## CHARACTERISATION OF THE PARTICLE-INDUCED BACKGROUND OF XMM-NEWTON EPIC-PN: SHORT AND LONG TERM VARIABILITY

Esra Bulbul, 1 Ralph Kraft, 1 Paul Nulsen, 1,2 Michael Freyberg, 3 Eric D. Miller, 4 Catherine Grant, 4 Mark W. Bautz, 4 David N. Burrows, 5 Steven Allen, 6 Tanja Eraerds, 3 Valentina Fioretti, 7 Fabio Gastaldello, 8 Vittorio Ghirardini, 1 David Hall, 9 Norbert Meidinger, 3 Silvano Molendi, 8 Arne Rau, 3 Dan Wilkins, 6 and Joern Wilms 10

- 1 Center for Astrophysics | Harvard &amp; Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138
- 2 ICRAR, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- 3 Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1 85748, Garching, Germany
- 4 Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139
- 5 Pennsylvania State University, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
- 6 Department of Physics, Stanford University, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-4060, USA
- 7 INAF Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, via Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, Italy 8
- INAF/IASF-Milano, Via Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy
- 9 Centre for Electronic Imaging, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK
- 10 Dr. Remeis-Sternwarte and Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Universit¨t Erlangen-Nurnberg, Sternwartstr. a 7, 96049 Bamberg, Germany

## ABSTRACT

The particle-induced background of X-ray observatories is produced by Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) primary protons, electrons, and He ions. Events due to direct interaction with the detector are usually removed by on board processing. The interactions of these primary particles with the detector environment produce secondary particles that mimic X-ray events from celestial sources and are much more difficult to identify. The filter wheel closed data from the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn camera in small window mode (SWM) contains both the X-ray-like background events and the events due to direct interactions with the primary particles. From this data we demonstrate that X-ray-like background events are spatially correlated with the primary particle interaction. This result can be used to further characterise and reduce the non-X-ray background in silicon-based X-ray detectors in current and future missions. We also show that spectrum and pattern fractions of secondary particle events are different from those produced by cosmic X-rays.

## 1. INTRODUCTION

X-ray studies of the assembly processes of extended large scale structures, constraints on cosmology and the nature of dark matter, and studies of the cosmic X-ray background that holds clues about the formation of the first black holes are among the primary science goals of current (e.g., Chandra , XMM-Newton , and SRG) and future X-ray telescopes ( Athena , Lynx ) (Nandra et al. 2013; Gaskin et al. 2019). These measurements are sensitive to the level of the total flux and related system- atic uncertainties of the instrumental X-ray background. Understanding, accurately characterizing, and reducing the absolute level of this X-ray background are fundamental to the X-ray analysis of faint X-ray sources and deep surveys.

Corresponding author: Esra Bulbul ebulbul@cfa.harvard.edu

The X-ray background can be classified into two major components: the cosmic X-ray background (CXB) and particle-induced non-X-ray background (NXB). The CXB is dominated by three main components: the Galactic local foreground, solar wind charge exchange emission, and unresolved X-ray emission by distant celestial sources. At lower energies ( &lt; 1 keV) the dominant component is thermal emission from the Galactic Halo contributing at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes (Burrows &amp; Mendenhall 1991; Snowden et al. 1991; War-

wick 2002; Lumb et al. 2002) and the Local Hot Bubble, a region of hot plasma ( T ∼ 10 6 K) mostly filling the local cavity extending 100 pc away from the Sun (Snowden et al. 1998). Another component, which is composed of C VI , O VII , O VIII , Ne IX , and Mg XI line emission at lower energies ( &lt; 1 keV), is the solar wind charge exchange produced when highly charged solar wind ions interact with neutral atoms in the solar system (Robertson &amp; Cravens 2003; Koutroumpa et al. 2006). Unresolved X-ray emission from distant astrophysical sources, e.g., Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs), contributes a power-law continuum spectrum that dominates at higher energies ( &gt; 1 keV) with a possible change in slope at lower energies and has been extensively studied in the literature, e.g., Lumb et al. (2002); Moretti et al. (2009). The magnitude of this component varies with position on the sky and it clearly suffers from cosmic variance (Hickox &amp; Markevitch 2007). If an observation is deep enough to resolve the brightest sources (e.g., the strong shot noise), the residual contribution reaches to the expected cosmic variance given the Log N - log S relation (see for example Fig. 9 in (Moretti et al. 2009) and discussion therein).

The non X-ray background due to particles in missions operating above the Earth's magnetic belts consists of two major background components: soft protons focused by the mirrors onto the focal plane and particleinduced instrumental background. Soft protons that are generated in the Solar corona and in the Earth's magnetosphere with energies less than a few 100 keV can follow the optical path through the telescope and be focused onto the detectors. The spectral shape of this component can be described by a power-law continuum with highly variable magnitude and slope (Kuntz &amp; Snowden 2008). When present, soft protons can increase the total background intensity by three orders of magnitude on short timescales of 10-10 4 s (Kuntz &amp; Snowden 2008). They deposit most of their energy near the surface of the detector and produce valid event patterns (Gastaldello et al. 2017).

On the other hand, the unfocused particle-induced internal detector background is generated by energetic Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) primaries with energies from several tens of MeV to several GeV. GCR particles consisting of protons, electrons, and He ions are subject to variations over the Solar cycle. These incoming particles interact with the detector and produce secondary particles. The interactions constitute the major components of the unfocused portion of the particle-induced instrumental background (Kuntz &amp; Snowden 2008; Snowden et al. 2008; von Kienlin et al. 2018). Based on their high total energies or the pattern of pixels excited in the event, particle events generated by primary GCRs are mostly discarded on board by the event processing (e.g., by the Minimum Ionizing Particle, MIP, rejection algorithm for XMM-Newton ) to prevent them from saturating the limited bandwidth for telemetry (Lumb et al.

2002). However, the secondary electrons and photons due to this unfocused component deposit charge in the detector that it is challenging to distinguish from X-ray events from celestial sources and thus contribute significantly to (and often dominate) the quiescent instrumental background.

Quantifying the particle-induced instrumental background of X-ray observatories is not a trivial process and needs careful examination of observations while the detector is not exposed to sky. The XMM-Newton observatory, carrying two types of silicon-based X-ray detectors on board, the European Photon Imaging Camera (EPIC) MOS (Turner et al. 2001) and the EPIC pn (Str¨der et al. 2001), provides an excellent opportunity u to explore the instrumental background of silicon-based X-ray detectors. The unexposed corners of the XMMNewton EPIC MOS detector that are masked off and the MOS data obtained when the filter wheel is in the closed position (FWC data) serve as estimators of the particle background for each observation that are used in the X-ray analysis of faint extended sources (De Luca &amp; Molendi 2004; Kuntz &amp; Snowden 2008; Gastaldello et al. 2017). The particle background of XMM-Newton EPIC-pn is difficult to predict and eliminate due to the fact that the unexposed region on the detector is small, i.e., statistics on the background level is limited.

In this paper, we examine the long-term variability of the unfocused EPIC-pn background. We present results from an analysis of all archival EPIC-pn data in the small window mode (SWM) with the filter wheel closed and MIP rejection disabled. The filter wheel closed observations with 1.05 mm of Al shielding do not allow any photons from celestial sources or soft protons to reach the focal plane. Additionally, all of the pixel data from both valid events and normally rejected particle tracks (GCR primaries) are telemetered to the ground in SWMmode observations. This set-up provides a unique opportunity to quantitatively investigate the relationship between the energetic primaries (i.e., GCRs) and the secondaries that mimic X-rays from celestial sources which constitute the dominant component of the instrumental background. We describe our sample and data analysis methods in Section 2. Our results for the XMMNewton EPIC-pn SWM observations are described in Section 3. Our conclusions are given in Section 4.

This work was originally performed as part of a program to develop algorithms for improved background characterization and reduction for the Athena WideField Imager (WFI) Science Products Module (SPM) (Burrows 2018; Bulbul et al. 2018; Grant 2018). One of the goals of the SPM would have been to use the full data stream from the WFI, not just the ground science event data available to the observer, to reduce the instrumental background. In an effort to better understand the instrumental background in X-ray observatories, we examined the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn SWM data as described in this paper and modeled the WFI background

Figure 1. Frames with just particle tracks (Case A), valid events (Case B), and both particle tracks and valid events (Case C) are shown. The circles in red mark the detected primary particle events, while the green circles show the secondary valid events.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00604v2-figure-0221847f-c2e3-4b32-aa26-7bd4a656b6a9.jpg)

using the GEANT4 software (Tenzer et al. 2010). The latter modeling was done using the measured particle background at the Athena orbit (L2) with a mass model of the flight instrument (von Kienlin et al. 2018). Results from this study will be presented in a separate publication (Miller et al. 2019).

## 2. XMM-NEWTON EPIC-PN DATA ANALYSIS

## 2.1. Filter-Wheel Closed Slew and Pointed Observations

result, these observations represent an ideal data set to characterize the long term behavior of the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn internal background, since the ground observer has full access to all pixels above a threshold set by the ground observer. The data consist of electronic readout noise (at lowest energies, hot pixels, columns, and readout noise), primary high energy GCRs, secondaries generated by high energy galactic cosmic rays, and particleinduced X-rays (continuum and fluorescent lines, von Kienlin et al. 2018).

