Specificity of Sustainable Structural Dynamics of Local Economy in Romanian Tourist Resorts

Keywords: sustainable development, tourist resorts, local economy, territorial management, Romania

The lack of sustainable development strategies of the tourist resorts from Romania caused the structural dynamics of their economy to record large fluctuations under the impact of determinants with unpredictable developments. The spectacular dynamics have led to developments difficult to predict, in many situations that generate environmental conflicts, where the economic pressure has exceeded the support capacity of the natural environment. In this study, we aim to analyze the dynamic relationship between tourism and the other components of the economy, from each resort from Romania. The significant growth of tourism in recent years requires new approaches, relevant for understanding the role of tourism in increasing the complexity of the local economy. Measuring the role of tourism in the development of local economy was achieved by building an economic database for all tourist resorts from Romania (according to Government Decision No. 107 of 2018), at the four-digit NACE code level (Classification of National Economy Activities), for the economic indicators considered relevant: number of companies, number of employees, and turnover and profit, for the period 2000-2016, as well as at territorial administrative unit level. Detailed analyses revealed very different structural dynamics, the spectacular dynamics, lacking a coherent strategic framework, led in all situations to the emergence of environmental conflicts. Tourist resorts in which tourism has become an essential component of economic development have based their development on capitalization of local resources, which led to multiplication effects, materialized in a spectacular evolution of the local economy, and an increasing pressure on the natural environment. 

Introduction

Analyzing the global economic development of the last decade, it can be noticed that tourism has become an important sector for local, national, and international economic activities [1], and, with its development, there has been a diversification of both tourist products and destinations [2]. Potential economic benefits of tourism, at national or regional level, is a very discussed topic in the literature where the development of the tourism sector leads to possible direct or indirect positive effects on the economy and on the well-being of communities [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Tourism, is one of the greatest wealth generators, classified as one of the major economic development factors [11], and is often described as a driver of growth and economic development [12], being approached as a priority sector for the Romanian economy, given the potential contribution of general economic recovery. 
Tourism is, at the same time, an economic sector that consumes resources and puts pressure on ecosystems. The development of tourism often requires a strong intervention, in a short time, on the environment, generating a whole chain of negative multiplier effects. The analysis of the dynamic relationship between tourism and the other components of the economic system is a good premise for identifying potential imbalances in the natural environment. 
As a result, the debate on the sustainability of tourism has become particularly important lately [13][14][15][16][17]. This fact is due, among other things, to the decision-makers who have become increasingly aware of the limitations of using natural and cultural resources, but also the negative impact that tourism, without adequate measures, can have on the environment, on society, and on people [18]. 
On the other hand, sustainability was considered a key element in the primary models in the specialty literature on tourism competitiveness [19], and some authors have referred, in particular, to environmental sustainability as a key variable for the competitiveness of long-term tourism destinations or for improving the quality of life of the local population [20]. International or intergovernmental organizations as well as the United Nations Environmental Program and World Tourism Organization, have promoted the concept of sustainable tourism as a "balance" appropriate between economic viability, environmental responsibility, and socio-cultural prosperity [21,22]. 
The analysis of the dynamic relationship between tourism and the other systemic components is a good premise for identifying potential imbalances in the natural environment. In addition, in order to measure and monitor the sustainability of tourism, researchers have developed different techniques, such as the Sustainable Tourism Index, the Global Sustainable Tourism Council Criteria, the Systematic Indicators System, or the Importance-Performance Analysis [23][24][25]. 
The role played by the tourism sector in the development of local economies is a critical issue for geographers [26,27], representing one of the most studied topics in tourism studies. Its role in the development of local economies is important due to the complex economic influences that occur both vertically and horizontally in the local economic system [28][29][30][31][32]. Studying this role, held by tourism in the development of local economies, becomes very important for the design and implementation of sustainable management strategies in the medium and long term. Through a management policy on improving services, along with an appropriate marketing policy, tourism can bring significant economic benefits to these communities [33,34]. Thus, the development of methodologies for modeling the relations patterns with the other components of the territorial system is an important goal for both researchers and decision-makers. 
The study aims to develop a methodology for analyzing the role of tourism in the development of local economy, based on relevant indicators of economic complexity for each administrative-territorial unit analyzed from Romania for a statistically relevant period of time. Modeling the complex relationship between tourism and the other components of the local economy (agriculture, industry, trade, etc.), will bring new elements of knowledge regarding one of the most dynamic relationships between the components of a territorial system, and designing in this way, the premises that can generate imbalances in the natural environment. 

Materials and Methods


Study Area

In this study, all tourist resorts from Romania are analyzed from the point of view of tourism's contribution to the development of the local economy. The Law of Tourism defines the tourist resort as "the locality or part of a locality, which has a tourist heritage and a tourist infrastructure, in which the economic activities mainly support the achievement of the tourism product and which is attested by Government decision, at the proposal of the authority of the central public administration responsible for tourism, in the situation of cumulative fulfillment of the mandatory minimum certification criteria, approved by Government decision". According to the Government Decision no. 107 of 2018, approving the attestation of some localities or parts of localities as tourist resorts of national or local interest and on the change of annex no. 5 to the Government Decision no. 852 of 2008, to approve the rules and the attestation criteria of tourist resorts, in Romania are 108 resorts (47 national interest and 61 local interest). To mention that, although Romania has 108 tourist resorts, in cartographic representation there are only 98, since: Băile Felix and 1 Mai; Crivaia and Semenic; North Eforie and South Eforie; Mangalia, Cap Aurora, Jupiter, Neptun-Olimp, Saturn and Venus; Predeal, Pârâul Rece and Timis , ul de Sus, share the same territorial administrative unit. The cartographic model was developed with the help of open-source software QGis (Grüt, Switzerland), which represents the spatial distribution of tourist resorts at both, national and regional level (Figure 1). In this study, all tourist resorts from Romania are analyzed from the point of view of tourism's contribution to the development of the local economy. The Law of Tourism defines the tourist resort as "the locality or part of a locality, which has a tourist heritage and a tourist infrastructure, in which the economic activities mainly support the achievement of the tourism product and which is attested by Government decision, at the proposal of the authority of the central public administration responsible for tourism, in the situation of cumulative fulfillment of the mandatory minimum certification criteria, approved by Government decision". According to the Government Decision no. 107 of 2018, approving the attestation of some localities or parts of localities as tourist resorts of national or local interest and on the change of annex no. 5 to the Government Decision no. 852 of 2008, to approve the rules and the attestation criteria of tourist resorts, in Romania are 108 resorts (47 national interest and 61 local interest). To mention that, although Romania has 108 tourist resorts, in cartographic representation there are only 98, since: Băile Felix and 1 Mai; Crivaia and Semenic; North Eforie and South Eforie; Mangalia, Cap Aurora, Jupiter, Neptun-Olimp, Saturn and Venus; Predeal, Pârâul Rece and Timișul de Sus, share the same territorial administrative unit. The cartographic model was developed with the help of open-source software QGis (Grüt, Switzerland), which represents the spatial distribution of tourist resorts at both, national and regional level (Figure 1). 

Data Analysis

The study is based on the development of an economic database, both at the territorial administrative unit level, and four-digit NACE code (Classification of National Economy Activities) with the four economic indicators relevant to tourism development in each resort in Romania, for the period 2000-2016 (number of companies, number of employees, turnover, and profit). Based on this, were made evolution charts for the aforementioned indicators, for analyzing the share of tourism in the total local economy for the tourist resorts, as well as for the evolution of the three sectors of activity (primary, secondary, and tertiary), highlighting the tourism sector, for the same period. The 

Data Analysis

The study is based on the development of an economic database, both at the territorial administrative unit level, and four-digit NACE code (Classification of National Economy Activities) with the four economic indicators relevant to tourism development in each resort in Romania, for the period 2000-2016 (number of companies, number of employees, turnover, and profit). Based on this, were made evolution charts for the aforementioned indicators, for analyzing the share of tourism in the total local economy for the tourist resorts, as well as for the evolution of the three sectors of activity (primary, secondary, and tertiary), highlighting the tourism sector, for the same period. The database for the turnover and profit was represented in Romanian currency, Ron, where 1 Ron is equal to 0.28 € (Euro), average course calculated for the period 2000-2016. To identify the structural dynamics of tourist resorts, an analysis of the variation of the ranks held by each resort was made by: the share of the company's number from tourism sector in total number of companies, the share of the employee's number from tourism sector in total number of employees, the share of turnover from tourism sector in total turnover, and the share of the profit from tourism sector in total profit. In the end, we made a matrix with the variation of ranks with the arithmetic mean of the share of the four economic indicators from tourism sector for each resort. For the matrix, each resort has been given a certain color: red for resorts that showed a declining trend, orange for a relatively constant evolution, i.e., their evolution does not show large fluctuations, and green for those resorts that experienced an increase in rank over the period under review. The analysis of the relationship between the increase of the role of tourism in the local economy and the environmental conflicts was done by creating a database on their number, recorded in official documents. Thus, by associating their number with the evolution trend of this relationship, the direct link between tourism developments has been observed, in most cases in a short period, and also the generation of environmental conflicts. 

Results

In the territorial systems with touristic functionality from Romania, the total number of companies is showing an upward dynamics from the first year of the analysis, 2000, until 2008, with an increase of about 69%, the tourism sector contributing to this evolution with values between 3% and 3.4% (Figure 2). While the total number of companies declined after 2008, with about 7% due to the global economic crisis, those from the tourism sector have registered an upward trend, from 2668 companies in 2008, to 2742 in the last year of analysis, this growth amounting to 2.7%. The main areas of tourism where the number of companies increased were: hotels and other similar accommodation facilities, tourist agency activities, and tour operator activities, and the main resorts where these rises were produced were Mamaia, Eforie, Păltiniş. database for the turnover and profit was represented in Romanian currency, Ron, where 1 Ron is equal to 0.28 € (Euro), average course calculated for the period 2000-2016. To identify the structural dynamics of tourist resorts, an analysis of the variation of the ranks held by each resort was made by: the share of the company's number from tourism sector in total number of companies, the share of the employee's number from tourism sector in total number of employees, the share of turnover from tourism sector in total turnover, and the share of the profit from tourism sector in total profit. In the end, we made a matrix with the variation of ranks with the arithmetic mean of the share of the four economic indicators from tourism sector for each resort. For the matrix, each resort has been given a certain color: red for resorts that showed a declining trend, orange for a relatively constant evolution, i.e., their evolution does not show large fluctuations, and green for those resorts that experienced an increase in rank over the period under review. The analysis of the relationship between the increase of the role of tourism in the local economy and the environmental conflicts was done by creating a database on their number, recorded in official documents. Thus, by associating their number with the evolution trend of this relationship, the direct link between tourism developments has been observed, in most cases in a short period, and also the generation of environmental conflicts. 

Results

In the territorial systems with touristic functionality from Romania, the total number of companies is showing an upward dynamics from the first year of the analysis, 2000, until 2008, with an increase of about 69%, the tourism sector contributing to this evolution with values between 3% and 3.4% (Figure 2). While the total number of companies declined after 2008, with about 7% due to the global economic crisis, those from the tourism sector have registered an upward trend, from 2668 companies in 2008, to 2742 in the last year of analysis, this growth amounting to 2.7%. The main areas of tourism where the number of companies increased were: hotels and other similar accommodation facilities, tourist agency activities, and tour operator activities, and the main resorts where these rises were produced were Mamaia, Eforie, Păltiniş. Regarding the number of employees (Figure 3), things are similar to the number of companies, but with few exceptions. Here, the economic crisis has been felt since 2007, with a sharp decline of around 24% by 2010. After this period, the number of active employees in tourist resorts enters a trajectory with small fluctuations. As for the tourism sector, the number of employees is variable throughout the analyzed period, their percentage oscillating from year to year, with the highest value being in 2016, when out of a total of 410,223 employees, 18,371 were active in tourism. As the main areas of tourism activity are: hotels and other similar accommodation facilities, accommodation Regarding the number of employees (Figure 3), things are similar to the number of companies, but with few exceptions. Here, the economic crisis has been felt since 2007, with a sharp decline of around 24% by 2010. After this period, the number of active employees in tourist resorts enters a trajectory with small fluctuations. As for the tourism sector, the number of employees is variable throughout the analyzed period, their percentage oscillating from year to year, with the highest value being in 2016, when out of a total of 410,223 employees, 18,371 were active in tourism. As the main areas of tourism activity are: hotels and other similar accommodation facilities, accommodation facilities for holidays and short-term periods, other accommodation services, other reservation and tourist assistance services, and tourism agency activities. 
Both the turnover and the profit of tourist resorts (Figures 4 and5) follow the same well-known growth path until 2008, then they decrease over the next period, that is attributed to the economic crisis and which has made its mark especially in the case of profit, its decrease from 2008 to 2009 being about 24%, and a spectacular recovery for both indicators over the past two years of the analysis that can be attributed to new investments. Additionally, in the last two years of the analysis, 2015 and 2016, there are changes in the share of the tourism sector, so it decreases in the case of turnover and increases for profit. Both the turnover and the profit of tourist resorts (Figures 4 and5) follow the same well-known growth path until 2008, then they decrease over the next period, that is attributed to the economic crisis and which has made its mark especially in the case of profit, its decrease from 2008 to 2009 being about 24%, and a spectacular recovery for both indicators over the past two years of the analysis that can be attributed to new investments. Additionally, in the last two years of the analysis, 2015 and 2016, there are changes in the share of the tourism sector, so it decreases in the case of turnover and increases for profit. For the number of companies, the tertiary sector, which includes services, water distribution, and electricity production, holds the largest share of the companies at the level of the resorts: 76.8% in 2000, 76.2% in 2008, and 78.5% in 2016 (Figure 5). Tourism, which is part of this sector, makes an economic contribution between 3% and 3.7%. Its contribution throughout the period analyzed is increasing. Of the total number of companies that existed in 2016 in the tertiary sector, 73,118, 2727 were active in tourism. The second sector, which records a significant number of firms, is the secondary one with main areas of activity: manufacture of other outerwear, sawmilling and planning Both the turnover and the profit of tourist resorts (Figures 4 and5) follow the same well-known growth path until 2008, then they decrease over the next period, that is attributed to the economic crisis and which has made its mark especially in the case of profit, its decrease from 2008 to 2009 being about 24%, and a spectacular recovery for both indicators over the past two years of the analysis that can be attributed to new investments. Additionally, in the last two years of the analysis, 2015 and 2016, there are changes in the share of the tourism sector, so it decreases in the case of turnover and increases for profit. For the number of companies, the tertiary sector, which includes services, water distribution, and electricity production, holds the largest share of the companies at the level of the resorts: 76.8% in 2000, 76.2% in 2008, and 78.5% in 2016 (Figure 5). Tourism, which is part of this sector, makes an economic contribution between 3% and 3.7%. Its contribution throughout the period analyzed is increasing. Of the total number of companies that existed in 2016 in the tertiary sector, 73,118, 2727 were active in tourism. The second sector, which records a significant number of firms, is the secondary one with main areas of activity: manufacture of other outerwear, sawmilling and planning 

