⦁ $_{How does this experience relate to previous lessons? }$ 

⦁ $_{What might be done to mitigate a similar risk in a future situation? }$ 

⦁ $_{Which aspects of this experience might apply to future situations, and how? }$ 

⦁ $_{What personal minimums should be established, and what additional proficiency flying and/or training }$ might be useful? 

Any self-assessment stimulates growth in the learner’s thought processes and, in turn, behaviors. An in-depth discussion between the instructor and the learner may follow, which compares the instructor’s assessment to the learner’s self-assessment. Through this discussion, the instructor and the learner jointly determine the learner’s progress. The progress may be recorded on a rubric as part of a training program. As explained earlier, a rubric is a guide for scoring performance assessments in a reliable, fair, and valid manner. It is generally composed of dimensions for judging learner performance, a scale for rating performances on each dimension, and standards of excellence for specified performance levels. 

The collaborative assessment process in learner-centered grading uses two broad rubrics: one that assesses the learner’s level of$_{ }$ proficiency on skill-focused maneuvers or procedures, and one that assesses the learner’s level of proficiency on single-pilot resource management (SRM), which is the cognitive or decision-making aspect of flight training. 

The performance assessment dimensions for each type of rubric are as follows: 

## Maneuver or Procedure “Grades”$_{ }$ 

⦁ $_{Describe—at the completion of the scenario, the learner is able to describe the physical characteristics and }$ cognitive elements of the scenario activities but needs assistance to execute the maneuver or procedure successfully. 

⦁ $_{Explain—at the completion of the scenario, the learner is able to describe the scenario activity and }$ understand the underlying concepts, principles, and procedures that comprise the activity, but needs assistance to execute the maneuver or procedure successfully. 

⦁ $_{Practice—at the completion of the scenario, the learner is able to plan and execute the scenario. Coaching, }$ instruction, and/or assistance will correct deviations and errors identified by the instructor. 

⦁ $_{Perform—at the completion of the scenario, the learner is able to perform the activity without instructor }$ assistance. The learner will identify and correct errors and deviations in an expeditious manner. At no time will the successful completion of the activity be in doubt. (“Perform” is used to signify that the learner is satisfactorily demonstrating proficiency in traditional piloting and systems operation skills). 

⦁ $_{Not observed—any event not accomplished or required. }$ 

For example, a learner can describe a landing and can tell the flight instructor about the physical characteristics and appearance of the landing. On a good day, with the wind straight down the runway, the learner may be able to practice landings with some success while still functioning at the rote level of learning. However, on a gusty crosswind day the learner needs a deeper level of understanding to adapt to the different conditions. If a learner can explain all the basic physics associated with lift/drag and crosswind correction, he or she is more likely to practice successfully and eventually perform a landing under a wide variety of conditions. 

## Assessing Risk Management Skills 

⦁ $_{Explain—the learner can verbally identify, describe, and understand the risks inherent in the flight scenario, }$ but needs to be prompted to identify risks and make decisions. 

⦁ $_{Practice—the learner is able to identify, understand, and apply SRM principles to the actual flight situation. }$ Coaching, instruction, and/or assistance quickly corrects minor deviations and errors identified by the instructor. The learner is an active decision maker. 

⦁ $_{Manage-Decide—the learner can correctly gather the most important data available both inside and outside }$ the flight deck, identify possible courses of action, evaluate the risk inherent in each course of action, and make the appropriate decision. Instructor intervention is not required for the safe completion of the flight. 

