## A deep spatio-temporal attention model of dynamic functional network connectivity shows sensitivity to Alzheimer's in asymptomatic individuals

Yuxiang Wei 1,2 , Anees Abrol 1,2 , James Lah , Deqiang Qiu , Vince D. Calhoun 3 3 1,2 1 Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TreNDS), Atlanta, USA 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA 3 Emory University, Atlanta, USA

Abstract -Alzheimer's disease (AD) progresses from asymptomatic  changes  to  clinical  symptoms,  emphasizing  the importance of early detection for proper treatment. Functional magnetic  resonance  imaging  (fMRI),  particularly  dynamic functional  network  connectivity  (dFNC),  has  emerged  as  an important biomarker for AD. Nevertheless, studies probing atrisk  subjects  in  the  pre-symptomatic  stage  using  dFNC  are limited. To identify at-risk subjects and understand alterations of dFNC  in  different stages, we leverage deep learning advancements and introduce a transformer-convolution framework  for  predicting  at-risk  subjects  based  on  dFNC, incorporating  spatial-temporal  self-attention  to  capture  brain network  dependencies  and  temporal  dynamics.  Our  model significantly outperforms other popular machine  learning methods. By analyzing individuals with diagnosed AD and mild cognitive  impairment  (MCI),  we  studied  the  AD  progression and observed a higher similarity between MCI and asymptomatic  AD.  The  interpretable  analysis  highlights  the cognitive-control  network's  diagnostic  importance,  with  the model focusing on intra-visual domain dFNC when predicting asymptomatic AD subjects.

connectivity  (FNC)  is  an  extension  of  this  concept  that focuses on estimating temporal coupling among data-driven brain networks [5]. A time-resolved extension, dynamic FNC (dFNC) captures recurring temporal patterns of FNC, enabling an understanding of temporal variability [6]. Notably,  studies  have  demonstrated  a  strong  correlation between dFNC and AD. For example, Sendi et al. [7] studied both static and dynamic FNC and found increasing connectivity in the middle frontal gyrus as AD progressed.

Keywords-dynamic  functional  network  connectivity,  deep learning, early diagnosis, Alzheimer's disease

## I. INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD), a prevalent form of dementia, is a  progressive  neurological  syndrome  characterized  by memory loss and cognitive deficit [1]. Due to its irreversible nature,  the  timely  identification  of  AD  holds  significant clinical importance, enabling the implementation of interventions  to  slow  its  progression  [2].  More  recently, growing efforts have shifted towards the asymptomatic stage of  AD,  where  individuals  exhibit  no  sign  of  functional  or cognitive decline but have positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker.  Exploring  AD  at  the  early  stage  has  become  a focal  point,  prompting  numerous  efforts  to  understand  its underlying dynamics. Several pathological biomarkers, including  amyloid-β  peptide  (Aβ )  and  total  tau  protein 42 (tTau), have been identified as pivotal prodromal risk factors for asymptomatic AD [3].

Functional magnetic  resonance imaging  (fMRI) has emerged as a popular imaging modality for the non-invasive examination of functional connectivity (FC) coupling among brain regions, providing insights into brain changes throughout disease progression [4]. Functional network

Recent literature has leveraged machine learning methods for  AD diagnosis based on FNC. Millar et al. [8] applied a Gaussian regression model to select brain networks and used a linear regression model to predict at-risk subjects. Shen et al., [9] employed a decision-tree-based method called Hollow Tree Super to predict patients with subject cognitive decline.  Alorf  et  al.  [10]  utilized  a  stacked  sparse  autoencoder for classifying  6  AD  stages, from asymptomatic  to clinical  AD.  Apart  from  these,  support  vector  machines (SVM) have been widely used for AD diagnosis, as seen in [11]-[13].  So  far,  most  of  these  studies  focused  on  the clinical  AD  and  only  a  handful  of  them  examined  the  presymptom stage of AD using FNC and machine learning [8][10]. Moreover, the temporal dynamism of FNC has not been extensively  studied,  and  only  a  limited  number  of  works explored  dFNC  for  AD  study  in  conjunction  with  machine learning [13], [14]. Additionally, common machine learning methods  may  encounter  challenges  when  confronted  with intricate spatiotemporal connectomics information [15], leading to unsatisfactory performance.

