## Electronic Landscape of Group-5 Transition Metal Ditellurides M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta): Multiple Crystal Phases with Local Bonds and Flat Bands

Natsuki Mitsuishi 1,2* and Kyoko Ishizaka 1,2†

1

RIKEN Center of Emergent Matter Science (CEMS), Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan 2 Quantum-Phase Electronics Center &amp; Department of Applied Physics, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

Group-5 transition metal ditellurides M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta) are unique CdI2-type layered materials that exhibit peculiar quasi-one-dimensional intralayer superstructures, known as ribbon-chains and butterfly-like clusters of M atoms. In this review article, we attempt to systematically understand their  electronic  band  structures  based  on  our  recent  angle-resolved  photoemission  spectroscopy (ARPES) studies and first-principles calculations. We underscore the role of the localized molecularlike orbital bonds that form the anomalous flat bands in the momentum space, and demonstrate how they influence the Fermi surface anisotropy, phase stabilities of crystal structures, and nontrivial topological  properties  in  some  cases.  We  also  elaborate  the  future  prospects  for  novel  quantum phenomena that can be realized in these materials.

## 1. Introduction

- 2. Superperiodic Patterns and Phase Transitions in M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta)

## 3. (V,Ti)Te2: Trigonal 1 T to Monoclinic Ribbon-chain 1 T' Phase Transition

- 3.1. Fermi surfaces derived from t 2g orbitals in the trigonal 1 T phase
- 3.2. Flat band and quasi-one-dimensional Fermi surface induced by the dYZ / dZX trimerization the 1 T' phase
- 3.3. Selective disappearance of topological surface states through the 1 T -1 T' transition

## 4. VTe2, NbTe2, and TaTe2: Common Ribbon-chain 1 T' Phase

- 4.1. Phase stability at high-temperature regime
- 4.2. Universal flat band formation at different energy levels

## 5. TaTe2: Ribbon-chain 1 T' to Butterfly-like-cluster Phase Transition

- 5.1. Electronic states modifications: Overview
- 5.2. Kink-like reconstruction in dXY -derived band at Brillouin zone boundary
- 5.3. Structural and electronic fluctuations emerging at room-temperature phase

## 6. Summary and Outlook

*natsuki.mitsuishi[at]riken.jp

† ishizaka[at]ap.t.u-tokyo.jp

## 1. Introduction

Molecular-like orbital bonding, analogues of dimers, polymers or clusters in organic molecules, is becoming one of the key concept for organizing complex inorganic compounds with versatile physical properties [1]. This concept has been widely used in strongly correlated insulators with charge/magnetic/orbital  ordering  (e.g.,  transition  metal  oxides [2]  and  spinel  compounds [3]),  but recently it has also become important in phenomena like charge density wave (CDW) [4] and latticecollapse transitions [5] in various metallic systems including superconductors. One important example is the transition metal dichalcogenides MX 2 ( M = transition metal, X = S, Se, Te), the van der Waals layered materials hosting rich quantum phenomena including CDW ordering [6-8]. CDW is basically described  as  a  superperiodic  wave-like  modulation  of  the  electron  density  accompanying  the concomitant  lattice  distortion,  induced  by  the  Peierls  instability  of  Fermi-surface  nesting  in  lowdimensional systems [9]. On the other hand, some of the superperiodic lattice distortions in MX 2 has been argued in terms of molecular bonding of relevant orbitals [10]. Especially in the case of CdI2type phase (hereafter referred to as 1 T ) [Figs. 1(a,b)], Whangbo et al . [10] proposed a mechanism of metal-metal bonding that leads to a variety of superperiodic patterns depending on the number of d electrons [Fig. 1(c)]. For this materials family, the MX 6 octahedral configuration splits the metal d orbitals into the low-lying t 2g ( dXY , dYZ , dZX ) and high-lying e g ( GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;2&gt; GLYPH&lt;3&gt; GLYPH&lt;4&gt;GLYPH&lt;5&gt; GLYPH&lt;3&gt; , GLYPH&lt;1&gt; GLYPH&lt;6&gt; GLYPH&lt;3&gt; ) manifolds. For simplicity, the effect of trigonal distortion is ignored and Oh symmetry is assumed here. The above scenario can be interpreted based on the concept of the directional σ -bonding of t 2g orbitals residing on the edgesharing octahedra, which introduces the scheme of virtual (or hidden) one-dimensional Fermi surfaces and their nesting according to the d electron occupation [10].

Of particular interest in this review is the group-5 ditelluride M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta) revealing the ribbon chain (sometimes termed double zigzag chain) superstructure [see the middle panel in Fig. 1(c)] [11,12]. This superstructure can be regarded as the superposition of M -trimers among adjacent dYZ , and dZX orbitals, which can be energetically stabilized by forming the so-called  'three-center twoelectron' state [the right panel in Fig. 1(b)] [10,13,14]. Here, the number of d -electrons is assumed to be close to 4/3 due to the fairly strong charge transfer from Te to M [15]. We note that the importance of Te-Te hybridization and M -Te charge transfer has been argued in tellurides ( M Te2) [15-18], which may make the picture of M M -and/or Te-Te local bonding more plausible as compared to sulfides and selenides. Indeed, there have been similar arguments in various tellurides, such as M zigzag chains in (Mo,W)Te2 [19] and (Ta,Nb)IrTe4 [20], Ir dimer in IrTe2 [21], and Te dimer in AuTe2 [22]. Here we should also note that the origin of ribbon chain formation has been also discussed based on a typical Fermi surface nesting scenario [23] and/or anisotropic electron-phonon coupling [23,24] from first-

principles calculations, whereas its M dependence is not yet reported. Furthermore, TaTe2 exhibits another superstructure with butterfly-like Ta clusters [25] at low temperature, which is not presented in Fig. 1(c). Thus a systematic M - and temperature-dependent investigation on electronic properties is necessary.

In  this  review,  we  focus  on  the  group-5  tellurides M Te2  ( M =  V ,  Nb,  Ta)  and  attempt  to systematically  understand  their  electronic  band  structures  based  on  angle-resolved  photoemission spectroscopy  (ARPES)  and  first-principles  calculations  (Some  data  are  cited  from  our  recent publications [26,27]).  We  primarily  demonstrate  the  characteristic  changes  in  electronic  band structures accompanying the formation of ribbon chains and butterfly-like clusters. Here it is important to grasp the correspondence between the chemical orbital bonding in real space and the band structure in momentum space. We also discuss their impact on the Fermi surface anisotropy, crystal structural phase stabilities, and nontrivial topological properties.

This review is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we briefly review the superperiodic patterns and phase transitions reported in M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta) and their associated physical properties. Section 3  describes  the  characteristics  of  the  electronic  band  structures  in  the  undistorted  1 T trigonal  and ribbon-chain phases, as revealed in the pristine- and Ti-doped VTe2. In Section 4 we turn our eyes on to the common ribbon-chain phase in room temperature M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta), focusing on the M -dependent band structure and its phase instability. Section 5 overviews the temperature dependent electronic structure of TaTe2 with a particular focus on its modifications through the ribbon-chain to butterfly-like-cluster phase transition. Section 6 summarizes the review and offers some suggestions for future research.

Fig. 1. Crystal structure and metal-metal bonding in CdI2-type transition metal dichalcogenides.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-eea1f062-adf1-4426-b7cd-e1263f465305.jpg)

(a) Crystal structure of MX 2 with the edge-sharing MX 6 octahedral configuration. The crystal structures are  visualized  by  VESTA [28]. dXY orbital  is  depicted  in  the  octahedron.  (b)  Metal d orbital  level splitting under the octahedral crystal field [middle panel] and the trimerized 'three-center two-electron' bonded  state  [right  panel].  (c)  Multiple  metal-metal  bonding  representing  the  patterns  of  lattice distortions observed in various t 2g systems [10]. This review focuses on group-5 M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta) highlighted by the yellow box.

## 2. Superperiodic Patterns and Phase Transitions in M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta)

Prior to elaborating the electronic band structures of the bulk group-5 M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta), we first summarize their superperiodic patterns and phase transitions as presented in Figs. 2(a)-(d). Among them, only VTe2 crystallizes in the non-distorted 1 T structure [Fig. 2(a), P m 3 GLYPH&lt;8&gt; 1] at high-temperature regime. VTe2 undergoes a first-order structural phase transition to the monoclinic 1 T' phase [Fig. 2(b), C 2/ m ] at T s ~ 480 K upon cooling, appearing as a jump in the temperature-dependent resistivity [29]. The 1 T' structure is characterized by the quasi-one-dimensional ribbon chains (double-zigzag chains) of V atoms stemming from the substantial contraction of the V-V bond distance of about 9% (~0.33 ¯) [12] through the transition. This 1 T' state is also referred as the metallic CDW state with (3×1×3) superstructure, where the last term '3' arises from the successive 1/3 shift of ribbon chains between adjacent layers [30]. Since TiTe2 has the 1 T structure down to the lowest temperature [31], the 1 T -1 T' transition temperature of VTe2 can be suppressed by Ti doping as displayed in Fig. 2(e) [26]. We also note that the phase transition in VTe2 can be feasibly manipulated by optical pulses as reported by recent pump-probe diffraction studies [30,32,33] and optical spectroscopy [34,35].

In contrast to VTe2, the 1 T' phases in NbTe2 and TaTe2 are thermally stable and persist up to the highest temperature (as will be elaborated in Sect. 4.1). Among them, only NbTe2 maintains the 1 T' structure in the whole temperature region and exhibits superconductivity below 0.5-0.7 K [36,37]. Meanwhile, TaTe2 exhibits a first-order structural phase transition at T s ~ 170 K to a low-temperature (3×3×3)  superstructure  [Fig.  2(c), C 2/ m ] [25].  This  superstructure  is  distinguished  by  a  large displacement of some Ta atoms along the b m-axis (up to ~0.28 ¯), resulting in the formation of the 'butterfly-like' clusters (or 'heptamer' [38])  with  multiple isolated Ta  sites [25,39]. Several anomalies  in  transport  properties  are  observed  at T s ,  including  a  step-like  decrease  in  electrical resistivity (upon cooling) [25] and a change in the sign of the Seebeck coefficient [40], as shown in Fig. 2(f) [27]. Recent studies have demonstrated that this phase transition can be controlled through a variety of methods, including chemical doping [24,40-42], pressure [43], photodoping [44-47], and some of them also induce superconductivity [24,41,43].

