## An alternative way to decipher the nature of the doubly charmed tetraquark Tcc (3875) + : its antiparticle Tcc ¯¯ (3875) -photoproduction off nuclei near threshold

## E. Ya. Paryev

Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia

## Abstract

We study the inclusive photoproduction of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons (which are the antiparticles of the doubly charmed tetraquarks T cc (3875) + discovered recently by the LHCb Collaboration) from nuclei in the near-threshold energy region within the nuclear spectral function approach by considering incoherent direct ( γp n ( ) → D + ( D 0 ) T ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ ) photon-nucleon + c T ¯¯ cc (3875) -creation processes as well as five possible different scenarios for their internal structure with the main goal of clarifying the possibility to decipher this structure (and, hence, that of T cc (3875) + ) in photoproduction via integral and differential observables. We calculate the absolute and relative excitation functions for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production off 12 C and 184 Wtarget nuclei at nearthreshold photon beam energies of 30-38 GeV, the absolute differential cross sections for their production off these target nuclei at laboratory polar angles of 0 ◦ -10 ◦ as well as the A and momentum dependences of the relative (transparency ratios) cross sections for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production at photon energy of 35 GeV within the adopted scenarios for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson intrinsic structure. We demonstrate that the absolute and relative observables considered show a certain sensitivity to these scenarios. Therefore, the measurement of such observables in future experiments at the proposed high-luminosity electron-ion colliders EIC and EicC in the US and China in the near-threshold energy region might shed light on the T cc (3875) + internal structure.

## 1. Introduction

The study of exotic heavy hadrons, which exhibit properties incompatible with the predictions of the conventional quark model for quark-antiquark mesons and three-quark baryons and which are composed of four or five quarks (and antiquarks) and are named as tetraquark and pentaquark states, respectively, has received considerable interest in recent years and is one of the most exciting topics of the nuclear and hadronic physics nowadays owing to the expectation to better understand perturbative and nonperturbative aspects of QCD and to extend our knowledge about the world of 'elementary' particles. (for a recent overview of the multiquark states see Refs. [1-5]). This interest was triggered by the discovery of X (3872) resonance (also known as χ c 1 (3872)) by the Belle Collaboration in 2003 [6] as a narrow peak in the vicinity of the D D 0 ¯ ∗ 0 ( ¯ D D 0 ∗ 0 ) mass threshold in the J/ψπ + π -invariant mass distribution in exclusive B ± → K X ± (3872) → K ± ( J/ψπ + π -) decays.

Recently (in 2021), the LHCb Collaboration announced the first observation of the isoscalar doubly charmed tetraquark state T cc (3875) + in the D D π 0 0 + mass spectrum in the prompt production of the proton-proton collisions at LHC [7, 8]. This state has a quark content ccud ¯ ¯ , a mass of approximately 3875 MeV and manifests itself as a very narrow peak in this spectrum just below the D D 0 ∗ + mass threshold 1) . Its spin-parity quantum numbers were estimated as J P = 1 + by the experiment. The T cc (3875) + is the second doubly charmed hadron that has been experimentally observed up to now. In 2017, 2018, the LHCb Collaboration reported the observation of the doubly charmed baryon Ξ ++ cc with quark content ccu through the non-leptonic decay modes Ξ ++ cc → Λ + c K π π -+ + [9] and Ξ + c π + [10]. After the experimental discovery of the T cc (3875) + meson, its internal structure has been intensively debated. Since the mass of T cc (3875) + lies just below the nominal D D 0 ∗ + and D D + ∗ 0 mass thresholds 2) , it is natural to treat it as an extremely narrow D D + ∗ 0 -D D 0 ∗ + weakly bound molecular state in a relative S-wave with a very small width and binding energy, dynamically generated from the interaction of the coupled channels D D 0 ∗ + and D D + ∗ 0 in the isospin I = 0 sector (see, for example, Refs. [11-14] and those cited below). On the other hand, the T cc (3875) + has possibilities to be either a compact multiquark state where the quarks and antiquarks form compact configurations with the size of a typical hadron [15-17] or a mixture of a molecular and compact tetraquark states [18, 19] 3) . All these plausible interpretations of the T cc (3875) + exotic state were supported by many current theoretical studies (see references herein below). But, in spite of large efforts the full understanding of the T cc (3875) + structure remains a challenging open problem.

Most of the above various interpretations are based on the analysis of the three-body hadronic and radiative decays of T cc (3875) + via intermediate states D D 0 ∗ + and D D + ∗ 0 into the channels D D π 0 0 + , D D π 0 + 0 and D D γ 0 + , using the experimental values of its mass and total decay width as inputs [21]. However, the internal structure of T cc (3875) + could also be studied in high-energy proton-proton and heavy-ion collisions at hadron colliders where a large number of charm quarks is produced, since its abundance in these collisions could reflect its structure [22]. In these collisions the T cc (3875) + mesons can be produced as a compact tetraquarks from the four-quark coalescence in the QGP phase at the critical temperature or as a hadronic molecules from the coalescence of charm mesons D and D ∗ formed at the end of the mixed phase [22] (cf. Ref. [23] containing the similar statement for the exotic hadron X (3872)) and in them their such observables as the transverse

1) Thus, its mass with respect to this threshold ( m D 0 + m D ∗ + = 3875 1 MeV) and width are . δm exp = -360 ± 40 +4 -0 keV, Γ = 48 ± 2 +0 -14 keV when the T cc (3875) + is fitted with a unitarized Breit-Wigner shape [8].

2) The latter one lies at a slightly higher energy of m D + + m D ∗ 0 = 3876 51 MeV than the former and difference . between them is only 1.41 MeV.

3) It is worth noting that the large value of the ratio of the partial radiative decay widths of the χ c 1 (3872) into ψ (2 S γ ) and J/ψγ final states measured very recently by the LHCb Collaboration makes the interpretation of the χ c 1 (3872) state as a pure D D 0 ¯ ∗ 0 + ¯ D D 0 ∗ 0 molecule questionable and provides a strong argument in favor of a compact component also in its structure [20].

momentum distributions and total production yields are expected to be completely different for both these configurations [24]. Alternatively, the structure of T cc (3875) + can also be investigated through its antiparticle T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction off nuclei at near-threshold energies in the same manner as it was done for the X (3872) resonance in Ref. [25]. The advantage of photoproduction compared to the hadronic collisions is that the interpretation of data from such future experiments is clearer due to insignificant strength of initial-state photon interaction and since in it a fewer individual exclusive elementary T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson production channels need to be accounted for.

In this work, we present the detailed predictions for the absolute and relative excitation functions for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production off 12 C and 184 W target nuclei as well as for the A and momentum dependences of the relative (transparency ratios) cross sections for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production from γA reactions at threshold energies obtained in the framework of the first collision model within the possible different scenarios for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -(and, hence, for the T cc (3875) + ) meson intrinsic structure. The predictions can be tested by future high-precision measurements at electron-ion colliders EIC [26] and EicC [27] with the aim of discriminating between these scenarios.

## 2. Framework: direct Tcc ¯¯ (3875) -photoproduction mechanism

Direct T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction off nuclei in the near-threshold photon beam energy region E γ ≤ 38 GeV of interest 4) can occur in the following elementary processes with the lowest free production threshold ( ≈ 33.9 GeV) [28, 29]:

$$\gamma + p \rightarrow D ^ { + } + T _ { \bar { c } \bar { c } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } + \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + },$$

$$\gamma + n \rightarrow D ^ { 0 } + T _ { \bar { c } \bar { c } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } + \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + }.$$

The D + , D 0 , T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons and Λ + c hyperons, produced in these processes, are sufficiently energetic. Thus, for example, the kinematically allowed D + , T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons and final Λ + c hyperon laboratory momenta in the direct process (1), proceeding on the free target proton at rest, vary within the momentum ranges of 5.749-11.125 GeV/c, 13.748-20.066 GeV/c and 7.335-13.061 GeV/c, respectively, at incident photon beam energy of E γ = 35 GeV. Since the neutron and D 0 meson masses are approximately equal to the proton and D + meson masses, respectively, the kinematical characteristics of final particles, produced in the reaction (2), are close to those of final particles in the process (1). The binding of target nucleons and their Fermi motion will distort the distributions of the outgoing high-momentum D + , D 0 , T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons and Λ + c hyperons as well as lead to a wider accessible for them momentum intervals compared to those given above (cf. Figs. 8 and 9 given below). Since the medium effects are expected to be reduced for high momenta [30, 31], we will ignore the medium modifications of these final particles in the case when the reactions (1), (2) proceed on a nucleons embedded in a nuclear target 5) .

