Miller is tried for armed robbery of the First Bank of City.. The prosecutor offers the testimony of a bartender who will say that when he saw the money in Miller's wallet, he said, "You must have robbed a bank," to which Miller made no reply. This evidence is
admissible to prove that Miller's conduct caused the bartender to believe that Miller robbed the bank. admissible as a statement made in the presence of the defendant. inadmissible, because it would violate Miller's privilege against selfincrimination.  inadmissible, because Miller had no reason to respond to the bartender's statement.