In this work, we present a convolution-transformer-based neural network designed to predict asymptomatic AD subjects  that  are  CSF  biomarker-positive  using  dFNC.  Our proposed method incorporates a spatio-temporal selfattention  module,  allowing  for  the  modeling  of  intricate correlations  between  brain  networks  while  capturing  the temporal functional dynamics of the brain. The effectiveness of the proposed method  is evaluated on two  publicly available datasets. To provide a comprehensive analysis, we introduce  AD  and  MCI  subjects  and  further  analyze  the similarity between the dFNC patterns of subjects in different stages  of  AD.  Additionally,  our  investigation  extends  to understanding how the functional dynamics of brain networks contribute to the model's predictions when discerning asymptomatic AD  subjects from cognitively normal individuals.

## II. METHODOLOGY

## A. Dataset

1) Emory Healthy Brain Study (EHBS): We include data from the EHBS [16] which is a longitudinal cohort study of cognitively  normal  adults  (50-75  years).  A  total  of  362 subjects  are  selected  with  available  fMRI  scans,  with  303 cognitive  normal  (CN)  subjects  and  59  asymptomatic  AD (Asym)  subjects.  We  use  tTau  and   Aβ   as  biomarkers  to 42 identify Asym from CN, where subjects with tTau/Aβ &gt;0.24 42 are identified as Asym [3].

2) Alzheimer's  Disease  Neuroimaging  Initiative: We also use the ADNI dataset to verify the model's performance and study the relationship between Asym and symptomatic AD and MCI subjects. We randomly select 59 AD subjects and 59 MCI subjects to mitigate the effect of class imbalance. Furthermore, we stratified the ADNI dataset  according  to  the  florbetapir  standardized  uptake value  ratio  (AV45  SUVR)   and  obtained 397  CN  and  132 Asym subjects.

## B. Data Preprocessing

The fMRI data from the datasets are preprocessed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM12) software. The pipeline includes rigid body correction to correct the subject's  head  movement,  slice-time  correction  to  account for  timing  differences  in  slice  acquisition,  warping  into  the standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space using an echo planar imaging (EPI) template, resampling to isotropic voxels of 3mm³, and finally Gaussian smoothing.

To extract the dFNC  data, we use the spatiallyconstrained ICA [17] with the Neuromark\_fMRI\_1.0 template [18] and obtain 53 spatially independent networks, which are grouped into sub-cortical (SC, 5), auditory (AUD, 2),  sensorimotor (SM, 10), visual (VS, 9), cognitive control (CC,  16),  default  mode  (DM,  7),  and  cerebellar  (CB,  5) network domains, as in Fig. 1.

To  estimate  the  FNC  time  courses,  we  apply  a  tapered window  (width=10 TRs, i.e., 30 s) and compute the correlations  across  the  53  identified  brain  networks  within the  window.  By  sliding  the  window  by  step  of  1  TR,  we obtain  a  total  of  246  windows.  Therefore, for  each  subject, 246 53×53 symmetric correlation matrices are estimated.

Fig. 1. Spatial maps of 53 networks assigned to 7 functional domains.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00378v1-figure-1e939413-707c-4b6d-87cd-f62740d52c47.jpg)

## C. Method Overview

To accurately identify Asym subjects and better understand how brain networks change during the progression AD, we take advantage of the transformer [19]

and  combine  it  with  traditional  convolution.  Based  on  the backbone presented in our previous work [20],  we utilize a transformer-convolution-based framework to locally and globally extract relevant features from brain network connectivity. In addition, to better capture the intricate temporal dynamics of dFNC, we propose a spatial-temporal self-attention module (as in Fig. 2) to facilitate the modeling of  temporal  variability  between  different  dFNC  states,  thus better extracting  crucial  features  that  are significant for diagnosis.

