## Probing effective operators in single top quark production in association with a lepton-neutrino pair

Reza Goldouzian 1 and Michael D. Hildreth 2

Department of Physics, 225 Nieuwland Science Hall,University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA

We study single top quark production in association with a lepton-neutrino pair at the LHC within the framework of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). We focus on relevant two-quark-two-lepton operators ( O 3 lq , O 1 lequ , and O 3 lequ ). It is known that these operators have tiny effects on the inclusive cross section of standard model tW production and are thus typically ignored in the SMEFT searches. However, we show that by employing smart observables, such as m T 2 , the pp → t ℓν process is significantly sensitive to these operators. We set the most stringent limit on the coupling strength of the O 3 lq operator by reinterpreting the results of a search for new phenomena with two oppositecharge leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum at √ s = 13 TeV performed by the ATLAS collaboration. The limits derived on the O 1 lequ and O 3 lequ operators are comparable to those obtained from probing EFT effects in pp → t ¯ t ℓν and pp → t ¯ t ℓℓ processes at the LHC. Consequently, we propose to include the effects of these three operators on the pp → t ℓν process in future global SMEFT analyses to increase the sensitivity and to reduce possible degeneracies.

1 Rgoldouz@nd.edu

2 Mikeh@nd.edu

## 1 Introduction

All direct searches at the large hadron collider (LHC) have so far been unsuccessful in finding clear indications of physics beyond the standard model (BSM). This might mean that the BSM energy scale (Λ) is above what can be directly probed at the LHC. If Λ is well separated from the electroweak scale, heavy states can be integrated out and then cast into extensions of the SM Lagrangian by higher dimensional operators ( O ) [1], i.e. operators of dimension D &gt; 4:

$$\mathcal { L } = \mathcal { L } _ { \text{SM} } + \sum _ { D, i } \frac { C _ { i } ^ { D } } { \Lambda ^ { D - 4 } } \mathcal { O } _ { i } ^ { D } \,,$$

The dimensionless effective couplings of new physics, called Wilson coefficients (WC), are denoted by C D i . The structure of the operators is entirely dictated by the field content and symmetry restrictions. Writing L including the SM gauge symmetries and particle content results in the SM Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) representation [2]. The SMEFT is a consistent model-independent framework for systematically parameterising and predicting deviations from the SM. Furthermore, the SMEFT is a renormalizable theory and its predictions can be improved by adding terms of higher order quantum electrodynamic (QCD) and electroweak corrections [3].

For dimension D=6, there are 59 independent operators with minimal flavour violation and Baryon number conservation [4]. Each operator may affect multiple SM physics processes in different parts of the available phase space. In order to explore the SMEFT parameter space, it is necessary to discover regions sensitive to SMEFT effects for different types of processes and include them within a coherent global SMEFT analysis. In recent years, the SMEFT has been probed in different sectors by measurements of quantities related to electroweak bosons, the Higgs boson and the top quark by performing global fits [5-10]. All these global fits are performed on a few handpicked unfolded kinematic distributions provided by the experiments.

Recently, the CMS Collaboration has performed the most global detector-level SMEFT search to date in the production of one or more top quarks with additional leptons, jets, and b jets in proton-proton (pp) collisions [11]. Constraints are set on 26 WCs which affect the pp → t ¯ X and pp t → tqX (X= W, Z and Higgs bosons and q=light jet) processes. They have also included nonZ/W/H mediated t ¯ t ℓℓ and t ¯ t ℓν processes for probing the two-quark-two-lepton operators in multilepton final states [12]. In this analysis there are two important improvements with respect to the previous version [13]: first, including 10 more sensitive operators in the global fit, and second, employing smarter observables in various regions of the phase space. Consequently, a more realistic global fit is performed and the 2 σ profiled confidence intervals are improved by factors of approximately 2 to 6, depending on the WC. Therefore, recognizing sensitive operators in any available phase space and including them in the global fit is a crucial task [14-17].

In this work, we focus on the SMEFT effects on single top quark production in association with a W boson at the LHC. We show that the number of sensitive operators increases if we extend the pp → tW process to include pp → t lν . We propose a unique phase space for probing the extended operators and examine its sensitivity by reinterpreting the results of a search for new phenomena with two opposite-charge leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum per-

formed by the ATLAS Collaboration [18].