In the following sections, we elaborate on the electronic band structures in momentum space. To account for  the  in-plane  anisotropy  of  the  (3×1)  ribbon-chains  and  (3×3)  butterfly-like  cluster phases, we use a special set of high-symmetry points ( M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; /MGLYPH&lt;13&gt; GLYPH&lt;10&gt; and K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; /KGLYPH&lt;13&gt; GLYPH&lt;10&gt; ) and Brillouin zones (BZ) based on the primitive unit cell of trigonal 1 T as depicted in Fig. 2(g).

Fig. 2. Phase transitions and superperiodic patterns in the group-5 M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-6e113a60-0584-48cf-8900-fd5ed3ad9b99.jpg)

(a)-(c) Top-down view of crystal structures for the undistorted trigonal 1 T [(a), P m 3 GLYPH&lt;8&gt; 1], ribbon chain (3×1) monoclinic 1 T' [(b), C 2/ m ], and butterfly-like cluster (3×3) monoclinic phases [(c), C 2/ m ]. The broken lines represent the unit cells. The yellow lines in (b) and (c) show the characteristic ribbon chains and butterfly-like chains, respectively. (d) Thermal phase stabilities of M Te2 ( M = Ti, V, Nb, Ta). (e) Phase diagram of polycrystalline V1x Ti Te2 derived from electric resistivity measurements [3]. x (f)  Temperature-dependent  electric  resistivity  and  Seebeck  coefficient  of  single-crystalline  TaTe2. Adapted from Ref. [5] (' 2024 American Physical Society). (g) (001) surface Brillouin zones for the three phases shown in (a)-(c). GLYPH&lt;15&gt; (GLYPH&lt;17&gt;×GLYPH&lt;11&gt;) and GLYPH&lt;15&gt; (GLYPH&lt;17&gt;×GLYPH&lt;17&gt;) depict the reciprocal lattice vectors of the periodic lattice distortion for ribbon-chain and butterfly-cluster phases, respectively.

## 3. (V,Ti)Te2: Trigonal 1 T to Monoclinic Ribbon-chain 1 T' Phase Transition

This section outlines the characteristics of the electronic band structures for the undistorted 1 T and ribbon-chain 1 T' phases based on the results in the pristine- and Ti-doped VTe2. Section 3.1 presents the details of the Fermi surface and band structures in the 1 T phase with special emphasis on their orbital  characters.  Section  3.2  highlights  the  anomalous  flat  bands  and  the  resulting  quasi-onedimensional Fermi surface formed in the 1 T' phase. Section 3.3 remarks the topological surface states realized in the (V,Ti)Te2 system and their modifications through the 1 T -1 T' transition. Some parts of this section refer to our previous work in Ref. [26].

## 3.1 Fermi surfaces derived from  2g orbitals in the trigonal 1 t T phase

We begin with an overview of the electronic band structure in the undistorted trigonal 1 T -(V,Ti)Te2. Figure 3(a) represents the three-dimensional BZ in the 1 T phase, where the blue arrows indicate the half-length reciprocal lattice vectors ( a */2, b */2, c */2). Figure 3(b) shows the calculated electronic band structures of 1 T -VTe2 along the high-symmetry lines [see the red lines in Fig. 3(a)]. The size of the circular (diamond) markers depicts the contributions of V 3 d (Te 5 p ) orbitals. The color of the circular markers represents the decomposition of the V 3 d t 2g orbital [ dXY dYZ dZX / / , for the XYZ notation see Fig. 1(a)]. Along the BZ boundary (M-K/L-H lines), the linear band dispersion crossing the Fermi level ( E F) is found to be mainly derived from the V 3 dXY orbital (green circles). Note that considering the trigonal symmetry, dYZ and dZX orbitals are responsible for other two M-K/L-H lines. Meanwhile, we can see the Te 5 p band forming a hole-like Fermi surface around Γ .  These characteristic band structures in the calculation are clearly observed in the ARPES spectra of 1 T -V0.90Ti0.10Te2 (350 K, photon energy: 21.2 eV) as displayed in Fig. 3(c) (We note that the single-crystal V0.90Ti0.10Te2 shows the 1 T -1 T' transition at a mild temperature of ~280 K [26]). The coexistence of the V 3 d and Te 5 p derived Fermi surfaces indicates the significant p d -charge transfer from Te to V, which increases the d -electron number from (nominal) 1 toward 4/3. We note that the chalcogen-derived hole band around Γ sinks below the Fermi level in the case of the group-5 sulfides/selenides such as 1 T -TaS2 [8,48] and 1 T -VSe2 [49].

We  then  discuss  the  three-dimensionality  of  the  Fermi  surface.  Figure  3(d)  displays  the calculated  Fermi  surface  for  1 T -V0.87Ti0.13Te2.  This  indicates  that  the  Fermi  surface  has  a  finite dependence along  * axis (or c kz dependence). To experimentally reveal this, we performed the photon energy ( h ν )  dependent ARPES measurements on 1 T -V0.90Ti0.10Te2 (350 K) using synchrotron light sources. Figures 3(e) and 3(f) show the Fermi surface intensity maps at kz = 0 and π / c planes collected with h ν = 83 and 102 eV photons, respectively. As guided by cyan curves, the Fermi surface topology

critically depends on kz : there are triangular hole-like Fermi surfaces centered at K in kz = 0, whereas ellipses electron-like ones at L in kz = π / c . Here we emphasize that the E F-crossing V-shaped band exist along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; irrespective to the kz value. Figure 3(g) displays the cross-sectional Fermi surface plot  along  the k// -kz plane  that  contains  the  M-L  line  [the  yellow  plane  in  Fig.  3(a)],  obtained  by scanning the incident photon energy ( h ν = 48-90 eV). Here k // is the in-plane momentum direction parallel  to  the  reciprocal  lattice  vector  ( q -vector)  of  the  ribbon-chain  1 T' (3 × 1)  periodic  lattice distortion ( a* /3). To test the Fermi surface nesting scenario, we extract the Fermi momentum [red markers  in  Figs.  3(e)-(g)]  by  Lorentzian  fitting,  and  compare  the  observed  Fermi  surface  nesting vectors ( q FSN, red arrows) with the q -vector of the 1 T' (3×1×3) periodic lattice distortion ( |GLYPH&lt;15&gt; GLYPH&lt;22&gt;GLYPH&lt;23&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; | = | a */3| ~ 0.67 ¯ -1 , | GLYPH&lt;15&gt; GLYPH&lt;22&gt;GLYPH&lt;23&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; | = | a */3 + c */3| ~ 0.74 ¯ -1 , gray arrows) as summarized in Fig. 3(h). Given that q FSN is set parallel to GLYPH&lt;15&gt; GLYPH&lt;22&gt;GLYPH&lt;23&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; [for Figs. 3(e) and 3(f)] or GLYPH&lt;15&gt; GLYPH&lt;22&gt;GLYPH&lt;23&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; [for Fig. 3(g)], the size of the nesting vector (| q FSN|) is evaluated to be at most 0.64(3) |GLYPH&lt;15&gt; GLYPH&lt;22&gt;GLYPH&lt;23&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; | for Fig. 3(e), 0.72(4) |GLYPH&lt;15&gt; GLYPH&lt;22&gt;GLYPH&lt;23&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; | for Fig. 3(f), and 0.80(3) |GLYPH&lt;15&gt; GLYPH&lt;22&gt;GLYPH&lt;23&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; | for Fig. 3(g). For all cases, | q FSN| is sufficiently smaller compared to |GLYPH&lt;15&gt; GLYPH&lt;22&gt;GLYPH&lt;23&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; | or |GLYPH&lt;15&gt; GLYPH&lt;22&gt;GLYPH&lt;23&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; GLYPH&lt;17&gt;GLYPH&lt;24&gt; | , thus the simple Fermi surface nesting is not the origin of 1 T -1 T' phase transition.

Before introducing Whangbo's chemical bonding scenario, it is very instructive to classify the obtained Fermi surfaces near the BZ boundaries based on their orbital characters. At sufficiently close to the BZ boundaries, the kz -dependence of the Fermi surfaces is quite small, and they can be simplified as a superposition of the three virtual one-dimensional Fermi surfaces as illustrated in the top part of Fig. 3(i). Given that the 1 T structure has a threefold trigonal symmetry, each of the virtual one-dimensional  Fermi  surfaces  are  derived  from  one  of  the t 2g ( dXY , dYZ ,  or dZX ) σ -bonding  state spanning along the edge-sharing octahedral network [see the bottom part of Fig. 3(i)]. The resulting virtual one-dimensional band dispersion should exhibit a dispersive V-shape along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; , which is  parallel  to  the σ bonding.  This  simple  concept  represents  the hidden Fermi  surface  raised  by Whangbo et al . [10,50] as mentioned in Sect.1, which makes a good correspondence with the first principles calculation [Fig. 3(b)] as long as focusing on the BZ boundary. It has been also widely adopted in inorganic compounds including 1 T MX -2 [14,26,51] and purple bronzes A Mo6O17 ( A = Na, K) [50,52,53].

Fig. 3. Band structure and Fermi surface in the trigonal 1 T -(V,Ti)Te2.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-542751dd-2017-42f2-b913-63ce2c5b2ab0.jpg)

(a) Brillouin zone for the trigonal 1 T .  (b)  Orbital-weighted band calculations along high-symmetry lines for 1 T -VTe2. Circular (diamond) markers indicate the contribution from the V 3 d (Te 5 p ) orbitals. (c) APRES data along the Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; direction collected in 1 T -V0.90Ti0.10Te2 (350 K, 21.2 eV). (d) Calculated Fermi surface contours for 1 T -V0.87Ti0.13Te2. (e), (f) Fermi surface maps at kz = 0 [(e)] and π / c planes [(f)]. These data are recorded with synchrotron light sources (83, 102 eV). The red markers depict  the  Fermi  momentum  determined  by  the  numerical  fitting  of  their  momentum  distribution curves. The cyan broken lines trace the Fermi surface contours around the Brillouin zone boundaries. (g) Fermi surface map along the kx -kz plane passing through M-L lines [see the yellow plane in (a)] recorded using 48-90 eV photons (interval of 3 eV). (h) Comparison between the Fermi surfaces nesting  vectors  ( q FSN)  obtained  from  (d)-(f)  and  the q -vector  of  the  1 T' (3×1×3)  periodic  lattice distortion  ( q PLD),  (i)  Illustration  of  the  one-dimensional hidden Fermi  surfaces  derived  from  the orthogonal V t 2g σ -bonding. (a)-(d) are adopted and edited from Ref. [3] (' 2020 Springer Nature).

