## Investigating radiation damage in nuclear energy materials using JANNuS multiple ion beams

## A. Gentils 1 , C. Cabet 2

1 CSNSM, Univ Paris-Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France 2 DEN, Service de Recherches de Métallurgie Physique, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France

## Corresponding authors :

A. Gentils (aurelie.gentils@u-psud.fr), C. Cabet (celine.cabet@cea.fr)

Abstract :  Ion  accelerators  have  been  used  by  material  scientists  for  decades  to  investigate radiation  damage  formation  in  nuclear  materials  and  thus  to  emulate  neutron-induced changes. The versatility of conditions in terms of particle energy, dose rate, fluence, etc., is a key asset of ion beams allowing for fully instrumented analytical studies. In addition, very short irradiation times and handling of non-radioactive samples dramatically curtail the global cost and duration as compared to in-reactor testing. Coupling of two or more beams, use of heated/cooled sample holders, and implementation of in situ characterization and microscopy pave the way to real time observation of microstructural and property evolution in various extreme  radiation  conditions  more  closely  mimicking  the  nuclear  environments.  For  these reasons, multiple ion beam facilities have been commissioned worldwide.

In France, under the auspices of the Université Paris-Saclay, the JANNuS platform for 'Joint Accelerators  for  Nanosciences  and  Nuclear  Simulation'  comprises  five  ion  implanter  and electrostatic  accelerators  with  complementary  performances.  At  CSNSM  (CNRS  &amp;  Univ Paris-Sud, Orsay), a 200 kV Transmission Electron Microscope is coupled to an accelerator and an implanter for in situ observation of microstructure modifications induced by ion beams in a material, making important contribution to the understanding of physical phenomena at the  nanoscale.  At  CEA  Paris-Saclay,  the  unique  triple  beam  facility  in  Europe  allows  the simultaneous  irradiation  with  heavy  ions  (like  Fe,  W)  for  nuclear  recoil  damage  and implantation of a large array of ions including gasses for well-controlled modelling-oriented experiments.

Several classes of materials are of interest for the nuclear industry ranging from metals and alloys, to oxides or glasses and carbides. This paper gives selected examples that illustrate the use of JANNuS ion beams in investigating the radiation resistance of structural materials for today's and tomorrow's nuclear reactors.

Keywords: nuclear materials, ion irradiation, ion implantation, radiation tolerance, triple ion beam, in situ TEM

## 1. Introduction

Under  the  auspices  of  the  new  Université  Paris-Saclay,  the  multi-ion  beam  irradiation platform  JANNuS  for  'Joint  Accelerators  for  Nanosciences  and  Nuclear  Simulation'  is dedicated to researches in the effects of ions in materials. Its particle beams make it possible to irradiate small samples in a perfectly controlled manner, and thus to observe and quantify the  evolution  of  their  microstructure  (segregation,  precipitation,  formation  of  dislocation loops,  cavities,  bubbles,  etc.)  and  service  properties.  JANNuS-Orsay  and  JANNuS-Saclay have been developed from the origin as two complementary facilities on neighbouring sites (Orsay and Saclay) and they are bound since 2005 by a Grouping of Scientific Interest (GIS) [1]. This platform offers to the international academic community the opportunity to perform fully instrumented irradiation experiments on advanced materials which may be supplemented by in situ characterization techniques such as Transmission Electron Microscopy, Raman or Ion Beam Analysis (IBA) [2]. The actual capabilities combine five electrostatic accelerators for  single  beam,  dual  beam  and  triple  beam  ion  experiments  and  a  Transmission  Electron Microscope (TEM) for in situ studies. Such a scientific platform has no equivalent in Europe and plays an essential role for multi-scale modelling of radiation effects in materials. With the scarcity of Material Testing Reactors throughout the world, ion irradiation facilities allow to emulate  neutron  irradiation  and  to  understand  the  fundamentals  of  radiation  resistance  of nuclear materials. This is of special importance for the present and future nuclear industry. As an  example,  Ref.  [3,4]  describe  the  need  to  predict  the  modification  of  materials  under irradiation and to validate their radiation resistance.

In  situ Transmission  Electron  Microscopy  is  a  speciality  since  the  early  1980's  [5]  of  the CSNSM lab (joint research unit of CNRS/IN2P3 and Université Paris-Sud) located in Orsay, France. A 120 kV Philips EM400 TEM and a 190 kV homemade ion implanter (called IRMA [6])  were  connected  together  under  the  guidance  of  Dr.  Marie-Odile  Ruault,  allowing in situ observations of modification of materials under ion beam. Several research projects took place  mainly  on  ion  beam  synthesis  in  semiconductors  and  metals  using  this  peculiar equipment  [e.g.  7-10].  A  new  120  keV  Philips  CM12  microscope  equipped  with  EnergyDispersive X-ray Spectroscopy was installed in 1994 [11] and researches were still focused on ion beam synthesis in silicon for microelectronic applications [e.g. 12], but also dedicated to nuclear materials [e.g. 13-15]. The facility was updated in 2006 [16] with the arrival of a new FEI  Tecnai  200kV  G 2 20  TEM  and  the  construction  of  a  new  ion  beam  line  connected to ARAMIS [17], a 2 MV Tandem / Van de Graaff homemade accelerator, built in the late 80's. This exceptional facility that includes the TEM and the two ion beam lines coming from the IRMA ion implanter and the ARAMIS ion accelerator has been called JANNuS-Orsay. It is part of the SCALP accelerators platform of the CSNSM  lab, where single ion implantation/irradiation and ion beam analysis are also available [18].

