## EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0275v2-figure-a49589ab-5e34-4c18-be5e-3f1605309546.jpg)

CERN-PH-EP-2014-181 LHCb-PAPER-2014-042 July 27, 2014

## Measurement of the B 0 -B 0 and Bs 0 -Bs 0 production asymmetries in pp collisions at √ s = 7TeV

The LHCb collaboration †

## Abstract

The B 0 -B 0 and B 0 s -B 0 s production asymmetries, A P ( B 0 ) and A P ( B 0 s ), are measured by means of a time-dependent analysis of B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 , B 0 → D π -+ and B 0 s → D π -s + decays, using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb -1 , collected by LHCb in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. The measurements are performed as a function of transverse momentum and pseudorapidity of the B 0 and B 0 s mesons within the LHCb acceptance. The production asymmetries, integrated over p T and η in the range 4 &lt; p T &lt; 30 GeV /c and 2 5 . &lt; η &lt; 4 5, . are determined to be A P ( B 0 ) = ( -0 35 . ± 0 76 . ± 0 28)% and . A P ( B 0 s ) = (1 09 . ± 2 61 . ± 0 66)%, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the . second systematic.

Submitted to Phys. Lett. B

c © CERN on behalf of the LHCb collaboration, license CC-BY-4.0.

† Authors are listed at the end of this letter.

## 1 Introduction

The production rates of b and ¯ hadrons in b pp collisions are not expected to be identical. This phenomenon, commonly referred to as the production asymmetry, is related to the fact that there can be coalescence between a perturbatively produced b or ¯ quark and the b u and d valence quarks in the beam remnant. Therefore, one can expect a slight excess in the production of B + and B 0 mesons with respect to B -and B 0 mesons, and e.g. of Λ 0 b baryons with respect to Λ 0 b baryons. As b and ¯ quarks are almost entirely produced in b pairs via strong interactions, the existence of B + and B 0 production asymmetries must be compensated by opposite production asymmetries for other B -meson and b -baryon species. These asymmetries are roughly estimated to be at the 1% level for pp collisions at LHC energies, and are expected to be enhanced at forward rapidities and small transverse momenta. Other subtle effects of quantum chromodynamics, beyond the coalescence between beauty quarks and light valence quarks, may also contribute [1-3].

The production asymmetry is one of the key ingredients to perform measurements of CP violation in b -hadron decays at the LHC, since CP asymmetries must be disentangled from other sources. The production asymmetry for B 0 and B 0 s mesons is defined as

$$A _ { \text{P} } \left ( B _ { ( s ) } ^ { 0 } \right ) & \equiv \frac { \sigma \left ( \bar { B } _ { ( s ) } ^ { 0 } \right ) - \sigma \left ( B _ { ( s ) } ^ { 0 } \right ) } { \sigma \left ( \bar { B } _ { ( s ) } ^ { 0 } \right ) + \sigma \left ( B _ { ( s ) } ^ { 0 } \right ) },$$

where σ denotes the production cross-section. Similar asymmetries are also expected when producing charmed hadrons. LHCb has already performed measurements of D + -D -and D + s -D -s production asymmetries, finding values around the 1% level or less [4,5].

In this paper, the values of A P ( B 0 ) and A P ( B 0 s ) are constrained by measuring the oscillations of B 0 and B 0 s mesons with a time-dependent analysis of the B 0 → J/ψ µ ( + µ -) K ∗ 0 ( K π + -), B 0 → D -( K π π + --) π + and B 0 s → D -s ( K K π + --) π + decay rates, without tagging the initial flavour of the decaying B 0 ( s ) meson. The inclusion of chargeconjugate decay modes is implied throughout. The measurements are performed as a function of transverse momentum, p T , and pseudorapidity, η , of the B 0 ( s ) meson within the LHCb acceptance, and then integrated over the range 4 &lt; p T &lt; 30 GeV /c and 2 5 . &lt; η &lt; 4 5. .

## 2 Detector, trigger and simulation

The LHCb detector [6] is a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the pseudorapidity range 2 &lt; η &lt; 5, designed for the study of particles containing b or c quarks. The detector includes a high-precision tracking system consisting of a silicon-strip vertex detector surrounding the pp interaction region, a large-area silicon-strip detector located upstream of a dipole magnet with a bending power of about 4 Tm, and three stations of silicon-strip detectors and straw drift tubes placed downstream of the magnet. The tracking system provides a measurement of momentum with a relative uncertainty that varies from 0.4% at

low momentum to 0.6% at 100 GeV /c . The minimum distance of a track to a primary vertex (PV), the impact parameter, is measured with a resolution of (15 + 29 /p T ) µ m, where p T is in GeV /c . Different types of charged hadrons are distinguished using information from two ring-imaging Cherenkov detectors. Photon, electron and hadron candidates are identified by a calorimeter system consisting of scintillating-pad and preshower detectors, an electromagnetic calorimeter and a hadronic calorimeter. Muons are identified by a system composed of alternating layers of iron and multiwire proportional chambers. The trigger consists of a hardware stage, based on information from the calorimeter and muon systems, followed by a software stage, which applies a full event reconstruction.

In the case of the B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 decay, events are first selected by a hardware trigger that requires muon candidates with p T &gt; 1 48 . GeV /c . The subsequent software trigger is composed of two stages. The first stage performs a partial event reconstruction and requires events to have two well identified oppositely charged muons, with invariant mass larger than 2.7 GeV /c 2 . The second stage performs a full event reconstruction and only retains events containing a µ + µ -pair that has invariant mass within 120 MeV /c 2 of the known J/ψ mass [7] and forms a vertex that is significantly displaced from the nearest PV.

In the case of B 0 → D π -+ and B 0 s → D π -s + decays, events are first selected by a hardware trigger requiring a high transverse energy cluster in the calorimeter system. Events passing the hardware trigger are further filtered by a software trigger which requires a two-, three- or four-track secondary vertex with a large sum of p T of the tracks and a significant displacement from the PVs. Subsequently, a multivariate algorithm [8] is applied, aimed at identifying secondary vertices, consistent with the decay of a b hadron.

Simulated events are used to determine the signal selection efficiency, acceptance as function of decay time, decay time resolution, and to model the background. In the simulation, pp collisions are generated using Pythia 6.4 [9] with a specific LHCb configuration [10]. The interaction of the generated particles with the detector, and its response, are implemented using the Geant4 toolkit [11] as described in Ref. [12].

## 3 Data set and selection

The selection of B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 candidates is based on the reconstruction of J/ψ → µ + µ -and K ∗ 0 → K π + -decays. The J/ψ candidates are formed from two oppositely charged tracks, identified as muons, having p T &gt; 500 MeV /c and originating from a common vertex. The invariant mass of this pair of muons must lie in the range 3030 -3150 MeV /c 2 . The K ∗ 0 candidates are formed from two oppositely charged tracks, one identified as a kaon and the other as a pion, originating from a common vertex. It is required that the K ∗ 0 candidate has p T &gt; 1 GeV /c and that the invariant mass lies in the range 826 -966 MeV /c 2 .

The B 0 candidates are reconstructed from the J/ψ and K ∗ 0 candidates, with the invariant mass of the µ + µ -pair constrained to the known J/ψ mass. They are required to have an invariant mass in the range 5150 -5400 MeV /c 2 . The decay time of the B 0 candidate is calculated from a vertex and kinematic fit that constrains the candidate to originate from its associated PV [13]. The χ 2 per degree of freedom of the fit is required

to be less than 10. Only B 0 candidates with a decay time greater than 0.2 ps are retained. This lower bound on the decay time rejects a large fraction of the prompt combinatorial background.

In the case of B 0 → D π -+ and B 0 s → D π -s + decays, the selection of the B -meson candidate is based on the reconstruction of D -→ K π π + --and D -s → K K π + --decays, respectively. Requirements are made on the D -( s ) decay products before combining them to form a common vertex. The scalar p T sum of the tracks must exceed 1.8 GeV /c and the maximal distance of closest approach between all possible pairs of tracks must be less than 0.5 mm. The D -( s ) candidate is required to have a significant flight distance with respect to the associated PV, by requiring a χ 2 greater than 36 compared to the zero distance hypothesis. The masses of the D -and D -s candidates must lie within 1850 -1890 MeV /c 2 and 1949 -1989 MeV /c 2 , respectively. They are subsequently combined with a fourth particle, the bachelor pion, to form the B -meson decay vertices. The sum of the D -( s ) and bachelor pion p T values must be larger than 5 GeV /c and the decay time of B -meson candidates must be greater than 0 2 ps. . The cosine of the angle between the B -meson candidate momentum vector and the line segment between the PV and B -meson candidate vertex is required to be larger than 0.999. Particle identification (PID) selection criteria are applied to the kaons and pions from the D -( s ) candidate, and to the bachelor pion, in order to reduce the background from other B -meson decays with a misidentified kaon or pion and from Λ 0 b decays with a misidentified proton to a negligible level.

A final selection is applied to the candidates that satisfy the criteria described above. It uses a multivariate analysis method [14,15], optimized separately for each of the three decay modes, to reject the combinatorial background. The variables used in the selection for the B decay products are the transverse momentum and the impact parameter. For the B candidates the variables employed are the transverse momentum, the distance of flight and the impact parameter.

## 4 Fit model

For each signal and background component, the distributions of invariant mass and decay time of B -meson candidates are modelled by appropriate probability density functions (PDFs). We consider two categories of background: the combinatorial background, due to the random association of tracks, and the partially reconstructed background, due to decays with a topology similar to that of the signal, but with one or more particles not reconstructed. The latter is present only for B 0 ( s ) → D -( s ) π + decays.

