## The superconductivity mechanism in Nd-1111 iron-

## based superconductor doped by calcium

F. Shahbaz Tehrani, V. Daadmehr *

Magnet &amp; Superconducting Research Lab., Faculty of Physics &amp; Chemistry, Alzahra University, Tehran 19938, Iran

* Corresponding author:

Tel: (+98 21) 85692640 / (+98) 912608 9714

Fax: (+98 21) 88047861

E-mail: daadmehr@alzahra.ac.ir

URL: http:// staff.alzahra.ac.ir/daadmehr/

First author:

E-mail: tehrani66@gmail.com

## Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Vice Chancellor Research and Technology of Alzahra University for financial supports.

## Abstract

We  described  the  effect  of  nonmagnetic  impurity  on  the  superconductivity  behavior  of  the NdFeAsO0.8F0.2 iron-based superconductor. The resistivity measurement showed that the superconductivity  suppressed  upon  increasing  the  low  amounts  of  calcium  impurity  (x  0.05). Also,  the Tc  decreased  with  the  increase  in  the  residual resistivity. Such  behavior  was qualitatively described by the Abrikosov-Gorkov theory and confirmed that these impurities act as scattering centers. For  our  samples,  the  exchange  constant  between  the  calcium  and  the conduction electron spins was estimated J exc =|8| meV. Moreover, we presented the phase diagram of our synthesized samples for the various calcium dopings and found that according to increase of  the  calcium  impurities  and  temperature  decreasing  of  the  spin-density  wave  (T SDW),  Fe  ions arranged stripe antiferromagnetically at lower temperatures and also the superconducting transition  temperature  (T C )  declined.  Based  on  our  results  and  in  agreement  with  the  available theories  as  explained  in  the  text,  since  the  S++  state  has  not  an  effect  on  the  impurity-doped samples,  and  the  S±  state  that  is  attributed  to  the  spin-fluctuations  mechanism  causes  the superconducting  suppression  for  low  amounts  of  calcium.  So,  it  confirms  the  role  of  the  spinfluctuations as a dominant pairing mechanism in our synthesized samples.

Keywords: superconductivity, Iron-Based superconductor, pairing mechanism, Spin-fluctuations.

## 1. Introduction

For the first time, the discovery of superconductivity in LaFeAsO1-xFx compounds (with TC=26 K) by Y. Kamihara et al. [1] attracted the attention of physicists to the iron-based superconductors (FeSCs) as a new  group  of superconductors and introduced them as a candidate for another group of hightemperature  superconductors.  The  FeSCs  have  similar  characteristics  to  the cuprates such as the layered structure, the small coherence length, the dependence of  the  superconductivity  transition  temperature  (T C) upon  the doping,  and  the unconventional  pairing  mechanism  [2-6].  Also,  they  display  the  extraordinary physics due to the co-existence of the magnetism and superconductivity, and the multiband electronic structure [7,8]. But the superconducting mechanism of these compounds is one of the controversial issues and there is still no explicit answer to this question. Most FeSCs have a common phase diagram that there is often a structural transition from tetragonal to orthorhombic and a magnetic spin-density wave (SDW) state with stripe antiferromagnetic (AF) spin configuration [9-12]. From this one can conclude that they play and important role in the superconducting  mechanism  of  FeSCs.  However,  the  cause  of  the  structural transition is still under debate and has been proposed that either spin [13-15] or ferro-orbital  nematic  ordering  [16-18]  is  responsible  for  the  occurrence  of  it.  In the spin-nematic scenario, the structural transition is driven by magnetic fluctuations and the lattice symmetry breaks from C  to C  through the magnetic4 2 elastic coupling to lift the degeneracy of the stripe-type antiferromagnetism [1922]. In the orbital-nematic scenario, the ferro-orbital ordering causes the breaking of  C   symmetry  and  the  strong  inter-orbital  interactions  lead  to  an  unequal 4 occupation of the d xy and d yz Fe orbitals [23-25].

