## UNIVERSAL SPACES FOR UNRAMIFIED GALOIS COHOMOLOGY

## FEDOR BOGOMOLOV AND YURI TSCHINKEL

Abstract. We construct and study universal spaces for birational invariants of algebraic varieties over algebraic closures of finite fields.

## Introduction

Let /lscript be a prime. Recall that in topology, there exist unique (up to homotopy) topological spaces K( Z //lscript n , m ) such that

- · K( Z //lscript n , m ) is homotopically trivial up to dimension m -1, in particular,

$$\mathbf H ^ { i } ( \mathbf K ( \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n }, m ), \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) = 0, \quad \text{for} \quad i < m ;$$

- · H (K( m Z //lscript n , m , ) Z //lscript n ) is cyclic, with a distinguished generator κ m ;
- · for every topological space X and every α ∈ H ( m X, Z //lscript n ) there is a unique, up to homotopy, continuous map

$$\mu _ { X, \alpha } \, \colon \, X \to K ( \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n }, m )$$

such that

$$\mu _ { X, \alpha } ^ { * } ( \kappa _ { m } ) = \alpha.$$

This reduces many questions about singular cohomology to the study of these universal spaces. Analogous theories exist for other contravariant functors, for example, topological K-theory, or the theory of cobordisms. The study of moduli spaces in algebraic geometry can be viewed, broadly speaking, as an incarnation of the same idea of universal spaces.

Here we propose a similar theory for unramified cohomology, developed in connection with the study of birational properties of algebraic varieties [4], [16]. The Bloch-Kato conjecture proved by Voevodski, Rost, and Weibel, combined with techniques and results from birational anabelian geometry in [10], implies that an unramified class in the cohomology of a function field K = k X ( ) of an algebraic variety X over an algebraic closure of a finite field k = ¯ , with finite constant F p

Key words and phrases. Galois groups, function fields.

coefficients, is induced from the cohomology of a finite abelian group G a . Our main result is:

Theorem. Let /lscript and p be distinct primes, K = k X ( ) the function field of an algebraic variety X of dimension ≥ 2 over k = ¯ F p , G K its absolute Galois group, and α K ∈ H ∗ nr ( G , K Z //lscript n ) an unramified class. Then there exists a finite set J of finite-dimensional k -vector spaces V , j j ∈ J , such that α K is induced, via a rational map, from an unramified class in the cohomology of an explicit open subset of the quotient of

$$\mathbb { P } \coloneqq \prod _ { j \in J } \mathbb { P } ( V _ { j } ) \\ \mathcal { \cdot } G ^ { a }. \ a c t i n a \ n r o i e c t$$

by a finite abelian /lscript -group G a , acting projectively on each factor.

Thus, the spaces P /G a serve as universal spaces for all finite birational invariants of algebraic varieties over k = ¯ . F p

Actions of finite abelian groups G a on products of projective spaces are described by central extensions of G a , i.e., by subspaces in ∧ 2 ( G a ). This allows to present unramified classes of X in terms of configurations of subspaces of skew-symmetric matrices. For example, if the unramified Brauer group of X is trivial, then all finite birational invariants of X are encoded already in the combinatorics of configurations of liftable subgroups in finite abelian quotients of the absolute Galois group G K (see Section 1 for the definition).

Similar ideas were first put forward in [4] and [5], however, the recent proof of the Bloch-Kato conjecture allows us to formulate a more precise and constructive theory. This approach to birational invariants leads to many new questions:

- · Is there a smaller class of configurations with this universal property?
- · How does this structure interact with Sylow subgroups of G K ?
- · Is there an extention to cohomology with Z /lscript -coefficients? An equally simple description of models for /lscript -adic invariants would provide insights into higher-dimensional Langlands correspondence.
- · What are the analogs of universal spaces for varieties over k = ¯ ? Q Counterexamples to our main result arise from bad reduction places, already for abelian varieties [4].

Here is the roadmap of the paper: In Section 1 we recall basic facts about stable and unramified cohomology. In Section 3 we provide some background on valuation theory. In Section 5 we investigate Galois cohomology groups of function fields of higher-dimensional algebraic varieties over k = ¯ F p and their images in cohomology of finite groups.

In Section 6 we introduce and study unramified cohomology of algebraic varieties. Section 7 contains the proof of our main theorem, modulo geometric considerations presented in Sections 8 and 9.

Acknowledgments. We are grateful to A. Pirutka for her interest and insightful comments. The first author was supported by NSF grant DMS-1001662 and by AG Laboratory GU-HSE grant RF government ag. 11 11.G34.31.0023. The second author was partially supported by NSF grants DMS-0739380, 0901777, and 1160859.

## 1. Stable cohomology

Let G be a pro-finite group. We will write

$$G ^ { a } = G / [ G, G ] \quad \text{and} \quad G ^ { c } = G / [ [ G, G ], G ]$$

for the abelianization, respectively, the second lower central series quotient of G . We have a canonical central extension

$$1 \to Z \to G ^ { c } \stackrel { \pi _ { a } } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a } \to 1.$$

Let M be a topological G -module and H ( i G,M ) its (continuous) i -cohomology group. These groups are contravariant with respect to G and covariant with respect to M . In this paper, G is either a finite group or a Galois group (see [1] for background on group cohomology and [28] for background on Galois cohomology) and M either Z //lscript n or Q Z / , with trivial G -action. We will sometimes omit the coefficient module M from the notation.

Our goal is to investigate incarnations of Galois cohomology of function fields in cohomology of finite groups. For example, let K = k X ( ) be a function field of an algebraic variety X over an algebraically closed field k ; varieties birational to X are called models of K . Let G K be the absolute Galois group of K and ˆ ( π 1 X ) the ´tale fundamental group of e X , with respect to some basepoint. The choice of a base point will not affect our considerations and we omit it from our notation. We have natural homomorphisms

$$H ^ { * } ( \hat { \pi } _ { 1 } ( X ) ) \stackrel { \kappa _ { X } ^ { * } } { \longrightarrow } H _ { e t } ^ { * } ( X ) \stackrel { \tilde { \eta } _ { X } ^ { * } } { \longrightarrow } H ^ { * } ( G _ { K } ),$$

where the right arrow arises from the embedding of the generic point X η → X . We will write

$$\eta _ { X } \colon G _ { K } \rightarrow \hat { \pi } _ { 1 } ( X )$$

and

$$\eta _ { X } ^ { * } = \tilde { \eta } _ { X } ^ { * } \circ \kappa _ { X } ^ { * } \colon \mathrm H ^ { * } ( \hat { \pi } _ { 1 } ( X ) ) \to \mathrm H ^ { * } ( G _ { K } )$$

for the corresponding map in cohomology.

We say that a class α K ∈ H ( ∗ G K ) is defined (or represented) on a model X of K if there exists a class α X ∈ H ( ∗ et X ) such that

$$\alpha _ { K } = \tilde { \eta } _ { X } ^ { * } ( \alpha _ { X } ).$$

Let G be a finite group. A continuous homomorphism

$$\chi \colon \hat { \pi } _ { 1 } ( X ) \rightarrow G$$

gives rise to homomorphisms in cohomology

$$H ^ { * } ( G ) \stackrel { \chi ^ { * } } { \longrightarrow } H ^ { * } ( \hat { \pi } _ { 1 } ( X ) ) \stackrel { \eta ^ { * } _ { X } } { \longrightarrow } H ^ { * } ( G _ { K } ).$$

Conversely, every α K ∈ H ( ∗ G K ) arises in this way: there exist

- · a model X of K ,
- · a continuous homomorphism χ as above,
- · and a class α G ∈ H ( ∗ G )

such that

$$\alpha _ { K } = \eta _ { X } ^ { * } ( \chi ^ { * } ( \alpha _ { G } ) ).$$

This follows from the description of ´ etale cohomology of points, see [22]. In such situations we say that α K is defined on X and is induced from χ .

A version of this construction arises as follows: assume that the characteristic of k does not divide the order of G . Let V be a faithful representation of G over k , and X an algebraic variety over k with function field

$$K = k ( X ) \simeq k ( V ) ^ { G },$$

the field of invariants; we will write X = V/G and call it a quotient . Even more generally, let Y be an algebraic variety over k with a generically free action of G X , = Y/G a quotient. This situation gives rise to a natural surjective continuous homomorphism

$$G _ { K } \rightarrow G$$

and induced homomorphisms on cohomology

$$s _ { K } ^ { i } \, \colon \, \mathrm H ^ { i } ( G ) \to \mathrm H ^ { i } ( G _ { K } ).$$

The following lemma shows that we have many choices in realizing a class α K ∈ H ( i G K ):

Lemma 1.1. [4] Assume that α K ∈ H ( i G K ) is represented by a class α X ∈ H ( i et X ) on some affine irreducible model X of K and is induced from a surjective continuous homomorphism χ : ˆ ( π 1 X ) → G and a class α G ∈ H ( i G ) . Let V be a faithful representation of G over k and

V ◦ ⊂ V the locus where the action is free. Then, for every x ∈ X and v ∈ V ◦ there exists a map

$$f = f _ { x } \colon X \rightarrow V / G$$

such that

- · f ( x ) = v and
- · the restriction of α X to X ◦ = f -1 ( V ◦ /G ) ⊂ X is equal to f ∗ ( α G ) .

Proof. We follow the proof in [4]. The homomorphism χ : ˆ ( π 1 X ) → G defines a finite ´tale covering e π : ˜ X → X , by an affine variety ˜ . X The ring k X [ ˜ ] is a k G [ ] -module. Every finite-dimensional k G [ ]-submodule W ∗ ⊂ k X [ ˜ ] defines a G -equivariant map ˜ X → W := Spec( W ∗ ).

Let e ∈ k G [ ] be the unit element of G . For any G -orbit G · y ∈ V there is a G -linear homomorphism

$$l _ { y } \colon k [ G ] \to V,$$

which maps the orbit G e · to G y · . Let ˜ x ∈ π -1 ( x ). Choose h ∈ k X [ ˜ ] such that

/negationslash

$$h ( \tilde { x } ) = 1, \ \ h ( g \cdot \tilde { x } ) = 0, \ \ g \neq e.$$

Then h generates a k G [ ]-submodule W ⊂ k X [ ˜ ] and defines a regular G -map h : ˜ X → W = k G [ ], with h x (˜) = e ∈ k G [ ]. The map f := l y ◦ h is a regular G -map satisfying the first property.

Let X ◦ = f -1 ( V ◦ /G ) ⊂ X . It is a nonempty affine subvariety. We have a compatible diagram of G -maps

/d111

/d111

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d111

$$\begin{array} { c c c c } \text{file diagram of $G$-maps} \\ V ^ { \circ } \xleftarrow { \leftarrow \leftarrow \leftarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow
} } \pi _ { G } \right | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big | \Big |
V ^ { \circ } / G \xleftarrow { \leftarrow \leftarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \leftarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow \rightarrow
\pi _ { G } \text{ and } \pi \text{ induce the same cover } \pi _ { G } \text{ } \text{Th} \end{array}$$

/d111

and the maps π G and π induce the same cover π 0 . This implies the second claim. /square

We can achieve even more flexibility for G -maps, under a projectivity conditions on V : we say that a G -module V is projective if for every finite-dimensional representation W of G with a G -surjection

$$\mu \, \colon W \rightarrow V$$

there exists a G -section

$$\theta \, \colon V \to W \quad \text{with} \quad \mu \circ \theta = \text{id}.$$

This condition holds, for example, for regular representations over arbitrary fields or when the order of G is coprime to the characteristic of the ground field k .

