## High-Resolution Imaging in the Visible on Large Ground-Based Telescopes.

Craig Mackay* , Rafael Rebolo a ,e , Jonathan Crass , David L. King , Lucas Labadie , Víctor a a d González-Escélera , Marta Puga , Antonio Pérez-Garrido , Roberto López , Alejandro Oscoz , Jorge b b c b b A. Pérez-Prieto , Luis F. Rodríguez-Ramos , Sergio Velasco , Isidro Villó , b b b c a Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK b Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, C/ Vía Láctea s/n, La Laguna, Tenerife E-38205, Spain and Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain c Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena, Campus Muralla del Mar, Cartagena, Murcia E-30202, Spain d I. Physikalsiches Institut, Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Strasse 77,50937 Köln, Germany 38700

e Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Spain

## ABSTRACT

Lucky Imaging combined with a low order adaptive optics system has given the highest resolution images ever taken in the visible or near infrared of faint astronomical objects.  This paper describes a new instrument that has already been deployed on the WHT 4.2m telescope on La Palma, with particular emphasis on the optical design and the predicted system performance. A new design of low order wavefront sensor using photon counting CCD detectors and multi-plane curvature wavefront sensor will allow virtually full sky coverage with faint natural guide stars. With a 2 x 2 array of 1024 x 1024 photon counting EMCCDs, AOLI is the first of the new class of high sensitivity, near diffraction limited imaging systems giving higher resolution in the visible from the ground than hitherto been possible from space.

Keywords: Lucky Imaging, adaptive optics, Charge coupled devices, EMCCDs, low light level imaging, nlCWFS.

## 1. INTRODUCTION

The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) has revolutionised many branches of astronomy by delivering much higher angular resolution than is possible with conventional ground-based telescopes.  Although large telescopes are capable of much better angular resolution it has been very difficult to achieve major improvements.  Most progress has been made in the near infrared on large (4-10 m class) telescopes.  In the visible only one technique has demonstrated Hubble resolution on  a  Hubble  sized  (2.5  m  diameter)  telescope  on  the  ground.    This  technique  is  known  as  Lucky  Imaging.    It  was suggested originally by Hufnagel  in 1966 and given its name by Fried  in 1978.  Images are recorded at high frame rates 1 2 to  freeze  the  motion  caused  by  atmospheric  turbulence.    A  relatively  bright  reference  star  in  the  field  allows  image quality to be determined.  The best fraction of images are shifted and added to give a combined image close to diffraction limited  in  their  image  quality  when  a  fraction  of  ~5-30%  is  selected,  the  percentage  depending  on  the  atmospheric conditions at the time.

The Lucky Imaging technique has become viable in recent  years  principally  because  of  the  development  of  electron multiplying CCDs (EMCCDs) particularly by E2V Technologies Ltd (Chelmsford, UK).  These devices have most of the characteristics of conventional CCDs used routinely by astronomers and which are read out at low speed.  However,  a modification of the device output register  provides internal amplification by large factors, up to  a few thousand times. 3 At high pixel rates of up to 30 MHz and readout noise of around 100 electrons RMS this gain allows individual photons to be detected with good signal-to-noise.  This permits imaging at high frame rates without any read noise penalty.  In photon counting mode it is possible to operate with almost all of the quantum efficiency of a conventional CCD making these devices particularly attractive for a range of high-speed imaging and spectroscopy applications in astronomy and other research areas.

*cdm &lt;at&gt; ast.cam.ac.uk

In  principle,  large  telescopes  can  deliver  sharper  images  than  HST.    However,  the  probability  of  the  Lucky  Imaging technique delivering near diffraction limited images becomes vanishingly small for telescopes significantly larger than the HST .  This is because the number of turbulent cells across the diameter of the telescope is too large for there to be a 2 significant chance of a relatively flat wavefront (and hence a near diffraction-limited image) across the aperture of the telescope.    By  increasing  the  diameter  of  the  telescope  we  bring  in  the  effects  of  yet  larger  scales  of  atmospheric turbulence.  In principle, if we could eliminate the largest turbulent scales where most of the power in the atmospheric turbulence resides  then the probability of recording a sharp image will increase.  Essentially, eliminating one turbulent 4 scale reduces the phase variance across that scale so that the characteristic cell size, r  (defined as the scale size over 0 which the variance is ~1 radian ) is increased.  Provided enough of the large turbulent scales are removed, the corrected 2 r   will  be  large  enough  so  the  number  of  cells  across  the  diameter  of  the  telescope  is  similar  to  those  typically 0 encountered with an uncorrected 2.4 m aperture, the largest diameter for which the Lucky Imaging technique normally gives good results.

