## Nanostructured Fe₂O₃/CuxO Heterojunction for Enhanced Solar Redox Flow Battery Performance

Jiaming Ma 1 , Milad Sabzehparvar 1 , Ziyan Pan , Giulia Tagliabue * 1 1

- 1 Laboratory  of  Nanoscience  for  Energy  Technologies  (LNET),  STI,  École  Polytechnique  Fédérale  de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

*Corresponding Author. Email: giulia.tagliabue@epfl.ch

## Abstract

Solar redox flow batteries (SRFB) have received much attention as an alternative integrated technology for simultaneous  conversion  and  storage  of  solar energy.  Yet, the photocatalytic efficiency of semiconductor-based single photoelectrode, such as hematite, remains low due to the trade-off between fast electron hole recombination and insufficient light utilization, as well as inferior reaction kinetics at the solid/liquid interface. Herein, we present an α -Fe2O3/CuxO p-n junction, coupled with a readily scalable nanostructure, that increases the electrochemically active sites and improves charge separation. Thanks to  light-assisted  scanning  electrochemical  microscopy  (Photo-SECM), we  elucidate  the  morphologydependent carrier transfer process involved in the photo-oxidation reaction at a α -Fe2O3 photoanode. The optimized nanostructured is then exploited in the α -Fe2O3/CuxO p-n junction, achieving an outstanding unbiased photocurrent density of 0.46 mA/cm 2 , solar-to-chemical (STC) efficiency over 0.35% and a stable photocharge-discharge cycling. The average solar-to-output energy efficiency (SOEE) for this unassisted α -Fe2O3-based SRFB system reaches 0.18%, comparable to previously reported DSSC-assisted hematite SRFBs.  The  use  of  earth-abundant  materials  and  the  compatibility  with  scalable  nanostructuring  and heterojunction preparation techniques, offer promising opportunities for cost-effective device deployment in real-world applications.

## Introduction

Solar  energy  conversion  offers  a  promising  solution  to  meet  the  steadily  increasing  energy  demand sustainably. Through the combination of photoelectrochemical cells (PEC) and redox flow batteries (RFB), solar energy can be efficiently converted and stored as chemical fuels by oxidizing or reducing various redox couples 1 3 -.  The success of this all-in-one solar redox flow battery (SRFB) mainly depends on the design of the cell structure 4,5 and the development of high-performance photoelectrodes 6,7 .

Theoretically, the maximum solar-to-chemical (STC) efficiency of a single photoelectrode SRFB system can reach 16%-18% if the bandgap of the absorber material is within 1.4 -2 eV and the thermodynamic cell voltage is around 0.9 V and 0.7 V 8 . Yet, practical realizations have not surpassed 3.9% STC efficiencies 9 with limited upscale fabrication. This is related to band-alignment constraints for SRFB photocharging up to  high  states  of  charge,  which  favor  wide-bandgap  materials  with  limited  solar  light  absorption 10 . Additionally, low efficiency of charge separation dramatically reduces the performance of real devices. STC  conversion  efficiencies  up  to  21.1%  have  been  instead  achieved  by  exploiting  complex  device structures (e.g. dual photoelectrodes 11 ) or more expensive tandem photoelectrodes (e.g. multi-junction solar cells 12,13 ). Thus, the development of single photoelectrodes with low cost and scalable manufacturing necessitates further investigation 14 .

H ematite  (α -Fe2O3)  is  a  promising  photoanode  material  due  to  its  stability,  non-toxicity,  low  cost, abundance on Earth, and attractive band gap 15,16  (1.9-2.2 eV). However, its performance is hindered by the trade-off between light-absorption and charge separation/transport, due to the short hole diffusion length 17 and poor charge carrier conductivity 6,18 .  Hematite thin films 19,20 have been used to reduce the charge carrier diffusion distance to the electrode/electrolyte interface at the expense of complete light absorption (a thickness of 40-100 nm is needed to absorb 450-550 nm light 21 ). An effective approach to overcome this trade-off is the use of nanoengineered structures, which can shorten the charge carrier transfer  length 22 24 -,  increase  the  electrochemically  active  surface  area 25 ,  achieve  light  trapping 26 ,  and induce  optical  resonances  within  the  active  photocatalyst  material  itself 27 . Additionally,  properly engineered  heterojunction  photoelectrodes,  e.g.  based  on  a  p-n  junction 28 ,  can  further  improve  the spatial separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs 29 , enhancing the photocatalytic activity. In the context of water-splitting or photosynthetic devices, a significant amount of effort has been devoted to proposing  and  designing  heterojunctions  aimed  at  efficiently  extracting  photoholes  from  α -Fe2O3 catalysts 15,30 -33 .  Yet,  this  approach  has  not  been  thoroughly  explored  in semiconductor-based  SRFBs, despite major advantages in enabling higher state-of-charge and higher voltages during photocharging and discharging, respectively. Overall, nanoengineering and heterojunction design have a large untapped potential for improving single photoelectrode SRFB PEC performance.

In this work, we present a scalable, nanostructured α -Fe2O3/CuxO p-n junction and demonstrate its largely improved  unassisted  photocharging  of  an  integrated  solar  redox  flow  battery  ( Figure  1a ).  First, α -Fe2O3/CuxO films with varying thicknesses were systematically investigated to elucidate the impact of the p-n junction on the photoelectrochemical performance ( Figure 1b ). Concurrently, light-assisted scanning electrochemical microscopy (Photo-SECM) was employed to reveal enhanced charge separation  in α -Fe2O3  nanopillar  arrays  ( Figure  1c ).  Finally,  g uided  by  the  results  from  SECM,  the  optimized  α -Fe2O3 nanostructure was integrated with the p-n junction strategy to enhance charge carrier separation while improving electrochemically active sites, thus resulting in a high performance photoanode. Our SRFB, featuring  the nanostructured  α -Fe2O3/CuxO  p-n  junction,  demonstrates  record  values  of  unassisted photocurrent (0.46 mA/ cm 2 ), along with STC efficiency ~0.35% and SOEE ~0.18%, comparable to solar cell-assisted  hematite-based  devices.  Overall,  this α -Fe2O3-based  SRFB  shows  a  stable  photochargedischarge cycling performance and presents opportunities to drive real-world deployment of more costeffective devices.

## Experimental Section

## Sample Preparation

Synthesis  of α -Fe2O3/CuxO  Film  photoanodes ( Figure  S1a , Supporting  Information)   RF  magnetron . sputtering was used to sputter iron thin films (15, 30 and 50 nm) on Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) glass under the protection of Argon gas. Subsequently, copper thin films with different thickness (15, 30 and 45 nm) were sputtered on the iron films under the same condition. The Fe/Cu films were then immersed in 4 M NaOH  (1 h at 80 °C, then 20 h at room temperature) to get Fe/Cu2O film in accordance with previous reports 34 .  Next, all the samples were annealed at 645 °C under air for 10 minutes with the ramping of 5 °C/min to obtain α -Fe2O3/ CuxO (named F-CuxO) photoanodes. The control samples, named 15F, 30F, and 50F, consisted of iron films with thicknesses of 15 nm, 30 nm, and 50 nm, respectively, without copper coating or NaOH treatment, all subjected to the same annealing process, which turns them into hematite films.

Synthesis of α -Fe2O3/CuO Film photoanodes. Iron thin film (15 nm) was sputtered on Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) glass by using the same method mentioned above. Subsequently, copper thin (30 nm) was sputtered on the iron film under the same condition. Then, the sample was annealed at 645 °C under air for 10 minutes with the ramping of 5 °C/min to obtain α -Fe2O3/ CuO (named 15/30 F-CuO) photoanodes.