Now let { S j } j ∈ J be a finite set of G -orbits in Y with stabilizers H j so that S j /similarequal G/H j . Consider a faithful representation V of G and a subset { T j } j ∈ J of G -orbits in V with stabilizers Q j , with H j ⊂ Q j , T j = G/Q j . Consider regular G -maps f j : S j → T j , for j ∈ J .

Lemma 1.2. Assume that V is a projective G -module. Then there is a regular G -map f : Y → V such that f = f j , for all j ∈ J .

We return to our setup: X = Y/G , K = k X ( ), and χ : G K → G , inducing

$$s _ { K } ^ { i } \colon \mathrm H ^ { * } ( G ) \to \mathrm H ^ { * } ( G _ { K } ).$$

The groups

$$H ^ { i } _ { s, K } ( G ) \coloneqq H ^ { i } ( G ) / \text{Ker} ( s ^ { i } _ { K } )$$

are called stable cohomology groups with respect to K = k X ( ). Let

$$\text{Ker} ( s ^ { i } ) \coloneqq \bigcap _ { K } \text{Ker} ( s ^ { i } _ { K } ), \\ \text{|ds $K=k(X)\text{ as above. In fact}$}$$

over all function fields K = k X ( ) as above. In fact,

$$\text{Ker} ( s ^ { i } ) = \text{Ker} ( s ^ { i } _ { k ( V / G ) } ),$$

for some faithful representation V of G over k , in particular, this is independent of the choice of V (see [8, Proposition 4.3]). The groups

$$H _ { s } ^ { i } ( G ) \coloneqq H ^ { i } ( G ) / \text{Ker} ( s ^ { i } )$$

are called stable cohomology groups of G (with coefficients in M = Z //lscript n or Q Z / ); they depend on the ground field k . These define contravariant functors in G . For example, for a subgroup H ⊂ G we have a restriction homomorphism

$$\text{res} _ { G / H } \colon \text{H} _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ) \rightarrow \text{H} _ { s } ^ { * } ( H ).$$

## Furthermore:

- · While usual group cohomology H ( i G ) can be nontrivial for infinitely many i (even for cyclic groups), stable cohomology groups H ( i s G ) = 0 for i &gt; dim( V ), where V is a faithful representation.
- · We have

$$H _ { s } ^ { i } ( G ) \subseteq H _ { s } ^ { i } ( S y l _ { \ell } ( G ) ) ^ { N _ { G } ( S y l _ { \ell } ( G ) ) },$$

where N G ( H ) is the normalizer of H in G and Syl ( /lscript G ) an /lscript -Sylow subgroup of G .

## UNIVERSAL SPACES

The determination of the stable cohomology ring

$$H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ) \coloneqq \oplus _ { i } H _ { s } ^ { i } ( G )$$

is a nontrivial problem, see, e.g., [7] for a computation of stable cohomology of alternating groups. For finite abelian groups G , we have

$$H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ) = \wedge ^ { * } ( { \mathrm H } ^ { 1 } ( G ) ).$$

For central extensions of finite groups as in (1.1), the kernel of

$$\pi _ { a } ^ { * } \colon H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ^ { a } ) \to H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ^ { c } )$$

is the ideal I = I( G c ) generated by

(see, for example, [12, Section 8]). We will identify

$$R ^ { 2 } = R ^ { 2 } ( G ^ { c } ) \coloneqq & \, \text{Ker} \left ( H _ { s } ^ { 2 } ( G ^ { a } ) \to H _ { s } ^ { 2 } ( G ^ { c } ) \right ). \\ \text{r example, [12, Section 8]}). \, \text{We will identify}$$

$$H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ^ { a } ) / I$$

with its image in H ( ∗ s G c ). An important role in the computation of this subring of H ( ∗ s G c ) is played by the fan

$$\Sigma = \Sigma ( G ^ { c } ) = \{ \sigma \},$$

the set of noncyclic liftable subgroups σ of G a , and the complete fan

$$\bar { \Sigma } = \bar { \Sigma } ( G ^ { c } ) = \{ \sigma \},$$

consisting of all liftable subgroups σ ⊂ G c : a subgroup σ is liftable if and only if the full preimage ˜ of σ σ in G c is abelian. The fan Σ defines a subgroup R (Σ) 2 ⊆ H ( 2 s G a ) as the set of all elements which vanish upon restriction to every σ ∈ Σ. We have

$$R ^ { 2 } \subseteq R ^ { 2 } ( \Sigma ).$$

Lemma 1.3. For every α ∈ I( G c ) ⊆ H ( ∗ s G a ) and every σ ∈ Σ( G c ) the restriction of α to σ is trivial.

## Definition 1.4. Let

$$1 \to Z \to G ^ { c } \to G ^ { a } \to 1$$

be a central extension. A ∆-pair ( I, D ) of G a is a set of subgroups

$$I \subseteq D \subseteq G ^ { a }$$

a

## such that

- · I ∈ ¯ ( Σ G c ),
- · D is noncyclic,
- · for every δ ∈ D , the subgroup 〈 I, δ 〉 ∈ ¯ ( Σ G c ).

This definition depends on G c . Assume we have a commutative diagram of central extensions

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d47

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-97abf03c-3cf6-47a2-bf57-1f2f5813d55c.jpg)

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

.

Definition 1.5. A ∆-pair ( ˜ I, D ˜ ) of ˜ G a surjects onto a ∆-pair ( I, D ) of G a if γ I ( ˜ ) = I and γ D ( ˜ ) = D .

Definition 1.6. A class α ∈ H ( i s G a ) is unramified with respect to a ∆-pair if its restriction to D is induced from D/I , i.e., there exists a β ∈ H ( i s D/I ) such that φ α ( ) = ψ β ( ), for the natural homomorphisms in the diagram:

/d47

$$\mathbf H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ^ { a } ) \xrightarrow { \phi } \mathbf H _ { s } ^ { * } ( D ) \xrightarrow { \psi } \mathbf H _ { s } ^ { * } ( D / I )$$

/d47

/d111

/d111

By Lemma 1.3 we have a similar notion for

$$\mathsf H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ^ { a } ) / \mathsf I ( G ^ { c } ) \subseteq \mathsf H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ^ { c } ).$$

Lemma 1.7. Consider a homomorphism

$$\gamma \colon \tilde { G } ^ { a } \rightarrow G ^ { a }$$

and a class α ∈ H ( i G a ) . Let ˜ := α γ ∗ ( α ) ∈ H ( ˜ i G a ) be the induced class. Let ( ˜ I, D ˜ ) be a ∆ -pair in ˜ G a . Assume that one of the following holds:

- · γ I ( ˜ ) = 0 ,
- · γ D ( ˜ ) is cyclic,
- · γ induces a surjection of ∆ -pairs

$$( \tilde { I }, \tilde { D } ) \rightarrow ( I, D )$$

and α ∈ H ( i s G a ) is unramified with respect to ( I, D ) .

Then ˜ α ∈ H ( ˜ i s G a ) is unramified with respect to ( ˜ I, D ˜ ) .

Proof. The first two cases are evident. Consider the third condition. By assumption, γ induces a homomorphism ˜ D/I ˜ → D/I . Passing to cohomology we get a commuting diagram

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-8301cad1-a95d-4cde-bacd-114185e361e8.jpg)

and thus the claim.

/d47

/d47

## UNIVERSAL SPACES

## 2. Central extensions and isoclinism

Let G a and Z be finite abelian /lscript -groups. Central extensions of G a by Z are parametrized by H ( 2 G , Z a ); for α ∈ H ( 2 G , Z a ) we let G c α be the corresponding central extension:

$$1 \to Z \to G _ { \alpha } ^ { c } \stackrel { \pi _ { a } } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a } \to 1$$

Fix an embedding Z ↪ → ( Q Z / ) r , consider the exact sequence

$$1 \rightarrow Z \rightarrow ( \mathbb { Q } / \mathbb { Z } ) ^ { r } \rightarrow ( \mathbb { Q } / \mathbb { Z } ) ^ { r } \rightarrow 1,$$

and the induced long exact sequence in cohomology

$$\mathbf H ^ { 1 } ( G ^ { a }, ( \mathbb { Q } / \mathbb { Z } ) ^ { r } ) \stackrel { \delta } { \longrightarrow } \mathbf H ^ { 2 } ( G ^ { a }, Z ) \rightarrow \mathbf H ^ { 2 } ( G ^ { a }, ( \mathbb { Q } / \mathbb { Z } ) ^ { r } ).$$

We say that α, α ˜ ∈ H ( 2 G , Z a ) and the corresponding extensions are isoclinic if

$$\alpha - \tilde { \alpha } \in \delta ( { \mathsf H } ^ { 1 } ( G ^ { a }, ( { \mathbb { Q } } / { \mathbb { Z } } ) ^ { r } ) ).$$

This notion does not depend on the chosen embedding Z ↪ → ( Q Z / ) r and coincides with the standard definition of isoclinic in the theory of /lscript -groups.

Lemma 2.1. If α, α ˜ ∈ H ( 2 G , Z a ) are isoclinic then the corresponding extensions of G a define the same set of ∆ -pairs in G a .

Proof. A pair of subgroups ( I, D ) is a ∆-pair in G a , with respect to a central extension G c , if their preimages commute in G c , i.e.,

$$[ \pi _ { a } ^ { - 1 } ( I ), \pi _ { a } ^ { - 1 } ( D ) ] = 0 \quad \text{in} \quad Z.$$

Consider the homomorphism

$$\pi _ { a } ^ { * } \colon \mathrm H ^ { 2 } ( G ^ { a }, \mathbb { Q } / \mathbb { Z } ) \to \mathrm H ^ { 2 } ( G ^ { c }, \mathbb { Q } / \mathbb { Z } ),$$

and note that Ker( π ∗ a ) only depends on the isoclinism class of the extension. Furthermore, H ( 2 G , a Q Z / ) is dual to ∧ 2 ( G a ). Let R ⊂ ∧ 2 ( G a ) be the subgroup which is dual to Ker( π ∗ a ). It remains to observe that ( I, D ) is a ∆-pair for G c if and only if π -1 a ( I ) ∧ π -1 a ( D ) intersects R trivially; thus the notion of a ∆-pair is an invariant of the isoclinism class of the extension. /square

Lemma 2.2. If α, α ˜ ∈ H ( 2 G , Z a ) are isoclinic then

$$R ^ { 2 } ( G _ { \alpha } ^ { c } ) = R ^ { 2 } ( G _ { \tilde { \alpha } } ^ { c } ),$$

in particular

$$\mathsf H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ^ { a }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) / \mathsf I ( G _ { \alpha } ^ { c } ) = \mathsf H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ^ { a }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) / \mathsf I ( G _ { \tilde { \alpha } } ^ { c } ).$$

Proof.

