## The Impact of Global Warming on Silicon PV Energy Yield in 2100

Ian Marius Peters, Tonio Buonassisi

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, United States of America

Abstract -    While  the  installed  photovoltaic  (PV)  capacity grows to a terawatt scale, effects of global climate change unfold. The question arises, how a changing climate, and especially raising temperatures, will affect the performance of PV installations in the future. In this  paper we present an estimate of the reduction in energy yield for silicon PV installations due to global warming in the year 2100. Using IPCC  global  warming  scenarios and published temperature coefficients for today's silicon PV panels, we  project median  reductions in annual energy output of 15kWh/kWP, with reductions  up to 50kWh/kWP in some  areas. Higher efficiency cells and advanced cell and module architectures can significantly reduce these losses.

## I. INTRODUCTION

Contemplating  the  21st  century,  two  developments  seem very likely: 1) the world will get warmer [1], and 2) solar panel deployment will increase [2-4]. Considering these developments  in  conjunction,  the  question  arises:  how  will climate change affect solar energy production in the future? It is well known that solar cell performance is affected by local meteorological  conditions  such  as  insolation,  temperature, water content in the atmosphere [5], and aerosol concentration [6]. The best-established features of current climate change -rising temperature and humidity levels [7] -will  result  in  a performance  reduction  of  all  photovoltaic  technology,  with silicon, the most prevalent photovoltaic technology today [8], being especially sensitive [9].

The impact of global climate change on PV performance has been addressed in a number of studies [10-15]. One challenge that  these  studies  face  is  the  projection  of  changes  in  solar insolation over time. An investigation of uncertainties in [10] showed that yield projections that include insolation projections have very large uncertainties. Consequently, there are considerable variations in the projected impact for PV installations for various regions that these studies show. They agree, however, on the overall trend: climate change will likely reduce the power output of solar installations. One parameter that plays a significant role in this reduction is the, arguably, most prominent aspect of climate change: global warming.

In this paper, we present a simple projection of the impact of raising temperatures on the energy yield of silicon PV installations  worldwide.  The  presented  results  are  based  on temperature coefficients of PERC type silicon solar cells, and temperature projections according to the  RCP4.5 scenario  of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC).

## II. BACKGROUND

The efficiency of a solar cell is a function of temperature for a  variety  of  reasons.  The  current-voltage  characteristics  of  a solar cell are governed by Boltzmann's statistic, and the explicit dependence  on k T B results  in  a  reduction  of  the  open-circuit voltage  with  increasing  temperature.  There  are  also  device dependent  aspects,  including  the  temperature  dependence  of recombination mechanics [16]. In a first order approximation, the temperature dependence of a PV module can be described by a linear temperature coefficient T C:

$$T _ { C } = \frac { 1 } { P _ { M } } \frac { d \, P _ { M } } { d T }$$

Where P M is the power output of the module at the maximum power point [17]. It should be noted that the actual temperature dependence of a solar cell is not necessarily linear over a wide temperature range, but the approximation is often decent for all practically relevant  temperatures. In this  study  we  will  use a value of -0.45%/K for T C,  which can be considered a typical value [18].

Fig. 1. Projected global temperature change between 2000 and 2100 according  to  the  RCP  4.5  scenario  of  the  IPCC  [1].  The  average worldwide temperature increase is +1.8K.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00622v3-figure-9fb478b1-6f00-4295-8e7b-d04c22cc4206.jpg)

Global warming is one of the most well-documented aspects of  climate  change.  Projecting  how  the  temperatures  on  the planet will evolve is one of the tasks carried out by the IPCC. In this study, we use the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 scenario to investigate the impact on PV installations.  This  scenario  represents  a  middle  path  with greenhouse gas emissions peaking in 2040, and a temperature increase by the end of the century of 1.8K compared to the year 2000.  The  temperature  development  around  the  globe  until 2100 is shown in Figure 1 .

## III. RESULTS

The  reduction  in  energy  output  is  calculated  simply  by multiplying  the  worldwide  solar  resource  with  the  projected temperature change and the temperature coefficient. The result of this calculation is shown in Figure 2 . As temperatures raise nearly everywhere on the land mass of our planet, energy output is reduced  everywhere.  Areas  that  are  especially  affected include  the Southern  United  States,  Southern  Africa  and Central Asia.

