[Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread
<h1 id="title">Elliquiy Role Playing Forums</h1>
		<h2 id="linktree">Play-By-Post: Light =&gt; Light: Human Small Groups =&gt; Topic started by: MadPanda on 22-01-2007, 05:28:57</h2>
		<dl id="posts">
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>[Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>22-01-2007, 05:28:57</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Every game has one.&nbsp; This is ours.&nbsp; ;)<br><br>and just in case anyone's wondering 'why the alternate setting'?<br><br>I'm a big fan of the original books, and the game (there's a reason my copy is so dang dog-eared and worn!).&nbsp; But sometimes, having all those Elders around can get in the way.&nbsp; So here we have a 'younger' equivalent of Amber--the massive family tree isn't all filled in, and the Matriarch is a bit nicer than Oberon.&nbsp; (But only a little bit, as you'll see later).<br><br>If you really want the equivalents:<br>Mom = Oberon<br>Indira = Fiona<br>Darius = Eric? with a hint of Florimel<br>Adnan = Bleys<br>Aysel = Julian in a Dierdre suit<br><br>This way, I hope you get the opportunity to do the usual kicking around in Shadow without having to worry about your own family quite so much.&nbsp; ;)&nbsp; It also means I don't get to use them as a <em>deus ex machina</em> if things go sour.&nbsp; It's a fair trade, I think.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>22-01-2007, 11:52:16</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Two quick questions.&nbsp; One, does the city have a navy?&nbsp; Or is it landlocked?<br><br>And two, just wondering if you had read the Betancourt novels?&nbsp; A prequel series leading to the founding of Amber.&nbsp; I have read the first one (think there are three), but it seemed like a good way to use Amber without all the family hanging about.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>22-01-2007, 14:56:49</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I'll getting there on the descriptions...&nbsp; ;)&nbsp; Had to get some sleep first.<br><br>Al-Ahlam is landlocked.<br><br>I read the first Betancourt novel, tried the second but just couldn't get into it.&nbsp; (You are right: there are three in all.)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 02:17:16</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				*crumples up one character idea, tossing it over shoulder*&nbsp; So much for that idea.&nbsp; :)<br><br>No problem on the description, I can wait.&nbsp; Won't have much time to do much anything until Wednesday.<br><br>I only read the first one.&nbsp; Not to bad, not as good as Zelznay's Amber books.&nbsp; But was thinking it might make a good idea, to play Amber near the beginning of the city, instead of the later version we see in Zelzany's books.&nbsp; Just a possible idea I was tossing out.<br><br>Oh, can we do contributions to get more points?&nbsp; Or are we limited to 65 points plus whatever bad stuff we can stand?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 03:34:01</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Technically, I'm <em>already</em> giving you points for both Character Diary and Game Log, since a play-by-post sort of provides both...<br><br>What did you have in mind?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 05:02:07</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I've never read the Amber novels, MP.&nbsp; How much would I need to know about the setting to make an appropriate character?<br><br>(If need be, the problem can be rectified in reasonably short order.&nbsp; I read quickly.)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 05:08:11</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				For <em>this</em> game?&nbsp; Long's you know the rules, you should be fine...well, mostly fine.&nbsp; ;D<br><br>The game, however, was definitely written by fans of the novels, for fans of the novels.&nbsp; And they're a fun read.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 10:48:20</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=8562.msg304656#msg304656">Quote from: MadPanda on 23-01-2007, 03:34:01</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Technically, I'm <em>already</em> giving you points for both Character Diary and Game Log, since a play-by-post sort of provides both...<br><br>What did you have in mind?<br></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>Mostly, just wondering.&nbsp; For example, can someone do Trumps of the various characters (not me, since I can't draw)?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 14:47:53</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				If someone wants to do Trumps, I'm perfectly willing to give 'em a few extra points for it.&nbsp; ;D
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 17:00:29</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Should we start sending bids for attributes even before we have a finalized concept, MP?&nbsp; I think I grasp the rules, more or less, but I need to get through some of the books before I'm sure what fits.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 17:03:50</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				You shouldn't need to read the books so long as you have a grasp of the rules.&nbsp; ;)&nbsp; The key point in the attribute auction is to get as high as you can without going over-budget...in hopes of beating the others.&nbsp; It's a bit like Chicken in some regards, now that I think about it.&nbsp; ;)<br><br>Go ahead and PM me if you have specific questions about your concept.&nbsp; We don't want any secrets getting accidentally divulged beforehand!
