Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Title: Micro- and Nano-scale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces

Authors: Jacopo Buongiorno, David G. Cahill, Carlos H. Hidrovo, Saeed Moghaddam, Aaron J. Schmidt, Li Shi

## Abstract

In  this  opinion  piece,  we  discuss  recent  advances  in  experimental  methods  for  characterizing phase  change  heat  transfer.  We  begin  with  a  survey  of  techniques  for  high  resolution measurements of temperature and heat flux at the solid surface and in the working fluid. Next, we focus on diagnostic tools for boiling heat transfer and describe techniques for visualizing the temperature and velocity fields as well as measurements at the single bubble level. Finally, we discuss techniques to probe the kinetics of vapor formation within a few molecular layers of the interface. We conclude with our outlook for future progress in experimental methods for phase change heat transfer.

## 1. Introduction

There has been increasing interest in the potential for nanostructured surfaces to enhance phase change heat transfer, as discussed in several other papers in this issue. Heat transfer between a solid  and  a  working  fluid  is  fundamentally  an  interface  phenomenon,  and  advancing  both scientific understanding and engineering practice in this field requires experimental capabilities for  high  resolution  characterization  of  the  thermodynamics  and  kinetics  of  the  underlying interfacial processes.  The science and engineering discipline of phase-change heat transfer is not alone in facing this daunting challenge.  Tribology, corrosion, water purification, electrochemical energy conversion, catalysis, photocatalysis, crystal growth, and adhesion of contacting surfaces are just some of the current problems in science and engineering that share these challenges. The traditional  science  of  solid  surfaces  focuses  on  clean  crystals  in  ultra-high  vacuum,  where powerful tools based on electron scattering  and  photoemission can be used  to precisely  probe structure and composition of a surface with high spatial and temporal resolutions.  In the topical and more practical  problems  listed  above,  co-existence  of  multiple  phases  makes  the  ambient highly complex, the surfaces of interest are often inhomogeneous on multiple length scales, and elevated  pressures  and  temperatures  of  the  vapors  and  liquids  involved  greatly  restrict  the applicability of most experimental tools for the measurement of phase, composition, temperature, and heat flux.

Despite these challenges, there has been substantial work  on experimental techniques to study different  aspects  of  phase  change  heat  transfer  across  many  length  and  time  scales,  and  the resulting data has shed light on many of the complex physical processes involved. In this opinion

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

piece, we discuss recent advances in experimental methods for characterizing several aspects of phase change heat transfer from the nanoscale to the macroscale. We begin with a discussion on measurement challenges in phase change heat transfer in the context of the problem of nucleate boiling,  and survey some techniques for high resolution measurements of temperature and heat flux  at  the  solid  surface  and  in  the  working  fluid.  We  consider  recent  experiments  based  on microfabricated heater and sensor arrays, as well as a variety of optical techniques for visualizing the solid surface and the temperature and velocity fields in the adjacent fluid. Next we discuss recent  microscale  measurements  at  the  single  bubble  level  during  boiling,  and  then  go  on  to describe  the  use  of  photothermal  and  photoacoustic  techniques  to  probe  the  kinetics  of  vapor formation  within  a  few  molecular  layers  of  the  interface.  We  conclude  with  our  outlook  for future progress and directions.

## 2. Measurement needs and existing approaches

The  phenomenon  of  nucleate  boiling  highlights  the  experimental  challenges  associated  with measuring phase change processes over multiple time and length scales.  As a critical mechanism of  heat  transfer  in  numerous  practical  applications  ranging  from  large-scale  power  plants  to small-scale  heat  sinks,  nucleate  boiling  has  been  studied  for  several  decades.  However,  its physical nature is still plagued with large uncertainties, due in large part to the complex coupling of  mass,  momentum,  and  energy  transport  that  occurs  between  the  solid  surface,  the  wetting liquid, and the vapor produced to generate the bubble. The complexity of the problem and the lack of physical understanding of the process have resulted in diverse hypotheses concerning the physics  of  the  involved  heat  transfer  processes  [73-76].  For  example,  the  microlayer  [73,74] presence and its level of contribution to the bubble growth and the overall surface heat transfer is still a subject of debate and some studies (e.g. [75]) suggest that most heat transfer to the liquid takes place via a transient conduction process triggered by the bubble growth and departure.

Evaluation  of  analytical  models  requires  new,  highly-resolved  data  for  the  many  individual (sub)phenomena that constitute what we call 'boiling'.  In particular, a complete characterization of nucleate boiling would require knowledge of bubble size and shape throughout the ebullition cycle,  bubble  departure  frequency  (including  growth  and  wait  times),  nucleation  site  density, wetted area fraction (i.e. fraction of the boiling surface that is in contact with the liquid phase), temperature field (2D on the boiling surface, and D within the fluid), velocity field, local heat flux, and evolution of the microlayer at the base of the bubble.  To aid in the development and validation of models and simulations, the above quantities should be measured over a meaningful range of conditions; in dimensionless terms: P/Pcr (pressure), Bo (heat flux), Ja (subcooling) and Re (flow rate in flow boiling).

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Traditionally, boiling heat transfer has been studied with fairly simple apparatuses, consisting of a  heater  (typically  a  metallic  plate  or  rod)  instrumented  with  thermocouples,  and  high-speed cameras  for  visualization  of  the  interactions  among  the  fluid  phases  and  the  boiling  surface. Thermocouples can only measure temperature at discrete locations on the boiling surface, thus little information on the temperature distribution can be obtained, while the usefulness of highspeed  video  is  typically  limited  by  poor  optical  access  to  the  nucleation  site  and  interference from adjacent bubbles, although the total reflection approach [35-38] allows for visualization of the boiling process from below the boiling surface through a transparent heater at any conditions.

Because no one diagnostic can generate all the desired data, a requirement key to the success of any  modern  study  of  boiling  is  combination/synchronization  of  multiple  diagnostics.  Secondgeneration  two-phase  flow  diagnostics,  such  as  multi-sensor  conductivity  and  optical  probes [39,40] and wire-mesh probes [41], can measure bubble diameter and velocity near the boiling surface.    However,  these  approaches  are  intrusive,  and  also  produce  data  only  at  discrete locations  within  the  boiling  fluid.    On  the  other  hand,  X-ray  and  -ray  tomography  is  nonintrusive, but rather costly/cumbersome as the radiation source has to be rotated at high speed around the test section, which also may limit the time and/or space resolution of the technique; ultra-fast  approaches  have  been  developed  to  increase  the  time  and  space  resolution  in  recent years,  including  2D  non-tomographic  approaches  that  can  reach  extraordinarily  high  spatial resolution  (&lt;1  m),  but  require  massive  X-rays  sources  [42].  Several  modern  and  powerful experimental approaches are coming to full maturity for use in two-phase systems, and can be used  to  satisfy  the  data  needs  discussed  above.  For  example,  infrared-based  visualization  of thermal  patterns  on  the  boiling  surface  was  pioneered  by  Theofanous  et  al.  [43]  in  the  early 2000s, and then adopted by many others [38, 44-48], while arrays of micro-heaters, individually controlled to achieve a constant temperature boundary condition, can be used to resolve the local instantaneous surface heat flux, as shown by Demiray and Kim [49].  In the remainder of this section  we  survey  some  of  the  approaches  which  could  be  combined  in  complementary experiments  to  study  nucleate  boiling  as  well  as  other  phase  change  processes  such  as condensation and evaporation.