See Section 2 and Theorem 3.2 in [6]. /square

Lemma 2.3. If R = R (Σ) 2 2 then Σ determines G c up to isoclinism.

Example 2.4 . Consider G a = F 2 m /lscript , as a vector-space over F /lscript 2 of dimension m . Let Σ be the set of F /lscript -linear subspaces of the form F /lscript 2 . Then

$$H _ { s } ^ { i } ( G ^ { c }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) = 0, \quad \text{for} \quad i > 2.$$

Lemma 2.5. If α, α ˜ ∈ H ( 2 G , Z a ) are isoclinic then there exist faithful representations V, V ˜ of G c α and G c ˜ α over k such that V/G c α and ˜ V /G c ˜ α are birational.

Proof. Explicit construction: Let χ , . . . , χ 1 r be a basis of Hom( Z, k × ) and put

$$V \coloneqq \oplus _ { j = 1 } ^ { r } V _ { j } \quad \text{and} \quad \tilde { V } = \oplus _ { j = 1 } ^ { r } \tilde { V } _ { j },$$

where

$$V _ { j } = \text{Ind} _ { Z } ^ { G _ { \alpha } ^ { c } } ( \chi _ { j } ) \quad \text{and} \quad \tilde { V } _ { j } = \text{Ind} _ { Z } ^ { G _ { \bar { \alpha } } ^ { c } } ( \chi _ { j } ).$$

Note that the projectivizations P ( V j ) and P ( ˜ V j ) are canonically isomorphic as G a -representations. The group ( k × ) r acts on V and ˜ , V and both V/G c α and V/G c ˜ α are birational to

$$\bar { \bar { \mu } } ^ { \dots \dots } \cdot \bar { \bar { \mu } } ^ { \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \cdot \cdot } \cdot \\ \left ( \prod _ { j = 1 } ^ { r } \mathbb { P } ( V _ { j } ) \right ) / G ^ { a } \times \left ( \prod _ { j = 1 } ^ { r } k ^ { \times } / \chi _ { j } ( Z ) \right ).$$

Lemma 2.6. Consider a central extension of finite /lscript -groups

$$1 \to Z \to G ^ { c } \stackrel { \pi _ { a } } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a } \to 1$$

and fix a primitive g ∈ G a . Then there exists an isoclinic extension

$$1 \rightarrow \tilde { Z } \rightarrow \tilde { G } ^ { c } \stackrel { \tilde { \pi } _ { a } } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a } \rightarrow 1$$

and a lift ˜ g c ∈ ˜ G c of g such that the order of ˜ g c in ˜ G c equals the order of g ∈ G a .

Proof. Since H ( 2 Z //lscript n , ( Q Z / ) r ) = 0 we can modify the sequence (2.2) by an element in δ (H ( 1 G , a ( Q Z / ) r )) to split the induced extension

$$1 \to Z \to Z _ { g } \to \langle g \rangle \to 1, \quad Z _ { g } \coloneqq ( \pi _ { a } ) ^ { - 1 } ( \langle g \rangle ),$$

this provides a lift of g of the same order.

/square

Corollary 2.7. If for some g ∈ Z the restriction of π a to 〈 g 〉 defines an embedding π a : 〈 g 〉 → ↪ G a then G c is isoclinic to G / g c 〈 〉 × 〈 g 〉 .

Proof. Consider the central extension

$$1 \to \langle g \rangle \to G ^ { c } \to G ^ { c } / \langle g \rangle \to 1.$$

It is defined by an element α g ⊂ H ( 2 G / g , c 〈 〉 〈 g 〉 ). Consider the embedding 〈 g 〉 ⊂ Q Z / . Then the image of α g in H ( 2 G / g , c 〈 〉 Q Z / ) is 0.

Indeed, the extension is induced from a central extensions of abelian quotient groups

$$1 \to \pi _ { a } ( \langle g \rangle ) \to G ^ { a } \to G ^ { a } / \pi _ { a } ( \langle g \rangle ) \to 1,$$

which is isoclinic to the trivial central extension; the same holds for the exact sequence (2.3). /square

Lemma 2.8. Consider a central extension of finite /lscript -groups

$$1 \rightarrow Z \rightarrow G ^ { c } \rightarrow G ^ { a } \rightarrow 1,$$

let α ∈ H ( 2 G , Z a ) be the corresponding class, and assume that there exists a g ∈ G a lifting to a g c ∈ G c of the same order. Let Z g ⊂ G c be the centralizer of g c . Then the central extension

$$0 \rightarrow \langle g ^ { c } \rangle \rightarrow Z _ { g } \rightarrow Z _ { g } / \langle g ^ { c } \rangle \rightarrow 0$$

is induced from the extension

$$0 \rightarrow \langle g \rangle \rightarrow G ^ { a } \rightarrow G ^ { a } / \langle g \rangle \rightarrow 0.$$

If V is a faithful representation of G c as in the proof of Lemma 2.5 then V/Z g is a vector bundle over ˜ V / Z / g ( g 〈 c 〉 ) , for some faithful representation ˜ V of Z / g g 〈 c 〉 . Furthermore, if K := k V/Z ( g ) and

$$s _ { K } ^ { 2 } \colon \mathrm H ^ { 2 } ( G ^ { a }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) \to \mathrm H ^ { 2 } ( G _ { K }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } )$$

is the corresponding homomorphism, then s 2 K ( α ) is induced from G / g a 〈 〉 . Proof. Immediate from the definitions. /square

Lemma 2.9. Consider a central extension of finite groups

$$1 \rightarrow Z \rightarrow G ^ { c } \stackrel { \pi _ { a } } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a } \rightarrow 1$$

and let V = ⊕ j V j be a faithful representation of G c as in Lemma 2.5, i.e., each V j = Ind G c Z ( χ j ) , where { χ j } j ∈ J is a basis of Hom( Z, k × ) . Let P := ∏ j ∈ J P ( V j ) . Then: (1) G a acts faithfully on P .

- (2) For any subgroup σ ⊂ G a the subset of σ -fixed points P σ ⊂ P is nonempty if and only if σ ∈ ¯ ( Σ G c ) .
- (3) Each irreducible component of P σ is a product of projective subspaces of P ( V j ) , corresponding to different eigenspaces of σ in V j , and distinct irreducible components are disjoint.
- (5) The action of G a on P ◦ := P \ ∪ σ ∈ ¯ Σ P σ is free.
- (4) Each irreducible component of P σ is stable under the action of H σ ⊂ G c , the maximal subgroup such that [ H ,π σ -1 a ( σ )] = 0 in G c ; the action of G /H c σ on the set of components of P σ is free.

Proof. Since the order of G c is coprime to the characteristic of k , every g ⊂ G c is semi-simple and we can decompose

$$V _ { j } = \oplus _ { i } V _ { j } ( \lambda _ { i } ( g ) ),$$

as a sum of eigenspaces. The subset of g -fixed points splits as a product ∏ ij P ( V j ( λ i ( g ))), where the product runs over different eigenvalues in different V j . It follows that the subset of g -fixed points P g ⊂ P is a union of products of projective subspaces of P ( V j ).

Let σ := 〈 g, h 〉 ⊂ G a be a subgroup such that σ / ∈ ¯ . Σ Then the same holds for the images of g, h in GL( V j ), for at least one j ∈ J . Thus the commutator [ g, h ] ∈ GL( V j ) is a nontrivial scalar matrix, hence they have no common eigenvectors, i.e., no common fixed points in P ( V j ). Thus if σ / ∈ ¯ then Σ σ has no fixed points in ∏ j P ( V j ). Note that projective subspaces corresponding to different eigenvalues of g do not intersect in P ( V j ) and hence P σ splits into a disjoint union of products of projective subspaces of different P ( V j ).

If σ ∈ ¯ then its elements can be simultaneously diagonalized. Hence Σ the subset of fixed points in P = ∏ j P ( V j ) is a union of products of projective subspaces, and there is a Zariski open subvariety of P stable under the action of the preimage ˜ := σ π -1 a ( σ ) ⊂ G c .

Assume that [ h, σ ˜] = 0 in G c for some h ∈ G c . Then 〈 h, σ ˜ 〉 has a fixed point in each component of P σ and h maps every component of P σ into itself. Thus a subgroup H ⊂ G c , with [ H,σ ˜] = 0 maps every component of P σ into itself.

Assume that 〈 h, γ 〉 ∈ / ¯ , for some Σ γ ∈ σ . Then for some j , the images of h, γ in GL( V j ) have nonintersecting invariant subvarieties in P ( V j ). In particular, h does not preserve any component of P σ . /square

Lemma 2.10. Let K = k X ( ) be a function field with Galois group G K . Given a surjection G K → G c , onto some finite central extension of an abelian group G a , let P = ∏ j P ( V j ) be the space constructed in Lemma 2.9. Then there is a rational map /rho1 : X → P /G a such that

- · /rho1 maps the generic point of X into P ◦ /G a ;
- · the homomorphism

$$s _ { K } \colon \mathbf H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ^ { a }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) \to \mathbf H ^ { * } ( G _ { K }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } )$$

factors through the cohomology of P ◦ /G a .

Proof. Let X ◦ ⊂ X be an open affine subvariety such that π 1 ( X ◦ ) surjects onto G c . Let ˜ X ◦ → X ◦ be the induced unramified G c covering. Then k X [ ˜ ◦ ] decomposes into an infinite direct sum of G c -representations.

Fix a point ˜ X ◦ and consider its orbit. The restriction of k X [ ˜ ◦ ] to this orbit defines a regular quotient G c -representation isomorphic to k G [ ]; this admits homomorphisms to k V [ ], corresponding to maps X → V/G c . /square

## 3. Basic valuation theory

/negationslash

Let X be a variety over k = ¯ , F p K = k X ( ) its function field, and G K the absolute Galois group of K . We write V K for the set of valuations of K and DV K for the subset of divisorial valuations. The corresponding residue fields will be denoted by K ν . For ν ∈ V K , let D ν ⊂ G K denote a decomposition group of ν and I ν ⊂ D ν the inertia subgroup; we have G K ν = D /I ν ν . The pro- -quotients of these groups will be /lscript denoted by G K , D ν , and I ν , respectively. We will always assume that p = /lscript . The corresponding abelianizations will be denoted by G a K , D a ν , and I a ν ; their canonical central extensions by G c K , D c K , and I c K . Under our assumptions, G a K is a free Z /lscript -module of infinite rank.

Lemma 3.1. For ν ∈ V K consider the commutative diagram

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-ee38bb43-77e3-45f3-a9c2-cc3ac8fb8dba.jpg)

/d47

/d47

ν

where π v and π are the canonical projections and δ a ν is the induced homomorphism. Then δ a ν is injective with primitive image. In particular, δ a ν embeds I a ν as a primitive subgroup of D a ν .