## 2 SMEFT operators

In this section, we review the SMEFT operators that affect single top quark production in association with a lepton-neutrino pair in pp collisions. Eight operators can affect the pp → t lν process at leading order (LO); these operators are listed in Table 1 together with corresponding WCs [12, 19]. The operators are classified into two categories: operators that involve two quarks and gauge bosons, and operators that involve two quarks and two leptons.

Table 1: List of operators that have effects on the pp → t lν process. The ijkl are flavor indices; q and ℓ are the left-handed fermion doublets; u , d , and e are the right-handed fermion singlets; φ is the Higgs doublet; τ I are the Pauli matrices; ε ≡ iτ 2 ; T A ≡ λ A / 2 where λ A are Gell-Mann matrices [12].

| Operator                       | Definition                                | WC                             |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Two-quark operators            | Two-quark operators                       | Two-quark operators            |
| O 3( ij ) φq                   | ( φ † i ← → D I µ φ )(¯ q i γ µ τ I q j ) | c 3 φQ                         |
| ‡ O ( ij ) φud                 | ( ˜ φ † iD µ φ )(¯ u i γ µ d j )          | c φtb                          |
| ‡ O ( ij ) dW                  | (¯ q i σ µν τ I d j ) φW I µν             | c bW                           |
| ‡ O ( ij ) uW                  | (¯ q i σ µν τ I u j ) ˜ φW I µν           | c tW                           |
| ‡ O ( ij ) uG                  | (¯ q i σ µν T A u j ) ˜ φG A µν           | c tG                           |
| Two-quark-two-lepton operators | Two-quark-two-lepton operators            | Two-quark-two-lepton operators |
| O 3( ijkl ) lq                 | ( ¯ l i γ µ τ I l j )(¯ q k γ µ τ I q l ) | c 3( ℓ ) Qℓ                    |
| ‡ O 1( ijkl ) lequ             | ( ¯ l i e j ) ε (¯ q k u l )              | c S ( ℓ ) t                    |
| ‡ O 3( ijkl ) lequ             | ( ¯ l i σ µν e j ) ε (¯ q k σ µν u l )    | c T ( ℓ ) t                    |

In the SM, the pp → t lν process involves tW production with the leptonic decays of the W boson. The O 3( ij ) φq , ‡ O ( ij ) φud , ‡ O ( ij ) dW , and

‡ O ( ij ) uW operators modify the SM Wtb vertex and thus affect the tW production[20]. The O 3( ij ) φq operator has the same structure as the SM Wtb vertex and only rescales the Wtb coupling without affecting any kinematic distribution. In the m b = 0 limit, the ‡ O ( ij ) φud and ‡ O ( ij ) dW operators do not interfere with the SM amplitude and only contribute at order 1 / Λ to the cross section. The 4 ‡ O ( ij ) uW operator involves the right-handed top quark and interferes with the SM amplitudes. The ‡ O ( ij ) φud , ‡ O ( ij ) dW , and ‡ O ( ij ) uW operators affect the W boson polarization fractions in top quark decays and are well constrained via the W polarization measurements by the CMS and ATLAS Collaborations [21, 22]. These operators can also affect the pp → t ¯ X t and pp → tqX processes [11, 23]. The ‡ O ( ij ) uG operator contributes to tW production via modification of the SM top-gluon vertex [19]. This operator is also well constrained using t ¯ t events at the LHC [24, 25].

The O 3( ijkl ) lq , ‡ O 1( ijkl ) lequ , and ‡ O 3( ijkl ) lequ operators do not have a W boson and directly connect a top-bottom quark pair to a leptonneutrino pair [26]. The O 3( ijkl ) lq , ‡ O 1( ijkl ) lequ , and ‡ O 3( ijkl ) lequ operators have vector-, scalar-, and tensor-like Lorentz structure, respectively. It is worth mentioning that these operators are of great interest for new physics searches because of the observed anomalies in B meson decays [27, 28]. They can represent the low energy effects of heavy new physics particles such as W', Z', leptoquarks, etc. which could be solutions that can describe the 'B anomalies'[29]. These twoquark-two-lepton operators with a top quark leg also affect the t ¯ t ℓℓ and t ¯ t ℓν processes and are probed in three lepton final states by the CMS collaboration [11].