Synthesis of α -Fe2O3 nanopillar array  Figure S1b ( ,  Supporting Information) . Iron thin film (30 nm) was sputtered on Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) glass by using the same method mentioned above. The Fe nanopillars were then made by e-beam lithography and ion beam etching. ZEP-520A (50%) was spin coated at 4000 rpm rate (~120 nm) on a precleaned iron sample, followed by baking at 180°C for 5 minutes. E-beam was used to pattern nanostructures on photoresist and the sample was subsequently developed in AmylAcetate solution for 1 minute.  The desired Fe nanopillars (300 nm periodicity; 100, 150 and 200 nm in diameter) was then fabricated by ion beam etching with 1.1 nm/s etching speed. The as-prepared Fe nanostructure consists of nanopillars that are 25 nm in height, with a continuous Fe layer that is 5 nm thick at the bottom. The sample was cleaned via oxygen plasma (150 sccm O2, 200 W) for 10s, followed by annealing at 645 °C under air for 10 minutes to obtain α -Fe2O3 nanopillar array (named P100, P150 and P200).

Synthesis of nanostructured α -Fe2O3/CuxO photoanode  Figure S1c ( , Supporting Information) . Iron thin films  (30  nm)  were  sputtered  on  Indium  Tin  Oxide  (ITO)  glass  as  mentioned  above.  Polystyrene  (PS) nanospheres (Microparticles GmbH) with average diameter of 300 nm were then coated on top of iron film via Langmuir Blodgett (LB) technique as a monolayer 35 . Oxygen plasma (800 sccm O2, 300 W) was used to reduce the PS nanospheres to a diameter ranging from 150 to 180 nm. The PS etching speed is around 7.5 nm/min. Subsequently, similar Fe nanopillars with Fe thin film (~5 nm) was obtained via ion beam  etching  and  beads  removing  process 36 .  30  nm  copper  film  was  then  sputtered  on  the  Fe nanostructure. The same NaOH treatment and annealing process as mentioned above were performed to get  the nanostructured α -Fe2O3/CuxO (named P/CuxO)  photoanode. The bare nanostructured α -Fe2O3 (named P) without copper coating and NaOH treatment was also fabricated as a control sample via the same method.

The summary of the sample preparation process is shown in Table S1.

## Material Characterization

The  morphology  and  crystal  structure  of  photoanodes  were  characterized  by  a  scanning  electron microscope  (Zeiss  Gemini  SEM  300)  and  X-ray  diffractometer  (XRD,  Rigaku  Synergy-I  single  crystal). Ultraviolet  photoelectron  spectroscopy  (UPS)  was  performed  using  a  PHI  VersaProbe  II  scanning  XPS microprobe (Physical Instruments AG, Germany) equipped used with He(I) and He(II) UV source.

## Optical Measurements

The UV-Vis test for α -Fe2O3/CuxO Film and nanostructured α -Fe2O3/CuxO were performed under a solar simulator  (Newport  66984-300XF-R1  Xe  lamp)  with  an  AM  1.5G  filter  as  the  light  source,  using  a monochromator (Newport, CS260B-2-MC-A) connected with an integrating sphere (Newport, 819D-IS5.3). The absorption data was obtained following our previous work 37 .

For the α -Fe2O3 nanopillars, an inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti2) was used in combination with a grating spectrometer (Princeton Instruments Spectra Pro HRS-500) equipped with a Peltier-cooled 2D CCD detector  (Princeton  Instruments  PIXIS  256)  to  record  reflection  (R)  and  transmission  (T)  spectra.  The absorption (A) was determined as A=1-R-T. The detailed process is in accordance with previous reports 38,39 .

## Photoelectrochemical Measurements and Photocharge-Discharge

Linear  Sweep  Voltammetry  (LSV),  Photocurrent  density-time  (j-t)  and  Electrochemical  Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) were used to evaluate the photoelectrochemical performance of different photoanodes and were recorded on a Biologic SP-300 potentiostat. LSV were tested both in dark and under illumination with a scan rate of 10 mV/s; J-t was recorded without bias and the photo response signal were obtained with 20-20 s light on/off. EIS analyses were carried out at a perturbation amplitude of 10 mV with the frequency ranging from 0.01 Hz to 10 kHz. EC-Lab software was used to fit the measured EIS results.  All  tests  were carried  out  by using  a two-electrode configuration  of the SRFB device  (one photoanode in anolyte and one 39 AA carbon felt in catholyte) under 1 sun illumination (AM 1.5 G filter, 100 mW/cm 2 ). All samples were back-illuminated through the ITO glass, and the illuminated area is 0.785 cm 2 .

The  photocharge-discharge  behavior  of  our  solar  redox  flow  batteries  was  demonstrated  via  three electrodes  integrated  SRFB  and  was  recorded  by  two  potentiostats.  During  photocharging  process, potentiostat 1 (SP-300) was connected to the PEC part to monitor the photocurrent, while potentiostat 2 (CHI 760E), connecting the RFB part, measured the evolution of the cell potential. During the discharging process, the solar simulator and potentiostat 1 were turned off, while a discharging current of 0.4 mA was applied by potentiostat 2 to RFB part until the cell potential reached 0 V.

During all these tests, the electrolyte recirculation was guaranteed by using two peristaltic pumps (30 ml/min), both the anolyte (0.2 M Na4Fe(CN)6/1 M NaOH) and catholyte ( 0.1 M 2, 7-AQDS/1 M NaOH ) volume of the running system were 4 ml.

## Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

Light-assisted scanning electrochemical microscopy (Photo-SECM) was implemented to investigate the photocatalytic activity of micro-array structures (100 x 100 μ m 2 ) of α -Fe2O3 nanopillars, using a previously described  home-built  instrument 38 .  Briefly,  a  home-built  SECM  was  coupled  with  an  inverted  optical microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti2) and a white light source (Energetiq EQ-99X-FC LDLS) for back-illumination of the structures.  A three-electrode configuration was  employed with Pt and Ag/AgCl as counter and reference electrodes, and Pt ultra-microelectrode (Pt UME) tip as the working electrode. The structured samples were unbiased and grounded. Tip to substrate distance was controlled by monitoring the tip current during its fine approach towards the substrate and lifting up the tip by 3 um higher than the distance corresponding to 30% change from the bulk state. All experiments were performed in a 4mM K4Fe(CN)6 4and 0.4M KOH solution, using a 1.2 μ m radius UME tip (RG value=14.5) biased at a reductive 0V vs Ag/AgCl tip potential, and modulating a ~ 90 μ m diameter collimated light beam having 80 mW/m 2 power density.

## Numerical simulation

Electromagnetic simulations were performed using the RF module of COMSOL Multiphysics v6.1 to obtain the absorption spectra of α -Fe2O3 nanopillars and α -Fe2O3 film. For α -Fe2O3 nanopillars, a 3D unit cell model with periodicity of 300 nm, consisting of one α -Fe2O3 nanopillar (50 nm in height) on top of 10 nm α -Fe2O3 film/100 nm ITO film /fused silica substrate surrounded with a top layer of air, was simulated by setting  the  diameter  of  nanopillars  from  100  nm  to  250  nm  with  10  nm  step  size.    For α -Fe2O3  film simulations , a similar 3D unit cell model without the α -Fe2O3 nanopillar was performed by varying the film thickness from 20 -180 nm with 10 nm step size. In both cases, perfect magnetic conductor and perfect electric  conductor  boundary  conditions  were  used  at  the  side  walls  of  the  unit  cell.  A  port  boundary condition  was  used  at  the  bottom  of  the  unit  cell.    The  back  illumination  was  applied  with  a  normal incident plane wave (300-850 nm) with electric field polarization perpendicular to the film plane as well as recording the reflected wave. At the top of the unit cell, a second port boundary condition without excitation was used to record the transmitted wave. The refractive indices for α -Fe2O3 and ITO were taken from literatures 40,41 . Then the absorbed power was calculated by volume integration of the electromagnetic power loss density over the α -Fe2O3 volume.

## Results and Discussion

Figure 1. (a) Digital figure of a  P/CuxO sample (5 cm 2 ), obtained by synergistically combining heterojunction engineering with large-area nanofabrication (nanosphere lithography; (b) Schematic of a planar p-n junction and its contribution to electron-hole separation (left) as well as quantitative band alignment of the as prepared α-Fe2O3 and CuxO (right); (c) Schematic a nanostructured photoanode and its improved hole collection (left) and SEM of one of the studied α-Fe2O3 nanopillars (right, period of 300 nm and diameter of 150 nm).