## 3.2 Flat band and quasi-one-dimensional Fermi surface induced by the dYZ dZX / trimerization the 1 T' phase

Next, we highlight the anisotropic electronic modification emerging across the ribbon-chain formation observed in the (V,Ti)Te2 system. Figures 4(a), (b) and 4(c), (d) display the ARPES results of the Fermi surface and band dispersions recorded with synchrotron light sources for 1 T -V0.90Ti0.10Te2 (350 K, h ν = 83 eV) and 1 T' -VTe2 (20 K, h ν = 86 eV), respectively. As described in Sect. 3.1, the Fermi surfaces of 1 T at kz = 0 [Fig. 4(a)] are characterized by the Te 5 p -derived hole pocket at Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; and V 3 d -derived large triangular ones centered at K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; . The latter originates from the V-shaped band dispersions spanning along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; [Fig. 4(b)]. Across the 1 T to 1 T' phase transition, the rotational symmetry changes from threefold ( P m 3 GLYPH&lt;8&gt; 1) to twofold ( C 2/ m ) and accordingly the originally equivalent three M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; points become one M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; and two M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; points. As shown in Fig. 4(d), the original E F-crossing V-shaped band dispersions along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; are transformed into the flat bands along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; .  On the other hand, the V-shaped band is retained along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; ,  resulting  in  a  strongly  anisotropic quasi-one-dimensional Fermi surface contour as demonstrated in Fig. 4(c). Thus, the 1 T -1 T' phase transition accompanies the huge directional modification of the electronic structure.

These  anisotropic  band  modifications  can  be  essentially  understood  by  the  trimerization picture of specific V 3 d t 2g orbitals. Here we set the Z axis as the unique V-Te bond direction which is perpendicular to the vanadium ribbon chain (i.e., b m axis) as shown in Fig. 4(e). Figure 4(f) displays the calculated partial density of states (PDOS) of the V t 2g orbitals in 1 T /1 T' -VTe2. In the trigonal 1 T phase, the equivalent three t 2g states are broadly distributed in the vicinity of the Fermi level, and each forms the E F-crossing V-shaped band at different BZ boundaries. Through the 1 T -1 T' transition, the two of three t 2g orbitals ( dYZ and dZX ) are split into three segments, lying around E B ~ 0.4, -0.5, and -1.3 eV. Recalling the 'three-center two-electron' picture depicted in the right part of Fig. 1(b), they are reminiscent of bonding ('B'), non-bonding ('NB'), and anti-bonding ('AB') states in molecular orbitals  of  linear  trimer,  arising  from  the  local σ -bonding of dYZ dZX / orbitals  in  the  adjacent  three vanadium atoms [see the pink oval in Fig. 4(e) for the dYZ case].  Accordingly, the dYZ dZX / -derived itinerant V-shaped bands transform into the localized flat ones around M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; as the bonding states below the Fermi level. Meanwhile, the remaining dXY state stays relatively intact, and the corresponding Vshaped  band  at  the M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; side  survives  throughout  the  phase  transition.  Consequently,  the  orbitaldependent modification on the Fermi surface can be illustrated as Fig. 4(g).

Mk

Fig. 4. Formation of dYZ dZX / flat bands and quasi-one-dimensional Fermi surface observed in the ribbon chain 1 T' phase (V,Ti)Te2 system.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-a51b06d4-ad5e-4f85-afc0-a86a20672f39.jpg)

(a) ARPES intensity map at E F in the triangular 1 T phase of V0.90Ti0.10Te2. (b) ARPES spectra along high-symmetry lines as depicted by the red lines in (a). Data are collected at 350 K (above the 1 T -1 T' transition temperature of ~280 K) using 87 eV photons. (c), (d) Same as (a), (b), but collected for the monoclinic 1 T' phase of VTe2 (20 K, 83 eV). (e) Local orthogonal XYZ coordination. Here we set Z as  the  direction  perpendicular  to  the  vanadium's  ribbon  chains.  The  pink  oval  indicates  the trimerization of dYZ orbitals. (f) Calculated partial density of states (PDOS) for V 3 d t 2g orbitals in 1 T /1 T' -VTe2. 'B', 'NB', 'AB' represent the bonding, non-bonding, and anti-bonding states realized in 1 T' , respectively. The arrow indicates the dYZ dZX / PDOS peak assigned to the flat bands. (g) Cartoon of the Fermi surface reconstruction around the Brillouin zone boundaries. ' m ' indicates the mirror planes. (e)-(g) are adapted from Ref. [26] (' 2020 Springer Nature).

## 3.3 Selective disappearance of topological surface states through the 1 T -1 T' transition

Another  intriguing  aspect  of  the  1 T -1 T' transition  in  (V,Ti)Te2  is  its  significant  impact  on  the nontrivial topological surface states around the BZ boundary. Here, the key to the topological band inversion is the sufficient kz -dependence of bulk bands along the M-L direction [see Fig. 5(a) for BZ]. Figure 5(b) displays the orbitally resolved band calculations for 1 T -V0.87Ti0.13Te2 at selected kz planes along the momentum parallel to Γ -M ( k Γ M). The colors of the curves indicate the weight of atomic orbitals as depicted by the color scale (note that the xyz coordinate used here is different from the octahedral XYZ axis).  The  black  broken  curves  represent  the  results  in  the  absence  of  spin-orbit interaction. Focusing on the topmost two bands at M and L, denoted as 'A' and 'B', their orbital characters of mainly V 3 d (blue-like, even parity) and Te 5 px+py (red-like, odd parity) get inverted at a specific kz (~0.76 π / c ). Since the k Γ M resides in a mirror plane, these two bands cannot hybridize or gap  out  without  the  help  of  spin-orbit  interaction  [see  the  broken  curves  in  Fig.  5(b)].  Upon introduction of the spin-orbit interaction, the topological band inversion occurs and gives rise to the Dirac cone-like surface state within the bulk band gap (~0.2 eV) along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; on a (001) surface, as presented by the slab calculation shown in Fig. 5(c). Such a kz band inversion is indicative of the strong d -p hybridization characteristic to tellurides, which is seemingly absent in 1 T -VS2 [54] and 1 T -VSe2 [55]  (although  note  that  a  recent  study  of  strain-applied  VSe2 [56]  predicts  as  similar  band inversion mechanism).

Figures  5(d)  and  5(e)  summarize  the  ARPES  results  that  highlight  the  Fermi  surface  and bulk/surface  bands  (purple/cyan  curves)  at  the  BZ  boundaries  recorded  in  the  normal-state  1 T -V0.87Ti0.13Te2 (300 K, 21.2 eV) and the CDW-state 1 T' -VTe2 (200 K, 90 eV), respectively. In the 1 T phase [Fig. 5(d)], the Dirac cone-like topological surface state together with the two bulk bands 'A' and 'B' are observed to be similar to those predicted by the slab calculation [Fig. 5(c)]. Thorough h ν -dependent ARPES measurements [Fig. 5(f)] reveal the two-dimensional nature of the Dirac surface states and the substantial kz dispersion of the bulk bands 'A' and 'B'. We note that the bulk band 'A' is identical to the t 2g -dominated V-shaped band that forms the Fermi surface at the BZ boundary. In the  1 T' phase  [Fig.  5(e)],  a  similar  Dirac  surface  state  is  preserved  at  the M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; side,  but  disappears completely at the M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; side. These contrasting features can be attributed to the kz dependence of the corresponding bulk bands as shown in Figs. 5(g) and 5(h). At the M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; side [Fig. 5(g)], the V-shaped band clearly shows the finite kz -dispersion together with the h ν -independent Dirac surface state akin to those in the 1 T phase [Fig. 5(f)]. On the other hand, the flat band at the M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; side associated with trimerization exhibits negligible kz -dependence [Fig. 5(h)], leading to the dissolution of the topological band inversion. This experimental finding demonstrates a unique way to manipulate topological states

by molecular-like local bonding, though further theoretical analysis of the topological phase in 1 T' -VTe2 is desired.

Fig. 5. Significance of the bulk kz dispersion for the topological surface states in (V,Ti)Te2.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-d82ec935-9a67-496f-878d-64ed206729b1.jpg)

(a) Three-dimensional Brillouin zone of the trigonal 1 T .  ( kx , ky , kz )  axes  span  the  reciprocal  space corresponding with the global xyz axes adopted for the calculation in (b). (b) Orbital-projected band calculation for 1 T -V0.87Ti0.13Te2. The broken curves indicate the results without spin-orbit coupling. (c) Corresponding (001) slab calculation along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; . (d), (e) Observation of the Fermi surface and bulk/surface bands for 1 T -V0.87Ti0.13Te2 [(d), 300 K, 21.2 eV] and 1 T' -VTe2 [(e), 200 K, 90 eV]. The  purple  and  cyan  curves  depict  the  bulk  bands  ('Bulk')  and  Dirac  surface  states  ('DSS'), respectively. (f)-(h) Testing the kz -dependence of band structures around M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; for 1 T -V0.90Ti0.10Te2 [(f)] and M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; / M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; for 1 T' -VTe2 [(g) and (h)] from h ν -dependent ARPES. Adapted from Ref. [26] (' 2020 Springer Nature).

## 4. VTe2, NbTe2, and TaTe2: Common Ribbon-chain 1 T' Phase

As previously described in Sect. 2, M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta) commonly crystallize in the ribbon-chain 1 T' superstructure at room temperature, while only VTe2 undergoes the 1 T structure above ~480 K. This section aims to discuss the origin of the M -dependence of the 1 T' phase instability with respect to the 1 T phase from the viewpoint of electronic band structures. Section 4.1 presents the results of the thermal analysis measurements. Section 4.2 compares the electronic band structures in 1 T' M -Te2 ( M =  V,  Nb,  Ta)  and  remarks  the  energy  gain  resulting  from  the  flat  band  formation  reflecting  the trimerization.

## 4.1 Phase stability at high-temperature regime

To confirm the 1 T' -1 T phase transition, we performed the thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA) on single-crystalline M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta) using a NETZSCH TG-DTA2500-IW thermal analyzer. Several pieces of samples (10-15 mg in total) and the equivalent weight of α -Al2O3 powders (for reference) were loaded into open alumina pans and then heated from room temperature at a rate of 10 K/min with flowing inert nitrogen gas (70 ml/min).