The EPIC-pn CCD camera is one of the primary instruments on on-board XMM-Newton , with a collecting area of ∼ 2500 cm 2 at 1 keV and a 27.2 arcmin by 26.2 arcmin field of view over the broad energy range of 0.1 keV to 12 keV (Str¨der et al. 2001). u The XMMNewton EPIC-pn data used in this work were taken during slews when the filter wheel was closed and performed in the SWM. In this mode, a 63 pixel by 64 pixel (4.3 arcmin by 4.4 arcmin) region on detector CCD4 is active and the read-out time is 5.67 ms, roughly a factor of 13 faster than the full-frame readout time of the primary science observing mode (full frame mode). A total of 309 observations have been completed since 2007 between revolutions 1360-3217, with typical exposures of 3-7 ks, adding up to a total exposure time of 1 Ms. The observation IDs and exposure times of the slew FWC observations are given in Table 4.

FWC observations are performed with 1.05 mm aluminum shielding, preventing low-energy soft protons and X-rays from celestial sources from reaching the EPIC-pn detector. Thus, FWC exposures contain only the particle-induced internal detector background, generated as a result of interactions of energetic Galactic Cosmic Rays (E &gt; 100 MeV) with the material surrounding the EPIC-pn camera. Additionally, in the observations taken in the SWM set-up, the standard minimum ionizing particle (MIP) rejection algorithm, which identifies and automatically eliminates the pixels above a certain energy threshold and invalid patterns identified on board from the telemetered data, is inactive. As a

The SWM frame time is sufficiently short in a sufficiently small readout area that the particle rate is much smaller than the frame rate. We thus have the unique opportunity to associate the normally rejected chargedparticle events with the valid events that comprise the instrumental background. Since these observations are mostly dominated by the unfocused X-ray background, we use the term non-X-ray background (NXB) for these FWC slew observations hereafter.

For a comparison, we also examine the pointed XMMNewton EPIC-pn SWM observations from two celestial sources: observations of the AB Doradus star system with the closed and thick filters, and a supernova remnant G21.5 -0.9 (SNR 21.5 -09, hereafter) performed with the thin filter. The details of these observations are given in Table 5. The AB Doradus observations with the closed filter are not expected to include any source photons (NXB dominated), while the observation with the thick filter is expected to be dominated by soft protons. A detailed analysis of the comparison between these two observations with different set-up will be explored in another article (Bulbul et al., in prep). SNR 21.5 -09 observations, on the other hand, are dominated by photons from the supernova remnant in the FOV in the 2-7 keV band, while the contribution from the non X-ray background is subdominant. These pointed observations, taken in the SWM set-up, are similarly telemetered to the ground with the 'on-board' MIP rejection algorithm inactive, thus including all pixels above the energy threshold. Having a longer uninterrupted expo-

Figure 2. Left: The fraction of frames with just primary particle events (red; Case A), just secondary valid events (blue; Case B), and with both valid and particle events (green; Case C) as a function of time. Curve in black shows the total rate of particle events. Strong modulation with the Solar cycle observed for all the frames indicates that the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn unfocused background is dominated by Galactic cosmic rays. Right: Zoom onto Case B and Case C frame to enhance the visibility of the Solar modulation cycle.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00604v2-figure-03d6a358-3aa8-49e6-a227-67b8c5fbbdb0.jpg)

sure time, these data provide information on short term variability of the unfocused X-ray background.

## 2.2. Data Reduction and Analysis

We first run the standard the Science Analysis Software SAS algorithm epchain to eliminate hot pixels and columns from the data and to form event lists for single exposures and for a given list of CCDs from the relevant observation data files (ODF) (Gabriel et al. 2004). We note that a non-standard parameter setting is selected in the epchain runs to switch off the 'on-ground' MIP rejection. We then construct individual frames from the event files using the frame rate of 5.67 ms. The total number of frames constructed is given in Table 4. We examined a total of ∼ 1.86 × 10 8 frames in the XMMNewton EPIC-pn slew observations in this work. These observations span 10 years covering a full solar cycle.

After the construction of frames, we run an image segmentation algorithm on each frame to identify the independent event islands. This algorithm finds connected pixels and traces the long charge tracks of the energetic particle interactions. The charge of each event island is determined by the total charge enclosed in that particular event island. The centroids of these event islands are defined by the maximally charged pixel. We then assign a pattern ID by the pattern detection algorithm, i.e., epchain , to each event island. We note that this image segmentation algorithm developed by our team, is not the same algorithm used by the on board software.

The standard XMM-Newton EPIC-pn event processing flags event islands with pattern ID ≤ 12 as valid events, while particle events are marked with pattern IDs &gt; 12 . 1 The pattern ID is related to the number and pattern of the CCD pixels triggered for an X-ray

1 https://xmm-tools.cosmos.esa.int/external/xmm user support /documentation/uhb/epic evgrades.html

event above a certain threshold. The pattern IDs with 0 mark valid single pixel events, double pixel events are marked with pattern IDs 1-4, while triple and quadruple events have pattern IDs of 5-8 and 8-12, respectively. We note that in this FWC data set, the valid events are dominated by secondary particles that are produced by interactions of primary GCRs with the surroundings of the instrument. This component is mostly composed of secondary electrons and photons that deposit their energy in the active volume of the detector. The contributing secondary electrons are generated in ionization processes, while the secondary photons are mainly generated in bremsstrahlung and inelastic scattering processes (see von Kienlin et al. 2018 for more detail). In this work, we only consider valid events in the 2-7 keV energy band to avoid low-energy detector noise, unless otherwise noted. The event islands marked with pattern IDs &gt; 12 are mostly the incoming background GCR particles ( ∼ 200 MeV-GeV), and Supra-Thermal Ions (STIs), mostly protons, accelerated in the Heliosphere to energies up to &lt; 100 keV hitting the detector (von Kienlin et al. 2018). These particle event islands are identified based on their patterns and the total charge encapsulated within the island. For most of these energetic events, there exists more than one pixel with a total charge exceeding the saturation level of the analog-todigital converter (ADC; corresponding to 22.5 keV when MIP rejection is off). In those cases, the centroid of a particle event island is the maximally charged pixel last read by the image segmentation algorithm.

## 2.3. Classification of Frames

We next analyze the data sets on a frame-by-frame basis and identify event islands and divide the frames into four categories: frames with just particle tracks (Case A), frames with only valid events (Case B), frames with at least one particle track and at least one valid event (Case C), and frames with no particle tracks or

Table 1. Fractions of Frames

| Frame Type   |   Number of Frames % |   Fractions |
|--------------|----------------------|-------------|
| Case A       |              2089948 |       1.12  |
| Case B       |                39186 |       0.02  |
| Case C       |                 5175 |       0.003 |
| Case D       |            184541368 |      98.8   |

events (Case D). This categorization allow us to examine the frames with particle primaries without a secondary (Case A), secondaries that are created by particle primaries but not detected on the same frame (Case B), and the frames with the primary particle events and their secondaries detected on the same frame (Case C). Figure 1 illustrates the subdivision of frames. We find that overall the total number of Case A frames is 2089948, while 39186 of the frames are in the Case B, and 5175 of the frames are in Case C categories.

## 3. RESULTS

In the next subsections, we investigate the spectral properties, light curves, and spatial correlations between valid events and particle tracks in Case A, B, and C frames in detail.

## 3.1. Long Term Variability

Investigating the temporal changes in the number of frames, we find that the overwhelming majority of the frames are empty and fall under the Case D category independent of solar cycle or orbit (see Figure 2). We find that overall the total number of Case A frames is 2089948 (1.12% of the total), while 39186 (0.02%) of the frames are Case B, 5175 (0.003%) of the frames are Case C, and the remainder (98.8%) are empty Case D frames (see 1). The temporal changes in the fractional A, B, and C frame rates are shown in Figure 2. The clear modulation with solar cycle observed in the fraction of Case A, B, and C frames is consistent with the previously observed modulations in the count rates in unexposed corners of MOS2 detector, EPIC Radiation Monitor on board of XMM-Newton (Gastaldello et al. 2017), and Chandra high energy (12-15 keV) count rate for the ACIS-S3 CCD as a function of year. 2 GCRflux is modulated in anti-correlation with solar activity due to the solar wind (Neher &amp; Anderson 1962). While, Tthe Earth's magnetic field provides a varying degree of geomagnetic shielding from these GCR particles, the level of the modulation depends on the energy of GCRs. The observed modulation on the EPIC-pn data shows that the FWC data are dominated by GCRs.

