Roofer entered into a written contract with Orissa to repair the roof of Orissa's home, the repairs to be done "in a workmanlike manner." Roofer completed the repairs and took all of his equipment away, with the exception of a 20-foot extension ladder, which was left against the side of the house. He intended to come back and get the ladder the next morning. At that time, Orissa and her family were away on a trip. During the night, a thief, using the ladder to gain access to an upstairs window, entered the house and stole some valuable jewels. Orissa has asserted a claim against Roofer for damages for the loss of the jewels. In her claim against Roofer, Orissa will  
prevail, because by leaving the ladder, Roofer became a trespasser on Orissa's property.  prevail, because by leaving the ladder, Roofer created the risk that a person might unlawfully enter the house.  not prevail, because the act of the thief was a superseding cause.  not prevail, because Orissa's claim is limited to damages for breach of contract