## A case study on the impact of interplanetary coronal mass ejection on the Martian O( 1 S) 557.7 nm dayglow emission using ExoMars TGO/NOMAD-UVIS observations: First Results

Aadarsh Raj Sharma 1 , Lot Ram , Harshaa Suhaag , Dipjyoti Patgiri , Lauriane Soret , Jean1 1 1 3 Claude Gérard 3 , Ian R. Thomas , Ann Carine Vandaele , and Sumanta Sarkhel 4 4 1,2*

* Sumanta Sarkhel, Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee - 247667, Uttarakhand, India (sarkhel@ph.iitr.ac.in)

1 Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

2 Centre  for  Space  Science  and  Technology,  Indian  Institute  of  Technology  Roorkee,  Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

3 LPAP, STAR Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

4 Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium

## Abstract

We report, for the first time, the impact of an interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) on the recently discovered O( S) 557.7 nm dayglow emission in the Martian atmosphere. Although 1 there are only a few studies on the seasonal variation are available in the literature, the impact of ICME on 557.7 nm dayglow emission hasn't been investigated so far. Using the instruments aboard ExoMars-TGO and MAVEN spacecrafts, we show that the primary emission peak (7580  km)  remains  unaffected  during  the  ICME  event  compared  to  quiet-times.  However,  a noticeable enhancement has been observed in the brightness of secondary emission peak (110120 km) and the upper altitude region (140-180 km). The enhancement is attributed to the increased solar electrons and X-ray fluxes, augmenting the electron-impact process and causing the enhancement in the brightness. These analyses have an implication to comprehend the role of intense solar transients like ICME on the Martian dayglow emissions.

## Keywords

Martian dayglow, O( 1 S) 557.7 nm emission, ExoMars-TGO, MAVEN, ICME

## Key points

- 1. Impact of an ICME on the Martian 557.7 nm dayglow emission has been studied using instruments onboard ExoMars-TGO and MAVEN spacecrafts.
- 2. During this ICME, the primary emission peak does not show variation compared to quiet-time and seasonal quiet-time average periods.
- 3. An enhancement in the secondary emission peak and upper altitude region (140-180 km) is observed due to increased electron impact process.

## Plain Language Summary:

The O( 1 S) 557.7 nm dayglow emission has been recently discovered in the Martian dayside atmosphere, having a primary and secondary emission peak observed at ~80 and ~120 km altitudes, respectively. It is produced via photodissociation of CO2 by solar extreme ultraviolet radiation  and  electron  impact  processes.  It  is  to  be  noted  that  space  weather  event  like interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) can significantly affect the Martian atmosphere. This motivates us to study the behavior of 557.7 nm emission during the ICME event. The present study report, for the first time, the impact of ICME on the O( S) 557.7 nm dayglow 1 emission using the instruments onboard ExoMars-TGO and MAVEN spacecrafts.  Our findings show  that  during  the  ICME,  the  primary  emission  peak  does  not  show  any  variation  as compared  to  quiet-times.  However,  the  brightness  of  secondary  emission  peak  and  upperaltitude  region  (140-180  km)  show  enhancements  in  comparison  to  quiet-times.  We  have observed the increase in the solar X-ray and electron fluxes during the ICME event which produces more photo-electrons and secondary electrons. This enhances the electron impact process resulting in the enhancement in the brightness of the secondary emission peak and the upper altitude region.

## 1. Introduction

The detection of O( S) 557.7 nm Martian dayglow emission has been carried out recently by 1 Gérard et al., (2020) using the Ultraviolet and Visible Spectrometer (UVIS) channel part of Nadir and Occultation for Mars Discovery (NOMAD) onboard Exobiology on Mars - Tracer Gas Orbiter (ExoMars-TGO) mission of European Space Agency (ESA) and ROSCOSMOS. They found that the 557.7 nm limb profiles consist of two peaks with a primary emission peak (brightest) nearly at 80 km and a secondary emission peak around 120 km of altitude. Soret et al. (2022) showed the variation of the emission peaks over different seasons of Mars and found it in good agreement with photochemical airglow simulations. The long-term variations of the 557.7 nm dayglow have been studied. However, its behavior during transient events like ICME have not been investigated so far. During the passage of ICMEs, depletion has been observed in the Martian dayside and nightside plasma density (Jakosky et al., 2015b; Thampi et al., 2021; Ram et al., 2023). Further, the peak electron density (M2 peak) of ionosphere shows depletion with the upliftment of the peak (Ram et al., 2024). This study for the first time takes advantage of  simultaneous  measurements  of  different  instruments  onboard  ExoMars-TGO  and  Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) spacecraft to identify the ICMEs and observe their impact on the 557.7 nm dayglow emission.

## 2. Data and Methodology

The data used in this study has been collected from the instruments onboard ExoMars - TGO and MAVEN spacecrafts. The MAVEN spacecraft (Jakosky et al., 2015a) has been orbiting Mars since 2014 in 4.5 hr (currently ~3.5 hr) elliptical orbit with an apoapsis of ~6200 km and periapsis  altitude  of  ~150  km  (currently  ~180  km)  and  inclination  of  75  .  The  solar  wind parameters (velocity, density, and dynamic pressure), resultant interplanetary magnetic field (IMF; | B |) and electron density near Mars have been acquired from Solar Wind Ion Analyzer (SWIA),  Magnetometer  (MAG),  and  Solar  Wind  Electron  Analyzer  (SWEA)  instruments onboard the MAVEN spacecraft. The Extreme Ultraviolet Monitor (EUVM; Eparvier, 2015) part of the Langmuir Probe and Wave (LPW; Andersson et al., 2015) onboard MAVEN is used to  measure  the  flux  of  solar  irradiance.  It  measures  the  solar  irradiance  in  mainly  three wavelength bands (0.1-0.7 nm, 17-22 nm, and 121.6 nm). SWIA measures the solar wind ionflow and covers a broad energy range of 5-25 eV for solar ions (Halekas et al., 2015). The IMF is measured  by  the  MAG  using  a  triaxial  fluxgate  magnetometer  (Connerney,  Espley, DiBraccio,  et al., 2015;  Connerney,  Espley,  Lawton,  et al., 2015).  SWEA  is  a  symmetric, hemispheric electrostatic analyzer that measures the energy and angular distributions of 3-4600 eV electrons (Mitchell et al., 2016).

