## New physics in resonant production of Higgs boson pairs

Vernon Barger , Lisa L. Everett a a , C. B. Jackson , Andrea Peterson b a , Gabe Shaughnessy a a Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA b Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA (Dated: August 4, 2014)

We advocate a search for an extended scalar sector at the LHC via hh production, where h is the 125 GeV Higgs boson. A resonance feature in the hh invariant mass is a smoking gun of an s -channel heavy Higgs resonance, H . With one h decaying to two photons and the other decaying to b -quarks, the resonant signal may be discoverable above the hh continuum background for M H &lt; 1 TeV. The product of the scalar and top Yukawa couplings can be measured to better than 10 -20% accuracy, and its sign can be inferred from the hh lineshape via interference effects.

PACS numbers: 14.80.Ec, 12.60.Fr

Introduction. The discovery of the 125 GeV Higgs boson at the LHC marks the successful completion of the long quest to validate the spontaneous breaking of the Standard Model (SM) gauge symmetry. The discovery intensifies the search for new physics at the TeV scale using this Higgs particle as a probe. The Higgs branching fractions have been measured in many channels, with the best determinations in h → γγ , h → ZZ ∗ → glyph[lscript] + glyph[lscript] -glyph[lscript] + glyph[lscript] -, h → WW ∗ → glyph[lscript] + νglyph[lscript] -¯, ν and (to a lesser extent) in h → bb, τ ¯ + τ -[1, 2]. The h couplings to tt ¯ and gg have been inferred from the cross sections and the total Higgs width has been bounded above the SM prediction. [1-5].

Although all evidence to date is consistent with the SM Higgs sector, LHC14 is quickly approaching. The precision of Higgs coupling measurements may reach a level at which the presence of new physics contributions is evident, and an International Linear Collider could provide still greater precision [4, 5]. However, new physics may be difficult to detect in single Higgs production, for example in the decoupling limit of an extended scalar sector. Indeed, analyses have been done with LHC8 data [6]. Whether or not this occurs, the measurement of the M hh distribution in double Higgs production at LHC14 and its model independent interpretation could give an important new way to determine whether just the SM Higgs is the whole story. This is the aim of this study.

Double Higgs production is potentially discoverable in several final states, of which the most promising is hh → bbγγ ¯ , allowing a measurement of λ hhh to O (50%) from the moderate M bbγγ ¯ region [7, 8]. The presence of γγ allows severe rejection of background, but with an attendant high cost to the signal rate. The branching fraction of hh → bbγγ ¯ is only 0.28% in the SM, and thus the identification of the SM signal above the continuum background is challenging. The hh → bbτ ¯ + τ -signal is rendered unfeasible by the reducible background of bbjj ¯ where both light flavored jets fake a τ . The bbW ¯ + W -channel has only a small significance in the SM [9].

The small SM hh cross section provides an opportunity to search for new physics in this channel. In models with two (or more) Higgs doublets, the hh cross-section may be enhanced significantly above the SM by way of an s -channel Higgs boson resonance, H , dramatically improving the opportunity for a new physics discovery at the LHC. Measurements of the scalar mass and couplings can lead to a deeper understanding of the scalar sector with implications, for instance, in vacuum (meta)stability [10].

Higgs Pair Production. The Higgs pair is dominantly produced through two classes of amplitudes [11-13]: ( ) i the triangle diagram in which an s -channel J CP = 0 + particle mediates the gluon-gluon transition to two Higgs bosons and ( ii ) the box diagram in which the annihilation of two gluons through a loop produces the Higgs boson pair, as shown in Fig. (1). These amplitudes with generic internal/external Higgs bosons (and generic heavy quarks) were first computed in [14], to which we refer readers interested in the details.

The differential cross section at the parton level is

$$\begin{array} { c c c c c } \nu & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & && & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &  & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \ & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &
 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\ & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & - & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & } & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & ; & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & _ & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &. & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & + & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &, & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & = & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & ^ & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & 0 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & b & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &

 & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & &$$

FIG. 1: Representative processes that contribute to Higgs boson pair production. The final state requires a 0 + resonance.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0003v1-figure-29c8e1d0-6317-4779-8c74-820bd7bc6aac.jpg)

in which the C 's are coupling form factors, the F 's and G 's are gauge invariant form factors arising from orthogonal gluonic tensor structures, and the NLO+NNLL Kfactor is K = 2 27 at 14 TeV [15-20]. . Resonant production can shift the overall K-factor, as σ NLO + NNLL /σ LO can be √ ˆ dependent. s However, since the K-factor has not been calculated for the resonant process, we adopt the SM value under the reasonable assumption that any change in its value due to the H resonance is small.

