![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-42094d5d-963d-4ce6-998e-090e0469c93a.jpg)

Nuclear Physics A

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-7119c946-0e54-41f6-9960-2ed92bf60d80.jpg)

Nuclear Physics A 00 (2014) 1-8

## Experimental Results on p(d) + A Collisions at RHIC and the LHC

## Anne M. Sickles

Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York

## Abstract

Recent experimental results at both the LHC and RHIC show evidence for hydrodynamic behavior in proton-nucleus and deuteronnucleus collisions ( p + A). This unexpected finding has prompted new measurements in p + A collisions in order to understand whether matter with similar properties is created in A + A and p + A collisions or whether another explanation is needed. In this proceedings, we will discuss the new experimental data and its interpretation within the context of heavy-ion collisions.

Keywords:

## 1. Introduction

Collisions of protons or deuterons with large nuclei (hereafter collectively refered to as p + A collisions) were studied as control measurements for heavy-ion collisions. Results since Quark Matter 2012 have cast doubt on this paradigm. The possible creation of hot nuclear matter has been suggested by measurements of long range azimuthal correlations in p + Pb collisions at the LHC and d + Au collisions at RHIC. These observations have motivated an abundance of vN and spectra measurements in small collision systems to determine to what extent a hydrodynamic description is applicable in p + A . Additionally, significant modifications to jets and highpT hadrons have been observed at the LHC which remain unexplained. In this proceedings we discuss a selection of the interesting experimental results related to p + A physics and highlight some of the open questions and new measurements that are needed.

The results discussed here are divided into three sections: highpT jets and hadrons, identified particles, and correlations.

## 2. HighpT Jets and Hadrons

One of the original motivations for p + A physics at RHIC and the LHC is to quantify nuclear modifications to the production of hard observables as a baseline for heavy-ion measurements. First results measurements of highpT single hadron production in both d + Au [1, 2] and p + Pb [3] were consistent with binary scaled p + p to pT GLYPH&lt;25&gt; 10 GeV / c at RHIC and to GLYPH&lt;25&gt; 20 GeV / c at the LHC. New results presented at this conference show that reconstructed jet spectra are approximately consistent with binary scaling to very high pT [4, 5, 6]. There is evidence for a slight excess of the nuclear modification factor, RpPb , ( &lt; 20% at midrapidity) which is consistent with expectations from nuclear modifications to the parton distribution functions [7].

Surprisingly, single charged hadrons with pT &gt; 30 GeV / c show a large and significant excess compared to binary scaling of p + p data (up to approximately a 40% increase) in recent measurements from the CMS [5] and ATLAS [8]

pQCD at

s

5 02 and 7 TeV [10].

In the lower panel of Fig. 1 the ratios of the spectra for backward (

0 8

.

&lt;

η

cms

&lt;

0 3 and

.

1 3

.

&lt;

η

-

cms

&lt;

0 8) pseudorapidity ranges to that at

.

η

cms

&lt; .

0 3 are shown. The indication of a slight softening of the

-

|

|

p

T

spectrum when going from central to backward (Pb-side) pseudorapidity,

-

-

observed already in the pilot-run data of 2012 [4] (note opposite

η

cms sign convention in [4]) is confirmed with better

Transverse momentum dependence of inclusive primary charged-particle production . . .

5

significance and extended in

p

T

down to 0.15 GeV

/

c

.

A good description of our earlier measurement of spectra in p-Pb collisions [4] was achieved in the

EPOS3 model [14] including a hydrodynamical description of the collision, while the PHSD model [15]

significantly underestimated the spectra for

p

pQCD at

√

s

=

5 02 and 7 TeV [10].

.

T

values of several

GeV

/

c

.

In the lower panel of Fig. 1 the ratios of the spectra for backward (

0 8

.

&lt;

η

cms

&lt;

0 3 and

.

1 3

.

&lt;

η

-

cms

&lt;

0 8) pseudorapidity ranges to that at

.

η

cms

&lt; .

0 3 are shown. The indication of a slight softening of the

-

|

|

pPb

=5.02 TeV, NSD

s

ALICE  p-Pb

R

p

T

spectrum when going from central to backward (Pb-side) pseudorapidity,

1.3

NN

in the pilot-run data of 2012 [4] (note opposite

η

cms sign convention in [4]) is confirmed with better

1.2

charged particles significance and extended in

p

T

down to 0.15 GeV

/

c

.

1.1

1

0.9

A good description of our earlier measurement of spectra in p-Pb collisions [4] was achieved in the

EPOS3 model [14] including a hydrodynamical description of the collision, while the PHSD model [15]

significantly underestimated the spectra for

p

0.8

0.7

T

values of several

GeV

/

c

.

0.6

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-0867e3fe-cd60-4656-82da-002e68eccf0d.jpg)

T

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-ba38d6cf-e086-4d5d-a280-28e722eea2f9.jpg)

2 - comparison with CMS and ALIC

pPb glyph&lt;c=1,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=2,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=3,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;

glyph&lt;c=1,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=4,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=5,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=5,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=6,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=7,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=4,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=8,font=/ERBPWC+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-1b2f8ca7-7d6f-4a5e-9c7f-ce16fbf51f8e.jpg)

T

1.1

T

1

0.8 0.9 The nuclear modification factor of charged particles as a function of transverse momentum, measured minimum-bias (NSD) p-Pb collisions at √ s NN = 5 02 TeV in two pseudorapidity ranges, . η cms &lt; . 0 3 and compatible with Figure 1. Charged hadron RpPb at p sNN = 5.02 TeV from ALICE [4], CMS [5] and ATLAS [8] (from left to right).

Fig. 2:

in

-

0.7

1 3

.

&lt;

η

|

|

cms

&lt; .

0 3.

