## Magnetic and orbital correlations in multiferroic CaMn O 7 12 probed by x-ray resonant elastic scattering

K. Gautam , S. S. Majid , S. Francoual , 1 2 3 A. Ahad , K. Dey , 2 1 M. C. Rahn , R. Sankar 4 5 6 , , F.C. Chou , and D. K. Shukla 6 1 ∗

2 Department of Physics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India

1 UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research, Khandwa Road, Indore 452001, India

3 Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Notkestrasse 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany

5

4 Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom †

Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan and

6 Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan (Dated: June 30, 2020)

The quadruple perovskite CaMn O 7 12 is a topical multiferroic, in which the hierarchy of electronic correlations driving structural distortions, modulated magnetism, and orbital order is not well known and may vary with temperature. x-ray resonant elastic scattering (XRES) provides a momentum-resolved tool to study these phenomena, even in very small single crystals, with valuable information encoded in its polarization- and energy-dependence. We present an application of this technique to CaMn O 7 12 . By polarization analysis, it is possible to distinguish superstructure reflections associated with magnetic order and orbital order. Given the high momentum resolution, we resolve a previously unknown splitting of an orbital order superstructure peak, associated with a distinct locked-in phase at low temperatures. A second set of orbital order superstructure peaks can then be interpreted as a second-harmonic orbital signal. Surprisingly, the intensities of the first- and second-harmonic orbital signal show disparate temperature and polarization dependence. This orbital re-ordering may be driven by an exchange mechanism, that becomes dominant over the Jahn-Teller instability at low temperature.

PACS numbers: 75.85.+t, 61.05.C, 61.44.Fw, 75.80.+q

In materials with strong electronic correlations, the coupling of spin, orbital and lattice degrees of freedom can give rise to unusual phenomena, like colossal magneto-resistance, chiral orders, metal-insulator transitions, superconductivity and multiferroicity. While the resulting bulk physical properties are often not straightforward to interpret, in many cases a microscopic (i.e., momentumand energy-resolved) understanding was achieved through x-ray resonant elastic scattering 1-4 . In multiferroics, the coexistence and coupling of several order parameters can obscure the roles of the different electronic interactions that are at play, but also creates unusual scenarios in which novel emergent phases may arise. Notably, ordered phases in such materials often couple strongly to external fields, which adds potential for technological applications, for example, as in magneto-electric random access memory and multiferroic tunnel junctions 5,6 .

ments 7-9 .

The orbital ordering phenomenon in CaMn O 7 12 is unusually complex due to presence of the Jahn-Teller (JT) active Mn 3+ ( d 4 ) ions on two different Wyckoff sites. Each of these sublattices develop a distinct type of distortion: (i) the A -type Mn 3+ ions (Wyckoff sites 9 e in R ¯ are situated at the center of a rhombic prism resem3 bling an elongated octahedron, whereas (ii) the B -type Mn 3+ ions (Wyckoff site 9 d ) are contained in an apically contracted octahedral environment - a rare case among JT distortions 10 . This combination of magnetic environments with different symmetries makes it difficult to recognize the causality between the resulting orbital, spin, and structural instabilities.

As in other manganites 11 there are two candidate mechanisms for OO in CaMn O 7 12 : (i) the JT distortion, in which a spontaneous symmetry breaking energetically lowers the occupied crystal-field-split d -electronic states, and (ii) an exchange mechanism, in which the crystal relaxes to accommodate couplings between magnetic spin and orbital pseudo-spin degrees of freedom (the pseudospin τ = ± 1 / 2, corresponding to the choice between occupying d x 2 -y 2 or d z 2 -r 2 orbitals). Without a detailed knowledge of the material, it is hardly possible to distinguish these mechanisms by bulk measurements, especially if both are active in the material 12-14 . Its capability to disentangle magnetic, orbital, and charge-scattering contributions make XRES a particularly powerful tool to identify which is the dominant effect 14,15 .