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-bd75738b-9ac3-4286-bdc8-f046df509729.jpg)

α -Fe2O3/CuxO heterojunctions were fabricated via a facile and scalable method to enhance electron/hole separation in SRFB photoanodes. Specifically, after sputtering 15 nm Fe and between 15 nm and 45 nm Cu onto ITO, a NaOH treatment was used to convert Cu to Cu2O 34 . Subsequently, annealing of the asprepared composite leads to the formation of α -Fe2O3-Cu2O-CuO, concisely referred to α -Fe2O3/CuxO (see Experimental Section). In the following, samples are named according to the thickness of the initial Fe and Cu film (e.g. 15/30 F-CuxO for the heterostructure). We note that an approximately 2-fold expansion is expected for conversion from Fe to Fe2O3 42 while a significant reduction in thickness is expected for the Cu to CuxO conversion duo to the partially dissolving of Cu into NaOH 34 . As a control sample, we use a 15 nm  Fe  film  that  is  annealed  under  the  same  conditions  without  NaOH  treatment  (sample  15F,  see Experimental Section).

Figure  1b shows  the  estimated  band  alignment  for  our α -Fe2O3/CuxO  heterojunction,  obtained  by combining the measured bandgap from Tauc plot, work function from the Mott-Schottky technique and the valence band maxima from UPS ( Figure S2 , Supporting Information). This is indeed crucial to assess the energy levels compatibility between the electrode/electrolyte. We confirmed that CuxO is a p-type semiconductor and that a p-n junction is formed at the α -Fe2O3/CuxO interface. While this is expected to promote charge separation, and hence the photoelectrochemical performance of the photoanode 29 , it can  reduce  the  possible  theoretical  discharge  cell  voltage  ( Figure  1b ),  as  the  oxidation  and  reduction potentials of the chosen redox couples must lie within the p-type semiconductor valence band and the ntype semiconductor conduction band energies 29 . We chose Fe(CN)6 4- /Fe(CN)6 3as the anolyte (0.60 V vs normal hydrogen electrode (NHE)) and AQDS/AQDS 2-  (-0.14 V vs NHE) as the catholyte to evaluate the performance of the designed α -Fe2O3-based photoanodes 5 .

Figure 2. (a) XRD of different photoelectrodes; (b) Photoresponse behavior for 15/30 F-CuxO and 15F with 20 s light on-off; (c) Linear  sweep  voltammetry  curve  for  15/30  F-CuxO  and  15F  both  under  1  sun  illumination  and  dark;  (d)  UV-Vis  absorption spectrum of 15/30 F-CuxO and 15F.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-78e4ffbb-550e-4c9d-bceb-0add8afc540a.jpg)

A two-electrode SRFB was used to perform photocurrent density-time (j-t) measurements and investigate the PEC performance of the photoanodes under 1 sun illumination. The NaOH treatment time and the thickness of sputtered Cu have been optimized, identifying 15/30 F-CuxO as the best p-n junction film ( Figure S3 , Supporting Information). XRD measurements ( Figure 2a , pink curve) confirm that the 15/30 FCuxO  sample  present the  hematite  phase  of  α -Fe2O3  and  a  mixture  of  Cu2O-CuO  (CuxO).  The  sharp diffraction peaks at 2 θ of 33.1° indicate the (104) plane of the rhombohedral structure of hematite 43 . The peaks observed at 35.4° and 48.8° correspond to the (002) and (202) planes of CuO, while the peaks at 36.6° (111) and 42.2° (200) are characteristic peaks of Cu2O 44 . The rest of the peaks can be attributed to

ITO 45 . Additionally, we observed that excluding the NaOH treatment of the Cu film (sample 15/30 F-CuO, see Experimental Section) results only in CuO diffraction peaks without any trace of Cu2O ( Figure 2a , green curve).  From  a  morphological  point  of  view,  scanning  electron  micrographs  ( Figure  S4 ,  Supporting Information) interestingly show that the 15/30 F-CuxO heterojunction film exhibits a smoother surface and more uniform grains than the control hematite sample 15F. This can be attributed to the formation of CuxO during the annealing process of Cu2O on top of α -Fe2O3.

As shown in Figure 2b , the unbiased photocurrent density for 15/30 F-CuxO is 0.24 mA/cm 2 , two times higher than the control hematite sample (0.12 mA/cm 2 ). Both 15/30 F-CuxO and 15F show a stable pulse signal with  instantaneous  photoresponse,  indicating  their  excellent  photoactivity.  The  long-term operation (1 h) of 15/30 F-CuxO also exhibits remarkable photocurrent stability, with a current retention of  approximately  98%  ( Figure  S5 ,  Supporting  Information),  indicating  its  robust  structure  as  well  as enduring  photocatalytic  stability.  Additionally,  linear  sweep  voltammetry  (LSV)  curves  of  these  two photoanodes were measured in the same set up both  under illumination and dark conditions with a sweeping rate of 10 mV/s ( Figure 2c ). Indeed, the photocurrent onset of 15/30 F-CuxO is observed around -0.42 V vs carbon felt, slightly higher than that of 15F (-0.52 V), owing to the partial sacrifice of oxidation and reduction potentials by the p-n junction as discussed above. Given their consistent dark current onset (0.3 V), the photovoltage (defined here as the potential difference between dark and light current onset) of 15/30 F-CuxO is smaller than that of 15F as expected. The unbiased photocurrent at 0 V in linear sweep voltammetry of these two photoanodes are in line with j-t tests, further demonstrating the significantly increased photocatalytic activity of the heterojunction.

When  considering  solely  the  photoelectrode  components  (i.e.  excluding  considerations  of  battery resistance  losses  and  redox  couple  reaction  activities),  the  theoretically  achievable  photocurrent  is decided by the light absorption and the charge carriers transfer from the bulk to the electrode/electrolyte interface of semiconductors 37 . The optical response of the bare α -Fe2O3 film was measured and compared with that of the 15/30 F-CuxO in Figure 2d . The UV absorption (340-400 nm) increases from 15F to 15/30 F-CuxO, while the visible light absorption (400-600 nm) of 15F is slightly higher than 15/30 F-CuxO. Overall, with their total light absorption spectra being comparable, the primary factor influencing photocurrent becomes the  photogenerated  electron-hole  separation  process,  indicating  that  the  15/30  F-CuxO  p-n junction exhibits better charge transfer than 15F. As a comparison, we tested thicker hematite films (30F and  50F)  with  higher  absorption  as  well  as  their  p-n  junction  counterparts  ( Figure  S6-S8 ,  Supporting Information).  Yet,  in  all  cases  due  to  the  limited  charge  mobility  within  hematite 17 ,  the  measured photocurrent was lower than for the 15/30 F-CuxO film. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

analysis  ( Figure  S9 ,  Supporting  Information)  further  confirmed  the  photocurrent  measurements.  The internal charge transfer resistance (Rsc) of 15/30 F-CuxO is 1530 Ω ,  significantly lower than that of 15F (5430 Ω ),  suggesting  efficient  charge  carrier  transport  within  the  bulk  facilitated  by  the  p-n  junction. Additionally, the charge transfer resistance at the interface (Rct) decreases from 15F ( 4060 Ω ) to 15/30 FCuxO  ( 1050  Ω ),  indicating  faster  photooxidation  reaction  dynamics  at  the  15/30  F-CuxO/ferrocyanide interface compared to the 15F/ferrocyanide interface. Hence, these two factors contribute to the higher photocurrent density of the planar 15/30 F-CuxO p-n junction.