Then, neglecting the distortion of the incident photon at energies of interest and describing the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson absorption by intranuclear nucleons by the absorption cross section σ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N , we represent the total cross section for the production of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons off nuclei from the direct processes (1), (2) as follows [25]:

$$\sigma _ { \gamma A \to T _ { \Re e } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } X } ^ { ( \text{dir} ) } ( E _ { \gamma } ) = I _ { V } [ A, \sigma _ { T _ { \Re e } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ] \left \langle \sigma _ { \gamma p \to D ^ { + } T _ { \Re e } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } } ( E _ { \gamma } ) \right \rangle _ { A },$$

4) Which corresponds to the center-of-mass energies W of the photon-proton system W ≤ 8 5 . GeV, or to the relatively 'low' excess energies ϵ above the D T + ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c production threshold W th = m D + + m T ¯¯ cc (3875) -+ m Λ + c ( m D + , m T ¯¯ cc (3875) -and m Λ + c are the D + , T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons and Λ + c hyperon free space masses, respectively ) 0 ≤ ϵ ≤ 0 47 . GeV and in which the doubly anticharmed tetraquark T ¯¯ cc (3875) -can be observed in γp and γA reactions at the proposed electron-ion colliders EIC [26] and EicC [27] in the US and China.

5) It should be pointed out that the properties of the D T , cc (3875) + and T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons and Λ + c hyperons in a strongly interacting nuclear environment at low energies have been theoretically investigated, respectively, in the works [32-42], [43, 44] and [45, 46].

where and

$$I _ { V } [ A, \sigma ] = 2 \pi \int _ { 0 } ^ { R } r _ { \perp } d r _ { \perp } \int _ { - \sqrt { R ^ { 2 } - r _ { \perp } ^ { 2 } } } ^ { \sqrt { R ^ { 2 } - r _ { \perp } ^ { 2 } } } d z \rho ( \sqrt { r _ { \perp } ^ { 2 } + z ^ { 2 } } ) \exp \left [ - \sigma \int _ { z } ^ { \sqrt { R ^ { 2 } - r _ { \perp } ^ { 2 } } } \rho ( \sqrt { r _ { \perp } ^ { 2 } + x ^ { 2 } } ) d x \right ],$$

$$\rho ( r ) = \rho _ { p } ( r ) + \rho _ { n } ( r ), \ r = \sqrt { r _ { \perp } ^ { 2 } + z ^ { 2 } } \text{ or } r = \sqrt { r _ { \perp } ^ { 2 } + x ^ { 2 } } ;$$

$$\left \langle \sigma _ { \gamma p \rightarrow D ^ { + } T _ { \tilde { \epsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } } ( E _ { \gamma } ) \right \rangle _ { A } = \int \int P _ { A } ( \mathbf p _ { t }, E ) d \mathbf p _ { t } d E \sigma _ { \gamma p \rightarrow D ^ { + } T _ { \tilde { \epsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } } ( \sqrt { s ^ { * } } )$$

$$s ^ { * } = ( E _ { \gamma } + E _ { t } ) ^ { 2 } - ( { \mathbf p } _ { \gamma } + { \mathbf p } _ { t } ) ^ { 2 },$$

$$E _ { t } = M _ { A } - \sqrt { ( - \mathbf p _ { t } ) ^ { 2 } + ( M _ { A } - m _ { p } + E ) ^ { 2 } }.$$

Here, σ γp → D T + ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c ( √ s ∗ ) is the 'in-medium' total cross section for the production of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons in process (1) 6) at the 'in-medium' γp center-of-mass energy √ s ∗ ; ρ p ( r ), ρ n ( r ) ( r is the distance from the nucleus center) and P A ( p t , E ) are normalized to the numbers of protons Z , neutrons N and to unity the local proton, neutron densities and the spectral function of target nucleus with mass number A ( A = Z + N ), having mass M A and radius R 7) ; p t and E are the internal momentum and binding energy of the struck target proton just before the collision; p γ and E γ are the momentum and energy of the incident photons; m p is the proton bare mass. √

As in Ref. [25], we suppose that the 'in-medium' cross section σ γp → D T + ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c ( s ∗ ) for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production in process (1) is equivalent to the free space cross section σ γp → D T + ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c ( √ s E ( γ )), in which the free space center-of-mass energy squared s E ( γ ) for given photon energy E γ , presented by the formula

$$s ( E _ { \gamma } ) = W ^ { 2 } = ( E _ { \gamma } + m _ { p } ) ^ { 2 } - \mathbf p _ { \gamma } ^ { 2 } = m _ { p } ^ { 2 } + 2 m _ { p } E _ { \gamma },$$

is replaced by the in-medium expression (7). For the free total cross section σ γp → D T + ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c ( √ s E ( γ )) no data are available up to now. Therefore, in the photon energy range W ≤ 8.5 GeV of interest we have adopted for it the following parametrization of the results of the calculations of this cross section here (for a cutoff parameter α = 1 7) within the approach [28], . in which the γp → D T + ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c reaction is studied by considering the central diffractive mechanism and T ¯¯ cc (3875) -as a ¯ ¯ DD ∗ molecule:

$$\sigma _ { \gamma p \to D ^ { + } T _ { \partial e } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } \Lambda _ { e } ^ { + } } ( \sqrt { s ( E _ { \gamma } ) } ) = 2. 4 0 9 \left ( 1 - \frac { s _ { t h } } { s ( E _ { \gamma } ) } \right ) ^ { 1. 7 4 5 } \, \left [ \text{pb} \right ],$$

where

$$s _ { \text{th} } & = W _ { \text{th} } ^ { 2 } = ( m _ { D ^ { + } } + m _ { T _ { \mathbb { A } } \in ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } } + m _ { \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } } ) ^ { 2 }. & ( 1 1 )$$

In the energy regime W ≤ 8.5 GeV, the cross section of the γp → D T + ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c reaction can reach the values of the order of 0.05 pb [28]. Although, this cross section is quite small here, one may hope that its measurements cold be performed in the future at the electron-ion colliders in the US [26] and China [27] (cf. also [28]). The empirical formulas (10), (11) will be used in our subsequent calculations as a guideline for a reasonable evaluation of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -yield in γA reactions.

6) In Eq. (3) we assume that the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production cross sections in γp and γn reactions are the same.

7) The information about the spectral function of target nucleus, used in the subsequent calculations, is given in

Refs. [47, 48] and the local nucleon densities, employed in them, will be defined below.

We discuss now the local nucleon densities, employed in our calculations of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction on the target nuclei 12 6 C, 27 13 Al, 40 20 Ca, 63 29 Cu, 93 41 Nb, 112 50 Sn, 184 74 W, 208 82 Pb and 238 92 U considered in the present study. For lightest nucleus 12 6 C we use the same proton and neutron density profiles of the harmonic oscillator model [49, 50]. For nuclei 27 13 Al, 40 20 Ca and 63 29 Cu for the proton and neutron densities, ρ p ( r ) and ρ n ( r ), we have employed in our present calculations the Woods-Saxon distributions with the same radial parameters for protons and neutrons given in Ref. [25]. For medium-weight 93 41 Nb, 112 50 Sn and heavy 184 74 W, 208 82 Pb, 238 92 U target nuclei, we adopted for protons and neutrons the two-parameter Fermi density distributions with proton and neutron density parameters also reported in Ref. [25]. As in Ref. [25], we use here the neutron density ρ n ( r ) in the 'skin' form.

To go further, we have to determine the T ¯¯ cc (3875) --nucleon absorption cross section σ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N . It is a crucial to estimate this cross section in different theoretical pictures describing the possible underlying structure of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -for its interpretation through the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction on nuclei since there is a direct dependence of the rate of this production on the absorption cross section σ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N (cf. Eq.(3)). This rate is expected to be different for different options for the inner structure of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -. That is, in our approach the rate of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson photoproduction off nuclei reflects the sensitivity to this structure. This remarkable feature can be used to better determine/constrain the inner structure of this exotic state in the future dedicated experiments. In our present study we consider three scenarios for the hypothetical T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson based on the proposed in literature three popular configurations for the discovered doubly charmed tetraquark T cc (3875) + : i) a molecular state - a loosely bound, with large spatial size characterized by the r.m.s. radius of the order of 5-7 fm or more, S -wave state in the ¯ D D 0 ∗-( D D -¯ ∗ 0 ) system consisting of an anticharmed ¯ D 0 and D ∗-or D -and ¯ D ∗ 0 mesons having the quarks contents ¯ cu and ¯ cd or ¯ cd and ¯ , respectively, [51-65] cu 8) , ii) compact, ∼ 1 fm, diquark [ ud ] and antidiquark [¯¯] cc tetraquark state [24, 69-72], and iii) a hybrid state - a state in which the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -wave function contains a molecular and compact four-quark components [18, 73].

