This paper has been accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. The final bibliographic details are IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity vol. 25 no. 1, p. 4700104, 2015. DOI:

## DC and AC Characterization of Pancake Coils Made from Roebel-Assembled Coated Conductor Cable

Anna Kario, Michal Vojen č iak, Francesco Grilli, Andrea Kling, Alexandra Jung, Jšrg Brand, Andrej Kudymow, Johann Willms, Uwe Walschburger, Victor Zermeno and Wilfried Goldacker

Abstract Ñ Roebel  cables  made  of  HTS  coated  conductors  can carry  high  currents  with  a  compact  design  and  reduced  AC losses.  They  are  therefore  good  candidates  for  manufacturing coils for HTS applications such as motors and generators.

In this paper we present the experimental DC  and AC characterization of several coils assembled from a 5 meter long Roebel cable built  at  KIT,  which  differ  in  the  number  of  turns and turn-to-turn spacing. Our experiments, supported by finiteelement  method  (FEM)  calculations,  show  that  a  more  tightly wound Roebel coil, despite having a lower critical (and therefore operating)  current,  can  produce  a  higher  magnetic  field  than  a loosely  wound  one.  For  a  given  magnetic  field  produced  at  the coilÕs center,  all the  coils have  similar  AC  losses,  with  the exception of the most loosely wound one, which has much higher losses  due  to  the  relatively  large  current  needed  to  produce  the desired field.

studied  by  several  groups  [5-9],  but  until  now  only  one pancake  coil  with  Roebel  cable  was  successfully  made  by Jiang et al. [10]. That coil was made from a 5 m-long Roebel cable  with  9  strands,  each  2  mm  wide,  with  a  5.44  mm distance  between  the  turns.  AC  loss  measurement  in  the pancake coil wound with the Roebel cable showed hysteretic features and the AC loss was approximately 60% higher than that of a straight Roebel cable.

The experiments presented in this paper are carried out on the geometry  of  pancake  coils  made  of  Roebel  cables,  but  they  are exemplary of a more general strategy that, coupling experiments and  numerical  simulations,  can  be  used  to  optimize  the  coil design with respect to different parameters, such as tape quantity,  size,  or  AC  loss  Ð  the  relative  importance  of  which  is dictated by the specific application.

Index Terms ÑRoebel cable, pancake coils, critical current, AC losses, self-field effects

## I. INTRODUCTION

ECOND-GENERATION coated conductor tapes are most promising high-temperature superconductors for applications because of their current-carrying potential, mechanical flexibility, and in-field behavior. The development of coated conductors has been constantly improving in terms of  pinning  quality  as  well  as  of  long  length  production[1]. Following  this  development,  in  our  group  work  with  Roebel Assembled Coated Conductor (RACC) cable has been steadily progressing [2-4]. Besides improving the single RACC cable  current  performance,  we  are  also  focusing  on  other equally important aspects: extending the cable length, reducing  the  AC  losses,  and  assembling  coils  for  possible applications. Pancake coils from coated conductors have been S

A. Kario, F. Grilli, A. Kling, A. Jung, J. Brand, A. Kudymow, J. Willms, U. Walshburger, V. Zermeno and W. Goldackerare with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (anna.kario@kit.edu). M. Vojen č iak is now with the Institute of  Electrical  Engineering  Slovak  Academy  of  Science.  Funding  from  the Helmholtz Association (FG, VMRZ and MV, Grant VH-NG-617) and EFDA (MV, Grant WP11-FRF-KIT) is gratefully acknowledged.

For the design of future Roebel cable coils it is important to understand what the most important parameters for obtaining a given magnetic field are and to have techniques and tools able to predict the coilÕs performance[11]. In the present work we modified  the  distance  between  the  turns  of  the  coils  and investigated  its  influence  on  the  performance  of  the  coils,  in terms of critical current, magnetic field produced at the center, and AC losses. Experiments are supported by FEM calculations able to compute the magnetic field distribution in detail and to estimate the coilÕs critical current.

