On June 1, Kravat, a manufacturer of men's neckties, received the following order from Clothier: "Ship 500 two-inch ties, assorted stripes, your catalogue No. V34. Delivery by July l." On June 1, Kravat shipped 500 three-inch ties that arrived at Clothier's place of business on June 3. Clothier immediately telegraphed Kravat: "Reject your shipment. Order was for two-inch ties." Clothier, however, did not ship the ties back to Kravat. Kravat replied by telegram: "Will deliver proper ties before July 1." Clothier received this telegram on June 4, but did not reply to it. On June 30, Kravat tendered 500 two-inch ties in assorted stripes, designated in his catalogue as item No. V34; but Clothier refused to accept them.Did Clothier properly reject the ties tendered on June 30?
Yes, because Kravat's shipping the threeinch ties on June 1 was a present breach of contract.  Yes, because Kravat's shipping the threeinch ties on June 1 was an anticipatory repudiation.  No, because Kravat cured the June 1 defective delivery by his tender of conforming goods on June 30.  No, because a contract for the sale of goods can be modified without consideration