The DMN department of the CEA Paris-Saclay has been developing for many years modeling tools from the atomic to the macroscopic scale in order to validate the resistance of nuclear materials under the extremely harsh conditions which they encounter in service, in particular irradiation  effects,  and  to  design  innovative  materials  for  advanced  nuclear  systems  [19]. These models rely on high-performance numerical methods  and on fully controlled characterization techniques at the same scales. In line with this technological and scientific approach, the SRMP has designed the JANNuS-Saclay triple ion beam irradiation facility as a key tool to understand the physical mechanisms of neutron radiation damage, and to validate the multiscale modeling of the macroscopic events of materials aging [20].

After a brief technical description of each facility, this paper gives selected examples of recent research  studies  related  to  nuclear  materials  for  existing  and  future  reactors  that  have  been performed at JANNuS.

## 2. Description of the equipments

Ion  accelerators  have  been  used  by  material  scientists  for  decades  to  investigate  radiation damage formation in nuclear materials and thus to emulate neutron-induced changes [e.g. 21, 22]. The versatility of conditions in terms of particle energy, dose rate, fluence, is a key asset of  ion  beams  allowing  for  fully  instrumented  analytical  studies.  In  addition,  very  short irradiation times and handling of non-radioactive samples dramatically curtail the global cost and  duration  as  compared  to  in-reactor  testing.  Coupling  of  two  or  more  beams,  use  of heated/cooled sample holders, and implementation of in situ characterization and microscopy pave the way to real time observation of microstructural and property evolution in various extreme  radiation  conditions  more  closely  mimicking  the  nuclear  environments.  For  these reasons,  multiple  ion  beam  facilities  have  been  commissioned  worldwide.  A  few  triple  ion beam facilities  are  operating  at  Takasaki  Advanced  Radiation  Research  Institute  (TIARA) , Japan [23], at the National Tsing Hua University (Accelerator Laboratory) in Taiwan [24], or at the University of Michigan (MIBL) in USA [25], to name only a couple. In situ TEM with ions (single or dual beam) facilities are available at various locations, such as in the USA, Japan, UK, China, as described in Ref. [26].

In  France,  within  the  Université  Paris-Saclay,  the  JANNuS  platform  comprises  five  ion implanter and accelerators with complementary performances presented below, that make it quite unique in the world. A more detailed description of the facilities can be found in Ref. [27].

## 2.1. JANNuS-Orsay in situ dual ion beam TEM

The  JANNuS-Orsay  facility,  a  scheme  of  which  is  shown  in  Figure  1,  is  now  operating according to three modes: i) TEM + IRMA ion implanter, ii) TEM + ARAMIS ion accelerator and iii) TEM in dual ion beam mode (TEM + IRMA + ARAMIS), at a chosen temperature in the range 77 - 1300 K, allowing in situ observation and analysis of the material microstructure modifications induced by single or dual ion implantation/irradiation. The detailed characteristics of IRMA ion implanter and ARAMIS Van de Graaff-Tandem ion accelerator are fully described in Ref. [6, 17, 18]. More than 40 elements from H to Yb can be produced from their ion sources, and both beams are rastered during ion implantation/irradiation, so that ion  irradiation  of  the  observed  zone  is  homogeneous.  Inside  the  TEM,  the  typical  range  of beam energies available depends on elements and is within 10-500 keV for the IRMA 190 kV ion  implanter  and  0.5-6  MeV  for  the  2  MV  ARAMIS  ion  accelerator.  Indeed  due  to  the deflection of the ion beam going to the TEM, a limitation of a maximum energy of 1 MeV per charge state occurs in the microscope for ions coming from ARAMIS. In situ simultaneous dynamical TEM observation is possible when using one or two ion beam lines, depending on the geometry used (i.e. tilt angle values, shape of the thin foil, location of the transparent area, use of a ultra-thin specimen holder to minimize shadowing effects, etc.). If using light and low energy elements (below 100 keV N ions) on the IRMA ion beam line, only sequential observation is possible due to the ion beam deflection induced by the magnetic field of the objective lens of the microscope, that must be switched off during in situ ion implantation of such elements. For each ion beam line an open Faraday cup is located close to the TEM thin foil less than 3 cm away (thanks to the modified polar pieces), so that the current is measured continuously during the ion irradiation. The measurements of the flux and fluence are given with an accuracy of 10 %. The typical flux range measured in the microscope, depending on

elements and energies, is between approximately 1x10 9  cm -2 .s -1  and 5x10 11 cm -2 .s -1 . The two ion beam lines have a 45° angle between them, and 22° with respect to the surface normal direction, as shown in the inset in Figure 1. The TEM is a 200 kV FEI Tecnai G 2  20 Twin equipped with a LaB6 filament, with a spatial resolution of 0.25 nm. Images and videos are recorded using a 2kx2k CCD high-resolution camera, with 30 frames per second recording, or a high speed and wide area-imaging camera. Several analytical techniques are also coupled to the  microscope,  e.g  Electron  Energy  Loss  Spectroscopy  (EELS),  Energy-Filtered  TEM (EFTEM),  Scanning  TEM  (STEM)  and  Energy-Dispersive  X-ray  Spectroscopy  (EDXS), allowing for example a chemical analysis of the specimen.

## 2.2 JANNuS-Saclay triple ion beam

The JANNuS-Saclay facility consists of three electrostatic accelerators, respectively named Épiméthée, Japet and Pandore, connected to a triple beam chamber for single-, dual- and triple beam irradiations [28]. Two other chambers are linked to Épiméthée and Pandore for single beam irradiation and/or Ion Beam Analysis, as shown in Figure 2.