The statistical errors are represented by vertical bars, the systematic errors by boxes around data points.

0.6

The relative systematic uncertainties on the normalization are shown as boxes around unity near

p

0.5

T

=

0.

50

In order to quantify nuclear effects in p-Pb collisions, the the nuclear modification factor, is calculated as:

Fig. 2:

The nuclear modification factor of charged particles as a function of transverse momentum, measured in

minimum-bias (NSD) p-Pb collisions at

-

5 02 TeV in two pseudorapidity ranges,

1 3

.

&lt;

η

cms

&lt; .

0 3.

The statistical errors are represented by vertical bars, the systematic errors by boxes around pPb

data points.

The relative systematic uncertainties on the normalization are shown as boxes around unity near where

N

is the charged particle yield in p-Pb collisions.

p

T e measurement of the nuclear modification factor

=

0.

Th for charged particle production in

and

1 3

.

&lt;

η

cms

&lt; .

0 3 is shown in Fig. 2.

in quadrature, of the p-Pb and pp spectra are added

T-differential yield relative to the pp reference,

In order to quantify nuclear effects in p-Pb collisions, the tic

-

separately for the statistical

The systematic uncertainties the nuclear modification factor, is calculated as: s.

are largely correlated

between adjacent

The total systematic uncertainty tion, the quadratic sum of the uncertainty on

CMS measurement

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-34ef7065-0b96-4d23-bac6-caef34a184cf.jpg)

different trend

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-b76acccf-df6a-4996-9384-6c1d79528e6d.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-ecea25b4-61ef-47cf-884c-d5f4bc1f543d.jpg)

T

T

R

d 2 the normalization of the pp reference spectrum and

N

/

d

η

d

p

T

pPb

,

pPb

(

p

T

) =

,

〈

-

〈 T pPb 〉 d 2 σ pp / d η d p T where N pPb is the charged particle yield in p-Pb collisions. The measurement of the nuclear modification factor R pPb for charged particle production in | η cms | &lt; . 0 3 and 1 3 . &lt; η &lt; . 0 3 is shown in Fig. 2. The uncertainties of the p-Pb and pp spectra are added Figure 2. RpPb for charged pions (left) and (anti-)protons (middle) for minimum bias p + Pb collisions [12]. Pions are consistent with unity for pT &gt; 4 GeV / c and the (anti-)protons are enhanced by approximately 20-40% for 3 &lt; pT &lt; 6 GeV / c . Similar measurements in d + Au collisions at p sNN = 200 GeV are shown in the right panel [13]. Pions are consistent with unity and (anti-)protons are enhanced by approximately 60%.

cms in quadrature,

separately for the statistical

〉

and systematic uncertainties.

The systematic uncertainties are largely

correlated between adjacent

p

bins.

The total systematic uncertainty on the normaliza-

tion, the quadratic sum of the uncertainty on 〈 T pPb 〉 , the normalization of the pp reference spectrum and collaborations. Results from the ALICE experiment [4] do not show this excess however the pT reach is smaller and the statistical and systematic uncertainties are large in the region where the excess is observed in CMS and ATLAS. Results from all three collaborations are shown in Fig. 1. The excess is larger than is expected from the jet data and larger and with a di GLYPH&lt;11&gt; erent pT dependence than expected from the EPS09 [7] nuclear parton distribution functions [5]

T

It is notable that there is no p + p data at 5.02 TeV, so there are substantial uncertainties in the p + p reference, which has to be interpolated from higher and lower energy p + p collisions. An analysis by CMS has found that much of the di GLYPH&lt;11&gt; erence between the ALICE and CMS results is in the p + p reference, not the p + Pb measurement [5]. p + p running at 5 TeV is of interest to establishing the excess observed by CMS and ATLAS and is central to reducing the uncertainties which will enable more precise characterization of the charged hadron scaling. In the short term, understanding the origin of the reference di GLYPH&lt;11&gt; erences and direct comparison of the p + Pb spectra are of interest. The results from ATLAS and CMS could suggest some modification to jet fragmentation in p + Pb . It could also suggest that there is a larger fraction of quark jets than would be expected based on p + p collisions. That might create an excess because of the softer fragmentation of gluon jets than quark jets, but it has not been demonstrated that this would be able to account for the size and pT dependence of the charged hadron excess.

Centrality in p + A collisions has been measured by the forward energy in the nucleus going direction [9, 6, 10]. The centrality dependence of very highpT jet production in p + Pb has been measured by ATLAS [6] and they find an excess of jets in peripheral collisions and a suppression of jets in central collisions relative to binary scaling. These e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects cancel to produce the RpPb for minimum bias collisions that is nearly unity. This is similar to what was previously seen by PHENIX [11]. ATLAS has measured over a wide range in jet pseudorapidity and finds that for a large span in GLYPH&lt;17&gt; the binary collision scaled central to periphal jet ratio, RCP follows a constant trend as a function of the total jet momentum (not pT ).

(1)

)

T-differential yield relative to the pp reference,

2

1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2

1

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

1.3

0

1.2

1.1

1

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0

-

-

|&lt;1)

η

CM

(|

pPb

R

pPb

R

10

pPb

CMS Preliminar

N

=6.9

coll

1

glyph&lt;c=1,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=2,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=3,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=4,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=5,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;

glyph&lt;c=4,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=6,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=7,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=7,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=8,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=9,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;glyph&lt;c=6,font=/MZVGTI+font00000000192b5d8d&gt;

ALICE p-Pb

N

s

char

10

15 g

|

|

cms

η

15

5

5

ons ns

3

3

4

4

5

Blast Wave

Blast Wave

FONLL

FONLL

6

7

8

p

9

10

(GeV/c)

T

3 (GeV/c) T p 7 8 9 10 (GeV/c) T p 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 Figure 3. (left) Blast-wave expectations for D and B meson nuclear modification factors at RHIC. (center) The resulting nuclear modification factor for electrons from the decay of D and B mesons (curves) and heavy meson decay electron measurement in central d + Au collisions (points) [20]. (right) The same quantity for D mesons and decay electrons at the LHC. Figures are from Ref. [21].

