content_image/457667.jpg content_image/457668.jpg
<img src='content_image/457667.jpg'>

<img src='content_image/457668.jpg'>

and mitigation strategies for continuity of the service in case of absence of the member of the team) which might appear during the implementation of the assignment; 5 points 

• Propose risk mitigation actions and explain their likely effectiveness. 5 points 

5. MEASURES TO GUARANTEE QUALITY OF DELIVERABLES (10 points - minimum threshold 60% i.e. 6/10 to pass minimum quality threshold for this criteria) This is to assess the quality assurance mechanisms put in place to guarantee the high quality of deliverables. The tenderer should explain : 

• Role of team leader / leading partner in quality assurance; 5 points 

Special additional measures for quality assurance proposed for this particular project. 5 points 

QUALITY AWARD CRITERIA FOR LOT 3: Roadmap for action risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals 

1. UNDERSTANDING OF THE ASSIGNMENT AND TASKS REQUIRED (max. 35 points - minimum threshold 60% i.e. 21/35 to pass minimum quality threshold for this criteria) 

This is intended to assess the extent to which the offer demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment and project objectives covering all the aspects of the technical specifications. 

## The tenderer should: 

• Describe how they propose to provide the services described in the technical specifications and to perform the work necessary for achieving the objectives requested in this open call; 

• Demonstrate awareness regarding methods development, tools harmonisation, data consolidation and implementation of human health risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals, dietary and non- dietary, across EFSA’s domains of activity; 

• Demonstrate awareness of EFSA needs in the area of combined exposure to multiple chemicals into account the information in the theme paper (Annex 5) and in the tender specifications; 

• Demonstrate that the proposal is within the scope of this Open Call. 

2. METHODOLOGY PROPOSED FOR IMPLEMENTATION (max. 25 points - minimum threshold 60%, i.e. 15/25 to pass minimum quality threshold for this criterion) 

The degree to which the proposed methodology shows that the tenderer has the capacity to implement his knowledge in the area of combined exposure to multiple chemicals, dietary and non-dietary, and regulatory chemical risk assessment in order to address the tasks underlined in the tender specifications. In particular the tenderer should: 

• Provide a proper methodology for addressing all objectives and include convincing justification for the choice of the proposed methodology; 2 points 