## 3.2. Branching Ratios of Valid Events

2 http://space.mit.edu/cgrant/cti/cti120/bkg.pdf

Having the largest number of valid events, Case B frames dominate the unfocused background of the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn. We next examine the branching ratios, i.e., the fraction of the patterns of the valid events (singles, doubles, triples, and quadruples) in Case B frames, where only secondary events are detected. We detect a total number of 39190 valid events in non X-ray background observations (i.e., slew filterwheel-closed observations listed in Table 4). The fractions of these valid patterns in Case B frames are shown in Table 2. Of the total valid events, 65 6 . ± 0 2% of them . are singles, 31 3 . ± 0 2% are doubles, while 1 47 . . ± 0 06% . and 1 59 . ± 0 06% are . triples and quadruples, respectively. Comparing these ratios with Case B frames observed in the closed filter AB Doradus observations, of the total 4172 valid events, 65 3 . ± 0 7% are singles, . 32 1 . ± 0 7% . are doubles, and triples and quadruples make up 1 0 . ± 0 1% and 1 6 . . ± 0 2% of them, . respectively. These pattern fractions are consistent with the ratios observed in the NXB slew observations, indicating that the 2-7 keV energy band of the AB Doradus observations with the filter closed is also dominated by the unfocused background of the XMM-Newton EPICpn. Case B frames for the SNR 21.5 -09 observations include a total of 170114 valid events and have a lower fraction of singles (61 6 . ± 0 1%) and a larger percentage . of doubles (34 5 . ± 0 1%) is . detected compared to the AB Doradus and NXB observations.

In Case C frames of the NXB observations, we find a total of 3622 valid events in the 2-7 keV band. The majority of the valid events (67 8 . ± 0 8%) are singles, while . doubles make up 30 1 . ± 0 7% of the total events. . We find that 1 0 . ± 0 2% and 1 1 . . ± 0 2% are triples and quadruples, . respectively. Fractions of the valid patterns in Case C frames are shown in Table 2. Examining AB Doradus observations with the closed filter, we find a much lower number of valid events (a total of 322) in the Case C frames compared to Case B frames, consistent with the results we find in NXB observations (see Figure 2). Of these events 69 4 . ± 2 6% are singles, . 28 5 . ± 2 5% are . doubles, 1 0 . ± 0 6% and 1 0 . . ± 0 6% of them are triples . and quadruples. The branching ratios in this band are consistent with the fractions of valid event patterns observed in the slew NXB SWM data, indicating that the 2-7 keV band of AB Doradus observations is dominated by the EPIC-pn's unfocused X-ray background, as in the Case C frames.

In Case C frames in the SNR 21.9-05 observations (a total of 4663 frames), the fraction of singles is lower (60 7 . ± 0 7%), . while doubles are higher (35 9 . ± 0 7%) . compared to both NXB dominated slew and AB Doradus observations in the source dominated hard band. Sparse statistics of triples and quadruples do not allow us to compare their branching ratios to the unfocused X-ray background. The key result here is that the valid events that make up the instrumental background have slightly different branching ratios to celestial X-rays in

Table 2. Pattern Distribution of valid events in Case B and Case C frames of the Non-Xray Background (NXB) taken in filter-wheel closed set up, AB Doradus observations in filter-wheel closed set up, and SNR 21.5 -09 observations performed with thin filter.

| Frames     | NXB                | NXB        | AB Doradus         | AB Doradus   | SNR 21.5 - 09    | SNR 21.5 - 09   |
|------------|--------------------|------------|--------------------|--------------|------------------|-----------------|
|            | Closed Flt. Case B | Case C     | Closed Flt. Case B | Case C       | Thin Flt. Case B | Case C          |
| Singles    | 65.6 ± 0.2         | 67.8 ± 0.8 | 65.3 ± 0.7         | 69.4 ± 2.6   | 61.6 ± 0.1       | 60.7 ± 0.7      |
| Doubles    | 31.3 ± 0.2         | 30.1 ± 0.7 | 32.1 ± 0.7         | 28.5 ± 2.5   | 34.5 ± 0.1       | 35.9 ± 0.7      |
| Triples    | 1.47 ± 0.06        | 1.0 ± 0.2  | 1.0 ± 0.1          | 1.0 ± 0.6    | 2.0 ± 0.6        | 1.7 ± 0.2       |
| Quadruples | 1.59 ± 0.06        | 1.1 ± 0.2  | 1.6 ± 0.2          | 1.0 ± 0.6    | 1.9 ± 0.6        | 1.6 ± 0.2       |

the 2-7 keV band. High energy events with harder spectrum have more probability to have high splint event ratios compared to the low energy photons with soft spectrum. Since SNR 21.9-05 has a harder spectrum, the split event ratios are expected to be higher than the split event ratios in the non X-ray background.

## 3.3. Time Interval Between Valid Events

We further investigate whether there is a temporal correlation between the arrival times of valid events. The distribution of the arrival times of successive events in Case B frames in the 2-7 keV energy band is shown in Figure 3. If the valid events are independent of each other, the distribution is expected to be exponential, with a time constant close to the mean time between events (the reciprocal of the mean rate of Case B frames). We find that the mean difference in the arrival times of the valid events in Case B frames is 26.7 second, which is comparable to the time constant of the exponential distribution. There is no evidence of a characteristic time interval between events shorter than the mean time interval. This also confirms that the 2-7 keV band is dominated by the unfocused background and that our filtering has removed most of the instrumental artifacts associated with the long reset time constant of the output amplifiers (Freyberg et al. 2004). We do not find any significant departures from expectations in the arrival time of valid events depending on the particle environment.

## 3.4. Spectral Properties of Valid and Particle Events

We first extract spectra of all valid events based on their patterns in Case B frames (see Figure 4). Overall the spectra of singles and doubles are quite flat, while the spectra of triples and doubles are slightly positively sloped towards higher energies. Additionally, we removed events that are located at the detector boundaries since it is challenging to determine if the event detected at the boundary is a single pixel event or is the partially collected charge of an event that landed off the active area of the detector.

Figure 3. Distribution of the time intervals between valid events in Case B frames showing the exponential form expected for uncorrelated events. The exponential time constant is equal to the mean time between Case B events.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00604v2-figure-494eab56-48aa-4d16-b26c-d3cf7ccb84a7.jpg)

Next, we investigate the spectral properties of the particle tracks in Case A and C frames. The total energy of particle tracks is obtained by summing the charge in spatially connected pixels found by our image segmentation algorithm. We then generate the spectra of these particle events and normalize them by the total frames in each observation (as given in Table 4). The spectra of the particle events are shown in Figure 5. The overwhelming statistical power in Case A frames (see Figure 2) allows us to examine particle spectra in different phases of the solar cycle: the observations in the solar activity plateau between 2007 - 2008 (in magenta), 2012 - 2015 (in cyan), decline in solar activity between 2008-2010 (in orange) and 2015-2017 (dark blue), and increase in solar activity between 2010-2012 (in green). We then overplot the spectra of particle events in Case C frames from all epochs (2007-2017) in red in Figure 5 with the same bin size of 7 keV. Due to the limited number of Case C frames, we combine all particle events detected between 2007 and 2017. Figure 5 shows spectra of particle events in Case A and Case C frames (left) and the difference between them (right). The spectra of the particle events in Case A frames are strikingly sim-

Figure 4. Pulse-height spectra of valid events (single pixel events in red, doubles in blue, triples in green, and quadruples in purple) in Case B frames observed in the XMMNewton EPIC-pn filter-wheel-closed observations. Fluorescent instrumental lines of Si K α (1.75 keV), Ti K α (4.5 keV), Cr K α (5.4 keV), Cu K α (8.0 keV), and Zn K α (8.6 keV) are visible in the spectra.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00604v2-figure-0cacc449-5efb-444a-aebd-d3f197409d6d.jpg)

ilar to one another and independent of the solar cycle. We find a significant difference between the spectra of particle events that are detected in Case C frames and those detected in Case A frames. We observe a steeper slope in the energy band &lt; 200 keV in the Case A spectra, and above &gt; 200 keV the Case C spectrum flattens. This may indicate that the particle events that create showers of valid events while passing through the detector housing (in Case C frames) originate from a different particle population or geometry than primary particles detected in Case A frames. The observed flattening of the spectrum of Case C frames above 1.5 MeV is likely due to combination of limited statistics, lack of sensitivity, and ADC saturation limit.

Another implication of Figure 5 is that if the spectra of particle events in the Case B and Case C frames are normalized to the counts in the 250-750 keV energy band, the spectral slopes become consistent between these two spectra. In this case, an excess of low energy particle events is observed on the Case C frames compared to the Case B frames in the lower energy band below 200 keV. This may indicate that low energy particle events are more likely to convert into showers and create secondaries that are detected on the detector.

## 3.5. Spatial Correlation Between Particle and Valid Events

We further examine the distribution of distances between the centroid position of the valid and particle events in Case C frames. In both cases, the centroids of the events are determined by the maximally charged pixels. In the case of the particle event islands, when highly energetic particles interact with the detector, often more than one pixel gets charged at the ADC saturation limits, i.e., 22.5 keV with MIP rejection off. In these cases, the center of the event is marked as the last saturated pixel in an event island to be read. The distribution of distance between particle events and their secondary valid events for the slew NXB observations is shown in blue in Figure 6. The form of the distribution expected for uncorrelated events in these frames is plotted as a dashed yellow curve. The significant excess of event pairs at small separations indicates that the valid events in the immediate &lt; 30 pixel area around the particle events are highly spatially correlated with the associated particle track. We note that, due to the small active area of the detector in the SWM observations (63 pixel × 64 pixel), our analysis is not sensitive to correlations at large scales.