Moreover, up to now, two superconducting mechanisms have been reported for the  FeSCs:  spin-  and  orbital-fluctuations.  Based  on  the  spin-fluctuations  theory, fully-gapped  sign-reversing  s-wave  (S±)  state  had  been  predicted  [26,  27].  The origin  of  the  spin-fluctuations  is  the  intra-orbital  nesting  and  the  Coulomb interaction.  Furthermore,  the  orbital-fluctuations  generally  originate  from  the inter-orbital nesting and the electro-phonon interactions due to the Fe-ion optical phonons  [28-30].  The  theories  introduced  that  the  electron-phonon  coupling improves the orbital fluctuations at wave vectors (0, 0) and ( π ,  0)/(0, π ),  which correspond to ferro-orbital and antiferro-orbital fluctuations, respectively [31, 32]. Also,  the  antiferro-orbital  fluctuations  around  ( π ,  0)/(0, π )  competes  with  the antiferromagnetic spin-fluctuations around the same wave vectors [5]. When the spin-fluctuations overcome, the pairing state is S± as mentioned above, but when the orbital fluctuations dominate, the sign of the gap remains the same between the electron and hole pockets and is called the S++ state [33-35].

The theoretical models [33, 36-38] described that the S± state is very fragile to the  nonmagnetic  impurities,  and  only  1%  nonmagnetic  impurity  with  moderate scattering  potential  could  completely  suppress  superconductivity  and  the  S± pairing  state,  while  for  the  S++  symmetry  the  T C  does  not  show  the  effective variation to the nonmagnetic  impurities  [33].  So,  an  appropriate probe  to determine the  type  of  symmetry  and  pairing  in  the  FeSCs  is  the  substitution  of nonmagnetic impurity. Consequently, to discover the superconducting mechanism, several experimental works have been carried out for the investigation of the impurity effects on the suppression of superconductivity in the FeSCs [39-44]. For example, the Zn ions which act as strong potential scattering centers in the LaFeAsO1-xFx compound and suppress the superconductivity [45]. However,  the  conclusions  remain  discussible  and  the  more  experimental  and

theoretical works are needed to illuminate the impurity effects in the FeSCs that can help us to understand the superconducting mechanism. In our previous work, we studied the effects of Ca 2+ /Nd 3+ substitution on polycrystalline Nd1-xCaxFeAsO0.8F0.2 samples with 0   x 0.1 [46]. We compared our experimental data and the results of the mentioned theories i.e. the spin- and orbital-fluctuations in  pairing  mechanism.  The  consistency  of  our  experimental  results  and  the theoretical reports based on the spin- and the orbital- fluctuations theories shows that  these  models  play  an  important  role  in  the  pairing  mechanism  of  the  ironbased  superconductors.  Given  this  background,  in  this  work,  we  focus  on  the investigation of calcium  doping  effects as a nonmagnetic  impurity  in  the superconductivity mechanism of Nd-1111 iron-based superconductor.  We study the  calcium  doping  effects  on  the  structural  transition  and  SDW  state  and  the relation between them to clarify the superconducting mechanism. We show that calcium  doping  can  affect  the  spin-  and  orbital-fluctuations  and  change  the competition  between  them.  We  hope  that  our  experimental  results  and  the available corresponding theories will help to understand the pairing symmetry and superconductivity mechanism in the FeSCs.

## 2. Experimental

We used one-step solid state reaction method for synthesizing the polycrystalline  samples  with  the  nominal  compositions  of  Nd 1-x CaxFeAsO0.8F0.2 (x=0.0, 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, and 0.1), as indicated in Refs. [46,47]. The NdFeAsO0.8F0.2, Nd0.99 Ca0.01 FeAsO0.8F0.2, Nd0.975 Ca0.025 FeAsO0.8F0.2, Nd0.95 Ca0.05 FeAsO0.8F0.2  and  Nd 0.9 Ca0.1 FeAsO0.8F0.2  samples  are  labeled  as  Nd1111, Nd-Ca0.01, Nd-Ca0.025, Nd-Ca0.05, and Nd-Ca0.1, respectively. The Xray diffraction patterns (XRD)  of  our  samples  were  accomplished  using  a

