).
- 22. Buzdin, A. I. Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 , 935-975 (2005).
- 23. Kim, J., Kwon, J. H., Char, K., Doh, H. &amp; Choi, H.-Y. Quantitative analysis of the proximity  effect  in  Nb/Co60Fe40,  Nb/Ni,  and  Nb/Cu40Ni60  bilayers. Phys.  Rev.  B 72 , 014518 (2005).
- 24. Kim, K., Kwon, J. H., Kim, J., Char, K., Doh, H. &amp; Choi, H.-Y. Proximity effect in Nb/Cu/CoFe trilayers. Phys. Rev. B 74 , 174503 (2006).
- 25. Lee, T. Y., Won, Y. C., Son, D. S., Lim, S. H. &amp; Lee, S.-R. Strength of Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy at Bottom and Top Interfaces in [Pt/Co/Pt] Trilayers. IEEE Mag. Lett. 5 , 1000104 (2014).
- 26. Zhang, W., Han, W., Jiang, X., Yang, S.-H. &amp; Parkin, S. S. P. Role of transparency of platinum-ferromagnet interfaces in determining the intrinsic magnitude of the spin Hall effect. Nat. Phys. 11 , 496-502 (2015).
- 27. Bass, J. &amp; P Pratt Jr, W. Spin-diffusion lengths in metals and alloys, and spin-flipping at metal/metal interfaces: an experimentalist's critical review. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 , 183201 (2007).
- 28.  Fominov,  Ya.  V.,  Golubov,  A.  A.,  Karminskaya,  T.  Yu.,  Kupriyanov,  M.  Yu., Deminov, R. G. and Tagirov L. R. Superconducting Triplet Spin Valve. JETP Lett. 77 , 308-313 (2010).
- 29. Zhou, L. et al. Observation of spin-orbit magnetoresistance in metallic thin films on

magnetic insulators. Sci. Adv. 4 , eaao3318 (2018).

- 30.  Saitoh,  E.,  Ueda,  M.,  Miyajima,  H.  &amp;  Tatara,  G.  Conversion  of  spin  current  into charge current at room temperature: Inverse spin-Hall effect. Appl. Phys. Lett . 88 , 182509 (2006).
- 31.  Jeon,  K.-R.  et  al.  Spin-pumping-induced  inverse  spin-Hall  effect  in  Nb/Ni80Fe20 bilayers  and  its  strong  decay  across  the  superconducting  transition  temperature. Phys. Rev. Applied 10 , 014029 (2018).
- 32. Brataas, A., Kent, A. D. &amp; Ohno, H. Current-induced torques in magnetic materials. Nat. Mater. 11 , 372 (2012).
- 33. Vlaminck, V. &amp; Bailleul, M. Current-Induced Spin-Wave Doppler Shift. Science 322 , 410 (2008).
- 34.  Vlaminck,  V.  &amp;  Bailleul,  M.  Spin-wave  transduction  at  the  submicrometer  scale: Experiment and modeling. Phys. Rev. B 81 , 014425 (2010).
- 35. Chumak A. V., Vasyuchka, V. I., Serga, A. A. &amp; Hillebrands, B. Magnon spintronics. Nat. Phys. 11 , 453-461 (2015).
- 36. Manchon. A., Koo. H. C., Nitta, J., Frolov, S. M. &amp; Duine, R. A. New perspectives for Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Nat. Mater. 14 , 871 (2015).
- 37. Raphael, J. R., Bindel, R., Pezzotta, M., Ulrich, J., Liebmann, M., Sherman, E. Y. &amp; Morgenstern, M. Probing variations of the Rashba spin-orbit coupling at the nanometre scale. Nat. Phys. 12 , 920-925 (2016).

## Acknowledgements

This work was supported by EPSRC Programme Grant EP/N017242/1.

## Author contributions

K.-R.J.  and  J.W.A.R.  conceived  and  designed  the  experiments.  The  samples  were prepared by K.-R.J. and the magnetization and transport measurements were performed by K.-R.J. with help from S.K. The SW devices were fabricated by K.-R.J., C.-M.L. and S.K. The FMR absorption and iSHE measurements were carried out by K.-R.J. with help of C.C. The SW transmission spectra were measured by K.-R.J. with the guidance of J.H. The data analysis was performed by K.-R.J., C.C., J.H., H.K., L.F.C., M.G.B., S.K. and J.W.A.R. The model calculation was undertaken by X.M. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript, which was written by K.-R., X.M. and J.W.A.R.