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 17:12:38</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I don't know enough to ask specific questions yet, sadly.&nbsp; But I should have bids ready soon enough.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 17:18:14</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				That's cool&nbsp; :)&nbsp; I've only gotten one set so far.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>TheAlchemist</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 17:32:13</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Just keep in mind a few points when bidding:<br><br>1) Bids are 'spent points', i.e even if you bid say 25 on strength, and only get 2nd rank (or lower), those 25 points are still <strong>gone</strong>.<br><br>2) The points you have (65 in our case) are what you can use for both the attribute bids <strong>and</strong> buying the extra stuff (magic, Trump etc), so don't spend them all on bidding.<br><br>3) Have at least a <strong>general</strong> idea of your character concept before you bid - i.e do you want him to be the Psychic type, the Strong type, the Warrior type - and bid accordingly. You can always "buy up" on a certain attribute (match a higher 'final' bid) once the auction is over, if you have the points.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 17:42:41</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=8562.msg304949#msg304949">Quote from: TheAlchemist on 23-01-2007, 17:32:13</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">1) Bids are 'spent points', i.e even if you bid say 25 on strength, and only get 2nd rank (or lower), those 25 points are still <strong>gone</strong>.<br></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>Understood, but it's also better to be a close second than a weak second, isn't it?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 17:44:06</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Second is second...but when dealing with NPCs, since it's a straight point-to-point comparison, a close second may save your bacon&nbsp; :)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>TheAlchemist</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 17:59:03</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Also, this is where the other attributes come into play (or may not, depending on GM's style).<br><br>Say the 2 top ranked warriors are dueling. If rank 1 was only a couple points above rank 2, then maybe Endurance comes into play - what if the duel came after a long chase, and rank 2 fighter is rank 1 Endurance? Suddenly the fighter's superiority isn't so clear-cut...
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 18:04:12</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I like to reward clever tactical thinking, even when I can't come up with anything myself.&nbsp; ;D&nbsp; There's nothing worse than a straight "highest score wins, period" approach.<br><br>And, thanks to a long-dead website, I have a copy of an alternate conflict resolution system that takes into account things like Endurance.&nbsp; It makes more work (for the GM), but the results are worth it.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>TheAlchemist</strong> on <strong>23-01-2007, 18:22:10</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				And the beauty is, it really is all in the books - that Endurance-deciding duel isn't an 'out of the air' example, it really did happen when Corwin and Eric crossed swords :)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>24-01-2007, 17:07:31</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I've got four opening bids sitting in my grubby little paws.&nbsp; Are we waiting on anyone else, or is it time to reveal los nombres?&nbsp; ;)<br><br>UPDATE: the only possible fifth of whom I'd known has decided to decline...for now.&nbsp; We might see them later.<br><br>The bidding, she is open.<br><br>ALSO UPDATE:&nbsp; If you haven't already started thinking of a name, a physical description, and things like any personal symbols or colors your character likes to wear, now's a good time to start.&nbsp; ;D<br><br>
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>26-01-2007, 01:17:15</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Question, MP: as the campaign opens and the PCs are all turning 18, have they already Walked the Pattern (or the Al-Ahlam equivalent) and spent some (minimal) time messing around in Shadow, or has that yet to come?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>26-01-2007, 01:18:42</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				That has yet to happen.<br>(Guess what you get to do on your birthday?)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>26-01-2007, 22:03:34</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Woot!&nbsp; One PC submitted and approved.&nbsp; We need a Cast thread...
