## Block Free Optical Quantum Banyan Network based on Quantum State

## Fusion and Fission *

Zhu Chang-Hua ( 朱畅华 ) † , Meng Yan-Hong （孟艳红） , Quan Dong-Xiao ( 权东晓 ),

Zhao Nan ( 赵楠 ), Pei Chang-Xing ( 裴昌幸

)

State Key Laboratory of Integrated Services Networks, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China

Abstract: Optical switch fabric plays an important role in building multiple-user optical quantum communication networks. Owing to its  self-routing  property  and  low  complexity, Banyan network is widely used for building switch fabric. While, there is no efficient way to remove  internal  blocking  in  Banyan  network  by  classical  way.  Quantum  state  fusion,  by which  the  two-dimensional  internal  quantum  state  of  two  photons  could  be  combined  into four-dimensional internal state of a single photon, makes it possible to solve this problem. In this  paper,  we  convert  the  output  mode  of  quantum  state  fusion  from  spatial-polarization mode to time-polarization mode. By combining modified quantum state fusion, quantum state fission with quantum Fredkin gate, we propose a practical scheme to build an optical quantum switch unit which is block free. The scheme can be extended to build more complex units, four of which are shown in this paper.

Key  words: optical switch  fabric,  quantum  state  fusion,  quantum  Fredkin  gate,  Linear optics

PACS: 03.67.Hk, 42.50.Ex

## 1. Introduction

Based on the principle of quantum mechanism and unique quantum mechanical effects (e. g.  quantum  entanglement),  quantum  information  technology  can  enhance  the  transmission, processing and storage of information, and has been developing quickly. Single photon, for its

* This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61372076 and No. 61301171), the 111 Project (No.B08038), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. K5051201021), and the scholarship from China Scholarship Council (No. 201308615037).

† Corresponding author. chhzhu@xidian.edu.cn

low decoherence rate and easier manipulation, has been widely used in quantum information technology (e. g. quantum key distribution [1] ) and quantum computing (e.g. quantum logical gate [2][3] ).  With  the  development  of  photon-based  quantum  key  distribution  system,  several experimental  multiple-user  quantum  communication  networks  were  built [4]-[8] . In these networks, trusted relay were used to implement long distance quantum key distribution. The key factor is that relay should be trusted. In short distance quantum key distribution system, untrusted optical switch can be used to build multiple users network [4][7] .

In classical communication network, switch-based topology is widely applied. In optical fiber communication network, optical switch is used to build optical cross connect (OXC) by which different devices can be connected. For optical quantum, OXC can be also applied to build  an  end-to-end  quantum  channel  for  two  quantum  communication  terminals.  Various switch  fabrics  were  proposed  for  OXC,  e.g.  Crossbar  network,  Banyan  network,  Beneš network, Clos network, et. al. [9] A  higher  performance OXC should be lower in block rate, smaller  in  insert  loss  and  shorter  in  processing  delay.  Banyan  network  has  self-routing property  since  a  qubit  can  be  routed  by  only  knowing  it's  input  and  output  addresses,  as shown in Fig.1. Each 2×2 switch can be either in cross state or in through state. A qubit is routed to the lower output of a switch at the i th stage if the i th most significant bit is '1' and to the  upper  output  if  it  is  '0'.  Although  Banyan  network  has  simple  structure  and  short processing delay, it also has a shortcoming that block exists. In classical optical network, it is a difficult problem except for adopting a more complex structure. While, there exists efficient method  to  overcome  block  in  Banyan  network  by  quantum  characteristics,  e.g.  quantum superposition [10] . Several quantum switch schemes were proposed [11]-[14] , but practical optical quantum  circuit  has  not  been  proposed.  Quantum  state  fusion  and  quantum  state  fission combining with quantum Fredkin gate may be one of efficient ways to remove block.

Quantum state fusion and quantum state fission are two processes proposed by Vitelli et. al. [15] . Quantum state fusion is defined as the physical process by which the internal quantum state  of  two  particles  (e.g.  photons)  is  combined  into  four-dimensional  internal  state  of  a single  particle  (photon) [15] . For  photons,  the  input  photons  may  be  in  two-dimensional polarization mode, the output photon may be in four-dimensional spatial-polarization mode.