## Additional information

Supplementary  information  is  available  for  this  paper  here  (TBD).  Reprints  and permissions  information  is  available  at  www.nature.com/reprints.  Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.-R.J. or J.W.A.R.

## Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

## Methods

Sample growth. Symmetric Pt/Co/Pt/Nb/Ni8Fe2/Nb/Pt/Co/Pt and asymmetric Pt/Co/Pt/Nb/Ni8Fe2 multilayers, with and without Cu spacer layers, were grown on 5 mm × 5 mm thermally oxidized Si substrates by d.c. magnetron sputtering in an ultra-high vacuum chamber 9,18 . The symmetric and asymmetric structures were prepared, respectively, for the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) absorption 9,18 and inverse spin-Hall

effect (iSHE, or transverse d.c. voltage) 31 measurements. All layers were grown in-situ at room temperature. Ni8Fe2, Nb, Co and Cu are deposited at an Ar pressure of 1.5 Pa and Pt at 3.0 Pa. The typical deposition rates were 5.1 nm/min for Ni8Fe2, 21.1 nm/min for Nb, 6.0 nm/min for Co, 9.7 nm/min for Cu and 7.6 nm/min for Pt. The thicknesses of Ni8Fe2, Nb, inner (outer) Pt and Cu layers were kept constant at 6, 30, 1.7 (2.2) and 5 nm, respectively, while the thickness of the Co layer varied from 0 to 2 nm to investigate the variation  of  FMR  damping  as  a  function  of t Co  (or  the  Co  tilt  angle θ Co)  through  the superconducting transition temperature T c of the coupled Nb. Note that for all samples, the  Nb  (inner  Pt)  thickness  is  fixed  at  30  (1.7)  nm  where  the  Pt/Co/Pt  spin  sink  was proximity-coupled through the Nb layer to the precessing Ni8Fe2 layer and the largest enhancement of spin pumping in the superconducting state was achieved  in our prior FMR experiments 9,18 .

Magnetization  characterization. The  static  magnetization  hysteresis  curves  were measured  on  5  mm  ×  5  mm  samples  using  a  Quantum  Design  Magnetic  Property Measurement  System  at  8  K,  immediately  above  the  superconducting  transition temperature T c . The external magnetic field was applied parallel and perpendicular to the film plane direction.

Superconducting transition measurement. d.c. electrical transport measurements were conducted on (un-patterned) 5 mm × 5 mm samples using a custom-built dipstick probe in a liquid helium dewar with a four-point current-voltage method. The resistance R (of a sample) vs. temperature T curves were obtained at the applied current   of ≤ 0.1 mA while I decreasing T .  From  the T derivative  of R ,  d R /d T , T c was  defined  as  the T value  that

exhibits the maximum of d R /d T .

We analyzed our T c ( t Co) data (Fig. 1d) using the following approximate formula 22 :

$$\ln \left [ \frac { T _ { c } ^ { * } } { T _ { c } } \right ] \approx \Psi \left ( \frac { 1 } { 2 } \right ) - R e \left \{ \Psi \left [ \frac { 1 } { 2 } + \frac { 2 T _ { c } } { T _ { c } ^ { * } \tilde { t } _ { 0 } } \times \frac { 1 } { \widetilde { \gamma } + \frac { 1 - i } { 2 } \cosh \left [ ( 1 + l ) t _ { F M } \right ] } \right ] \right \}, \text{ where } T _ { c } ^ { * } = T _ { c } ( t _ { F M } = 0 ), \Psi$$

is the digamma function, 𝜏̃ 0 -1 = (1/4𝜋𝑇 𝑐 )(𝐷 𝑆𝐶 /𝑡𝑆𝐶 𝜉𝐹𝑀 )(𝜌 𝑆𝐶 /𝜌𝐹𝑀 ) , 𝐷𝑆𝐶 is the diffusion coefficient of the Nb (10 cm /s at 8 K), 2 𝑡 𝑆𝐶 is the Nb thickness (30 nm) and 𝜌𝑆𝐶 (𝜌 𝐹𝑀) is the  conductivity  of  the  Nb  (Co)  [7  (30) µ Ω-cm  at  8  K]. 𝛾 ̃ = 𝛾𝐵(𝜉𝑆𝐶 /𝜉𝐹𝑀 ) , 𝛾𝐵 is  the interface transparency and 𝜉𝑆𝐶 is the (dirty-limit) coherence length of the Nb (16 -18 nm at  2  K) 9 .  Note that in this  formula, only the  influence of h ex on the order parameter is taken into account 22 .