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>28-01-2007, 23:47:01</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I thought the attribute auction was going to be really annoying, but it's actually a lot of fun in a deranged sort of way.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>29-01-2007, 17:21:59</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				We're shaping up nicely.&nbsp; Two finished characters, and two in the works.&nbsp; I have a funny feeling the auction is now just about wrapped up...
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>29-01-2007, 23:07:23</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				For the record, MP, how will attribute increases work for the front-runners?&nbsp; Will they need enough points to catch up to whatever NPC is above them to get anywhere, or are intermediate steps a possibility?<br><br>(On the same note, should we start formulating wish lists for increases already, or will it be a good while before that starts mattering?)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>29-01-2007, 23:34:13</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Since it'll be a while before we get there, go ahead and start thinking about wish lists, but don't worry too much about it at this point.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>30-01-2007, 18:16:32</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Only one last PC to go!<br><br>Those of you who have them...this is <em>not</em> mandatory, but your GM would like a description of your artifacts and/or personal shadows.<br><br>By spending points on these things, they become part of the campaign in a sense (you don't have a generic Sword +1 versus Anything, you have Excalibur, Blade of Destiny!) and this will help me give you a more complete return on your investment.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>31-01-2007, 16:12:52</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				An excellent question has been put before me via PM.<br><br>Do I expect that there will be politicking in this campaign, or is this simply about young Amberites getting themselves into trouble across Shadow?<br><br>Short answer: Yes.<br><br>Longer answer: there will be politics and intrigue, just not necessarily <em>within the family</em>.&nbsp; With the amounts of Good Stuff I'm seeing, your elder siblings are more likely to be kindly disposed than not.&nbsp; And Mom really doesn't like internal bickering...&nbsp; I would hope that you will (mostly) hang together or at least keep your rivalries and inter-group intrigues subtle!&nbsp; &nbsp;;)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>31-01-2007, 21:00:10</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=8562.msg308027#msg308027">Quote from: Jefepato on 29-01-2007, 23:07:23</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">For the record, MP, how will attribute increases work for the front-runners?&nbsp; Will they need enough points to catch up to whatever NPC is above them to get anywhere, or are intermediate steps a possibility?<br></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>And now for the first half of my answer (the bit about wish lists I've already done), now that I've had a chance to think about it.<br><br>Attribute increases will depend on the front-runners building new rungs as they do.&nbsp; Catching up to the NPCs is not required.&nbsp; What this means, though, is that if someone at, say, Rank 1.5 goes for an increase, and someone at Rank 1 does not, they might just find themselves suddenly at Rank 2...<br><br>But you all knew that.&nbsp; ;D
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>01-02-2007, 21:30:37</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				The Auction Thread, she is kaput.&nbsp; Once I have Zephyr in my grubby little paws and get a chance to do any shake-out chat that may be required, the big shiny red candy-like button will be pushed and we will proceed.<br><br>I'm still wondering how we're going to handle 'private' stuff, since Elliquiy has no facility for (say) private lines or 'secret' threads...we could potentially go on the honor system, but, well...(&nbsp; :D )<br><br>Any ideas?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>01-02-2007, 22:46:11</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				How much stuff do we need to keep private?&nbsp; If there's really that much, the honor system wouldn't bother me <em>too</em> much.&nbsp; I can probably trust my fellow players not to read about all the plans I have for killing them.<br><br>You could probably put private lines in beige text, though, so important data won't be seen by accident.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>01-02-2007, 22:49:42</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Ohhhh, things like...<br><br>Trump calls (player to player, player to NPC, NPC to player...)<br>Secret plots (the player vs. player sort, not that we should see many of those)<br>Individual side trips through shadow (not 'secret' per se, but hard to coordinate)<br><br>Beige text is a good idea.&nbsp; I've used it before for mechanical stuff to avoid cluttering up a story thread.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>01-02-2007, 23:07:53</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				The fact that player vs. player plots are likely to be rare is the main reason I'm not too worried.&nbsp; I think beige text will suffice -- you can always take it to PMs if something comes up that absolutely must be inviolate.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>02-02-2007, 02:23:14</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=8562.msg309510#msg309510">Quote from: MadPanda on 01-02-2007, 21:30:37</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">The Auction Thread, she is kaput.&nbsp; Once I have Zephyr in my grubby little paws and get a chance to do any shake-out chat that may be required, the big shiny red candy-like button will be pushed and we will proceed.<br><br></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>As long as it is the "Game Start" button, and not the "History Eraser" button, all should be well.&nbsp; &nbsp;;D<br><br>