As a next step, we divide the valid events based on their patterns and reexamine the spatial correlations of singles, doubles, triples, and quadruples. We find a similar correlation between these patterns and particle events independent of their patterns. We also looked for energy dependence in the correlation between particle tracks and related events by dividing particle events into categories: particles with low-energies, &lt; 200 keV, and high energy particles with &gt; 200 keV (see Section 3.4). We do not observe any differences in the spatial correlation between valid events and particle tracks as a function of energy of the particle events.

Next, we examine the spatial correlation between valid/particle event pairs observed in Case C frames for the pointed observations through the closed filter of the ABDoradus star system (black distribution in Figure 6). As expected, this histogram is similar to the one for the slew NXB observations (e.g., there is a significant excess at small spatial scales up to 30 pixels) indicating that the 2-7 keV band is dominated by the unfocused X-ray background.

The shape of the spatial correlation between valid events and particle tracks for the SNR 21.5-0.9 data (cyan in Figure 6) is similar to the form expected for uncorrelated events (yellow curve). However, the distribution of separations is more peaked than expected for pairs of randomly distributed events. This is because, although a particle is equally likely to land anywhere on the detector, the supernova is centered on the chip, causing the distribution of source photons to be peaked there. This indicates that the 2-7 keV energy band for the SNR 21.5 -09 observations is dominated by photons from the supernova remnant and the unfocused X-ray background is subdominant.

These results are the basis of the self-anti-coincidence (SAC) method, used to reduce secondary events associated with a particle primary. This method of partial vetoing of valid events around particle tracks shows

Figure 5. Left Panel: Pulse-height spectra of the particle events in Case A frames. The data have been divided into five time intervals to sample the variation of the particle spectra with the Solar cycle and normalized by the number of frames in each period. Over-plotted in red is the pulse-height spectrum of the particle events in Case C frames between 2007 and 2017. The periodic structure observed at high energies is an aliasing effect due to binning and ADC saturation limit. Flattening of the spectrum of the red (Case C) histogram above ∼ 200 keV relative to the other histograms (Case A) is clearly visible. Right Panel shows the difference between the normalized pulse height spectra of Case A frames and Case C frames.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00604v2-figure-0afadd17-55d2-4601-b00f-13630fd0d8e9.jpg)

promise at reducing the systematic error produced by the instrumental background at the expense of eliminating events from real source X-rays (based on private communication with Silvano Molendi). We find that by eliminating events that fall within 30 pixels of the peak of a particle track, the particle-induced background of the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn can be reduced by ∼ 10% (see Figure 7). The results summarized here from the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn FWC observations can be used to reduce the particle background level of the future silicon-based X-ray detectors. For instance, the earlier EPIC MOS results were used to optimize FWC rotation strategy to sample particle background component during Athena WFI observations of faint objects (Gastaldello et al. 2017; von Kienlin et al. 2018).

## 3.6. Short Term Variability of the Particle Environment

Owing to the long term coverage of the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn slew observations with the filter-wheel closed between years 2007 and 2017, we are able to probe short term variability of particle events in Case A frames. We examine the light curves of particle events in Case A frames in five epochs defined by the phase of the solar cycle as shown in Figure 2 (plateau in 2007, solar minimum in 2009, increase in solar activity in 2011, solar maximum in 2014, decrease in solar activity in 2016). The variability of the rate of particle events in Case A frames in 10 observations taken close together in time, with 100 s binning, is shown in Figure 8 for each epoch. We note that the observations used in producing light curves in this section differ from the observations used to generate the spectra in Section 3.4. The mean, standard deviation, and skewness of the light curve counts of these particle events are given in Table 3. The dashed curves indicate a normal distribution with Poisson standard de- viation. There is no statistically significant variability of the particle tracks in any epoch.

We find that the mean values of the particle counts vary between 133 and 276, depending on the solar activity (see Table 3); however, the standard deviations (12-19) are remarkably small and independent of solar cycle. The mean of particle event counts observed per 100 s can be as high as 276 during solar minimum, while it can be as low as 133 during solar maximum. In general, each distribution is well-matched to the Poisson distribution expected for a constant mean rate (shown in dashed curves). We do not observe significant irregularities or outlier particle events in the light curves.

Similarly, we examine the light curves of particle events in Case A frames of the pointed XMMNewton EPIC-pn SWM observations of AB Doradus and SNR 21.5 -09. The histograms of the light curves are similarly tightly distributed around the mean as observed in NXB observations, close to the expected Poisson distribution. The AB Doradus observations were taken in 2002 and 2004, and the observed mean values are 133 and 179 while the Sun was active. The AB Doradus observations with thick filter were taken in 2017, when the solar activity was approaching its minimum, therefore a mean rate of 239 particle tracks is observed during those observations. These count rates are consistent with the count rates we observe in NXB dominated slew observations. The SNR 21.5 -09 observations were also taken in 2017 while solar activity was approaching minimum. The observed mean value of 239 indicates that these observations were performed when the solar activity was at minimum.

To further test the similarities in the background light curves against the Poisson distribution, we computed Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics. The KolmogorovSmirnov test determines the probability of two sam-

Figure 6. The distribution of distances between valid events in the 2-7 keV energy band and the particle events detected in Case C frames of the NXB with closed filter (in blue), SNR 21.5 -09 with thin filter (in black), and AB Doradus with closed filter (in cyan). The dashed curve in yellow indicates the expected distribution for uncorrelated event pairs. Valid events in the immediate ∼ 30 pixel vicinity of the particle events in NXB and AB Doradus observations are highly correlated, indicating that the 2-7 keV band of these observations are dominated by the unfocused background of XMM-Newton EPIC-pn. Although statistics of Case C frames are limited, an evidence of spatial correlation in small spatial scales ( &lt; 30 pixels) is visible in the AB Doradus observations on the right panel. The two-point correlation function in the SNR 21.5 -09 observations shows a distribution consistent with the theoretical distribution of uncorrelated events, indicating that 2-7 keV band is dominated by the emission from the supernova remnant.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00604v2-figure-46580ed4-bdcd-449a-8c5a-a9b6a18db323.jpg)

ples being drawn from the same distribution. The high values of probabilities ( &gt; 0 73) indicate that these back-. ground light curves distributions are originating from the same underlying Poisson distribution.

We also show distributions of the number of valid events in the 2-7 keV energy band in Case B frames in Figure 9, binned for longer time intervals (200 s) to allow for the lower event rate. Similarly, we do not observe any significant deviations from Poisson distributions for the numbers of particle related events in the filter-wheel closed data.

## 4. CONCLUSIONS

In this work, we present analysis of the unfocused Xray background of the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn operating in small window mode with a fast frame time. These observations were taken while XMM-Newton was slewing to a variable source that was to be observed in SWM, while the filter-wheel was in the closed position and the MIP rejection algorithm was turned off. This dataset uniquely allows us to study temporal, spectral, and spatial properties of particle primaries and their secondaries generated as a result of the interactions with the detector housing, which constitute the unfocused instrumental background for the science observer. We also compare our results from the unfocused background, NXB, with the pointed filter closed observations of a star system AB Doradus and observations of a supernova remnant SN 21.5 -09 taken with the thin filter. Owing to the

Table 3. Statistics of Light Curves of Particle Event Rates in Case A Frames binned for 100s

|   Date | Epoch                     |   Mean |   Std Dev. |   Skewnes |   KS test D-value |   p-value |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|------------|-----------|-------------------|-----------|
|   2007 | Plateau                   |    238 |         16 |      0.01 |              0.16 |      0.76 |
|   2009 | Solar Miminum             |    276 |         19 |      0.23 |              0.13 |      0.93 |
|   2011 | Solar Activity Increase   |    210 |         18 |      0.06 |              0.1  |      0.99 |
|   2014 | Solar Maximum             |    159 |         14 |      0.24 |              0.13 |      0.93 |
|   2016 | Solar Activity Decrease   |    230 |         18 |     -0.01 |              0.13 |      0.93 |
|   2002 | AB Doradus (Closed Flt.)  |    133 |         12 |      0.08 |              0.17 |      0.76 |
|   2004 | AB Doradus (Closed Flt.)  |    179 |         15 |     -0.82 |              0.25 |      0.78 |
|   2017 | AB Doradus (Thick Flt.)   |    239 |         15 |      0.25 |              0.13 |      0.94 |
|   2017 | SNR 21.5 - 09 (Thin Flt.) |    239 |         16 |      0.05 |              0.16 |      0.76 |

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00604v2-figure-e68d448f-4763-4c65-9ab8-9fe166d7dea9.jpg)

in the supernova observations (60.7 ± 0.7%). In both cases, the differences are statistically significant. That is, the valid events in the instrumental background have somewhat different branching ratios than those of the celestial X-rays.