The ExoMars-TGO orbits in a near circular Martian orbit at ~400 km inclined by 74  on the planetary equator since 2018. The observations of O( S) 557.7 nm were taken using the 1 UVIS (Patel et al., 2017; Vandaele et al., 2015) channel of NOMAD (Vandaele et al., 2018) instrument. The NOMAD-UVIS channel operates in the wavelength range of 200-650 nm. This study uses data collected in special limb mode (inertial), where the UVIS channel, usually pointing to the nadir, is oriented toward the planetary limb (López-Valverde et al., 2018). The UVIS spectrometer scans the Martian atmosphere in inertial limb mode from several hundreds of  kilometers  of  altitude  to  the  near-surface  and  back  up  toward  the  upper  atmosphere, providing two scans (ingress and egress) in one orbit.

For this study, the ICME events are identified through the upstream solar wind data available  from the Space Weather  Database  of  Notifications,  Knowledge,  and  Information (DONKI) (2010) system. To identify the dayside limb observations during the time of an ICME event and the nearest quiet-time (similar latitude, longitude, and SZA), the temporal variation of upstream solar wind parameters, IMF (| B |), and electron flux measurements are mapped with the duration of NOMAD-UVIS observation. The UVIS dayside limb observations consist of spectral data for each tangent altitude, selected based on altitude, latitude, solar zenith angle (SZA), and Martian solar longitude (LS). According  to  Gérard  et  al.  (2020),  the  557.7  nm emission is primarily observed between altitudes of 70-200 km in the dayside atmosphere of Mars. Consequently, all spectra are taken between altitudes of 60 and 200 km with a SZA less than 70°. Spectral data below 100 km, affected by solar contamination, have been corrected using the methodology outlined by Aoki et al. (2022). First, the signal of O( S) emission at 1 557.7 nm is considered between the spectral range of 556.2 and 559.2 nm at a given altitude. Subsequently, the average radiance values are also estimated in the wavelength range of (550.2556.2 nm) and (559.2-565.2 nm) at that altitude. The background noise is then determined by taking the mean of the two average radiance values and then subtracted from the respective emission spectra to remove the solar contamination. In the subsequent step, the Radiance unit is converted from W m -2  𝑛𝑚 -1 𝑠𝑟 -1 to kR nm -1 . This procedure has been applied to the UVIS limb observations gathered between April 2019 and October 2023.

## 3. Results

In this study, we have investigated the impact of an ICME on 557.7 nm dayglow emission using the NOMAD-UVIS observations. The limb profiles of 557.7 nm dayglow during the ICME

event  are  compared  with  the  quiet-time  to  assess  the  impact  of  the  ICME.  To  verify  the upstream  conditions,  we  have  analyzed  the  data  from  SWIA,  Magnetometer,  and  SWEA instruments onboard the MAVEN spacecraft. The results obtained after analyzing the mutispacecraft datasets are described in the following paragraphs.

Figure 1 represents the temporal variation of the upstream solar wind (a) density, (b) velocity,  (c)  dynamic  pressure  (SWDP),  (d)  IMF  (| B |),  and  (e)  electron  flux,  respectively, between 08 and 17 May 2019. To get the unhindered solar wind intervals in the upstream region, we have followed the algorithm provided by Halekas et al. (2017) and Ram et al. (2023). The solar wind parameters (density, velocity, and dynamic pressure), and resultant IMF (| B |) show an upsurge on 09 May 2019, and attain the peak magnitudes of nearly 12 cm -3 , 320 km s -1 , and 1.6 nPa, respectively, on 10 May 2019. During this period, the peak magnitude of IMF (| B |) and electron flux approach to 17.5 nT and 10 8 𝑒𝑉 𝑐𝑚 -2 𝑠 -1 𝑠𝑟 -1 , respectively. This ICME event is similar in strength as mentioned in the study by Ritter et. al. (2018). The verticalcolored dotted line in red represents the NOMAD-UVIS observation during the event-time (11 May 2019 00:20 UT), whereas the blue-colored dotted line depicts the quiet-time (15 May 2019  15:38  UT)  condition.  Although,  the  event-time  observation  (NOMAD-UVIS  limb observation) does not coincide with the peak time of ICME, it occurred during the declining phase of the ICME.

