## Influence of Environmentally Affected Hole Transport Layers on Spatial Homogeneity and Charge Transport Dynamics of Organic Solar Cells.

Huei  -Ting  Chien 1 * ,  Florian  Pilat ,  Thomas  Griesser ,  Harald  Fitzek ,  Peter  Poelt 1 2 3 3,4 ,  Bettina Friedel 1,5

1 Institute of Solid State Physics, Graz University of Technology, Austria;

2 Chair of Chemistry of Polymeric Materials, University of Leoben, Austria;

3 Institute of Electron Microscopy and Nanoanalysis, Graz University of Technology, Austria;

4 Graz Centre for Electron Microscopy, Austria

5 illwerke vkw Endowed Professorship for Energy Efficiency, Energy Research Vorarlberg University of Applied Sciences, Austria

Center,

*Email: hchien@tugraz.at

KEYWORDS: organic solar cells; spatial  homogeneity;  photocurrent  mapping;  environmental degradation; colloidal films; hole-transport layer

## ABSTRACT

After the efficiency of organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells achieved more than 10%, the control of stability and degradation mechanisms of solar cells became a prominent task. The improvement of device efficiency due to incorporation of a hole-transport layer (HTL) in bulk-heterojunction solar  cells  has  been  extensively  reported.    However,  the  most  widely  used  HTL  material, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate)  (PEDOT:PSS)  is  frequently  suspected to  be  the  dominating  source  for device's  instability under  environmental  conditions.  Thereby effects like photooxidation and electrode corrosion are often reported to shorten device lifetime. However, often in environmental device studies, the source of degradation, whether being from the  HTL,  the  active  layer  or  the  metal  cathode  are  rather  difficult  to  distinguish,  because  the external  diffusion  of  oxygen  and  water  affects  all  components.  In  this  study,  different  HTLs, namely  prepared  from  traditional  PEDOT:PSS  and  also  two  types  of  molybdenum  trioxide (MoO3), are exposed to different environments such as oxygen, light or humidity, prior to device finalization  under  inert  conditions.  This  allows  investigating  any  effects  within  the  HTL  and from reactions at its interface to the indium-tin-oxide electrode or the active layer. The surface and  bulk  chemistry  of  the  exposed  HTL  has  been  monitored  and  discussed  in  context  to  the observed device physics, dynamic charge transport and spatial performance homogeneity of the according  OPV  device.  The  results  show  that  merely  humidity-exposure  of  the  HTL  leads  to decreased device performance for PEDOT:PSS, but also for one type of the tested MoO3. The losses are related to the amount of absorbed water in the HTL, inducing loss of active area in terms of interfacial contact. The device with PEDOT:PSS HTL after humid air exposure showed seriously decreased photocurrent by micro-delamination of swelling/shrinkage of the hygroscopic layer. The colloidal MoO3 with water-based precursor solution presents slight decay of solar cell performance, also here caused by swelling/shrinking reaction, but by a combination

of in-plane particle contact and resistance scaling with particle expansion. However, the device with quasi-continuous and alcohol-based MoO3 showed unharmed stable electrical performance.

## INTRODUCTION

The research on organic photovoltaics (OPV) reached remarkable growth due to their potential for  realization  of  flexible,  large-area  and  light-weight  devices,  categorized  by  environmental 4]. The heterojunction (BHJ) concept by the combination of organic donor and acceptor on the nanoscale.

friendliness, low thermal budget and low-cost production e.g. via roll-to-roll printing.[1 -power conversion efficiency (PCE) of OPVs has been greatly improved by introducing the bulk[1,5]  The most prominent system here is the donor-acceptor couple of the conjugated polymer poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and the fullerene derivative phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM).  [6 -7]  Best  systems  currently  reach  up  to  12%  efficiency.[8-9]  Typical  BHJ  OPVs require a selective hole-transport layer (HTL) to block electrons and enhance hole-transfer to the anode, further to stabilize the anode's work fun ction and reducing its surface roughness. [10-11] The most commonly used material for the anode interlayer is poly(3,4ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) due to its benefits  such as  high conductivity, high transparency and  good solution processibility[12-13]. However, beside high efficiencies and cost-effective processing, also long device lifetimes are desirable for OPVs. [14] Plenty of research has been focusing on environmentally induced mechanisms leading to device degradation, based on various approaches and techniques. [15 -20] This is not exclusively caused by  environments  like  air,  light  and  humidity,  even  solvent  vapors  which  are  present  during fabrication or even testing, can affect the device performance considerably.[71]  But exactly the long-term  stability  is  a  concern  when  using  PEDOT:PSS,  since  the  strongly  hygroscopic polysulfonic acid dissociates under the influence of humidity, suspected to induce corrosion in the device. [14-21] To overcome this problem, high-work function transition metal oxides, such

as  NiOx [22 -23],    WO3  [24]  and  MoO3  [25-27]  have  been  introduced  as  alternatives  to PEDOT:PSS  in  OPVs.  Still,  it  is  not  clear  if  those  materials  are  entirely  inert  against environmental influence.

Spatially resolved methods such as conductive atomic force microscopy [28] ,near-field scanning optical  microscopy  [29],  lock-in  thermography  [30],  photo-  and  electroluminescence  [31]  and light-beam induced current (LBIC) [27,31] have been applied as tools to characterize surface and device performance of OPVs. In particular, laser beam induced current (LBIC) has been widely used  to  investigate  degradation  and  efficiency  losses  by  spatial  homogeneity  across  the  entire photoactive pixel area. [20,32-34] Further, transient photocurrents (TPC) have been used to gain knowledge about the dynamics of charge separation, determine mobilities, to describe the buildup of trapped charges and the dynamics of recombination of OPVs. [35-41]

Aim of this work is to distinguish the environmental effects solely induced by exposition of the HTL, without the impact of a total device exposure. Therefore three different types of solution processed HTLs have been compared: (1) deposited from commercial PEDOT: PSS ink, (2) a quasi-continuous MoO3 nanolayer obtained from deposition of an acetylacetonate precursor in alcohol  and  hydrolysation  in  air  and  (3)  a  MoO3  layer  of  colloidal  particles  obtained  from hydrolysis  and  condensation  of  an  molybdate  precursor  in  acidic  aqueous  solution.  The  two different precipitation methods for MoO3 were chosen to see eventual effects of an acid presence. The as-prepared HTLs on indium-tin-oxide (ITO) glass substrates are exposed to dry air, humid air in the dark or with illumination, before further processing of the ITO/HTL/P3HT:PCBM/LiF/Al  device  stack  in  inert  atmosphere.  Surface  and  local  bulk chemistry  of  the  exposed  HTLs  have  been  investigated  by  X-ray  photoelectron  spectroscopy (XPS) and Raman microscopy, respectively. Finalized devices are characterized regarding their general  device  performance  and  scanned  regarding  their  photocurrent  homogeneity  and  local device  characteristics  by  LBIC.  The  dynamic  behavior  of  charge  transport  in  the  devices  was

studied  by  TPC.  Altogether,  these  results  allow  conclusions  on  device  changes/degradation solely  connected  to  chemical/photochemical  reactions  of  the  HTL  itself  or  at  the  closest interfaces in consequence.

## EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

## Materials

P3HT  was  supplied  by  Rieke  Metals  Inc.  (MW  50 -70  kg  mol -1 ,  regioregularity  91 -94%). PC60BM was purchased from Nano-C Inc. (99.5% purity). Anhydrous chlorobenzene (99.8%) as solvent  for  the  organic  semiconductors,  was  purchased  from  Acros  Organics.  The  aqueous formulation of PEDOT: PSS ink was purchased from Heraeus Deutschland GmbH &amp; Co. KG (Clevios  P  Jet  (OLED)).  Ammonium  molybdate  ((NH4)2MoO4)  ( ≥99.98%) ,  hydrochloric  acid (HCl)  ( ≥37%)  and  bis(acetylacetonato)dioxomolybdenum(VI)  (MoO 2(acac)2)  were  purchased from  Sigma-Aldrich.  Isopropanol  (99.9%)  was  purchased  from  VWR  International  LLC.  All substances  were  used  as  received.  ITO  sub strates  (20  Ω  /square,  Ossila)  were  cleaned  by sonication  in  acetone  and  isopropanol,  followed  by  O2  plasma  etching  (100  W  for  30  min) briefly before further processing.

## Preparation of the MoO3 and PEDOT:PSS HTLs

Two different formulations were used to generate the MoO3 films. The quasi-continuous films, consisting of a nanosized network with particle mean diameter of 6 nm, [27] are referred to in the following as MoO3-1 . For their preparation, following a procedure reported by K. Zilberberg et al., [25]  MoO2(acac)2 was dissolved in isopropanol to form a 0.5% (w/v) precursor solution. The colloidal films, comprising a layer of separated particles (10-30 nm), [27] are referred to as

MoO3-2 in this study and were prepared as reported by Liu et al. [26]. Here, (NH4)2MoO4 was dissolved in distilled water to form a 0.005 mol/L solution. Then 2 mol/L aqueous HCl solution as catalyst was added drop-wise under stirring until the pH value of the solution was between 1 and 1.5. Particles of MoO3 start forming already in solution by hydrolysis and condensation, thus generating  a  suspension.    All  three  formulations,  PEDOT:PSS,  MoO3-1  and  MoO3-2,    were filtered by 0.22 μm PVDF membrane filters (Sigma Aldrich) prior to deposition and spin-coated onto ITO substrates at 4000 rpm for PEDOT: PSS and 3000 rpm for MoO3 for 40s, respectively. The layers of MoO3-1 and MoO3-2 were kept in ambient air at room temperature for 1 h for hydrolysis  of  the  precursor.  Finally,  films  were  annealed  at  160  °C  for  20  min  to  dry  and promote oxide formation. The PEDOT: PSS layers were merely heated to 160 °C for 20 min under Argon (Ar) flow for removal of water. The film thickness of PEDOT:PSS is around 40 nm, MoO3-1  and  MoO3-2  are  both  around  10  nm.  The  as-prepared  HTLs  were  either  used immediately  for  device  fabrication  (referred  to  as  * /Fresh )  or  underwent  selected  exposure before. For this purpose films were submitted to dry air with &lt;20% relative humidity ( */Air ) or humid air with &gt;80% relative humidity (* /H2O )  without  any  illumination,  or  to  dry  air  under white  light  illumination  (tungsten  halogen)  at  10%  equivalent  of  AM1.5G  ( */Air  &amp;  light ), respectively. For each condition, the temperature was 25°C and the duration of exposure was 18 hours. Devices were fabricated immediately after exposure. Samples for XPS investigation were prepared  with  the  same  procedure  on  unpatterned  ITO  substrates.  Different  to  the  standard process, samples for Raman spectroscopy were prepared on ITO substrates for PEDOT:PSS and on Si substrates for MoO3-1 and MoO3-2 by drop casting method to obtain thicker layers (~80nm) to increase the weak signal intensity.