In the 'pure' molecular picture of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -, whose wave function takes the following charge-conjugation form

$$| T _ { \bar { c } \bar { c } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } > _ { \text{mol} } = \frac { 1 } { \sqrt { 2 } } \left ( | D ^ { - } \bar { D } ^ { * 0 } > - | \bar { D } ^ { 0 } D ^ { * - } > \right )$$

compared to that

$$| T _ { c c } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { + } > _ { \text{mol} } = \frac { 1 } { \sqrt { 2 } } \left ( | D ^ { + } D ^ { * 0 } > - | D ^ { 0 } D ^ { * + } > \right )$$

for the T cc (3875) + in the isoscalar channel [52, 64, 74, 75] 9) and in which the constituents (anticharmed mesons) are weakly bound and have large spatial separation in coordinate space (see

8) Loosely bound S -wave charm-meson molecules like X (3872) and T cc (3875) + have universal properties determined by their binding energies [66, 67]. Accordingly, within the molecular hypothesis, the r.m.s. size r T of the separation of the ¯ D 0 and D ∗-constituents in the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -molecule can be estimated from the relation r T = 1 / √ 4 µ δ 0 T ¯¯ cc (3875) -by knowing the binding energy δ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -= m ¯ D 0 + m D ∗--m T ¯¯ cc (3875) -of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -molecule [66, 67]. Here, µ 0 is the ¯ D D 0 ∗-reduced mass. Assuming that this binding energy is equal to that δ T cc (3875) + of the T cc (3875) + state relative to the D D 0 ∗ + mass threshold and taking δ T cc (3875) + = 360 ± 40 +4 -0 keV as input in the case when an unitarized Breit-Wigner shape is used to fit the T cc (3875) + [8], we find that the anticharmed mesons in the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -have a sufficiently large r.m.s. separation: r T = 5 3 . ± 0 3 fm. . The typical scale for the relative momentum between the ¯ D 0 and D ∗-mesons [66, 68], √ 2 µ δ 0 T ¯¯ cc (3875) -≃ 25-30 MeV/c, is much smaller than their average laboratory momenta ∼ 8.1 and 8.8 GeV/c, respectively (see above). With these, we expect that the application of the considered below quasi-free approximation to evaluate the T ¯¯ cc (3875) --nucleon absorption cross section in molecular scenario is sufficiently well justified.

9) It should be pointed out that in a molecular picture (13) the T cc (3875) + couples equally to the D D + ∗ 0 and D D 0 ∗ + channels. However, in some works (see, for example, Refs. [53, 64, 65]) it was predicted that the T cc (3875) + flavor wave function contains about 70% of the D D 0 ∗ + and 30% of the D D + ∗ 0 molecular components. Since in our model the specific flavor content of the T cc (3875) + (and, respectively, of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -) has no influence on

above) the T ¯¯ cc (3875) --nucleon absorption cross section σ mol T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N can be naturally estimated in the quasi-free approximation [22, 76, 77]. In this approximation, the binding energy of the anticharmed mesons is ignored. They are taken to be on-shell and they are considered to fly together with an average laboratory momentum of the order of 8 GeV/c each. In this approximation the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -is absorbed when a nuclear nucleon (proton or neutron) interacts (elastically or inelastically) with the ¯ D 0 or with the D ∗-(or with the D -or with the ¯ D ∗ 0 ). In each of these interactions the other anticharmed meson is a spectator. Then, assuming that the total cross sections of the free D ∗-N and ¯ D N ∗ 0 interactions are the same as those for the D N -and ¯ D N 0 ones [78, 79], we can evaluate the cross section for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -absorption, σ mol T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N , as [25, 77]:

$$\sigma _ { T _ { \xi \xi } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ^ { \text{mol} } & = \sigma _ { T _ { \xi \xi } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } p } ^ { \text{mol} } = \sigma _ { T _ { \xi \xi } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } n } ^ { \text{mol} },$$

where the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -p and T ¯¯ cc (3875) -n absorption cross sections, σ mol T ¯¯ cc (3875) -p and σ mol T ¯¯ cc (3875) -n , are given by

$$\sigma _ { T _ { \delta z } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } p ( n ) } ^ { \text{mol} } \approx \sigma _ { \tilde { D } ^ { 0 } p ( n ) } ^ { \text{el} } + \sigma _ { \tilde { D } ^ { 0 } p ( n ) } ^ { \text{in} } + \sigma _ { D ^ { - } p ( n ) } ^ { \text{el} } + \sigma _ { D ^ { - } p ( n ) } ^ { \text{in} } + \sigma _ { D ^ { - } p \rightarrow \tilde { D } ^ { 0 } n } ( \sigma _ { \tilde { D } ^ { 0 } n \rightarrow D ^ { - } p } ).$$

Here, σ el(in) ¯ D p n 0 ( ) and σ el(in) D p n -( ) are the elastic (inelastic) cross sections of the free ¯ D p D n 0 ( ¯ 0 ) and D p D n -( -) interactions, respectively. And, σ D p -→ ¯ D n 0 and σ ¯ D n 0 → -D p -are the total cross sections of the free charge-exchange reactions D p -→ ¯ D n 0 and ¯ D n 0 → D p , correspondingly. In the calculations we employ for them the following constants, which are relevant to the momentum regime above of 1 GeV/c of our interest: σ el ¯ D p n 0 ( ) = σ el D p n -( ) = 10 mb, σ in ¯ D p n 0 ( ) = σ in D p n -( ) = 0, σ D p -→ ¯ D n 0 = σ ¯ D n 0 → D p -= 12 mb [78, 79]. Adopting these values, we get that σ mol T ¯¯ cc (3875) -p = σ mol T ¯¯ cc (3875) -n = 32 mb and, in line with Eq. (14), σ mol T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N = 32 mb.

In the second scenario, in which the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson is treated as a compact ¯¯ ccud tetraquark state, its breakup cross section σ 4q T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N can be approximated by the following relation [77]:

$$\sigma _ { T _ { \tilde { \varepsilon } \varepsilon } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ^ { 4 q } \approx \frac { 1 } { 3 } \sigma _ { T _ { \tilde { \varepsilon } \varepsilon } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ^ { \text{mol} }.$$

For σ mol T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N = 32 mb we obtain that σ 4q T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N = 10 7 mb. . It is interesting to note that this value for the quantity σ 4q T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N is similar to that of 13.3 mb, adopted in Ref. [25] for the highmomentum X (3872)-nucleon absorption cross section σ 4q X (3872) N considering the X (3872) meson as a compact tetraquark with radius r 4 q = 0 65 fm and approximating the latter cross section by a . geometrical cross section σ geo 4 q = πr 2 4 q .

In the hybrid scenario, it is assumed that the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -wave function is a linear superposition of the compact ¯¯ ccud (or 4 q ) and the molecular ¯ ¯ DD ∗ components [18, 73]:

$$| T _ { \vec { c } \vec { c } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } > _ { \text{hyb} } = \alpha | \bar { c } \bar { c } u d > + \frac { \beta } { \sqrt { 2 } } \left ( | D ^ { - } \bar { D } ^ { * 0 } > - | \bar { D } ^ { 0 } D ^ { * - } > \right ).$$

Here, α 2 and β 2 represent the probabilities to find a compact and non-compact hadronic configurations, respectively, for the normalization

$$\alpha ^ { 2 } + \beta ^ { 2 } = 1.$$

The limiting case of α 2 = 0, β 2 = 1 corresponds to the pure molecular interpretation of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -state, while the case of α 2 = 1, β 2 = 0 refers to its pure compact four-quark treatment. Following Refs. [18, 43, 44, 73], we assume that the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -wave function (17) contains 80% of

the determination of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) --nucleon absorption cross section in a molecular scenario, we will treat the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -below in this scenario as a D D -¯ ∗ 0 -¯ D D 0 ∗-molecule.

the non-molecular 4 q component and 20% of the molecular ¯ ¯ DD ∗ component (( α , β 2 2 ) = (0 8 . , 0 2)), . 50% of the compact component and 50% of the non-compact component (( α , β 2 2 ) = (0 5 0 5)) . , . as well as 20% of the non-molecular component and 80% of the molecular component (( α , β 2 2 ) = (0 2 . , 0 8)). . These five options for the non-molecular and molecular probabilities of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -cover the bulk of theoretical and experimental information presently available in this field and they will allow us to see the sensitivity of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson photoproduction cross sections from the direct processes (1), (2) on nuclei to its internal structure. In the hybrid picture (17) of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -, we can represent the T ¯¯ cc (3875) --nucleon absorption cross section σ hyb T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N in the following incoherent probability-weighted sum [25]:

$$\sigma _ { T _ { \tilde { e } \tilde { e } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ^ { \text{hyb} } = \alpha ^ { 2 } \sigma _ { T _ { \tilde { e } \tilde { e } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ^ { 4 q } + \beta ^ { 2 } \sigma _ { T _ { \tilde { e } \tilde { e } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ^ { \text{mol} }.$$

In view of the above, we set σ 4q T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N = 10 7 mb and . σ mol T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N = 32 mb. With these values, the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -absorption cross section (19) is σ hyb T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N = 15 0, 21.35 as well as 27.7 mb for the non-. molecular and molecular probabilities of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -80% and 20%, 50% and 50% as well as 20% and 80%, respectively. We summarize below the results obtained above for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) --nucleon absorption cross section σ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N in the considered schemes for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -tetraquark inner configuration:

$$\text{$powu\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\sin\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\tan\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\os\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\ cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\ sin\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\cos\lesscorner.$$

Therefore, the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -as a ¯ ¯ DD ∗ molecule has the largest absorption cross section and, hence, it is expected to be more easily absorbed than its other configurations in a nuclear medium. We will use these values for the quantity σ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N in our calculations. For better readability of the text, in discussing the results in Section 3 we will use scenario I, II, III, IV, V for the five lines in Eq. (20) from top to down.