The s -channel diagram in Fig. 1 contains the h and H exchanges, where H is the heavy resonance that must be a 0 + state. Note that the particle(s) that couple to the SM doublet Φ need not carry quantum numbers, and can couple to quarks via mixing. We denote the coupling of the H to the hh pair as

$$\mathcal { L } \supset - \lambda ^ { h h H } H \Phi ^ { \dagger } \Phi. \quad \quad ( 2 ) \quad \ \ M _ { i } \\ \quad \ \ t i o n$$

The SM tri-scalar coupling has the form λ hhh SM = 3 M /v 2 h . The coupling combination λ hhH y H t , where y H t is the t -quark Yukawa coupling to H , is the prefactor in the s -channel H amplitude. The hh cross section is shown in Fig. 2 for LHC14. The enhancement from the resonance is typically over 100 fb, well above the SM value of σ SM pp → hh = 43 fb [18]. For a sufficiently heavy H , the λ hhh uncertainty is approximated to be the SM uncertainty [8]; there is a strong dependence of the coupling uncertainty at low M hh , where the SM signal is strong.

FIG. 2: Higgs pair production cross section at LHC14 with Γ H /M H = 1%. σ SM pp → hh = 43 fb (with a NLO+NNLL Kfactor).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0003v1-figure-c525285c-e322-4b54-bb4b-92b0ebc84133.jpg)

Measuring the hh lineshape. In the bbγγ ¯ channel, the dominant irreducible background is the continuum pp → bbγγ ¯ process. We also include the additional processes listed in [8] and adopt their tagging efficiencies, mis-tag rates, threshold requirements and momentum smearing. We simulate the resonant production of hh → bbγγ ¯ and as minimal cuts, require two b -tags, two γ tags and | M bb -m h | &lt; 20 GeV and | M γγ -m h | &lt; 10 GeV. Additional details on the acceptance criteria are given in [21].

We first study resonant production alone, which serves to determine the response of the detector simulation to an injection of hh states at a given √ ˆ, s greatly simplifying the subsequent analysis. The analytic differential distributions are Gaussian smeared according to the resonant shape after event simulation including particle identification and isolation. In the range of masses we consider, M H = 200 -1000 GeV, the energy resolution of the reconstructed bbγγ ¯ resonance is found to vary with increasing M H between 5 -25 GeV. The acceptance is computed for each resonant mass, which ranges from 6-11%.

To determine how well the H → hh resonance signal can be measured at LHC14, we perform a ∆ χ 2 fit of the M hh distribution to the expected SM pp → hh distribution that does not contain a resonance. We also include the effect of increased uncertainty via background subtraction by inflating the Poisson uncertainty according to the continuum bbγγ ¯ background distribution, and assume a 100% background normalization uncertainty.

The differential event rate is computed via

$$\underset { \text{$the} \text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text	$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text
$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text#\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{	$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\test$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text}$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text'$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text`$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text.$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text<$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text51$\text$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{\text{\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$$\text$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{#\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text$$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$\text{$$$$

$$\int \stackrel { \cdot \cdot } { d M ^ { \prime } G ( M ^ { \prime }, M _ { b \bar { b } \gamma \gamma } ) } \frac { d \sigma _ { g g \to h h } } { d M ^ { \prime } } \int _ { ( M ^ { \prime } ) ^ { 2 } / s } ^ { 1 } d \tau \frac { d \mathcal { L } _ { g g } } { d \tau },$$

where A M ( bbγγ ¯ ) is the signal acceptance with the resonance at M H = M bbγγ ¯ , the Gaussian kernel with energy resolution σ is G E ,E ( ′ ) = ( √ 2 πσ ) -1 e -( E ′ -E ) 2 2 σ 2 , and d L gg /dτ is the parton luminosity for gg collisions.

