## A 4-Element MIMO Baseband Receiver with &gt;35dB 80MHz Spatial Interference Cancellation

Erfan Ghaderi 1 , Student Member , IEEE , Ajith Ramani 2 , Member IEEE , , Arya Rahimi 1 , Student Member, IEEE , Sudip Shekhar 2 , Senior Member, IEEE and Subhanshu Gupta 1 , Senior Member , IEEE

Abstract -Next-generation  communication  systems  with  wide bandwidths need to operate in interference-limited  networks. A discrete-time delay (TD) technique in a baseband receiver array is proposed for canceling wide modulated bandwidth spatial interference and reducing the ADC dynamic range requirements. The proposed discrete TD technique first aligns the interference using non-uniform sampled phases followed by uniform cancellation using a Truncated Hadamard Transform implemented  with  antipodal  binary  coefficients.  A  digital  timeinterleaver  with  5  ps  resolution  spanning  15  ns  implements  a scalable discrete TD to compensate the inter-element delay, while the multiply-accumulate  in  the  signal  path  is  simplified by implementing  a  1-bit  differential  truncated  Hadamard  matrix. Measured  results  demonstrate  greater  than  35  dB  cancellation over 80 MHz modulated bandwidth in 65 nm CMOS with a 592× improvement  over  prior-art  demonstration  of  wide  modulated bandwidth interference cancellation.

Index  Terms -  MIMO  receiver,  wide  modulated  bandwidth interferer,  spatial  interference  cancellation,  discrete-time  delay, truncated Hadamard matrix.

## I. INTRODUCTION

The  exponential growth in wireless communication  is spurring  development  of  Multiple-Input  and  Multiple-Output (MIMO)  transceivers  for  higher  spectral  efficiencies,  wide modulation bandwidths (BWs), and spatial multiplexing gains. However,  as  next-generation  sub-6GHz  and  millimeter-wave networks  [1]  progress  towards  ultra-dense  small  cells,  the dramatic shortening of inter-cell  distances  will  result  in  both line-of-sight  and  non-line-of-sight  interference  channels  [2][4].  This  problem  is  severe  for  multi-user  communications networks operating in crowded electromagnetic environments and can significantly degrade the performance of radios.

An  example  scenario  in  Fig.  1  shows  two  user  elements (UEs) located in adjacent cell-sectors communicating with an access point (AP) in uplink and downlink modes respectively. Even though the strength of side-lobe is only 10-15 dB lower than the main-lobe, the in-band (same frequency channel) sidelobe interference can desensitize the receiver (RX) or degrade the  in-band  SNR  if  not  addressed.  This  interference  problem worsens  near  the  sector  boundary  creating  poor  connection zones, especially if the small cell is operating near maximum capacity. Multiple system parameters impact the onset of an

Manuscript  submitted  July  1 st , 2019.  This  research  work  was  partly supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) award #1705026 and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). 1 E.  Ghaderi,  A.  Rahimi  and  S.  Gupta  are  with  the  School  of  Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. (erfan.ghaderi@wsu.edu).

2 A.  Ramani  and  S.  Shekhar  are  with  the  Department  of  Electrical  and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T1Z4, Canada.

Fig. 1. Illustration of interference in dense small cells with aggressive frequency use. User elements UE1 and UE2 use the same frequency channel across the sector boundaries.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-c37a3320-3bb1-441f-8f54-157f5662466e.jpg)

interference-limited network behavior over noise-limited behavior [3]-[5]. These parameters can include the number of UEs  and  APs,  antenna  gains, operational BW,  blockage characteristics, and the choice of MIMO architecture. Though frequency allocation schemes have been proposed to mitigate interference [6], [7], the next-generation communication networks require considerable frequency planning and integrated spatial cancellation techniques.

While interference mitigation using electronic phased-arrays has  been  an  active  research  area  [8-14],  the  dense  small-cell mobile  networks  with  wide  modulated  BWs  and  higher  data rates for next-generation systems impose unique challenges to the front-end hardware that has not been addressed in prior art. The phase-shift (PS) method employed for interference cancellation  in  prior-art,  being  an  approximation  of  a  timedelay (TD) cancels the interference at a single frequency (i.e., generates a single null). For next-generation systems with wide modulated BWs, it results in interference leakage and significantly higher dynamic range requirements for the baseband (BB) and the ADC [2]. The PS based approximation (and hence, leakage) can be corrected by augmenting the RX front-end with a true TD (TTD) in BB as described in Section II. However, such an approach needs precise delay generation and  compensation.  This  work  presents  the  first  interference cancellation technique for spatially separated wide modulated BW signals that coexist in the same frequency channel using discrete TD augmented RX front-ends.

In  our  prior  work  [15],  we  introduced  a  high  range-toresolution ratio BB TTD for frequency-uniform beamforming gain  to  overcome  the  beam  squinting  problem  in  PS-based beamformers.  In  this paper, we  leverage the BB  delaycompensating technique [15] with Truncated Hadamard Transform (THM) to implement a 4-element wide modulated BW Spatial Interference  Cancellation  (SpICa)  BB  RX  array. Our contributions in this paper compared to our previous work [15] are as follows:

- a. SpICa for dense interference-limited networks, where only beamforming cannot support the multiple wide modulated BW channel coexistence, is developed.

