## Damped Electromagnetic fluctuations in the early universe?

Ian G. Moss ∗

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK (Dated: August 5, 2014)

This short note considers the effects of quantum theory on the linear evolution of the magnetic fields during and after inflation. The analysis appears to show that the magnetic fields decay exponentially in the high-temperature radiation era due to a combination of ohmic dissipation and vacuum polarisation.

## I. INTRODUCTION

There have been many attemps to find a primordial origin for large-scale magnetic fields from physical processes taking place during the inflationary era. These have to overcome the natural tendency of magnetic fields to decay exponentially in an exponentially expanding universe. The key ingredient for a successful model is recognised as the necessity to break conformal invariance, and examples include higher derivative gravity-electromagnetic couplings [1], massive gauge fields [2], uncharged scalar-gravity couplings [3], charged scalar couplings [4]. (For a review of recent developments see, for example, [5].)

This short note considers the effects of quantum theory on the linear evolution of the magnetic fields during and after inflation. It appears that the magnetic fields decay exponentially in the high-temperature radiation era due to a combination of ohmic dissipation and vacuum polarisation. A similar decay process has been mentioned before by Berera et al. [6], but not yet investigated in any detail.

At leading order in the field strength, the main quantity of interest is magnetic field power spectrum. It therefore seems natural to use a formalism which puts this quantity centre stage. The formalism used here is based on the Schwinger-Dyson equations, and gives a rigorous treatment of the fluctuations at linearised level.

The rapid decay of magnetic fields in the radiation era seems likely to remove anything produced during inflation, but there are limitations to the analysis. If the fields are large enough, then they have to be analysed using a non-linear theory such as magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). (See [7] or [8] for reviews of early universe MHD). However, even in this case the vacuum polarisation effects have to be included and they will modify the MHD equations.

## II. PROPAGATOR THEORY

The central issue is how to track the evolution of the equal time fluctuations in the electromagnetic field. At a fundamental level, this can be derived if we can evaluate the ensemble average of the vector potential operator product,

$$\langle \widehat { A } _ { \mu } ( \mathbf x, t ) \widehat { A } _ { \nu } ( \mathbf x ^ { \prime }, t ) \rangle. & & ( 1 ) \\ \mathbf n \, \text{of this correlator in an expanding universe, taking into account interactions}.$$

We would like to follow the evolution of this correllator in an expanding universe, taking into account interactions with other fields, especially those which are charged.

The evolution of the components of the field operator in a comoveing coordinate frame and a gauge with ∇ µ A µ = 0 is described by

$$\widehat { A } _ { i } ^ { \ddot { \cdot } } & + H \widehat { A } _ { i } ^ { \cdot } + k ^ { 2 } \widehat { A } _ { i } = \widehat { j } _ { i }, \\ \text{ted non-linear operator depending on the vector potential and other charged field} \\.. \quad.. \quad.. \quad.. \quad.. \quad.. \quad.. \quad.. \quad........................................................................................................................................................................................................$$

where the current ̂ j i is a complicated non-linear operator depending on the vector potential and other charged field operators. The vector field obtained from (2) could in principle be fed back into the ensemble average (1), but this would be a formidable task.

If the field had a non-zero expectation value A µ , then the effective field equation derived from quantum field theory would have a linear approximation

$$\ddot { A } _ { i } + H \dot { A } _ { i } + \sigma \dot { A } _ { i } + k ^ { 2 } A _ { i } + \Pi _ { i } ^ { j } A _ { j } = 0,$$

∗ ian.moss@ncl.ac.uk

where σ is the plasma conductivity, and the non-dissipative part of the vacuum polarisation Π ij acts like an effective mass term. It is quite common to confuse the operator equation (2) with the effective field equation (3) to follow the time evolution of an operator which is then inserted into (1). Amore rigorous procedure, which we adopt here, uses the Schwinger-Dyson equation to follow the evolution of the two-point function (1). An account of the Schwinger-Dyson equations for non-equilibrium quantum field theory can be found in reviews such as [9].