## II. COIL PREPARATION AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

A  5  m  long  RACC  cable  was  produced  to  assemble  5 pancake coils. Coated conductor tape from Superpower with a width  of 12.01  mm,  an  overall  thickness of 0.098  mm including  a  Cu  stabilization  thickness  of  40 µ m,  and  an average self-field critical current of 348 A (at 77 K) was used. A  50  m  long  piece  of  tape  was  cut  into  a  5.5  mm  wide meander-shaped strand using our customized reel-to-reel punching tool [2]. The strand material was then cut in ten 5 mlong  pieces,  which  were  manually  assembled  to  form  a  10strand RACC  cable.  A  fiberglass epoxy  laminate (G10) sample  holder  was  built  and  used  to  change  the  distance between the turns using Styrofoam spacers (Fig.1).

Rounded  copper  contacts  were  soldered  at  the  ends  of  the RACC cable  using  Sn60Pb40  solder  at  250  ¡C  (Fig.1).  The contacts  were  specially  designed  to  prevent  damages  to  the cable  due  to  different  winding  events  and  to  be  indifferently used  with  the  various  coils.  Five  coils  with  different  space between  the  windings  were  prepared  from  the  same  RACC cable and characterized. In order to prevent movements due to the  Lorentz  force,  during  the  measurements  the  coil  was secured between two G10 plates. For the loosely wound coils (turn-to-turn spacing of 20, 10, 4 mm) Styrofoam material was used  as  spacer.  For  the  tightly  wound  coils  (turn-to-turn

10.1109/TASC.2014.2349512

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-232d1771-3ef0-4f26-a423-83080a270add.jpg)

Fig. 1. Assembled coils with 20 (a), 10 (b), 4 (c), 1.4 (d) and 0.1 mm (e) separation between the turns. The massive copper blocks are the current leads. Top view of the Roebel cable (f) is also shown.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-b5417a35-65fe-4148-a13a-a8274cea3551.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-5fd3f3cb-f514-4b16-82a8-c0bb6df33490.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-357e9cc6-8248-4c8d-8ed7-03d08533169a.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-6017921b-cae2-413d-8d42-7ae66895fd18.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-c96037fb-95df-4336-aa89-7454e85858b0.jpg)

spacing of 1.4 and 0.1 mm) the turns were separated  by  means  of  a  paper  spacer  and  Kapton  tape, respectively. For all coils the inner diameter was kept constant and  equal  to  9.2  cm;  the  number  of  turns  and  the  outer diameter  varied  correspondingly.  The  main  properties  of  the coils are summarized in Table I.

TABLE I COIL DIMENSIONS AND SPACING MATERIAL.

| Coil                | C20       | C10       | C4        | C1.4   | C0.1   |
|---------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|--------|
| Spacing (mm)        | 20        | 10        | 4         | 1.4    | 0.1    |
| Spacing material    | Styrofoam | Styrofoam | Styrofoam | paper  | Kapton |
| No. of turns        | 6         | 9         | 9         | 11     | 13     |
| Outer diameter (mm) | 350       | 294       | 186       | 148    | 123    |

All  coils  were  wound  with  the  superconducting  layer  in  the Roebel cable facing away from the coil center, so that voltage taps can be easily soldered on the superconductorÕs side of the tape.  Cable  bending  experiments  with  the  superconducting layer inwards and outwards with diameter of 92 mm (diameter of  the  innermost  turn  of  the  coils)  were  performed  and  no degradation  of  the  critical  current  was  observed.  The  other turns  of  the  coils  have  a  diameter  larger  than  92  mm  (and  a correspondingly  lower  tension),  so  one  can  assume  that  no degradation of  Ic occurs.

Each coil sample was characterized in DC and AC as follows. In  order  to  measure  the  critical  current,  voltage  taps  were placed  on  each  tape  outside  the  current  contacts,  on  the superconductor side of each single meander tape. For comparison, voltage contacts were also placed inside the coil on two tapes, which resulted in the same Ic, in agreement with the  findings  of  experiments  conducted  on  single  tapes[12]. The  transport  AC  losses  were  measured  with  the  standard lock-in technique. The voltage signal was taken from the taps on  one  strand,  as  signals  on  all  10  strands  were  found  to  be comparable.  The  AC  current  was  generated  by  a  power amplifier and by a copper transformer cooled in liquid nitrogen.