Neglecting the nuclear effects considered: the target nucleon binding and Fermi motion, from Eq. (3) we obtain the following simple expression for the total cross section σ (dir) γA → T ¯¯ cc (3875) -X ( E γ ):

$$\sigma _ { \gamma A \to T _ { \mathcal { e } e } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } X } ^ { ( \text{dir} ) } ( E _ { \gamma } ) = I _ { V } [ A, \sigma _ { T _ { \mathcal { e } e } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ] \sigma _ { \gamma p \to D ^ { + } T _ { \mathcal { e } e } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } } ( \sqrt { s ( E _ { \gamma } ) } ),$$

where the elementary cross section σ γp → D T + ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c ( √ s E ( γ )) is given above by Eq. (10). This expression is valid only at photon energies well above threshold 10) . As a measure for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -absorption cross section σ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N in nuclei and, hence, for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -intrinsic configuration we will use the so-called T ¯¯ cc (3875) -transparency ratio defined as [80, 81]:

$$S _ { A } = \frac { \sigma _ { \gamma A \to T _ { \delta \varepsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } X ( E _ { \gamma } ) } { A \ \sigma _ { \gamma p \to D ^ { + } T _ { \delta \varepsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } ( \sqrt { s ( E _ { \gamma } ) } ) },$$

10) In our case, the difference between the expressions (3) and (21) is small at incident photon energies around 37 GeV and more, and it becomes substantial at photon energies close to the threshold energy of 33.9 GeV as our calculations have shown (compare magenta short-dashed and cyan short-dashed-dotted curves in figures 1-4 given below).

i.e. the ratio of the inclusive nuclear T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction cross section divided by A times the same quantity on a free proton. It should be noted that this relative observable is more favorable compared to those based on the absolute cross sections for the aim of obtaining the information on the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -nuclear absorption [25] (and, hence, on the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -internal configuration). It is expected that the direct processes (1), (2) will be dominant in the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production in γA interactions close to threshold 11) . Then, in the case of ignoring the considered nuclear effects and according to Eq. (21), we have:

$$S _ { A } = \frac { \sigma _ { \gamma A \to T _ { \tilde { c c } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } X } ^ { ( \text{dir} ) } ( E _ { \gamma } ) } { A \ \sigma _ { \gamma p \to D ^ { + } T _ { \tilde { c c } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } } ( \sqrt { s ( E _ { \gamma } ) } ) } = \frac { I _ { V } [ A, \sigma _ { T _ { \tilde { c c } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ] } { A }.$$

With accounting for these effects, the quantity S A takes on, according to Eqs. (3) and (4), a more complex form:

$$S _ { A } = \frac { \sigma _ { \gamma A \to T _ { e c } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } X } ^ { ( \text{dir} ) } ( E _ { \gamma } ) } { A \ \sigma _ { \gamma p \to D ^ { + } T _ { e c } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } A _ { c } ^ { + } } ( \sqrt { s ( E _ { \gamma } ) } ) } = \frac { I _ { V } [ A, \sigma _ { T _ { e c } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ] } { A } \frac { \left \langle \sigma _ { \gamma p \to D ^ { + } T _ { e c } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } } ( E _ { \gamma } ) \right \rangle _ { A } } { \sigma _ { \gamma p \to D ^ { + } T _ { e c } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } } ( \sqrt { s ( E _ { \gamma } ) } ) },$$

which will be used in our subsequent calculations. Usually, the transparency ratio of the meson is normalized to a light nucleus like 12 C [80, 82]. With this and Eq. (24), for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -we have:

$$T _ { A } = \frac { S _ { A } } { S _ { C } } = \frac { 1 2 \ \sigma _ { \gamma A \to T _ { \widehat { \epsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } X } ^ { ( \text{dir} ) } } { A \ \sigma _ { \gamma C \to T _ { \widehat { \epsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } X } ^ { ( \text{dir} ) } } = \frac { 1 2 \ I _ { V } [ A, \sigma _ { T _ { \widehat { \epsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ] } { A \ I _ { V } [ C, \sigma _ { T _ { \widehat { \epsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ] } \frac { \left \langle \sigma _ { \gamma \pm D ^ { + } T _ { \widehat { \epsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } A _ { c } ^ { + } } ( E _ { \gamma } ) \right \rangle _ { A } } { \left \langle \sigma _ { \gamma \pm D ^ { + } T _ { \widehat { \epsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } A _ { c } ^ { + } } ( E _ { \gamma } ) \right \rangle _ { C } }.$$

In the case when direct T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production processes (1), (2) proceed on a free target nucleons being at rest the expression (25) for the quantity T A is reduced to the following simpler form:

$$T _ { A } \approx \frac { 1 2 \ I _ { V } [ A, \sigma _ { T _ { \partial \epsilon } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - N } } ] } { A \ I _ { V } [ C, \sigma _ { T _ { \partial \epsilon } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - N } } ] }.$$

The formulas (21)-(26) will be used in calculations of the integral observables considered at photon energies of our interest.

Before going further, we consider now the momentum-dependent inclusive differential cross section for production of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons with momentum p T ¯¯ cc (3875) -and total energy E T ¯¯ cc (3875) -(or with momentum p T -¯¯ cc and total energy E T -¯¯ cc for brevity) on nuclei in the direct processes (1) and (2) in γA reactions. According to Eqs. (3), (6) and Ref. [83], we represent this cross section as follows:

$$\frac { d \sigma _ { \gamma A \rightarrow T _ { \varepsilon } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - X } } ( E _ { \gamma }, \mathbf p _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } ) } { d \mathbf p _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } } = I _ { V } [ A, \sigma _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - N } } ] \left \langle \frac { d \sigma _ { \gamma p \rightarrow D ^ { + } T _ { \varepsilon } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - A _ { 2 } ^ { + } } } ( \mathbf p _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } ) } { d \mathbf p _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } } \right \rangle _ { A }, \quad ( 2 7 )$$

where the off-shell elementary differential cross section dσ γp → D T + ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c ( p γ , p T -¯¯ cc ) /d p T -¯¯ cc for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production in process (1) is given by (cf. Ref. [83])

$$& \underline { \mu \infty \colon \colon \colon \colon } \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \infty \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inneutral \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \innegative \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \innormal \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inyes \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \innull \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inn \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inni \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inin \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inskip \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \innot \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inNO \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inio \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inp \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inpo \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inpn \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inna \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inip \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno \, \inno$$

11) At least, at incident photon energies ≤ 35 GeV, where the elementary processes γN → DT ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c π with one pion in the final states are expected to be suppressed in T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production in γA reactions compared to those of (1), (2) due to their larger production threshold energy ( ≈ 35.1 GeV) in free γN collisions. Moreover, since the main inelastic channel in γN collisions at these photon energies is the multiplicity production of pions with rather low energies the secondary pion-induced T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production processes are energetically suppressed at them as well. We expect that the full inclusive nuclear T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction cross section σ γA → T ¯¯ cc (3875) -X ( E γ ), entering into Eq. (22), is entirely exhausted by that of Eq. (3) from the direct T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production processes (1), (2) not only at photon energies E γ ≤ 35 GeV, but also at higher energies considered in the present study.