## 4.1 Mass model

The signal component for each decay is modelled convolving a double Gaussian function with a function parameterizing the final state radiation. The PDF of the B invariant mass, m , is given by

$$\lambda _ { \nu } ^ { \nu } g ( m ) = A \left [ \Theta ( \mu - m ) \ ( \mu - m ) \right ] ^ { s } \otimes G ( m ),$$

where A is a normalization factor, Θ is the Heaviside function, G is the sum of two Gaussian functions with different widths and zero mean, and µ is the B meson mass. The parameter s glyph[similarequal] -0 99 governs the amount of final state radiation, and is determined . using simulated events for each of the three decay modes. The combinatorial background is modelled by an exponential function for all final states. In the case of B 0 → D π -+ and B 0 s → D π -s + decays, a background component due to partially reconstructed B 0 and B 0 s decays is also present in the low invariant mass region. The main contributions are expected to come from decays with a missing γ or π 0 : B 0 → D ∗-( D γ,D π --0 ) π + decays with D -→ K π π + --; B 0 → D -( K π π + --) ρ + ( π + π 0 ) decays; B 0 s → D ∗-s ( D γ,D π -s -s 0 ) π + decays with D -s → K K π + --; B 0 s → D -s ( K K π + --) ρ + ( π + π 0 ) decays.

We parameterize the partially reconstructed components by means of a kernel estimation technique [16] based on invariant mass distributions obtained from full simulation, using the same selection as for data. In the case of B 0 s → D π -s + decays, there is also a background component due to B 0 → D π + s -decays. We account for this component in the fits using the same parameterization adopted for the signal. The B 0 → D π + s -yield is fixed using the ratio between hadronization fractions measured by LHCb [17,18] and the world average of branching fractions [7].

## 4.2 Decay time model

The time-dependent decay rate of a neutral B 0 ( s ) or B 0 ( s ) meson to a flavour-specific f or ¯ f final state is given by the PDF

$$h \left ( t, \psi \right ) \ = \ & K \left ( 1 - \psi A _ { C P } \right ) \left ( 1 - \psi A _ { f } \right ) \\ & \quad \left \{ e ^ { - \Gamma t } \left [ \Lambda _ { + } \cosh \left ( \frac { \Delta \Gamma t } { 2 } \right ) + \psi \Lambda _ { - } \cos \left ( \Delta m t \right ) \right ] \right \} \otimes R \left ( t \right ) \epsilon \left ( t \right ),$$

where K is a normalization factor, glyph[epsilon1] ( ) is the acceptance as a function of the decay time, t R t ( ) is the decay time resolution function, ∆ m ≡ m H -m L and ∆Γ ≡ Γ L -Γ H are the mass and decay-width differences of the B 0 ( s ) -B 0 ( s ) system mass eigenstates and Γ is the average decay width. The subscripts H and L denote the heavy and light eigenstates, respectively. The two observables are the decay time t and the tag of the final state ψ , which assumes the values ψ = 1 if the final state is f and ψ = -1 if the final state is the CP conjugate ¯ . f The terms Λ + and Λ -are defined as

$$\Lambda _ { \pm } \equiv ( 1 - A _ { P } ) \left | \frac { q } { p } \right | ^ { 1 - \psi } \pm ( 1 + A _ { P } ) \left | \frac { q } { p } \right | ^ { - 1 - \psi },$$

where p and q are complex parameters entering the definition of the two mass eigenstates of the effective Hamiltonian in the B 0 ( s ) system, p B | 0 ( s ) 〉 ± q B | 0 ( s ) 〉 . The symbol A P denotes the production asymmetry of the given B meson, and A f is the detection asymmetry of the final state, defined in terms of the f and ¯ detection efficiencies as f

$$A _ { f } \equiv \frac { \epsilon _ { \bar { f } } - \epsilon _ { f } } { \epsilon _ { \bar { f } } + \epsilon _ { f } }.$$

The direct CP asymmetry A CP is defined as

$$A _ { C P } \equiv \frac { \mathcal { B } \left ( \bar { B } ^ { 0 } _ { ( s ) } \to \bar { f } \right ) - \mathcal { B } \left ( B ^ { 0 } _ { ( s ) } \to f \right ) } { \mathcal { B } \left ( \bar { B } ^ { 0 } _ { ( s ) } \to \bar { f } \right ) + \mathcal { B } \left ( B ^ { 0 } _ { ( s ) } \to f \right ) }.$$

Trigger and event selections lead to distortions in the shapes of the decay time distributions. The signal decay time acceptances are determined from simulated events. For each simulated decay we apply trigger and selection algorithms as in real data.

Concerning the combinatorial and the partially reconstructed backgrounds, empirical parameterizations of the decay time spectra are determined by studying the low and high invariant mass sidebands from data. Partially reconstructed backgrounds are only present in the case of B 0 → D π -+ and B 0 s → D π -s + decays. In the case of B 0 s → D π -s + decays, the additional background component due to B 0 → D π + s -decays is modelled using the same functional form as that of the B 0 s → D π -s + signal, and the value of the production asymmetry is fixed to that obtained from the B 0 → D π -+ fit.

## 4.3 Decay time resolution

The strategy adopted to study the decay time resolution of the detector consists of reconstructing the decay time of fake B candidates formed from a D -decaying to K π π + --and a pion track, both coming from the same PV. The bachelor pion must be selected without introducing biases on the decay time, hence only requirements on momentum and transverse momentum are applied, avoiding the use of impact parameter variables. The decay time distribution of these fake B candidates yields an estimate of the decay time resolution of a real decay. In order to validate the method, simulated events are used for both signals and fake B decays. The resolution is found to be overestimated by about 4 fs. This difference is taken into account as a systematic effect. The simulation also indicates that a dependence of the resolution on the decay time must be considered. Taking this into account, an average decay time resolution of 49 ± 8 fs is estimated. A resolution model, R t ( ), consisting of a triple Gaussian function with zero mean and three different widths, characterized by an average width of 49 fs, is used. The uncertainty of 8 fs on the average width is taken into account as a systematic uncertainty. It is estimated from simulation that the measurement of the decay time is biased by no more than 2 fs, and the effect is accounted for as a systematic uncertainty.

## 5 Determination of the production asymmetries

The production asymmetry for each of the three decay modes is determined by means of a simultaneous fit to the invariant mass and decay time spectra. To account for the dependence of the production asymmetries on the kinematics of the B 0 and B 0 s mesons, each data sample must be divided into bins of ( p T , η ), performing the same fit for each bin.

Table 1: Values of the various physical inputs used in the fits.

| Parameter       | Value               | Reference   |
|-----------------|---------------------|-------------|
| ∆ m d [ps - 1 ] | 0 . 510 ± 0 . 004   | [7]         |
| ∆ m s [ps - 1 ] | 17 . 768 ± 0 . 024  | [19]        |
| Γ d [ps - 1 ]   | 0 . 6583 ± 0 . 0030 | [7]         |
| Γ s [ps - 1 ]   | 0 . 6596 ± 0 . 0046 | [7]         |
| ∆Γ s [ps - 1 ]  | 0 . 081 ± 0 . 011   | [7]         |
| | q/p | B 0     | 0 . 9997 ± 0 . 0013 | [20]        |
| | q/p | B 0 s   | 1 . 0003 ± 0 . 0030 | [21]        |

In order to validate the fit model, a series of fits to the distributions of events obtained from fast simulations is used to verify the accuracy of the central values and the reliability of the uncertainties. No evidence of biases on central values nor of uncertainty misestimations is found. Furthermore, a global fit to the total sample of selected events is performed for each of the three decay modes. The mass differences ∆ m d and ∆ m s , the mixing parameters | q/p | B 0 and | q/p | B 0 s , the average decay widths Γ d and Γ , and the width difference ∆Γ s s are fixed to the central values of the measurements reported in Table 1. The width difference ∆Γ d is fixed to zero.

According to Eq. 3, for small values of A CP and A f , to first order the decay rate is only sensitive to the sum of these two quantities. For this reason, we fix A CP to zero and leave A f as a free parameter in the fits. It is empirically verified that the choice of different A CP values, up to the few percent level, leads to negligible variations of A P , as expected.

Figure 1 shows the J/ψK + π -, K π π π + --+ and K K π π + --+ invariant mass and decay time distributions, with the results of the global fits overlaid. Figure 2 shows the raw asymmetries, defined as the ratios between the difference and the sum of the overall decay time distributions, as a function of decay time for candidates in the signal mass region. The signal yields, A P values and detection asymmetries obtained from the global fits are reported in Table 2. The A P values obtained from the global fits are not well defined physical quantities, because efficiency corrections as a function of p T and η need to be applied. They are reported here for illustrative purposes only.

Figure 3 shows the two-dimensional distributions of ( p T , η ) for B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 , B 0 → D π -+ and B 0 s → D π -s + decays. The background components are subtracted using the sPlot technique [22] and the chosen definition of the various kinematic bins is overlaid. For the two B 0 decays we use a common set of bins, as reported in Table 3, in order to allow a simple combination of the two independent A P measurements. In the case of the B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 , two additional bins at small p T and large η are also defined. An accurate knowledge of the decay time resolution is important for B 0 s → D π -s + decay, due to the fast oscillation of the B 0 s meson. For this reason we determine the decay time resolution using the method previously described, applied to events belonging to each ( p T , η ) bin,

Figure 1: Distributions of (left) invariant mass and (right) decay time for (top) B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 , (middle) B 0 → D π -+ and (bottom) B 0 s → D π -s + decays, with the results of the fit overlaid. The contributions of the various background sources are also shown.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0275v2-figure-ecdc16e6-8577-4ae4-b0b0-9263c6143e7c.jpg)

where a double Gaussian function with zero mean and values of the widths depending on the given bin is used.

