## On the Second Approximate Matsumoto Metric

A. Tayebi, T. Tabatabaeifar and E. Peyghan

August 4, 2014

## Abstract

In this paper, we study the second approximate Matsumoto metric F = α + β + β /α 2 + β /α 3 2 on a manifold M . We prove that F is of scalar flag curvature and isotropic S-curvature if and only if it is isotropic Berwald metric with almost isotropic flag curvature.

Keywords : Isotropic Berwald curvature, S-curvature, almost isotropic flag curvature. 1

## 1 Introduction

The flag curvature in Finsler geometry is a natural extension of the sectional curvature in Riemannian geometry, which is first introduced by L. Berwald. For a Finsler manifold ( M,F ), the flag curvature is a function K ( P, y ) of tangent planes P ⊂ T M x and directions y ∈ P . F is said to be of scalar flag curvature if the flag curvature K ( P, y ) = K ( x, y ) is independent of flags P associated with any fixed flagpole y . F is called of almost isotropic flag curvature if

$$\mathbf K = \frac { 3 c _ { x ^ { m } } y ^ { m } } { F } + \sigma,$$

where c = c x ( ) and σ = σ x ( ) are scalar functions on M . One of the important problems in Finsler geometry is to characterize Finsler manifolds of almost isotropic flag curvature [11].

To study the geometric properties of a Finsler metric, one also considers non-Riemannian quantities. In Finsler geometry, there are several important non-Riemannian quantities: the Cartan torsion C , the Berwald curvature B , the mean Landsberg curvature J and S-curvature S , etc [6][9][11][18]. These are geometric quantities which vanish for Riemnnian metrics.

Among the non-Riemannian quantities, the S-curvature S = S ( x, y ) is closely related to the flag curvature which constructed by Shen for given comparison theorems on Finsler manifolds. A Finsler metric F is called of isotropic S -curvature if

$$\mathbf S = ( n + 1 ) c F,$$

1 2010 Mathematics subject Classification: 53C60, 53C25.

for some scalar function c = c x ( ) on M . In [11], it is proved that if a Finsler metric F of scalar flag curvature is of isotropic S-curvature (2), then it has almost isotropic flag curvature (1).

The geodesic curves of a Finsler metric F = F x, y ( ) on a smooth manifold M , are determined by ¨ c i +2 G c i ( ˙) = 0, where the local functions G i = G x,y i ( ) are called the spray coefficients. A Finsler metric F is called a Berwald metric, if G i are quadratic in y ∈ T M x for any x ∈ M . A Finsler metric F is said to be isotropic Berwald metric if its Berwald curvature is in the following form

$$B ^ { i } _ { \ j k l } = c \Big \{ F _ { y ^ { j } y ^ { k } } \delta ^ { i } _ { \ l } + F _ { y ^ { k } y ^ { l } } \delta ^ { i } _ { \ j } + F _ { y ^ { l } y ^ { j } } \delta ^ { i } _ { \ k } + F _ { y ^ { j } y ^ { k } y ^ { l } } y ^ { i } \Big \}, \quad \quad ( 3 ) \\ \text{where } c = c ( x ) \text{ is a scalar function on } M \ [ 6 ].$$

where c = ( ) is a scalar function on c x M [6].

As a generalization of Berwald curvature, B´cs´-Matsumoto proposed the a o notion of Douglas curvature [1]. A Finsler metric is called a Douglas metric if G i = 1 2 Γ i jk ( x y y ) j k + P x, y y ( ) i .

In order to find explicit examples of Douglas metrics, we consider ( α, β )-metrics. An ( α, β )-metric is a Finsler metric of the form F := αφ ( β α ), where φ = φ s ( ) is a C ∞ on ( -b 0 , b 0 ) with certain regularity, α = √ a ij ( x y y ) i j is a Riemannian metric and β = b i ( x y ) i is a 1-form on M . This class of metrics is were first introduced by Matsumoto [10]. Among the ( α, β )-metrics, the Matsumoto metric is special and significant metric which constitute a majority of actual research. The Matsumoto metric is expressed as

$$F = \alpha & \left [ 1 + \frac { \beta } { \alpha } + ( \frac { \beta } { \alpha } ) ^ { 2 } + ( \frac { \beta } { \alpha } ) ^ { 3 } + \cdots \right ]. \\ \text{as introduced by Matsumoto as a realization of}$$

This metric was introduced by Matsumoto as a realization of Finsler's idea 'a slope measure of a mountain with respect to a time measure' [19]. In the Matsumoto metric, the 1-form β = b y i i was originally to be induced by earth gravity. Hence, we could regard b i ( x ) as the the infinitesimals and neglect the infinitesimals of degree of b i ( x ) more than two [12][13][14][15][16]. An approximate Matsumoto metric is a Finsler metric in the following form

$$F = \alpha \left [ \sum _ { k = 0 } ^ { r } ( \frac { \beta } { \alpha } ) ^ { k } \right ], \\ \text{more information see [13]} \text{ \ This metric was introduced}$$

where | β | &lt; α | | (for more information, see [13]). This metric was introduced by Park-Choi in [13]. By definition, the Matsumoto metric is expressed as lim r →∞ L α, β ( ) = α 2 α -β .

In this paper, we consider second approximate Matsumoto metric F = α + β + β 2 α + β 3 α 2 with some non-Riemannian curvature properties and prove the following.

Theorem 1.1. Let F = α + β + β 2 α + β 3 α 2 be a non-Riemannian second approximate Matsumoto metric on a manifold M of dimension n . Then F is of scaler flag curvature with isotropic S -curvature (2), if and only if it has isotropic Berwald curvature (3) with almost isotropic flag curvature (1). In this case, F must be locally Minkowskian.

## 2 Preliminaries

Let M be a n-dimensional C ∞ manifold. Denote by T M x the tangent space at x ∈ M , by TM = ∪ x ∈ M x T M the tangent bundle of M , and by TM 0 = TM \ { 0 } the slit tangent bundle on M . A Finsler metric on M is a function F : TM → [0 , ∞ ) which has the following properties: (i) F is C ∞ on TM 0 ;

- (ii) F is positively 1-homogeneous on the fibers of tangent bundle TM ;
- (iii) for each y ∈ T M x , the following quadratic form g y on T M x is positive definite,

$$\mathbf g _ { y } ( u, v ) \coloneqq \frac { 1 } { 2 } \frac { \partial ^ { 2 } } { \partial s \partial t } \left [ F ^ { 2 } ( y + s u + t v ) \right ] | _ { s, t = 0 }, \ u, v \in T _ { x } M. \\ \text{et } x \in M \text{ and } F _ { x } \coloneqq F | _ { T _ { x } M }. \text{ To measure the non-Euclidean feature of } F _ { x }$$

Let x ∈ M and F x := F | T M x . To measure the non-Euclidean feature of F x , define C y : T M x ⊗ T M x ⊗ T M x → R by

$$\mathbf C _ { y } ( u, v, w ) \coloneqq \frac { 1 } { 2 } \frac { d } { d t } \left [ \mathbf g _ { y + t w } ( u, v ) \right ] | _ { t = 0 }, \ u, v, w \in T _ { x } M. \\ \intertext { a l m v \, } \mathbf C \coloneqq \{ \mathbf C _ { x } \} _ { \sim \mathbf T _ { M } } \text{ is called the Cartan torsion. It is well known } t$$

The family C := { C y } y ∈ TM 0 is called the Cartan torsion. It is well known that C = 0 if and only if F is Riemannian [17]. For y ∈ T M x 0 , define mean Cartan torsion I y by I y ( u ) := I i ( y u ) i , where I i := g jk C ijk . By Diecke Theorem, F is Riemannian if and only if I y = 0.