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-0046d544-02b0-4d98-9381-5465d30041da.jpg)

## 3. Identified Particle Measurements in p + A

The particle spectra at lower pT in d + Au collisions have shown an increased yield of protons and anti-protons compared to pions for 1.5 &lt; pT &lt; 3 GeV / c [14, 15]. New data from PHENIX [13] and ALICE [12] extend those measurements. The nuclear modification factors for pions and protons at both PHENIX and ALICE are shown in Fig. 2. In order to further understand the origin of the modified particle ratios, ALICE measured the ( GLYPH&lt;3&gt; + GLYPH&lt;3&gt; ¯ ) = 2 K S 0 ratio of both inclusive particles and those associated with reconstructed jets in p + Pb collisions [16]. The inclusive ( GLYPH&lt;3&gt; +GLYPH&lt;3&gt; ¯ ) = 2 K S 0 ratio is three times larger than that which is measured in reconstructed jets. This suggests that the species dependence of RpA is not associated with jets.

In light of the description of light hadrons at the LHC, it is natural to ask whether this descriptions extends to p s NN = 200 GeV d + Au collisions 1 and heavy mesons. Results from RHIC have shown a significant enhancement of electrons from the decay of heavy mesons in 0-20% central d + Au collisions [20]. If the enhancement observed in p + A collisions is from a radial flow boost, then D and B mesons will be more enhanced because of their larger mass. Blast-wave fits were done to the d + Auspectra in Ref. [13] and was found to give a good description of the spectra [21]. The blast-wave fit parameters from the light hadron spectra were used to determine a blast-wave prediction for the D and B meson spectra. These spectra were compared to theoretical calculations from Fixed-Order-Next-to-LeadingLog (FONLL) calculations [23, 24, 25] of D and B spectra. The resulting nuclear modification factors for D and B mesons are shown in Fig. 3 (left). In order to compare with the RHIC data which are for electrons from charm and bottom hadron decays, information about the decay kinematics from PYTHIA [26] is used. The resulting electron RdAu for 0-20% central d + Au collisions is shown in Fig. 3 (center) compared with the measurement from Ref. [20]. Given the uncertainties both on the data and the blast-wave parameters, the data and the calculation are in reasonable agreement. The calculations can also be done using the ALICE blast-wave parameters and the FONLL calculation at 5.02 TeV. At p s NN = 5.02 TeV the harder initial mesons spectra will lead to a smaller enhancement. The resulting RpA based on high multiplicity p + Pb blast-wave parameters from ALICE[19] is shown in Fig. 3 (right). The data from ALICE are thus far only for minimum bias p + Pb collisions so a direct comparison of the calculation to the data is not possible at this time.

Since the particle species dependent modifications seem to be associated with non-jet particle production it is interesting to determine if hydrodynamics can account for the patterns in the data. The ALICE collaboration has preformed blast-wave [17, 18] fits to the p + Pb spectra and find the di GLYPH&lt;11&gt; erent particle species are well described by a single set of blast-wave parameters and that the extracted velocities increase as function of the multiplicity of produced particles in the collision [19].

In asymmetric nuclear collisions, the particle production is also asymmetric around mid-rapidity. In d + Au collisions at p s NN = 200 GeV the maximum in dNch = d GLYPH&lt;17&gt; is near GLYPH&lt;17&gt; GLYPH&lt;25&gt; 2-3 in the Au-going direction [27]. Therefore,

1 It would also be interesting to determine if the original Cronin data [22] can be described with a blast-wave fit to see whether hydrodynamics might account for the Cronin e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ect.

5

6

3.5

Heavy-flavour decay muons:

p

T

-differential

R

pPb

1.5

1

0.5

2.5

0

2.5

dA

R

2

2

1.5

1.5

1

Pb

p

μ

3  GeV4

5 0 &lt; y &lt; -1.4

6

∝

→

PYTHIA + EPS09s LO, D

-2.

1.4 &lt; y &lt; 2.0

∝

→

PYTHIA + EPS09s LO, D

(a) 60-88%

(b) 0-20%

away from midrapidity

0.5

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-8d9024d6-e04f-49e9-9f2e-d9bf07a4c250.jpg)

μ

μ

: 1.4 &lt;|

η

| &lt; 2.0

2

R

pPb at forward rapidity

:

consistent with unity within uncertainties over the whole measured

T

z

z R pPb at backward rapidity : slightly larger than unity in 2&lt; p T &lt;4 GeV/  and close to unity at higher c p T z Within uncertainties, data can be described by perturbative QCD calculations with EPS09 parameterization of shadowing 0.5 1 1.5 (c) 0-100% Figure 4. Nuclear modification factors for GLYPH&lt;22&gt; GLYPH&lt;6&gt; from heavy meson decays. Left and middle panels show RpPb for forward (left) and backward (middle) in minimum bias p + Pb collisions [28] and the right panel shows forward (squares) and backward (circles) RdAu in central d + Au collisions [29]. Curves on all panels show expectations from EPS09 [7]. directions in p + Pb collisions. and Ref. [29].

pQCD NLO (MNR): Nucl. Phys. B 373 (1992) 295; EPS09: K. J. Eskola et al., JHEP 04 (2009) 065

p

T

range

17

broadening, CNM E-loss)