Commented [M1]: P in this manuscript


Commented [M1]:

in this manuscript of wood, manufacture of communication equipment, construction of residential and non-residential buildings, plumbing, heat, and air-conditioning installation. On the last place is the primary sector, which brings the lowest economic contribution to resorts, not exceeding the threshold of 2000 firms, accounting for 2.5% of the total local economy. It should be mentioned that during the whole period analyzed, the number of companies in the tourism sector exceeds the number of companies in the primary sector. Regarding the number of employees (Figure 6), in the first years of analysis, the sector in which most employees were employed was the secondary one. After 2004, the main sector of activity with the largest number of employees becomes the tertiary sector, with about 59% of the total number. Tourism contributes between 6.8% and 10.8% in terms of the number of employees in the tertiary sector. Of the total number of employees in this sector in 2016 (242,973), 18,371 were active in the tourism sector. As for the primary sector, it has the lowest number, its share declining year to year, so in 2016 records show only 9833 employees, mostly in the field of growing of cereals (except rice), leguminous crops, and oil seeds. Starting with 2013, the number of tourism employees exceeded the number of those active in the primary sector. For the number of companies, the tertiary sector, which includes services, water distribution, and electricity production, holds the largest share of the companies at the level of the resorts: 76.8% in 2000, 76.2% in 2008, and 78.5% in 2016 (Figure 5). Tourism, which is part of this sector, makes an economic contribution between 3% and 3.7%. Its contribution throughout the period analyzed is increasing. Of the total number of companies that existed in 2016 in the tertiary sector, 73,118, 2727 were active in tourism. The second sector, which records a significant number of firms, is the secondary one with main areas of activity: manufacture of other outerwear, sawmilling and planning of wood, manufacture of communication equipment, construction of residential and non-residential buildings, plumbing, heat, and air-conditioning installation. On the last place is the primary sector, which brings the lowest economic contribution to resorts, not exceeding the threshold of 2000 firms, accounting for 2.5% of the total local economy. It should be mentioned that during the whole period analyzed, the number of companies in the tourism sector exceeds the number of companies in the primary sector. 
Regarding the number of employees (Figure 6), in the first years of analysis, the sector in which most employees were employed was the secondary one. After 2004, the main sector of activity with the largest number of employees becomes the tertiary sector, with about 59% of the total number. Tourism contributes between 6.8% and 10.8% in terms of the number of employees in the tertiary sector. Of the total number of employees in this sector in 2016 (242,973), 18,371 were active in the tourism sector. As for the primary sector, it has the lowest number, its share declining year to year, so in 2016 records show only 9833 employees, mostly in the field of growing of cereals (except rice), leguminous crops, and oil seeds. Starting with 2013, the number of tourism employees exceeded the number of those active in the primary sector. 
which brings the lowest economic contribution to resorts, not exceeding the threshold of 2000 firms, accounting for 2.5% of the total local economy. It should be mentioned that during the whole period analyzed, the number of companies in the tourism sector exceeds the number of companies in the primary sector. Regarding the number of employees (Figure 6), in the first years of analysis, the sector in which most employees were employed was the secondary one. After 2004, the main sector of activity with the largest number of employees becomes the tertiary sector, with about 59% of the total number. Tourism contributes between 6.8% and 10.8% in terms of the number of employees in the tertiary sector. Of the total number of employees in this sector in 2016 (242,973), 18,371 were active in the tourism sector. As for the primary sector, it has the lowest number, its share declining year to year, so in 2016 records show only 9833 employees, mostly in the field of growing of cereals (except rice), leguminous crops, and oil seeds. Starting with 2013, the number of tourism employees exceeded the number of those active in the primary sector. Turnover (Figure 7) and profit (Figure 8), present the same ascending trend pattern, with fluctuations, with increases up to 2008 and with a recovery in the next period. The tertiary sector is the one with the highest turnover and profit from tourist resorts with a share of 57% and 63.9% for 2016, followed by the secondary sector, with a lower economic contribution, but significant, of 40% and 31.5%. The contribution of tourism to the two indicators, the turnover and profit, in the tertiary sector is between 3.6% and 6.1%, respectively 3.9% and 13.6%. The sector with the smallest share of the economy of these systems is the primary one, where in any year of the analysis period, does not exceed the value threshold of 4,039,940.47 Ron (847,539.11 €, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €) for the turnover, respectively 499,851,582 Ron for profit (104,863,863.39 €). 
the one with the highest turnover and profit from tourist resorts with a share of 57% and 63.9% for 2016, followed by the secondary sector, with a lower economic contribution, but significant, of 40% and 31.5%. The contribution of tourism to the two indicators, the turnover and profit, in the tertiary sector is between 3.6% and 6.1%, respectively 3.9% and 13.6%. The sector with the smallest share of the economy of these systems is the primary one, where in any year of the analysis period, does not exceed the value threshold of 4,039,940.47 Ron (847,539.11 €, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €) for the turnover, respectively 499,851,582 Ron for profit (104,863,863.39 €). Analysis of the rankings held by the share of the tourism sector in the total number of companies in tourist resorts from Romania (Table 1), shows a predominance of those who, over the 17 years, have a relatively constant trend with a share of 53.1% of the total number of resorts. These resorts did the one with the highest turnover and profit from tourist resorts with a share of 57% and 63.9% for 2016, followed by the secondary sector, with a lower economic contribution, but significant, of 40% and 31.5%. The contribution of tourism to the two indicators, the turnover and profit, in the tertiary sector is between 3.6% and 6.1%, respectively 3.9% and 13.6%. The sector with the smallest share of the economy of these systems is the primary one, where in any year of the analysis period, does not exceed the value threshold of 4,039,940.47 Ron (847,539.11 €, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €) for the turnover, respectively 499,851,582 Ron for profit (104,863,863.39 €). Analysis of the rankings held by the share of the tourism sector in the total number of companies in tourist resorts from Romania (Table 1), shows a predominance of those who, over the 17 years, have a relatively constant trend with a share of 53.1% of the total number of resorts. These resorts did Analysis of the rankings held by the share of the tourism sector in the total number of companies in tourist resorts from Romania (Table 1), shows a predominance of those who, over the 17 years, have a relatively constant trend with a share of 53.1% of the total number of resorts. These resorts did not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Aries , eni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna S , ugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 
Table 1. Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 31 34 Gura Humorului not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 
Table 1. Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 

2000

not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. t show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout e period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones ith a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can t support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, angalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category entified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic velopment: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, na Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 

General decrease trend

Analyzing the variation of the ranks held by the share of tourism in the number of employees, we have the following situation (Table 2): 31 resorts, i.e., 31.6%, have a general decline trend, 17 resorts, 17.4 % registered an increasing number of employees in the tourism sector (Călimănes , ti-Căciulata, Bran, Ocna S , ugatag, Muntele Băis , orii Area, etc.), and the highest number and percentage is held by resorts which during the 17 years had a constant trend (58.1%). not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 

General decrease trend

Table 3 illustrates the variation of the ranks held by the turnover from tourism sector, which shows a predominance of the resorts that have a relatively constant trend throughout the analyzed period, with a share of 57.1% of the total number of resorts. The second category is that of the resorts with a general downward trend, with a share of 27.6%. These are resorts where tourism is not a major activity, but a complementary one. As examples of downward trending resorts, we can mention Horezu, Lipova, Săcelul, Câmpulung Moldovenesc, Borsec, and Pucioasa. With a share of only 15.3%, there are resorts that registered a general growth trend during the period 2000-2016: Dâmbovicioara, Moneasa, Sinaia, Zona Pes , tera-Padina, Albes , tii de Muscel, Crivaia/Semenic etc. the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. t show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout e period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones ith a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can t support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, angalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category entified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic velopment: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, na Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 

General decrease trend

The next variation of the ranks analyzed is the share of the profit from tourism in the total profit of tourist resorts from Romania (Table 4). Most of the resorts, namely 43.9% of the total number of resorts have an evolution where tourism in their local economy is constant, is not the main sector, 36.7% show decreases in rank, being those resorts where the economic crisis has put most of its mark and only 19.4% of the total number of resorts have a growth trend. Examples of growth-trend resorts for the period 2000-2016: Dâmbovicioara, Moneasa, Slănic Prahova, Slănic Moldova (the resort that holds the first place in 2016 in terms of the profit in the tourism sector), Aries , eni, Bran (2nd place in 2016), Trei Ape (3rd place in 2016), Solca, etc. the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. Gura Humorului not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. An analysis of the ranks on the arithmetic mean of the four economic indicators was done for each tourist resort from Romania (Table 5), which shows a predominance of the resorts that, over the course of 17 years, had a relatively constant trend, did not show large fluctuations, and which, out of the total number of resorts, account for 51% (Băile Herculane, Borsec, Vatra Dornei, Slănic Prahova, Băile Turda, Trei Ape-this being the resort which holds the first place in the last 4 years, whose economic activity is mainly focused on tourism-in 2001, the total number of employees and the profit were 100% in the tourism sector). 
With a smaller share of 28.6%, are the resorts whose economic indicators have led to their decline over the whole period under review, this category being represented by resorts whose economic base is not tourist activity, but is supported by economic areas such as trade and industry (examples of resorts with drastic decreases in rank: Băile Govora, where all economic indicators in the tourism sector in the last two years of analysis had values equal to 0, Săcelu, Poiana Stampei, Tăs , nad, Stâna de Vale, Breaza). Last, is the category of resorts whose natural resources lay the foundations of their local economies where most of the revenue comes from tourism. Compared to the other two categories, it has the lowest number of resorts, the percentage being 19% (Dâmbovicioara, which has shown a relatively constant trend in recent years in terms of tourism, Moneasa, Slănic Moldova, Aries , eni, Bran, Solca, Zona Muntele Băis , orii, etc.) not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. Gura Humorului not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. Gura Humorului not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. Gura Humorului not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. Gura Humorului not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. t show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout e period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones ith a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can t support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, angalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category entified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic velopment: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, na Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. General decrease trend Environmental conflicts can be defined by several characteristics, whose knowledge is essential for their management to reduce the negative impacts on society, the environment, and the economy [35]. The development of tourist resorts produces a series of negative effects on the environment. In Table 6, we analyzed the number of environmental conflicts that occurred in these tourist destinations in Romania, which are closely correlated with the development of tourism. Most conflicts occur in those resorts where tourism develops and represents its main economic sector (between 20 and 41 environmental conflicts: Moieciu resort, 41). At the opposite pole, with the fewest environmental conflicts, are the poorly developed tourist resorts (between zero and nine conflicts: Bors , a, Buzias , , Lipova, Păltinis , , 0). 

Discussion and Conclusions

The results obtained from the analyzes at the level of administrative-territorial unit, show the oscillating dynamics of the analyzed indicators and for the tourist resorts in Romania. A significant number of resorts in Romania have a paradoxical dynamic. Although, they are declared tourist resorts, the specific values of tourism have a low share, tourism being a complementary economic activity, whose dynamics are in a strong relationship with the general economic profile or almost do not interfere with the economic system, its contribution being reduced in their local economy, having other main fields of activity that support the revenues of these systems (Băile Herculane, retail). Thus, out of the total number of Romanian resorts, only 20% of them have as a predominant economic activity tourism, where the main income profile comes from the tourist activities (Trei Ape, Băile Tus , nad, Costines , ti, Bran-resorts where the share of tourism in the main economic indicators is between 20% and 50%). The obtained results confirm the relevance of the methodology used, because we obtained new elements regarding the specific dynamics of the local economies from the local economies with basic tourist function. The analyzes showed that the status of the tourist resort is not necessarily conditioned by the high share of tourist activities, but by a combination of factors, among them, the presence of tourist activities and the desire of the local authorities certified by the central authorities [36]. 
Detailed analyses of the relationship between tourism and the other economic activities of the local economy have highlighted a number of particular aspects in the resorts that have seen spectacular increases in the hierarchy. The most important aspect is the pressure on the environment to expand the accommodation spaces and, in particular, the leisure activities that require the availability of important land areas. This increasing pressure on the environment has been observed in numerous studies on 

Figure 1 .