Figure 1: Representative Feynman diagrams for single top quark production in association with a leptonneutrino pair via SMEFT interactions. The red circles mark the EFT vertices.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00476v1-figure-b53fdb3f-2641-4feb-b66b-03b94f792cca.jpg)

## 3 Signal sample simulation

We aim to study dimension-six EFT effects on t lν production at the LHC. Representative Feynman diagrams for pp → t lν process in the presence of the EFT vertices are shown in Figure. 1.

The signal sample is modeled at leading order using the Madgraph@NLO Monte Carlo event generator in the five-flavour scheme [30]. The SMEFT Lagrangian is included using the dim6top model described in Ref. [12]. Events are generated using the NNPDF3.0 parton distribution function (PDF) set [31] and are passed to PYTHIA8 [32] for showering and hadronization.

In the dim6top model, only operators involving one or more top quarks are provided with no limitations on the lepton flavors. In this study we assume the same couplings for all generations of leptons (e.g. c 3( e ) Qℓ = c 3( µ ) Qℓ = c 3( τ ) Qℓ ). All eight operators mentioned in Table 1 are included simultaneously in the signal sample generation. Only diagrams with one EFT vertex are included together with the SM diagrams. The sig- nal sample is generated at a non-zero point of eight-dimensional WC phase space. In order to predict the EFT effects at arbitrary points of the WC phase space, we use the Madgraph@NLO event reweighting technique [33]. By knowing the fact that the cross section of the pp → t lν process depends quadratically on the WCs and by having enough event weights, we can determine the eight-dimensional quadratic function of the cross section in any region of the phase space or observable bin [34].

## 4 Sensitive observables

In Figure 2, relative SMEFT contributions to the pp → t lν inclusive cross section are shown for individual WCs. It can be seen that the O 3( ij ) φq , ‡ O ( ij ) uW and ‡ O ( ij ) uG operators, with considerable interference with the SM, have the largest effects. The ‡ O ( ij ) dW operator, with no interference with the SM, has the second largest effect. Finally, the ‡ O ( ij ) φud and two-lepton-two-quark operators have very small effects on the inclusive pp → t lν cross section.

(13 TeV)

]

Figure 2: Relative SMEFT contributions to the pp → t lν inclusive cross section as a function of the individual WCs.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00476v1-figure-66e9c6a7-4713-4821-8be2-5ecfa4991466.jpg)

In Ref. [26], the authors constrained the two-quark-two-lepton WCs by reinterpreting the unfolded differential cross sections of the pp → tW → t lν process measured by the ATLAS collaboration [35]. Although the invariant mass of the ℓℓb system (M( ℓℓb )) and the transverse mass of the ℓℓννb system (M ( T ℓℓννb )) show better separation power between the EFT and SM events compared to the inclusive cross section, the 95% CL limits obtained from these two distributions are much looser than those set by the CMS collaboration by analyzing the t ¯ t ℓℓ and t ¯ t ℓν processes (see table 3 for an exact comparison) [11].

There is an important difference between the tl ν production via the SM and twoquark-two-lepton operators: the SM process involves on-shell W boson production while the EFT process does not. Therefore, one can discriminate between the SM and EFT events by reconstructing the mass of the l ν

system. In the dilepton final state, the measured missing transverse momentum vector ( -→ p miss T ) is associated to the sum of the two neutrinos which causes ambiguity in the reconstruction of the lν system. A well known variable which can be used to extract information about the mother particle's mass in events where two massive particles each decay to a detected and an undetected object is m T 2 [36]. The m T 2 variable is defined as:

$$\underset { \bar { t } \ell \nu } { \text{MS} } \quad & m _ { T 2 } ( p _ { T, 1 }, p _ { T, 2 }, p _ { T } ^ { \text{miss} } ) = \min _ { \substack { q _ { T, 1 } + q _ { T, 2 } = p _ { T } ^ { \text{miss} } } } \\ \text{uri} \quad & \left \{ \max [ \, m _ { T } ( p _ { T, 1 }, q _ { T, 1 } ), m _ { T } ( p _ { T, 2 }, q _ { T, 2 } ) \, ] \right \},$$

where p T and q T are the transverse momenta of the detected and undetected particles, and m T is the transverse mass

$$\text{while} \quad m _ { \text{T} } ( p _ { \text{T} }, q _ { \text{T} } ) = \sqrt { 2 | p _ { \text{T} } | | q _ { \text{T} } | ( 1 - \cos ( \Delta \phi ( p, q ) ) ) }.$$

