events.action: opened
events.author: nrjpoddar
events.text: The HTTP wildcard listener fall through FCM was not adding the mixer v1 filter
  which was causing telemetry to be missing for BlackHole/Passthrough case.
events.title: Added Mixer v1 filter for fall through FCM in HTTP
events.type: issue
events.action: created
events.author: nrjpoddar
events.text: I'm going to enable tests based on the results of the checks.
events.type: comment
events.action: created
events.author: nrjpoddar
events.text: /test unit-tests_istio
events.type: comment
events.action: created
events.author: douglas-reid
events.text: @nrjpoddar what needs to be done here?
events.type: comment
events.action: created
events.author: nrjpoddar
events.text: Time and probably understanding the failed test case. I can't follow that unit test very easily.
events.type: comment
events.action: created
events.author: douglas-reid
events.text: Still a priority for 1.6 ?  Should we pull in help?
events.type: comment
data_with_bots.bot: @nrjpoddar: The following test **failed**, say `/retest` to rerun all failed tests:
  
  Test name | Commit | Details | Rerun command
  --- | --- | --- | ---
  unit-tests_istio | 87db2db982f48fad77b7758c322b94f6c8902794 | [link](https://prow.istio.io/view/gcs/istio-prow/pr-logs/pull/istio_istio/22739/unit-tests_istio/11334) | `/test unit-tests_istio`
  
  <details>
  
  Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md).  If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository. I understand the commands that are listed [here](https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands).
  </details>
  <!-- test report -->
data_with_bots.meta: This message directly preceded comment from bot *istio-testing* by author *nrjpoddar*:
data_with_bots.text: I'm going to enable tests based on the results of the checks.
data_with_bots.bot: @nrjpoddar: The following test **failed**, say `/retest` to rerun all failed tests:
  
  Test name | Commit | Details | Rerun command
  --- | --- | --- | ---
  unit-tests_istio | 7bf77dac3e4830fc06d6995d956bad325c370797 | [link](https://prow.istio.io/view/gcs/istio-prow/pr-logs/pull/istio_istio/22739/unit-tests_istio/11336) | `/test unit-tests_istio`
  
  <details>
  
  Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md).  If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository. I understand the commands that are listed [here](https://go.k8s.io/bot-commands).
  </details>
  <!-- test report -->
data_with_bots.meta: This message directly preceded comment from bot *istio-testing* by author *nrjpoddar*:
data_with_bots.text: /test unit-tests_istio
data_with_bots.bot: 🧭 This issue or pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity from an Istio team member since 2020-04-23. It will be closed on 2020-06-07 unless an Istio team member takes action. Please see [this wiki page](https://github.com/istio/istio/wiki/Issue-and-Pull-Request-Lifecycle-Manager) for more information. Thank you for your contributions.
  
  
  _Created by the issue and PR lifecycle manager_.
data_with_bots.meta: This message directly preceded comment from bot *istio-policy-bot* by author *douglas-reid*:
data_with_bots.text: Still a priority for 1.6 ?  Should we pull in help?
data_without_bots.meta: This message directly preceded comment from bot *istio-testing* by author *nrjpoddar*:
data_without_bots.text: I'm going to enable tests based on the results of the checks.
data_without_bots.meta: This message directly preceded comment from bot *istio-testing* by author *nrjpoddar*:
data_without_bots.text: /test unit-tests_istio
data_without_bots.meta: This message directly preceded comment from bot *istio-policy-bot* by author *douglas-reid*:
data_without_bots.text: Still a priority for 1.6 ?  Should we pull in help?