Device fabrication

Standard solar cells with P3HT:PCBM photoactive layer according to the architecture shown in Figure 1 were assembled in inert gas atmosphere, using named HTLs of MoO3-1 , MoO3-2 and PEDOT: PSS directly  after  different  environments exposures. The active layer was applied on the  according  ITO/HTL  substrate  by  spin-coating  from  a  solution  of  P3HT  and  PCBM  (1:1 weight  ratio,  18  mg/mL  each)  in  70°C  chlorobenzene  at  1500  rpm  for  60  s,  followed  by annealing at 120° C for 5 min. The film thickness obtained is around 150 nm. The cathode was thermally evaporated as a bilayer of LiF (2nm) and Al (100 nm). The nominal active area of the devices is 6 mm  (pixel size 1.5 mm x 4.0 mm). 2

## Characterization

The surface chemistry of HTLs was characterized by XPS and local bulk chemistry by Raman spectroscopy.  The  XPS  (Thermo  Fischer  Scientific,  Waltham,  MA  USA)  is  equipped  with  a monochromatic Al K α X-ray source (1486.6 eV). All scans were performed at room temperature. The peaks were fitted using a Gaussian/Lorentzian mixed function employing Shirley background correction (Software XPSPEAK41). Raman measurements were performed with a Horiba Jobin Yvon LabRam 800 HR spectrometer equipped with a 1024 x 256 CCD (Peltiercooled) and an Olympus BX41 microscope. All scans were done using a laser wavelength of 532 nm  (50  mW),  an  x50  Olympus  LMPlanFLN  (N.A.  0.5)  objective  and  a  300  l/mm  grating (spectral  resolution  of  3  cm -1 ).  Spatial  Raman  spectroscopy  characteristics  for  point-to-point analysis  were  taken  in  line-scans  along  100 μm scanning area  with  2  μm  step  size  for PEDOT:PSS, and with 4 μm for MoO3-1 and MoO3-2, respectively. In order to avoid damage to the sample, the laser intensity was reduced to 10 % for the measurements of PEDOT:PSS and MoO3-2 and to 1 % for the measurements of MoO3-1. The photocurrent density -voltage (J -V) characteristics  of  the  OPV  cells  were  recorded  using  a  computer-controlled  Keithley  2636A source  meter  and  AM1.5G  illumination  (100 mW/cm ) from  a  solar  simulator  (Model  10500, 2

ABET  Technologies,  rated  ABB).  Spatial  photocurrent  distribution  was  determined  by  laser beam induced current (LBIC) method, scanning with a computer-controlled nano-manipulatordriven  xy-stage  (Kleindiek  Nanotechnik,  NanoControl  NC-2-3)  and  excitation  with  a  532  nm laser (&lt;5mW) with a focused spotsize of ≈2 µm. Spatial photocurrent mappings were scanned with 40 μm step size across the entire photoactive pixel area of 4.0 mm x 1.5 mm (Fig. 1). Local photocurrent-voltage characteristics for point-to-point analysis were taken in line-scans along the long side of each pixel, scanning from the left (0 mm) to the right (4 mm) with 160 μm step size. For transient photocurrent measurements, a 530 nm green LED (Thorlabs, M530L2) was used as the light source and a 300 μs square pulse from a function generator (HAMEG HMF 2550) at 1 kHz  was  used  to  power  the  LED.  The  photocurrent  of  the  devices  was  measured  by  an oscilloscope (HAMEG HMO 3002 Series) with input impedance of 50 Ω. For voltage-dependent photocurrent transients, devices were connected to a computer-controlled Keithley 2636A source meter operating in DC mode.

## RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

To investigate how the environmental conditions such as air, illumination and humidity affect the  HTLs  and  in  consequence  lead  to  degradation  of  the  OPV  devices,  solar  photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) characteristics were recorded, shown in Figure 2. I n every case the ' fresh ' condition acts as blind sample in this study, to account for environment-independent relaxation, aging or measurement-related changes of the materials. Figure 2(a) shows the J-V-characteristics of devices  with  exposed  PEDOT:PSS  HTLs.  It  can  be  seen  that PEDOT:PSS/Air and PEDOT:PSS/Air  &amp;  light present  the  best  performance  of  the  4  conditions,  with  the  highest rectangularity indicated by fill factors (FF) of 0.49 and 0.50, respectively. PEDOT:PSS/Fresh on  the  other  hand,  shows  equal  short-circuit  current  (JSC)  of  around    -8.6  mA/cm   and  open2 circuit voltage (VOC) of around 0.54, but considerably lower fill factor of only 0.44. However,

the by far lowest performance is shown by PEDOT:PSS/H2O , which exhibits lower rectangularity  with  FF  of  0.39  and  additionally  greatly  reduced  photocurrent  of  JSC  of  -6.4 mA/cm 2 ,  but  stable  VOC  of  0.55.  The  behaviour  of  the  fresh  sample  compared  to  the  air-  and light-exposed ones can be explained by reduced interfacial charge transport efficiency between PEDOT:PSS and neighboring  layers  and  an  associated  higher  series  resistance  of  the  device, indicated by low FF and the change in slope around the VOC, respectively. The reason for the lack in interfacial transfer is the non-equilibrium condition the PEDOT:PSS layer is in when it is processed  into  a  device  right  away.  In  that  case,  a  certain  degree  of  aging  is  necessary  for relaxation of the polymer and its surface groups to make better contact to the ITO electrode and the active layer. The low FF accompanied by reduced photocurrent in PEDOT:PSS/H2O on the other hand, is a sign for loss of active area, in the sense of ITO corrosion producing insulating islands or local (photo)degradation of the adjacent active area facilitated by the absorbed water diffusing from the exposed PEDOT:PSS layer.[42-44] Figure 2(b) shows the solar J-V curve of devices  with  MoO3-1  HTL  after  different  environmental  exposures.  All  four  samples, MoO31/Fresh , MoO3-1/Air , MoO3-1/Air &amp;  light and MoO3-1/H2O show identical unaltered performance irrespective of the exposure of the HTL, with JSC of about -9.5 mA/cm , a VOC of 2 0.54 and a quite high fill factor of 0.54. This suggests that MoO3-1 is a considerably stable HTL material with unalterable surface chemistry, morphology or electric properties. Figure 2(c) shows the  solar  photocurrent  characteristics  of  devices  comprising  fresh  or  exposed  MoO3-2  HTLs. Three of the samples, MoO3-2/Fresh , MoO3-2/Air and MoO3-2/Air &amp; light exhibit very similar characteristics with JSC around -10.3 mA/cm , VOC of 0.56 and FF of 0.55. Only the photocurrent 2 output  of  the  humidity-exposed  sample MoO3-2/H2O is  significantly  lower  with  JSC  of  -8.9 mA/cm 2 , while neither the FF nor the VOC are affected. The fact that FF and series resistance (indicated by the slope  near VOC) do not change compared to the other samples, but only the current, indicates that the loss of photocurrent is caused by loss of photoactive area contributions,

either by local insulating areas due to corrosion of the ITO electrode interface or by degradation of the adjacent organic semiconductor. Though the current slopes in VOC look quite parallel for MoO3-2/H2O compared to the other exposure conditions, there is a difference in series resistance with an increase of around 9 %, implying that the bulk or interfacial charge transport is slightly affected.

To differentiate any effects caused by the devices  charge transport ability and potential trapping ' phenomena,  charge  transport  dynamics  were  studied  via  TPC.  Complete  sets  of  biased photocurrent transients following 300 µs square laser pulses for devices with exposed HTLs, for all conditions are shown in the Supporting Information with relative (Figure S1) and normalized currents (Figure S2). Selected normalized transient photocurrents are displayed in Figure 3, for devices of exposed PEDOT:PSS HTL (all conditions) and for the humidity-exposed MoO3 HTLs. Comparing the device response of PEDOT:PSS/Fresh , PEDOT:PSS/Air , PEDOT:PSS/Air&amp; light and PEDOT:PSS/H2O in  Figure 3 (a)-(d), one particular feature can be noticed, that is a current-overshoot  of  the  device  at  the  start  of  the  square  light  pulse  for  some  samples.  For PEDOT:PSS/Fresh this feature occurs quite weakly and merely for higher positive voltages. For PEDOT:PSS/H2O on  the  other  hand  the  effect  is  present  starting  from  -0.2  V  and  gets  more pronounced the more positive the voltage. PEDOT:PSS/Air and PEDOT:PSS/Air&amp; light do not show  this  behavior.  Otherwise  the  transient characteristics of the devices  with  exposed PEDOT:PSS are quite similar with rise (t90) of t90 (PEDOT:PSS) = 25 +/- 2 µs and fall times (t10) of t 10  (PEDOT:PSS)  =  25  +/-  2  µs,  respectively.  With  one  exception,  PEDOT:PSS/H2O  has  slightly extended rise and fall times of t90 (PEDOT:PSS/H2O) = 27 µs and t10 (PEDOT:PSS/H2O) = 33 µs. In devices with MoO3  HTL  current  shoots  are not observed for any condition. Exemplarily, the photocurrent transients of MoO3-1/H2O and MoO3-2/H2O are shown in Figure 3 (e) and (f). The transients of the MoO3 HTL devices behave quite similar for any of the exposure conditions or bias voltage (see also Supplemental Information Figure S2) with rise and fall times of around t90

