Pat sustained personal injuries in a three-car collision caused by the concurrent negligence of the three drivers, Pat, Donald, and Drew. In Pat's action for damages against Donald and Drew, the jury apportioned the negligence 30% to Pat, 30% to Donald, and 40% to Drew. Pat's total damages were $100,000. Assume for this question only that the state has retained the common-law rule pertaining to contribution and that the state's comparative negligence statute provides for a system of pure comparative negligence but abolishes joint and several liability. If Pat chooses to execute against Donald alone, she will be entitled to collect at most 
$70,000 from Donald, and then Donald will be entitled to collect $40,000 from Drew.  $30,000 from Donald, and then Donald will be entitled to collect $10,000 from Drew.  $30,000 from Donald, and then Donald will be entitled to collect nothing from Drew.  nothing from Donald, because Donald's percentage of fault is not greater than that of Pat. 