In order to demonstrate this, one of the Cambridge Lucky Imaging cameras was mounted on the Palomar 5-m telescope behind the low order adaptive optics system PALMAO .  We obtained images with a resolution more than 3 times that of 5 the HST. The performance of this combination of Lucky Imaging plus low order adaptive optics is compared with that of the Advanced Camera for Surveys on HST in Figure 1.  Lucky Imaging has now been used by a number of groups both in  Europe  and  in  the  US  and  this  has  contributed  to  the  scientific  development  of  optical  Lucky  Imaging 6,7,8,9 .    For example,  FastCam  and  AstraLux  have  worked  on  2-m  and  4-m  class  telescopes  achieving  full  diffraction-limited resolution in the z'- and I- bands. In the US, projects aiming at developing visible AO systems are also continuing 10 . New post-processing approaches have also been successfully implemented to further improve on the image sharpness and quality of the delivered images, reaching Strehl ratio significantly higher than possible with classical LI 11,12 .

Figure 1: Comparison images of the core of the globular cluster M 13.  On the left the image with natural (~0.65 arcsec) seeing  on  the  Palomar  5-m  telescope,  the  Hubble  Advanced  Camera  for  Surveys  with  ~120  milliarcsecond  resolution (middle) and the Lucky Camera plus Low-Order AO image with 35 milliarcsecond resolution (right).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0117v1-figure-1f73870f-2c76-4d79-a780-b8bf23c0a62b.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0117v1-figure-93cd2dc6-f7fc-42c1-9250-52e44018ec5f.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0117v1-figure-12d7448a-3163-4f82-ad9e-0507b7c91624.jpg)

In  common  with  most  Shack-Hartmann  based  AO  systems,  PALMAO  requires  a  very  bright  reference  star  for  the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.  Shack-Hartmann AO systems generally need reference stars of I~12-14 magnitude, and  these  are  very  scarce 13 .    AO  systems  that  try  to  recover  every  moment  on  the  telescope  also  have  a  very  small isoplanatic  patch  in  the  visible  of  only  a  few  arcseconds  in  diameter 14 .    The  net  effect  is  that  conventional  ShackHartmann AO based systems can only be used over a very small fraction of the sky, &lt; 0.1%. Laser guide stars have problems in delivering images with ~0.1 arcseconds accuracy.  The consequence of these considerations is that it is very hard to achieve a resolution better than 0.1 arcseconds even in the near infrared on large telescopes although this has been achieved in a limited number of instances, particularly on very bright targets.

A study by Racine 15 showed that curvature sensors  actually deployed on telescopes are significantly more sensitive than Shack-Hartmann sensors particularly when used for relatively low order turbulent correction.  Olivier Guyon 16 simulated the performance of pupil plane curvature sensors and showed that they are very attractive in general and, when combined with EMCCDs, ought to give a substantial improvement in sensitivity over Shack-Hartmann sensors.  This would allow operation over a much larger fraction of the sky.  We have designed a new instrument, AOLI (Adaptive Optics assisted Lucky Imager), to let us carry out science combining Lucky Imaging and low order adaptive optics on targets over much of  the  sky.    AOLI  is  a  collaboration  between  the  Instituto  de  Astrofisica  de  Canarias/Universidad  de  La  Laguna

(Tenerife, Spain), the Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena (Spain), Universität zu Köln (Germany), the Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes (La Palma, Spain) and the Institute of Astronomy in the University of Cambridge (UK). This paper describes the current status of the instrument, its optical configuration and performance.

## 2. AOLI: GENERAL CONFIGURATION

The AOLI instrument consists of a  non-linear curvature  wavefront sensor and a low order adaptive optics  wavefront corrector  using  a  deformable  mirror  in  conjunction  with  a  wide-field,  array  detector  Lucky  Imaging  camera.    It  is designed specifically for use on the WHT 4.2-m and the GTC 10.4-m telescopes on La Palma but it could be used on almost any large telescope without major modification.