Fig. 2. Time domain representation of the source and received desired and undesired signals in a four-element linear antenna array.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-ac677bf3-fc23-4f8a-b1e0-117efc577d4c.jpg)

- b. A wide modulated BW  SpICa  technique in BB  is implemented  through  delay-compensating  and  THM  for the first time.
- c. Detailed circuit implementations of the delaycompensating  technique  and  its application for wide modulated  BW  SpICa  in  a  4-element  BB  RX  array  are presented.
- d. SpICa measurements that demonstrate significant performance improvement over prior-art are presented.

A brief overview of SpICa techniques is presented in Section II.  An  analytical  study  of  interference  leakage  in  PS-based schemes  is  conducted  to  understand  the  impact  of  multiple system parameters in an interference-limited network behavior necessitating the need  for  TTD-based  SpICa.  Section  III describes the design of the proposed time-interleaved staggered switched-capacitor array implementing  discrete TD  based SpICa.    Section  IV  details  the  measured  results  for  a  fourelement BB RX array. Section V concludes the proposed work.

## II. STATE-OF-ART SPICA AND NEED FOR TD WIDE MODULATED BW SPICA

This  section studies state-of-art SpICa  schemes  in  the presence of multiple strong and weak single-tone, narrowband (NB) or wide modulated BW spatially-distinct in-band signals [8]-[11]. These schemes are needed to avoid the need for large BB and ADC dynamic range. We will further motivate the need of a TTD-based SpICa for wideband modulated signals.

The  non-zero  spacing  of  the  antennas  leads  to  a  delay between the received signals at each antenna. We model this phenomena  in  a  phased-array  system  as y (t)= Γ D[SD (t)] + Γ UD[SUD(t)],  where y (t)  is  the  received  signal  vector  at  the antennas, Γ D  and Γ UD  are  the  TD  generating  function  for  the desired signal SD(t) and the undesired signal SUD(t) , respectively. A four-element linear antenna array is shown in Fig. 2. In this array the incident input signal can be written in the time-domain as:

$$y _ { i } ( t ) = S _ { D } [ t - ( i - 1 ) \Delta t _ { D } ] + S _ { U D } [ t - ( i - 1 ) \Delta t _ { U D }$$

where i is  the  element  number.  The  same  equation  can  be described in the frequency domain as:

$$y _ { i } ( j 2 \pi f ) = S _ { D } ( j 2 \pi f ) \cdot e ^ { - j ( i - 1 ) 2 \pi f \Delta _ { D } } + S _ {$$

where ∆t D and ∆t UD are the delays for the desired and undesired signal, respectively, and defined as:

$$\Delta t _ { D } = & \frac { d } { \lambda _ { C } } \cdot \frac { \sin \theta _ { D } } { f _ { C } } \quad \quad \quad$$

(1)

$$\Delta t _ { \text{UD} } = & \frac { d } { \lambda _ { C } } \cdot \frac { \sin \theta _ { \text{UD} } } { f _ { C } }$$

Here, d λC , , and f C are the element spacing, carrier wavelength and frequency respectively.

## A. PS-based SpICa schemes and interference leakage

In a PS-based MIMO RX the input signal BW is assumed to be small and (2) can be rewritten as (5):

$$y _ { i } ( j 2 \pi f ) = S _ { D } ( j 2 \pi f ) \cdot e ^ { - j ( i - 1 ) \Delta \varphi _ { D } } + S _ { U$$

where the phase shift elements ∆φ D and ∆φ UD are calculated as follows:

$$\cdot \\ \Delta \varphi _ { D } = 2 \pi f _ { C } \cdot \Delta t _ { D } = \frac { d } { \lambda _ { C } / 2 } \pi \cdot \sin \theta _ { D }$$

(1)

$$\Delta \varphi _ { \text{UD} } = & 2 \pi f _ { C } \cdot \Delta t _ { \text{UD} } = & \frac { d } { \lambda _ { C } / _ { 2 } } \pi \cdot \sin \theta _ { \text{UD} }$$

This approximation is valid as long as the received signal is a single-tone or NB signal. In PS-based SpICa schemes [8]-[11], the  received  signals  are  phase  shifted  and  properly  added  to cancel  the  undesired  signal  (Fig.  3).  Mathematically,  each y i ( j2πf ) is  multiplied  by  e j ( -i 1 ∆φ UD ,  resulting  in  the  overall ) phase for the undesired signal as ∆φ UD -2πf∆t UD . This term is frequency  dependent  and  zero  at  a  single  frequency  only, leaving  a  residue  for  other  frequencies  offset  from  carrier frequency, f C . This residue leads to interference leakage leading to increased dynamic range for the BB and ADC after downconversion.

In [8], a SpICa  RX  is  demonstrated  using  BB-to-RF impedance translation that  models an inverse function of  the incoming array pattern. Although capable of single-tone SpICa when swept over 320 MHz, SpICa for modulated interferer is not demonstrated. Other techniques include switched-capacitor vector-modulation based phase shifters [10], [11], but SpICa is achieved only for NB interferers or modulated interferer (16QAM) over ~135 kHz [11]. We study interference leakage in a PS-based SpICa with 4, 16 and 64 elements. In these cases, we assume the even elements of y i ( ) t are subtracted from its odd elements.  Fig.  4  shows  the  rejection  performance  of  the undesired signal across the normalized frequency with angle of arrival  (AoA)=45 o .  As  it  can  be  seen,  for  higher  number  of antennas the undesired signal leakage is larger (higher conversion  gain  for  SUD)  and  cancellation  starts  to  become imperfect even in narrower BWs as the number of antennas are progressively increased. This simulation shows the need for a TTD  implementation  to  compensate  the  delay  between  the received signals before performing SpICa, ideally independent of the input signal BW.

