[MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))
<h1 id="title">Elliquiy Role Playing Forums</h1>
		<h2 id="linktree">Play-By-Post: Extreme =&gt; Extreme Small Groups =&gt; Topic started by: Erebus on 06-04-2009, 10:35:09</h2>
		<dl id="posts">
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>[MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>06-04-2009, 10:35:09</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				OOC for the whites ONLY.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>07-04-2009, 00:06:03</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Well, since we're white, might I suggest starting simple with e2-e4? :)<br><br>Also, can I claim a knight and it's pawn? Don't care about b or g.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>07-04-2009, 00:37:44</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Sure thing mate. e4 classic opening move.<br>As for the pieces i'm cool with it.<br>Pick your file as well and you're on.<br><br>Only thing i wont be able to post the updated board <br>until sometime tomorrow.<br><br>Cheers 
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Federico</strong> on <strong>07-04-2009, 13:04:27</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Agreed on e4. I'd take any piece, so you can assign me last. <br><br>If we assign the 'e' line immediately that player car write the narration of the pawn advance. Or do we narrate only the fights?<br><br>.. that's the king line so perhaps it's Erebus one..
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>07-04-2009, 20:57:51</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Right, so since each one of us will handle a file, please post your requests here.<br>We'll post the whole list to the generic&nbsp; ooc thread.<br><br>The list so far:<br><br>Erebus: e file.<br>Xillen: b file.<br><br>
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>10-04-2009, 14:53:23</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I've PMed&nbsp; sciurindae, Prefect Mos(admerwill), SomethingWycked, Caliban, DarkTide but i haven't heard from them.<br><br>So this means we're just us three guys.<br>What i want from you is to claim your pieces, so we can finally start playing.<br><br>I will post the board with our e4 move, right after i post this.<br><br><br>
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>10-04-2009, 16:55:10</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Huh, what? That's gonna be like 5,33 piece/player :o<br><br>What groups do you want to divide them? Maybe king+queen+4 middle pawns as a group, and the remaining pieces on left and right sides as a group each?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Federico</strong> on <strong>10-04-2009, 19:30:50</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I agree with Xillen's distribution - so I'll get the right zone and he gets the left, right? *looks at his hands* right.. left.. right... *snaps out of it*<br><br>If someone of the others shows up I'd be glad to share the pieces. <br><br>Let's start!
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>10-04-2009, 19:33:57</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				So that gives me both pieces on A and B, and the bishop on C.<br><br>Federico receives both pieces on G and H, and the bishop on F.<br><br>Erebus receives both pieces on D and E, and the pawns on C and F?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Federico</strong> on <strong>10-04-2009, 19:40:22</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I'd say so. I'm trying to connect us on yahoo right now (faster for chats like this) but of course you may prefer to write here. 
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>10-04-2009, 23:28:24</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=34007.msg1782404#msg1782404">Quote from: Xillen on 10-04-2009, 19:33:57</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">So that gives me both pieces on A and B, and the bishop on C.<br><br>Federico receives both pieces on G and H, and the bishop on F.<br><br>Erebus receives both pieces on D and E, and the pawns on C and F?<br></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>I'm cool with this.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>SomethingWycked</strong> on <strong>13-04-2009, 13:39:26</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Apologies, gone longer than expected :P<br><br>And I imagine having 4 players will make dividing up the pieces slightly easier XD
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>14-04-2009, 19:16:16</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Yeah, it will, though we were done already :P<br><br>In case of 4 players, I'll take both pieces on A and B. I guess others can take C+D, E+F and G+H?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>SomethingWycked</strong> on <strong>14-04-2009, 21:56:49</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I'm totally fine with taking leftover pieces- giving first priority to those who were here from the beginning :P I don't have a preference for any piece over any other, anyway.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Federico</strong> on <strong>15-04-2009, 00:21:53</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				The white has made her move! We have to reply fast. I propose<br><br>D2 in D4<br><br>so to rush the bloodbath. Since I've proposed it, I'd take the C-D zone if Erebus wants to take the E-F; this leaves G-H to SomethingWycked. <br><br>I agree in advance with any other combination. Cheers to all!
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>15-04-2009, 00:38:55</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Normally I wouldn't... they're probably trading it off (they should), leaving our queen rather exposed...<br><br>Though in the spirit of the game, it might open something interesting :) Let's go there and see where it leads.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>15-04-2009, 11:21:15</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I agree with file claims and to sum it up:<br>a+b -&gt; Xillen<br>c+d -&gt; Federico<br>e+f -&gt; Erebus<br>g+h -&gt; SomethingWycked<br><br>As for the move, i'll opt for Nf3 instead.<br><br>If you all agree...
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>15-04-2009, 11:55:09</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Agree with file claims. They look good to me.<br><br>Nf3 is so... basic! Of course, if we wanna win, that would be a better choice.<br><br>I'll keep my vote on d4, but I'm ok with Nf3.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>15-04-2009, 12:25:37</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				OK then, 2.d4 it is.<br><br>But since this is Federico's file, i'd like him to write a narration as well in the main thread.<br><br>Cheers!!!
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>SomethingWycked</strong> on <strong>15-04-2009, 15:02:11</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Awesome. Love Rooks, I do. Would've preferred the knight move, but, hey, we're not -really- here to win. We're here to have fun, so I'm totally ok with wild moves :P
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>15-04-2009, 18:59:21</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=34007.msg1796419#msg1796419">Quote from: Erebus on 15-04-2009, 12:25:37</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">But since this is Federico's file, i'd like him to write a narration as well in the main thread.</blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>It would be an interesting way in doing it like that. It would make pretty clear what pieces are controlled by whom.<br><br>Erebus, since the initial move was done by a piece of you, you could edit it into the initial post?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Federico</strong> on <strong>15-04-2009, 23:58:49</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Done. Comments welcome. What do we do now???<br><br>ops, we have to wait for their move? Really?? Can't I move again???