1

Figure 1: (Color online.) Excitation function for production of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons off 12 C from primary γp n ( ) → D + ( D T 0 ) ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c reactions proceeding on an off-shell target nucleons and on a free ones being at rest. The curves are calculations in the scenarios, in which the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -is treated as a pure tetraquark state: a compact four quark (4 q ) state, as a purely molecular state: a weakly coupled ¯ D D 0 ∗-( D D -¯ ∗ 0 ) molecule, or as a hybrid state: a mixture of the non-molecular (compact) and molecular (non-compact) components, in which there are, respectively, 80% of the 4 q component and 20% molecular component, 50% of the 4 q component and 50% molecular component as well as 20% and 80% of the non-molecular and molecular states. The arrow indicates the threshold energy for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction on a free nucleon.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00360v3-figure-6247bb1a-76c8-4543-b0ba-199f099b521d.jpg)

assuming for simplicity that the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -angular distribution in reaction (1) is isotropic in the γp c.m.s. at photon beam energies of interest. Here,

$$I _ { 3 } [ s ^ { * }, a, b, c ] = \left ( \frac { \pi } { 2 } \right ) ^ { 2 } \underset { ( b + c ) ^ { 2 } } { \overset { ( \sqrt { s ^ { * } } - a ) ^ { 2 } } { \underset { ( b + c ) ^ { 2 } } } } \frac { \lambda [ x, b ^ { 2 }, c ^ { 2 } ] } { x } \frac { \lambda [ s ^ { * }, x, a ^ { 2 } ] } { s ^ { * } } d x,$$

$$\lambda ( x, y, z ) = \sqrt { \left [ x - ( \sqrt { y } + \sqrt { z } ) ^ { 2 } \right ] \left [ x - ( \sqrt { y } - \sqrt { z } ) ^ { 2 } \right ] },$$

$$s _ { D ^ { + } \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } } ^ { * } = s ^ { * } + m _ { T _ { \varepsilon \varepsilon } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } } ^ { 2 } - 2 ( E _ { \gamma } + E _ { t } ) E _ { T _ { \varepsilon \varepsilon } ^ { - } } + 2 ( \mathbf p _ { \gamma } + \mathbf p _ { t } ) \mathbf p _ { T _ { \varepsilon \varepsilon } ^ { - } }$$

and the quantity s ∗ is defined above by Eq. (7). At the initial photon energies of interest the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons are produced at very small laboratory polar angles 12) . Therefore, we will calculate their momentum distribution from target nuclei considered for the laboratory solid angle

12) Thus, for example, the maximum angle of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson production off a free proton at rest in reaction (1) is about 2.5 ◦ at photon energy of 35 GeV.

Figure 2: (Color online.) The same as in Fig. 1, but for the 184 Wtarget nucleus.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00360v3-figure-17bd3012-9c43-4b0f-9b65-a346c40a100c.jpg)

∆ Ω T -¯¯ cc = 0 ◦ ≤ θ T -¯¯ cc ≤ 10 ◦ and 0 ≤ φ T -¯¯ cc ≤ 2 π . Then, in line with Eq. (27), we can get the following expression for this distribution:

$$\frac { d \sigma _ { \gamma A \to T _ { \varepsilon } ( 3 8 7 ) ^ { - } X } ( E _ { \gamma }, p _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } ) } { d p _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } } = \underset { \Delta \Omega _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } } { \int } d \Omega _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } } \frac { d \sigma _ { \gamma A \to T _ { \varepsilon } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } X } ^ { ( \text{dir} ) } ( E _ { \gamma }, \mathbf p _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } ) } { d \mathbf p _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } } p _ { T _ { \varepsilon } ^ { - } } ^ { 2 } }$$

$$= 2 \pi I _ { V } [ A, \sigma _ { T _ { \tilde { \varepsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } N } ] \underset { \cos 1 0 ^ { \circ } } { \int } \, d \cos \theta _ { T _ { \tilde { \varepsilon } } ^ { - } } \left \langle \frac { d \sigma _ { \gamma p \to D ^ { + } T _ { \tilde { \varepsilon } } ( 3 8 7 5 ) ^ { - } \, \Lambda _ { c } ^ { + } } ( p _ { \gamma }, p _ { T _ { \tilde { \varepsilon } } ^ { - } }, \theta _ { T _ { \tilde { \varepsilon } } ^ { - } } ) } { d p _ { T _ { \tilde { \varepsilon } } ^ { - } } d \Omega _ { T _ { \tilde { \varepsilon } } ^ { - } } } \right \rangle _ { A }.$$

## 3. Results and discussion

We discuss now the results of our calculations in the framework of the approach outlined above. First of all, we consider the excitation functions for production of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons off 12 C and 184 W nuclei. They were calculated in line with Eq. (3) for five adopted options for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -absorption cross section σ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N in nuclear medium (cf. Eq. (20)) as well as in line with formula (21) for the free target nucleon at rest with the value of σ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N = 32 mb corresponding to the molecular picture for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -, and are given in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. One can see that the difference between calculations with and without accounting for the target nucleon Fermi motion (between magenta short-dashed and cyan short-dashed-dotted curves) is sufficiently small at well above threshold photon energies ∼ 37-38 GeV, while at lower incident energies its impact on the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -yield is substantial. It can be seen yet that the

2.25

Figure 3: (Color online.) Ratio between the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production cross sections on 12 C, shown in Fig. 1, and the cross section, calculated in the molecular scenario of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -for an off-shell target nucleons, as a function of photon energy. The arrow indicates the threshold energy for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction on a free target nucleon.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00360v3-figure-d76f8632-57e9-4dfc-a9e4-e88e2a0120ae.jpg)

T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson total cross sections show a definite sensitivity to the absorption cross section σ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N and, hence, to the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -internal structure, for both target nuclei and for all photon energies considered. But their absolute values are quite small even at above threshold photon energies of ∼ 35-38 GeV. At these energies, they are ∼ 0.1-0.5 and 1-5 pb for carbon and tungsten target nuclei, correspondingly, which is accessible at the proposed electron-ion colliders [26, 27] (see below). For the heavy target nucleus 184 W, there are experimentally distinguishable differences between the considered scenarios for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) --nucleon absorption cross section or for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -intrinsic configuration, namely: between the scenarios V and IV, IV and III, III and II, II and I. They are ∼ 12, 21, 25, 20% for all considered photon energies. For the light target nucleus 12 C, the sensitivity of the cross sections to these quantities becomes somewhat lower and, respectively, the same differences as above become somewhat smaller. They are ∼ 6, 11, 11, 8%. Measurement of such small effects is a difficult experimental challenge. On the other hand, the differences between calculations corresponding to the molecular configuration and hybrid configuration with the non-molecular and molecular probabilities of 50% and 50%, hybrid configuration with the non-molecular and molecular probabilities of 50% and 50% and pure 4 q compact configuration for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -are yet not so small. They are ∼ 18, 20%. This means that, at least, these configurations could be tested in the future T ¯¯ cc (3875) -measurements on carbon and light target nuclei like carbon as well. To motivate such measurements at the future colliders EicC and EIC, it is desirable to estimate the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production rates (the event numbers) in the γ 12 Cand γ 184 Wreactions. For this purpose, we translate the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction total cross

2.25

Figure 4: (Color online.) Ratio between the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production cross sections on 184 W, shown in Fig. 2, and the cross section, calculated in the molecular scenario of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -for an off-shell target nucleons, as a function of photon energy. The arrow indicates the threshold energy for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction on a free target nucleon.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00360v3-figure-1a4a2b21-9891-4ab7-b85e-90bcb1999a4e.jpg)

sections, reported above, into the expected event numbers for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -from the reactions γ 12 C( 184 W) → T ¯¯ cc (3875) -X T , ¯¯ cc (3875) -→ ¯ D D π 0 ¯ 0 -, ¯ D 0 → K π + -, ¯ D 0 → K π + -. To estimate the total numbers of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -events in a one-year run at EicC, one needs to multiply the above T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction total cross sections of 0.1-0.5 and 1-5 pb on the carbon and tungsten target nuclei, respectively, by the integrated luminosity of 60 fb -1 [27, 84] as well as by the detection efficiency and by the appropriate branching ratios Br T [ ¯¯ cc (3875) -→ ¯ D D π 0 ¯ 0 -] ≈ 60% and Br D [ ¯ 0 → K π + -] ≈ 4% 13) . With a realistic 50% detection efficiency [27], we estimate about of 3-15 and 30-150 events per year for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -signal in the cases of the 12 C and 184 Wtarget nuclei, respectively. The event numbers for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -→ ¯ D 0 ( → K π + -) ¯ D 0 ( → K π + -) π -at EIC are about of 15-75 and 150-750 with an integrated luminosity of 300 fb -1 [26, 84]. We see that a sufficiently large number of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -events could be observed (especially at EIC collider) at well above threshold photon energies of 35-38 GeV. Thus, the electron-ion colliders EicC and EIC provide a good platform to study the nature of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -(and, respectively, of the T cc (3875) + ) in near-threshold photonuclear reactions.