Fig.  2.  Projected  global  change  in  energy  output  for  a  silicon  PV installation between 2000 and 2100 for the temperature changes shown in Figure 1.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00622v3-figure-a91d4124-6652-427f-8d32-19f83180c9c2.jpg)

The  statistical  distribution  of  the  change  in  energy  output over  the  entire  planet  is  shown  in Figure  3 . The  median reduction is approx. 15 kWh/kWP, with some regions reaching up to 50 kWh/kWP.

Fig. 3. Histogram of the data shown in Figure 2 .

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.00622v3-figure-6a7108db-360c-4d7c-986f-6bb31397453d.jpg)

## IV. DISCUSSION

The shown results just represent one climate scenario, and use one representative temperature coefficient. Within temperature projections, warming scenarios vary over a wide range, depending on the future development of greenhouse gas emissions. The RCP 4.5 scenarios falls within the lower middle of projected temperature changes. Lower and higher levels are covered  by  the  RCP2.6  and  RCP8.5  scenarios,  respectively. RCP2.6 assumes a peak in greenhouse gas emissions before the end  of  the  decade,  and  a  drastic  reduction  in  emissions thereafter. The  mean  likely temperature increase in this scenario is 1.0K. The  RCP8.5  scenario assumes  raising emissions throughout the rest of the century and project a mean likely  temperature  increase  of  3.7K.  Comparing  the  mean temperature increases in all scenarios gives a good sense of the corresponding projected changes in yield. Hence, in the RCP8.5 scenarios, yield reductions would be more than twice as high as indicated here.

The second factor to affect this calculation is the temperature coefficient of silicon PV modules. -0.45%/K marks a representative value, but coefficients vary depending on technology and cell and  module architecture. For silicon  PV panels, temperature coefficients between -0.3%/K and 0.6%/K can  be  found,  with  the  lowest  values  achieved  for  HIT  type solar cells [19]. Materials with a higher band gap, like CdTe have even lower temperature coefficients [20].

Improvements in cell efficiency have an additional effect on module temperature. As conversion efficiencies increase, more energy is converted into electricity and less into heat [21]. It can be expected, hence, that future solar installations will be more robust towards changes in temperature.

Global  warming  is  not  the  only  relevant  aspect  of  climate change that will affect energy yield. Changes in insolation and humidity will affect the amount of light that reaches a panel. Especially  variations  in  insolation  will  have  an  immediate effect  that  may  very  well  be  more  noticeable  than  that  of temperature. Insolation variations can largely be considered as an additional factor to the one shown here.

## V. SUMMARY

Global warming has an impact on how photovoltaic installations perform. We use a simple performance model to project  the  likely  reductions  in  performance  of  silicon  PV panels by the end of the century using climate change scenarios from  the  IPCC  and  a  representative  temperature  coefficient. Using the RCP 4.5 scenario and a temperature coefficient of 0.45%/K,  we  find  that  the  energy  output  of  silicon PV installations  will  be  reduced  by  approx.  15  kWh/kWP,  with some regions experiencing losses of up to 50 kWh/kWP.

## ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

Climate  scenarios  used  were  from  the  NEX-GDDP  dataset, prepared  by  the  Climate  Analytics  Group  and  NASA  Ames Research Center using the NASA  Earth  Exchange,  and distributed by  the NASA  Center  for  Climate  Simulation (NCCS).  Insolation data were  obtained from  the NASA Langley  Research  Center  Atmospheric  Science  Data  Center. This work was financially supported by the DOE-NSF ERF for Quantum Energy and Sustainable Solar Technologies (QESST) and by funding from Singapore's National Research Foundation through the Singapore MIT  Alliance for Research and Technology's 'Low energy electronic systems (LEES) IRG'

