## Multi-label Classification for Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Electrical Machines

Adrienn Dineva*, Amir Mosavi*, Mate Gyimesi, and Istvan Vajda

Institute of Automation, Kalman Kando Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary

Abstract :  Primary  importance  is  devoted  to  Fault  Detection  and  Diagnosis  (FDI)  of electrical machine and drive systems in modern industrial automation. The widespread use of Machine Learning techniques has made it possible to replace traditional motor fault detection techniques with more efficient solutions that are capable of early fault recognition  by  using  large  amounts  of  sensory  data.  However,  the  detection  of concurrent failures is still a challenge in the presence of disturbing noises or when the multiple faults cause overlapping features. The contribution of this work is to propose a novel methodology using multi-label classification method for simultaneously diagnosing  multiple  faults  and  evaluating  the  fault  severity  under  noisy  conditions. Performance  of  various  multi-label  classification  models  are  compared.  Current  and vibration signals are acquired under normal and fault conditions. The applicability of the proposed method is experimentally validated under diverse fault conditions such as unbalance and misalignment.

Keywords: multiple fault detection, rotating electrical machines; drive systems, multilabel classification, machine learning, fault severity, fault classifiers

## 1. Introduction

Rotating  electrical  machines  are  responsible  for  converting  a  great  amount  of worldwide  energy  into  mechanical  energy  [1-3].  Mobility,  transportation,  logistics, construction, production, agriculture, food,  automation, and basically, any economical activities and industries directly or indirectly depend on rotating electrical machines [4-

6].  The  rapidly  evolving  industries  have  suggested that we will be witnessing further increase this rate [7-12]. Furthermore, the increasing demand for the hybrid and electric vehicles, the rapid transition toward automated systems and micro and nano mechatronics devises, increasing interests for more efficient energy conversion systems, and emerging new robotics machines have been motivating further advancement in the rotating electrical machines [13-18].

One of the key factor of overall efficiency maximization covers the well-sized and high-efficient  components  [19-22].  Therefore,  the  reduction  and  prediction  of  faults occurring in electrical machines and drive systems such as electrical, thermal, mechanical faults  of  electrical  machines  are  strongly  suggested  to  be  essential  [23-29].  Classical solutions  of  fault  diagnosis  and  identification  (FDI)  [30]  are  based  on  the  complex mathematical models [25-29, 31], or dynamic models [32-37] of the processing system. Intelligent modernization has contributed to the widespread use of Machine Learning (ML) techniques  in  industrial  applications  [38-43].  As  a  result,  the  latest  FDI  systems demand  more  artificial  intelligent  solutions  to  incorporate  multiple  fault  events  or dynamically changing load profiles in case of incomplete or noisy measurements [44-49]. Commonly,  the  diagnosis  and  predictions  is  calculated  through  current  signature analysis (MCSA) [50, 51], i.e., examining the output signals of the motor stator's current while  running  on  a  steady-state  operating  mood  [52-56].  MCSA  analyses  the  timefrequency decomposition of the current signals or by faults' frequencies in the frequency domain. MCSA works based on a single input source, and representing a simple, lowcost and non-invasive monitoring method [50, 57, 58]. An enhanced method of MCSA in case of multiphase electrical machines is called electrical signature analysis (ESA) [59].

Timely diagnosis of the complete rotating machinery system contributes to avoiding overpriced reparations and unexpected breakdowns. According to [60], the great majority of recent electric motor condition monitoring methods can be classified into three main categories.  The  first-class  includes  the  detection  of  single  faults  by  analyzing  one  or multiple parameters; the second class covers the detection of different faults with multiple parameters and processing techniques, and the last one contains the mixed techniques of various  computing-intensive  approaches  to  analyze different  electrical  and  mechanical parameters  in  order  to  detect  multiple  faults  [61-64] . In  contrast  to  conventional  signal processing based fault detection techniques [65], recently a few attempts are made for the application of intelligent algorithms [66, 67] including new approaches to fault detection and isolation (FDI) [68] based on fuzzy logic, decision trees, neural networks, and further machine learning techniques [69-73]. However, most of them rely on the measurement and processing of vibration signals, which require at least one vibration sensor, which demands extra costs for its proper installation and maintenance [74-77]. In addition, a technician  needs  knowledge  and  a  good  amount  of  experience  to  correctly  use  such sensors [78-84]. However, the ESA reported to be able to reveal a large number of relations between the machine parameters [85-88]. Therefore, the ML techniques are highly suitable to support the processing of such extracted information.

There are some intelligent methods which have evolved in recent years with the purpose  of  improving  fault  diagnosis  methods  of  electrical  motor  and  drive  systems associated with various fault events on the basis of current or vibration signature analysis. For  instance,  in  [89]  it  has  been  shown  that  motor  current  signature  analysis  based Support Vector Machine classifier achieves better accuracy in case of gearbox multiple fault detection than decision trees. In [90] the authors state that hybridization of machine learning methods, e.g., adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) in combination with Classification and Regression Tree (CART) has the potential for fault diagnosis of induction motors. The proposed method also employs vibration and current signals and achieves nice performance, however, the method lacks the flexibility to easily fit with specific  types  of  machines.  Random  Forest  Classifier  was  developed  for  multi-class bearing faults in [91]. This work also employs input features extracted only from vibration signals.

An  number  of  studies  report  the  advantages  of  the  wavelet  transform  in  signal detection and fault feature identification (see, e.g. [92-96]). The decision tree's capability, with combination the well-studied wavelet technique also provides a possible tool for fault detection [97]. In [97], a large number of possible wavelets are analyzed in order to find the best match. The selection of a suitable wavelet function is still a challenge for the users  for  specific  applications.  The  investigation  of  mechanical  fault  signatures  of misalignment  and  unbalance  is  carried  out  in  [97],  where  the  authors  found  that  a multilayer perceptron model only with three layers is able to classify the faults.  High accuracy is reported that is achieved by training the network on a large dataset. In [98] a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is successfully applied for fault classification. This approach relies on the S-transform of vibration signals into images displaying the timefrequency patterns in which the pattern recognition is performed. We can clearly observe that the common pattern recognition methods are relying on the assumption of a single fault scenario and only a limited number of work proposes flexible and comprehensive solutions for multiple fault detection. In the presence of multiple faults, the single fault recognition techniques' performance may be degraded. In addition, the other machines operating in the  motor's  environment or  the  coupled  subsystems,  etc.,  may  introduce further noise components in the measured signal. As a result, it may occur that one of the fault or noise component obscure a particular fault feature and makes it impossible to recognize it. Its further consequence is that the fault isolation operations  may become rather difficult.