Figure 3. (a) Schematic of light-assisted scanning electrochemical microscopy (Photo-SECM) set-up; (b) SEM of P150; SECM to probe α-Fe O  (c) films (F) and (d) nanopillar arrays (P) under white light illumination (80 mW/cm 2 ). 2 3

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-3350d805-e128-49fb-9ce9-986f737ca93c.jpg)

To  improve  charge  transfer  in  thicker  hematite  films  that  exhibit  higher  light  absorption  ( Figure  S6, Supporting  Information),  we  explored  the  impact  of  nanoengineering  strategies,  which  increase  the available surface area and reduce the charge transport distances. Specifically, we realized arrays of Fe nanopillars with well-defined diameter, D , and periodicity, P , which were subsequently oxidized to obtain α -Fe2O3 nanopillars. A thin (~10 nm) α -Fe2O3 film was left to cover the ITO substrate (see Figure S1b and Experimental Section). Electromagnetic simulations (COMSOL Multiphysics®) were used to quantify the impact of D on the absorption spectrum of α -Fe2O3 nanopillar arrays based on a 30 nm thick iron ( P = 300

nm). We observe that, despite the reduction in overall absorbing material, nanostructuring allows the excitation  of  optical  resonance  modes  that  entail  a  high  absorption  level  ( Figure  S7b , Supporting Information). In order to explore the optimal balance between optical performance and electron transfer, α -Fe2O3  nanopillar  arrays  with  diameters  of  100,  150,  and  200  nm  (named  as  P100,  P150,  and  P200 respectively) were patterned via E-beam lithography over an area of approximately 100 x 100 um 2 . The SEM top-view images of nanopillar arrays with different diameters are reported in Figure 3b and Figure S10a-f (Supporting  Information),  showing  the  increase  in  the  pillar  diameter  upon  annealing,  due  to oxygen  incorporation.  Microscale  absorption  measurements 39   of  the  different  arrays  ( Figure  S11 , Supporting Information) were consistent with simulations and showed a minimal decrease in absorption compared to the unpatterned film.

To  investigate  the  effect  of nanopatterning  on  the  photocatalytic  performance  of  the  α -Fe2O3 photoanodes,  we  performed  Photo-SECM  on  both  films  and  nanopillar  array  structures  in  a  4  mM Fe(CN)6 4and 0.4 M NaOH electrolyte solution under white light illumination.  The reductively biased Pt UME tip in our experiments locally detects the photo-generated oxidant species, i.e. Fe(CN)6 3-( Figure 3a ). For all the measurements, we controlled the tip to substrate distance by monitoring tip current versus distance  and  positioning  the  tip  at  a  distance  3  um  higher  than  the  30%  offset  value 46 ( Figure  S1 2, Supporting Information). Figure 3c shows the time trace of the tip current for the α -Fe2O3 films having different thicknesses when the light is modulated on and off at the same power density. Analyzing the I T,ON /I T,OFF values shows that the photocatalytic activity of the film structures decreases by increasing the film thickness from 15F to 30F, and then to 50F. This is in agreement with the lower charge transfer rates observed in the SRFB photoresponse as film thickness increases ( Figure S8a ,  Supporting Information). Comparing the IT,ON/IT,OFF values for the α -Fe2O3 nanopillar arrays ( Figure 3d ) with the best performing film structure  (15F)  shows  a  significant  enhancement  (more  than  5  folds)  in  photocatalytic  activity,  not achievable by only decreasing the film thickness. Most importantly, the results show that the P150 α -Fe2O3 nanopillar array has the highest photocatalytic activity among all the samples, realizing an optimum combination of surface area, light absorption, and charge transport dynamics 27 . Based on these local PEC results,  we  chose  150  nm  as  the  optimum  Fe  nanopillar  diameter  for  realizing  centimeter-scale, nanostructured α -Fe2O3/CuxO photoanodes for SRFBs.

0.6

Figure 4. (a) UV-Vis absorption spectrum of nanostructures and 30F; (b) Photoresponse behavior for P/CuxO and P with 20 s light on-off; Linear sweep voltammetry curve for P/CuxO and P both under 1 sun illumination and dark; (c) Representative photochargedischarge  cycling  behavior  with  a  cut-off  potential  set  to  0-0.58  V  and  unbiased  photocurrent  using  P/CuxO  photoanode;  (d) Coulombic and energy efficiency of photocharge/ discharge curve.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-293c1b7f-1c8f-43fa-ab44-2da80ba6c99e.jpg)

The nanostructured  α -Fe2O3/CuxO  (P/CuxO)  photoanode  was  fabricated  employing  a  combination  of nanoengineering  and  heterojunction  design,  as  illustrated  in Figure  S1c (Supporting  Information).  A Langmuir  Blodgett (LB) technique, rather than  E-beam  lithography, was  exploited to fabricate nanopatterns over cm-scale samples 47 . A nanostructured α -Fe2O3 (P) without copper coating nor NaOH treatment  was  also  fabricated  as  a  control  sample.  The  addition  of  the  CuxO  layer  results  in  distinct morphological changes. Specifically, the P/CuxO exhibits nanorod bundles-like structures on the surface which are absent on the P sample ( Figure S13 , Supporting Information). Optically, the P sample exhibits the same light absorption of the unpatterned film while the P/CuxO sample exhibits a small but broadband absorption increase ( Figure 4a ).

Photoelectrochemically, the nanostructured α -Fe2O3 (P)  shows  a  photocurrent  density  of  0.2  mA/cm 2 ( Figure 4b ), nearly two folds higher than the best thin film sample, 15F, consistent with the SECM analysis.

With the addition of the p-n junction, which improves both light harnessing and carrier transport, the P/CuxO sample exhibits an outstanding photocurrent density of 0.46 mA/ cm 2  as well as a good stability ( Figure  S14 ,  Supporting  Information). Figure  4b illustrates  the  variation  of  photocurrent  density  with applied voltage. At 0V, the photocurrent density for P/CuxO and P are 0.49 mA/cm 2  and 0.21 mA/cm 2 , respectively. The higher photocurrents compared to the photoresponse tests may arise from the transient current  generated  by  the  double-layer  capacitance  under  voltage  changes  as  well  as  the  trapped photogenerated holes due to the existence of detrimental surface states at the electrode -electrolyte interface 48 . Interestingly,  the  similar  photovoltage  (0.75  V)  of  both  photoanodes  suggest  that  the nanostructured p-n junction does not compromise its capability to drive these redox couples. EIS studies were also carried out under illumination to gain insight into the effect of the p-n junction on PEC redox oxidation reaction. The same electrical circuit was used as a model to fit the photooxidation process in the photoanodes ( Figure S15 , Supporting Information).  In contrast to P, the P/CuxO exhibits significantly lower values of Rsc (500 Ω ) and Rct (757 Ω ), indicating that the surface coverage of an additional CuxO layer can improve the charge separation inside bulk α -Fe2O3 as well as reduce the charge extraction barrier to create  a  facile  carrier  pathway  at  the  electrode/electrolyte  interface.  Additionally,  the  space-charge capacitance (Csc) decreases from P/CuxO (1.4×10 -3  F) to P (0.03×10 -3 F),  implying the broadening of the depletion layer of the P photoanode and thus much inferior carrier mobility 49 51 -.

After demonstrating the photooxidation reaction activity and stability of the P/CuxO photoanodes, the photocharge/discharge  test  was  finally  performed  using  a  fully  integrated  SRFB.  The  photocharge/ discharge curves of the SRFB for the initial 10 cycles (approximately 11h) are shown in Figure 4c .  The average photocurrent density is around 0.42 mA/cm 2  (0.33 mA when considering the active area) under 1 sun illumination, with a discharging current applied of -0.4 mA. The almost identical cycles imply the stability  of  both  photoanodes  and  the  overall  SRFB  system.  This  integrated  system  exhibits  a  high coulombic efficiency around 90%-98% and an average energy efficiency around 50% as shown in Figure 4d .  Overall, the P/CuxO-based SRFB achieves a stable solar-to-chemical efficiency of 0.35% and an average solar-to-output energy efficiency of 0.18% over 12 cycles, which is a significant progress for unassisted α -Fe2O3-based SRFB.

