But Chiang Kai-shek only came to Taiwan to exercise occupation as the representative of the Allied Powers. He did not thereafter allow Taiwan to exercise self-determination. It remained an occupation, and therefore the talk about KMT rule having always been legitimate is just the KMT-centric viewpoint, not the Taiwan-centric viewpoint.
但當初蔣介石其實只是代表盟軍來台行使佔領權，之後卻沒有讓台灣行使自決權，這還是佔領，所以那種從頭到尾合法的說法，是以國民黨為中心的觀點，而不是站在以台灣為中心的觀點來說的。