## Correlating and Cross-linking Knowledge Threads in Informledge System for Creating New Knowledge

4

T.R. Gopalakrishnan Nair 1,2 and Meenakshi Malhotra 3,4 1 Saudi Aramco Endowed Chair, Technology and Information Management, PMU. KSA 2 Vice President Aadvanced AI and Bio Computing, RIIC, D. S. Institutions,Bangalore, India 3 Advanced AI and Bio Computing, RIIC, D. S. Institutions, Bangalore, India (Lecturer): Dept. of Computer Science Eng, The Oxford College of Engineering, Bangalore, India trgnair@ieee.org, uppal\_meenakshi@yahoo.co.in

Keywords:

Informledge System (ILS): Knowledge Network Node (KNN): Multi-lateral links: weighted graphs: Tensor graph product: Concept: Concept State Diagram (CSD)

Abstract:

There  has  been  a  considerable  advance  in  computing,  to  mimic  the  way  in  which  the  brain  tries  to comprehend and structure the information to retrieve meaningful knowledge. It is identified that neuronal entities  hold  whole  of  the  knowledge  that  the  species  makes  use  of.  We  intended  to  develop  a  modified knowledge based system, termed as Informledge System (ILS) with autonomous nodes and intelligent links that integrate and structure the pieces of knowledge. We conceive that every piece of knowledge is a cluster of  cross-linked and correlated structure.  In this paper, we put forward the theory of the nodes depicting concepts, referred as Entity Concept State which in turn is dealt with Concept State Diagrams (CSD). This theory is based on an abstract framework provided by the concepts. The framework represents the ILS as the  weighted  graph  where  the  weights  attached  with  the  linked  nodes  help  in  knowledge  retrieval  by providing the direction of connectivity of autonomous nodes present in knowledge thread traversal. Here for the first time in the process of developing Informledge, we apply tenor computation for creating intelligent combinatorial knowledge with cross mutation to create fresh knowledge which looks to be the fundamentals of a typical thought process.

## 1 INTRODUCTION

With  the advancement  in  the field of artificial intelligence  and  cognitive  science,  development  of knowledge based systems  has  taken  a  greater  leap. Artificial  Intelligence  as  stated  is  the  study  of  the computations that make  it possible to perceive reasons  and  act  (Winston,  Patrick  Henry,  1992). Cognitive  Science  as  referred  by  Thagard,  Paul (2005) is the field of study of mind and its computational  intelligence.  Researchers  from  both the fields have been striving to develop a knowledge based system that could simulate the mode  of existence or either of human knowledge and human information processing mechanism or both.

Knowledge  management  field  developed  so  far involve information storage, processing and retrieval of  information  stored  in  databases  in  the  form  of fixed  sentences  and  words.  At  present  there  is  no meaningful system at hand that can store elements of concepts from different domains coherently and can retrieve correlated knowledge. To overcome this, we had  suggested  Informledge  System  (ILS)  in  our work  published  earlier  (T.R.  Gopalakrishnan  Nair, Meenakshi  Malhotra,  2011  and  2010).    In  ILS, knowledge  units  belonging  to  same  or  different knowledge  domains  are  linked  together  to  form  a knowledge network using the autonomous nodes and intelligent  links.  These  links  play  an  important  role in connecting correlated concepts stored at the knowledge  units.  The  knowledge  unit  in  ILS  is termed  as  Knowledge  Network  Node  (KNN)  as defined by T.R. Gopalakrishnan Nair, Meenakshi Malhotra  (2010).In  this  paper  we  put  forward  the theory  of  concepts  represented  by  KNNs  and  the Concept State Diagram  (CSD)  depicted  by the knowledge  thread.  This  knowledge  thread,  formed during  knowledge  embedding  and  retrieval,  is  the result of intelligent linking of KNNs, wherein every link formed is composed of multiple strands each of which  hold  a  property  (T.R.  Gopalakrishnan  Nair, Meenakshi Malhotra, 2011).

This  paper  is  organized  as  follows.  Section  II discusses Research Background. It is then followed by  a  brief  introduction  to  the  understanding  of  the theory of concept in section III. Section IV gives the Structural Organization of Concepts and CSD and in section  V  we  discuss  the  formation  of  knowledge threads  in  ILS  and  section  VI  focuses  on  details about  Tensor  algebra  applied  to  the  CSD.  Finally, we conclude the work in section VII.