The minimisation is performed over all the possible decompositions of p miss T = q T 1 , +

(13 TeV)                 140 fb

Figure 3: Distributions of the M( ℓℓb ), M T ( ℓℓννb ), and m T 2 observables for the pp → t lν process in the SM and SMEFT with the O 3( ijkl ) lq , ‡ O 1( ijkl ) lequ , and ‡ O 3( ijkl ) lequ operators. Arbitrary values for the WCs are chosen to show relative contributions. The lower panel gives the ratio of the SMEFT to SM predictions. Bin sizes for the M( ℓℓb ) and M( T ℓℓννb ) distributions are taken from the unfolded distributions in Ref [35].

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00476v1-figure-1013156f-2b48-48ba-b7e9-cc9ad2b9cb82.jpg)

q T 2 , . The m T 2 distribution has an endpoint at the W boson mass for the SM tW events, while signal events are expected to populate the tails of m T 2 distribution. The m T 2 variable is used widely in searches for supersymmetric particles [37, 38] and top quark mass measurements [39, 40].

In Figure 3, distributions of the M( ℓℓb ), M ( T ℓℓννb ), and m T 2 observables are shown for the pp → t lν process in the SM and SMEFT scenarios. Events with an oppositesign lepton pair ( e ± ∓ e , e ± µ ∓ , and µ ± µ ∓ )

and a b-quark with p T &gt; 20 GeV and | η | &lt; 2 4 are selected at the generator level. . We also require events to have | p miss T | &gt; 40 GeV to be closer to the selection used in Ref. [26]. We only show the effects related to non-zero values of the two-quark-two-lepton WCs. In the tail of the m T 2 distribution, EFT variations are enhanced significantly compared to the M( ℓℓb ) and M T ( ℓℓννb ) distributions. This proves that the pp → t lν process could be sensitive to the O 3( ijkl ) lq , ‡ O 1( ijkl ) lequ , and ‡ O 3( ijkl ) lequ operators if one chooses a smart ob-

servable.

## 5 Experimental inputs

In order to evaluate the power of the m T 2 observable for constraining the two-quarktwo-lepton operators via tl ν production, we reinterpret the results of a search for top squarks in events with two leptons, b-jets and missing transverse energy at √ s = 13 TeV performed by the ATLAS Collaboration with the full Run-2 data corresponding to 139 fb -1 [18]. Dedicated event selections are optimised in the ATLAS search to probe various decay modes of the top squark. One of these event selections, called the 'two-body selection', targets the two-body top squark decay into an on-shell top quark and the lightest neutralino. The estimated SM yields in the signal region defined in the 'two-body selection' are reported in multiple bins of the m T 2 distribution in the range of [100,inf) GeV. This signal region is proper for probing the pp → t lν process and the m T 2 variable that is our variable of interest in this study. Therefore, we use the published results in Ref. [18] in the 'two-body selection' for constraining the two-quark-two-lepton operators.

In the 'two-body selection', events are accepted if they have two opposite-sign leptons ( e ± ∓ e , e ± µ ∓ , and µ ± µ ∓ ) with the leading lepton p T ( ℓ 1) larger than 25 GeV and the subleading lepton p T ( ℓ 2) larger than 20 GeV. Electrons (muons) are required to be in the | η | &lt; 2 47(2 40) region. . . Electrons in the transition region between the barrel and endcap electromagnetic calorimeters of the ATLAS detector, 1 37 . &lt; η | | &lt; 1 52, are ex-. cluded. To remove leptons from Drell-Yan and low-mass resonances, dilepton events with an invariant mass m ll &lt; 20 are rejected. Events with same flavor (SF) lep- ton pairs with 71 2 . &lt; m ll &lt; 111 2 GeV are . also rejected to reduce the Z boson background. Jets are reconstructed using the antik t algorithm [41] with a radius parameter of 0.4 and are selected if they have p T &gt; 20 GeV and | η | &lt; 2 8. . Selected jets are tagged as b-jets using the MV2C10 boosted decision tree algorithm with 77% efficiency [42]. Events should have at least one reconstructed b-tagged jet. Linked to the missing transverse momentum, the objectbased missing transverse momentum's significance ( E miss T significance) is used to discriminate between the events in which the reconstructed E miss T originates from weakly interacting particles and the events in which the E miss T is related to the resolution and inefficiencies in particle measurements. The E miss T significance is computed by considering the expected resolution and mismeasurement likelihood of all the objects that enter the E miss T reconstruction, as detailed in Ref. [43]. Another variable employed in this search is the azimuthal angle between the -→ p miss T and the vectorial sum of -→ p miss T and the leptons' transverse momentum vectors, denoted as ∆ ϕ boost . Selected events are required to have E miss T significance larger than 12, ∆ ϕ boost &lt; 1 5, . and finally m T 2 greater than 110 GeV. The two-body selection requirements are summarized in Table 2.

