content_image/142996.jpg content_image/143009.jpg content_image/143010.jpg
The breakdown of the fair value of plan assets is as follows: 

<img src='content_image/142996.jpg'>

## 1. Japanese plan assets 

Equity comprises mainly investment trust funds and it is categorised as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. 

The fair values of bonds are measured using quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, and they are categorised as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. 

Cash and other investments include alternative investments. 

## 2. Overseas plan assets 

Equity and bonds are mainly composed of investments with quoted prices in active markets, and they are mainly categorised as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. 

Cash and other investments include alternative investments. 

Significant actuarial assumptions and sensitivity analysis for each significant actuarial assumption are as follows: 

<img src='content_image/143009.jpg'>

A 0.5% increase or decrease in the discount rate as significant actuarial assumption would lead to a ¥12,560 million decrease and ¥14,026 million increase, respectively, in the defined benefit obligation. 

The sensitivity analysis does not consider correlations between assumptions, assuming that all other assumptions 

The weighted-average duration of the defined benefit obligation is as follows: 

are held constant. In practice, changes in some of the assumptions may occur in a correlated manner. When calcu- lating the sensitivity of the defined benefit obligations, the same method has been applied as calculating the defined benefit obligations recognised in the consolidated statements of financial position. 

<img src='content_image/143010.jpg'>