T

I. Vitev (shadowing, k

Lim

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

(GeV/c) T p e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects which are sensitive to the bulk particle production would be expected to also be strong in this region as well. Correspondingly, in the in the d -going direction where there is less particle production, these e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects would be expected to be reduced. ALICE [28] and PHENIX [29] have measured muons from the decay of heavy mesons on both sides of midrapidity, in addition to the midrapidity electron measurements discussed above. The results are shown in Fig. 4. Both experiments observe an enhancement in the nucleus-going direction (denoted as 'backward'), which is perhaps somewhat larger in PHENIX than in ALICE though the systematic uncertainties are large on both measurements. In the proton-going direction (denoted as 'forward') ALICE observes an RpPb consistent with unity while PHENIX observes a small suppression in the d -going direction. The curves in Fig. 4 show the expectations from nuclear PDFs [7, 30]. The enhancement in the Au-going direction at RHIC is larger than is expected from EPS09s and the d -going RdAu is consistent with EPS09s expectations. In ALICE, the enhancement in the Pb-going direction is perhaps slightly larger than the expectation from EPS09, though the uncertainties on the data are large. p p + Au running at s NN = 200 GeV is expected in 2015. Since the d + Au data taking in 2008 silicon vertex detectors have been installed in both STAR and PHENIX. This will enable the separation of decay electrons from charm and bottom which will be sensitive to whether there is the mass dependence characteristic of radial flow as well as better comparisons to nuclear parton distribution functions and LHC data. Direct reconstruction of D mesons has been done at ALICE [28]. D mesons have been measured at RHIC with the 2003 d + Au data [31] and higher statistics measurements would be of great interest at RHIC both in p + Au and d + Au .

## 4. Azimuthal Correlations in p + A

The interest in azimuthal correlations in p + A collisions began with the observation of a long range correlation in pseudorapidity of particles close together in azimuth, the ridge , in p + Pb collisions [32]. The ridge has been understood in heavy-ion collisions as being due to azimuthal correlations from the initial geometry of the collision followed by hydrodynamic evolution. The discovery of a ridge in p + A collisions was immediately suggestive of collective behavior. The discovery that there was also an away-side ridge under the recoiling jet peak [33, 34] and that the correlations were larger in d + Au collisions than in p + Pb collisions [35] strongly suggested that the correlations were caused by hydrodynamic flow as is the case in nucleus-nucleus collisions. Another possible explanation is that the back-to-back correlations are due to Glasma diagrams in the Color-Glass Condensate [36]. Over the last year much experimental activity has gone into trying to understand the origin of these correlations. Here we highlight some new results and discuss future opportunities.

The most straightforward method removing dijet correlations is the peripheral subtraction method . In order to remove dijet correlations from high multiplicity, or central events, the correlations are measured in peripheral events (low multiplicity events). The peripheral subtraction technique relies on the assumption that modifications to jet correlations are small compared to the correlations attributed to vN . On the near side, sensitivity to this e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ect can be reduced by increasing the GLYPH&lt;17&gt; separation between the particles. On the away side the jets are not well correlated in GLYPH&lt;17&gt; ,

The first results of v 2 in p + A systems were based on two particle azimuthal correlations. This method has several limitations. The main limitation is the influence of dijet correlations on the v 2 measurement. Additionally, this method is insensitive to the number of particles which are correlated. Here we discuss how more sophisticated techniques are being used to make qualitative improvements in the vN measurements in p + A collisions.

New d+Au

=200

1 @  s 2 NN

7

TPC-TPC

∆φ

TPC-TPC

∆φ

d+Au@200 GeV

d+Au@200 GeV

Correlations High- vs Low-m p : [1,3]x[1,3] GeV

Correlations High- vs Low-mult.

T

p : [1,3]x[1,3] GeV/

T

c

A ridge is observed with|

'K

|&gt;6.0

FTPC Multiplicity

0&lt;|

|&lt;0.3

∆η

0.5&lt;|

|&lt;0.7

∆η

STAR Preliminary

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-2452b444-c932-42c8-9b7c-f920af010847.jpg)

FTPC Multiplicity

1.2&lt;|

∆η

|&lt;1.8

STAR Preliminary

∆φ

(0-20%) - (40-100%)

high-mult. (cent.) &gt; low-mult. (peri.) on both near-side and



Correlation between Au-going and d-going MPC towers

●

high-mult. (cent.) &gt; low-mult. (peri.) on both near-side and away-side.

12 2014 May Li Yi, Purdue University 7 away-side. ● central - peripheral = 'double ridge' 2014 May Li Yi, Purdue University ● central - peripheral = 'double ridge' Figure 5. (left panel) Correlations of the ET measured by the d-going and Au-going MPC detectors 0-20% central d + Au collisions. A ridge correlation is seen for j GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt; j &gt; 6. (top row, right two panels) Azimuthal correlation for 0-20% central events (light points) and 40-100% central events (dark points) for two di GLYPH&lt;11&gt; erent GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt; selections: 0.5-0.7 (middle) and 1.2-1.8 (right). The background has been subtracted using the zero yield at minimum technique [39]. (bottom row, right two panels) Results of a perpherial subtraction of the corresponding upper panels. Excess at GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;30&gt; GLYPH&lt;25&gt; 0 and GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;30&gt; GLYPH&lt;25&gt; GLYPH&lt;25&gt; are seen in all GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt; ranges (there is a downward shift in the right panel). Plot is from Ref. [40]. It should be noted that the centrality selections used here are not the same was used in Ref. [35].

so regardless of the GLYPH&lt;17&gt; separation between the particles the away side jet contribution to two-particle correlations is approximately constant. The measurement is then sensitive to di GLYPH&lt;11&gt; erences in the dijet correlations between central and peripheral events.