(MoO3-1) = 29 +/- 1 µs and t10 (MoO3-1)  = 30 +/- 1 µs, and of around t90 (MoO3-2) = 27 +/- 1 µs and t10 (MoO3-2) = 26 +/- 1 µs, respectively. With one exception, MoO3-2/H2O has slightly extended rise and  fall  times  of  t90  (MoO3-2/H2O)  =  30  µs  and  t10  (MoO3-2/H2O) =  30  µs.  The  slight  homogeneous increase  of  charge  extraction  times  when  the  applied  bias  is  varied  from  -0.4  V  to  0.4  V,  is directly  assigned  to  the  influence  of  decreased  internal  electric  field.  Lack  of  heavy  or  abrupt changes to the rise and fall times and absence of any overshoot behavior are signs for stable, unhindered and well balanced transport in the devices.[45] Especially the biasing is a valuable tool  to  identify  energetic  barriers  or  traps  in  a  device,  as  the  applied  voltage  depending  on polarity and strength helps photogenerated charges to overcome  barriers, getting released from traps and swept out of the device.[40, 46] In the case of MoO3-HTL device sets, where divergent behavior could have been expected after the general J-V characteristics, transients show no signs of delayed charges or blocking behaviour. Only MoO3-2/H2O shows slightly longer rise and fall times,  indicating  a  lower  charge  transport  efficiency  of  solar  cell  influenced  by  the  HTL 's or interfacial contact resistance. The case of PEDOT:PSS is there somehow more complex. While the air- and air/light exposure shows no signs for blocking of delayed transport either, the fresh and the humidity-exposed film seem to induce a build-up of charges in the device upon switchon,  seen  as  the  overshoot  of  current  at  the  start  of  the  square  laser  pulse.  This  is  clearly  a consequence of an interface issue near the ITO electrode or near the active layer. The fact that for  the  fresh  one  this  only  happens  weakly  and  only  for  high  positive  voltages,  reducing  the internal  electric  field  of  the  device,  supports  the  aforementioned  theory  of  an  unrelaxed PEDOT:PSS  layer.  When  the  bias  is  strong  enough  to  overcome  this  eventual  layer  contact problem,  the  device  transport  is  normal.  For  the  humidity-exposed  PEDOT:PSS  layer  the consequences seem to be more severe, as the charge build-up already takes effect from negative biases and builds up fast when reducing the device's internal field. This behavior is typical for traps in a device. [40, 46] Merely for negative voltages exceeding -0.3 V the charge transport is

unhindered,  giving  an  idea  about  the  strength/depth  of  the  charge  traps  in  these  devices.  The longer rise and fall times also imply a lower charge transport efficiency of solar cell

Thereby  the  rising  relative  magnitude  of  the  overshoot  transient  peaks  to  the  steady  state photocurrent with increasing applied voltage, correlates with trap-facilitated recombination [37]. In this case their origin could be migrated indium or oxidation sites in the organic active layer, or at  surface  defects  (e.g.  dangling  bonds)  of  the  corroded  inorganic  ITO.  [36].  The  build-up  of trapped charges in the device may hereby lead to increased recombination rates either directly through  trap-assisted  recombination  routes  such  as  Shockley-Read-Hall  recombination,  or through  space  charge  mediating  increases  in  bimolecular  recombination  and/or  decreases  in charge  separation  efficiency.[37]  When  the  overshoot  transient  peaks  are  not  observed  in  the reversed bias region this indicates that the larger internal electric field in the device inhibits trapmediated recombination.[46]

XPS and Raman spectroscopy were investigated to understand changes in surface chemistry and local bulk chemistry of HTL films after different environmental exposure, which might explain their impact on the adjacent layers within the solar cell stack. The films' XPS core level spectra of atoms relevant to the respective material are shown in Figure 4. The S 2p and O 1s core level spectra in PEDOT:PSS HTLs for different exposure conditions are presented in Figure 4(a) and (b), respectively. In the S 2p signal of PEDOT:PSS (Figure 4a), two weak low-binding energy peaks  appear  at  approximately  165.1  eV  and  163.9  eV,  corresponding  to  the  spin-split components of the sulfur atoms in the PEDOT, while the stronger high-binding energy peaks at 169.0  eV  and  167.8  eV  correspond  to  the  sulfur  atoms  in  PSS.[47-48]  The  intensity  relation between PEDOT and PSS contributions is typical, because the PEDOT:PSS particles and films thereof  are  covered  with  PSS,  therefore  diminishing  the  PEDOT  signal.  However,  no  clear difference is seen for different exposure scenarios. Figure 4(b) shows the XPS spectra of O 1s core level, a main peak at 531.5 eV that originates from SO3 2acid groups of PSS, and a weaker

shoulder  at  533.0  eV  due  to  C-O  bonds  of  PEDOT.[49]  Also  these  spectra  exhibit  no  clear changes on surface chemistry of PEDOT:PSS HTLs. It should be mentioned though that water eventually adsorbed by PSS in humidity-exposed films might have been re leased in the XPS's high vacuum chamber before measurement was initialized. Figure4 (c) and (e) show the Mo 3d doublet core level spectra of MoO3-1 and MoO3-2 films. Both materials demonstrate comparable results for fresh films and for air and air with illumination exposures. The doublet peaks show a slight  asymmetric line shape, suggesting the presence of mixed oxidation states of Mo, which slightly  shift  their  energy.  The  major  contribution  comes  from  Mo 6+ oxidation  states  with  the 3d3/2 peak at 236.0 eV and 3d5/2 at  232.8  eV, while the minor underlying peaks centered at 234.7 eV and 231.7 eV are assigned to the 3d orbital doublet of Mo 5+ .[50-51] In both, MoO3-1 and MoO3-2 films, the intensity of the peaks belonging to Mo 5+ oxidation state get stronger after humid-air exposure, visible a tail of the peaks on the low-energy side. Since for preparation of both materials hydrolysis reactions with a molybdenum precursor are involved, it is suggested absorbed humidity triggered according chemical reactions with Mo atoms in the film, leading to this shift. Figure 4(d) and (f) depict the O 1s core level spectra for MoO3-1 and MoO3-2 HTL after  exposure.  Again  here  fresh,  air-  and  illuminated  air-exposed  samples  are  very  similar, showing  a  main  peak  at  530.9  eV  assigned  to  the  O 2in  the  oxide  [52]  and  a  weak  second component at 532.4 eV attributed to hydroxyl groups. [52] With humidity-exposure a significant increase of surface hydroxyl groups is observed and additionally a further signal appears at 533.4 eV,  which  can  be  assigned  to  adsorbed  molecular  water.[53-54]  This  confirms  an  ongoing hydrolysis and condensation reaction of molybdenum oxide in the film upon humidity exposure. However, none of the surface chemical observations can explain the behavior of the films in the device.

Raman spectroscopy provides more detailed information related to the chemical properties of the bulk and is not recorded under vacuum, allowing the exposed films to maintain their chemical

surface  composition  during  the  measurement.  In  the  present  experiment,  spatially  resolved Raman  measurements  were  performed  which  allow  a  point-topoint  analysis  of  the  film's chemistry,  completing  the  highly  accurate  surface  sensitive  but  area-integrated  information  of XPS. Figure 5 a-c present the averaged spectra of the area scans for all exposition scenarios for PEDOT:PSS,  MoO3-1  and  MoO3-2,  respectively.  The  complete  sets  of  the  corresponding spatially  resolved  Raman  spectra  sequences  obtained  by  Raman  microscopy  scans  for  all exposure  conditions  can  be  found  in  the  Supplemental  Information  in  Figure  S3.  As  the humidity-exposed films seem to exhibit the most relevant changes, these are shown exemplarily for each of the materials in Figure 5 d-f.  Figure 5(a) shows the average spectra of point-to-point Raman  analysis  of PEDOT:PSS HTLs  after  different  environmental  exposures  (see  from Figure5  (s)  for  humid  air  exposure  and  Figure  S3  in  supplement  for  fresh,  air,  and  air  with illumination exposures). All spectra of PEDOT:PSS  HTLs  after  different  environmental exposures  show  nearly  identical  bands,  suggesting  no  clear  chemical  composition  changes  on PEDOT:PSS  film  after exposure. Those curves exhibit the main peak at 1442 cm -1 , corresponding to the C=C symmetrical stretching vibration of PEDOT and the band near 1370 cm -1 is  associated  with  the  C-C  stretching.  [55]  The  peaks  at  1508  and  1570  cm -1 have  been associated with the C=C asymmetric stretching vibrations that correspond to thiophene rings in the middle and at the end of the chains, respectively.[56] The band located at 1540 cm -1 is related to the splitting of these asymmetrical stretching vibrations.[57-58] All the other bands observed at  440,  578,  701,  854,  991,  1097,  1367,  1255,  1367,  1505,  1539  and  1569  cm -1 are  also associated  with  PEDOT  on  the  basis  of  the  spectrum  of  PEDOT.[55-56]      Figure5  (d) demonstrates  spatially  resolved  Raman  spectra  from  the  PEDOT:  PSS  HTL  after  humid  air exposure. The spectra present equal chemical composition across scanning area, merely varying by  intensities  with  film  thickness,  which  corresponds  to  the  bubble  feature  displayed  in  the corresponding optical microscopy picture (Fig. 5d inset). These bubbles were exclusively found

in humidity-exposed PEDOT:PSS films. It is suggested that the bubbles form as a consequence of film swelling upon water uptake by the hygroscopic polymer PSS.  This means that the water exposure does not induce irreversible  chemical  changes  in  the  PEDOT:PSS  layer,  but  merely reversible water uptake, with  eventual effect on morphology.