Épiméthée is 3 MV, single-ended (NEC, 3-UH-2 Pelletron) and equipped with an electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) source (Pantechnik, Nanogan type). The ECR source delivers high charge states of gas ions like O, He, Ar, Xe, H and metal ions such as Fe and W, which are produced  by  the  MIVOC  process  from  two  cartridges  of  organometallic  compounds.  In combination with the 3 MV acceleration potential, it can supply ion beams with energies from 0.5 MeV up to as high as 36 MeV. Maximal current at the targets is for example 140 µA for protons and He + , 12 µA for Fe 5+ , 7 µA for W 5+ . Epiméthée is thus able to provide rather high dose rates of Fe and W that are classically used to induce damage levels up to 1 - 2 µm range in metals with damage rate typically up to 10 dpa/h.

Japet is a 2 MV Tandem (NEC, 6SDH-2 Pelletron) equipped with an external Cs sputtering source (SNICS II) which can deliver a large variety of ions such as Cl, I, C, Si, V, Cu, Zr, Ag, Au… Associated to an analysis magnet at 90°, this system produces beams protected from any  contamination  with  energies  of  0.5  to  about  14  MeV  depending  on  the  charge  state. Typical beams and current include: protons at 50 µA, iodine at 4 µA and gold at 1 µA.

Pandore  is  2.5  MV,  single-ended  and  equipped  with  a  RF  source  which  produces  singlecharge gas ions like protons, deuterium ions, helium-4 and helium-3 ions. This accelerator is used for implantation as well as for IBA. Maximal current intensities are for example 2 µA for protons and 9 µA for  4 He.

The  triple  beam  chamber  receives  one  beam  line  coming  from  each  accelerator  with  an incidence angle of 15 ° allowing single, dual or triple beam irradiations. A second vacuum chamber in line with Épiméthée can be used for single beam irradiation at normal incidence. Beam lines can be raster scanned to spread the beam homogeneously over an area of 2 cm by 2  cm  on  the  target  and  they  can  be  complemented  with  energy  degraders  that  flatten irradiation damage and implanted gas in the sample thickness. During irradiation experiment, current  intensity  is  monitored  using  a  mobile  multi-pin  Faraday  cups  device;  integrating current  intensity  provides  an  accurate  quantification  of  implanted  species.  Pumping  groups and cold traps allow reaching a vacuum better than 10 -7  Torr. Heating-cooling sample stages provide precise temperature control from liquid nitrogen temperature to 800°C. One to five thermocouples are used to monitor the sample temperature and a 2D infrared thermal imaging camera  maps  the  sample  surface  temperature. At higher temperature, a bi-chromatic pyrometer can be implemented. A confocal Raman spectrometer (Renishaw, Invia Reflex) has been connected to the triple beam chamber in 2014 for in situ measurements [29]. It has been successfully used for investigating the kinetics of radiation damage in various systems.

## 3. Examples of radiation damage investigations in nuclear materials at JANNuS

In the last decade, many materials of interest for the nuclear industry have been investigated at the JANNuS platform. A non-exhaustive list includes: nuclear fuel and surrogates such as uranium  dioxide  [30-33];  neutron  absorber  like  B4C  [34,35];  structural  alloys  for  present, advanced and future fission and fusion systems as well as model metals such as iron, Fe-Cr alloys  and  ferritic-martensitic  steels  [36-39],  ODS  steels  [40-45],  austenitic  steels  [46-51], tungsten and copper [52-54], aluminum alloys [55], zirconium [56-58]; Enhanced Accident Tolerant Fuel [59, 60]; advanced structural ceramics for innovative nuclear systems such as carbides  and  nitrides  [61-65];  glasses  and  oxides  for  waste  management  [66-69];  advanced coatings  for  Liquid  Metal  fast  Reactors  [70];  polymers  for  cable  sheath  or  glove  box components [71]. Selected studies are presented in the following that exemplify the prime role of in situ characterization during ion irradiation experiments and the strength of associating numerical modelling and controlled ion irradiation. All these examples are aimed to increase the understanding of fundamental properties in materials submitted to irradiation, for actual and future nuclear industries [72,73].

## 3.1. Stability of ODS nano-oxide particles under ion irradiation

Oxide  Dispersion  Strengthened  (ODS)  steels  are  considered  as  promising  candidates  for structural  material  in  future  fission  and  fusion  reactors.  These  steels  exhibit  enhanced  HT creep and mechanical strength thanks to the dispersion of nano-sized oxide particles.

Different  experiments  were  performed  to  confirm  the  stability  of  nano-oxides  under  ion irradiation in ferritic-martensitic ODS steels [40-44], and in austenitic ODS steels [45]. The stability of nano-oxides in a ODS Fe-18Cr stabilized with Y2O3 was investigated by in situ TEM at JANNuS-Orsay under Fe-ion irradiation. It was shown that Y-Ti-O nanoprecipitates as small as 5 nm are stable up to 45 dpa (displacements per atom), and larger oxides seem more affected by ion irradiation [40]. Irradiation at higher doses allowed studying the nanoparticle evolution [40]. At room temperature, irradiation at 200 dpa at JANNuS-Orsay lead to a complete dissolution of the oxide particles. TEM observations and APT analysis of samples irradiated at 500°C and 150 dpa at JANNuS-Saclay revealed an increase in particle size and a decrease  of  their  density  with  increasing  irradiation  dose.  It  was  assumed  that  the  most important  effect  of  irradiation  at  500  °C  would  be  to  accelerate  kinetics  and  therefore  to favour a faster evolution towards thermodynamic equilibrium.