The horizontal covariant derivatives of I along geodesics give rise to the mean Landsberg curvature J y ( u ) := J i ( y u ) i , where J i := I i s | y s . A Finsler metric is said to be weakly Landsbergian if J = 0.

Given a Finsler manifold ( M,F ), then a global vector field G is induced by F on TM 0 , which in a standard coordinate ( x , y i i ) for TM 0 is given by G = y i ∂ ∂x i -2 G x,y i ( ) ∂ ∂y i , where

$$G ^ { i } \coloneqq \frac { 1 } { 4 } g ^ { i l } \left [ \frac { \partial ^ { 2 } ( F ^ { 2 } ) } { \partial x ^ { k } \partial y ^ { l } } y ^ { k } - \frac { \partial ( F ^ { 2 } ) } { \partial x ^ { l } } \right ], \quad y \in T _ { x } M. \\ \text{-} \text{-} \text{allad to an even a-occuritized $t_{\mathbb{ }T}_{M}_{F}\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{  T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb { }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{t_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathBB{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T$_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathfrak{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T _\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb
 }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{ \mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{
 }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T _$_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\tilde{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T._\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{\ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{	\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb`T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{ }T_{\mathbb{$$

The G is called the spray associated to ( M,F ). In local coordinates, a curve c t ( ) is a geodesic if and only if its coordinates ( c i ( )) satisfy ¨ t c i +2 G c i ( ˙) = 0.

For a tangent vector y ∈ T M x 0 , define B y : T M x ⊗ T M x ⊗ T M x → T M x and E y : T M x ⊗ T M x → R by B y ( u, v, w ) := B i jkl ( y u v ) j k w l ∂ ∂x i | x and E y ( u, v ) := E jk ( y u v ) j k where

$$B ^ { i } _ { \ j k l } \coloneqq \frac { \partial ^ { 3 } G ^ { i } } { \partial y ^ { j } \partial y ^ { k } \partial y ^ { l } }, \ \ E _ { j k } \coloneqq \frac { 1 } { 2 } B ^ { m } _ { \ j k m }.$$

The B and E are called the Berwald curvature and mean Berwald curvature, respectively. Then F is called a Berwald metric and weakly Berwald metric if B = 0 and E = 0 , respectively.

A Finsler metric F is said to be isotropic mean Berwald metric if its mean Berwald curvature is in the following form

$$E _ { i j } = \frac { n + 1 } { 2 F } c h _ { i j }, \quad \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
 \quad. \quad.$$

where c = ( ) is a scalar function on c x M and h ij is the angular metric [6].

Define D y : T M x ⊗ T M x ⊗ T M x → T M x by D y ( u, v, w ) := D i jkl ( y u v ) i j w k ∂ ∂x i | x where

$$\ v n e r e \quad & D ^ { i } _ { \ j k l } \coloneqq B ^ { i } _ { \ j k l } - \frac { 2 } { n + 1 } \{ E _ { j k } \delta ^ { i } _ { l } + E _ { j l } \delta ^ { i } _ { k } + E _ { k l } \delta ^ { i } _ { j } + E _ { j k, l } y ^ { i } \}. \\ \cdots \quad \cdots \quad \cdots \quad \cdots \quad \cdots \quad.$$

We call D := { D y } y ∈ TM 0 the Douglas curvature. A Finsler metric with D = 0 is called a Douglas metric. The notion of Douglas metrics was proposed by B´cs´-Matsumoto as a generalization of Berwald metrics [1]. a o

For a Finsler metric F on an n -dimensional manifold M , the BusemannHausdorff volume form dV F = σ F ( x dx ) 1 · · · dx n is defined by

∣ In general, the local scalar function σ F ( x ) can not be expressed in terms of elementary functions, even F is locally expressed by elementary functions. Let G i denote the geodesic coefficients of F in the same local coordinate system. The S-curvature can be defined by

$$\cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdot \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \colon \\ \sigma _ { F } ( x ) \coloneqq \frac { \text{Vol} ( \mathbb { B } ^ { n } ( 1 ) ) } { \text{Vol} \left \{ ( y ^ { i } ) \in R ^ { n } \, \Big | \ F \left ( y ^ { i } \frac { \partial } { \partial x ^ { i } } | _ { x } \right ) < 1 \right \} \\ \text{al, the local scalar function $\sigma_{F} ( x ) \, \text{ can not be expressed in}$} \\ \text{ry functions, even $F$ is locally expressed by elementary funct}$$

$$\mathbf S ( \mathbf y ) \coloneqq \frac { \partial G ^ { i } } { \partial y ^ { i } } ( x, y ) - y ^ { i } \frac { \partial } { \partial x ^ { i } } \left [ \ln \sigma _ { F } ( x ) \right ], \\ \frac { \partial } { \partial x } | _ { x } \in T _ { r } M. \text{ It is proved that } \mathbf S = 0 \text{ if } F \text{ is a Be}$$

where y = y i ∂ ∂x i | x ∈ T M x . It is proved that S = 0 if F is a Berwald metric. There are many non-Berwald metrics satisfying S = 0. S said to be isotropic if there is a scalar functions c x ( ) on M such that S = ( n +1) ( c x F ) .

The Riemann curvature R y = R i k dx k ⊗ ∂ ∂x i | x : T M x → T M x is a family of linear maps on tangent spaces, defined by

$$R ^ { i } _ { \ k } = 2 \frac { \partial G ^ { i } } { \partial x ^ { k } } - y ^ { j } \frac { \partial ^ { 2 } G ^ { i } } { \partial x ^ { j } \partial y ^ { k } } + 2 G ^ { j } \frac { \partial ^ { 2 } G ^ { i } } { \partial y ^ { j } \partial y ^ { k } } - \frac { \partial G ^ { i } } { \partial y ^ { j } } \frac { \partial G ^ { j } } { \partial y ^ { k } }.$$

For a flag P = span { y, u } ⊂ T M x with flagpole y , the flag curvature K = K ( P, y ) is defined by

$$\mathbf K ( P, y ) \coloneqq \frac { \mathbf g _ { y } ( u, \mathbf R _ { y } ( u ) ) } { \mathbf g _ { y } ( y, y ) \mathbf g _ { y } ( u, u ) - \mathbf g _ { y } ( y, u ) ^ { 2 } }. \\ \text{a Finsler metric $F$ is of scalar curvature if for any $u$}$$

We say that a Finsler metric F is of scalar curvature if for any y ∈ T M x , the flag curvature K = K ( x, y ) is a scalar function on the slit tangent bundle TM 0 . In this case, for some scalar function K on TM 0 the Riemann curvature is in the following form

$$R ^ { i } _ { \ k } = \mathbf K F ^ { 2 } \{ \delta ^ { i } _ { k } - F ^ { - 1 } F _ { y ^ { k } } y ^ { i } \}. \\ \text{hon } F \text{ is said to be of content } \text{a} \, \text{a} \, \text{$c}$$

If K = constant , then F is said to be of constant flag curvature. A Finsler metric F is called isotropic flag curvature , if K = K ( x ).