Based on the above briefly summarized antecedents and state-of-the-art applications this research on the development  of  new  condition  monitoring  and  diagnostic methodology for electrical machines and drives are focused into the applicability of multilabel classification machine learning approaches for multiple fault detection under noisy conditions and also the simultaneous determination of fault severity. The contribution of this work is to propose a novel methodology using multi-label classification method for simultaneously diagnosing multiple faults and evaluating the fault severity under noisy conditions.  Performance  of  various  multi-label  classification  models  are  compared. Current and vibration signals are acquired under normal and fault conditions.

The rest of this paper organizes as follows: in Section II. we briefly introduce the latest multi-label classification methods, and we derive a new methodology for multifault  diagnosis  and  severity  assessment  for  rotating  electrical  machines  and  drive systems. Section III is devoted to the description of the experimental setup as well as the description of feature extraction and dataset preparation. Section IV presents the results of  our  investigations on the multi-label classification methods.  After, in Section V. we draw some pertinent conclusions.

## 2. Multiple Fault Classification and Fault Severity Determination

## 2.1. Brief Introduction of Multi-label Classification Methods

Modern industry requires data mining algorithms that are able to efficiently cope with the growing amount of information and large datasets. Specialized processing tasks of various practical application fields deal with common characteristics of the stored data that can be assigned to multiple categories [99, 100]. Therefore, multi-label classification algorithms  have  gained  increasing  interest  in  recent  years.  Specialized  techniques  for learning such type of data is still in the focus of researches which have the capability of predicting a set of relevant labels for new species. Currently, three main groups of newly developed multi-label classification methods are proposed in the literature, namely the data transformation methods, adaptation methods and ensemble of classifiers [101, 102]. Early  solutions  for  multi-label  classification  methods  cover  the  data  transformation techniques. The concept is to turn the original multi-label set into binary sets or multiclass  sets  that  adequately  can  be  processed  with  the  classical  algorithms.  Besides binarization with the widely applied binary relevance technique, also the voting methods and divide-and-conquer approaches are also applied for accomplish multi-label transformation [100, 103, 104]. Such separated sets are learned by single-label classifiers, such as decision trees. This group also includes the Classifier Chains that is similar to the binary relevance technique, but it performs the  binarization in  consecutive  classifiers. Since, the models' order has importance [105, 106]. The output of one response variable for a sub-classifier is used as an additional feature in the next sub-classifier. Optimal order of the classification models can be enhanced by the Naïve Bayes method.

Adaptation  methods  are  based  on  the  adaptation  of  conventional  classification methods  to  multi-label  versions  without  problem  transformation.  The  adaptation methods  are  extensions  of  well-founded  automatic  classifications  algorithms.  For instance, the support vector machine (SVM) classifiers [107] or the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) classifiers [108, 109] are able to predict binary or multiclass outputs simultaneously [110, 111]. KNN is a non-parametric method used for classification and regression  [112,  113].  In  KNN,  an  object  is  classified  through  a  plurality  vote  of  its neighbors while the object assigned to the class of the most common k nearest neighbors. K is a positive and small number, to be able to reduce the number of calculations, and thus the process duration. Similarly, the neural networks and decision trees have such abilities, but the adaptation of the algorithm may become difficult. Ensemble classifiers are  also  held  notable  interest.  The  classification  ensemble  approach  is  based  on  the aggregation  of  the  outputs  of  a  number  of  the  individual  classifier  by  weighted  or unweighted  averaging  [114].  According  to  the  'no-free-lunch'  theory  [115,  116],  it  is assumed that the weaker classifiers with different bias can achieve better performance than the better ones [114, 117, 118].

## 2.2. The Scheme of the Proposed Method

We mainly focus on diagnostics based on Electrical Signature Analysis, but we also utilize traditional  vibration  data.  The  analysis  starts  with  the  elimination  of  the components that do not contribute to the system from the acquired stator phase current signals.  After,  the  filtered  signal  is  used  for  extracting  the  fault  features  affecting  the machine health. Then, the trained multi-label classifier receives the new feature vectors and performs the multi-label prediction. The flowchart of the method is depicted in Fig. 1. below.

Figure 1. Flow chart of the proposed multi-label fault diagnosis system

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.01078v1-figure-b67a6d58-3b59-4db7-936e-b17229ba2106.jpg)

For both of the misalignment and unbalance faults the two targets can be treated as logical labels, i.e. each output is a binary value, indicating whether a label is associated with the fault or not.

Table I. Vibration severity per ISO 10816.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.01078v1-figure-42f5ceea-f2c5-4b71-8185-6c90e9606398.jpg)

|   vibration velocity [mm/s] | Class I. small machines   | Class II. medium machines   | Class III. large rigid foundation   | Class IV. large soft foundation   |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                        0.28 |                           |                             |                                     |                                   |
|                        0.45 | GOOD                      | GOOD                        | GOOD                                | GOOD                              |
|                        0.71 |                           |                             |                                     |                                   |
|                        1.12 |                           |                             |                                     |                                   |
|                        1.8  |                           |                             |                                     |                                   |
|                        2.8  | SATISFACTORY              | SATISFACTORY                | SATISFACTORY                        | SATISFACTORY                      |
|                        4.5  |                           |                             |                                     |                                   |
|                        7.71 | UNSATISFACTORY            | UNSATISFACTORY              | UNSATISFACTORY                      | UNSATISFACTORY                    |
|                       11.2  |                           |                             |                                     |                                   |
|                       18    |                           |                             |                                     |                                   |
|                       28    | UNACCEPTABLE              | UNACCEPTABLE                | UNACCEPTABLE                        | UNACCEPTABLE                      |
|                       45.9  |                           |                             |                                     |                                   |

For evaluating the fault severity, we can inject additional classes or alternatively we can generate a second classifier which is executed parallel.    Acquired vibration data is sufficient for proper evaluation. The fault severity can be determined easily according to the ISO 2372 Standard [119, 120]    for vibration severity of machines operating between 600 to 12.000 rpm range. The severity classes are shown in Table 1.