## MAVENISWIA-MAG-SWEA

Figure 1: Variation in solar wind (a) density, (b) velocity, (c) dynamic pressure (SWDP), (d) resultant IMF (| B |), and electron energy flux, observations near Mars, between 08-17 May 2019. The red and blue dashed lines denote the event- and quiet-time observations of NOMAD-UVIS.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.01045v1-figure-6b848a3a-11fc-4315-9614-f4e7694cc114.jpg)

Figure 2 shows the EUVM observations during the respective days of May 2019. The panels (a) and (b) in Figure 2 represent the solar irradiance flux for soft X-ray (SXR; 1-10 nm) and extreme ultraviolet (EUV; 85-125 nm). The red and blue curves denote the solar irradiance flux during the event- and quiet-times, respectively. Figure 2c depicts the variation of integrated SXR and EUV flux between 08 and 17 May 2019. We have calculated the integrated SXR (right y-axis) and EUV (left y-axis) from Figures 2a and 2b. The red- and blue-colored dotted lines represent the UVIS observations for the event- and quiet-times (like Figure 1). During the event-time, the SXR flux reaches approximately 5  10 -6 𝑊𝑚 -2 𝑛𝑚 -1 , while during the quiettime, it is about 4.6  10 -6 𝑊𝑚 -2 𝑛𝑚 -1 . This represents around 8% increase in the soft X-ray flux  compared  to  the  quiet-time.  The  EUV  flux  during  the  event-time  does  not  show  any significant change as compared to that of quiet-time, evident from Figures 2b and 2c.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.01045v1-figure-d0531404-3e16-4d32-a2bb-22b3fb7fd05f.jpg)

Days

May,

Figure 2: (a) Solar irradiance flux for the soft X-ray (SXR; 1-10 nm). (b) extreme ultraviolet (EUV; 85-125 nm during event(11 May 2019; red) and quiet-time (15 May 2019; blue). (c) Variation in the integrated SXR and EUV in magenta and black colors, respectively.  The red- and blue-colored dotted lines denote the period of event- and quiet-time observations of UVIS.

Figures 3a and 3b illustrate the variation of SZA and latitude with respect to altitude for the event- (red line; Ls: ~23.4) and quiet-time (blue line; Ls: ~25.6) limb observations using

NOMAD-UVIS. To get a similar SZA and latitude coverage of the event- and quiet-time limb profiles, the egress and ingress limb scans have been considered, respectively. In the altitude range of 60-200 km, the event-time limb profile covers the SZA and latitude range of 43.3  -56.6  and 43.7 - 34.2 , respectively. Whereas the quiet-time limb profile falls within the SZA    and latitude range of 40.6  - 53.5  and 48.9 - 48.4    , respectively. In addition, Figure 3c shows the spatial distribution of limb observations in latitude and longitude.

Figure 3: Variation of (a) SZA with altitude, (b) Latitude with altitude, and (c) longitude with latitude during the ICME event (11 May 2019; red) and quiet-time (15 May 2019; blue).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.01045v1-figure-433098cf-1330-48c0-ad33-cc5b36f282c2.jpg)

Since  NOMAD-UVIS  dayside  inertial  limb  observations  occur  intermittently,  it  is difficult to get consecutive observations. This major constraint has made it challenging to find UVIS observation during ICME events along with the quiet-time observation having similar SZA and location. Thus, we could only find the ICME event of 09-11 May 2019 with a nearby quiet-time observation of 15 May 2019 satisfying the criteria necessary for this study. Figure 4 depicts the variation of the 557.7 nm emission as a function of altitude. The x -axis represents brightness (kR), and the y -axis denotes the tangent altitude (60-200 km). The red, blue, and grey-colored  profiles  show  the  event-time,  quiet-time,  and  seasonal  quiet-time  average NOMAD-UVIS limb observations. The event- and quiet-time profiles are generated by taking the  6  km  altitude  bin.  The  profiles  (red  and  blue)  are  represented  with  their  respective measurement  uncertainties  in  horizontal  error  bars.  For  providing  a  typical  background scenario during the northern spring season (Ls: 0  -90 ; Latitude: 20   -60 ), we have considered 

the UVIS inertial limb mode observations, including both the egress and ingress scans. In order to ensure that the profiles lie within the similar latitude and SZA ranges (mentioned in Figure 3)  on  11  and  15  May  2019,  we  have  considered  those  profiles  which  are  distributed  over different longitudes having SZA range of 40 -60 . After applying these constraints, 9 quiet-  time  profiles  have  been  obtained.  The  seasonal  quiet-time  average  limb  profile  (grey)  is calculated by taking the mean of all the quiet-time profiles in 6 km attitude bins. The grey profile is shown with the 1  variability (grey-zone). The purpose of calculating the seasonal quiet-time  average  of  557.7  nm  limb  profile  is  to  assess  typical  background  brightness  at different  altitudes  during  quiet-time  conditions.  The  primary  emission  peak  magnitude  of brightness during event-time (red) does not show a significant deviation in comparison to the quiet-time (blue). Also, the primary emission peak brightness lies within the 1  uncertainty of seasonal quiet-time average (grey-zone), showing that the brightness of primary emission peak of some quiet-time observations is greater than that of event-time. This could be related to the variation of 557.7 nm emission with latitude, longitude or SZA (Soret et. al., 2022). During the event,  the  primary  emission  peak  brightness  is  nearly  142.5  ±  14.2  kR  at  77  km  altitude. Whereas, for the quiet-time, the magnitude is 141 ± 14 kR (75 km altitude). The seasonal quiettime average brightness for the primary emission peak is 127 ± 43.7 kR at an altitude of 81 km.