PANalytical Å) operated at 40 kV and 40 mA with a step size of 0.026°. We applied a fourprobe  technique  for  the  superconductivity  measurements  using  the  20K  Closed Cycle  Cryostat  (QCS101),  ZSP  Cryogenics  Technology.  Also,  we  used  a  Lake Shore-325 temperature controller for measuring the temperature and the applied DC  current  (Lake  Shore-120)  was  10  mA  and  the  voltage  was  measured  with microvolt accuracy. ® PW3050/60 X-ray diffractometer with Cu K α radiation ( λ = 1.54056

## 3.  Results and discussion

Fig.  1  shows  the  XRD  patterns  of  the  Nd rather pure phase and the negligible impurities in each pattern indicate the good quality  of  our  synthesized  samples.  All  samples  have  the  tetragonal  structures with  P4/nmm:2 space group that proved  with  Rietveld's  analysis  by  employing the  MAUD  software.  Further  details  of  this  analysis  were  explained  in  our previous work in Ref. [46]. The variation of lattice parameters 'a, c' and the cell volume for the calcium contents is displayed in Fig. 2. All the data are normalized by  the  values  of  the  undoped  sample  i.e.  Nd-1111.  As  shown,  the  lattice parameters and the cell volume decrease upon increasing the calcium doping. 1-x CaxFeAsO0.8F0.2 samples that the

Fig. 1. The XRD patterns of our samples: (a) Nd-1111,  (b) Nd-Ca0.01, (c) Nd-Ca0.025 and (d) Nd-Ca0.05

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-79b7e276-6a2c-4988-8d3e-af7f587ba711.jpg)

Fig.2. The variation of normalized lattice parameters and cell volume for the various calcium dopings

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-ef5e885b-1d20-4a55-99ff-f54556811336.jpg)

The decline of the lattice parameter 'c' is more in comparison to the 'a'. Due to the small difference in the ionic radius of the calcium and neodymium ions, the reason  for  the  reduction  of  the  mentioned  parameters  is  the  change  in  other structural parameters such as bond lengths, bond angles, and the thickness of the layers. In our previous work, we explicitly explained the reason for the reduction of the lattice parameters, based on the variation of bond lengths, bond angles and the  thickness  of  layers  with  the  increase  in  the  calcium  content  [46].  The temperature  dependence  of  resistivity  for  our  synthesized  samples  is  shown  in Figs.  3-6.  As  shown  in  these  figures,  the  T increasing  the  calcium  doping  and  also,  the  superconductivity  suppresses  in  the Nd-Ca0.05 sample. In our previous work [46], the dependence of TC and the AsFe-As bond angles, the Fe-As bond length, the pnictogen height, and the lattice parameters  for  the  various  calcium  contents  have  been  discussed.  We  have understood  that  the  T tetrahedron  from  the  regular  value  and  also  with  decreasing  the  Fe-As  bond length,  the  pnictogen  height,  and  the  lattice  parameters  with  the  increase  in  the calcium content. Our experimental data were consistent with the same results that C decreased  with  increasing  the  distortion  of  FeAs4C  of  our  samples  decreases  by

Fig. 3. Temperature dependence of resistivity for the synthesized Nd-1111 sample

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-bdc6a94d-c095-48c6-872f-a8be24245d7b.jpg)

had suggested theoretically based on the spin- and orbital-fluctuations theories (as described  in  Ref.  [46]).  Now,  we  want  to  know  which  type  of  spin-  or  orbitalfluctuations is dominated in our samples, so, we study the investigation of calcium impurity effects via the available theories.

