Devlin was charged with murder. Several witnesses testified that the crime was committed by a person of Devlin's general description who walked with a severe limp. Devlin in fact walks with a severe limp. He objected to a prosecution request that the court order him to walk across the courtroom in order to display his limp to the jury to assist it in determining whether Devlin was the person that the witnesses had seen. Devlin's objection will most likely be
sustained, because the order sought by the prosecution would violate Devlin's privilege against self-incrimination.  sustained, because the order sought by the prosecution would constitute an illegal search and seizure.  denied, because the order sought by the prosecution is a legitimate part of a proper courtroom identification process.  denied, because a criminal defendant has no legitimate expectation of privacy. 