Figure 4: Radiance limb profile of O( 1 S) 557.7 nm emission during event-time (red), quiet-time (blue), and average-quiettime (grey), respectively. The grey shaded region is the 1  variability within each altitude bin. The red and blue horizontal bars are 10% error in the brightness.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.01045v1-figure-5d3b915e-8bf1-4cd9-9b2a-0045840d9db6.jpg)

It  is  interesting  to  note  that  the  557.7  nm  emission  brightness  on  the  event-time  show  an enhancement at the secondary emission peak (70 ± 7 kR; 106.5 km altitude) compared to the both quiet-time (47 ± 4.7 kR; 111.2 km altitude) and seasonal quiet-time average (47 ± 11.8 kR; 111.4 km altitude) profiles. Further, there is a noticeable increase in the brightness of eventtime between the 140 and 170 km altitudes and lies beyond both the quiet-time and seasonal quiet-time  average  profile.  For  verifying  this  observed  enhancement  in  the  brightness,  we applied the statistical t-test (Mann-Whitney U test; Mann and Whitney, 1947) on the dataset [available in Sharma et. al. (2024)] between the altitude of 100-180 km. The test results show that the p-value between the event-time and quiet-time data is ~0.0013, between event-time and seasonal quiet-time average is ~0.029, and between quiet-time and seasonal quiet-time average is ~0.182. P-values less than 0.05 indicate significant difference in two datasets, thus supporting our findings. Therefore, the event-time data is significantly different from the quiettime and seasonal quiet-time average data.

## 4. Discussion

The present case study deals with the impact of the ICME (10-11 May 2019) on the Martian O( 1 S) 557.7 nm dayglow emission using the NOMAD-UVIS observations onboard ExoMarsTGO orbiter. Past and current space missions to Mars have detected various atomic oxygen emissions in UV (Barth et al., 1971), however, visible emissions have been discovered quite recently (Gérard et al., 2020, 2021; Soret et al., 2022). The O( S) 557.7 nm is one of the visible 1 emissions produced by the forbidden transition from the O( S) to the O( D) state of atomic 1 1 oxygen  (Fox  and  Dalgarno,  1979).  Various  photochemical  reactions  are  responsible  for producing O( 1 S), which involves plasma and solar radiation (Raghuram et al., 2021; Gkouvelis et al., 2018; Jain, 2013). The primary reactions, involving photodissociation and photoelectron impact on CO2, CO and O2 and dissociative recombination of CO2 + and O2 + , are as follows:

$$\text{CO} _ { 2 } + h v \rightarrow \text{O} ( ^ { 1 } \text{S} )$$

$$\mathcal { O } \, \text{and} \, \text{dissociative recombination of} \, \text{CO} _ { 2 } ^ { + } \, \text{and} \, \text{O} _ { 2 } ^ { + }, \colon \\ \mathcal { O } _ { 2 } + h v \rightarrow O ^ { l } S ) + \mathcal { O } \, \text{and} \, \text{(R1)} \\ \mathcal { O } + h v \rightarrow O ^ { l } S ) + C \, \text{and} \, \text{(R2)} \\ \mathcal { O } _ { 2 } + h v \rightarrow O ^ { l } S ) + \mathcal { O } \, \text{and} \, \text{(R3)} \\ \mathcal { O } + e ^ { * } \rightarrow O ^ { l } S ) + e ^ { * } \, \text{and} \, \text{(R4)} \\ \mathcal { O } _ { 2 } \, + e ^ { * } \rightarrow O ^ { l } S ) + \mathcal { O } + e ^ { * } \, \text{and} \, \text{(R5)} \\ \mathcal { O } + e ^ { * } \rightarrow O ^ { l } S ) \, + C + e ^ { * } \, \text{and} \, \text{(R6)} \\ \mathcal { O } _ { 2 } \, + \, e ^ { * } \rightarrow O ^ { l } S ) + \mathcal { O } + e ^ { * } \, \text{and} \, \text{(R7)} \\ \mathcal { O } _ { 2 } ^ { + } + e ^ { - } \rightarrow O ^ { l } S ) + \mathcal { O } \, \text{and} \, \text{(R9)}$$

$$C O _ { 2 } ^ { + } \, + e ^ { - } \rightarrow O ( ^ { 1 } S ) + C O$$

This study examines the variation of 557.7 nm dayglow emission between 60 and 200 km altitude, covering both the lower and upper Martian atmosphere. The upper atmosphere, dominated by photoionization and photoexcitation, forms  the ionosphere  with  M2  and  M1 layers (Bougher et al., 2017; Rishbeth and Mendillo, 2004; Withers, 2018, 2020). The M2 layer (120-160 km) is produced by EUV photons and contains the peak electron density, while the M1 layer (105-115 km) is formed by shorter wavelength X-ray photons (&lt;15 nm) (Rishbeth and Mendillo, 2004; Withers, 2018; 2020). High energy X-rays generate hot photoelectrons, ionizing  neutral  species  and  creating  ion-electron  pairs  (Fox,  2004;  Fox  and Yeager,  2006; Fallows et al., 2015). Photoionization and photoelectron ionization produce CO2 + as a major ionic species, but it quickly gets removed through various reactions, leading to O2 + , making it the  primary  ion  over  all  altitudes  (Fox  and  Dalgarno,  1979).  During  flares  and  ICMEs, increased irradiance and electron flux enhance ionization at 100-160 km, affecting Martian atmospheric emissions. For instance, flares can boost electron density by 50-200% (Mendillo et al., 2006) and UV emissions by 50-123% (Ram et al., 2024).

Previous theoretical works investigated the photochemistry of the O( S) state of atomic 1 oxygen and predicted the radiance limb profile of O( S) 557.7 nm emission in the Martian 1 atmosphere (Fox and Dalgarno, 1979; Gkouvelis et al., 2018; Gérard et al., 2020; Raghuram et al., 2021). The radiance limb profiles of the 557.7 nm emission are in good agreement with the models having the primary and secondary emission peaks between the altitude range of 75-80 km and 110-120 km, respectively. These studies have shown that reactions R1-R9 are primarily responsible for producing the O( S) state. The photodissociation of CO2 by solar H Lyman-α 1 (121.6  nm)  radiation  is  the  dominant  factor  in  producing  the  O( S)  state  and  forming  the 1 primary emission peak  of the  557.7  nm  emission.  The  secondary  emission  peak  is  mainly formed by photodissociation of CO2 through EUV (86-116 nm) radiation (Raghuram et al., 2021). Other processes, such as dissociative recombination of O2 + (R7) electron impact on O, CO, and CO2, also contribute to the formation of the secondary emission peak, with dissociative recombination  of  O2 + being  the  second  most  crucial  process  in  secondary  emission  peak formation (Gkouvelis et al., 2018).