In CaMn O 7 12 , the thermal variation of Mn 3+ -O bond lengths can serve as a measure for the relevance of the

In CaMn O 7 12 , a cubic ( Im ¯ ) 3 to rhombohedral ( R ¯ ) 3 structural phase transition occurs below 480 K and incommensurate orbital order (OO, propagation vector q oo ) develops at T oo ∼ 250 K. At T N1 ∼ 90 K, this is followed by the onset of modulated magnetic order (propagation vector q m 1 ), coincident with an electric polarization of the material. In fact, among type-II multiferroic materials, CaMn O 7 12 develops the largest known polarization induced by magnetic order . 5 Down to T N2 ∼ 48 K, the periodicity of the incommensurate magnetic order is exactly twice that of the orbital modulation ( q m 1 = q oo / 2), signifying an intimate coupling between the arrangements of orbitals and magnetic mo-

FIG. 1. (a) x-ray fluorescence across the Mn K edge in CaMn O 7 12 , and a corresponding energy scan of the magnetic q m 1 = (0 0 1 035) reflection at 65 K in the , , . σπ ′ polarization channel. (b) L -scans across this reflection in the σπ ′ and the σσ ′ channels at 65 K and 6550 eV, confirming its magnetic origin.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00371v2-figure-321348f3-e7a1-4dc7-8b00-88398eebeeaa.jpg)

JT mechanism 16 . Between room temperature and T N1 , they are indeed known to show relatively strong variations. On the other hand, below T N1 , the Mn-O bond lengths remain almost constant. Thus, while both mechanisms are likely active in CaMn 7 O 12 , JT distortions can only be the driving instability at high temperatures, and onset of magnetism and electric polarization at T N1 is associated with a changeover in the character of the orbital instability.

The spin and orbital structures of CaMn 7 O 12 have previously been investigated by neutron (NPD) and x-ray powder diffraction 9,17-19 . Although much information is lost in the polycrystalline average, these techniques are each sensitive to two of four (charge, orbital, structural and magnetic) ordering channels. Taken together, these insights therefore already provided valuable insights into the ordering phenomena in this material (see related text and references 8,9,18,20-22 therein in the Supplemental Material 23 ).

In XRES, the photon energy is tuned to the proximity of atomic absorption edges, which enhances magnetic and multipolar scattering cross sections by orders of magnitude. The technique thus provides a powerful means to determine both magnetic structures and OO. Due to the high momentum-resolution, the spectroscopic selectivity of the resonant process and its polarization dependence, XRES is highly suited to disentangle the origins of different scattering contributions, which makes it the ideal tool to study multiferroics 24,25 . Here, we report an application of Mn K-edge XRES on a minute ( ≈ 100 µ m) single crystal of CaMn 7 O 12 . We track in detail the thermal variation of different superstructure peaks and assign their origin by analyzing their energy and polarization dependence.

High-quality CaMn O 7 12 crystals were grown by the self-flux method, as reported in our earlier study 26 . Details on the crystal structure, characterization, and alignment are provided in the Supplemental Material (see Fig. S1 and Ref. 27 along with related text 23 ). A c -axis-specular CaMn O 7 12 platelet was mounted on the cold finger of a CCR cryostat and probed in the vertical scattering geometry, using the six-circle diffractometer at beamline P09, PETRA III (DESY) 28 . The x-ray energy was tuned to the Mn K edge ( ∼ 6 5 keV) and a Cu(110) . crystal was used as an analyzer. Compound refractive lenses focused the beam to ∼ 20 µ m at the sample position. In the following, σ ( σ ′ ) and π ( π ′ ) denote incident (scattered) x-ray polarization perpendicular and parallel to the scattering plane, respectively [see inset to Fig. 1(a)]. Magnetization measurements as a function of temperature and magnetic field were performed in a commercial 7 T SQUID vibrating sample magnetometer (Quantum Design).

In the rhombohedral ( R ¯ ) phase of CaMn O 3 7 12 , the reflection condition for (0 , 0 , L ) peaks is L = 3 n (integer n ). Below T N1 , θ -2 θ scans along the specular (0 , 0 , L ) direction reveal a magnetic superstructure peak at q m 1 = (0 0 1 035), in agreement with neutron studies , , . 8,18 . Figure 1 shows energyand polarization-dependent scans that confirm the magnetic origin of this peak (all measurements at 65 K). Panel (a) shows the energy dependence of the integrated magnetic ( σπ ′ ) intensity across the Mn K edge, along with the x-ray fluorescence signal. Three resonances are observed, corresponding to a preedge (6539 eV) 1 s → 3 d quadrupole transition (indicative of broken local inversion symmetry), and two 1 s → 4 p dipole transitions (at 6550 and 6559 eV, corresponding to the two distinct Mn sites). Even though it couples directly to the 3 d valence shell, the quadrupole resonant enhancement is only around one fifth of that at the dipole transitions. Figure 1(b) illustrates that the q m 1 intensity at 6550 eV is observed entirely in the crossed polarization channel, a characteristic of magnetic XRES. In agreement with the neutron diffraction study by Johnson et al. , the characterisitcs of this reflection show no thermal variation between T N1 and T N2 8 .

