The Pinners, a retired couple, had lived in their home in a residential neighborhood for 20 years when the Darleys moved into the house next door and built a swimming pool in the back yard. The four young Darley children frequently played in the pool after school. They often were joined by other neighborhood children. The Pinners were in the habit of reading and listening to classical music in the afternoons. Sometimes they took naps. The boisterous sounds of the children playing in the pool disturbed the Pinners' customary enjoyment of quiet afternoons. In the Pinners' nuisance action for damages against the Darleys, the Pinners should 
prevail, if the children's noise constituted a substantial interference with the Pinners' use and enjoyment of their home.  prevail, because the Pinners' interest in the quiet enjoyment of their home takes precedence in time over the Darleys' interests.  not prevail, unless the noise constituted a substantial and unreasonable disturbance to persons of normal sensibilities.  not prevail, because the children's interest in healthy play has priority over the Pinners' interest in peace and quiet. 