Roberts, a professional motorcycle rider, put on a performance in a privately owned stadium during which he leaped his motorcycle over 21 automobiles. Spectators were charged $5 each to view the jump and were prohibited from using cameras. However, the local television station filmed the whole event from within the stadium without the knowledge or consent of Roberts and showed the film in its entirety on the evening newscast that day. Roberts thereafter brought suit to recover damages from the station for the admittedly unauthorized filming and broadcasting of the act. The television station raised only constitutional defenses. The court should 
hold against Roberts, because the First and Fourteenth Amendments authorize press coverage of newsworthy entertainment events.  hold against Roberts, because under the First and Fourteenth Amendments news broadcasts are absolutely privileged.  find the station liable, because its action deprives Roberts of his property without due process.  find the station liable, because the First and Fourteenth Amendments do not deprive an entertainer of the commercial value of his or her performances. 