With the aim of clarifying the role of nanoparticles, single (Fe)-, dual (He)- and triple (H)beam ion irradiations were also performed in ferritic/martensitic steels w/o ODS reinforcement and microstructural damage was characterized by TEM [42, 43]. Dislocation loops were observed in Eurofer-97 and Eurofer-ODS steels under single Fe irradiation as well as under dual and triple beam irradiation at 26 dpa and 400 °C [42]. However, simultaneous gas ion implantation induces the formation of cavities.  It was shown that a high-density of ODS nano-particles such as in the ferrite grains of Eurofer-ODS inhibits cavity formation.

## 3.2. Boron carbide behaviour under ion irradiation

Boron  carbide  is  widely  used  as  a  neutron  absorber  in  nuclear  plants.  B4C  samples  were irradiated  with  Au  ions  at  different  temperatures  at  JANNuS  and  damage  evolution  was monitored by in situ TEM [34] and in situ Raman [35]; it should be noted that B4C exhibits characteristic  Raman  fingerprints  for  the  pristine  as  well  as  for  the  irradiated  structure  that enable its characterization by Raman  spectroscopy. As an example, in situ Raman spectroscopy  was  performed  during  4  Me V Au  ion  irradiations  up  to  10 15 cm -2 at  -160°C, room temperature, and 800°C. The Raman analyses showed a structural disorder starting at a low fluence of 10 13 cm -2 , equivalent to ~0.01 dpa. However,  post-irradiation TEM

examinations have shown that the structure of the material remains crystalline. At a higher fluence, if one keeps away from the Au-ion implanted zone, small amorphous areas of few nanometers appear in the damaged zone but the long-range order is preserved. The material is fully amorphous above about 7.5 dpa at room temperature but at a higher dpa level at 800°C. Figure 3 shows the Raman spectrum evolution at room temperature. The defect band (marked by an arrow) is attributed to a loss of symmetry. This band gets broader from 9x10 11  to 9x10 14 cm -2 , and then it remains almost constant in width. These graphs illustrate that in situ Raman may be a powerful tool to monitor damage kinetics during irradiation.

## 3.3. Ageing of austenitic steels under irradiation

Single and dual ion beam irradiation experiments were used to study the ageing of austenitic stainless steels under radiation w/o helium gas presence [46-51].  The synergistic effects of the defect creation (induced by 4 MeV Au 2+ ) and He injection (10 keV He + ) on their potential swelling were for example studied using in situ dual ion beam TEM observations at JANNuSOrsay [47]. Characterization of the populations of cavities and defects induced by single or dual ion beam was performed at different temperatures and fluences, for both industrial CW 316L  steel  and  model  FeNiCr  alloy.  The  importance  of  the  minor  constituents  in  the microstructure under ion irradiation was highlighted. Figure 4 shows the cavities microstructure (in dark grey/black) obtained after single Au ion irradiation (a), consecutive single  Au  ion  irradiation  and  He  implantation  (b),  and  dual  ion  beam  irradiation  (c).  It  is observed  that  simultaneous  He  implantation  enhances  the  cavity  nucleation  in  contrast  to when  He  is  injected  after  damage.  Moreover  it  was  shown  that  the  cavity  distribution characteristics agree qualitatively with rate theory models.

## 4. Conclusion

In France, under the auspices of the Université Paris-Saclay, the JANNuS platform for Joint Accelerators  for  Nanosciences  and  Nuclear  Simulation  comprises  five  ion  implanter  and electrostatic accelerators with complementary performances. At CSNSM (CNRS/IN2P3 and Univ  Paris-Sud,  Orsay),  a  200  kV  Transmission  Electron  Microscope  is  coupled  to  an accelerator and an implanter for in situ observation of microstructure modifications induced by ion beams in a material, making important contribution to the understanding of physical phenomena in irradiated materials at the nanoscale, with a wide range of ions and energies available.  At  CEA  Paris-Saclay,  the  unique  triple  beam  facility  in  Europe  allows  the simultaneous  irradiation  with  heavy  ions  (like  Fe,  W)  for  nuclear  recoil  damage  and implantation of a large array of ions including gasses for well-controlled modelling-oriented experiments.  Some  current  investigations  on  various  systems  of  interest  for  the  nuclear industry  have  been  briefly  described  in  this  paper  and  complementary  information  can  be found in the list of references. These fundamental researches allow better understanding of the physical mechanisms that occurred in nuclear materials submitted to extreme conditions such as irradiation, gas presence and temperature. This is significant for materials currently used in the nuclear industry as well as for candidates that may be used in the future.

The  JANNuS  platform  is  open  to  the  international  academic  community  for  scientifically relevant  proposals  through  the call  for  projects  of  the  EMIR  French  accelerators  federation [74]. Our wish for the near future is to keep up with the state-of-the-art ion beam technologies and  to  reinforce in  situ characterization  to  monitor  the  microstructure  modification  of materials under ion beams.

## Acknowledgments

The  current  and  former  JANNuS  staffs  are  gratefully  acknowledged  for  their  unfailing assistance. The on-going support is provided at CSNSM Orsay especially by C. Bachelet, C.

Baumier,  J.  Bourçois,  S.  Picard,  S.  Jublot-Leclerc,  B.  Décamps,  but  also  C.-O.  Bacri,  L. Delbecq, F. Fortuna, D. Ledu, S. Pitrel, and at CEA Paris-Saclay by F. Leprêtre, G. Adroit, L. Roux,  G.  Gutierrez,  S.  Pellegrino,  M.  Loyer-Prost,  A.P.  Barabé,  H.  Martin.  We  are  also thankful to all the users, and especially to G. Gutierrez and S. Jublot-Leclerc for providing the images shown respectively in Figures 3 and 4.