## 3 Proof of Theorem 1.1

Let F = αφ s ( ), s = β α be an ( α, β )-metric, where φ = φ s ( ) is a C ∞ on ( -b 0 , b 0 ) with certain regularity, α = √ a ij ( x y y ) i j is a Riemannian metric and β = b i ( x y ) i is a 1-form on a manifold M . Let

$$r _ { i j } \coloneqq \frac { 1 } { 2 } \left [ b _ { i | j } + b _ { j | i } \right ], \quad s _ { i j } \coloneqq \frac { 1 } { 2 } \left [ b _ { i | j } - b _ { j | i } \right ]. \\ r _ { j } \coloneqq b ^ { i } r _ { i j }, \quad s _ { j } \coloneqq b ^ { i } s _ { i j }. \\ \quad \,.$$

where b i j | denote the coefficients of the covariant derivative of β with respect to α . Let

$$r _ { i 0 } \coloneqq r _ { i j } y ^ { j }, \ s _ { i 0 } \coloneqq s _ { i j } y ^ { j }, \ r _ { 0 } \coloneqq r _ { j } y ^ { j }, \ s _ { 0 } \coloneqq s _ { j } y ^ { j }.$$

Put

$$Q & = \frac { \phi ^ { \prime } } { \phi - s \phi }, \\ \Theta & = \frac { \phi \phi ^ { \prime } - s ( \phi \phi ^ { \prime \prime } + \phi ^ { \prime 2 } ) } { 2 \phi \left [ ( \phi - s \phi ^ { \prime } ) + ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) \phi ^ { \prime \prime } \right ] } \\ \Psi & = \frac { \phi ^ { \prime \prime } } { 2 \left [ ( \phi - s \phi ^ { \prime } ) + ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) \phi ^ { \prime \prime } \right ] }. \\ \text{urvature is given by} \\ \prime \quad \underset { \theta } { \sim } \cap \quad \ \overline { \nu } \cap \overline { \nu } \cap \ \overline { \nu } \cap \ \overline { \nu } \end{pmatrix}$$

Then the S -curvature is given by

$$\mathbf S = \left [ Q ^ { \prime } - 2 \Psi Q s & - \ 2 ( \Psi Q ) ^ { \prime } ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) - 2 ( n + 1 ) Q \Theta + 2 \lambda \right ] s _ { 0 } \\ & + \ 2 ( \Psi + \lambda ) s _ { 0 } + \alpha ^ { - 1 } \left [ ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) \Psi ^ { \prime } + ( n + 1 ) \Theta \right ] r _ { 0 0 }. \\ \text{Let us put}$$

Let us put

$$\Delta & \coloneqq \ 1 + s Q + ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) Q ^ { \prime }, \\ \Phi & \coloneqq \ - ( n \Delta + 1 + s Q ) ( Q - s Q ^ { \prime } ) - ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) ( 1 + s Q ) Q ^ { \prime \prime }. \\ \vdots \sim \sim \ \sim \ \sim \ \cdot \quad \cdot \quad \cdot \quad \cdot \quad \cdot \quad \cdot \quad \cdot \quad \cdot \quad \cdot$$

In [5], Cheng-Shen characterize ( α, β )-metrics with isotropic S-curvature.

Lemma 3.1. ([5]) Let F = αφ β/α ( ) be an ( α, β )-metric on an n -manifold. Then, F is of isotropic S-curvature S = ( n + 1) cF , if and only if one of the following holds

## (i) β satisfies

$$r _ { i j } = \varepsilon \left \{ b ^ { 2 } a _ { i j } - b _ { i } b _ { j } \right \}, \quad s _ { j } = 0, & & ( 8 ) \\ x ) \text{ is a scalar function, and } \phi = \phi ( s ) \text{ satisfies}$$

where ε = ( ) is a scalar function, and ε x φ = φ s ( ) satisfies

$$\Phi = - 2 ( n + 1 ) k \frac { \phi \Delta ^ { 2 } } { b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } }, \\ \prod _ { \text{out in to each } } \varepsilon = \iota _ { \varepsilon }$$

where k is a constant. In this case, c = k/epsilon1 .

(ii) β satisfies

In this case, c = 0.

Let

$$\Psi _ { 1 } \, \coloneqq \, & \sqrt { b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } } \Delta ^ { \frac { 1 } { 2 } } \left [ \frac { \sqrt { b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } } \Phi } { \Delta ^ { \frac { 3 } { 2 } } } \right ] ^ { \prime }, \\ \Psi _ { 2 } \, \coloneqq \, & 2 ( n + 1 ) ( Q - s Q ^ { \prime } ) + 3 \frac { \Phi } { \Delta }, \\ \theta \, \coloneqq \, & \frac { Q - s Q ^ { \prime } } { 2 \Delta }. \\ \text{rmula for the mean Cartan torsion of an } ( \alpha, \beta ) \text{-metric is given by}$$

Then the formula for the mean Cartan torsion of an ( α, β )-metric is given by following

$$I _ { i } & = \frac { 1 } { 2 } \frac { \partial } { \partial y ^ { i } } \left [ ( n + 1 ) \frac { \phi ^ { \prime } } { \phi } - ( n - 2 ) \frac { s \phi ^ { \prime \prime } } { \phi - s \phi ^ { \prime } } - \frac { 3 s \phi ^ { \prime \prime } - ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) \phi ^ { \prime \prime \prime } } { ( \phi - s \phi ^ { \prime } ) + ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) \phi ^ { \prime \prime } } \right ] \\ & = - \frac { \Phi ( \phi - s \phi ^ { \prime } ) } { 2 \Delta \phi \alpha ^ { 2 } } ( \alpha b _ { i } - s y _ { i } ). \\ \vdots \, \vdots \, \vdots \, \dots \, \dots \, \vdots \, \vdots \, \vdots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \vdots \, \vdots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \vdots \, \vdots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \vdots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \vdots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \dots \, \end{array}$$

In [7], it is proved that the condition Φ = 0 characterizes the Riemannian metrics among ( α, β )-metrics. Hence, in the continue, we suppose that Φ = 0.

/negationslash

Let G i = G x,y i ( ) and ¯ G i α = ¯ G i α ( x, y ) denote the coefficients of F and α respectively in the same coordinate system. By definition, we have

$$G ^ { i } = \bar { G } _ { \alpha } ^ { i } + P y ^ { i } + Q ^ { i },$$

where

$$P \coloneqq \ \alpha ^ { - 1 } \Theta \Big [ - 2 Q \alpha s _ { 0 } + r _ { 0 0 } \Big ] \\ Q ^ { i } \coloneqq \ \alpha Q s ^ { i } _ { 0 } + \Psi \Big [ - 2 Q \alpha s _ { 0 } + r _ { 0 0 } \Big ] b ^ { i }. \\ \text{ yields the following}$$

Simplifying (13) yields the following

$$G ^ { i } = \bar { G } _ { \alpha } ^ { i } + \alpha Q s _ { 0 } ^ { i } + \theta ( - 2 \alpha Q s _ { 0 } + r _ { 0 0 } ) \left [ \frac { y ^ { i } } { \alpha } + \frac { Q ^ { \prime } } { Q - s Q ^ { \prime } } b ^ { i } \right ]. \quad \ ( 1 4 ) \\ \text{Clearly, if } \beta \text{ is parallel with respect to } \alpha \ ( r _ { i j } = 0 \text{ and } s _ { i j } = 0 ), \text{ then } P = 0 \text{ and }$$

Clearly, if β is parallel with respect to α ( r ij = 0 and s ij = 0), then P = 0 and Q i = 0. In this case, G i = ¯ G i α are quadratic in y , and F is a Berwald metric.