The three two-point functions which are required are the retarded and advanced Green functions,

$$G _ { R i j } & = i \theta ( t - t ^ { \prime } ) \langle [ \widehat { A } _ { i } ( { \mathbf x }, t ), \widehat { A } _ { j } ( { \mathbf x } ^ { \prime }, t ^ { \prime } ) ] \rangle, \\ G _ { A i j } & = - i \theta ( t ^ { \prime } - t ) \langle [ \widehat { A } _ { i } ( { \mathbf x }, t ), \widehat { A } _ { j } ( { \mathbf x } ^ { \prime }, t ^ { \prime } ) ] \rangle,$$

and the anti-commutator function

$$G _ { A i j } ^ { \lambda } & = - i \theta ( t ^ { \prime } - t ) \langle [ \widehat { A } _ { i } ( { \mathbf x }, t ), \widehat { A } _ { j } ( { \mathbf x } ^ { \prime }, t ^ { \prime } ) ] \rangle, & \\ \intertext { r function }$$

$$G _ { S i j } = \frac { 1 } { 2 } \langle \{ \widehat { A } _ { i } ( { \mathbf x }, t ) \widehat { A } _ { j } ( { \mathbf x } ^ { \prime }, t ^ { \prime } ) \} \rangle. \quad & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & && & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &  & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &
 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & - & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \ & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & _ & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & ; & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & } & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &. & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & + & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &, & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & = & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &</ & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & b & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & ^ & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & | & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &$$

These satisfy Schwinger-Dyson equations. At leading order in the two-point functions, these are

$$( - \nabla ^ { 2 } + \Pi _ { R } ) G _ { S } & = - \Pi _ { S } G _ { A }, & ( 7 ) \\ ( - \nabla ^ { 2 } + \Pi _ { N } \wr G _ { N } & = - 1 & ( 8 \wr$$

$$( - \nabla ^ { 2 } + \Pi _ { R } ) G _ { R } = - 1, \\ \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot$$

when written in a convenient condensed notation. The product terms in condensed notation translate into ordinary notation by

$$\Pi _ { S } G _ { A i j } ( x, x ^ { \prime } ) = \int \Pi _ { S i } ^ { k } ( x, y ) G _ { A k j } ( y, x ^ { \prime } ) \, \sqrt { g } d ^ { 4 } y,$$

and 1 ≡ g ij √ gδ 4 ( x -y ), where g ij is the spatial metric. A formal solution to the Schwinger-Dyson equation (7) is given by

$$G _ { S } = G _ { S } ^ { ( 0 ) } + G _ { R } \Pi _ { S } G _ { A }$$

where G (0) S is a solution to the homogeneous equation and represents the effects of initial conditions, whilst the second term represents induced fluctuations.

The vacuum polarisations Π R and Π S can be evaluated purturbatively by summing 1-particle-irreducible free Feynman diagrams. In the case of Π , the most important effects R are the ones that are localised in space and time, specifically effective mass and dissipation terms. On the other hand, for fluctuations on large length scales the small momentum contributions to Π R are the ones of interest. The methods for dealing with each of these vacuum polarisation terms are therefore different.

In Fourrier space, we can take advantage of the spatially homogeneous background to define the transverse symmetric fumction G S ( k , t, t ′ ) by

$$\langle \{ \widehat { A } _ { i } ( \mathbf k, t ) \widehat { A } _ { j } ^ { * } ( \mathbf k ^ { \prime }, t ^ { \prime } ) \} \rangle & = 2 \delta _ { k k ^ { \prime } } \pi _ { i j } G _ { S } ( \mathbf k, t, t ^ { \prime } ), & ( 1 1 ) \\ \mathfrak { c } - \mathbf k ^ { \prime } ) \text{ and for transverse fields } \pi _ { i j } & = \delta _ { i j } - k _ { i } k _ { j } / k ^ { 2 }. \text{ The electric and magnetic fields in an} \text{.}$$

where δ kk ′ = (2 π ) 3 δ ( k -k ′ ) and for transverse fields π ij = δ ij -k k /k i j 2 . The electric and magnetic fields in an orthonormal spatial frame (rather than the comoving coordinate frame) are B i = ia -2 /epsilon1 ijk k A j k and E i = -a -2 A ′ i , where /epsilon1 123 = 1 and prime denotes the conformal time derivative ∂ η = a∂ t . The equal-time magnetic power spectrum is defined by

$$\langle \widehat { B } _ { i } ( { \mathbf k }, t ) \widehat { B } _ { j } ^ { * } ( { \mathbf k } ^ { \prime }, t ) \rangle = \delta _ { k k ^ { \prime } } \pi _ { i j } P _ { B }. & & ( 1 2 ) \\ \text{the power spectrum to the vector Green function},$$