While at midrapidity PHENIX has a limited accessible GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt; range for charged particles, long range correlations have been shown between midrapidity charged hadrons and the energy in the Au-going muon piston calorimeter (MPC) [37, 38]. A ridge has also been observed in energy correlations between the Au-going and d-going MPCs with j GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt; j &gt; 6 [38], as seen in Fig 5. PHENIX has used the Au-going energy to determine an event plane in d + Au collisions and measure the v 2 of charged hadrons near midrapidity with respect to this plane [37]. The event plane v 2 results are slightly lower than the two-particle correlation results in Ref. [35].

This limitation is particularly applicable to the first measurements of v 2 in d + Aucollisions [35]. There the required GLYPH&lt;17&gt; separation was between 0.5-0.7, limited by the size of the PHENIX charged particle acceptance. This separation is not enough to completely exclude the near side jet. In contrast, the LHC experiments and STAR have a wider midrapidity charged particle acceptance in GLYPH&lt;17&gt; allowing more complete suppression of the near side jet correlations.

The STAR detector has the ability to measure over a wider range in pseudorapidity separation. Results for central and peripheral correlations for a single pT selection and two GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt; selections are shown in Fig. 5. Following a peripheral subtraction near and away side correlations are observed in correlations with j GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt; j up to 1.8. In this GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt; range the near side jet is completely removed in 40-100% peripheral collisions and a small near side correlation is observed in 0-20% central collisions. In order to explore the possible e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects of dijet modifications between the jets in central and peripheral collisions, STAR introducted a scaling factor to match the near side jets in the small GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt; region. Applying this scaling factor to di GLYPH&lt;11&gt; erent GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt; selection causes the away side correlation to be reduced. There was discussion that this finding was inconsistent with the observation of collective e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects in d + Au collisions. This conclusion is premature. A study of the sensibility of this rescaling procedure in more pT bins is called for. Additionally, the validity of the peripheral subtraction method with a wide central bin (0-20%) and a rather central 'peripheral' bin (40-100%) is not clear and has not been demonstrated. Given the focus of the community on the topic of angular correlations in very small collisions, these and related studies should be given a high priority. The ATLAS collaboration has employed a similar technique [41], but both ridges remain. A fuller understanding of this procedure requires a systematic study as a function of pT , centrality, and GLYPH&lt;17&gt; acceptance (the ATLAS GLYPH&lt;17&gt; acceptance is much wider than that of the STAR detector).

Two-particle correlations alone are not sensitive to whether many or a few particles (for example as is the case with jets) are correlated. In the Color-Glass Condensate model only a few particles in the event should be correlated by the Glasma diagrams, whereas if hydrodynamics is the source of observed correlations all of the particles should be correlated. The event plane results discussed above suggest that many particles are correlated rather than just a

5

7

0.3

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-485c16ab-b81b-4f68-b416-522a3809661f.jpg)

d+Au@200 GeV

v

collisions [2, 3, 5], with much improved uncertainti

(EP) 0-5%

extended

p

range.

It is about 20% higher than

2

T

Figure 6. v 2 in Pb + Pb (left) and p + Pb (right) collisions as measured with 2, 4, 6 and 8 particle cumulants as well as the Lee-Yang Zeros method [42]. The v 2 ngular correlations of values are plotted as a function of the number of o GLYPH&lt;15&gt; ine tracks as measured by CMS. A π , K and p in p-Pb collisions ALICE Collaboration 0.2 (2p) 0-5% 2 v Polynominal Fit CMS 0-2% ALICE 0-20% p +Pb at p T = 1 GeV/ , and the difference decre c few percent at p T &gt; 2.0 GeV/ . c

ATLAS 0-2%

2

v

/ Fit

2

v

1.0

0.3

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-f2841cbb-ae00-4721-93a8-7bac75eb5434.jpg)

0-20% p+Pb @ 5.02 T

pion proton

collisions [2, 3, 5], with much improved uncertainties extended

about 20% higher than th

p

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3

= 1 GeV/ , and the difference decreas

0.2

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0220v2-figure-e31ee61b-6953-4d26-8561-a3e815c86104.jpg)

T

T

p

T

&gt;

2.0 GeV/ .

c

2

v

T

few percent at

Fig. 4:

The Fourier coefficient

v

2

{

2PC sub

,

}

for hadrons (black squares), pions (red triangles), kaons plane method in Panel (a).

(green stars) and protons (blue circles) as a function of p p T from the correlation in the 0-20% multiplicity class after subtraction of the correlation from the 60-100% multiplicity class. The data is plotted at the averagep T for each considered p T interval and particle species under study. Error bars show statistical FIG. 3: Measured v 2 ( EP ) for midrapidity charged tracks in 0%-5% central d +Au at √ s NN = 200 GeV using the event FIG. 4: Measured v 2 ( p T ) for identified pio (anti)protons, each charged combined, in 0%-5% 0.1 0.25 0-5% d+Au @ 200 GeV (a) 0-20% p+Pb @ 5.02 TeV Figure 7. vN for GLYPH&lt;25&gt; GLYPH&lt;6&gt; and p p ; ¯ for high multiplicity + Pb collisions from ALICE [44] (left) and central d + Au collisions from PHENIX [37] (right). Shown on the PHENIX data is a hydrodynamic calculation from Ref. [45].