In addition to λ hhh , the two free parameters that determine the differential distribution are M H and λ hhH y H t . In Fig. 3, we show the differential distributions for M H = 500 (800) GeV with Γ H /M H = 1% (10%) for λ hhH y H t = ± 100 GeV. The total width of H can vary considerably depending on λ hhH and its coupling to gauge bosons. Since the only measurable quantity is λ hhH y H t , the production rate can be taken to be independent of the total width, and therefore we just take the two cases.

In Fig. 4, we see that with ∫ L dt = 300 fb -1 , LHC14 can constrain | λ hhH y H t | glyph[greaterorsimilar] 100 (500) GeV over most of the mass range up to 1 TeV for a 1% (10%) total width. The decrease in the reach for low M H is mainly due to the continuum bbγγ ¯ background at low M bbγγ ¯ and (to a lesser extent) the reduced phase space near threshold.

The sign of λ hhH y H t can also be determined from the interference of the resonant and continuum amplitudes. This is seen in Fig. 3 where, even with momentum smearing, the interference effect is clearly visible. For λ hhH y H t &gt; 0, an excess of events occurs below resonance and a deficit above resonance (and vice-versa for λ hhH y H t &lt; 0). In Fig. 5, we show regions over which the sign of λ hhH y H t can be distinguished via the hh lineshape.

FIG. 3: The dN/dM bbγγ ¯ distribution for M H = 500 800 GeV , and λ hhH y H t = ± 100 GeV, for Γ H /M H = 1% (top) and Γ H /M H = 10% (bottom). The SM bbγγ ¯ continuum background (gray shaded) peaks at low invariant mass while the SM hh continuum is denoted by the black curve. Even with momentum smearing, the sign of λ hhH y H t can be resolved.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0003v1-figure-0189a612-a0b6-43e0-9ad2-d4c4afc09409.jpg)

We perform a ∆ χ 2 fit to approximately 1500 points in the M H -λ hhH y H t plane for Γ H /M H = 0 01(0.1), varying . M H , Γ H , λ hhH y H t , and λ hhh simultaneously and restricting the luminosity to L dt = 3 ab -1 . We find that M H can be measured to 0.5% or better and the total width to 20% or better over most of the parameter space. For an intrinsically broader Higgs width with Γ H /M H = 0 1, . the fit is degraded for the Higgs mass measurement, but the fit uncertainty in Γ H /M H is not that different.

In Fig. 6, we show the 1 σ uncertainty of λ hhH y H t , which can be probed to a remarkably sensitive level over most of the parameter space and in some cases to less than 2%. This sensitivity degrades somewhat as the total width is increased, but the uncertainty remains low. For a particular model of Yukawa couplings, the scalar coupling can

FIG. 4: LHC14 reach of the H resonance in the M H and coupling plane with ∫ L dt = 300 fb -1 for Γ H /M H = 1% (top) and Γ H /M H = 10% (bottom). The asymmetry in the contours is due to the SM continuum contribution.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0003v1-figure-7050b963-092a-4af1-872e-52aab16fbc96.jpg)

be accurately deduced. Even better, with an independent measurement of the H coupling to the quark sector, the scalar coupling can be uniquely determined.

Conclusions. We studied resonant pair production of the 125 GeV Higgs h for the final state in which one h decays to γγ and the other to bb ¯ . In new physics models with a heavy CP-even Higgs H , the s -channel resonance amplitude of the H interferes with the SM amplitudes. We find that LHC14 sensitivity to the H → hh channel is possible if the magnitude of the product of the scalar and top quark Yukawa couplings λ hhH y H t is O (100 GeV) or larger (for M H ≤ 1 TeV) and its sign can be inferred from the hh lineshape via interference effects. λ hhH y H t can be measured to greater than 10 -20% accuracy over a broad range of M H ≤ 1 TeV. Using the resonant enhancement of hh production, the scalar coupling can be deduced or directly measured, yielding a deeper understanding of the scalar sector with potentially profound implications.