Comparison with (11) relates the power spectrum to the vector Green function,

$$P _ { B } = k ^ { 2 } a ^ { - 4 } G _ { S } ( { \mathbf k }, t, t ).$$

## III. FREE EVOLUTION

Solutions for the 'free' part of the anti-commutator function can be constructed from the solutions to the homogeneous field equation (3) or (8), u i ( k, t ) = u k, t e ( ) i , where e i is a transverse vector. If the initial state is a vaccum state, then the relevant solution is

$$G _ { S } ^ { ( 0 ) } ( k, t, t ^ { \prime } ) & = \frac { 1 } { 2 } \left ( u ( k, t ) \bar { u } ( k, t ^ { \prime } ) + u ( k, t ^ { \prime } ) \bar { u } ( k, t ) \right ),$$

where the modes are normalised by a uu ( ˙ ¯ -¯ ˙ ) = uu i at the initial time. We shall consider the case where the very long wavelength modes are not thermalised. The thermal symmetric Green function contains an extra factor 1 + 2 n T ( ), where n T ( ) is the thermal occupation number, and the conclusions we reach are similar if we begin with a thermal state.

## A. de Sitter space

In de Sitter space we define a negative conformal time τ such that dt = adτ . In the slow-roll approximation with H constant, τ = -1 / aH ( ) and τ = τ r at the end of reheating. The mode equation, which may include mass terms from quantum effects in the curved spacetime, becomes

$$u ^ { \prime \prime } + k ^ { 2 } u + a ^ { 2 } m _ { A } ^ { 2 } u = 0.$$

The solutions relevant for the de Sitter vacuum are Hankel functions of the first kind,

$$u _ { d S } = \frac { 1 } { 2 } \sqrt { \pi } ( - \tau ) ^ { 1 / 2 } H _ { 1 / 2 - \epsilon } ^ { ( 1 ) } ( - k \tau ),$$

where /epsilon1 = 1 2 / -(1 / 4 -m /H 2 A 2 ) 1 / 2 . In the large wavelength limit, using (14),

$$G _ { S } ^ { ( 0 ) } ( k, \eta ) \approx \frac { 1 } { 2 } k ^ { - 1 } ( k \tau ) ^ { 2 \epsilon }.$$

When /epsilon1 = 0 the maxwell fields become conformally invariant. In the language of conformal field theory the field operators have conformal weight zero. The magnetic field has conformal weight minus two and the power spectrum obtained from (13) decays rapidly. We can pull out a factor of k -3 for comparison with a scale invariant result,

$$\cdot \quad & P _ { B } = \frac { H ^ { 4 } } { 2 } \left ( \frac { k } { a H } \right ) ^ { 4 } k ^ { - 3 }.$$

As mentioned in the introduction, the rapid decay of the magnetic field can be overcome by interactions between the electromagnetic field and other fields which break the conformal invariance. One example, the coupling to charged scalar fields, will be considered in section IV A

## B. Radiation era

Suppose a significant amplitude of magnetic field fluctuations has been produced from one of the mechanisms mentioned in the introduction. The universe reheats and then enters the radiation era. In a linear approximation, the evolution of the field is subject to dissipation and other vacuum polarisation effects.

For temperatures larger than the lightest charged fermion mass, the dominant contribution to the vacuum polarisation comes from hard thermal fermion loops (i.e. from loop momenta larger than charged fermion masses), and standard flat-spacetime results for the vacuum polarisation are available (see appendix A). The vacuum polarisation can be decomposed into transverse and longitudinal components. For long vector wavelengths, both components reduce to a mass term,

$$m _ { A } ^ { 2 } = \frac { N _ { f } } { 6 } e ^ { 2 } T ^ { 2 },$$

where N f is the number of relativistic charged fermions. The conductivity of a relativistic plasma σ ∼ e -2 T , and so both aσ and am A are roughly constant. We use conformal time η , where dt = adη , and η = η r at the end of reheating. The mode equation becomes

$$u ^ { \prime \prime } + ( a \sigma ) u ^ { \prime } + k ^ { 2 } u + ( a m _ { A } ) ^ { 2 } u = 0.$$