Fig. 3. PS-based SpICa (implemented using vector modulation technique) causes leakage and requires higher dynamic range ADC for wide modulated BW interferers.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-ab3ae897-7d52-48f2-aae5-7f1e23e7b056.jpg)

Fig. 4. SpICa simulation in a PS-based scheme vs. normalized frequency over 20% fractional bandwidth with different number of antennas.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-d9dcf475-3e92-44a5-bf61-9438900adf7d.jpg)

## B. TTD based interference cancellation for wide modulated BW signals

The TTD element can be implemented at RF. In this case the delay elements, such as LC  or transmission lines, can compensate  the  TD  between  the  undesired  signals  and  align them.  However,  the  area/power  hungry  implementation  and passive  device  mismatches  at  RF  makes  this  solution  less attractive. TTD was recently implemented digitally in [14], but the  post-ADC  implementation  requires  large  ADC  dynamic range  in absence  of  any  spatial interference cancellation techniques. The digital implementation for a 16-element TTD with 16 oversampled ADCs also consumes 453 mW (16 mW per ADC, 12.3 mW per element for digital TTD beamforming) for 100 MHz BB bandwidth. In a downconversion RX, RF TD implementation is mathematically identical to TD introduced in LO together with BB [15]. The TD element in LO, operating at a single  frequency  is  simply  analogous  to  a  phase  shift. Consequently, augmenting this PS in LO with a BB TD element can compensate the delay between the received signals, which is the proposed implementation in this work.

In other words, a BB delay implementation can remove the frequency-dependent  residue  phase  ( ∆φ UD -2πf∆t UD ) that exists  in  a  PS-based  SpICa  scheme.  After  time-aligning  the undesired signals at the BB, SpICa can be performed through a differential  orthogonal  matrix,  which  subtracts  half  of  the signals from the other half uniquely. At the output of the matrix, the  undesired  signal  component  is  uniformly  rejected  across BW without any residue compared to the PS-based SpICa, i.e. the proposed intervention is angle- and frequency-independent.

In Fig. 5, the proposed BB discrete TD implementation for a four-element SpICa RX is shown. In this four-element array, there  are  three  unique  combinations  of  the  time-aligned  BB

signals  to  perform  SpICa.  These  three  unique  combinations construct a 4×3 matrix with only +1 and -1 entries, which forms a THM [16]. The received signals, including both desired and undesired, at the antenna are downconverted, phase shifted, and then fed to BB to perform TTD and SpICa. Because the SpICa is being done at BB, the RF-FE must have sufficient linearity to downconvert the strong undesired signal without distorting the desired signal, similar to requirements in prior-art BB SpICa [8],  [12].  Note  that  the  BB  linearity  is  relaxed  due  to  the interference  cancellation  prior  to  addition.  Further  RF-FE impairments, especially amplitude and phase mismatches between the elements must be taken into design considerations so  as  to  not  limit  the  performance  of  BB  SpICa  techniques. These  mismatches  can  be  reduced  using  digital  techniques similar to improving the image rejection ratio in a quadrature receiver for intra-band carrier aggregation [17], [18].

## C. Effect of SpICa on wide modulated BW desired signal in a TTD-based implementation

Since the TTD implementation at LO in conjunction with BB is  mathematically  identical  to  RF  TTD  implementation,  we examine the effect of the  SpICa on  the  desired  signal  in  RF domain.  At  the  output  of  the  THM  (OUT (t),  =1, 2, 3),  the i i undesired signal is eliminated, and the residue signal (which is only a function of the desired signal) can be written as:

$$\begin{smallmatrix} \swarrow \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \ sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma
 \text{out} ( t ) = \begin{smallmatrix} \text{OUT} _ { 1 } ( t ) \\ \text{OUT} _ { 2 } ( t ) \\ \text{OUT} _ { 3 } ( t ) \end{smallmatrix} =$$

(1)

$$& \text{OU} ( t ) = \begin{bmatrix} \text{OU} _ { 1 } ( t ) \\ \text{OUT} _ { 2 } ( t ) \end{bmatrix} = \\ \begin{bmatrix} + 1 & - 1 & + 1 & - 1 \\ + 1 & + 1 & - 1 & - 1 \\ + 1 & - 1 & - 1 & + 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} S _ { D } [ t ] \\ S _ { D } [ t + ( \Delta t _ { U D } - \Delta t _ { D } ) \\ S _ { D } [ t + 2 ( \Delta t _ { U D } - \Delta t _ { D } ; \end{bmatrix}.$$

$$\begin{bmatrix} + 1 & - 1 & + 1 & - 1 \\ + 1 & + 1 & - 1 & - 1 \\ + 1 & - 1 & - 1 & + 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} S _ { D } [ t ] \\ S _ { D } [ t + ( \Delta t _ { U D } - \Delta t _ { D } ) ] \\ S _ { D } [ t + 2 ( \Delta t _ { U D } - \Delta t _ { D } ) ] \\ S _ { D } [ t + 3 ( \Delta t _ { U D } - \Delta t _ { D } ) ] \end{bmatrix} \\. \quad. \quad. \quad. \quad. \quad. \quad. \quad.$$

This equation can be rewritten in the frequency domain, as in (9), and desired signal conversion gain vector, GD (j2πf), can be defined as (10):

(

1

(

1

)

$$\begin{array} { c c c c c c c } \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v V { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m s u n \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v } { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v { \ m v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v } v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v s v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v vv v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v t v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v b v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v h v } \end{array}$$