Figure 7. Pulse-height spectrum of valid events detected in Case B and C frames (in red). Rejecting valid events associated with a primary GCR by using SAC with a 30 pixels exclusion radius would reduce the particle-induced background level of the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn by ∼ 10% in the 2-7 keV energy band. The resulting background spectrum is shown in dashed blue.

large number of frames, we were able to independently study the frames with just primary particles (Case A), with just secondary valid events (Case B), and with both primary particle and secondary valid events (Case C). Our major results are as follows.

- · Examining the branching ratios of event morphologies, we find that the vast majority of valid events in Case B frames of NXB observations are single pixel events (65.6 ± 0.2%) and double pixel events (31.3 ± 0.2%). Comparing these ratios with the observations of a supernova remnant, we find that in both cases, Case B frames have a significantly smaller fraction of singles (61.6 ± 0.1), and larger fraction of doubles (34.5 ± 0.1%). The fraction of singles in Case C frames of the unfocused NXB(67.8 ± 0.8%) is also higher compared to that
- · The mean difference between the observed arrival times of successive valid events in Case B frames matches the reciprocal of the event rate, as expected. We do not observe any structure in the distribution of the time intervals suggestive of a temporal correlation between background events, or detector or background effects on the time interval between valid events. As expected, all background events appear to be independent and uncorrelated.
- · The energy spectrum of the particle tracks in frames with valid events is somewhat flatter than that of the tracks in frames with no valid events. This result indicates that the particle events detected with secondary events in the same frame (Case C) might be due to a different population of particles passing through, or a different geometry compared to the primary particle events that do not generate secondary showers in the detector housing. We also found that when the spectra of particle events are normalised to the high energy band (250-750 keV), an excess of low energy particle are observed in the Case C frames (frames with at least one primary and secondary particles) compared to the Case B frames (frames with just primaries). This may indicate that low energy particles are more likely to interact with the detector housing and create secondary particle showers.
- · We find a significant spatial correlation between particle and valid events in Case C frames on small spatial scales up to 30 pixels (4500 microns) of

Figure 8. The light curves of particle events detected in Case A frames per 100 s binning for five different epochs in the solar cycle are shown on the left panels. The dashed lines in the right hand panels show the expected Poisson distributions around the mean. The distributions of count rates of particle events in these observations in each epoch are shown on the right panels.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00604v2-figure-e8d28f3c-514a-472e-b000-d781043934c1.jpg)

Figure 9. The light curves of valid events in 2 to 7 keV band detected in Case B frames per 200s binning for five different epochs in the solar cycle are shown on the left panels. The dashed lines in the right hand panels show the expected Poisson distributions around the mean. The distributions of count rates of particle events in these observations in each epoch are shown on the right panels.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00604v2-figure-a6fa6be1-b7fd-4879-9c55-98b1da34bfc2.jpg)

Figure 10. Distribution of particle event counts per 100 s bin obtained from light curves of the pointed observations of the AB Doradus star system taken in two different filter configurations; filter closed and with the thick filter. The observations were taken in 2002, 2004, and 2017. Comparing mean count rates with the count rates observed in NXB data (see Table 3), we can infer that the filter closed observations were taken during solar maximum, while the 2017 observations were performed during solar minimum. The unfocused background level measured in the FWC data and solar activity are closely correlated.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00604v2-figure-015f76cd-f307-4ee3-be9f-d6d3afbd9646.jpg)

the unfocused background observations with the closed filter in the 2-7 keV band. In the observations of the supernova remnant SNR 21.5 -09 no spatial correlation between the valid events and particle events is observed, as expected. Rejecting valid events ('self-anticoincidence'' or 'SAC') within 30 pixels around the primary GCRs reduces the absolute level of the particle-induced background of XMM-Newton EPIC-pn by ∼ 10% in the 2-7 keV energy band.

- · Light curves of particle events in Case A frames display a tight distribution, with mean particle counts of 133 to 276 per 100 s bin, depending on the phase of the solar cycle. The mean number of particle events per 100 s bin can be as high as 276 during solar minimum, while it can be as low as 133 during solar maximum. The sample standard deviations of the count per 100 s bin are consistent with expectations for Poisson distributions with the observed means. There is no evidence for any short-term temporal variability in the GCR component of the instrumental background, beyond what is expected for Poisson noise. KS-test results indeed indicate that the distribution of count rates in the light curves of Case A and Cade B frames are consistent with the Poissonian distribution around the mean rate. These means and distributions can be used to monitor particle rates and estimate the level of unfocused background of future X-ray imaging detectors.
- · Light curves of valid events (secondaries generated by primary GCRs) also display a tight distribution around the mean, consistent with the expected Poissonian distribution. Similarly, there is no significant evidence for any short-term temporal variability in the secondary background events. These observed rates closely correlate with the solar cycle and particle rates and can be used to predict the level of unfocused X-ray background.

Similar analyses of the unfocused component of the X-ray detector background have been performed on the Chandra stowed ACIS data and the Neil Gehrels Swift Telescope XRT data (e.g., Bartalucci et al. 2014; Grant 2018; Bulbul et al. 2018). Results we present in this work should help to understand and reduce the particle background level in other Si-based X-ray detectors (e.g., the Wide Field Imager on Athena and the eROSITA instrument on board the Spectrum Roentgen Gamma observatory). The SWM frame time of 5.67 ms is similar to the Athena WFI default frame, allowing us to validate GEANT4 simulations of the Athena WFI unfocused background (see Miller et al. 2019).

Beyond validating the GEANT4 simulations for the Athena WFI, this study also lays the ground work for application of self-anticoincidence to reduce the unfocused background in silicon-based X-ray detectors, e.g. WFI on board of Athena (Nandra et al. 2013), eROSITA on board of SRG (Merloni et al. 2012), EPIC on board of XMM-Newton (Jansen et al. 2001), and HDXI on board of Lynx (Gaskin et al. 2019). The results obtained from this work will be used to develop both on-board and ground-based algorithms to better characterize and improve background rejection for siliconbased X-ray imaging detectors. The self-anticoincidence method, and the results presented in this work, will help reduce the Athena WFI particle background and increase the signal-to-noise in background-dominated observations, such as galaxy cluster outskirts and deep surveys, enhancing the science return of Athena .

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments on the draft. We gratefully acknowledge support from NASA grant NNX17AB07G, administered by Penn State, and from NASA contracts NAS 8-37716 and NAS 8-38252.

This paper made use of the simulations from GEANT software (Tenzer et al. 2010) and XMM-Newton SAS analysis software (Gabriel et al. 2004). This work made use of SciPy (Jones et al. 2001), matplotlib, a Python library for publication quality graphics (Hunter 2007), Astropy, a community-developed core Python package for Astronomy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013), NumPy (Van Der Walt et al. 2011).

## APPENDIX A. OBSERVATIONS

Table 4 . XMM-Newton EPIC-pn Small Window Mode Observations Taken in the Filter-Wheel Closed Set-up during slewing phase.

