At Defendant's trial for sale of drugs, the government called Witness to testify, but Witness refused to answer any questions about Defendant and was held in contempt of court. The government then calls Officer to testify that, when Witness was arrested for possession of drugs and offered leniency if he would identify his source, Witness had named Defendant as his source. The testimony offered concerning Witness's identification of Defendant is 
admissible as a prior inconsistent statement by Witness. admissible as an identification of Defendant by Witness after having perceived him. inadmissible, because it is hearsay not within any exception.  inadmissible, because Witness was not confronted with the statement while on the stand. 