## 2.1 Contact techniques

The surface superheat temperature at the onset of nucleation on a superhydrophobic surface can be  well  within  the  measurement  uncertainty  of  a  thermocouple  [1],  and  boiling  sub-processes with drastically different physical nature could be only several micrometers apart [Moghaddam and Kiger, 2009]. Thus, techniques with high temperature measurement accuracy as well as high spatial  and  temporal  resolutions  are  needed  to  quantify  phase  change  processes  on  a  boiling surface. Spatially resolved characterization of the temperature field at the solid surface can be accomplished with a number of techniques. Arrays of microfabricated electro-thermal

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

transducers have been employed for surface temperature measurements in  many phase change heat  transfer  experiments.  For  example,  an  array  of  ~100  m wide parallel long thin film Au lines  were  employed  to  measure  the  evolution  of  the  surface  temperature  distribution  when  a water  drop  slowly  evaporated  from  the  surface  kept  at  60  K  before  the  drop  impinged  [1]. Because  each  line  only  measured  the  average  temperature  along  the  line,  the  results  were analyzed with a numerical simulation to obtain the radial distribution of the surface temperature under the drop. In addition, microcantilevers with an integrated resistive heater and thermometer have  been  employed  for  measuring  the  boiling  curve  of  microjets  [2].  However,  there  is  still ample room to push to the limits in terms of both the spatial and temperature resolutions of these microfabricated temperature sensors.

Highly  sensitive  measurements  of  heat  conduction  in  individual  nanostructures  have  been achieved using a number of techniques [4]. With the use of microfabricated suspended thin film Pt serpentine line resistance thermometers and sophisticated differential measurement schemes, temperature  and  heat  flow  resolutions  better  than  1 x 10 -3 K  and  10 -10 W/K  have  been demonstrated  [5,6].  In  addition,  nanoscale  thermocouple  junctions  have  been  fabricated  for scanning thermal microscopy measurements of surface temperature distribution [7]. Continuous efforts  along  this  direction  during  the  past  decade  have  allowed  for  quantitative  surface temperature measurements with sub-100 nm spatial resolution and temperature resolution on the order of 1 K [8,9].  In  a  recent  work  that  has  pushed  the  limit  of  this  nanoscale  thermocouple based  measurement  technique,  a  temperature  resolution  approaching  1 x 10 -3 K  was  achieved with  a  unique  modulation  and  averaging  approach  [10].  Nevertheless,  these  microfabricated electro-thermal  transducers  are  contact  sensors  and  often  suffer  from  a  long  thermal  time constant that is insufficient for observing the 10 -3 s  scale dynamics of phase change processes. Furthermore,  these  are  intrusive  measurements  that  can  greatly  affect  the  dynamics  of  these processes.  This  has  motivated  the  development  non-contact  techniques,  some  of  which  are described below.

## 2.2 Non-contact techniques for surface temperature measurements

A variety of optical techniques have been employed for thermal measurements of phase change heat transfer. For example, infrared thermometry techniques are commonly used for measuring the  solid  surface  temperature  during  phase  change  [11].  Silicon  is  transparent  in  the  infrared spectrum,  making  it  convenient  for  infrared  thermal  imaging  of  phase  change  heat  transfer processes  on  surfaces  fabricated  on  a  silicon  wafer.  Under  proper  calibration  procedures,  this technique can be used to clearly detect the liquid-vapor-solid triple contact line under even small temperature  differences  (~1°C)  [12].  However,  the  spatial  resolution  of  such  measurements  is typically limited by far field diffraction to be on the order of the infrared wavelength, about 10 microns,  which  is  often  insufficient  for  resolving  the  detailed  temperature  distribution  on

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

nanostructured  surfaces  being  explored  to  enhance  boiling  or  condensation.  In  addition,  the relatively low temporal resolution of this measurement approach limits it ability to capture fast transient  events  that  require  several  kHz  temperature  sampling  rate,  as  described  later  in  this study.

Spatial  resolution  can  be  improved  with  optical  techniques  in  the  visible  spectrum,  such  as micro-Raman spectroscopy based thermometry techniques that have been increasingly used to study heat conduction in nanostructured materials and devices [13]. Silicon, III-V compounds, graphite and other solids possess strong and distinct Raman peaks, with the line width broadened and  peak  position  shifted  with  the  temperature  because  of  scattering  of  Raman  active  optical phonons  with  intermediate  and  low  frequency  phonons.  However,  the  peak  shift  can  also  be caused by strain, which can result in uncertainty in the temperature determined from the peak shift. In comparison, the optical phonon temperature can be measured unambiguously from the intensity  ratio  of  the  Stokes  to  anti  Stokes  peaks.  Nevertheless,  accurate  measurements  of  the anti-Stokes peak intensity may require high sample temperature. These factors have often limited the temperature resolution of micro-Raman thermometry technique to be several Kelvins or even tens of Kelvins, whereas a spatial resolution of 0.5 micron is achievable. An advantage of the micro-Raman thermometry technique is that different materials yield distinctly different Raman peak frequencies, so that the temperature difference between two ultrathin layers in contact can be  measured  from  the  respective  Raman  peaks  [14].  This  capability  may  allow  for  highly localized measurement of surface heat flux during phase change heat transfer.