Suppression of superconductivity by nonmagnetic impuritydiffraction data, we can see that calcium content could be easily placed into the neodymium sites of Nd-1111 sample up to 0.05 [46]. According to AbrikosovGorkov theory (AG), if the impurities act as strong pair breakers, the suppression of TC is associated with the impurity scattering rate define as k We  define  the region  before  starting  of  the  superconductivity  state  that  is  displayed  for  our synthesized samples by a dashed line in Figs. 3-6. Figs. 7(a) and (b) display that the  values  of respectively,  by  increasing  the  calcium  impurity.  Also,  the  decrement  of  the normalized  TC  versus  the  calcium  doping  is  linear  with  a  good  approximation. Furthermore, the dependence of TC and suppression of superconductivity in our synthesized samples with the increment of ρ 0 ρ 0 from  the  extrapolation  of  resistivity  in  the  low  temperature and  the  normalized  T C  are  found  to  increase  and  decrease, ρ 0 is shown in Fig.8, which describes the From the X-ray B Δ TC ≈ πħτ s ∝ ρ 0 .

2

13

1.2

0.6

0.3

00

(a)

20

40

Tcmid =48 K

60

80

100

T

120

140

160

180

200 220

T(K)

Fig. 4.  Temperature dependence of (a) resistivity and (b) its derivate for the synthesized Nd-Ca0.01 sample

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-70317bd0-7e7c-4e4e-87c1-5a704bb07757.jpg)

Fig. 5.  Temperature dependence of (a) resistivity and (b) its derivate for the synthesized Nd-Ca0.025 sample

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-35e2ca8d-8bc4-442c-94b4-7816ab20c786.jpg)

Fig. 6. Temperature dependence of (a) resistivity and (b) its derivate for the synthesized Nd-Ca0.05 sample

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-aa1a85b1-a171-463a-87f5-8787385f5a10.jpg)

ρ 0 .  So,  the  substitution  of  calcium  ions  strongly  destroys  superconductivity  and increases  the  residual  resistivity  ( impurities act as scattering centers. ρ 0 )  for  our  samples,  which  means  that  these

Based  on  the  AG  theory,  in  the  presence  of  nonmagnetic  impurities  and isotropic  exchange  interaction,  the  variation  of  T expression [48-51]: C  is  given  by  the  following

$$\ln [ \frac { T _ { C } } { T _ { C 0 } } ] = \Psi \left [ \frac { 1 } { 2 } + ( 2 \pi k _ { B } T _ { C } \tau _ { s } ) ^ { - 1 } \right ] - \Psi \left ( \frac { 1 } { 2 } \right )$$

with

$$\frac { 1 } { \tau _ { s } } = 2 \pi n _ { I } N ( 0 ) ( g - 1 ) ^ { 2 } J _ { e x c } ^ { 2 } \ J ( J + 1 )$$

Where the absence of doping, ݊ ூ the concentration of impurity ions, T ߖ is the digamma function, N(0) is the density of states at C0 is  the  transition  temperature in

Fig. 7.  The variation of (a) ρ 0 and (b) T C /T C0 as a function of calcium contents (x).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-7c0f96fe-35af-4067-a26e-e839c24cadd3.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-439c172e-1b7c-4a2d-b3e1-170d6738ee06.jpg)

the  Fermi  level.  Also,  g  and  J  is  the  Lande  g  factor  and  the  total  angular momentum  of  the  impurity  ion,  respectively.  Likewise,  J constant between the impurity ion spin and the conduction electron spin. For the small concentration of nonmagnetic impurities, the T and the initial rate of depression of T equation [48, 51]: C (dTC/dnI )  is  determined by the following exc C decreases linearly with is  the  exchange ݊ ூ

$$\frac { d T _ { C } } { d n _ { I } } | _ { n _ { I \rightarrow 0 } } = \frac { d T _ { c } } { d x } | _ { x \rightarrow 0 } = \, - \frac { \pi ^ { 2 } N ( 0 ) J _ { s x c } ^ { 2 } \, ( g - 1 ) ^ { 2 } \, J ( J + 1 ) } { 2 k _ { B } }$$

For Nd1-xCaxFeAsO0.8F0.2 samples with one dopant atom per unit cell, we define x= ݊ ூ where  x  is  the  fraction  of  calcium  ions  in  our  synthesized  samples.  The variation of T C with the concentration of calcium doping was shown in Fig. 7(a).