Figures  6(a)-(c)  show  the  TG  (weight  loss)  and  DTA  (heat  flow)  profiles  for  the  three compounds. For VTe2 [Fig. 6(a)], the DTA profile exhibits an endothermic peak at around 480 K without any weight change. This is a fingerprint of the first-order 1 T -1 T' phase transition as reported in the previous literature [29]. Upon further heating, a weight loss occurs at around 700 K, indicating that the 1 T -VTe2 crystals decompose above this temperature regime. Similar decomposition behavior is seen in NbTe2 [Fig. 6(b)] and TaTe2 [Fig. 6(c)] above around 800 and 750 K, respectively. On the other hand, their DTA profiles do not exhibit any endothermic peaks indicative of the 1 T -1 T' transition, thus the room-temperature 1 T' configuration is retained up to the thermal decomposition temperature for NbTe2 and TaTe2.

## 4.2 Universal flat band formation at different energy levels

Figures 6(d)-(f) show the calculated band dispersions at kz = 0 for 1 T' M -Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta). The band structures in overall are very complicated for all compounds due to the tripling of the unit cell compared to the undistorted trigonal 1 T .  Nevertheless, they commonly host the dispersive-less flat band structures along M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; as marked by arrows. To experimentally characterize these flat bands, we collected the ARPES spectra along Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; by using a He-discharge lamp ( h ν = 21.2 eV) for VTe2 [Fig. 6(g), 15 K], NbTe2 [Fig. 6(h), 15 K], and TaTe2 [Fig. 6(i), 300 K]. Here we note that the spectra of NbTe2 [Fig. 6(h)] includes some minor photoelectron signals from the Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; line due

to the mixing of in-plane 120° domains [23] within the sample. For all three compounds, a pair of flat bands exist around the M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; point. Thus the flat band formation is universal in 1 T' M -Te2. Meanwhile, their energy positions for VTe2 (0.25/0.38 eV at M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; , see the energy distribution curve in Fig. 6(j)) are located at significant shallower E B compared to those for NbTe2 (0.59/0.88 eV) and TaTe2 (0.62/0.91 eV).  This  trend  is  well  reproduced  by  the  calculations  shown  in  Figs.  6(d)-(f).  Although  the corresponding energy positions in the calculations for NbTe2 (0.63/0.85 eV) and TaTe2 (0.64/0.84 eV) are close to those observed by ARPES, there is a substantial energy mismatch between the calculation (0.37/0.46 eV) and experiment (0.25/0.38 eV) for VTe2.We ascribe this mismatch to the correlation effects of the V 3 d electrons, which should be stronger compared to Nb 4 d and Ta 5 d . We note that the electron  correlation  effect  had  been  also  discussed  in  ARPES  studies  on  other  vanadium-based dichalcogenides 1 T -VS2 [57] and 1 T -VSe2 [49,58], where the narrowing of bandwidth were found in comparison with the band calculation.

As described for the (V,Ti)Te2 case in Sect. 3.2, the 1 T -1 T' phase transition accompanying the trimerization of dYZ dZX / orbitals transforms the E F-crossing V-shaped bands into the flat bands along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; as illustrated in Fig. 7(a). Such a fully 'gapped' band modification should result in lowering the energy of involved electrons as marked by arrows in Fig. 7(a). Here we discuss the energy of the flat bands based on the band calculations for VTe2 and TaTe2. Figures 7(b) and 7(c) display the PDOS distributions for dYZ [(b)]  and  the  band  dispersions along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; [(c)]  in  the  1 T /1 T' phases  for  VTe2.  As  discussed  in  Sect.  3,  the  PDOS  shows  a  strong  modification  into  three segmentations  reflecting  the  trimerization,  whereas  the  total  bandwidth  is  rather  weakly  modified (~10% increase). Accordingly, the energy position of the flat band at M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; in 1 T' is roughly pinned to the bottom of the original V-shaped band at M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; in  1 T ,  as  shown in Fig. 7(c). This suggests that the corresponding eigenstates at M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; and M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; for 1 T' and 1 T , respectively represented by the trimerized and uniform σ -bonding dYZ chains, have similar eigenenergies. At the same time, the almost completely flat band realized for whole M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; indicates the decoupled nature of the trimers, i.e. the negligible inter-trimer  transfer  integrals  compared  to  intra-trimer  ones.  This  trend  is  similarly  found  in  the calculation of virtual 1 T - and 1 T'TaTe2 [Figs. 7(d) and 7(e)], but with the total bandwidth about 1.5 times wider than that of VTe2. It reflects the itinerant nature of 5 d orbitals compared to 3 d . We should also note that the narrowing of the bandwidth caused by the electron correlation effects in VTe2 further pushes  the  flat  bands  toward  the  Fermi  level. T he  robustness  of  the  1 T" phase  in  (Nb,Ta)Te2  as compared to VTe2 is thus likely due to their energetically deeper flat bands [Fig. 6(j)] arising from the larger overlap of the d orbitals, even though one should consider the total energy balance between the gain of the electron system in the whole momentum space and the associated elastic cost in the lattice

system.

Finally, we comment on the remarkable difference between NbTe2 and TaTe2. Although the present results in Fig. 6 appear quite similar, they rather exhibit distinct physical properties at low temperatures as described in Sect. 2. The above discussion is thus limited to the 1 T' phase stability at high-temperature regime, with respect to the 1 T phase. It is also noteworthy that they have different phase diagrams under high pressure. NbTe2 undergoes a lattice-collapse phase transition accompanied by Nb dimerization at ~20 GPa [59]. In contrast, TaTe2 does not show such structural phase transition while exhibiting three superconducting phases (up to ~3.5 K) upon increasing pressure [43]. Given that NbTe2 has recently been proposed as a topological superconductor candidate [37,60], further highresolution ARPES experiments using single-domain samples are highly desirable in order to clarify the relevant low-energy electronic band structures.

Fig. 6. Universal flat band formation and relative phase stabilities in 1 T' M -Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-e360d1ff-e8ad-4fb6-be89-d0f06a5b6632.jpg)

(a)-(c) TG-DTA profiles for VTe2 [(a)], NbTe2 [(c)], and TaTe2 [(c)]. The positive (negative) values of the heat flow indicate endothermic (exothermic) changes. The inset in (a) shows the endothermic peak indicative of the 1 T -1 T' transition. The gray shades highlight the decomposition temperature regime as found from the occurrence of weight loss. Data were recorded on heating from room temperature with a rate of 10 K/min under inert N2 gas flow. (d)-(f) Calculated band dispersions for the 1 T' phase in VTe2 [(d)], NbTe2 [(e)], and TaTe2 [(f)]. The characteristic flat bands are depicted by arrows. (g)(i) ARPES spectra along Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; for VTe2 [(g), 15 K], NbTe2 [(h), 15 K], and TaTe2 [(i), 300 K], acquired using a He-discharge lamp ( h ν = 21.2 eV). The markers indicate the energy positions of flat bands. The spectra of NbTe2 include minor photoelectron signals along Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; due to the mixing of in-plane 120 deg. domains. (j) Comparison of energy distribution curves at M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; (integral width: 0.05 ¯ -1 ).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-4492d47c-d306-4d90-9170-0742f9ad04a5.jpg)

Fig. 7. Energy gain stemming from the flat band formation in the 1 T' phase.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-813e4c1d-526d-4b23-91b6-e18c083f12d0.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-01472ab7-5354-4206-8f1d-250b24bc2e63.jpg)

(a) Sketch of the one-dimensional M sites and the band dispersions along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; for the 1 T and 1 T' phases. The arrows in the band dispersions highlight the energy gain arising from the flat band formation through the 1 T -1 T' transition. (b) Partial density of states of the V 3 dYZ orbital in VTe2 for the 1 T /1 T' phases. The yellow shades roughly highlight the bandwidth. (c) Band dispersion along the Brillouin zone boundary at kz = 0 in 1 T /1 T' -VTe2. The yellow marker represents the bottom of the d YZ-derived bands. (d), (e) Same as (b) and (c), but for the Ta 5 dYZ orbital in TaTe2. (b), (c) and (d), (e) are reproduced from Ref. [26] and [27], respectively.

## 5. TaTe2: Ribbon-chain 1 T' to Butterfly-like-cluster Phase Transition

This  section  presents  a  review  of  the  electronic  structure  of  TaTe2  with  a  particular  focus  on  its modifications through the ribbon-chain to butterfly-like-cluster phase transition at ~170 K, as revealed by temperature-dependent photoemission spectroscopy measurements with first-principles calculations [27]. Section 5.1 summarizes several experimental findings including core-level spectra splitting,  chemical  potential  shift,  band  spectral  segmentation,  and  kink-like  band  reconstruction. Section 5.2 is dedicated to the characteristic band structures along the BZ boundary and their orbitaldependent reconstructions through the transition. Section 5.3 highlights the structural and electronic fluctuations that appear at room temperature peculiar to TaTe2.

## 5.1 Electronic states modifications: Overview

Figures 8(a), (b) and 8(c), (d) show the ARPES data of the Fermi surface and band dispersion across the transition temperature (300 and 15 K) collected with a He-discharge lamp (21.2 eV). At roomtemperature phase [Fig. 8(a)], the quasi-one-dimensional wrapped Fermi surfaces extend along the Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; direction, similar to those observed in 1 T' -VTe2 [Fig. 3(c)]. In contrast, the spectral weight of the Fermi surfaces remains largely unchanged across the transition [Figs. 8(a) and 8(c)], which is in stark contrast to the 1 T -1 T' phase transition in (V,Ti)Te2 [see Figs. 3(a) and 3(c)]. Meanwhile, we can find several types of modifications upon cooling in the core-level spectra and band dispersions as follows.

(i) Splitting  of  Ta  4   core-level  spectra: f Figures  8(e)  and  8(f)  respectively  show  the temperature-dependence  of  the  Ta  4 f 7/2 and  Te  4 d 5/2 core-level  spectra  collected  on  cooling  with synchrotron light source ( h ν = 90 eV). The Ta 4 f 7/2 core-level spectra [Fig. 8(e)] exhibit a remarkable splitting through the transition up to ~0.31 eV (see the broken curves for fitting peaks), indicating an enhancement in the variation of the electron densities among the inequivalent Ta sites (i.e., d -d charge transfer). We note that this splitting energy size is not comparable to that of the Star-of-David-type tantalum dichalcogenides TaS2 (~1.2 eV) [61] or TaSe2 (~0.9 eV) [62]. In contrast, the Te 4 d 5/2 spectral distribution [Fig. 8(f)] hardly changed over the measured temperature. This indicates that the charge distribution among the Te sites ( p -p charge transfer) is negligible.

