## Hadron Collider Signatures of Lepton Number Violation in the Type II Seesaw Model

Patrick D. Bolton, 1, ∗ Jonathan Kriewald, 1, † Miha Nemevˇ sek, 2, 1, ‡ Fabrizio Nesti, 3, 4, § and Juan Carlos Vasquez 5, ¶

1 Joˇ zef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, Universit` a dell'Aquila, via Vetoio, I-67100, L'Aquila, Italy 4 INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, I-67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy Department of Physics and Astronomy, Science Center, Amherst College, Amherst, MA 01002, USA.

5 (Dated: February 26, 2025)

We examine the prospect of observing genuine lepton number violating (LNV) signals at hadron colliders in the context of the Type II seesaw mechanism. The model features smoking gun signals involving same-sign di-leptons and jets that may be the primary observable channel in certain regions of the parameter space. The flavour composition of final-state charged leptons is related to the origin of neutrino masses and is correlated with other rare processes, such as neutrinoless double beta decay. We review existing collider limits and provide sensitivity estimates from LNV signals at upcoming LHC runs, including non-zero mass splittings between triplet components.

Introduction. A well-known feature of the Standard Model (SM) is the accidental conservation of total lepton number L . The observation of non-zero neutrino masses could imply the existence of L number violating (LNV) new physics. According to Majorana [1], a real representation under the Lorentz group can describe neutrinos with a ∆ L = 2 mass term. The most studied LNV process, sensitive to light neutrino exchange and new physics, is neutrinoless double beta decay (0 νββ ) [2]. Considerable experimental and theoretical efforts are underway to detect such smoking gun signals and establish its connection to light neutrinos [3] and new physics [4]; for a review, see [5].

Other LNV processes have been probed from eV to beyond TeV [6]. Perhaps the most striking signature is the final state of two same-sign charged leptons and two jets in pp collisions, arising from the production and decay of heavy Majorana neutrinos N . Such states are the key ingredient of Type I seesaw scenarios [7-11], which can introduce Majorana masses m N for the gauge singlets ν R either by hand or via the spontaneous symmetry breaking of an extended gauge group, such as in the minimal LeftRight symmetric model (LRSM) [8, 12-14]. There, it is tied to the scale of SU (2) R breaking through the Yukawa coupling Y N as m N = Y N R v , where v R is the vacuum expectation value (VEV) of the scalar triplet ∆ R .

In models with gauged U (1) B -L (and SU (2) R ), the VEV v R can be in TeV range, kinematically accessible to colliders. Distinct LNV signatures, such as the KeungSenjanovi´ [15] channel, appear nearly automatically due c to the presence of m N and Yukawa couplings that communicate LNV to the SM. The production and decay of on-shell N via charged currents leads to LNV in half of events, containing two same-sign leptons and jets. In the case of interference, the ratio of same- and opposite-sign leptons may be altered [16] and LNV may be suppressed by pseudo-Dirac masses [17, 18]. The exact origin of heavy Majorana neutrino masses can be determined from

FIG. 1. Pair (and associated) production of charged scalars mediated by Z/γ ∗ ( W ± ), producing the LNV final state ℓ ± ′± ℓ 4 j at the LHC.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00833v2-figure-2ef640bc-bb23-4910-a83c-46be338b1c11.jpg)

complementary signals, such as the Higgs decay h → NN via the h -∆ 0 R mixing [19, 20], which can also feature LNV final states with two same-sign leptons and up to four jets. See [21] for a review of the LRSM parameter space and [22] for future colliders.

The Type II seesaw [23-27] provides Majorana masses for the light neutrinos without extending the SM gauge group or fermion content. A single scalar triplet ∆ L = (3 2) under , SU (2) L ⊗ U (1) Y can partially break the electroweak (EW) symmetry with its VEV v ∆ . The Yukawa term that couples the left-handed lepton doublet to the triplet with the coupling Y ∆ then leads to the Majorana neutrino mass matrix M ν ∝ Y ∆ ∆ v .