FIG. 5: LHC14 sensitivity to the sign of λ hhH y H t from the interference between the SM and H resonant diagrams for Γ H /M H = 1% (top) and Γ H /M H = 10% (bottom).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0003v1-figure-cc7f8050-83f8-42dc-bb1b-d1ef5ba3ae9f.jpg)

Acknowledgements. V. B., L. L. E, A. P. and G. S. are supported by the U. S. Department of Energy under the contract DE-FG-02-95ER40896.

- [1] The ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS-CONF-2014-009.
- [2] The CMS Collaboration, CMS-PAS-HIG-14-009.
- [3] V. Barger, M. Ishida and W. -Y. Keung, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 , 261801 (2012) [arXiv:1203.3456 [hep-ph]].
- [4] S. Dawson, A. Gritsan, H. Logan, J. Qian, C. Tully, R. Van Kooten, A. Ajaib and A. Anastassov et al. , arXiv:1310.8361 [hep-ex].
- [5] V. Barger, L. L. Everett, H. E. Logan and G. Shaughnessy, Phys. Rev. D 88 , 115003 (2013) [arXiv:1308.0052 [hep-ph]].
- [6] The CMS Collaboration, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-032.
- [7] W. Yao, arXiv:1308.6302 [hep-ph].
- [8] V. Barger, L. L. Everett, C. B. Jackson and G. Shaughnessy, Phys. Lett. B 728 , 433 (2014) [arXiv:1311.2931

FIG. 6: Fit uncertainties at the 1 σ level for λ hhH y H t for Γ H /M H = 0.01 (top) and 0.1 (bottom) with ∫ L dt = 3 ab -1 .

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0003v1-figure-6aa74e53-f2de-4cd0-a91d-ffeaad529049.jpg)

[hep-ph]].

- [9] J. Baglio, A. Djouadi, R. Gro¨ber, M. M. M¨hlleitner, o u J. Quevillon and M. Spira, JHEP 1304 , 151 (2013) [arXiv:1212.5581 [hep-ph]].
- [10] G. Degrassi, S. Di Vita, J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, JHEP 1208 , 098 (2012) [arXiv:1205.6497 [hep-ph]].
- [11] O. J. P. Eboli, G. C. Marques, S. F. Novaes and A. A. Natale, Phys. Lett. B 197 , 269 (1987).
- [12] E. W. N. Glover and J. J. van der Bij, Nucl. Phys. B 309 , 282 (1988).
- [13] D. A. Dicus, C. Kao and S. S. D. Willenbrock, Phys. Lett. B 203 , 457 (1988).
- [14] T. Plehn, M. Spira and P. M. Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. B 479 , 46 (1996) [Erratum-ibid. B 531 , 655 (1998)] [hepph/9603205].
- [15] S. Dawson, S. Dittmaier and M. Spira, Phys. Rev. D 58 , 115012 (1998) [hep-ph/9805244].
- [16] S. Dittmaier et al. arXiv:1101.0593 [hep-ph].
- [17] G. C. Branco et al, Phys. Rept. 516 , 1 (2012) [arXiv:1106.0034 [hep-ph]].
- [18] D. Y. Shao, C. S. Li, H. T. Li and J. Wang,

arXiv:1301.1245 [hep-ph].

- [19] D. de Florian and J. Mazzitelli, Phys. Lett. B 724 , 306 (2013) [arXiv:1305.5206 [hep-ph]].
- [20] D. de Florian and J. Mazzitelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 ,

201801 (2013) [arXiv:1309.6594 [hep-ph]].

- [21] V. Barger, L. L. Everett, C. B. Jackson, A. Peterson and G. Shaughnessy, in preparation.
Vernon Barger Lisa L. Everett C. B. Jackson Andrea Peterson Gabe Shaughnessy
New physics in resonant production of Higgs boson pairs
We advocate a search for an extended scalar sector at the LHC via $hh$
production, where $h$ is the 125 GeV Higgs boson. A resonance feature in the
$hh$ invariant mass is a smoking gun of an $s$-channel heavy Higgs resonance,
$H$. With one $h$ decaying to two photons and the other decaying to $b$-quarks,
the resonant signal may be discoverable above the $hh$ continuum background for
$M_H<$ 1 TeV. The product of the scalar and top Yukawa couplings can be
measured to better than $10-20\%$ accuracy, and its sign can be inferred from
the $hh$ lineshape via interference effects.