Fig.8. The dependence T C of versus ρ 0 for our synthesized samples

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-43c10c35-1334-4b88-a33d-6a61648d1259.jpg)

With the calculation of line slope (by using the experimental value), we have ௗ் ೎ ௗ௫ =

-81.15 K/atom and so obtain from Eq. (3):

$$N ( 0 ) J _ { e x c } ^ { 2 } \ \approx 7 0. 9 \times 1 0 ^ { - 5 } \ ( \frac { e V. s t a t e s } { a t o m \, s p i n } )$$

We get a value of N(0) =10 states/eV atom spin from Ref. [52]. Therefore, the exchange constant (J spin  is  estimated  |8|  meV.  This  amount  has  the  same  order  of  magnitude  that obtained for the 122-type of FeSCs and the conventional superconductors in Refs. [53,54] that obtained based on the ESR experiments [44]. The dependence result of TC ( similarly to the magnetic ions with J AG theory  describes  the  competition  effects  of  the  magnetic  and  nonmagnetic impurities in the superconductivity destruction. ρ 0 ) and based on the AG theory shows that calcium impurity ions behave exc ) between the calcium ion spin and the conduction electron exc =|8| meV in our samples. Consequently, the

Phase diagram of the synthesized samplesshoulders  in  the  resistivity  measurements  of  the  calcium  doped  samples.  These shoulders  were  usually  attributed  to  the  structural  transition  (T state (T for 122-type is the same and they move away from each other by substitution the SDW) [55]. In 1111-type of FeSCs, the T As shown in Figs.4-6, there are other SDW is smaller than T S )  and  the  SDW S [56], while

Fig. 9. (a) Phase Diagram of our synthesized samples , (b) Theoretical phase diagram for arbitrary nonmagnetic impurity that taken from Ref. [33]

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-bf014aa0-ef76-4290-a75d-f752f4b61560.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00675v1-figure-b50ca524-8425-452a-b8d8-1f3e385684dc.jpg)

doping  and  applying  the  pressure  [57].  For  more  accurate,  we  calculate  the derivate of resistivity and obtained the values of T samples.  Fig.  9(a)  displays  the  phase  diagram  of  our  samples  and  shows  the suppression of the superconducting transition and the SDW state with increasing the  calcium  impurities,  while  the  T   increases.  With  the  increase  of  calcium impurities and the decrement of T stripe  AF  at  the  lower  temperatures  and  so  T presents a similar trend of decreasing for the T the spin-fluctuations have a direct and effective impact on the superconductivity mechanism of our samples. Likewise, as we described before based on the AG theory,  the  calcium  ions  act  as  scattering  centers  and  hence,  at  the  lower temperatures,  the  Fe  ions  arrange  stripe  AF.  This  means  that  nonmagnetic S SDW, it can be described that the Fe ions arrange S C  declines.  Moreover,  Fig.9  (a) SDW and TC. As an important result, and TSDW for our synthesized

impurities can affect and suppress the T SDW and correspondingly the T C. Based on the five-orbital model, S. onari et al. [33] theoretically had considered the effect of the  local  and  low  amount  of  impurity  in  FeSCs  and  found  that  the  interband impurity scattering was boosted by the d-orbital degree of freedom. This signifies that  the  fully  gapped  sign-reversing  S±  state,  which  is  attributed  to  the  spinfluctuations theory, is very fragile against impurities, while the S++ state due to the orbital-fluctuation is constant for all amount of impurity and not affect in the superconductivity suppression (for more detail see Fig. 9(b)). So the matching of our  experimental  phase  diagram  and  the  results  of  the  above  theoretical  model confirms the role of the spin-fluctuations as a dominant pairing mechanism in our synthesized  samples.  In  other  words,  the  low  amount  of  calcium  impurity (x  0.05) in our samples suppresses completely the superconductivity. Consequently and according to the mentioned theory, the S± symmetry and the spin-fluctuations are predominant  against to the orbital-fluctuations in our samples. In the other work, J. Li et al. [58] described that the T C would be weakly suppressed by impurities in the S++ state, because of the following reasons: (1) Suppression  of  the  orbital-fluctuations  because  of  the  violation  of  the  orbital degeneracy near the impurities, (2) The strong localization effect, which the mean free path is comparable to the lattice spacing. Also, the ARPES evidence for S± symmetry, in contrast to the S++ state confirms the opinion that the superconducting  and  the  SDW  states  can  be  suppressed  by  the  same  impurities [59-61].  This  behavior  has  occurred  in  our  samples.  Since  impurity  has  not  an effect on the S++ state in the doped samples, and the S± state that is attributed to the spin-fluctuations mechanism causes the superconducting suppression for low amounts of the impurity, it can be concluded that the superconducting mechanism