Apart from the magnetic q m 1 = (0 0 1 035) reflection, , , . we also characterized q oo = (0 0 , , L ± δ ) superstructure reflections ( δ ∼ 0 93), which had also been observed ear-. lier in x-ray and neutron studies 8,9,18 . In contrast to q m 1 -type peaks, these reflections are observed both in the σσ ′ and σπ ′ channels. This corroborate that they are not due to a magnetic superstructure, but to a periodic anisotropy in the occupation of the Mn 3 d e g ground state manifold. The intensity map in Fig. 2(a) illustrates the thermal variation of L scans around (0,0,0.93) in σσ ′ . Evidently, the associated order already exists at temperatures above the onset of magnetism ( T N1 = 90K), and its modulation length is not affected down to T N2 = 48K. Then, at T N2 , q s begins to split into a pair of propagation vectors that eventually separated by ∼ 0 01 reciprocal . lattice units. This subtle effect had not been resolved in earlier studies 8 .

We label these new branches by their values at low temperatures, δ 1 = 0 93 ( . ≈ δ ), and δ 2 = 0 94. . Their disparate temperature dependence suggests that each may be associated with a different underlying order parameters. While δ 1 does not deviate from the higher-

temperature value of δ , δ 2 below T N2 increases with a constant slope and, at 20 K, locks into a new constant value. In Fig. 2(b) we illustrate the characteristic evolution of spectral weight and correlation length of the two branches. Below T N2 , in σσ ′ most spectral weight is continuously transferred to the δ 2 reflection. In the lowtemperature decoupled state, as it is de-locked from the constant δ 1 , the δ 2 modulation retains a constant correlation length, while that of δ 1 increases significantly (see inset).

FIG. 2. Characteristics of the XRES response from orbital order. (a) Thermal variation of L scans of the δ 1 and δ 2 orbital superstructure peaks, measured in the σσ ′ channel. (b) Corresponding changes in integrated intensity and linewidths (inset) of these reflections. (c) L scans across the (0,0,2.07) peak in σσ ′ at 10 K and 60 K. (d) L scans across this reflection at 4.5 K, comparing the σσ ′ and σπ ′ , channels. (e) Energy scans of the (0,0,2.07) intensity, at 4.5 K, measured in σσ ′ and σπ ′ . (f) Energy scans at (0,0,2.06), at 4.5 K, in σσ ′ and σπ ′ .

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00371v2-figure-163f16a3-0ef2-4911-8f95-5464f0f766d9.jpg)

As a check for consistency, we also investigated this splitting on the satelites of another reflection (0 , 0 2 07) = (0 0 3 , . , , -δ ) and found the same behavior.

In Fig. 2(c), we show σσ ′ L scans across (0,0,2.07), at 10 K and 60 K. As at (0,0,0.93), the reflection splits into δ 1 and δ 2 components at low temperatures (here corresponding to L = 2 07 and . L = 2 06, respectively). . We denote this state below ∼ 20 K as locked-in state II (liII), in analogy to the higher-temperature ( T N2 &lt; T &lt; T N1 ) locked-in state liI, where q m 1 = q oo / 2.

The liII regime features a reduction in σπ ′ intensity at δ 2 , as well as a significant change in the relative intensities between the two peaks ( δ 1 /δ 2 ), in both σσ ′ and σπ ′ . As shown in Fig. 2(d), at 4.5 K, the relative intensity is three times higher in σπ ′ compared to σσ ′ . In Figs. 2(e) and 2(f), energy scans of the δ 1 and δ 2 peaks, in both polarization channels, are shown for the liII phase. A resonance appears in σπ ′ , which indicates that this is not mere Thompson (charge) scattering, while non-resonant character of the σσ ′ channel implies that Thompson scattering may yet contribute. Similar behavior is observed in the energy scans of δ in other phases (at T N1 &lt; T , and T N2 &lt; T &lt; T N1 )(see Fig. S3 23 ). Notably, the resonance energies E δ 1 res ∼ 6534 and E δ 2 res ∼ 6530 of these modulations both lie well below the magnetic resonance E m 1 res ∼ 6550 eV. This is an indication that OO in CaMn O 7 12 is driven by a JT distortion which could only move the orbital energy levels 29 .