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>02-02-2007, 04:08:14</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				The tempting, shiny, candy-like red History Eraster Button?&nbsp; No, that's next week.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>02-02-2007, 04:11:56</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				"What happens if we press it?"<br><br>"That's just it, we don't know.&nbsp; Maybe something good, maybe something bad."<br><br>Uhm, I volunteer to push it.&nbsp; Again and again and again.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>04-02-2007, 18:58:27</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Woot!&nbsp; We's launched!<br>Go have a good read, kiddies.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>04-02-2007, 21:09:56</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Gonna be a little slow (at best) posting today, MP.&nbsp; The Super Bowl is quite the distraction.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>04-02-2007, 21:12:07</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				That's perfectly all right.&nbsp; I have to go attend (ghasp!) dance practice as my voice acting class enters Convention Performance Preparation Mode.&nbsp; Thus my replies may be few and far between.&nbsp; ;)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>05-02-2007, 12:15:39</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Just to be sure.&nbsp; I am guessing that we are supposed to wait for one to finish walking the Pattern before the next starts?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>05-02-2007, 15:02:57</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Nope.&nbsp; You're all supposed to hop on and hustle along&nbsp; ;)&nbsp; Otherwise this might take forever.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 15:56:33</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Speaking of taking forever...<br><br>Where'd everybody go?&nbsp; Helloooooooo...
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 16:00:45</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Maybe Adnan should push them.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 16:08:06</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Heh.&nbsp; He'd enjoy that, but getting blood on the Pattern is a Bad Thing.<br><br>Our delinquents have been gently nudged.&nbsp; If they don't post soon, I will roll right over them without mercy...<br><br>(sigh)&nbsp; And they logged off without responding.&nbsp; Come on, guys!
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 17:21:00</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Sorry, work has been rough the last couple of days, left with little energy to post.&nbsp; Have posted.&nbsp; Danesh is just waiting to see if Inanna wants to walk it next, before walking it himself.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 17:25:14</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				OK.&nbsp; RL concerns are valid.&nbsp; ;)&nbsp; One too many cases of playerus vanishingus make for a paranoid GM&nbsp; :P
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 17:28:09</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Also trying to come up with something for the Patternwalk.&nbsp; Am guessing that we will have mental flashbacks as we walk the Lion's Foot?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 17:41:25</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Actually, I was going to gloss over that, for the most part...the point here is just to get you folks moving.&nbsp; ;D&nbsp; If you want to have a few flashbacks, though, that's fine.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 18:03:11</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Glossing over the flashbacks would be fine.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 18:04:26</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				If you ever come back and do this again, that'll be another thing entirely&nbsp; ;D
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 22:09:46</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				By the way, MP, how'd we all turn eighteen on the same day?&nbsp; Are we fraternal quadruplets, or does Empress Oblivia just pull a lot of shenanagins with fast-time Shadows?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 22:22:26</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I'm sorry, Friend Citizen, but that information is not available at your security clearance.&nbsp; ;D<br><br>You are not quadruplets, though...and as far as anyone knows, the Empress has never been a) married or b) pregnant.<br><br>I laugh maniacally in your general direction.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 22:28:35</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				If I wasn't playing this particular character, I would totally go find a Paranoia Shadow.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 22:47:34</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Well, as long as Mommy isn't living in a Texas trailer park and create fire with her hands, and Daddy is running for Congress in New York, and oh yes, can fly, think Danesh will be okay.&nbsp; :)<br><br>