## 2 RESEARCH BACKGROUND

As  believed, all the information processing for human  cognition  is  held  at  the  neurons.  A  neuron receive information, process it and forward  the control to another neuron for the further information processing,  in  the  interconnected  mesh  of  neurons (David  Sánchez,  2010).  In  almost  similar  process ILS, the KNN receive the inputs and have the inbuilt ability  to  infer  and  reason  the  linkages  to  the  other nodes (T.R. Gopalakrishnan Nair, Meenakshi Malhotra, 2011).

In addition to this, knowledge-based neurocomputing  has  gained  importance  in  last  two decades. It is stated that Knowledge-based neurocomputing  (KBN)  concerns  with  methods  to address the explicit representation and processing of knowledge where a neurocomputing system is involved (Ian Cloete and Jacek M. Zurada, 2000).

The key element involved in knowledge processing  and  retrieval  is  the  knowledge  and  its representation.  Knowledge  representation  has  been recognized as an imperative field of artificial intelligence  which  involves  information  embedding and processing for computation in cognitive models. Knowledge  has  been  represented  using  network, graphs, and finite automata and using concept maps. According  to  Christopher  Brewster  (2004)  many knowledge  based  representations involve use of Ontology. Ontology finds its origin from the field of philosophy  whereas  its  implication  in  the  field  of computer  science  is  stated  as  'ontology  is  formal, explicit specification of a shared conceptualization' (Thomas  R.  Gruber,  1993).  Also,  there  have  been efforts to define the set of attributes for the concepts involved  during  ontology  development  (Priss,  U., 2006.).

Different strategies have been adopted to represent concepts. Concept maps are used to represent and convey knowledge. It is a diagram that connects pieces with of information entities that are linked by labelled straight lines without any processing power. ''Mind Maps'' are such a type of meaning diagram as shown by Beth Crandall et al. (2006) and Farrand, P et al. (2002).The connecting lines in Mind  Map  are not labelled and they represent  just  the  connection  between  ideas  (Open Directory -Reference: Knowledge  Management, 2009).  Also,  the  diagrams  that  are  referred  to  as ''Cognitive  Maps''  are  large  web  like  diagrams which involve representation of sentences and short paragraphs  as  ideas  resulting  in  hundreds  of  joins and  the  same  has  been  shown  with  example  by (Robert M. Kitchin, 1994). However these maps are just  the  fixed  representation  of  joints  representing words  whereas  the  knowledge  representation  does not involve the language alone. Similarly, the knowledge formation in human brain includes concept formation and its representation in different regions as stated in the field of neuroscience (Eric R. Kandel  et  al.,  2000).While  the  mind  maps  connect the  ideas  they  are  not  capable  of  processing  the knowledge nodes, but in the case of ILS, the system is intelligent by virtue of its capability to formulate and  process  the  concepts  which  is  kept  apart  from how  the  knowledge  is  represented  (Nair,  T.R.G., Malhotra, Meenakshi, 2011).

Conceptual graph is a graphical representation of knowledge depiction and reasoning. The translation to and from the spoken language, used for understanding,  into  some  computer  understandable representation  can  be    done  by  means  of  these graphs (Sowa, John F., 1984).  As stated by Michel Chein  ,  Marie-Laure  Mugnier  (2008),  conceptual graph involve mainly relations between concepts as 'is  a'  and  'has  property'.  This  restricts  the  way  in which knowledge can be linked, whereas ILS provides  the  flexibility  in  linking  properties  of  the KNNs through the use of its multi-stranded links.

## 3 CONCEPT THEORY

Knowledge  is  nothing  but  a  collection  of  linked concepts. However many attempted to create knowledge bases, connect words and sentences rather  than  concepts  (Rajendra  Akerkar, Priti Sajja, 2010).    In  his  book,  Gregory  L.  Murphy  (2002) referred that  many properties of concepts are found in word-meaning and use, suggesting that meanings are psychologically represented through the conceptual  system.  Most  of  this  type  of  approach ended connecting words through lines  where as the meaning of the knowledge structure is created in the human mind. But actual breakthrough is required in incorporating a meaning creation processing capability  in  the  nodes  and  in  the  links  by  adding intelligence in both. In ILS, the information is stored at  the  intelligent  knowledge  network  nodes  (KNN) which is an integral part of this knowledge network. A concept is represented partially or completely by a KNN.  The  link  between  these  autonomous  nodes represents the affinity between the concepts. For the loosely related concepts the thickness of the link is less whereas for tightly coupled concepts the thickness is more. As more and more information is added  into  the  network,  there  is  cross-linking  of concepts and new knowledge threads can be retrieved through the interlinked concepts correlation  and  cross-linking.  In  the  first  case  of existing knowledge bases, they were static representation of the thinking process and where as ILS  is  capable  of  furnishing  active  computation process.