As  seen  in  (10),  the  desired  signal  is  affected  by  a  known frequency-dependent profile that can be equalized after digitization (Fig. 5). The transfer function profile for each of the signal paths in (10) depends on the difference between desired and undesired time delay, which itself is a function of the AoA of  both  desired  and  undesired  signals.  Fig.  6  plots  these conversion gains vs. normalized frequency, for a signal occupying a BW equivalent to 20% of the center frequency. In this simulation, for the AoAD=0 o and AoAUD= 45 o , it can be

Fig. 5. Proposed discrete TD scheme with THM for wide modulated BW SpICa.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-43d926a2-06e9-4bb6-8937-2b3801767f91.jpg)

Fig. 6. Desired signal conversion gain vs. normalized frequency over 20% fractional BW in the proposed SpICa scheme.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-59684c2d-b4cf-4dbf-b48b-cc524346ed03.jpg)

seen that the conversion gains for almost the entire band are more than one and their frequency dependency profiles can be compensated by a digital equalizer post ADC.

## III. DISCRETE TD-BASED SPICA CIRCUIT DESIGN

The  proposed  BB  wide  modulated  BW  SpICa  solution comprises of two main blocks: (i) the delay compensation array; and (ii) the cancellation matrix, which in this case is THM. The delay  compensation  array  is  implemented  through  a  nonuniform discrete  TD technique. The THM entries are simply constructed through differential implementation and the row's addition  is  done  through  charge  domain  summation.  The proposed solution, as shown in Fig. 5, implements a BB discrete TD-based SpICa over 100 MHz modulated BW in BB. A delay compensation range of 15 ns (between the first and last antenna) and a delay compensation resolution of 5 ps is chosen for our proof-of-concept 4-element prototype. As explained later in this section,  this  design  is  highly  scalable  in  terms  of  array  size, SpICa performance, and BW.

## A. Discrete TD Technique

Fig.  7  shows  the  non-uniform  sampling  technique  used  to implement the discrete TD array and compensate the undesired TD between BB signals. Intuitively, sampling the BB signals with  time  delayed  clocks,  is  equivalent  to  sampling  the  time delayed version of those signals with same clock. Using this discrete  TD  technique,  the  BB  delay  compensation  array  is realized.  The  resolution  of  the  delay-compensation  elements, which  in  this  discrete  TD  structure  is  determined  by  the resolution of the delay between the sampling clocks, determines the  SpICa  performance.  The  longest  delay  sets  the  required level of interleaving. As  an  example,  if  8  elements are implemented, the delay between the first and the last antenna increases to 35 ns (assuming  all the other parameters are not changing).  To  compensate  this  new  total  delay,  instead  of changing  the  sampling  rate  that  is  determined  by  the  signal bandwidth, we scale the level of interleaving to 8. By doing so, there will be 8 sets of sampling phases and each set consists of 8 interleaved phases.

Fig.  8(a)  shows  the  proposed  time-interleaver  topology  to obtain  a  precision  of  5  ps  and  a  maximum  range  of  15  ns, between the first and the last antennas, in the sampling clock phases. The time-interleaver resolution determines the theoretical  maximum  interference  rejection.  In  the  proposed design, Nyquist sampling results in a sampling clock frequency 200 MHz (twice of BB BW, 2×100 MHz). The external 800 MHz single-phase clock ( f clk ) is first terminated with a 50 Ω onchip resistor and is fed to a quadrature phase generator circuit [19]  after  amplification  to  rail-to-rail  swing.  The  quadrature phase generator provides quadrature outputs (I ,  I + ,  Q ,  Q -+ )  at 200 MHz with complete cycle coverage (=360 o ) and period of TS = 5 ns. These quadrature phases are fed to an 8-bit-binary is capable of 5 ps resolution (=1.25 ns/256) and has a maximum 5

Fig. 7. Basic idea behind non-uniform sampling used to implement TD.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-3f5a58ea-8526-4a2d-bbd6-0d464efc2176.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-1a456f8b-423e-4359-8f35-5d65af1a1621.jpg)

(b)

Fig. 8. (a) Time-interleaver topology with 5 ns delay between consecutive antennas and 5 ps resolution; (b) 8-bit quadrature PI schematic.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-359c7a2c-bf1a-45d4-b6a7-7f7629b12f6c.jpg)

Fig. 9. Required phases to span 15 ns range and ensure proper functionality of the discrete TD-based SpICa implementation.

ns range after the four differential quadrature outputs of the PI (I o -, I o + , Qo -, Qo + ) are selected by digital phase interpolator (PI) which is programmed using an on-chip serial-to-parallel (SPI).

The period of the 200 MHz clock is insufficient to cover the required  time  span  of  15  ns  between  the  first  and  the  last antenna. This is remedied by generating four phases (P11, …, P14), from each Q-MUX output, for each quadrant select MUX, at  50  MHz  with  a  12.5%  ON-time  from  a  time  interleaver. These 16 phases (P11, …, P44) provide the required staggeredtime-interleaved clocks as shown in Fig. 9. A digital implementation with power consumption proportional to C VDD 2   f clk permits  scaling  with  CMOS  process,  VDD  and BW. A finer resolution is preferred in improving the consecutive antenna, resulting in 15 ns of overall range. Such a large range is again chosen to prove that this design can be used in larger arrays, where the delay between received signals at the first and last antenna can be a large value.