The two solutions are now

$$u _ { 1 } = e ^ { - p _ { 1 } ( \eta - \eta _ { r } ) }, \quad u _ { 2 } = e ^ { - p _ { 2 } ( \eta - \eta _ { r } ) }.$$

where the conformal time η = 1 ( / aH ) and p 1 , p 2 are the roots of

$$p ^ { 2 } + ( a \sigma ) p + ( k ^ { 2 } + a ^ { 2 } m _ { A } ^ { 2 } ) = 0.$$

Since σ /greatermuch m A , and for long wavelengths m A /greatermuch k/a , we have p 1 ≈ am /σ 2 A ∼ e aT 4 and p 2 ≈ aσ ∼ e -2 aT . The unsourced electromagnetic fluctuations are strongly exponentially damped, with negative exponents of order e T/H 4 . The exponential damping only occurs when the ohmic dissipation and the electromagnetic mass term are both present.

The lightest fermion is the electron. For temperatures smaller than the electron mass, around 0 5MeV, the real . part of the vacuum polarisation drops suddenly due to thermal suppression factors in the fermion loop and it can be ignored. Then, p 1 ≈ ak /σ 2 ≈ 0, and the mode u 1 is frozen. The free magnetic field power spectrum P B defined by (13) falls off as a -4 . This is the familiar situation in which the r.m.s. magnetic field energy density also decays as a -4

## C. The reheating stage

Although the unsourced fluctuations are heavily damped and not capable of producing cosmological magnetic fields, it is interesting to follow their evolution through a short reheating stage following inflation. It has been claimed that there is a large growth of the magnetic field at the reheating time [ ? ]. Consider the modes

$$\alpha \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \\ u = \begin{cases} u _ { d S } & t < t _ { r } & & \\ \alpha u _ { 1 } + \beta u _ { 2 } & t > t _ { r } & & \\.. &.. &.. &.. &.. &.. &.. &.. &.. &.. &.. &.. \end{cases}$$

We obtain α and β by requiring the continuity of u and ˙ at reheating. Using these in (14) gives u

$$G _ { S } ^ { ( 0 ) } = \frac { 1 } { 2 } k ^ { - 1 } ( k \tau _ { r } ) ^ { 2 \epsilon } \frac { | \epsilon a _ { r } H ( u _ { 1 } - u _ { 2 } ) + p _ { 1 } u _ { 2 } - p _ { 2 } u _ { 1 } | ^ { 2 } } { | ( a \sigma ) ^ { 2 } - 4 ( a m _ { A } ) ^ { 2 } | } \\ \prod _ { \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \colon } \prod _ { \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdots }$$

If the dissipation and mass terms (after reheating) are ignored, then σ = 0 and am A is replaced by k . The numerator is dominated by the first term and the result would agree with Refs. [10, 11],

$$G _ { S } ^ { ( 0 ) } \approx \frac { 1 } { 2 } k ^ { - 1 } ( k \tau _ { r } ) ^ { 2 \epsilon - 2 } \epsilon ^ { 2 }.$$

This contains an enhancement factor 1 / kτ ( r ) 2 compared to the value before reheating. However, using the physical values for σ and m A gives

$$G _ { S } ^ { ( 0 ) } \approx \frac { 1 } { 2 } k ^ { - 1 } ( k \tau _ { r } ) ^ { 2 \epsilon } e ^ { - ( \alpha m _ { \lambda } ^ { 2 } / \sigma ) ( \eta - \eta _ { r } ) }.$$

There is no growth at reheating time, and the correllator decays after reheating.

## IV. SOURCED EVOLUTION

After finding that the free fluctuations in the magnetic fields are exponentially damped during the radiation era, we now turn to the fluctuations which arise from the source term. These depend on the retarded Green function G R and the vacuum polarisation Π S . We start with the retarded Green function.