To reinterpret the results of the ATLAS search, simulated signal events are passed to Delphes 3 for modeling the response of the ATLAS detector [44]. The 'twobody selection' requirements are applied to the Delphes reconstructed objects. It is not trivial to extract precise object-based E miss T significance from the Delphes reconstructed objects. Therefore, we approximate the object-based E miss T significance by an

(13 TeV)                 140 fb

Figure 4: Distribution of the m T 2 observable for the pp → t lν process with the two-body selection. Events with same flavor and different flavor leptons are combined. The ATLAS prediction together with total uncertainties is shown in the gray dotted histogram. The solid line histograms show the SM and SMEFT predictions without cutting on the m T 2 variable.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00476v1-figure-53d6abe4-6c38-4c20-9e2b-fd7db47035e5.jpg)

Table 2: Two-body selection

| Variables            | Cuts           |
|----------------------|----------------|
| p T ( ℓ 1) [GeV]     | > 25           |
| p T ( ℓ 2) [GeV]     | > 20           |
| m ll [GeV]           | > 20           |
| | m ll - m Z | [GeV] | > 20 (only SF) |
| n b - jets           | ≥ 1            |
| ∆ ϕ boost [rad] miss | < 1 . 5        |
| E T significance     | > 12           |
| m T 2 [GeV]          | > 110          |

event-based E miss T significance ( S ) as:

gion reported by the ATLAS collaboration (see Table 7 in Ref [18]). The t ¯ t validation region has exactly the same selection requirements as the 'two-body selection' except for the m T 2 variable which is restricted to [100, 110] GeV. We found that cutting on the event-based E miss T significance at 9.6 GeV 1 2 / for our Delphes simulated sample could reproduce the reported ATLAS prediction for the pp → tW process in the t ¯ validat tion region. Therefore we replace the cut of E miss T significance &gt; 12 GeV with the S &gt; 9.6 GeV 1 2 / requirement in the 'two-body selection'.

$$\mathcal { S } = \frac { E _ { T } ^ { \text{miss} } } { \sqrt { H } _ { T } }$$

where H T is the sum of the transverse momenta of visible particles [43]. The cut value for the event-based E miss T significance was chosen to obtain a similar SM prediction for the pp → tW process in the t ¯ validation ret

In Figure 4, the m T 2 distribution predicted by the ATLAS collaboration for the SM pp → tW process in the signal region is compared to the SMEFT predictions via the Delphes simulated sample. There is an acceptable agreement between our simulations at the SM point of WC phase space and the ATLAS predictions. Although the ATLAS

Table 3: The observed 2 σ confidence intervals for the c 3( ) ℓ Qℓ , c S ℓ ( ) t , and c T ℓ ( ) t obtained in Refs. [11] and [26] compared to 95% confidence level observed limits obtained in this analysis.

| Process pp →        | 2 σ CI or 95% c 3( ℓ ) Qℓ   | CL limits c S ( ℓ ) t   | [TeV - 2 ] c T ( ℓ ) t   | Ref.       |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------|------------|
| tt ¯ ℓℓ and tt ¯ ℓν | [-2.84, 2.55]               | [-2.60, 2.62]           | [ 0.37, 0.37]            | [11]       |
| t lν                | [-10,10]                    | [-20,20]                | [-5,5]                   | [26]       |
| t lν                | [-0.93,0.46]                | [-1.76,1.76]            | [-0.45,0.45]             | this paper |

prediction for the SM tW process in the tail of the m T 2 distribution has large statistical uncertainties, the agreement between our prediction and the ATLAS prediction for the SM tW yield in the last bin of the m T 2 distribution, which is the most sensitive bin, is very good. In addition to the SM prediction, SMEFT predictions for the pp → t lν process in the presence of the two-quark-two-lepton operators are shown. The ratio plots in Figures 3 and 4 show similar deviations with respect to the SM prediction at the generator and reconstructed levels. This confirms that the 'two-body selection' is proper for probing the two-quark-two-lepton operators at the reconstruction level.

per limits to constraint the two-quark-twolepton WCs affecting t ℓν production.