The resonant behavior discussed above reveals that combined effects of charge (Thompson) and resonant orbital scattering are observed at both δ 1 and δ 2 . This supports the previous hypothesis that the stabilization of the d x 2 -y 2 OO on the Mn +3 (9 d ) site (coupled to the oxygen displacements modes of the JT distortion) is driven by charge order on both Mn +3 (9 d ) and Mn +4 (3 ) sites b 7,30 . Furthermore, a monotonous increase in intensity of the δ peak, while cooling down to T N1 [see Fig. 2(a) and 2(b)], indicates that the contribution of the JT mechanism to this effect reaches its peak at this temperature, and then stays constant down to T N2 . This is followed by the bifurcation at T N2 , which marks the onset of a new dominant OO mechanism on the background the pre-existing orbital and magnetic order.

In their single crystal neutron diffraction study, Johnson et al. 8 observed a reflection at (0 , 0 , k 0 ) = (0 , 0 1 12) , . (at 2 K), and interpreted this as the fundamental magnetic wave vector in the ground state of CaMn O 7 12 . We also confirmed the presence of this peak (at base temperature, ∼ 4 5 K) . by XRES, but find significant intensity not only in σπ ′ , but also in the σσ ′ channel, which is at odds with purely magnetic order. The similarities of the thermal variations presented here suggest that the peak at (0 0 , , k 0 ) actually derives from that at (0,0,1.14): It can be indexed as a second order orbital reflection, (0 , 0 3 , -2 ) and first arises δ below T N1 (i.e., in the liI phase). Such higher-harmonic reflections have previously been observed when an incommensurate magnetic structure is accompanied by structural distortions, allowing quadratic magnetoelastic coupling 31 . As shown in Fig. 3(a), below T N2 , the (0,0,1.14) peak splits into (0 0 3 , , -2 δ 1 ) = (0 , 0 1 14) and (0 , . , 0 3 , -2 δ 2 ) = (0 , 0 1 12), , .

in a similar fashion as at the first-harmonic [cf. Fig. 2(a)].

Figures 3(a) and 3(b) illustrate that below T N2 , the new 2 δ 2 branch gains continuously in σσ ′ spectral weight, while the 2 δ 1 instability maintains the constant modulus and intensity of the δ modulation vector. Below ∼ 10 K, both of these second harmonic reflections appear to be strongly enhanced, indicating higher order (orbital and magnetic) reflection coupling processes in the ground state of this compound. The inset to Fig. 3(b) shows that the correlations lengths of 2 δ 1 and 2 δ 2 evolve in parallel to their parent reflections [cf. Fig. 2(b)].

Energy scans of 2 δ 2 , in both polarization channels, are shown in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d), for 4.5 K and 20 K, respectively. Against expectations, the resonant behavior of the second-order reflections differs from that at δ 1 and δ 2 : The σσ ′ and σπ ′ signals are perfectly proportional to each other. As a common feature of these energy scans, the signal is suppressed at the absorption edge, which can be explained in terms of the structural modulation caused due to the displacement of the Mn +4 ions (as a consequence of the JT crystal distortion). This was also observed in other manganites 32 .

Moreover, the intensities of the firstand secondharmonic OO peaks, also show an opposite thermal variation, adding to the evidence that the first- and secondorder intensities are (dominantly) of different origin, even though they are locked into the same underlying periodicity.

In the context of these findings, it appears to be a valid interpretation that the first-harmonic OO peaks are specific to JT-like distortion (they set in at 250 K /greatermuch T N1 , with significantly shifted resonance energy), while the second-harmonic signal that appears below T N1 is associated with an exchange (magneto-orbital) coupling mechanism. This scenario is also consistent with anomalies in the magnetic entropy that were recently reported by Parul et al. 33 for the temperature regime in which the 2 δ reflection sets in ( ∼ 65 K).

In the following, we discuss the entanglement of order parameters below T N2 . Slawinski et al. 20 , using NPD, discovered a weak inflection of the magnetic propagation vector near 37 K, but were not able to achieve a reliable refinement of the modulus of the ordered magnetic moment between 30K and 48K. As seen in the magnetization curves shown in Fig. 4(a), we observe a hysteresis between cooling and warming ramps in a similar temperature regime (20 K - 48 K), which can be interpreted as a first order magnetic order-order transition. Figure 4(b) illustrates that the same hysteresis is also manifest in the modulation length k z of the (0,0,2.07) reflection. Aside from the de-locking of orbital and spin modulations, the appearance of a new orbital reflection (2 δ ) just above this hysteretical regime underlines the intricate relation to orbital-reordering and indicates that orbitals play a key role in this order-order phase transition.