In conformal time, the Fourrier space Green functions satisfy

$$G _ { i j } ^ { \prime \prime } + ( a \sigma ) G _ { i j } ^ { \prime } + k ^ { 2 } G _ { i j } + ( a m _ { A } ) ^ { 2 } G _ { i j } = - \pi _ { i j } \delta ( \eta - \eta ^ { \prime } ).$$

With this deffinition,

$$G _ { R } \Pi _ { S } G _ { A i j } ( \eta, \eta ^ { \prime } ) & = \pi _ { i j } \int d \rho d \rho ^ { \prime } \, a ^ { 2 } ( \rho ) a ^ { 2 } ( \rho ^ { \prime } ) G _ { R } ( \eta, \rho ) G _ { R } ( \eta ^ { \prime }, \rho ^ { \prime } ) \Pi _ { S } ^ { T } ( \rho, \rho ^ { \prime } ),$$

where Π T S is the transverse part of the vacuum polarisation, and all of the terms are evaluated at the same k . Using the modes (21), we get the retarded Green function

$$G _ { R i j } & = \pi _ { i j } \frac { 1 } { a \sigma } \left ( e ^ { - p _ { 1 } ( \eta - \eta ^ { \prime } ) } - e ^ { - p _ { 2 } ( \eta - \eta ^ { \prime } ) } \right ), \\. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &.. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &.$$

where p 1 and p 2 are given by (22). In some cases of interest, a 4 Π T S varies more slowly than the exponential terms, and we can take it out of the intergal (28),

$$G _ { R } \Pi _ { S } G _ { A i j } ( \eta, \eta ) & \approx \pi _ { i j } \frac { a ^ { 4 } \Pi _ { S } ^ { T } ( \eta, \eta ) } { ( k ^ { 2 } + a ^ { 2 } m _ { A } ^ { 2 } ) ^ { 2 } }.$$

The magnetic field fluctuations (13) sourced by Π T S are therefore

$$P _ { B } \approx k ^ { 2 } \frac { \Pi _ { S } ^ { T } ( \eta, \eta ) } { ( k ^ { 2 } + a m _ { A } ) ^ { 4 } }$$

In effect, the exponential damping of the vector modes localises the effect of the source term.

## A. Current fluctuations

As an example of possible source terms, consider charged scalar fields which produce long-wavelength current fluctuations during the de Sitter era, as originally suggested by Calzetta et al. [4, 12, 13]. The transverse current operators ˆ j T i couple to the gauge potentials in the Lagrangian and produce a vacuum polarisation,

$$\langle \{ \hat { j } _ { i } ^ { T } ( { \mathbf k }, t ), \hat { j } _ { j } ^ { T } ( { \mathbf k } ^ { \prime }, t ^ { \prime } ) \} \rangle & = 2 \pi _ { i j } \delta _ { k k ^ { \prime } } \Pi _ { S } ^ { T } ( { \mathbf k }, t, t ^ { \prime } ).$$

Consider a U (1) field φ for simplicity, with current operator

$$\stackrel { \dots } { \dots } \psi, \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \delta }$$

The leading order diagram contribution to the current correlations is

$$\dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \Delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta\delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \dots \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \ delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \dia \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \ delta \ delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta \delta$$

where G φ S is the anticommutator function for the charged scalar. If we assume that the fluctuations on large length scales are vacuum fluctuations, the anticommutator function can be expressed in terms of the scalar modes v and ¯, v

$$G _ { S } ^ { \phi } = \frac { 1 } { 2 } \left ( v ( k, t ) \bar { v } ( k, t ^ { \prime } ) + v ( k, t ^ { \prime } ) \bar { v } ( k, t ) \right ).$$

where

$$\ddot { v } + 3 H \dot { v } + \sigma _ { \phi } \dot { v } + k ^ { 2 } a ^ { - 2 } v + m _ { \phi } ^ { 2 } v = 0.$$

For large wavelengths, the effective mass is due curved space effects in de Sitter space, and to interaction with thermal radiation in the radiation era. The damping term is due to radiative damping and the decay of the charged scalar into charged fermion fields.

It is questionable whether the scalar correllators retain their vacuum form in the hot plasma, even on very long length scales. Giovannini et al. [13] have constructed a model where the occupance of the charged field modes is represented by a distribution function, and find a reduction in the induced magnetic fields.