Fig. 1 Block in banyan network

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0380v1-figure-60cc4ad4-3c51-4640-8e12-3ae314c2f143.jpg)

An  inverse  process,  quantum  state  fission,  is  defined  as  the  physical  process  by  which  a higher-dimensional  quantum state  of  a  particle  is  split  into  two  (or  more)  particles.  By  the quantum state fusion process, the blocking in Fig.1 can be efficiently removed. In the output of the second stage, a state fusion process could be applied to implement information fusion. Then in the third stage, a state fission process should be used to split them again. Although this is a good solution, the spatial-polarization mode still needs two output physical channels. We  design a state conversion circuit to convert the spatial-polarization mode  into time-polarization mode. The base states in time mode are one time instant and another time instant which is separated by a constant interval with the first one. This time interval is larger than the full-power bandwidth of optical pulse and dead time of single photon detector.

In this paper, we use this modified quantum state fusion scheme, quantum state fission scheme and quantum Fredkin gate to build block free optical quantum switch units. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: in section 2, a heralded linear optical quantum Fredkin gate is presented. In section 3, quantum state fusion scheme with time-polarization mode as output is given. A quantum state fission scheme with state conversion circuit is also given. In section  4,  a  block  free  optical  quantum  switch  unit  with  two  two-dimensional  polarization states  as  inputs  is  proposed.  Four  types  of  switch  fabric  units  are  also  proposed  for  four different scenarios with fused state (or states) as input. In section 5, we conclude the paper.

## 2. Heralded linear optical quantum Fredkin gate

Quantum Fredkin gate is also named as controlled swap gate, that is, if the control bit is in state 1 , then the two target qubits swap their states and otherwise, they remain in their initial  states  if  the  control  bit  is  in  state 0 .  Quantum  Fredkin  gate  can  be  built  by  three CNOT gates [16] . There are two types of optical methods to implement Quantum Fredkin gate. One  is linear optical method  by  which  the  Fredkin gate is built by linear optical components [17] ;  the  other  is  nonlinear  optical  method  by  which  nonlinear  effect  of  optical components is used [18][19] .  In  linear  optical  quantum  information  processing,  qubit  could  be implemented by the photon with special polarization direction. The schemes and experiments with linear optical method are developed quickly. Gong et. al. constructed a heralded Fredkin gate  by  using  four  CNOT  gates  and  linear  optical  components [17] ,  they  also  simplified  the methods to post-selection ones which operate in the coincidence basis and required ancillary photons in maximally entangled state.

Here,  the  state 0 is  prepared  by  a  photon  with  horizontal  polarization,  denoted  by H and the state 1   is  prepared by a photon with vertical polarization, denoted by V . The operation for optical quantum bit is converted to the operation of polarization of photon. For a Fredkin gate, the two input quantum bits are 1 1 1 1 1 h v a a a H V ψ β β = + and 2 2 2 2 2 h v a a a H V ψ β β = + , where 1 h β , 1 v β , 2 h β and 2 v β are arbitrary complexes, and 2 2 1 1 1, h v β β + = 2 2 2 2 1, h v β β + = 1 a and 2 a denote  different  space  modes,  as  shown  in Fig.2 [17] . So the joint state of the two input photons is

$$| \psi _ { i n } \rangle & = | \psi \rangle _ { _ { a _ { i } } } | \psi \rangle _ { _ { a _ { i } } } \\ & = \beta _ { i h } \beta _ { 2 i h } | H \rangle _ { _ { a _ { i } } } | H \rangle _ { _ { a _ { i } } } + \beta _ { i h } \beta _ { 2 i v } | H \rangle _ { _ { a _ { i } } } | V \rangle _ { _ { a _ { i } } } + \beta _ { i v } \beta _ { 2 i h } | V \rangle _ { _ { a _ { i } } } | H \rangle _ { _ { a _ { i } } } + \beta _ { i v } \beta _ { 2 i v } | V \rangle _ { _ { a _ { i } } } | V \rangle _ { _ { a _ { i } } }$$