## 3. System Description and Experiment

## 3.1. System Description

The outlined method requires precise measurements and appropriate dataset. The theoretical considerations and their usability are validated by simulation investigations by using the collected data on the test bench. The Laboratory of Electrical Machines of the Institute  of  Automation  provides  equipment  for  motor  diagnostics  and  expert  system development that allows the integration of measurement, computing, and communication. The laboratory has a wind power simulation system, where the wind power is simulated by an inverter-driven cage induction machine (Leroy Somer 3fFLSE225MTC; No28221L12001/2012; IP55IK08; P=30 kW; n=985 1/min; U=230/400 V; f=50 Hz; cos φ=0,82). Three different types of motors are available on the test bench: one brushless synchronous  machine  of  40  kW,  one  double-fed  asynchronous  machine  and  one permanent  magnet  synchronous  machine  (PMSM)  (Leroy  Somer  3fLSRPM200L-T; No728333K12001/2012; IP55IK08; P=40 kW; n=1500 1/min; U=400 V; f=100 Hz; I=83 A; 95,2 %; Imax/In=145 %) on which the measurements and tests are carried out (see, Fig. 2.).

Figure 2. Bellows shaft coupling connects the generator (left) and the motor (right).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.01078v1-figure-ae333d67-363e-4cce-9d06-78d8d88625d6.jpg)

The system is capable of simulating fault events. Misalignment and unbalance is introduced in  the  system  and  a  simple  NI  data  acquisition  system  for  data  collection purposes  is  installed.  The  laboratory  has  the  latest  NI  LabVIEW  Software.  The  data acquisition  system  consists  of  the  National  Instruments  PCI  6013  B-Series  16-AnalogInput  multifunction  DAQ  board  and the SC-2345 signal conditioning connector block with various modules and sensors connected to the test bench. The representation of the data acquisition system through a visualization of block schematic illustraion is available in Fig. 3.

Figure 3. Block scheme of the data acquisition system.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.01078v1-figure-099047f0-2785-4484-b311-2a052ade6640.jpg)

The  measuring  and  controlling  LabVIEW  software  collaborates  with  the  abovepresented devices and additional hardware components and conducts the measurements. The  measurement  data  is  processed  simultaneously  on  each  channel  which  takes  a relatively short time. The LabVIEW software is developed in order to inspect the proper configuration of the test bench. The software displays the amplitude-time signals of the three-phase stator current and vibration signals of the motor and the generator in realtime. The second tab of the software views the Park Vector's spectrums calculated from the current signals. Frequency-amplitude diagrams can be used to predict machine errors during measurement. The third part of the program saves the measurement results in the Excel .csv format, so the measured values can be evaluated and processed later.

## 3.2. Feature Extraction and Dataset Preparation for Training

Stator current signals and vibration data picked for fault-free no load and for 40% of full load at the speed of 1500 rpm conditions with fs=10000 sampling rate and t=2 seconds duration in the presence of both mechanical faults. Unbalance results in high-frequency amplitudes  at  frequencies  at  once  the  rotational  speed.   The  typical  fault  features  of misalignment  are  dominant  frequencies  at  one  or  two  times  the  rotational  speed depending on the degree of angular misalignment and the type of the couplings. Spectral images also display sub-harmonic multiplies of 1/2xRPM. However, the different speeds, loads,  motor  parameters  and  operational  setups,  etc.  may  affect  the  fault  frequencies. Differences between faulty and healthy conditions can  immediately be observed from vibration spectra during the measurement (see, Figure 4.).

Figure 4. Vibration FFT spectrum (upper chart) and time-domain signal (lower chart) during measurement displayed by the LabVIEW software. A1 (white line) denotes the generator's vibration signal and A2 (red line) stands for the motor's vibration signal.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.01078v1-figure-cd868d9e-2e12-4322-b526-db74cfff7d0d.jpg)

It is clearly visible in the spectrum that the machine vibrates strongly around 25 Hz, which  indicates  a  shaft  misalignment.  From  the  generator  current  spectrum,  a  50  Hz component  appeared  in  the  spectra,  while  in  the  motor  current  spectrum  a  75  Hz component. The reason is that, the generator is a 4-pole machine, while the motor has 6 poles. This indicates exactly that the machine vibrates at 25 Hz.

Figure 5. FFT spectra of the generator current (upper chart) and motor current (lower chart).

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.01078v1-figure-b0f44ea9-540d-47dc-b16f-21b6efd7969e.jpg)

The  unbalancing  load  is  placed  at  the  generator's  side,  so  the  flexible  bellows coupling may attenuate the fault signature in its spectra. Therefore, for fault extraction, we have applied the Thomson multitaper spectral estimates that are proven to be efficient in case of weaker signals [121] and combines the beneficial properties of high resolution and low variance. Figure 6. displays the Thomson multitaper spectrum of the generator's current  signal in which  we  can  observe  how  the  distinguished  magnitudes  are emphasized. This allows a fast automatic extraction of the peaks.

Figure 6. Multitaper power spectral density estimation of generator current signal for fault frequency magnitude detection.

![image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/1908.01078v1-figure-41ff272c-ce49-4dc6-b6b7-b2b0e1809630.jpg)

The features carrying most of the information of interest are mainly in the frequency domain. However we have inspected a few time-domain features also. The feature vector composed  from  the  magnitudes  of  the  distinguished  sideband  frequencies  and  RMS variance frequencies from the spectra for all three phases of both machines. The timedomain features cover the form factor, kurtosis and the entropy deviation from the faultfree  sample.  Fault  feature  vector  includes  also  the  distance  calculated  between  the observed signature and each pure signature associated with the identified fault [122]. The dataset is built by synthetically adding a random number of ten to twenty of external disturbing frequency components for the faulty and fault free signals. Fifteen different samples are generated with random contaminating frequencies for all of the fault-free, multiple-fault and single fault (unbalance or misalignment) cases and additionally the data collected by the accelerometers at both sides for the severity evaluation. The training set consists of 64 feature vectors including the original ones and each of them containing 27 features.