The production of charged and neutral scalars in the model proceeds through the EW interactions [28, 29], followed by decays defining the final state [30-34]. For v ∆ ≲ 10 keV, leptonic decay modes dominate with three and four-lepton states, with current flavour-dependent lower bounds on the doubly charged scalar mass in the O (500 -700) GeV range [35-41]. In such final states, the total lepton number is conserved (LNC). Another LNC search exists in the v ∆ ≳ 100 keV region, where decays to SM vector bosons take over, with weaker bounds at m ∆ ++ ≳ 350 GeV [42-44]. Mass splittings between ∆ L components trigger LNC cascade decays [45, 46] that ei-

FIG. 2. Position of the LNV window in the Type II seesaw, defined by BR ∆ ++ → ℓ + + ℓ × BR ∆ ++ → W W + + &gt; 20%. Blue and orange bands correspond to the NO and IO cases, each with the benchmark masses m ∆ ++ = 300 GeV and 900 GeV. The gray regions indicate the limits from Planck data [54] (dotted vertical line), 0 νββ from KamLAND-Zen [55] (dashed) and KATRIN [56] (solid).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00833v2-figure-01827ea2-2d02-49a6-bedb-74661475a08c.jpg)

ther enhance or reduce the bounds. Signatures of Type II have been investigated at future lepton [47], e -p [48] and hadron [49, 50] colliders.

̸

It is well-known [51] that genuine LNV signals in Type II require the simultaneous presence of Y ∆ and v ∆ . Turning on the Yukawa coupling Y ∆ ensures that the ∆ L triplet indeed has L = 2. Then, v ∆ communicates L = 0 to the SM sector with L = 0 and the combined effect leads to LNV. This is especially obvious when the finalstate gauge bosons decay hadronically and neutrinos cannot carry away L . In pure Type II, the product Y ∆ ∆ v is fixed and LNV signals are not automatically observable.

The LNV window [51] exists for v ∆ ≃ 10 -100 keV, where both decay modes, proportional to Y ∆ and v ∆ , are present. Smoking gun signals with two same-sign leptons and jets appear, shown in FIG. 1. While existing leptonic searches can be recast to the LNV region [52, 53] with some sensitivity, a dedicated analysis presented here opens the LNV window completely, and accounts for the presence of mass splittings in ∆ . L We determine the strength of the LNV signal with a di-lepton plus jets analysis that significantly improves the sensitivity, spanning the range of v ∆ shown in FIG. 2.

Location of the LNV window. In the Type II seesaw, the Yukawa term

$$\mathcal { L } _ { Y u k } \supset - Y _ { \Delta i j } L _ { i } ^ { T } \mathcal { C } i \sigma _ { 2 } \Delta _ { L } L _ { j } + \text{h.c.} \,, \quad ( 1 ) \quad \text{nent} _ { \text{Tr} \left [ \text{1} }$$

with

$$\text{with} \quad \Delta _ { L } = \begin{pmatrix} \Delta ^ { + } / \sqrt { 2 } & \Delta ^ { + + } \\ ( v _ { \Delta } + \Delta ^ { 0 } + i \chi _ { \Delta } ) \, / \sqrt { 2 } & - \Delta ^ { + } / \sqrt { 2 } \end{pmatrix} \,, \quad ( 2 ) \quad \Gamma _ { \cdot }$$

sources the light neutrino mass matrix

$$\Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lamda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda\times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times\Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Sigma \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \minus \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Sq \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \% \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Reverse \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambma \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \raysigma \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \ Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambdelta \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \gets \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \| \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Line \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \rangle \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \sLambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \Lambda \times \$$

FIG. 3. Regions with the branching ratios of BR ∆ ±± → ℓ ± ± ℓ × { BR ∆ ±± → W W ± ± , BR ∆ ± → W Z h ± ( ) , BR ∆ ± → tb } &gt; 5% 10% in , blue, orange and green. The NO mass spectrum is assumed with m ν min = 0 01 eV. The dashed lines show the ∆ . ++ decay length in the rest frame, see [63-66] for displacement.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00833v2-figure-d4b8d385-30ff-431c-b654-06f2e604f297.jpg)

where m ν = diag( m ,m ,m 1 2 3 ) contains the light neutrino masses and V is the PMNS mixing matrix. The singly charged ∆ + and pseudo-scalar χ ∆ components mix with the SM would-be Goldstones, while the neutral component ∆ 0 mixes with the SM Higgs h with a small mixing of order v ∆ /v . Eq. (1) also results in the decays of ∆ ++ to two same-sign charged leptons, with

$$\Gamma _ { \Delta ^ { + + } \to \ell _ { i } ^ { + } \ell _ { j } ^ { + } } = \frac { m _ { \Delta ^ { + + } } } { 8 \pi \left ( 1 + \delta _ { i j } \right ) } \left | \frac { M _ { \nu i j } } { v _ { \Delta } } \right | ^ { 2 } \,, \quad ( 4 )$$