 1 Figure 1. The distribution of tourist resorts in Romania. 


Figure 1 .

 1 Figure 1. The distribution of tourist resorts in Romania. 


Figure 2 .

 2 Figure 2. Total number of companies from total economy and from tourism sector in tourist resorts from Romania. 


Figure 2 .

 2 Figure 2. Total number of companies from total economy and from tourism sector in tourist resorts from Romania. 




  11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 27facilities for holidays and short-term periods, other accommodation services, other reservation and tourist assistance services, and tourism agency activities. 


Figure 3 .

 3 Figure 3. The number of employees from total economy and from tourism sector in tourist resorts from Romania. 


Figure 4 .

 4 Figure 4. Total turnover from total economy and from tourism sector in tourist resorts from Romania (values represented in Ron, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €, average course calculated for the period 2000-2016). 


Figure 3 .

 3 Figure 3. The number of employees from total economy and from tourism sector in tourist resorts from Romania. 


Figure 3 .

 3 Figure 3. The number of employees from total economy and from tourism sector in tourist resorts from Romania. 


Figure 4 .

 4 Figure 4. Total turnover from total economy and from tourism sector in tourist resorts from Romania (values represented in Ron, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €, average course calculated for the period 2000-2016). 


Figure 4 .

 4 Figure 4. Total turnover from total economy and from tourism sector in tourist resorts from Romania (values represented in Ron, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €, average course calculated for the period 2000-2016). 


Figure 5 .

 5 Figure 5. Evolution of the number of companies by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts. 


Figure 5 .

 5 Figure 5. Evolution of the number of companies by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts. 


Figure 4

 4 Figure 4 Total turnover from total economy and from tourism sector in tourist resorts from Romania (values represented in Ron, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €, average course calculated for the period 2000-2016). 


Figure 5 .

 5 Figure 5. Evolution of the number of companies by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts. 


Figure 6 .

 6 Figure 6. Evolution of the number of employees by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts. 


Figure 6 .

 6 Figure 6. Evolution of the number of employees by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts. 


Figure 7 .

 7 Figure 7. Evolution of turnover by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts (values represented in Ron, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €, average course calculated for the period 2000-2016). 


Figure 8 .

 8 Figure 8. Evolution of profit by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts (values represented in Ron, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €, average course calculated for the period 2000-2016). 


Figure 7 .

 7 Figure 7. Evolution of turnover by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts (values represented in Ron, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €, average course calculated for the period 2000-2016). 


Figure 7 .

 7 Figure 7. Evolution of turnover by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts (values represented in Ron, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €, average course calculated for the period 2000-2016). 


Figure 8 .

 8 Figure 8. Evolution of profit by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts (values represented in Ron, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €, average course calculated for the period 2000-2016). 


Figure 8 .

 8 Figure 8. Evolution of profit by sectors of activity and the evolution of the tourism sector in the tertiary sector in tourist resorts (values represented in Ron, where 1 Ron = 0.28 €, average course calculated for the period 2000-2016). 


Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Azuga	32	36	34	34	Buziaș 39	51	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra										
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bus , teni	13	14	15	15	Bușteni 14	16	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 2831 30 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile															
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Felix/1Mai															
	Băile															
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Herculane															
	Băile															
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Olănești															
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
	Câmpulung															
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
	Călimănești-															
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
	Căciulata															
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
	Dâmbovicioa															
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
	ra															
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
	Geoagiu-															

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
						2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Govora	28	26	24	32	Buziaș 32	29	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
						2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Felix/1Mai	39	40	39	44	Buziaș 37	30	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Herculane	25	23	26	30	Bușteni Buziaș 21	19	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Băile Olănes , ti	10	9	7	8	Băile Olănești 9	13	10 9 12	7 13	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
						2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Tus , nad	3	4	4	3	Buziaș 2	3	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bors , a	45	38	38	33	Bușteni Buziaș 33	34	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
						2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Borsec	20	15	11	16	Buziaș 16	17	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44	44	47	52	Bușteni Buziaș 53	54	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Mangalia	27	25	23	27	Bușteni Buziaș 25	33	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


				Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
					Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Călimănes , ti-Căciulata 23	33	28	29	Buziaș 29	28	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
				Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
					Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Olănești												
				Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
				Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
					Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
				Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
					Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
				Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
					ra												
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
				Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
					Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
					Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
					Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Brașov												
				Predeal/Pâra											
					ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
				Rece/Timișul											
					de Sus												
					Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
						2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Geoagiu-Băi	19	20	21	22	Buziaș 24	24	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016	
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
	Gura																
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
	Humorului																
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
	Poiana																
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
	Brașov																
	Predeal/Pâra																
	ul																
		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
	Rece/Timișul																
	de Sus																

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014		2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile Felix/1Mai	39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Băile Herculane	25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Băile Olănești	10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
	Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
	Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
	Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
	Gura Humorului	41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana Brașov	59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
	de Sus																	
	Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
	Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	Bușteni 5	4	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-Căciulata		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul Rece/Timișul		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014		2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile Felix/1Mai	39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Băile Herculane	25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Băile Olănești	10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
	Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
	Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
	Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
	Gura Humorului	41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana Brașov	59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
	de Sus																	
	Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
	Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Predeal/Pâraul Rece/Timis , ul de Sus	2	5	5	5	Bușteni Buziaș 7	6	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-Căciulata		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul Rece/Timișul		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016	
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
	Gura																
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
	Humorului																
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
	Poiana																
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
	Brașov																
	Predeal/Pâra																
	ul																
		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
	Rece/Timișul																
	de Sus																

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016	
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
	Gura																
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
	Humorului																
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
	Poiana																
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
	Brașov																
	Predeal/Pâra																
	ul																
		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
	Rece/Timișul																
	de Sus																
	Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
	Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Slănic Prahova	53	54	65	70	Bușteni 73	79	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 60 51 56 52 59 60 62 64 61 48
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Sinaia	21	22	27	23	Bușteni 20	21	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 19 20 25 23 28 25 27 28 27 27
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Sângeorz-Băi	29	30	31	38	Bușteni 42	52	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 53 59 64 71 61 62 64 66 65 64
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
						2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Slănic Moldova	53	56	50	35	Buziaș 31	25	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 21 18 21 27 29 24 28 23 24 24
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Sovata	18	21	32	31	Băile 26	27	26	27	28	31	33		32	33		35	36	34
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
						2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Sucevit , a	3	1	1	2	Buziaș 3	2	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 9
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
						2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Târgu-Ocna	75	74	79	76	Buziaș 71	75	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 79 80 80 81 80 82 85 82 79 74
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Târgu-Neamt ,	57	64	66	66	Bușteni 64	67	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 75 69 65 69 67 69 67 74 74 66
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Techirghiol	29	24	29	36	Bușteni 38	39	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 30 34 39 30 34 46 51 42 48 50
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


						2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Vatra Dornei	37	37	41	46	Buziaș 50	40	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 46 42 41 39 37 44 43 38 43 40
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Voineasa	31	32	42	49	Bușteni Buziaș 45	52	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 31 25 22 22 26 27 26 31 33 25
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Mamaia North Area	70	72	74	81	Băile 84	85	10 9 84	7 79	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 77 80 77 76 70 69 68 60
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Pes , tera-Padina Area	33	34	40	28	Băile 19	26	10 9 35	7 23	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 24 20 20 22 22 22 23 28
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Parâng-Petros , ani Area	51	53	58	61	Bușteni Buziaș 69	72	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 76 75 78 73 69 71 73 70 69 69
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Tourist Area of Piatra-Neamt ,	72	73	76	Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 78 79 83 81 85 83 85 86 83 87 83 83 80
					Băile												
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-												
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
					ra												
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
					Gura												
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
					Poiana												
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul												
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Albac	15	18	19	12	Bușteni Buziaș 17	20	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 17 16 15 8 8 12 12 17 16 18
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Albes , tii de Muscel	81	80	85	86	Bușteni Buziaș 89	31	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 33 43 45 35 25 26 19 26 28 29
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Aries , eni	81	10	9	6	Băile 4	7	9	9		11	13	6		10	7		4	4	5	3
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Balvanyos	35	19	25	50	43	64	67	57	96	62	60		34	35		29	30	30
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Baia de Fier	47	34	44	41	Bușteni 40	35	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 42 44 47 33 32 30 29 27 26 32
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bazna	81	80	85	86	Bușteni Buziaș 30	36	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 43 47 54 57 51 52 30 52 32 21
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Bălt , ătes , ti	81	80	85	86	Băile 62	70	48	49	58	58	56		56	54		50	51	61
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Homorod	48	48	48	54	Bușteni 54	48	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 57 55 57 50 49 57 52 56 55 55
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Turda	71	70	73	77	Bușteni 78	80	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 82 86 87 86 83 85 82 86 86 84
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Băit , a	76	75	80	82	Bușteni 82	86	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 88 91 93 95 94 91 89 92 90 91
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Boghis ,	81	80	85	86	Bușteni Buziaș 89	91	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 93 96 35 35 16 13 10 7 5 9
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
	Bran	14	17	18	14	11	10	7	7	7		10	11		9	11		11	11	13
						Băile											
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Breaza	60	55	70	60	Bușteni 57	63	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 71 76 76 79 78 80 75 72 70 94
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Cacica	81	80	85	86	Bușteni Buziaș 89	91	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 93 96 37 46 47 66 67 54 58 55
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
	Calacea	81	80	85	86	89	91	93	88	90	93	92		94	94		84	97	89
						Băile											
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW											8 of 27
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 Cheia 68 51 59 48 45 47 37 41 40 42 42 45 44 43 40 51

333334 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014		2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile Felix/1Mai	39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Băile Herculane	25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Băile Olănești	10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52

Table 1 .

 1 Cont. 



2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  
	Colibit , a	81	80	85	86	89	91	68	77	68	65	64	64	56	55	52	58	40

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003		2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Crivaia/Semenic	81	80	16	19	Băile Olănești 28	17	10 9 10	7	8	8	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 5 8 8 8 9 9 2 7
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4		3		2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7		8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8		9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3		4		5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5		5		7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Harghita-Băi	61	57	60	58	Buziaș 67	68	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 69 73 75 78 76 79 77 80 80 76 79
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra										
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	Humorului																
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																
	Predeal/Pâra																
	ul																
		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
	Rece/Timișul																
	de Sus																
	Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
	Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Izvorul Mures , ului	81	80	85	37	Bușteni 51	56	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 61 64 53 56 55 39 42 34 54 41 30
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Lacul Sărat	48	49	62	63	Bușteni 74	81	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 85 90 91 94 93 93 92 78 77 83 85
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Lipova	56	60	69	74	Buziaș 81	76	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 83 87 86 87 87 92 90 93 92 88 89
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Moieciu	17	13	13	10	Buziaș 6	5	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 5 5 4 7 5 5 6 8 8 7 6
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Negresti-Oas ,	80	79	84	85	Bușteni 88	90	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 92 95 95 97 96 96 96 96 94 85 87
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Ocna Sibiului	25	28	33	25	Bușteni 43	45	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 38 37 41 39 50 55 65 58 65 63
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Ocna S , ugatag	22	29	16	18	Buziaș 15	14	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 20 24 27 25 20 21 20 15 13 11 8
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Păltinis ,	63	59	63	64	Bușteni 68	71	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 73 70 72 77 75 75 71 75 72 70 67
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Poiana Stampei	81	80	52	55	Bușteni 89	91	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 54 72 51 63 79 61 80 61 78 94 95
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Pojorâta	24	26	22	17	Bușteni 27	15	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 15 10 10 14 13 18 18 14 19 20 23
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.	
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Praid	7	11	12	12	Bușteni 13	12	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 13 14 16 17 17 19 25 25 21 26 26
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile															
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai															
	Băile															
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane															
	Băile															
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești															
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung															
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-															
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata															
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa															
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra															
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11									

14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.		
	Săcelu	12	16	19	19	22	22	28	29	45	49	45		47	49	44	28	94	95
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile															
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai															
	Băile															
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane															
	Băile															
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești															
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung															
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-															
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata															
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa															
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra															
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11									

14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.		
	Sărata-Monteoru	38	31	37	40	48	41	51	54	55	53	48		38	45	46	45	39	38
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11										

14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.		
	Secu	66	63	67	71	77	78	78	82	82	83	84		86	86		87	82	81	82
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.	
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Snagov	34	42	46	47	Bușteni 52	55	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 59 62 62 67 66 68 62 67 67 68 64
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Solca	36	80	42	25	Buziaș 56	37	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 48 47 69 68 68 52 53 49 38 33 47
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.	
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Sângeorgiu de Mures ,	58	65	61	67	Bușteni 72	77	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 77 84 85 88 82 81 84 89 89 79 83
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Stâna de Vale	11	12	14	19	Buziaș 22	31	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 34 45 33 32 36 36 40 39 39 35 37
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Straja	50	45	54	43	Buziaș 36	43	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 36 37 34 35 38 48 48 36 41 42 47
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability												
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Soveja	81	80	52	38	Bușteni 34	37	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 45 65 67 50 51 36 50 48 47 53 51
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile															
		39 40 39 44 37 30									
	Felix/1Mai															