Quantum  Fredkin  gate  shown  in  Fig.2  can  be  in  'Cross'  state  or  'Through'  state controlled by the control qubit in c .  In 'Cross' state the two input qubits are swapped, the qubit 1 2 b a ψ ψ = and the qubit 2 1 b a ψ ψ = . In 'Through' state the two input qubits are

Fig.2. A linear optical implementation of quantum Fredkin gate [17] . (a)quantum circuit. (b) a simple model in which only inputs and outputs

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0380v1-figure-3f44c918-1d62-4633-9b09-6a01c650c268.jpg)

## are given.

passed  through  directly,  the  qubit 1 1 b a ψ ψ = and  the  qubit 2 2 b a ψ ψ = .  In  Fig.2, 1 D and 2 D are  two  single  photon  detectors  (SPD).  CNOT  gate  can  make  the  polarization direction of the photon rotate 0 90 . 1 HWP and 3 HWP are 22.5°-tilted half-wave plates(HWP), which act as Hadamard gates ( ( ) 2 , H H V → + ( ) 2 ). V H V → -2 HWP and 4 HWP are 67.5°-tilted half-wave  plates  which  perform  the  transformation: ( ) 2   and H V H → -( ) 2 . Polarization beamsplitter (PBS) works as V H V → + follows:  the  horizontally  polarized  photon  is  passed  through,  while  the  vertically  polarized

photon  is  reflected.  If 1 in c V = = , and  no  photon  arrives  at 1 D and 2 D ,  the  output state is

$$| \psi _ { c o u } \rangle = \beta _ { i n } \beta _ { 2 n } | H \rangle _ { n _ { 2 } } | H \rangle _ { n _ { 2 } } + \beta _ { i n } \beta _ { 2 v } | H \rangle _ { n _ { 2 } } | V \rangle _ { n _ { 2 } } + \beta _ { i v } \beta _ { 2 n } | V \rangle _ { n _ { 2 } } | H \rangle _ { n _ { 2 } } + \beta _ { i v } \beta _ { 2 v } | V \rangle _ { n _ { 2 } } | V \rangle _ { n _ { 2 } }.$$

In this case, the quantum Fredkin gate is in 'Cross' state. Otherwise, if 0 in c H = = and no photon arrives at 1 D and 2 D , the quantum Fredkin gate is in 'Through' state. If the quantum  efficiency η of  SPD  is  100%  and  the  dark  count  isn't  taken  into  account,  the success rate of the quantum Fredkin gate is 0.25.

A simple model of quantum Fredkin gate is shown in Fig. 2(b) in which only the inputs and outputs are given.

## 3. Quantum state fusion and fission

In  this  section,  we  introduce  the  schemes  of  quantum  state  fusion  and  state  fission proposed by Vitelli  et.  al. [15] and  our  modification  for  applying  to  optical  quantum  switch unit.

## 3.1 Scheme of quantum state fusion

Vitelli et. al. proposed a schematic of quantum state fusion [15] , in which the two-dimensional quantum qubits of two input photons can be combined into a single output photon  within  a  four-dimensional  quantum  space.  Based  on  this  scheme,  we  add  a  state conversion circuit and a control qubit in d c , as shown in Fig.3. In Fig.3, the half wave plates are all oriented at 22.5° with respect to the H direction except for 6 HWP which is oriented at -22.5°. Let 3 3 3 3 3 h v a a a H V ψ β β = + and 4 4 4 4 4 h v a a a H V ψ β β = + denote  two  input  states, where 3 h β , 3 v β , 4 h β and 4 v β are arbitrary complexes, and 2 2 3 3 1 h v β β + = , 2 2 4 4 1.  The  ancillary  photon enters the setup in h v β β + = H state,  that  is a H = .  So the joint input state is

$$| \psi \rangle _ { _ { m } } = \left ( \beta _ { s h } \beta _ { 4 h } | H \rangle _ { _ { a _ { s } } } | H \rangle _ { _ { a _ { s } } } + \beta _ { s h } \beta _ { 4 v } | H \rangle _ { _ { a _ { s } } } | V \rangle _ { _ { a _ { s } } } + \beta _ { s v } \beta _ { 4 h } | V \rangle _ { _ { a _ { s } } } | H \rangle _ { _ { a _ { s } } } + \beta _ { s v } \beta _ { 4 v } | V \rangle _ { _ { a _ { s } } } | V \rangle _ { _ { a _ { s } } } \right ) | H \rangle _ { _ { a } } | c \rangle _ { _ { d _ { m } } }.$$