Fig. 2. The  proposed  spatio-temporal  self-attention  mechanism,  which calculates  spatial  and  temporal  attention  separately  and  fuses  them  to provide a spatiotemporally aware model

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00378v1-figure-68520301-4cab-48f7-80e2-b2e89d3e8279.jpg)

## D. Spatio-Temporal Self-Attention

Transformers were used for fMRI-related study in recent literature for their superb feature extracting ability [21]. The self-attention mechanism can encode long-range contextual dependencies  from  the  data  and  model  variations  in  the functional  connectivity  topology  [22],  thereby  obtaining pivotal information for the designated tasks.

In this work, to better capture time-dependent aspects of spatial dependencies  across  dFNC  states,  we  propose  a spatio-temporal self-attention to substitute vanilla selfattention. As in Fig. 2, the proposed self-attention takes the dFNC data as input and performs position embedding in the spatial and temporal manners separately. For better performance  and  interpretability  [20],  we  use  a  sparse function  to generate  the  spatial self-attention attn s and temporal  self-attention attn t .  As  such, attn s represents  the importance of connectives across the brain networks, while attn t denotes the importance of different dFNC states.

Standard RNN  structure often overlook long-range contextual dependencies while focusing in immediate temporal  links  in  time-series  data,  and  while  LSTM  can handle  this,  they  are  typically  hard  to  interpret  [23].  The proposed temporal self-attention addresses the limitations by encoding variabilities across all dFNC states over time. By combined with spatial self-attention, it can capture higherorder representations of dynamic spatial-temporal dependencies, facilitating the asymptomatic AD diagnosis.

## III. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

## A. Experimental Settings

We train our models based on Pytorch 2.1, with a Nvidia A100.  We  perform  5-fold  cross-validation  with  300-epoch training  in  each  fold.  We  use  the  AdamW  optimizer,  with 0.05  weight  decay  and  0.001  learning  rate.  To  facilitate convergence, we apply the cosine annealing rate scheduler. We  use  binary  cross-entropy  loss  for  binary  classification and cross-entropy loss for multi-class classification.

TABLE I. COMPARE PERFORMANCES ON TWO DATASETS

| Dataset   | method   | acc    | f1     | precision   | spec   | sens   |
|-----------|----------|--------|--------|-------------|--------|--------|
| EHBS      | proposed | 76.76  | 45.09  | 34.21       | 75.25  | 66.10  |
|           | ResNet   | 74.03  | 39.74* | 31.96*      | 78.22  | 52.54* |
|           | SVM      | 83.15  | 0.00*  | 0.00*       | 99.34  | 0.00*  |
| ADNI      | proposed | 93.76  | 86.53  | 93.81       | 80.30  | 93.76  |
|           | ResNet   | 92.82* | 85.27* | 87.30*      | 83.33  | 92.82* |
|           | SVM      | 86.20* | 62.56* | 99.50       | 46.21* | 86.20* |

## B. Performance

We  compare  the  proposed  method  with  a standard residual  neural  network  (ResNet)  and  a  machine  learning model (SVM) that is commonly applied in the literature [11][13]. We perform evaluation based on the EHBS dataset and the ADNI dataset. The results are shown in Table Ⅰ.

As  in  Table  Ⅰ,  'acc'  denotes  accuracy,  'spec'  denotes specificity (recall over the CN subjects), and 'sens' denotes sensitivity (recall over the asymptomatic subjects). We further perform the paired t-test, and * in the table indicates p &lt;0.01.  From  the  table,  the  proposed  method  significantly outperforms  other  methods  on  most  metrics,  especially  on the  sensitivity,  which  indicates  that  it  can  more  accurately diagnose subjects with asymptomatic AD. The SVM model showed inferior performance on the EHBS dataset.

## C. Analysis of AD Progression

Based on the proposed model, we explore the relationship between AD stages in terms of dFNC. Using the ADNI dataset, we perform two binary classifications: EHBSCN  vs.  EHBS-Asym  &amp;  ADNI-AD  and  EHBS-CN  vs. EHBS-Asym &amp; ADNI-MCI. As in Table Ⅱ, the lower output score  from  the  model  signifies  a  stronger  likelihood  of negative class, i.e., CN.