In a theoretical study of this low temperature regime, Dai et al. 34 concluded that the structural symmetry in the ground state of CaMn O 7 12 should be described by

FIG. 3. (a) Temperature dependence of L scans of the orbital order reflections at L = 3 -2 δ 1 = 1 12 and . L = 3 -2 δ 2 = 1 14, . in the σσ ′ polarization channel. (b) Corresponding variation of integrated intensities and linewidths (see inset). (c) Fixed momentum transfer energy scans of the L = 3 -2 δ 1 peak, measured in both polarization channels, at 4.5 K, and (d) at 20 K.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00371v2-figure-521e8ee7-8592-46aa-8d01-1ee91006fbf6.jpg)

the space group P 3, rather than R ¯ . 3 Kadlec et al. 35 , observed a dielectric anomaly near 20 K and changes in the far IR transmittance below T N2 . Based on the Landau theory of phase transition, Johnson et al. 8 also associated the dielectric anomalies below T N2 with a first-order transition. In the case of structural transition from R ¯ 3 (centro-symmetric) to P 3 (noncentro-symmetric) below T N2 , the Wyckoff positions should split from 9 d (B-site Mn 3+ ) into two (3 f and 6 g ) and three (3 d , 3 d , and 3 d ) independent sites. The Mn 3+ ions at these sites would then be in different orbital states and might give rise to different types of incommensurate structural modulations. The observed splitting of OO reflections below T N2 could be the consequence of such a structural transition. Further dedicated experimental and theoretical studies are required to address this possibility for understanding the exact origin of these splittings.

Taken together, the present results allow us to establish a relation between the orbital and the magnetic modulations at low temperatures. The phase diagram shown in Fig. 4(c) provides an overview of the superstructure Fourier components that have so far been observed in CaMn O 7 12 . The propagation vectors determined in the present XRES study are shown, along with the neutron scattering results by Johnson et al. (repro-

duced from Ref. ). 8 As discussed above, we identify two locked-in phases (liI and liII) that are separated by a delocked regime. In the liI phase ( T N2 &lt; T &lt; T N1 ), spin and orbital modulations are constant and locked to each other by the relation q oo = q m 1 = (0 0 3 , , -δ / ) 2 (with δ ∼ 0 93), which is confirmed by the perfect consistency . of the neutron and x-ray results. No such relation seems to exist in the de-locked phase (30 K &lt; T &lt; T N2 ), where q m 1 splits into q 0 and q 1 -8 . In the liII phase, q 1 -locks into (0 , 0 3 , -2 ) and thus a fixed relation between the δ magnetic and orbital modulations is then re-established.

FIG. 4. (a) Temperature dependence of the magnetization of polycrystalline CaMn O 7 12 measured at 100 Oe, in cooling and warming ramps (see arrows). (b) Temperature dependence of the peak positions of the L scans of the σσ ′ intensity around k z ∼ 2 07 (arrows indicate cooling and warming . ramps). (c) Phase diagram summarizing the temperature dependence of Fourier components of orbital and magnetic order in CaMn O 7 12 . Along with the present (XRES) findings, we reproduce the neutron diffraction results by Johnson et al. 8 . Two lock-in phases (liI and liII) can be identified, separated by a broad first order phase transition, during which which the modulation lengths of orbital and magnetic order are delocked.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00371v2-figure-62af6ba0-fa8a-48f1-a5ce-6d2b1487ef85.jpg)

In summary, we have used resonant x-ray elastic scattering to investigate the correlation of magnetic and or-

∗ dkshukla@csr.res.in

1 S. Wilkins, P. Hatton, M. Roper, D. Prabhakaran, and A. Boothroyd, Physical review letters 90 , 187201 (2003).

† Current address: Institute for Solid State and Materials Physics, Technical University of Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany

2 L. Paolasini, R. Caciuffo, A. Sollier, P. Ghigna, and M. Altarelli, Physical review letters 88 , 106403 (2002).

3 S. Blanco-Canosa, A. Frano, T. Loew, Y. Lu, J. Porras, G. Ghiringhelli, M. Minola, C. Mazzoli, L. Braicovich, E. Schierle, et al. , Physical review letters 110 , 187001

bital modulations in multiferroic CaMn O 7 12 . It is clear that orbital degrees of freedom play a leading role in the emergence of magnetic order and the large spontaneous electric polarization below T N1 . We found that the orbital and magnetic modulations are coupled in between T N1 and T N2 through the relation q m 1 = q oo / 2 = (0 0 3 , , -δ / ) 2, where δ = 0 93. . Between 20 K to ∼ 45 K, these modulations are incommensurate with respect to each other, corresponding a very broad orbital-involved order to order transition. Our direct observation of this first order phase transition also provides an explanation for a number of anomalies that had been observed in bulk measurements 20,34,35 .