Broadband  FMR  absorption  and  iSHE  measurements. We  measured  the  FMR response of the sample attached on a broadband coplanar waveguide (CPW) with either d.c. field or r.f. pulse modulation 9,18 . To obtain each FMR spectrum, the microwave power absorbed by the sample was measured while sweeping the external static magnetic field μ H 0 at  the  fixed  microwave  frequency f of  5-20  GHz.  At  the  beginning  of  each measurement, we applied a large IP μ H 0 (0.5 T) to fully magnetize the Ni8Fe2 layer, after which  the  field  was  reduced  to  the  range  of  FMR.  Once  the f -dependent  FMR measurements (from high to low f ) were complete, the field was returned to zero to cool the system  down  further for a lower T measurement.  For  all FMR  absorption measurements,  the  microwave  (MW)  power  was  set  to  10  dBm  where  the  actual microwave power absorbed in the sample is a few mW that has no effect on T c of the Nb layer . Note also that the fixed thickness (30 nm) of Nb layers studied here is much less 9 than the magnetic penetration depth in the superconducting state (≥ 100 nm in thin Nb films) and so there is no considerable effect of Meissner screening on the local (d.c./r.f.)

magnetic field experienced by Ni8Fe2 below T c , as supported by the insensitivity of the resonance field  0Hres across T c (Fig.  2a,b). We employed a vector field cryostat from Cryogenic Ltd. that can apply a 1.2-T-magnetic field in any direction over a T range of 2-300 K.

W e first fitted the FMR absorption data (Supplementary Section 3) with the field derivative of symmetric and antisymmetric Lorentzian functions 38 to accurately determine the FMR  linewidth µ 0Δ H and the resonance field µ H 0 res : 𝑑𝜒 " 𝑑𝐻 ∝  𝐴 ∙ [ (∆𝐻𝐻𝑊𝐻𝑀) 2 ∙(𝐻-𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠 ) [(∆𝐻𝐻𝑊𝐻𝑀) 2 +(𝐻-𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠 ) 2 ] 2 ] + 𝐵 ∙ [ (∆𝐻𝐻𝑊𝐻𝑀)∙(𝐻-𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠) 2 -(∆𝐻𝐻𝑊𝐻𝑀 ) 3 [(∆𝐻𝐻𝑊𝐻𝑀) 2 +(𝐻-𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠 ) 2 ] 2 ] , where 𝐴 (𝐵) is the amplitude of the field derivative  of the symmetric (antisymmetric) Lorentzian function, µ H 0 is  the  external d.c.  magnetic  field and 𝜇0∆𝐻𝐻𝑊𝐻𝑀 = √3 2 𝜇0Δ𝐻 is  the  half-width-athalf-maximum (HWHM) of the imaginary part χ " of the magnetic susceptibility.

From  the  linear  scaling  of µ 0Δ H with f (Fig.  2a,b),  we  calculated  the  effective Gilbert(-type) damping constant α : 𝜇0∆𝐻(𝑓) = 𝜇0∆𝐻0 + 4𝜋𝛼𝑓 √3𝛾 , here 𝜇0∆𝐻0 is the zerofrequency line broadening. We also estimated the effective saturation magnetization µ M 0 s (of  the  Ni8Fe2)  from  the  dispersion  relation  of µ H 0 res with f (inset  of  Fig.  2a,b)  using Kittel's formula: 𝑓 = 𝛾 2𝜋 √[𝜇0(𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠 +𝑀𝑒𝑓𝑓) ∙ 𝜇0𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠 ] , where 𝛾 = 𝑔𝐿𝜇𝐵/ℏ is the gyromagnetic ratio (1.84 × 10 11 T -1 s -1 ), 𝑔𝐿 is the Landé g-factor (taken to be 2.1), 𝜇𝐵 is the Bohr magneton and ℏ is Plank's constant divided by 2π.