Let Σ( G c K ) be the set of primitive topologically noncyclic subgroups of G a K whose preimage in G c K is abelian. By [9, Section 6], we have:

Theorem 3.2. Assume that dim( X ) ≥ 2 . Then

$$\text{rk} _ { \mathbb { Z } _ { \ell } } ( \sigma ) \leq \dim ( X ), \ \ \text{ for all } \ \sigma \in \Sigma ( \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { c } ).$$

The following key result gives a valuation-theoretic interpretation of liftable subgroups in G a K ; it is crucial for the reconstruction of function fields in [10] and [11].

Theorem 3.3. [9, Corollary 6.4.4] Assume that dim( X ) ≥ 2 and let σ ∈ Σ( G c K ) . Then there exists a valuation ν ∈ V K such that I a ν is a subgroup of σ of Z /lscript -corank at most one and σ ⊆ D a ν .

We recall some background from valuation theory. For ν ∈ V K let Γ ν = ν K ( × ) be its value group. We have a fundamental inequality

$$( 3. 1 ) \quad \ \ \ t r \deg _ { k } ( K ) \geq \text{tr} \deg _ { k } ( K _ { \nu } ) + \dim _ { \mathbb { Q } } ( \Gamma _ { \nu } \otimes \mathbb { Q } ).$$

A valuation ν is called algebraic of rank r if its value group Γ ν := ν K ( × ) is isomorphic to Z r and admits a filtration

$$\mathbb { Z } ^ { r } \simeq \Gamma _ { \nu } = \Gamma _ { \nu _ { r } } \supsetneq \dots \supsetneq \Gamma _ { \nu _ { 1 } } \simeq \mathbb { Z }$$

by free abelian subgroups Γ ν j corank j which are value groups of embedded compatible valuations ν j . Such valuations arise from flags of irreducible subvarieties c j of codimension j

$$\mathfrak { c } _ { r } \subsetneq \mathfrak { c } _ { r - 1 } \subsetneq \dots \subsetneq \mathfrak { c } _ { 1 } \subsetneq X.$$

A valuation is called an Abhyankar valuation if equality holds in (3.1) (alternatively, ν is said to be without transcendence defect); every algebraic valuation is an Abhyankar valuation.

Let ν be an Abhyankar valuation of K . By [19, Theorem 3.4(a)],

$$\Gamma _ { \nu } \simeq \mathbb { Z } ^ { r },$$

for some r . By [19, Theorem 1.1], for any F := { f , . . . , f 1 m } ⊂ o ν there exists a projective model X of K such that

- · the center c = c X ( ν ) of ν is a generically smooth subvariety of X of dimension dim Q (Γ ν ⊗ Q );
- · there exists a regular parameter system ( a , . . . , a 1 r ) of O X, c such that each f j , j = 1 , . . . , m , is an O X, c -monomial in { a , . . . , a 1 r } .

We say that ν admits a smooth monomial uniformization on X with respect to F . In particular, we have:

Proposition 3.4. Let K be a function field of an algebraic variety over k = ¯ F p . Let ν be an algebraic valuation of rank r . Then there exists a projective model X of K over k such that the centers c j of ν j on X are irreducible subvarieties of codimension j which are smooth at the general point of c r .

The following statement has been proved in [20, Theorem 1.2 and Corollary 1.3].

Proposition 3.5. Let K be a function field of an algebraic variety over k = ¯ F p , ν ∈ V K , and F = { f , . . . , f 1 m } ⊂ o ν a finite set of functions. Then there exists a finite separable Galois extension ˜ K/K , an extension of ν to a valuation ˜ ν ∈ V ˜ K , and a projective model ˜ X of ˜ K such that

- (1) the extension of residue fields ˜ K ˜ ν / ˜ K ˜ ν is purely inseparable;
- (2) Γ ˜ ν / Γ ν is a finite p -group;
- (3) ˜ ν admits a smooth monomial uniformization on ˜ X with respect to F .

Proposition 3.6. Let K be a function field of an algebraic variety over k = ¯ F p and I a ν , D a ν ⊂ G a K the abelianized inertia, resp. decomposition subgroup of some valuation ν ∈ V K . Let

$$\gamma _ { K } \, \colon \, \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \rightarrow G ^ { a }$$

be a continuous surjective homomorphism onto a finite abelian /lscript -group G a . Assume that γ K ( I a ν ) is nontrivial. Then for any primitive cyclic subgroup I ⊂ γ K ( I a ν ) there exists a divisorial valuation ν ′ ∈ DV K such that

$$I \subseteq \gamma _ { K } ( \mathcal { I } ^ { a } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } } ) \quad a n d \quad \gamma _ { K } ( \mathcal { D } ^ { a } _ { \nu } ) \subseteq \gamma _ { K } ( \mathcal { D } ^ { a } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } } ).$$

Proof. Assume that /lscript n annihilates G a = ⊕ j Z //lscript n j , i.e., n j ≤ n . By Kummer theory, the homomorphism

$$\gamma _ { K } \in \text{Hom} ( \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } / \ell ^ { n }, G ^ { a } ) = \oplus _ { j } \text{Hom} ( \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n _ { j } } ) = \oplus _ { j } K ^ { \times } / ( K ^ { \times } ) ^ { \ell ^ { n _ { j } } }$$

is defined by a finite set of elements F = { f j } , with f j ∈ K / K × ( × ) /lscript n j . We lift these to a set of elements of K × , denoted by the same letter, and we may assume that these are in o ν . We apply Proposition 3.5 and pass to a finite separable Galois extension ˜ K of K over which ˜, the ν extension of ν , admits a smooth uniformization on a projective model ˜ X of ˜ with respect to K F . Properties (1) and (2) in Proposition 3.5 insure that the image in G a of the corresponding inertia and decomposition group is unchanged, i.e., we have a diagram

/d15

/d15

/d47

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-69f32f52-c50b-4a85-91fb-d3603effac10.jpg)

/d47

/d47

/d47

Thus we may assume that K = ˜ . K Let c = ( ) be the center of the c ν (the lift of) ν on X . The regular parameter system ( a , . . . , a 1 r ) of O X, c defines an algebraic valuation ν ′ = ( ν , . . . , ν ′ 1 ′ r ) of rank r of K and

$$\rho ( \mathcal { I } _ { \nu } ^ { a } ) = \rho ( \mathcal { I } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } } ^ { a } ) \subseteq \rho ( \mathcal { D } _ { \nu } ^ { a } ) = \rho ( \mathcal { D } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } } ^ { a } ).$$

We have reduced the proof to the case of algebraic valuations, where it is straightforward: If ρ ( I a ν ′ 1 ) is nontrivial in G a then we are done since

$$\rho ( \mathcal { I } ^ { a } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } _ { 1 } } ) \subset \rho ( \mathcal { I } ^ { a } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } } ) = \rho ( \mathcal { I } ^ { a } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } _ { 1 } } ) \subset \rho ( \mathcal { D } ^ { a } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } } ).$$

/negationslash

Otherwise, we can assume that ρ ( I a ν ′ 1 ) and ρ ( I a ν ′ j ) = 0 , j &gt; i but ρ ( I a ν ′ i ) = 0. We blow up the general point of the center of ν ′ i and let E be the exceptional divisor, it is generically smooth by Proposition 3.4. Then

16

we have

/negationslash

$$0 \neq \rho ( \mathcal { I } _ { E } ^ { a } ) \subset \rho ( \mathcal { I } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } } ^ { a } / \mathcal { I } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } _ { i + 1 } } ^ { a } ) \subset \rho ( \mathcal { D } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } } ^ { a } ) / \rho ( \mathcal { I } _ { \nu ^ { \prime } _ { i + 1 } } ^ { a } ) \subset \rho ( \mathcal { D } _ { E } ^ { a } )$$

and ρ ( I a E ) coincides with ρ ( I a ν ′ i / I a ν ′ i +1 ), which is nontrivial by assumption. /square

Remark 3.7 . The proof is essentially an application of the general result that algebraic valuations (or Abhyankar valuations) are dense in the patch-topology on V K .

## 4. Liftable subgroups and their configurations

Let K = k X ( ) be the function field of an algebraic variety over k = ¯ . In this section, we compare the structure of the fan Σ( F p G c K ) with fans in its finite quotients. Consider the canonical central extension

$$\mathcal { C } _ { \cdot \cdot } ^ { c } \rightarrow \mathcal { C } _ { \cdot \cdot } ^ { a }.$$

$$1 \to \mathcal { Z } _ { K } \to \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { c } \to \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \to 1.$$

Lemma 4.1. We have

$$\mathcal { Z } _ { K } = [ \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { c }, \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { c } ].$$

Proof. This holds for function fields of curves since the corresponding pro- -quotients of their absolute Galois groups are free. /lscript In higher dimensions, G a K embedds into the product ∏ E G a E , where E ranges over function fields of curves E ⊂ K . Under the projection to G c K → G a E , the center of G c K maps to zero, hence the claim. /square

Lemma 4.2. Consider commutative diagrams of continuous homomorphisms

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d47

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-b9a00184-a0a0-4d84-8388-95313384b541.jpg)

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

,

where G c is finite, with fixed surjective γ K . Assume that Z is the maximal quotient of Z K giving rise to such a diagram. Then G c is unique, modulo isoclinism.

Proof. Assume that G , G c 1 c 2 are two such extensions of G a with Z , Z 1 2 , respectively, and put G := G c 1 × G a G c 2 . We have a natural surjection G → G a and an inclusion Z 1 × Z 2 ↪ → G . Moreover, [ G,G ] ⊆ Z 1 × Z 2 . By Lemma 4.1, Z K is generated by commutators in G c K , thus Z 1 × Z 2 is also generated by commutators in G . It follows that G = G c . If both projections [ G , G c c ] → Z , Z 1 2 are isomorphisms then G c 1 and G c 2 are isoclinic. Otherwise, we have a contradiction to the maximality assumption. Since G a is finite, G c is also finite, as it is bounded by ∧ 2 ( G a ) ∗ . /square

We proceed to investigate the properties of fans under such factorizations. Let

$$\gamma _ { K } \colon \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \to G ^ { a }$$

be a continuous surjective homomorphism onto a finite group. We choose a maximal finite central extension G c of G a as in Lemma 4.2.

## Corollary 4.3. Given continuous surjective homomorphisms

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \stackrel { \tilde { \gamma } _ { K } } { \longrightarrow } \tilde { G } ^ { a } \stackrel { \gamma } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a },$$

with ˜ G a a finite group, there is a unique (modulo isoclinism of lower rows) diagram of central extensions

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-424d9acc-7bbc-4de8-936e-4bbad936af95.jpg)

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

with surjective ˜ γ c K , γ c and maximal ˜ Z , Z .