Fig.  10.      States  of  the  time-interleaver  and  important  phases  for  delay compensation of 4 ns between consecutive antennas.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-7c1cc6fc-655b-4989-b01d-6916cd367dbe.jpg)

In  Fig.  10,  the  state  of  each  PI  and  MUX  is  illustrated  to generate  a  delay  compensation  of  4  ns  between  consecutive antennas.  Each  of  the  four  PIs  is  configured  independently using the SPI data bits. The first PI does not interpolate any of the phases generated by the quadrature phase generator preceding the PI. As such, the Io + phase is selected by the MUX and  fed  to  the  time-interleaver  to  generate  the  first  set  of sampling phases (P11, .., P14). These sampling phases are then applied  to  the  first  input  signal  (BB1  in  Fig.  11).  In  order  to generate 4 ns of delay for the 2 nd antenna element, the 2 nd PI interpolates the input clocks by 0.25 ns. Selecting the Qo -phase of the PI by MUX results in 4 ns relative delay (0.25 ns from the PI and 3.75 ns from choosing the Qo -phase). In order to

Fig. 11. THM realization through differential analog MAC implementation.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-9682d25e-1d0b-4a50-ad79-ae8ecc3b3d48.jpg)

generate 8 ns of delay for the 3 rd antenna element, the 3 rd PI interpolates the input clocks by 0.5 ns. Selecting the Io -phase of the PI by MUX results in 3 ns relative delay (0.5 ns from the PI and 2.5 ns from choosing the Io -phase). Another 5 ns (= TS) of  desired  relative  delay  is  introduced  by  enabling  the  time interleaver  only  after  5  ns  relative  to  the  first  two  timeinterleavers. This relative delay can only be controlled as 0, TS, or  2TS,  in  our  implementation.  Finally,  a  delay  of  12  ns  is implemented for the 4 th antenna element.

## B. THM implementation through time-interleaved switched capacitor sampling

In Fig. 11 an analog implementation of the THM is proposed. In this structure, each row of the THM is implemented as an analog multiply-accumulate  (MAC),  with  four  multipliers (M1··M4) and one accumulator. Differential implementation is used to simplify THM entries' realization. By simply flipping the polarity of the corresponding inputs to -1, the THM can be realized without any extra hardware requirements. Multiplications  are  achieved  using  the  conventional  bottomplate sampling switched-capacitor circuit and accumulation is achieved using a fully-differential operational transconductance  amplifier  (OTA)  based  parasitic-insensitive summer (Fig. 12). Each accumulator sums the inputs, delayed and  sampled  on  the  four  capacitors  during  the  SUM  phases (S1··S4). This switched-capacitor based implementation of a BB RX  requires  four  phases  for  sampling  (P1i··P4i)  followed  by summation (Si) and reset (RST) phase, in a four-element array (also see Fig. 9). In the sampling phases, (P1i··P4i), input signal from  each  RX  is  first  sampled  on  a  sampling  capacitor  (CS) uniquely.  The  input  sampler  is  implemented  using  a  PMOS switch optimized to provide the maximum linearity to handle input signals between 0.4 V - 1 V. The value of CS is determined by the noise requirements of the RX. After the last sampling phase (P4i), the stored charges on each capacitor are shared in Si phase. This charge sharing performs an averaging function. To change this functionality to summation, the shared charges are transferred to the feedback capacitor (CF) in a switched-

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-96dec3bb-efde-4c8e-96d5-cd85f94f25cd.jpg)

M1

Fig. 12. Simplified single-ended representation of THM rows' implementation.  Note that the interference cancellation is done at the virtual ground resulting in significantly relaxed linearity requirements.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-6bf853f2-0292-461f-a426-fa7b85eb8740.jpg)

Fig. 13. Two-stage internally compensated OTA with the feedback network (Bias circuits are not shown).

capacitor  summer.  The  OTA  used  in  this  adder  must  satisfy SNR and BW requirements of the RX. In the RST phase, there is a feedback network on the OTA, with feedback coefficient of 1/4  (consisting  of  4  effective  sampling  capacitors  and  one feedback capacitor). Considering these requirements, the OTA is implemented as a two-stage internally compensated structure with Miller compensation (Fig. 13). The OTA is designed with more  than  70  dB  open  loop  gain,  685  MHz  unity  gain bandwidth, and 72 o  phase margin. These values ensure that the desired cancellation performance  is met  across the PVT variations.  Because  the  input  nodes  of  the  OTA  do  not  vary significantly (virtual ground) and the output nodes just carry the weaker  desired  signals  (the  undesired  has  been  rejected), telescopic cascode structure has been used for both stages. A wide-swing cascode current mirror is used that mirrors the input off-chip  bias  current  (=200  µA)  to  each  of  the  three  OTAs consuming 2 mA at 1V supply. The BW of the common-mode feedback loop is  set  to  be  greater  than  Nyquist  frequency  to allow first-order rejection of common-mode noise and interference.  Note  that  the  interference  cancellation  happens prior to summation resulting in significantly reduced linearity requirements for the summer.

Fig. 14. Die micrograph in 65 nm CMOS.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-edeae058-4d08-44b7-950d-3237ca43f938.jpg)

with  the  other  half;  (ii)  easy  realization  through  differential implementation without requiring any extra hardware; and (iii) easy scalability to a higher number of elements thus promising low-latency  operation.  A  low-power  source-follower  buffer consuming 0.25 mA is used to drive each MAC output (OUT) for off-chip measurement.