For the iSHE (or transverse d.c. voltage) measurement 31 , the sample was attached face  down  on  the  CPW  by  using  an  electrically  insulating  high-vacuum  grease.  A microwave signal was passed through the CPW and excited FMR of the Ni8Fe2 layer; a transverse d.c. voltage as a function of μ H 0 was measured between two Ag-paste contacts

at opposite ends of the sample. In these measurements, the microwave frequency was fixed at 5 GHz and the microwave power at the CPW at approximately 150 mW (for T = 2 and 8 K), which yields measurable signals (≥ 5 nV) in our setup.

The  measured  d.c.  voltage  (Fig.  3a,b)  can  be  decomposed  into  symmetric  and antisymmetric Lorentzian functions with respect to μ H 0 res , with weights of V sym and V asy respectively 31 : 𝑉(𝐻) - 𝑉 0 = 𝑉 𝑠𝑦𝑚 ∙ [ (∆𝐻 ′ ) 2 (∆𝐻 ′ ) 2 +(𝐻-𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠 ) 2 ] + 𝑉 𝑎𝑠𝑦 ∙ [ (∆𝐻 ′ )∙(𝐻-𝐻 𝑟𝑒𝑠 ) (∆𝐻 ′ ) 2 +(𝐻-𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠 ) 2 ] , where V 0 is a background voltage and 𝜇0∆𝐻 ′ is the HWHM of the d.c. voltage. We attributed 𝑉 𝑠𝑦𝑚 to the iSHE signal V iSHE. If the Co thickness in the Pt/Co/Pt spin sink is larger than its  spin  dephasing  length  (a  few  ångstroms) 32 , V iSHE( θ Co)  is  simply  proportional  to cos 2 ( θ Co) (Fig. 3d).

SW  device  fabrication. To  fabricate  the standard SW  devices 33,34 displayed in Supplementary Section 6, the Hall bar(-type) structures with an active SW track of 50 × 50 μm 2   were  patterned  into  the in-situ grown  Nb/Ni8Fe2/Nb  films  with  and  without Pt/Co(0.8 nm)/Pt spin sinks by using optical lithography and Ar-ion beam etching. After depositing  AlN(40  nm)  for  d.c.  electrical  isolation  by  reactive  sputtering,  coplanar waveguides (CPWs or, MW antennas) with a various inter-spacing of 10 -25 μm were patterned on top of the SW track using electron-beam lithography and lift-off of sputtered Cu(100 nm)/Ti(5 nm) layers. Two identical CPWs consist of a  MW signal line (2 μm wide)  and  two  ground  lines  (1  μm  wide)  with  an  intra-separation  of  2  μm,  which preferentially excites or detects the SWs with a wavenumber 𝑘𝑆𝑊 in the range of 0.9 ± 0.6 μm -1 (Supplementary Section 6).

Propagating SW spectroscopy. A pair of antennas of the SW device were connected to

ports 1 and 2 of a vector network analyser (VNA, Rohde &amp; Schwarz, 100 MHz to 20 GHz)  by  multiple  wire  bonding  to  a  pre-calibrated  sample  holder  (having  the  50  Ω impedance) via phase-stable coaxial cables. The f -dependent forward complex transmission coefficient (e.g. scattering parameter S12: the MW power received at port 1 relative to the power conveyed to port 2) was measured in the variable temperature insert of  a  vector  field  cryostat  by  applying  a  fixed/external  IP μ H 0 transverse  to  the  SW propagation direction (or wave vector 𝒌𝑆𝑊 ) , so-called the MSSW configuration 33,34 . The input MW power was set to 0 dBm (the actual power delivered to the device in our setup: &lt;  100  µW)  so  that  the  non-linear  response  of  magnetization  dynamics  and  the  unintentional heating effect on the Nb layer can be avoided. The SW transmission signal ∆𝑆12(𝑓, 𝜇 0 𝐻) of  interest  was  analyzed  by  subtracting  the  non-magnetic  background 𝑆12 (𝑓,  𝜇 0 𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑓 ) under  application  of  a large reference field μ Href 0 (0.12  T) and normalizing the  -dependence f 33,34 : ∆𝑆12 (𝑓, 𝜇0𝐻) = 𝑆12 (𝑓, 𝜇 0 𝐻) - 𝑆 12 (𝑓, 𝜇 0 𝐻 𝑟𝑒𝑓 ) 𝑆12 (𝑓, 𝜇 0 𝐻 𝑟𝑒𝑓 ) .