## III. DC CHARACTERIZATION

Figure  2  shows  the  critical  current  (1 µ V/cm  criterion)  as  a

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-ab2c2912-f42f-4433-ba4b-b2a3464e5664.jpg)

Fig. 2.Critical current (black stars are simulations,  red square experimental results, lines are guide for eyes) and n factor (empty circles) as a function of the distance between turns in the coil.

function  of  the  distance  between  the  turns  in  the  different coils.  Reducing  the  distance  between  the  turns  decreases  the coilÕs  critical  current.  This  is  the  result  of  the  generated magnetic  self-field,  which  increases  when  the  coil  is  more tightly packed. The flux-creep exponent n was extracted from the  current-voltage  relation  adopting  a  power-law  behavior: V(I)=Vc(I/Ic) n . We also observed a decrease (from 24 to 18) of the  power  exponent  with  reduced  turn-to-turn  spacing,  with the exception of coil C4. For comparison, the critical current and the power exponent of the straight RACC cable are1002 A and 23, respectively.

The  critical  current  of  each  coil  was  also  estimated  by means  of  FEM  simulations,  with  a  new  modeling  approach recently developed for this purpose [13]. The model is based on the asymptotic limit of FaradayÕs equation when the time t approaches infinity, it includes the angular dependence of the superconductorÕs critical current density, and is able to calculate the voltage drop in each conductor and turn composing  the  coil.  The  voltage  to  determine  the  critical current  of  the  coil  was  calculated  by  averaging  the  voltage drops  of  the  strands  in  each  turn  and  by  summing  these averages, taking into account their different length. The estimated  voltage  drop  per  meter  in  each  turn  is  shown  in figure 3. For reference, the calculated current in each coil turn with  respect  to  local  I   is  also  shown.  Being  exposed  to  a c higher magnetic field, the innermost turns in every coil shows the  largest  voltage  drop,  hence  largely  contributing  to  the current limitation. This can be seen directly from the right axis

This paper has been accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. The final bibliographic details are IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity vol. 25 no. 1, p. 4700104, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2014.2349512

Fig. 3. Calculated current in each coil turn with respect to local Ic (left axis). Voltage drop per meter in each turn (right axis)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-41c5fd88-a8f7-4f2b-a8d9-9fda5a3242be.jpg)

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-2b14d733-0f63-452f-9057-d80b51c262d7.jpg)

that shows a net current in the innermost turns about 7% above the local I  value. c

The critical currents calculated with the FEM model are in excellent agreement (4-6 %) with the experimental values, as shown in  Fig.  2,  which  is  completely  satisfactory,  given  the large number of effects that can make real coils different from the modeled ones (e.g. lateral and longitudinal tape uniformities, errors in the determination of angular dependence, misalignment in the Roebel structure).

If,  in  a  given  application,  the  coil  needs  to  be  designed  to produce a field as large as possible at its center, there are two competing  effects  that  need  to  be  taken  into  account.  One effect is that, in order to produce a high field at its center, the coil needs to be wound as compactly as possible. The second effect is that the critical current in a tight coil is lower than in a  loosely  wound  coil,  because  of  the  higher  produced  selffield.  A  reduced  critical  current  means  a  reduced  maximum current that can be injected, and ultimately a reduced maximum generated field. FEM analysis allows evaluating the magnetic field produced by each coil, and therefore to determine, which of the two competing effects is dominant.

Figure  4  shows  the  calculated  magnetic  field  produced  by each coil at its center with a current equal to the critical one (black points). Coil C0.1, in spite of having a critical current of  only  495  A,  creates  a  magnetic  flux  two  times  higher  (84 vs.  41  mT)  than  that  produced  by  coil  C20  with  its  critical current of 886 A. With a transport current of 495 A, coil C20 produces a field of only 23 mT Ð see red circle data points.