Table 2. Structure of the dataset.

| id   | Imkf     | Imbkf    | Imckf    | ...   | i ...    | isUnbalance   | isMisalignm   | Severity   |
|------|----------|----------|----------|-------|----------|---------------|---------------|------------|
| 0    | 0.687150 | 0.028560 | 0.123693 | ...   | 0.358956 | 1             | 1             | 'Good'     |
| 1    | 0.019699 | 0.388238 | 0.07809  | ...   | 0.900697 | 1             | 0             | 'Good'     |
|      |          |          |          |       | .        |               |               |            |
|      |          |          |          |       | .        |               |               |            |
|      |          |          |          |       | .        |               |               |            |

In our qualitative models ' isUnbalance' and ' isMisalignment '  (Table 2.) are the fault label columns which consists of values 0 (No) and 1 (Yes) corresponding to the presence of the symptom of a fault in a given sample. For the fault severity classifier, we have specified the labels according to the previously  presented ISO standard [25] as ' Good ', ' Satisfactory ', ' Unsatisfactory ', ' Unacceptable '. The dataset is divided into a training set 80% of the vectors to train the classifier and a testing set of 20 % for testing the accuracy of the classifier on new data. When most of the samples have the same labels in the training set, the classifier would achieve a high accuracy value. In order to avoid such a bias half of the dataset composed of samples including the fault features. Further metrics are applied for the proper evaluation of the performance.

## 4. Results

The  experiments  with  three  different  algorithms  are  performed  by  applying  the Python Scikit-multi-learn library which offers various classification approaches that are suitable  for  predicting  simultaneously  multiple outputs.  At  first,  a  binarized  Decision Tree has been implemented for predicting the labels. As a criterion, which defines the function to measure the quality of a split both criteria for Gini Index and  entropy for Information Gain were used. We have modified also the maximum of tree depth in order to compare the performance using various maximum depths of the trees. Various tree models were built also with including and excluding the error attribute values. According to initial tests we have found that by applying the error feature attributes in the training does not result in significant improvement in the accuracy. The best accuracy score we have achieved is 0.7333. The accuracy score is not the most representative metric in case of  multi-label  classification.  Therefore,  further  metrics  are  applied.  The  results  are collected in Table 3.

Table 3. Performance evaluation of the tested models.

|                         |    |   precision |   recall |   f1-score |
|-------------------------|----|-------------|----------|------------|
| Binarized Decision Tree |  0 |        0.79 |     0.88 |       0.83 |
| Binarized Decision Tree |  1 |        0.85 |     0.94 |       0.89 |
| Classifier Chain        |  0 |        0.79 |     0.88 |       0.83 |
| Classifier Chain        |  1 |        0.78 |     1    |       0.88 |
| KNN                     |  0 |        0.76 |     0.76 |       0.76 |
| KNN                     |  1 |        0.82 |     1    |       0.9  |

The precision shows also the accuracy of the model by the ration of total predicted positive and the number of true positive ones. Recall or sensitivity is calculated by the number of true positives divided by the number of true positives plus the number of false negatives.  The  F1  score  covers  the  weighted  average  of  the  sensitivity  and  precision values that is suitable to characterize the test performance. After, a Classifier Chain multilabel method using Gaussian Naïve Bayes approach has been tested. We found it to be more  efficient.  Its  performance  can  be  seen  in  Table  3.  The  Classifier  Chain's  score accuracy resulted in 0.8333. Subsequently, we have tested the multi-label KNN method whose best percentage accuracy resulted in 0.7 after testing the algorithm with various k values.

It can be seen from Table 3. that the classification performance has been the most enhanced by using Classifier Chains and KNN. The accuracy may be further improved by  training  a  model  with  a  larger  training  set  and  further  tuning  the  algorithms.  Its excellent pattern recognition  capabilities can  be effectively utilized for the fault classification of electrical machines in the presence of disturbing noises. The prediction performance of the parallel severity classification tree resulted in 99% accuracy because most of the vibration data is labeled ' good '.

## 5. Discussions

In  modern  industrial  systems,  complexity  is  increasing  as  multi-sensor  network systems are expanding towards largescale systems. The intelligent solutions of Electrical Signature Analysis allow simplifying the fault identification processes because does not require  a  large  number  of  sensors that  results  in  remarkable cost  reduction and support sensorless  and  largescale  technologies . Furthermore,  a  well-developed  theoretical  and practical  methodology  could  serve  as  a  basis  for  a reliable  remote  -diagnostics tasks  of electrical  machines  that  are  especially  important  diagnostics  carried  out  in  hazardous environment (for instance, in nuclear plants). The development of appropriate diagnosticprediction methods which are capable of reliably and timely evaluating the health status of the system on the basis of representative parameters acquired directly or indirectly is an important part of the modern electric drivetrain monitoring system. The state-of-health of a certain dynamic system and its possible initial failures can be addressed by a number of approaches published in the literature. The strengths and weaknesses of conventional fault diagnosis methods have already been proven. In recent years, diagnostics research has focused on the prediction algorithms that can identify the fault features of progressive malfunctions. As such algorithms are highly technology-dependent, it is important to define the method as a function of a large number of parameters of the dynamic system for fitting to the system under consideration, taking into account boundary conditions. Data-driven technologies aim such difficulties.

Fault  classification  methods  have  already  established  for  the  investigation  of  the relations between the symptom and the fault feature. It is clear that binary relationships can be easily represented with such systems. Early versions of these algorithms are used rather  for  visualizing  diagnostic  reasoning.  However,  practical  engineering  problems demanded the development of new automatic methods that are able to deal with multiple fault scenarios and noisy or uncertain fault features. A possible solution is the extension of  the  most  commonly  applied  classification  methods.  Recently  binary  trees,  Chain Classifiers, Neural Networks, etc. and other multi-label and multi-class techniques are introduced  in  the  literature.  However,  these  algorithms  need  more  development  and improvement especially in terms of robustness. In addition, the application of Machine Learning techniques on sensory data is still not well-established and requires the synergy of classical signal processing and intelligent data analysis. As a conclusion from all cases studied,  the  analysis  of  motor  current  signatures  in  combination  with  the  machine learning-based processing and evaluation algorithms is a viable methodology for fault detection and prediction in electrical machine and drive systems that has the following additional advantages ; the measurement or monitoring does not interfere with the production process ; it is well suited for any machine with speed, performance and power; it is universal because it is able to detect the quality of electricity supply, disturbances, faults in a motor control,  starter  and  control-  devices,  the  efficiency  of  the  electric  machine  and  its characteristics, errors in the electrical machine, plant-wide machine monitoring, and its operating costs (energy consumption, repair, maintenance) meet the economy's expectations.  The  transfer  of  recent  Machine  Learning  approaches  to  practical  fault diagnosis  problems  of  rotating  electrical  machines  and  drive  systems  may  help  to facilitate smart industrialization and intelligent modernization.