## B. de Sitter space

In de Sitter space, with σ φ /lessmuch H , the scalar modes are

$$v = \frac { 1 } { 2 } \sqrt { \pi } H ( - \tau ) ^ { 3 / 2 } H _ { 3 / 2 - \delta } ^ { ( 1 ) } ( - k \tau ).$$

where δ = 3 2 / -(9 / 4 -m /H 2 φ 2 ) 1 / 2 . In the long-wavelength limit,

$$\L _ { \varphi ^ { \prime } } \, ^ { \prime } \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \ \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \	 \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \ } \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \,\quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \,\ \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \ \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \, \quad \,
 \quad \quad \quad$$

after substituting this into the current-current correlations (34), we get

$$\langle \{ \hat { j } _ { i } ^ { T } ( { \mathbf k }, \tau ), \hat { j } _ { j } ^ { T } ( { \mathbf k } ^ { \prime }, \tau ^ { \prime } ) \} \rangle \approx 2 \delta _ { k k ^ { \prime } } \pi _ { i j } \frac { e ^ { 2 } } { 2 \pi } H ^ { 4 } k ^ { - 1 } ( k \tau ) ^ { 2 \delta } ( k \tau ^ { \prime } ) ^ { 2 \delta }.$$

The magnetic field fluctuations induced by these current fluctuations are obtained from Eq. (28) and Eq. (13). The scale factors in (28) compensate for the scale factors in (13) and the rapid decay of the magnetic field fluctuations is avoided.

## C. Radiation era

Consider what happens in the (unphysical) case with the radiation damping switched off, σ φ ≈ 0. Using a WKB approximation for the long-wavelength modes gives

$$v & = a ^ { - 1 } ( a m _ { \phi } ) ^ { - 1 / 2 } e ^ { - i \int m _ { \phi } d t }. & & ( 4 0 ) \\.. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &.. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &.. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &. &.$$

Consequently, the scalar correlation function G φ S ∝ a -2 and the current-current correlations fall as a -4 . We can match to the de Sitter value (39) at reheating, and then

$$\langle \{ \hat { j } _ { i } ^ { T } ( \mathbf k, t ), \hat { j } _ { j } ^ { T } ( \mathbf k ^ { \prime }, t ^ { \prime } ) \} \rangle \approx 2 \delta _ { k k ^ { \prime } \pi i j } \frac { e ^ { 2 } } { 2 \pi } H _ { r } ^ { 4 } T _ { r } ^ { - 4 } T ^ { 4 } k ^ { - 1 } ( k \tau _ { r } ) ^ { 4 \delta }.$$

Combining with (31) when the temperature has dropped below the lightest fermion mass and m A = 0 gives

$$P _ { B } \approx \frac { e ^ { 2 } } { 2 \pi } H _ { r } ^ { 4 } T _ { r } ^ { - 4 } T ^ { 4 } ( k \tau _ { r } ) ^ { 4 \delta } \, k ^ { - 3 }.$$

This would be observationally significant. However, inserting a radiation damping term σ φ ∼ e -2 T gives a mode equation

$$v ^ { \prime \prime } + 2 H v ^ { \prime } + ( a \sigma _ { \phi } ) v ^ { \prime } + ( k ^ { 2 } + a ^ { 2 } m _ { \phi } ^ { 2 } ) v = 0$$

This is a similar situation to the vector modes, and v decays exponentially with negative exponent or order e T/H 4 . This feeds through into an exponential decay of the current so that the magnetic field fluctuations sourced by the de Sitter fluctuations decays exponentially, leaving nothing of significance behind.

## V. CONCLUSION

It appears that the combination of ohmic dissipation and real vacuum polarisation effects leads to an exponential decay of small magnetic field fluctuations during the radiation era at temperatures above 0 5MeV. . Any magnetic fields produced during inflation should be limited to have an energy density smaller than the vacuum energy driving inflation, and these fields would decay away during the radiation era.

For fields which are large enough to require an MHD treatment, the situation is unclear. The long-wavelength approximation to the vacuum energy applies when k /lessmuch | ω | . This can include sub-horizon scales, and the vacuum polarisation effects would have to be included in the MHD equations.

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

IGM is supported by STFC Consolidated Grant ST/J000426/1.