where δ ij is the Kronecker delta. Through M ν , and hence m ν and V , these rates are directly related to neutrino oscillations [30-32]. The total leptonic rate, Γ ∆ ++ → ℓ + + ℓ = m ∆ ++ / (16 π ) ∑ m /v 2 ν 2 ∆ , is insensitive to V and depends only on the neutrino masses, determined from the mass-squared differences ∆ m 2 21 and ∆ m 2 32 and the lightest neutrino mass m ν min . With m ν fixed by oscillations, the leptonic rates in (4) dominate the Γ tot ∆ ++ when v ∆ becomes small, until the lower bound on v ∆ is met, coming from the non-observation of lepton flavour violating (LFV) processes [57-62] and Y ∆ perturbativity. For the larger values of v ∆ relevant for the LNV window, the LFV rates are highly suppressed by small Yukawa couplings and the constraints become irrelevant.

̸

Likewise, v ∆ = 0 triggers decays of ∆ L components into the SM gauge bosons via the kinetic term Tr [ ( D µ ∆ ) ( L † D µ ∆ ) . L ] Particularly important are the decays ∆ ++ → W W + + and ∆ + → W Z + , with the rates

$$\Gamma _ { \{ W ^ { + } W ^ { + }, W ^ { + } Z \} } \simeq \frac { \alpha _ { 2 } } { 4 } \left ( \frac { v _ { \Delta } } { v } \right ) ^ { 2 } \left \{ \frac { m _ { \Delta ^ { + + } } ^ { 3 } } { M _ { W } ^ { 2 } }, \frac { m _ { \Delta ^ { + } } ^ { 3 } } { 2 M _ { W } ^ { 2 } } \right \} \,, \quad ( 5 )$$

for m ∆ + , m ∆ ++ ≫ v . Also relevant are ∆ + → W h + and

FIG. 4. Proton level cross-sections at √ s = 14 , 27 , 100 TeV in dotted, dashed and solid lines with ∆ m = 0, for the LO associated, EW pair and gluon fusion Higgs pair production.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00833v2-figure-6e0813d3-7866-4d6b-8e83-570212efb911.jpg)

∆ + → tb ¯ that proceed via ∆ + -χ + mixing, with

$$\Gamma _ { \Delta ^ { + } \to W ^ { + } h } \simeq \frac { \alpha _ { 2 } } { 8 } \left ( \frac { v _ { \Delta } } { v } \right ) ^ { 2 } \frac { m _ { \Delta ^ { + } } ^ { 3 } } { M _ { W } ^ { 2 } } \,, \quad \left ( 6 \right ) \, \text{ the } \text{stud} \, \right )$$

$$\Gamma _ { \Delta ^ { + } \to t \bar { b } } \simeq \frac { 3 } { 4 \pi } \left ( \frac { v _ { \Delta } } { v } \right ) ^ { 2 } m _ { \Delta ^ { + } } ^ { \dots } \left ( \frac { m _ { t } } { v } \right ) ^ { 2 } \,. \quad ( 7 ) \quad \text{rate}$$

Unlike (4), these are independent of m ν and dominate for larger values of v ∆ . The upper bound of v ∆ ≲ O (1) GeV comes from electroweak precision tests (EWPT).

The number of genuine LNV signal events is proportional to the product of leptonic and gauge branching ratios, BR ∆ ++ → ℓℓ × { BR ∆ ++ → WW , BR ∆ + → WZ h ( ) , BR ∆ + → tb ¯ } that define the LNV window. Its position depends on the neutrino mass ordering but less so on m ν min , non-trivial behaviour happens in the region disfavoured by the cosmological data [54] and the latest 0 νββ [55] and KATRIN [56] searches. The exact location is shown in FIGs. 2 and 3 and depends non-trivially on m ∆ ++ , which we scan within the LHC observable range. It is maximal for v ∆ ∼ 40 -50 keV.

Size of the LNV window. To obtain the number of LNV events, the branching ratios above are multiplied by the dominant production cross-sections. The doubly charged scalars can be pair-produced in pp collisions through off-shell γ/Z/h → ∆ ±± ∆ ∓∓ and in the associated channel via W ± → ∆ ±± ∆ , see FIG. 1. ∓ The associated production cross section is integrated over the parton distribution functions (PDFs) as

$$\sigma _ { \text{assoc.} } ^ { \text{LO} } \simeq \int _ { \text{PDF} } \frac { \pi \alpha _ { 2 } ^ { 2 } } { 3 6 } \frac { \hat { s } \left ( 1 - 4 m _ { \Delta ^ { + + } } ^ { 2 } / \hat { s } \right ) ^ { 3 / 2 } } { ( \hat { s } - M _ { W } ) ^ { 2 } + ( \Gamma _ { W } M _ { W } ) ^ { 2 } } \,, \quad ( 8 ) \quad \text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$th}$}$}$}$} \\ \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \, \cdot \end{cases}$$

and similarly for γ/Z/h exchange. The leading order (LO) cross-sections at different √ s , multiplied by the next-to-leading-order (NLO) K -factors, are shown in