The  quantum  state  fusion  is  successful  if  there  is  one  and  only  one  photon  at  each H-channel  of 11 PBS and 12 PBS ,  no  photon  at  each  V-channel  of 11 PBS and 12 PBS ,  one and only one photon at 3 b ′ and 4 b ′ . The detailed working process of quantum state fusion is shown  in  Ref.  [15]  and  its  supplementary  materials.  After  quantum  state  fusion,  the spatial-polarization state at 3 b ′ and 4 b ′ is

$$| \psi \rangle _ { _ { b _ { c } } i } = \beta _ { _ { 4 a } } \beta _ { _ { 3 b } } | H \rangle _ { _ { b _ { c } } i } + \beta _ { _ { 4 a b } } \beta _ { _ { 3 r } } | V \rangle _ { _ { b _ { c } } i } + \beta _ { _ { 4 r } } \beta _ { _ { 3 b } } | H \rangle _ { _ { b _ { c } } i } + \beta _ { _ { 4 r } } \beta _ { _ { 3 r } } | V \rangle _ { _ { b _ { c } } i } \,.$$

Fig.3 Quantum state fusion. (a)quantum circuit. (b)a simple model

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0380v1-figure-18eb7102-63e8-4ea3-b59c-d366a385d124.jpg)

in which only inputs and outputs are given.

In Fig.3(a), state conversion circuit aims at converting the spatial-polarization mode to time-polarization  mode.  Here  the  state  of  a  photon  is  in  a  four-dimensional  Hilbert  space obtained by time-polarization mode means that the photon may occur at one of the two time instants  and  may  be  in  one  of  the  two  polarization  directions.  There  are  two  time  delay components  with  delay 1 τ and 2 τ , two  CNOT  gates  and  two  PBS  components  in  the conversion  circuit.  The  spatial  modes  at 3 b ′ and 4 b ′ are  combined  to  one  path  (spatial) mode  at 43 b based  on  the  two  CNOT  gates  which  perform  NOT  operation  only  on  the photons from 3 b ′ by adjusting the values of 1 τ and 2 τ properly.

A simple model is shown as Fig. 3(b) in which only the inputs and outputs are shown.

## 3.2 Scheme of quantum state fission

Vitelli  et.  al.  also  proposed  an  inverse  process  of  quantum  state  fusion,  quantum  state fission,  in  which  the  four-dimensional  quantum  state  of  a  single  photon  is  split  into  two two-dimensional states of two photons, each carrying a qubit [15] .  We add a state conversion circuit on their scheme, as shown in Fig.4. There are four input states: one fused state 56 a ψ , one  control  state in d c under  which  state  conversion  circuit  performs,  and  two  ancillary states a and b which  are  in H at  the  inputs.  In  Fig.4,  the  half  wave  plates  are  all oriented at 22.5° with respect to the H direction, acting as Hadamard gates, except for 23 HWP and 24 HWP which are oriented at 45° so as to be equivalent to a NOT gate swapping states H and V .