Figure 2: The optical layout of AOLI.  Light enters AOLI from the bottom left-hand corner after passing through an image de-rotator  mounted  on  the  Naysmith  instrument  ring  before  reaching  the  telescope  focus.  The  light  is  collimated  and passed through an atmospheric dispersion corrector before it strikes a deformable mirror (DM).  We selected the ALPAODM241 unit as it has excellent stability and provides an unusually long stroke.  The light is then reflected and, after a fold mirror, is reimaged on to a pickoff mirror.  The pickoff mirror deflects light towards the science camera (Figure 4).  The light from the reference star goes directly on to the wavefront sensor (WFS).  The telescope pupil is reimaged down to approximately 2 mm diameter from its original 4.2 m.  Figure 3 shows the details of the wavefront sensor arrangement.  In addition we have a calibration system which is designed to provide calibration sources that are of the same diameter in the telescope focal plane as the diffraction limit of the principal telescope.  This is needed particularly to feed the wavefront sensor for setup and alignment.  The wavefront sensor uses broadband light between 500 and 950 nm and therefore the calibration system has to be achromatic.  Rather than using any refractive optics it uses off-axis paraboloid mirrors.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0117v1-figure-c04b2bb6-410c-4cb3-b6a7-9554b3a5d420.jpg)

Figure 3: A model of the optical arrangement of the curvature sensor. The common optics take light from the WHT focus to the pickoff mirror where  the light for the science camera is diverted to the science camera assembly.  The light to the wavefront sensor passes through the pickoff mirror where is split into 2 beams with a dichroic beam splitter working at approximately 700 nm.  Each beam is then split again with the second dichroic, one at 600 nm giving pupil images at wavelengths of ~550 nm and ~650 nm for one pair of beams and, with another dichroic beam splitter centred on about 800 nm gives a pair of pupil images at wavelengths of ~750 nm and ~870 nm.  The pupil images are recorded with a pair of photon counting electron multiplying CCD cameras developed in Cambridge running at about 100 Hz frame rate.  The data  from  these  detectors  are  processed  to  derive  the  wavefront  errors  and  these  values  are  then  used  to  drive  the deformable mirror to remove the largest scales of turbulence from the wavefront.  The science beam is turned 90° by the pickoff mirror plane to the science imaging detector  (see Figure 4) which is then used in conventional Lucky Imaging mode.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0117v1-figure-719e56ad-d58b-4c33-88ec-9dfdc7d1dd9c.jpg)

AOLI includes an atmospheric dispersion corrector, essential for work away from the zenith, after the collimating lens and before the deformable mirror (the ADC is not marked in the figure).  In Figure 2 the science beam goes from the telescope to a pickoff mirror which deflects light from the science beam towards the science camera shown in figure 4. The reference star is located on the optical axis of the telescope and passes through the pickoff mirror to the wavefront sensor.  The light  from the telescope is reflected  via a deformable  mirror set in a pupil plane of the telescope  which allows  the  curvature  errors  determined  by  the  curvature  sensor  sub-system  to  be  corrected  directly.    The  deformable mirror  is  manufactured  by  ALPAO  (France)  with  241  elements  over  the  pupil.  It  will  allow  correction  of  wavefront errors on scales of &gt; ~0.5m on the 4.2 m diameter WHT telescope.  Our simulations 17 suggest that this will then give us a Lucky  Imaging  selection  percentage  under  typical/good  conditions  of  about  25-30%  in  I  band.    In  addition,  our simulations suggest that this deformable mirror will have a high enough resolution to achieve satisfactory correction on the GTC 10.4 m telescope.  Our approach is to develop a system optimised for the WHT that may be modified and redeployed quickly in order to demonstrate the technologies as convincingly as possible.  Its subsequent deployment to the GTC will then follow.