## IV. MEASUREMENT RESULTS

The binary (  1) entries in the proposed THM based MACs permit: (i) half of the signal vector to be uniquely combined

The 4-element MIMO BB RX is implemented in a 65 nm CMOS process in an area of 0.65 and 0.9 mm 2  without and with pads,  respectively,  as  shown  in  Fig.  14.  The  prototype  is packaged in a Quad-Flat Package (QFP) enclosure to minimize

Fig. 17. Measurement and simulation results of the single-tone desired signal conversion gain vs. frequency for ∆t D= 0 and four cases of ∆t UD .

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-2065c6c0-a596-45ba-a270-3a26f10b90c9.jpg)

Fig. 18. SpICa measurement for a wide modulated BW undesired signal vs. frequency: (a) without any desired signal; and (b) with a wide modulated BW desired signal.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-9fafba93-d01b-4bd3-be79-6f1149dff013.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-558ef7d7-8911-4cd2-9eed-399f7fabffd4.jpg)

Fig. 19. Reconstructed constellation after measurement of a desired 4Mb/s QPSK signal in presence of a 12 dB stronger wide modulated BW interference.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-60c35905-4b67-4e01-9b60-48b6ba189f95.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00631v1-figure-20422c2b-e461-4079-93d2-4c7b2a133511.jpg)

parasitic bond wires. An SPI control port is used to set the onchip  digital  phase-interpolation  and  time-interleaving.  The delays between the RX antenna signals is implemented through two NI PXIe-5450 AWGs with four differential outputs and 145 MHz modulation BW as shown in the test setup in Fig. 15. Both single-tone  and  modulated  signals  are  applied  as  inputs  to characterize the SpICa.

Fig. 16 shows the measured SpICa performance for multiple AoAUD (corresponding to ΔtUD = 1, 2, 4 ns) and a swept singletone from 1 MHz (balun-limited) to 99 MHz. As it can be seen, the cancellation across the entire band is independent from AoA and &gt;46 dB is achieved with 1.5  improvement in fractional BW over prior art [8].

Fig.  17  shows  the  desired  signal  conversion  gains  for  the swept single-tone inputs from 1 MHz to 99 MHz at the outputs of  each  of  the  THM  rows,  matching  closely  with  the  ideal simulated conversion gains. The desired signal gain is defined as the ratio of output power when all inputs are applied, divided by the output power when only one input is applied, assuming all  the  desired  inputs  are  in-phase  and  there  are  no  delays between  the  inputs.  This  measurement  is  repeated  for  four different AoAUD (corresponding to ΔtUD = 0.5, 1, 2.5, 4 ns). In all the cases, the gain response follows closely to the theoretical response as described in Section II-C.

Fig.  18(a)  shows  measured  wide  modulated  BW  SpICa performance  for  80  MHz  BW  at  the  output  of  the  THM's second  row  with  one  input  (no  cancellation)  and  four  inputs

(cancellation  enabled),  demonstrating  &gt;35  dB  SpICa  for  a fractional-BW of 80% in the DC-100 MHz band (80 MHz is selected to visualize the plot easier and demonstrate the SpICa clearly). Similar performance is obtained when the cancellation is performed  with  other  THM  rows,  confirming  that  the proposed  architecture  can  be  used  for  generating  multiple versions of the desired signal simultaneously, while cancelling the  undesired  interference  signals.  This  desired  conversion gains can be equalized in the digital domain.

Fig.  18(b)  shows  the  desired-  and  the  undesired-signal spectrum (35 MHz within the DC-100 MHz band) with one and four  inputs.  In  this  measurement,  AoAUD=0   and  AoAD=45 . o o More  than  35  dB  SpICa  across  the  entire  BW  of  undesired signal is obtained again. Note that the BW of the desired- and the  undesired-signal  is  reduced  from  80MHz  to  35MHz  to visually show the cancellation on a 100 MHz plot. Although not demonstrated  herein,  our  proposed  approach  can  cancel  two spatially distinct interferences.

Fig. 19 depicts SpICa performance for a wide modulated BW interferer 12 dB higher in power than the desired 4 Mb/s QPSK signal,  with  an  offline-computed EVM of 11.5%. The  SpICa data is sampled and stored using the digital sampling oscilloscope followed by digital equalization and EVM estimation  in  MATLAB.    Limited  memory  in  the  sampling oscilloscope has restricted our measurements to QPSK modulation only.

The  measured  total power  consumption  of  the  analog implementation of the THM is  8 mW/100 MHz. Another 44 mW is consumed in clocking including the 0.8 GHz to 0.2 GHz quadrature  phase  generator,  the  four  8-bit  PIs  and  the  timeinterleaving  circuit.  The  clocking  power  can  be  decreased further to less than 5 mW for smaller resolutions (for example, the clocking power is &lt;5 mW for 4-bit resolution). The clocking power can also be decreased if a reduced delay range is needed. The design constraints and power consumption associated with realization of a high-dynamic range ADC is thus significantly relaxed. With the demonstrated &gt;35 dB wide modulated BW SpICa,  the  ADC  dynamic  range  is  significantly  relaxed  by nearly 6-b. Notably, a 1b reduction in ADC resolution leads to nearly  4  power  savings  [21]  for  ADCs  limited  by  thermal noise. Additionally, the ADC power consumption can increase quadratically for high sampling frequencies as in [21].

Table 1 compares the proposed wide modulated BW SpICa to prior-art. The demonstrated SpICa of &gt;35 dB over 80 MHz of wide modulated BW interferers is the highest ever reported to  the  best  of  our  knowledge.  The  delay  range-bandwidth product  for  the  proposed  TTD  implementation  is  1.5  (=15 ns×100 MHz).