For an ( α, β )-metric F = αφ s ( ), the mean Landsberg curvature is given by

$$& \text{For an } ( \alpha, \beta ) \text{-metric } F = \alpha \phi ( s ), \text{ the mean Landsberg curvature is given by} \\ J _ { i } = & \ - \frac { 1 } { 2 \Delta \alpha ^ { 4 } } \left [ \frac { 2 \alpha ^ { 2 } } { b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } } [ \frac { \Phi } { \Delta } + ( n + 1 ) ( Q - s Q ^ { \prime } ) ] ( r _ { 0 } + s _ { 0 } ) h _ { i } \\ & \ + \frac { \alpha } { b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } } ( \Psi _ { 1 } + s \frac { \Phi } { \Delta } ) ( r _ { 0 0 } - 2 \alpha Q s _ { 0 } ) h _ { i } + \alpha \left [ - \alpha Q ^ { \prime } s _ { 0 } h _ { i } + \alpha Q ( \alpha ^ { 2 } s _ { i } - y _ { i } s _ { 0 } ) \\ & \ + \alpha ^ { 2 } \Delta s _ { i 0 } + \alpha ^ { 2 } ( r _ { i 0 } - 2 \alpha Q s _ { i } ) - ( r _ { 0 0 } - 2 \alpha Q s _ { 0 } ) y _ { i } \right ] \frac { \Phi } { \Delta } \right ].$$

$$r _ { i j } = 0, \quad s _ { j } = 0.$$

Contracting (15) with b i = a im b m yields

$$\bar { J } \coloneqq J _ { i } b ^ { i } = - \frac { 1 } { 2 \Delta \alpha ^ { 2 } } \left [ \Psi _ { 1 } ( r _ { 0 0 } - 2 \alpha Q s _ { 0 } ) + \alpha \Psi _ { 2 } ( r _ { 0 } + s _ { 0 } ) \right ]. \quad \ ( 1 6 ) \\ \text{The horizontal covariant derivatives } J _ { i ; m } \text{ and } J _ { i | m } \text{ of } J _ { i } \text{ with respect to } F \text{ and}$$

The horizontal covariant derivatives J i m ; and J i m | of J i with respect to F and α , respectively, are given by

$$J _ { i ; m } = \frac { \partial J _ { i } } { \partial x ^ { m } } - J _ { l } \Gamma ^ { l } _ { i m } - \frac { \partial J _ { i } } { \partial y ^ { l } } N ^ { l } _ { m },$$

$$J _ { i | m } = \frac { \partial J _ { i } } { \partial x ^ { m } } - J _ { l } \bar { \Gamma } ^ { l } _ { i m } - \frac { \bar { \partial J _ { i } } } { \partial y ^ { l } } \bar { N } ^ { l } _ { m }.$$

Then we have

$$J _ { i ; m } y ^ { m } = J _ { i | m } y ^ { m } - J _ { l } ( N _ { i } ^ { l } - \bar { N } _ { i } ^ { l } ) - 2 \frac { \partial J _ { i } } { \partial y ^ { l } } ( G ^ { l } - \bar { G } ^ { l } ). \quad \quad ( 1 7 )$$

Let F be a Finsler metric of scalar flag curvature K . By Akbar-Zadeh's theorem it satisfies following

$$A _ { i j k ; s ; m } y ^ { s } y ^ { m } + \mathbf K F ^ { 2 } A _ { i j k } + \frac { F ^ { 2 } } { 3 } \left [ h _ { i j } \mathbf K _ { k } + h _ { j k } \mathbf K _ { j } + h _ { k i } \mathbf K _ { j } \right ] = 0, \quad ( 1 8 ) \\ \text{where } A _ { i j k } = F C _ { i j k } \text{ is the Cartan torsion and } \mathbf K _ { i } = \frac { \partial \mathbf K } { A. i } \, [ 2 ]. \text{ Contracting } ( 1 8 )$$

$$\Phi _ { \Phi _ { i } ; m } y ^ { m } + \mathbf K F ^ { 2 } I _ { i } + \frac { n + 1 } { 3 } F ^ { 2 } \mathbf K _ { i } = 0. \quad \ \quad \ \ ( 1 9 ) \\ \Phi _ { \Phi _ { i } ; m } \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nu \nolimits \Phi _ { \Phi _ { i } } }$$

where A ijk = FC ijk is the Cartan torsion and K i = ∂ K ∂y i [2]. Contracting (18) with g ij yields

By (17) and (19), for an ( α, β )-metric F = αφ s ( ) of constant flag curvature K , the following holds

$$J _ { i | m } - J _ { l } \frac { \partial ( G ^ { l } - \bar { G } ^ { l } ) } { \partial y ^ { i } } b ^ { i } - 2 \frac { \partial \bar { J } } { \partial y ^ { l } } ( G ^ { l } - \bar { G } ^ { l } ) \mathbf K \alpha ^ { 2 } \phi ^ { 2 } I _ { i } = 0. \quad \ ( 2 0 )$$

Contracting (20) with b i implies that

$$\bar { J } _ { | m } y ^ { m } - J _ { i } a ^ { i k } b _ { k | m } y ^ { m } - J _ { l } \frac { \partial ( G ^ { l } - \bar { G } ^ { l } ) } { \partial y ^ { i } } b ^ { i } - 2 \frac { \partial \bar { J } } { \partial y ^ { l } } ( G ^ { l } - \bar { G } ^ { l } ) + \mathbf K \alpha ^ { 2 } \phi ^ { 2 } I _ { i } b ^ { i } = 0. \ ( 2 1 )$$

There exists a relation between mean Berwald curvature E and the Scurvature S . Indeed, taking twice vertical covariant derivatives of the S-curvature gives rise the E -curvature. It is easy to see that, every Finsler metric of isotropic S-curvature (2) is of isotropic mean Berwald curvature (5). Now, is the equation S = ( n +1) cF equivalent to the equation E = n +1 2 cF -1 h ?

/negationslash

Recently, Cheng-Shen prove that a Randers metric F = α + β is of isotropic S -curvature if and only if it is of isotropic E -curvature [4]. Then, Chun-HuanCheng extend this equivalency to the Finsler metric F = α -m ( α + β ) m +1 for every real constant m , including Randers metric [3]. In [8], Cui extend their result and show that for the Matsumoto metric F = α 2 α -β and the special ( α, β )-metric F = α + /epsilon1β + κ β /α ( 2 ) ( κ = 0), these notions are equivalent.

To prove Theorem 1.1, we need the following.

Proposition 3.2. Let F = α + β + β 2 α + β 3 α 2 be a second approximate Matsumoto metric on a manifold M of dimension n . Then the following are equivalent

- (i) F has isotropic S -curvature, S = ( n +1) ( c x F ) ;
- (ii) F has isotropic mean Berwald curvature, E = n +1 2 c x F ( ) -1 h ;

where c = ( ) c x is a scalar function on the manifold M . In this case, S = 0 . Then β is a Killing 1 -form with constant length with respect to α , that is, r 00 = 0 .