## Conclusion

In summary, the synergistic design of nanostructuring and engineered heterojunction for photoelectrodes was realized to improve the SRFB performance. Firstly, we conducted a comprehensive investigation through band alignment engineering and various electrochemical techniques, elucidating the enhancement of carrier transport both within the bulk photoelectrode and at the photoelectrode/electrolyte interface facilitated by the CuxO-Fe2O3 p-n junction rather than CuO-Fe2O3. Secondly, leveraging the localized measurements of SECM, we are able to utilize microscale samples to seamlessly explore the nanostructure sizes effect on the photoelectrodes performance. Nanoengineering not  only  enables  the  manipulation  of  the  optical  properties  of  the  photoelectrodes  (including  light trapping  and  Mie  resonance),  but  also  provides  additional  reactive  sites,  effectively  mitigating  losses attributable to charge recombination. Indeed, by combining these two strategies, the nanorod bundleslike P/CuxO exhibits the highest unbiased photocurrent density (0.46 mA/cm 2 ) as well as good stability for unassisted α -Fe2O3-based SRFB. The average STC efficiency during photocharge process reaches 0.35% and the solar-to-output energy efficiency of the as-designed photoanode is 0.18%, a performance level previously  achieved  in  hematite  systems  only  with  the  assistance  of  external  solar  cells.  Overall,  the straightforward  photoanode  preparation  process,  the  earth-abundant  material  choice  along  with  the remarkable  performance  should  be  promising  for  the  practical  application  of  the  solar  rechargeable batteries. In addition, further advancements in the SRFB system can be anticipated, particularly in terms of  microfluidic  design  to  enhance  mass  transport  and  nanophotonic  engineering  to  improve  charge transfer and optical performance. These SRFB design concepts may open new avenues for reaching highly efficient solar redox flow batteries.

## Acknowledgment

The  authors  acknowledge  the  support  of  the  Swiss  National  Science  Foundation  (Eccellenza  Grant #194181). J.M. acknowledges the support of the China Scholarship Council (201906210091). The authors also acknowledge the support of the following experimental facilities at EPFL: Interdisciplinary Centre for Electron Microscopy (CIME) and Center of MicroNano Technology (CMI). Finally, the authors would like to thank Dr. Alan Bowman for his assistance with the discussion on absorption testing.

## Author Information

Corresponding Author

Giulia Tagliabue, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; orcid.org/0000-0003-4587-728X; Email: giulia.tagliabue@epfl.ch

Other Authors

Jiaming Ma, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland;

orcid.org/ 0000-0003-4311-0640

Milad Sabzehparvar, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland;

orcid.org/ 0000-0001-5594-6889

Ziyan Pan, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland;

orcid.org/ 0009-0000-5585-5098

## Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## SINanostructured Fe₂O₃/CuxO Heterojunction for Enhanced Solar Redox Flow Battery Performance

Jiaming Ma 1 , Milad Sabzehparvar 1 , Ziyan Pan , Giulia Tagliabue * 1 1

- 1 Laboratory  of  Nanoscience  for  Energy  Technologies  (LNET),  STI,  École  Polytechnique  Fédérale  de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
- *Corresponding Author. Email: giulia.tagliabue@epfl.ch

## Table of Contents

Reference  .....................................................................................................................................................  17

| Supporting Information 1 - Schematic of samples preparation ...................................................................2            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Supporting Information 2 - Band alignment measurements........................................................................3             |
| Supporting Information 3 - Investigation of NaOH treatment time and Cu film thickness .........................4                            |
| Supporting Information 4 - Scanning electron microscope of planer sample..............................................5                     |
| Supporting Information 5 - Stability of planer sample .................................................................................6    |
| Supporting Information 6 - Optical performance of hematite film with different thickness.......................7                            |
| Supporting Information 7 - Optical simulation.............................................................................................8 |
| Supporting Information 8 - Photoresponse testing of various planer p-n junctions ...................................9                       |
| Supporting Information 9 - Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis........................................10                        |
| Supporting Information 10 - SEM and optical microscopy image of different patterns............................11                            |
| Supporting Information 11 - Microscale absorption measurements.........................................................12                   |
| Supporting Information 12 - Tip approaching curve ..................................................................................13      |
| Supporting Information 13 - SEM for nanostructures................................................................................14        |
| Supporting Information 14 - Photoresponse and stability for nanostructures..........................................15                      |
| Supporting Information 15 - EIS analysis for nanostructures.....................................................................16          |

## Supporting Information 1 -Schematic of samples preparation

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-1a252754-5c64-4795-8ff1-7b3a232093ba.jpg)

etching

Figure S1. (a) Schematic of the synthesis of α-Fe2O3/CuxO film photoanodes; (b) Schematic of the synthesis process of α-Fe2O3 nanopillar array ; (c) Schematic of the synthesis of nanostructured α-Fe2O3/CuxO photoanode. All the materials were sputtered on the ITO substrate.

Table S1. Summary of sample preparation process.

| Sample type                     |   Sputtered Fe (nm) |   Sputtered Cu (nm) | NaOH   | Annealing   | Sample         |
|---------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------|--------|-------------|----------------|
| Planar Fe 2 O 3                 |                  15 |                   0 | NO     | YES         | 15F            |
| Planar Fe 2 O 3                 |                  30 |                   0 | NO     | YES         | 30F            |
| Planar Fe 2 O 3                 |                  50 |                   0 | NO     | YES         | 50F            |
| Planar Fe 2 O 3 -CuO            |                  15 |                  30 | NO     | YES         | 15/30 F-CuO    |
| Planar Fe 2 O 3 -Cu x O         |                  15 |                  30 | YES    | YES         | 15/30 F-Cu x O |
| Planar Fe 2 O 3 -Cu x O         |                  30 |                  30 | YES    | YES         | 30/30 F-Cu x O |
| Planar Fe 2 O 3 -Cu x O         |                  50 |                  30 | YES    | YES         | 50/30 F-Cu x O |
| Nanopatterned Fe 2 O 3          |                  30 |                   0 | NO     | YES         | P100 P150 P200 |
| Nanostructured Fe 2 O 3         |                  30 |                   0 | NO     | YES         | P              |
| Nanostructured Fe 2 O 3 -Cu x O |                  30 |                  30 | YES    | YES         | P/Cu x O       |

## Supporting Information 2 -Band alignment measurements

Figure S2. (a) Tauc plots, (b) Mott-schottky test and (c) UPS test of α-Fe2O3 and CuxO to get bandgap, work function and valence band maxima (VBM); respectively.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-5a4c241c-6faa-4fc7-b1eb-954a91b66a63.jpg)

The band gap value is estimated by identifying the intersection point between the linear portion of Tauc's plots  and  the  X-axis.  These  plots  of the  absorption  coefficient  (α)  were  obtained  using  a  UV -visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UV2600i) within the wavelength range of 300-800 nm. Mott-Schottky  (MS)  measurements  were  conducted  under  dark  conditions  using  a  three -electrode homemade cell via CHI 760E potentiostat. The photoanode served as the working electrode, while a Pt foil  (99.99%  purity,  Alfa  Aesar)  acted  as  the  counter  electrode.  Additionally,  a  leakage-free  Ag/AgCl electrode  (Innovative  Instruments,  Inc)  was  utilized  as  the  reference  electrode.  The  experiment  was performed  within a potential range  of  -0.8  to  1.2  V  vs  Ag/AgCl  under  anolyte,  empl oying  an  applied frequency of 1 kHz to investigate the intrinsic electrical properties. The flat band potential (Ffb) value can be determined using the following equation 52 :

$$C ^ { - 2 } = \frac { 2 } { q \epsilon _ { 0 } \epsilon _ { s } N _ { D } } \left [ V - F _ { f b } \ - \frac { K T } { q } \right ]$$

## Supporting Information 3 -Investigation of NaOH treatment time and Cu film thickness

Figure S3 . (a) Photoresponse behavior of 15/30 F-CuxO with different NaOH treatment time; (b) Photocurrent performance of 15F-based heterojunctions with varying thicknesses of deposited Cu films subsequently treated for 20 h in NaOH.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-49e0d59b-c704-4f6e-90d2-333f5074c410.jpg)

## Supporting Information 4 -Scanning electron microscope of planer sample

Figure S4. SEM of (a) 15F and (b) 15/30 F-CuxO.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-fb44f49e-b027-4cd8-bce0-c9d42f2faecc.jpg)

## Supporting Information 5 -Stability of planer sample

Figure S1. Stability test (1h) of 15/30 F-CuxO with photoresponse before and after.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-282d00e5-8ac7-4ed5-97ed-ff55309cb264.jpg)