## 6. Conclusions

This paper proposes a novel methodology using multi-label classification method for  simultaneously  diagnosing multiple faults  and  evaluating  the  fault  severity  under noisy  conditions.  Furthermore,  the  performance  of  various  multi-label  classification models are compared. Current and vibration signals are acquired under normal and fault conditions. The applicability of the proposed method is experimentally validated under diverse fault conditions such as unbalance and misalignment. The prediction performance of the parallel severity classification tree resulted in 99% accuracy and most of the vibration data is labeled ' good '.

Author Contributions: Principal  investigator,  lead  author,  writing,  machine  learning  expertise, electric machines expertise, A.D.; data collection, data curation, data analysis, technical expertise, laboratory  expertise,  data  acquisition  system  implementation,  LabVIEW  programming,  M.G.; machine learning modeling expertise, writing, revision support, A.M.; electric machines expertise, conceptualization, supervision, resources, software, controlling and verifying the results, I.V.

Funding: This work has been supported by the project GINOP-2.3.4-15-2016-00003.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest

## References

- 1. Dineva, A., et al., Review of soft computing models in design and control of rotating electrical machines. Energies, 2019. 12 (6).
- 2. Jokanović, B., M. Bebić, and N. Kartalović, The influence of combined strain and constructive solutions  for  stator  insulation  of  rotating  electrical  machines  on  duration  of  their  reliable exploitation. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2019. 110 : p. 3647.
- 3. Roubache, L., et al., Elementary subdomain technique for magnetic field calculation in rotating electrical  machines  with  local  saturation  effect. COMPEL  -  The  International  Journal  for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2019. 38 (1): p. 2445.
- 4. Boughrara, K., F. Dubas, and R. Ibtiouen, 2-D exact analytical method for steady-state heat transfer prediction in rotating electrical machines. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2018. 54 (9).
- 5. Caruso, M., et al., The use of slightly asymmetrical windings for rotating electrical machines. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2018. 28 (7).
- 6. Kande,  M.,  et  al., Rotating  electrical  machine  condition  monitoring  automation-A  review. Machines, 2017. 5 (4).
- 7. Byerly, K., et al., Metal Amorphous Nanocomposite (MANC) Alloy Cores with Spatially Tuned Permeability for Advanced Power Magnetics Applications. JOM, 2018. 70 (6): p. 879-891.
- 8. Fu, Y., et al., Controllable inertial control strategy of rotating motor in DC distribution network. Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018. 38 (10): p. 32-38.
- 9. Guerroudj, C., et al., Performance analysis of Vernier slotted doubly salient permanent magnet generator for wind power. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017. 42 (13): p. 87448755.
- 10. Song, Z., et al., Rotating core loss model for motor considering skin effect and dynamic hysteresis effect. Nongye  Gongcheng  Xuebao/Transactions  of  the  Chinese  Society  of  Agricultural Engineering, 2019. 35 (6): p. 74-80.
- 11. Zhang, J., et al., Dynamic characteristics and experiment analysis of a single phase permanent magnet linear generator for wave energy conversion. Diangong Jishu Xuebao/Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2013. 28 (7): p. 110-116.
- 12. Mosavi,  A.,  S.  Faizollahzadeh  Ardabili,  and  S.  Shamshirband, Demand  prediction  with machine learning models: State of the art and a systematic review of advances. Demand Prediction with Machine Learning Models; State of the Art and a Systematic Review of Advances, 2019.
- 13. Akhtar, M.J. and R.K. Behera, Optimal design of stator and rotor slot of induction motor for electric vehicle applications. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, 2019. 9 (1): p. 35-43.
- 14. Deng, W. and S. Zuo, Electromagnetic vibration and noise of the permanent-magnet synchronous motors for electric vehicles: An overview. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2019. 5 (1): p. 59-70.
- 15. Fan,  Y.,  et  al., Design  and  analysis  of  a  new  five-phase  dual-stator  consequent-pole  brushless hybrid excitation machine. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2019. 55 (1).

16.

- Ulu,  C.,  O.  Korman,  and  G.  Kömürgöz, Electromagnetic  and  thermal  design/analysis  of  an induction  motor for  electric  vehicles. International  Journal  of Mechanical  Engineering and Robotics Research, 2019. 8 (2): p. 239-245.
- 17. Mosavi, A., et al., State of the art of machine learning models in energy systems, a systematic review. Energies, 2019. 12 (7): p. 1301.
- 18. Mosavi, A. and A. Bahmani, Energy consumption prediction using machine learning: A review. Preprints, 2019. 2019 .
- 19. Aljehaimi, A.M. and P. Pillay, Operating Envelopes of the Variable-Flux Machine with Positive Reluctance Torque. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2018. 4 (3): p. 707719.

20.