(ii)  Chemical potential shift: Although the shape of the Te 4 d 5/2 core-level spectral profile remains mostly unchanged, it shifts to the lower E B regime (up to about 45 meV) upon cooling [see the overlaid profiles in Fig. 8(f)]. As summarized in Fig. 8(g), this temperature-dependent energy shift is similarly observed in the Ta 4  spectra (purple triangles and cyan rectangles) and the valence band f dispersions (gray shades). This sizeable energy shift is therefore ascribed to the temperature-dependent

chemical potential shift.

(iii) Spectral weight segmentation due to the band-folding effect: Around the BZ center (e.g., Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; / Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; ), the hole-like bands split into sharp submanifolds with small energy gaps (typically 50-150 meV), as indicated by the white arrows in Fig. 8(d). These characteristics are well reproduced by band-unfolding spectral calculations as shown in Fig. 8(h). Here, Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; ′ denotes the newly introduced BZ  center  stemming  from  the  in-plane  (3×3)  superstructure  of  the  low-temperature  butterfly-like cluster phase. Because several replica bands, such as the downward convex dispersions depicted by the  upper  two  arrows  in  Fig.  8(h),  are  periodically  distributed  at  both  the Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; and Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; ′ points,  these modifications are essentially attributed to the band-folding effect.

(iv) Kink-like band reconstruction: In the M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; direction (BZ boundary), the E F-crossing liner band [depicted by the yellow arrows in Figs. 8(b) and 8(d)] undergoes a significant transformation into  the  less-dispersive  kink-like  structure,  exhibiting  a  70%  reduction  in  gradient.  The  kink-like structure exhibits a characteristic peak at E B ~ 70 meV as evaluated from its energy distribution curve. This energy scale is consistent with the temperature-dependent optical conductivity spectra, where a sharp peak at 800 cm -1 (~100 meV) indicative of an interband transition emerges below the transition temperature [45]. This type of the band reconstruction cannot be explained by the simple band-folding effect. The origin of this band will be elucidated in Sect. 5.2.

Fig. 8. Electronic state modifications through the ribbon-chain to butterfly-like-cluster phase transition in TaTe2.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-10526a5a-e7a3-4de5-bb31-3e59b4bb9183.jpg)

(a) ARPES intensity plots at E F (integral width: 20 meV) collected at 300 K ( h ν = 21.2 eV). (b) ARPES spectra along Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; - K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt;(GLYPH&lt;13&gt;) - MGLYPH&lt;11&gt;(GLYPH&lt;13&gt;) GLYPH&lt;10&gt; - Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; . (c), (d) Same as (a) and (b), but collected at 15 K. The white arrows mark the characteristic spectral segmentation features, whereas the yellow arrow depicts the kink-like band reconstruction appearing around M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; . (e), (f) Temperature evolution of the Ta 4 f 7/2 [(e)] and Te 4 d 5/2 [(f)] core-level spectra recorded in cooling scan using synchrotron light sources ( h ν = 90 eV). The black dotted curves and markers in (e) represent the fitting Voigt functions and their peak positions, respectively. (g) Temperature dependence of energy position shifts (relative to the values at 20 K) for the highest intensity peak of Te 4 d 5/2 (orange circles), the center of spectral weight of Ta 4 f 7/2 (purple triangles) and Te 4 d (including 4 d 5/2 and 4 d 3/2 , cyan rectangles). The gray shade shows the possible energy shift evaluated from the flat bands around M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; . (h) Close-up comparison of the ARPES spectra (15 K, 21.2 eV) and calculated band-unfolding spectra (at kz = 0) in the butterfly-like cluster phase. The cyan arrows mark characteristic sharp submanifold structures. Γ GLYPH&lt;8&gt; ′ denotes the newly introduced Brillouin  zone  center  by  the  (3×3)  superstructure.  The  cyan  arrows  depict  the  characteristic  sharp submanifold structures. Adopted and edited from Ref. [27] (' 2024 American Physical Society).

## 5.2 Kink-like reconstruction in dXY -derived band at Brillouin zone boundary

We  now  turn  our  attention  to  the  orbital-dependent  band  reconstruction  occurring  along  the  BZ boundary.  Figures  9(a)-(c)  display  the  ARPES  data  (300  K,  21.2  eV),  calculated  band-unfolding spectra ( kz = 0), and Ta 5 d t 2g orbital-projected band calculation [with a same manner as Fig. 3(b)] along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; and K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; in the ribbon-chain  phase  at  room  temperature.  The contrasting band structures, namely the E F-crossing V-shaped band at M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; indicated by the green arrow and the two flat bands at M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; by the blue and red arrows, are observed to be similar to those of 1 T' -VTe2 [Fig. 4(d)]. These bands are in good agreement with the band calculations [Figs. 9(b) and 9(c)] and originate from the Ta dXY and dYZ dZX / orbitals, respectively (see the green and red/blue arrows). Figures 9(d)-(f) show the results in the low-temperature butterfly-like cluster phase (ARPES data are collected at 15 K). The calculated band dispersion, represented by the thin lines in Fig. 9(e) and 9(f), show numerous branches due to the (3×3) folding. However, its unfolded band dispersion [Fig. 9(e)] exhibit similarities to the ARPES image [Fig. 9(d)]. Both datasets indicate that the dYZ dZX / -dominated flat bands at M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; are scarcely modified across the transition, whereas the dXY -derived V-shaped band at M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; undergoes  a  remarkable  reconstruction  into  the  unusual  kink-like  structure.  Such d orbitaldependent band reconstructions can also be seen as characteristic peaks in the Ta site-averaged PDOS distributions  shown  in  Fig.  9(g),  as  indicated  by  the  yellow  arrows.  The  Ta  site-specific  PDOS calculations [27] further reveal that the middle string of Ta ribbon chains is primarily responsible for the kink-like dXY band reconstruction through the transition. Conversely, the Te states appear to remain largely unchanged throughout the transition, which is anchored by the temperature-independence of the Te 5 p -derived band [depicted by the gray arrows in Figs. 9(a)-(f)] as well as the Te 4 d core-level spectra [Fig. 8(f)].

These  results  demonstrate  the d orbital-dependent  electronic  modifications  through  the ribbon-chain  to  butterfly-like-cluster  phase  transition  in  TaTe2.  However,  the  kink-like  band reconstruction is arguably a milder change compared to the flat band formation around M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; through the trigonal to ribbon-chain (1 T -1 T' ) phase transition as observed in (V,Ti)Te2. This may be explained by the  fact  that  in  the  1 T' phase  all M atoms  participate  in  the dYZ dZX / trimerization,  whereas  in  the butterfly-like cluster phase only a subset of Ta atoms in the cluster is involved in the dXY kink structure (note that two-ninth of Ta atoms are isolated sites that are not included in clusters). Further studies are required to better understand the driving forces of the phase transition in TaTe2 from both theoretical and experimental sides.

Fig. 9. Band reconstructions along the Brillouin zone boundaries in TaTe2.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00915v2-figure-f042a54e-db6a-42ec-93ce-074b3b9a3a0e.jpg)

(a)-(c) ARPES data [300 K, (a)], band calculation with its unfolded spectra [(b)], and Ta t 2g orbitalprojected calculation [(c)] along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; and K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; for the ribbon-chain phase. (d)-(f) Same as (a)-(c), but for the butterfly-like cluster phase (ARPES data: 15 K). The green and red/blue arrows  mark  the dXY -dominated  V-shaped  band  and  the dYZ ZX / -dominated  flat  bands,  respectively, whereas the gray arrow indicates the Te p -derived E F-crossing band. The while arrow depicts the band dispersion peculiar to the low-temperature phase but its remnant is found in the ARPES spectra at 300 K [(a)]. (g) Calculated PDOS of the Ta site-averaged dXY dYZ dZX / / for  the  virtual  trigonal 1 T ,  roomtemperature ribbon-chain 1 T' ,  and low-temperature butterfly-like cluster phases. The arrows in the middle panel mark the dYZ dZX / PDOS peaks in 1 T' corresponding to the flat bands around M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;13&gt; , whereas the one in the right panel kink-like band emerged at M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; side. (h) Enlarged ARPES spectra at 300 K along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; . The  markers  indicate  the  peak  positions  obtained  by  fitting  the  momentum distribution curves, tracking the faint kink-like feature (see also the white arrows). Adopted and edited from Ref. [27] (' 2024 American Physical Society).

## 5.3 Structural and electronic fluctuations emerging at room-temperature phase

While the ARPES results in TaTe2 are basically in agreement with first-principles calculations, there are some signatures of structural/electronic fluctuations in the room-temperature ARPES data. For example,  the  spectral  weight  located  at E B  ~  0.5  eV  along K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -M GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; -K GLYPH&lt;10&gt; GLYPH&lt;11&gt; is  unusually  blurred,  as indicated by the white arrow in Fig. 9(a). Furthermore, the dXY -derived V-shaped band exhibits a faint kink-like feature even at 300 K, as evidenced by the peak plots in Fig. 9(h). Although anomalously broad, these features are characteristic of the butterfly-like cluster phase at low temperature [Figs. 9(e) and 9(f)] and are completely absent in the ribbon-chain phase calculations [Figs. 9(b) and 9(c)] under static atomic configurations.

From the perspective of structural analysis, the seminal work by Sörgel et al . [25] revealed that the room-temperature TaTe2 exhibits an unusual large atomic displacement parameter ( U 22 ~ 0.04 ¯ 2 )  in  the  middle  string  of  Ta  ribbon  chains  along  the b m-axis.  The  recent  comprehensive  x-ray diffraction study on the group-5 M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta) by Katayama et al . [38] further reported that TaTe2 hosts a conspicuous anisotropic structural fluctuation as compared to VTe2 and NbTe2 at room temperature. They also proposed that Ta atoms are locally displaced to dimerization with thermal fluctuations, instead of the conventional trimerization. In this context, the trimerization picture in the room-temperature TaTe2 may not be as precise as that in VTe2 or NbTe2. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that  an  unusual  convex-upward  electrical  resistivity  curve  [Fig.  2(f)] [25]  and  a  broad  Drude component in the optical conductivity spectrum [45] are observed above the transition temperature of 170 K, thereby suggesting that the electrons are strongly scattered in this regime. This indicates that the strong fluctuation in the middle string of Ta chains indeed affects the electronic band structure, leading to the anomalous electronic properties.

