Proposed new rules will strictly ban holders of elective or executive office from financially backing, holding stock in, or managing electronic media enterprises. While there is a consensus about these proposed changes among the ruling and opposition parties, many observers are skeptical: If politicians only withdraw from the media in form, but turn over their stock to relatives, wouldn't the rules be rendered meaningless?
從媒體的資金來源、持股背景、經營者的黨職或公職身分等等，予以嚴格限制的形式改革，雖然獲得朝野一致共識，但外界也質疑，政治人物若只是形式上退出媒體，卻將股權轉移給親人，又有何意義？