The average spectra of MoO3-1 HTLs for freshly prepared, air, air with illumination and humid air  exposures  are  shown Figure 5 (b).  These spectra present identical  features for all different conditions,  indicating  no  obvious  chemical  composition  transformation  on  the  bulk  MoO3-1 HTL films. The broad band features in the spectral are consistent with the previous literatures. [59-61]  Thereby  the  Raman  band  usually  appearing  in  the  500 -1000 cm -1 and  200 -400 cm -1 regions stands for the stretching (ν) and bending (δ) vibration of the structure of MoO3.[60] Here, the  broad  Raman  bands  at  about  640,  850,  950,  and  989  cm -1 , are  explained  by  a  wide distribution  of  different  Mo-O  bond  length.  [59]  Bands  in  the  range  of  920 -1000  cm -1 are associated with stretching modes of the Mo=O terminal. [62] Looking at the spatially resolved spectra of humidity exposed MoO3-1 (Figure 5e), all spectra exhibit high homogeneity of peaks and intensities across the scanning area, implying a great chemical stability of MoO3-1 HTL. The microscopic  pictures  given  in  the  inset  of  the  diagram  show  a  widely  continuous  and homogeneous  film.  Figure  5(c)  demonstrates  average  Raman  spectra  from  the  four  different conditions  of MoO3-2 HTL films.  The  spectra  of  fresh  MoO3  HTL  and  after  air  and  air  with illumination  exposures  show  identical  Raman  bands,  suggesting  the  considerably  comparable chemical  composition  in  those  films.  The  peaks  at  152,  280,  660,  819,  and  995  cm -1 are associated  with  the thermodynamically  stable  α -MoO3  crystalline  phase.  [63]  The  vibration modes,  which  appear  in  the  frequency  ranges  of  1000 -600  cm -1 and  600 -200  cm -1 , are corresponding to the stretching and deformation modes, respectively. [64-65]  The Raman peaks at 994 and 819 cm -1 are the stretching vibration of the terminal double bonds (Mo=O). [66] The wave number range, between 150 and 400 cm -1 , are associated to the Mo-O modes type scissor,

wagging, twist and rotational/translational rigid MoO4 chain mode. [66] Figure 5(f) shows the sequence of spatially resolved Raman spectra of MoO3-2 HTL after humid air exposure. Unlike the PEDOT:PSS  and  MoO3-1  HTLs  after  humid  air  exposure,  which  present  spatially homogeneous  chemical  composition,  MoO3-2  HTLs  present  considerably  inhomogeneous spectra across the scanning area after humid air exposure. These inhomogeneities are not limited to thickness related intensity variations but also different new peaks appearing around 900 -1000 cm 1   in  some  local  spectra.  These  additional  peaks  at  691,  901,  912,  and  978  cm --1 can  be correlated  to  an  h-MoO3  crystalline  phase,  which  has  been  previously  reported.  [67-68]  The peaks  in  the  range  of  880 -987  cm -1 are  due  to  Mo=O  bond  and  the  band  at  691  cm -1 is corresponding  to  O -Mo O  vibrations.  Most  spectra  of  humidity-exposed  MoO3-2  show  the -peaks of α -MoO3, which is the same phase as seen for all other exposure conditions, but some local spectra display mixed peaks of α -MoO3 and h-MoO3 in one spectrum, implying that water induces  a  phase  transition  in  the  MoO3-2  HTL  from α -MoO3  to  h-MoO3.  From  the  optical microscopy image, which is shown in the inset Figure 5(f), the film exhibits a granular structure, which  is  also  present  in  freshly  prepared  MoO3-2  HTLs  and  after  air  and  air/illumination exposure.  However,  upon  humidity  exposure,  these  particles  seem  to  swell  by  absorption  of water  from  around  50  nm  for  other  conditions  to  about  200  nm.  This  swelling  and  also  the different MoO3-phase alters the grain boundaries and charge transport properties of the film and thus may lead to lower conductivity of the MoO3-2 HTL film.

To investigate how altered surface and bulk properties of environmentally exposed HTLs and their  local  homogeneities  affect  OPV  devices  they  have  been  integrated  in,  microscale  laserbeam-induced  photocurrent  mapping  was  conducted.  Figure  6  shows  relative  photocurrent density (J) maps of P3HT:PCBM solar cells with PEDOT:PSS, MoO3-1 and MoO3-2 HTLs after different environmental exposures with a scanning area of 15 00 μm x 4000 μm. On the given length  scale,  the  photocurrent  map  of PEDOT:PSS/Fresh exhibits  only  subtle  wave-like

fluctuations  across  the  area  of  around  5%  of  highest  photocurrent  amplitude,  except  for  some considerably  lower  current  near  the  pixel  edges.  Further,  some  very  defined  spots  of  100  µm with  slightly  lower  performance  are  visible.  In  comparison,  both PEDOT:PSS/Air and PEDOT:PSS/Air  &amp;  light , show  slightly  more  homogeneous  photocurrent  distribution  as PEDOT:PSS/Fresh , with  similar  current  gradient,  but  without  visible  pattern  and  without mentioned edge effects. For humidity-exposed PEDOT:PSS this changes drastically. PEDOT:PSS/H2O shows a highly inhomogeneous photocurrent output, with a wave-like pattern across  the  surface  like PEDOT:PSS/Fresh , wherein  only  20%  of  the  output  area  shows unchanged high performance, while for about 2/3 of the area photocurrent output is reduced by 15%, for about 1/10 by 25% photocurrent and output is basically negligible for the remaining area.  The fact that air exposure of the HTL neither with nor without illumination has an effect on homogeneity of photocurrent distribution, indicates that PEDOT:PSS itself is not affected by the  treatment  and  also  does  not  trigger  defects  in  the  device  later.  The  localized  lower photocurrent  output  spots,  which  are  visible  in  all  the  devices  with  PEDOT:PSS  HTLs  are assigned to the aggregation of colloidal particles, which has been proven in a previous report.[27] and  do  not  show  this  edge  effects  due  to  the  longer  relaxation  time  (during  exposure)  before device fabrication. The edge effects visible for the fresh device may  be caused by aforementioned non-equilibrium interface between ITO and PEDOT:PSS, which affects the film most  near  the  crossover  between  the  ITO  pixel  patch  and  the  glass  substrate.  The  humidityexposed device shows the worst performance along the pixel edges for a similar reason. In this case,  the  moisture  uptake  makes  the  PEDOT:PSS film expand. As the film is confined to the substrate  dimensions,  this  leads  to  folding  of  the  film,  thereby  creating  wave-like  current fluctuations. At the crossover between ITO and glass this may lead to partial delamination and thus  contact  loss.  Devices  with  MoO3-1  HTLs  show  remarkably  comparable  homogenious photocurrent distributions for all different environmental exposures MoO3-1/Fresh , MoO3-1/Air ,

MoO3-1/Air &amp; light and MoO3-1/H2O , merely with a mild smooth photocurrent gradient of less than 5% across the pixel area. This means that the subtle changes in surface chemistry of MoO31/H2O , which have been observed in XPS, are negligible for the photocurrent homogeneity. This is slightly different for solar cells with MoO3-2 HTLs. They exhibit quite identical homogeneous photocurrent maps for three of the conditions MoO3-2/Fresh , MoO3-2/Air and MoO3-2/Air &amp; light ,  with a smooth photocurrent gradient of less than 5%, but compared to MoO3-1 , with a smaller area fraction of highest output. The homogeneous spatial photocurrent is consistent with the  highly  homogeneous  surface  and  bulk  chemical  composition  seen  from  XPS  and  Raman spectroscopic spectra. In contrast, MoO3-2/H2O demonstrates slight inhomogeneities in photocurrent, at the pixel edges, where photocurrent output is decreased down to 85%. From this outcome three possible scenarios can be considered following the absorption of water vapor by the film: swelling of MoO3-2 particles causing lower conductivity of the film (mentioned earlier in context of microscopy), loss of inter-particle/interfacial contact from swelling/shrinking of the particles or from potential ITO corrosion by the remaining acidity in the film, diminishing the conductivity of the actual electrode.

To gain a deeper understanding of the roots for local photocurrent losses in the devices, point-topoint J-V analyses across pixel sections have been conducted, to investigate their device physics. Different  from  the  integrated  J-V  performance  measured  under  simulated  solar  conditions (AM1.5G), local photocurrents were measured at 532 nm wavelength, which is at the spectral response maximum of the P3HT:PCBM active layer blend. Figure 7 shows the local photo-J-V curves  of  devices  with  the  different  HTLs  after  humidity-exposure,  recorded  along  a  central scanning line along the long-side of device pixel. These samples have been selected here because merely  humidity-exposure  displays  significant  features  in  the  local  photocurrent  scans,  while other  conditions fresh , air and air&amp;light are characterized  by  extraordinary  conformity. Complete sets of according scans for all studied conditions of the three materials are presented in

Figure  S4  of  the  Supporting  Information.  For  better  visibility  of  any  performance  variance between  local  J-V  characteristics  across  a  device  area,  the  curves  have  been  color-coded (analogous to the relative photocurrent of the maps in Figure 6) in order of their achieved shortcircuit current.