Similar to Raman spectroscopy, Brillouin light scattering  (BLS) is an inelastic light scattering technique.  While  Raman  peaks  arise  from  inelastic  scattering  of  photons  and  high-frequency optical  phonons,  BLS  peaks  origin  from  that  between  photons  and  low-frequency  acoustic phonons  or  magnons  that  are  energy  quanta  of  spin  waves  in  ferromagnetic  materials  [15]. Although BLS phonon signal is usually weak, it has been recently shown that the BLS phonon peak intensity of glass depends nearly linearly with temperature [16], because the Bose-Einstein distribution of the low-frequency acoustic phonon population is reduced to the classical limit at room temperature. A temperature resolution of a few Kelvins has been demonstrated based on the BLS phonon peak intensity of glass. Moreover, the BLS magnon peak intensity can be very strong  on  ferromagnetic  materials,  with  its  position  shifted  with  temperature  because  of temperature dependence of the exchange constant and saturation magnetization. A temperature resolution  on  the  order  of  1K  has  been  achieved  based  on  the  BLS  magnon  peak  position measured on a sub-100 nm thick permalloy film, whereas the spatial resolution is 0.5 micrometer [16]. Hence, BLS combined with one or two thin ferromagnetic coatings near the surface can potentially allow for sensitive non-contact measurement of the surface temperature or heat flux distribution with high spatial resolution. Similarly, time-resolved ellipsometry has been used to assess the thermal accommodation coefficient between a solid-gas interface by measurement of the photoacoustics at the Brillouin frequencies [17]. Systems consisting of inert gases (Xe, Kr,

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Ar  and  Ne),  tetrafluoroethane  (R-134a),  methanol  and  water  vapor  interacting  with  both  a hydrophilic and hydrophobic Au substrate were characterized.

Sub-10 nm spatial resolution has  been  achieved  with  a  thermal  scanning  electron  microscopy (ThSEM) technique [18], where the electron diffraction pattern of Si and other crystals is used to obtain the surface temperature. Meanwhile,  environmental  scanning  electron microscopy (ESEM)  technique  has  been  increasingly  used  for  studying  dropwise  condensation  [19,20]. Further development of multifunctional electron microscopy instruments may potentially allow high spatial resolution surface temperature mapping during phase change heat transfer process. Nevertheless,  the  temporal  resolution  of  the  ThSEM  and  the  aforementioned  inelastic  light scattering techniques need to be improved by orders of magnitude in order for them to capture the fast dynamics of phase change processes.

## 2.3 Measurements of the liquid and vapor phases

The  temperature  distribution  in  the  liquid  and  vapor  phase  are  critical  for  understanding  the phase change heat transfer process, yet options for temperature measurement in the liquid and vapor  phase  are  rather  limited.  There  have  been  a  number  of  reports  of  using  laser-induced fluorescence  to  measure  the  temperature  of  droplets.  For  example,  laser  induced  fluorescence was used to measure the temperature of impinging droplets mixed with fluorescence dye [22]. Emission spectrum from Pyrene dye stabilized with a cationic surfactant, cetyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride (CDBAC), is used as the thermometer. The surfactant is used to prevent pyrene from grouping into micelles. Given the controversy on thermal properties of  nanofluids  that  are  liquid  suspension  of  solid  nanoparticles  [23],  it  remains  to  be  better understood whether the fluorescence dye can affect the phase change processes of the liquid and vapor  phases.  Similarly,  thermochromic  liquid  crystal  (TLC)  thermography  has  been  used  to measure  the  temperature  near  the  triple  line  in  the  evaporation  front  of  a  water filled microcapillary [24]. However, this technique has a very limited temperature range (~4°C) and the same  concerns  raised  by  the  presence  of  long  polymeric  molecules  in  fluorescence techniques apply here with the introduction of the liquid crystals.

At MIT, researchers have expanded the infrared (IR) thermography approach by synchronizing it with  high-speed  video  (HSV)  from  below  and  beside  the  boiling  surface,  and  Particle  Image Velocimetry (PIV) [50,51].  Also, the DEtection of Phase by Infrared Thermometry (DEPIcT) technique was developed, which uses the differences in emissivity of the liquid and vapor phases to measure the phase distribution (including the shape of the microlayer) on the boiling surface of  IR-transparent  heaters  [52,53].    Examples  of  the  data  obtained  at  MIT  from  these  two approaches are shown in Figures 1-4, and details are given in the figure captions.

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

It  is  also  desirable  to  develop  other  non-contact  optical  temperature  measurement  techniques without  the  need  of  seeding  temperature  sensitive  materials  in  the  heat  transfer  fluids.  For example,  a  Global  Rainbow  Thermometry  has  been  developed  to  measure  the  temperature  of water droplets based on the temperature dependence of the refractive index and light scattering pattern of the water droplet [25]. Another possibility is the use of near infrared (NIR) absorption thermometry which has been used to measure water temperature in PDMS microchannels with a resolution of 0.2K [26]. These and other non-invasive techniques represent a research direction worth further investigations.

## 3 Measurement at the single bubble level.

Having discussed a variety of techniques for measuring the solid, fluid, and vapor phases, we now turn  to  an  experiment  designed  to  study  the  nucleation  and  departure  of  single  bubbles. Measurement at the single bubble level is a key to deciphering the physics of the complex heat and mass transfer processes involved in boiling, and could pave the way for better understanding of  the  higher  order  effects  resulting  from  multiple  bubbles  interactions.  While  it  is  common knowledge that bubble generation at the surface is responsible for the observed enhanced heat transfer  in  boiling,  details  of  the  heat  transfer  processes  triggered  by  bubble  formation  and departure  are  not  clearly  understood.  Different  and  often  contradictory  hypotheses  have  been proposed to describe the nature of the heat transfer processes [54-65], and although great efforts have been devoted to development and testing of these models, the necessary measurement tools have not been generally available to test the basic assumptions of the models at the single bubble level. This is because performance of the models has often been evaluated based on their ability to  predict  the  overall  surface  heat  transfer  coefficient,  which  is  the  cumulative  effect  of  all microscale boiling subprocesses. While this bulk measure is often the quantity of engineering interest, such a simple validation metric is insufficient to answer why a particular model fails.

Figure 5 shows the top view of a device that generates single bubbles and determines the surface temperature  and  heat  flux  at  the  surface-bubble  interface  using  three  layers  of  temperature sensors imbedded within a composite wall. The details of the device are discussed in Refs. [6669]. The device die is attached to a Pin Grid Array (PGA) that is installed on the bottom of a test liquid  chamber  and  is  connected  from  below  to  a  custom-made  Signal  Conditioning  Board (SCB) through a stack of sockets. The output of the SCB is directly connected to an A/D board installed in a PC. The temperature sensors are calibrated with an accuracy of ±0.1 °C. Data are collected  during  boiling  of  FC-72  liquid  at  saturation  conditions  under  atmospheric  pressure. Figure 6 shows images of a bubble at a surface temperature of 80.2 ºC, and Fig. 7 shows the surface temperature and heat flux results corresponding to the bubbling event.