## 6. Summary and Outlook

In this review, we provided an overview of electronic structures realized in the group-5 ditellurides M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta), based on the ARPES data and first-principles calculations. We highlighted the role  of  the  localized  molecular-like  orbital  bonds  that  form  the  unusual  flat  bands  in  specific momentum space, and discussed their impacts on the Fermi surface anisotropy, crystal phase stabilities, nontrivial  topological  properties,  and  so  on. We  believe  that  this  review  offers  the  comprehensive insight into the quantum electronic states in M Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta) and stimulates further studies on the electron-lattice-bond coupled phenomena emerging in various metallic systems.

Lastly, we would like to remark several potential avenues for future research on the group-5 M Te2:  (i)  Recent  studies  revealed  that  the  superstructures  and  electronic  properties  of M Te2  are sometimes strongly affected by the slight change of non-stoichiometry, such as Te deficiency and/or M self-intercalations.  Some  of  them  include  the  different  polymorphic  (3×3)  superstructure  with antiferromagnetic  ordering [63]  and  the  Kondo  effect [64]  appearing  in  the  vicinity  of VTe2.  Fine tuning of such non-stoichiometry and possible chemical substitutions may lead to the new phases with novel polymorphism/polytypism in M Te2 [41]. (ii) Electron-lattice-bond coupled phase in M Te2 can be manipulated by external triggers, such as electric fields or optical pulses. Indeed, many works have been recently made in VTe2 [30,32-35] and TaTe2 [44-47]. These attempts will also provide promising routes to explore the nonequilibrium state of materials and realize exotic phenomena. (iii) The group5 M Te2 has great potential as a novel two-dimensional material. This is naively because reducing the thickness down to a monolayer should eliminate the moderately strong interlayer interaction inherent to tellurides as compared to sulfides and selenides, and affect the stability of trimerizations. Indeed, the  bottom-up  synthetic  approaches  such  as  molecular  beam  epitaxy  (MBE)  and  chemical  vapor deposition  (CVD)  have  successfully  fabricated  mono/few-layer M Te2  with  different  charge/spin orderings from the bulk counterparts (see Refs. [65-76] for VTe2, [77,78] for NbTe2, and [79-82] for TaTe2). On the other hand, we would also encourage more research using the top-down exfoliation method to assemble van der Waals heterostructures and pursue the relevant novel phenomena such as twistronics.  Although  exfoliation  down  to  the  monolayer  limit  is  challenging  due  to  the  strong interlayer coupling as compared to graphene, we expect that the state of the art exfoliation techniques such as the Al2O3-assisted mechanical exfoliation [83] and solid lithiation and exfoliation [84] will solve this issue.

## Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Yusuke Sugita and Yukitoshi Motome (for providing band calculations of NbTe2), Manabu Kamitani, Hidefumi Takahashi, Hideaki Sakai, and Shintaro Ishiwata (providing single-crystalline NbTe2), Kiyoshi Nikaido and Tatsuo Hasegawa (assistance of TG-DTA measurements), Miho Kitamura, Koji Horiba, Hiroshi Kumigashira, and Kenichi Ozawa (set up of Photon  Factory  KEK  BL28A),  and  Naoyuki  Katayama  (discussion  about  crystal  structures).  The synchrotron  ARPES  experiments  were  conducted  under  KEK-PF  proposals  (No.  2018G624  and 2023G108). This work was partly supported by Grands-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (Grants No. JP19H05826, JP22H00107).

## Reference

- [1] Linus Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond and the Structure of Molecules and Crystals; An Introduction to Modern Structural Chemistry , Cornell University Press (1960).
- [2] J. B. Goodenough, The Two Components of the Crystallographic Transition in VO2 , J. Solid State Chem. 3, 490 (1971).
- [3] Paolo G. Radaelli, Y. Horibe, Matthias J. Gutmann, Hiroki Ishibashi, C. H. Chen, Richard M. Ibberson, Y. Koyama, Yew-San Hor, Valery Kiryukhin, and Sang-Wook Cheong, Formation of isomorphic Ir 3+  and Ir 4+ octamers and spin dimerization in the spinel CuIr2S4 , Nature 416, 155 (2002).
- [4] Jean-Paul Pouget and Enric Canadell, Structural approach to charge density waves in low-dimensional systems: electronic instability and chemical bonding , Reports Prog. Phys. 87, 026501 (2024).
- [5] Minoru  Nohara  and  Kazutaka  Kudo,  Arsenic  chemistry  of  iron-based  superconductors  and  strategy  for  novel superconducting materials, Adv. Phys. X 2, 450 (2017).
- [6] J. A. Wilson and A. D. Yoffe, The transition metal dichalcogenides discussion and interpretation of the observed optical, electrical and structural properties , Adv. Phys. 18, 193 (1969).
- [7] Manish Chhowalla, Hyeon Suk Shin, Goki Eda, Lain-Jong Li, Kian Ping Loh, and Hua Zhang, The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets, Nat. Chem. 5, 263 (2013).
- [8] K. Rossnagel, On the origin of charge-density waves in select layered transition-metal dichalcogenides, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 213001 (2011).
- [9] G. Grüner, Density Waves in Solids , Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1994).
- [10] Myung-Hwan Whangbo and Enric Canadell, Analogies between the concepts of molecular chemistry and solidstate  physics  concerning  structural  instabilities.  Electronic  origin  of  the  structural  modulations  in  layered transition-metal dichalcogenides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 9587 (1992).
- [11] B. E. Brown, The crystal structures of NbTe2 and TaTe2, Acta Crystallogr. 20, 264 (1966).
- [12] K. D. Bronsema, G. W. Bus, and G. A. Wiegers, The crystal structure of vanadium ditelluride, V1+xTe2, J. Solid State Chem. 53, 415 (1984).
- [13] Chen Chen, Heung-Sik Kim, Alemayehu S. Admasu, Sang-Wook Cheong, Kristjan Haule, David Vanderbilt, and Weida Wu, Trimer bonding states on the surface of the transition-metal dichalcogenide TaTe2, Phys. Rev. B 98, 195423 (2018).
- [14] N.  Katayama,  S.  Tamura,  T.  Yamaguchi,  K.  Sugimoto,  K.  Iida,  T.  Matsukawa,  A.  Hoshikawa,  T.  Ishigaki,  S. Kobayashi, Y. Ohta, and H. Sawa, Large entropy change derived from orbitally assisted three-centered twoelectron σ bond formation in metallic Li0.33VS2, Phys. Rev. B 98, 081104 (2018).
- [15] Enric Canadell, StØphane Jobic, Raymond Brec, Jean Rouxel, and Myung-Hwan Whangbo, Importance of short interlayer  Te···Te  contacts  for  the  structural  distortions  and  physical  properties  of  CdI2-type  layered transition-metal ditellurides, J. Solid State Chem. 99, 189 (1992).
- [16] A. Vernes, H. Ebert, W. Bensch, W. Heid, and C. Näther, Crystal structure, electrical properties and electronic band structure of tantalum ditelluride, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10, 761 (1998).
- [17] M.-L. Doublet, S. Remy, and F. Lemoigno, Density functional theory analysis of the local chemical bonds in the periodic tantalum dichalcogenides TaX  (X=S, Se, Te), J. Chem. Phys. 2 113, 5879 (2000).

- [18] David  C.  Miller,  Subhendra  D.  Mahanti,  and  Phillip  M.  Duxbury, Charge  density  wave  states  in  tantalum dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045133 (2018).
- [19] B. E. Brown, The crystal structures of WTe2 and high-temperature MoTe2, Acta Crystallogr. 20, 268 (1966).
- [20] Arhur Mar, StØphane Jobic, and James A. Ibers, Metal-metal vs tellurium-tellurium bonding in WTe2 and its ternary variants TaIrTe4 and NbIrTe4, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 8963 (1992).
- [21] G. L. Pascut, K. Haule, M. J. Gutmann, S. A. Barnett, A. Bombardi, S. Artyukhin, T. Birol, D. Vanderbilt, J. J. Yang, S.-W. Cheong, and V. Kiryukhin, Dimerization-Induced Cross-Layer Quasi-Two-Dimensionality in Metallic IrTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 086402 (2014).
- [22] G. Tunnell and L. Pauling, The atomic arrangement and bonds of the gold-silver ditellurides, Acta Crystallogr. 5, 375 (1952).
- [23] Corsin Battaglia, HervØ Cercellier, Florian Clerc, Laurent Despont, Michael Gunnar Garnier, Christian Koitzsch, Philipp  Aebi,  Helmuth  Berger,  LÆszló  Forró,  and  Claudia  Ambrosch-Draxl, Fermi-surface-induced  lattice distortion in NbTe2, Phys. Rev. B 72, 195114 (2005).
- [24] Y. Liu, D. F. Shao, L. J. Li, W. J. Lu, X. D. Zhu, P. Tong, R. C. Xiao, L. S. Ling, C. Y. Xi, L. Pi, H. F. Tian, H. X. Yang, J. Q. Li, W. H. Song, X. B. Zhu, and Y. P. Sun, Nature of charge density waves and superconductivity in 1 T -TaSe2- Te , x x Phys. Rev. B 94, 045131 (2016).
- [25] T.  Sörgel,  J.  Nuss,  U.  Wedig,  R.  K.  Kremer,  and  M.  Jansen, A new low temperature modification of TaTe2Comparison to the room temperature and the hypothetical 1T-TaTe2 modification, Mater. Res. Bull. 41, 987 (2006).
- [26] N. Mitsuishi, Y. Sugita, M. S. Bahramy, M. Kamitani, T. Sonobe, M. Sakano, T. Shimojima, H. Takahashi, H. Sakai, K. Horiba, H. Kumigashira, K. Taguchi, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, S. Ishiwata, Y. Motome, and K. Ishizaka, Switching of band inversion and topological surface states by charge density wave, Nat. Commun. 11, 2466 (2020).
- [27] Natsuki  Mitsuishi,  Yusuke  Sugita,  Tomoki  Akiba,  Yuki  Takahashi,  Masato  Sakano,  Koji  Horiba,  Hiroshi Kumigashira,  Hidefumi  Takahashi,  Shintaro  Ishiwata,  Yukitoshi  Motome,  and  Kyoko  Ishizaka, Unveiling  the orbital-selective electronic band reconstruction through the structural phase transition in TaTe2, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013155 (2024).
- [28] K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011).
- [29] T.  Ohtani,  K.  Hayashi,  M.  Nakahira,  and  H.  Nozaki, Phase  transition  in  V1+ x Te2  (0.04 ⩽ ⩽ x 0.11), Solid  State Commun. 40, 629 (1981).
- [30] Asuka Nakamura, Takahiro Shimojima, Masatoshi Matsuura, Yusuke Chiashi, Manabu Kamitani, Hideaki Sakai, Shintaro Ishiwata, Han Li, Atsushi Oshiyama, and Kyoko Ishizaka, Evaluation of photo-induced shear strain in monoclinic VTe2 by ultrafast electron diffraction, Appl. Phys. Express 11, 092601 (2018).
- [31] Yoji  Koike,  Masami  Okamura,  Takashi Nakanomyo, and Tetsuo Fukase, Log T dependence of resistivity  and negative magnetoresistance in the layered compound TiTe2, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 52, 597 (1983).
- [32] Asuka Nakamura, Takahiro Shimojima, Yusuke Chiashi, Manabu Kamitani, Hideaki Sakai, Shintaro Ishiwata, Han Li, and Kyoko Ishizaka, Nanoscale imaging of unusual photoacoustic waves in thin flake VTe2, Nano Lett. 20, 4932 (2020).