## 4 CONCEPT FRAMEWORK

Concept  State  Diagram  (CSD)  is  the  diagram  that depicts the states of the concepts that are connected by  strengthening  of  the  links.  CSD  is  basically  a knowledge thread where state is associated with the concepts as shown in Figure 1.

The knowledge that can be retrieved after incorporating  knowledge  representation  in  to  the retrieved  knowledge  threads  is  anomalous  to  the sentence in language. The knowledge thread formed by  connecting  concepts  have  two  basic  knowledge units  namely  Apex  Knowledge  Unit  (AKU)  and Subsidiary Knowledge Unit (SKU).

CSD,  which  is  a  form  of  a  knowledge  thread comprise of these knowledge units defined as follows:

## 4.1 Apex Knowledge Unit (AKU)

This knowledge unit in the CSD is the key concept which implies that the knowledge thread formed by CSD  has  this  knowledge  unit  (KNN)  representing the  concept  about  which  something  is  stated  in  the knowledge  thread.  E.g.  considering  the  knowledge thread 'Continent  is the largest and  continuous landmass  on  earth'  can  be  represented  in  CSD  as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Concept State Diagram for a Knowledge Thread.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0595v1-figure-131f39d9-94e9-49d9-a947-fd6040cff3cd.jpg)

Where  the  KNN's  shown  in  figure,  1  holds  the concepts shown in table 1 below

Table 1: Concepts and KNNs shown in figure 1.

| KNN     | KNN1       | KNN2     | KNN3        | KNN4      | KNN5   |
|---------|------------|----------|-------------|-----------|--------|
| Concept | Contine nt | Larges t | Contin uous | Land mass | Earth  |

The AKUs here can be continent (KNN1), landmass (KNN4)  or  earth  (KNN5).  The  centre  concept  for this  CSD  can  be  taken  as  any  of  the  three.  The weight attached with any of the AKU would be more than the weight attached with the nodes that are far from the AKU. The weight attached with interlinked concepts  decreases  as  we  traverse  from  AKU  to SKU.

## 4.2 Subsidiary Knowledge Unit (SKU)

This  knowledge  unit  in  the  CSD  is  an  auxiliary concept  which  implies  that  the  knowledge  thread formed by CSD has these knowledge units (KNNs) in the form of supplementary concept. E.g. considering  the  CSD  as  shown  in  Figure  1,  largest (KNN2)  and  continuous  (KNN3)  are  the  SKUs. These  SKUs  supplement  the  AKUs,  in  common language representation SKUs represent the predicates whereas AKU's represent subjects.

Hence the AKU and SKU provides a much wider representation  for  knowledge  in  ILS  analogous  to subject and  predicates used  in human  language representation.

## 5 CONCEPT FORMATION

ILS  is  an  organized  knowledge  network,  in  which connectivity and search is done through an ordered set  of  links.  Methods  of  understanding  is  in  links which includes classifying, correlating and extrapolating  the  information.  Properties  of  links leads to processing where by several logically interlinked concepts can be retrieved through it. The interlinked links form CSDs, which facilitate to form the  cluster  to  knowledge  threads  during  retrieval. Before we put forward how this knowledge cluster is formed, we brief about the CSDs.

The necessary and sufficient conditions for CSD formation are stated as follows:

## 5.1 Every CSD that is formed should consist of at least one AKU and several SKUs .

This  can  be  proved  by  contradiction,  by  including the following two cases:

-  Let us presume CSD doesn't have an AKU Assume that there is a CSD that doesn't have an AKU. Let's consider such a CSD shown in figure 2, for this CSD  there  is  no  AKU specified during embedding of this knowledge.  So  this  implies  that  all  KNNs linked would be SKUs only.

As  stated  earlier AKU  and  SKU  are  like subject and  predicates, so AKU  could  be similar to what the knowledge thread is about. Absence  of  AKU  would  imply  that  some concepts represented by SKUs are linked but doesn't provide any information about anything. Such a CSD is termed as irrelevant and meaningless.