The SW dispersion in the MSSW mode for symmetric sample structures is given by 33,34 : 𝑓 𝑆𝑊 ≈ 𝛾 2𝜋 √[𝜇0(𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠 +𝑀𝑒𝑓𝑓) ∙ 𝜇0𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠 +( 𝜇0𝑀𝑒𝑓𝑓 2 ) 2 (1 - exp  (-2𝑘 𝑆𝑊𝑡))] , where 𝑡 is the Ni8Fe2 thickness (6 nm). By fitting the SW resonance, corresponding to the peak in the absolute of ∆𝑆12 ( = |∆𝑆12 | , Fig. 4a,b), to this dispersion relationship, we extracted the 𝑘𝑆𝑊 and 𝜇0𝑀𝑒𝑓𝑓 values (Supplementary Section 6) for the Ni8Fe2 layer. In addition, we deduced the SW attenuation length 𝜆𝑆𝑊 (insets of Fig. 4c,d) from the fact 33,34 that the SW intensity, defined as the maximum peak-to-valley height of the real part of ∆𝑆12 ( = 𝑅𝑒[∆𝑆12] , Fig. 4a,b), exponentially decays with increasing d : exp (𝑑 𝜆𝑆𝑊 ) . Here 𝜆𝑆𝑊 = -1

𝜐𝑔 𝜏𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠 , 𝜐𝑔 = 2𝜋 ∙ ( 𝜕𝑓𝑆𝑊 𝜕𝑘𝑆𝑊 ) is the group velocity and 𝜏𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠 = {𝛼𝛾[𝜇0(2𝐻𝑟𝑒𝑠 +𝑀𝑒𝑓𝑓)]}

is the magnetization precession time.

## Data availability

The data used in this paper can be accessed here (TBD).

## Code availability

The  code  that  was  used  for  the  numerical  calculations  is  available  from  X.M.  upon reasonable request.

## References

38.  Celinski,  Z.,  Urquhart,  K.  B.  &amp;  Heinrich,  B.  Using  ferromagnetic  resonance  to measure  the  magnetic  moments  of  ultrathin  films. J.  Magn.  Magn.  Mater. 166 ,  6-26 (1997).

## Figure legends

Figure 1. Principle of the approach and experimental setup a ,  Schematic of Pt(2.0 nm)/Co( Co)/Pt(1.7  nm)/Nb(30  nm)/Ni8Fe2(6  nm)/Nb(30  nm)/Pt(1.7  nm)/Co( t t Co)/Pt(2.0 nm) multilayers with different  Co thicknesses t Co. The Cu spacer with weak spin-orbit coupling (SOC)  is selected to quench the interfacial Rashba-type SOC  at  the Nb/Pt/(Co/Pt) interface. b , Measurement scheme and Cartensian coordinate system used in  the  present  study. c ,  Normalized  resistance R/R N  vs.  temperature T plots  for  three different sets of the samples, grown each in a single deposition run. d , t Co dependence of the superconducting transition temperature T c of the sample sets with and without Cu(5 nm) spacer layers; for comparison, T c of a bare Nb(30 nm) film is also shown. The black solid (dashed) line is a fit to estimate the effective values of coherence length and interface

transparency (see Methods) for the Cu-absent (Cu-present) samples. e , In-plane and outof-plane magnetization hysteresis m(H) curves of  Pt(2.0 nm)/Co( t Co)/Pt(1.7 nm)/Nb(30 nm)-only films, measured at 8 K.  , Effective tilt angle f θ Co of the Co layer estimated from e using the Stoner-Wohlfarth model, in which only the corresponding regime of the inplane m(H) curves to the ferromagnetic resonance measurement condition/sequence ( i.e. from high to low field, see Methods) is considered.