In the present case study, we assess the impact of the ICME on the Martian 557.7 nm dayglow emission. The observations from the SWIA, MAG, and SWEA instruments onboard the  MAVEN  spacecraft  indicate  a  significant  increase  in  the  magnitude  of  solar  wind parameters, IMF (| B |) and electron flux during the passage of an ICME event during 09-11 May 2019 compared to the quiet-time. Using the observations from the NOMAD-UVIS onboard the ExoMars-TGO during both  event-time  (11  May  2019)  and  quiet-time  (15  May  2019),  we investigate  the  impact  of  ICME  on  the  Martian  557.7  nm  dayglow  emission  at  different altitudes. It is evident from Figure 4 that the magnitude of the primary emission peak during the event-time does not show much variation in comparison to the quiet-time and lies within the  1  uncertainty  of  seasonal  quiet-time  average  profile.  This  lack  of  variation  in  the brightness of primary emission peak during the event-time might be due to the photodissociation  process  or  neutral  channels  such  as  three-body  recombination  or  Barth mechanism.

$$O + O + M \rightarrow O _ { 2 } ^ { * } + M$$

O

$$O _ { 2 } ^ { * } + O \rightarrow O ( ^ { 1 } S ) + O _ { 2 }$$

The Barth mechanism is a prominent source of O( S) in the lower altitude on Earth (Barth and 1 Hilderbrandt,  1961;  Bates,  1960;  Slanger  and  Black,  1977;  McDade  and  Llewellyn,  1986; Frederick et al., 1976) and the primary emission peak of 557.7 nm emission lies in the Martian lower  atmosphere  (75-80  km).  As  the  lower  atmosphere  of  Mars  is  abundant  with  neutral species, the role of a neutral channel in the dynamics of primary emission peak requires some attention. In the Barth mechanism (R10 and R11), M represents the CO2 for Mars (Migliorini et al., 2012). The excited intermediate O2 ∗ is the O2(c 1 Σ𝑢 ) -state, which is the source of the O2 Herzberg II band (Gronoff et al., 2008; Llewellyn and Solheim, 1979). The recent detection of O2  Herzberg  II  band  nightglow  on  Mars  (Gérard  et  al.,  2023)  confirms  the  production  of O2(c 1 Σ𝑢 ) -excited intermediate state via three-body recombination process. While the Barth mechanism produces O( 1 S) state, its role during daytime is small and uncertain in the Martian atmosphere  (Gronoff  et  al.,  2008;  Jain,  2013),  making  photodissociation  of  CO2 due  to  H Lyman-α the dominant process in the formation of the primary emission peak. The solar H Lyman-α  flux  does  not  appear  to  show  much  change  between  event-  and  quiet-time,  as illustrated in Figure 2b, which might cause a negligible variation in the primary emission peak's brightness over the event-time profile.

During  the  event,  the  secondary  emission  peak  brightness  significantly  increases compared to the quiet-time brightness and even lies outside the 1  uncertainty of seasonal quiet-time average. The event-time radiance profile also observes an increase in brightness above 140 km and below 180 km. Since the EUV flux between 86-115 nm is approximately similar for both event- and quiet-times (Figures 2b and 2c), the enhancement in the brightness during event-time might be attributed to electron impact processes (R4-R9). During the ICME event, the electron flux increases nearly twice that of quiet-time period (Figure 1e), and the Xray flux also increases by around 8%. As discussed above, the enhancement in the electron and X-ray flux during the ICME event is likely responsible for the increase in the photoelectrons at the altitude of the secondary emission peak and above. These photoelectrons having enough kinetic  energy  also  produce  secondary  electrons  (Jain,  2013),  which  further  enhances  the electron density during the ICME at the altitude of secondary emission peak. The increased photoelectrons  drive  the  electron  impact  processes,  which  contribute  to  enhancing  the brightness of secondary emission peak compared to the quiet-time and seasonal quiet-time average. These processes might also be responsible for the enhancement in brightness between

140-180  km  altitude.  Hence,  for  the  first  time,  this  specific  case  study  provides  us  an opportunity wherein we assess the impact of an ICME on the Martian atmospheric 557.7 nm dayglow emission.

We have investigated the impact of this ICME event, which is categorized as minor storm (NASA DONKI archive), on 557.7 nm emission. However, it is to be analyzed in the future  whether  the  stronger  ICME  (rising  solar  cycle  25)  cause  more  enhancement  in  the secondary emission peak and upper altitude region or not. This present work paves the path to carry out more research in the near future with more comprehensive datasets. Moreover, since these findings are only based on a single ICME event due to the constraints discussed in the Results section, it might not be possible to draw any statistical inference. In order to firmly establish  our  current  conclusions,  further  analyses  will  be  required  in  the  future  with  the inclusion of more ICME events.