Proof.

$$P r o o f. \text{ Evident}.$$

We will use the following observation:

Lemma 4.4. Let G a be a profinite abelian group and

$$\mathcal { G } ^ { a } \stackrel { \gamma _ { j } } { \longrightarrow } \tilde { G } ^ { a } _ { j }, \ \ j = 1, \dots, n,$$

a collection of continuous surjective homomorphisms onto finite groups. Then there exists a continuous surjection

$$\gamma \, \colon \mathcal { G } ^ { a } \rightarrow \tilde { G } ^ { a }$$

onto a finite group such that each γ j factors through γ :

$$\gamma _ { j } \colon \mathcal { G } ^ { a } \stackrel { \gamma } { \longrightarrow } \tilde { G } ^ { a } \rightarrow \tilde { G } ^ { a } _ { j }.$$

Proof. We can choose ˜ G a to be the image of G a in the direct product

$$\tilde { G } _ { 1 } \times \dots \times \tilde { G } _ { n }.$$

/square

We are interested in factorizations (4.2), with finite ˜ G a , preserving liftable subgroups and their configurations. Throughout we will be

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d47

/d47

working with the canonical, modulo isoclinism, diagram as in Corollary 4.3, i.e., a factorization as in Equation (4.2) will canonically determine Σ( ˜ G c ) and the set of ∆-pairs in ˜ G a , by Lemma 2.1. Let

$$\Sigma _ { E } ( G ^ { c } ) \coloneqq \{ \sigma \in \Sigma ( G ^ { c } ) \, | \, \sigma = \gamma _ { K } ( \sigma _ { K } ), \quad \text{for some} \quad \sigma _ { K } \in \Sigma ( \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { c } ) \}$$

be the subset of extendable subgroups.

Lemma 4.5. Given a continuous surjective homomorphism

$$\gamma _ { K } \colon \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \to G ^ { a }$$

onto a finite abelian group there exists a factorization

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \stackrel { \tilde { \gamma } _ { K } } { \longrightarrow } \tilde { G } ^ { a } \stackrel { \gamma } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a }, \ \ \gamma _ { K } = \gamma \circ \tilde { \gamma } _ { K },$$

with finite ˜ G a , such that for all σ ∈ Σ( G c ) we have: if σ is nonextendable then there is no ˜ σ ∈ Σ( ˜ G c ) with γ σ (˜) = σ .

Moreover, this holds for every finite ¯ G a fitting into

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \rightarrow \bar { G } ^ { a } \rightarrow \tilde { G } ^ { a }.$$

Proof. First we prove the statement for one nonextendable σ . Write

$$( 4. 3 ) \quad \ \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } = \text{projlim} G _ { \iota \in I } ^ { a }, \quad \gamma _ { \iota \iota ^ { \prime } } \colon G _ { \iota } ^ { a } \longrightarrow G _ { \iota ^ { \prime } } ^ { a }, \quad \iota ^ { \prime } \preceq \iota,$$

where the limit is over finite continuous quotients of G a K . Assume that for all ι , there is some σ ι ∈ Σ( G c ι ) surjecting onto σ ; this implies that there exist such σ ι ′ , for all ι ′ /precedesequal ι , with γ ιι ′ ( σ ι ) = σ ι ′ .

By compactness of G a K , there exists a closed liftable σ K ⊂ G a K surjecting onto σ . This contradicts our assumption that σ is nonextendable. Thus there is a required factorization

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \rightarrow \tilde { G } ^ { a } \stackrel { \gamma } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a }.$$

Let

For each j , let

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \longrightarrow \tilde { G } _ { j } ^ { a } \stackrel { \gamma _ { j } } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a }$$

be the factorization constructed above. Now we apply Lemma 4.4, combined with Corollary 4.3, and obtain factorizations of γ j :

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \to \tilde { G } ^ { a } \to \tilde { G } _ { j } \to G ^ { a }, \quad \gamma \, \colon \tilde { G } ^ { a } \to G ^ { a },$$

Assume that there is some j for which there exists a ˜ σ ∈ Σ( ˜ G c ) surjecting onto σ j . Then image ˜ in σ ˜ G j must be liftable, contradicting the construction in the first part. /square

$$\{ \sigma _ { 1 }, \dots, \sigma _ { n } \} = \Sigma ( G ^ { c } ) \, \wedge \Sigma _ { E } ( G ^ { c } ).$$

Let

$$I \subseteq D \subseteq G ^ { a }.$$

be a ∆-pair (see Definition 1.4). Throughout, we assume that G a arises as a finite quotient of the Galois group of some function field G K , in particular, the corresponding G c is determined as in Lemma 4.2, up to isoclinism. We say that ( I, D ) is extendable if there exists a valuation ν ∈ V K and subgroups

$$I ^ { a } \subseteq \mathcal { I } ^ { a } _ { \nu }, \ \ D ^ { a } \subseteq \mathcal { D } ^ { a } _ { \nu }$$

such that

$$\gamma _ { K } ( I ^ { a } ) = I, \ \gamma _ { K } ( D ^ { a } ) = D.$$

Recall that a ∆-pair ( ˜ I, D ˜ ) is said to surject onto ( I, D ) if

$$\gamma ( \tilde { I } ) = I, \ \gamma ( \tilde { D } ) = D.$$

We will need the following strengthening of Lemma 4.5

Proposition 4.6. Given a continuous surjective homomorphism

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \rightarrow G ^ { a }$$

onto a finite abelian group there exists a factorization

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \rightarrow \tilde { G } ^ { a } \rightarrow G ^ { a },$$

with finite ˜ G a , such that for all ∆ -pairs ( I, D ) in G a we have: if ( I, D ) nonextendable then there is no ∆ -pair ( ˜ I, D ˜ ) in ˜ G a surjecting onto ( I, D ) .

Proof. As in the proof of Lemma 4.5, it suffices to establish the statement for one nonextendable ∆-pair; indeed, there are only finitely many ∆-pairs in G a and the same application of Lemma 4.4 will then establish it for all.

Assume that there is no finite quotient of G a K with the desired property. We start with a factorization

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \rightarrow \tilde { G } ^ { a } \stackrel { \gamma } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a }$$

such that ˜ G a satisfies the conclusions of Lemma 4.5, i.e., no σ ∈ Σ( G c ) \ Σ ( E G c ) is the image of a ˜ σ ∈ Σ( ˜ G c ).

Let ( I, D ) be a nonextendable ∆-pair. By our assumption, there exists a ∆-pair ( ˜ I, D ˜ ) in ˜ G a surjecting onto ( I, D ). Choose representatives g , . . . , g 1 n ∈ D for D/I and their preimages ˜ g j := γ -1 ( g j ) ∈ ˜ . D Note that for each j ,

$$\sigma _ { j } \coloneqq \langle g _ { j }, I \rangle \in \Sigma ( G ^ { c } ), \ \tilde { \sigma } _ { j } \coloneqq \langle \tilde { g } _ { j }, \tilde { I } \rangle \in \Sigma ( G ^ { c } ).$$

and that ˜ σ j surject onto σ j . By Lemma 4.5 and our choice of ˜ G a , all σ j are extendable. Moreover,

$$\tilde { I } = \cap _ { j = 1 } ^ { n } \tilde { \sigma } _ { j }.$$

We replace and rename the original ˜ D by

$$\tilde { D } \coloneqq \cup _ { j = 1 } ^ { n } \tilde { \sigma } _ { j }.$$

Then ( ˜ I, D ˜ ) is a ∆-pair in ˜ G a surjecting onto ( I, D

).

Now we consider a projective system of finite continuous quotients

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \to \tilde { G } _ { \iota } ^ { a } \to \tilde { G } ^ { a } \to G ^ { a }, \quad \gamma _ { \iota \iota ^ { \prime } } \colon G _ { \iota } ^ { a } \longrightarrow G _ { \iota ^ { \prime } } ^ { a }, \ \iota ^ { \prime } \preceq \iota.$$

Assume that for each ι there exists a ∆-pair ( ˜ I , D ι ˜ ) in ι ˜ G a ι surjecting onto ( I, D ). Iterating the construction above, we construct, for each ι , a collection of liftable subgroups

$$\tilde { \sigma } _ { \iota, 1 }, \dots, \tilde { \sigma } _ { \iota, n }$$

and a ∆-pair ( ˜ I , D ι ˜ ) of the form ι

$$\tilde { I } _ { \iota } = \cap _ { j = 1 } ^ { n } \tilde { \sigma } _ { \iota, j }, \quad \tilde { D } _ { \iota } \coloneqq \cup _ { j = 1 } ^ { n } \tilde { \sigma } _ { \iota, j },$$

such that

- · ( ˜ I , D ι ˜ ) surjects onto ( ˜ ι I ι ′ , D ˜ ι ′ ), for each ι ′ /precedesequal ι ,

and in particular onto ( I, D ). By compactness of G a K (see Lemma 4.5), there exist closed subgroups

$$\sigma _ { K, 1 }, \dots, \sigma _ { K, n } \in \Sigma ( \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { c } ) ;$$

the closed subgroups

$$\mathcal { I } ^ { a } \coloneqq \cap \sigma _ { K, j }, \quad \mathcal { D } ^ { a } \coloneqq \cup \sigma _ { K, j }$$

of G a K surject onto I , resp. D . On the other hand, by the theory of liftable pairs (see [9, Section 6] and [11, Corollary 4.3]), there exists a valuation ν ∈ V K such that

$$\mathcal { I } ^ { a } \subseteq \mathcal { I } ^ { a } _ { \nu }, \ \mathcal { D } ^ { a } \subseteq \mathcal { D } ^ { a } _ { \nu }.$$

This contradicts our assumption that ( I, D ) is not extendable. /square

## 5. Galois cohomology of function fields

/negationslash

In [10], [11] we proved that if k = ¯ , with F p p = /lscript , and X is an algebraic variety over k of dimension ≥ 2 then K = k X ( ) is encoded, up to purely inseparable extensions, by G c K , the second lower series quotient of G K . Related reconstruction results have been obtained in [24], [23], [25].

The proof of the Bloch-Kato conjecture by Voevodsky, Rost, and Weibel, substantially advanced our understanding of the relations between fields and their Galois groups, in particular, their Galois cohomology. Indeed, consider the diagram

/d127

/d127

/d31

/d31

/d47

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-d88ef762-9b42-41c7-aa71-d3fbb4542cf9.jpg)

/d47

.

The following theorem relates the Bloch-Kato conjecture to statements in Galois-cohomology, with coefficients in Z //lscript n (see also [13], [14], [26]).

/negationslash

Theorem 5.1. [3] , [12, Theorem 11] Let k = ¯ F p , p = /lscript , and K = k X ( ) be the function field of an algebraic variety of dimension ≥ 2 . The Bloch-Kato conjecture for K is equivalent to:

- (1) The map

$$\pi ^ { * } \colon \mathrm H ^ { * } ( \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) \to \mathrm H ^ { * } ( G _ { K }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } )$$

is surjective and

- (2) Ker( π ∗ a ) = Ker( π ∗ ) .

This implies that the Galois cohomology of the pro- - quotient /lscript G K of the absolute Galois group G K encodes important birational information of X . For example, in the case above, G c K , and hence K , modulo purelyinseparable extensions, can be recovered from the cup-products

$$\mathsf H ^ { 1 } ( \mathcal { G } _ { K }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) \cup \mathsf H ^ { 1 } ( \mathcal { G } _ { K }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) \to \mathsf H ^ { 2 } ( \mathcal { G } _ { K }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ), \ \ n \in \mathbb { N }.$$

From now on, we will frequently omit the coefficient ring Z //lscript n from notation.