## Supporting Information 6 -Optical performance of hematite film with different thickness

Figure S6. UV-Vis absorption spectrum of 15F, 30F and 50F.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-67b0071a-db06-4be3-8c2f-4a303e720150.jpg)

## Supporting Information 7 -Optical simulation

Figure S2. Simulated 2D absorption spectra of the (a) α-Fe2O3 film with different thickness and (b) 30F-based α-Fe2O3 nanopillar arrays with varying diameters under a periodicity of 300 nm.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-99333264-a401-4b74-8641-de090dbdba7c.jpg)

## Supporting Information 8 -Photoresponse testing of various planer p-n junctions

Figure S3. (a) The influence of α-Fe2O3 thickness on the photoelectrochemical performance; Photoresponse of (b) 30F-based and (c) 50F-based heterojunctions with varying thicknesses of deposited Cu films treated for 20 h in NaOH.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-7516e308-7bba-4e69-a618-ec41996dc339.jpg)

As a comparison, we measured the absorption spectra and photochemical activity of pure hematite films with different thicknesses (Figure S6 and FigureS8) under back illumination in ambient air conditions as described in Experimental Section. The measured absorption curves align well with numerical calculations (Figure  S7a).  The  light  absorption  demonstrates  a  notable  increase  from  15F  to  30F,  followed  by saturation upon reaching 50F. Yet, due to the limited charge mobility within hematite 53 ,  electron-hole recombination significantly constrains the performance of the photoanodes. The photocurrent density decreases  from 15F  (0.12  mA/cm 2 )  to  30F  (0.07  mA/cm )  and  experiences  a  significant  decrease  at 2 50F  (0.01  mA/cm 2 )  thereafter  (Figure  S8a).  Despite  efforts  to  construct  p-n  junctions  to  improve charge  transfer,  the  best  samples  obtained  with  thicker  hematite  films  only  exhibit  a  photocurrent density of 0.14 mA/cm 2  and 0.06 mA/cm 2  for 30/30 F-CuxO and 50/30 F-CuxO, respectively (Figure S8b,

## Supporting Information 9 -Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis

Figure S9. The (a) measured and (b) fitting EIS results of 15F and 15/30 F-CuxO. The inset is the equivalent electrical circuit.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-dd44e526-cefd-4071-9aa2-b6dde0b33998.jpg)

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) analysis was performed with frequency ranging from 10 kHz  to  10  mHz  under  1  sun  illumination  to  further  investigate  the  mechanisms  that  occur  at  the photoanodes. The electrical circuit (the inset of Figure S9a) was used as a model to fit the PEC redox couple oxidation  reaction  process  in  the  photoanodes.  Where  Rseries  represents  the  series  resistance,  which includes the resistance at the ITO/photoanode interface, the ionic conductivity in the electrolyte and the external  contact  resistance;  Rsc  and  Csc  are  models  of  charge  transfer  behavior  in  the  internal semiconductor, while Rct and Cct are the analogous reactions that take place at the semiconductor/electrolyte interface. The fitting Nyquist plots are shown in Figure S9b, which is similar to the measured EIS results.

## Supporting Information 10 -SEM and optical microscopy image of different patterns

Figure S10. SEM of (a, d) P100, (b, e) P150 and (c, f) P200 before and after annealing; (g) Optical microscopy image of the αFe2O3 nanopillar arrays.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-f7adf5d4-d644-42a7-9ef1-413b86503ce5.jpg)

The  corresponding  optical,  white-light  transmission  images  (Figure  S10g)  exhibit  the  different  optical appearances  of  the  three  patterns,  providing  a  direct  way  to  observe  the  tunability  of  the  optical properties with varying diameters.

## Supporting Information 11 -Microscale absorption measurements

Figure S11. Microscale absorption measurements of the fabricated α-Fe2O3 nanopillar arrays as well as α-Fe2O3 films.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-bdb3cb6b-c1a4-4772-bf95-950e019b493b.jpg)

The absorption depth for incident photons of hematite 54 is 40-100 nm for wavelengths ranging from 450 to 550 nm. A significant enhancement in broadband light absorption can be observed from Figure S11 as the thickness of the thin film sample increases from 15F (~30 nm hematite) to 30F (~60 nm hematite). However, the hole diffusion length limitation for hematite 55 necessitated a sacrifice in the thickness of the  photoanode.  Nanoengineering  could  potentially  serve  as  a  solution  strategy  to  balance  optical performance and charge carrier transport. It is worth noting that all the 30F-based nanopillar arrays (even those with only a 10 nm thickness of continuous α -Fe2O3 thin film underneath) exhibit comparable optical absorption  to  the  30F  sample,  significantly  stronger  than  the  15F  sample.  This  enhancement  could be attributed to the light-trapping effect of the nanopillar array 56 .  Additionally,  P200  enables  sunlight to induce  optical  resonances  at  550  nm  and  600  nm,  consistent  with  our  simulation  findings  (Figure S7b). This phenomenon can enhance the light intensity within the photoanode 57 .

## Supporting Information 12 -Tip approaching curve

Figure S12. Tip approach curve. Experimental current-distance curves (points) obtained with the tip approaching the hematite film part of the substrate. The solution contained 4 mM Fe(CN)6 4-  and 0.4 M NaOH. Tip potential ET=0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl and an unbiased grounded substrate in dark.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-0ce4aeec-b1c3-4c6c-a628-b04dcc967c49.jpg)

## Supporting Information 13 -SEM for nanostructures

Figure 13. SEM of (a) P and (b) P/CuxO.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-dca531ed-e754-4f8f-8234-ba300f990b12.jpg)

## Supporting Information 14 -Photoresponse and stability for nanostructures

Figure S4. Stability of j-t for P/CuxO.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-153cd21e-9e86-4c79-950a-be9f4bd016ce.jpg)

## Supporting Information 15 -EIS analysis for nanostructures

Figure S5. The (a) measured and (b) fitting EIS results of α -Fe2O3 P and P/CuxO. The inset is the equivalent electrical circuit.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00266v1-figure-81cbf375-7896-4268-9db2-9f09adbb27b9.jpg)

By using the same equivalent electrical circuit as Figure S9, we can get the Rseries, Rsc , Rct and Csc for α -Fe2O3 P is 160 Ω , 4075 Ω , 2028 Ω and 0.03×10 -3 F, respectively. The Rseries , R sc , R ct and Csc for P/CuxO is 90 Ω , 500 Ω , 757 Ω and 1.4×10 -3 F, respectively.