## Appendix A: Vacuum polarisation

The vacuum polarisation for an electromagnetic vector potential interacting with N f relativistic charged fermions in equilibrium at temperature T is a tensor with two spacetime indices. The spatial part decomposes into transverse and longitudinal terms,

$$\Pi _ { i j } & = \Pi ^ { T } \pi _ { i j } + \Pi ^ { E } q _ { i j }, & ( \text{A} 1 )$$

where π ij = δ ij -k k /k i j 2 and q ij ∝ k k i j . For temperatures large compared to the fermion mass, the one-loop contribution to the transverse component is given by

$$\text{e u a v e s e c o m p o u r e n } & \text{s g i v e n } \text{y} \\ \Pi ^ { T } & = m _ { A } ^ { 2 } \left \{ \frac { \omega ^ { 2 } } { k ^ { 2 } } + \frac { \omega } { 2 k } \left ( 1 - \frac { \omega ^ { 2 } } { k ^ { 2 } } \right ) \ln \left ( \frac { \omega + k + i \epsilon } { \omega - k + i \epsilon } \right ) \right \}, \\ \text{frofit max} \, & \text{g i v e n } \, &$$

where m A is an effective mass,

$$m _ { A } ^ { 2 } = \frac { 1 } { 6 } N _ { f } e ^ { 2 } T ^ { 2 }$$

Including the i/epsilon1 terms allows us to analytically continue the result off the real ω axis. When k /lessmuch | ω | , we find

$$\Pi ^ { T } & \approx m _ { A } ^ { 2 }.$$

The quantity appearing in the Schwinger-Dyson equation Eq. (7) is the retarded vacuum polarisation Π R ,

$$\psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, \psi _ { \quad } \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \, 0 \}$$

For k /lessmuch | ω | we can move the contour to lie entirely in the range k /lessmuch | ω ′ | , where Π T ≈ m 2 A . In the cosmological context, we use Fourrier components in conformal time and space, so that the physical frequency and wave numbers are ω/a and k/a . The vacuum polarisation depends on the ratio of these two, and reduces to a mass term when k /lessmuch | ω | .

The plasma conductivity ω is an imaginary contribution to the vacuum polarisation in the ω → 0 limit. For high temperatures, it has the form σ ∼ T 2 e / 2 Γ, where Γ is a decay width from one of the internal lines in the vacuum polarisation diagram. (This is not included in Eq. (A2) where the emphasis was on the real part of the vacuum polarisation.) The decay width is of order e T 4 , and so σ ∼ e -2 T [14]. Note that this result is perturbative, but just happens to have inverse powers in the leading term. Logarithmic corrections can also be calculated [15]. The conductivity is similar to the low temperature result obtained from classical Drude theory if we replace T by the electron mass.

- [1] M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Phys.Rev. D37 , 2743 (1988).
- [2] K. Enqvist, A. Jokinen, and A. Mazumdar, JCAP 0411 , 001 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0404269 [hep-ph].
- [3] B. Ratra, Astrophys.J. 391 , L1 (1992).
- [4] E. A. Calzetta, A. Kandus, and F. D. Mazzitelli, Phys.Rev. D57 , 7139 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9707220 [astro-ph].
- [5] R. Durrer and A. Neronov, Astron.Astrophys.Rev. 21 , 62 (2013), arXiv:1303.7121 [astro-ph.CO].
- [6] A. Berera, T. W. Kephart, and S. D. Wick, Phys.Rev. D59 , 043510 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9809404 [hep-ph].
- [7] R. Banerjee and K. Jedamzik, Phys.Rev. D70 , 123003 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0410032 [astro-ph].
- [8] K. Subramanian, Astron.Nachr. 331 , 110 (2010), arXiv:0911.4771 [astro-ph.CO].
- [9] J. Berges, AIP Conf.Proc. 739 , 3 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0409233 [hep-ph].
- [10] O. Tornkvist, A.-C. Davis, K. Dimopoulos, and T. Prokopec, , 443 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0011278 [astro-ph].
- [11] K. Dimopoulos, T. Prokopec, O. Tornkvist, and A. Davis, Phys.Rev. D65 , 063505 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0108093 [astro-ph].
- [12] A. Kandus, E. A. Calzetta, F. D. Mazzitelli, and C. E. Wagner, Phys.Lett. B472 , 287 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9908524 [hep-ph].
- [13] M. Giovannini and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Phys.Rev. D62 , 103512 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0004269 [hep-ph].
- [14] M. L. Bellac, Thermal Field Theory , 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1996) section 6.5.
- [15] P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, JHEP 0011 , 001 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0010177 [hep-ph].
Ian G. Moss
Damped Electromagnetic fluctuations in the early universe?
This short note considers the effects of quantum theory on the linear
evolution of the magnetic fields during and after inflation. The analysis
appears to show that the magnetic fields decay exponentially in the
high-temperature radiation era due to a combination of ohmic dissipation and
vacuum polarisation.