Figure 2: Incorrect CSD without AKU.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0595v1-figure-fe4b5f5e-cff7-4259-9773-ac4d64cf798e.jpg)

As shown in figure 2 the concepts grow, thin, breathe, eat and strong, are just linked together but no information can be retrieved from their linking.  Also,  in  ILS  links  properties  provide weightage which tend to present weak threads linking these concepts.

-  Let  us  presume  CSD  have  multiple  AKU's and no SKU
- On the other hand if no SKUs are there then it's similar to a sentence not having  any predicates.  This  would  mean  some  subjects are linked, leading to no bigger concept. Main objective behind linking concepts is to form a bigger  concept,  whereas  linking  only  AKU would not provide any meaningful knowledge. Same is depicted in the figure 3 where animal, plant, stick, door and hands are linked but this CSD does not provide any meaningful knowledge.

Figure 3: Incorrect CSD with multiple AKU and no SKU.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0595v1-figure-d6833a94-ea23-423e-89b0-e89e692a6ecd.jpg)

These  AKUs  when put together  doesn't  lead  to formation of any bigger concept or a valid knowledge thread. These two points can be considered similar to some invalid human knowledge formation wherein one speaks about the properties  of  an  entity  and  not  the  entity  itself  or someone  connects  some  entities  with  weak  links. Thus,  every  CSD  should  consist  of  least  one  AKU and one or more SKUs.

## 5.2 CSDs interact to form a cluster of correct and incorrect CSDs.

During  knowledge  retrieval,  the  link  processor  at KNN helps in retrieving the knowledge threads. The intelligence of the system lies in interaction of these retrieved  knowledge  threads.  CSDs  interaction  is basically interaction between two knowledge threads that can connect and form multiple CSDs in the form of knowledge  cluster  depending  on  the  state  of individual knowledge  units. The  CSDs  that  are formed  by  CSD  interaction  may  be  correct  and incorrect.

## 5.3 The CSD formed after learning has got only one form.

During knowledge retrieval, CSDs interact to form a cluster  of  valid  and  invalid  CSDs.  In  addition  to having invalid CSDs, the cluster comprises of repeated connected concepts based on the weights of the concepts involved. The learning process involves removal of invalid and the redundant CSDs. So after the  learning  process,  which  is  an  integral  part  of retrieval,  is  complete  only  one  form  of  the  CSD would be there in the knowledge network.

## 5.4 The final CSD must be conceptually correct

It  is  stated  for  the  proof  of  Statement  3  that  the invalid  CSDs are  removed during learning process. Hence  the  final  CSD  in  the  ILS  are  conceptually correct.

To retrieve knowledge intelligently from this network, concepts need to be combined  during retrieval. These concepts interact to form combination  of  ideas, which  is possible due  to interaction  between  KNNs.  During  this  interaction various links are formed which comprise to formation  of  both  correct  and  incorrect  CSDs.  The incorrect CSDs are discarded based on the rationality  involved  in  learning.  CSDs  are  formed during knowledge embedding and retrieval.

The splinters  retrieved  during  the  interaction  of CSDs  have  to  pass  through  learning  process.  The process  includes  sieving  out  of  the  CSDs  that  are secondary and redundant invalid CSDs. Removal of the same from the system, lead to consistent knowledge in ILS knowledge network.

## 6 CSD AND TENSOR ALGEBRA

CSD's once formed interact during retrieval to form the  cluster.  This  involves  tensor  algebra  from  the graph theory.  In  view  of  tensor  algebra,  as  defined by Sandi Klavžar and Simone Severini (2010)

The tensor product, K  =  G H, of graphs G  = (V(G), E(G)) and H  =  (V(H), E(H)) is the graph with  vertex  set  V(K)   =   V(G)  ×  V(H)  and  {(g, h),  (g ',  h ')} E(K) if and only if {g, g '} E(G) and {h, h '} E(H).( p. 3)

Now as a CSD is just a graph of nodes connected together  we  can  apply  tensor  product  to  the  same. This  implies  that  if  two  CSDs  interact  they  can actually  form  a  tensor  product  and  the  resultant graph is a cluster of CSDs composed of relevant and irrelevant CSDs. This cluster has a group of concepts which are collection of  AKUs and SKUs.

Let's  consider  two  knowledge  threads  kt1  and kt2 as shown in the figure 4 and figure5.

Figure 4: Knowledge Thread kt1

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0595v1-figure-08eb4b53-c8e9-4cc2-9bbb-a38395eb4027.jpg)

For the knowledge thread, kt1 shown in figure 4 represent the following knowledge and the concepts.