At low temperatures in liII, magnetic and orbital modulations couple again, with the previously unknown relation of propagation vectors (0 , 0 , k 0 ) = (0 0 3 , , -2 ). δ Our measurements of the photon energy dependence of the resonant x-ray scattering intensity allows us to disentangle the dominant driving mechanisms of the orbital orderings (purely electronic versus JT distortion driven) near the two multiferroic transition temperatures. Orbital ordering at the wave vector δ is dominated by the JT mechanism, while the previously unknown higher harmonic 2 δ is driven by magneto-orbital exchange interactions. The observation of second-harmonic superstructure reflections proves the existence of a quadratic magnetoelastic coupling below T N1 in CaMn O 7 12 .

K.G. acknowledges support from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India, in the form of SRF. D.K.S. is grateful for support through a DST INSPIRE faculty award (No.IFA-13/PH-52), and to the DST-DESY project for financial support for synchrotron x-ray resonant magnetic scattering experiments. The authors also extend their thanks to R.J. Choudhary for providing magnetization measurements and to G. Panchal for his assistance in one of the synchrotron experiments. R.S. acknowledges financial support provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan under Project No. MOST-108-2112-M-001-049-MY2. RS and FCC both acknowledge Academia Sinica for the budget of AS-iMATE-109-13. Part of this research was carried out at the PETRA III synchrotron radiation source at DESY, a member of the Helmholtz Association.

(2013).

- 5 J. Scott, Nature Mater. 6 , 256 (2007).
- 4 G. R. Blake, T. Palstra, Y. Ren, A. A. Nugroho, and A. Menovsky, Physical review letters 87 , 245501 (2001).
- 6 D. Pantel, S. Goetze, D. Hesse, and M. Alexe, Nature Mater. 11 , 289 (2012).
- 8 R. Johnson, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, A. Bombardi, C. Martin, L. Chapon, and P. Radaelli, Phys. Rev. B 93 , 180403 (2016).
- 7 N. J. Perks, R. D. Johnson, C. Martin, L. C. Chapon, and P. G. Radaelli, Nat. Commun. 3 , 1277 1282. (2012).