Compared to previous results, there's a significant elevation in performance, showing a higher contrast between CN and AD/MCI than CN and Asym. In addition, Asym is similar  to  CN,  as  evidenced  by  the  small  score  difference. The  smaller score difference between Asym  and  MCI compared  to  Asym  and  AD  suggests  a  closer  similarity between MCI and Asym.

TABLE II. CONFOUND MODEL WITH AD OR MCI SUBJECTS

|                 |       |       |   on CN |   Asym |   AD/MCI |
|-----------------|-------|-------|---------|--------|----------|
| CN vs Asym &AD  | 86.22 | 70.71 |  0.0676 | 0.1891 |   0.9814 |
| CN vs Asym &MCI | 85.99 | 72.56 |  0.0949 | 0.2599 |   0.9948 |

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00378v1-figure-a782ee41-71f0-4a0d-aae3-50439ad6a3e4.jpg)

difference

Fig. 3. The class activation maps produced by the model based on the EHBS dataset.  We  show  the  average  results  over  CN  and  Asym  subjects  and calculate their difference (use the map of CN minus the map of Asym).

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00378v1-figure-1f86c0a8-cb39-40dc-9d31-bc362fd8ca74.jpg)

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00378v1-figure-e1a02c7d-027e-4084-9f30-63b080185e7a.jpg)

Fig. 4. Difference of correlations between brain networks of CN and Asym subjects. Note that we apply a 0.7 threshold to filter out weak correlations.

![Image](https://ac.marcodsn.me/arxiv-markdown-images/2408.00378v1-figure-e7694eb5-e5ed-4e5b-b93d-9c4a6a58d06f.jpg)

## D. Interpretable Visualizations

To show how brain networks contribute to the diagnosis, we  further  present  the  visualizations  of  the  class  activation maps  produced  by  gradients.  We  evaluate  several  popular CAM-based methods using the  confidence  metric  [24]  and choose  LayerCam  [25],  which  has  the  highest average confidence. The results are shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4.

As  in  the  figures,  where  identifying  the  CN  or  Asym subjects, the model focuses primarily on correlations within the  cognitive-control  network  (CC)  and  the  visual  network (VS).  When  predicting  Asym  subjects,  the  model  shows increased  focus  over  the  intra-visual  domain  dFNC,  with decreased  focus  over  dFNC  between  cerebellar-subcortical (CB-SC) and cerebellar-sensorimotor (CB-SM). From Fig. 4, the  VS  and  SM  connections  have  greater  contributions  to predicting  Asym,  while  correlations  among  CB,  SC,  and between default-mode (DM) and VS tend to be neglected.

Our  findings  align  with  prior  research.  For  instance, Buckley et al. [26] identified the CC network as one of the strongest  predictors  for  Aβ  change  and  cognitive  decline. Yuan et al. [27] observed a change of connectivity in the left superior frontal gyrus and left inferior parietal lobule (components  of  the  CC  network)  and  the  middle  occipital gyrus  and  middle  temporal  gyrus  (components  of  the  VS network). Consistent results are reported in [28], presenting a significant difference between CN and Asym in CC and SM networks. Despite some previous works suggesting significant changes in the DM network [29], [30], our model indicates that it does not significantly contribute to diagnosis.

## IV. CONCLUSION

In this work, we study the pre-symptomatic stage of AD using  dFNC.  We  introduce  a  novel  spatial-temporal  selfattention  mechanism  designed  to  capture  temporal  brain dynamics.  We  evaluate  the  method  based  on  two  dFNC datasets for asymptomatic AD diagnosis. We further include AD  and  MCI  subjects  to  examine  AD-stage  relationships. Results show  MCI  subjects  share closer similarities to asymptomatic individuals than diagnosed AD cases. Additionally,  we conduct an interpretable analysis with class activations  maps,  highlighting  specific  network  connections for CN  and  asymptomatic  identification.  These  findings deepen the understanding of pre-symptomatic AD and offer valuable insights for future diagnostics.

