content_image/370511.jpg
spinon phase ϑ$_{s}$ ( x ) must be pinned to a constant value ϑ$_{s}$ ( x $_{) = (}$√$_{2}$$_{π}$$_{)}$$_{−}$ $^{1}$[ π 2 + nπ ], n = 0 , 1 , 2 .. . Therefore, the system has no spinon excitations, and the only excitations are spinless fermions. It is this constraint which gives strong exponential decays of the spinon correlation function. As a result, the system is described effectively by a spinless system. Therefore, due to the exclusion of double occupancy, the electronic density in the wire will be half in comparison to the leads, where the constraint is absent. This changes will modify the commutation equation for the electron number from [ ϑ$_{e}$ ( x ) , P$_{e}$ ( x ′ )] = iδ ( x − x ′ ) to a new commutator [ ϑ$_{e}$ ( x ) , P$_{e}$ ( x ′ )]$_{D}$ = i $_{2}$δ ( x − x ′ ). 

For the remaining part, we will work with the full constraint operator given in equa- tion (16). The constraint Q$_{1}$ ( x, t ) must be satisfied at any time. Therefore, we must have dQ$_{1}$ ( x,t ) dt | F > = 0. Using the Heisenberg equations of motion with the non-interacting anoma- lous commutator given in equation (6), we compute : i ¯ h dQ$_{1}$ ( x,t ) dt = [ H$_{wire}$, Q$_{1}$ ( x, t )]. The condition dQ$_{1}$ ( x,t ) dt | F > = 0 can be satisfied only if one introduces a new constraint Q$_{2}$ ( x ) given by [ Q$_{1}$ ( x, t ) , H$_{wire}$ ] : 

<img src='content_image/370511.jpg'>

The constraint must annihilate the ground state, Q$_{2}$ ( x ) | F > = 0, and we must also have dQ$_{2}$ ( x,t ) dt | F > = 0. In order for this to happen, we need to include a third constraint Q$_{3}$ ( x ) ∝ [[ Q$_{1}$ ( x, t ) , H$_{wire}$ ] , H$_{wire}$ ] which is given by: Q$_{3}$ ( x ) = sin [2 K$_{F}$x + √ πϑ$_{e}$ ( x $_{)](}$√$_{2}$$_{P}$$_{e}$$_{(}$$_{x}$$_{))}$ 2 + sin $_{[}$√$_{2}$$_{πϑ}$$_{s}$$_{(}$$_{x}$$_{)]}$$_{P}$ 2 $_{s}$( x ). Continuing this process, we identify additional constraints Q$_{4}$ ( x ), Q$_{5}$ ( x )..... The third order constraint Q$_{3}$ ( x, t ) ∝ [[ Q$_{1}$ ( x, t ) , H$_{wire}$ ] , H$_{wire}$ ] can be written as a second order time derivative Q$_{3}$ ( x, t ) ∝ d $^{2}$Q$_{1}$ ( x,t ) dt 2 . The higher order constraints Q$_{i}$ ( x, t ), i = 3 , 4 , 5 , .. can be neglected since they are represented by higher order time derivatives : Q$_{i}$ ( x, t ) ∝ d i − $^{1}$Q$_{1}$ ( x,t ) dt i − 1 , i ≥ 3 [35]. 

Following [1, 30], we find that the operators Q$_{i}$ ( x ) i=1,2 form a set of Second Class constraints, [ Q$_{1}$ ( x ) , Q$_{2}$ ( x )] ≈ < F | [ Q$_{1}$ ( x ) , Q$_{2}$ ( x )] | F > ̸ = 0. In order to find the new commu- tation rules for our system, we will use the Lagrange multiplier fields λ$_{i}$ ( x ) which will be multiplied by the step function h ( x, d ) (which is one for | x | ≤ d 2 and zero otherwise). We are interested to find the commutation rules for the full wire-leads system. In order to do this, we replace the Hamiltonian H$_{wire}$ + H$_{leads}$ by the the Hamiltonian H$_{T}$ which is a function of the Lagrange fields λ$_{i}$ ( x ) that enforce the constraints Q$_{i}$ ( x ) for the wire [1]. Since we have no constraints for the leads, we will introduce the step function h ( x, d ) which is zero for the 