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Comparison of the bubble images and the temperature data show that the initial formation of the bubble at t = 3.8 ms was associated with a sudden drop in surface temperature. The temperature drop  started  at  the  center  of  the  array  and  progressed  over  the  subsequent  sensors.  A  second phase  of  surface  temperature  decline  started  after  the  bubble/surface  contact  area  reached  its maximum diameter and the apparent contact line started to advance over the contact area. The advancing liquid rewetted the dried out area contact area. This rewetting process began at about t =  5.8  ms.  The  process  resulted  in  a  continued  decrease  in  temperature  of  sensor  S-5  that  had already significantly decreased due to the prior cooling event. The temperature decrease trend passed as a radially inward moving wave, corresponding to when the contact line successively passed  over  sensors  S-4  to  S-1.  As  can  be  seen  in  the  lower  panel  of  Fig.  9,  the  surface temperature outside the contact area remained unchanged during the entire bubble growth and departure process. Comparison of the bubble contact radius with the surface temperature history showed that the temperature drop at each sensor started after the  apparent contact line passed over the sensor. This suggested that the observed temperature drop was due to surface cooling resulted from evaporation of a thin liquid layer (i.e., a 'microlayer') left over the surface, after the  contact  line  rapidly  receded.  The  surface  temperature  started  to  increase  shortly  after  the microlayer was mostly evaporated. These data clearly reinforce the results of prior studies [7074] regarding the microlayer presence underneath a bubble, and suggest that the process is active primarily  at  the  bubble/surface  contact  area,  in  contrast  with  the  Mikic  and  Rohsenow  [58] model that suggested an active area of twice the bubble diameter, and much closer to the more recent  observations  of  Yaddanapudi  and  Kim  [75].  Mikic  and  Rohsenow  [58]  cited  Han  and Griffith [34] as a basis for their assumption. However, Han and Griffith [76] did not provide a solid reason or any particular experimental evidence for their assumption. They simply assumed that  following  the  departure  of  a  bubble  from  the  heating  surface,  a  volume  element  of superheated liquid from an area twice the bubble diameter is brought into the bulk fluid.

The example results presented here suggest that in order to fully capture the heat transfer events at the bubble-surface interface, a temperature sampling rate on the order of 10 kHz is required. So, thermal imaging with 1-2 orders of magnitude lower sampling rate does not seem to be a suitable  tool  for  capturing  the  details  of  the  boiling  sub-processes,  although  such  tools  can  be used  to  capture  the  integral  effect  of  the  cooling  events  over  a  period  of  time.  In  addition, temperature  sensors  and  the  heated  wall  structure/properties  should  be  carefully  designed  to isolate  and  study  fast  events  (such  as  the  microlayer  evaporation  process).  For  example, thermally thick walls (this is relative to the boiling characteristics of a particular fluid) do not allow proper isolation of different heat transfer events.

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

## 4. Molecular- and nanoscale resolution of interfacial phenomena

There  are  few  experimental  methods  that  are  capable  of  resolving  the  presence  of  a  few molecular layers of liquid condensed on a surface. These adsorbed layers are critical, however, for  determining  the  surface  energies  and  the  kinetics  of  evaporation  and  condensation.  Sumfrequency vibrational spectroscopy can be used to probe the vibrational states at the interfaces but requires complex and expensive equipment and nearly perfect surfaces to suppress diffuse light scattering.  X-ray or neutron reflectivity are also capable of directly resolving thin adsorbed layers but require large facilities to carry out the work and the sample requirements are highly restrictive. Photothermal  and  photoacoustic  phenomena  provide  more  generally  applicable methods  for  probing  the  thermodynamics  and  kinetics  of  surfaces  under  conditions  that  are relevant for heat transfer applications. In the pump-probe ellipsometry approach, a short pump laser  pulse  creates  a  rapid  temperature  excursion  of  a  surface  and  a  time-delayed  probe  laser pulses  measures  the  propagation  of  an  acoustic  wave  in  the  vapor  that  is  generated  by  heat transfer from the surface to the vapor [27] as well as the exchange of mass between the surface and vapor [17]. The time-resolved ellipsometry experiments revealed more extensive adsorption of  R134a  refrigerant  on  Au  surfaces  that  were  coated  with  OH-terminated  self-assembled monolayers  than  on  Au  surfaces  with  CH4  termination  [17].    The  data  show  that  while  the macroscopic  contact  angle  of  refrigerants  is  nearly  constant  at  very  small  values,  the  free energies  of  nanoscale  adsorbed  layers  can  nevertheless  be  affected  by  modifying  surface chemistry.

The free energy of liquid-vapor interfaces creates a large nucleation barrier for the formation of a vapor bubble within a homogeneous liquid.  At  a solid surface,  the  nucleation  barrier  for  the formation of vapor is reduced but homogeneous nucleation rates remain low.  Therefore, rapid phase change of liquid-to-vapor in a heat-transfer application is usually thought to require preexisting  vapor-liquid  interfaces  that  circumvent  the  slow  nucleation  kinetics.  At  Illinois, researchers have investigated the evaporation rate of water droplets that adhere to hydrophilic surfaces [28] and the time-scale for the formation of a vapor layer during the droplet rebound from a hydrophobic surface [29]. In both cases, a small drop of liquid was brought rapidly into contact  with  a  hot  surface,  and  high  frequency  thermoreflectance  measurements  were  used  to determine when vapor forms at the solid-liquid interface with an ultimate time resolution on the order of 10 microseconds.  A novel optical thermometry-based on the temperature dependence of two-photon absorption in an indirect gap semiconductor-enabled temperature measurements with similarly high time resolution.  Measurements of temperature of Si using this approach have a spatial resolution on the order of 10 microns and a noise floor on the order of 1 K in a 1 kHz bandwidth [30].

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

The apparatus used for the thermoreflectance measurements is shown in Figure 8, while Figure 9 shows  illustrative transient temperature  and  effective  thermal  interface conductance  data obtained during the impingement of dispensed water droplets at different surface temperatures. Because  of  the  transient  process  of  the  impinging  drops,  the  measurements  of  the  transient absorption signal were synchronized to the trigger of drop dispenser. The time offset between the measurement and trigger of the dispenser was varied between 0 and 1500 ms. Results from a number of measurements made at the same time offset were averaged to obtain the evolution of the surface temperature and thermal conductance as a function of time after drop impingement on the substrate. The time evolution data were analyzed to obtain the heat transfer and residence time  of  the  drop  evaporation  process,  and  it  was  found  that  the  heat  flux  could  exceed  500 W/cm 2 for  a  short duration on the order of 10 ms when the surface temperature was increased near 200  C. o

## 5. Conclusions

We have seen that there are many specialized measurement methods for studying phase change heat transfer, and that there is still much that can be learned from data generated today with stateof-the-art diagnostics. Indeed, transformative improvements in the understanding, prediction and control  of  phase  change  heat  transfer  may  come  from  the  development  of  new  mechanistic models  and  direct  numerical  simulations,  with  inspiration  and  validation  coming  from  a combination of existing experimental techniques that can probe temperature and heat flux with sufficient  sensitivity  over  multiple  length  and  time  scales.  However,  there  is  great  room  for progress in experimental methods, and continuation of the following trends is advocated: i) more systematic use of combined (synchronized) diagnostics, to develop a complete physical picture of  phase  change  phenomena;  ii)  development  of  temperature  and  velocity  sensors  with  ever higher  temporal  resolution  (&gt;5  kHz)  and  spatial  resolution  (&lt;5  m),  particularly  useful  as  we start  to  understand  how  phenomena at the microscale (e.g., microlayer evaporation) can affect macroscopic  figures  of  merit  such  as  the  heat  transfer  coefficient  and  the  Critical  Heat  Flux (CHF); and iii) more systematic use of engineered surfaces (engineered at the micro- and nanoscale), to control the composition and texture of the boiling surface, thus enabling investigation of the effects of roughness, wettability, porosity, presence of cavities, size and shape of cavities, and surface thermo-physical properties on boiling heat transfer.