- Catuogno, G.R. and G.O. Garcia, Conversion of Three-phase Commercial Machines into Sixphase Machines for Didactic and Research Purposes. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 2018. 16 (2): p. 467-475.
- 21. Morozov, A., et al., Design, Analysis, and Optimization of a Multi-Speed Powertrain for Class7 Electric Trucks. SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains, 2018. 7 (1).
- 22. Palanivel,  A.  and  S.  Padmanabhan, Software-based  performance  estimation  and  real-time thermal analysis of brushless direct current motor with corroded permanent magnets. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2018. 71 : p. 938-952.
- 23. Praveenkumar, T., M. Saimurugan, and K.I. Ramachandran, Comparison of vibration, sound and motor current signature analysis for detection of gear box faults. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 2017. 8 (2).
- 24. Bessous,  N.,  S.  Sbaa,  and  A.C.  Megherbi, Mechanical  fault  detection  in  rotating  electrical machines using MCSA-FFT and MCSA-DWT techniques. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, 2019. 67 (3): p. 571-582.
- 25. Corne, B., et al., Emulating single point bearing faults with the use of an active magnetic bearing. IET Science, Measurement and Technology, 2018. 12 (1): p. 39-48.
- 26. Glowacz, A., et al., Fault diagnosis of three phase induction motor using current signal, MSAFRatio15 and selected classifiers. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 2017. 62 (4): p. 24132419.
- 27. Glowacz, A. and Z. Glowacz, Diagnosis of stator faults of the single-phase induction motor using acoustic signals. Applied Acoustics, 2017. 117 : p. 20-27.
- 28. Irhoumah, M., et al., Information Fusion with Belief Functions for Detection of Interturn ShortCircuit  Faults  in  Electrical  Machines  Using  External  Flux  Sensors. IEEE  Transactions  on Industrial Electronics, 2018. 65 (3): p. 2642-2652.
- 29. Lopez-Perez,  D.  and  J.  Antonino-Daviu, Application  of  Infrared  Thermography  to  Failure Detection  in  Industrial  Induction  Motors:  Case  Stories. IEEE  Transactions  on  Industry Applications, 2017. 53 (3): p. 1901-1908.
- 30. Ma, Y. and X. Wu, Discriminant sparse and collaborative preserving embedding for bearing fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing, 2018. 313 : p. 259-270.
- 31. Sapena-Bano, A., et al., Induction machine model with space harmonics for fault diagnosis based on the convolution theorem. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2018. 100 : p. 463-481.
- 32. Antonino-Daviu, J. and P. Popaleny. Detection of induction motor coupling unbalanced and misalignment via advanced transient current signature analysis . 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 33. Bessous, N., A. Chemsa, and S. Sbaa. New Vision about the Mixed Eccentricity Fault Causes in Induction Motors and its relationship with the Rolling Element Bearing Faults : Analytical model dedicated to the REB faults . 2019. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 34. Brandt,  M.,  et  al. Analysis  of  winding  fault  in  electric  machines  by  frequency  method .  2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 35. Nikita,  T.,  K.  Manickavasagam,  and  S.  Sachin. Magnetostriction  analysis  on  doubly  fed induction generator under normal and low voltage ride through (LVRT) condition . 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

36.

