Deland operates a bank courier service that uses armored trucks to transport money and securities. One of Deland's armored trucks was parked illegally, too close to a street intersection. Pilcher, driving his car at an excessive speed, skidded into the armored truck while trying to make a turn. The truck was not damaged, but Pilcher was injured. Pilcher has brought an action against Deland to recover damages for his loss resulting from the accident. The jurisdiction follows a pure comparative negligence rule. In this action, Pilcher should recover 
nothing, because Deland was not an active or efficient cause of Pilcher's loss.  nothing, if Deland was less negligent than Pilcher.  his entire loss, reduced by a percentage that reflects the negligence attributed to Pilcher.  his entire loss, because Deland's truck suffered no damage. 