To gain further insight, we show in Figs. 3 and 4 the energy dependences of the ratios of the cross sections, presented in Figs. 1 and 2, to the cross section, calculated in the molecular picture for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -for an off-shell target nucleons, on the same linear scale for 12 C and 184 Wtarget nuclei, respectively. It is clearly seen that for the heavy 184 W target nucleus the sensitivity of the

13) We suppose here that Br T [ ¯¯ cc (3875) -→ ¯ D D π 0 ¯ 0 -] = Br T [ cc (3875) + → D D π 0 0 + ] ≈ 60% [18, 55, 58, 85] and Br D [ ¯ 0 → K π + -] = Br D [ 0 → K π -+ ] ≈ 4% [86].

S

Figure 5: (Color online.) Transparency ratio S A for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons from primary γp n ( ) → D + ( D T 0 ) ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c reactions proceeding on an off-shell target nucleons at initial photon energy of 35 GeV in the laboratory system as a function of the nuclear mass number A in the considered theoretical pictures describing the underlying intrinsic structure of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -tetraquark state. The lines are to guide the eyes.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00360v3-figure-386c69e1-d066-41e2-b9b7-424e2ec703a0.jpg)

T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson yield to variations in its intrinsic structure is significantly stronger than that in the case of light 12 C target nucleus and it would definitely be possible for 184 Wnucleus to distinguish between the results corresponding to all considered choices for this structure at all initial photon energies. At the same time, for light 12 C target nucleus we see a big enough distinctions between the curves corresponding to the pure molecular configuration, hybrid configuration with the compact and non-compact probabilities of 50% and 50% and pure compact tetraquark configuration for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -. On the basis of the foregoing, we can conclude that the structure of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons could be studied at the future electron-ion colliders via the energy dependence of their absolute (and relative) total production cross sections in inclusive near-threshold photonuclear reactions. Figures 3 and 4 also show clearly that the difference between the absolute T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction cross sections, calculated in the pure molecular picture for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -with allowance for the impact of the binding of intranuclear nucleons and their Fermi motion on the direct processes (1), (2) and without it (cf. Eqs. (3) and (21)) becomes indeed small only for above-threshold photon energies ∼ 37-38 GeV.

Additional information about the sensitivity of the cross sections to the internal structure of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson is contained in Figs. 5 and 6, where the A-dependences of the transparency ratios S A and T A from the direct reaction channels (1), (2) in γA ( A = C, 12 27 Al, 40 Ca, 63 Cu, 93 Nb, 112 Sn, 184 W, 208 Pb, and 238 U) collisions, calculated for the photon beam energy of 35 GeV in line with Eqs. (24) and (25), respectively, and for the values of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) --nucleon absorption cross

1.1

Figure 6: (Color online.) Transparency ratio T A for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons from primary γp n ( ) → D + ( D T 0 ) ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c reactions proceeding on an off-shell target nucleons at initial photon energy of 35 GeV in the laboratory system as a function of the nuclear mass number A in the considered theoretical pictures describing the underlying intrinsic structure of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -tetraquark state. The lines are to guide the eyes.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00360v3-figure-6f220fe4-8134-4c7a-b53a-008c6ed7bbf4.jpg)

section σ T ¯¯ cc (3875) -N given above by Eq. (20) 14) . It is seen that the transparency ratio S A depends more strongly on this cross section or on the adopted interpretation of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -than that for the quantity T A . Thus, there are a sizeable changes ∼ 8, 13, 17, 11% in the ratio S A between calculations corresponding to the cases when the loss of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons in nuclear matter is determined by their absorption cross sections of 32 and 27.7 mb, 27.7 and 21.35 mb, 21.35 and 15 mb, 15 and 10.7 mb, respectively, (cf. Eq. (20)) already for comparably 'light' nuclei ( 27 Al, 40 Ca). For the medium-mass ( 93 Nb, 112 Sn) and heavy ( 184 W, 238 U) target nuclei these changes are larger and already are measurable. They are about 10, 18, 22, 18% and 13, 21, 27, 21%, respectively. We see that the highest sensitivity of the quantity S A to the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -structure is observed, as is expected, for heavy target nuclei. For the quantity T A the analogous changes are smaller and are almost insignificant. They are about 2, 3, 5, 3%, 4, 7, 10, 10% and 6, 10, 15, 12%, correspondingly, in the cases of 'light', medium-mass and heavy target nuclei indicated above. Therefore, we conclude that the observation, at least, of the A dependence of the transparency ratio S A , especially for large mass numbers A , in the future high-precision photoproduction experiments at electron-ion colliders opens the possibility to discriminate between all considered inner configurations of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -tetraquark state. At the same time, the precise T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction data on the A dependence of the transparency ratio T A in the range of large A, obtained in such experiments,

14) It should be noted that the feasibility of the experimental determination of the width of a D meson in a nuclear medium by using the method of the nuclear transparency T A has been studied in recent publication [87].

0.80

Figure 7: (Color online.) Transparency ratio T A for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons from primary γp n ( ) → D + ( D T 0 ) ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c reactions proceeding on an off-shell and free target nucleons as a function of the incident photon energy for combination 184 W/ 12 C in the considered scenarios for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -internal structure. The arrow indicates the threshold energy for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -photoproduction on a free target nucleon at rest.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00360v3-figure-6fa3a4b8-4dc7-47fb-8060-2aca208cce9c.jpg)

could also additionally help to distinguish, at least, between a pure compact tetraquark state and compact tetraquark-molecule mixture with the compact and molecular probabilities ∼ 50% and 50%, compact tetraquark-molecule mixture with the compact and molecular probabilities ∼ 50% and 50% and a pure molecular configuration of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -exotic state.

In addition to the A dependence of the transparency ratio T A at photon energy of 35 GeV presented in Fig. 6, we have investigated the initial photon energy dependence of this ratio for the 184 W/ 12 C combination. This dependence is shown in Fig. 7. It was calculated in line with Eq. (25) for five adopted options for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson intrinsic structure and for the off-shell target nucleons as well as in line with simple formula (26) for its pure molecular interpretation and for the free target nucleons at rest. One can see that there is a certain sensitivity of the transparency ratio T A to various interpretations of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -considered at all studied photon energies. At these energies, the sensitivity is similar to that available in Fig. 6 for heavy nuclei. Inspection of this figure tells us yet that the simple formula (26) describes well the quantity T A at above threshold photon energies (at energies E &gt; γ 33.9 GeV), where (and at subthreshold energies E &lt; γ 33.9 GeV) it exhibits practically a flat behavior. This behavior of the transparency ratio T A can also be used for discriminating between possible scenarios for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -internal structure. Thus, it is optimistic that this relative (also integral) observable can, additionally, be used to help determine this structure.

We discuss now the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -differential observables. Figs. 8 and 9 show the absolute

Figure 8: (Color online.) The direct momentum distribution of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons, produced in the reaction γ 12 C → T ¯¯ cc (3875) -X in the laboratory polar angular range of 0 -10 ◦ ◦ and calculated in line with Eq. (32) at initial photon energy of 35 GeV in the laboratory system. The curves are calculations in the scenarios, in which the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -is treated as a purely tetraquark state: a compact four quark (4 q ) state, as a purely molecular state: a weakly coupled ¯ D D 0 ∗-( D D -¯ ∗ 0 ) molecule, or as a hybrid state: a mixture of the compact tetraquark and hadronic molecular states, in which there are, respectively, 80% of the 4 q component and 20% molecular component, 50% of the compact component and 50% molecular component as well as 20% and 80% of the non-molecular and molecular states.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00360v3-figure-86114609-2279-41fb-9513-bcaa049d92d0.jpg)

T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson momentum distributions from the direct processes (1), (2), respectively, in γ 12 C and γ 184 W reactions, determined in line with Eq. (32) for laboratory polar angles of 0 -10 , for ◦ ◦ photon beam energy of 35 GeV and for five adopted values of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) --nucleon absorption cross section in the considered interpretations of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -. Our results indicate that the differential cross sections for producing the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons on 12 C nucleus are roughly one order of magnitude smaller than those on 184 W nucleus and, therefore, they have a lesser chance to be observed (at EIC). The latter ones have, according to estimates given above, a rather measurable (at EIC) strength ∼ 0.1-0.3 pb/(GeV/c) in the central momentum region of 13-19 GeV/c and also show a rather sizeable variations 15) , when going from the T ¯¯ cc (3875) --nucleon absorption cross section value of 10.7 to 32.0 mb. Such behavior of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production differential cross sections on tungsten target nucleus can also be used to decipher the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -inner structure from comparison our model calculations with future experimental data.

Finally, in Fig. 10 we show the 'differential' transparency ratio T A for target combination W/C for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons produced in the direct reaction channels (1), (2) at laboratory angles

15) Which are similar to those shown in Fig. 2.

