<div class="chunk-title">Sec. 40-225. - WTS format preference.</div>
<div class="chunk-content">
            <p class="incr0">
               (a)
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="content1">
               The following order of preference shall be used during the review and approval of
               WTS development:
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="incr1">
               (1)
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="content2">
               Stealth antenna;
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="incr1">
               (2)
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="content2">
               Antenna located on existing WTS facilities, utility poles, water towers or similar
               utility structure;
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="incr1">
               (3)
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="content2">
               Antenna attached to or mounted on an existing building or structure (single or colocation
               provider);
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="incr1">
               (4)
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="content2">
               Freestanding WTS development designed and constructed with colocation capability;
               and
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="incr1">
               (5)
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="content2">
               Freestanding WTS development designed and constructed for single-provider use.
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="incr0">
               (b)
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="content1">
               The applicant shall provide documentation giving the reasons why in the opinion of
               the applicant it is not feasible or reasonable to require the applicant to comply
               with a WTS development of a higher order of preference as set forth in this section.
               The application for a WTS development shall not be approved for a lower format preference,
               unless it is not reasonable to expect the applicant to meet a higher order of preference.
               
            </p>
            		
            <p class="historynote0">
               (Ord. No. 56, Â§ (d), 12-15-1997)
               
            </p></div>