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>07-02-2007, 23:31:13</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Your parentage is one of those little mysteries that you may or may not resolve, depending on how much you decide to hunt for the answers.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>27-02-2007, 15:31:03</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Okay, I've set up individual threads for you for those little one-off personal quests and so on that are inevitable.&nbsp; Very soon now Adnan is going to turn you four loose.&nbsp; Feel free to detail your wanderings through shadow at your leisure--this is a good opportunity to go looking for your shadow or personal item!<br><br>I'm tempted to give you a certain amount of time to play with before we move to Part Two.&nbsp; Five to ten years subjective, say?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>27-02-2007, 23:19:43</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Sounds good.&nbsp; One can't help but look forward to seeing what happens when a group of super-powered 18-year-olds get loose in Shadow.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>27-02-2007, 23:23:45</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				That's the general idea, yes...&nbsp; &nbsp;;D
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>01-03-2007, 02:43:48</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Anyway, MP, is it (subjective to when the group left Al-Ahlam) mid-day-ish or more like evening?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>01-03-2007, 03:12:33</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Local time is early evening...but earlier than it 'should' be.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>05-03-2007, 08:34:29</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Does anyone have anything else to say or do before morning?&nbsp; Perhaps we should move on, lest the game lose all momentum.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>05-03-2007, 15:23:24</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				(makes note, prepares to fast forward...)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>06-03-2007, 02:14:43</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Nope, nothing much to say or do.&nbsp; Other than saying his goodnights and heading off to bed, had nothing in mind for Danesh until the morning.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>06-03-2007, 02:20:42</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				When you split up the next morning, feel free to start posting in your own independent quest threads.&nbsp; ;D&nbsp; For the most part, at least to start, I'm likely to be fairly liberal with what I'll allow...<br><br>this will be an opportunity for you to detail your quests for that artifact or personal shadow!&nbsp; Plus you get a little 'you' time to develop your character's skillsets a bit.<br><br>Except, of course, for Zephyr...who has another set of issues before him.&nbsp; Heh heh heh.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>TheAlchemist</strong> on <strong>06-03-2007, 09:58:21</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=8562.msg323750#msg323750">Quote from: MadPanda on 06-03-2007, 02:20:42</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Except, of course, for Zephyr...who has another set of issues before him.&nbsp; Heh heh heh.<br></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>Gotta love sinister GM laughter... &lt;gulps&gt;
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>14-03-2007, 16:55:32</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Wow.&nbsp; One re-org and everybody quits posting&nbsp; &gt;:(&nbsp; Except Zephyr, who at least contacted me to let me know he was lost.<br><br>PMs sent.&nbsp; Let's get this back on the road, folks.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>15-03-2007, 02:20:31</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Uhm, was waiting for a response.&nbsp; I had wondered if it were possible to block a Trump call, since no one had mentioned that.&nbsp; In the Blood Gift's thread.&nbsp; Since I think there was still one or two characters that had yet to take off.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>15-03-2007, 03:22:13</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Ah.<br>FYI...if I don't respond in a timely fashion to a question, PM me.&nbsp; I may not realize you're waiting for something!&nbsp; Easy to get sidetracked.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>15-03-2007, 03:40:04</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				No problem.&nbsp; The way that E is doing threads is a bit.... confusing.&nbsp; <br><br>Just one thing.&nbsp; Next time, check to see if someone has posted before you jump on them for not posting.&nbsp; :)<br><br>
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>15-03-2007, 15:27:30</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Actually, Max, I pinged everybody (except the person who PM'd me to ask were the game was, 'cause their bookmarks didn't work anymore).
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Max</strong> on <strong>16-03-2007, 15:22:53</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				There are bookmarks?&nbsp; Oh, like my Munchkin Bookmark of Goodness, or was it Ultimate Power?&nbsp; Can never remember.&nbsp; &nbsp;;D
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>16-03-2007, 15:24:15</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I used to have the Gothic themed one somewhere.&nbsp; I might still have it.&nbsp; Not being a Munchkin player on general principles, I've never used the thing except as a bookmark.<br><br>(pounds fist into palm)<br><br>I know!&nbsp; I left it in my copy of the Kamasutra!