The first part of the Bloch-Kato theorem says that every α K ∈ H ( i G K ) is induced from a cohomology class α a ∈ H ( i G a ) of some finite abelian quotient G K → G a . An immediate application of this is the following proposition:

Proposition 5.2. Let α K ∈ H ( i G K ) be defined on a model X of K and induced from a continuous surjective homomorphism χ : ˆ ( π 1 X ) → G onto a finite group. Let α = α X ∈ H ( i et X ) be the class representing α K on X . Then there exists a finite cover X = ∪ j X j by Zariski open subvarieties such that, for each j , the restriction α j := α | X j is induced from a continuous surjective homomorphism χ j : ˆ ( π 1 X j ) → G a onto a finite abelian group and a class α a ∈ H ( i s G a ) = ∧ i (H ( 1 G a )) .

Proof. We first apply the Bloch-Kato theorem to V ◦ /G and find a Zariski open subset U := U ◦ α such that the restriction α U is as claimed, i.e., induced from a class α a ∈ H ( i s G a ) = ∧ i (H ( 1 G a )), for some homomorphism χ a : G K → G a to a finite abelian group.

By Lemma 1.1, for every x ∈ X there exists a map f = f x such that f ( x ) ⊂ U and the restriction of α to f -1 ( U ) ⊂ X equals f ∗ ( χ ∗ a ( α a )). The claim follows by choosing a finite cover by open subvarieties with these properties. /square

The second part implies the following:

Corollary 5.3. Let α K ∈ H ( i G K ) . Assume that we are given finitely many quotients

$$\chi _ { j } \colon G _ { K } \to G _ { j } ^ { a }$$

onto finite abelian groups and classes

$$\alpha _ { j } ^ { a } \in \mathrm H ^ { i } ( G _ { j } ^ { a } )$$

with χ ∗ j ( α a j ) = α K , for all j . Then there exists a continuous finite quotient G K → G c onto a finite central extension of an abelian group G a such that

- · χ j factor through G c , i.e., there exist surjective homomorphisms ψ j : G c → G a j , for all j ;
- · there exists a class α c ∈ H ( i G c ) with

$$\alpha ^ { c } = \psi _ { j } ^ { * } ( \alpha _ { j } ^ { a } ), \ \ \ f o r \ a l l \ \ \ j.$$

Lemma 5.4. Let Z ⊂ X be an affine subset, Z = Spec( o Z ) , and ν ∈ V K . The general point of ν is contained in Z ,

$$\mathfrak { c } _ { X } ( \nu ) ^ { \circ } \subseteq Z$$

if and only if ν f ( ) ≥ 0 , for all f ∈ o Z .

Lemma 5.5. Let X be a normal variety with function field K . Assume that α K ∈ H ( i G K ) is defined on X and induced from a homomorphism χ : ˆ ( π 1 X ) → G to a finite group G . Consider the sequence

$$\chi _ { K } \colon G _ { K } \to \hat { \pi } _ { 1 } ( X ) \stackrel { \chi } { \longrightarrow } G.$$

Then χ K ( I ν ) = 0 , for every ν such that c X ( ν ) ◦ ⊂ X .

Proof. An ´ etale cover of X induces an ´tale cover of the generic point e of c X ( ν ), thus the cover is unramified in ν , i.e., χ K ( I ν ) = 0. /square

Corollary 5.6. Let α K ∈ H ( i G K ) . Let X be a normal projective model of K and ∪ j X j a finite cover by open subvarieties such that α K is defined on X j , for each j , and is induced from a class α a j ∈ H ( i G a j ) , via a homomorphism χ j : ˆ ( π 1 X j ) → G a j to some finite abelian group.

Then there exists a quotient χ K : G K → G a and a class α a ∈ H ( i G a ) such that

- · α a induces α K and
- · α a is unramified on every extendable ∆ -pair ( I, D ) in G a .

Proof. Each α a j is unramified on all ν such that the generic point c X ( ν ) ◦ ⊂ X j , by Lemma 5.5. Since the classes α j define the same element α K ∈ H ( i G K ), there exists an intermediate quotient G a and a class in α a ∈ H ( i G a ) inducing α K . /square

## 6. Unramified cohomology

An important class of birational invariants of algebraic varieties are unramified cohomology groups, with finite constant coefficients (see [4], [16]). These are defined as follows: Let ν be a divisorial valuation of K . We have a natural homomorphism

$$\partial _ { \nu } \, \colon \, H ^ { i } ( G _ { K } ) \to H ^ { i - 1 } ( G _ { K _ { \nu } } ).$$

Classes in ker( ∂ ν ) are called unramified with respect to ν . The unramified cohomology is

$$H ^ { i } _ { n r } ( G _ { K } ) \coloneqq \bigcap _ { \nu \in \mathcal { D } \mathcal { V } _ { K } } \text{Ker} ( \partial _ { \nu } ) \subset H ^ { i } ( G _ { K } ). \\ \text{thic ie the unramified Rrature around which was dead}$$

For i = 2 this is the unramified Brauer group which was used to provide counterexamples to Noether's problem, i.e., nonrational varieties of type V/G , where V is a faithful representation of a finite group G (see [27], [2]).

Generally, for ν ∈ V K and α ∈ H ( G K

$$\alpha _ { \nu } \in \mathrm H ^ { i } ( D _ { \nu } )$$

$$H ^ { i } ( G _ { K } ) & \text{ let } \\ H ^ { i } ( D _ { \nu } )$$

be the restriction of α to the decomposition subgroup D ν ⊂ G K of ν .

Lemma 6.1. A class α ∈ Ker( ∂ ν ) ⊆ H ( i G K ) , for ν ∈ DV K , if and only if α ν is induced from the quotient G K ν = D /I ν ν . In particular, α ν is well-defined as an element in H ( i G K ν ) .

Proof. The exact sequence

$$1 \to I _ { \nu } \to D _ { \nu } \to G _ { \mathcal { K } _ { \nu } } \to 1$$

admits a noncanonical splitting, i.e., D ν is noncanonical direct product of G K ν = D /I ν ν with the corresponding inertia group, which is a torsion-free central procyclic subgroup of D ν . Thus

$$H ^ { * } ( D _ { \nu } ) = H ^ { * } ( G _ { \mathbf K _ { \nu } } ) \otimes \wedge ^ { * } H ^ { 1 } ( I _ { \nu } ).$$

We have and

Thus

$$\mathsf H ^ { i } ( D _ { \nu } ) = \mathsf H ^ { i - 1 } ( G ^ { a } _ { K _ { \nu } } ) \otimes \wedge ^ { * } ( \mathsf H ^ { 1 } ( I _ { \nu } ) ) \oplus \mathsf H ^ { i } ( G ^ { a } _ { K _ { \nu } } )$$

and the differential ∂ ν coincides with the projection onto the first summand. Hence ∂ ν ( α ) = 0 is equivalent to α ν being induced from G a K ν = D /I ν ν . /square

Let K be a function field over k = ¯ . F p By Theorem 5.1, a class α ∈ H ( i G K ) is induced from α a K ∈ G a K , which in turn is induced from a finite quotient G a K → G a . Applying Proposition 3.6 we obtain an alternative characterization unramified classes.

Corollary 6.2. A class α K ∈ H ( i G K ) is unramified if and only if for every ν ∈ V K the restriction of α c K := π ∗ a ( α a K ) ∈ H ( i G c K ) to D c ν is induced from D c ν / I c ν .

Proof. Assuming that for every ν ∈ DV K , the restriction of α a K to D a ν is induced from D a ν / I a ν we need to show this property for every ν . This follows from Proposition 3.6. /square

This allows to extend the notion of unramified to arbitrary valuations.

Combining the considerations above we obtain the notion of unramified stable cohomology

$$H _ { s, n r } ^ { * } ( G )$$

of a finite group G : a stable cohomology class α ∈ H ( i s G ) is unramified if and only if it is contained in the kernel of the composition

$$H _ { s } ^ { i } ( G ) \rightarrow H ^ { i } ( G _ { K } ) \stackrel { \partial _ { \nu } } { \longrightarrow } H ^ { i - 1 } ( G _ { K _ { \nu } } ),$$

/negationslash for every valuation ν ∈ DV K , where K = k V/G ( ) for some faithful representation of G . This does not depend on the choice of V , provided /lscript = char( k ). These groups are contravariant in G and form a subring

$$H _ { s, n r } ^ { * } ( G ) \subset H _ { s } ^ { * } ( G ).$$

## Furthermore:

- · If V/G is stably rational then H i s,nr ( G ) = 0, for all i ≥ 2.
- · We have

$$\mathsf H ^ { i } _ { s, n r } ( G ) \subseteq \mathsf H ^ { i } _ { s, n r } ( \text{Syl} _ { \ell } ( G ) ) ^ { N _ { G } ( \text{Syl} _ { \ell } ( G ) ) }.$$

$$\mathsf H ^ { 1 } ( I _ { \nu }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) = \mathsf H ^ { 0 } ( I _ { \nu }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) = \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n }$$

$$\wedge ^ { * } ( \mathbf H ^ { 1 } ( I _ { \nu }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) ) = \mathbf H ^ { 1 } ( I _ { \nu }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ) \oplus \mathbf H ^ { 0 } ( I _ { \nu }, \mathbb { Z } / \ell ^ { n } ).$$

Remark 6.3 . In [8], we proved that H i s,nr ( G ) = 0, i ≥ 1, for most quasisimple groups of Lie type. A complete result for quasi-simple groups and i = 2 was obtained in [21].

Note that the /lscript -Sylow-subgroups of finite simple groups often have stably-rational fields of invariants; this provides an alternative approach to our vanishing theorem.

## Lemma 6.4. Let

$$1 \rightarrow Z \rightarrow G ^ { c } \stackrel { \pi } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a } \rightarrow 1$$

be a central extension of finite /lscript -groups and α a ∈ H ( 2 s G a ) . Then α c := π ∗ a ( α ) ∈ H 2 s,nr ( G c ) if and only if for all σ ∈ Σ := Σ( G c ) the restriction of α a to σ is trivial, i.e., α a ∈ R (Σ) 2 .

## Lemma 6.5. Let

$$\gamma _ { K } \colon \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \to G ^ { a }$$

be a continuous surjective homomorphism and α a K = γ ∗ K ( α a ) ∈ H ( i G a K ) , for some α a ∈ H ( i s G a ) . Assume that α a K is unramified and let ( I, D ) be an extendable ∆ -pair in G a . Then α a is unramified with respect to ( I, D ) .

Conversely, if α a is unramified with respect to every extendable ∆ -pair in G a then α a K ∈ H i nr ( G a K ) .