Wide modulated BW  interference separation is also demonstrated  in  [11],  where  a  500  kSps  64-QAM  signal  is separated from a 400 kSps 16-QAM signal, with an allocated bandwidth that can be calculated as 112.5 kHz and 135 kHz, respectively.  In  comparison,  in  our  work,  we  demonstrate  a cancellation of 80 MHz modulated bandwidth, an improvement of 592  . Measured P1dB compression point of the BB RX is 4.7 dBm with 10.6 dBm IIP3. Measured noise power at the THM output is 330 μVrms. We are currently investigating other phase interpolation  techniques  to  significantly  reduce  the  power consumption for future prototypes [22], [23].

TABLE I

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AND COMPARISON TO PRIOR-ART SPATIAL CANCELLATION IMPLEMENTATIONS.

|                   |                   | JSSC2017 [8]                         | RFIC2016 [9]                            | JSSC2014 [10]         | ISSCC2017 [11]      | Proposed Work                          |
|-------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------|
| # Channel         | # Channel         | 4 inputs, 4 outputs                  | 4 input, 1 output                       | 4 inputs, 1 output    | 8 inputs, 8 outputs | 4 inputs, 3 outputs                    |
| CMOS Tech. (nm)   | CMOS Tech. (nm)   | 65                                   | 65                                      | 65                    | 65                  | 65                                     |
| VDD (V)           | VDD (V)           | 1.2                                  | 1.3-1.5                                 | 1.2                   | 1.2                 | 1.0                                    |
| Resolution        | Resolution        | Phase: 6.5-b (3.8 ° ) Amp: 3.9-b     | 6-b I/Q                                 | Phase: 3-b            | 14-b                | 8-b (5ps) Overall delay range: 15ns    |
| BB Power          | BB Power          | Not Available (RF+BB implementation) | Not Applicable (RF only implementation) | 36mW/40MHz 1          | 91  W/350kHz       | BB: 8mW/100MHz Clock: 44mW Total: 52mW |
| Area (mm 2 )      | Area (mm 2 )      | 2.25                                 | 3.8                                     | 0.97                  | 3.24                | 0.9                                    |
| P IN1dB 2 (dBm)   | P IN1dB 2 (dBm)   | Not Available                        | Not Available                           | -5 3                  | Not Available       | 4.7 3                                  |
| P IIP3 2 (dBm)    | P IIP3 2 (dBm)    | -29 3, 4, 5                          | Not Available                           | 0-2.6                 | Not Available       | 10.6                                   |
| Noise Performance | Noise Performance | 3.4-5.8 dB 5 (Noise Figure)          | 9.5 dB 5 (Noise Figure)                 | 3-6 dB (Noise Figure) | Not Available       | 330 µV rms (Output-referred)           |
| SpICa Frequency   | SpICa Frequency   | 0.3-0.7GHz                           | 100MHz @10GHz                           | 40MHz @2.4GHz         | 350kHz              | 1-100MHz                               |
| NB-SpICa 6        | Cancellation (dB) | 20                                   | 20                                      | < 38                  | 84                  | 46-51                                  |
| NB-SpICa 6        | Range (MHz)       | 320                                  | 100                                     | 40                    | 0.35                | 99                                     |
| Modulated- SpICa  | Cancellation (dB) | -                                    | -                                       | -                     | Not Available       | >35                                    |
| Modulated- SpICa  | BW                | -                                    | -                                       | -                     | 135 kHz             | 80 MHz                                 |

1 Does not include LO power,  2  NB-SpICa includes swept single-tone measurements,  3 Desired signal,  4 POIP3-Gain,  5 Cancellation enabled,  Including 6 swept single-tone measurements.

## V. CONCLUSION

This  work  demonstrates  a  wide  modulated  BW  spatial interference cancellation utilizing a discrete TD technique with Truncated Hadamard Matrix (THM) for a 4-element BB RX array. The proposed wide modulated BW SpICa implements a digital time-interleaver with 5 ps resolution and 15 ns range in a  BW-,  process-  and  supply-scalable  implementation.  The proposed architecture consumes less power (and area) compared  to  RF-based  SpICa  using  a  non-uniform  sampling scheme with orthogonal THM implementation.  Measurements demonstrate  uniform  cancellation  across  80  MHz  modulated interferer  covering  entire  100%  modulated  BW  unlike  priorarts.  The  implemented  spatial  null  BW  is  much  larger  than state-of-the  art  and  represent  the  first  demonstration  of  wide modulated  BW  signal  null  with  35  dB  of  rejection.  The proposed wide modulated BW SpICa RX baseband augments the existing phased-array front-ends and can be easily adapted for even wider modulated BWs.

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The  authors  acknowledge  the  contributions  of  National Instruments for  customized  AWG. Access to CAD tools and technology was facilitated by MOSIS and CMC Microsystems. The authors are grateful to Profs. Deukhyoun Heo, Vishal Saxena and Akbar Sayeed for useful comments.