The detailed working process can be obtained in the supplementary materials of Ref.[15]. The  state  conversion  circuit  added  here  aims  at  converting  time-polarization  mode  to spatial-polarization mode. The CNOT gates work only on the photon at the second time mode. After state conversion, the spatial-polarization state at 5 a ′ and 6 a ′ is

$$| \psi \rangle _ { a _ { s _ { 6 } } ^ { ^ { \prime } } } = \beta _ { s h } \beta _ { 6 h } | H \rangle _ { a _ { s } ^ { ^ { \prime } } } + \beta _ { s h } \beta _ { 6 v } | V \rangle _ { a _ { s } ^ { ^ { \prime } } } + \beta _ { s v } \beta _ { 6 h } | H \rangle _ { a _ { s } ^ { ^ { \prime } } } + \beta _ { s v } \beta _ { 6 v } | V \rangle _ { a _ { s } ^ { ^ { \prime } } }$$

The quantum fission is successful if there is one and only one photon in the H-channel of

Fig. 4. Quantum state fission. (a) quantum circuit. (b) a simple model in which only inputs and outputs are given.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0380v1-figure-edabea3a-7177-46ac-92b1-c7ea34e097cb.jpg)

20 PBS , no photon in the V-channel of 20 PBS , one and only one photon in 5 b , one and only one photon in 6 b , no photon in 6 b ′ . A simplified version of the scheme is shown in Fig.4 (b).

## 4. Block free optical quantum switch units

Based  on  the  heralded  quantum  Fredkin  gate  in  section  2,  quantum  state  fusion  and

quantum state fission in section 3, we propose an optical quantum switch unit (OQSU) which is block free. Actually, the quantum state fusion schematic in section 3 can be directly applied to  the  scenario  that  two  qubits  which  derive  from  two  different  inputs  are  switched  to  the same  output  at  the  same  time.  The  two  qubits  can  be  fused  and  transmitted  in  the  same quantum channel. Here, we propose a scheme in which the two input states may be fused or not.

## 4.1 Optical quantum switch unit (OQSU) with block free

The  proposed  optical  quantum  switch  unit  is  shown  in  Fig.  5.  There  are  two  input information  qubits  at 7 a and 8 a , 7 a ψ and 8 a ψ ,  four  control  qubits in f c , in F c , in s c and in d c , and  one  ancillary  qubit a . Let in f c denote  the  output  competition.  When 1 ,  it  means  that  output  competition  exists  and  quantum  state  fusion  works.  When in f c = 0 , it means that there is no output competition and quantum Fredkin gate works. Let in f c = in F c denote the operation of quantum Fredkin gate which is in cross state when 1 , in F c = in through state when 0 . Let in F c = in s c denote the output port of the fused state which is 7 b when 1 , in s c = 8 b when 0 . Let in s c = in d c act as the control qubit of CNOT gate and is applied to combine the two spatial mode after delay of 2 τ . Let φ denote the vacuum state. The input-output relation under different control qubits is shown in the Table 1.

In Fig. 5, path selection circuit consists of two CNOT gates and two polarization beam splitters.  When 1 ,  the  two  input  states in f c = 7 a ψ and 8 a ψ are  transmitted  to  the output ports at 7 a ′ ′ and 8 a ′ ′ . Otherwise, they are transmitted to the outputs at 7 a ′ and 8 a ′ . The two states at 7 a ′ and 8 a ′ are transmitted to quantum Fredkin gate. They are swapped or not  under  the  control  of  qubit in F c . The  two  states  at 7 a ′ ′ and 8 a ′ ′ are  fused  to  a spatial-polarization mode. Then the spatial-polarization mode is converted into a time-polarizaiton  mode by  a  converting  circuit  in  which  the  time  delay 1 τ and 2 τ are  set properly. The output selection circuit is used to transmit the fused state to the expected output

Fig.5. An optical quantum switch unit with block free

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0380v1-figure-aeb4a71b-9dea-40c5-aaa5-786d5db470cc.jpg)

Table 1. The input-output relation under different control qubits

|   in f c |   in F c |   in s c | 7 b ψ   | 8 b ψ   | Condition                                |
|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|------------------------------------------|
|        0 |        0 |        0 | 7 a ψ   | 8 a ψ   | Both 1 D and 2 D have                    |
|        0 |        0 |        1 | 7 a ψ   | 8 a ψ   | Both 1 D and 2 D have                    |
|        0 |        1 |        0 | 8 a ψ   | 7 a ψ   | count.                                   |
|        0 |        1 |        1 | 8 a ψ   | 7 a ψ   | Both 1 D and 2 D have                    |
|        1 |        0 |        0 | φ       | f ψ     | Both 3 D and 5 D detect one and only one |
|        1 |        0 |        1 | f ψ     | φ       | Both D                                   |
|        1 |        1 |        0 | φ       | f ψ     | one photon                               |
|        1 |        1 |        1 | f ψ     | φ       | two time modes b .                       |

under the control of qubit in s c .  So  the  two output states 7 b ψ and 8 b ψ can be a single

state or fused state. The operation is performed according the value of the control qubits as shown in Table 1.