Proof. For the converse, for ν ∈ DV K , let D := γ K ( D a ν ) and I := γ K ( I a ν ). Then either D is cyclic or ( D,I ) is an extendable ∆-pair in G a . We have a commutative diagram

/d47

/d47

/d111

/d111

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d47

$$\begin{array} { c } \mathbf H ^ { i } _ { s } ( G ^ { a } ) \xrightarrow { \phi } \mathbf H ^ { i } _ { s } ( D ) \xleftarrow { \psi } \mathbf H ^ { i } _ { s } ( D / I ) \\ \gamma ^ { * } _ { K } \Big | \Big | \Big \downarrow \Big \downarrow \\ \mathbf H ^ { i } ( \mathcal { G } ^ { a } _ { K } ) \xrightarrow { \Big | \Big | \Big | \Phi ^ { a } _ { \nu } ) \xleftarrow { \Big | \Big | \Phi ^ { a } _ { \nu } / \mathcal { I } ^ { a } _ { \nu } ) \\ a \cdot \cdot \cdot c \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \, \end{array}$$

/d47

/d111

/d111

In either case, α a K is unramified with respect to ν , by Lemma 1.7. /square

## 7. Main theorem

/negationslash

Theorem 7.1. Let K = k X ( ) be a function field over k = ¯ F p of tr deg k ( K ) ≥ 2 and α K ∈ H i nr ( G K ) , with /lscript = p and i &gt; 1 . Then there exist a continuous homomorphism G K → ˜ G a onto a finite /lscript -group, fitting into a diagram

/d15

/d15

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-bf94cbb8-6039-414e-a876-129cd0f44207.jpg)

- (1) α K is induced from ˜ α a ,
- (2) ˜ α c := π ∗ a (˜ ) α a ∈ H ∗ s,nr ( ˜ G c ) .

Conversely, every α K ∈ H ( i G K ) induced from ∧ ∗ (H ( ˜ 1 G a )) and unramified on some ˜ G c as above is in H i nr ( G K ) .

In this section we begin the proof of Theorem 7.1, reducing it to geometric statements addressed in Sections 8 and 9.

Fix an unramified class

$$\alpha _ { K } \in \mathbf H ^ { i } _ { n r } ( G _ { K } ) \subset \mathbf H ^ { i } ( G _ { K } ).$$

By Theorem 5.1, we have a surjection

$$\pi ^ { * } \colon \mathsf H ^ { i } ( \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } ) \rightarrow \mathsf H ^ { i } ( G _ { K } ),$$

let α a K ∈ H ( i G a K ) be the unramified class such that π ∗ ( α a K ) = α K . Let

$$\gamma _ { K } \colon \mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \rightarrow G ^ { a }$$

be a continuous quotient onto a finite abelian /lscript -group such that α a K is induced from a class α a ∈ H ( i s G a ) = ∧ i (H ( 1 G a )). We have a diagram of central extensions:

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d47

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-e10b6053-b4e6-4320-8be9-2c08546154ec.jpg)

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

1

where the lower row is uniquely defined, up to isoclinism, as in Lemma 4.2. The group G a might be too small, i.e., it may happen that

$$\pi _ { a } ^ { * } ( \alpha ^ { a } ) \notin \mathbf H _ { s, n r } ^ { i } ( G ^ { c } ).$$

Our goal is to pass to an intermediate finite quotient G a K → ˜ G a fitting into a commutative diagram below

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-a5967b46-2d52-44b5-9a51-26dd0a30fecc.jpg)

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

where the vertical arrows are surjections onto finite /lscript -groups, and such that α a K is induced from a class ˜ α a ∈ H ( ˜ ∗ G a ) with

$$\tilde { \pi } _ { a } ^ { * } ( \tilde { \alpha } ^ { a } ) \in \mathbf H _ { s, n r } ^ { i } ( \tilde { G } ^ { c } ).$$

There are two possibilities:

- (1) There exists a finite quotient G K → G a such that α K is induced from α a ∈ H ( i s G a ) which is unramified with respect to every extendable ∆-pair ( I, D ) in G a . This case is treated in Lemma 7.2.
- (2) On every finite quotient, the class α a inducing α K is ramified on some extendable ∆-pair ( I, D ). This possibility is eliminated by Lemma 7.3.

Lemma 7.2. Assume that α a ∈ H ( i s G a ) is unramified with respect to every extendable ∆ -pair ( I, D ) in G a . Then there is a factorization

$$\mathcal { G } _ { K } ^ { a } \stackrel { \tilde { \gamma } _ { K } } { \longrightarrow } \tilde { G } ^ { a } \stackrel { \gamma } { \longrightarrow } G ^ { a }, \quad \gamma _ { K } = \gamma \circ \tilde { \gamma } _ { K },$$

with finite ˜ G a , such that

$$\pi _ { a } ^ { * } ( \tilde { \alpha } ^ { a } ) \in \mathbf H ^ { i } _ { s, n r } ( \tilde { G } ^ { c } ), \quad \tilde { \alpha } ^ { a } \coloneqq \gamma ^ { * } ( \alpha ^ { a } ).$$

Proof. Let ˜ G a be the quotient constructed in Proposition 4.6, i.e., if ( I, D ) is not an extendable ∆-pair in G a then no ∆-pair ( ˜ I, D ˜ ) surjects onto ( I, D ). Thus, for each ∆-pair ( ˜ I, D ˜ ) in ˜ G a one of the following holds:

- · either γ I ( ˜ ) = 0 or γ D ( ˜ ) cyclic,
- · or ( γ I ( ˜ ) , γ ( ˜ )) D is an extendable ∆-pair in G a .

By Lemma 1.7, combined with Lemma 6.5, ˜ α a := γ ∗ ( α a ) is unramified with respect to ( I, D ). /square

Lemma 7.3. There exists a finite quotient G K → G a such that α a ∈ H ( i G a ) induces α K and is unramified on every extendable ∆ -pair ( I, D ) in G a .

The proof of this lemma is presented in Section 8, in the case when K admits a smooth projective model; a reduction to the smooth case is postponed until Section 9.

## 8. The smooth case

Let X be a smooth projective irreducible variety over an algebraically closed field k with function field K = k X ( ). By the Bloch-Ogus theorem, there is an isomorphism

$$\mathsf H ^ { i } _ { n r } ( G _ { K } ) = \mathsf H ^ { 0 } _ { Z a r } ( X, \mathcal { H } ^ { i } _ { e t } ( X ) ),$$

where H i et is an ´ etale cohomology sheaf (see also Theorem 4.1.1 in [15]). In particular, a class α K ∈ H i nr ( G K ) can be represented by a finite collection of classes { α n } n ∈ N , with α n defined on some Zariski open affine X n ⊂ X , with X = ∪ n X n , such that the restrictions of α n to some common open affine subvariety X ◦ ⊂ ∩ n X n coincide. We will need the following strengthening:

Lemma 8.1. Let X be a smooth variety with function field K and S = { x , . . . , x 1 r } ⊂ X a finite set of points. Given a class α K ∈ H i nr ( G K ) there exist

- · a Zariski open subset U S ⊂ X , containing S , and
- · a class α S ∈ H ( i et U S )

such that α K and α S coincide on some dense Zariski open subset U ◦ S ⊂ U S , i.e., for every representation of α K by { α n } n ∈ N as above there exists some dense Zariski open U ◦ S ⊂ U S such that the restrictions of α S and all α n to U ◦ S coincide.

Proof. Fix a representation of α K by { α n } n ∈ N as above; in particular α n -α n ′ = 0 on X n ∩ X n ′ , for all n, n ′ ∈ N . Every point in S is contained in some X n ; refining the cover by Zariski open subsets, we can achieve that each point in S is contained in exactly one such subset; i.e., after relabeling, we may assume that x n ⊂ X n , for n = 1 , . . . , r . Put

X ◦ S := ∩ r n =1 X n and X ◦ n := X n \ [(( X \ X n ) ∪ ( X \ X n ′ )) ∩ ( X \ X ◦ S )] If x n ∈ X n then x n ∈ X ◦ n . Moreover,

$$X _ { S } ^ { \circ } = X _ { n } ^ { \circ } \cap X _ { n ^ { \prime } } ^ { \circ }, \text{ \ for all \ } n, n ^ { \prime } \in [ 1, \dots, r ].$$

Define

$$U _ { S } \coloneqq \cup _ { n = 1 } ^ { r } X _ { n } ^ { \circ }.$$

The restrictions of α n to X ◦ n can be glued to a unique class α S ∈ H ( i et U S ), via the Mayer-Vietoris exact sequence. This is the required class. /square

Fix a representation of α K ∈ H i nr ( G K ) by { α n } n ∈ N as above. Each class α n ∈ H ( i et X n ) is represented by a finite collection { X nm } of affine charts X nm , with ∪ X nm = X n and finite ´tale covers e

$$\psi _ { n m } \colon \tilde { X } _ { n m } \rightarrow X _ { n m },$$

.

such that the restrictions α nm := α n X | nm are induced from homomorphisms χ nm : ˆ ( π 1 X nm ) → G nm onto finite groups. Proposition 5.2 implies that there is further refinement of the cover by affine subcovers

$$X = \cup _ { j } X _ { j },$$

such that for each j there exist

- · a finite abelian group G a j
- · a class α j ∈ H ( i G a j ) inducing α via χ K,j .
- · a surjection χ K,j : G K → G a j , and

Corollary 5.3 implies that there exists a finite quotient π c : G K → G c onto a central extension of an abelian group G a such that the projections χ K,j factor through G c and the images of α j in H ( i G c ) coincide. In particular, α K is induced from α c ∈ H ( i G c ).

We claim that α c is unramified on every pair ( π c ( I ν ) , π c ( D ν )), for ν ∈ V K . Indeed, for each ν , χ K,j ( I ν ) = 0 on at least one of the charts X j , thus α j is induced from χ K,j ( D /χ ν ) K,j ( I ν ); since α c ∈ H ( i G c ) is induced from α j , we have the same property for α c , with respect to the pair ( π c ( I ν ) , π c ( D ν )).

The rest of the argument is similar to the proof of Lemma 7.2. Let G K → G a be an intermediate quotient surjecting onto each G a j and

$$G _ { K } \rightarrow \tilde { G } ^ { a } \rightarrow G ^ { a }$$

the intermediate finite quotient constructed in Proposition 4.6. In particular, the projection of every ∆-pair in ˜ G a to G a j is either of the form ( π a,j ( I ν ) , π a,j ( D ν )), for some ν ∈ V K , or cyclic . Let ˜ G c be a central extension as in Corollary 4.3, surjecting onto G c . We have classes ˜ α a j ∈ H ( ˜ j G a ), induced by α a j constructed above, and mapping to the same class ˜ α c ∈ H ( ˜ j G c ).

We claim that ˜ α c ∈ H j s,nr ( ˜ G c ). Indeed, for every ∆-pair ( ˜ I, D ˜ ) in ˜ G a either ˜ projects to a cyclic group in D G a or it is extendable, i.e., image of some ( I ν , D ν ). In the first case, all elements ˜ α j are unramified on ( ˜ I, D ˜ ). In the second case, at least one of the ˜ α j is unramified on it.

## 9. Reduction to the smooth case

In absense of resolution of singularities in positive characteristic, we reduce to the smooth case via the de Jong-Gabber alterations theorem (see [17]): The Galois group G K contains a subgroup G ˜ K of finite index, coprime to /lscript , such that

- · The function field ˜ K corresponding to G ˜ K admits a smooth model, i.e., there exists a finite cover

$$\rho \colon \tilde { X } \rightarrow X,$$

of degree | G /G K ˜ K | with ˜ X smooth and ˜ K = k X ( ˜ ).