| Obs.   | Obs. ID    | Revolution   | Exposure (ks)   | Number of Frames   | Obs.    | Obs. ID               | Revolution   | Exposure (ks)   | Number of Frames   |
|--------|------------|--------------|-----------------|--------------------|---------|-----------------------|--------------|-----------------|--------------------|
| Index  |            |              |                 |                    | Index   |                       |              |                 |                    |
| 0      | 9136000003 | 1360         | 3.91            | 690114             | 155     | 9213400002            | 2134         | 3.4             | 599994             |
| 1      | 9136100002 | 1361         | 2.37            | 418658             | 156     | 9214900004            | 2149         | 1.42            | 249893             |
| 2      | 9136200004 | 1362         | 6.42            | 1132080            | 157     | 9217500002            | 2175         | 1.85            | 326346             |
| 3      | 9136500003 | 1365         | 4.07            | 717519             | 158     | 9218200004            | 2182         | 2.58            | 454189             |
| 4      | 9137500005 | 1375         | 5.65            | 995629             | 159     | 9218300002            | 2183         | 2.47            | 435767             |
| 5      | 9138800003 | 1388         | 2.24            | 395752             | 160     | 9219200004            | 2192         | 3.13            | 551326             |
| 6      | 9138900004 | 1389         | 4.42            | 778932             | 161     | 9223300002            | 2233         | 5.31            | 935852             |
| 7      | 9139200003 | 1392         | 2.86            | 504355             | 162     | 9223700003            | 2237         | 2.7             | 475590             |
| 8      | 9139400002 | 1394         | 1.15            | 201914             | 163     | 9225900003            | 2259         | 3.18            | 560297             |
| 9      | 9139500004 | 1395         | 4.31            | 759510             | 164     | 9226100002            | 2261         | 5.88            | 1035931            |
| 10     | 9139700002 | 1397         | 2.18            | 383899             | 165     | 9226400004            | 2264         | 2.63            | 464485             |
| 11     | 9140100004 | 1401         | 1.37            | 241883             | 166     | 9227500006            | 2275         | 3.48            | 614237             |
| 12     | 9141000003 | 1410         | 4.08            | 719023             | 167     | 9227600002            | 2276         | 2.24            | 394874             |
| 13     | 9142800004 | 1428         | 5.71            | 1005950            | 168     | 9229000002            | 2290         | 1.84            | 324827             |
| 14     | 9143300002 | 1433         | 3.71            | 654472             | 169     | 9229600003            | 2296         | 1.84            | 323646             |
| 15     | 9144300004 | 1443         | 6.17            | 1087659            | 170     | 9229700003            | 2297         | 1.52            | 267659             |
| 16     | 9144500003 | 1445         | 2.97            | 522981             | 171     | 9229900003            | 2299         | 1.51            | 265961             |
| 17     | 9144700003 | 1447         | 0.99            | 175325             | 172     | 9230900003            | 2309         | 4.29            | 756196             |
| 18     | 9144900005 | 1449         | 1.33            | 234024             | 173     | 9231800002            | 2318         | 3.82            | 673051             |
| 19     | 9145700003 | 1457         | 5.2             | 917470             | 174     | 9232100004            | 2321         | 6.81            | 1199982            |
| 20     | 9146300006 | 1463         | 3.33            | 587072             | 175     | 9233000003            | 2330         | 2.29            | 403991             |
| 21     | 9147500002 | 1475         | 1.88            | 331127             | 176     | 9233200003            | 2332         | 3.94            | 693939             |
| 22     | 9147900002 | 1479         | 1.86            | 327992             | 177     | 9233900005            | 2339         | 4.44            | 782505             |
| 23     | 9148000004 | 1480         | 1.28            | 225991             | 178     | 9236300002            | 2363         | 3.8             | 669151             |
| 24     | 9148400003 | 1484         | 2.5             | 440018             | 179     | 9236600002            | 2366         | 5.91            | 1042100            |
| 25     | 9149500002 | 1495         | 4.75            | 838019             | 180     | 9236700002            | 2367         | 6.49            | 1144493            |
| 26     | 9151000002 | 1510         | 6.67            | 1175239            | 181     | 9236900002            | 2369         | 4.91            | 865822             |
| 27     | 9151000003 | 1510         | 3.59            | 632906             | 182     | 9238200002            | 2382         | 5.89            | 1038778            |
| 28     | 9151300002 | 1513         | 5.52            | 973663             | 183     | 9238700004            | 2387         | 4.35            | 766698             |
| 29     | 9151600004 | 1516         | 1.98            | 349686             | 184     | 9239400003            | 2394         | 3.85            | 678823             |
| 30     | 9151700002 | 1517         | 0.95            | 168322             | 185     | 9240900002            | 2409         | 3.38            | 595051             |
| 31     | 9152300002 | 1523         | 2.14            | 377646             | 186     | 9241200002            | 2412         | 2.11            | 371796             |
| 32     | 9152400002 | 1524         | 3.32            | 585622             | 187     | 9241500002            | 2415         | 5.36            | 944903             |
| 33     | 9152700003 | 1527         | 3.79            | 667745             | 188     | 9241600002            | 2416         | 1.11            | 196163             |
| 34     | 9152900002 | 1529         | 3.54            | 624743             |         | 9242200003            |              |                 | 359330             |
| 35     | 9153000003 | 1530         | 4.17            | 735806             | 189     |                       | 2422         | 2.04            | 401729             |
| 36     | 9153100004 | 1531         | 5.72            | 1007747            | 190 191 | 9242700002 9243000003 | 2427 2430    | 2.28 3.56       | 628516             |
| 37     | 9153200003 | 1532         | 5.31            | 936525             | 192     | 9245700004            | 2457         | 2.3             | 405332             |

Table 4 (continued)

| Obs.   | Obs. ID    | Revolution   | Exposure   | Number of   | Obs.    | Obs. ID    | Revolution   | Exposure   | Number of     |
|--------|------------|--------------|------------|-------------|---------|------------|--------------|------------|---------------|
| Index  |            |              | (ks)       | Frames      | Index   |            |              | (ks)       | Frames        |
| 38     | 9153300002 | 1533         | 4.7        | 827869      | 193     | 9247900002 | 2479         | 1.03       | 182172        |
| 39     | 9153400002 | 1534         | 3.7        | 652071      | 194     | 9248700002 | 2487         | 1.23       | 216006        |
| 40     | 9153400004 | 1534         | 4.92       | 868326      | 195     | 9248900002 | 2489         | 2.41       | 425183        |
| 41     | 9153600002 | 1536         | 5.47       | 964802      | 196     | 9248900003 | 2489         | 3.63       | 640579        |
| 42     | 9153600003 | 1536         | 6.18       | 1090252     | 197     | 9249100002 | 2491         | 6.75       | 1189397       |
| 43     | 9153900002 | 1539         | 1.05       | 184286      | 198     | 9249300002 | 2493         | 6.28       | 1106857       |
| 44     | 9154200004 | 1542         | 6.26       | 1103389     | 199     | 9249400002 | 2494         | 3.42       | 603517        |
| 45     | 9154300003 | 1543         | 2.9        | 510531      | 200     | 9249500003 | 2495         | 6.09       | 1073205       |
| 46     | 9154400005 | 1544         | 3.06       | 538903      | 201     | 9249600002 | 2496         | 3.48       | 614271        |
| 47     | 9154600005 | 1546         | 4.39       | 773231      | 202     | 9249700002 | 2497         | 3.49       | 615429        |
| 48     | 9156800003 | 1568         | 5.83       | 1027723     | 203     | 9249800002 | 2498         | 1.72       | 302452        |
| 49     | 9158100002 | 1581         | 4.66       | 822194      | 204     | 9249900002 | 2499         | 4.02       | 708999        |
| 50     | 9158900004 | 1589         | 3.34       | 589018      | 205     | 9252900006 | 2529         | 0.98       | 171979        |
| 51     | 9160000002 | 1600         | 3.28       | 578523      | 206     | 9253300003 | 2533         | 3.06       | 540308        |
| 52     | 9160700004 | 1607         | 1.44       | 253915      | 207     | 9254400002 | 2544         | 1.25       | 220908        |
| 53     | 9160800004 | 1608         | 5.82       | 1025948     | 208     | 9254500004 | 2545         | 4.1        | 723228        |
| 54     | 9160900002 | 1609         | 2.95       | 519505      | 209     | 9254600004 | 2546         | 4.71       | 830219        |
| 55     | 9161000002 | 1610         | 0.95       | 167732      | 210     | 9256500002 | 2565         | 5.84       | 1028961       |
| 56     | 9161300002 | 1613         | 1.08       | 189574      | 211     | 9256600002 | 2566         | 4.34       | 764502        |
| 57     | 9161500004 | 1615         | 2.03       | 358285      | 212     | 9257300002 | 2573         | 1.56       | 274811        |
| 58     | 9161600002 | 1616         | 6.03       | 1062547     | 213     | 9258700002 | 2587         | 4.26       | 751265        |
| 59     | 9161900002 | 1619         | 1.53       | 268946      | 214     | 9258800002 | 2588         | 3.16       | 557816        |
| 60     | 9162100003 | 1621         | 3.5        | 617167      | 215     | 9259300002 | 2593         | 5.78       | 1018257       |
| 61     | 9163100002 | 1631         | 1.93       | 341051      | 216     | 9261200003 | 2612         | 5.39       | 950948        |
| 62     | 9164900002 | 1649         | 2.56       | 450613      | 217     | 9261800002 | 2618         | 5.7        | 1004257       |
| 63     | 9164900003 | 1649         | 3.04       | 536480      | 218     | 9262500003 | 2625         | 5.94       | 1046693       |
| 64     | 9165500004 | 1655         | 2.32       | 408867      | 219     | 9263300002 | 2633         | 1.54       | 271100        |
| 65     | 9166200003 | 1662         | 0.99       | 175344      | 220     | 9264200002 | 2642         | 1.24       | 219011        |
| 66     | 9168100003 | 1681         | 1.48       | 260533      | 221     | 9264400003 | 2644         | 4.18       | 737026        |
| 67     | 9169500002 | 1695         | 1.39       | 245523      | 222     | 9265000003 | 2650         | 5.15       | 908458        |
| 68     | 9169600003 | 1696         | 1.55       | 273414      | 223     | 9265400005 | 2654         | 5.74       | 1012829       |
| 69     | 9169700004 | 1697         | 3.36       | 591780      | 224     | 9265500003 | 2655         | 2.25       | 396033        |
| 70     | 9169800002 | 1698         | 4.11       | 725288      | 225     | 9266200002 | 2662         | 1.57       | 276761        |
| 71     | 9169900004 | 1699         | 4.56       | 804166      | 226     | 9266700002 | 2667         | 3.01       | 531492 801427 |
| 72     | 9170200002 | 1702         | 2.06       | 362767      | 227     | 9267800004 | 2678         | 4.55       |               |
| 73     | 9170300002 | 1703         | 4.63       | 816310      | 228     | 9268600003 | 2686         | 6.46       | 1139449       |
| 74     | 9170500003 | 1705         | 3.97       | 700703      | 229     | 9268900002 | 2689         | 5.64       | 993993        |
| 75     | 9171000002 | 1710         | 5.26       | 926909      | 230     | 9269100003 | 2691         | 1.24       | 219322        |
| 76     | 9171000003 | 1710         | 2.56       | 450836      | 231     | 9269300002 | 2693         | 4.37       | 769649        |
| 77     | 9171100004 | 1711         | 1.28       | 225877      | 232     | 9270200002 | 2702         | 2.88       | 508607        |
| 78     | 9171600003 | 1716         | 4.29       | 756501      | 233     | 9272100002 | 2721         | 6.61       | 1165708       |
| 79     | 9172300002 | 1723         | 4.09       | 720996      | 234     | 9272200003 | 2722         | 3.91       | 689470        |
| 80     | 9175700002 | 1757         | 4.69       | 826810      | 235     | 9272300003 | 2723         | 1.79       | 316186        |
| 81     | 9176600004 | 1766         | 1.97       | 346701      |         | 9272400004 | 2724         | 6.2        | 1093794       |
| 82     | 9176800004 | 1768         | 1.7        | 300522      | 236 237 | 9273200003 | 2732         | 4.78       | 842060        |
| 83     | 9176900004 | 1769         | 1.62       | 285310      | 238     | 9273400004 | 2734         | 6.58       | 1160738       |
| 84     | 9177600004 | 1776         | 3.42       | 603085      | 239     | 9274300003 | 2743         | 5.68       | 1002279       |