27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.		
	Tinca	81	80	85	86	89	91	93	96	96	98	97		97	97		97	96	92	94
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile															
		39 40 39 44 37 30									
	Felix/1Mai															

27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14

  
	not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
	the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
	with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
	not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
	Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
	identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
	development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
	Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.							
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	Humorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
	Rece/Timișul																	
	de Sus																	
	Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
	Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile															
	Felix/1Mai															

39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.
	Vălenii de Munte	78	77	83	83	86	88	90	92	88	92	89		89	88		90	84	78	80
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile															
	Felix/1Mai															

39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.
	Vat , a de Jos	40	42	51	51	34	44	22	26	29	43	53		49	36		44	50	43	55
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in 


	the total number of companies.											
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28														

26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
	Vis , eu de Sus	67	61	56	68	59	59	58	63	63	63	57		65	65		61	63	57	60
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in 


	the total number of companies.											
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28														

26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
	Băile Banffy Area	69	69	77	75	75	73	74	81	79	82	81		74	78		77	76	73	73
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in 


	the total number of companies.											
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28														

26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
	Băile Ocna Dej Area	79	78	81	80	85	87	89	93	89	91	90		90	93		91	91	87	88
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28														

26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
	Fântanele Area	81	80	85	86	89	91	93	29	43	40	97		97	97	97	97	94	95
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in 


	the total number of companies.											
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28														

26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
	Moines , ti Băi Area	77	76	82	84	87	89	91	94	94	96	95		95	95		95	95	90	91
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in 


	the total number of companies.											
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile															
		39 40 39												
	Felix/1Mai															

44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41

  
					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
	Muntele Băisorii Area	15	80	30	24	18	22	24	17	19	21	19		29	24		20	25	16	10
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
						the total number of companies.							
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	S , uior -Baia Sprie Area	64	67	72	69	Bușteni Buziaș 83	82	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 86 89 92 89 91 87 83 81 81 75 77
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in 


	8 of 27																	
	ank and they have maintained their position throughout																	
	eaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones																	
	ism is not their main activity, and natural resources can																	
	out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,																	
	tâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category																	
	trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic																	
	ra, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,																	
	sorts is only 17.3%.																	
	are of number of companies from the tourism sector in																	
	the total number of companies.													
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile																	
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																	
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	Humorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
	Rece/Timișul 2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 1 . Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

 1 
								Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW					8 of 27
	Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș ăile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78	Relatively constant trend
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile Herculane Băile Olănești ăile Tușnad 3 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec âmpulung oldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 ălimănești-
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	âmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
	eoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	umorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	redeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile																	
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																	
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	Humorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
	Rece/Timișul 2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 2 .

 2 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of employees from the tourism sector in the total number of employees. 



2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.			
	Amara	26	27	32	38	40	40	39	39	40	36	36	71	72	38	36	34

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Azuga	73	65	68	64	Buziaș 62	61	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 44 44 48 91 38 51 39 37 41 51
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra										
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.	
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bus , teni	13	15	14	16	Bușteni 17	17	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 17 17 22 1 25 28 15 17 19 23
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category
					identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic
					development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,
					Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buzias ,	25	26	12	24	Buziaș 27	31	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 21 31 29 29 34 34 35 34 92 37
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones
					with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can
					not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,
					Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol,				
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Govora	3	5	2	2	Buziaș 2	4	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 2 3 2 5 4 4 3 2 2 90
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Felix/1Mai	6	8	6	6	Buziaș 8	7	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 10 8 6 7 6 7 26 9 9 7 8
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (Azuga,										
						the total number of companies.							
																			2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Herculane	5	6	4	3	Bușteni 4	1	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 4 6 8 14 18 27 22 18 29 19
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-												
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Olănes , ti	27	13	8	11	Buziaș 9	5	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 7 7 7 8 8 8 6 6 6 26
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Tus , nad	1	3	1	1	Buziaș 1	3	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 1 2 3 4 5 9 21 5 5 3 5
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
						the total number of companies.							
																			2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bors , a	32	31	33	37	Bușteni 36	24	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 24 35 36 38 56 40 46 63 61 44
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Borsec	29	73	23	39	Buziaș 44	43	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 50 84 81 87 90 89 89 89 90 87
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
						the total number of companies.							
																			2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Câmpulung Moldovenesc	33	34	41	46	Bușteni 45	45	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 48 48 54 56 60 63 65 64 62 63
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Mangalia	14	16	16	22	Buziaș 18	20	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 23 26 31 30 35 31 31 32 33 35
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


				Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
					Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Călimănes , ti-Căciulata 10	9	7	8	Buziaș 7	8	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 9 11 17 21 20 19 5 4 4 2 2
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
					Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
				Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
					Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
					Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
				Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
					ra												
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
					Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
					Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
					Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul											
					de Sus												
					Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Costines , ti	11	12	10	15	Băile Olănești 14	12	10 9 13	7 15	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 11 12 19 18 20 26 40 36
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi																

19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53

  
	Covasna	16	18	17	Mamaia Moneasa Poiana Brașov Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus Pucioasa Râșnov 19 23 27 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 13 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 30 33 24 31 31 30 28 30 27 28 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014		2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile																	
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Herculane																	
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
	Humorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
	Rece/Timișul																	
	de Sus																	
	Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
	Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Mamaia	43	29	44	48	Buziaș 49	57	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 59 64 62 70 65 65 64 65 63 62
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Predeal/Pâraul Rece/Timis , ul de Sus	8	10	9	Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 13 13 10 12 10 12 13 11 10 7 11 10 18
					Băile												
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-												
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
					ra												
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
					Gura												
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
					Poiana												
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul												
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus												
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Pucioasa	36	38	43	57	Buziaș 67	63	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 67 68 71 72 74 72 76 77 70 88
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Râs , nov	61	52	66	55	Buziaș 56	59	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 61 55 45 51 53 44 43 42 43 41
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability												
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Slănic Prahova	4	4	3	5	6	6	5	5	5		6	3		3	1		3	3	4	6
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Sângeorz-Băi	15	24	20	25	Băile 28	25	26	29		30	35	40		36	38		39	38	38
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Slănic Moldova	23	25	15	34	Buziaș 10	9	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 6 12 13 18 23 23 27 22 30 30
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Vatra Dornei	34	40	28	31	Buziaș 33	33	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 28 27 27 26 28 29 24 24 25 29
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Parâng-Petros , ani Area	69	67	65	74	Băile 79	81	10 9 84	7 86	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 87 89 85 83 88 81 76 76
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Albac	31	73	73	81	Buziaș 39	35	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 22 22 28 32 37 38 55 54 54 46
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

1114 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Aries , eni	76	73	30	29	Băile 16	14	16	16		18	20	16		11	12		12	15	22
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Balvanyos	16	19	18	81	24	87	88	25		90	23	24		24	25		29	31	31
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
					Rece/Timișul 2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

1114 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

1114 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Bălt , ătes , ti	76	73	73	81	Băile 80	83	85	79		73	81	64		69	58		56	84	75
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie 9 12 Gura 6 8 8							
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												

1114 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Homorod	67	61	59	61	Buziaș 60	58	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 60 62 59 54 55 56 56 51 49 50
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

15rsec 201511 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

333334 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile															
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Felix/1Mai															
	Băile															
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Herculane															
	Băile Olănești Băile Tușnad 3 10 9 4 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 Bran 28 32 27 26 29 28 29 21 16 16 13 16 14 15 13 10

1114 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
	Breaza	48	42	45	53	Băile 58	62	63	65		67	67	76		74	73		73	81	90
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Sustainability																
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 2 Borșa 45 38 38 Cacica 76 73 73 81 86 87 88 91 90 80 83 79 78 70 57 64

333334 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

333334 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

333334 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Table 2 .

 2 Cont. 



2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  
	Colibit , a	76	73	73	81	86	87	88	91	90	78	75	70	61	52	65	65	69

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					the period (												
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Crivaia/Semenic	76	73	73	10	Bușteni 5	15	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 11 9 10 9 7 6 2 14 39 20 33
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					development:										
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Dorna Candrenilor	76	73	73	81	Buziaș 86	87	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 88 87 74 74 71 67 59 74 53 52 51
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra										
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Durău	9	23	24	14	Băile Olănești 12	11	10 9 15	7 14	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 15 15 15 13 29 35 35 8 14
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Harghita-Băi	62	48	57	60	Bușteni 65	64	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 68 70 72 71 78 77 79 80 71 74 77
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Horezu	22	28	31	33	Buziaș 42	46	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 51 51 55 48 50 49 54 50 56 57 49
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Izvorul Mures , ului	76	73	73	65	Buziaș 70	76	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 77 77 66 76 72 61 68 93 77 90 91
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Lacul Ros , u	38	62	47	49	Buziaș 59	55	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 58 58 61 65 62 59 60 66 64 58 54
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Lacul Sărat	70	69	69	77	Bușteni 78	75	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 80 75 79 77 80 80 77 82 78 82 80
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Lipova	49	47	50	51	Bușteni 61	54	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 56 63 65 62 67 68 66 71 68 70 70
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Moieciu	51	41	37	32	Buziaș 30	34	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 32 24 23 25 21 17 18 20 17 13 22
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Moisei	76	73	73	81	Băile 86	87	88	88		84	45	47		52	49		88	89	85	90
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Negresti-Oas ,	75	72	71	79	Buziaș 84	85	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 86 89 89 90 91 93 91 90 91 84 86
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Ocna Sibiului	76	73	73	66	Bușteni 75	79	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 73 81 78 19 10 78 82 75 59 69 58
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Ocna S , ugatag	76	73	73	72	Bușteni 47	42	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 38 36 26 28 29 26 16 16 24 16 19
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Onces , ti	76	73	73	81	Băile 86	87	88	91		90	93	93		94	93		93	92	90	72
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Păltinis ,	50	56	46	47	Bușteni 50	50	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 66 56 57 57 59 57 52 55 55 55 59
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Poiana Stampei	76	73	73	81	Bușteni 86	87	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 45 46 42 61 61 73 93 49 83 90 91
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Pojorâta	66	68	51	52	Buziaș 54	49	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 47 50 47 43 49 46 48 45 47 47 44
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Praid	18	17	19	23	Băile 22	22	31	23		33	34	33		35	32		33	32	32	30
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Săcelu	76	73	73	9	Buziaș 26	23	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 41 37 46 93 93 94 93 93 92 90 91
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
						Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Sărata-Monteoru	55	45	52	30	Buziaș 31	36	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 35 32 32 33 32 33 36 28 23 25 25
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Secu	54	49	56	68	Băile 76	77	78	80		83	84	87		85	84		84	82	77	81
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Snagov	46	58	73	81	Buziaș 86	69	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 72 61 64 58 63 58 62 60 72 45 40
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Solca	76	73	73	56	Bușteni 51	56	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 37 49 60 59 66 62 93 93 14 14 9
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Sângeorgiu de Mures ,	37	39	49	63	Băile 66	68	10 9 62	7 59	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 53 47 54 55 51 46 45 42 41
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Stâna de Vale	2	14	13	17	Bușteni 25	32	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 34 42 34 44 42 15 13 36 44 67 78
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Straja	58	60	55	71	Buziaș 73	73	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 83 82 82 86 84 82 80 79 79 73 73
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Soveja	76	73	73	54	Bușteni 37	60	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 64 91 90 93 93 94 71 57 92 90 45
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Tăs , nad	59	44	39	50	Bușteni 55	48	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 53 54 51 53 52 48 45 47 50 49 50
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Tinca	76	73	73	81	Bușteni 86	87	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 88 91 90 93 93 94 93 93 92 90 91
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Trei Ape	7	1	73	4	Bușteni 3	2	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 3 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 1
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
						Călimănești-												
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Vălenii de Munte	71	70	72	80	Bușteni 85	86	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 87 90 88 92 92 91 87 87 88 83 85
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Vat , a de Jos	53	53	60	70	Bușteni 74	70	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 71 74 58 60 70 60 47 53 52 53 84
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Vis , eu de Sus	60	57	58	62	Bușteni 68	74	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 76 72 75 73 79 75 67 72 67 60 46
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Băile Banffy Area	68	66	67	76	Bușteni 82	84	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 81 85 86 88 89 90 86 85 87 80 82
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Băile Ocna Dej Area	65	63	61	69	Bușteni 71	71	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 74 76 77 79 81 84 83 83 80 79 79
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Fântanele Area	76	73	73	81	Bușteni 86	87	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 88 34 90 93 93 94 93 93 92 90 91
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Moines , ti Băi Area	44	46	64	75	Bușteni 81	80	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 75 73 76 83 82 86 90 91 86 86 89
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Muntele Băisorii Area	76	73	73	42	Buziaș 35	26	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 33 41 37 37 14 20 30 43 22 12 7
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	S , uior -Baia Sprie Area	64	51	42	43	Băile 48	47	10 9 52	7 53	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 52 75 48 53 53 59 60 59 56
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile																	
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																	
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	Humorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
	Rece/Timișul 2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13

occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout ia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones here tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can hey stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, hirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic mbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, by these resorts is only 17.3%. 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36	Relatively constant trend
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile																	
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																	
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	Humorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014		2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile																	
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																	
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	Humorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
	Rece/Timișul 2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 3 .