## 5. Conclusions

This paper reports the impact of an ICME event (09-11 May 2019) on the Martian 557.7 nm dayglow  emission  using  the  MAVEN  and  NOMAD-UVIS  datasets.  During  this  event,  the primary emission peak brightness showed similar behavior as quiet-time (15 May 2019). This behavior of primary emission peak is attributed to the minimal change in the solar H Lyman-α flux in the period of ICME (11 May 2019). On the contrary, the brightness of the secondary emission peak and higher altitude region (140-180 km) showed noticeable increase during the ICME as compared to quiet-time. Interestingly, this enhancement in brightness aligns with the increase in electron and X-ray flux, which produced more photoelectrons and thereby increased the electron impact processes. During the ICME, electron impact processes contributed more toward  the  enhancement  of  the  secondary  emission  peak  brightness  and  that  of  the  upper altitude region (140-180 km) compared to quiet-times. This case study shows that external forcing like ICME enhances the brightness of the secondary emission peak and upper altitude region. However, no impact on the primary emission peak intensity of O( S) 557.7 nm emission 1 has been observed.

## 6. Data availability

We have used the NASA DONKI catalog for space weather forecast information. The MAVEN dataset of the SWIA (solar wind ion) Level 2, version\_19, revision\_01, MAG (IMF) Level 2, version\_19, revision\_01, SWEA (electron flux) Level 2, version\_19, revision\_01, and EUV Monitor  Level  3,  version\_15,  revision\_01  used  in  this  work  are  obtained  from  the  NASA

Planetary Data System (PDS) at PDS/PPI Home Page (https://pdsppi.igpp.ucla.edu/search/default.jsp).  The  NOMAD-UVIS  Level  3  Calibrated  data  can  be downloaded from ESA Planetary Science Archive (PSA) at PSA UI (https://archives.esac.esa.int/psa/#!Table%20View). The NOMAD-UVIS datafiles i.e., nmd\_cal\_sc\_uvis\_20190510t233028-20190511t004353-l and nmd\_cal\_sc\_uvis\_20190515t153813- 20190515t165133-l have been utilized for the event- and quiet-time observation, respectively. The NOMAD-UVIS derived data products used in this work can be found in Sharma et al. (2024).

## 7. Acknowledgement

We sincerely  acknowledge the ESA PSA and ExoMars-TGO NOMAD-UVIS team for the spectral data. We also acknowledge the NASA PDS and MAVEN team members, especially SWIA and SWEA for the datasets. A.R.S., D.P., and L.R. acknowledge the fellowship from the Ministry of Education, Government of India for carrying out this research work. L.S. and J.C.G. acknowledge  funding  for  this  research  by  the  PRODEX  program  of  the  European  Space Agency, managed in collaboration with the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office. This work is also supported by the Ministry of Education, Government of India.

## References

Andersson, L., Ergun, R. E., Delory, G. T., Eriksson, A., Westfall, J., Reed, H., et al. (2015). The Langmuir Probe and Waves (LPW) instrument for MAVEN. Space Science Reviews, 195(1-4), 173-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0194-3

Aoki, S., Gkouvelis, L., Gérard, J.-C., Soret, L., Hubert, B., Lopez-Valverde, M. A., et al. (2022). Density and temperature of the upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere of Mars retrieved from the OI 557.7 nm dayglow measured by TGO/NOMAD. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 127, e2022JE007206. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JE007206

Barth, C. A., Hord, C. W., Pearce, J. B., Kelly, K. K., Anderson, G. P., &amp; Stewart, A. I. (1971). Mariner 6 and 7 Ultraviolet Spectrometer Experiment: Upper atmosphere data. Journal of Geophysical Research , 76 (10), 22132227. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA076i010p02213

Barth, C. A., &amp; Hildebrandt, A. F. (1961). The 5577 A airglow emission mechanism. Journal of Geophysical Research , 66 (3), 985-986. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i003p00985

Bates, D. R. (1960). Physics of the upper atmosphere, edited by J. A. Ratcliffe, 220pp., Academic, San Diego, Calif.

Bauer,  Siegfried  &amp;  Lammer,  Helmut.  (2004).  Planetary  Aeronomy,  Atmosphere  Environments  in  Planetary Systems. 10.1007/978-3-662-09362-7.

Bougher, S. W., Roeten, K. J., Olsen, K., Mahaffy, P. R., Benna, M., Elrod, M., Jain, S. K., Schneider, N. M., Deighan, J., Thiemann, E., Eparvier, F. G., Stiepen, A., &amp; Jakosky, B. M. (2017). The structure and variability of Mars dayside thermosphere from MAVEN NGIMS and IUVS measurements: Seasonal and solar activity trends in  scale  heights  and  temperatures. Journal  of  Geophysical  Research:  Space  Physics , 122 (1),  1296-1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023454

Connerney, J. E. P, Espley, J. R., DiBraccio, G. A., Gruesbeck, J. R., Oliversen, R. J., Mitchell, D. L., Halekas, J., Mazelle, C., Brain, D., &amp; Jakosky, B. M. (2015). First results of the MAVEN magnetic field investigation. Geophysical Research Letters , 42 (21), 8819-8827. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065366

Connerney, J.E.P., Espley, J., Lawton, P. et al. The MAVEN Magnetic Field Investigation. Space Sci Rev 195 , 257-291 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0169-4

Eparvier, F. G., Chamberlin, P. C., Woods, T. N., &amp; Thiemann, E. M. B. (2015). The solar extreme ultraviolet monitor for MAVEN. Space Science Reviews, 195, 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0195-2

Fallows, K., Withers, P., and Gonzalez, G. (2015). Response of the Mars ionosphere to solar flares: Analysis of MGS  radio  occultation  data. Journal of Geophysical  Research:  Space  Physics, 120(11), 9805-  9825. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021108

Fox, J. L. (2004). Response of the Martian thermosphere/ionosphere to enhanced fluxes of solar soft X rays. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , 109 (A11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010380

Fox, J. L., &amp; Dalgarno, A. (1979). Ionization, luminosity, and heating of the upper atmosphere of Mars. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84(A12), 7315-7333. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA084iA12p07315