Figure 7(a) shows the point-to-point analysis J-V curves of PEDOT:PSS/H2O . All characteristics show consistent slopes at the intersection with VOC and good rectangularity with slight deviation of FF between 0.45 and 0.48, indicating that neither significant series resistance nor interfacial charge transport are affected by humidity in PEDOT:PSS or reactions thereof with adjacent layers. Further, the VOC fluctuates only minorly between 0.40 V to 0.38 V across the device area and the curves exhibit unchanged parallel slopes at the intersection with the currentdensity axis (JSC region), suspending leakage currents as reason for decreased photocurrent, as the parallel resistance is stable. This is in good agreement with the results from integral device characterization. Therefor the origin for the fluctuating photocurrent across the device area, with JSC varying by 28 % between -0.18 mA/cm 2  at optimum performance and 0.13 mA/cm 2 , is loss of active area. As not leakage, barriers or charge transfer limitations are obvious, photocurrent loss  is  most  likely  caused  by  either  local  degradation  of  the  active  layer  by  reaction  with absorbed water from PSS or by local loss of contact area at the ITO/HTL or HTL/active layer interface. The latter could arise from delamination of the swelling/shrinking PEDOT:PSS layer during  water  uptake/release  during/after  device  fabrication.  Another  reason  could  be  failing interfacial  wetting  during  device  fabrication  up on  changes  of  the  HTL's  surface  chemistry. Figure 7(b) shows the local J-V characteristics of MoO3-1/H2O . Here, considerably uniform J-V curves  are  visible,  which  are  very  similar  to  the  ones  of MoO3-1/Fresh,  MoO3-1/Air,  MoO31/Air &amp;  light shown  in  the  Supporting  Information  (Figure  S4). MoO3-1/H2O exhibits exclusively constant VOC of 0.4V, JSC of -0.18 mA/cm  and FF of 0.57 across the device area. 2 This  is  in  good  agreement  with  their  integral  device  performance  and  the  high  homogeneity

shown in the photocurrent maps. The minor deviation of photocurrent (around 5% compared to maximum)  across  the  device  area  is  suspected  to  originate  from  regular  morphological inhomogeneities of the devices [27] and not related to the treatment. Figure 7(c) demonstrates the  local  variations  of  J-V  curves  of MoO3-2/H2O .  Different  to  the  previous  MoO3-1,  here fluctuations across the device area are visible. The curves exhibit consistent parallel slopes at the intersection with JSC and with VOC and constant rectangularity with a FF of 0.55, indicating that neither  parallel  resistance  nor  series  resistance  of  interfacial  charge  transfer  are  affected  by humidity  from  the  HTL.  In  addition,  the  variation  of  VOC  between  0.39  V  and  0.40  V  is negligible.  Merely  the  fluctuation  of  photocurrent  between  -0.18  mA/cm   at  maximum  and 2 lowest  of  -0.16  mA/cm   is  significant.  Thereby  this  fluctuation  of  11%  is  less  than  for 2 PEDOT:PSS/H2O but considerably stronger than for MoO3-1/H2O . As similar for PEDOT:PSS/H2O also here it is obvious that this effect is caused by a loss of active area, as suggested either from active layer degradation [69] or by loss of interfacial contact of the HTL with  adjacent  layers.  This  would  not  be  unlikely  because  particle  swelling  of  MoO3-2  upon water-exposure was observed earlier. Thereby it can be speculated that the difference in intensity of this device 'degradation' effect  between PEDOT:PSS/H2O and MoO3-2/H2O is  related to the amount absorbed water and thus volume fluctuation of the layer.

For a complete overview with greater detail on all HTLs and conditions, the solar cell parameters were extracted/calculated  from  the  respective  photo-J-V  characteristics  in  Figure  7  and  in  the Supplemental Information Figure S4.  They are plotted in Figure 8 for JSC (a), VOC (b), FF (c) and RS (d). As expected from photocurrent maps and their local device-physical analysis, devices with  MoO3-1  HTL  exhibit  clearly  the  highest  spatial  homogeneity  and  stability  regarding electrical  performance  independent  of  different  environmental  exposures,  with  very  narrow distribution  of  less  than  5%  deviation  of  the  values  for  JSC,  VOC,  FF  and  RS.  In  contrast,  the devices with PEDOT:PSS HTL present most strongly fluctuating performance and

inhomogeneity of local output of JSC, VOC, FF and RS  for different environmental exposures. In the worst case, which is humidity exposure reflected by PEDOT:PSS/H2O , the deviation is up to 28% for JSC photocurrent and around 6% for its VOC ,FF and RS.

For PEDOT:PSS/Fresh , PEDOT:PSS/Air , PEDOT:PSS/Air  &amp;  light ,  all  parameters    show  a more narrow and very similar distribution, with deviations as high as around 8 % for JSC and between 5 and 6 % for VOC, FF and RS, indicating that air and illumination (equivalent of 10% of AM1.5G) do not cause obviously localized surface and electric property changes of the HTL. MoO3-2/Fresh , MoO3-2/Air , and MoO3-2/Air &amp; light present all a quite narrow distribution of solar cell parameters with deviations around 5 % for JSC and less than 3 % for VOC, FF and RS. MoO3-2/H2O on the other hand, exhibits a wider distribution of JSC  with a deviation of 10% and less than 4% for VOC, FF and RS, however, no inhomogeneity effect on RS in comparison with other  environmental exposures of MoO3-2 HTL. These results clearly show that the values of PEDOT:PSS HTLs are spreading towards lower JSC, slightly lower VOC, slightly lower FF and higher series resistance upon HTL contact with humidity. For the MoO3 HTLs, MoO3-1 shows no scattering of the values independent of the exposure condition, while for MoO3-2, clearly a subtle  shift  in  JSC  and  VOC  is  noted  but  with  relatively  not  much  increased  scattering.  Since merely representative data have been selected for display in the main text for the sake of better visibility, statistical data  on  the  devices' variations  in  performance  are  presented  in  the Supplemental Information Figure S5 for completion.

## Discussion

The  presented  results  show  clearly  that  PEDOT:PSS  as  HTL  induces  the  most  unstable, fluctuating  and  inhomogeneous  performance  in  standard  OPV  devices,  compared  to  the  two MoO3 HTLs. Thereby  humidity-exposure  of  PEDOT:PSS  before  device  completion  strongest affects electrical performance, despite the fact the XPS and Raman spectra show no change in

surface  and  bulk  chemistry  of  the  layer,  suspending  ITO  corrosion  as  a  potential  reason  and strengthening the argument of layer delamination by consecutive swelling and shrinking of the film  upon  water  uptake  or  release.  A  significant  current-overshoot  and  extended  charge extraction times seen in the transients confirm less efficient charge transport near the electrode, leading  to  an  accumulation  of  charges  at  high  light  intensities/  current  densities.  A  highly inhomogeneous spatial photocurrent output with a wave-like pattern across the surface supports the idea of interfacial contact issues from partial delamination of PEDOT :PSS from ITO or/and active layer.  This in consequnce leads to a general lower photocurrent in the device. The good rectangularity with constant FF, minor VOC fluctuation and stable parallel resistance from pointto-point J-V  analysis, showing  no  significant  changes  of  the cell parameters  exept  for photocurrent  and  series  resistance,  again  confirms  this  assumption.  Another  condition  which surprisingly causes performance changes, is the immediate use of a freshly deposited and dried PEDOT:PSS layer, leading to equal JSC and VOC of, but considerably lower fill factor and an associated  higher  series  resistance  of  the  device,  compared  to  the  ones  containing  air  or illumination exposed PEDOT:PSS. The reason is suspected to be from limited interfacial charge transport  between  the  PEDOT:PSS  and  neighboring  layers  due  to  the  unrelaxed  PEDOT:PSS film.  This  argument  is  supported  by  the  fact  that  any  form  of  short  storage  before  device completion improves the device and further by the observation of a weak current overshoot in the transients at high positive bias and subtle wave-like fluctuations in the spatial photocurrent. Dry air or light exposure of the PEDOT:PSS does not lead to significant changes of the actual layer, indicating that PEDOT:PSS itself is not affected by the treatment, nor to changes of the device, confirming that also no defects are triggered later in the device. MoO3-1 demonstrates the most stable electrical device performance among the tested materials, with unaltered JSC, VOC, high fill factor and comparable homogeneous spatial photocurrent distributions for fresh, air, air with illumination and humidity exposures. This reflects also in stable charge transport dynamics

seen  in  the  transients  and  bulk  chemical  stability  seen  from  Raman  spectra.  The  surface chemistry  shows  a  significant  increase  of  surface  hydroxyl  groups  upon  humidity  exposure, visible from stronger Mo 5+ contribution in XPS, which seems not to affect the film properties or the device performance. MoO3-2 is reasonably stable for fresh films and after exposure to air or illumination, exhibiting comparable output of all solar cell parameters, JSC, VOC ,FF, and RS, as well  as  highly  homogeneous  spatial  photocurrent  output.  However,  upon  humidity  exposure, according  devices  show  lower  photocurrent  output,  obviously  induced  by  a  slightly  increased series  resistance,  while  other  parameters  are  barely  affected.  Together  with  the  microscopic observation  of  MoO3-2  particle  swelling/shrinking  upon  water  uptake/release,  this  can  be explained  by  decreased  interparticle-contact,  detachment  from  the  ITO  surface  or  increased resistance  of  the  actual  swollen  particle  due  to  the  hydrated  (thus  insulating)  outer  shell.  A slightly  longer  charge  extraction  time  in  the  photocurrent  transients  but  missing  overshoot, supports this theory and confirms that the effect on charge transport efficiency is not as strong as for  PEDOT :PSS.  This  is  further  supported  by  a  homogeneously  slightly  increased  series resistance visible from local variations of J-V curves. A subtle decrease in photocurrent along the pixel edge suggests detachment of the particles at the transition between glass and ITO on the substrate, thus  similar  but not  the same  phenomenon  as  observed  for  humidity-exposed PEDOT :PSS. The observed phase transition from α -MoO3 to h-MoO3 in the Raman spectra is not relevant to lower charge transport efficiency due to the actual higher conductivity of h-MoO3 compared to α -MoO3. [70]  However, it cannot be excluded that the recrystallization changed interparticle or particle/ITO contact.