Also shown are

v

2

measured in central

uncertainties while shaded areas denote systematic uncertainties.

p

+Pb collisions at

s

= 5.02 TeV [2, 3, 5], and our

+Au collisions at RHIC. In panel (a) the data are co

0.20

pion pion

/ Fit

v

6 Summary Two-particle angular correlations of charged particles with pions, kaons and protons have been he event plane method) [37] and are shown in measured in p-Pb collisions at √ s NN = imize 5.02 TeV and expressed as associated yields per trigger particle. The Fourier coefficient v 2 was extracted from these correlations and studied as a function of p T and event multiplicity. In low-multiplicity collisions the p T and species dependence of v 2 resembles that observed in pp collisions at similar energy where correlations from jets dominate the measurement. In high-multiplicity p-Pb collisions a different picture emerges, where v p &lt; v π is found up to about 2 GeV/ c . At 3-4 GeV/ , c v p is slightly larger than v π , albeit three subevents method [23, 24], with the other two event planes being (i) the second order event plane determined from central-arm tracks, restricted to low p T (0.2 GeV/ c &lt; p T &lt; 2.0 GeV/ ) to min c contribution from jet fragments; and (ii) the first order event plane measured with spectator neutrons in the shower-maximum detector on the Au-going side ( η &lt; -6.5) [24, 25]. The systematic bined for each species, up to p T = 3 GeV/ c usi event plane method; the systematic uncertainties same as for inclusive charged hadrons. A dist mass-splitting can be seen. The meson v 2 is highe the baryon for p T &lt; 1 5 GeV/ , as has been seen . c sally in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC [29-34]. Figu also shows calculations with Glauber initial con (GeV/c) T p FIG. 3: Measured v 2 ( EP ) for midrapidity charged tracks in 0%-5% central d +Au at √ s NN = 200 GeV using the event plane method in Panel (a). Also shown are v 2 measured in central p +Pb collisions at √ s NN = 5.02 TeV [2, 3, 5], and our prior measurements with two particle correlations ( v (2 p )) for (GeV/c) T p 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 (GeV/c) T p 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 FIG. 4: Measured v 2 ( p T ) for identified pions (anti)protons, each charged combined, in 0%-5% ce d +Au collisions at RHIC. In panel (a) the data are com with the calculation from a viscous hydrodynamic model Radial flow, in addition to modifications of the particle spectra discussed in Section 3, should also a GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ect the vN of hadrons in a mass dependent manner. Measurements of v 2 for pions and (anti-)protons are now available in both p + Pb (using the subtraction method) [44] and d + Au collisions (using t Fig. 7. In both collision systems, the mass ordering of v 2 characteristic of radial flow is observed. The splitting is larger in p + Pb collisions, consistent with larger radial flow in p + Pb collisions. A hydrodynamic calculation [45] is able to qualitatively describe both the p + Pb and d + Au results. However, the magnitude of the observed splitting in p + Pb collisions is larger than that expected within the calculation.

class and subtracting the 60-100% event class, results in qualitatively similar observations. On lants. average the v 2 values are 15-25% lower and the statistical uncertainties are about a factor 2 larger than in the 0-20% case. For the 40-60% event class, the statistical uncertainties are too large to draw a conclusion. The analysis was repeated using the energy deposited in the ZNA instead of the VZERO-A to define the event classes. The extracted v 2 values are consistently lower by about 12% due to the e different event sample selected in this way. However, the presented conclusions, in particular the observed difference of v p 2 and v π 2 compared between jet-dominated correlations (60-100% event class) and double-ridge dominated correlations (0-20% event class after subtraction), are unchanged. NN prior measurements with two particle correlations ( v 2 (2 p )) for d +Au collisions [6]. A polynomial fit to the current measurement and the ratios of experimental values to the fit are shown in the panel (b). resolution Res(Ψ Obs 2 ) is calculated through the standard with the calculation from a viscous hydrodynamic mo 28], and in panel (b) the v 2 data for pions and pro 0%-20% central p +Pb collisions at LHC are shown f parison [15]. Figure 4 shows the midrapidity v 2 ( p T ) for ide charged pions and (anti)protons, with charge sign 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 2 1.0 1.5 (b) 2 v 0.05 0.10 0.15 proton pion proton viscous hydro. ) π /s = 1.0/(4 η proton few. At the LHC, CMS has investigated this by measuring v 2 with cumu Results for Pb + Pb and p + Pb are shown in Fig. 6 [42]. The v 2 from two particle correlations with a rapidity separation between the two particles is found to be larger than the v 2 f 4 g ( v 2 as measured via four particle cumulants). However increasing the order of the cumulants from 4 to 8 does not change the observed v 2 in either Pb + Pb or p + Pb . Additionally, CMS has extracted v 2 from the Lee-Yang Zeros method [43] which involves correlations among all th particles in the event. The v 2 extracted via that method is also found to be consistent with the cumulant v 2 for four or more particles. These results are consistent with the origin of the correlations in hydrodynamic phenomena and is not the behavior that is expected from the Color-Glass Condensate where only a few particles would be expected to be correlated.

d

2 2 2 2 with low significance. ns uncertainties on the v 2 of charged hadrons are mainly for viscous hydrodynamics starting at 2 +Au collisions [6]. A polynomial fit to the current measure28], and in panel (b) the v 2 data for If the correlatio observed in p + A systems are a response to the initial collision geometry, then changing the

τ

= 0 5 fm/

.

pions and proto ment and the ratios of experimental values to the fit are shown

0%-20% central

p

+Pb collisions at LHC are shown for in the panel (b).

from the tracking background and pile-up effects, as de-

η/s

= 1 0

.

/

(4

π

), followed by a hadronic cascade [

scribed above,

and also from the difference in

v

12

parison [15].

2

from different

event plane

determinations.

To estimate the

systematic uncertainty of the latter we compare the

v

2

2

resolution Res(Ψ

Obs

) is calculated through the standard three subevents method [23, 24], with the other two event

extracted with the MPC-S event plane with that using the south (Au-going) beam-beam counter, and the two

measurements of

v

2

are consistent to within 5%.

planes being (i) the second order event plane determined from cen

The tral-arm tracks, restricted to low

v

2

of

p

T

(0.2 GeV/

charged hadrons for 0%-5% central

d

c

+Au

T

The splitting at lower

p

is also seen in the calcu

Because there are no known CGC calculations av

2

Figure 4 shows the midrapidity

v

(

p

T

)

for ident

charged pions and (anti)protons, with charge signs that would indicate a mass-splitting, it may be ch

ing - even in principle - to establish the observe

T

bined for each species, up to

p

= 3 GeV/

c

usin event plane method; the systematic uncertainties ar

dependence in the initial stages of the collision.