1

Figure 9: (Color online.) The same as in Fig. 8, but for the 184 Wtarget nucleus.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00360v3-figure-7a6311db-5837-48e5-b1c6-945d7022176c.jpg)

of 0 -10 ◦ ◦ by 35 GeV photons as a function of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -laboratory momentum. This ratio is calculated in line with Eq. (25) by using in it the differential cross sections presented in Figs. 8 and 9 instead of the total cross sections. One can see that the sensitivity of the transparency ratio T A to the adopted configurations of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -is similar to that available in Fig. 7 for the 'integral' quantity T A considered as a function of photon energy. The transparency ratio T A exhibits dips at momenta ∼ 9-10 GeV/c. This can be explained by the fact that the differential cross sections for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production on 184 W nucleus 'are bent down' at these momenta (see Fig. 9) due to the off-shell kinematics of the direct photon-nucleon collision and the role played by the nucleusrelated effects such as the target nucleon binding and Fermi motion, encoded in the nuclear spectral function P A ( p t , E ). The spectral functions for 12 C and 184 W, employed in the calculations, are different [48]. This behavior of the 'differential' transparency ratio T A can additionally be adopted for discriminating between possible schemes for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -internal structure.

In conclusion, the absolute total and differential cross sections for production of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons in near-threshold photonuclear reactions as well as their relative (transparency ratios) yields might allow one to shed light on the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -(and, respectively, on the T cc (3875) + ) intrinsic configuration.

## 4. Conclusions

Motivated by the experimental discovery of a doubly charmed tetraquark state T cc (3875) + , in this work we have studied theoretically the inclusive photoproduction of T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons (which are the antiparticles of the T cc (3875) + ) from nuclei in the near-threshold energy region within the nuclear spectral function approach by considering incoherent direct ( γp n ( ) → D + ( D T 0 ) ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ ) + c

Figure 10: (Color online.) Transparency ratio T A for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -mesons from primary γp n ( ) → D + ( D T 0 ) ¯¯ cc (3875) -Λ + c reactions proceeding on an off-shell target nucleons as a function of the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -laboratory momentum for incident photon energy of 35 GeV for combination 184 W/ 12 C in the considered scenarios for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -inner structure.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00360v3-figure-145d78a0-199d-4ece-b8fe-ab1fcc16db94.jpg)

photon-nucleon T ¯¯ cc (3875) -creation processes as well as five possible different scenarios for their internal structure with the main goal of clarifying the possibility to decipher this structure (and, hence, that of T cc (3875) + ) in photoproduction via integral and differential observables. We have calculated the absolute and relative excitation functions for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production off 12 C and 184 W target nuclei at near-threshold photon beam energies of 30-38 GeV, the absolute differential cross sections for their production off these target nuclei at laboratory polar angles of 0 -10 ◦ ◦ as well as the A and momentum dependences of the relative (transparency ratios) cross sections for T ¯¯ cc (3875) -production at photon energy of 35 GeV within the adopted scenarios for the T ¯¯ cc (3875) -meson intrinsic structure. We show that the absolute and relative observables considered reveal a certain sensitivity to these scenarios. Hence, they may be an important tool to clarify it and that of the T cc (3875) + . The measurements of these observables could be performed in the future experiments at the proposed high-luminosity electron-ion colliders EIC and EicC in the US and China.

## References

- [1] X. Liu, Chin. Sci. Bull. 59 , 3815 (2014); arXiv:1312.7408 [hep-ph].
- [2] A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016 ,

- 062C01 (2016);
- arXiv:1603.09229 [hep-ph].
- [3] A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97 , 123 (2017); arXiv:1706.00610 [hep-ph].
- [4] F.-K. Guo, X.-H. Liu, and S. Sakai, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112 , 103757 (2020); arXiv:1912.07030 [hep-ph].
- [5] M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L. S. Geng, arXiv:2404.06399 [hep-ph].
- [6] S.-K. Choi et al. [The Belle Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 , 262001 (2003); arXiv:hep-ex/0309032.
- [7] R. Aaij et al. [the LHCb Collaboration], Nature Phys. 18 , 751 (2022); arXiv:2109.01038 [hep-ex].
- [8] R. Aaij et al. [the LHCb Collaboration], Nature Commun. 13 , 3351 (2022); arXiv:2109.01056 [hep-ex].
- [9] R. Aaij et al. [the LHCb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 , 112001 (2017); arXiv:1707.01621 [hep-ex].
- [10] R. Aaij et al. [the LHCb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 , 162002 (2018); arXiv:1807.01919 [hep-ex].
- [11] Q. Xin and Z.-G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. A 58 , 110 (2022); arXiv:2108.12597 [hep-ph].
- [12] P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Lett. B 841 , 137918 (2023); Phys. Lett. B 847 , 138308 (2023) (erratum); arXiv:2211.06118 [hep-ph].
- [13] C. Chen, C. Meng, Z. Xiao, and H.-Q. Zheng, Eur. Phys. J. A 58 , 110 (2022); arXiv:2307.12069 [hep-ph].
- [14] M. Sakai and Y. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 109 , 054016 (2024); arXiv:2312.08663 [hep-ph].
- [15] S. Noh and W. Park, Phys. Rev. D 108 , 014004 (2023); arXiv:2303.03285 [hep-ph].
- [16] X. Y. Liu, W. X. Zhang, and D. Jia, Phys. Rev. D 108 , 054019 (2023); arXiv:2303.03923 [hep-ph].
- [17] D. Wang, K. R. Song, W. L. Wang, and F. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 109 , 074026 (2024); arXiv:2403.15187 [hep-ph].
- [18] M.-J. Yan and M. P. Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 105 , 014007 (2022); arXiv:2108.04785 [hep-ph].
- [19] R. F. Lebed and S. R. Martinez, Phys. Rev. D 110 , 034033 (2024); arXiv:2406.08690 [hep-ph].
- [20] R. Aaij et al. [the LHCb Collaboration], arXiv:2406.17006 [hep-ex].

- [21] N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov, Phys. Rev. D 105 , 096038 (2022); arXiv:2203.17100 [hep-ph]. L. Dai, S. Fleming, R. Hodges, and T. Mehen, Phys. Rev. D 107 , 076001 (2023); arXiv:2301.11950 [hep-ph].
- [22] L. M. Abreu, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, and H. P. L. Vieira, arXiv:2209.03862 [hep-ph].
- [23] X. Guo, J. Liao, and H. Xing, EPJ Web Conf. 296 , 13014 (2024); arXiv:2402.15673 [hep-ph].
- [24] H. Yun, D. Park, S. Noh, A. Park, W. Park, S. Cho, J. Hong, Y. Kim, S. Lim, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C 107 , 014906 (2023); arXiv:2208.06960 [hep-ph].
- [25] E. Ya. Paryev, Nucl. Phys. A 1047 , 122876 (2024); arXiv:2405.01089 [hep-ph].
- [26] R. A. Khalek et al. , Nucl. Phys. A 1026 , 122447 (2022); arXiv:2103.05419 [physics.ins-det].
- [27] D. P. Anderle et al. , Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16 , 64701 (2021); arXiv:2102.09222 [nucl-ex].
- [28] Y. Huang, H. Q. Zhu, L.-S. Geng, and R. Wang Phys. Rev. D 104 , 116008 (2021); arXiv:2108.13028 [hep-ph].
- [29] X. Wang, Y. Xie, Y. Huang, and X. Chen Phys. Rev. D 109 , 016007 (2024); arXiv:2310.00980 [hep-ph].
- [30] C.-H. Lee, T. T. S. Kuo, G. Q. Li, and G. E. Brown, Phys. Lett. B 412 , 235 (1997).
- [31] Z. Rudy et al. , Eur. Phys. J. A 15 , 303 (2002); arXiv:nucl-th/0201069.
- [32] A. Sibirtsev, K. Tsushima, and A. W. Thomas, Eur. Phys. J. A 6 , 351 (1999); arXiv:nucl-th/9904016.
- [33] A. Hayashigaki, Phys. Lett. B 487 , 96 (2000); arXiv:nucl-th/0001051.
- [34] A. Mishra, E. L. Bratkovskaya, J. Schaffner-Bielich, S. Schramm, and H. Stoecker, Phys. Rev. C 69 , 015202 (2004); arXiv:nucl-th/0308082.
- [35] L. Tolos, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and A. Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 70 , 025203 (2004); arXiv:nucl-th/0404064.
- [36] L. Tolos, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and H. Stoecker, Phys. Lett. B 635 , 85 (2006); arXiv:nucl-th/0509054.
- [37] T. Hilger, R. Thomas, and B. Kampfer, Phys. Rev. C 79 , 025202 (2009); arXiv:0809.4996 [nucl-th].
- [38] C. Garcia-Recio, J. Nieves, and L. Tolos, Phys. Lett. B 690 , 369 (2010); arXiv:1004.2634 [nucl-th].
- [39] G. Krein, A. W. Thomas, and K. Tsushima, Phys. Lett. B 697 , 136 (2011); arXiv:1007.2220 [nucl-th].