## REFERENCES

- [1] M. A. DeTure and D. W. Dickson, 'The neuropathological diagnosis of  Alzheimer's disease,' Mol.  Neurodegener.,  vol.  14,  no.  1,  p.  32, Aug. 2019.
- [2] H.  Hampel  and  S.  Lista,  'Dementia:  The  rising  global  tide  of cognitive  impairment,'  Nature  reviews.  Neurology,  vol.  12,  no.  3. nature.com, pp. 131-132, Mar. 2016.
- [3] R. Tandon et al., 'Predictors of cognitive decline in healthy middleaged  individuals  with  asymptomatic  Alzheimer's  disease,'  Res  Sq, Feb. 2023.
- [4] N.  Gour  et  al., 'Functional  connectivity changes  differ in  early  and late-onset Alzheimer's disease,' Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 2978-2994, Jul. 2014.
- [5] W. Yan et al.,  'Discriminating  schizophrenia using  recurrent neural network applied on time courses of multi-site FMRI data,' EBioMedicine, vol. 47, pp. 543-552, Sep. 2019.
- [6] Z. Fu et al., 'Altered static and dynamic functional network connectivity in Alzheimer's disease and subcortical ischemic vascular disease: shared and specific brain connectivity abnormalities,' Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 3203-3221, Aug. 2019.
- [7] M.  S.  E.  Sendi  et  al.,  'Disrupted  Dynamic  Functional  Network Connectivity Among Cognitive Control Networks in the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease,' Brain Connect., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 334-343, Aug. 2023.
- [8] P. R. Millar et al., 'Predicting brain age from functional connectivity in symptomatic and preclinical Alzheimer disease,' Neuroimage, vol. 256, p. 119228, Aug. 2022.
- [9] Y.  Shen  et  al.,  'Use  of  machine  learning  to  identify  functional connectivity  changes  in  a  clinical  cohort  of  patients  at  risk  for dementia,' Front. Aging Neurosci., vol. 14, p. 962319, Sep. 2022.
- [10] A. Alorf and M. U. G. Khan, 'Multi-label classification of Alzheimer's disease stages from resting-state fMRI-based correlation connectivity data and deep learning,' Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 151, no. Pt A, p. 106240, Dec. 2022.
- [11] Y. Shi, W. Zeng, J. Deng, W. Nie, and Y. Zhang, 'The Identification of Alzheimer's  Disease  Using  Functional  Connectivity  Between Activity  Voxels  in  Resting-State  fMRI  Data,'  IEEE  J.  Transl.  Eng. Health. Med., vol. 8, p. 1400211, Apr. 2020.
- [12] H. Chen et al., 'Machine learning based on the multimodal connectome can predict the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease: a preliminary  study,'  Eur.  Radiol.,  vol.  32,  no.  1,  pp.  448-459,  Jan. 2022.
- [13] A. Abrol, Z. Fu, Y. Du, and V. D. Calhoun, 'Multimodal Data Fusion of Deep Learning and Dynamic Functional Connectivity Features to Predict  Alzheimer's  Disease  Progression,'  Conf.  Proc.  IEEE  Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., vol. 2019, pp. 4409-4413, Jul. 2019.
- [14] R.  Jing  et  al.,  'Altered  large-scale  dynamic  connectivity  patterns  in Alzheimer's  disease  and  mild  cognitive  impairment  patients: A machine learning study,' Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 34673480, Jun. 2023.
- [15] T.-E. Kam, H. Zhang, Z. Jiao, and D. Shen, 'Deep Learning of Static and Dynamic Brain Functional Networks for Early MCI Detection,' IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 478-487, Feb. 2020.
- [16] M.  E.  Goetz  et  al.,  'Rationale  and  Design  of  the  Emory  Healthy Aging and Emory Healthy Brain Studies,' Neuroepidemiology, vol. 53, no. 3-4, pp. 187-200, Aug. 2019.
- [17] V. D. Calhoun, T. Adali, G. D. Pearlson, and J. J. Pekar, 'A method for making group inferences from functional MRI  data using independent component analysis,' Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 140-151, Nov. 2001.
- [18] Y.  Du  et  al.,  'NeuroMark:  An  automated  and  adaptive  ICA  based pipeline  to  identify  reproducible  fMRI  markers  of  brain  disorders,' Neuroimage Clin, vol. 28, p. 102375, Aug. 2020.