Knowledge thread, kt1 is 'World has living and non-living things.'

Table 2: Concepts represented by KNNs shown in figure 4

| KNN     | Knn1   | Knn2   | Knn3   | Knn4       |
|---------|--------|--------|--------|------------|
| Concept | World  | Thing  | Living | Non-living |

Figure 5: Knowledge Thread, kt2

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0595v1-figure-05ab3b5b-575a-4b56-9be2-48b8dc24fc9b.jpg)

The  knowledge  thread,  Kt2  is  'Living  things grow and breathe like animals'.

For the knowledge thread, kt2 shown in figure 5 represent the following knowledge and the concepts.

Table 3: Concepts represented by KNNs shown in figure 5

| KNN      | KNN2   | KNN3   | KNN5   | KNN6     | KNN7     |
|----------|--------|--------|--------|----------|----------|
| Conce pt | Thing  | Living | Grow   | Breath e | Anima ls |

Here kt1 is similar to G and kt2 is similar to H and the vertices set for both are as follows:

V (kt1) = {KNN1, KNN2, KNN3, KNN4}

V  (kt2) = {KNN2,  KNN3,  KNN5,  KNN6, KNN7}

V  (kt1) ⊗ V  (kt2)  =  4*5=20  vertices,  which comprise  of  the  node  space  after  the  2  knowledge threads interact.

The  cluster of CSDs  formed  after applying tensor  algebra  for  product  of  connected  graphs  is applied to kt1 and kt2 shown in figure 4 and figure 5 respectively, is given in figure 6.

The edges connecting nodes of clusters combine to form the link space as shown in figure 6.

Figure  6:  CSD  Cluster  formed  after  interaction  of  two knowledge threads, kt1 and kt2

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0595v1-figure-3a00b588-c1ee-4f5d-bdff-4e7245440775.jpg)

From the definition of tensor product of graphs, the  edge  with  vertices  (KNN1,  KNN2  (kt2))  and (KNN2  (knn1),  KNN3)  in  the  cluster  exist  if  and only if (KNN1, KNN2 (kt1) is an edge (link) in kt1 and (KNN2 (kt2), KNN3) is an edge (link) in kt2. In this  cluster  many  CSD's  are  correct  or  valid  and many are incorrect or invalid.  E.g.: KNN2-KNN3--KNN6 are connected which means concepts living, thing,  breathe  are  linked  to  make  a  bigger  concept which  is valid. Whereas  KNN4  ---  KNN6  are connected which mean concept non-living and breathe are linked which is invalid.

As we cannot multiply word here and there and absurd things cannot connect. Whereas in comparison to this we can multiply two concepts or linked  concepts  are  multiplied  using  tensor  algebra to  form a bigger concept.  So it's only the concepts that are involved in the interaction which result into formation of a bigger valid concepts represented by CSDs.

## 7 CONCLUSION

In  this  paper,  we  presented  the  theory  of  KNNs which are capable of actively representing concepts and the knowledge thread as Concept State Diagram (CSD). The intelligence of ILS is depicted in formulating  correlated  and  cross-linked  cluster  of CSDs  through  tensorial  interaction  of  the  CSDs. This  correlation  and  cross-linking  is  established  by the  tensor  algebraically  manipulations.  Thus  ILS  is capable  to  classifying  and  extrapolating  the  two knowledge  threads  retrieved  and  can  derive  all  the cross-linked knowledge threads out of the interaction. On forced interaction between two tensorial knowledge threads, it can form new clusters that consist of relevant and irrelevant CSDs, from  which  the  irrelevant  CSDs  can  be  sieved  out during  learning  process  or  so  to  say  a  thinking process.  The  tensor  algebra  has  been  applied  for CSDs manipulations on the CSDs retrieved  from  a single domain and this arrangement of manipulation of CSDs for multiple domain need to be evaluated in the next phase.

Acknowledgment: Authors express their sincere thanks to the IP managers, for the patenting process on the sequence of theories related to this.

## REFERENCES

Beth Crandall , Gary Klein and Robert R. Hoffman, 2006. Working  Minds-  A  Practitioner's  Guide  to  Cognitive Task Analysis , ISBN 0262033518, Ch4.

Christopher  Brewster,  Kieron  O'Hara,2004. Knowledge Representation with Ontologies: The Present and Future ,  2004  IEEE  Intelligent  Systems  19(1):  72-81 (2004).