## References

- [1]  Y.  Serruys,  M.-O.  Ruault,  P.  Trocellier,  S.  Henry,  O.  Kaïtasov,  Ph.  Trouslard,  Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 240 (2005) 124.
- [2]  Y.  Serruys,  P.  Trocellier,  S.  Miro,  E.  Bordas,  M.O.  Ruault,  O.  Kaïtasov,  S.  Henry,  O. Leseigneur,  Th.  Bonnaillie,  S.  Pellegrino,  S.  Vaubaillon,  D.  Uriot,  Journal  of  Nuclear Materials 386 (2009) 967.
- [3] C. Abromeit, J. Nucl. Mater. 216 (1994) 78.
- [4]  B.  Heidrich,  S.M.  Pimblott,  G.S.  Was,  S.  Zinkle,  Nucl.  Instrum.  and  Methods  B  441 (2019) 41.
- [5] M.-O. Ruault, J. Chaumont, H. Bernas, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 209-210 (1983) 351.
- [6] J. Chaumont, F. Lalu, M. Salomé, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 189 (1981) 193.
- [7] M.-O. Ruault, M. Schack, H. Bernas, J.-P. Chevalier, Phil. Mag. A 58 (1988) 397.
- [8] X.W. Lin, M.O. Ruault, A. Traverse, H. Bernas, J.  Less Common Metals 130 (1987) 133.
- [9]  P.  Zheng,  M.-O. Ruault, M. Gasgnier, B. Descouts, P. Krauz, J. Appl. Phys. 70 (1991) 752.
- [10] F. Fortuna, M.-O. Ruault, H. Bernas, H. Gu, C. Colliex, Appl. Surf. Sci. 73 (1993) 264. [11] M.O. Ruault, F. Fortuna, H. Bernas, J. Chaumont, O. Kaïtasov, J. Mater. Res. 20 (2005) 1758.
- [12] M.-O. Ruault, , F. Fortuna, V. Borodin, M.G. Ganchenkova, M.A. Kirk, J. Appl. Phys. 104 (2008) 033527.
- [13] A. Gentils, M.-O. Ruault, L. Thomé, J. Nucl. Mater. 381 (2008) 297.
- [14]  S.  Soulet,  J.  Carpena,  J.  Chaumont,  O.  Kaïtasov,  M.-O.  Ruault,  J.-C.  Krupa,  Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 184 (2001) 383.
- [15] I. Monnet, P. Dubuisson, Y. Serruys, M.-O. Ruault, O. Kaïtasov, B. Jouffrey, J. Nucl. Mater. 335 (2004) 311.
- [16]  N.  Chauvin,  S.  Henry,  H.  Flocard,  F.  Fortuna,  O.  Kaitasov,  P.  Pariset,  S.  Pellegrino, M.O. Ruault, Y. Serruys, P. Trocellier, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 261 (2007) 34.
- [17] H. Bernas, J. Chaumont, E. Cottereau, G. Moroy, C. Clerc, O. Kaitasov, D. Ledu, M. Salomé, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Res. B 62 (1992) 416.
- [18] C.-O. Bacri, C. Bachelet, C. Baumier, J. Bourçois, L. Delbecq, D. Ledu, N. Pauwels, S. Picard, S. Renouf, C. Tanguy, Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 406 (2017) 48.
- [19] P. Yvon, M. Le Flem, C. Cabet, J.L. Séran, Nuclear Engineering and Design 294 (2015) 161.
- [20] P. Trocellier, Y. Serruys, S. Miro et al ., in Effects of radiation on nuclear materials: 25th volume,  edited  by  T.  Yamamoto,  American  Society  for  Testing  and  Materials  Special Technical Publications, STP1547 (2013) 143, doi: 10.1520/STP103948.
- [21] G. Was, J. Mater. Res. 30 (2015) 1158.
- [22] S.J. Zinkle, L.L. Snead, Scripta Materialia 143 (2018) 154.
- [23] S. Kurashima, T. Satoh, Y. Saitoh, W. Yokota, Quantum Beam Science 1 (2017) 2.
- [24] K.F. Chen, C.H. Chen, Z.H. Zeng, F.R. Chen, J.J. Kai, Progress in Nuclear Energy 57 (2012) 46; http://acc.web.nthu.edu.tw
- [25] O. Toader, F. Naab, E. Uberseder, T. Kubley, S. Taller, G. Was, Physics Procedia 90 (2017) 385.
- [26] J. Hinks, Nucl. Instrum. and Methods B 267 (2009) 3652.

## [27] http://jannus.in2p3.fr

[28] L. Beck, Y.  Serruys, S.  Miro, P.  Trocellier, E. Bordas, F.  Leprêtre, D.  Brimbal, T. Loussouarn, H. Martin, S. Vaubaillon, S. Pellegrino, D. Bachiller-Perea, Journal of Materials Research 30 (2015) 1183.

[29] S. Miro, G. Velisa, L. Thome, P. Trocellier, Y. Serruys, A. Debelle, F. Garrido, J. Raman Spectrosc, 45 (2014) 481; S. Miro, G. Velisa, L. Thome, J.-M. Constantini, F. Leprêtre, P. Trocellier, Y. Serruys, L. Beck, D. Gosset, R. Verlet, J. Huguet-Garcia, M. Tupin, M. Belleil, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 47 (2016) 476.