Table 4 (continued)

| Obs.   | Obs. ID    | Revolution   | Exposure   | Number of     | Obs.   | Obs. ID    | Revolution   | Exposure   | Number of   |
|--------|------------|--------------|------------|---------------|--------|------------|--------------|------------|-------------|
| Index  |            |              | (ks)       | Frames        | Index  |            |              | (ks)       | Frames      |
| 85     | 9178100003 | 1781         | 1.75       | 309354        | 240    | 9276100002 | 2761         | 0.95       | 167169      |
| 86     | 9179300002 | 1793         | 3.36       | 591642        | 241    | 9276400002 | 2764         | 2.79       | 492081      |
| 87     | 9180400003 | 1804         | 2.58       | 454489        | 242    | 9276600002 | 2766         | 3.79       | 668182      |
| 88     | 9180700003 | 1807         | 4.22       | 744111        | 243    | 9276600003 | 2766         | 3.47       | 611061      |
| 89     | 9181400002 | 1814         | 1.19       | 209206        | 244    | 9276700003 | 2767         | 4.7        | 828186      |
| 90     | 9181700003 | 1817         | 2.36       | 415451        | 245    | 9278000004 | 2780         | 3.44       | 607388      |
| 91     | 9181900003 | 1819         | 4.2        | 740381        | 246    | 9278900002 | 2789         | 3.99       | 703211      |
| 92     | 9182100003 | 1821         | 5.27       | 928537        | 247    | 9279400003 | 2794         | 0.94       | 166137      |
| 93     | 9182200003 | 1822         | 4.81       | 848729        | 248    | 9280600003 | 2806         | 1.98       | 349925      |
| 94     | 9182500003 | 1825         | 3.03       | 534405        | 249    | 9281000002 | 2810         | 3.13       | 552697      |
| 95     | 9185700003 | 1857         | 1.52       | 267126        | 250    | 9281200003 | 2812         | 3.62       | 637549      |
| 96     | 9187200003 | 1872         | 2.3        | 405573        | 251    | 9281300003 | 2813         | 2.18       | 384111      |
| 97     | 9187300003 | 1873         | 3.35       | 591401        | 252    | 9285000003 | 2850         | 5.78       | 1018841     |
| 98     | 9187400002 | 1874         | 4.27       | 751985        | 253    | 9285400002 | 2854         | 1          | 176060      |
| 99     | 9187400003 | 1874         | 2.52       | 443917        | 254    | 9285400003 | 2854         | 3.17       | 559730      |
| 100    | 9188300003 | 1883         | 1.09       | 192227        | 255    | 9285600002 | 2856         | 0.98       | 173367      |
| 101    | 9189000003 | 1890         | 2.53       | 446735        | 256    | 9285700003 | 2857         | 3.8        | 669560      |
| 102    | 9189200004 | 1892         | 3.79       | 668616        | 257    | 9288200003 | 2882         | 1.08       | 191254      |
| 103    | 9190100002 | 1901         | 5.01       | 882669        | 258    | 9289500004 | 2895         | 1.73       | 305505      |
| 104    | 9190400003 | 1904         | 1.39       | 244955        | 259    | 9289800002 | 2898         | 1.13       | 200067      |
| 105    | 9190600003 | 1906         | 2.32       | 409140        | 260    | 9290800002 | 2908         | 3.45       | 608332      |
| 106    | 9191000002 | 1910         | 6.44       | 1134925       | 261    | 9291100003 | 2911         | 3          | 529685      |
| 107    | 9191100005 | 1911         | 3.12       | 549656        | 262    | 9291500002 | 2915         | 1.03       | 181709      |
| 108    | 9191300004 | 1913         | 4.98       | 877200        | 263    | 9291600004 | 2916         | 3.01       | 530927      |
| 109    | 9191600003 | 1916         | 2.83       | 498338        | 264    | 9291800002 | 2918         | 4.92       | 867689      |
| 110    | 9191700004 | 1917         | 5.73       | 1010187       | 265    | 9291900002 | 2919         | 2.67       | 470591      |
| 111    | 9191800002 | 1918         | 5.73       | 1010697       | 266    | 9292200002 | 2922         | 5.23       | 921950      |
| 112    | 9192100003 | 1921         | 2.25       | 397558        | 267    | 9292300002 | 2923         | 3.36       | 592678      |
| 113    | 9193100002 | 1931         | 2.14       | 377032        | 268    | 9292300003 | 2923         | 3.32       | 585432      |
| 114    | 9193200002 | 1932         | 3.09       | 545221        | 269    | 9292400005 | 2924         | 3.6        | 635465      |
| 115    | 9194500007 | 1945         | 2.16       | 380834        | 270    | 9293100002 | 2931         | 6.35       | 1118778     |
| 116    | 9194800004 | 1948         | 3.55       | 625570        | 271    | 9293400002 | 2934         | 1.11       | 196290      |
| 117    | 9195000003 | 1950         | 3.73       | 658118        | 272    | 9293500002 | 2935         | 1.21       | 213551      |
| 118    | 9196600002 | 1966         | 5.18       | 913961 220960 | 273    | 9293700002 | 2937         | 4.79       | 844386      |
| 119    | 9196900002 | 1969         | 1.25       |               | 274    | 9294700014 | 2947         | 1.85       | 325342      |
| 120    | 9197000002 | 1970         | 5.27       | 929152        | 275    | 9294800004 | 2948         | 1.6        | 282729      |
| 121    | 9197500003 | 1975         | 2.27       | 399390        | 276    | 9294900005 | 2949         | 4.03       | 710343      |
| 122    | 9198100002 | 1981         | 2.22       | 390596        | 277    | 9305600003 | 3056         | 4.35       | 767630      |
| 123    | 9198300002 | 1983         | 4.06       | 716621        | 278    | 9305600004 | 3056         | 4.58       | 807780      |
| 124    | 9198400003 | 1984         | 2.51       | 443394        | 279    | 9305700003 | 3057         | 5.35       | 943508      |
| 125    | 9198700006 | 1987         | 1.09       | 192494        | 280    | 9305700005 | 3057         | 2          | 352481      |
| 126    | 9198900002 | 1989         | 1.82       | 320276        | 281    | 9305800002 | 3058         | 4.78       | 843571      |
| 127    | 9198900004 | 1989         | 4.43       | 780710        | 282    | 9306300003 | 3063         | 2.3        | 405608      |
| 128    | 9199200004 | 1992         | 1.05       | 185637        | 283    | 9306400004 | 3064         | 6.67       | 1176203     |
| 129    | 9199500004 | 1995         | 1.91       | 336064        | 284    | 9307500002 | 3075         | 2.49       | 438811      |
| 130    | 9200100005 | 2001         | 3.19       | 563143        | 285    | 9307800002 | 3078         | 1.62       | 285357      |
| 131    | 9200200002 | 2002         | 3.23       | 568866        | 286    | 9307900004 | 3079         | 3.1        | 546744      |