 3 Variation of the rankings for the share of turnover from the tourism sector in the total turnover. 



2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  
	Amara	35	30	35	33	34	30	24	33	30	33	34	45	40	35	31	29

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Azuga	67	61	76	74	Bușteni 76	64	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 61 51 63 55 49 34 26 51 56 61
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bus , teni	12	14	16	15	Bușteni 18	18	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 19 26 28 31 42 33 28 30 37 31
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buzias ,	17	19	19	Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 29 35 39 40 44 44 46 37 39 37 41 45 47
					Băile Felix/1Mai	39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
					Băile Herculane	25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Băile Olănești	10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
					Gura Humorului	41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
					Poiana Brașov	59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					de Sus												
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Băile Govora	4	5	6	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 5 7 5 6 9 17 13 12 12 10 5 4 93 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
									2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Felix/1Mai	10	11	11	11	Buziaș 10	12	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 11 11 10 11 15 14 32 15 18 16
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Băile Herculane	6	7	5	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 4 5 2 9 10 14 26 21 24 19 14 21 14 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Băile Olănes , ti	15	16	9	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 9 6 6 7 7 8 6 6 7 4 7 8 19 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
									2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Tus , nad	1	2	1	2	Buziaș 1	1	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 1 2 3 5 8 6 3 3 3 3 1
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Bors , a	29	29	34	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 34 32 31 29 32 32 32 39 41 36 46 55 34 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Borsec	33	33	30	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 38 36 26 31 36 81 89 86 86 88 86 86 83 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44	44	46	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 46 42 45 46 52 50 51 50 52 51 59 63 54 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Mangalia	21	21	23	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 24 21 24 26 31 35 34 40 37 33 31 32 36 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


				Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
					Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Călimănes , ti-Căciulata 5	4	7	3	Buziaș 3	4	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 5 6 6 7 11 8 5 6 5 4 3
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
					Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
				Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
					Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
					Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
				Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
					ra												
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
					Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
					Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
					Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul											
					de Sus												
					Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Costines , ti	7	9	8	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 8 8 10 10 14 11 10 18 16 18 21 24 26 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
									2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Covasna	22	22	24	22	Buziaș 26	28	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 28 28 23 27 26 25 24 24 26 25
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Dâmbovicioara	79	77	81	81	Bușteni 86	87	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 89 67 71 69 46 36 35 19 25 6 8
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Eforie	11	12	14	12	Băile Olănești 16	23	10 9 21	7 22	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 25 21 28 28 30 26 15 12
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Geoagiu-Băi	8	8	10	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 10 12 13 16 13 9 12 17 15 20 20 17 18 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Gura Humorului	36	34	32	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 26 27 35 37 37 36 44 41 44 56 53 54 49 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
									2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Mamaia	48	46	51	47	Buziaș 50	50	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 54 64 64 67 55 56 54 58 53 55
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

not 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Moneasa	16	6	2	6	Bușteni 4	11	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 18 5 4 3 5 5 8 12 6 5 5
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


	Poiana Bras , ov	50	51	53	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 52 56 57 51 59 57 60 57 66 64 63 67 67 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

not 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


	Predeal/Pâraul Rece/Timis , ul de Sus	9	10	15	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 14 14 16 12 12 12 14 14 10 7 9 7 15 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

not 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


	Pucioasa	39	39	54	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 57 61 56 56 68 65 58 59 63 67 72 74 90 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

not 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
									2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Râs , nov	58	60	58	49	Buziaș 51	52	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 65 53 45 56 58 43 43 37 61 58
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

not 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Slănic Prahova	2	3	3	1	Bușteni 2	3	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-												
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Sinaia	24	23	22	20	Bușteni 22	19	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 17 15 16 20 20 17 12 13 11 9
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

not 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


	Sângeorz-Băi	13	13	13	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 13 19 14 13 18 26 38 56 62 78 40 41 32 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

not 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
									2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Slănic Moldova	27	24	12	25	Buziaș 11	9	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 8 3 7 16 9 2 11 23 19 24
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Sovata	19	20	21	23	Bușteni 20	22	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 20 20 20 19 19 18 17 16 16 13
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Sucevit , a	49	40	38	39	Bușteni 31	29	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 33 27 13 18 27 27 13 29 27 48
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Târgu-Ocna	25	26	42	40	Bușteni 45	41	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 42 41 37 36 32 29 31 34 35 33
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Târgu-Neamt ,	72	63	70	66	Bușteni 73	69	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 71 75 55 65 77 69 68 83 85 76
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Techirghiol	43	35	44	37	Bușteni 41	40	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 41 34 33 37 76 79 72 42 44 44
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Vatra Dornei	30	27	26	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50 30 28 32 35 29 29 30 31 31 29 33 40 37 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
									2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Voineasa	63	77	81	81	Buziaș 71	74	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 43 47 41 42 52 49 71 71 49 40
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Mamaia North Area	76	73	78	77	Bușteni 83	80	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 83 85 88 95 93 92 87 77 70 87
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Pes , tera-Padina Area	52	52	60	58	Bușteni Buziaș 49	63	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 66 72 70 53 48 50 34 36 33 28
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Parâng-Petros , ani Area	60	47	52	50	Băile 65	73	10 9 75	7 81	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 78 87 85 80 83 79 77 71
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Tourist Area of Piatra-Neamt ,	55	56	63	63	Bușteni Buziaș 64	65	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 67 73 69 70 69 67 57 56 62 56
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
					Rece/Timișul 2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Albac	53	77	81	81	Bușteni 39	34	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 23 19 21 29 30 38 44 50 43 46
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Albes , tii de Muscel	79	77	81	81	Bușteni 86	66	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 39 54 31 9 4 9 14 11 10 11 9
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Aries , eni	79	74	18	17	Băile 23	21	32	16		19	22	7		4	6		8	12	21
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Balvanyos	34	32	41	81	33	87	89	38	95	35	35		40	42		49	46	38
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Baia de Fier	59	59	61	64	Bușteni 69	36	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 30 35 40 43 43 35 39 28 39 51
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bazna	79	77	81	81	Bușteni 86	77	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 81 70 56 62 71 64 60 67 29 23
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Bălt , ătes , ti	79	77	81	81	Băile 86	82	89	88	79	84	87		72	70		76	81	84
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Homorod	73	55	59	60	Bușteni 53	51	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 59 58 59 54 60 70 69 74 57 65
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Turda	42	43	47	43	Bușteni 40	42	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 44 48 53 66 53 55 52 52 52 50
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Băit , a	66	65	66	65	Bușteni 63	53	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 62 56 49 71 68 68 74 73 73 72
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Boghis ,	79	77	81	81	Bușteni 86	87	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 89 93 92 77 74 81 49 27 23 35
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Bran	46	37	36	28	Băile 37	27	25	23		18	8	10		11	9		10	9	8	6
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Breaza	28	28	45	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura 42 46 47 52 66 67 68 72 71 75 68 78 93 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW						8 of 27
									2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Cacica	79	77	81	81	Buziaș 86	87	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 89 93 95 93 88 85 86 64 72 70
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile										
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai										
						Băile										
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane										
						Băile										
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești										
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung									
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-									
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata										

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Calacea	79	77	81	81	Bușteni 86	87	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 89 93 90 94 94 94 94 95 95 92
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Cheia	71	49	50	51	Bușteni 47	59	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 58 69 51 45 29 20 22 17 14 41
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014		2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
	Câmpulung																

Table 3 .

 3 Cont. 



2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  
	Colibit , a	79	77	81	81	86	87	87	91	82	73	75	77	73	69	57	49

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003		2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
	Crivaia/Semenic	79	77	33	21	Băile Olănești 17	8	10 9 2	7	8	8	5	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22 4 3 3 2 4 27 26
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4		3		2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7		8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8		9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3		4		5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul Rece/Timișul		2	5	5		5		7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
	Dorna Candrenilor	79	77	81	81	Băile Olănești 81	85	10 9 89	7 90	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22 84 78 81 84 79 89 66 70
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Durău	20	50	20	18	Bușteni 13	15	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 15 24 15 15 13 19 15 18 10 14
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Harghita-Băi	65	58	57	59	Bușteni 67	71	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 74 78 74 79 83 83 81 82 77 78
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Horezu	31	31	37	35	Bușteni 38	43	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 45 50 47 49 44 51 48 57 62 63
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
	Izvorul Mures , ului	79	77	81	75	Buziaș 80	81	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78 85 86 91 86 82 74 61 92 79 81
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Lacul Ros , u	54	67	64	62	Bușteni 70	60	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 63 62 68 59 70 61 58 66 59 61
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Lacul Sărat	74	70	73	73	Bușteni 79	78	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 76 79 83 75 80 82 80 80 82 83
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
	Lipova	51	53	56	53	Buziaș 54	54	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78 48 60 60 57 64 75 76 78 75 82
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
	Moieciu	62	48	43	32	Buziaș 25	38	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78 34 30 34 25 23 21 23 25 17 25
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Moisei	79	77	81	81	86	87	89	92	94	90	54		59	77		81	91	92
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Negresti-Oas ,	78	75	80	80	Bușteni 82	83	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 86 87 87 96 95 96 95 94 89 91
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Ocna Sibiului	37	41	48	48	Bușteni 43	61	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 80 71 62 23 16 32 47 45 43 48
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Ocna S , ugatag	79	77	75	67	Bușteni 68	49	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 27 25 27 28 33 30 25 22 20 17
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Onces , ti	79	77	81	81	Băile 86	87	84	93	95	92	91		91	92		91	88	75
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Păltinis ,	40	38	29	27	Bușteni 29	37	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 53 39 42 41 36 42 41 47 53 51
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
	Poiana Stampei	79	77	81	81	Buziaș 86	87	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78 38 42 43 48 51 53 96 70 93 93
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Pojorâta	68	68	62	61	Bușteni 60	48	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 50 57 52 64 62 58 59 65 63 65
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Praid	18	17	17	16	Bușteni 15	17	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 14 17 22 24 25 23 27 32 30 29
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
	Săcelu	14	15	25	19	Buziaș 24	25	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78 64 55 76 82 67 87 84 96 93 93
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (												
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
	Sărata-Monteoru	38	36	39	41	Buziaș 55	46	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78 49 49 46 52 63 60 53 38 39 39
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Secu	69	69	68	69	Bușteni 77	76	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 79 80 86 85 89 89 89 85 74 74
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Snagov	45	45	77	79	Bușteni 85	84	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 70 43 39 74 65 65 62 61 52 57
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Solca	79	77	81	81	Bușteni 66	44	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 55 45 66 81 66 76 63 88 7 7
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Sângeorgiu de Mures ,	56	62	71	72	Băile 74	68	10 9 68	7 63	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22 48 47 45 46 46 48 45 42
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW not show large									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Stâna de Vale	3	18	28	36	Băile 57	55	60	76	58	76	24		22	21		44	68	59
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
	Straja	70	71	72	70	Buziaș 78	72	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78 69 77 77 83 73 57 66 75 81 77
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Soveja	79	77	49	55	Bușteni 59	87	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 47 93 89 63 84 90 82 43 73 53
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW not show large								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Tăs , nad	32	25	27	31	Bușteni 30	33	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 36 40 38 40 38 47 50 60 64 68
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
	Tinca	79	77	81	81	Buziaș 86	87	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78 89 93 95 98 97 97 96 96 93 93
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Trei Ape	23	1	4	7	Bușteni 9	7	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 3 1 1 1 1 13 16 2 1 1 4
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
						Călimănești-												
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Vălenii de Munte	77	76	79	78	Bușteni 84	86	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 88 89 93 97 96 95 93 93 86 84
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Vat , a de Jos	64	64	67	68	Bușteni 72	75	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 82 84 73 72 79 78 65 62 69 89
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Vis , eu de Sus	41	42	40	45	Bușteni 48	62	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 57 61 61 61 61 54 55 54 42 35
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Băile Banffy Area	47	57	69	71	Bușteni 75	79	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 78 82 80 88 92 93 90 84 80 73
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Băile Ocna Dej Area	61	54	55	56	Bușteni 52	58	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 77 83 85 91 90 88 91 87 78 79
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Fântanele Area	79	77	81	81	Bușteni 86	87	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 89 46 75 39 97 97 96 96 93 93
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	Moines , ti Băi Area	57	66	74	76	Bușteni 62	70	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 72 74 72 80 78 73 85 90 85 85
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
	Muntele Băisorii Area	26	77	31	54	Buziaș 44	20	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78 22 21 24 17 22 26 38 39 22 12
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	S , uior-Baia Sprie Area	75	72	65	44	Bușteni Buziaș 58	67	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78 73 65 54 50 47 48 45 55 60 55
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


											8 of 27							
	stainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27				
	are of number of companies from the tourism sector in							
	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016							
	87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86							
	38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36							
	18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24							
	65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2013	2014	2015	2016
	39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95							
												Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 85 85 82 86
	27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41							
												Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 33 34 37 36
	23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14	Bușteni General growth trend	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 21 20 23 24
												Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 79 87 77 78
												Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 60 57 94 95
	12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22							
												Băile						
													39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2							
												Felix/1Mai						
	29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52							
												Băile						
													25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
	16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18							
												Herculane						
												Băile						
	55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56							
													10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 13 15 22 22
												Olănești						
	40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45							
												Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
												Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 41 49 49 52
	32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44							
												Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 24 22 19 18
	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15							
												Câmpulung						
	64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
												Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 40 44 46 45
	93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5							
												Călimănești-						
													23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
	14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17							
												Căciulata						
	25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34							
												Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 19 18 15 15
												Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 68 66 67 68
	50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53							
												Dâmbovicioa						
													81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71							
												ra						
	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4							
												Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 18 17 17 17
												Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 30 31 31 34
	66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69							
												Gura						
													41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 53 56 52 53
												Humorului						
												Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 76 73 72 71
	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13							
												Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
												Poiana						
													59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 73 71 71 69
	80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92							
												Brașov						
	47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50							
												Predeal/Pâra						
												ul						
													2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
												Rece/Timișul						
												de Sus						

ank and they have maintained their position throughout eaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones ism is not their main activity, and natural resources can out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, tâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic ra, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, sorts is only 17.3%. 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW					8 of 27
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș ăile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78	Relatively constant trend
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile Herculane Băile Olănești ăile Tușnad 3 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec âmpulung oldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 ălimănești-
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	âmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
	eoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	umorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	redeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
	ece/Timișul 2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile																	
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																	
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	Humorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
	Rece/Timișul																	
	de Sus																	

Table 4 .