Th g tified

particle

v

2

in 0%-20%

p

+Pb collisions are in Fig. 4(b) for comparison [15].

The magnitude same as

for inclusive

charged hadrons.

A distin

d

√

p

(GeV/c)

0.1

1.5

0.0

projectile nucleus should be able to change the measured vN . This was seen in d + Au collisions where the v 2 in central d + Au collisions was found to be larger than in in p + Pb collisions [35] possibly due to the initial elongated shape of the deuteron. Pursuing that idea further, it might be possible to observe a large v 3 by colliding a triangluar nucleus with a large nucleus. In the time since this conference, RHIC has successfully delivered 3 He + Au collisions at p s NN = 200 GeV. Hydrodynamic calculations show some increase in the expected v 3 of these collisions compared to d + Au (in d + Au no significant v 3 has been observed [35, 37]), especially in very high multiplicity events where the 3 He nucleus could preferentally be oriented to maximize the triangularity of the collision region [45]. As a further comparison, p + Au running at RHIC is expected in 2015. The full collection of these three small nuclei collided with Au will provide the most constraining tests as to the correlations between the geometry of the initial state and the final state correlations.

## 5. Conclusions

There has been great interest in determining the role that hot nuclear matter e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects play in p + A collisions. A wealth of new measurements were presented at this conference aimed at precisely this question. The available data strongly suggests that the angular correlations observed in these small collision systems involve many (or all) of the particles in the event, persist to large pseudorapidity separations and are related to the collision geometry. The results from single identified particle measurements support this interpretation. Mass dependent enhancement in the RpA measurements has been observed and there are hints that this may extend to the heavy mesons. The modifications to the particle composition does not seem to originate in jets, but rather in non-jet particles.

While much of the interest in p + A has focussed on lowpT physics, high pT physics of hadrons, jets, other hard probes and the centrality dependence of their production has also been of great interest. E ects are seen which are GLYPH&lt;11&gt; larger than expected from nuclear modifications to the parton distribution functions, the origin of which is not understood. Some of these e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects are seen in the centrality dependent results and further investigation of the centrality determination in p + A and the correlations between that determination and the measured hard probes are under investigation. The comparison between p + Pb collisions at the LHC and the upcoming p + Au collsions at RHIC will be of great interest. In contrast to heavy-ion collisions, no evidence for jet quenching in p + A has been observed.

The similarity of all these measurements to what has been seen in heavy-ion collisions is striking and suggests a common origin of phenomena in both systems. There was much discussion at the conference on whether hydrodynamic models could explain the totality of the data small and large system data. First attempts at more comprehensive calculations are being made [46] and more work is clearly necessary. The ability to quantitatively extract GLYPH&lt;17&gt;= s from the central heavy-ion data will be unconvincing without a clear understanding of the applicability of hydrodynamics in small collision systems. Since smaller collision systems can create less matter and will live for a shorter period of time they potentially provide a good place to descriminate between models of the collision at very early times. Upcoming 3 He + Au and p + Au data to be taken at RHIC will be key to experimentally constraining the physics of small collision systems.

p + A systems have proven to be much more interesting and surprising than originally envisioned and might be providing the most discriminating opportunity to push our understanding of collective behavior in heavy-ion physics to its limits. Other surprising e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects remain unexplained. Upcoming p + A and 3 He + Au running at RHIC as well as more p + Pb measurements will provide more insight into the physics of asymmetric nuclear collisions.

## 6. Acknowledgements

I thank the organizers for providing such an enjoyable and stimulating conference. I would also like to thank all those who discussed their work with me in preparation for this talk. I would like to thank the ALICE, ATLAS, CMS, PHENIX and STAR collaborations for providing me with the material necessary to put this talk together in a timely manner. This work was supported by the DOE under contract number: DE-AC02-98CH10886.

## References

[1] J. Adams, et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 91 (2003) 072304. arXiv:nucl-ex/0306024 .

