If oral testimony is not treated as pure history, but rather is viewed in the same light as a newspaper report, it can be read and then forgotten. But if oral history becomes the foundation of scholarly writing, or itself becomes printed up as a final product, it is very possible there will be problems.
如果口述歷史不被當作歷史著作，像報紙新聞一樣，看看便忘也就罷了，但若變成學術專著的註釋，被引用成為文章，很難說不成問題。