## CONCLUSIONS

We compared the surface and device inhomogeneity of P3HT: PCBM bulk heterojunction PV cells influenced by three different solution-processed colloidal HTLs with various environmental

exposures, one PEDOT: PSS, one continuous MoO3 and one nanoparticle MoO3 film. HTLs are exposed to the air in the dark, air with equivalent 10% AM1.5G solar illumination, and humidity in the dark, and compare them with fresh samples, respectively, to gain the information about potentially occurring degradation mechanisms influenced by HTLs with different environmental effects.  Standard  OPV  device  investigation  is  accompanied  by  the  comparison  of  surface  and bulk  chemistry  of  the  HTLs , along  with  the  devices'  charge  t ransport  dynamics,  spatial photocurrent  distribution  and  local  device  physics.  By  this  exposure  procedure  limited  to  the actual  HTL,  the  environmental  effects  caused  directly  on  the  HTL  and  potential  late  effects within  the  device  structure  could  be  distinguished  without  affecting  the  entire  device  stack, different  to  studies  with  exposure  of  the  complete  device.  Here  we  could  clearly  show  that humidity exposure of PEDOT:PSS does not actually lead to device failure by the suspected ITO corrosion  or  humidity  diffusion  into  the  active  layer  with  associated  degradation,  but  instead merely signs for partial interfacial contact loss were found. These are caused by the consecutive swelling and shrinking of the layer on top of the ITO substrate and after incorporation within the device  stack.  Also  fresh  PEDOT:PSS  layers  which  are  immediately  incorporated  into  devices present interfacial resistance, but, in that case because the layer is in a completely dry rigid nonequilibrium state at use. Any form of relaxation time leads to improvement. The two investigated solution  processed  molybdenum  oxide  films  show  extremely  stable  unchanging  electrical behavior and homogeneity for any condition, except for humidity exposure of the particle layer. In that case humidity treatment leads to swelling of the particles, similar to PEDOT:PSS, but due to the thin non-continuous layer, the effect leads to generally higher series resistance and thus lower current by either detachment of particles from the other layers or increased resistance of the particles themselves by the insulating hydrate shell. In no condition and for no material any material degradation was found for the HTL itself or the device they were incorporated in. The

observation  of  decreased  device  performance  merely  by  the  loss  of  interfacial  contact  upon water-uptake induced swelling is a completely new view on the matter.

## ASSOCIATED CONTENT

## Supporting Information

The  Supporting  Information  contains  complete  sets  of  relative  and  normalized  transient photocurrents,  spatially  resolved  sequences  of  Raman spectra,  statistical  data  on  the  solar  cell performance and sets of local photo-J-V curves across the device for different holetransportation layer materials after various environmental exposures.

## AUTHOR INFORMATION

## Corresponding Author

*Email: hchien@tugraz.at

## Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

## ACKNOWLEDGMENT

H.-T. C. and B.F. are grateful to the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) for financial support (Project No. P 26066)

## REFERENCES

(1)  Yu,  G.;  Gao,  J.;  Hummelen,  J.  C.;  Wudl,  F.;  Heeger,  A.  J.  Polymer  Photovoltaic  Cells: Enhanced Efficiencies via a Network of Internal Donor-Acceptor Heterojunctions. Science 1995 , 270 , 1789 -1791.

- (2) Thompson, B. C.; Fréchet, J. M. J. Polymer-Fullerene Composite Solar Cells. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) 2008 , 47 , 58 -77.
- (3) Hoppe, H.; Sariciftci, N. S. Polymer Solar Cells. In Photoresponsive Polymers II ; Marder, S. R., Lee, K.-S., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008; pp 1 -86.
- (4) Brabec, C. J.; Gowrisanker, S.; Halls, J. J. M.; Laird, D.; Jia, S.; Williams, S. P. PolymerFullerene  Bulk-Heterojunction  Solar  Cells. Advanced  materials  (Deerfield  Beach,  Fla.) 2010 , 22 , 3839 -3856.
- (5)  Sariciftci,  N.  S.;  Smilowitz,  L.;  Heeger,  A.  J.;  Wudl,  F.  Photoinduced  Electron  Transfer From a Conducting Polymer to Buckminsterfullerene. Science 1992 , 258 , 1474 -1476.
- (6) Li, G.; Shrotriya, V.; Huang, J.; Yao, Y.; Moriarty, T.; Emery, K.; Yang, Y. High-Efficiency Solution Processable Polymer Photovoltaic Cells by Self-Organization of Polymer Blends. Nat Mater 2005 , 4 , 864 -868.
- (7)  Ma,  W.;  Yang,  C.; Gong,  X.;  Lee,  K.;  Heeger,  A.  J.  Thermally  Stable,  Efficient  Polymer Solar Cells with Nanoscale Control of the Interpenetrating  Network Morphology. Adv.  Funct. Mater. 2005 , 15 , 1617 -1622.
- (8) Green, M. A.; Emery, K.; Hishikawa, Y.; Warta, W.; Dunlop, E. D. Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (version 46). Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2015 , 23 , 805 -812.
- (9) Dennler, G.; Scharber, M. C.; Ameri, T.; Denk, P.; Forberich, K.; Waldauf, C.; Brabec, C. J. Design Rules for Donors in Bulk-Heterojunction Tandem Solar Cells?: Towards 15 % EnergyConversion Efficiency. Adv. Mater. 2008 , 20 , 579 -583.
- (10)  Kim,  J.  Y.;  Kim,  S.  H.;  Lee,  H.-H.;  Lee,  K.;  Ma,  W.;  Gong,  X.;  Heeger,  A.  J.  New Architecture  for  High-Efficiency  Polymer  Photovoltaic  Cells  Using  Solution-Based  Titanium Oxide as an Optical Spacer. Adv. Mater. 2006 , 18 , 572 -576.

(11) Chan, M. Y.; Lee, C. S.; Lai, S. L.; Fung, M. K.; Wong, F. L.; Sun, H. Y.; Lau, K. M.; Lee, S. T. Efficient Organic Photovoltaic Devices Using a Combination of Exciton Blocking Layer and Anodic Buffer Layer. Journal of Applied Physics 2006 , 100 , 94506.

- (12) Cao, Y.; Yu, G.; Zhang, C.; Menon, R.; Heeger, A. Polymer Light-Emitting Diodes with Polyethylene Dioxythiophene -Polystyrene Sulfonate as the Transparent Anode. Synthetic Metals 1997 , 87 , 171 -174.
- (13)  Heithecker,  D.;  Kammoun,  A.;  Dobbertin,  T.;  Riedl,  T.;  Becker,  E.;  Metzdorf,  D.; Schneider,  D.;  Johannes,  H.-H.;  Kowalsky,  W.  Low-Voltage  Organic  Electroluminescence Device with an Ultrathin, Hybrid Structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003 , 82 , 4178 -4180.
- (14)  Jørgensen,  M.;  Norrman,  K.;  Krebs,  F.  C.  Stability/Degradation  of  Polymer  Solar  Cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2008 , 92 , 686 -714.
- (15) Schafferhans, J.; Baumann, A.; Wagenpfahl, A.; Deibel, C.; Dyakonov, V. Oxygen Doping of  P3HT:  PCBM  Blends:  Influence  on  Trap  States,  Charge  Carrier  Mobility  and  Solar  Cell Performance. Organic Electronics 2010 , 11 , 1693 -1700.
- (16) Seemann, A.; Egelhaaf, H.-J.; Brabec, C. J.; Hauch, J. A. Influence of Oxygen on SemiTransparent Organic Solar Cells with Gas Permeable Electrodes. Organic Electronics 2009 , 10 , 1424 1428. -
- (17) Hermenau, M.; Riede, M.; Leo, K.; Gevorgyan, S. A.; Krebs, F. C.; Norrman, K. Water and Oxygen Induced Degradation of Small Molecule Organic Solar Cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2011 , 95 , 1268 -1277.
- (18) Rivaton, A.; Chambon, S.; Manceau, M.; Gardette, J.-L.; Lemaître, N.; Guillerez, S. LightInduced Degradation of the Active Layer of Polymer-Based Solar Cells. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2010 , 95 , 278 -284.

(19) Ecker, B.; Nolasco, J. C.; Pallarés, J.; Marsal, L. F.; Posdorfer, J.; Parisi, J.; Hauff, E. von. Degradation  Effects  Related  to  the  Hole  Transport  Layer  in  Organic  Solar  Cells. Adv.  Funct. Mater. 2011 , 21 , 2705 -2711.

(20)  Chien,  H.-T.;  Zach,  P.  W.;  Friedel,  B.  Short-Term  Environmental  Effects  and  Their Influence on Spatial Homogeneity of Organic Solar Cell Functionality. ACS applied materials &amp; interfaces 2017 , 9 , 27754 -27764.

- (21) Jong, M. P. de; van IJzendoorn, L. J.; Voigt, M. J. A. de. Stability of the Interface between Indium-Tin-Oxide and Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/Poly(styrenesulfonate) in Polymer Light-Emitting Diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000 , 77 , 2255 -2257.
- (22)  Irwin,  M.  D.;  Buchholz,  D.  B.;  Hains,  A.  W.;  Chang,  R.  P.  H.;  Marks,  T.  J.  P-Type Semiconducting Nickel Oxide as an Efficiency-Enhancing Anode Interfacial Layer in Polymer Bulk-Heterojunction Solar Cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008 , 105 , 2783 2787. -
- (23) Steirer, K. X.; Chesin, J. P.; Widjonarko, N. E.; Berry, J. J.; Miedaner, A.; Ginley, D. S.; Olson,  D.  C.  Solution  Deposited  NiO  Thin-Films  as  Hole  Transport  Layers  in  Organic Photovoltaics. Organic Electronics 2010 , 11 , 1414 -1418.
- (24) Meyer, J.; Kröger, M.; Hamwi, S.; Gnam, F.; Riedl, T.; Kowalsky, W.; Kahn, A. Charge Generation Layers Comprising Transition Metal-Oxide/Organic Interfaces: Electronic Structure and Charge Generation Mechanism. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010 , 96 , 193302.
- (25) Zilberberg, K.; Gharbi, H.; Behrendt, A.; Trost, S.; Riedl, T. Low-Temperature, SolutionProcessed  MoO(x)  for  Efficient  and  Stable  Organic  Solar  Cells. ACS  applied  materials  &amp; interfaces 2012 , 4 , 1164 -1168.