## Reference

- (1) Fu, H.-C.; Li, W.; Yang, Y.; Lin, C.-H.; Veyssal, A.; He, J.-H.; Jin, S. An Efficient and Stable Solar Flow Battery Enabled by a Single-Junction GaAs Photoelectrode. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12 (1), 156. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20287-w.
- (2) Wedege, K.; Bae, D.; Dražević, E.; Mendes, A.; Vesborg, P. C. K.; Bentien, A. Unbiased, Complete Solar Charging of a Neutral Flow Battery by a Single Si Photocathode. RSC Adv. 2018 , 8 (12), 6331-6340. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA00319J.
- (3) Feng, H.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, X.; Esan, O. C.; Li, Q.; Chen, R.; An, L. Advances and Challenges in Photoelectrochemical Redox Batteries for Solar Energy Conversion and Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022 , 12 (24), 2200469. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202200469.
- (4) Cao, L.; Skyllas-Kazacos, M.; Wang, D.-W. Solar Redox Flow Batteries: Mechanism, Design, and Measurement. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2018 , 2 (8-9), 1800031. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.201800031.
- (5) da Silva Lopes, T.; Dias, P.; Monteiro, R.; Vilanova, A.; Ivanou, D.; Mendes, A. A 25 Cm2 Solar Redox Flow Cell: Facing the Engineering Challenges of Upscaling. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022 , 12 (5), 2102893. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202102893.
- (6) Li, J.; Cushing, S. K.; Zheng, P.; Meng, F.; Chu, D.; Wu, N. Plasmon-Induced Photonic and Energy-Transfer Enhancement of Solar Water Splitting by a Hematite Nanorod Array. Nat. Commun. 2013 , 4 (1), 2651. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3651.
- (7) Yun, S.; Qin, Y.; R. Uhl, A.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Yin, M.; Li, D.; Han, X.; Hagfeldt, A. NewGeneration Integrated Devices Based on Dye-Sensitized and Perovskite Solar Cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018 , 11 (3), 476-526. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE03165C.
- (8) Bae, D.; Faasse, G. M.; Kanellos, G.; Smith, W. A. Unravelling the Practical Solar Charging Performance Limits of Redox Flow Batteries Based on a Single Photon Device System. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2019 , 3 (9), 2399-2408. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00333A.
- (9) McKone, J. R.; DiSalvo, F. J.; Abruña, H. D. Solar Energy Conversion, Storage, and Release Using an Integrated Solar-Driven Redox Flow Battery. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017 , 5 (11), 5362-5372. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA00555E.
- (10) Bae, D.; Kanellos, G.; Faasse, G. M.; Dražević, E.; Venugopal, A.; Smith, W. A. Design Principles for Efficient Photoelectrodes in Solar Rechargeable Redox Flow Cell Applications. Commun. Mater. 2020 , 1 (1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-020-0020-7.
- (11) Liao, S.; Zong, X.; Seger, B.; Pedersen, T.; Yao, T.; Ding, C.; Shi, J.; Chen, J.; Li, C. Integrating a Dual-Silicon Photoelectrochemical Cell into a Redox Flow Battery for Unassisted Photocharging. Nat. Commun. 2016 , 7 (1), 11474. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11474.
- (12) Li, W.; Zheng, J.; Hu, B.; Fu, H.-C.; Hu, M.; Veyssal, A.; Zhao, Y.; He, J.-H.; Liu, T. L.; HoBaillie, A.; Jin, S. High-Performance Solar Flow Battery Powered by a Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cell. Nat. Mater. 2020 , 19 (12), 1326-1331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0720-x.
- (13) Li, W.; Fu, H.-C.; Zhao, Y.; He, J.-H.; Jin, S. 14.1% Efficient Monolithically Integrated Solar Flow Battery. Chem 2018 , 4 (11), 2644-2657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.023.
- (14) Li, W.; Jin, S. Design Principles and Developments of Integrated Solar Flow Batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020 , 53 (11), 2611-2621. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00373.
- (15) Lin, Y.; Yuan, G.; Sheehan, S.; Zhou, S.; Wang, D. Hematite -Based Solar Water Splitting: Challenges and Opportunities. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011 , 4 (12), 4862-4869. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE01850G.
- (16) Khataee, A.; Azevedo, J.; Dias, P.; Ivanou, D.; Dražević, E.; Bentien, A.; Mendes, A. Integrated Design of Hematite and Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell for Unbiased Solar Charging of an Organic-

Inorganic Redox Flow Battery. Nano Energy 2019 , 62 , 832843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.06.001.

- (17) Tolod, K. R.; Hernández, S.; Quadrelli, E. A.; Russo, N. Chapter 4 - Visible Light-Driven Catalysts for Water Oxidation: Towards Solar Fuel Biorefineries. In Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis ; Albonetti, S., Perathoner, S., Quadrelli, E. A., Eds.; Horizons in Sustainable Industrial Chemistry and Catalysis; Elsevier, 2019; Vol. 178, pp 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-444-64127-4.00004-5.
- (18) Gao, R.-T.; Zhang, J.; Nakajima, T.; He, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Wu, L. Single-AtomicSite Platinum Steers Photogenerated Charge Carrier Lifetime of Hematite Nanoflakes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Nat. Commun. 2023 , 14 (1), 2640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38343-6.
- (19) Piekner, Y.; S. Ellis, D.; A. Grave, D.; Tsyganok, A.; Rothschild, A. Wasted Photons: Photogeneration Yield and Charge Carrier Collection Efficiency of Hematite Photoanodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021 , 14 (8), 4584-4598. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE01772A.
- (20) Le Formal, F.; Grätzel, M.; Sivula, K. Controlling Photoactivity in Ultrathin Hematite Films for Solar Water-Splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010 , 20 (7), 1099-1107. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200902060.
- (21) Gardner, R. F. G.; Sweett, F.; Tanner, D. W. The Electrical Properties of Alpha Ferric Oxide-II.: Ferric Oxide of High Purity. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1963 , 24 (10), 1183-1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(63)90235-X.
- (22) Gao, R.; Yan, D. Recent Development of Ni/Fe-Based Micro/Nanostructures toward Photo/Electrochemical Water Oxidation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020 , 10 (11), 1900954. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201900954.
- (23) Tang, R.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, R.; Huang, J. Engineering Nanostructure-Interface of Photoanode Materials Toward Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. Adv. Mater. 2021 , 33 (17), 2005389. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202005389.
- (24) Lee, J.-W.; Cho, K.-H.; Yoon, J.-S.; Kim, Y.-M.; Sung, Y.-M. Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Using One-Dimensional Nanostructures. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021 , 9 (38), 21576-21606. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA04829E.
- (25) Krause, L.; Skibińska, K.; Rox, H.; Baumann, R.; Marzec, M. M.; Yang, X.; Mutschke, G.; Żabiński, P.; Lasagni, A. F.; Eckert, K. Hydrogen Bubble Size Distribution on Nanostructured Ni Surfaces: Electrochemically Active Surface Area Versus Wettability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023 , 15
- (14), 18290-18299. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c22231.
- (26) Kiani, F.; Sterl, F.; Tsoulos, T. V.; Weber, K.; Giessen, H.; Tagliabue, G. Ultra-Broadband and Omnidirectional Perfect Absorber Based on Copper Nanowire/Carbon Nanotube Hierarchical Structure. ACS Photonics 2020 , 7 (2), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01658.
- (27) Kim, S. J.; Thomann, I.; Park, J.; Kang, J.-H.; Vasudev, A. P.; Brongersma, M. L. Light Trapping for Solar Fuel Generation with Mie Resonances. Nano Lett. 2014 , 14 (3), 1446-1452. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl404575e.
- (28) Li, F.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Gao, L.; Long, X.; Hu, Y.; Li, S.; Jin, J.; Ma, J. NiO Nanoparticles Anchored on Phosphorus-Doped α-Fe2O3 Nanoarrays: An Efficient Hole Extraction p-n Heterojunction Photoanode for Water Oxidation. ChemSusChem 2018 , 11 (13), 2156-2164. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201800571.
- (29) Low, J.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M.; Wageh, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A. A. Heterojunction Photocatalysts. Adv. Mater. 2017 , 29 (20), 1601694. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201601694.
- (30) Zhang, H.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Huang, H.; Yang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, K.; Fu, X.; Jin, S.; Hou, Y.; Ding, Z.; Yuan, R.; Roeffaers, M. B. J.; Zhong, S.; Long, J. The Hole-Tunneling Heterojunction

of Hematite-Based Photoanodes Accelerates Photosynthetic Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021 , 60 (29), 16009-16018. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202102983.