Figure 2: Time-dependent raw asymmetries for candidates in the (a) B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 , (b) B 0 → D π -+ and (c) B 0 s → D π -s + signal mass regions with the results of the global fits overlaid. In (c) the asymmetry is obtained by folding the B 0 s and B 0 s decay time distributions into one oscillation period, and the offset t 0 = 0 2 ps corresponds to the selection requirement on the . decay time.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0275v2-figure-3dc879ab-bf81-41be-9d06-4e4ae2e43062.jpg)

Table 2: Values of signal yields, A P , A f and of the correlations ρ A ( P , A f ) obtained from global fits. The smaller value of the correlation in the B 0 s case is due to the much larger mixing frequency of B 0 s mesons.

| Parameter       | B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0        | B 0 → D - π +         | B 0 s → D - s π +     |
|-----------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|
| N sig           | 93 627 ± 360          | 76 682 ± 308          | 16 887 ± 174          |
| A P             | - 0 . 0116 ± 0 . 0063 | - 0 . 0058 ± 0 . 0070 | - 0 . 0032 ± 0 . 0166 |
| A f             | - 0 . 0086 ± 0 . 0046 | - 0 . 0151 ± 0 . 0049 | - 0 . 0110 ± 0 . 0086 |
| ρ ( A P , A f ) | - 0 . 65              | - 0 . 64              | - 0 . 01              |

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0275v2-figure-bd76a7a6-fc55-4821-81cd-d9dac1325a8c.jpg)

T

Figure 3: Distributions of p T and η , where the background components are subtracted using the sPlot technique [22], for (a) B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 , (b) B 0 → D π -+ and (c) B 0 s → D π -s + decays. The definition of the various kinematic bins is superimposed.

## 6 Systematic uncertainties

Several sources of systematic uncertainty that affect the determination of the production asymmetries are considered. For the invariant mass model, the effects of the uncertainty on the shapes of all components (signals, combinatorial and partially reconstructed backgrounds) are investigated. For the decay time model, systematic effects related to the decay time resolution and acceptance are studied. The effects of the uncertainties on the external inputs used in the fits, reported in Table 1, are evaluated by repeating the fits with each parameter varied by ± 1 σ . Alternative parameterizations of the background components are also considered. To estimate the contribution of each single source, we repeat the fit for each ( p T , η ) bin after having modified the baseline fit model. The shifts from the relevant baseline values are taken as the systematic uncertainties. To estimate a systematic uncertainty related to the parameterization of final state radiation effects on the signal mass distributions, the parameter s of Eq. 2 is varied by ± 1 σ of the corresponding value obtained from fits to simulated events. A systematic uncertainty related to the invariant mass resolution model is estimated by repeating the fit using a single Gaussian function. The systematic uncertainty related to the parameterization of the mass shape for the combinatorial background is investigated by replacing the exponential function with a

straight line. Concerning the partially reconstructed background, we assess a systematic uncertainty by repeating the fits while excluding the low mass sideband, i.e. applying the requirements m &gt; 5 20 GeV . /c 2 for the B 0 → D π -+ decays and m &gt; 5 33 GeV . /c 2 for B 0 s → D π -s + decays. To estimate the uncertainty related to the parameterization of signal decay time acceptances, different acceptance functions are considered. Effects of inaccuracies in the knowledge of the decay time resolution are estimated by rescaling the widths of the baseline model to obtain an average resolution width differing by ± 8 fs. Simulation studies also indicate that there is a small bias in the reconstructed decay time. The impact of such a bias is assessed by introducing a corresponding bias of ± 2 fs in the decay time resolution model.

The determination of the systematic uncertainties related to the | q/p | input value needs a special treatment, as A P is correlated with | q/p | . For this reason, any variation of | q/p | turns into the same shift of A P in each of the kinematic bins. Such a correlation is taken into account when averaging A P ( B 0 ) measurements from B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 and B 0 → D π -+ decays, or when integrating over p T and η . The values of the systematic uncertainties related to the knowledge of | q/p | are 0.0013 in the case of A P ( B 0 ) and 0.0030 in the case of A P ( B 0 s ). The dominant systematic uncertainties for the B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 decay are related to the signal mass shape and to | q/p | . For the B 0 → D π -+ decay, the most relevant systematic uncertainties are related to the signal mass shape and to the partially reconstructed background. Systematic uncertainties associated with the decay time resolution and ∆ m s are the main sources for the B 0 s → D π -s + decay.

## 7 Results

The values of A P ( B 0 ) are determined independently for B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 and B 0 → D π -+ decays in each kinematic bin and then averaged. Table 3 reports the final results. The overall bin-by-bin agreement between the two sets of independent A P ( B 0 ) measurements is evaluated by means of a χ 2 test, with a χ 2 = 7 for 14 degrees of freedom. The values of A P ( B 0 s ) determined from the B 0 s → D π -s + fits are reported in Table 4.

The integration over p T and η of the bin-by-bin A P values is performed within the ranges 4 &lt; p T &lt; 30 GeV /c and 2 5 . &lt; η &lt; 4 5. . The integrated value of A P is given by

$$A _ { P } = \frac { \sum _ { i } \frac { N _ { i } } { \varepsilon _ { i } } A _ { P, i } } { \sum _ { i } \frac { N _ { i } } { \varepsilon _ { i } } },$$

where the index i runs over the bins, N i is the number of signal events and ε i is the efficiency, defined as the number of selected events divided by the number of produced events in the i -th bin. The signal yield in each bin can be expressed as

$$N _ { i } = \mathcal { L } \cdot \sigma _ { b \bar { b } } \cdot 2 \cdot f _ { d ( s ) } \cdot \mathcal { B } \cdot f _ { i } \cdot \varepsilon _ { i },$$

where L is the integrated luminosity, σ bb ¯ is the bb ¯ cross section, f d s ( ) is the B 0 ( s ) hadronization fraction, f i is the fraction of B mesons produced in the i -th bin and B is the branching

Table 3: Combined values of A P ( B 0 ) from B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 and B 0 → D π -+ decays, corresponding to the various kinematic bins. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. For completeness, the values obtained either from B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 or B 0 → D π -+ decays are also reported in the last two columns, with statistical uncertainties only. The values of the last two bins are obtained from B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 decays alone.

| p T ( GeV /c )    | η               | A P ( B 0 )                      | A P ( B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 )   | A P ( B 0 → D - π + )   |
|-------------------|-----------------|----------------------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|
| ( 1 . 0 , 4 . 0)  | (4 . 5 , 5 . 2) | 0 . 0016 ± 0 . 0253 ± 0 . 0016   | 0 . 0037 ± 0 . 0260      | - 0 . 0331 ± 0 . 1044   |
| ( 1 . 0 , 4 . 0)  | (3 . 7 , 4 . 5) | - 0 . 0158 ± 0 . 0162 ± 0 . 0015 | - 0 . 0161 ± 0 . 0170    | - 0 . 0130 ± 0 . 0519   |
| ( 2 . 0 , 4 . 0)  | (3 . 0 , 3 . 7) | 0 . 0055 ± 0 . 0254 ± 0 . 0016   | 0 . 0078 ± 0 . 0271      | - 0 . 0114 ± 0 . 0738   |
| ( 4 . 0 , 12 . 0) | (4 . 5 , 4 . 7) | 0 . 0160 ± 0 . 0736 ± 0 . 0067   | - 0 . 0489 ± 0 . 0840    | 0 . 2353 ± 0 . 1529     |
| ( 4 . 0 , 7 . 0)  | (3 . 7 , 4 . 5) | - 0 . 0189 ± 0 . 0158 ± 0 . 0032 | - 0 . 0221 ± 0 . 0184    | - 0 . 0099 ± 0 . 0310   |
| ( 4 . 0 , 7 . 0)  | (3 . 0 , 3 . 7) | - 0 . 0311 ± 0 . 0132 ± 0 . 0014 | - 0 . 0342 ± 0 . 0160    | - 0 . 0245 ± 0 . 0232   |
| ( 4 . 0 , 7 . 0)  | (2 . 5 , 3 . 0) | 0 . 0556 ± 0 . 0254 ± 0 . 0020   | 0 . 0703 ± 0 . 0324      | 0 . 0321 ± 0 . 0408     |
| ( 7 . 0 , 12 . 0) | (3 . 7 , 4 . 5) | - 0 . 0145 ± 0 . 0205 ± 0 . 0027 | - 0 . 0364 ± 0 . 0269    | 0 . 0161 ± 0 . 0316     |
| ( 7 . 0 , 12 . 0) | (3 . 0 , 3 . 7) | - 0 . 0142 ± 0 . 0111 ± 0 . 0015 | - 0 . 0067 ± 0 . 0173    | - 0 . 0196 ± 0 . 0146   |
| ( 7 . 0 , 12 . 0) | (2 . 5 , 3 . 0) | - 0 . 0236 ± 0 . 0138 ± 0 . 0014 | - 0 . 0341 ± 0 . 0228    | - 0 . 0175 ± 0 . 0173   |
| ( 7 . 0 , 12 . 0) | (2 . 2 , 2 . 5) | - 0 . 0190 ± 0 . 0348 ± 0 . 0034 | - 0 . 0397 ± 0 . 0623    | - 0 . 0096 ± 0 . 0420   |
| (12 . 0 , 30 . 0) | (3 . 7 , 4 . 5) | - 0 . 0550 ± 0 . 0473 ± 0 . 0020 | - 0 . 0195 ± 0 . 0649    | - 0 . 0951 ± 0 . 0690   |
| (12 . 0 , 30 . 0) | (3 . 0 , 3 . 7) | 0 . 0067 ± 0 . 0180 ± 0 . 0021   | - 0 . 0193 ± 0 . 0311    | 0 . 0199 ± 0 . 0220     |
| (12 . 0 , 30 . 0) | (2 . 5 , 3 . 0) | 0 . 0177 ± 0 . 0162 ± 0 . 0023   | 0 . 0295 ± 0 . 0314      | 0 . 0134 ± 0 . 0190     |
| (12 . 0 , 30 . 0) | (2 . 0 , 2 . 5) | - 0 . 0018 ± 0 . 0236 ± 0 . 0020 | 0 . 0031 ± 0 . 0485      | - 0 . 0033 ± 0 . 0270   |
| ( 0 . 2 , 1 . 0)  | (4 . 5 , 6 . 0) | - 0 . 0391 ± 0 . 0501 ± 0 . 0016 | - 0 . 0391 ± 0 . 0501    | -                       |
| ( 1 . 0 , 2 . 2)  | (5 . 2 , 6 . 0) | 0 . 0523 ± 0 . 0684 ± 0 . 0025   | 0 . 0523 ± 0 . 0684      | -                       |

