For example, the US argues that it is unreasonable to demand that when an American company files a lawsuit claiming IPR violation, the representative in the suit must be the chairman of the board of the American parent company. Because each country is different on the question of who can represent the company, why should foreign companies determine their representative based on ROC company law?
例如美國認為我國司法單位要求美國公司提起智慧財權侵權訴訟時，代表美國公司提出訴訟之人需為總公司之董事長，就不合理，因為何人可以代表公司，每國不同，外國公司如何能依據我國的公司法決定代表人係何人？