of our samples is the spin-fluctuations coupling. This result is in agreement with our previous work [46].

## 4. Conclusions

To summarize, we have studied the superconducting behavior of the Nd-1111 iron-based superconductor that was doped by the calcium impurity. The samples were synthesized through the one-step solid state reaction method. We found that:

- 1. Superconductivity  had  been  suppressed  for  the  low  amount  of  calcium impurity.
- 2. The TC decreased linearly with the increase of impurity and also T C reduced by  increasing  the  residual  resistivity.  So,  the  calcium  impurity  acted  as scattering  centers  and  the  Abrikosov-Gorkov  theory  was  true  for  our samples. Accordingly, we estimated the exchange constant between calcium and conduction electron spins (Jexc=|8| meV).
- 3. In phase diagram of our synthesized samples, upon increasing the calcium impurity, the temperature of the spin-density wave (T SDW) state declined, so at the lower temperatures, the Fe ions arranged stripe antiferromagnetically.
- 4. According to the previous results and the matching of our experimental- and the theoretical-phase diagram that can concluded from the available theoretical model, the role of the spin-fluctuations (the S± state) has been confirmed as a dominant pairing mechanism in our samples.

## References

- [1] Y. Kamihara, M. Hirano, R. Kawamura, H. Yanagi, T. Kamiya, H. Hosono, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 , 10012 (2006).
- [2]  N.  L.  Wang,  H.  Hosono,  P.  Dai,  Iron  based  superconductor: Materials,  Properties  and Mechanisms, first Edition, (CRC Press, 2012), pp1-20.
- [3]  N.  Fujiwara,  S.  Tsutsumi,  S.  Iimura,  S.  Matsuishi,  H.  Hossono,  Y.  Yamakawa,  H.  Kontani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 , 097002 (2013).
- [4] K. Gofryk, B. Saparov, T. Durakiewicz, A. Chikina, S. Danzenbacher, D. V. Vyalikh, M. J. Graf, A. S. Sefat, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 , 186401 (2014).