- Ugale, R.T., S.N. Gore, and B.N. Chaudhari. Web based remote and locally operated all in one electrical machine laboratory with data acquisition, fault diagnosis and protection . 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 37. Ullah, S., et al., A permanent magnet assist, segmented rotor, switched reluctance drive for fault tolerant aerospace applications. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2019. 55 (1): p. 298-305.
- 38. Baranyai,  M.,  et  al. Optimal  Design  of  Electrical  Machines:  State  of  the  Art  Survey . in International Conference on Global Research and Education . 2017. Springer.
- 39. Kankar, P.K., S.C. Sharma, and S.P. Harsha, Fault diagnosis of ball bearings using machine learning methods. Expert Systems with applications, 2011. 38 (3): p. 1876-1886.
- 40. Pöyhönen, S., et al., Numerical magnetic field analysis and signal processing for fault diagnostics of electrical machines. COMPEL-The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, 2003. 22 (4): p. 969-981.
- 41. Varkonyi-Koczy, A.R. Optimal Design of Electrical Machines: State of the Art Survey . in Recent Advances in Technology Research and Education: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Global Research and Education Inter-Academia 2017 . 2017. Springer.
- 42. Mosavi, A. ModeFrontier for the optimal design of electrical machines .  in INTERNATIONAL CAE CONFERENCE AND . 2017.
- 43. Zekveld, M. and G.P. Hancke. Vibration Condition Monitoring Using Machine Learning .  in IECON 2018-44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society . 2018. IEEE.
- 44. Aydemir,  G. Deep  learning  based  spectrum  compression  algorithm  for  rotating  machinery condition monitoring . 2018. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
- 45. Dos  Santos,  T.,  et  al. Stator  winding  short-circuit  fault  diagnosis  in  induction  motors  using random forest . 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 46. Ferreira, J.G. and A. Warzecha. An application of machine learning approach to fault detection of a synchronous machine . 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 47. Senanayaka, J.S.L., et al. Early detection and classification of bearing faults using support vector machine algorithm . 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 48. Senanayaka,  J.S.L.,  H.  Van  Khang,  and  K.G.  Robbersmyr. Towards  online  bearing  fault detection  using  envelope  analysis  of  vibration  signal  and  decision  tree  classification  algorithm . 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 49. Zhang, J., W. Zhan, and M. Ehsani. On-line fault diagnosis of electric machine based on the Hidden Markov Model . 2016. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 50. Abid, F.B., S. Zgarni, and A. Braham, Distinct bearing faults detection in induction motor by a hybrid  optimized  SWPT  and  aiNet-DAG  SVM. IEEE  Transactions  on  Energy  Conversion, 2018. 33 (4): p. 1692-1699.
- 51. Giantomassi,  A.,  et  al., Signal  Based  Fault  Detection  and  Diagnosis  for  Rotating  Electrical Machines: Issues and Solutions ,  in Studies in  Fuzziness  and Soft  Computing .  2015,  Springer Verlag. p. 275-309.
- 52. Afrasiabi, S., et al. Real-Time Bearing Fault Diagnosis of Induction Motors with Accelerated Deep Learning Approach . 2019. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 53. He, D. and B. Fahimi. Power management of a self-powered multi-parameter wireless sensor for IoT application . 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 54. Martin-Diaz, I., et al., An Experimental Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Motor Fault Diagnosis under Various Operating Conditions. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2018. 54 (3): p. 2215-2224.
- 55. Meckel, S., R. Obermaisser, and J.U. Yang. Generation of a diagnosis model for hybrid-electric vehicles using machine learning . 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 56. Senanayaka, J.S.L., H. Van Khang, and K.G. Robbersmyr. Online Fault Diagnosis System for Electric Powertrains Using Advanced Signal Processing and Machine Learning . 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- 57. Chahine, K., Rotor fault diagnosis in induction motors by the matrix pencil method and support vector machine. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2018. 28 (10).
- 58. Kao, I.H., et al., Analysis of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Fault Diagnosis Based on Learning. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2019. 68 (2): p. 310-324.
- 59. Mendonça,  P.L.,  et  al., Detection  and  modelling  of  incipient  failures  in  internal  combustion engine driven generators using Electrical Signature Analysis. Electric Power Systems Research, 2017. 149 : p. 30-45.
- 60. Cabal-Yepez,  E.,  et  al., Single-parameter  fault  identification  through  information  entropy analysis at the startup-transient current in induction motors. Electric Power Systems Research, 2012. 89 : p. 64-69.
- 61. Kande,  M.,  et  al., Rotating  electrical  machine  condition  monitoring  automation-A  review. Machines, 2017. 5 (4): p. 24.
- 62. Delpha,  C.,  et  al., Multiple  incipient  fault  diagnosis  in  three-phase  electrical  systems  using multivariate statistical signal processing. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2018. 73 : p. 68-79.
- 63. Vas, P., Parameter estimation, condition monitoring, and diagnosis of electrical machines . Vol. 27. 1993: Oxford University Press.
- 64. Tidriri,  K.,  et  al., A  generic  framework  for  decision  fusion  in  fault  detection  and  diagnosis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2018. 71 : p. 73-86.
- 65. Delgado-Arredondo, P.A., et al., Methodology for fault detection in induction motors via sound and vibration signals. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2017. 83 : p. 568-589.
- 66. Serdio, F., et al., Fuzzy fault isolation using gradient information and quality criteria from system identification models. Information Sciences, 2015. 316 : p. 18-39.
- 67. Serdio, F., et al., Improved fault detection employing hybrid memetic fuzzy modeling and adaptive filters. Applied Soft Computing, 2017. 51 : p. 60-82.
- 68. Jafari, H. and J. Poshtan, Fault detection and isolation based on fuzzy-integral fusion approach. IET Science, Measurement and Technology, 2019. 13 (2): p. 296-302.
- 69. Chen, Z., et al., A data-driven ground fault detection and isolation method for main circuit in railway electrical traction system. ISA Transactions, 2019. 87 : p. 264-271.
- 70. Jung,  D.  and  E.  Frisk, Residual  selection  for  fault  detection  and  isolation  using  convex optimization. Automatica, 2018. 97 : p. 143-149.
- 71. Jung,  D.  and  C.  Sundstrom, A Combined Data-Driven  and Model-Based  Residual  Selection Algorithm  for Fault Detection and Isolation. IEEE  Transactions  on  Control  Systems Technology, 2019. 27 (2): p. 616-630.
- 72. Kannan, R., S. Solai Manohar, and M. Senthil Kumaran, Nominal features-based class specific learning  model  for  fault  diagnosis  in  industrial  applications. Computers  and  Industrial Engineering, 2018. 116 : p. 163-177.
- 73. Na, W., et al., Sensitivity-based fault detection and isolation algorithm for road vehicle chassis sensors. Sensors (Switzerland), 2018. 18 (8).
- 74. El Bakri, A., M. Koumir, and I. Boumhidi, Extreme learning machine-based non-linear observer for fault detection and isolation of wind turbine. Australian Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2019. 16 (1): p. 12-20.
- 75. Sarwar, M., et al., High impedance fault detection and isolation in power distribution networks using support vector machines. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 2019.
- 76. Shahnazari, H., et al., Modeling and fault diagnosis design for HVAC systems using recurrent neural networks. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2019: p. 189-203.
- 77. Yang, J., Y. Guo, and W. Zhao, Long short-term memory neural network based fault detection and isolation for electro-mechanical actuators. Neurocomputing, 2019.
- 78. Abderrahmane,  M.  and  B.  Mohammed, Fault  diagnosis  of  a  wind  turbine  benchmark  via statistical  and  support  vector  machine. International  Journal  of  Engineering  Research  in Africa, 2018. 37 : p. 29-42.
- 79. Ait-Izem, T., et al., On the application of interval PCA to process monitoring: A robust strategy for sensor FDI with new efficient control statistics. Journal of Process Control, 2018. 63 : p. 2946.

80.

- Fazai, R., et al., Online fault detection and isolation of an AIR quality monitoring network based on machine learning and metaheuristic methods. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018. 99 (9-12): p. 2789-2802.
- 81. Khorasgani, H. and G. Biswas, A methodology for monitoring smart buildings with incomplete models. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2018. 71 : p. 396-406.
- 82. Lindahl, P.A., et al., Shipboard Fault Detection Through Nonintrusive Load Monitoring: A Case Study. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2018. 18 (21): p. 8986-8995.
- 83. Mohamed Syed  Ali,  A., Helmet  deduction  using  image  processing. Indonesian  Journal  of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2018. 9 (2): p. 342-344.
- 84. Zhang, D., et al., A Data-Driven Design for Fault Detection of Wind Turbines Using Random Forests and XGboost. IEEE Access, 2018. 6 : p. 21020-21031.

85.

Cheng, F., et al. Rotor current-based fault diagnosis for DFIG wind turbine drivetrain gearboxes using  frequency  analysis  and  a  deep  classifier .  2017.  Institute  of  Electrical  and  Electronics Engineers Inc.