- [40] K. Azizi, N. Er, and H. Sundu, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 , 3021 (2014); arXiv:1405.3058 [hep-ph].
- [41] Z.-G. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 92 , 065205 (2015); arXiv:1501.05093 [hep-ph].
- [42] K. Suzuki, P. Gubler, and M. Oka, Phys. Rev. C 93 , 045209 (2016); arXiv:1511.04513 [hep-ph].
- [43] V. Montesinos, M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, and L. Tolos, Phys. Rev. C 108 , 035205 (2023); arXiv:2306.17673 [hep-ph].
- [44] V. Montesinos, M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, and L. Tolos, EPJ Web Conf. 291 , 03003 (2024); arXiv:2310.02057 [hep-ph].
- [45] K. Tsushima and F. C. Khanna, Phys. Lett. B 552 , 138 (2003); arXiv:nucl-th/0207036.
- [46] K. Tsushima and F. C. Khanna, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 149 , 160 (2003); arXiv:nucl-th/0212100.
- [47] S. V. Efremov and E. Ya. Paryev, Eur. Phys. J. A 1 , 99 (1998).
- [48] E. Ya. Paryev, Eur. Phys. J. A 7 , 127 (2000).
- [49] E. Ya. Paryev, M. Hartmann, and Yu. T. Kiselev, Chin. Phys. C 41 , 124108 (2017); arXiv:1612.02767 [nucl-th].
- [50] E. Friedman and A. Gal, Phys. Lett. B 837 , 137669 (2023); arXiv:2204.02264 [nucl-th].
- [51] L. Meng, G.-J. Wang, B. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 104 , 051502 (2021); arXiv:2107.14784 [hep-ph].
- [52] A. Feijoo, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 104 , 114015 (2021); arXiv:2108.02730 [hep-ph].
- [53] R. Chen, Q. Huang, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 104 , 114042 (2021); arXiv:2108.01911 [hep-ph].
- [54] Y. Hu, J. Liao, E. Wang, Q. Wang, H. Xing, and H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 104 , L111502 (2021); arXiv:2109.07733 [hep-ph].
- [55] S. Fleming, R. Hodges, and T. Mehen, Phys. Rev. D 104 , 116010 (2021); arXiv:2109.02188 [hep-ph].
- [56] X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (12), 125201 (2021); arXiv:2108.02673 [hep-ph].
- [57] H.-W. Ke, X.-H. Liu, and X.-Q. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 , 144 (2022); arXiv:2112.14142 [hep-ph].
- [58] X.-Z. Ling, M.-Z. Liu, L.-S. Geng, E. Wang, and J.-J. Xie, Phys. Lett. B 826 , 136897 (2022); arXiv:2108.00947 [hep-ph].

- [59] J. Xe and X. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 , 387 (2022); arXiv:2202.07248 [hep-ph].
- [60] K. Chen, R. Chen, L. Meng, B. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 , 581 (2022).
- [61] C. Deng and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 105 , 054015 (2022); arXiv:2112.12472 [hep-ph].
- [62] S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, JHEP 06 , 057 (2022); arXiv:2201.02788 [hep-ph].
- [63] B. Wang and L. Meng, Phys. Rev. D 107 , 094002 (2023); arXiv:2212.08447 [hep-ph].
- [64] G.-J. Wang, Z. Yang, J.-J. Wu, M. Oka, and S.-L. Zhu, arXiv:2306.12406 [hep-ph].
- [65] M. Albaladejo, A. Feijoo, I. Vidana, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. C 104 , 035203 (2021); arXiv:2307.09873 [hep-ph].
- [66] P. Artoisenet and E. Braaten, Phys. Rev. D 81 , 114018 (2010); arXiv:0911.2016 [hep-ph].
- [67] E. Braaten, L.-P. He, K. Ingles, and J. Jiang, Phys. Rev. D 106 , 034033 (2022); arXiv:2202.03900 [hep-ph].
- [68] Z.-H. Zhang and F.-K. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 , 012002 (2021); arXiv:2012.08281 [hep-ph].
- [69] K. Azizi and U. Ozdem, Phys. Rev. D 104 , 114002 (2021); arXiv:2109.02390 [hep-ph].
- [70] S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Nucl. Phys. B 975 , 115650 (2022); arXiv:2108.00188 [hep-ph].
- [71] J. B. Wang, G. Li, C. S. An, C. R. Deng, and J.-J. Xie, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 , 721 (2022); arXiv:2204.13320 [hep-ph].
- [72] H. Yang, J. Jiang, and B. Long, Phys. Rev. D 109 , 114034 (2024); arXiv:2404.01633 [hep-ph].
- [73] F.-Z. Peng, M.-J. Yan, and M. P. Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 108 , 114001 (2023).
- [74] X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 109 , 094010 (2024); arXiv:2402.02151 [hep-ph].
- [75] S. Collins, A. Nefediev, M. Padmanath, and S. Prelovsek, Phys. Rev. D 109 , 094509 (2024); arXiv:2402.14715 [hep-lat].
- [76] L. M. Abreu, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, and H. P. L. Vieira, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 , 296 (2022); arXiv:2110.11145 [hep-ph].
- [77] J. Hong, S. Cho, T. Song, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C 98 , 014913 (2018); arXiv:1804.05336 [nucl-th].
- [78] Ye. S. Golubeva, W. Cassing, and L. A. Kondratyuk, Eur. Phys. J. A 14 , 255 (2002); arXiv:nucl-th/0202084.

- [79] Ye. S. Golubeva, E. L. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing, and L. A. Kondratyuk, Eur. Phys. J. A 17 , 275 (2003); arXiv:nucl-th/0212074.
- [80] M. Kotulla et al. [CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 , 192302 (2008); arXiv:0802.0989 [nucl-ex].
- [81] A. B. Larionov, M. Bleicher, A. Gillitzer, and M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. C 87 , 054608 (2013); arXiv:1303.0236 [nucl-th].
- [82] M. Hartmann et al. , Phys. Rev. C 85 , 035206 (2012); arXiv:1201.3517 [nucl-ex].
- [83] E. Ya. Paryev, Nucl. Phys. A 1017 , 122352 (2022); arXiv:2111.14101 [nucl-th].
- [84] P.-P. Shi, F.-K. Guo, and Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 106 , 114026 (2022); arXiv:2208.02639 [hep-ph].
- [85] Z.-F. Sun, N. Li, and X. Liu, arXiv:2405.00525 [hep-ph].
- [86] R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022 , 083C01 (2022).
- [87] V. Montesinos, N. Ikeno, E. Oset, M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, and L. Tolos, arXiv:2407.19295 [nucl-th].
E. Ya. Paryev
An alternative way to decipher the nature of the doubly charmed tetraquark $T_{cc}(3875)^+$: its antiparticle $T_{{\bar c}{\bar c}}(3875)^-$ photoproduction off nuclei near threshold
We study the inclusive photoproduction of $T_{{\bar c}{\bar c}}(3875)^-$
mesons (which are the antiparticles of the doubly charmed tetraquarks
$T_{cc}(3875)^+$ discovered recently by the LHCb Collaboration) from nuclei in
the near-threshold energy region within the nuclear spectral function approach
by considering incoherent direct (${\gamma}p(n) \to D^+(D^0){T_{{\bar c}{\bar
c}}(3875)^-}\Lambda^+_c$) photon--nucleon $T_{{\bar c}{\bar c}}(3875)^-$
creation processes as well as five possible different scenarios for their
internal structure with the main goal of clarifying the possibility to decipher
this structure (and, hence, that of $T_{cc}(3875)^+$) in photoproduction via
integral and differential observables. We calculate the absolute and relative
excitation functions for $T_{{\bar c}{\bar c}}(3875)^-$ production off $^{12}$C
and $^{184}$W target nuclei at near-threshold photon beam energies of 30--38
GeV, the absolute differential cross sections for their production off these
target nuclei at laboratory polar angles of 0$^{\circ}$--10$^{\circ}$ as well
as the A and momentum dependences of the relative (transparency ratios) cross
sections for $T_{{\bar c}{\bar c}}(3875)^-$ production at photon energy of 35
GeV within the adopted scenarios for the $T_{{\bar c}{\bar c}}(3875)^-$ meson
intrinsic structure. We demonstrate that the absolute and relative observables
considered show a certain sensitivity to these scenarios. Therefore, the
measurement of such observables in future experiments at the proposed
high-luminosity electron-ion colliders EIC and EicC in the US and China in the
near-threshold energy region might shed light on the $T_{cc}(3875)^+$ internal
structure.