The science camera (Figure 4) is a simple magnifier using custom optics to give diffraction limited performance.  The camera is optimised for the 500nm to 1 micron wavelength range.  The diffraction limit of the WHT (GTC) at 0.8µm (I band) is about 40 (15) mas and the camera offers a range of pixel scales of between 15 and 55 mas on the WHT.  The camera  uses  an  array  of  4  photon  counting,  electron  multiplying,  back  illuminated  CCD201s  manufactured  by  E2V Technologies Ltd, each 1024 x 1024 pixels.  As the CCDs are non-buttable we use an arrangement similar to that of the original  HST  WF/PC  (see  Figure  4).    Four  small  contiguous  mirrors  in  the  focal  plane  are  slightly  tilted  and  then individually reimaged on to a separate CCD.  Each CCD has its own filter wheel.  This allows the use of a narrowband filter, for example, for the science object with a broad filter for the reference star.  The configuration allows a contiguous region of 2000 x 2000 pixels giving a field of view of from 112 x 112 arcsec down to 30 x 30 arcseconds on the WHT, depending on the magnification selected.

Figure  4:  The  science  camera  optical  arrangement  whereby  the  light  from  a  single  area  of  sky  is  split  on  to  four separated and non-buttable CCDs.  The magnified image (optics not shown) of the sky is projected onto a pyramid of four  mirrors  that  reflects  the  light  on  to  relay  mirrors  and  via  reimaging  optics  onto  four  electron  multiplying detectors.  This structure was suggested by the design of the original widefield/planetary camera installed on the HST.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0117v1-figure-709e8f1c-192b-43ac-ae6b-e1c508f88c7e.jpg)

The  CCDs  are  back  illuminated  (thinned)  with  very  high  quantum  efficiency  (peak  &gt;95%)  from  E2V  Technologies. Custom electronics developed in Cambridge give up to 30 MHz pixel rate, and 25 frames per sec.  Higher frame rates are possible.  A readout format of 2000 x 100 pixels gives ~200 fps, allowing high time resolution astronomy as well with the instrument.  The data (~220 MBytes/sec continually) are streamed via the host computer to high-capacity RAID disk drive systems after lossless compression.  The host computer performs basic lucky imaging selection, allowing image quality to be assessed while the exposure is progressing. The construction of the unit has been kept relatively low-cost. The instrument will be mounted at Nasmyth focus on an optical bench behind the WHT image rotator.  On the GTC it is probable that the instrument would be mounted on one of the folded Cassegrain ports.

## 3.  NON-LINEAR PHOTON COUNTING CURVATURE WAVEFRONT SENSORS

Adaptive optic systems most frequently depend on  Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors which require very bright and scarce  reference  stars  (typically  I~12-14  magnitude).    Low  order  correction  may  be  achieved  in  principle  with  much fainter reference stars.  Curvature wavefront sensors work by taking images on either side of a conjugate pupil plane and by measuring changes in the intensity of illumination as the wavefront passes through the pupil.  A part of the wavefront that becomes fainter as it goes through the pupil must correspond to a part of the wavefront that is diverging while if it becomes  brighter  it  is  converging.    Racine 15 has  shown  that  curvature  sensors  actually  deployed  on  telescopes  are typically 10 times (2.5 magnitudes) more sensitive than Shack-Hartmann sensors for the same degree of correction.  In addition  they  are  very  much  more  sensitive  again  when  used  for  low  order  correction  as  the  system  cell  size  is dynamically increased  and the wavefront sensor readout rate/integration time may be significantly reduced.  Correction 8 with coarse cell sizes allows  averaging sensor signals over significant areas of the curvature sensor.

AOLI uses a more advanced version of this approach, the non-linear curvature  wavefront sensor that uses four pupil planes to provide a more rapid and faster convergence in achieving a wavefront fit.  The angular resolution we should achieve on the WHT/GTC will be typically 40/15 milliarcseconds in the visible to I-band range.  Our simulations suggest that we should be able to operate at the faintest level of the reference star of about 17.5-18.0 on the WHT and about 18.519.0 mag on the GTC.  This will allow us to find reference stars over nearly all the sky even at high galactic latitudes (&gt;85%) 13 .    At  the  fainter  end  of  these  ranges  it  is  probable  that  we  will  only  be  able  to  achieve  partial  correction but enough to improve the variance of the wavefront entering the science camera.  The AOLI wavefront sensor is described in more detail in another paper in this conference from Crass at al 18 .

