In an op-ed piece, a judge, aside from applauding the Grand Council's ruling, also raised practical considerations, arguing that this constitutional ruling brought dejure equality but did not resolve the practical matter of judges needing clear standards upon which to base decisions. If the courts must determine the meaning of "household residence" on a case-to-case basis, then the ruling "might just make matters worse."
在一片為大法官喝采之餘，也有法官提出審判實務上的質疑，認為此釋憲案只得到形式上的平等，並未解決實質問題，法官審判一定要有標準，假如連住所地都要由法官來裁判認定，豈不是「治絲益棼」？