For  the  coils  considered  here,  winding  the  cable  with  a small turn-to-turn spacing is advantageous not only in terms of the  maximum  field  produced  at  the  coil's  center,  but  also  in terms of field produced at a given applied current. In the case of other coils with different geometries or cable strands with a different  angular Jc(B) dependence  the  conclusion  can  be unlike. However, these results show the general effectiveness of  our  method  for  optimizing  the  coil  design  with  respect  to the field produced at its center.

Fig. 4. Magnetic field in the center of each coil as a function of the distance between  turns  and  critical  current  (black),  and  normalized  to  the  critical current of C0.1 (red).

## IV. AC CHARACTERIZATION

Figure 5 shows the dependence of AC losses at 36 Hz on the transport current amplitude for coils with different separation between the turns. The loss of the straight cable is similar to the  loss  predicted  by  NorrisÕ  model  for  a  conductor  with elliptical cross-section. Similar behavior has also been reported in earlier works [3][10]. As discussed above, winding the cable into a coil changes the magnetic field experienced by the  superconductor:  the  tighter  the  coil  is  wound  the  higher this field is (see also for example figures 4-5 in[14]). This has an important influence on the AC loss as well, which increases with  respect  to  that  of  the  straight  cable:  in  the  case  of  the loosely wound coil (spacer 20 mm) only slightly, while in case of densely packed coil by more than 50 times. As discussed in [15]  and  confirmed  by  measurements  in  a  dedicated  study conducted on single tapes [12], the measured loss value is also influenced by the dissipation in the copper contact.

Fig.  5.  Measured  AC  loss  (36  Hz)  as  a  function  of  the  transport  current amplitude  for  the  different  coils  and  for  the  straight  Roebel  cable.  NorrisÕ analytical prediction for straight conductors with Ic=1002 A are also shown.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-31e43181-0e58-4556-a6cb-1e45d9588d2f.jpg)

This paper has been accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. The final bibliographic details are IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity vol. 25 no. 1, p. 4700104, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2014.2349512

As seen from the results reported above, the coil  with  the thinnest spacer has the highest loss. However,  this coil produces also the highest magnetic field at a fixed current. In coil applications the maximum  reachable magnetic flux density  is  usually  the  parameter  around  which  the  coil  is tailored. Therefore one can think of representing the AC losses as a function of this parameter, instead of the transport current. For  this  purpose,  we  used  the  calculated  flux  density  in  the center of the coil as independent parameter Ð see Fig. 4. In this representation the loss curves are mostly overlapping (Fig.6.). We found a small, non-monotonic dependence of the loss on the distance between turns at fixed magnetic flux density. This dependence for a field of 35 mT is shown in figure 7.

Following this approach one can optimize the spacer thickness to  reduce  the  losses  at  a  given  magnetic  field.  C4  has  the lowest losses at a given field, but only by a small margin (10 %) with respect to C10 and C0.1. On the contrary coil C20 has much higher losses (94 % higher) at the same given field. By increasing the spacing, the coil is composed of less turns: as a consequence, in order to produce a given field, more current needs to be injected, which increases the losses. This is caused

Fig.  6.  AC  losses  as  a  function of  the  magnetic  field at  the center of  coils with different distance between turns.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-7d407498-71d7-4e38-a318-40d3818aa61d.jpg)

Fig.  7.  AC  losses  vs.  distance  between  turns  of  each  coil  for  a  central magnetic field of 35 mT at 36 Hz.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1408.0616v2-figure-95d29d03-5e91-47f8-b86f-82fee651ef6c.jpg)

by  the  fact  that  with  a  large  separation,  the  coil  tends  to increasingly behave like an isolated Roebel cable.