(26) Liu, F.; Shao, S.; Guo, X.; Zhao, Y.; Xie, Z. Efficient Polymer Photovoltaic Cells Using Solution-Processed MoO3 as Anode Buffer Layer. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2010 , 94 , 842 -845.

(27) Chien, H.-T.; Pölzl, M.; Koller, G.; Challinger, S.; Fairbairn, C.; Baikie, I.; Kratzer, M.; Teichert, C.; Friedel, B. Effects of Hole-Transport Layer Homogeneity in Organic Solar Cells -A Multi-Length Scale Study. Surfaces and Interfaces 2017 , 6 , 72 -80.

(28) Coffey, D. C.; Reid, O. G.; Rodovsky, D. B.; Bartholomew, G. P.; Ginger, D. S. Mapping Local  Photocurrents  in  Polymer/Fullerene  Solar  Cells  with  Photoconductive  Atomic  Force Microscopy. Nano letters 2007 , 7 , 738 -744.

- (29)  McNeill,  C.  R.;  Frohne,  H.;  Holdsworth,  J.  L.;  Furst,  J.  E.;  King,  B.  V.;  Dastoor,  P.  C. Direct  Photocurrent  Mapping  of  Organic  Solar  Cells  Using  a  Near-Field  Scanning  Optical Microscope. Nano letters 2004 , 4 , 219 -223.
- (30) Breitenstein, O.; Warta,  W.;  Langenkamp,  M. Lock-in  Thermography:  Basics  and Applications to Functional Diagnostics of Electronic Components ;  Springer series in advanced microelectronics 10; Springer: Berlin, London, 2011.
- (31)  Krebs,  F.  C.;  Søndergaard,  R.;  Jørgensen,  M.  Printed  Metal  Back  Electrodes  for  R2R Fabricated Polymer Solar Cells Studied Using the LBIC Technique. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2011 , 95 , 1348 -1353.
- (32) Rösch, R.; Tanenbaum, D. M.; Jørgensen, M.; Seeland, M.; Bärenklau, M.; Hermenau, M.; Voroshazi,  E.;  Lloyd,  M.  T.;  Galagan,  Y.;  Zimmermann,  B. et al. Investigation  of  the Degradation  Mechanisms  of  a  Variety  of  Organic  Photovoltaic  Devices  by  Combination  of Imaging Techniques -the ISOS-3 Inter-Laboratory Collaboration. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012 , 5 , 6521.

- (33)  Krebs,  F.  C. Stability  and  Degradation  of  Organic  and  Polymer  Solar  Cells ;  Wiley: Chichester, 2012.
- (34)  Jeranko,  T.;  Tributsch,  H.;  Sariciftci,  N.;  Hummelen,  J.  Patterns  of  Efficiency  and Degradation of Composite Polymer Solar Cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2004 , 83 , 247 -262.
- (35) Christ, N.; Kettlitz, S.; Mescher, J.; Valouch, S.; Lemmer, U. Dispersive Transport in the Temperature  Dependent  Transient  Photoresponse  of  Organic  Photodiodes  and  Solar  Cells. Journal of Applied Physics 2013 , 113 , 234503.
- (36) McNeill, C. R.; Hwang, I.; Greenham, N. C. Photocurrent Transients in All-Polymer Solar Cells: Trapping and detrapping effects. Journal of Applied Physics 2009 , 106 , 24507.
- (37)  Hwang,  I.;  McNeill,  C.  R.;  Greenham,  N.  C.  Drift-Diffusion  Modeling  of  Photocurrent Transients in Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells. Journal of Applied Physics 2009 , 106 , 94506.
- (38)  Shuttle,  C.  G.;  Treat,  N.  D.;  Douglas,  J.  D.;  Fréchet,  J.  M.  J.;  Chabinyc,  M.  L.  Deep Energetic Trap States in Organic Photovoltaic Devices. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012 , 2 , 111 -119.
- (39) Kniepert, J.; Schubert, M.; Blakesley, J. C.; Neher, D. Photogeneration and Recombination in  P3HT/PCBM Solar  Cells  Probed  by  Time-Delayed  Collection  Field  Experiments. J.  Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011 , 2 , 700 -705.
- (40)  Tress,  W.;  Corvers,  S.;  Leo,  K.;  Riede,  M.  Investigation  of  Driving  Forces  for  Charge Extraction in Organic Solar Cells: Transient Photocurrent Measurements on Solar Cells Showing S-Shaped Current-Voltage Characteristics. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013 , 3 , 873 -880.
- (41)  Zhou,  H.;  Zhang,  Y.;  Seifter,  J.;  Collins,  S.  D.;  Luo,  C.;  Bazan,  G.  C.;  Nguyen,  T.-Q.; Heeger, A. J. High-Efficiency Polymer Solar Cells Enhanced by Solvent Treatment. Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) 2013 , 25 , 1646 -1652.

- (42) Crispin, X.; Marciniak, S.; Osikowicz, W.; Zotti, G.; van der Gon, A. W. D.; Louwet, F.; Fahlman,  M.;  Groenendaal,  L.;  Schryver,  F.  de;  Salaneck,  W.  R.  Conductivity,  Morphology, Interfacial Chemistry, and Stability of Poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene)-Poly(styrene sulfonate): A Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2003 , 41 , 2561 -2583.
- (43)  Marciniak,  S.;  Crispin,  X.;  Uvdal,  K.;  Trzcinski,  M.;  Birgerson,  J.;  Groenendaal,  L.; Louwet,  F.;  Salaneck,  W.  Light  Induced  Damage  in  Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)  and  its Derivatives Studied by Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Synthetic Metals 2004 , 141 , 67 -73.
- (44)  Rannou,  P.;  Nechtschein,  M.  Ageing  of  Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):  Kinetics  of Conductivity Decay and Lifespan. Synthetic Metals 1999 , 101 , 474.
- (45)  Li,  Z.;  Gao,  F.;  Greenham,  N.  C.;  McNeill,  C.  R.  Comparison  of  the  Operation  of Polymer/Fullerene, Polymer/Polymer, and Polymer/Nanocrystal Solar Cells: A  Transient Photocurrent and Photovoltage Study. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011 , 21 , 1419 -1431.
- (46)  Li,  Z.;  McNeill,  C.  R.  Transient  Photocurrent  Measurements  of  PCDTBT:  PC70BM  and PCPDTBT:PC70BM Solar Cells: Evidence for Charge Trapping in Efficient Polymer/Fullerene Blends. Journal of Applied Physics 2011 , 109 , 74513.
- (47)  Liu,  Y.;  Park,  H.-G.;  Lee,  J.  H.;  Seo,  D.-S.;  Kim,  E.-M.;  Heo,  G.-S.  Electro-Optical Switching of Liquid Crystals Sandwiched between Ion-Beam-Spurted Graphene Quantum DotsDoped PEDOT:PSS Composite Layers. Optics express 2015 , 23 , 34071 -34081.
- (48)  Park,  H.;  Lee,  S.  H.;  Kim,  F.  S.;  Choi,  H.  H.;  Cheong,  I.  W.;  Kim,  J.  H.  Enhanced Thermoelectric  Properties  of  PEDOT:  PSS  Nanofilms  by  a  Chemical  Dedoping  Process. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014 , 2 , 6532 -6539.

- (49)  Zhang,  S.;  Yu,  Z.;  Li,  P.;  Li,  B.;  Isikgor,  F.  H.;  Du,  D.;  Sun,  K.;  Xia,  Y.;  Ouyang,  J. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): Polystyrene Sulfonate Films with Low Conductivity and Low Acidity through a Treatment of Their Solutions with Probe Ultrasonication and Their Application as Hole Transport Layer in Polymer Solar Cells and Perovskite Solar Cells. Organic Electronics 2016 , 32 , 149 -156.
- (50) Zhu, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Cui, W.; Wu, Z.; Sun, Q.; Wang, S.; Kang, Z.; Sun, B. A Cost-Effective Commercial  Soluble  Oxide  Cluster  for  Highly  Efficient  and  Stable  Organic  Solar  Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014 , 2 , 1436 -1442.
- (51)  Wallace Chik Ho Choy, Fengxian Xie, ChuanDaO Wang. Solution-Processed Transition Metal Oxides. US 2014/0061550 A1, 2014.
- (52)  Diaz-Droguett,  D.  E.;  Fuenzalida,  V.  M.  Gas  Effects  on  the  Chemical  and  Structural Characeristics  of  Porous  MoO3  and  MoO3 -x  Grown  by  Vapor  Condensation  in  Helium  and Hydrogen. Materials Chemistry and Physics 2011 , 126 , 82 -90.
- (53)  Kwon,  D.  W.;  Park,  K.  H.;  Hong,  S.  C.  The  Influence  on  SCR  Activity  of  the  Atomic Structure of V2O5/TiO2 Catalysts Prepared by a Mechanochemical Method. Applied Catalysis A: General 2013 , 451 , 227 -235.
- (54) Luo, Z.; Poyraz, A. S.; Kuo, C.-H.; Miao, R.; Meng, Y.; Chen, S.-Y.; Jiang, T.; Wenos, C.; Suib, S. L. Crystalline Mixed Phase (Anatase/Rutile) Mesoporous Titanium Dioxides for Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity. Chem. Mater. 2014 , 27 , 6 -17.
- (55) Garreau, S.; Louarn, G.; Buisson, J. P.; Froyer, G.; Lefrant, S. In Situ Spectroelectrochemical Raman Studies of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDT). Macromolecules 1999 , 32 , 6807 -6812.

(56) Sakamoto, S.; Okumura, M.; Zhao, Z.; Furukawa, Y. Raman Spectral Changes of PEDOT -PSS in Polymer  Light-Emitting  Diodes  upon  Operation. Chemical  Physics  Letters 2005 , 412 , 395 -398.