## 6 Results

No excess in data over the SM prediction is observed by the ATLAS Collaboration [18]. The results are presented in terms of model independent 95% confidence levels (CL) on the number of signal events using the CLs method [45]. The upper limits are derived for the different flavor and same flavor signal regions combined. Multiple upper limits are calculated using event yields from the following cuts on the lower edge of the range for the m T 2 variable, with the upper end of the range at infinity: m T 2 &gt; 110, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, or 220 GeV. We use these up-

It is more sensitive to include both the yield and shape variations in multiple bins of the m T 2 distribution because of the SMEFT effects. However, because the SMEFT signal shapes are different from the top squark signal shape we are constrained to consider on the event yield variation in one cumulative bin in order to use the model dependent limits in Ref [18]. Based on the reported expected limits, we found that the tightest constraints are obtained in the range where m T 2 ∈ [160, ∞ ] GeV. In Figure 5 the difference between the SMEFT and SM yield predictions for the pp → t ℓν process in the range m T 2 ∈ [160, ∞ ] GeV are shown as a function of individual two-quark-twolepton WCs. The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the number of signal events in the same range of m T 2 , reported by the ATLAS Collaboration, are also shown. The constraints on the two-quark-two-lepton WCs are determined by finding where the quadratic curves cross the 95% CL upper limit lines. In Table 3, the 95% CL upper limits obtained in this analysis by using the m T 2 observable are listed. In addition, our results are compared to the limits obtained from analyzing the M T ( ℓℓννb ) observable [26] and to those extracted from events in the three lepton final states [11].

(13 TeV)      140 fb

Figure 5: Difference between the SMEFT and SM predictions for the number of t lν events in 140 fb -1 of data as a function of the two-quark-two-lepton WCs. Events are selected using two-body selection requirements with m T 2 =[160, ∞ ] GeV. The observed and expected upper limits on the number of signal events obtained in two-body selection region with m T 2 =[160, ∞ ] GeV by the ATLAS Collaboration are shown with solid and dashed lines, respectively.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00476v1-figure-e8d2b5b5-0228-4f0e-a17a-19eea6f534f9.jpg)

The obtained limit on the c 3( ) ℓ Qℓ operator is the most stringent reported on this WC to date. Constraints on the c S ℓ ( ) t and c T ℓ ( ) t couplings are comparable to those obtained in the three lepton final state. Therefore, combining dilepton and three lepton final states in a global fit can improve the results on top of the individual constraints.

## 7 Summary

In this work, we have investigated the possibility of probing the top quark related twoquark-two-lepton SMEFT operators in the production of a single top quark in association with a lepton-neutrino pair at the LHC. We showed that the pp → t lν process is very sensitive to the O 3 lq , O 1 lequ , and O 3 lequ operators in the tail of the m T 2 distribution. To make a realistic evaluation of the power of the proposed phase space for constraining these SMEFT operators, we reinterpreted the results of an ATLAS search in a very similar phase space. We set strong 95% confidence level limits on the Wilson coefficients of the mentioned operators. The obtained bound on the c 3( ) ℓ Qℓ operator is around four times tighter than the latest reported bounds to date. Consequently, we advocate for including the m T 2 variable as analyzed in this paper in future SMEFT searches and global SMFFT fits as a probe of this specific corner of phase space.

## Acknowledgments

R.G. would like to thank Hamzeh Khanpour for useful input.