FIG. 5. Efficiencies after selection cuts for the signal events in the ℓ ± ± ℓ W W ,ℓ ℓ W ∓ ∓ ± ± ∓ Z h ( ) and ℓ ± ± ℓ tb channels.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00833v2-figure-4ff16355-86ca-4375-8b69-016a8e066f89.jpg)

FIG. 4. We assumed m ∆ ++ = m ∆ + = m ∆ 0 , the impact of mass splittings is discussed below. For details of NLO cross-sections and PDF uncertainties, see [29, 67]. The kinematics of NLO jet emissions does not impact our study and the LO simulations are sufficient for an accurate estimate of signal selection efficiencies in the LNV window.

Sensitivity at the LHC. To enhance the sensitivity to the Type II LNV window, we propose the following search, based on Monte Carlo simulations of the ℓ ± ′± ℓ + jets final states for the signal and backgrounds at the LHC. We focus on three possible electron and muon final states: e ± ± e , µ ± µ ± and the e ± µ ± LFV channel.

We use the Feynrules [68] implementation of the model file [29] for the generation of signal events in the MadGraph5 [69] framework at LO. Pythia8 [70] is used for showering and hadronisation and the Delphes [71] library for fast detector simulation, using the default detector cards. We use MadAnalysis5 [72] for designing and implementing the following cuts. Select events with at least two same-sign leptons ℓ ± ′± ℓ , ℓ, ℓ ′ = e, µ , and at least two jets, defined with the antik T algorithm using ∆ R = 0 3 and . p Tj min = 20 GeV. Impose cuts of p Tℓ &gt; 50 GeV and p Tj &gt; 50 GeV on the leading lepton and jet. Accept events within the narrow di-lepton invariant mass peak, m ℓℓ ∈ [0 9 . , 1 1] . m ∆ ++ , reject those with ∆ R ℓℓ &gt; π . Events with the invariant mass m j 1 j 2 &gt; . 1 1 m ∆ ++ for the two leading jets are omitted.

FIG. 5 shows the signal efficiencies, i.e. ratios between the number of events after applying the cuts and the initial number of simulated events with hadronically decaying V = W ,Z ± .

The main sources of background are V +012 js , V V + 012 js , tt + 012 js . All simulations were performed with aMC@NLO at LO with up to two matched jets and rescaled to the NLO cross-sections.

The estimated sensitivities S , used to establish up-

GeV

/

m

FIG. 6. The LNV window sensitivity at √ s = 14 TeV for pair and associated production of ∆ ++ with m ν min = 0 01 eV. The . left, center and right panels correspond to the combined e ± ± e 4 , j µ ± µ ± 4 j and e ± µ ± 4 j channels. The inner (outer) regions correspond to L = 300 fb -1 (3000 fb -1 ), solid lines show the sensitivity at 2 σ for NO. The dashed (dotted) lines denote the sensitivity for IO at 300 fb -1 (3000 fb -1 ). The black solid (dashed) lines denote the strongest bound from exclusive flavour channels for NO(IO). The purple region shows the exclusion from the doubly charged searches in the di-lepton channel(s) [3541]. The rose region denotes the ∆ ±± → W W ± ± and ∆ ±± , ∆ ∓ → W W ± ± , W ∓ Z searches [42, 43].

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00833v2-figure-8c979e14-cf5f-4fde-8610-6091733b9782.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00833v2-figure-a20b66fe-caa0-400c-8b15-14488e83b031.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00833v2-figure-c5ed502e-84be-4d2e-a18f-0af4ff8d32e0.jpg)

per limits for the LNV channels, are obtained with S 2 = ∑ i s / s 2 i ( i + b i ), where s i ( b i ) is the expected number of signal(background) events in each region i after cuts. They are shown in FIG. 6, together with the exclusion regions of current searches by ATLAS, CMS, L3 and OPAL [35-43] in purple. We omit the inclusive ATLAS search [73] where all flavour channels were combined into a single sensitivity. The bounds from current searches in the leptonic channels (purple) in FIG. 6 disappear at around v ∆ ∼ 100 keV, while for v ∆ &gt; 200 keV, the W W ± ± channel takes over, with a weaker exclusion of m ∆ ++ ≳ 350 GeV (rose).