According to Ref. [15] and its supplementary materials, the state fusion shown in Fig. 3 is  successful  with  a  probability  of  1/32.  By  a  suitable  feed-forward,  the  success  probability can be raised to 1/8. The state fission shown in Fig. 4 is the same as the state fusion. Since the Fredkin gate has a 1/4 success rate at ideal condition, and we assume the value of the control qubit in f c is 1   or 0 with equal probability, the average success probability of the unit is 1/2×1/8+1/2×1/4=3/16.

Since  heralded  quantum  Fredkin  gate,  heralded  quantum  fusion  process  and  quantum fission process are used in each switch unit, a network will fail if any one of the units in the network could not work  successfully. In this scenario, the quantum  bits should be retransmitted. How to overcome this deficiency will be our further work.

## 4.2 Optical quantum switch units with different input states

Besides the quantum circuit in the Fig. 5, there are other block free switch units which consist  of  one  fusion  circuit  or  more  fusion  circuits,  one  quantum  Fredkin  gate  or  more Fredkin gates, on fission circuit or more fission circuits. Here are four examples, as shown in Fig.6.

In  Fig.  6(a),  the  input  state  is  a  fused  state,  which  is  splitted  into  two  single  qubits  by quantum state fission operation. Then a quantum Fredkin gate follows. This network can be used in a scenario in which a multiplexed optical quantum signal is demultiplexed and the two resulted separate qubits can be sent to two outputs as they require. In Fig. 6(b), the input states are  one  fused  state  and  a  single  state,  one  of  the  state  after  fission  is  fused  with  the  input single state. This network can be used in a scenario in which a multiplexed optical quantum signal  is  demultiplexed  into  two  separate  qubits,  in  which  one  qubit  is  transmitted  to  the output directly and the other is multiplexed with the input single photon signal. In Fig. 6(c), the input are one fused state and one single state. A vacuum state is inserted into the input state at next time slot in order to perform Fredkin operation. This network can be used in a scenario in which one multiplexed quantum signal is swapped with a single qubit or not. In Fig. 6(d), the input states are two fused states. They are fissed and fused again. This network

Fig.6. Basic switch units based on the combinations of quantum state fusion, fission and Fredkin gate. (a)one fission and one Fredkin gate. (b) one fission and one fusion. (c) one Fredkin gate. (d) two fissions and two fusions.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0380v1-figure-eb58c6bb-2a6b-4147-9d26-ebd23ba3de65.jpg)

can be used in a scenario in which two multiplexed quantum signals are demultiplexed and mutilplexed again after exchanging one of the two qubits. In these four scenarios, the switch units  are  successful  if  the  counts  of  the  detectors  in  the  quantum  circuits  meet  with  the conditions  shown  in  section  3  and  there  is  one  and  only  one  photon  in  each  output  for non-fused sate and one and only one photon in each time instant for fused state. Note that the some scenarios are not taken into account, e.g. a fused state might compete with another input state for same output port. These scenarios should be further discussed.

## 5 Conclusion

In  this  paper,  we  propose  an  optical  quantum  switch  fabric  with  block  free  by  using modified quantum state fusion, quantum state fission and quantum Fredkin gate. This switch fabric can be used to build a Banyan network with self-routing. We also propose schemes to build four types of switch fabric with block free. Since the photon loss in quantum circuit may decrease the fidelity of the switch fabric, we could improve its performance by using low-loss components and quantum nondemolition (QND) detectors.