## Figure 2. Correlation of Co tilt angle with superconducting spin-pumping efficiency.

a , Microwave frequency f dependence of ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) absorption for symmetric  Pt(2.0  nm)/Co( t Co)/Pt(1.7  nm)/Nb(30  nm)/Ni8Fe2(6  nm)/Nb(30  nm)/Pt(1.7 nm)/Co( Co)/Pt(2.0 nm) samples with various Co thicknesses, taken above and below t T c of the couple Nb. From this, one can extract the (effective) Gilbert(-type) damping α and the (effective) saturation magnetization µ M 0 s . b, Data equivalent to a but for symmetric Pt(2.0  nm)/Co( t Co)/Pt(1.7  nm)/Cu(5  nm)/Nb(30  nm)/Ni8Fe2(6  nm)/Nb(30  nm)/Cu(5 nm)/Pt(1.7 nm)/Co( Co)/Pt(2.0 nm) samples. Note that in any case, the zero-frequency line t broadening 𝜇0∆𝐻0 due to long-range magnetic inhomogeneities is less than |0.5 mT| and the FMR linewidth 𝜇0∆𝐻 scales linearly with 𝑓 , indicating the high quality of the samples and the absence of two-magnon scattering 38 .  Extracted α ( c )  and µ M 0 s ( d )  values as a function of t Co for the samples with and without the Cu spacer.  The dashed lines are guide to the eyes. e , Damping difference across T c , denoted as [ α 2 K α 8 K]/2∆2 K where 2∆ is the superconducting gap at 2 K calculated from the measured T c (Fig. 1d), as a function of the (effective) Co tilt angle θ Co. The black solid (dashed) line is a fit from spin-triplet proximity  theory 4-6,8 for  the  Cu-absent  (Cu-present)  samples  (Supplementary  Section 1,2).  , Interfacial SOC contribution f ∆ [ α ]SOC, separated by taking the difference between

the  [ α 2  K -α 8  K ]/2∆2 K  data  ( e )  with  and  without  the  Cu  spacer.  The  black  solid  is  a theoretical  fit  based  on  Rashba-type  SOC-induced  triplet  paring 6,8 (Supplementary Section 1,2). Here, the amplitude and component of Rashba SO field and the exchange field strength are only adjustable parameters to get to the theoretical fit. The inset of e f , shows [ α 2 K α 8 K]/2∆2 K data as a function of Cu spacer thickness t Cu for the t Co= 0.8 nm samples  (Supplementary  Section  4).  The  red  and  blue  symbols  in c d , represent independent sets of the samples grown each in a single deposition run.

Figure 3. Effect of Cu spacer addition and Co tilt angle on normal spin-transport properties. a , Transverse d.c. voltage measurements for asymmetric Pt(2.0 nm)/Co( Co)/Pt(1.7 nm)/Nb(30 nm)/Ni8Fe2(6 nm) samples with various Co thicknesses  Co t t at a fixed microwave frequency   = 5 GHz, taken above and below f T c of the couple Nb. The black solid lines are fits to Lorentzian functions (see Methods). b , Data equivalent to a but for asymmetric Pt(2.0 nm)/Co( t Co)/Pt(1.7 nm)/Cu(5 nm)/Nb(30 nm)/Ni8Fe2(6 nm) samples.  Inverse  spin-Hall  effect  (iSHE)  voltage  divided  by  the  sample's  resistance V iSHE/ R as a function of t Co ( c ) and the (effective) Co tilt angle θ Co ( d ) at   = 5 GHz. The f dashed lines are guide to the eyes. The left (right) inset in c  d ( ) shows the signal difference caused by the Cu(5 nm) spacer addition whereas the right inset in c exhibits the Cu spacer thickness  Cu dependence of iSHE for the  Co= 0.8 nm samples (see Supplementary Section t t 5 for details). The dashed lines in c are guide to the eyes whereas the black solid (dashed) line in d is  a  fit  to  cos 2 ( θ Co) for the Cu-absent (Cu-present) samples. The red and blue symbols  in c d , represent  independent  sets  of  the  samples  grown  each  in  a  single deposition run.