David Sánchez, 2010. A methodology to learn ontological attributes from the Web, Data &amp; Knowledge Engineering  Volume  69,  Issue  6,  June  2010,  Pages 573-597.

Eric  R.  Kandel,  James  H.  Schwartz,  Thomas  M.  Jessel, 2000. Principles of Neural Science ISBN-0-07112000-9, McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division, 4 th edition.

Farrand,  P.,  Hussain,  F.  and  Hennessy,  E.  (2002). The efficacy  of  the  `mind  map'  study  technique. Medical Education, 36: 426-431. doi: 10.1046/j.13652923.2002.01205.x

Gregory L. Murphy, 2002. The Big Book of Concepts MIT Press ISBN-10:0-262-13409-8, The MIT Press

Ian Cloete and Jacek M. Zurada, 2000. Knowledge-Based Neurocomputing ISBN-13:978-0-262-03274-2, The MIT Press

Michel Chein , Marie-Laure Mugnier, 2008. Graph-based Knowledge Representation: Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs , Springer Publishing Company, ISBN:1848002858, 9781848002852

Nair, T.R.G.; Malhotra, Meenakshi; 2011 Creating intelligent linking for information threading in knowledge  networks , India  Conference  (INDICON), 2011 Annual IEEE, pp.1-5, doi: 10.1109/INDCON.2011.6139335

Open Directory Project DMOZ. Open Directory -Reference: Knowledge Management : Knowledge Creation:  Mind  Mapping:  Software. Website,  July 2009. URL http://www.dmoz.org/Reference/ Knowledge\_Management/Knowledge\_Creation/Mind \_Mapping/Software//.

Priss,  U.,  2006. Formal  concept  analysis  in  information science Annual  Review  of  Information  Science  and Technology,40: 521-543.

doi: 10.1002/aris.1440400120

Robert M. Kitchin, 1994. Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14 (1), pp. 1-19.

Sandi Klavžar and Simone Severini, 2010. Tensor 2-sums and entanglement , Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 43 No  21 , doi:10.1088/17518113/43/21/212001.

Conceptual Structures: Information Reading,  MA:

Sowa, John F., 1984. Processing  in Mind  and  Machine . Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0201144727.

T.R.  Gopalakrishnan  Nair,  Meenakshi  Malhotra,  2011. Knowledge Embedding and Retrieval Strategies in an Informledge System ' International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications (ICCEA 2011). P: V2-473: V2-477.

T.R.  Gopalakrishnan  Nair,  Meenakshi  Malhotra,  2010. Informledge  System:  A  modified  Knowledge  Network with  Autonomous  Nodes  using  Multi-lateral  Links , International  Conference  on  Knowledge  Engineering and Ontology Development, KEOD 2010, Proceeding of KEOD-2010, pp 351-354, Valencia-Spain.

Thagard,  Paul,  2005. Mind:  Introduction  to  Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ISBN-10:0262-20154-2 2 nd edition

Thomas  R.  Gruber,  1993. A  translation approach  to portable ontology specifications. In: Knowledge Acquisition. 5: 199-220.

Winston, Patrick Henry, 1992. Artificial Intelligence Reading, MA:  Addison-Wesley,3 rd edition. ISBN: 9780201533774.
T. R. Gopalakrishnan Nair Meenakshi Malhotra
Correlating and Cross-linking Knowledge Threads in Informledge System for Creating New Knowledge
There has been a considerable advance in computing, to mimic the way in which
the brain tries to comprehend and structure the information to retrieve
meaningful knowledge. It is identified that neuronal entities hold whole of the
knowledge that the species makes use of. We intended to develop a modified
knowledge based system, termed as Informledge System (ILS) with autonomous
nodes and intelligent links that integrate and structure the pieces of
knowledge. We conceive that every piece of knowledge is a cluster of
cross-linked and correlated structure. In this paper, we put forward the theory
of the nodes depicting concepts, referred as Entity Concept State which in turn
is dealt with Concept State Diagrams (CSD). This theory is based on an abstract
framework provided by the concepts. The framework represents the ILS as the
weighted graph where the weights attached with the linked nodes help in
knowledge retrieval by providing the direction of connectivity of autonomous
nodes present in knowledge thread traversal. Here for the first time in the
process of developing Informledge, we apply tenor computation for creating
intelligent combinatorial knowledge with cross mutation to create fresh
knowledge which looks to be the fundamentals of a typical thought process.