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>16-04-2009, 00:58:13</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=34007.msg1797164#msg1797164">Quote from: Xillen on 15-04-2009, 18:59:21</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">It would be an interesting way in doing it like that. It would make pretty clear what pieces are controlled by whom.<br><br>Erebus, since the initial move was done by a piece of you, you could edit it into the initial post?<br></blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>No, not really.<br>I tried, but could not come up with something decent. <br>So I quietly bailed, hoping to go by unnoticed :)<br><br>Anyway no point in doing so now, methinks.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>19-04-2009, 11:50:07</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Should we post our piece setup in the OOC thread?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>20-04-2009, 14:52:48</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Sure, why not?<br><br>Will you do it?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>20-04-2009, 15:24:01</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Sure :)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Federico</strong> on <strong>26-04-2009, 00:58:11</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Ok, we have a move! And my piece is still alive! Yippiee!!<br><br>My suggestion for the next one is G1-F3, which prepares for C1-G5. As I said it's not as if I really understand this game, so I'd be glad to go along with any other move - I'd rather prefer the game to move quickier.<br><br>On a related note, we'll miss Xillen until May the second. I think he would support our decision, though, in the interest of a quickier game ^__^<br><br>In general (also seen the situation in the Black field) I suggest to post in the OOC chat an indication to consider people not answering in 2 days as if agreeing to the other's decision. At least for me you can do this anytime. Erebus, what do you say?
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>SomethingWycked</strong> on <strong>26-04-2009, 05:36:40</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I'd suggest D4-D5, grab a little more forward of a position, displace the knight, etc.<br><br>And, yeah, if I'm not around for longer than 2 days, I automatically agree as well. :P
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>26-04-2009, 08:56:20</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				<div class="quoteheader"><div class="topslice_quote"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?topic=34007.msg1829095#msg1829095">Quote from: Federico on 26-04-2009, 00:58:11</a></div></div><blockquote class="bbc_standard_quote">On a related note, we'll miss Xillen until May the second.</blockquote><div class="quotefooter"><div class="botslice_quote"></div></div><br>We do ???<br><br>Ng1-f3 would cover the pawn as well. It's a regular defensive move. However, I do like the d4-d5 move more, since we already decided to go with that pawn last turn. At d5 it receives cover from e4, and we could match that up later with c4, getting ourselves a wig in the middle of the board.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>28-04-2009, 13:57:30</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Well let's see....<br><br>The <strong>3.Nf3</strong> is a fine move. but the <strong>4.Bc5</strong> is not, due to the <strong>f</strong> and <strong>h</strong> pawns.<br><br>On the other hand the <strong>3.d5</strong> although it will require some extra effort to support, i think it's best, plus it puts some stress on that black knight :)<br><br>So our next move is <strong>3.d5</strong><br><br>Federico write some narration at your pace please.<br><br>Cheers!<br><br>
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>03-05-2009, 09:10:48</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				(http://i479.photobucket.com/albums/rr159/palmer_eldridge/NaughtyChess/chess_board_3a.jpg)<br><br>Their knight moves to D4. If we attack it again with pawn C3, it has to flee again. Let's see where it can go:<br><br>C6, gets hit by our pawn on D5.<br>E6, gets hit by our pawn on D5.<br>F5, gets hit by our pawn on E4.<br>F3, gets hit by our knight on G1.<br>E2, gets hit by our bishop on F1.<br>C2, gets hit by our queen on D1.<br>B3, gets hit by our pawn on A2.<br>B5, gets hit by our bishop on F1.<br><br>Either way, they lose their knight and we lose a pawn at most.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Federico</strong> on <strong>03-05-2009, 11:59:55</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				Sounds nice, but doesn't C3 kind of locks our forces in? Should we consider also G1-F3? (just learning here, I remind you)
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Xillen</strong> on <strong>03-05-2009, 13:46:50</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				If we attack with the pawn, we force them to a weak trade, their knight for our pawn.<br><br>If we attack with the knight, they can basically trade them off, and force our queen out or two pawns on the f line.<br><br>So the knight idea certainly doesn't have my favor. The only thing we block with C3 is our knight, but we can always move that in a different way, or move the pawn up to C4 for backup later.
			</dd>
			<dt class="postheader">
				Title: <strong>Re: [MUL/EX] Naughty Chess ((OOC:Whites))</strong><br>
				Post by: <strong>Erebus</strong> on <strong>05-05-2009, 15:05:37</strong>
			</dt>
			<dd class="postbody">
				I agree with Xillen.<br><br>4.c3 is the way to go. We'll get their knight and they'll be behind on the tempo.<br><br>Federico, it seems you'll have to write another narration :)<br><br>
			</dd>
		</dl>
		<div id="footer" class="smalltext">
			
			<span class="smalltext" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;"><a href="https://elliquiy.com/forums/index.php?action=credits" title="Simple Machines Forum" target="_blank" class="new_win">SMF 2.0.19</a> |
 <a href="https://www.simplemachines.org/about/smf/license.php" title="License" target="_blank" class="new_win">SMF © 2021</a>, <a href="https://www.simplemachines.org" title="Simple Machines" target="_blank" class="new_win">Simple Machines</a>
			</span>
		</div>