Proof. ( ) i → ( ii ) is obvious. Conversely, suppose that F has isotropic mean Berwald curvature, E = ( n +1) 2 c x F ( ) -1 h . Then we have

$$\mathbf S = ( n + 1 ) [ c F + \eta ],$$

where η = η i ( x y ) i is a 1-form on M . For the second approximate Matsumoto metric, (6) reduces to following

$$\text{etric, (0) requires to following} \\ Q = & - \frac { 1 + 2 s + 3 s ^ { 2 } } { - 1 + s ^ { 2 } + 2 s ^ { 3 } }, \\ \Theta = & \frac { 1 } { 2 } \frac { 1 - 6 s ^ { 2 } - 1 2 s ^ { 3 } - 1 5 s ^ { 4 } - 1 2 s ^ { 5 } } { ( 1 + s + s ^ { 2 } + s ^ { 3 } ) ( 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s ) }, \\ \Psi = & \frac { 1 + 3 s } { ( 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s ) }. \\ \mu = & \mu \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \colon$$

By substituting (22) and (23) in (7), we have

$$\Psi = & \, \frac { \left ( 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s \right ) }. \\ \dots & \, \left ( \infty \, \cdots \, \cdots \, \left ( \infty \, \cdots \, \right ) \, \left ( \infty \, \cdots \, \cdots \, \cdots \, \cdots \,.$$

$$& \gamma - ( 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s ) ^ { \cdot } \quad \langle \rangle ^ { \cdot \rangle } \\ \text{By substituting} \, ( 2 2 ) \, \text{and} \, ( 2 3 ) \, \text{in} \, ( 7 ), \, \text{we have} \\ \text{S} & = \, \left [ \frac { 2 ( 1 + 3 s ) ( 1 + s + s ^ { 2 } + s ^ { 3 } ) } { ( - 1 + s ^ { 2 } + 2 s ^ { 3 } ) ^ { 2 } } \, + \, ( 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s ) ( - 1 + s ^ { 2 } + 2 s ^ { 3 } ) } \\ & \quad - \frac { 2 ( 5 + 2 6 s + 7 7 s ^ { 2 } + 8 8 s ^ { 3 } - 6 1 s ^ { 4 } - 4 3 0 s ^ { 5 } - 8 0 5 s ^ { 6 } + 4 b ^ { 2 } + 4 0 b ^ { 2 } s + 1 4 8 b ^ { 2 } s ) ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) } { ( 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s ) ^ { 2 } ( - 1 + s ^ { 2 } + 2 s ^ { 3 } ) ^ { 2 } } \\ & \quad + \frac { ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + 2 s + 3 s ^ { 2 } ) ( 1 - 6 s ^ { 2 } - 1 2 s ^ { 3 } - 1 5 s ^ { 4 } - 1 2 s ^ { 5 } ) } { ( - 1 + s ^ { 2 } + 2 s ^ { 3 } ) ( 1 + s + s ^ { 2 } + s ^ { 3 } ) ( 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s ) } + 2 \lambda \right ] s _ { 0 } \\ & \quad + 2 \left [ \frac { ( 1 + 3 s ) } { 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s } \right ] + \frac { ( 1 ) s ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) ( 1 + 1 s ^ { 2 } + 1 6 s ^ { 3 } + 2 s ) } { \alpha ( 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s ) ^ { 2 } } \right ] r _ { 0 0 } \\ & \quad + \left [ \frac { ( n + 1 ) ( 1 - 6 s ^ { 2 } - 1 2 s ^ { 3 } - 1 5 s ^ { 4 } - 1 2 s ^ { 5 } ) } { 2 \alpha ( 1 + s + s ^ { 2 } + s ^ { 3 } ) ( 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s ) } \right ] r _ { 0 0 } \\ & = \, ( n + 1 ) \left [ \alpha ( 1 + s + s ^ { 2 } + s ^ { 3 } ) + \eta \right ]. \quad \, ( 2 4 ) \\ \text{Multiplying} \, ( 2 4 ) \, \text{with} \, ( - 1 + s ^ { 2 } + 2 s ^ { 3 } ) ( 1 + s + s ^ { 2 } + s ^ { 3 } ) ( 1 - 3 s ^ { 2 } - 8 s ^ { 3 } + 2 b ^ { 2 } + 6 b ^ { 2 } s ) ^ { 2 } \alpha ^ { 1 4 } \\ \text{ implies that}$$

$$\text{mases} \text{max} \\ M _ { 1 } + M _ { 2 } \alpha ^ { 2 } + M _ { 3 } \alpha ^ { 4 } + M _ { 4 } \alpha ^ { 6 } + M _ { 5 } \alpha ^ { 8 } + M _ { 6 } \alpha ^ { 1 0 } + M _ { 7 } \alpha ^ { 1 2 } + M _ { 8 } \alpha ^ { 1 4 } \\ + \alpha \left [ M _ { 9 } + M _ { 1 0 } \alpha ^ { 2 } + M _ { 1 1 } \alpha ^ { 4 } + M _ { 1 2 } \alpha ^ { 6 } + M _ { 1 3 } \alpha ^ { 8 } + M _ { 1 4 } \alpha ^ { 1 0 } \\ + M _ { 1 5 } \alpha ^ { 1 2 } + M _ { 1 6 } \alpha ^ { 1 4 } \right ] = 0, \quad ( 2 5 ) \\ 8$$

[ ] Multiplying (24) with ( -1+ s 2 +2 s 3 )(1+ s + s 2 + s 3 )(1 -3 s 2 -8 s 3 +2 b 2 +6 b 2 s ) 2 α 14 implies that (25)

## where

- M 1 := -128( n +1) cβ 15 , M 2 := 2 ( [ n +1) ( [ -385 + 96 b 2 ) cβ 2 -64 ηβ ] +128 ( λ r 0 + s 0 ) β +48 nr 00 ] β 11 , M 3 := -[ ( n +1)[4( -283 b 2 +243 + 18 b 4 ) cβ 2 -6(32 b 2 -59) ηβ ] + [12( -59 + 32 b 2 ) λ r ( 0 + s 0 ) -96((3 n -1) s 0 -r 0 ] β + 3( -24 b 2 +36 -219 n +72 nb 2 ) r 00 ] β , 9 M 4 := [ ( n +1) [ -2(29 -738 b 2 +208 b 4 ) cβ 2 -3( -172 b 2 +21 + 24 b 4 ) ηβ ] + ( -159 nb 2 -132 -39 n +96 b 2 ) r 00 -3( -48 b 2 +123 + 72 nb 2 -277 n s β ) 0 + 3(24 b 2 +86) r β 0 +6 ( λ -172 b 2 +21+24 b 4 )( s 0 + r 0 ) β β , ] 7 M 5 := [ ( n +1)[ -8( -27 b 2 +70 b 4 -41) cβ 2 -4(47 b 4 -40 -32 b 2 ) ηβ ] + (15 nb 2 +20 -55 n +108 b 2 ) r 00 +8 (47 λ b 4 -40 -32 b 2 )( r 0 + s 0 ) β -2 ( [ -262 b 2 +278 + 303 nb 2 -147 n s ) 0 -(94 b 2 +32) r 0 ] β β ] 5 M 6 := 2 ( [ n +1) [ -2(4 b +1)(4 b -1)(4 b 2 +13) cβ 2 -10(1 + 20 b 2 +6 b 4 ) ηβ ] + (11 n -40 b 2 +35 nb 2 +20) r 00 +20 (1 + 20 λ b 2 +6 b 4 )( r 0 + s 0 ) β -2(32 n +51 + 129 nb 2 -294 b 2 ) s β 0 -(30 b 2 -50) r β 0 ] β , 3 M 7 := -[ ( n +1) [ -4( -17 b 2 -7 + 30 b 4 ) cβ 2 -6( -1 + 10 b 4 ) β ] +(3 n +12) b 2 r 00 -12 λ (1 -10 b 4 )( s 0 + r 0 ) -6 ( [ nb 2 -n -2 + 14 b 2 ) s 0 -10 b 2 r 0 ] β β, ] M 8 := 4 ( [ n +1) 2(1 + 2 [ b 2 )(8 b 2 +1) cβ +(1 + 2 b 2 ) 2 η ] -2 λ (1 + 2 b 2 ) 2 ( s 0 + r 0 ) + [ -57 nb 2 -64( n +1) b 4 -8 n -55 b 2 +6 ] r 00 -(2 -4 b 2 ) r 0 + [ n +(4 + 2 n b ) 2 -1 ] s 0 ] , M 9 := -416( n +1) cβ 14 , M 10 := [ ( n +1)[( -1037 + 616 b 2 ) cβ 2 -288 ηβ ] + 576 λ r ( 0 + s 0 ) β +(204 n -6) r 00 ] β 12 , M 11 := -1 2 [ ( n +1)[8(57 b 4 -385 b 2 +143) cβ 2 -2(424 b 2 -267) ηβ ] + 4 (424 [ λ b 2 -267)( r 0 + s 0 ) -4( -115 + 330 n s ) 0 +1320 r 0 ] β + (300 nb 2 +249 -189 n -120 b 2 ) r 00 ] β , 8 M 12 := 4 ( [ n +1)[ -(572 b 4 -932 b 2 -275) cβ 2 -4(39 b 4 -28 -102 b 2 ) ηβ ] -75 nb 2 -62 -89 n +144 b 2 r 00 +8 (39 λ b 4 -28 -102 b 2 )( r 0 + s 0 ) β -6[( -58 b 2 +100 + 81 nb 2 -109 n s ) 0 -(26 b 2 +34) r 0 ] β β , ] 6