Table 4: Values of A P ( B 0 s ) from B 0 s → D π -s + decays, corresponding to the various kinematic bins. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

| p T ( GeV /c   | η               | A P ( B 0 s )                    |
|----------------|-----------------|----------------------------------|
| ( 2 , 4)       | (3 . 0 , 5 . 0) | - 0 . 1475 ± 0 . 0895 ± 0 . 0192 |
| ( 4 , 8)       | (3 . 5 , 4 . 5) | - 0 . 0471 ± 0 . 0513 ± 0 . 0112 |
| ( 4 , 8)       | (2 . 5 , 3 . 5) | 0 . 0376 ± 0 . 0467 ± 0 . 0083   |
| ( 8 , 12)      | (3 . 5 , 4 . 5) | 0 . 0582 ± 0 . 0537 ± 0 . 0053   |
| ( 8 , 12)      | (2 . 5 , 3 . 5) | 0 . 0370 ± 0 . 0332 ± 0 . 0051   |
| (12 , 30)      | (3 . 5 , 4 . 5) | - 0 . 0339 ± 0 . 0750 ± 0 . 0095 |
| (12 , 30)      | (2 . 5 , 3 . 5) | - 0 . 0333 ± 0 . 0309 ± 0 . 0040 |
| ( 8 , 30)      | (2 . 2 , 2 . 5) | - 0 . 0351 ± 0 . 0485 ± 0 . 0059 |

fraction of the B decay. By substituting N /ε i i from Eq. 8 into Eq. 7, the integrated value of A P becomes

$$A _ { P } = \sum _ { i } \omega _ { i } A _ { P, i } \,,$$

where ω i = f / i ∑ i f i . The values of ω i are determined using simulated events. The

Table 5: Values of ω i determined from simulation and ω data i extracted from data using B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 decays in two different binning schemes. The ω i values and the difference between ω i and ω data i values are used to determine the integrated results and to evaluate the related systematic uncertainties, respectively.

| p T ( GeV /c )   | η               | ω i                 | ω data i            |
|------------------|-----------------|---------------------|---------------------|
| ( 4 , 7)         | (3 . 7 , 4 . 5) | 0 . 1698 ± 0 . 0008 | 0 . 1946 ± 0 . 0025 |
| ( 4 , 7)         | (3 . 0 , 3 . 7) | 0 . 2432 ± 0 . 0009 | 0 . 2396 ± 0 . 0036 |
| ( 4 , 7)         | (2 . 5 , 3 . 0) | 0 . 2222 ± 0 . 0009 | 0 . 1976 ± 0 . 0051 |
| ( 7 , 12)        | (3 . 7 , 4 . 5) | 0 . 0662 ± 0 . 0006 | 0 . 0789 ± 0 . 0016 |
| ( 7 , 12)        | (3 . 0 , 3 . 7) | 0 . 1129 ± 0 . 0007 | 0 . 1129 ± 0 . 0045 |
| ( 7 , 12)        | (2 . 5 , 3 . 0) | 0 . 1150 ± 0 . 0007 | 0 . 1002 ± 0 . 0019 |
| (12 , 30)        | (3 . 7 , 4 . 5) | 0 . 0113 ± 0 . 0003 | 0 . 0160 ± 0 . 0007 |
| (12 , 30)        | (3 . 0 , 3 . 7) | 0 . 0276 ± 0 . 0004 | 0 . 0307 ± 0 . 0028 |
| (12 , 30)        | (2 . 5 , 3 . 0) | 0 . 0318 ± 0 . 0004 | 0 . 0296 ± 0 . 0025 |
| ( 4 , 8)         | (3 . 5 , 4 . 5) | 0 . 2667 ± 0 . 0009 | 0 . 3064 ± 0 . 0020 |
| ( 4 , 8)         | (2 . 5 , 3 . 5) | 0 . 4766 ± 0 . 0009 | 0 . 4644 ± 0 . 0030 |
| ( 8 , 12)        | (3 . 5 , 4 . 5) | 0 . 0564 ± 0 . 0005 | 0 . 0640 ± 0 . 0015 |
| ( 8 , 12)        | (2 . 5 , 3 . 5) | 0 . 1295 ± 0 . 0008 | 0 . 0873 ± 0 . 0019 |
| (12 , 30)        | (3 . 5 , 4 . 5) | 0 . 0175 ± 0 . 0003 | 0 . 0238 ± 0 . 0008 |
| (12 , 30)        | (2 . 5 , 3 . 5) | 0 . 0532 ± 0 . 0005 | 0 . 0541 ± 0 . 0027 |

difference between the values of ω i predicted by Pythia for B 0 and B 0 s mesons is found to be negligible, if the same bins in p T and η would be used. These values are also extracted from data using B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 decays. In this case ω data i is measured as

$$\omega _ { i } ^ { \text{data} } = \frac { N _ { i } } { \varepsilon _ { i } ^ { \text{rec} } } \, / \, \sum _ { j } \frac { N _ { j } } { \varepsilon _ { j } ^ { \text{rec} } },$$

where N i is the yield in the i -th bin and ε rec i is total reconstruction efficiency. The values of ε rec i are determined using both simulated events and data control samples. The values of ω i and ω data i , summarized in Table 5, exhibit systematic differences at the 10% level. The difference in the central value between A P ( B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 ) calculated using either ω i or ω data i is found to be 0.0024 using the B 0 binning scheme, and 0.0034 using the B 0 s binning scheme. These values are assigned as systematic uncertainties for A P ( B 0 ) and A P ( B 0 s ). Table 6 summarizes the systematic uncertainties associated with the integrated measurements. In the first row, the combined systematic uncertainties estimated in each bin, as described in the previous section, are reported.

Using Eq. 9, the integrated measurements of A P ( B 0 ) for B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 and B 0 → D π -+ decays are found to be

$$\dots$$

$$A _ { P } ( B ^ { 0 } \to J / \psi K ^ { * 0 } ) & = \ - 0. 0 0 3 3 \pm 0. 0 0 9 6 \, ( \text{stat} ) \pm 0. 0 0 2 8 \, ( \text{syst} ), \\ A _ { P } ( B ^ { 0 } \to D ^ { - } \pi ^ { + } ) & = \ - 0. 0 0 3 8 \pm 0. 0 1 2 4 \, ( \text{stat} ) \pm 0. 0 0 2 9 \, ( \text{syst} ),$$

Table 6: Absolute values of systematic uncertainties. The total systematic uncertainties are obtained by summing the individual contributions in quadrature.

| Source                                             | Uncertainty   | Uncertainty   |
|----------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
|                                                    | A P ( B 0 )   | A P ( B 0 s ) |
| Combined systematic uncertainties from bin studies | 0.0004        | 0.0048        |
| Uncertainty on | q/p |                             | 0.0013        | 0.0030        |
| Difference between ω i and ω data i                | 0.0024        | 0.0034        |
| Total                                              | 0.0028        | 0.0066        |

which lead to the average

$$A _ { P } ( B ^ { 0 } ) = - 0. 0 0 3 5 \pm 0. 0 0 7 6 \, ( \text{stat} ) \pm 0. 0 0 2 8 \, ( \text{syst} ).$$

The integrated value of A P ( B 0 s ) is

$$A _ { \text{P} } ( B _ { s } ^ { 0 } ) = \ 0. 0 1 0 9 \pm 0. 0 2 6 1 \, ( \text{stat} ) \pm 0. 0 0 6 6 \, ( \text{syst} ).$$

Finally, the dependencies of A P ( B 0 ) and A P ( B 0 s ) on p T , obtained by integrating over η , and on η , obtained by integrating over p T , are shown in Fig. 4. The corresponding numerical values are reported in Tables 7 and 8.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0275v2-figure-6bf04b68-f1e4-4d91-bd6e-0e82cdaa05a2.jpg)

T

Figure 4: Dependence of (top) A P ( B 0 ) and (bottom) A P ( B 0 s ) on (left) p T and (right) η . The error bars include both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Table 7: Values of the production asymmetry A P ( B 0 ) in bins of p T and η from B 0 → J/ψK ∗ 0 and B 0 → D π -+ decays. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

| Variable      | Bin                | A P ( B 0 )                                                         |
|---------------|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| p T (GeV /c ) | ( 4 , 7) ( 7 , 12) | 0 . 0033 ± 0 . 0111 ± 0 . 0028 - 0 . 0167 ± 0 . 0084 ± 0 . 0028 ± ± |
| p T (GeV /c ) | (12 ,              | 0 . 0001 0 . 0130 0 . 0029                                          |
| p T (GeV /c ) | 30)                |                                                                     |
| η             | (2 . 5 , 3 . 0)    | 0 . 0264 ± 0 . 0161 ± 0 . 0030                                      |
| η             | (3 . 0 , 3 . 7)    | - 0 . 0232 ± 0 . 0093 ± 0 . 0028                                    |
| η             | (3 . 7 , 4 . 5)    | - 0 . 0203 ± 0 . 0125 ± 0 . 0021                                    |

Table 8: Values of the production asymmetry A P ( B 0 s ) in bins of p T and η from B 0 s → D π -s + decays. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

| Variable      | Bin                | A P ( B 0 s )                                                 |
|---------------|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| p T (GeV /c ) | ( 4 , 8) ( 8 , 12) | 0 . 0069 ± 0 . 0351 ± 0 . 0067 0 . 0435 ± 0 . 0283 ± 0 . 0039 |
| p T (GeV /c ) | (12 , 30)          | - 0 . 0334 ± 0 . 0296 ± 0 . 0038                              |
| η             | (2.5, 3.5)         | 0 . 0315 ± 0 . 0342 ± 0 . 0060 0 . 0286 ± 0 . 0412 ± 0 .      |
| η             | (3.5, 4.5)         | - 0088                                                        |

## 8 Conclusions

The production asymmetries of B 0 and B 0 s mesons have been measured in pp collisions at √ s = 7 TeV within the acceptance of the LHCb detector, using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb -1 . The measurements have been performed in bins of p T and η , and provide constraints that can be used to test different models of B -meson production. Furthermore, once integrated using appropriate weights for any reconstructed B 0 ( s ) decay mode, they can be used to derive effective production asymmetries, as inputs for CP violation measurements with the LHCb detector.