- 9 W. Slawinski, R. Przenioslo, I. Sosnowska, M. Bieringer, I. Margiolaki, A. N. Fitch, and E. Suard, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20 , 104239 (2008).
- 11 Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, science 288 , 462 (2000).
- 10 B. Bochu, J. Buevoz, J. Chenavas, A. Collomb, J. Joubert, and M. Marezio, Solid State Commun. 36 , 133 (1980).
- 12 S. Wilkins, P. Spencer, P. Hatton, S. Collins, M. Roper, D. Prabhakaran, and A. Boothroyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 , 167205 (2003).
- 14 M. Benfatto, Y. Joly, and C. R. Natoli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 , 636 (1999).
- 13 I. Elfimov, V. Anisimov, and G. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 , 4264 (1999).
- 15 S. Di Matteo, T. Chatterji, Y. Joly, A. Stunault, J. Paixao, R. Suryanarayanan, G. Dhalenne, and A. Revcolevschi, Phys. Rev. B 68 , 024414 (2003).
- 17 R. D. Johnson, L. C. Chapon, D. D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, P. G. Radaelli, and C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 , 067201 (2012).
- 16 R. Przenios/suppresso, l I. Sosnowska, E. Suard, A. Hewat, and A. Fitch, Physica B: Condensed Matter 344 , 358 (2004).
- 18 W. Slawi´ski, n R. Przenioslo, I. Sosnowska, and V. Petˇ r´ ˇek, Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural ıc Science 68 , 240 (2012).
- 20 W. Slawinski, R. Przenioslo, I. Sosnowska, M. Bieringer, I. Margiolaki, and E. Suard, Acta Cr B65 , 535 (2009).
- 19 W. Slawinski, R. Przenioslo, I. Sosnowska, and Chrobak, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81 , 094708 (2012).
- 21 S. v. Smaalen, Oxford University Press. , 24. ((2007)).
- 23 See Supplemental Material at [URL]. Section I shows details about crystal structure and Laue diffraction images of CMO crystal. Section II contains the description of propagation vectors obtained from XRD and NPD from previous literatures. Section III contains the temperature depen-
- 22 G. Zhang, S. Dong, Z. Yan, Y. Guo, Q. Zhang, S. Yunoki, E. Dagotto, and J.-M. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 84 , 174413 (2011).
- dance of (0,0,1.035) magnetic reflection and energy scans of the (0,0,2.07) orbital order reflection.
- 25 S. Nandi, A. Kreyssig, L. Tan, J. Kim, J. Yan, J. Lang, D. Haskel, R. McQueeney, and A. Goldman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 , 217201 (2008).
- 24 Y. Murakami, H. Kawada, H. Kawata, M. Tanaka, T. Arima, Y. Moritomo, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 , 1932 (1998).
- 26 K. Gautam, D. Shukla, S. Francoual, J. Bednarcik, J. Mardegan, H.-P. Liermann, R. Sankar, F. Chou, D. Phase, and J. Strempfer, Phys. Rev. B 95 , 144112 (2017).
- 28 J. Strempfer, S. Francoual, D. Reuther, D. K. Shukla, A. Skaugen, H. Schulte-Schrepping, T. Kracht, and H. Franz, Journal of synchrotron radiation 20 , 541 (2013).
- 27 H. S. Horowitz and J. M. Longo, Materials Research Bulletin 13 , 1359 (1978).
- 29 C. Castleton and M. Altarelli, Phys. Rev. B 62 , 1033 (2000).
- 31 J. Strempfer, B. Bohnenbuck, I. Zegkinoglou, N. Aliouane, S. Landsgesell, M. v. Zimmermann, and D. Argyriou, Phys. Rev. B 78 , 024429 (2008).
- 30 A. A. Belik, Y. Matsushita, and D. D. Khalyavin, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56 , 10423 (2017).
- 32 S. Wilkins, P. Spencer, T. Beale, P. Hatton, M. v. Zimmermann, S. Brown, D. Prabhakaran, and A. Boothroyd, Phys. Rev. B 67 , 205110 (2003).
- 34 J.-Q. Dai, Y.-M. Song, and H. Zhang, New Journal of Physics 17 , 113038 (2015).
- 33 P. Jain, D. Bansal, G. Sharma, A. Bhattacharya, B. Ingale, O. Delaire, and R. Chatterjee, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 30 , 075801 (2018).
- 35 F. Kadlec, V. Goian, C. Kadlec, M. Kempa, P. Vanˇ ek, J. Taylor, S. Rols, J. Prokleˇka, M. Orlita, s and S. Kamba, Phys. Rev. B 90 , 054307 (2014).

## Supplementary: Magnetic and orbital correlations in multiferroic CaMn O 7 12 probed by X-ray resonant elastic scattering

K. Gautam , S. S. Majid , S. Francoual , A. Ahad , K. Dey , 1 2 3 2 1

M. C. Rahn , R. Sankar 4 5 6 , , F.C. Chou , and D. K. Shukla 6 1 ∗ 1 UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research, Khandwa Road, Indore 452001, India 2 Department of Physics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India 3 Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Notkestrasse 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany 4 Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK † 5 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan and 6 Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan (Dated: June 30, 2020)

∗ dkshukla@csr.res.in

† Present address: Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA

## I. CRYSTAL STRUCTURE, ORIENTATION AND ALIGNMENT

The compound CaMn O 7 12 forms a quadruple perovskite structure A A B B 3 ′ 3 ′ O , in which 12 the A and B sites are occupied by Mn +3 , A ′ by Ca +2 and B ′ by Mn +4 . At T s ∼ 440 K, the material undergoes a lattice distortion from cubic ( Im ¯ , 3 a = 7 39 ˚ for . A T &gt; T s ) to rhombohedral symmetry ( R ¯ , 3 a = 10 4414 ˚ , . A c = 6 3433 ˚ for . A T &lt; T s ). The CaMn O 7 12 crystals were obtained resemble perfect cubes with dimensions of ∼ 100 µ m (the size being limited by thermodynamical constraints [1]). To allow specular scattering from (0,0, L ) reflections of the hexagonal cell, a cubic crystal was polished into a platelet orthogonal to one of its vertices (i.e., parallel to a pseudo-cubic-[1,1,1] plane). Due to twinning, the pseudo-cubic (2,2,2) Bragg-reflection is split into the (4,0,1) and (0,0,3) reflections of the hexagonal cell, which can be distinguished by their intensity ratio of ca. 1:120.