## V. CONCLUSIONS

We manufactured a 5 m long RACC cable with high current capacity (1002 A) and used it to assemble pancake coils with different  distances  between  the  turns:  20,  10,  4,  1.4  and  0.1 mm. We investigated experimentally the influence of the turn separation on the critical current and on the AC losses of those coils. The  pancake  coil  geometry  using  Roebel  cables  is interesting  for  applications  such  as  motors  and  generators where space and AC losses are important issues. We also used FEM analysis to calculate critical currents of the coils and the magnetic  field  produced  at  their  center.  The  results  of I c calculation  are  in  excellent  agreement  with  the  experimental characterization, showing an average difference of 5% for the value of the coilÕs critical current.

The results allowed us to evaluate the trade-off between two competing  effects:  winding  tighter  coils  enables  reaching higher magnetic fields, but it also reduces the critical current of the coil and increases its AC  losses. For the coils considered  in  this  paper,  in  the  case  of  DC  applications  the first  effect  dominates:  the  most  tightly  wound  coil  (0.1  mm turn  separation)  allows  reaching  higher  fields  despite  the lower  current  that  can  be  injected  into  it.  However,  for  AC applications, the coil with the lowest losses at a given produced field is the one with 4 mm turn separation, but only with  9%  and  10%  differences  with  respect  to  C10  and  C0.1 respectively.

This  paper  presents  results  for  a  specific  case,  but  can  be seen  as  an  example  of  a  general  strategy  for  optimizing  the coil design. That kind of numerical analysis is not only limited to  coils  that  might  be  simplified  to  2-D,  but  also  other  coil geometry  like  racetrack  [16].  Our  results,  based  on  coupling experimental characterization and FEM analysis, are exemplary of an effective strategy to find the design of a coil that can generate, for example, a given magnetic field with the lowest AC losses. Other parameters important in applications, such as the size of the coil or the quantity of superconducting tape used, can be entered in the quest for optimization.

## REFERENCES

- [1] V. Selvamanickam, Y. Yao, Y. Chen, T. Shi, Y. Liu, N. D. Khatri, J. Liu, C. Lei, E. Galstyan, G. Majkic, ÒThe low-temperature, highmagnetic-field critical current characteristics of Zr-added (Gd,Y)Ba2Cu3Ox superconducting tapes,Ó Supercond. Sci. Technol. , vol. 25, no. 12, p. 125013, Dec. 2012.
- [2] W. Goldacker, A. Frank, A. Kudymow, R. Heller, A. Kling, S. Terzieva, C. Schmidt, ÒStatus of high transport current ROEBEL assembled coated conductor cables,Ó Supercond. Sci. Technol. , vol. 22, no. 3, p. 034003, Mar. 2009.
- [3] S. Terzieva, M. Vojen č iak, E. Pardo, F. Grilli, A. Drechsler, A. Kling, A. Kudymow, F. Gšmšry, W. Goldacker, ÒTransport and magnetization ac losses of ROEBEL assembled coated conductor cables: measurements and calculations,Ó Supercond. Sci. Technol. , vol. 23, no. 1, p. 014023, Jan. 2010.

This paper has been accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. The final bibliographic details are IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity vol. 25 no. 1, p. 4700104, 2015. DOI:

## 10.1109/TASC.2014.2349512

| [4]   | S. Terzieva, M. Vojen č iak, F. Grilli, R. Nast, J. Š ouc, W. Goldacker, A. Jung, A. Kudymow, A. Kling, ÒInvestigation of the effect of striated strands on the AC losses of 2G Roebel cablesÓ Supercond. Sci. Technol. , vol. 24, no. 4, p. 045001, Apr. 2011.   |      | Roebel cable : dependence on spacing between turns / strandsÓ, Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 035002, 2012.                                                                                                                                                   |
|-------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [5]   | M. Polak, E. Demencik, L. Jansak, P. Mozola, and D. Aized, ÒAC losses in a YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 - x coilÓ Applied Physics Letters vol. 88, 232501, pp. 2Ð5, 2006.                                                                                                       | [11] | Y. Sogabe, M. Nii, T. Tsukamoto, T. Nakamura, and N. Amemiya, ÒElectromagnetic Field Analyses of REBCO Roebel Cables Wound Into Coil ConfigurationsÓ IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1Ð5, Jun. 2014.                                       |
| [6]   | J. Kim, C. H. Kim, G. Iyyani, J. Kvitkovic, S. Pamidi, ÒTransport AC Loss Measurements in Superconducting CoilsÓ IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity ,vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 3269Ð 3272, 2011.                                                            | [12] | M. Vojen č iak, F. Grilli, a. Stenvall, a. Kling, and W. Goldacker, ÒInfluence of the voltage taps position on the self-field DC and AC transport characterization of HTS superconducting tapesÓ Cryogenics , vol. 57, pp. 189Ð194, Oct. 2013.                |
| [7]   | M. Daibo, S. Fujita, M. Haraguchi, H. Hidaka, Y. Iijima, M. Itoh, and T. Saitoh, ÒCharacteristics of Impregnated Pancake Coils Fabricated Using REBCO Coated ConductorsÓ IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity ,vol. 22, no. 3, 2012.                    | [13] | V. Zermeno, E. Pardo, M. Vojenciak, A. Kario, F. GrilliÒSelf-field Effects and AC Losses in Pancake Coils Assembled from Coated Conductor Roebel CablesÓ , IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercon ., vol. 24, nO. 3, Jun. 2014                                            |
| [8]   | J. Š ouc, E. Pardo, M. Vojen č iak, F. Gšmšry, ÒTheoretical and experimental study of AC loss in high temperature superconductor single pancake coilsÓ Supercond. Sci. Technol. , vol. 22, no. 1, p. 015006, Jan. 2009.                                           | [14] | F. Gšmšry, J. Š ouc, E. Pardo, E. Seiler, M. Soloviov, L. Frolek, M. Skarba, P. Konopka, M. Pekarÿ, and J. Janovec, ÒAC Loss in Pancake Coil Made From 12 mm Wide REBCO TapeÓ IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 6Ð11, 2013. |
| [9]   | F. Grilli and S. P. Ashworth, ÒMeasuring transport AC losses in YBCO-coated conductor coilsÓ, Supercond. Sci. Technol. , vol. 794, 2007.                                                                                                                          | [15] | F. Grilli, V. Zerme-o, M. Vojenciak, E. Pardo, A. Kario, W. Goldacker ÒAC Losses of Pancake Coils Made of Roebel CableÓ IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 0Ð4, 2013.                                                                          |
| [10]  | Z. Jiang, N. J. Long, R. A. Badcock, M. Staines, and R. A. Slade, ÒAC loss measurements in pancake coils wound with 2G tapes and                                                                                                                                  | [16] | V. Zerme-o, F. Grilli, Ò3D modeling and simulation of 2G HTS stacks and coilsÓ Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 044025 (7pp), 2014.                                                                                                                             |
Anna Kario Michal Vojenčiak Francesco Grilli Andrea Kling Alexandra Jung Jörg Brand Andrej Kudymow Johann Willms Uwe Walschburger Victor Zermeno Wilfried Goldacker
DC and AC Characterization of Pancake Coils Made from Roebel-Assembled Coated Conductor Cable
Roebel cables made of HTS coated conductors can carry high currents with a
compact design and reduced AC losses. They are therefore good candidates for
manufacturing coils for HTS applications such as motors and generators. In this
paper we present the experimental DC and AC characterization of several coils
assembled from a 5 meter long Roebel cable built at KIT, which differ in the
number of turns and turn-to-turn spacing. Our experiments, supported by
finite-element method (FEM) calculations, show that a more tightly wound Roebel
coil, despite having a lower critical (and therefore operating) current, can
produce a higher magnetic field than a loosely wound one. For a given magnetic
field produced at the coil's center, all the coils have similar AC losses, with
the exception of the most loosely wound one, which has much higher losses due
to the relatively large current needed to produce the desired field. The
experiments presented in this paper are carried out on the geometry of pancake
coils made of Roebel cables, but they are exemplary of a more general strategy
that, coupling experiments and numerical simulations, can be used to optimize
the coil design with respect to different parameters, such as tape quantity,
size, or AC loss, the relative importance of which is dictated by the specific
application.