## 4. AOLI CALIBRATION SYSTEM

Any instrument design must take particular care to provide proper calibration facilities that allow the instrument to be set up fully in the laboratory or on the telescope during the daytime.  The most demanding feature of AOLI is the need to generate an artificial star at the telescope focal plane no bigger than the diffraction limit of the telescope.  This is further complicated because the curvature wavefront sensor design described above and by Crass et al. 18 ,    uses  light between 500 and 950 nm making the use of refractive optics unrealistically difficult.   Because of this,  we have developed an optical arrangement which uses a pair of off-axis paraboloids to give the necessary image quality.  The outline design is shown  in  figure  5.    The  calibration  system  is  described  in  more  detail  in  another  paper  presented  as  part  of  this conference (Antolin et al 19 ).

Figure 5: the AOLI calibration system uses a fibre source to generate a broadband input to a 2.5: 1 demagnification optical arrangement that uses a pair of off-axis paraboloids to produce a compact image at the same position as the focus of the telescope but can be used to feed the wavefront sensor and science camera optics of AOLI.  It turbulence simulator is located close to the pupil plane of the reimaging system (OAP design from David King).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0117v1-figure-0f15f465-d7b1-476c-aede-6b17a97cb2d3.jpg)

## 5. FIRST LIGHT EXPERIENCES WITH AOLI

The first observing run with AOLI was on the 4.2 m William Herschel telescope (WHT) in September 2013.  In most respects the instrument worked well and Figure 6 shows it mounted at the Naysmith focus of the WHT.  Unfortunately the weather conditions while at the telescope were remarkably poor with very poor seeing, high humidity and frequent dome closures.  As a consequence very little in the way of  scientific results  were actually obtained.  Nevertheless,  a paper is in preparation describing results that were obtained ( Velasco et al. 20 ).

Figure 6: AOLI mounted at the Naysmith focus of the William Herschel 4.2 m Telescope in September 2013.  Light comes from the telescope through the collimating optics immediately at the front of the picture.  The  deformable mirror is to the right and one of the curvature wavefront sensor EMCCD cameras is at the edge of the picture on the left.  The science camera is vertically mounted at the far end of the instrument.  Most of the light baffles used in the instrument were removed before this photograph was taken.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0117v1-figure-16ac190f-88df-4465-8bd1-64d429f62242.jpg)

## 6. CONCLUSIONS

For  many  years  instrument  developers  have  been  trying  to  produce  an  instrument  capable  of  observing  close  to  the diffraction  limit  of  large  telescopes  in  the  visible  from  the  ground,  over  the  full  sky  with  good  observing  efficiency. High-speed,  high  efficiency,  photon  counting  detector  availability  has  transformed  our  capacity  to  build  instruments capable  of  working  with  the  rapidly  changing  atmosphere  and  using  very  faint  reference  stars  to  let  us  optimise  our recording of light from the sky.  The combination of these EMCCDs with low order curvature wavefront sensors  (also using  EMCCDs)  will  allow  a  new  generation  of  astronomers  to  explore  the  Universe  with  as  big  a  step  change  in resolution as Hubble provided over 20 years ago.  Hubble provided an eight-fold improvement over the typical groundbased image resolution of ~1 arcsec to give images of ~0.12 arcsec resolution.  We have already demonstrated a further improvement  over  Hubble  with  the  Palomar  5  m  telescope  by  imaging  with  ~0.035  arcsec  resolution.    AOLI  in  the visible on the GTC 10.4m telescope has the diffraction limit of eight times better than HST of ~0.015 arcsec resolution, roughly 60 times the resolution when limited by atmospheric turbulence.  There is every expectation that by making such high resolution images and spectra available more routinely many fields of astronomy will be revolutionised yet again.