## References

- [1] S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians , Physica A 96 (1979) 327-340.
- [2] I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory , Phys. Rept. 793 (2019) 1-98, [ 1706.08945 ].
- [3] C. Degrande, G. Durieux, F. Maltoni, K. Mimasu, E. Vryonidou and C. Zhang, Automated one-loop computations in the standard model effective field theory , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 096024, [ 2008.11743 ].
- [4] B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian , JHEP 10 (2010) 085, [ 1008.4884 ].
- [5] J. Ellis, C. W. Murphy, V. Sanz and T. You, Updated Global SMEFT Fit to Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Data , JHEP 06 (2018) 146, [ 1803.03252 ].
- [6] A. Buckley, C. Englert, J. Ferrando, D. J. Miller, L. Moore, M. Russell et al., Global fit of top quark effective theory to data , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 091501, [ 1506.08845 ].
- [7] A. Buckley, C. Englert, J. Ferrando, D. J. Miller, L. Moore, M. Russell et al., Constraining top quark effective theory in the LHC Run II era , JHEP 04 (2016) 015, [ 1512.03360 ].
- [8] N. Castro, J. Erdmann, C. Grunwald, K. Kr¨ oninger and N.-A. Rosien, EFTfitter-A tool for interpreting measurements in the context of effective field theories , Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 432, [ 1605.05585 ].
- [9] N. P. Hartland, F. Maltoni, E. R. Nocera, J. Rojo, E. Slade, E. Vryonidou et al., A Monte Carlo global analysis of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory: the top quark sector , JHEP 04 (2019) 100, [ 1901.05965 ].
- [10] I. Brivio, S. Bruggisser, F. Maltoni, R. Moutafis, T. Plehn, E. Vryonidou et al.,
- O new physics, where art thou? A global search in the top sector , JHEP 02 (2020) 131, [ 1910.03606 ].
- [11] CMS collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for physics beyond the standard model in top quark production with additional leptons in the context of effective field theory , JHEP 12 (2023) 068, [ 2307.15761 ].
- [12] D. Barducci et al., Interpreting top-quark LHC measurements in the standard-model effective field theory , 1802.07237 .
- [13] CMS collaboration, T. C. Collaboration et al., Search for new physics in top quark production with additional leptons in proton-proton collisions at √ s = 13 TeV using effective field theory , JHEP 03 (2021) 095, [ 2012.04120 ].
- [14] J. Brehmer, K. Cranmer, G. Louppe and J. Pavez, A Guide to Constraining Effective Field Theories with Machine Learning , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 052004, [ 1805.00020 ].
- [15] H. E. Faham, F. Maltoni, K. Mimasu and M. Zaro, Single top production in association with a WZ pair at the LHC in the SMEFT , JHEP 01 (2022) 100, [ 2111.03080 ].
- [16] R. Aoude, H. El Faham, F. Maltoni and E. Vryonidou, Complete SMEFT predictions for four top quark production at hadron colliders , JHEP 10 (2022) 163, [ 2208.04962 ].
- [17] F. Maltoni, L. Mantani and K. Mimasu, Top-quark electroweak interactions at high energy , JHEP 10 (2019) 004, [ 1904.05637 ].
- [18] ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for new phenomena in events with two opposite-charge leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √ s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 04 (2021) 165, [ 2102.01444 ].
- [19] C. Zhang and S. Willenbrock,

Effective-Field-Theory Approach to Top-Quark Production and Decay , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 034006, [ 1008.3869 ].