In the intermediate v ∆ range, both leptonic and gauge searches are weakened and the opportunity for genuine LNV signals emerges. Sensitivity estimates reveal encouraging prospects justified by the extent of the LNV windows in FIG. 6. They cover a large portion of parameter space, above the limits of existing searches and spanning orders of magnitude in v ∆ .

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00833v2-figure-49fd5e52-7f98-4bcc-a57e-120abd3dedcd.jpg)

## Impact of mass splittings.

The scalar potential contains two bi-quadratic terms that couple ∆ L to the Higgs doublet φ ,

$$\lambda _ { h \Delta 1 } \, \varphi ^ { \dagger } \varphi \, \text{Tr} \left [ \Delta _ { L } ^ { \dagger } \Delta _ { L } \right ] + \lambda _ { h \Delta 2 } \, \text{Tr} \left [ \varphi \varphi ^ { \dagger } \Delta _ { L } \Delta _ { L } ^ { \dagger } \right ]. \quad ( 9 )$$

The λ h ∆1 gives a universal mass shift to all triplet scalar components and is limited by h → γγ , while the λ h ∆2 term splits them, such that

$$m _ { \Delta ^ { 0 } } ^ { 2 } - m _ { \Delta ^ { + } } ^ { 2 } = m _ { \Delta ^ { + } } ^ { 2 } - m _ { \Delta ^ { + + } } ^ { 2 } = \frac { \lambda _ { h \Delta 2 } v ^ { 2 } } { 4 } \,, \quad ( 1 0 ) \quad \text{with} \quad \text{large}$$

up to O ( v ∆ /v ) 2 . The perturbativity bound λ h ∆2 ≲ √ 4 π limits the size of the mass splitting, especially for larger m ∆ ++ . For smaller values of m ∆ ++ , the EWPT oblique parameters [45, 74-77] further constrain the splitting, as shown in FIG. 7, see [75, 78] for details. As realized in [45], mass splittings trigger three-body cascades via

FIG. 7. Future sensitivity of the LHC to the LNV window for NO (IO) in solid (dotted) lines, with L = 3000 fb -1 . Blue, orange and green lines denote the e ± ± e , µ ± µ ± and e ± µ ± channels. The grey area shows the EWPT constraints, the pink region excludes λ h ∆2 &gt; √ 4 π , the light green region the Γ tot Z , the purple region h → γγ and the red region current direct searches as in FIG. 6. The hatched area is forbidden by the sum rule (10).

off-shell V , such as ∆ ++ → ∆ + ff ¯ , approximated by

$$\Gamma _ { \Delta ^ { + + } \rightarrow \Delta ^ { + } f \bar { f } } \simeq \frac { 3 \alpha _ { 2 } ^ { 2 } } { 5 \pi } \frac { \Delta m ^ { 5 } } { M _ { W } ^ { 4 } } \,, \quad \quad ( 1 1 )$$

with ∆ m = m ∆ ++ -m ∆ + . Two-body cascades require a large mass splitting ∆ m&gt;M W,Z and are disfavoured by EWPT; only off-shell V s with soft leptons and jets are relevant.

Cascade decays modify the number of LNV events coming from the pair or associated production of ∆ . L Additional sources of same-sign charged leptons are present when ∆ ++ is the lightest, coming from the production and cascade decays of ∆ + 0 , . When ∆ ++ is the

heaviest, the ∆ ±± → ℓ ± ′± ℓ final state is suppressed by cascades to ∆ + 0 , , whose decay products fail to pass the invariant mass cut on m ℓ ± ′± ℓ . The resulting sensitivity, together with current bounds from direct searches and the indirect constraints outlined above, is shown in FIG. 7 (see also cascades sensitivities at LHC [79, 80] and e + e -colliders [81]).

Conclusions and outlook. Weinvestigate the prospect of observing LNV signals in the minimal Type II seesaw and delineate the region of parameter space where the sensitivity of current LNC searches diminishes and a genuine LNV signal becomes observable. Our selection criteria strongly reduce the known SM backgrounds and enhances the sensitivity, and reveal encouraging prospects for searches at hadron colliders, filling the remaining gap of current searches.