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>16-03-2007, 16:51:41</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				The re-org seems pointless and annoying to me, but clicking "Show new replies to your posts" brings up the transferred threads just like it should, so it more or less works out.<br><br>Although my IC thread doesn't actually have anything yet.&nbsp; (This is actually sort of a good thing, since I'm deluged by posts in many other games now that I'm back in town.)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>16-03-2007, 16:53:25</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				That's 'cause unless I dropped the ball again, you haven't left on any personal errands just yet...&nbsp; ;D<br><br>If I've missed something, by all means PM me when you have the time and we'll go from there.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>21-03-2007, 18:46:21</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				(reads Jacob's brief history and laughs)<br><br>Brilliantly done!&nbsp; Alas, I have to let the others catch up, which may take a bit.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>21-03-2007, 19:01:31</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I thought about zeroing in on one or two of the more amusing scenes, but I was feeling far too lazy to write up an entire bar fight.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>21-03-2007, 19:02:42</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				The worst bar fight in Basra's history... ;D ;D ;D&nbsp; that's a good one!
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>21-03-2007, 19:06:14</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Most likely the bar no longer existed afterwards.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>03-04-2007, 19:37:31</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Okay, we're slowing down...who's not responding?<br>Or did I forget somebody again?&nbsp; &nbsp;:(
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>03-04-2007, 19:41:49</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I believe Max still needs to describe Danesh's downtime activities, and Rayve hasn't quite gotten to that point with Inanna yet.&nbsp; You haven't forgotten anyone.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>10-04-2007, 22:24:51</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I've PM'd both of them.<br><br>If they don't respond, they'll just get overrun.&nbsp; I'm tired of this game sitting here.&nbsp; Time to get a move on.&nbsp; &nbsp;&gt;:(
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>11-04-2007, 05:38:28</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Update--<br><br>One of our two respondents seems to have decided to just quit on us, which puts me in a real positive mood for continuing this game.&nbsp; My morale is hitting bottom repeatedly due to <em>playerus nonresponsivus</em> in other games as well.<br><br>Am I wasting my time with this, or do the rest of you wish to continue?&nbsp; We may need a replacement, assuming I haven't misunderstood the party in question (and hopefully I have because I hate losing people).<br><br>&nbsp;:( :( :( :( :(<br><br>As a courtesy to the others, if you have a problem or need to leave, PLEASE let us know before dropping off the radar so that we can accomodate you.&nbsp; If I had known that it would have taken this long to get responses, I would have been PMing certain folks over two weeks ago.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>11-04-2007, 05:43:15</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I still wish to continue.&nbsp; You're a pretty damned good GM, so I'm not really sure why you keep having problems.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>11-04-2007, 05:58:31</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Yeah, I used to think so, too&nbsp; :P&nbsp; Hence my little morale issue!<br><br>That's one vote to keep going, and I know Inanna's going to want to continue.&nbsp; :-\
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>TheAlchemist</strong> on <strong>11-04-2007, 10:03:50</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGO!<br><br>And go right ahead and put a want ad for replacement players, a lot of new blood has trickled in over the past fortnight, and there's always people who missed the original recruiting and so forth.<br><br>I'm with Jefepato on this, I was enjoying your GM'ing a lot.&nbsp; ;D
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>11-04-2007, 15:22:20</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Max is bailing.<br>Do we advertise for a direct replacement (ie someone gets his character) or do I just kill him off out in Shadow somewhere?&nbsp; Decisions, decisions....