We are confident that advances in experimental methods will significantly impact the discipline of  phase  change  heat  transfer,  including  the  rapidly  expanding  research  in  phase  change  heat transfer on nanostructured surfaces.  We emphasize, however, that further development of the field also requires clear accounting of what is known and what is unknown, i.e., that scientific progress  requires  the  formulation  of  thoughtful  questions  that  the  field  will  ask  and  then subsequently answer as new capabilities for experiment come on-line. Theory and computational

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

models typically require input parameters that are determined from experiment, and theory often includes simplifying assumptions that must be validated by experiment. This interplay between theory, modeling, and experiment will be critical for a better fundamental understanding of the key physical processes in phase change heat transfer, and for the translation of this understanding into improved performance in engineering applications.

## References

- 1. R. Betz, J. Jenkins, C.-J. C. Kim, and D. Attinger, "Boiling heat transfer on superhydrophilic, superhydrophobic, and superbiphilic surfaces," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 57, pp. 733-741, 2013.
- 2. S. W. Paik, K. D. Kihm, S. P. Lee, and D. M. Pratt, "Spatially and Temporally Resolved Temperature Measurements for Slow Evaporating Sessile Drops Heated by a Microfabricated Heater Array," Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 129, pp. 966-976, 2006.
- 3. J. Lee, H. Hunter, A. Glezer, and W. P. King, "Phase change and cooling characteristics of microjets measured using microcantilever heaters," Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 147, pp. 64-69, 2008.
- 4. Weathers and L. Shi, " Thermal Transport Measurement Techniques For Nanowires And Nanotubes," in Annual Review of Heat Transfer. vol. 16, G. Chen, Ed., ed, 2013, pp. 101-134.
- 5. M. C. Wingert, Z. C. Y. Chen, S. Kwon, J. Xiang, and R. Chen, "Ultra-sensitive thermal conductance measurement of one-dimensional nanostructures enhanced by differential bridge," Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 83, p. 024901, 2012.
- 6. Weathers, K. Bi, M. T. Pettes, and L. Shi, "Reexamination of Thermal Transport Measurements of a Low-Thermal Conductance Nanowire with a Suspended MicroDevice," Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. In print, 2013.
- 7. L. Shi, O. Kwon, A. C. Miner, and A. Majumdar, "Design and batch fabrication of probes for sub-100 nm scanning thermal microscopy," Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 10, pp. 370-378, Sep 2001.
- 8. K. Kim, J. Chung, J. Won, O. Kwon, J. S. Lee, S. H. Park, and Y. K. Choi, "Quantitative scanning thermal microscopy using double scan technique," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, p. 3, Nov 2008.
- 9. Jo, I. K. Hsu, Y. J. Lee, M. M. Sadeghi, S. Kim, S. Cronin, E. Tutuc, S. K. Banerjee, Z. Yao, and L. Shi, "Low-Frequency Acoustic Phonon Temperature Distribution in Electrically Biased Graphene," Nano Letters, vol. 11, pp. 85-90, Jan 2011.
- 10. W. Lee, K. Kim, W. Jeong, L. A. Zotti, F. Pauly, J. C. Cuevas, and P. Reddy, "Heat dissipation in atomic-scale junctions," Nature, vol. 498, pp. 209-212, 2013.
- 11. Gerardi, J. Buongiorno, L. W. Hu, and T. McKrell, "Study of bubble growth in water pool boiling through synchronized, infrared thermometry and high-speed video," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 53, pp. 4185-4192, Sep 2010.

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

- 12. H. Kim and J. Buongiorno, "Detection of liquid-vapor-solid triple contact line in twophase heat transfer phenomena using high-speed infrared thermometry," International Journal of Multiphase Flow, vol. 37, pp. 166-172, Mar 2011.
- 13. T. E. Beechem and J. R. Serrano, "Raman Thermometry of Microdevices: Choosing a
- Method to Minimize Error," Spectroscopy, vol. 26, pp. 36-44, Nov 2011.
- 14. Y. N. Yue, J. C. Zhang, and X. W. Wang, "Micro/Nanoscale Spatial Resolution Temperature Probing for the Interfacial Thermal Characterization of Epitaxial Graphene on 4H-SiC," Small, vol. 7, pp. 3324-3333, Dec 2011.
- 15. Berne and R. Pecora, Dynamics Light Scattering. New York: Dover, 2000.
- 16. R. Birt, K. An, A. Weathers, L. Shi, M. Tsoi, and X. Li, "Brillouin light scattering spectra as local temperature sensors for thermal magnons and acoustic phonons," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 102, pp. 082401-5, 2013.
- 17. C. K. Min, K. J. Chen, S. C. Bae, D. G. Cahill, and S. Granick, "Heat Transfer at SolidGas Interfaces by Photoacoustics at Brillouin Frequencies," Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, pp. 10896-10903, May 2012.
- 18. X. Wu and R. Hull, "The material dependence of temperature measurement resolution in thermal scanning electron microscopy," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 102, p. 113107, 2013.
- 19. Y. C. Jung and B. Bhushan, "Wetting behaviour during evaporation and condensation of water microdroplets on superhydrophobic patterned surfaces," Journal of MicroscopyOxford, vol. 229, pp. 127-140, Jan 2008.
- 20. K. Rykaczewski, "Microdroplet Growth Mechanism during Water Condensation on Superhydrophobic Surfaces," Langmuir, vol. 28, pp. 7720-7729, May 2012.
- 21. P. Kukura, D. W. McCamant, and R. A. Mathies, "Femtosecond Stimulated Raman Spectroscopy," Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, vol. 58, pp. 461-488, 2007.
- 22.        ala ar,        o   le , a          ivera,   easureme t of  em eratures o    Flight Water Droplets by Laser Induced Fluorescence Thermometry," Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 126, pp. 279-285, 2004.
- 23. J. Buongiorno, D. C. Venerus, N. Prabhat, T. McKrell, J. Townsend, R. Christianson, Y. V. Tolmachev, P. Keblinski, L.-w. Hu, J. L. Alvarado, I. C. Bang, S. W. Bishnoi, M. Bonetti, F. Botz, A. Cecere, Y. Chang, G. Chen, H. Chen, S. J. Chung, M. K. Chyu, S. K. Das, R. D. Paola, Y. Ding, F. Dubois, G. Dzido, J. Eapen, W. Escher, D. Funfschilling, Q. Galand, J. Gao, P. E. Gharagozloo, K. E. Goodson, J. G. Gutierrez, H. Hong, M. Horton, K. S. Hwang, C. S. Iorio, S. P. Jang, A. B. Jarzebski, Y. Jiang, L. Jin, S. Kabelac, A. Kamath, M. A. Kedzierski, L. G. Kieng, C. Kim, J.-H. Kim, S. Kim, S. H. Lee, K. C. Leong, I. Manna, B. Michel, R. Ni, H. E. Patel, J. Philip, D. Poulikakos, C. Reynaud, R. Savino, P. K. Singh, P. Song, T. Sundararajan, E. Timofeeva, T. Tritcak, A. N. Turanov, S. V. Vaerenbergh, D. Wen, S. Witharana, C. Yang, W.-H. Yeh, X.-Z. Zhao, and S.-Q. Zhou, "A benchmark study on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 106, p. 094312, 2009.
- 24. C. Buffone and K. Sefiane, "Temperature measurement near the triple line during phase change using thermochromic liquid crystal thermography," Experiments in Fluids, vol. 39, pp. 99-110, Jul 2005.
- 25. J. P. A. J. van Beeck, D. Giannoulis, L. Zimmer, and M. L. Riethmuller, "Global Rainbow Thermometry For Average Temperature Measurement of Spray Droplets," in