The ∆ L also appears in the LRSM [26], where the mass splittings are large if M W R is fairly light [82], leading to a lower bound for m ∆ ++ at around 1 TeV if W R is accessible at the LHC, see also [83]. The LRSM seesaw extends (3) with another Type I source, spoiling the relation between Y ∆ and v ∆ and modifying the flavour structure of final-state leptons. This shifts the location of the LNV window, whereas the kinematics and estimated efficiencies still apply. Future outlook for enhancing the sensitivity of the LNV window includes the τ final states, leptonic decays of W ± and Z , and ∆ 0 , χ ∆ contributions.

Interest in the LNV window may be spurred by cosmology, where Type II can play an important role in phase transitions [84, 85] and leptogenesis. While the standard leptogenesis scenario with a single ∆ L fails [86], a successful variant was claimed in [87, 88]. The washout effects are strongest precisely within the LNV window [89].

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

MN would like to thank Yue Zhang and Richard Ruiz for discussions. PDB, JK and MN are supported by the Slovenian Research Agency under the research core funding No. P1-0035 and in part by the research grants J13013 and N1-0253. MN is grateful to the Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics (MITP) of the DFG Cluster of Excellence PRISMA+ (Project ID 33083149), for its hospitality and its partial support during the course of this work. PDB, JK, MN and FN thank the CERN Theory group for hospitality during which a part of the work was being done. MN thanks the Carleton University for hospitality and support during the completion of the paper. JCV would like to thank Goran Senjanovi´ c and Michael Ramsey-Musolf for encouragement and enlightening discussions. JCV was partially funded under the US Department of Energy contract DE-SC0011095.

- ∗ patrick.bolton@ijs.si
- † jonathan.kriewald@ijs.si
- ‡ miha.nemevsek@ijs.si
- § fabrizio.nesti@aquila.infn.it
- ¶ jvasquezcarm@umass.edu
- [1] E. Majorana, Nuovo Cim. 14 , 171 (1937).
- [2] G. Racah, Nuovo Cim. 14 , 322 (1937).
- [3] F. Vissani, JHEP 06 (022), arXiv:hep-ph/9906525.
- [4] V. Tello, M. Nemevˇ sek, F. Nesti, G. Senjanovi´, c and F. Vissani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 , 151801 (2011), arXiv:1011.3522 [hep-ph].
- [5] M. J. Dolinski, A. W. P. Poon, and W. Rodejohann, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 , 219 (2019), arXiv:1902.04097 [nucl-ex].
- [6] Y. Cai, T. Han, T. Li, and R. Ruiz, Front. in Phys. 6 , 40 (2018), arXiv:1711.02180 [hep-ph].
- [7] P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B 67 ,
- 421 (1977).
- [8] R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 , 912 (1980).
- [9] S. L. Glashow, NATO Sci. Ser. B 61 , 687 (1980).
- [10] M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Conf. Proc. C 790927 , 315 (1979), arXiv:1306.4669 [hep-th].
- [11] T. Yanagida, Conf. Proc. C 7902131 , 95 (1979).
- [12] J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D 10 , 275 (1974), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 11, 703-703 (1975)].
- [13] R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, Phys. Rev. D 11 , 566 (1975).
- [14] G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 12 , 1502 (1975).
- [15] W.-Y. Keung and G. Senjanovi´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 , 1427 (1983).
- [16] J. Gluza, T. Jelinski, and R. Szafron, Phys. Rev. D 93 , 113017 (2016), arXiv:1604.01388 [hep-ph].
- [17] J. Kersten and A. Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 76 , 073005 (2007), arXiv:0705.3221 [hep-ph].
- [18] M. Drewes, J. Klari´, c and P. Klose, JHEP 11 (032), arXiv:1907.13034 [hep-ph].
- [19] A. Maiezza, M. Nemevˇ sek, and F. Nesti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 081802 (2015), arXiv:1503.06834 [hep-ph].
- [20] M. Nemevˇ sek, F. Nesti, and J. C. Vasquez, JHEP 04 (114), arXiv:1612.06840 [hep-ph].
- [21] M. Nemevˇ sek, F. Nesti, and G. Popara, Phys. Rev. D 97 , 115018 (2018), arXiv:1801.05813 [hep-ph].
- [22] M. Nemevˇ sek and F. Nesti, Phys. Rev. D 108 , 015030 (2023), arXiv:2306.12104 [hep-ph].
- [23] M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B 94 , 61 (1980).
- [24] J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 22 , 2227 (1980).
- [25] T. P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Phys. Rev. D 22 , 2860 (1980).
- [26] R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi´ c, Phys. Rev. D 23 , 165 (1981).
- [27] G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi, and C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B 181 , 287 (1981).
- [28] T. Han, B. Mukhopadhyaya, Z. Si, and K. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 76 , 075013 (2007), arXiv:0706.0441 [hep-ph].
- [29] B. Fuks, M. Nemevˇ sek, and R. Ruiz, Phys. Rev. D 101 , 075022 (2020), arXiv:1912.08975 [hep-ph].
- [30] E. J. Chun, K. Y. Lee, and S. C. Park, Phys. Lett. B 566 , 142 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0304069.
- [31] J. Garayoa and T. Schwetz, JHEP 03 (009), arXiv:0712.1453 [hep-ph].