$$M _ { 1 3 } \coloneqq \ \left [ ( n + 1 ) [ - 8 ( - 2 4 + 3 5 b ^ { 2 } + 4 7 b ^ { 4 } ) c \beta ^ { 2 } - 6 ( 2 6 b ^ { 4 } - 1 1 + 2 0 b ^ { 2 } ) \eta \beta \right ] \\ & + ( 5 1 n b ^ { 2 } + 3 3 - 6 n + 2 4 b ^ { 2 } ) r _ { 0 0 } + 1 2 \lambda ( 2 6 b ^ { 4 } - 1 1 + 2 0 b ^ { 2 } ) ( s _ { 0 } + r _ { 0 } ) \\ & - 6 ( - 1 1 8 b ^ { 2 } + 5 4 + 8 3 n b ^ { 2 } - 3 n ) s _ { 0 } \beta + 6 ( 2 6 b ^ { 2 } - 1 0 ) r _ { 0 } \beta \right ] \beta ^ { 4 }, \\ M _ { 1 4 } \coloneqq \ \left [ ( n + 1 ) [ - ( 5 6 b ^ { 4 } - 2 7 2 b ^ { 2 } - 3 9 ) c \beta ^ { 2 } - 4 ( 7 ( n + 1 ) b ^ { 4 } - 6 ( 1 + n ) - 2 2 n b ^ { 2 } ) \eta \beta \right ] \\ & + ( - 7 n b ^ { 2 } - 8 - 5 n + 3 2 b ^ { 2 } ) r _ { 0 0 } + 8 \lambda ( 7 b ^ { 4 } - 6 - 2 2 b ^ { 2 } ) ( r _ { 0 } + s _ { 0 } ) \beta \\ & + 2 ( - 1 5 4 b ^ { 2 } + 1 2 + 3 3 n b ^ { 2 } + 1 9 n ) s _ { 0 } \beta + 2 ( 1 4 b ^ { 2 } - 2 2 ) s _ { 0 } \beta \right ] \beta ^ { 2 } \\ M _ { 1 5 } \coloneqq \ \left [ ( n + 1 ) [ 4 ( 2 3 b ^ { 4 } + 5 b ^ { 2 } - 1 ) c \beta ^ { 2 } - ( 1 4 b ^ { 2 } + 1 ) ( 2 b ^ { 2 } + 1 ) \eta \beta \right ] \\ & - \frac { n + 1 } { 2 } ( 8 b ^ { 2 } + 1 ) r _ { 0 0 } - 2 \lambda ( 1 4 b ^ { 2 } + 1 ) ( 2 b ^ { 2 } + 1 ) ( s _ { 0 } + r _ { 0 } ) \beta \\ & - 2 ( - 6 b ^ { 2 } + 3 - 5 n b ^ { 2 } ) s _ { 0 } \beta - 2 ( 4 + 1 4 b ^ { 2 } ) r _ { 0 } \beta \right ], \\ M _ { 1 6 } \coloneqq \ ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + 2 b ^ { 2 } ) ^ { 2 } c \\ The term of ( 2 5 ) which is seemingly does not contain \alpha ^ { 2 } \, is \, M _ { 1 }. \, Since \, \beta ^ { 1 5 } \, is \, not \\ divisible by \alpha ^ { 2 }, \, then \, c = 0 \, \text{which implies that}$$

The term of (25) which is seemingly does not contain α 2 is M 1 . Since β 15 is not divisible by α 2 , then c = 0 which implies that

$$M _ { 1 } = M _ { 9 } = 0.$$

Therefore (25) reduces to following

$$M _ { 2 } + M _ { 3 } \alpha ^ { 2 } + M _ { 4 } \alpha ^ { 4 } + M _ { 5 } \alpha ^ { 6 } + M _ { 6 } \alpha ^ { 8 } + M _ { 7 } \alpha ^ { 1 0 } + M _ { 8 } \alpha ^ { 1 2 } = 0, \text{ \quad \ } ( 2 6 )$$

$$M _ { 1 0 } + M _ { 1 1 } \alpha ^ { 2 } + M _ { 1 2 } \alpha ^ { 4 } + M _ { 1 3 } \alpha ^ { 6 } + M _ { 1 4 } \alpha ^ { 8 } + M _ { 1 5 } \alpha ^ { 1 0 } + M _ { 1 6 } \alpha ^ { 1 2 } = 0. \quad ( 2 7 )$$

By plugging c = 0 in M 2 and M 10 , the only equations that don't contain α 2 are the following

$$8 \left [ 8 ( 2 \lambda ( r _ { 0 } + s _ { 0 } ) - ( n + 1 ) \eta ) + 6 n r _ { 0 0 } \right ] & = \tau _ { 1 } \alpha ^ { 2 }, \quad \quad ( 2 8 ) \\ 6 \left [ 4 8 ( 2 \lambda ( r _ { 0 } + s _ { 0 } ) - ( n + 1 ) \eta ) + ( 3 4 n - 1 ) r _ { 0 0 } \right ] & = \tau _ { 2 } \alpha ^ { 2 }, \quad \quad ( 2 9 )$$

where τ 1 = τ 1 ( x ) and τ 2 = τ 2 ( x ) are scalar functions on M . By eliminating [2 λ r ( 0 + s 0 ) -( n +1) ] from (28) and (29), we get η

$$\check { 6 \left [ 4 8 ( 2 \lambda ( r _ { 0 } + s _ { 0 } ) - ( n + 1 ) \eta ) + ( 3 4 n - 1 ) r _ { 0 0 } \check { \right ] } = \tau _ { 2 } \alpha ^ { 2 }, \quad \ ( 2 9 ) \\ \intertext { here } \tau _ { 1 } = \tau _ { 1 } ( x ) \text{ and } \tau _ { 2 } = \tau _ { 2 } ( x ) \text{ are scalar functions on } M. \text{ By eliminating}$$

$$r _ { 0 0 } = \tau \alpha ^ { 2 },$$

where τ = τ 2 -τ 1 -(18 n +1) . By (28) or (29), it follows that

$$2 \lambda ( r _ { 0 } + s _ { 0 } ) - ( n + 1 ) \eta = 0.$$

By (30), we have r 0 = τβ . Putting (30) and (31) in M 10 and M 11 yield

$$M _ { 1 0 } = & ( 2 0 4 n - 6 ) \tau \alpha ^ { 2 } \beta ^ { 1 2 }, & & ( 3 2 ) \\ & r & & ( 3 0 0 n - 1 0 0 \lambda ^ { 2 } \pm 2 0 n - 1 8 0 n } \quad. \,.$$

$$\stackrel { \cdots \nu } { \cdots } \stackrel { \cdots \cdots } { \cdots } \stackrel { \cdots \cdots } { \cdots } \stackrel { \cdots \cdots } { \cdots } \stackrel { \cdots } { \cdots } \,, \\ M _ { 1 1 } = & \left [ [ ( 6 6 0 n - 2 3 0 ) s _ { 0 } - 6 6 0 r _ { 0 } ] \beta - \frac { ( 3 0 0 n - 1 2 0 ) b ^ { 2 } + 2 4 9 - 1 8 9 n } { 2 } r _ { 0 0 } \tau \alpha ^ { 2 } \right ] \beta ^ { 2 } _ { 0 3 } )$$