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Proc. 10th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, 2001.

- 26. N. Kakuta, Y. Fukuhara, K. Kondo, H. Arimoto, and Y. Yamada, "Temperature imaging of water in a microchannel using thermal sensitivity of near-infrared absorption," Lab on a Chip, vol. 11, pp. 3479-3486, 2011.
- 27. C.K. Min, D. G. Cahill, and S. Granick, "Time-resolved ellipsometry for heat transfer studies at liquid/solid and gas/solid interfaces," Rev. Sci. Instrum.  81, 074902 (2010).
- 28. J.Y. Park, C.K. Min, S. Granick, and D.G. Cahill, "Heat transfer and residence time when water droplets hit a scalding surface," J. Heat Transfer 134, 101503 (2012).
- 29. J.Y. Park, A. Gardner, A. Ramesh, W.P. King, S. Granick, D.G. Cahill, "Droplet impingement and vapor layer formation on hot hydrophobic surfaces," submitted for publication.
- 30. C.K Min, J.Y. Park, D.G. Cahill, and S. Granick, "Fast, spatially-resolved thermometry of Si crystals by pump-probe two-photon absorption," J. Appl. Phys.  106, 013102 (2009).
- 31. N. Kurul, M.Z. Podowski, Multidimensional effects in forced convection subcooled boiling, Proc. 9th International Heat Transfer Conference, Jerusalem, Israel. pp. 21-25, 1990.
- 32. N. Kolev, How accurately can we predict nucleate boiling?, in Multiphase Flow Dynamics 2, Springer, 2002.
- 33. Sanna, C. Hutter, D.B.R. Kenning, T.G. Karayiannis, K. Sefiane, R.A. Nelson, Nucleate Pool Boiling Investigation on a Silicon Test Section with Micro-Fabricated Cavities, ECI International Conference on Boiling Heat Transfer, Florianópolis, Brazil, 3-7 May, 2009.
- 34. L. Gilman, E. Baglietto, Advancements on Wall Boiling Modeling in CFD: Leveraging New Understanding from MIT Flow Boiling Facility, Paper 633, The 15th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermalhydraulics, NURETH-15, Pisa, Italy, May 12-15, 2013.
- 35. S. Nishio and H. Tanaka, Visualization of Boiling Structures in High Heat-Flux PoolBoiling, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 47, pp. 4559-4568, 2004.
- 36. H. J. Chung, H. C. No, Simultaneous visualization of dry spots and bubbles for pool boiling of R-113 on a horizontal heater, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 46 2239-2251, 2003.
- 37. I.-C. Chu, H. C. NO, C.-H. Song, Observation of High Heat Flux Boiling Structures in a Horizontal Pool by a Total Refection Technique, Paper 401, 14th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-14), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, September 25-29, 2011.
- 38. S. Jung, H. Kim, Simultaneous Measurements of Liquid-Vapor Phase and Temperature Distributions on Boiling Surface with Synchronized Infrared Thermometry and Total Internal Reflection Techniques, Paper 387, The 15th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermalhydraulics, NURETH-15, Pisa, Italy, May 12-15, 2013.
- 39. Barrau, N. Rivière, Ch. Poupot and A. Cartellier, Single and double optical probes in airwater two-phase flows: real time signal processing and sensor performance, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 25, no.2, pp. 229-256, 1999.
- 40. S. Kim, X. Y. Fu, X. Wang and M. Ishii, Development of the miniaturized four-sensor conductivity probe and the signal processing scheme, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 43, no. 22, 4101-4118, 2000.