- [33] Takeshi  Suzuki,  Yuya  Kubota,  Natsuki  Mitsuishi,  Shunsuke  Akatsuka,  Jumpei  Koga,  Masato  Sakano,  Satoru Masubuchi, Yoshikazu Tanaka, Tadashi Togashi, Hiroyuki Ohsumi, Kenji Tamasaku, Makina Yabashi, Hidefumi Takahashi,  Shintaro  Ishiwata,  Tomoki  Machida,  Iwao  Matsuda,  Kyoko  Ishizaka,  and  Kozo  Okazaki, Ultrafast control of the crystal structure in a topological charge-density-wave material, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184305 (2023).
- [34] Hiroshi Tanimura, Norihiko L. Okamoto, Takao Homma, Yusuke Sato, Akihiro Ishii, Hitoshi Takamura, and Tetsu Ichitsubo, Nonthermal melting of charge density wave order via nucleation in VTe2, Phys. Rev. B 105, 245402 (2022).
- [35] Manuel Tuniz, Davide Soranzio, Davide Bidoggia, Denny Puntel, Wibke Bronsch, Steven L. Johnson, Maria Peressi, Fulvio Parmigiani, and Federico Cilento, Ultrafast all-optical manipulation of the charge-density-wave in VTe2, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043276 (2023).
- [36] Shoichi  Nagata,  Tsuyoshi  Abe,  Shuji  Ebisu,  Yutaka  Ishihara,  and  Kitomi  Tsutsumi, Superconductivity  in  the metallic layered compound NbTe2, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 54, 895 (1993).
- [37] Xi Zhang, Tianchuang Luo, Xiyao Hu, Jing Guo, Gongchang Lin, Yuehui Li, Yanzhao Liu, Xiaokang Li, Jun Ge, Ying  Xing, Superconductivity  and  Fermi  Surface  Anisotropy  in  Transition  Metal  Dichalcogenide  NbTe2, Chinese Phys. Lett. 36, 057402 (2019).
- [38] N. Katayama, Y. Matsuda, K. Kojima, T. Hara, S. Kitou, N. Mitsuishi, H. Takahashi, S. Ishiwata, K. Ishizaka, and H. Sawa, Observation of local atomic displacements intrinsic to the double zigzag chain structure of 1 T M -Te2 ( M = V, Nb, Ta), Phys. Rev. B 107, 245113 (2023).
- [39] Ismail El Baggari, Nikhil Sivadas, Gregory M. Stiehl, Jacob Waelder, Daniel C. Ralph, Craig J. Fennie, and Lena F. Kourkoutis, Direct Visualization of Trimerized States in 1 T '-TaTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 165302 (2020).
- [40] Y. Liu, W. J. Lu, D. F. Shao, L. Zu, X. C. Kan, W. H. Song, and Y. P. Sun, Structural, electrical, and thermoelectric properties of distorted 1T-Ta1-xNbxTe2 Single Crystals, EPL 109, 17003 (2015).
- [41] Huixia Luo, Weiwei Xie, Jing Tao, Hiroyuki Inoue, AndrÆs Gyenis, Jason W. Krizan, Ali Yazdani, Yimei Zhu, and Robert Joseph Cava, Polytypism, polymorphism, and superconductivity in TaSe2-xTex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, E1174 (2015).
- [42] Ye-Cheng Luo, Yang-Yang Lv, Rui-Ming Zhang, Lu Xu, Zhi-An Zhu, Shu-Hua Yao, Jian Zhou, Xiao-Xiang Xi, Y. B. Chen, and Yan-Feng Chen, Subtle effect of doping on the charge density wave in TaTe2GLYPH&lt;31&gt; ( GLYPH&lt;31&gt; = 0.028-0.123) crystals revealed by anisotropic transport measurements and Raman spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 103, 064103 (2021).
- [43] Jing Guo, Cheng Huang, Huixia Luo, Huaixin Yang, Linlin Wei, Shu Cai, Yazhou Zhou, Hengcan Zhao, Xiaodong Li, Yanchun Li, Ke Yang, Aiguo Li, Peijie Sun, Jianqi Li, Qi Wu, Robert J. Cava, and Liling Sun, Observation of three  superconducting  transitions  in  the  pressurized  CDW-bearing  compound  TaTe2, Phys.  Rev.  Mater. 6, L051801 (2022).
- [44] Khalid M. Siddiqui, Daniel B. Durham, Frederick Cropp, Colin Ophus, Sangeeta Rajpurohit, Yanglin Zhu, Johan D. Carlström, Camille Stavrakas, Zhiqiang Mao, Archana Raja, Pietro Musumeci, Liang Z. Tan, Andrew M. Minor, Daniele Filippetto, and Robert A. Kaindl, Ultrafast optical melting of trimer superstructure in layered 1T'-TaTe2, Commun. Phys. 4, 152 (2021).
- [45] T. C. Hu, Q. Wu, Z. X. Wang, L. Y. Shi, Q. M. Liu, L. Yue, S. J. Zhang, R. S. Li, X. Y. Zhou, S. X. Xu, D. Wu, T.

Dong, and N. L. Wang, Optical spectroscopy and ultrafast pump-probe study of the structural phase transition in 1 '-TaTe2, Phys. Rev. B 105, 075113 (2022).

- [46] J. Koga, Y. Chiashi, A. Nakamura, T. Akiba, H. Takahashi, T. Shimojima, S. Ishiwata, and K. Ishizaka, Unusual photoinduced  crystal  structure  dynamics  in  TaTe2  with  double  zigzag  chain  superstructure, Appl.  Phys. Express 17, 042007 (2024).
- [47] Till Domröse and Claus Ropers, Femtosecond trimer quench cycled at megahertz rates in the unconventional charge-density wave material 1 T' -TaTe2, arXiv:2402.02931 (2024).
- [48] Y. D. Wang, W. L. Yao, Z. M. Xin, T. T. Han, Z. G. Wang, L. Chen, C. Cai, Yuan Li, and Y. Zhang, Band insulator to Mott insulator transition in 1 T -TaS2, Nat. Commun. 11, 4215 (2020).
- [49] Vladimir N. Strocov, Ming Shi, Masaki Kobayashi, Claude Monney, Xiaoqiang Wang, Juraj Krempasky, Thorsten Schmitt, Luc Patthey, Helmuth Berger, and Peter Blaha, Three-Dimensional Electron Realm in VSe2 by Soft-XRay Photoelectron Spectroscopy: Origin of Charge-Density Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 086401 (2012).
- [50] M.-H. Whangbo, E. Canadell, P. Foury, and J. -P. Pouget, Hidden Fermi Surface Nesting and Charge Density Wave Instability in Low-Dimensional Metals, Science 252, 5002 (1991).
- [51] Kyoo Kim, Sooran Kim, K.-T. Ko, Hwangho Lee, J.-H. Park, J. J. Yang, S.-W. Cheong, and B. I. Min, Origin of First-Order-Type Electronic and Structural Transitions in IrTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 136401 (2015).
- [52] Daixiang Mou, A. Sapkota, H.-H. Kung, Viktor Krapivin, Yun Wu, A. Kreyssig, Xingjiang Zhou, A. I. Goldman, G. Blumberg, Rebecca Flint, and Adam Kaminski, Discovery of an Unconventional Charge Density Wave at the Surface of K0.9Mo6O17, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 196401 (2016).
- [53] Lei Su, Chuang-Han Hsu, Hsin Lin, and Vitor M. Pereira, Charge Density Waves and the Hidden Nesting of Purple Bronze K0.9Mo6O17, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 257601 (2017).
- [54] A. Gauzzi, A. Sellam, G. Rousse, Y. Klein, D. Taverna, P. Giura, M. Calandra, G. Loupias, F. Gozzo, E. Gilioli, F. Bolzoni, G. Allodi, R. De Renzi, G. L. Calestani, and P. Roy, Possible phase separation and weak localization in the absence of a charge-density wave in single-phase 1 -VS2, Phys. Rev. B 89, 235125 (2014).
- [55] Jans Henke, Felix Flicker, Jude Laverock, Jasper van Wezel, Charge order from structured coupling in VSe2, SciPost Phys. 9, 056 (2020).
- [56] Turgut Yilmaz, Xuance Jiang, Deyu Lu, Polina M. Sheverdyaeva, Andrey V. Matetskiy, Paolo Moras, Federico Mazzola, Ivana Vobornik, Jun Fujii, Kenneth Evans-Lutterodt, and Elio Vescovo., Dirac nodal arc in 1T-VSe2, Commun. Mater. 4, 47 (2023).
- [57] M. Mulazzi, A. Chainani, N. Katayama, R. Eguchi, M. Matsunami, H. Ohashi, Y. Senba, M. Nohara, M. Uchida, H. Takagi, and S. Shin, Absence of nesting in the charge-density-wave system 1T-VS2 as seen by photoelectron spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 82, 075130 (2010).
- [58] K. Terashima, T. Sato, H. Komatsu, T. Takahashi, N. Maeda, and K. Hayashi, Charge-density wave transition of 1 -VSe2 studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 68, 155108 (2003).
- [59] Shujia Li, Qing Dong, Jiajia Feng, Yanju Wang, Mingqiang Hou, Wen Deng, Resta A. Susilo, Nana Li, Hongliang Dong, Shun Wan, Chunxiao Gao, and Bin Chen, Evolution of Structural and Electronic Properties in NbTe2 under High Pressure, Inorg. Chem. 60, 7857 (2021).
- [60] Feng  Tang,  Hoi  Chun  Po,  Ashvin  Vishwanath,  and  Xiangang  Wan, Comprehensive  search  for  topological

materials using symmetry indicators, Nature 566, 486 (2019).