 4 Variation of the rankings for the share of profit from the tourism sector in the total profit. 



2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  
	Amara	33	69	60	51	49	50	26	64	43	17	80	38	37	29	39	25	34

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Azuga	38	56	71	Bușteni 58 78	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 42 78 39 34 73 87 32 15 69 83 48 61
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile Felix/1Mai	39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Băile Herculane	25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Băile Olănești	10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura Humorului	41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana Brașov	59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bus , teni	16	16	12	Bușteni 16 18	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 20 21 11 25 39 50 44 32 32 27 17 33
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buzias ,	11	19	25	Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 43 38 41 44 41 44 34 45 34 88 88 92 89 92
					Băile Felix/1Mai	39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Băile Herculane	25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Băile Olănești	10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura Humorului	41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana Brașov	59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Băile Govora	13	21	2	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 1 29 16 22 5 10 7 14 48 48 40 37 89 92 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Băile Felix/1Mai	7	8	16	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 17 7 5 7 8 6 9 11 11 38 15 22 20 25 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Băile Herculane	22	24	4	Buziaș 7	15	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 8 19 16 37 61 65 9 20 21 29 1 13
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Băile Olănes , ti	17	30	9	Bușteni 10	2	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 4 5 9 7 3 3 4 4 2 4 29 27
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Băile Tus , nad	2	2	1	Bușteni 3	1	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 1 3 4 2 6 12 2 5 6 18 7 5
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Bors , a	24	37	32	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 33 33 31 23 38 45 47 52 57 54 72 53 27 66 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Borsec	27	44	6	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 68 68 38 33 51 35 28 68 28 29 34 49 80 88 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Câmpulung Moldovenesc	37	43	35	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 70 48 62 42 46 57 58 47 63 49 48 57 54 63 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Mangalia	20	14	13	Buziaș 29	17	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 12 15 12 8 24 22 22 21 18 20 23 23
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Călimănes , ti-Căciulata	4	7	14	Bușteni 8	6	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 9 12 14 16 27 15 14 33 19 9 2 6
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Costines , ti	5	6	7	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 5 21 30 31 13 24 18 25 20 34 20 34 28 17 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Covasna	14	28	30	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 19 14 23 11 17 11 30 23 31 39 31 32 35 38 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Dâmbovicioara	68	69	71	Buziaș 74	81	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 84 84 30 81 49 13 41 3 12 17 11 26
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Eforie	6	5	8	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 9 12 15 17 20 12 16 19 18 28 16 21 12 11 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Geoagiu-Băi	3	3	19	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 26 34 18 16 27 22 23 24 33 52 50 86 26 41 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Gura Humorului	18	20	21	Buziaș 20	27	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 43 34 32 42 40 29 35 47 67 45 44 52
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Moneasa Poiana Bras , ov	46 35	27 35	62 40	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 39 20 21 35 6 4 22 18 6 10 23 7 5 4 45 57 54 54 63 58 76 56 69 63 62 66 57 62 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Predeal/Pâraul Rece/Timis , ul de Sus	8	9	5	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 11 10 13 13 19 19 19 16 17 8 11 13 13 21 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Pucioasa	42	47	69	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 74 72 44 47 44 54 51 64 71 76 57 56 89 80 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Râs , nov	43	61	34	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 31 37 45 50 52 59 54 38 52 46 54 51 62 70 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Slănic Prahova	48	45	42	Buziaș 22	8	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 3 6 3 3 2 6 5 2 3 3 8 15
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Sinaia	12	23	17	Bușteni 13 11	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 10 9 18 17 38 21 19 18 14 8 9 10
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Sângeorz-Băi	25	15	15	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 6 22 24 27 25 29 35 69 25 14 55 31 31 39 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Slănic Moldova	15	69	57	Buziaș 36	9	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 14 8 7 5 41 9 10 26 28 15 16 1
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Sovata	9	12	22	37	26	27	10		23	9		13	10	8		6	10	11	10	9
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Sucevit , a	23	4	26	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 18 13 6 25 26 27 20 58 40 19 46 19 40 47 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Târgu-Ocna	10	18	18	Buziaș 27	25	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 25 24 21 32 10 8 7 7 8 5 15 12
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Târgu-Neamt ,	57	57	66	Bușteni 57 69	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 73 66 70 52 33 28 47 35 80 79 67 79
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Techirghiol	52	38	37	Bușteni 25 36	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 34 37 48 21 31 33 26 27 24 28 38 42
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Vatra Dornei	29	32	39	Bușteni 49 30	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 33 32 31 38 52 43 23 22 27 30 47 59
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Voineasa	68	69	71	Bușteni 74 47	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 47 20 22 13 25 88 50 51 71 23 36 28
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Mamaia North Area	56	33	71	74	80	75	81		47	76		86	71	61		55	78	71	70	60
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Pes , tera-Padina Area	68	53	41	Bușteni 74 32	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 84 84 34 47 56 39 56 45 36 35 37 19
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Parâng-Petros , ani Area	28	31	38	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Amara 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 Azuga 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 Mamaia 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71 Moneasa 9 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 Poiana Brașov 59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69 Predeal/Pâra ul Rece/Timișul de Sus 2 5 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 9 10 7 9 10 10 9 13 Pucioasa 74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92 Râșnov 46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50 34 45 46 53 62 65 65 62 62 50 53 52 58 55 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
							2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Tourist Area of Piatra-Neamt ,	53	39	53	Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 60 61 69 68 84 73 83 73 81 77 63 70 63 76
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Albac	60	69	71	Bușteni 74	4	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 52 55 2 14 21 17 21 23 39 69 84 54
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
					Rece/Timișul 2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Albes , tii de Muscel	68	69	71	Bușteni 74 81	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 40 2 28 15 12 2 12 36 9 61 43 18
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Aries , eni	68	51	3	Băile 4	24	22	49		10	31		42	7	13		12	13	26	24	7
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Balvanyos	30	46	50	74	43	84	84		71	86		96	79	37		78	65	62	49	40
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Baia de Fier	68	69	71	Bușteni 50 40	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 28 18 40 33 26 41 16 13 25 24 41 36
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bazna	68	69	71	Bușteni 74 81	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 84 84 15 23 36 84 36 74 85 73 59 48
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile												
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra												
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura												
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Bălt , ătes , ti	68	69	71	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 74 81 84 82 89 86 69 46 65 17 38 58 89 87 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Băile Homorod	55	49	48	Buziaș 69	62	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 72 74 76 82 68 72 83 81 75 48 78 69
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai											
					Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane											
					Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata											
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra												
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
					Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
					Humorului											

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Băile Turda	41	36	47	Bușteni 48 59	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 51 63 65 69 84 30 46 41 49 50 39 43
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile												
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra												
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Băile Băit , a	45	50	54	2000 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 59 73 68 57 55 49 75 60 64 73 74 80 64 78 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 2016

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Boghis ,	68	69	71	Buziaș 74	81	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 84 84 92 86 82 92 91 88 88 46 69 50
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai											
					Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane											
					Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata											
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra												

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bran	21	17	24	Bușteni 14 31	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 32 30 24 26 4 4 3 1 5 2 4 2
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile												
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	Breaza	40	64	55	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Amara 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 Azuga 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 44 77 63 67 91 77 94 85 84 62 83 82 89 92 Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Cacica	68	69	71	Buziaș 74	81	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78 84 84 92 86 90 92 86 88 51 85 85 82
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai											
					Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane											
					Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata											
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Calacea	68	69	71	Bușteni 74 81	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 84 84 92 86 91 78 82 88 88 92 88 89
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile												
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Cheia	68	41	56	Bușteni 56 60	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 55 36 37 74 70 61 39 66 45 33 19 32
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile												
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Colibit , a	68	69	71	Băile 74	81	84	76		87	60		48	42	68		56	44	41	53	35
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Crivaia/Semenic	68	69	49	Băile 66	67	2	1		29	20		8	1	15		9	4	6	22	16
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Dorna Candrenilor	68	69	71	Băile 74	76	83	83		90	36		57	26	66		82	88	76	33	31
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


	2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44

Table 4 .

 4 Cont. 



2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2015 2016

  
	Durău	68	60	71	41	23	29	40	53	28	15	49	51	40	37	16	21	53

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Harghita-Băi	51	48	58	Bușteni 55 66	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 71 64 78 67 77 75 76 60 73 72 66 57
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile Felix/1Mai	39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Băile Herculane	25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Băile Olănești	10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura Humorului	41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana Brașov	59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Horezu	68	62	51	Bușteni 65 52	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 48 69 60 62 32 76 53 83 86 67 72 72
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Izvorul Mures , ului	68	69	71	Bușteni 53 50	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 53 84 81 86 71 90 88 87 70 54 52 73
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Lacul Ros , u	34	55	46	Bușteni 46 51	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 65 51 56 64 55 66 42 30 60 68 65 58
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Lacul Sărat	59	54	59	Bușteni 35 44	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 58 48 49 61 60 44 55 80 77 74 86 71
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Lipova	39	40	52	Buziaș 63	55	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 61 39 61 55 50 54 80 79 87 90 73 90
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile Felix/1Mai	39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Băile Herculane	25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Băile Olănești	10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura Humorului	41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana Brașov	59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Moieciu	62	25	28	Buziaș 24	5	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 17 14 45 30 43 34 27 24 26 12 14 24
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
						2000	2001		2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile Felix/1Mai	39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Băile Herculane	25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
	Moisei	68	69	71	Băile Olănești 74 81	10 9 84	84	7	8 92	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22 86 78 59 75 85 68 92 87 85
					Băile Tușnad 3	4		4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					Eforie	6	8		8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura Humorului	41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3		3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana Brașov	59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5		5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Negresti-Oas ,	68	69	71	Bușteni 74 74	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 76 72 86 75 95 92 93 86 88 91 83 86
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Ocna Sibiului	68	69	71	Bușteni 23 16	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 26 79 83 85 46 77 67 88 41 77 51 45
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Ocna S , ugatag	68	69	67	Bușteni 74 81	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 64 46 42 41 45 32 45 31 17 14 32 22
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Onces , ti	68	69	71	Băile 74	81	84	77		92	86		96	37	59		70	58	60	89	30
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Păltinis ,	19	26	20	Bușteni 15 28	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 36 59 54 46 44 31 49 57 42 47 55 64
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Poiana Stampei	68	69	71	Buziaș 74	81	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 84 65 77 53 66 70 85 88 88 92 89 92
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Pojorâta	50	69	45	Buziaș 47	58	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 67 60 58 66 92 67 78 43 76 88 75 77
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Praid	54	13	27	Buziaș 28	39	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 37 28 35 39 37 36 29 44 43 36 34 20
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Săcelu	68	10	10	Bușteni 2	3	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 11 84 43 86 62 53 93 88 88 10 89 92
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Sărata-Monteoru	36	22	36	Buziaș 30	35	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 39 41 36 48 64 27 24 25 33 42 46 51
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Secu	58	52	33	Buziaș 40	54	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 66 62 72 80 72 82 89 84 79 84 61 74
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Snagov	65	63	65	Buziaș 72	63	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 79 58 66 79 59 35 43 61 81 55 68 67
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Solca	68	69	71	Bușteni 74 81	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 59 71 67 86 85 40 93 88 88 40 3 8
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large												
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Sângeorgiu de Mures ,	63	67	64	Băile 54	53	56	73		85	70		79	48	74		67	22	38	56	46
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
					not show large													
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Stâna de Vale	1	11	11	Bușteni 21 81	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 57 84 57 51 5 20 1 16 59 75 30 37
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012		2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Soveja	68	69	71	Bușteni 71 75	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 84 56 92 86 29 92 70 71 7 43 50 29
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large												
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Tăs , nad	32	34	31	Băile 42	46	35	52		79	63		89	81	79		69	84	64	82	75
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large												
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Tinca	68	69	71	Buziaș 74	81	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 84 84 92 86 96 92 93 88 88 92 89 92
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large												
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Trei Ape	31	1	23	Buziaș 12	19	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 7 4 1 1 1 5 30 11 1 1 6 3
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Vălenii de Munte	66	69	63	74	81	81	84		75	72		81	89	93		88	88	89	76	81
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

not 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Vat , a de Jos	68	42	71	Bușteni 74 81	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 77 84 74 86 67 92 90 42 30 92 42 91
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
					not show large													
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Vis , eu de Sus	64	65	43	Bușteni 62 65	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 74 43 73 83 74 74 60 59 47 44 45 44
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	Băile Banffy Area	49	59	71	67	64	82	70		82	71		93	86	92		75	66	78	77	65
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Băile Ocna Dej Area	61	58	61	Bușteni 52 56	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 60 38 80 78 88 83 87 68 82 87 79 83
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Fântanele Area	68	69	71	Buziaș 74	81	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 84 84 59 50 14 92 93 88 88 92 89 92
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	Moines , ti Băi Area	47	66	70	Buziaș 73	79	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78 78 75 88 84 87 91 72 65 64 63 74 68
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile													
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
	Muntele Băisorii Area	44	69	71	Bușteni 38 42	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24 19 29 33 18 11 55 73 72 35 25 18 14
					Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai													
					Băile													
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane													
					Băile													
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
					Olănești													
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung													
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-													
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata													
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa													
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului													
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra													
					ul													
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul													
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
							2000	2001		2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
					Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
					Băile													
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile													
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
					Herculane												
	S , uior -Baia Sprie Area	67	68	68	Băile 61	70	10 9 80	80	7	8 68	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22 40 53 51 77 58 56 81 81 84
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4		4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
					ra													
					Eforie		6	8		8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
					Gura													
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
					Moneasa	9	3		3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
					Poiana													
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
					Brașov													
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul													
							2	5		5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus													
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