By putting (32) and (33) into (27), we have

$$& [ ( 6 6 0 n - 2 3 0 ) s _ { 0 } - 6 6 0 r _ { 0 } ] \beta ^ { 1 0 } - \frac { 3 0 0 n b ^ { 2 } + 2 4 9 - 1 8 9 n - 1 2 0 b ^ { 2 } } { 2 } r _ { 0 0 } \tau \alpha ^ { 2 } \beta ^ { 9 } \\ + & \, ( 2 0 4 n - 6 ) \tau \beta ^ { 1 2 } - M _ { 1 2 } \alpha ^ { 2 } + M _ { 1 3 } \alpha ^ { 4 } + M _ { 1 4 } \alpha ^ { 6 } + M _ { 1 5 } \alpha ^ { 8 } + M _ { 1 6 } \alpha ^ { 1 0 } = 0. \ ( 3 4 )$$

$$n - 6 ) \tau \beta ^ { 1 2 } - M$$

The only equations of (34) that do not contain α 2 is [(204 n -6) τβ 2 +(660 n -230) s 0 -660 r 0 ] β 10 . Since β 10 is not divisible by α 2 , then we have

$$[ ( 2 0 4 n - 6 ) \tau \beta ^ { 2 } + ( 6 6 0 n - 2 3 0 ) s _ { 0 } - 6 6 0 r _ { 0 } ] = 0. \quad \quad ( 3 5 )$$

By Lemma 3.1, we always have s j = 0. Then (35), reduces to following

$$( 2 0 4 n - 6 ) \tau \beta ^ { 2 } - 6 6 0 r _ { 0 } = 0.$$

Thus

$$2 ( 2 0 4 n - 6 ) \tau b _ { i } \beta - 6 6 0 \tau b _ { i } = 0. \quad \quad \quad ( 3 7 )$$

By multiplying (37) with b i , we have

$$\tau = 0.$$

Thus by (31), we get η = 0 and then S = ( n +1) cF . By (30), we get r ij = 0. Therefore Lemma 3.1, implies that S = 0. This completes the proof.

Proof of Theorem 1.1: Let F be an isotropic Berwald metric (3) with almost isotropic flag curvature (1). In [20], it is proved that every isotropic Berwald metric (3) has isotropic S-curvature (2).

Conversely, suppose that F is of isotropic S-curvature (2) with scalar flag curvature K . In [11], it is showed that every Finsler metric of isotropic Scurvature (2) has almost isotropic flag curvature (1). Now, we are going to prove that F is a isotropic Berwald metric. In [6], it is proved that F is an isotropic Berwald metric (3) if and only if it is a Douglas metric with isotropic mean Berwald curvature (5). On the other hand, every Finsler metric of isotropic S-curvature (2) has isotropic mean Berwald curvature (5). Thus for completing the proof, we must show that F is a Douglas metric. By Proposition 3.2, we have S = 0. Therefore by Theorem 1.1 in [11], F must be of isotropic flag curvature K = σ x ( ). By Proposition 3.2, β is a Killing 1-form with constant length with respect to α , that is, r ij = s j = 0. Then (14), (15) and (16) reduce to

$$G ^ { i } - \bar { G } ^ { i } = \alpha Q s ^ { i } _ { \ 0 }, \ \ J _ { i } = - \frac { \Phi s _ { i 0 } } { 2 \alpha \Delta }, \ \ \bar { J } = 0.$$

By (12), we get

$$\lambda I _ { i } b ^ { i } = \frac { - \Phi } { 2 \Delta F } ( \phi - s \phi ^ { \prime } ) ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ).$$

We consider two case:

Case 1. Let dimM ≥ 3. In this case, by Schur Lemma F has constant flag curvature and (21) holds. Thus by (38) and (39), the equation (21) reduces to following

$$\frac { \Phi s _ { i 0 } } { 2 \alpha \Delta } a ^ { i k } s _ { k 0 } + \frac { \Phi s _ { l 0 } } { 2 \alpha \Delta } \Big ( \alpha Q s ^ { l } _ { 0 } \Big ) _ {. i } b ^ { i } - K F \frac { \Phi } { 2 \Delta } ( \phi - s \phi ^ { \prime } ) ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) = 0. \quad ( 4 0 ) \\ \text{Bv assumption } \Phi \neq 0. \text{ Thus } b v \ ( 4 0 ). \text{ we get}$$

By assumption Φ = 0. Thus by (40), we get

/negationslash

$$s _ { i 0 } s _ { 0 } ^ { i } + s _ { l 0 } \left ( \alpha Q s _ { 0 } ^ { l } \right ) _ {. i } b ^ { i } - K F \alpha ( \phi - s \phi ^ { \prime } ) ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) = 0. \quad \ ( 4 1 ) \\ \text{The following holds}$$

The following holds

$$\left ( \alpha Q s ^ { l } _ { \, 0 } \right ) _ {. i } b ^ { i } = s Q s ^ { i } _ { \, 0 } + Q ^ { \prime } s ^ { i } _ { \, 0 } ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ). \\ \text{n be rewritten as follows}$$

Then (41) can be rewritten as follows

$$s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } \Delta - K \alpha ^ { 2 } \phi ( \phi - s \phi ^ { \prime } ) ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) = 0.$$

By (11), (23) and (42), we obtain

$$\begin{array} { l l l l } \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \\ & \left [ 1 - \frac { s ( 1 + 2 s + 3 s ^ { 2 } ) } { ( - 1 + s ^ { 2 } + 2 s ^ { 3 } ) } + \frac { 2 ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) ( 1 + 3 s ) ( 1 + s + s ^ { 2 } + s ^ { 3 } ) } { ( - 1 + s ^ { 2 } + 2 s ^ { 3 } ) ^ { 2 } } \right ] s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } \\ & - K ( 1 + s + s ^ { 2 } + s ^ { 3 } ) \alpha ^ { 2 } \left [ 1 + s + s ^ { 2 } + s ^ { 3 } - s ( 1 + 2 s + 3 s ^ { 2 } ) \right ] ( b ^ { 2 } - s ^ { 2 } ) = 0 ( 4 3 ) \\ & \text{Multiplying (43) with (-1 + s ^ { 2 } + 2 s ^ { 3 } ) ^ { 2 } \alpha ^ { 1 2 } \text{ yields} \end{array}$$