- [2] S. Adler, et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 91 (2003) 072303. arXiv:nucl-ex/0306021 .
- [4] S. Aiola, these proceedings.
- [3] B. Abelev, et al., Transverse Momentum Distribution and Nuclear Modification Factor of Charged Particles in p -Pb Collisions at p sNN = 5 02 : TeV, Phys.Rev.Lett. 110 (2013) 082302. arXiv:1210.4520 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.082302 , .
- [5] E. Appelt, these proceedings.
- [7] K. Eskola, H. Paukkunen, C. Salgado, EPS09: A New Generation of NLO and LO Nuclear Parton Distribution Functions, JHEP 0904 (2009) 065. arXiv:0902.4154 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/065 , .
- [6] D. Perepelitsa, these proceedings.
- [8] P. Balek, these proceedings.
- [10] A. Toia, these proceedings.
- [9] A. Adare, et al., Centrality categorization for Rp d ( ) + A in high-energy collisions arXiv:1310.4793 .
- [11] D. V. Perepelitsa, Exploring cold nuclear matter e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects in d + Au with highpT reconstructed jets at PHENIX, Nucl.Phys. A904-905 (2013) 1003c-1006c. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.02.184 .
- [13] A. Adare, et al., Spectra and ratios of identified particles in Au + Au and d + Au collisions at p sNN = 200 GeV, Phys.Rev. C88 (2) (2013) 024906. arXiv:1304.3410 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.024906 , . p
- [12] M. L. Knichel, these proceedings.
- [14] J. Adams, et al., Pion, kaon, proton and anti-proton transverse momentum distributions from p + p and d + Au collisions at sNN = 200GeV, Phys.Lett. B616 (2005) 8-16. arXiv:nucl-ex/0309012 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.04.041 , .
- [16] X. Zhang, these proceedings.
- [15] S. Adler, et al., Nuclear e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects on hadron production in d = Au and p + p collisions at s(NN)**(1 2) / = 200-GeV, Phys.Rev. C74 (2006) 024904. arXiv:nucl-ex/0603010 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.024904 , .
- [17] P. Kolb, P. Huovinen, U. W. Heinz, H. Heiselberg, Phys.Lett. B500 (2001) 232-240. arXiv:hep-ph/0012137 , doi:10.1016/ S0370-2693(01)00079-X .
- [19] B. B. Abelev, et al., Multiplicity Dependence of Pion, Kaon, Proton and Lambda Production in p-Pb Collisions at sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys.Lett. B728 (2014) 25-38. arXiv:1307.6796 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.11.020 , . p
- [18] E. Schnedermann, J. Sollfrank, U. W. Heinz, Thermal phenomenology of hadrons from 200-A GeV S / + S collisions, Phys.Rev. C48 (1993) 2462-2475. arXiv:nucl-th/9307020 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.48.2462 , . p
- [20] A. Adare, et al., Cold-nuclear-matter e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects on heavy-quark production in d + Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV, Phys.Rev.Lett. 109 (24) (2012) 242301. arXiv:1208.1293 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.242301 , .
- [22] J. Cronin, H. J. Frisch, M. Shochet, J. Boymond, R. Mermod, et al., Production of Hadrons with Large Transverse Momentum at 200-GeV, 300-GeV, and 400-GeV, Phys.Rev. D11 (1975) 3105. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.3105 .
- [21] A. M. Sickles, Possible Evidence for Radial Flow of Heavy Mesons in d + Au Collisions, Phys.Lett. B731 (2014) 51-56. arXiv:1309.6924 , doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.02.013 .
- [23] M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, P. Nason, The p(T) spectrum in heavy flavor photoproduction, JHEP 0103 (2001) 006. arXiv:hep-ph/0102134 .
- [25] M. Cacciari, http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ ~ cacciari/fonll/fonllform.html .
- [24] M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, N. Houdeau, M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, et al., Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC, JHEP 1210 (2012) 137. arXiv:1205.6344 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2012)137 , .
- [26] T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P. Z. Skands, A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput.Phys.Commun. 178 (2008) 852-867. arXiv:0710. 3820 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.036 , .
- [28] S. Li, these proceedings.
- [27] B. Back, et al., Phys.Rev. C72 (2005) 031901. arXiv:nucl-ex/0409021 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.72.031901 , .
- [29] A. Adare, et al., Cold-nuclear-matter e GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ects on heavy-quark production at forward and backward rapidity in d + Au collisions at p sNN = 200 GeV arXiv:1310.1005 .
- [31] J. Adams, et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 94 (2005) 062301. arXiv:nucl-ex/0407006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.062301 , .
- [30] I. Helenius, K. J. Eskola, H. Honkanen, C. A. Salgado, Impact-Parameter Dependent Nuclear Parton Distribution Functions: EPS09s and EKS98s and Their Applications in Nuclear Hard Processes, JHEP 1207 (2012) 073. arXiv:1205.5359 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)073 , .
- [32] S. Chatrchyan, et al., Observation of long-range near-side angular correlations in proton-lead collisions at the LHC, Phys.Lett. B718 (2013) 795-814. arXiv:1210.5482 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.025 , .
- [34] G. Aad, et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 110 (2013) 182302. arXiv:1212.5198 .
- [33] B. Abelev, et al., Phys.Lett. B719 (2013) 29-41. arXiv:1212.2001 .
- [35] A. Adare, et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. arXiv:1303.1794 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.212301 , .
- [37] A. Adare, et al., Measurement of long-range angular correlation and quadrupole anisotropy of pions and (anti)protons in central d + Au collisions at p s NN = 200 GeV arXiv:1404.7461 .
- [36] K. Dusling, R. Venugopalan, Phys.Rev. D87 (2013) 094034. arXiv:1302.7018 .
- [38] S. Huang, these proceedings.
- [40] L. Yi, these proceedings.
- [39] N. Ajitanand, J. Alexander, P. Chung, W. Holzmann, M. Issah, et al., Phys.Rev. C72 (2005) 011902. arXiv:nucl-ex/0501025 .
- [41] S. Radhakrishnan, these proceedings.
- [43] R. Bhalerao, N. Borghini, J. Ollitrault, Analysis of anisotropic flow with Lee-Yang zeroes, Nucl.Phys. A727 (2003) 373-426. arXiv: nucl-th/0310016 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.08.007 , .
- [42] Q. Wang, these proceedings.
- [44] B. B. Abelev, et al., Phys.Lett. B726 (2013) 164-177. arXiv:1307.3237 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.024 , .
- [46] B. Schenke, R. Venugopalan, Eccentric protons? Sensitivity of flow to system size and shape in p + p, p + Pb and Pb + Pb collisions arXiv: 1405.3605 .
- [45] J. Nagle, A. Adare, S. Beckman, T. Koblesky, J. O. Koop, et al. arXiv:1312.4565 .
Anne M. Sickles
Experimental Results on p(d)+A Collisions at RHIC and the LHC
Recent experimental results at both the LHC and RHIC show evidence for
hydrodynamic behavior in proton-nucleus and deuteron- nucleus collisions (p+A).
This unexpected finding has prompted new measurements in p+A collisions in
order to understand whether similar matter is created in A+A and p+A collisions
or whether some another explanation is needed. In this proceedings, we will
discuss the new experimental data and its interpretation within the context of
heavy ion collisions.