(57)  Chiu,  W.  W.;  Travaš Sejdić,  J.;  Cooney,  R.  P.;  Bowmaker,  G.  A.  Spectroscopic -and Conductivity  Studies  of  Doping  in  Chemically  Synthesized  Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Synthetic Metals 2005 , 155 , 80 -88.

(58) Chiu, W. W.; Travaš Sejdić, J.; Cooney, R. P.; Bowmaker, G. A. Studies of Dopant Effects -in  Poly(3,4-ethylenedi-oxythiophene)  Using  Raman  Spectroscopy. J.  Raman  Spectrosc. 2006 , 37 , 1354 -1361.

(59) Diskus, M.; Nilsen, O.; Fjellvåg, H.; Diplas, S.; Beato, P.; Harvey, C.; van Schrojenstein Lantman, E.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Combination of Characterization Techniques for Atomic Layer Deposition  MoO3 Coatings:  From  the  Amorphous  to  the  Orthorhombic  α -MoO3  Crystalline Phase. Journal  of  Vacuum  Science  &amp;  Technology  A:  Vacuum,  Surfaces,  and  Films 2012 , 30 , 01A107.

(60) T., I.; K., G.; A., S. Structure and Optical Properties of CVD Molybdenum Oxide Films for Electrochromic Application. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 2002 , 7 , 21 -24.

(61) Chelvanathan, P.; Rahman, K. S.; Hossain, M. I.; Rashid, H.; Samsudin, N.; Mustafa, S. N.; Bais,  B.;  Akhtaruzzaman,  M.;  Amin,  N.  Growth  of  MoOx  Nanobelts  from  Molybdenum  BiLayer Thin Films for Thin Film Solar Cell Application. Thin Solid Films 2017 , 621 , 240 -246.

(62)  Seguin,  L.;  Figlarz,  M.;  Cavagnat,  R.;  Lassègues,  J.-C.  Infrared  and  Raman  Spectra  of MoO3 Molybdenum Trioxides and MoO3 · xH2O Molybdenum Trioxide Hydrates. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 1995 , 51 , 1323 -1344.

- (63) Camacho-López, M. A.; Escobar-Alarcón, L.; Picquart, M.; Arroyo, R.; Córdoba, G.; HaroPoniatowski, E. Micro-Raman Study of the m-MoO2 t o α -MoO3 Transformation Induced by CwLaser Irradiation. Optical Materials 2011 , 33 , 480 -484.

(64) Liu, D.; Lei, W. W.; Hao, J.; Liu, D. D.; Liu, B. B.; Wang, X.; Chen, X. H.; Cui, Q. L.; Zou,  G.  T.;  Liu,  J. et  al. High-Pressure  Raman  Scattering  and  X-Ray  Diffraction  of  Phase Transitions in MoO3. Journal of Applied Physics 2009 , 105 , 23513.

- (65)  Kondrachova,  L.;  Hahn,  B.  P.;  Vijayaraghavan,  G.;  Williams,  R.  D.;  Stevenson,  K.  J. Cathodic Electrodeposition of Mixed Molybdenum Tungsten Oxides from PeroxoPolymolybdotungstate Solutions. Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids 2006 , 22 , 10490 10498. -
- (66) Dieterle, M.; Weinberg, G.; Mestl, G. Raman Spectroscopy of Molybdenum Oxides. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002 , 4 , 812 -821.
- (67) Atuchin, V. V.; Gavrilova, T. A.; Kostrovsky, V. G.; Pokrovsky, L. D.; Troitskaia, I. B. Morphology and Structure of Hexagonal MoO3 Nanorods. Inorg Mater 2008 , 44 , 622 -627.
- (68) Pan, W.; Tian, R.; Jin, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, X.; Zhang, L.; Han, Z.; Liu, G.; Li, J. et al. Structure, Optical, and Catalytic Properties of Novel Hexagonal Metastable h -MoO3 Nanoand  Microrods  Synthesized  with  Modified  Liquid-Phase  Processes. Chem.  Mater. 2010 , 22 , 6202 6208. -
- (69)  Grossiord,  N.;  Kroon,  J.  M.;  Andriessen,  R.;  Blom,  P.  W.  Degradation  Mechanisms  in Organic Photovoltaic Devices. Organic Electronics 2012 , 13 , 432 -456.
- (70) Chithambararaj, A.; Rajeswari Yogamalar, N.; Bose, A. C. Hydrothermally Synthesized hMoO  3  and  α -MoO  3  Nanocrystals:  New  Findings  on  Crystal-Structure-Dependent  Charge Transport. Crystal Growth &amp; Design 2016 , 16 , 1984 -1995.

(71)  Wang,  W.;  Guo,  S.;  Herzig,  E.  M.;  Sarkar,  K.;  Schindler,  M.;  Magerl,  D.;  Philipp,  M.; Perlich, J.; Müller-Buschbaum, P. Investigation of morphological degradation of P3HT:PCBM bulk heterojunction films exposed to long-term host solvent vapor. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016 , 4 , 3743 3753 -

## FIGURES

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00135v1-figure-4b02a46e-f49e-4b21-848d-20d6fee20600.jpg)

Figure 1. Investigated device architecture with the focus on different hole-transport layers and their environmental exposure conditions.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00135v1-figure-e6375aaa-e1f5-4989-9640-71456ad0ba1f.jpg)

Figure 2. Photocurrent characteristics under AM1.5G of devices with fresh prepared HTLs and after different environmental exposures (a) PEDOT:PSS (b) MoO3-1 (c) MoO3-2.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00135v1-figure-4a9dd453-eb40-455f-a43e-7d33b2fea3f3.jpg)

Figure 3. Normalized TP C (normalized by the steady state photocurrent at 300 μs) at different applied  bias  of  selected  devices  with  different  environmentally  exposed  HTLs,  namely  (a) freshly prepared PEDOT:PSS  (b) PEDOT:PSS after air exposure in the dark (c) PEDOT:PSS after air with illumination (d) PEDOT:PSS after humid air exposure in the dark (e) MoO3-1 after humid air exposure in the dark (f) MoO3-2 after humid air exposure in the dark.

Figure 4. XPS spectra of different HTL films after selected environmental exposures: (a) S 2p core level of PEDOT:PSS (b) O 1s core level of PEDOT:PSS (c) Mo 3d core level of MoO3-1 (d) O 1s core level of MoO3-1 (e) Mo 3d core level of MoO3-2 (f) O 1s core level of MoO3-2.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00135v1-figure-197801e8-ef79-418e-a0b3-e1410fb3a649.jpg)

1400

Figure 5. Area-averaged spectra of spatially resolved Raman characteristics of PEDOT:PSS (a), MoO3-1 (b) and MoO3-2 (c) films after different exposures scenarios. Spatially resolved sequences of Raman spectra for humidity-exposed PEDOT:PSS (d), MoO3-1 (e) and MoO3-2 (f).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00135v1-figure-529fed3f-4cb9-4c44-bc64-5d5bf3ef59d2.jpg)

Figure  6. Relative  photocurrent  density  maps  of  P3HT:PCBM  solar  cells  with  PEDOT:PSS, MoO3 -1 and MoO3 -2 HTLs after different environmental exposures with a scanning area of 1500 μm x 4000 μm.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00135v1-figure-d14cc086-d5e9-492c-ba4b-95a6a3b73631.jpg)

Figure 7. Local photo-J-V curves from a central line-scan along the long-side of devices with different HTL materials after humid air in the dark exposure (a) PEDOT:PSS (b) MoO3-1 (c) MoO3-2.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00135v1-figure-5a6cbf14-cf42-4035-946f-c8e433815ba2.jpg)

Figure 8. Solar cell parameters as extracted/calculated from the local photo-J-V curves recorded at different points along the long-side (4 mm) of a device pixel, showing (a) JSC, (b) VOC, (c) FF and (d) RS.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00135v1-figure-360020f0-2b8b-49d1-8ca3-d4fd76372a07.jpg)

## SYNOPSIS TOC

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00135v1-figure-5073958b-8097-4cc6-838d-9d58a6f522d7.jpg)
Huei -Ting Chien Florian Pilat Thomas Griesser Harald Fitzek Peter Poelt Bettina Friedel
Influence of Environmentally Affected Hole Transport Layers on Spatial Homogeneity and Charge Transport Dynamics of Organic Solar Cells
After the efficiency of organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells achieved more than
10%, the control of stability and degradation mechanisms of solar cells became
a prominent task. The improvement of device efficiency due to incorporation of
a hole-transport layer (HTL) in bulk-heterojunction solar cells has been
extensively reported. However, the most widely used HTL material, PEDOT:PSS is
frequently suspected to be the dominating source for devices instability under
environmental conditions. Thereby effects like photooxidation and electrode
corrosion are often reported to shorten device lifetime. However, often in
environmental device studies, the source of degradation, whether being from the
HTL, the active layer or the metal cathode are rather difficult to distinguish,
because the external diffusion of oxygen and water affects all components. In
this study, different HTLs, namely prepared from traditional PEDOT:PSS and also
two types of molybdenum trioxide (MoO3), are exposed to different environments
such as oxygen, light or humidity, prior to device finalization under inert
conditions. This allows investigating any effects within the HTL and from
reactions at its interface to the indium-tin-oxide electrode or the active
layer. The surface and bulk chemistry of the exposed HTL has been monitored and
discussed in context to the observed device physics, dynamic charge transport
and spatial performance homogeneity of the according OPV device. The results
show that merely humidity-exposure of the HTL leads to decreased device
performance for PEDOT:PSS, but also for one type of the tested MoO3. The losses
are related to the amount of absorbed water in the HTL, inducing loss of active
area in terms of interfacial contact. The device with PEDOT:PSS HTL after humid
air exposure showed seriously decreased photocurrent by micro-delamination of
swelling/shrinkage of the hygroscopic layer.