The values of the production asymmetries integrated in the ranges 4 &lt; p T &lt; 30 GeV /c and 2 5 . &lt; η &lt; 4 5 have been determined to be .

$$A _ { \text{P} } ( B ^ { 0 } ) = ( - 0. 3 5 \pm 0. 7 6 \pm 0. 2 8 ) \%,$$

$$A _ { \text{P} } ( B _ { s } ^ { 0 } ) = ( \ 1. 0 9 \pm 2. 6 1 \pm 0. 6 6 ) \%,$$

$$\begin{matrix} \cdot \\ \cdot \end{matrix}$$

where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. No clear evidence of dependences on the values of p T and η has been observed.

## 9 Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments for the excellent performance of the LHC. We thank the technical and administrative staff at the LHCb institutes. We acknowledge support from CERN and from the national agencies: CAPES, CNPq, FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil); NSFC (China); CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG, HGF and MPG (Germany); SFI (Ireland); INFN (Italy); FOM and NWO (The Netherlands); MNiSW and NCN (Poland); MEN/IFA (Romania); MinES and FANO (Russia); MinECo (Spain); SNSF and SER (Switzerland); NASU (Ukraine); STFC (United Kingdom); NSF (USA). The Tier1 computing centres are supported by IN2P3 (France), KIT and BMBF (Germany), INFN (Italy), NWO and SURF (The Netherlands), PIC (Spain), GridPP (United Kingdom). We are indebted to the communities behind the multiple open source software packages on which we depend. We are also thankful for the computing resources and the access to software R&amp;D tools provided by Yandex LLC (Russia). Individual groups or members have received support from EPLANET, Marie Skglyph[suppress]odowska-Curie l Actions and ERC (European Union), Conseil g´ en´ral de Haute-Savoie, e Labex ENIGMASS and OCEVU, R´ egion Auvergne (France), RFBR (Russia), XuntaGal and GENCAT (Spain), Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851 (United Kingdom).

## References

- [1] M. Chaichian and A. Fridman, On a possibility for measuring effects of CP violation at pp colliders , Phys. Lett. B298 (1993) 218.
- [2] E. Norrbin and R. Vogt, Bottom production asymmetries at the LHC , arXiv:hep-ph/0003056 .
- [3] E. Norrbin and T. Sj¨strand, o Production and hadronization of heavy quarks , Eur. Phys. J. C17 (2000) 137, arXiv:hep-ph/0005110 .
- [4] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al. , Measurement of the D ± production asymmetry in 7 TeV pp collisions , Phys. Lett. B718 (2013) 902, arXiv:1210.4112 .
- [5] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al. , Measurement of the D + s -D -s production asymmetry in 7 TeV pp collisions , Phys. Lett. B713 (2012) 186, arXiv:1205.0897 .
- [6] LHCb collaboration, A. A. Alves Jr. et al. , The LHCb detector at the LHC , JINST 3 (2008) S08005.
- [7] Particle Data Group, J. Beringer et al. , Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 010001, and 2013 partial update for the 2014 edition.
- [8] V. V. Gligorov and M. Williams, Efficient, reliable and fast high-level triggering using a bonsai boosted decision tree , JINST 8 (2013) P02013, arXiv:1210.6861 .

| [9]   | T. Sj¨strand, o S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual , JHEP 05 (2006) 026, arXiv:hep-ph/0603175 .                                                                                                                      |
|-------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [10]  | I. Belyaev et al. , Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss , the LHCb simulation framework , Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC) IEEE (2010) 1155.                                                       |
| [11]  | GEANT4 collaboration, J. Allison et al. , Geant4 developments and applications , IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270; GEANT4 collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al. , GEANT4: A simulation toolkit , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250. |
| [12]  | M. Clemencic et al. , The LHCb simulation application, Gauss : design, evolution and experience , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032023.                                                                                                  |
| [13]  | W. D. Hulsbergen, Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A552 (2005) 566, arXiv:physics/0503191 .                                                                                                                |
| [14]  | L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone, Classification and regression trees , Wadsworth international group, Belmont, California, USA, 1984.                                                                           |
| [15]  | R. E. Schapire and Y. Freund, A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , Jour. Comp. and Syst. Sc. 55 (1997) 119.                                                                           |
| [16]  | K. S. Cranmer, Kernel estimation in high-energy physics , Comput. Phys. Commun. 136 (2001) 198, arXiv:hep-ex/0011057 .                                                                                                                    |
| [17]  | LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al. , Measurement of the fragmentation fraction ratio f s /f d and its dependence on B meson kinematics , JHEP 04 (2013) 001, arXiv:1301.5286 .                                                            |
| [18]  | LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al. , Measurement of b hadron production fractions in 7 TeV pp collisions , Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 032008, arXiv:1111.2357 .                                                                                |
| [19]  | LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al. , Precision measurement of the B 0 s - ¯ B 0 s oscil- lation frequency with the decay B 0 s → D - s π + , New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 053021, arXiv:1304.4741 .                                             |
| [20]  | Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, Y. Amhis et al. , Averages of b -hadron, c -hadron, and τ -lepton properties as of early 2012 , arXiv:1207.1158 , update available online at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag .                       |
| [21]  | LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al. , Measurement of the flavour-specific CP -violating asymmetry a s sl in B 0 s decays , Phys. Lett. B728 (2014) 607, arXiv:1308.1048 .                                                                  |
| [22]  | M. Pivk and F. R. Le Diberder, sPlot: a statistical tool to unfold data distributions , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A555 (2005) 356, arXiv:physics/0402083 .                                                                                     |

## LHCb collaboration

| R. Aaij 41 , B. Adeva 37 , M. Adinolfi 46 , A. Affolder 52 , Z. Ajaltouni 5 , S. Akar 6 , J. Albrecht 9 , F. Alessio 38 , M. Alexander 51 , S. Ali 41 , G. Alkhazov 30 , P. Alvarez Cartelle 37 , A.A. Alves Jr 25 , 38 S. Amato 2 , S. Amerio 22 , Y. Amhis 7 , L. An 3 , L. Anderlini 17 ,g , J. Anderson 40 , R. Andreassen 57 , M. Andreotti 16 ,f , J.E. Andrews 58 , R.B. Appleby 54 , O. Aquines Gutierrez 10 , F. Archilli 38 , A. Artamonov 35 , M. Artuso 59 , E. Aslanides 6 , G. Auriemma 25 ,n , M. Baalouch 5 , S. Bachmann 11 J.J. Back 48 , A. Badalov 36 , W. Baldini 16 , R.J. Barlow 54 , C. Barschel 38 , S. Barsuk 7 , W. Barter 47 V. Batozskaya 28 , V. Battista 39 , A. Bay 39 , L. Beaucourt 4 , J. Beddow 51 , F. Bedeschi 23 , I. Bediaga 1 , S. Belogurov 31 , K. Belous 35 , I. Belyaev 31 , E. Ben-Haim 8 , G. Bencivenni 18 , S. Benson 38 , J. Benton 46 , A. Berezhnoy 32 , R. Bernet 40 , M.-O. Bettler 47 , M. van Beuzekom 41 , A. Bien 11 , S. Bifani 45 , T. Bird 54 , A. Bizzeti 17 ,i , P.M. Bjørnstad 54 , T. Blake 48 , F. Blanc 39 , J. Blouw 10 , S. Blusk 59 , V. Bocci 25 , A. Bondar 34 , N. Bondar 30 , 38 , W. Bonivento 15 , 38 , S. Borghi A. Borgia 59 , M. Borsato 7 , T.J.V. Bowcock 52 , E. Bowen 40 , C. Bozzi 16 , T. Brambach 9 , J. van den Brand 42 , J. Bressieux 39 , D. Brett 54 , M. Britsch 10 , T. Britton 59 , J. Brodzicka 54 , N.H. Brook 46 , H. Brown 52 , A. Bursche 40 , G. Busetto 22 ,r , J. Buytaert 38 , S. Cadeddu 15 , R. Calabrese 16 ,f , M. Calvi 20 ,k , M. Calvo Gomez 36 ,p , P. Campana 18 , 38 , D. Campora Perez 38 , A. Carbone 14 ,d , G. Carboni 24 ,l , R. Cardinale 19 , 38 ,j , A. Cardini 15 , L. Carson 50 , K. Carvalho Akiba 2 , G. Casse 52 , L. Cassina 20 , L. Castillo Garcia 38 , M. Cattaneo 38 , Ch. Cauet R. Cenci 58 , M. Charles 8 , Ph. Charpentier 38 , M. Chefdeville 4 , S. Chen 54 , S.-F. Cheung 55 , N. Chiapolini 40 , M. Chrzaszcz 40 , 26 , K. Ciba 38 , X. Cid Vidal 38 , G. Ciezarek 53 , P.E.L. Clarke 50 , M. Clemencic 38 , H.V. Cliff 47 , J. Closier 38 , V. Coco 38 , J. Cogan 6 , E. Cogneras 5 , L. Cojocariu P. Collins 38 , A. Comerma-Montells 11 , A. Contu 15 , A. Cook 46 , M. Coombes 46 , S. Coquereau 8 , G. Corti 38 , M. Corvo 16 ,f , I. Counts 56 , B. Couturier 38 , G.A. Cowan 50 , D.C. Craik 48 , M. Cruz Torres 60 , S. Cunliffe 53 , R. Currie 50 , C. D'Ambrosio 38 , J. Dalseno 46 , P. David 8 , P.N.Y. David 41 , A. Davis 57 , K. De Bruyn 41 , S. De Capua 54 , M. De Cian 11 , J.M. De Miranda 1   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 54 9 29 , L. De Paula 2 , W. De Silva 57 , P. De Simone 18 , D. Decamp 4 , M. Deckenhoff 9 , L. Del Buono 8 , N. D´l´age e e 4 , D. Derkach 55 , O. Deschamps 5 , F. Dettori 38 , A. Di Canto 38 , H. Dijkstra 38 , S. Donleavy 52 , F. Dordei 11 , M. Dorigo 39 , A. Dosil Su´rez a 37 , D. Dossett 48 , A. Dovbnya 43 , K. Dreimanis 52 , G. Dujany 54 , F. Dupertuis 39 , P. Durante 38 , R. Dzhelyadin 35 , A. Dziurda 26 , A. Dzyuba 30 , S. Easo 49 , 38 , U. Egede 53 , V. Egorychev 31 , S. Eidelman 34 , S. Eisenhardt 50 , U. Eitschberger 9 , R. Ekelhof 9 , L. Eklund 51 , I. El Rifai 5 , Ch. Elsasser 40 , S. Ely 59 , S. Esen 11 , H.-M. Evans 47 , T. Evans 55 , A. Falabella 14 , C. F¨rber a 11 , C. Farinelli 41 , N. Farley 45 , S. Farry 52 ,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |

- J. He 38 , T. Head 38 , V. Heijne 41 , K. Hennessy 52 , P. Henrard , L. Henry , 5 8
- J.A. Hernando Morata 37 , E. van Herwijnen 38 , M. Heß 62 , A. Hicheur , D. Hill 1 55 , M. Hoballah , 5
- C. Hombach 54 , W. Hulsbergen 41 , P. Hunt 55 , N. Hussain 55 , D. Hutchcroft 52 , D. Hynds 51 ,
- M. Idzik 27 , P. Ilten 56 , R. Jacobsson 38 , A. Jaeger 11 , J. Jalocha 55 , E. Jans 41 , P. Jaton 39 ,
- A. Jawahery 58 , F. Jing , M. John 3 55 , D. Johnson 55 , C.R. Jones 47 , C. Joram 38 , B. Jost 38 ,
- N. Jurik 59 , M. Kaballo , S. Kandybei 9 43 , W. Kanso , M. Karacson 6 38 , T.M. Karbach 38 ,
- S. Karodia 51 , M. Kelsey 59 , I.R. Kenyon 45 , T. Ketel 42 , B. Khanji 20 , C. Khurewathanakul 39 ,
- S. Klaver 54 , K. Klimaszewski 28 , O. Kochebina , M. Kolpin 7 11 , I. Komarov 39 , R.F. Koopman 42 ,
- P. Koppenburg 41 38 , , M. Korolev 32 , A. Kozlinskiy 41 , L. Kravchuk 33 , K. Kreplin 11 , M. Kreps 48 ,
- G. Krocker 11 , P. Krokovny 34 , F. Kruse , W. Kucewicz 9 26 ,o , M. Kucharczyk 20 26 38 , , ,k ,
- V. Kudryavtsev 34 , K. Kurek 28 , T. Kvaratskheliya 31 , V.N. La Thi 39 , D. Lacarrere 38 ,
- G. Lafferty 54 , A. Lai 15 , D. Lambert 50 , R.W. Lambert 42 , G. Lanfranchi 18 , C. Langenbruch 48 ,
- B. Langhans 38 , T. Latham 48 , C. Lazzeroni 45 , R. Le Gac , J. van Leerdam 6 41 , J.-P. Lees 4 ,
- R. Lef`vre , A. Leflat e 5 32 , J. Lefran¸ois c 7 , S. Leo 23 , O. Leroy , T. Lesiak 6 26 , B. Leverington 11 ,
- Y. Li , T. Likhomanenko 3 63 , M. Liles 52 , R. Lindner 38 , C. Linn 38 , F. Lionetto 40 , B. Liu 15 ,

38

S. Lohn

,

I.

Longstaff

51

,

J.H. Lopes , N. Lopez-March

2

39

,

P. Lowdon

40

,

H. Lu , D. Lucchesi

3

22

,r

,

- H. Luo 50 , A. Lupato 22 , E. Luppi 16 ,f , O. Lupton 55 , F. Machefert , I.V. Machikhiliyan 7 31 ,
- F. Maciuc 29 , O. Maev 30 , S. Malde 55 , A. Malinin 63 , G. Manca 15 ,e , G. Mancinelli , A. Mapelli 6 38 ,
- J. Maratas , J.F. Marchand , U. Marconi 5 4 14 , C. Marin Benito 36 , P. Marino 23 ,t , R. M¨ arki 39 ,
- J. Marks 11 , G. Martellotti 25 , A. Martens , A. Mart´ ın S´nchez , M. Martinelli 8 a 7 39 ,
- D. Martinez Santos , F. Martinez Vidal , D. Martins Tostes , A. Massafferri , R. Matev
- Z. Mathe 38 , C. Matteuzzi 20 , A. Mazurov 16 ,f , M. McCann 53 , J. McCarthy 45 , A. McNab 54 ,
- R. McNulty 12 , B. McSkelly 52 , B. Meadows 57 , F. Meier , M. Meissner 9 11 , M. Merk 41
- 42 64 2 1 38 , ,
- D.A. Milanes , M.-N. Minard , N. Moggi 8 4 14 , J. Molina Rodriguez 60 , S. Monteil , M. Morandin 5 22 ,
- P. Morawski 27 , A. Mord` a 6 , M.J. Morello 23 ,t , J. Moron 27 , A.-B. Morris 50 , R. Mountain 59 ,
- F. Muheim 50 , K. M¨ uller 40 , M. Mussini 14 , B. Muster 39 , P. Naik 46 , T. Nakada 39 ,
- R. Nandakumar 49 , I. Nasteva , M. Needham 2 50 , N. Neri 21 , S. Neubert 38 , N. Neufeld 38 ,
- M. Neuner 11 , A.D. Nguyen 39 , T.D. Nguyen 39 , C. Nguyen-Mau 39 ,q , M. Nicol , V. Niess , 7 5 R. Niet , N. Nikitin 9 32 , T. Nikodem 11 , A. Novoselov 35 , D.P. O'Hanlon 48 ,
- A. Oblakowska-Mucha 27 , V. Obraztsov 35 , S. Oggero 41 , S. Ogilvy 51 , O. Okhrimenko 44 ,
- R. Oldeman 15 ,e , G. Onderwater 65 , M. Orlandea 29 , J.M. Otalora Goicochea , P. Owen 2 53 ,
- A. Oyanguren 64 , B.K. Pal 59 , A. Palano 13 ,c , F. Palombo 21 ,u , M. Palutan 18 , J. Panman 38 ,
- A. Papanestis 49 38 , , M. Pappagallo 51 , L.L. Pappalardo 16 ,f , C. Parkes 54 , C.J. Parkinson 9 45 , ,
- G. Passaleva 17 , G.D. Patel 52 , M. Patel 53 , C. Patrignani 19 ,j , A. Pazos Alvarez 37 , A. Pearce 54 ,
- A. Pellegrino 41 , M. Pepe Altarelli 38 , S. Perazzini 14 ,d , E. Perez Trigo 37 , P. Perret , 5
- M. Perrin-Terrin , L. Pescatore 6 45 , E. Pesen 66 , K. Petridis 53 , A. Petrolini 19 ,j ,
- E. Picatoste Olloqui 36 , B. Pietrzyk , T. Pilaˇ 4 r 48 , D. Pinci 25 , A. Pistone 19 , S. Playfer 50 ,
- M. Plo Casasus 37 , F. Polci 8 , A. Poluektov 48 34 , , E. Polycarpo , A. Popov 2 35 , D. Popov 10 ,
- B. Popovici 29 , C. Potterat , E. Price 2 46 , J. Prisciandaro 39 , A. Pritchard 52 , C. Prouve 46 ,
- V. Pugatch 44 , A. Puig Navarro 39 , G. Punzi 23 ,s , W. Qian , B. Rachwal 4 26 , J.H. Rademacker 46 ,
- B. Rakotomiaramanana 39 , M. Rama 18 , M.S. Rangel , I. Raniuk 2 43 , N. Rauschmayr 38 ,
- G. Raven 42 , S. Reichert 54 , M.M. Reid 48 , A.C. dos Reis , S. Ricciardi 1 49 , S. Richards 46 , M. Rihl 38 ,
- K. Rinnert 52 , V. Rives Molina 36 , D.A. Roa Romero , P. Robbe , A.B. Rodrigues , 5 7 1
- E. Rodrigues 54 , P. Rodriguez Perez 54 , S. Roiser 38 , V. Romanovsky 35 , A. Romero Vidal 37 ,
- M. Rotondo 22 , J. Rouvinet 39 , T. Ruf 38 , H. Ruiz 36 , P. Ruiz Valls 64 , J.J. Saborido Silva 37 ,
- N. Sagidova 30 , P. Sail 51 , B. Saitta 15 ,e , V. Salustino Guimaraes , C. Sanchez Mayordomo 2 64 ,

