For example, some overseas Chinese houses that were confiscated and resold have since changed hands many times over. Naturally the current resident, who acquired the house quite lawfully, will not consider the house as being "occupied." Or what about an overseas Chinese from Taishan in Guangdong Province who paid from abroad for a house in Guangzhou City--should the responsibility for settling the restoration of ownership lie with Guangzhou or Taishan?
譬如有些僑房被沒收拍賣後又轉了好幾手，現住戶當然不承認自己合法取得的房子是所謂的「佔用」僑房；又如原籍廣東省台山縣僑民，卻在廣州市購置僑房，如今退還的責任，應該算在廣州市頭上，還是由台山縣負責？