## REFERENCES

- [1] IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels,  Y.  Xia,  V.  Bex  and  P.M.  Midgley  (eds.)].  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.
- [2] IEA, Market Report Series: Renewables 2017, ISBN 978-92-6428187-5.
- [3] BP Energy Outlook 2018 Edition.
- [4] N. Haegel et al., Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: Transform global energy, Science 364:6443 (2019), 836-838.
- [5] M. Peters, T. Buonassisi, Energy Yield Limits for Single Junction Solar Cells, Joule 2(6) 2018
- [6] M. Peters, S. Karthik, H. Liu, T. Buonassisi, A. Nobre, Urban Haze and Photovoltaics, Energy Environ. Sci., 11 (2018), 30433054.
- [7] R.  Saeger,  N.  Naik  and  G.  A.  Vecchi,  Thermodynamic  and Dynamic Mecanisms for Large-Scale Changes in the Hydrological Cycle in Response to Global Warming, Journal of Climate, 23 (2010), 4651 -4668.
- [8] Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, ISE, Photovoltaic Status Report, presented Freiburg, 19 June 2018.
- [9] O. Dupré, R. Vaillon, M.A. Green, Physics of the temperature coefficients of solar cells, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 140 (2015), 92 -100.
- [10] Wild  M,  Folini  D,  Henschel  F,  Fischer  N,  Muller  B  (2015) Projections  of  long-term  changes  in  solar  radiation  based  on CMIP5 climate models and their influence on energy yields of photovoltaic systems. Sol Energ 116: 12-24.
- [11] J. A. Crook, L. A. Jones, P. M. Forstera and R. Crook, Climate change  impacts  on  future  photovoltaic  and  concentrated  solar power energy output, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 3101 -3109.
- [12] M.  D.  Bartos,  M.  V.  Chester,  Impacts  of  climate  change  on electric  power  supply  in  the  Western  United  States,  Nature Climate Change, 5 (2015).
- [13] S.  Jerez,  I.  Tobin,  R.  Vautard,  J.  P.  Montavez,  J.  M.  LppezRomero,  F.  Thais,  B.  Bartok,  O.  Bøssing  Christensen,  A. Colette, M. Deque, G. Nikulin, S. Kotlarski, E. van Meijgaard, C. Teichmann, &amp; M. Wild, The impact of climate change on photovoltaic power generation in Europe, Nature Communications (2015), DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10014.
- [14] S.  D.  Bazyomo,  E.  A.  Lawin,  and  A.  Ouedraogo,  Seasonal Trends in Solar Radiation Available at the Earth's Surface and Implication  of  Future  Annual Power  Outputs  Changes on the Photovoltaic  Systems  with  One  and  Two  Tracking  Axes,  J Climatol Weather Forecasting 2017, 5:1, DOI: 10.4172/23322594.1000201.
- [15] V.M.  Velasco  Herrera,  B.  Mendoza,  G.  Velasco  Herrera, Reconstruction and prediction of the total solar irradiance: From the Medieval Warm Period to the 21st century, New Astronomy 34 (2015) 221 -233.
- [16]   O. Dupré, R. Vaillon, M.A. Green, Physics of the temperature coefficients  of  solar  cells,  Solar  Energy  Materials  and  Solar Cells, 140 (2015), 92 -100.
- [17]   https://www.pveducation.org/pvcdrom/solar-celloperation/effect-of-temperature
- [18]   A.  Fell,  et  al.  Input  Parameters  for  the  Simulation  of  Silicon Solar Cells in 2014, IEEE JPV, 5 (2015), 1250 -1263.
- [19] J. Lopez-Garcia, D. Pavanello, T. Sample, Analysis of Temperature  Coefficients  of  Bifacial  Crystalline  Silicon  PV Modules, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 8:4 (2018), 960 - 968.
- [20]   P. K. Dash, N. C. Gupta, Effect of Temperature on Power Output from Different Commercially available Photovoltaic Modules, nt. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 5 (2015), 1-4.
- [21] Skoplaki,  E., and  Palyvos,  J.A.,  Operating  temperature  of photovoltaic modules: a survey of pertinent correlations. Renew. Energy 34 (2009), 23-29.
Ian Marius Peters Tonio Buonassisi
The Impact of Global Warming on Silicon PV Energy Yield in 2100
While the installed photovoltaic capacity grows to a terawatt scale, effects
of global climate change unfold. The question arises, how a changing climate,
and especially raising temperatures, will affect the performance of PV
installations in the future. In this paper we present an estimate of the
reduction in energy yield for silicon PV installations due to global warming in
the year 2100. Using IPCC global warming scenarios and published temperature
coefficients for todays silicon PV panels, we project median reductions in
annual energy output of today's silicon solar panel of 15kWh per kWP, with
reductions up to 50kWh per kWP in some areas. Higher efficiency cells and
advanced cell and module architectures can significantly reduce these losses.
Cell concepts with higher voltage are particularly effective in reducing
temperature induced losses.