[30] A. Michel, C. Sabathier, G. Carlot, O. Kaïtasov, S. Bouffard, P. Garcia, C. Valot, Nucl. Insturm.  Methods  B  272  (2012)  218  ;  C.  Sabathier,  G.  Martin,  A.  Michel,  G.  Carlot,  S. Maillard,  C.  Bachelet,  F.  Fortuna,  O.  Kaïtasov,  E.  Oliviero,  P.  Garcia,  Nucl.  Instrum. Methobds B 326 (2014) 247 ;

[31] C. Onofri, C. Sabathier, C. Baumier, C. Bachelet, H. Palancher, M. Legros, Journal of Nuclear Materials 482 (2016) 105 ; C. Onofri, C. Sabathier, H. Palancher, G. Carlot, S. Miro, Y. Serruys, L. Desgranges, M. Legros, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 374 (2016) 51.

- [32] G. Gutierrez, C. Onofri, S. Miro, M. Bricout, F. Leprêtre, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 434 (2018) 45.
- [33] Y. Haddad, L. Delauche, A. Gentils, F. Garrido, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 435 (2018) 25.
- [34]  G.  Victor,  Y.  Pipon,  N.  Moncoffre,  N.  Bérerd,  C.  Esnouf,  T.  Douillard,  A.  Gentils, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 39 (2019) 726.
- [35] D. Gosset, S. Miro, S. Doriot, G. Victor, V. Motte, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 365 (2015) 300 ; D. Gosset, S. Miro, S. Doriot, N. Moncoffre, J. Nucl. Mater. 476 (2016) 198.
- [36] A. Prokhodtseva, B. Décamps, A. Ramar, R. Schäublin, Acta Materialia 61 (2013) 6958 ; A. Prokhodtseva, B. Décamps, R. Schäublin, Journal of Nuclear Materials 442 (2013) 5786 ; R. Schäublin, B. Décamps, A. Prokhodtseva, J.F. Löffler, Acta Materialia 133 (2017) 427.
- [37]  D.  Brimbal,  B.  Décamps,  A.  Barbu,  E.  Meslin,  and  H.  Henry,  Journal  of  Nuclear Materials 418 (2011) 313 ; D. Brimbal, E. Meslin, J. Henry, B. Décamps, and A. Barbu, Acta Materialia  61  (2013)  4757 ;  D.  Brimbal,  B.  Décamps,  H.  Henry,  E.  Meslin,  and  A.  Barbu, Acta Materialia 64 (2014) 391.

[38] A. Bhattacharya, E. Meslin, H. Henry, C. Pareige, B. Décamps, C. Genevois, D. Brimbal, and  A.  Barbu,  Acta  Materialia  78  (2014)  394 ;  A.  Bhattacharya,  E.  Meslin,  J.  Henry,  A. Barbu, S. Poissonnet, and B. Décamps, Acta Materialia 108 (2016) 241 ; A. Bhattacharya, E. Meslin, J. Henry, B. Décamps, A. Barbu, Mater. Res. Lett. 6 (2018) 372.

- [39] O. Tissot, C. Pareige, E. Meslin, B. Décamps, and J. Henry, Materials Research Letters 122 (2016) 31.
- [40] M.-L. Lescoat, J. Ribis, A. Gentils, O. Kaïtasov, Y. de Carlan, A. Legris, J. Nucl. Mater. 428 (2012) 176 ; M.-L. Lescoat, J. Ribis, Y. Chen, E.A. Marquis, E. Bordas, P. Trocellier, Y. Serruys, A. Gentils, O. Kaïtasov, Y. de Carlan, A. Legris, Acta Materialia 78 (2014) 328.

[41] Z. Yao, K.H. Zhang, Z. Zhou, M.R. Daymond, S. Jublot-Leclerc, O. Kaïtasov, Materials Science and Technology 34 (2018) 42.

[42]  D.  Brimbal,  L.  Beck,  O.  Troeber,  E.  Gaganidze,  P.  Trocellier,  J.  Aktaa,  R.  Lindau,  J. Nucl. Mater. 465 (2015) 236 ; B. Kaiser, C. Dethloff, E. Gaganidze, D. Brimbal, M. Payet, P. Trocellier, L. Beck, J. Aktaa, J. Nucl. Mater. 484 (2017) 59.

[43] V. de Castro, M. Briceno, S. Lozano-Perez, P. Trocelier, S.G. Roberts, R. Pareja, J. Nucl. Mater. 455 (2014) 157.

- [44] J. Ribis, E. Bordas, P. Trocellier, Y. Serruys, Y. De Carlan, A. Legris, J. Mater. Res. 30 (2015) 2210 ; J. Ribis, F. Lepretre, Appl. Phys. Letters 111 (2017) 261602.
- [45] H. K. Zhang, Z. Yao, Z. Zhou, M. Wang, O. Kaïtasov, M.R. Daymond, J. Nucl. Mater. 455 (2014) 242.