												8 of 27						
	ied rank and they have maintained their position throughout						
	an, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones						
	tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can						
	stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara,						
	iol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category						
	Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27		
	neral trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic						
	icioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu,						
	ese resorts is only 17.3%.													
	the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in						
	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016						
	84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86						
	51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36						
	16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24						
	60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2014	2015	2016
	29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95						
													Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 82 86
	30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41						
													Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 34 37 36
													Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 20 23 24
	19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14	General growth trend				
													Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 87 77 78
													Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 57 94 95
	13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22						
													Băile					
														39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 37 38 41
	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2	Felix/1Mai					
	34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52	Băile					
														25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 14 14 14
	17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18	Herculane					
													Băile					
	54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 15 22 22
													Olănești					
	33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
													Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 49 49 52
	28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44						
													Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 22 19 18
	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15	Câmpulung					
	61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 60 54 56
													Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 44 46 45
	91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5						
													Călimănești-					
														23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 46 44 44
	11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17	Căciulata					
	24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 18 15 15
													Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 66 67 68
	50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53						
													Dâmbovicioa					
														81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71	ra					
	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 17 17 17
													Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 31 31 34
	66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69						
													Gura					
														41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 56 52 53
													Humorului					
													Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 73 72 71
	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13						
													Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
													Poiana					
														59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 71 71 69
	74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92	Brașov					
	46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50	Predeal/Pâra					
													ul					
														2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 9 13
													Rece/Timișul					
													de Sus					
													Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 93 93 92
													Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


							Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW					8 of 27
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
																			Relatively constant
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36	trend
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile																	
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																	
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	Humorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
	Rece/Timișul																	
	de Sus																	
	Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24	General decrease trend
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile																	
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																	
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34
	Gura																	
		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
	Humorului																	
	Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
	Rece/Timișul																	
	de Sus																	
	Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92
	Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 5 .

 5 Variation of the rankings for the arithmetic mean of the four economic indicators from the tourism sector. 



2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					not show large										
	Amara	33	39	46	48	49	47	36	51	49	33	53	59	56	44	47	35

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					not show large											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Azuga	55	57	57	54	Bușteni 57	51	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 51 48 40 68 51 44 29 46 48 48
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bus , teni	13	16	14	16	Bușteni 20	20	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 21 17 28 9 33 34 28 29 28 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Buzias ,	17	23	24	Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 32 37 41 38 45 44 42 47 45 52 50 82 55
					Băile Felix/1Mai	39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
					Băile Herculane	25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Băile Olănești	10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
					Gura Humorului	41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
					Poiana Brașov	59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					de Sus												
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Govora	4	11	2	2	Buziaș 8	7	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 6 5 9 8 13 18 14 12 9 94
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Felix/1Mai	9	12	12	13	Buziaș 9	9	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 9 9 7 10 10 13 36 14 17 17
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Herculane	11	13	3	4	Buziaș 6	3	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 10 11 16 27 28 15 19 18 26 7
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Olănes , ti	16	19	8	10	Bușteni 2	4	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 4 7 5 4 5 4 3 4 7 25
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-												
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Tus , nad	1	2	1	1	Buziaș 1	1	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 2 2 2 3 9 3 6 3 3 2 2
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra											
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bors , a	32	35	37	35	Bușteni 34	30	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 29 36 37 46 48 48 48 54 55 40
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Borsec	31	36	16	34	Buziaș 39	32	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 34 47 42 41 54 42 45 48 49 49
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Câmpulung Moldovenesc	40	43	44	57	Bușteni 50	54	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 49 53 57 59 55 61 59 61 65 56
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Mangalia	20	20	19	27	Buziaș 22	23	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 25 21 22 32 34 33 33 30 30 34
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


				Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
					Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
					Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Călimănes , ti-Căciulata 3	5	6	5	Buziaș 5	8	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 8 10 11 19 14 16 12 10 5 3 4
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
					Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
					Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
					Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
				Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
					Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
					Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
				Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
					ra												
					Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
					Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
					Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
					Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul											
					de Sus												
					Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
					Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Costines , ti	5	4	7	7	Bușteni 10	14	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 14 15 13 13 18 19 23 23 31 26
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Covasna	23	24	28	26	Buziaș 27	29	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 27 28 26 37 32 36 37 34 38 32
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Dâmbovicioara	81	80	85	86	Bușteni 89	91	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 93 49 36 34 17 26 10 13 18 9
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
	Eforie	10	6	10	11	Băile Olănești 15	18	10 9 17	7 18	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 18 20 24 25 27 22 21 14
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Geoagiu-Băi	8	9	17	18	Bușteni 25	19	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 22 26 14 17 20 24 24 24 24 22
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout
					the period (											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Gura Humorului	30	29	30	29	Buziaș 30	37	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 40 39 41 48 42 49 57 60 56 53
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large										
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Mamaia	44	38	45	50	Buziaș 54	57	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 62 66 67 81 73 73 72 70 69 69
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Moneasa	22	8	4	9	Buziaș 7	10	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 13 3 3 6 6 1 8 11 4 4 3
						Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
						Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
						Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
						Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large											
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Poiana Bras , ov	53	51	56	62	Băile 64	58	63	67	68	78	72		75	75		75	74	72
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
					not show large												
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Predeal/Pâraul Rece/Timis , ul de Sus	6	7	9	Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 12 11 11 12 12 10 14 12 12 7 8 8 13
					Băile												
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-												
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
					ra												
					Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
					Gura												
						41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
					Humorului												
					Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
					Poiana												
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul												
						2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul												
					de Sus												
					Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
					Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large										
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Pucioasa	51	50	68	77	Buziaș 79	64	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 68 68 77 77 83 81 86 83 80 93
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large										
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Râs , nov	60	61	50	44	Buziaș 45	52	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 54 55 52 57 50 51 47 47 50 52
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Slănic Prahova	7	10	5	6	Bușteni 4	5	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 5 4 4 2 3 2 1 2 2 5 7
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
						Călimănești-												
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

not 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
					not show large											
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Sinaia	18	22	21	19	Bușteni 21	17	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 15 19 20 28 23 23 15 15 12 10
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Sângeorz-Băi	19	21	18	15	Băile 28	26	28	29	32	44	59		41	34		51	44	42
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

not 
Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
					not show large										
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Slănic Moldova	25	32	25	33	Buziaș 13	12	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 7 6 6 26 11 9 21 27 23 23 6
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Sovata	14	18	27	28	26	28	20	23	15	18	16		14	13		17	20	18
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Sucevit , a	26	3	20	21	Bușteni 19	13	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 16 16 12 11 15 17 11 16 10 31
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Târgu-Ocna	24	30	29	39	Buziaș 40	35	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 41 35 47 25 22 20 22 25 25 33
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Târgu-Neamt ,	69	71	76	65	Bușteni 71	71	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 78 75 66 53 56 71 60 84 83 77
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Techirghiol	39	34	35	31	Bușteni 44	40	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 42 46 31 40 46 46 46 42 46 50
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Vatra Dornei	35	37	36	38	Buziaș 31	33	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 33 34 34 39 35 32 30 31 37 38
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura											
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului											
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
						Poiana											
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov											
					Predeal/Pâra										
						ul											
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 13
					Rece/Timișul										
						de Sus											
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Voineasa	48	60	64	74	Bușteni 55	55	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 35 33 29 36 45 47 51 52 41 41
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Mamaia North Area	78	68	79	82	Băile 85	87	10 9 90	7 78	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 89 91 89 86 78 76 77 75
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Pes , tera-Padina Area	50	44	47	43	Bușteni Buziaș 35	48	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 52 44 48 47 39 40 38 32 34 29
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Parâng-Petros , ani Area	54	49	61	61	Băile 67	69	10 9 81	7 84	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 85 86 84 80 81 77 75 74
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 50

Table 1 .

 1 15riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.141517 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
						2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
					Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
					Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
					Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Tourist Area of Piatra-Neamt ,	68	64	74	Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 75 77 79 82 85 83 87 87 87 83 80 79 76
					Băile												
						39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
					Felix/1Mai												
					Băile												
						25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
					Herculane												
					Băile												
						10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
					Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
					Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
					Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
					Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-												
						23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
					Căciulata												
					Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
					Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
						81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
					ra												
					Eforie 9 12 11 Mamaia 6 8 8 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
					Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4
					Poiana												
						59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
					Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul												

Table 1 .

 1 15riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.141517 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Albac	38	45	49	42	Bușteni 23	34	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 30 8 21 22 26 27 31 40 43 43
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie 9 12 11 Mamaia 6 8 8 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69

Table 1 .

 1 15riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.141517 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Albes , tii de Muscel	81	80	85	86	Bușteni 89	36	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 11 27 25 12 4 11 17 9 15 15
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie 9 12 11 Mamaia 6 8 8 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Aries , eni	81	33	13	14	Băile 16	16	23	14	23	23	8		10	9		7	13	19	8
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
					Rece/Timișul 2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 1 .

 1 15riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.141517 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Balvanyos	28	27	31	76	33	83	87	42	96	45	38		35	44		39	42	36
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie 9 12 11 Mamaia 6 8 8 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 1 .

 1 15riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.141517 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 


	Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW											8 of 27
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 Costinești 5 6 10 7 8 9 8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 Covasna 73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68 Dâmbovicioa ra 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9 4 4 3 5 6 7 6 5 Eforie 6 8 8 9 12 11 Baia de Fier 57 55 53 51 51 31 31 43 39 38 43 29 26 33 36 46

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bazna	81	80	85	86	Bușteni 56	59	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 56 30 35 51 67 50 50 59 40 28
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17

Table 1 .

 1 15riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.141517 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 53 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Bălt , ătes , ti	81	80	85	86	Băile 81	84	69	72	76	79	64		67	41		53	73	78
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie 9 12 11 Mamaia 6 8 8 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
	Băile Homorod	71	67	58	64	Buziaș 61	56	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 65 63 63 60 61 65 63 65 54 65
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
						Câmpulung										
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	5
						ra											

Table 1 .

 1 33riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3333 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Turda	61	56	69	63	Bușteni 66	61	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 74 71 80 85 57 66 65 72 66 60
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa 45 38 38 Costinești 5 6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68

Table 1 .

 1 33riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3333 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Băile Băit , a	76	77	80	81	Bușteni 83	81	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 83 76 71 90 88 89 89 90 89 84
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
						Băile											
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa 45 38 38 Costinești 5 6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15

Table 1 .

 1 33riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3333 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45 Călimănești-Căciulata 23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 


	Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW											8 of 27
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
	Bușteni Buziaș Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 Borșa 45 38 38 Boghis , 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 96 70 63 41 38 32 28 22 27

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane												
	Bran	29	26	32	22	Băile 29	27	26	20	17	7	7		5	4		6	6	6	5
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95
						Băile											
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41
						Felix/1Mai											
						Băile											
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14
						Herculane											
	Breaza	45	46	55	56	Băile 65	66	72	77	79	82	85		82	79		81	84	94
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18
					Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 45
					Călimănești-										
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44
						Căciulata											
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 68
					Dâmbovicioa										
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra											

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 Câmpulung Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 56 


	Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW											8 of 27
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 Borșa 45 38 38 Cacica 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 96	8 3	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 2 73 76 77 83 84 63 67 71

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52 Borsec 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 18 


	Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW										8 of 27
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile Olănești 10 9 7 Băile Tușnad 3 4 4 Borșa 45 38 38 Calacea 81 80 85 86 89 91 93 94	8 3	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2 95 96 95 94 95 94 97 91

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Cheia	74	48	52	52	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile 53 53 45 50	54	55	44		39	42		36	32	39
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
						Olănești											
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 52

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014		2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 86
	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile													
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2

Table 5 .

 5 Cont. 



2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  
	Colibit , a	81	80	85	86	89	91	86	92	82	67	70	77	55	58	63	47

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.Amara 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86 Azuga 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


								2000	2001	2002	2003		2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Crivaia/Semenic	81	80	39	20	Băile Olănești 18	6	10 9 3	7 13	8	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 5 2 6 2 5 14 16 21
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3		2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7		8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4		5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra												
					ul Rece/Timișul		2	5	5	5		7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.Amara 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86 Azuga 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. 