Table 4 (continued)

|   Obs. Index |    Obs. ID |   Revolution |   Exposure (ks) |   Number of Frames | Obs. Index   | Obs. ID    | Revolution   | Exposure (ks)   | Number of Frames   |
|--------------|------------|--------------|-----------------|--------------------|--------------|------------|--------------|-----------------|--------------------|
|          132 | 9200400003 |         2004 |            2.12 |             373047 | 287          | 9307900005 | 3079         | 6.48            | 1142453            |
|          133 | 9200800004 |         2008 |            4.74 |             835613 | 288          | 9308100004 | 3081         | 3.64            | 641870             |
|          134 | 9200900003 |         2009 |            1.74 |             307235 | 289          | 9308100005 | 3081         | 2.51            | 442592             |
|          135 | 9201300003 |         2013 |            4.14 |             730250 | 290          | 9308700003 | 3087         | 3.16            | 557727             |
|          136 | 9201400003 |         2014 |            1.66 |             292367 | 291          | 9309200003 | 3092         | 2.53            | 446555             |
|          137 | 9201500003 |         2015 |            6.49 |            1144810 | 292          | 9309900002 | 3099         | 4.56            | 804260             |
|          138 | 9202100003 |         2021 |            1.87 |             330235 | 293          | 9310100003 | 3101         | 7.66            | 1349994            |
|          139 | 9202900002 |         2029 |            4.21 |             741632 | 294          | 9310200004 | 3102         | 4.71            | 830686             |
|          140 | 9204700002 |         2047 |            1.6  |             282537 | 295          | 9311100002 | 3111         | 1.56            | 274181             |
|          141 | 9205700003 |         2057 |            6.36 |            1121529 | 296          | 9311100005 | 3111         | 5.01            | 883409             |
|          142 | 9207100003 |         2071 |            2.63 |             463072 | 297          | 9312000002 | 3120         | 0.97            | 170493             |
|          143 | 9207600004 |         2076 |            1.7  |             299695 | 298          | 9312000003 | 3120         | 3.08            | 542823             |
|          144 | 9207700003 |         2077 |            3.48 |             612781 | 299          | 9312000004 | 3120         | 2.03            | 358103             |
|          145 | 9208100004 |         2081 |            5.96 |            1051690 | 300          | 9313500002 | 3135         | 4.54            | 800551             |
|          146 | 9208400003 |         2084 |            5.35 |             942755 | 301          | 9313900002 | 3139         | 2.8             | 492855             |
|          147 | 9209500004 |         2095 |            3.19 |             561571 | 302          | 9315100002 | 3151         | 1.52            | 267559             |
|          148 | 9209600002 |         2096 |            6.56 |            1156232 | 303          | 9316200002 | 3162         | 4.86            | 857242             |
|          149 | 9209800002 |         2098 |            5.43 |             957569 | 304          | 9316200003 | 3162         | 1.55            | 273718             |
|          150 | 9210100003 |         2101 |            4.22 |             744294 | 305          | 9317200002 | 3172         | 1.54            | 271656             |
|          151 | 9210700004 |         2107 |            3.95 |             696954 | 306          | 9319100004 | 3191         | 4.31            | 760519             |
|          152 | 9211000002 |         2110 |            4.87 |             857875 | 307          | 9321200004 | 3212         | 3.71            | 654218             |
|          153 | 9211600002 |         2116 |            5.94 |            1047642 | 308          | 9321700003 | 3217         | 1.98            | 348438             |
|          154 | 9211700002 |         2117 |            2.14 |             376952 |              |            |              |                 |                    |

Table 5. Pointed XMM-Newton EPIC-pn Small Window Mode Observations

| Source        |    Obs. ID |   Year | Filter Set up   |   Exp. ks |   Number of Frames ( × 10 6 ) |
|---------------|------------|--------|-----------------|-----------|-------------------------------|
| AB Doradus    | 0134522101 |   2002 | Closed Flt.     |        49 |                          8.55 |
| AB Doradus    | 0160362901 |   2004 | Closed Flt.     |        56 |                          9.87 |
| AB Doradus    | 0791980401 |   2017 | Thick Flt.      |        12 |                          2.08 |
| SNR 21.5 - 09 | 0804250201 |   2017 | Thin Flt.       |        41 |                          7.14 |

Software: GEANT4 (Tenzer et al. 2010), XMMNewton SAS (Gabriel et al. 2004), Matplotlib (Hunter 2007), NumPy (Van Der Walt et al. 2011), Astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013), SciPy (Jones et al. 2001).

## REFERENCES

Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&amp;A, 558, A33,

doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

Bulbul, E., Kraft, R., Nulsen, P., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10699, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 106994G

Bartalucci, I., Mazzotta, P., Bourdin, H., &amp; Vikhlinin, A.

2014, A&amp;A, 566, A25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423443

Burrows, D. e. a. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10699, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 1069954

| Burrows, D. N., & Mendenhall, J. A. 1991, Nature, 351, 629, doi: 10.1038/351629a0                                                                                                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| De Luca, A., & Molendi, S. 2004, A&A, 419, 837, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034421                                                                                                                                               |
| Freyberg, M. J., Briel, U. G., Dennerl, K., et al. 2004, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 5165, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy XIII, ed. K. A.                                                                          |
| Flanagan & O. H. W. Siegmund, 112-122 Gabriel, C., Denby, M., Fyfe, D. J., et al. 2004,                                                                                                                                       |
| Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series,                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Vol. 314, The XMM-Newton SAS - Distributed Development and Maintenance of a Large Science Analysis System: A Critical Analysis, ed. F. M. G. Allen, & D. Egret, 759 Gaskin, J. A., Swartz, D. A., Vikhlinin, A., et al. 2019, |
| Ochsenbein, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 5, 021001, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.5.2.021001                                                                                                          |
| Gastaldello, F., Ghizzardi, S., Marelli, M., et al. 2017, Experimental Astronomy, 44, 321, doi: 10.1007/s10686-017-9549-y Grant, C. e. a. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical                                                   |
| Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10699, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 10699158                                                                                 |
| R. C., & Markevitch, M. 2007, ApJL, 661, L117, doi: 10.1086/519003                                                                                                                                                            |
| Hickox,                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering,                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 9, 90                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Jansen, F., Lumb, D., Altieri, B., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036 Jones, E., Oliphant, T., Peterson, P., et al. 2001,                                                                             |
| SciPy:                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Open source scientific tools for Python.                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| D., Lallement, R., Kharchenko, V., et al. 2006, A&A, 460, 289, doi:                                                                                                                                                           |
| Koutroumpa,                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| Kuntz, K. D., & Snowden, S. L. 2008, A&A, 478, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077912                                                                                                                                                |
| 575,                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| 10.1051/0004-6361:20065250                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| http://www.scipy.org/                                                                                                                                                                                                         |

| Lumb, D. H., Warwick, R. S., Page, M., & De Luca, A. 2002, A&A, 389, 93, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020531                                                                                                                        |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Merloni, A., Predehl, P., Becker, W., et al. 2012, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1209.3114. https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.3114                                                                                                             |
| Miller, E. D., Grant, C. E., Bautz, M., et al. 2019, JATIS, in prep.                                                                                                                                                            |
| Moretti, A., Pagani, C., Cusumano, G., et al. 2009, A&A, 493, 501, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811197                                                                                                                             |
| Nandra, K., Barret, D., Barcons, X., et al. 2013, arXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.2307                                                                                                                               |
| Neher, H. V., & Anderson, H. R. 1962, J. Geophys. Res., 67, 1309, doi: 10.1029/JZ067i004p01309                                                                                                                                  |
| Robertson, I. P., & Cravens, T. E. 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1439, doi: 10.1029/2002GL016740                                                                                                                               |
| Snowden, S. L., Egger, R., Finkbeiner, D. P., Freyberg, M. J., & Plucinsky, P. P. 1998, ApJ, 493, 715, doi: 10.1086/305135                                                                                                      |
| Snowden, S. L., Mebold, U., Hirth, W., Herbstmeier, U., & Schmitt, J. H. M. 1991, Science, 252, 1529, doi: 10.1126/science.252.5012.1529                                                                                        |
| Snowden, S. L., Mushotzky, R. F., Kuntz, K. D., & Davis, D. S. 2008, A&A, 478, 615, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077930                                                                                                             |
| Str¨der, u L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000066                                                                                                                              |
| Tenzer, C., Warth, G., Kendziorra, E., & Santangelo, A. 2010, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7742, High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy IV, 77420Y                                                                   |
| Turner, M. J. L., Abbey, A., Arnaud, M., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000087                                                                                                                            |
| Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 22                                                                                                                              |
| von Kienlin, A., Eraerds, T., Bulbul, E., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10699, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 106991I |

Warwick, R. S. 2002, arXiv Astrophysics e-prints
Esra Bulbul Ralph Kraft Paul Nulsen Michael Freyberg Eric D. Miller Catherine Grant Mark W. Bautz David N. Burrows Steven Allen Tanja Eraerds Valentina Fioretti Fabio Gasteldello Vittorio Ghirardini David Hall Norbert Meidinger Silvano Molendi Arne Rau Dan Wilkins Joern Wilms
Characterisation of the Particle-Induced Background of XMM-Newton EPIC-pn: Short and Long Term Variability
The particle-induced background of X-ray observatories is produced by
Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) primary protons, electrons, and He ions. Events due
to direct interaction with the detector are usually removed by on board
processing. The interactions of these primary particles with the detector
environment produce secondary particles that mimic X-ray events from celestial
sources and are much more difficult to identify. The filter wheel closed data
from the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn camera in small window mode (SWM) contains both the
X-ray-like background events and the events due to direct interactions with the
primary particles. From this data we demonstrate that X-ray-like background
events are spatially correlated with the primary particle interaction. This
result can be used to further characterise and reduce the non-X-ray background
in silicon-based X-ray detectors in current and future missions. We also show
that spectrum and pattern fractions of secondary particle events are different
from those produced by cosmic X-rays.