- [19] A.  Dosovitskiy,  L.  Beyer,  and  A.  Kolesnikov,  'An  image  is  worth 16x16  words:  Transformers  for  image  recognition  at  scale,'  arXiv preprint arXiv, 2020.
- [20] Y. Wei et al., 'A Deep Network for Explainable Prediction of NonImaging Phenotypes using Anatomical Multi-View Data,' arXiv [qbio.QM], Jan. 09, 2024.
- [21] X. Kan, A. A. C. Gu, H. Cui, Y. Guo, and C. Yang, 'Dynamic Brain Transformer with Multi-Level Attention for Functional Brain Network Analysis,' in 2023 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), IEEE, Oct. 2023, pp. 1-4.
- [22] T.  Wolf  et  al.,  'Transformers:  State-of-the-Art  Natural  Language Processing,'  in  2020  Conference  on  Empirical  Methods  in  Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, Oct. 2020, pp. 38-45.
- [23] L. Arras et al., 'Explaining and Interpreting LSTMs,' in Explainable AI:  Interpreting,  Explaining  and  Visualizing  Deep  Learning,  W. Samek, G. Montavon, A. Vedaldi, L. K. Hansen, and K.-R. Müller, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 211-238.
- [24] Y.  Rong,  T.  Leemann,  V.  Borisov,  G. Kasneci, and  E. Kasneci, 'A Consistent and Efficient Evaluation Strategy for Attribution Methods,' arXiv [cs.CV], Feb. 01, 2022.
- [25] P.-T.  Jiang,  C.-B.  Zhang,  Q.  Hou,  M.-M.  Cheng,  and  Y.  Wei, 'LayerCAM:  Exploring  Hierarchical  Class Activation Maps  for Localization,' IEEE  Trans. Image Process., vol. 30, pp. 5875-5888, Jun. 2021.
- [26] R. F. Buckley et al., 'Functional network integrity presages cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease,' Neurology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 29-37, Jul. 2017.
- [27] Q. Yuan  et al., 'Altered anterior cingulate cortex subregional connectivity associated with cognitions for distinguishing the spectrum of pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease,' Front. Aging Neurosci., vol. 14, p. 1035746, Dec. 2022.
- [28] J. Wang et al., 'Abnormal dynamic functional networks in subjective cognitive dcline and Alzheimer's Disease,' Front. Comput. Neurosci., vol. 16, p. 885126, May 2022.
- [29] A.  Chase,  'Altered  functional  connectivity  in preclinical  dementia,' Nat. Rev. Neurol., vol. 10, Nov. 2014.
- [30] A. Nakamura et al., 'Early functional network alterations in asymptomatic elders at risk for Alzheimer's disease,' Sci. Rep., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 6517, Jul. 2017.
Yuxiang Wei Anees Abrol James Lah Deqiang Qiu Vince D. Calhoun
A deep spatio-temporal attention model of dynamic functional network connectivity shows sensitivity to Alzheimer's in asymptomatic individuals
Alzheimer's disease (AD) progresses from asymptomatic changes to clinical
symptoms, emphasizing the importance of early detection for proper treatment.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), particularly dynamic functional
network connectivity (dFNC), has emerged as an important biomarker for AD.
Nevertheless, studies probing at-risk subjects in the pre-symptomatic stage
using dFNC are limited. To identify at-risk subjects and understand alterations
of dFNC in different stages, we leverage deep learning advancements and
introduce a transformer-convolution framework for predicting at-risk subjects
based on dFNC, incorporating spatial-temporal self-attention to capture brain
network dependencies and temporal dynamics. Our model significantly outperforms
other popular machine learning methods. By analyzing individuals with diagnosed
AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), we studied the AD progression and
observed a higher similarity between MCI and asymptomatic AD. The interpretable
analysis highlights the cognitive-control network's diagnostic importance, with
the model focusing on intra-visual domain dFNC when predicting asymptomatic AD
subjects.