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

- 41. H. M. Prasser, A. Bottger, J. Zschau, A new electrode-mesh tomography for gas-liquid flows, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 9, pp. 111-119, 1998.
- 42. C. Gerardi, K. Fezzaa, High-Speed X-Ray Visualization of Boiling Phenomena: Preliminary Demonstration, Paper 381, The 15th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermalhydraulics, NURETH-15, Pisa, Italy, May 12-15, 2013.
- 43. T. G. Theofanous, J. P. Tu, A. T. Dinh and T. N. Dinh, The Boiling Crisis Phenomenon, J. Experimental Thermal Fluid Science, P.I: pp. 775-792, P.II: pp. 793-810, vol. 26, no. 6-7, 2002.
- 44. Wagner and P. Stephan, High-resolution measurements at nucleate boiling of pure FC-84 and FC-3284 and its binary mixtures, Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 131, no. 12, p. 121008, 2009.
- 45. Golobic, J. Petkovsek, M. Baselj, A. Papez, D.B.R. Kenning, Experimental determination of transient wall temperature distributions close to growing vapour bubbles, Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 45, 857-866, 2009.
- 46. Golobic, J. Petkovsek, D.B.R. Kenning, Bubble growth and horizontal coalescence in saturated pool boiling on a titanium foil, investigated by high-speed IR thermography, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 55, 1385-1402, 2012.
- 47. T. H. Kim, E. Kommer, S. Dessiatoun, J. Kim, Measurement of two-phase flow and heat transfer parameters using infrared thermometry, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 40, 56-67, 2012.
- 48. C. Kunkelmann, K. Ibrahem, N. Schweizer, S. Herbert, P. Stephan, T. GambaryanRoisman, The effect of three-phase contact line speed on local evaporative heat transfer: Experimental and numerical investigations, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 55, 18961904, 2012.
- 49. Demiray, J. Kim, Microscale heat transfer measurements during pool boiling of FC-72: effect of subcooling, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 47, pp. 3257-3268, 2004.
- 50. C. Gerardi, J. Buongiorno, L. W. Hu, T. McKrell, Study of Bubble Growth in Water Pool Boiling through Synchronized, Infrared Thermometry and High-Speed Video, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 53, 19-20 4185-4192, 2010.
- 51. X. Duan, B. Phillips, T. McKrell, J. Buongiorno, Synchronized High-Speed Video, Infrared Thermometry and PIV Data for Validation of Interface-Tracking Simulations of Nucleate Boiling Phenomena, Exp. Heat Transfer, 26:169-197, 2013.
- 52. Kim, J. Buongiorno, Detection of Liquid-Vapor-Solid Triple Contact Line in Two-Phase Heat Transfer Phenomena Using High-Speed Infra-Red Thermometry, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol.  37, 166-172, 2011.
- 53. Kim, Y. Park, J. Buongiorno, Measurement of Wetted Area Fraction in Subcooled Pool Boiling of Water Using Infrared Thermography, Nucl. Eng. Des., 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.07.002.
- 54. M. Jakob, W. Linke, Boiling heat transfer, Phys. Z. 636 (1935) 267-273.
- 55. W.M. Rohsenow, A method of correlating heat transfer data for surface boiling of liquids, Journal of Heat Transfer. 74 (1951) 969-976.
- 56. C.L. Tien, Hydrodynamic model for nucleate pool boiling, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 5 (1962) 533-540.
- 57. N. Zuber, Nucleate boiling the region of isolated bubbles and the similarity with natural convection, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 6 (1963) 53-78.

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

- 58. B.B. Mikic, W.M. Rohsenow, A new correlation of pool boiling data including the effect of heating surface characteristics, Journal of Heat Transfer. 91 (1969) 245-250.
- 59. H.K. Forster, R. Greif, Heat transfer to a boiling liquid-mechanism and correlations, Journal of Heat Transfer. 81 (1959) 43-54.
- 60. S.I. Haider, R.L. Webb, A transient micro-convection model of nucleate pool boiling, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 40 (1997) 3675-3688.
- 61. R.W. Graham, R.C. Hendricks, Assessment of convection, conduction, and evaporation in nucleate boiling, 1967.
- 62. R.L. Judd, K.S. Hwang, A comprehensive model for nucleate pool boiling heat transfer including microlayer evaporation, Journal of Heat Transfer. 98 (1976) 623-629.
- 63. R.J. Benjamin, A.R. Balakrishnan, Nucleate pool boiling heat transfer of pure liquids at low to moderate heat fluxes, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 39 (1996) 2495-2504.
- 64. P. Stephan, J. Hammer, A new model for nucleate boiling heat transfer, Heat Mass Transfer/Waerme-und Stoffuebertragung. 30 (1995) 119-125.
- 65. V.K. Dhir, Boiling heat transfer, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 30 (1998) 365-401.
- 66. S. Moghaddam, K. Kiger, Physical mechanisms of heat transfer during single bubble nucleate boiling of FC-72 under saturation conditions-I. Experimental investigation, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 52 (2009) 1284-1294.
- 67. S. Moghaddam, K. Kiger, Physical mechanisms of heat transfer during single bubble nucleate boiling of FC-72 under saturation conditions-   :  heoretical a alysis, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 52 (2009) 1295-1303.
- 68. S. Moghaddam, Microscale study of nucleation process in boiling of low-surface-tension liquids, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 2006.
- 69. S. Moghaddam, K.T. Kiger, A. Modafe, R. Ghodssi, A novel benzocyclobutene-based device for studying the dynamics of heat transfer during the nucleation process, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems. 16 (2007) 1355-1366.
- 70. F.D. Moore, R.B. Mesler, The measurement of rapid surface temperature fluctuation during nucleate boiling of water, AIChE Journal. 7 (1961) 620-624.
- 71. R. Sharp, The nature of liquid film evaporation during nucleate boiling, NASA TN D1997, 1964.
- 72. R.C. Hendricks, R.R. Sharp, On the initiation of cooling due to bubble growth on a heating surface, NASA TN D-2290, 1961.
- 73. M.G. Cooper, The microlayer and bubble growth in nucleate pool boiling, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 12 (1969) 915-933.
- 74. L.D. Koffman, M.S. Plesset, Experimental observation of the microlayer in vapor bubble growth on a heated solid, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 105 (1983) 625- 632.
- 75. N. Yaddanapudi, J. Kim, Single bubble heat transfer in saturated pool boiling of FC-72, Multiphase Science and Technology. 12 (2001) 47-63.
- 76. C.Y. Han, P. Griffith, The mechanism of heat transfer in nucleate pool boiling-Part II: The heat flux-temperature difference relation, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 8 (1965) 905-914.

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

## FIGURE CAPTIONS

Figure 1: (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental configuration, not to scale. The Al heater block is 1 cm thick and the diameter of the hole in the Al heater block is 1.5 cm. Droplet generator, sample, and objective lens are vertically aligned. (b) The sample is a 1 mm thick double-side polished Si wafer. The bottom film of TiO2 is an antireflection coating and the top film of TiO2 thermally isolated the Ti thin film from the Si wafer. The Pt film provides a chemically inert surface, stable against boiling water. (c) Optical layout of the pump-probe system used. Sample region is described in detail in Fig 1(a).

Figure 2: Illustrative data showing transient changes of temperature and effective thermal conductance created by the impingement of dispensed water volume of 0.19 mm . Panels (a) and 3 (c) are for a relatively low sample temperature of 130 ° C. Panels (b) and (d) are for a relatively high sample temperature of 210  C. Time zero is defined by the electronic trigger of the ° microdispenser. The series of water droplets arrives at the sample surface 50 ms after the trigger.