- [32] M. Kadastik, M. Raidal, and L. Rebane, Phys. Rev. D 77 , 115023 (2008), arXiv:0712.3912 [hep-ph].
- [33] P. Fileviez Perez, T. Han, G.-y. Huang, T. Li, and K. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 78 , 015018 (2008), arXiv:0805.3536 [hep-ph].
- [34] A. Das, P. Das, and N. Okada, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2405.11820 [hep-ph].
- [35] M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS), Eur. Phys. J. C 78 , 199 (2018), arXiv:1710.09748 [hep-ex].
- [36] S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS), Eur. Phys. J. C 72 , 2189 (2012), arXiv:1207.2666 [hep-ex].
- [37] P. Achard et al. (L3), Phys. Lett. B 576 , 18 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0309076.
- [38] G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), JHEP 08 (138), arXiv:1411.2921 [hep-ex].
- [39] G. Abbiendi et al. (OPAL), Phys. Lett. B 526 , 221 (2002), arXiv:hep-ex/0111059.
- [40] CMS (CMS), A search for doubly-charged Higgs boson production in three and four lepton final states at √ s = 13 TeV, Tech. Rep. (CERN, Geneva, 2017).
- [41] G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), JHEP 03 (041), arXiv:1412.0237 [hep-ex].
- [42] G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), JHEP 06 (240), 146, arXiv:2101.11961 [hep-ex].
- [43] M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS), Eur. Phys. J. C 79 , 58 (2019), arXiv:1808.01899 [hep-ex].
- [44] G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), (2024), arXiv:2405.04914 [hepex].
- [45] A. Melfo, M. Nemevˇ sek, F. Nesti, G. Senjanovi´, c and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 85 , 055018 (2012), arXiv:1108.4416 [hep-ph].
- [46] R. Primulando, J. Julio, and P. Uttayarat, JHEP 08 (024), arXiv:1903.02493 [hep-ph].
- [47] P. Agrawal, M. Mitra, S. Niyogi, S. Shil, and M. Spannowsky, Phys. Rev. D 98 , 015024 (2018), arXiv:1803.00677 [hep-ph].
- [48] P. S. B. Dev, S. Khan, M. Mitra, and S. K. Rai, Phys. Rev. D 99 , 115015 (2019), arXiv:1903.01431 [hep-ph].
- [49] Y. Du, A. Dunbrack, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and J.-H. Yu, JHEP 01 (101), arXiv:1810.09450 [hep-ph].
- [50] R. Padhan, D. Das, M. Mitra, and A. Kumar Nayak, Phys. Rev. D 101 , 075050 (2020), arXiv:1909.10495 [hepph].
- [51] A. Maiezza, M. Nemevˇ sek, and F. Nesti, AIP Conf. Proc. 1743 , 030008 (2016).
- [52] F. del ´ guila A and M. Chala, JHEP 03 (027), arXiv:1311.1510 [hep-ph].
- [53] K. S. Babu, R. K. Barman, D. Gon¸ calves, and A. Ismail, JHEP 06 (132), arXiv:2212.08025 [hep-ph].
- [54] N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641 , A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO].
- [55] A. Gando et al. (KamLAND-Zen), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 , 082503 (2016), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 109903 (2016)], arXiv:1605.02889 [hep-ex].
- [56] M. Aker et al. (KATRIN), Nature Phys. 18 , 160 (2022), arXiv:2105.08533 [hep-ex].
- [57] A. Abada, C. Biggio, F. Bonnet, M. B. Gavela, and T. Hambye, JHEP 12 (061), arXiv:0707.4058 [hep-ph].
- [58] T. Fukuyama, H. Sugiyama, and K. Tsumura, JHEP 03 (044), arXiv:0909.4943 [hep-ph].
- [59] P. S. B. Dev, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 98 , 055013 (2018), arXiv:1806.08499 [hep-ph].
- [60] N. D. Barrie and S. T. Petcov, JHEP 01 (001), arXiv:2210.02110 [hep-ph].
- [61] M. Ardu, S. Davidson, and S. Lavignac, JHEP 11 (101), arXiv:2308.16897 [hep-ph].
- [62] U. Banerjee, C. Englert, and W. Naskar, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2403.17455 [hep-ph].
- [63] P. S. Bhupal Dev and Y. Zhang, JHEP 10 (199), arXiv:1808.00943 [hep-ph].
- [64] S. Antusch, O. Fischer, A. Hammad, and C. Scherb, JHEP 02 (157), arXiv:1811.03476 [hep-ph].