- [5] H. Hosono, K. Kuroki, Physica C 514 , 399 (2015).
- [6] M.  Calamiotou,  D.  Lampakis,  N.D.  Zhigadlo,  S.  Katrych,  J.  Karpinski,  A.  Fitch,  P. Tsiaklagkanos, E. Liarokapis, Physica C 527, 55 (2016).
- [7] V. Stanev, J. Kang, Z. Tesanovic, Phys. Rev. B 78 , 184509 (2008).
- [8] A. V. Chubukov, M. Khodas, R. M. Fernandes, , Phys. Rev. X 6 , 041045 (2016).
- [9] P. C. Canifield, S. L. Bud' ko, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1 , 27 (2010).
- [10]  S.  Matsuishi,  T.  Hanna,  Y.  Muraba,  S.  W.  Kim,  J.  E.  Kim,  M.  Takata,  S.  Shamoto,  R.  I. Smith, H. Hosono, Phys. Rev. B 85 , 014514 (2012).
- [11] K. Hayashi, P. V. Sushko, Y. Hashimoto, A. L. Shluger, H. Hosono, Nat. Commun. 5 , (2014) 3515.
- [12] H. Hosono, S. Matsuishi, Current Opinion Sol. State Mat. Sci. 17 (2013) 49.
- [13] C. Fang, H. Yao, W. F. Tsai, J. P. Hu, S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B 77 , 224509 (2008).
- [14] T. Yildirim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 , 037003 (2009).
- [15] V. Chubukov, D. V. Efremov, I. Eremin, Phys. Rev. B 78 , 134512 (2008).
- [16] F. Kruger, S. Kumar, J. Zaanen, J. van den Brink, Phys. Rev. B 79 , 054504 (2009).
- [17]  C.  Chen,  B.  Moritz,  J.  van  den  Brink,  T.  P.  Devereaux,  R.  R.  P.  Singh,  Phys.  Rev.  B 80 , 180418 (2009).
- [18] W. Lv. J. Wu, P. Phillips, Phys. Rev. B 80 , 224506 (2009).
- [19] I. Eremin, J. Knolle, R. M. Fernandes, J. Schmalian, A. V. Chobokov, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83 , 061015 (2014).
- [20] R. M. Fernandes, A. V. Chobokov, J. Schmalian, Nat. Phys. 10 , 97 (2014).
- [21] K. Kuroki, H. Usui, S. Onari, R. Arita, H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 79 , 224511 (2009).
- [22] K. Kuroki, Physica C 470 , S267 (2010).
- [23] W. Ly, F. Kruger, P. Phillips, Phys. Rev. B 82 , 045125 (2010).
- [24] T. Yamada, J. Ishizuka, Y. Ono, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83 , 043704 (2014).
- [25] S. Onari, H. Kontani, Phys. Rev. Lett 109 , 137001 (2012).
- [26] I. I. Mazin, D. J. Singh, M. D. Johannes, M. H. Du, Phys. Rev. Lett 101 , 057003 (2008).
- [27] K. Kuroki, S. Onari, R. Arita, H. Usui, Y. Tanaka, H. Kontani, H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. Lett 101 , 087004 (2008).
- [28]  R.  M.  Fernandes,  A.  V.  Chobukov,  J.  Knolle,  I,  Eremin,  J.  Schmalain,  Phys.  Rev.  B 85 , 024534 (2012).
- [29] H. Kontani, T. Saito, S. Onari, Phys. Rev. B 84 , 024528 (2011).
- [30] H. Kontani, S. Onari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 , 157001 (2010).
- [31] Y. Yanagi, Y. Yamakawa, Y. Ono, Phys. Rev. B 81 , 054518 (2010).
- [32] Y. Yanagi, Y. Yamakawa, N. Adachi, Y. Ono, Phys. Rev. B 82 , 064518 (2011).
- [33] S. Onari, H. Kontani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 , 177001 (2009).
- [34]  H.  Kontani,  Y.  Inoue,  T.  Saito,  Y.  Yamakawa,  S.  Onari,  Solid  state  Commun. 152 ,  718 (2012).
- [35] T. Saito, S. Onari, Y. Yakamawa, H. Kontani, S. V. Borisenko, V. B. Zabolotnyy, Phys. Rev. B 90 , 035104 (2014).
- [36] D. Parker et al., Phys. Rev. B 78 , 134524 (2008).
- [37] Y. Bang, H. Choi, H. Won, Phys. Rev. B 79 , 054529 (2009).
- [38] T. Kariyado, M. Ogata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79 , 083704 (2010).
- [39] S. Matsuishi, T. Hanna, Y. Muraba, S. W. Kim, J. E. Kim, M. Takata, S. Shamoto, I. Smith. H. Hosono, Phys. Rev. B 85 , 014514 (2012).
- [40] A. F. Wang, J. J. Pin, P. Cheng, G. J. Ye, F. Chen, J. Q. Ma, X. F. Lu, B. Lei, X. G. Luo, X. H Chen, Phys. Rev. B 88 , 094516 (2013).
- [41] P. Cheng, B. Shen, F. Han,H. Wen, Eur. Phys. J. B 104 , 37007 (2013).
- [42] M. Sato, Y. Kobayashi, S. C. Lee, H. Takahashi, E. Satomi, Y. Miura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79 , 014710 (2010).
- [43] J. Li, Y. Guo, S. Zhang, S. Yu, Y. Tsujimoto, H. Kontani, K. Yamaura, E. Takayama, Phys. Rev. B 84 , 020513(R) (2011).

