Preservation advocates have raised suspicions of government collusion with vested business interests, while supporters of demolition are suspicious of the attention-seeking of celebrities, egging on the sanatorium residents to take a stand and making the situation impossible to turn around. How should we choose between the 41 % and 90 % solutions?
在主張保存者質疑有既得利益者官商勾結、主張拆除者則質疑文化界以此沽名釣譽，唆使老院民抗爭而使事情無法轉圜之際，到底 41 % 與 90 % 兩案應如何抉擇？