- [20] J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Single top quark production at LHC with anomalous Wtb couplings , Nucl. Phys. B 804 (2008) 160-192, [ 0803.3810 ].
- [21] CMS, ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Combination of the W boson polarization measurements in top quark decays using ATLAS and CMS data at √ s = 8 TeV , JHEP 08 (2020) 051, [ 2005.03799 ].
- [22] A. Jueid, Probing anomalous Wtb couplings at the LHC in single t -channel top quark production , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 053006, [ 1805.07763 ].
- [23] C. Zhang, Single Top Production at Next-to-Leading Order in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 162002, [ 1601.06163 ].
- [24] CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Measurement of the top quark polarization and t ¯ t spin correlations using dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at √ s = 13 TeV , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 072002, [ 1907.03729 ].
- [25] CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for new physics in top quark production in dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at √ s = 13 TeV , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 886, [ 1903.11144 ].
- [26] D. Stolarski and A. Tonero, Constraining new physics with single top productionat LHC JHEP , 08 (2020) 036, [ 2004.07856 ].
- [27] C. Cornella, D. A. Faroughy, J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori and M. Neubert, Reading the footprints of the B-meson flavor anomalies , JHEP 08 (2021) 050, [ 2103.16558 ].
- [28] CMS collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Search for charged-lepton flavor violation in top quark production and decay in pp
- collisions at √ s = 13 TeV , JHEP 06 (2022) 082, [ 2201.07859 ].
- [29] M. Blanke, Theory Perspective on Heavy Flavour Physics , PoS LHCP2022 (2023) 017, [ 2207.07354 ].
- [30] J. Alwall, et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , JHEP 07 (2014) 079, [ 1405.0301 ].
- [31] NNPDF collaboration, Parton distributions for the LHC Run II , JHEP 04 (2015) 040, [ 1410.8849 ].
- [32] T. Sjostrand, et al., A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 , Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852-867, [ 0710.3820 ].
- [33] O. Mattelaer, On the maximal use of Monte Carlo samples: re-weighting events at NLO accuracy , Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 674, [ 1607.00763 ].
- [34] R. Schoefbeck, et al., LHC EFT WG Note: SMEFT predictions, event reweighting, and simulation , .
- [35] ATLAS collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Measurement of differential cross-sections of a single top quark produced in association with a W boson at √ s = 13 TeV with ATLAS , Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 186, [ 1712.01602 ].
- [36] C. G. Lester and D. J. Summers, Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders , Phys. Lett. B 463 (1999) 99-103, [ hep-ph/9906349 ].
- [37] CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for new phenomena with the M T2 variable in the all-hadronic final state produced in proton-proton collisions at √ s = 13 TeV Eur. Phys. J. C , 77 (2017) 710, [ 1705.04650 ].
- [38] ATLAS collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse

momentum using 36 fb -1 of √ s = 13 TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 112001, [ 1712.02332 ].

- [39] CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel Using m T 2 at CDF , Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 031102, [ 0911.2956 ].
- [40] CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Measurement of Masses in the tt ¯ System by Kinematic Endpoints in pp Collisions at √ s = 7 TeV , Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2494, [ 1304.5783 ].
- [41] M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez, The antik t jet clustering algorithm , JHEP 04 (2008) 063, [ 0802.1189 ].
- [42] ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., ATLAS b-jet identification performance and efficiency measurement with tt ¯ events in pp collisions at √ s = 13 TeV Eur. , Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 970, [ 1907.05120 ].
- [43] ATLAS collaboration, Object-based missing transverse momentum significance in the ATLAS detector , ATLAS-CONF-2018-038 (2018) .
- [44] DELPHES 3 collaboration, J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Mertens et al., DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment , JHEP 02 (2014) 057, [ 1307.6346 ].
- [45] A. L. Read, Presentation of search results: The CL s technique , J. Phys. G 28 (2002) 2693-2704.
Reza Goldouzian Michael D. Hildreth
Probing effective operators in single top quark production in association with a lepton-neutrino pair
We study single top quark production in association with a lepton-neutrino
pair at the LHC within the framework of the Standard Model Effective Field
Theory (SMEFT). We focus on relevant two-quark-two-lepton operators
($O^{3}_{lq}$, $O^{1}_{lequ}$, and $O^{3}_{lequ}$). It is known that these
operators have tiny effects on the inclusive cross section of standard model tW
production and are thus typically ignored in the SMEFT searches. However, we
show that by employing smart observables, such as $m_{T2}$, the
pp$\rightarrow$t$\ell\nu$ process is significantly sensitive to these
operators. We set the most stringent limit on the coupling strength of the
$O^{3}_{lq}$ operator by reinterpreting the results of a search for new
phenomena with two opposite-charge leptons, jets and missing transverse
momentum at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV performed by the ATLAS collaboration. The
limits derived on the $O^{1}_{lequ}$ and $O^{3}_{lequ}$ operators are
comparable to those obtained from probing EFT effects in
pp$\rightarrow$t$\bar{\rm t}\ell\nu$ and pp$\rightarrow$t$\bar{\rm t}\ell\ell$
processes at the LHC. Consequently, we propose to include the effects of these
three operators on the pp$\rightarrow$t$\ell\nu$ process in future global SMEFT
analyses to increase the sensitivity and to reduce possible degeneracies.