Let α K ∈ H n nr ( G K ) be an unramified class. Its restriction α ˜ K to a class in H n ( G ˜ K ) is also unramified. By results in Section 8, there exists a surjection

$$( 9. 1 )$$

$$G _ { \tilde { K } } \rightarrow \tilde { G } ^ { c }$$

onto a finite abelian /lscript -group such that α ˜ K is unduced from a class in ˜ α c ∈ H n s,nr ( ˜ G c ).

## Lemma 9.1. There exists a diagram

/d47

/d47

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d15

/d47

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-e6bfd216-c732-45ce-a902-65dd736dcc2d.jpg)

/d47

where the vertical arrows are injections, with image of index coprime to /lscript , ˜ G and G are finite groups, and α K is induced from an element α G ∈ H n nr ( G ) . In particular, Syl ( /lscript G ) /similarequal Syl ( ˜ ) /lscript G .

Proof. Fix a finite continuous quotient G K → G ′ such that α K is induced from some α G ′ ∈ H ( i G ′ ). Note that for every intermediate quotient

$$G _ { K } \rightarrow G \rightarrow G ^ { \prime }$$

there exists an α G ∈ H ( i G ) inducing α K . It suffices to find a sufficiently large G such that the sujection (9.1) factors through a subgroup of G . This is a standard fact in Galois theory.

Since ˜ α c ∈ H i s,nr ( G c ) its image ˜ α ∈ H ( ˜ ) is i G also unramified. Since the index ( G : ˜ ) is coprime to G /lscript , and since the unramified ˜ is induced α from an element α G ∈ H ( i G ), α G is also unramified, as claimed. /square

At this stage, we cannot yet guarantee that G is a central extension of an abelian group, nor that it is an /lscript -group. However, we know that

$$\text{tr} ( \text{res} _ { G _ { K } / G _ { \tilde { K } } } ( \alpha _ { K } ) ) = \alpha _ { K } \in \text{H} _ { n r } ^ { i } ( G _ { K } ),$$

modulo multiplication by an element in ( Z //lscript n ) × .

We need the following version of resolution of singularities in positive characteristic:

/d47

/d47

/d47

/d47

Theorem 9.2. [18] Let G be a finite /lscript -group and Y a smooth variety with a generically free action of G . Then there exists a G -variety ˜ Y with a proper G -equivariant birational map ˜ Y → Y such that ˜ Y /G is smooth.

We are very grateful to D. Abramovich for providing the reference and indicating the main steps of the proof in [18]:

- · Theorem VIII.1.1 gives an equivariant modification Y ′ of Y with a regular log structure on Y ′ such that the action is very tame , i.e., the stabilizers in G of points in Y ′ are abelian and act as subgroups of tori in toroidal charts of the log structure Y ′ .
- · By Theorem VI.3.2, the quotient Y /G ′ of a log regular variety by a very tame action is log regular.
- · By Theorem VIII.3.4.9, which is a step in Theorem VIII.1.1, a log regular variety has a resolution of singularities.

We return to the proof of Theorem 7.1. Start with a suitable faithful representation V of G , and thus of Syl ( /lscript G ) = Syl ( ˜ ), and construct a /lscript G diagram

/d47

/d47

)

/d15

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0392v1-figure-74c7fe80-5979-4e00-9778-eecf3225ca81.jpg)

/d15

where Y = ˜ Y / Syl ( /lscript G ) is the smooth projective variety from Theorem 9.2, and π Y is a Syl ( /lscript G )-equivariant map from a G -equivariant projective closure of V . Let L = k Y ( ) be the function field of Y . Given a class α L ∈ H i nr ( G L ) we have a covering of Y = ∪ n Y n by affine Zariski open subsets and a finite set of classes { α n } representing α L , as considered in Section 8.

Pick a point v ∈ ¯ . V The image S := π Y ( G · b ) of its G -orbit is a finite set of points. By Lemma 8.1, there exist a dense Zariski open subset U S and a class α S ∈ H ( i et U S ) coinciding with α L on some dense Zariski open subset U ◦ S ⊂ U S . Its preimage

$$\bar { U } _ { S } ^ { \circ } \coloneqq \pi _ { Y } ^ { - 1 } ( U _ { S } ^ { \circ } ) \subset \bar { V }$$

is a dense Zariski open subset containing G v · . Put

$$\bar { U } _ { v } \coloneqq \cap _ { g \in G } g ( \bar { U } _ { S } ^ { \circ } ) \subset \bar { V },$$

it is a G -stable dense Zariski open subvariety containing v . Its image π G ( ¯ U v ) ⊂ ¯ V /G is a Zariski open subset containing π G ( G v · ). Note that

π v : ¯ U / v Syl ( /lscript G ) → U S is a birational morphism to an open subset and π ∗ v ( α S ) is well-defined in ´tale e cohomology of ¯ U / v Syl ( /lscript G ). It follows that the trace

$$\text{tr} _ { \pi _ { G } } ( \pi _ { v } ^ { * } ( \alpha _ { S } ) ) \in \text{H} _ { e t } ^ { i } ( \bar { U } _ { v } / G )$$

is well-defined and coincides with ( G : Syl ( /lscript G )) · α S at the generic point of ¯ V /G .

Thus we have a covering of ¯ V /G by Zariski open subsets of the form ¯ U /G v , v ∈ ¯ , V with cohomology classes representing α K on each chart. There exists a finite subcovering by ¯ U /G v with extensions of α S to each ¯ U /G v . We can now apply Proposition 5.2 to produce a finite subcover such that on each chart, the class is induced from homomorphisms onto finite abelian groups, and proceed as in Section 8.

## References

- [1] A. Adem and R. J. Milgram. Cohomology of finite groups , volume 309 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 2004.
- [2] F. Bogomolov. The Brauer group of quotient spaces of linear representations. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. , 51(3):485-516, 688, 1987.
- [3] F. Bogomolov. On two conjectures in birational algebraic geometry. In Algebraic geometry and analytic geometry (Tokyo, 1990) , ICM-90 Satell. Conf. Proc., pages 26-52. Springer, Tokyo, 1991.
- [4] F. Bogomolov. Stable cohomology of groups and algebraic varieties. Mat. Sb. , 183(5):3-28, 1992.
- [5] F. Bogomolov. Stable cohomology of finite and profinite groups. In Algebraic groups , pages 19-49. Universit¨tsverlag G¨ttingen, G¨ttingen, 2007. a o o
- [6] F. Bogomolov and Chr. B¨hning. Isoclinism and stable cohomology of wreath o products, 2012. arXiv:1204.4747 .
- [7] F. Bogomolov and Chr. B¨ ohning. Stable cohomology of alternating groups. Cent. Eur. J. Math. , 12(2):212-228, 2014.
- [8] F. Bogomolov, T. Petrov, and Y. Tschinkel. Unramified cohomology of finite groups of Lie type. In Cohomological and geometric approaches to rationality problems , volume 282 of Progr. Math. , pages 55-73. Birkh¨user Boston Inc., a Boston, MA, 2010.
- [9] F. Bogomolov and Y. Tschinkel. Commuting elements of Galois groups of function fields. In Motives, polylogarithms and Hodge theory, Part I (Irvine, CA, 1998) , volume 3 of Int. Press Lect. Ser. , pages 75-120. Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2002.
- [10] F. Bogomolov and Y. Tschinkel. Reconstruction of function fields. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 18(2):400-462, 2008.
- [11] F. Bogomolov and Y. Tschinkel. Reconstruction of higher-dimensional function fields. Mosc. Math. J. , 11(2):185-204, 406, 2011.
- [12] F. Bogomolov and Y. Tschinkel. Introduction to birational anabelian geometry. In Current developments in algebraic geometry , volume 59 of Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. , pages 17-63. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012.

- [13] S. K. Chebolu, I. Efrat, and J. Min´ˇ c. Quotients of absolute Galois groups a which determine the entire Galois cohomology. Math. Ann. , 352(1):205-221, 2012.
- [14] S. K. Chebolu and J. Min´ˇ c. Absolute Galois groups viewed from small quoa tients and the Bloch-Kato conjecture. In New topological contexts for Galois theory and algebraic geometry (BIRS 2008) , volume 16 of Geom. Topol. Monogr. , pages 31-47. Geom. Topol. Publ., Coventry, 2009.
- [15] J.-L. Colliot-Th´l`ne. Birational invariants, purity and the Gersten conjecture. e e In K-Theory and Algebraic Geometry : Connections with Quadratic Forms and Division Algebras, AMS Summer Research Institute, Santa Barbara 1992 , volume 58, Part I of Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics , pages 1-64. 1995.
- [16] J.-L. Colliot-Th´l`ne e e and M. Ojanguren. Vari´t´s e e unirationnelles non rationnelles: au-del` de l'exemple d'Artin et Mumford. a Invent. Math. , 97(1):141158, 1989.
- [17] J.-L. Illusie. On Gabber's refined uniformization, talks at the University of Tokyo, 2008. preprint.
- [18] L. Illusie, Y. Laszlo, and F. Orgogozo. Travaux de Gabber sur l'uniformisation locale et la cohomologie etale des schemas quasi-excellents. Seminaire a l'Ecole polytechnique 2006-2008, 2012. arXiv:1207.3648 .
- [19] H. Knaf and F.-V. Kuhlmann. Abhyankar places admit local uniformization in any characteristic. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) ´ , 38(6):833-846, 2005.
- [20] H. Knaf and F.-V. Kuhlmann. Every place admits local uniformization in a finite extension of the function field. Adv. Math. , 221(2):428-453, 2009.
- [21] B. Kunyavski˘ ı. The Bogomolov multiplier of finite simple groups. In Cohomological and geometric approaches to rationality problems , volume 282 of Progr. Math. , pages 209-217. Birkh¨user Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 2010. a
- [22] J. Milne. ´ tale cohomology E . Princeton Mathematical Series 33. Princeton University Press, 1980.
- [23] Sh. Mochizuki. The local prop anabelian geometry of curves. Invent. Math. , 138(2):319-423, 1999.
- [24] F. Pop. On Grothendieck's conjecture of birational anabelian geometry. Ann. of Math. (2) , 139(1):145-182, 1994.
- [25] F. Pop. On the birational anabelian program initiated by Bogomolov I. Invent. Math. , 187(3):511-533, 2012.
- [26] L. Positselski. Koszul property and Bogomolov's conjecture. Int. Math. Res. Not. , (31):1901-1936, 2005.
- [27] D. J. Saltman. Noether's problem over an algebraically closed field. Invent. Math. , 77(1):71-84, 1984.
- [28] J.-P. Serre. Galois cohomology . Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.

Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, N.Y.U., 251 Mercer str., New York, NY 10012, U.S.A., Laboratory of Algebraic Geometry, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 7 Vavilova str., Moscow, 117312, Russia

E-mail address : bogomolo@cims.nyu.edu

Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, N.Y.U., 251 Mercer str., New York, NY 10012, U.S.A.

E-mail address :

tschinkel@cims.nyu.edu

Simons Foundation, 160 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA
Fedor Bogomolov Yuri Tschinkel
Universal spaces for unramified Galois cohomology
We construct and study universal spaces for birational invariants of
algebraic varieties over algebraic closures of finite fields.