- (31) Kodan, N.; Agarwal, K.; Mehta, B. R. All-Oxide α-Fe2O3/H:TiO2 Heterojunction Photoanode: A Platform for Stable and Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Performance through Favorable Band Edge Alignment. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019 , 123 (6), 3326-3335. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10794.
- (32) Barreca, D.; Carraro, G.; Gasparotto, A.; Maccato, C.; Warwick, M. E. A.; Kaunisto, K.; Sada, C.; Turner, S.; Gönüllü, Y.; Ruoko, T.-P.; Borgese, L.; Bontempi, E.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Lemmetyinen, H.; Mathur, S. Fe2O3-TiO2 Nano-Heterostructure Photoanodes for Highly Efficient Solar Water Oxidation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2015 , 2 (17), 1500313. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201500313.
- (33) Zhang, P.; Yu, L.; Lou, X. W. (David). Construction of Heterostructured Fe2O3-TiO2 Microdumbbells for Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018 , 57 (46), 15076-15080. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201808104.
- (34) You Zheng, J.; Van, T.-K.; U. Pawar, A.; Woo Kim, C.; Soo Kang, Y. One-Step Transformation of Cu to Cu 2 O in Alkaline Solution. RSC Adv. 2014 , 4 (36), 18616-18620. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA01174K.
- (35) Thangamuthu, M.; Santschi, C.; Martin, O. J. F. Reliable Langmuir Blodgett Colloidal Masks for Large Area Nanostructure Realization. Thin Solid Films 2020 , 709 , 138195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2020.138195.
- (36) Mireles, M.; Soule, C. W.; Dehghani, M.; Gaborski, T. R. Use of Nanosphere Self-Assembly to Pattern Nanoporous Membranes for the Study of Extracellular Vesicles. Nanoscale Adv. 2020 , 2 (10), 4427-4436. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00142B.
- (37) Ma, J.; Oh, K.; Tagliabue, G. Understanding Wavelength-Dependent Synergies between Morphology and Photonic Design in TiO2-Based Solar Powered Redox Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023 , 127 (1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05893.
- (38) Kiani, F.; Bowman, A. R.; Sabzehparvar, M.; Karaman, C. O.; Sundararaman, R.; Tagliabue, G. Transport and Interfacial Injection of D-Band Hot Holes Control Plasmonic Chemistry. ACS Energy Lett. 2023 , 8 (10), 4242-4250. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01505.
- (39) Bowman, A. R.; Ma, J.; Kiani, F.; García Martínez, G.; Tagliabue, G. Best Practices in Measuring Absorption at the Macro- and Microscale. APL Photonics 2024 , 9 (6), 061101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0210830.
- (40) Optical Constants . https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA158623 (accessed 2024-04-18).
- (41) König, T. A. F.; Ledin, P. A.; Kerszulis, J.; Mahmoud, Mahmoud. A.; El-Sayed, M. A.; Reynolds, J. R.; Tsukruk, V. V. Electrically Tunable Plasmonic Behavior of Nanocube-Polymer Nanomaterials Induced by a Redox-Active Electrochromic Polymer. ACS Nano 2014 , 8 (6), 6182-6192. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn501601e.
- (42) Saleem, M.; Al-Kuhaili, M. F.; Durrani, S. M. A.; Bakhtiari, I. A. Characterization of Nanocrystalline α-Fe2O3 Thin Films Grown by Reactive Evaporation and Oxidation of Iron. Phys. Scr. 2012 , 85 (5), 055802. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/85/05/055802.
- (43) Bhagya, T. C.; Krishnan, A.; S, A. R.; M, A. S.; Sreelekshmy, B. R.; Jineesh, P.; Shibli, S. M. A. Exploration and Evaluation of Proton Source-Assisted Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Generation. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2019 , 18 (7), 1716-1726. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9PP00119K.
- (44) Ozaslan, D.; Erken, O.; Gunes, M.; Gumus, C. The Effect of Annealing Temperature on the Physical Properties of Cu2O Thin Film Deposited by SILAR Method. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2020 , 580 , 411922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2019.411922.
- (45) Kim, J. H.; Jeon, K. A.; Kim, G. H.; Lee, S. Y. Electrical, Structural, and Optical Properties of ITO Thin Films Prepared at Room Temperature by Pulsed Laser Deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006 , 252 (13), 4834-4837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.134.
- (46) Sun, T.; Yu, Y.; Zacher, B. J.; Mirkin, M. V. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy of Individual Catalytic Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014 , 53 (51), 14120-14123. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201408408.
- (47) Thangamuthu, M.; Santschi, C.; Martin, O. J. F. Reliable Langmuir Blodgett Colloidal Masks for Large Area Nanostructure Realization. Thin Solid Films 2020 , 709 , 138195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2020.138195.
- (48) Harris-Lee, T. R.; Marken, F.; Bentley, C. L.; Zhang, J.; Johnson, A. L. A Chemist's Guide to Photoelectrode Development for Water Splitting - the Importance of Molecular Precursor Design. EES Catal. 2023 , 1 (6), 832-873. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EY00176H.
- (49) Huang, X.; Li, Y.; Gao, X.; Xue, Q.; Zhang, R.; Gao, Y.; Han, Z.; Shao, M. The Effect of the Photochemical Environment on Photoanodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Dalton Trans. 2020 , 49 (35), 12338-12344. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0DT01566K.
- (50) Zhang, K.; Ravishankar, S.; Ma, M.; Veerappan, G.; Bisquert, J.; Fabregat-Santiago, F.; Park, J. H. Overcoming Charge Collection Limitation at Solid/Liquid Interface by a Controllable Crystal Deficient Overlayer. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017 , 7 (3), 1600923. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600923.
- (51) Xu, Z.; Fan, Z.; Shi, Z.; Li, M.; Feng, J.; Pei, L.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, J.; Yang, L.; Li, W.; Xu, G.; Yan, S.; Zou,
- Z. Interface Manipulation to Improve Plasmon-Coupled Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting on αFe2O3 Photoanodes. ChemSusChem 2018 , 11 (1), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201701679.
- (52) Singh, A. P.; Kodan, N.; Mehta, B. R.; Held, A.; Mayrhofer, L.; Moseler, M. Band Edge Engineering in BiVO4/TiO2 Heterostructure: Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Performance through Improved Charge Transfer. ACS Catal. 2016, 6 (8), 5311-5318. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acscatal.6b00956.
- (53) Gao, R.-T.; Zhang, J.; Nakajima, T.; He, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Wu, L. Single-AtomicSite Platinum Steers Photogenerated Charge Carrier Lifetime of Hematite Nanoflakes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14 (1), 2640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38343-6.
- (54) Gardner, R. F. G.; Sweett, F.; Tanner, D. W. The Electrical Properties of Alpha Ferric Oxide-II.: Ferric Oxide of High Purity. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1963, 24 (10), 1183-1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(63)90235-X.
- (55) Kennedy, J. H.; Frese, K. W. Photooxidation of Water at α - Fe2 O 3 Electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1978, 125 (5), 709. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2131532.
- (56) Kiani, F.; Sterl, F.; Tsoulos, T. V.; Weber, K.; Giessen, H.; Tagliabue, G. Ultra-Broadband and Omnidirectional Perfect Absorber Based on Copper Nanowire/Carbon Nanotube Hierarchical Structure. ACS Photonics 2020, 7 (2), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01658.
- (57) Kim, S. J.; Thomann, I.; Park, J.; Kang, J.-H.; Vasudev, A. P.; Brongersma, M. L. Light Trapping for Solar Fuel Generation with Mie Resonances. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (3), 1446-1452. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl404575e.
Jiaming Ma Milad Sabzehparvar Ziyan Pan Giulia Tagliabue
Nanostructured Fe2O3/CuxO Heterojunction for Enhanced Solar Redox Flow Battery Performance
Solar redox flow batteries (SRFB) have received much attention as an
alternative integrated technology for simultaneous conversion and storage of
solar energy. Yet, the photocatalytic efficiency of semiconductor-based single
photoelectrode, such as hematite, remains low due to the trade-off between fast
electron hole recombination and insufficient light utilization, as well as
inferior reaction kinetics at the solid/liquid interface. Herein, we present an
{\alpha}-Fe2O3/CuxO p-n junction, coupled with a readily scalable
nanostructure, that increases the electrochemically active sites and improves
charge separation. Thanks to light-assisted scanning electrochemical microscopy
(Photo-SECM), we elucidate the morphology-dependent carrier transfer process
involved in the photo-oxidation reaction at a {\alpha}-Fe2O3 photoanode. The
optimized nanostructured is then exploited in the {\alpha}-Fe2O3/CuxO p-n
junction, achieving an outstanding unbiased photocurrent density of 0.46
mA/cm2, solar-to-chemical (STC) efficiency over 0.35% and a stable
photocharge-discharge cycling. The average solar-to-output energy efficiency
(SOEE) for this unassisted {\alpha}-Fe2O3-based SRFB system reaches 0.18%,
comparable to previously reported DSSC-assisted hematite SRFBs. The use of
earth-abundant materials and the compatibility with scalable nanostructuring
and heterojunction preparation techniques, offer promising opportunities for
cost-effective device deployment in real-world applications.