- 86. Cheng,  F.,  et  al., Rotor-Current-Based  Fault  Diagnosis  for  DFIG  Wind  Turbine  Drivetrain Gearboxes  Using  Frequency  Analysis  and  a  Deep  Classifier. IEEE  Transactions  on  Industry Applications, 2018. 54 (2): p. 1062-1071.
- 87. Gao, Z. and S. Sheng, Real-time monitoring, prognosis, and resilient control for wind turbine systems. Renewable Energy, 2018. 116 : p. 1-4.
- 88. Zhu, Y., et al., Improvement of reliability and wind power generation based on wind turbine realtime condition assessment. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2019. 113 : p. 344-354.
- 89. Vigneshkumar, S., et al. Fault Detection in Gearbox Using Motor Electrical Signature Analysis . in 2018 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) . 2018. IEEE.
- 90. Yang, B.-S., M.-S. Oh, and A.C.C. Tan, Fault diagnosis of induction motor based on decision trees and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009. 36 (2): p. 1840-1849.
- 91. Patel, R.K. and V. Giri, Feature selection and classification of mechanical fault of an induction motor using random forest classifier. Perspectives in Science, 2016. 8 : p. 334-337.
- 92. Jacop,  A.,  et  al. Bearing  fault  detection  for  drivetrains  using  adaptive  filters  based  wavelet transform . in 2017 20th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS) . 2017. IEEE.
- 93. Qin, Y., J. Zou, and F. Cao,
- Adaptively detecting the transient feature of faulty wind turbine planetary gearboxes by the improved kurtosis and iterative thresholding algorithm. IEEE Access, 2018. 6 : p. 14602-14612.
- 94. Zimroz,  R.,  et  al., Diagnostics  of  bearings  in  presence  of  strong  operating  conditions  nonstationarity-A procedure of load-dependent features processing with application to wind turbine bearings. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2014. 46 (1): p. 16-27.
- 95. Chen, J., et al., Generator bearing fault diagnosis for wind turbine via empirical wavelet transform using measured vibration signals. Renewable Energy, 2016. 89 : p. 80-92.
- 96. Teng, W., et al., Multi-fault detection and failure analysis of wind turbine gearbox using complex wavelet transform. Renewable Energy, 2016. 93 : p. 591-598.
- 97. Muralidharan,  V.  and  V.  Sugumaran, Feature  extraction  using  wavelets  and  classification through decision tree algorithm for fault diagnosis of mono-block centrifugal pump. Measurement, 2013. 46 (1): p. 353-359.
- 98. Wen, L., et al., A Jointed Signal Analysis and Convolutional Neural Network Method for Fault Diagnosis. Procedia CIRP, 2018. 72 : p. 1084-1087.
- 99. Tsoumakas, G. and I. Katakis, Multi-label classification: An overview. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM), 2007. 3 (3): p. 1-13.
- 100. Herrera, F., et al., Multilabel classification , in Multilabel Classification . 2016, Springer. p. 1731.
- 101. Read, J., B. Pfahringer, and G. Holmes. Multi-label classification using ensembles of pruned sets . in 8th IEEE international conference on data mining . 2008. IEEE.
- 102. Read, J., et al., Classifier chains for multi-label classification. Machine learning, 2011. 85 (3): p. 333.
- 103. Fu, H., et al., Joint optic disc and cup segmentation based on multi-label deep network and polar transformation. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2018. 37 (7): p. 1597-1605.
- 104. Xu, C., D. Tao, and C. Xu. Robust extreme multi-label learning . in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 2016. ACM.
- 117. Galar, M., et al., A review on ensembles for the class imbalance problem: bagging-, boosting-, and hybrid-based  approaches. IEEE  Transactions  on  Systems,  Man,  and  Cybernetics,  Part  C (Applications and Reviews), 2011. 42 (4): p. 463-484.
- 118. Polikar, R., Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits and systems magazine, 2006. 6 (3): p. 21-45.
- 119. Stack, J.R., T.G. Habetler, and R.G. Harley, Effects of machine speed on the development and detection of rolling element bearing faults. IEEE Power Electronics Letters, 2003. 1 (1): p. 19-21.
- 120. Skipp,  B., Ground  vibration-codes  and standards. Ground  dynamics  and  man-made processes. The Institution of Civil Engineers, United Kingdom, 1998: p. 29-41.
- 121. Thomson, D.J., Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1982. 70 (9): p. 1055-1096.
- 122. Liu,  H.  and  H.  Motoda, Feature  extraction,  construction  and  selection:  A  data  mining perspective . Vol. 453. 1998: Springer Science &amp; Business Media.

| 105.      | Cakir, E., et al. Polyphonic sound event detection using multi label deep neural networks . in 2015                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 106.      | Yang, X., et al., Identification of unhealthy Panax notoginseng from different geographical origins                                                                                                                     |
| 107.      | Hsu, C.-W., C.-C. Chang, and C.-J. Lin, Apractical guide to support vector classification. 2003.                                                                                                                        |
| 108.      | Dudani, S.A., The distance-weighted k-nearest-neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1976(4): p. 325-327.                                                                                   |
| 109. 110. | Peterson, L.E., K-nearest neighbor. Scholarpedia, 2009. 4 (2): p. 1883. Domeniconi, C. and D. Gunopulos. Adaptive nearest neighbor classification using                                                                 |
|           | support vector machines . in Advances in neural information processing systems . 2002.                                                                                                                                  |
| 111.      | Keskes, H., A. Braham, and Z. Lachiri, Broken rotor bar diagnosis in induction machines through stationary wavelet packet transform and multiclass wavelet SVM. Electric Power Systems Research, 2013. 97 : p. 151-157. |
| 112.      | Imandoust, S.B. and M. Bolandraftar, Application of k-nearest neighbor (knn) approach for predicting economic events: Theoretical background. International Journal of Engineering                                      |
|           | Research and Applications, 2013. 3 (5): p. 605-610.                                                                                                                                                                     |
| 114.      | Dietterich, T.G. Ensemble methods in machine learning . in International workshop on multiple classifier systems . 2000. Springer.                                                                                      |
| 115.      | Gómez, D. and A. Rojas, An empirical overview of the no free lunch theorem and its effect on real-world machine learning classification. Neural computation, 2016. 28 (1): p. 216-228.                                  |
| 116.      | Wolpert, D.H. and W.G. Macready, Nofree lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 1997. 1 (1): p. 67-82.                                                                          |
Adrienn Dineva Amir Mosavi Mate Gyimesi Istvan Vajda
Multi-label Classification for Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Electrical Machines
Primary importance is devoted to Fault Detection and Diagnosis (FDI) of
electrical machine and drive systems in modern industrial automation. The
widespread use of Machine Learning techniques has made it possible to replace
traditional motor fault detection techniques with more efficient solutions that
are capable of early fault recognition by using large amounts of sensory data.
However, the detection of concurrent failures is still a challenge in the
presence of disturbing noises or when the multiple faults cause overlapping
features. The contribution of this work is to propose a novel methodology using
multi-label classification method for simultaneously diagnosing multiple faults
and evaluating the fault severity under noisy conditions. Performance of
various multi-label classification models are compared. Current and vibration
signals are acquired under normal and fault conditions. The applicability of
the proposed method is experimentally validated under diverse fault conditions
such as unbalance and misalignment.