content_image/347888.jpg content_image/347889.jpg content_image/347894.jpg
<img src='content_image/347888.jpg'>

<img src='content_image/347889.jpg'>

denote by a$_{min}$ ( z ) and a$_{max}$ ( z ) the location of the minimum and maximum fourth cumulant. For z = − 9 . 87 we have a$_{min}$ ≈ 1 . 06965 and a$_{max}$ ≈ 2 . 51275. A simple scaling projection gives that roughly K$_{max}$ ( L ) ≈ K$_{c}$ + 0 . 22 /L 5 / 2 and K$_{max}$ ( L ) − K$_{min}$ ( L ) ≈ 0 . 093 /L 5 / $^{2}$. Also K$_{c}$ ≈ 0 . 113915, see $^{24}$. Thus, in principle at least, the rescaling between a and K is 

<img src='content_image/347894.jpg'>

However, this kind of expression is somewhat too simplistic to get figure 23. It would take higher-order corrections to scaling to produce it but this would probably take a more involved numerical study of the 5D-model. Other investigations of the 5D-lattice includes e.g. $^{11}$,25 and $^{24}$. 