## REFERENCES

- [1]    R.E.Hufnagel,  in  "Restoration  of  Atmospheric  and  Degraded  Images"  (National  Academy  Of  Sciences, Washington, DC, 1966), vol 3, Appendix 2, p11, (1966).
- [2]  D. L. Fried, "Probability of Getting a Lucky Short-Exposure Image through Turbulence", JOSA, vol 68, p1651-1658,(1978).
- [3]  C. D. Mackay, T. D. Staley, D. King, F. Suess and K. Weller, "High-speed photon-counting CCD cameras for astronomy", Proc SPIE 7742, p. 1-11,(2010).
- [4]  Noll, R. J., "Zernike Polynomials and Atmospheric Turbulence", JOSA, vol 66, p207-211, (1976).
- [5]  N.M. Law, C.D. Mackay, R.G. Dekany, M. Ireland, J. P. Lloyd, A. M. Moore, J.G. Robertson, P. Tuthill, H. Woodruff, "Getting Lucky with Adaptive Optics", ApJ ,vol. 692 p.924-930, (2009).
- [6]  C. Bergfors, W. Brandner, M. Janson et al. "Lucky Imaging Survey for southern M dwarf binaries', Astron &amp; Astrophys, vol. 520, A54 (2010).
- [7]    D.  Peter,  M.  Feldt,  Th.  Henning,  and  F.  Hormuth,  'Massive  binaries  in  the  Cepheus  OB2/3  region  Constraining the formation mechanism of massive stars', Astron. &amp; Astrophys., vol. 538, A74 (2012).
- [8]   L. Labadie, R. Rebolo, I. Villo et al., 'High-contrast optical imaging of companions: the case of the brown dwarf binary HD 130948 BC', Astron. &amp; Astrophys., vol. 526, A144 (2011).
- [9]    B.  Femenia,  R.  Rebolo,  J.  A.  Perez-Prieto  et  al.,  'Lucky  Imaging  Adaptive  Optics  of  the  brown  dwarf binary GJ569Bab', MNRAS, vol. 413, p.1524-1536 (2011).
- [10]  L.M. Close, V. Gasho, D. Kopon et al.,'The Magellan Telescope Adaptive Secondary AO System: AO Science in the Visible and Mid-IR', Proc. of the SPIE, vol. 7736, pp. 773605-773605-12 (2010).
- [11]  R.  Schödel,  et  al.  ,  "Holographic  Imaging  of  Crowded  Fields:  High  Angular  Resolution  Imaging  with Excellent Quality at Very Low Cost", MNRAS 429.1367(2013).
- [12]  C. Mackay, et al.  "High-efficiency lucky imaging", MNRAS 432, 702 (2013).
- [13]  D.  Simons,  "  Longitudinally  Averaged  R-Band  Field  Star  Counts  across  the  Entire  Sky  ",  Gemini Observatory technical note, (1995).
- [14]  M.  Sarazin  and  A.  Tokovinin,  "The  Statistics  of  Isoplanatic  Angle  and  Adaptive  Optics  Time  Constant Derived from DIMM Data", conference "Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics", Venice (2001).
- [15] R. Racine,"The Strehl Efficiency of Adaptive Optics Systems",  Pub. Astr. Soc Pacific, vol 118, p10661075, (2006).
- [16]  O. Guyon "Limits of Adaptive Optics for High-Contrast Imaging", Ap J, vol 629,p 592-614,(2005)
- [17]  J. Crass, C.D. Mackay, et al, "The AOLI low-order non-linear curvature wavefront sensor: a method for high sensitivity wavefront reconstruction", Proc SPIE 8447, (2012).
- [18]   J. Crass, D. King, C. Mackay, " AOLI low-order non-linear curvature wavefront sensor: laboratory and on-sky results", SPIE 9148-81,  Montréal, June 2014.
- [19]   M. Puga, et al., "An atmospheric turbulence and telescope simulator for the development of AOLI", SPIE 9147-294, Montreal,  June 2014.
- [20]   S. Velasco, et al. (in preparation, MNRAS)
Craig Mackay Rafael Rebolo Jonathan Crass David L. King Lucas Labadie Víctor González-Escélera Marta Puga Antonio Pérez-Garrido Roberto López Alejandro Oscoz Jorge A. Pérez-Prieto Luis F. Rodríguez-Ramos Sergio Velasco Isidro Villó
High-Resolution Imaging in the Visible on Large Ground-Based Telescopes
Lucky Imaging combined with a low order adaptive optics system has given the
highest resolution images ever taken in the visible or near infrared of faint
astronomical objects. This paper describes a new instrument that has already
been deployed on the WHT 4.2m telescope on La Palma, with particular emphasis
on the optical design and the predicted system performance. A new design of low
order wavefront sensor using photon counting CCD detectors and multi-plane
curvature wavefront sensor will allow virtually full sky coverage with faint
natural guide stars. With a 2 x 2 array of 1024 x 1024 photon counting EMCCDs,
AOLI is the first of the new class of high sensitivity, near diffraction
limited imaging systems giving higher resolution in the visible from the ground
than hitherto been possible from space.