B. Sanmartin Sedes 37 , R. Santacesaria 25 , C. Santamarina Rios 37 , E. Santovetti 24 ,l , A. Sarti 18 ,m , C. Satriano 25 ,n , A. Satta 24 , D.M. Saunders 46 , M. Savrie 16 ,f , D. Savrina 31 32 , , M. Schiller 42 , H. Schindler 38 , M. Schlupp , M. Schmelling 9 10 , B. Schmidt 38 , O. Schneider 39 , A. Schopper 38 , M.-H. Schune , R. Schwemmer 7 38 , B. Sciascia 18 , A. Sciubba 25 , M. Seco 37 , A. Semennikov 31 , I. Sepp 53 , N. Serra 40 , J. Serrano , L. Sestini 6 22 , P. Seyfert 11 , M. Shapkin 35 , I. Shapoval 16 43 , ,f , Y. Shcheglov 30 , T. Shears 52 , L. Shekhtman 34 , V. Shevchenko 63 , A. Shires , R. Silva Coutinho 9 48 , G. Simi 22 , M. Sirendi 47 , N. Skidmore 46 , T. Skwarnicki 59 , N.A. Smith 52 , E. Smith 55 49 , , E. Smith 53 , J. Smith 47 , M. Smith 54 , H. Snoek 41 , M.D. Sokoloff 57 , F.J.P. Soler 51 , F. Soomro 39 , D. Souza 46 , B. Souza De Paula , B. Spaan , A. Sparkes 2 9 50 , P. Spradlin 51 , S. Sridharan 38 , F. Stagni 38 , M. Stahl 11 , S. Stahl 11 , O. Steinkamp 40 , O. Stenyakin 35 , S. Stevenson 55 , S. Stoica 29 , S. Stone 59 , B. Storaci 40 , S. Stracka 23 38 , , M. Straticiuc 29 , U. Straumann 40 , R. Stroili 22 , V.K. Subbiah 38 , L. Sun 57 , W. Sutcliffe 53 , K. Swientek 27 , S. Swientek , V. Syropoulos 9 42 , M. Szczekowski 28 , P. Szczypka 39 38 , , D. Szilard , T. Szumlak 2 27 , S. T'Jampens , M. Teklishyn , 4 7 G. Tellarini 16 ,f , F. Teubert 38 , C. Thomas 55 , E. Thomas 38 , J. van Tilburg 41 , V. Tisserand , 4 M. Tobin 39 , S. Tolk 42 , L. Tomassetti 16 ,f , D. Tonelli 38 , S. Topp-Joergensen 55 , N. Torr 55 , E. Tournefier , S. Tourneur 4 39 , M.T. Tran 39 , M. Tresch 40 , A. Tsaregorodtsev , P. Tsopelas 6 41 , N. Tuning 41 , M. Ubeda Garcia 38 , A. Ukleja 28 , A. Ustyuzhanin 63 , U. Uwer 11 , V. Vagnoni 14 , G. Valenti 14 , A. Vallier 7 , R. Vazquez Gomez 18 , P. Vazquez Regueiro 37 , C. V´ azquez Sierra 37 , S. Vecchi 16 , J.J. Velthuis 46 , M. Veltri 17 ,h , G. Veneziano 39 , M. Vesterinen 11 , B. Viaud , 7 D. Vieira , M. Vieites Diaz 2 37 , X. Vilasis-Cardona 36 ,p , A. Vollhardt 40 , D. Volyanskyy 10 , D. Voong 46 , A. Vorobyev 30 , V. Vorobyev 34 , C. Voß 62 , H. Voss 10 , J.A. de Vries 41 , R. Waldi 62 , C. Wallace 48 , R. Wallace 12 , J. Walsh 23 , S. Wandernoth 11 , J. Wang 59 , D.R. Ward 47 , N.K. Watson 45 , D. Websdale 53 , M. Whitehead 48 , J. Wicht 38 , D. Wiedner 11 , G. Wilkinson 55 , M.P. Williams 45 , M. Williams 56 , F.F. Wilson 49 , J. Wimberley 58 , J. Wishahi , W. Wislicki 9 28 , M. Witek 26 , G. Wormser , S.A. Wotton 7 47 , S. Wright 47 , S. Wu , K. Wyllie 3 38 , Y. Xie 61 , Z. Xing 59 , Z. Xu 39 , Z. Yang , X. Yuan , O. Yushchenko 3 3 35 , M. Zangoli 14 , M. Zavertyaev 10 ,b , L. Zhang 59 , W.C. Zhang 12 , Y. Zhang , A. Zhelezov 3 11 , A. Zhokhov 31 , L. Zhong , A. Zvyagin 3 38 .

1 Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas F´ ısicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

2 Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

3 Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

4 LAPP, Universit´ e de Savoie, CNRS/IN2P3, Annecy-Le-Vieux, France

- 5 Clermont Universit´, Universit´ Blaise Pascal, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France e e 6
- CPPM, Aix-Marseille Universit´, CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille, France e
- 7 LAL, Universit´ Paris-Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France e
- 8 LPNHE, Universit´ e Pierre et Marie Curie, Universit´ Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France e
- 9 Fakult¨t Physik, Technische Universit¨t Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany a a
- 10 Max-Planck-Institut f¨r Kernphysik (MPIK), Heidelberg, Germany u
- 11 Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universit¨t Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany a

12 School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

13 Sezione INFN di Bari, Bari, Italy

14 Sezione INFN di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

- 15 Sezione INFN di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

16 Sezione INFN di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

17 Sezione INFN di Firenze, Firenze, Italy

- 18 Laboratori Nazionali dell'INFN di Frascati, Frascati, Italy

19 Sezione INFN di Genova, Genova, Italy

- 20 Sezione INFN di Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy

21 Sezione INFN di Milano, Milano, Italy

- 22 Sezione INFN di Padova, Padova, Italy
- 23 Sezione INFN di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- 24 Sezione INFN di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
- 25 Sezione INFN di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
- 26 Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krak´w, Poland o
- 27 AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Krak´ ow, Poland
- 28 National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
- 29 Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
- 30 Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI), Gatchina, Russia
- 31 Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP), Moscow, Russia
- 32 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University (SINP MSU), Moscow, Russia
- 33 Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAN), Moscow, Russia
- 34 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS) and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia
- 35
- Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Russia
- 36 Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- 37 Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- 38 European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
- 39 Ecole Polytechnique F´d´rale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland e e
- 40 Physik-Institut, Universit¨t Z¨rich, Z¨rich, Switzerland a u u
- 41 Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 42 Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 43 NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT), Kharkiv, Ukraine
- 44 Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine
- 45 University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- 46 H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- 47 Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 48 Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
- 49 STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
- 50 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- 51 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- 52 Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 53 Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- 54 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- 55 Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- 56 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
- 57 University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
- 58 University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
- 59 Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States
- 60 Pontif´ ıcia Universidade Cat´lica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, associated to o 2
- 61 Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, associated to 3
- 62 Institut f¨r Physik, Universit¨t Rostock, Rostock, Germany, associated to u a
- 11
- 63 National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia, associated to 31
- 64 Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular (IFIC), Universitat de Valencia-CSIC, Valencia, Spain, associated to 36
- 65 KVI - University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, associated to 41
- 66 Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey, associated to 38

a Universidade Federal do Triˆngulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba-MG, Brazil a

- b P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS), Moscow, Russia

c Universit` di Bari, Bari, Italy a

d Universit` di Bologna, Bologna, Italy a

- e Universit` di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy a
- f Universit` di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy a
- g Universit` di Firenze, Firenze, Italy a

h Universit` di Urbino, Urbino, Italy a

- i Universit` di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy a
- j Universit` di Genova, Genova, Italy a
- k Universit` di Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy a
- l Universit` di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy a
- m Universit` di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy a
- n Universit` della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy a
- o AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science, Electronics and Telecommunications, Krak´w, Poland o
- p LIFAELS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
- q Hanoi University of Science, Hanoi, Viet Nam