- [44] P. F. S. Rosa, C. Adriano, T. M. Garietezi, M. M. Piva, K. Mydeen, T. Grant, Z. Fisk, M. Nicklas, Sci. Rep. 4 , 6252 (2014).
- [45] J. Ishida, S. Limura, S. Matsuishi, H. Hosono, Phys. Condens. Matter. 26 , 435702 (2014)
- [46]  F.  Shahbaz  Tehrani,  V.  Daadmehr,  J.  Supercond.  Nov.  Magn 32(6) , 1497  (2019),  doi: 10.1007/s10948-019-05197-3.
- [47] Z. Alborzi, V. Daadmehr, accepted in the J. Supercond. Nov. Magn., doi:10.1007/s10948-01905209-2.
- [48] A.A. Abrikosov, L.P. Gorkov, Sov. Phys. JEPT 12 , 1243 (1961).
- [49] A. A. Abrikosov, Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 12 , 168 (1969).
- [50] P. Fulde, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 24 , 2601(2010).
- [51] S.K. Malik, C.V. Tomy, P. Bhargava, Phys. Rev. B 44 , 7042 (1991).
- [52] A. Tavana, PhD. Thesis, Sharif university, iran (2010).
- [53] P. G. Pagliuso, C. Rettori, S. B. Oseroff, P. C. C. Canfield, E. M. Baggio, D. Sanchez, Phys. Rev. B 57 , 3668 (1998).
- [54] E. M. Bittel, C. Adriano, C. Giles, C. Rettori, Z. Fisk, P. G. Pagliuso, J. Of Phys.: Cond. Matt. 23 , 455701 (2011).
- [55] J. Zhao, Q. Huang, C. Cruz, S. Li, J. W. Lynn, Y. Chen, M. A. Green, G. F. Chen, G. Li, Z. Li, J. L. Luo, N. L. wang, P. Dai, Nat. Mate. 7 , 2315 (2008).
- [56] R. H. Liu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 , 087001(2008).
- [57] A. F. Kordyuk, Low Temp. Phys. 38 , 888 (2012).
- [58] J. Li, Y.F. Guo, S. B. Zhang, J. Yuan, Y. Tsujimo, X. Wang, C. I. Sathish, Y. Sun, S. Yu, W.
- Yi  K.  Yamaura,  E.  Takayama,  Y.  Shirako,  M.  Akaogi,  H.  Kontani,  Phys.  Rev.  B 85 ,  214509 (2012).
- [59] R. M. Fernandes, M. G. Vavilov, A. V. Chubukov, (2012). Phys. Rev. B 85 , 140512 (2012).
- [60] M. G. Vavilov, A. V. Chubukov, Phys. Rev. B 84 , 214521 (2011).
- [61] Y. Senga, H. Kontani, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77 , 113710 (2008).
F. Shahbaz Tehrani V. Daadmehr
The superconductivity mechanism in Nd-1111 iron-based superconductor doped by calcium
We described the effect of nonmagnetic impurity on the superconductivity
behavior of the NdFeAsO0.8F0.2 iron-based superconductor. The resistivity
measurement showed that the superconductivity suppressed upon increasing the
low amounts of calcium impurity (x<0.05). Also, the Tc decreased with the
increase in the residual resistivity. Such behavior was qualitatively described
by the Abrikosov-Gorkov theory and confirmed that these impurities act as
scattering centers. For our samples, the exchange constant between the calcium
and the conduction electron spins was estimated Jexc=|8| meV. Moreover, we
presented the phase diagram of our synthesized samples for the various calcium
dopings and found that according to increase of the calcium impurities and
temperature decreasing of the spin-density wave (TSDW), Fe ions arranged stripe
antiferromagnetically at lower temperatures and also the superconducting
transition temperature (TC) declined. Based on our results and in agreement
with the available theories as explained in the text, since the S++ state has
not an effect on the impurity doped samples, and the S+- state that is
attributed to the spin fluctuations mechanism causes the superconducting
suppression for low amounts of calcium. So, it confirms the role of the
spinfluctuations as a dominant pairing mechanism in our synthesized samples.