- [61] H. P. Hughes and J. A. Scarfe, Site Specific Photohole Screening in a Charge Density Wave, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3069 (1995).
- [62] K. Horiba, K. Ono, J. H. Oh, T. Kihara, S. Nakazono, M. Oshima, O. Shiino, H. W. Yeom, A. Kakizaki, and Y. Aiura, Charge-density wave and three-dimensional Fermi surface in 1 -TaSe2 studied by photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 66, 073106 (2002).
- [63] Dongyeun Won, Do Hoon Kiem, Hwanbeom Cho, Dohyun Kim, Younghak Kim, Min Yong Jeong, Changwon Seo, Jeongyong Kim, Je-Geun Park, Myung Joon Han, Heejun Yang, and Suyeon Cho, Polymorphic Spin, Charge, and Lattice Waves in Vanadium Ditelluride, Adv. Mater. 32, e1906578 (2020).
- [64] Xiaxin Ding, Jie Xing, Gang Li, Luis Balicas, Krzysztof Gofryk, and Hai-Hu Wen, Crossover from Kondo to Fermi-liquid behavior induced by high magnetic field in 1 -VTe2 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125115 (2021).
- [65] Hongtao  Liu,  Yunzhou  Xue,  Jin-An  Shi,  Roger  A.  Guzman,  Panpan  Zhang,  Zhang  Zhou,  Yangu  He,  Ce  Bian, Liangmei Wu, Ruisong Ma, Jiancui Chen, Jiahao Yan, Haitao Yang, Cheng-Min Shen, Wu Zhou, Lihong Bao, and Hong-Jun Gao, Observation of the Kondo Effect in Multilayer Single-Crystalline VTe2 Nanoplates, Nano Lett. 19, 8572 (2019).
- [66] Paula Mariel Coelho, Kinga Lasek, Kien Nguyen Cong, Jingfeng Li, Wei Niu, Wenqing Liu, Ivan I. Oleynik, and Matthias Batzill, Monolayer Modification of VTe2 and Its Charge Density Wave, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 4987 (2019).
- [67] Katsuaki Sugawara, Yuki Nakata, Kazuki Fujii, Kosuke Nakayama, Seigo Souma, Takashi Takahashi, and Takafumi Sato, Monolayer VTe2: Incommensurate Fermi surface nesting and suppression of charge density waves, Phys. Rev. B 99, 241404(R) (2019).
- [68] Yuan Wang, Junhai Ren, Jiaheng Li, Yujia Wang, Huining Peng, Pu Yu, Wenhui Duan, and Shuyun Zhou, Evidence of charge density wave with anisotropic gap in a monolayer VTe2 film, Phys. Rev. B 100, 241404(R) (2019).
- [69] Ping Kwan Johnny Wong, Wen Zhang, Jun Zhou, Fabio Bussolotti, Xinmao Yin, Lei Zhang, Alpha T. N'Diaye, Simon A. Morton, Wei Chen, Johnson Goh, Michel P. de Jong, Yuan Ping Feng, and Andrew T. S. Wee, Metallic 1T Phase, 3d 1 Electronic Configuration and Charge Density Wave Order in Molecular Beam Epitaxy Grown Monolayer Vanadium Ditelluride, ACS Nano 13, 12894 (2019).
- [70] Meizhuang Liu, Changwei Wu, Zizhao Liu, Zhiqiang Wang, Dao-Xin Yao, and Dingyong Zhong, Multimorphism and gap opening of charge-density-wave phases in monolayer VTe2, Nano Res. 13, 1733 (2020).
- [71] Qiucen Wu, Zhongjie Wang, Yucheng Guo, Fang Yang, and Chunlei Gao, Orbital-collaborative charge density waves in monolayer VTe2, Phys. Rev. B 101, 205105 (2020).
- [72] Guangyao Miao, Siwei Xue, Bo Li, Zijian Lin, Bing Liu, Xuetao Zhu, Weihua Wang, and Jiandong Guo, Real-space investigation of the charge density wave in VTe2 monolayer with broken rotational and mirror symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 101, 035407 (2020).
- [73] Tappei  Kawakami,  Katsuaki  Sugawara,  Takemi  Kato,  Taiki  Taguchi,  Seigo  Souma,  Takashi  Takahashi,  and Takafumi Sato, Electronic states of multilayer VTe2: Quasi-one-dimensional Fermi surface and implications for charge density waves, Phys. Rev. B 104, 045136 (2021).

- [74] Zhi-Li Zhu, Zhong-Liu Liu, Xu Wu, Xuan-Yi Li, Jin-An Shi, Chen Liu, Guo-Jian Qian, Qi Zheng, Li Huang, and Xiao Lin, Charge density wave states in phase-engineered monolayer VTe2, Chinese Phys. B 31, 077101 (2022).
- [75] Omar  Concepción,  Liesbeth  Mulder,  Daan  H.  Wielens,  and  Alexander  Brinkman, Thickness-Dependent  Sign Change of the Magnetoresistance in VTe2 Thin Films, Solids 3, 500 (2022).
- [76] Wei-Min Zhao, Wenjun Ding, Qi-Wei Wang, Yu-Xin Meng, Li Zhu, Zhen-Yu Jia, Wenguang Zhu, and Shao-Chun Li, Observation of Electronic Strong Correlation in VTe2-!√# × !√# Monolayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 086501 (2023).
- [77] Taiki  Taguchi,  Katsuaki  Sugawara,  Hirofumi  Oka,  Tappei  Kawakami,  Yasuaki  Saruta,  Takemi  Kato,  Kosuke Nakayama, Seigo Souma, Takashi Takahashi, Tomoteru Fukumura, and Takafumi Sato, Charge order with unusual star-of-David lattice in monolayer NbTe2, Phys. Rev. B 107, L041105 (2023).
- [78] Yusong Bai, Tao Jian, Zemin Pan, Jinghao Deng, Xiaoyu Lin, Chao Zhu, Da Huo, Zhengbo Cheng, Yong Liu, Ping Cui, Zhenyu Zhang, Qiang Zou, and Chendong Zhang, Realization of Multiple Charge-Density Waves in NbTe2 at the Monolayer Limit, Nano Lett. 23, 2107 (2023).
- [79] Jinwoong Hwang, Yeongrok Jin, Canxun Zhang, Tiancong Zhu, Kyoo Kim, Yong Zhong, Ji-Eun Lee, Zongqi Shen, Yi Chen, Wei Ruan, Hyejin Ryu, Choongyu Hwang, Jaekwang Lee, Michael F. Crommie, Sung-Kwan Mo, and ZhiXun Shen, A Novel √$% × √$% Superstructure in Epitaxially Grown 1T-TaTe2, Adv. Mater. 34, 2204579 (2022).
- [80] Iolanda Di Bernardo, Joan Ripoll-Sau, Jose Angel Silva-GuillØn, Fabian Calleja, Cosme G. Ayani, Rodolfo Miranda, Enric  Canadell,  Manuela  Garnica,  and  Amadeo  L.  VÆzquez  de  Parga, Metastable  Polymorphic  Phases  in Monolayer TaTe2, Small 19, 2300262 (2023).
- [81] Runfa Feng, Wei Wang, Changhua Bao, Zichun Zhang, Fei Wang, Hongyun Zhang, Junjie Yao, Yong Xu, Pu Yu, Shuai-Hua Ji, Chen Si, and Shuyun Zhou, Selective Control of Phases and Electronic Structures of Monolayer TaTe2, Adv. Mater. 36, 2302297 (2024).
- [82] Bruno Kenichi Saika, Satoshi Yoshida, Markel Pardo-Almanza, Natsuki Mitsuishi, Masato Sakano, Yuita Fujisawa, Yue Wang, Yoshihiro Iwasa, Hideki Matsuoka, Hidefumi Takahashi, Shintaro Ishiwata, Yoshinori Okada, Masaki Nakano, Kyoko Ishizaka, Dimensionality-driven power-law gap in the bilayer TaTe2 grown by molecular-beam epitaxy, APL Mater. 12, 071105 (2024).
- [83] Yujun Deng, Yijun Yu, Yichen Song, Jingzhao Zhang, Nai Zhou Wang, Zeyuan Sun, Yangfan Yi, Yi Zheng Wu, Shiwei  Wu,  Junyi  Zhu,  Jing  Wang,  Xian  Hui  Chen,  and  Yuanbo  Zhang, Gate-tunable  room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2, Nature 563, 94 (2018).
- [84] Liangzhu Zhang, Zixuan Yang, Shun Feng, Zhuobin Guo, Qingchao Jia, Huidan Zeng, Yajun Ding, Pratteek Das, Zhihong Bi, Jiaxin Ma, Yunqi Fu, Sen Wang, Jinxing Mi, Shuanghao Zheng, Mingrun Li, Dong-Ming Sun, Ning Kang,  Zhong-Shuai  Wu,  and  Hui-Ming  Cheng, Metal  telluride  nanosheets  by  scalable  solid  lithiation  and exfoliation, Nature 628, 313 (2024).
Natsuki Mitsuishi Kyoko Ishizaka
Electronic Landscape of Group-5 Transition Metal Ditellurides $M$Te$_2$ ($M$ = V, Nb, Ta): Multiple Crystal Phases with Local Bonds and Flat Bands
Group-5 transition metal ditellurides $M$Te$_2$ ($M$ = V, Nb, Ta) are unique
CdI$_2$-type layered materials that exhibit peculiar quasi-one-dimensional
intralayer superstructures, known as ribbon-chains and butterfly-like clusters
of $M$ atoms. In this review article, we attempt to systematically understand
their electronic band structures based on our recent angle-resolved
photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) studies and first-principles calculations.
We underscore the role of the localized molecular-like orbital bonds that form
the anomalous flat bands in the momentum space, and demonstrate how they
influence the Fermi surface anisotropy, phase stabilities of crystal
structures, and nontrivial topological properties in some cases. We also
elaborate the future prospects for novel quantum phenomena that can be realized
in these materials.