Although  quantum  Fredkin  gate,  quantum  fusion  and  fission  processes  are  not  be implemented with a success probability of 100%, the switch fabric proposed in this paper can be  implemented without assisted  classical  control  information  and  can  be  used  to  build  all optical quantum information network. So, the side information leakage can be avoided.

With the development of integrated optics, large-scale optical quantum circuit or optical quantum  computer  may  be  built [20][21] .  Our  further  works  are  to  make  experiment  and  to discuss how to implement it by integrated optics technology.

## References

- [1] Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W and Zbinden H 2002 Rev. Mod. Phy. 74 145
- [2] Knill E, Laflamme R and Milburn G J 2001 Nature 409 46
- [3] Kok P, Munro W J, Nemoto K, Ralph T C, Dowling J P and Milburn G J 2007 Rev. Mod. Phy. 79 135
- [4]  Elliott  C,  Pearson  D  and  Troxel  G  2003  Proceedings  of  the  2003  Conference  on Applications,  technologies,  architectures  and  protocols  for  computer  communications, Aug. 25, 2003 Karlsruhe, Germany, p.227
- [5] Peev M, Pacher C and Alléaume R et al. 2009 New J. Phys. 11 075001
- [6] Sasaki M., Fujiwara M. and Ishizuka H. 2011 Opt. Express 19 10387
- [7] Chen T Y, Liang H, Liu Y, Cai W Q, Ju L, Liu W Y, Wang J, Yin H, Chen K, Chen Z B, Peng C Z, Pan J W 2009 Opt. Express 17 6540
- [8] Xu F X, Chen W, Wang S, Yin Z Q, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhou Z, Zhao Y B, Li H W, Liu D, Han Z F and Guo G C 2009 Chinese Sci. Bull. 54 2277 (in Chinese)
- [9]  Hui  J  Y  1990  Switching  and  Traffic  Theory  for  Integrated  Broadband  Networks  (New York: Springer Science+Business Media) p.64,126
- [10] Shukla M K, Ratan R and Oru ç A Y 2004 Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems March 17, 2004 Princeton, USA, p.484
- [11] Anwar S, Raja M Y A, Qazi S and IIyas M 2010 Nanotechnology for Telecommunications (Boca Raton: CRC press) p.373-384
- [12] Tsai I M and Kuo S Y 2002 IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 1 154

- [13] Cheng S T and Wang C Y 2006 IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I 53 316
- [14] Sue C C 2009 IEEE Trans. Comput. 58 238
- [15]  Vitelli  C,  Spagnolo  N,  Aparo  L,  Sciarrino  F,  Santamato  E  and  Marrucci  L  2013  Nat. Photon. 7 521
- [16]  Nielsen  M  A  and  Chuang  I  L  2000  Quantum  Computation  and  Quantum  Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp.22-24
- [17] Gong Y X, Guo G C and Ralph T C 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 012305
- [18] Lin Q 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 5983 (in Chinese)
- [19] Shao X Q, Chen L and Zhang S 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 3258
- [20] Politi A, Cryan M J, Rarity J G, Yu S and O'Brien J L 2008 Science 320 646
- [21] Marshall G D, Politi A, Matthews J C F, Dekker P, Ams M, Withford M J and O'Brien J L 2009 Opt. Express 17 12546
Chang-Hua Zhu Yan-Hong Meng Dong-Xiao Quan Nan Zhao Chang-Xing Pei
Block Free Optical Quantum Banyan Network based on Quantum State Fusion and Fission
Optical switch fabric plays an important role in building multiple-user
optical quantum communication networks. Owing to its self-routing property and
low complexity, Banyan network is widely used for building switch fabric.
While, there is no efficient way to remove internal blocking in Banyan network
by classical way. Quantum state fusion, by which the two-dimensional internal
quantum state of two photons could be combined into four-dimensional internal
state of a single photon, makes it possible to solve this problem. In this
paper, we convert the output mode of quantum state fusion from
spatial-polarization mode to time-polarization mode. By combining modified
quantum state fusion, quantum state fission with quantum Fredkin gate, we
propose a practical scheme to build an optical quantum switch unit which is
block free. The scheme can be extended to build more complex units, four of
which are shown in this paper.