- [46]  S. Jublot-Leclerc, M.-L. Lescoat, F. Fortuna, L. Legras, X. Li and A. Gentils, Journal of Nuclear  Materials  466  (2015)  646  ;  S.  Jublot-Leclerc,  X.  Li,  L.  Legras,  M-L.  Lescoat,  F. Fortuna, A. Gentils, J. Nucl. Mater. 480 (2016) 436.
- [47]  S. Jublot-Leclerc, X. Li, L. Legras, F. Fortuna, A. Gentils, J. Nucl. Mater. 494 (2017) 240.
- [48] B. Michaut, T. Jourdan, J. Malaplate, A. Renault-Laborne, F. Sefta, B. Décamps, Journal of Nuclear Materials 496 (2017) 166.
- [49] G.M. de Bellefon, J.C. van Duysen, K. Sridharan, in: J. Jackson, D. Pavarenti, M. Wright (eds),  Proceedings  of  the  18 th international  Conference  on  Environmental  Degradation  of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems - Water Reactors. The Minerals, Metal sand Materials Series, Springer, Cham.
- [50] J. Gupta, J. Hure, B. Tanguy, L. Laffont, M.-C. Lafont, E. Andrieu, J. Nucl. Mater. 501 (2018) 45.
- [51]  B.  Rouxel,  C.  Bisor,  Y.  de  Carlan,  A.  Courcelle,  A.  Legris,  Proc.  Int.  Congress  on Advances  in  Nuclear  Power  Plants  (ICAPP  '15),  Nice,  France,  May  03-06,  2015,  Paper 15481, American Nuclear Society (2015) (CD-ROM).
- [52] K. Arakawa et al. , in preparation.
- [53] P.O. Barrioz, J. Hure, B. Tanguy, J. Nucl. Mater. 502 (2018) 123.
- [54] S. Hasanzadeh, R. Schäublin, B. Décamps, V. Rousson, E. Autissier, M.-F. Barthe, C. Hébert, Micron 113 (2018) 24.
- [55] J. Ribis, P. Donnadieu, C. Flament, J. Garnier, F. Leprêtre, Y. Serruys, A. Deschamps, Phil.  Mag.,  96  (2016)  2504 ;  C.  Flament,  J.  Ribis,  J.  Garnier,  Y.  Serruys,  F.  Leprêtre,  A. Gentils,  C.  Baumier,  M.  Descoins,  D.  Mangelinck,  A.  Lopez,  K.  Colas,  K.  Buchanan,  P. Donnadieu, A. Deschamps, Acta Materialia 128 (2017) 64.
- [56] M. Gaumé, F. Onimus, L. Dupuy, O. Tissot, C. Bachelet, F. Monpiou, J. Nucl. Mater. 495 (2017) 516.
- [57] M. Tupin, R. Verlet, K. Colas, M. Jublot, G. Baldacchino, K. Wolski, Corrosion Science 136  (2018)  28  ;  R.  Verlet,  M.  Tupin,  G.  Baldacchino,  K.  Wolski,  S.  Miro,  D.  Gosset,  K. Colas, M. Jublot, F. Jomard, Corrosion Science 98 (2015) 327.
- [58]  C.  Ciszak,  M.  Mermoux,  S.  Miro,  G.  Gutierrez,  F.  Leprêtre,  I.  Popa,  K.  Hanifi,  I. Zacharie-Aubrun, L. Fayette, S. Chevalier, J. Nucl. Mater. 495 (2017) 392.
- [59]  A.  Wu,  J.  Ribis,  J.-C.  Brachet,  E.  Clouet,  F.  Leprêtre,  E.  Bordas,  B.  Arnal,  J.  Nucl. Mater. 504 (2018) 289.
- [60] J. Huguet-Garcia, A. Jankowiak, S. Miro, E. Meslin, Y. Serruys, J.-M. Constantini, Nucl. Instrum.  Meth.  Phys.  Res.  B  374  (2016)  76  ;  J.  Huguet-Garcia,  A.  Jankowiak,  S.  Miro,  T. Vandenberghe, C. Grygiel, I. Monnet, J.-M. Constantini, J. Mater. Research 30 (2015) 1572.
- [61] C.J. Pawley, M.-F. Beaufort, E. Oliveiro, J.A. Hinks, J.F. Barbot, S.E. Donnelly, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 371 (2012) 012052 ; M.-F. Beaufort, M. Vallet, J. Nicolaï, E. Oliviero, J.-F. Barbot, J. Appl. Phys. 118 (2015) 205904.
- [62] S. Agarwal, P. Trocellier, Y. Serruys, S. Vaubaillon, S.Miro, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 327 (2014) 117 ; S. Agarwal, P. Trocellier, D. Brimbal, S. Vaubaillon, Acta Materialia 121 (2016) 1.
- [63] S. Pellegrino, J.-P. Crocombette, A. Debelle, T. Jourdan, P. Trocellier, L. Thomé, Acta Materialia 102 (2016) 79 ; S. Pellegrino, L. Thomé, A. Debelle, S. Miro, P. Trocellier, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 327 (2014) 103.
- [64]  G.  Velisa,  P.  Trocellier,  L.  Thome,  S.  Vaubaillon,  G.  Sattonnay,  S.  Miro,  Y.  Serruys, Journal of Materials Science 49 (2014) 4899.
- [65] S. Miro, J.M. Costantini, J. Huguet-Garcia, L. Thomé, Phil. Mag. 94 (2014) 3898.
- [66]  R.  Bès,  T.  Sauvage,  S.  Peuget,  J.  Haussy,  F.  Chamssedine,  E.  Oliveiro,  T.  Fares,  L. Vincent, J. Nucl. Mater. 443 (2013) 544

[67] A.H. Mir, I. Monnet, M. Toulemonde, S. Bouffard, C. Jegou, S. Peuget, J. Nucl. Mater. 469 (2016) 244 ; A.H. Mir, M. Toulemonde, C. Jegou, S. Miro, Y. Serruys, S. Bouffard, S. Peuget, Scientific Reports 6 (2016) 30191.

[68]  Y.  Lou,  S.  Dourdain,  C.  Rey,  Y.  Serruys,  D.  Simeone,  N.  Mollard,  X.  Deschanels, Microporous  and  Mesoporous  Materials  251  (2017)  146 ;  X.  Deschanels,  A.M.  SeydouxGuillaume, V. Magnin, A. Mesbah, M. Tribet, M.P. Moloney, Y. Serruys, S. Peuget, Journal of Nuclear Materials 448 (2014) 184.