## REFERENCES

- [1] S. Parkvall, et al , 'Nr: The new 5g radio access technology,' IEEE Commun. Standards Mag ., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 24-30, Dec. 2017.
- [2] J.  Heuvel, et  al ,  'Full  MIMO  spatial  filtering  approach  for  dynamic range reduction in wideband cognitive radios,' IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. -I , vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 2761-2773, Nov. 2012.
- [3] R. W. Heath, Jr., et al , 'An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,' IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 436-453, Apr. 2016.
- [4] T. Bai and R. W. Heath, 'Coverage and rate analysis for MillimeterWave cellular networks,' IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 110-114, Feb. 2015.
- [5] J. G. Andrews, T. Bai, M. N. Kulkarni, A. Alkhateeb, A. K. Gupta, and R.  W.  Heath,  'Modeling  and  Analyzing  Millimeter  Wave  Cellular Systems,' IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 65, pp. 403-430, Jan. 2017.
- [6] M. Matinmikko et al. , 'Cognitive Radio Trial Environment: First Live Authorized Shared Access-Based Spectrum-Sharing Demonstration,' IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 30-37, Sep. 2013.
- [7] A. K. Gupta, J. G. Andrews, and R. W. Heath, 'On the Feasibility of Sharing  Spectrum  Licenses  in  mmWave  Cellular  Systems,' IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3981-3995, Sep. 2016.
- [8] L. Zhang  and H. Krishnaswamy,  "Arbitrary Analog/RF  Spatial Filtering  for  Digital  MIMO  Receiver  Arrays," IEEE  J.  Solid-State Circuits , vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 3392-3404, Dec. 2017.
- [9] S. Jain, Y. Wang, and A. Natarajan, 'A 10GHz CMOS RX frontend with  spatial  cancellation  of  co-channel  interferers  for  MIMO/digital beamforming arrays,' Proc. IEEE Radio Freq. Integr. Circuits Symp. (RFIC) , May 2016, pp. 99-102.
- [10] A. Ghaffari, et al , 'A 4-Element Phased-Array System With Simultaneous Spatial- and Frequency-Domain Filtering at the Antenna Inputs,' IEEE J. Solid-State Cir. , vol. 49, pp. 1303-1316, Jun. 2014.
- [11] S. Joshi, et al , "2pJ/MAC 14b 8×8 linear transform mixed-signal spatial filter in 65nm CMOS with 84dB interference suppression," IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf., Dig. Tech. Papers, Feb. 2017, pp. 364-365.
- [12] M. C. M. Soer, E. A. M. Klumperink, D. J. van den Broek, B. Nauta, and F. E. van Vliet, 'Beamformer With Constant-Gm Vector Modulators and Its Spatial Intermodulation Distortion,' IEEE J. SolidState Circuits , vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 735-746, Mar. 2017.
- [13] S. Mondal, et al , 'A 25-30 GHz Fully-Connected Hybrid Beamforming Receiver  for  MIMO  Communication,' IEEE J.  Solid-State  Circuits , vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1275-1287, May 2018.
- [14] S.  Jang et  al. , 'A  1-GHz  16-element  four-beam  True-Time-Delay digital beamformer,' IEEE J. Solid-State Cir.. vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1304-14, May 2019.
- [15] E. Ghaderi et al. , 'An Integrated Discrete-Time Delay-Compensating Technique for Large-Array Beamformers,' accepted in IEEE Trans. Of Cir. and Syst.- I: Regular Papers .

- [16] W. K. Pratt, J. Kane, and H. C. Andrews, 'Hadamard transform image coding,' Proc. IEEE , vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 58-68, Jan. 1969.
- [17] S. Kundu, et al , 'Frequency-channelized Mismatch-shaped Quadrature Data Converters for Carrier Aggregation in MU-MIMO LTE-A', IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. -I, vol. 64, pp. 3-13, Jan. 2017.
- [18] S.  Hwu  and  B.  Razavi,  "An  RF  Receiver  for  Intra-Band  Carrier Aggregation," IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits , vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 946961, Apr. 2015.
- [19] A. E. Sayed et al , 'A Hilbert transform equalizer enabling 80 MHz RF self-interference  cancellation  for  full-duplex  receivers,' IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. -I , pp. 1153-1165, Mar. 2019.
- [20] M. Mansuri et  al ,  'A  scalable  0.128-1  Tb/s,  0.8-2.6  pJ/bit,  64-lane parallel I/O in 32-nm CMOS,' IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits , vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3229-3242, Dec. 2013.
- [21] S. Krone  and  G.  Fettweis,  'Energy-efficient  A/D  conversion  in wideband communications receivers,' IEEE Vehi. Tech. Conf. , 2011, pp. 1-5.
- [22] M. Mansuri et al , 'Strong injection locking of low-Q LC oscillators,' IEEE Custom Intg. Circuits Conf. , Sep. 2008, pp. 699-702.
- [23] A. Sharkia, S. Mirabbasi and S. Shekhar, 'A Type-I sub-sampling PLL with a 100x100µm 2  footprint and -255-dB FOM,' IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits , vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 3553-3564, Dec. 2018.
Erfan Ghaderi Ajith Ramani Arya Rahimi Sudip Shekhar Subhanshu Gupta
A 4-Element MIMO Baseband Receiver with >35dB 80MHz Spatial Interference Cancellation
Next-generation communication systems with wide bandwidths need to operate in
interference-limited networks. A discrete-time delay (TD) technique in a
baseband receiver array is proposed for canceling wide modulated bandwidth
spatial interference and reducing the ADC dynamic range requirements. The
proposed discrete TD technique first aligns the interference using non-uniform
sampled phases followed by uniform cancellation using a Truncated Hadamard
Transform implemented with antipodal binary coefficients. A digital
timeinterleaver with 5 ps resolution spanning 15 ns implements a scalable
discrete TD to compensate the inter-element delay, while the
multiply-accumulate in the signal path is simplified by implementing a 1-bit
differential truncated Hadamard matrix. Measured results demonstrate greater
than 35 dB cancellation over 80 MHz modulated bandwidth in 65 nm CMOS with a
592x improvement over prior-art demonstration of wide modulated bandwidth
interference cancellation.