							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Dorna Candrenilor	81	80	85	86	Băile 70	75	66	83		43	54	40		54			74	53	45	40
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Amara 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86 Azuga 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Durău	15	25	26	17	14	15	19	22	19	15	19		22			26	16	12	22
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Harghita-Băi	72	65	70	67	Bușteni 75	77	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 76 82 81 84 86 84 85 81 80 76
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile Felix/1Mai		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Băile Herculane		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Băile Olănești		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung Moldovenesc	44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-Căciulata	23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa ra	81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura Humorului		41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana Brașov		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
					Predeal/Pâra											
					ul Rece/Timișul	2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 15riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.141517 16 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11										

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Moieciu	43	28	34	25	Buziaș 17	22	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 18 24 24 24 21 21 20 11 11 19
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung											
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 15riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.141517 16 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11										

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Poiana Stampei	81	80	75	79	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile 89 91 48 60	50	62		76	76			67	90	94	95
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Pojorâta	52	52	40	41	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile 48 44 39 37	38	43		36	43			41	45	44	45
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Praid	21	15	22	23	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile 24 25 24 25	30	31		29	28			35	35	30	26
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Săcelu	27	17	23	8	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile 12 21 46 40	58	72		69	78			78	27	94	95
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
						Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
						Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Sărata-Monteoru	42	31	41	36	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile 42 39 43 38	45	52		37	37			38	39	37	37
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
						Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14 Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile													
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-																

Table 1 .

 1 34riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.3439 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36 Bușteni 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 Buziaș 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78 Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95 Băile Felix/1Mai 39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41 Băile Herculane 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Sângeorgiu de Mures ,	62	63	73	73	Azuga 32 36 34 Băile 10 9 7 76 72 77 74	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 69 69 62 70 43 52 58 54
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-												
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa												
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra												
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul												
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Stâna de Vale	2	14	15	24	Bușteni 36	42	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 44 52 46 21 31 8 45 51 47 52
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																
	Băile																
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																
	Băile																
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																
	Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
	Geoagiu-																

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW									8 of 27
							2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
							39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
							25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	Băile Banffy Area	66	75	81	80	82	86	85	90	87	92	91		91			86	87	82	79
						Băile												
							10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
							23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
							81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
							41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
							59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
							2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa	74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov	46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Băile Ocna Dej Area	77	76	78	78	Bușteni 78	78	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 70 91 92 93 92 93 92 92 86 86
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Fântanele Area	81	80	85	86	Bușteni 89	91	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 93 41 59 29 97 97 97 97 94 95
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Moines , ti Băi Area	65	73	82	83	Bușteni 84	88	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 88 89 91 94 93 90 93 91 88 90
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW								8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009		2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Muntele Băisorii Area	37	80	42	40	Bușteni 38	24	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24 32 31 27 16 25 31 37 29 20 10
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
						Băile												
								10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. 


					Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27
								2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
						Amara		62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
						Azuga		32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
						Bușteni		13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
						Buziaș		43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
					Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
						Băile												
								39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
						Felix/1Mai												
						Băile												
								25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
						Herculane												
	S , uior -Baia Sprie Area	75	74	72	59	Băile 68	73	10 9 75	7 69	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 55 74 63 72 71 76 73 75
						Olănești												
					Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
						Borșa		45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
						Borsec		20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
					Câmpulung												
					Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
						Mangalia		27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
					Călimănești-											
								23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
						Căciulata												
						Costinești		5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
						Covasna		73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
					Dâmbovicioa											
								81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
						ra												
						Eforie		6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
					Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
						Gura												
								41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
						Humorului												
						Mamaia		52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
						Moneasa		9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
						Poiana												
								59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
						Brașov												
					Predeal/Pâra											
						ul												
								2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
					Rece/Timișul											
						de Sus												
						Pucioasa		74 66 71 79 70 74 80 83 84 90 88 91 94 93 93 92
						Râșnov		46 46 35 45 41 46 47 46 48 47 43 39 37 42 47 50

Table 1 .

 1 Variation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies. and they have maintained their position throughout eaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones ism is not their main activity, and natural resources can out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, tâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic ra, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, sorts is only 17.3%. 


											8 of 27							
	stainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW							8 of 27				
	are of number of companies from the tourism sector in							
	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016							
	87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86							
	38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36							
	18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24							
	65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95							
												Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 84 76 85 85 82 86
	27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41							
												Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 41 38 33 34 37 36
	23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14	Bușteni General growth trend	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 23 23 21 20 23 24
												Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 77 81 79 87 77 78
												Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 59 60 57 94 95
	12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22							
												Băile						
													39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 32 32 37 38 41
	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2							
												Felix/1Mai						
	29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52							
												Băile						
													25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 20 16 16 14 14 14
	16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18							
												Herculane						
												Băile						
	55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56							
													10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
												Olănești						
	40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45							
												Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
												Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 37 41 49 49 52
	32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44							
												Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 17 21 24 22 19 18
	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15							
												Câmpulung						
	64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 54 57 57 60 54 56
												Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 42 41 40 44 46 45
	93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5							
												Călimănești-						
													23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 40 47 47 46 44 44
	14 15 17 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17							
												Căciulata						
	25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34							
												Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 15 17 19 18 15 15
												Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53							
												Dâmbovicioa						
													81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71							
												ra						
	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4							
												Eforie	6	8	8	9 12 11 14 15 17 16 16 15 18 17 17 17
												Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 28 31 30 31 31 34
	66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69							
												Gura						
													41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 55 58 53 56 52 53
												Humorului						
												Mamaia	52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 78 74 76 73 72 71
	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13							
												Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
												Poiana						
													59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 69 73 71 71 69
	80 83 84 90 88 88 91 94 93 93 92							
												Brașov						
	47 46 48 47 46 43 39 37 42 47 50							
												Predeal/Pâra						
												ul						
													2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 7	9 10 10 9 13
												Rece/Timișul						
												de Sus						

ank 
Table 1 .

 1 15riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.141517 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 eoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura umorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 


							Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW					8 of 27
		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara Azuga Bușteni Buziaș ăile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95 62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86 32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36 13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24 43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78	Relatively constant trend
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile Herculane Băile Olănești ăile Tușnad 3 25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14 10 9 7 8 9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 6 4 5 6 3 2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec âmpulung oldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56 20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18 Mangalia 27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45 ălimănești-
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	âmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie 9 12 11 Mamaia 6 8 8 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	redeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
		2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 1 .

 1 15riation of the rankings for the share of number of companies from the tourism sector in the total number of companies.141517 16 18 16 15 18 17 17 17 Geoagiu-Băi 19 20 21 22 24 24 25 32 29 28 30 28 31 30 31 31 34 Gura Humorului 41 38 36 42 49 50 50 53 52 54 54 55 58 53 56 52 53 


		2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
	Amara	62 62 68 73 80 84 87 78 81 84 85 84 76 85 85 82 86
	Azuga	32 36 34 34 39 51 38 36 42 45 44 41 38 33 34 37 36
	Bușteni	13 14 15 15 14 16 18 21 23 26 27 23 23 21 20 23 24
	Buziaș	43 47 44 62 55 60 65 74 71 76 74 77 81 79 87 77 78
	Băile Govora 28 26 24 32 32 29 39 40 50 60 58 58 59 60 57 94 95
	Băile																	
		39 40 39 44 37 30 27 31 31 29 31 31 32 32 37 38 41
	Felix/1Mai																	
	Băile																	
		25 23 26 30 21 19 23 22 18 18 22 20 16 16 14 14 14
	Herculane																	
	Băile																	
		10 9	7	8	9 13 12 13 13 12 12 11 14 13 15 22 22
	Olănești																	
	Băile Tușnad 3	4	4	3	2	3	3	4	5	6	7	6	4	5	6	3	2
	Borșa	45 38 38 33 33 34 29 28 32 34 35 35 37 41 49 49 52
	Borsec	20 15 11 16 16 17 16 19 26 19 24 17 21 24 22 19 18
	Câmpulung																	
	Moldovenesc 44 44 47 52 53 54 55 52 58 55 50 54 57 57 60 54 56
	Mangalia	27 25 23 27 25 33 40 39 44 44 41 42 41 40 44 46 45
	Călimănești-																	
		23 33 28 29 29 28 32 35 36 38 43 40 47 47 46 44 44
	Căciulata																	
	Costinești	5	6 10 7	8	9	8 12 14 11 14 15 17 19 18 15 15
	Covasna	73 71 78 72 61 61 64 67 66 70 70 70 66 68 66 67 68
	Dâmbovicioa																	
		81 80 85 86 89 91 93 33 9	4	4	3	5	6	7	6	5
	ra																	
	Eforie 9 12 11 Mamaia 6 8 8 52 52 57 57 65 69 70 71 74 75 73 78 74 76 73 72 71
	Moneasa	9	3	3	4	5	4	4	2	2	3	3	4	3	3	3	4	4
	Poiana																	
		59 58 64 59 66 66 66 68 73 74 72 72 69 73 71 71 69
	Brașov																	
	Predeal/Pâra																	
	ul																	
	Rece/Timișul 2	5	5	5	7	6	6	6	6	9 10 7	9 10 10 9 13

Table 6 .

 6 The number of environmental conflicts in the tourist resorts from Romania. 


	Resort	Environmental Conflict	Resort	Environmental Conflict	Resort	Environmental Conflict
	Amara	10	Târgu-Neamt ,	18	Lipova	0
	Azuga	11	Techirghiol	3	Moieciu	
	Bus , teni	6	Vatra Dornei	17	Moisei	
	Buzias ,	0	Voineasa	31	Negresti-Oas ,	
	Băile Govora	1	Mamaia North Area	14	Ocna Sibiului	
	Băile Felix/1Mai	1	Pes , tera-Padina Area	33	Ocna S , ugatag	
	Băile Herculane	13	Parâng-Petros , ani Area	5	Onces , ti	
	Băile Olănes , ti	3	Tourist Area of Piatra-Neamt ,	11	Păltinis ,	0
	Băile Tus , nad	16	Albac	16	Poiana Stampei	1
	Bors , a	0	Albes , tii de Muscel	23	Pojorâta	8
	Borsec	19	Aries , eni	24	Praid	
	Câmpulung Moldovenesc	9	Balvanyos	19	Săcelu	1
	Mangalia	8	Baia de Fier	12	Sărata-Monteoru	8
	Călimănes , ti-Căciulata	16	Bazna	21	Secu	7
	Costines , ti	1	Bălt , ătes , ti	1	Snagov	8
	Covasna	13	Băile Homorod	9	Solca	
	Dâmbovicioara	21	Băile Turda	12	Sângeorgiu de Mures ,	
	Eforie	18	Băile Băit , a	13	Stâna de Vale	5
	Geoagiu-Băi	4	Boghis ,	19	Straja	
	Gura Humorului	8	Bran	36	Soveja	
	Mamaia	9	Breaza	3	Tăs , nad	3
	Moneasa	24	Cacica	9	Tinca	
	Poiana Bras , ov	8	Calacea	10	Trei Ape	
	Predeal/Pâraul Rece/Timis , ul de Sus	11	Cheia	9	Vălenii de Munte	
	Pucioasa	10	Colibit , a	34	Vat , a de Jos	
	Râs , nov	12	Crivaia/Semenic	37	Vis , eu de Sus	
	Slănic Prahova	14	Dorna Candrenilor	28	Băile Banffy Area	
	Sinaia	28	Durău	16	Băile Ocna Dej Area	9
	Sângeorz-Băi	4	Harghita-Băi	17	Fântanele Area	8
	Slănic Moldova	25	Horezu	1	Moines , ti Băi Area	9
	Sovata	12	Izvorul Mures , ului	17	Muntele Băisorii Area	
	Sucevit , a	3	Lacul Ros , u	19	S , uior -Baia Sprie Area	
	Târgu-Ocna	16	Lacul Sărat	19		
	Between 0 and 9 environmental conflicts	Between 10 and 19 environmental conflicts	Between 20 and 41 environmental conflicts

Sustainability 2019, 11, 7155; doi:10.3390/su11247155 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability 

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 27 

deforestation in Romania [37,38], as well as in research on the impact of deforestation on the occurrence and development of imbalances in natural ecosystems [39][40][41]. Thus, it is necessary in future studies to carry out a detailed analysis of the deforestation areas for increasing the complexity of the tourist function in the tourist resorts in Romania. 
The results obtained can contribute to the development of methodologies dedicated to the analysis of the role of tourism in the development of local economies, contributing to increasing the relevance of design models that measure the contribution of tourism to sustainable development at the local and regional level. 


Funding: This research received no external funding. 

Conflicts of Interest:

The authors declare no conflict of interest. 


not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%. not show large fluctuations in the occupied rank and they have maintained their position throughout the period (Azuga, Covasna, Sinaia, Bran, Breaza, etc.). The second category is occupied by the ones with a general trend of decrease, where tourism is not their main activity, and natural resources can not support their development. They stand out with a fairly high share of about 29.6% (Amara, Mangalia, Eforie, Geoagiu-Băi, Techirghiol, Stâna de Vale, Lacul Sărat, Săcelu, etc.). The last category identified is that of the resorts with a general trend of growth where tourism has led to local economic development: Băile Herculane, Dâmbovicioara, Slănic Moldova, Arieșeni, Crivaia/Semenic, Moieciu, Ocna Șugatag, etc. The share held by these resorts is only 17.3%.
Alexandra Grecu, Andreea Karina Gruia, Marian Marin, Mariana Bănuță, Cosmin Olteanu, Ionuț Constantin, Mihaela Gadoiu, Camelia Teodorescu, Răzvan Cătălin Dobrea, Cristian Constantin Drăghici
Specificity of Sustainable Structural Dynamics of Local Economy in Romanian Tourist Resorts