- [65] J. Alimena et al. , J. Phys. G 47 , 090501 (2020), arXiv:1903.04497 [hep-ex].
- [66] C. Arbel´ez, a J. C. Helo, and M. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. D 100 , 055001 (2019), arXiv:1906.03030 [hep-ph].
- [67] M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Phys. Rev. D 68 , 117701 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305288.
- [68] A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 , 2250 (2014), arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph].
- [69] J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, JHEP 07 (079), arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph].
- [70] T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 , 852 (2008), arXiv:0710.3820 [hepph].
- [71] J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3), JHEP 02 (057), arXiv:1307.6346 [hep-ex].
- [72] E. Conte, B. Fuks, and G. Serret, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 , 222 (2013), arXiv:1206.1599 [hep-ph].
- [73] G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Eur. Phys. J. C 83 , 605 (2023), arXiv:2211.07505 [hep-ex].
- [74] M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. D 46 , 381 (1992).
- [75] L. Lavoura and L.-F. Li, Phys. Rev. D 49 , 1409 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9309262.
- [76] E. J. Chun, H. M. Lee, and P. Sharma, JHEP 11 (106), arXiv:1209.1303 [hep-ph].
- [77] J. Haller, A. Hoecker, R. Kogler, K. M¨ onig, T. Peiffer, and J. Stelzer, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 , 675 (2018), arXiv:1803.01853 [hep-ph].
- [78] Y. Cheng, X.-G. He, F. Huang, J. Sun, and Z.-P. Xing, Nucl. Phys. B 989 , 116118 (2023), arXiv:2208.06760 [hep-ph].
- [79] S. Ashanujjaman and K. Ghosh, JHEP 03 (195), arXiv:2108.10952 [hep-ph].
- [80] S. Ashanujjaman and S. P. Maharathy, Phys. Rev. D 107 , 115026 (2023), arXiv:2305.06889 [hep-ph].
- [81] S. Ashanujjaman, K. Ghosh, and K. Huitu, Phys. Rev. D 106 , 075028 (2022), arXiv:2205.14983 [hep-ph].
- [82] A. Maiezza, M. Nemevˇ sek, and F. Nesti, Phys. Rev. D 94 , 035008 (2016), arXiv:1603.00360 [hep-ph].
- [83] J. Gluza, M. Kordiaczynska, and T. Srivastava, Chin. Phys. C 45 , 073113 (2021), arXiv:2006.04610 [hep-ph].
- [84] R. Zhou, L. Bian, and Y. Du, JHEP 08 (205), arXiv:2203.01561 [hep-ph].
- [85] P. Ghosh, T. Ghosh, and S. Roy, JHEP 10 (057), arXiv:2211.15640 [hep-ph].
- [86] T. Hambye and G. Senjanovi´ c, Phys. Lett. B 582 , 73 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0307237.
- [87] N. D. Barrie, C. Han, and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 , 141801 (2022), arXiv:2106.03381 [hep-ph].
- [88] N. D. Barrie, C. Han, and H. Murayama, JHEP 05 (160), arXiv:2204.08202 [hep-ph].

[89] S. Blanchet, Z. Chacko, and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 80 , 085002 (2009), arXiv:0812.3837 [hep-ph].
Patrick D. Bolton Jonathan Kriewald Miha Nemevšek Fabrizio Nesti Juan Carlos Vasquez
Hadron Collider Signatures of Lepton Number Violation in the Type II Seesaw Model
We examine the prospect of observing genuine lepton number violating (LNV)
signals at hadron colliders in the context of the Type II seesaw mechanism. The
model features smoking gun signals involving same-sign di-leptons and jets that
may be the primary observable channel in certain regions of the parameter
space. The flavour composition of final-state charged leptons in the minimal
model is related to the origin of neutrino masses and is correlated with other
rare processes, such as neutrinoless double beta decay. We review existing
collider limits and provide sensitivity estimates from LNV signals at upcoming
runs of the LHC, for zero and non-zero mass splittings between the scalar
triplet components.