r Universit` di Padova, Padova, Italy a

s Universit` di Pisa, Pisa, Italy a

t Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy

- u Universit` degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy a

v Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
LHCb collaboration R. Aaij B. Adeva M. Adinolfi A. Affolder Z. Ajaltouni S. Akar J. Albrecht F. Alessio M. Alexander S. Ali G. Alkhazov P. Alvarez Cartelle A. A. Alves Jr S. Amato S. Amerio Y. Amhis L. An L. Anderlini J. Anderson R. Andreassen M. Andreotti J. E. Andrews R. B. Appleby O. Aquines Gutierrez F. Archilli A. Artamonov M. Artuso E. Aslanides G. Auriemma M. Baalouch S. Bachmann J. J. Back A. Badalov W. Baldini R. J. Barlow C. Barschel S. Barsuk W. Barter V. Batozskaya V. Battista A. Bay L. Beaucourt J. Beddow F. Bedeschi I. Bediaga S. Belogurov K. Belous I. Belyaev E. Ben-Haim G. Bencivenni S. Benson J. Benton A. Berezhnoy R. Bernet M. -O. Bettler M. van Beuzekom A. Bien S. Bifani T. Bird A. Bizzeti P. M. Bjørnstad T. Blake F. Blanc J. Blouw S. Blusk V. Bocci A. Bondar N. Bondar W. Bonivento S. Borghi A. Borgia M. Borsato T. J. V. Bowcock E. Bowen C. Bozzi T. Brambach J. van den Brand J. Bressieux D. Brett M. Britsch T. Britton J. Brodzicka N. H. Brook H. Brown A. Bursche G. Busetto J. Buytaert S. Cadeddu R. Calabrese M. Calvi M. Calvo Gomez P. Campana D. Campora Perez A. Carbone G. Carboni R. Cardinale A. Cardini L. Carson K. Carvalho Akiba G. Casse L. Cassina L. Castillo Garcia M. Cattaneo Ch. Cauet R. Cenci M. Charles Ph. Charpentier M. Chefdeville S. Chen S. -F. Cheung N. Chiapolini M. Chrzaszcz K. Ciba X. Cid Vidal G. Ciezarek P. E. L. Clarke M. Clemencic H. V. Cliff J. Closier V. Coco J. Cogan E. Cogneras L. Cojocariu P. Collins A. Comerma-Montells A. Contu A. Cook M. Coombes S. Coquereau G. Corti M. Corvo I. Counts B. Couturier G. A. Cowan D. C. Craik M. Cruz Torres S. Cunliffe R. Currie C. D'Ambrosio J. Dalseno P. David P. N. Y. David A. Davis K. De Bruyn S. De Capua M. De Cian J. M. De Miranda L. De Paula W. De Silva P. De Simone D. Decamp M. Deckenhoff L. Del Buono N. Déléage D. Derkach O. Deschamps F. Dettori A. Di Canto H. Dijkstra S. Donleavy F. Dordei M. Dorigo A. Dosil Suárez D. Dossett A. Dovbnya K. Dreimanis G. Dujany F. Dupertuis P. Durante R. Dzhelyadin A. Dziurda A. Dzyuba S. Easo U. Egede V. Egorychev S. Eidelman S. Eisenhardt U. Eitschberger R. Ekelhof L. Eklund I. El Rifai Ch. Elsasser S. Ely S. Esen H. -M. Evans T. Evans A. Falabella C. Färber C. Farinelli N. Farley S. Farry RF Fay D. Ferguson V. Fernandez Albor F. Ferreira Rodrigues M. Ferro-Luzzi S. Filippov M. Fiore M. Fiorini M. Firlej C. Fitzpatrick T. Fiutowski M. Fontana F. Fontanelli R. Forty O. Francisco M. Frank C. Frei M. Frosini J. Fu E. Furfaro A. Gallas Torreira D. Galli S. Gallorini S. Gambetta M. Gandelman P. Gandini Y. Gao J. García Pardiñas J. Garofoli J. Garra Tico L. Garrido C. Gaspar R. Gauld L. Gavardi G. Gavrilov A. Geraci E. Gersabeck M. Gersabeck T. Gershon Ph. Ghez A. Gianelle S. Giani' V. Gibson L. Giubega V. V. Gligorov C. Göbel D. Golubkov A. Golutvin A. Gomes C. Gotti M. Grabalosa Gándara R. Graciani Diaz L. A. Granado Cardoso E. Graugés G. Graziani A. Grecu E. Greening S. Gregson P. Griffith L. Grillo O. Grünberg B. Gui E. Gushchin Yu. Guz T. Gys C. Hadjivasiliou G. Haefeli C. Haen S. C. Haines S. Hall B. Hamilton T. Hampson X. Han S. Hansmann-Menzemer N. Harnew S. T. Harnew J. Harrison J. He T. Head V. Heijne K. Hennessy P. Henrard L. Henry J. A. Hernando Morata E. van Herwijnen M. Heß A. Hicheur D. Hill M. Hoballah C. Hombach W. Hulsbergen P. Hunt N. Hussain D. Hutchcroft D. Hynds M. Idzik P. Ilten R. Jacobsson A. Jaeger J. Jalocha E. Jans P. Jaton A. Jawahery F. Jing M. John D. Johnson C. R. Jones C. Joram B. Jost N. Jurik M. Kaballo S. Kandybei W. Kanso M. Karacson T. M. Karbach S. Karodia M. Kelsey I. R. Kenyon T. Ketel B. Khanji C. Khurewathanakul S. Klaver K. Klimaszewski O. Kochebina M. Kolpin I. Komarov R. F. Koopman P. Koppenburg M. Korolev A. Kozlinskiy L. Kravchuk K. Kreplin M. Kreps G. Krocker P. Krokovny F. Kruse W. Kucewicz M. Kucharczyk V. Kudryavtsev K. Kurek T. Kvaratskheliya V. N. La Thi D. Lacarrere G. Lafferty A. Lai D. Lambert R. W. Lambert G. Lanfranchi C. Langenbruch B. Langhans T. Latham C. Lazzeroni R. Le Gac J. van Leerdam J. -P. Lees R. Lefèvre A. Leflat J. Lefrançois S. Leo O. Leroy T. Lesiak B. Leverington Y. Li T. Likhomanenko M. Liles R. Lindner C. Linn F. Lionetto B. Liu S. Lohn I. Longstaff J. H. Lopes N. Lopez-March P. Lowdon H. Lu D. Lucchesi H. Luo A. Lupato E. Luppi O. Lupton F. Machefert I. V. Machikhiliyan F. Maciuc O. Maev S. Malde A. Malinin G. Manca G. Mancinelli A. Mapelli J. Maratas J. F. Marchand U. Marconi C. Marin Benito P. Marino R. Märki J. Marks G. Martellotti A. Martens A. Martín Sánchez M. Martinelli D. Martinez Santos F. Martinez Vidal D. Martins Tostes A. Massafferri R. Matev Z. Mathe C. Matteuzzi A. Mazurov M. McCann J. McCarthy A. McNab R. McNulty B. McSkelly B. Meadows F. Meier M. Meissner M. Merk D. A. Milanes M. -N. Minard N. Moggi J. Molina Rodriguez S. Monteil M. Morandin P. Morawski A. Mordà M. J. Morello J. Moron A. -B. Morris R. Mountain F. Muheim K. Müller M. Mussini B. Muster P. Naik T. Nakada R. Nandakumar I. Nasteva M. Needham N. Neri S. Neubert N. Neufeld M. Neuner A. D. Nguyen T. D. Nguyen C. Nguyen-Mau M. Nicol V. Niess R. Niet N. Nikitin T. Nikodem A. Novoselov D. P. O'Hanlon A. Oblakowska-Mucha V. Obraztsov S. Oggero S. Ogilvy O. Okhrimenko R. Oldeman G. Onderwater M. Orlandea J. M. Otalora Goicochea P. Owen A. Oyanguren B. K. Pal A. Palano F. Palombo M. Palutan J. Panman A. Papanestis M. Pappagallo L. L. Pappalardo C. Parkes C. J. Parkinson G. Passaleva G. D. Patel M. Patel C. Patrignani A. Pazos Alvarez A. Pearce A. Pellegrino M. Pepe Altarelli S. Perazzini E. Perez Trigo P. Perret M. Perrin-Terrin L. Pescatore E. Pesen K. Petridis A. Petrolini E. Picatoste Olloqui B. Pietrzyk T. Pilař D. Pinci A. Pistone S. Playfer M. Plo Casasus F. Polci A. Poluektov E. Polycarpo A. Popov D. Popov B. Popovici C. Potterat E. Price J. Prisciandaro A. Pritchard C. Prouve V. Pugatch A. Puig Navarro G. Punzi W. Qian B. Rachwal J. H. Rademacker B. Rakotomiaramanana M. Rama M. S. Rangel I. Raniuk N. Rauschmayr G. Raven S. Reichert M. M. Reid A. C. dos Reis S. Ricciardi S. Richards M. Rihl K. Rinnert V. Rives Molina D. A. Roa Romero P. Robbe A. B. Rodrigues E. Rodrigues P. Rodriguez Perez S. Roiser V. Romanovsky A. Romero Vidal M. Rotondo J. Rouvinet T. Ruf H. Ruiz P. Ruiz Valls J. J. Saborido Silva N. Sagidova P. Sail B. Saitta V. Salustino Guimaraes C. Sanchez Mayordomo B. Sanmartin Sedes R. Santacesaria C. Santamarina Rios E. Santovetti A. Sarti C. Satriano A. Satta D. M. Saunders M. Savrie D. Savrina M. Schiller H. Schindler M. Schlupp M. Schmelling B. Schmidt O. Schneider A. Schopper M. -H. Schune R. Schwemmer B. Sciascia A. Sciubba M. Seco A. Semennikov I. Sepp N. Serra J. Serrano L. Sestini P. Seyfert M. Shapkin I. Shapoval Y. Shcheglov T. Shears L. Shekhtman V. Shevchenko A. Shires R. Silva Coutinho G. Simi M. Sirendi N. Skidmore T. Skwarnicki N. A. Smith E. Smith E. Smith J. Smith M. Smith H. Snoek M. D. Sokoloff F. J. P. Soler F. Soomro D. Souza B. Souza De Paula B. Spaan A. Sparkes P. Spradlin S. Sridharan F. Stagni M. Stahl S. Stahl O. Steinkamp O. Stenyakin S. Stevenson S. Stoica S. Stone B. Storaci S. Stracka M. Straticiuc U. Straumann R. Stroili V. K. Subbiah L. Sun W. Sutcliffe K. Swientek S. Swientek V. Syropoulos M. Szczekowski P. Szczypka D. Szilard T. Szumlak S. T'Jampens M. Teklishyn G. Tellarini F. Teubert C. Thomas E. Thomas J. van Tilburg V. Tisserand M. Tobin S. Tolk L. Tomassetti D. Tonelli S. Topp-Joergensen N. Torr E. Tournefier S. Tourneur M. T. Tran M. Tresch A. Tsaregorodtsev P. Tsopelas N. Tuning M. Ubeda Garcia A. Ukleja A. Ustyuzhanin U. Uwer V. Vagnoni G. Valenti A. Vallier R. Vazquez Gomez P. Vazquez Regueiro C. Vázquez Sierra S. Vecchi J. J. Velthuis M. Veltri G. Veneziano M. Vesterinen B. Viaud D. Vieira M. Vieites Diaz X. Vilasis-Cardona A. Vollhardt D. Volyanskyy D. Voong A. Vorobyev V. Vorobyev C. Voß H. Voss J. A. de Vries R. Waldi C. Wallace R. Wallace J. Walsh S. Wandernoth J. Wang D. R. Ward N. K. Watson D. Websdale M. Whitehead J. Wicht D. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. P. Williams M. Williams F. F. Wilson J. Wimberley J. Wishahi W. Wislicki M. Witek G. Wormser S. A. Wotton S. Wright S. Wu K. Wyllie Y. Xie Z. Xing Z. Xu Z. Yang X. Yuan O. Yushchenko M. Zangoli M. Zavertyaev L. Zhang W. C. Zhang Y. Zhang A. Zhelezov A. Zhokhov L. Zhong A. Zvyagin
Measurement of the B0bar-B0 and Bsbar-Bs production asymmetries in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV
The B0bar-B0 and Bsbar-Bs production asymmetries, AP(B0) and AP(Bs), are
measured by means of a time-dependent analysis of B0 -> J/\psi K*0, B0 -> D-
pi+ and Bs -> Ds- pi+ decays, using a data sample corresponding to an
integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb^{-1}, collected by LHCb in pp collisions at a
centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. The measurements are performed as a function of
transverse momentum and pseudorapidity of the B0 and Bs mesons within the LHCb
acceptance. The production asymmetries, integrated over pT and eta in the range
4 < pT< 30 GeV/c and 2.5<eta<4.5, are determined to be AP(B0) = (-0.35 +/- 0.76
+/- 0.28)% and AP(Bs) = (1.09 +/- 2.61 +/- 0.66)%, where the first
uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.