## Figure 4. Experimental realization of superconducting spin-wave devices. a ,  Spin-

wave (SW) transmission ΔS12 as a function of frequency f for the Nb(30 nm)/Ni8Fe2(6 nm)/Nb(30 nm) device with a different distance d (10 -25 µm)  between two separate antennas. These spectra are obtained under application of a fixed/external magnetic field µ H 0 = 70 mT above and below T c of the coupled Nb. In each figure, the red, blue and black  curves  represent  respectively  the  real,  imaginary  and  absolute  of  ΔS12. b ,  Data equivalent  to a but  for  the  Pt(2.0  nm)/Co(0.8  nm)/Pt(1.7  nm)/Nb(30  nm)/Ni8Fe2(6 nm)/Nb(30 nm)/Pt(1.7 nm)/Co(0.8 nm)/Pt(2.0 nm) device. c , Normalized intensity of the real part of ΔS12 across T c for the Pt/Co(0.8 nm)/Pt-absent device with d = 10 -25 µm. d , Data equivalent to c but for the Pt/Co(0.8 nm)/Pt-present device. Each inset shows the associated d -dependence of the signal intensity above and below T c . The dashed lines in c d , are guide to the eyes whereas the solid lines in each inset are fits to an exponential decay function to estimate the SW attenuation length 𝜆𝑎𝑡𝑡 33,34 (see Methods).

c

(normalized)

R/R N

nm

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-fb8eac8a-edff-4fa1-a517-1410e2c761e7.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-2ea3d40e-91e5-4f33-a478-6f30cc82a3e3.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-b8436525-525b-4c67-96cc-8cbb9ab2e1be.jpg)

f

1.0

90

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

No Cu

With Cu

No Cu

With Cu

3

0.0 nm

0.4 nm

0.8 nm

1.1 nm

1.5 nm

0.0 nm

0.4 nm

0.8 nm

1.1 nm

1.5 nm

0.8 nm

0.8 nm

2.0 nm

2.0 nm

4

5

6

7

8

9

Temperature (K)

2

10

(deg)

Co

q

Tilt angle of Co,

75

60

45

30

15

0

T = 8 K

60

120

180

240

Co

= 0.4 nm

0.8 nm

1.1 nm

1.5 nm

2.0 nm

300

360

m

0

H (mT)

Magnetic field,

t

a

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-01cc2344-4caf-404d-a393-6fe3dd549f61.jpg)

With Cu

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-3fc66aca-7307-4f02-82e9-da7b624790de.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-738194db-39c2-4cf8-a5d2-868914763949.jpg)

Co

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-497a8dee-d8ec-4a50-ac08-9ffd991ce436.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-c994a154-b7a5-43be-86f7-70e2a16c2b5e.jpg)

Co

a

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-3cf10a3d-6cde-43e3-a18f-1ff17b870161.jpg)

c

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-6a558672-fdcc-4816-99bd-41d040a5aaf2.jpg)

d

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00873v3-figure-fd5fa836-71f3-4b17-922a-c670bdf92a56.jpg)
Kun-Rok Jeon Xavier Montiel Sachio Komori Chiara Ciccarelli James Haigh Hidekazu Kurebayashi Lesley F. Cohen Chang-Min Lee Mark G. Blamire Jason W. A. Robinson
Tunable pure spin supercurrents and the demonstration of a superconducting spin-wave device
Recent ferromagnetic resonance experiments and theory of Pt/Nb/Ni8Fe2
proximity-coupled structures strongly suggest that spin-orbit coupling (SOC) in
Pt in conjunction with a magnetic exchange field in Ni8Fe2 are the essential
ingredients to generate a pure spin supercurrent channel in Nb. Here, by
substituting Pt for a perpendicularly magnetized Pt/Co/Pt spin-sink, we are
able to demonstrate the role of SOC, and show that pure spin supercurrent
pumping efficiency across Nb is tunable by controlling the magnetization
direction of Co. By inserting a Cu spacer with weak SOC between Nb and
Pt/(Co/Pt) spin-sink, we also prove that Rashba type SOC is key for forming and
transmitting pure spin supercurrents across Nb. Finally, by engineering these
properties within a single multilayer structure, we demonstrate a prototype
superconducting spin-wave (SW) device in which lateral SW propagation is
gateable via the opening or closing of a vertical pure spin supercurrent
channel in Nb.