In CI 371, delivered in 1995, the Grand Justices ruled: "A judge who when hearing a case has reasonable grounds to believe that the law as applicable thereto may violate the Constitution, should be en titled before ruling to seek resolution by petitioning for a constitutional interpretation."
大法官在八十四年做成釋字第三七一號，認為「法官於審理案件時，對於應用之法律，依其合理之確信，認為有抵觸憲法之疑義者，自應許其先聲請解釋憲法，以求解決」。