Multiplying (43) with ( -1 + s 2 +2 s 3 ) 2 α 12 yields

$$A + \alpha B = 0,$$

where

$$\text{where} \quad \\ A & = - K b ^ { 2 } \alpha ^ { 1 4 } + ( 2 b ^ { 2 } + 1 ) ( K \beta ^ { 2 } + s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } ) \alpha ^ { 1 2 } \\ & + 2 ( 3 K b ^ { 2 } \beta ^ { 2 } + 4 s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } b ^ { 2 } - K \beta ^ { 2 } - s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } ) \beta ^ { 2 } \alpha ^ { 1 0 } \\ & - ( 6 K \beta ^ { 2 } + 1 1 s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } + 2 0 K \beta ^ { 2 } b ^ { 2 } - 6 s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } ) \beta ^ { 4 } \alpha ^ { 8 } \\ & - ( - 2 0 K \beta ^ { 2 } + 5 K \beta ^ { 2 } b ^ { 2 } + 8 s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } ) \beta ^ { 6 } \alpha ^ { 6 } + ( K \beta ^ { 1 0 } ) ( 2 6 b ^ { 2 } + 5 ) \alpha ^ { 4 } \\ & - 2 K \beta ^ { 1 2 } ( 1 3 - 4 b ^ { 2 } ) \alpha ^ { 2 } - 8 K \beta ^ { 1 4 }, & ( 4 4 ) \\ B & = - ( K b ^ { 2 } \beta ) \alpha ^ { 1 2 } + ( 1 + 8 b ^ { 2 } ) ( K b ^ { 2 } \beta ^ { 2 } + s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } ) \beta \alpha ^ { 1 0 } \\ & - 2 ( 3 K b ^ { 2 } \beta ^ { 2 } - 4 s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } b ^ { 2 } + 4 K \beta ^ { 2 } + 5 s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } ) \beta ^ { 3 } \alpha ^ { 8 } \\ & + ( 6 K \beta ^ { 2 } - 1 1 s _ { i 0 } s ^ { i } _ { 0 } - 2 0 K \beta ^ { 2 } b ^ { 2 } ) \beta ^ { 5 } \alpha ^ { 6 } \\ & + ( 5 K \beta ^ { 9 } ) ( 3 b ^ { 2 } + 4 ) \alpha ^ { 4 } + ( 5 K \beta ^ { 1 1 } ) ( - 3 + 4 b ^ { 2 } ) \alpha ^ { 2 } - 2 0 \alpha K \beta ^ { 1 3 }. \\ \text{ Obviously, we have } A = 0 \text{ and } B = 0. \text{ } B \text{ } A = 0 \text{ and the fact that } \beta ^ { 1 4 } \text{ is not divisible by } \alpha ^ { 2 }, \text{ we get } K = 0.$$

Obviously, we have A = 0 and B = 0.

By A = 0 and the fact that β 14 is not divisible by α 2 , we get K = 0. Therefore (43) reduces to following

$$s _ { i 0 } s _ { \, 0 } ^ { i } = a _ { i j } s _ { \, 0 } ^ { j } s _ { \, 0 } ^ { i } = 0.$$

Because of positive-definiteness of the Riemannian metric α , we have s i 0 = 0, i.e., β is closed. By r 00 = 0 and s 0 = 0, it follows that β is parallel with respect to α . Then F = α + β + β 2 α + β 3 α 2 is a Berwald metric. Hence F must be locally Minkowskian.

Case 2. Let dim M = 2. Suppose that F has isotropic Berwald curvature (3). In [20], it is proved that every isotropic Berwald metric (3) has isotropic Scurvature, S = ( n +1) cF . By Proposition 3.2, c = 0. Then by (3), F reduces to a Berwald metric. Since F is non-Riemannian, then by Szab´'s rigidity Theorem o for Berwald surface (see [2] page 278), F must be locally Minkowskian.

Acknowledgment. The authors would like to thank the referee's valuable suggestions.

## References

- [1] S. B´cs´ and M. Matsumoto, a o On Finsler spaces of Douglas type, A generalization of notion of Berwald space , Publ. Math. Debrecen. 51 (1997), 385-406.
- [2] D. Bao, S. S. Chern and Z. Shen, An Introduction to Riemann-Finsler Geometry , Springer-Verlag, 2000.
- [3] X. Chun-Huan and X. Cheng, On a class of weakly-Berwald ( α, β ) -metrics , J. Math. Res. Expos. 29 (2009), 227-236.
- [4] X. Cheng and Z. Shen, Randers metric with special curvature properties , Osaka. J. Math. 40 (2003), 87-101.
- [5] X. Cheng and Z. Shen, A class of Finsler metrics with isotropic Scurvature , Israel. J. Math. 169 (2009), 317-340.
- [6] X. Chen and Z. Shen, On Douglas metrics , Publ. Math. Debrecen. 66 (2005), 503-512.
- [7] X. Cheng, H. Wang and M. Wang, ( α, β ) -metrics with relatively isotropic mean Landsberg curvature , Publ. Math. Debrecen. 72 (2008), 475-485.
- [8] N. Cui, On the S-curvature of some ( α, β ) -metrics , Acta. Math. Scientia, Series: A. 26 (7) (2006), 1047-1056.
- [9] I.Y. Lee and M.H. Lee, On weakly-Berwald spaces of special ( α, β ) -metrics , Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 43 (2) (2006), 425-441.
- [10] M. Matsumoto, Theory of Finsler spaces with ( α, β ) -metric , Rep. Math. Phys. 31 (1992), 43-84.

- [11] B. Najafi, Z. Shen and A. Tayebi , Finsler metrics of scalar flag curvature with special non-Riemannian curvature properties , Geom. Dedicata. 131 (2008), 87-97.
- [12] H. S. Park and E. S. Choi, On a Finsler spaces with a special ( α, β ) -metric , Tensor, N. S. 56 (1995), 142-148.
- [13] H. S. Park and E. S. Choi, Finsler spaces with an approximate Matsumoto metric of Douglas type , Comm. Korean. Math. Soc. 14 (1999), 535-544.
- [14] H. S. Park and E. S. Choi, Finsler spaces with the second approximate Matsumoto metric , Bull. Korean. Math. Soc. 39 (1) (2002), 153-163.
- [15] H. S. Park, I. Y. Lee and C. K. Park, Finsler space with the general approximate Matsumoto metric , Indian J. Pure. Appl. Math. 34 (1) (2002), 59-77.
- [16] H. S. Park, I.Y. Lee, H. Y. Park and B. D. Kim, Projectively flat Finsler space with an approximate Matsumoto metric , Comm. Korean. Math. Soc. 18 (2003), 501-513.
- [17] Z. Shen, Differential Geometry of Spray and Finsler Spaces , Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2001.
- [18] A. Tayebi and B. Najafi, On isotropic Berwald metrics , Ann. Polon. Math. 103 (2012), 109-121.
- [19] A. Tayebi, E. Peyghan and H. Sadeghi, On Matsumoto-type Finsler metrics , Nonlinear Analysis: RWA. 13 (2012), 2556-2561.
- [20] A. Tayebi and M. Rafie Rad, S-curvature of isotropic Berwald metrics , Sci. China. Series A: Math. 51 (2008), 2198-2204.

Akbar Tayebi and Tayebeh Tabatabaeifar Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics University of Qom Qom. Iran Email: akbar.tayebi@gmail.com Email: t.tabaee@gmail.com

Esmaeil Peyghan

Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics Arak University 38156-8-8349 Arak. Iran

Email: epeyghan@gmail.com
A. Tayebi T. Tabatabaeifar E. Peyghan
On the Second Approximate Matsumoto Metric
In this paper, we study the second approximate Matsumoto metric on a manifold
M. We prove that F is of scalar flag curvature and isotropic S-curvature if and
only if it is isotropic Berwald metric with almost isotropic flag curvature.