[69]  A.-M.  Seydoux-Guillaume,  X.  Deschanels,  C.  Baumier,  S.  Neumeier,  W.J.  Weber,  S. Peuget, American Mineralogist 103 (2018) 824.

- [70] F. García Ferré, A. Mairov, D. Ladicicco, M. Vanazzi, S. Bassini, M. Utili, M. Tarantino, M. Bragaglia, F.R. Lamastra, F. Nanni, L. Ceseracciu, Y. Serruys, P. Trocellier, L. Beck, K. Sridharan, M.G. Beghi, F. Di Fonzo, Corrosion Science 124 (2017) 80 ; F. Garcia Ferre, A. Mairov,  L.  Ceseracciu,  Y.  Serruys,  P.  Trocellier,  C.  Baumier,  O.  Kaïtasov,  R.  Brescia,  D. Gastaldi,  P.  Verna,  M.G.  Beghi,  L.  Beck,  K.  Sridharan,  F.  Di  Fonzo,  Scientific  Reports  6 (2016) 33478.

[71]  Y.  Ngono-Ravache,  M.  Ferry,  S.  Esnouf,  E.  Balanzat,  MINOS  2nd  International Workshop, Irradiation of Nuclear Materials: Flux and dose effects, Edited by: C. Galle, EPJ Web of Conferences 115 (2016) 02003.

[72]  Structural  Materials  for  Generation  IV  Nuclear  Reactors,  P.  Yvon  Ed.,  Woodhead Publishing, 2017.

- [73] Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, R. J. M. Konings Ed. , Elsevier, 2012.
- [74] S. Bouffard, Nuclear Physics 26 (2016) 14; http://emir.in2p3.fr

## Figures Captions

Figure  1 . Overview  of  the  JANNuS-Orsay  facility,  showing  the  coupling  between  the Transmission  Electron  Microscope  and  the  two  ion  accelerators.  The  inset  shows  the geometry of the in situ TEM experiment with two ion beams.

Figure 2 . Artist view of the JANNuS-Saclay facility.

Figure  3 . In  situ Raman  spectroscopy  of  B4C  irradiated  with  4  MeV  Au  ions  at  room temperature.  (a)  Raman  spectra  at  an  increasing  fluence  (values  indicated  in  cm -2 )  and  (b) evolution of the defect band width (see arrow in the graph (a)).

Figure 4 .  Overfocused  bright  field  TEM  images  of  316L  thin  foils  irradiated  at  550°C  (a) with  Au  ions  to  the  fluence  of  1x10 15 cm -2 ,  (b)  with  Au  ions  to  the  same  fluence,  and subsequently  implanted  with  He  ions  to  the  fluence  of  1x10 15 cm -2 ,  (c)  simultaneously  Au irradiated  to  1x10 15 cm -2 and  He  implanted  to  3.5x10 14 cm -2 ,  showing  cavities  (in  black) induced by irradiation (modified from [47].

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00627v1-figure-f0ced6db-74ce-49c8-9c29-58161eb105aa.jpg)

Figure 1 2-column figure color on-line

Figure 2 2-column figure color on-line

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00627v1-figure-cfffee4d-1e00-4a88-ad97-0753661997d6.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00627v1-figure-5858d9e7-a1cf-4e77-898e-8359ddb81ad0.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00627v1-figure-62cf440d-c21e-4348-a245-aeb69341af51.jpg)

Raman shift (cm ')

Figure 3 1-column figure

Single Au ion irradiation

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00627v1-figure-4a9a205e-3945-4eef-b869-9a0fdd1cd32f.jpg)

Au ion irradiation followed by He ion implantation

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00627v1-figure-2aebfd89-cb76-40ab-89b4-ef2f0ce6980a.jpg)

Figure 4 1-column figure

Dual beam ion

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00627v1-figure-fee4ec03-3410-445c-9d78-8e2c105a1f5e.jpg)
A. Gentils C. Cabet
Investigating radiation damage in nuclear energy materials using JANNuS multiple ion beams
Ion accelerators have been used by material scientists for decades to
investigate radiation damage formation in nuclear materials and thus to emulate
neutron-induced changes. The versatility of conditions in terms of particle
energy, dose rate, fluence, etc., is a key asset of ion beams allowing for
fully instrumented analytical studies. In addition, very short irradiation
times and handling of non-radioactive samples dramatically curtail the global
cost and duration as compared to in-reactor testing. Coupling of two or more
beams, use of heated/cooled sample holders, and implementation of in situ
characterization and microscopy pave the way to real time observation of
microstructural and property evolution in various extreme radiation conditions
more closely mimicking the nuclear environments. For these reasons, multiple
ion beam facilities have been commissioned worldwide. In France, under the
auspices of the Universit{\'e} Paris-Saclay, the JANNuS platform for 'Joint
Accelerators for Nanosciences and Nuclear Simulation' comprises five ion
implanter and electrostatic accelerators with complementary performances. At
CSNSM (CNRS \& Univ Paris-Sud, Orsay), a 200 kV Transmission Electron
Microscope is coupled to an accelerator and an implanter for in situ
observation of microstructure modifications induced by ion beams in a material,
making important contribution to the understanding of physical phenomena at the
nanoscale. At CEA Paris-Saclay, the unique triple beam facility in Europe
allows the simultaneous irradiation with heavy ions (like Fe, W) for nuclear
recoil damage and implantation of a large array of ions including gasses for
well-controlled modelling-oriented experiments. Several classes of materials
are of interest for the nuclear industry ranging from metals and alloys, to
oxides or glasses and carbides. This paper gives selected examples that
illustrate the use of JANNuS ion beams in investigating the radiation
resistance of structural materials for today's and tomorrow's nuclear reactors.