Figure 3: Representative synchronized PIV and high-speed video images of a growing and departing steam bubble at atmospheric pressure. (from [51])

Figure 4: Post-processing of the PIV data in Figure 3 yields the values of the z-component of the vorticity vector in the wake of a steam bubble. The abscissa represents time after bubble nucleation (bubble departure occurs at t=16 ms). Maximum uncertainty for vorticity values is ∼ 18%. (from [51])

Figure 5: Phase distribution on the boiling surface at various values of heat flux (normalized to CHF) and subcoolings, obtained with eth DEPIcT technique. Black represents dry regions, grey and white represent wet regions. The fluid is water at atmospheric pressure, boiling over hori o tal silico  heaters  Note that the subscri t 'CHF(-)' i  icates the last heat flux ste  before CHF occurs.

Figure 6: Post-processing of the DEPIcT data in Figure 5 yields the time-averaged wetted fraction (i.e. fraction of boiling surface that is contact with the liquid phase) as a function of normalized heat flux and subcooling.

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Figure 7: Close view of the MEM device showing the topmost sensor layer radially distributed. The bottom-right inset figure shows two sensors (i.e. H-1 and H-2) made at different levels beneath the sensor array. All temperature sensors are Resistance Temperature Detector (RTD). Material of the sensors is Ni and their thickness is approximately 10 nm. The H-1 and H-2 sensors are coil-shape with a diameter of 1 mm. Spacing between the H-1 and H-2 sensors is 7.5 μm   he se sor array is 2 5 μm above the H-2 sensor. The sensor array is covered with a 0.2-μm thick polymer layer. The top-right     image shows 0 7, 1 3, a   2 4 μm i   iameter cavities

Figure 8: A bubbling event at surface temperature 80.2 °C. A waiting time of 2.9 ms exists between the bubbles. Time is in millisecond.

Figure 9: Surface temperature (upper panel) and heat flux (lower panel) variations during the bubbling event. Heat transfer during microlayer evaporation and transient conduction processes are marked. S-1 through S-8 indicate sensors 1-8 in Figure 7.

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Figure 1: Representative synchronized PIV and high-speed video images of a growing and departing steam bubble at atmospheric pressure. (from [51])

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0277v1-figure-66e8304d-1ea2-4925-9b4e-f176cb6fd34f.jpg)

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Figure 2: Post-processing of the PIV data in Figure 3 yields the values of the z-component of the vorticity vector in the wake of a steam bubble. The abscissa represents time after bubble nucleation (bubble departure occurs at t=16 ms). Maximum uncertainty for vorticity values is ∼ 18%. (from [51])

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0277v1-figure-13ad05a8-d1c7-4507-a800-fb0500650d57.jpg)

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

ATsub =30 %

Figure 3: Phase distribution on the boiling surface at various values of heat flux (normalized to CHF) and subcoolings, obtained with eth DEPIcT technique. Black represents dry regions, grey and white represent wet regions. The fluid is water at atmospheric pressure, boiling over hori o tal silico  heaters  Note that the subscri t 'CHF(-)' i  icates the last heat flux ste  before CHF occurs.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0277v1-figure-298ee448-ea2a-4a7d-872a-49db6106754d.jpg)

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Figure 4: Post-processing of the DEPIcT data in Figure 5 yields the time-averaged wetted fraction (i.e. fraction of boiling surface that is contact with the liquid phase) as a function of normalized heat flux and subcooling.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0277v1-figure-1b74ac12-1acc-4489-81de-5f845873f1a4.jpg)

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Figure 5: Close view of the MEM device showing the topmost sensor layer radially distributed. The bottom-right inset figure shows two sensors (i.e. H-1 and H-2) made at different levels beneath the sensor array. All temperature sensors are Resistance Temperature Detector (RTD). Material of the sensors is Ni and their thickness is approximately 10 nm. The H-1 and H-2 sensors are coil-shape with a diameter of 1 mm. Spacing between the H-1 and H-2 sensors is 7.5 μm   he se sor array is 2 5 μm above the H-2 sensor. The sensor array is covered with a 0.2-μm thick polymer layer. The top-right     image shows 0 7, 1 3, a   2 4 μm i   iameter cavities

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0277v1-figure-3f1c8cd8-f056-4713-97b5-4a27d53fa41e.jpg)

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Figure 6: A bubbling event at surface temperature 80.2 °C. A waiting time of 2.9 ms exists between the bubbles. Time is in millisecond.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0277v1-figure-3cffc669-f852-4016-a84c-e426033f063e.jpg)

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Figure 7: Surface temperature (upper panel) and heat flux (lower panel) variations during the bubbling event. Heat transfer during microlayer evaporation and transient conduction processes are marked. S-1 through S-8 indicate sensors 1-8 in Figure 5.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0277v1-figure-4aa47f95-c930-46a2-b396-4b50045ca13d.jpg)

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Figure 8: (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental configuration, not to scale. The Al heater block is 1 cm thick and the diameter of the hole in the Al heater block is 1.5 cm. Droplet generator, sample, and objective lens are vertically aligned. (b) The sample is a 1 mm thick double-side polished Si wafer. The bottom film of TiO2 is an antireflection coating and the top film of TiO2 thermally isolated the Ti thin film from the Si wafer. The Pt film provides a chemically inert surface, stable against boiling water. (c) Optical layout of the pump-probe system used. Sample region is described in detail in Fig 1(a).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0277v1-figure-eb3e74af-1ac8-4a17-95bb-a09f05a7f4b9.jpg)

Cite this paper as J. Buongiorno, D. G. Cahill, C. H. Hidrovo,  S. Moghaddam, A.J. Schmidt, L. Shi, 'Micro- and Nanoscale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces', Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, vol. 18, p. 270-287 (2014). DOI:10.1080/15567265.2014.883454

Figure 9: Illustrative data showing transient changes of temperature and effective thermal conductance created by the impingement of dispensed water volume of 0.19 mm . Panels (a) and 3 (c) are for a relatively low sample temperature of 130 ° C. Panels (b) and (d) are for a relatively high sample temperature of 210  C. Time zero is defined by the electronic trigger of the ° microdispenser. The series of water droplets arrives at the sample surface 50 ms after the trigger.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0277v1-figure-5cb97bbf-d3b8-4862-986a-9d7a3a3d2633.jpg)
Jacopo Buongiorno David G. Cahill Carlos H. Hidrovo Saeed Moghaddam Aaron J. Schmidt Li Shi
Micro- and Nano-scale Measurement Methods for Phase Change Heat Transfer on Planar and Structured Surfaces
In this opinion piece, we discuss recent advances in experimental methods for
characterizing phase change heat transfer. We begin with a survey of techniques
for high-resolution measurements of temperature and heat flux at the solid
surface and in the working fluid. Next, we focus on diagnostic tools for
boiling heat transfer and describe techniques for visualizing the temperature
and velocity fields, as well as measurements at the single bubble level.
Finally, we discuss techniques to probe the kinetics of vapor formation within
a few molecular layers of the interface. We conclude with our outlook for
future progress in experimental methods for phase change heat transfer.