Fox, J. L., &amp; Yeager, K. E. (2006). Morphology of the near-terminator Martian ionosphere: A comparison of models and data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 111(A10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011697

Frederick, J. E., Rusch, D. W., Victor, G. A., Sharp, W. E., Hays, P. B., &amp; Brinton, H. C. (1976). The O I (λ5577 Å)  airglow:  Observations  and  excitation  mechanisms. Journal  of  Geophysical  Research , 81 (22),  3923-3930. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA081i022p03923

Gérard, C., Aoki, S., Gkouvelis, L., Soret, L., Willame, Y., Thomas, I. R., Depiesse, C., Ristic, B., Vandaele, A. C., Hubert, B., Daerden, F., Patel, M. R., López-Moreno, J., Bellucci, G., Mason, J. P., &amp; López-Valverde, M. A. (2021). First Observation of the Oxygen 630 nm Emission in the Martian Dayglow. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(8), e2020GL092334. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092334

Gérard, J., Aoki, S., Willame, Y., Gkouvelis, L., Depiesse, C., Thomas, I. R., Ristic, B., Vandaele, A. C., Daerden, F., Hubert, B., Mason, J., Patel, M. R., Bellucci, G., A., M., &amp; Beeckman, B. (2020). Detection of green line emission in the dayside atmosphere of Mars from NOMAD-TGO observations. Nature Astronomy, 4(11), 10491052. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1123-2

| Gérard, JC., Soret, L., Thomas, I.R. et al. Observation of the Mars O 2 visible nightglow by the NOMAD spectrometer onboard the Trace Gas Orbiter. Nat Astron 8 , 77-81 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023- 02104-8                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Gkouvelis, L., Gérard, C., Ritter, B., Hubert, B., Schneider, N. M., & Jain, S. K. (2018). The O(1S) 297.2-nm Dayglow Emission: A Tracer of CO2 Density Variations in the Martian Lower Thermosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 123(12), 3119-3132. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JE005709                                                                                                                                                              |
| Gronoff, G., Lilensten, J., Simon, C., Barthélemy, M., Leblanc, F., &Dutuit, O. (2008). Modelling the Venusian airglow. A&A, 482 3 1015-1029. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077503                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| Halekas, J.S., Taylor, E.R., Dalton, G. et al. The Solar Wind Ion Analyzer for MAVEN. Space Sci Rev 195, 125- 151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0029-z                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| Halekas, J. S., Ruhunusiri, S., Harada, Y., Collinson, G., Mitchell, D. L., Mazelle, C., McFadden, J. P., P. Connerney, J. E., Espley, J. R., Eparvier, F., Luhmann, J. G., & Jakosky, B. M. (2017). Structure, dynamics, and seasonal variability of the Mars-solar wind interaction: MAVEN Solar Wind Ion Analyzer in-flight performance and science results. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 122(1), 547-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023167 |
| Jain, S.K., 2013. Dayglow Emissions on Mars and Venus (Ph.D. thesis). Cochin University of Science and Technology, India. http://dyuthi.cusat.ac.in/purl/3688                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Jakosky BM, Lin RP, Grebowsky JM, Luhmann JG, Mitchell DF, Beutelschies G, Priser T, Acuna M, Andersson L, Baird D, Baker D(2015a). The Mars atmosphere and volatile evolution (MAVEN) mission. Space Sci Rev 195 , 3-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0139-x                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| Jakosky, Bruce M., et al. (2015b). MAVEN observations of the response of Mars to an interplanetary coronal mass ejection. Science, 350.6261. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad0210                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| Krasnopolsky, V. A. (2006). Photochemistry of the martian atmosphere: Seasonal, latitudinal, and diurnal variations. Icarus, 185(1), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2006.06.003                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| López-Valverde, M.A., Gerard, JC., González-Galindo, F. et al. Investigations of the Mars Upper Atmosphere with ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter. Space Sci Rev 214, 29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-017-0463-4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Llewellyn, E., Solheim, B., Witt, G., Stegman, J., & Greer, R. (1979). On the excitation of oxygen emissions in the airglow of the terrestrial planets. Journal of Photochemistry, 12(2), 179-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047- 2670(80)85041-6                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| H. B. Mann, D. R. Whitney "On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other," The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Ann. Math. Statist. 18(1), 50-60, (March, 1947)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| McDade, I.C., Llewellyn, E.J., 1986. The excitation of O (1S) by O2 bands in the nightglow. Canadian Journal of Physics, 64, 1626-1630. https://doi.org/10.1139/p86-287                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| Mitchell, D.L., Mazelle, C., Sauvaud, JA. et al. The MAVENSolar Wind Electron Analyzer. Space Sci Rev 200, 495-528 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0232-1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| Migliorini, A., Piccioni, G., Gérard, J., Soret, L., Slanger, T., Politi, R., Snels, M., Drossart, P., & Nuccilli, F. (2013). The characteristics of the O2 Herzberg II and Chamberlain bands observed with VIRTIS/Venus Express. Icarus, 223(1), 609-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2012.11.017                                                                                                                                                               |
| Mendillo, M., Withers, P., Hinson, D., Rishbeth, H., & Reinisch, B. (2006). Effects of solar flares on the ionosphere of Mars. Science, 311(5764), 1135-1138. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1122099                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Patel, M. R., Antoine, P., Mason, J., Leese, M., Hathi, B., Stevens, A. H., et al. (2017). NOMADspectrometer on the ExoMars trace gas orbiter mission: Part 2-Design, manufacturing, and testing of the ultraviolet and visible channel. Applied Optics, 56(10), 2771-2782. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.002771                                                                                                                                                      |
| Raghuram, S., Jain, S. K., & Bhardwaj, A. (2021). Forbidden atomic oxygen emissions in the martian dayside upper atmosphere. Icarus, 359, 114330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114330                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |

| Ram, L., Rout, D., Rathi, R., Mondal, S., Sarkhel, S., &Halekas, J. (2023). AComparison of the Impacts of CMEs and CIRs on the Martian Dayside and Nightside Ionospheric Species. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 128(4), e2022JE007649. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JE007649                                                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Ram, L., Sharma, R., Rout, D., Rathi, R., & Sarkhel, S. (2024). Investigation on the impact of solar flares on the Martian atmospheric emissions in the dayside near-terminator region: Case studies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets.                                                                                                                                                        |
| Ram, L., Rout, D., Rathi, R., Withers, P., & Sarkhel, S. (2024). Martian M2 peak behavior in the dayside near- terminator ionosphere during interplanetary coronal mass ejections. Icarus , 408 , 115857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115857                                                                                                                                                 |
| Rishbeth, H., & Mendillo, M. (2004). Ionospheric layers of Mars and Earth. Planetary and Space Science, 52(9), 849-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2004.02.007                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Ritter, B., Gérard, J.-C., Hubert, B., Rodriguez, L., & Montmessin, F. (2018). Observations of the proton aurora on Mars with SPICAM on board Mars Express. Geophysical Research Letters, 45,612-619. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076235                                                                                                                                                             |
| Schunk, R., &Nagy, A. (2009). Ionospheres: Physics, plasma physics, and chemistry. Cambridge university press. Retrieved from www.cambridge.org/9780521877060                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| Sharma, A. R., Sarkhel, S., Suhaag, H., Ram, L., Patgiri, D., Soret, L., Gérard, J.-C., Thomas, I. R., &Vandaele, A. C. (2024). A case study on the impact of interplanetary coronal mass ejection on the Martian O(1S) 557.7 nm dayglow emission using ExoMars TGO/NOMAD-UVIS observations: First Results [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12690459                                 |
| Slanger, T. G., & Black, G. (1976). O(1S) In the lower thermosphere-Chapman vs Barth. Planetary and Space Science , 25 (1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(77)90120-9                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Soret, L., Gérard, C., Aoki, S., Gkouvelis, L., Thomas, I. R., Ristic, B., Hubert, B., Willame, Y., Depiesse, C., Vandaele, A. C., Patel, M. R., Mason, J. P., Daerden, F., López-Moreno, J., & Bellucci, G. (2022). The Mars Oxygen Visible Dayglow: A Martian Year of NOMAD/UVIS Observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 127(6), e2022JE007220. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JE007220 |
| Space Weather Database of Notifications, Knowledge, and information (DONKI). (2010). DONKI [Software]. Retrieved from https://kauai.ccmc. gsfc.nasa.gov/DONKI/search/                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| Thampi SV, Krishnaprasad C, Nampoothiri GG, Pant TK. The impact of a stealth CME on the Martian topside ionosphere. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2021 May;503(1):625-32.                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| A. Vandaele, Y. Willame, C. Depiesse, I. Thomas, S. Robert, D. Bolsée, M. Patel, J. Mason, M. Leese, S. Lesschaeve, P. Antoine, F. Daerden, S. Delanoye, R. Drummond, E. Neefs, B. Ristic, J. Lopez-Moreno, G. Bellucci, and. Nomad Team, "Optical and radiometric models of the NOMAD instrument part I: the UVIS channel," Opt. Express 23, 30028-30042 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.030028 |
| Vandaele, A.C., Lopez-Moreno, JJ., Patel, M.R. et al. NOMAD, an Integrated Suite of Three Spectrometers for the ExoMars Trace Gas Mission: Technical Description, Science Objectives and Expected Performance. Space Sci Rev 214, 80 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0517-2                                                                                                                 |
| Withers, P., Felici, M., Mendillo, M., Moore, L., Narvaez, C., Vogt, M. F., & Jakosky, B. M. (2018). First Ionospheric Results From the MAVEN Radio Occultation Science Experiment (ROSE). Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123(5), 4171-4180. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025182                                                                                                     |
| Withers, P. (2020). Are Sporadic Plasma Layers at 90 km in the Mars Ionosphere Produced by Solar Energetic Particle Events. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 125(9), e2020JA028120. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028120                                                                                                                                                                |
Aadarsh Raj Sharma Lot Ram Harshaa Suhaag Dipjyoti Patgiri Lauriane Soret Jean-Claude Gerard Ian R. Thomas Ann Carine Vandaele Sumanta Sarkhel
A case study on the impact of interplanetary coronal mass ejection on the Martian O(1S) 557.7 nm dayglow emission using ExoMars TGO/NOMAD-UVIS observations: First Results
We report, for the first time, the impact of an interplanetary coronal mass
ejection (ICME) on the recently discovered O($^1$S) 557.7 nm dayglow emission
in the Martian atmosphere. Although there are only a few studies on the
seasonal variation are available in the literature, the impact of ICME on 557.7
nm dayglow emission has not been investigated so far. Using the instruments
aboard ExoMars-TGO and MAVEN spacecrafts, we show that the primary emission
peak (75-80 km) remains unaffected during the ICME event compared to
quiet-times. However, a noticeable enhancement has been observed in the
brightness of secondary emission peak (110-120 km) and the upper altitude
region (140-180 km). The enhancement is attributed to the increased solar
electrons and X-ray fluxes, augmenting the electron-impact process and causing
the enhancement in the brightness. These analyses have an implication to
comprehend the role of intense solar transients like ICME on the Martian
dayglow emissions.