FIG. 1. (a,b and c) Laue diffraction images of CaMn O 7 12 crystal in three different axis, and (d) scaled photograph of the crystal and an optical image of the crystal (prepared for Laue diffraction experiment).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00371v2-figure-d829f1c0-68fc-4cae-8148-1b991190d9e5.jpg)

## II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPAGATION VECTORS IN CaMn O 7 12 FROM EARLIER XRD AND NPD EXPERIMENTS

Based on XPD data, Slawinski et al. indexed the superstructure below T oo with the propagation vector q oo = (0 0 , , k oo z ) = (0 0 0 079), concluding that this phase transition is , , . due to charge ordering [2]. The same authors later performed a NPD study and revised the notation of the charge superstructure to k oo z = 2 07, in line with the observed magnetic . propagation vector q m 1 = (0 0 , , k oo z / 2) = (0 , 0 1 035) (for the magnetic phase, at , . T N2 &lt; T &lt; T N1 ) [3, 4]. Slawinski et al. also inferred from these studies that below T N2 ∼ 48 K the relation k m 1 z = k oo z / 2 is no longer valid, and, instead, a knotty magnetic phase described by two modulations q m 2 = (0 0 0 96) and , , . q m 3 = (0 0 1 12) appears [5, 6]. , , .

This second magnetic phase ( T &lt; T N2 ∼ 48 K) is particularly intriguing, because the changes in the coupling between orbital and spin order at T N2 are not well understood. Recently, Johnson et al. revealed the presence of a multiq magnetic structure in this phase [6]. Moreover, a number of additional unusual properties were reported for the low temperature regime, including an anomaly in dielectric and the pyroelectric measurements [7] and fluctuations of the magnetic moment coefficient in NPD (for 30 K &lt; T &lt; 50 K) [5].

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00371v2-figure-94dc9e54-fb17-4f26-85f4-75c5e4048bac.jpg)

/s32

/s32

/s32

FIG. 2. (a) L -scans across q m 1 = (0 0 1 035) reflection at temperatures between , , . T N1 to T N2 at 6550 eV in the σπ ′ channels.

/s54

/s32

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00371v2-figure-4d61b983-105d-4d72-84ca-24004f7caca1.jpg)

/s32

FIG. 3. (a, b) Energy scans of the (0,0,2.07) intensity, at 150 K ( &gt; T N1 ), and at 65 K (between T N1 and T N2 ), measured in σσ ′ and σπ ′ .

- [1] H. S. Horowitz and J. M. Longo, Materials Research Bulletin 13 , 1359 (1978).
- [2] W. Slawinski, R. Przenioslo, I. Sosnowska, M. Bieringer, I. Margiolaki, A. N. Fitch, and E. Suard, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20 , 104239 (2008).
- [3] W. Slawinski, R. Przenioslo, I. Sosnowska, M. Bieringer, I. Margiolaki, and E. Suard, Acta Cr B65 , 535 (2009).
- [4] S. v. Smaalen, Oxford University Press. , 24. ((2007)).
- [5] W. Slawinski, R. Przenioslo, I. Sosnowska, and V. Petricek, Acta Cry B-68 , 240 (2012).
- [6] R. Johnson, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, A. Bombardi, C. Martin, L. Chapon, and P. Radaelli, Phys. Rev. B 93 , 180403 (2016).
- [7] G. Zhang, S. Dong, Z. Yan, Y. Guo, Q. Zhang, S. Yunoki, E. Dagotto, and J.-M. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 84 , 174413 (2011).
K. Gautam S. S. Majid S. Francoual A. Ahad K. Dey M. C. Rahn R. Sankar F. C. Chou D. K. Shukla
Magnetic and orbital correlations in multiferroic CaMn$_7$O$_{12}$ probed by x-ray resonant elastic scattering
The quadruple perovskite CaMn$_7$O$_{12}$ is a topical multiferroic, in which
the hierarchy of electronic correlations driving structural distortions,
modulated magnetism, and orbital order is not well known and may vary with
temperature. x-ray resonant elastic scattering (XRES) provides a
momentum-resolved tool to study these phenomena, even in very small single
crystals, with valuable information encoded in its polarization- and
energy-dependence. We present an application of this technique to
CaMn$_7$O$_{12}$. By polarization analysis, it is possible to distinguish
superstructure reflections associated with magnetic order and orbital order.
Given the high momentum resolution, we resolve a previously unknown splitting
of an orbital order superstructure peak, associated with a distinct
\textit{locked-in} phase at low temperatures. A second set of orbital order
superstructure peaks can then be interpreted as a second-harmonic orbital
signal. Surprisingly, the intensities of the first- and second-harmonic orbital
signal show disparate temperature and polarization dependence. This orbital
re-ordering may be driven by an exchange mechanism, that becomes dominant over
the Jahn-Teller instability at low temperature.