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>11-04-2007, 15:33:37</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Kill him out in Shadow.&nbsp; With fire.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>TheAlchemist</strong> on <strong>11-04-2007, 16:05:57</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I'm thinking Shadow, unless whomever replaces him REALLY wants his char. Amber characters (I feel) are too hard to play and enjoy if they're not *yours*, if you get my drift.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>11-04-2007, 16:07:43</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Now, as to any replacements who show up...I'll have to think about this, but they'll probably have to come in when the PLOT takes off again unless someone wants to step into Danesh's shoes directly and take over.<br><br>Our resident Alchemist makes a really good point about Amber characters.&nbsp; Problem is, <em>having someone quit makes hash out of the damn attribute auctions</em>.&nbsp; So I gotta think about this carefully.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Jefepato</strong> on <strong>11-04-2007, 16:12:41</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=8562.msg337267#msg337267">Quote from: TheAlchemist on 11-04-2007, 16:05:57</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Amber characters (I feel) are too hard to play and enjoy if they're not *yours*, if you get my drift.<br></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>Personally, I feel this way about <em>all</em> RPG characters.<br><br>(And hey, I don't mind Jacob becoming the frontrunner in Warfare!)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>TheAlchemist</strong> on <strong>11-04-2007, 17:13:22</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=8562.msg337270#msg337270">Quote from: Jefepato on 11-04-2007, 16:12:41</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">Personally, I feel this way about <em>all</em> RPG characters.</blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>As do I, but I still feel there's various levels of 'investment' in the creation process. I get attached to all chars after a while playing them, but more so to Amber chars 'right off the bat'.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>22-04-2007, 20:36:59</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				We've had no takers, so I guess we're down to three of you.<br>And now that Inanna is caught up, we shall proceed with the plot.&nbsp; Thanks for your patience.<br>(I'm off to reping the Players Wanted)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>08-05-2007, 16:35:23</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				(tap tap tap)<br><br>Where'd everybody go?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>TheAlchemist</strong> on <strong>08-05-2007, 16:58:35</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I'm here, but I was a bit wary of taking things further as it seems I'm almost the only one responding &lt;sighs&gt;. Didn't want to 'rob' the others' of a chance to have their say, but looks like noone's having it.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>08-05-2007, 16:59:26</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Le sigh.<br>Time to light a fire...
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Rayve13</strong> on <strong>15-05-2007, 21:41:22</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I'll be posting tonight, just so you know. Got the kids this afternoon!
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>15-05-2007, 21:44:55</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				KO
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>TheAlchemist</strong> on <strong>13-06-2007, 13:14:16</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				So are we officially dead in the water here?&nbsp; ???
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>13-06-2007, 15:25:37</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Nobody's posting&nbsp; &gt;:(<br><br>I was hoping for more responses before moving onward...
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>29-06-2007, 18:33:09</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Okay, I think this one's officially DEAD.&nbsp; :-\ :(
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Eyeomancer</strong> on <strong>30-06-2007, 16:26:10</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				An online Amber game that died?&nbsp; I am shocked and appalled.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>30-06-2007, 19:20:05</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Playerus Nonrespondingus kills almost as many games as GMis Disappearus.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Eyeomancer</strong> on <strong>30-06-2007, 19:20:59</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Well, if you get the urge to AMBER out again, call me.&nbsp; It's one of the few systems I'll play, and I enjoy the setting.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>30-06-2007, 19:22:33</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Read this game's setting notes?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Eyeomancer</strong> on <strong>30-06-2007, 20:39:37</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Sure.&nbsp; It's a setting I could play.&nbsp; The thing is, I would want to get in on the beginning so as to have access to the wonderful bidding wars.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>MadPanda</strong> on <strong>30-06-2007, 20:45:58</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Alas, now all that'd be left would be playing catch-up...and that's assuming the game could be kicked back into gear.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [Amber: Court of Dreams] OOC Thread</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Eyeomancer</strong> on <strong>30-06-2007, 20:50:09</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Hence my dilemma.&nbsp; Sorry, love.
			</dd>
		</dl>
		<div id="footer" class="smalltext">
			
			<span class="smalltext" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?action=credits" title="Simple Machines Forum" target="_blank" class="new_win">SMF 2.0.19</a> |
 <a href="https://www.simplemachines.org/about/smf/license.php" title="License" target="_blank" class="new_win">SMF © 2021</a>, <a href="https://www.simplemachines.org" title="Simple Machines" target="_blank" class="new_win">Simple Machines</a>
			</span>
		</div>