content_image/369123.jpg content_image/369124.jpg content_image/369126.jpg content_image/369125.jpg content_image/369127.jpg content_image/369128.jpg
<img src='content_image/369123.jpg'>

<img src='content_image/369124.jpg'>

<img src='content_image/369126.jpg'>

<img src='content_image/369125.jpg'>

<img src='content_image/369127.jpg'>

<img src='content_image/369128.jpg'>

inter-band electronic transitions by separating the bands as follows: the first set consists of the two bands forming h -like FS sheets plus all the occupied bands and the second set consists of the all bands forming electron-like FS plus all the empty bands. Clearly such a grouping of the bands disregards band crossings ( e.g. , those of the e bands with filled states around M ). Fig. 5 shows static susceptibility resolved according to this criteria. Looking at various contributions around the Γ point it becomes clear that in both doped and undoped cases the low momentum susceptibility is dominated by the intra-band contribution ( e − e and h − h ). Doping leads to a strong reduction in the h − h contribution, which is expected since the effect of doping is to shrink the hole FS sheets around the Γ point. On the other hand around the M point and in the rest of the plane the inter-band e − h contributions dominate. Upon doping this inter-band contribution does not change substantially except in the very vicinity of the M point where a volcano like feature is formed. This can be easily understood as a consequence of the change of shape of the FS upon doping; the asymmetry between the e and h sheets becomes stronger resulting in a reduction of the strength of the nesting. 

In order to investigate how the response of LaO$_{1}$ − $_{x}$F$_{x}$ FeAs is affected by the change in 

